PLANNING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM

TO: Planning Commission VIA: J. Mark Willis, Directoji,( Britany J. Waddell, AICP', Deputy Director, Planning and Development Review j FROM: Carolyn V. Sunderland, AICP, Planning Commission Administra Lindsay Halterman, Planner II DATE: June 12,2019 SUBJECT: Draft 2018 Annual Report

Background: Title 1-207 of the Land Use Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires local planning commissions to "prepare, adopt and file" an annual report with the Maryland Department of Planning. It also requires that the annual report be made available to the legislative body so they may direct any appropriate and necessary studies and other actions be undertaken to ensure the continuation of a viable planning and development process.

Discussion: A draft of the 2018 Annual Report is attached for your review. The report documents and evaluates the county's residential and commercial growth and development patterns by specific indicators such as amendments to planning policies and regulations; agricultural preservation efforts; capacity improvements to transportation, schools, and water and sewerage infrastructure; growth restrictions resulting from inadequate public facilities; and the number, type and size of approved site plans, subdivisions and building permits. Digital maps that identify where the growth is occurring within the county are included with the report. A biennial report on the county's Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance is also required with this year's submittal, which has been included in the annual report. In 2013, a state law was adopted that requires local jurisdictions to perform a five-year report on the implementation status of their comprehensive plans. Because the Calvert County Comprehensive Plan (adopted in 2004 and amended in 2010 and 2017) is currently in the process of being updated, the brief summary on the progress made to date, has been provided in this report. A copy of this document has also been sent to the Calvert County Board of Commissioners for their consideration and use.

Next Steps: Planning Commission may choose to take one of the following actions: 1.Adopt the Draft 2018 Annual Report as presented and direct staff to send the report to the Maryland Department of Planning and copy to the Board of County Commissioners. 2.Adopt the Draft 2018 Annual Report with minor modifications and direct staff to send the report to the Maryland Department of Planning and copy the Board of County Commissioners. 3.Direct staff to make specified changes and remit the report for reconsideration at the next Planning Commission regular meeting.

Attachments: PowerPoint Presentation Maryland Department of Planning 2018 Annual Report Letter to Thomas E. Hutchins, President of BOCC Letter to Robert S. McCord, Secretary, Maryland Department of Planning Calvert County Planning Commission 2019 Annual Report for 2018 2018 Calvert County Planning Annual Report Prepared for the Maryland Department of Planning (MDP)

Department of Planning & Zoning

Carolyn Sunderland, AICP, Planning Commission Administrator (PCA)

1 Calvert County Staff Planning & Zoning (P&Z) • Britany Waddell, AICP, Planning Deputy Director • Terry Williams, Development Review Coordinator • Becky Parkinson, Planning Commission Recording Clerk • Lindsay Halterman, Planner II • Tamara Blake Wallace, Principal Transportation Planner • Ron Marney, AICP, Rural Planner III • Jesse Clark, Planner I • Jenny Plummer-Welker, Long Range Planner

Technology Services (TS) • Erick Pate, Geographical Information Systems Administrator • Ray Alvey, Geographical Information Systems Mapping Technician

Department of Public Works (DPW) • JR Cosgrove, Capital Improvements Projects Division Chief • Julie Paluda, Deputy Director Enterprise Fund Operations • Shuchita Warner, Director of School Construction, Calvert County Public Schools

Department of Finance & Budget (F&B) • Veronica Atkinson, Capital Projects Analyst 2 MDP Contacts

• Robert McCord, Planning Secretary

• Wendi Peters, Special Secretary of Smart Growth

• David Dahlstrom, Upper Shore Regional Planner

3 Planning Services Technical Assistance to Local Governments Implementing Federal & State Laws

2018 Southern Maryland Highlights: Smart Growth Subcabinet: • Prince George’s County Town of Eagle Harbor Sustainable Communities Designation • Charles County Town of Indian Head Downtown Streetscape • La Plata Transportation Pilot Program; • Patuxent River Policy Plan Implementation Aide 4 Planning Services (Continued…)

Infrastructure & Development:

• Power Plant Solar Research Program; Phase III Draft of Watershed Implementation Plan

Geospatial Data & Analysis: • Statewide Sewer Service Area Database • Rural Legacy Funding Applications • Patuxent River Seagrass Restoration Efforts; • Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) • FINDER Quantum Online 5 Long Form Reports Growth Related Changes in Development Patterns within the Jurisdiction (Does Not include the Towns of North Beach & Chesapeake Beach) 10 Sections 1. Amendments and Growth Related Changes in Development Patterns (Inside & Outside of the Priority Funding Areas (PFAs)), i.e. Subdivisions, Site Plans, Road Transportation Systems, Public Schools, Public Facilities, Water & Sewer Capacity, Text Amendments, Map Amendments (Tables A-J) 2. Mapping & GIS Shapefiles 3. Consistency of Development Changes with Adopted Plans (Tables K-N) 4. Plan Implementation (Adoption of Comprehensive Plan) 5. Measures & Indicators, i.e. Amount of Residential Growth, Net Density of Residential Growth, Share of Residential Growth, Amount of Commercial Growth, Net Density of Commercial Growth, Share of Commercial Growth 6. Agricultural Land Preservation 7. Local Land Use Percentage Goals 8. Development Capacity Analysis (DCA) 9. Adequate Public Facilities (APFO) Ordinances Restrictions 10. Planning Survey

6 Development Capacity Analysis

Table 9: Residential Development Capacity (Inside and Outside the PFA) within Farm & Forest District (FFD), Rural Community District (RCD), & Residential District (RD)

Parcels & Lots w/ Residential PFA Non – Total Capacity PFA Residentially Zoned Acres w/ 1,055 19,935 20,990 Capacity Residential Parcel & Lots 2,726 2,372 5,098 w/Capacity Residential Capacity (Units) 2,743 2,877 5,620

7 Trends Section V Measures & Indicators Table Title PFA Non-PFA Total Percent Inside PFA 1 Residential 266 111 377 71% Permits Constructed 2A Residential *Units 347 147 494 70% Constructed

2B Subdivisions 6 30 36 17% **Approved 2C Share of 16.7% 83.3% 100% 16.7% Residential Subdivisions 3A Commercial 18 19 37 49% Permits Constructed 3B **Approved 18.17 3.32 21.49 85% Commercial Net Acres 3C Approved 86,795 s.f. 26,740 s.f. 113,535 s.f. 76% Commercial Foot Print *Units include Single Family Dwellings (SFD), Duplex, Garages, Townhouse, Apartment Dwelling 8 **Approved Does Not mean Constructed Questions... Next Steps:

• Adopt the 2018 Annual Report as presented & direct staff to send the report to MDP and copy the BOCC. • Adopt the 2018 Annual Report with minor modifications and direct staff to send the report to MDP and copy the BOCC. • Direct staff to make specified changes and bring back the 2018 Annual Report for reconsideration at next Planning Commission meeting.

9 2018 Annual Report Supporting Communities, Preserving Resources, Enriching Lives... Changing Maryland for the Better On the cover: City of Hagerstown overlooking Public Square in City Center (upper left), Dairy Farm in rural Carroll County (upper right), Farmland in St. Inigoes, St. Mary’s County (lower left), Town of Ocean City looking south from 18th Street and the Boardwalk (lower right) A Message from Governor Larry Hogan I am pleased to present the Fiscal Year 2018 Annual Report for the Maryland Department of Planning (Planning). Under our administration, Planning continued working to change Maryland for the better through support for communities, responsible growth, and resource conservation. We remain focused and dedicated to creating jobs, helping Maryland families thrive , and restoring our state’s economy, guided by simple, common sense principles. In summer 2017, I signed an executive order directing Planning to prepare a revised state development plan through coordination and collaboration with the Smart Growth Subcabinet, the Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission, local governments, and other stakeholders. Recognizing that top-down, one-size- A Better Maryland will be a dynamic, evolving plan that provides a framework for a strong economy and environmental stewardship.fits-all solutions do not work, I invite you to read about Planning’s full range of activities and accomplishments, including the ongoing development of A Better Maryland. This FY 2018 Annual Report demonstrates our commitment to providing excellent customer service and assistance to local partners, while recognizing the unique nature of each region in our state that supports economic development and the preservation of Maryland’s natural resources. Our administration is working diligently to ensure that Maryland remains a vibrant place to live, work, and raise a family. We have accomplished a great deal,Sincerely, and I am confident that together, we will accomplish much more.

Larry Hogan Governor A Message from the Secretary Planning’s annual report for Fiscal Year 2018 highlights our activities and accomplishments in service to the state as we worked to advance the priorities of the Hogan Administration. We are focused on supporting communities, preserving resources, and enriching lives as part of an overall effort to change Maryland for the better. It is our mission at Planning to collaborate with state agencies, local governments, and the public by providing technical assistance and data that enables each community

its heritage, and presents opportunities for all of Maryland to to shape its future in a way that reflects local values, honors

There is no more meaningful wayflourish. to further this mission than to begin to bring together the new state development plan as directed by Governor Hogan at the beginning of FY 2018. Known as A Better Maryland, it is a dynamic, evolving plan that provides a framework to support a thriving economy and environmental stewardship. The plan supports collaboration among state and local governments and other stakeholders, providing resources and tools for the long term economic success of Maryland. Planning completed in FY 2018. For more information describing our work in the development of A Better Marylandour first round, see theof listening feature onsessions page 10. in all 23 Maryland counties and the city of Baltimore As home to the State Data Center, Planning is a repository of employment, educational, and demographic information from multiple sources. The largest source of these data is the U.S. the 2020 Census. Planning is preparing its outreach plan to help assure a complete count of MarylandCensus. As residents. Governor Hogan’s Liaison to the U.S. Census Bureau, we are looking ahead to Together, we are changing Maryland for the better. Planning stands ready to assist, bringing our full portfolio of professional staff, data resources, and programmatic assistance across the state. We are helping each area of our state plan for a prosperous future, while preserving the natural, historical, and cultural resources that make Maryland our home. Sincerely,

Robert S. McCord Secretary Table of Contents Introduction 2

Operations 4

Planning Services 5

A Better Maryland 10

Maryland Historical Trust 23

Special Secretary Wendi Peters and Secretary Robert McCord present at a public listening session for A Better Maryland in Queen Anne’s County. Planning began the process of forming the new state development plan, A Better Maryland, following Governor Hogan’s executive order.

1 Introduction The Maryland Department of Planning (Planning) serves the state by providing technical assistance, program guidance, data analysis, and outreach to local governments. We assist state agency partners and provide timely data to the private sector and the general public. Our work reflects the priorities and direction of the Hogan Administration, including a heightened focus on efficiency while emphasizing economic development, flexibility, and collaboration with local jurisdictions. into three divisions: Operations, Planning Services, and the Maryland HistoricalPlanning, servingTrust. its constituent base with 130 employees, is organized

Operations is responsible for the administrative support for the logistics, and legislative relations. The communications section coordinatesdepartment outreachincluding to financial, promote information the department’s technology, initiatives procurement, and services in order to develop and strengthen relationships, as well as support the administration’s legislative and policy initiatives.

Through Planning Services, Planning typically completes more than 200 technical assistance projects for counties and municipalities per year. We provide support in reviewing or drafting dozens of comprehensive plans or ordinances for local governments each year. We also collect, analyze, and publish social, economic, and geographic information and maintain foundation for the development of policies and are used throughout the statethe digital by various maps agencies,of the state’s decision 2.3 million makers, parcels. and stakeholders. These maps Weform also the within Maryland are consistent with state and local laws, regulations, and guidelines.ensure that proposed financial and non-financial assistance projects

The Maryland Historical Trust (the Trust) is dedicated to preserving and interpreting the legacy of Maryland’s past. The Trust serves as assistance to a broad base of local, state, and federal stakeholders in Maryland’s State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and provides direct The Trust administers a variety of historic preservation grant, loan, and taxthe creditidentification, programs protection, including andthe Heritageenhancement Structure of heritage Rehabilitation resources. Tax Credit, which leverages private investment in the rehabilitation of both commercial and residential historic properties. The Trust also administers and oversees operation of the Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum in Calvert County, which includes the Maryland Archaeological Conservation Laboratory.

2 Planning sees Maryland’s cities, towns, and communities as attractive, vibrant places to live, work, play, and learn. We help communities shape a vision for their future that continues to protect and preserve our resources. We view the natural, cultural, and historic resources of our communities as catalysts that strengthen and renew economic and community development. At Planning, we value Maryland’s unique diversity with its people and geography and recognize that successful solutions require balancing the concerns of various stakeholders. It is our responsibility to provide jurisdiction lines. We strive to provide customers with the best service andguidance to help for each the directionjurisdiction of stateimplement resources their most vision efficiently and achieve across their goals consistent with respect for people and place.

Planning staff shows the department’s latest public engagement tool, the touch display screen, to Governor Larry Hogan at the 2018 Maryland Municipal League conference. The touch display screen was used to introduce the recently released Reinvest Maryland 2.0 web-based tool to the attendees of the conference.

3 Operations In addition to continued focus on the governor’s customer service initiative, Planning’s Operations Division provided agency-wide support and support to other agencies. Management Information Systems (MIS) of the Department of Planning assisted the Maryland Tax Court as they developed their new web-based application database in FY 2018. The project modernized the platform, which provided the opportunity for future uninterrupted use and updated reporting functions. Planning’s assistance saved the state more than $50,000. Communications supports the agency by highlighting the work of Planning throughout the state. Communications uses social media platforms to provide information about initiatives across the state including: A Better Maryland Local Challenge; Maryland Heritage Areas; the Patuxent River Wade In; and Farmer’s Market Week. ; Reinvest Maryland 2.0; the Maryland Buy Legislative Relations works with our sister agencies on the Chesapeake

Bay Cabinet to support important initiatives in Maryland. For example, localthis year jurisdictions we were pleasedmay adopt to supportin order House to expand Bill 252,Maryland’s Land Use value- - addedAgritourism. farming The industry, bill provides including a model weddings, definition vineyards, of “agritourism” and breweries. that Agritourism is an emerging business practice that supports the local economy by expanding Maryland’s largest industry. The bill passed the Maryland General Assembly and was signed into law by Governor Larry Hogan on May 15, 2018. Planning Secretary Robert McCord and Special Secretary of Smart Growth Wendi Peters joined staff from the Maryland Department of Agriculture and others as HB 252 was signed into law by Governor Hogan.

4 Planning Services The Planning Services Division is the core of the agency’s planning- related functions. The Division’s personnel are organized into two sections: 1) Planning Coordination, which includes Local Assistance and Training, Infrastructure and Development, and Resource Conservation and Management; and 2) Planning Data and Research, which includes Geospatial and Data Analysis, Projections and State Data Center, and Property Mapping. The following highlights some of the many activities and contributions of Planning Services in support of the agency’s strategic plan and mission. Planning Coordination Local Assistance and Training Comprehensive Plan Review and Policy Guidance governments implementing state laws. Regional planning staff completed reviewsWe provided of 18 significant local comprehensive technical and plans policy and assistance amendments to local in FY 2018. In addition, they reviewed 19 municipal annexations. Local Technical Assistance The core function of Local Assistance and Training is providing technical assistance to jurisdictions, including helping them navigate federal and state regulations or providing the resources that smaller municipalities cannot deploy. Some examples of technical assistance provided in FY 2018 include:

Town of Eagle Harbor, Prince George’s County: Planning staff assisted town representatives with the completion and submission of a Sustainable Communities designation application.

Town of Indian Head, Charles County: The regional planner for Southern Maryland assisted the Town of Indian Head in coordinating with the neighboring Naval Support Facility in Indian Head, as well as with establishing a vision for its downtown streetscape.

Town of Williamsport, Washington County: At the town’s request, the regional planner for Western Maryland, along with Planning’s GIS staff, drafted a Town Land Use Map in support of a zoning ordinance update.

5 Town of Chestertown, Kent County: With representatives from the partnersGovernor’s in Officefunding and the the infrastructure Department necessaryof Commerce, for the the Dixon Secretaries Valve of Planning and Housing and Community Development identified potential new jobs. project, which will retain 300 jobs in the county and ultimately create 400

Dixon Valve growing at the Chestertown Business Campus. Talbot County: County through the comprehensive planning, water and sewer planning, and Priority Funding The Lower Area exception Eastern Shore processes, Regional in order Office to assisted extend Talbotpublic sewer to its rural villages and other properties. Interagency Coordination and Subcabinet Support Smart Growth Subcabinet: In FY 2018, staff reviewed and provided visits to, and submitted comments on, hundreds of revitalization grant applications.feedback on 24 Sustainable Community applications and conducted site

Commerce Subcabinet: Two regional planners participated in an interagency working group supporting the Maryland Department of

As part of this effort, a draft Statewide Joint Land Use Study (SJLUS) was completed,Commerce’s which Department makes recommendationsof Defense Office of for Economic compatible Adjustment land use grant.and collaboration with Maryland’s military installations.

Transportation Coordination: In FY 2018, staff developed a draft comprehensive plan transportation element checklist; set up a system to engage jurisdictions in transportation planning early by tracking pending updates; engaged the town of La Plata in a pilot assistance program; and continued to review Maryland Department of Transportation Consolidated Transportation Program (CTP) priority letters for consistency with comprehensive plans.

6 Climate Change Commission Support: As a member of the Maryland Commission on Climate Change (MCCC), Planning participates on the Adaptation Working Group, providing constructive feedback on this commission’s procedures, work plans, and policy recommendations. Planning also provided its annual report to the MCCC on greenhouse gases prevented through compact development in Maryland. Planning plans, Montgomery County’s Climate Protection Plan, and the City reviewed all 23 counties’ and the City of Baltimore’s climate adaptation determine how each jurisdiction is preparing for climate change impacts. of Baltimore’s Disaster Preparedness and Planning Project Plan to Patuxent River Commission Support: Planning provides administrative support to the Patuxent River Commission (PRC), which is tasked with supporting local government and state agency implementation of the Patuxent River Policy Plan. This year, the PRC launched the Patuxent River Challenge, which encourages exploration of many ecological and historic amenities within each county in the Patuxent River watershed.

Appalachian Regional Commission: Planning’s Western Maryland regional planner serves as the Program Manager for the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) facilitating federal, state, and local Planning by the cooperation and resources to advance economic, community and Numbers workforce development in the three Western Maryland counties: Allegany, Garrett, and Washington. Our ARC work includes improving accessibility Federal FY 2017* in the region through local road improvements and extension of ARC in Maryland broadband service to businesses and communities, enhancing educational opportunities and workforce development, and assisting communities 18 supported projects to develop strategies for economic development uniquely focused to $1.5 million investment by ARC maximize the potential of their assets. The shared goal is to create a $6.6 million in matching funds self-sustaining and growing economy. In FY 2018, the ARC supported 18 $13 million leveraged investment projects include: projects leveraging more than $13 million in investment. Some of those •• Completion of feasibility study to evaluate technical, economic This adds up to: Jobs created and retained, and regulatory feasibility of a potential Autonomous Technology workers/students trained or Center to position Maryland as a leader in autonomous educated, Increased economic development and quality of life technology research and development. for 252,000 residents. •• Providing new STEM program training opportunities at Garrett *Federal fiscal year October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017. Community College including a virtual dissection table for Federal FY 2018 information not anatomy education. The table is used for classroom training, available at time of Planning’s report. state paramedic instruction, and retraining for hospital professionals.

7 •• Investing in equipment for the new Energy and Trades Training Center at Hagerstown Community College. The program will provide hands-on learning activities in courses and programs leading to energy technology and building trades careers. •• Western Maryland Fiber project providing the last connections necessary for high-speed broadband in Allegany and Garrett

to seven industrial parks. counties. The project will also provide high speed fiber internet •• Funding construction of a water tank and related infrastructure

storage and adequate pressurized water to allow for the developmentfor the Keyser’s of Ridgethe park Business and serve Park. 17 The existing project businesses. will provide •• Purchasing a Telemedicine Communication System for Garrett Regional Medical Center to engage in patient consultations with specialists. The hospital is now able to provide better services to patients, expand educational opportunities for staff, and attract medical professionals with the addition of this technology •• Frostburg State University funding to establish an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Remote Sensing Center. The center

management of UAVs, data acquisition and storage, digital image processing,will provide and training coordination in flight operations,with ground maintenance, based GPS. and

8 Education and Training Local Assistance and Training oversees Planning’s educational efforts, Planning by the both locally and statewide. Staff is responsible for Planning’s newsletter, Numbers Planning Practice Wednesday (PPW), along with posting available trainings, conferences, webinars, and funding on the PPW website. In FY 2018 2018, Planning published 11 newsletters with topics ranging from local Planning Practice Wednesday and training includes working with professional planners, citizen 1,020 Subscribers planners,staff interviews and students. to Maryland’s public-school financing program. Education 34% growth in FY 2018 subscribers Maryland Planning Commissioners Association: Staff conducted seven community meetings, along with an online survey, as part of an outreach 30,960 recipients gathered to develop a strategic plan. This adds up to: project in support of the MPCA. The MPCA Board is using the information Connecting, informing, Local Assistance and Training also assisted MPCA in conducting its and serving local officials, planners, and partners. annual fall conference in Easton, with more than 50 registrants and the inclusion of Open Meetings Act training (requested by participants during the outreach project). Staff oversaw the online Planning Commissioner Training Course and multiple in-person trainings in FY 2018, totaling 178 newInternship certificates Programs: of completion. continued its close relationship with Salisbury University (SU) and the cultivation of future Theplanners Lower with Eastern its Critical Shore Arearegional Circuit office Rider internship program. In FY 2018, Planning staff supervised two interns. Planning also brought in a Morgan State University (MSU) student to populate the assets and challenges map from the A Better Maryland listening sessions and provide GIS support on the development of a brownfield sites layer.

Planning holds live training for planning commission and boards of appeal members several times through the year. Chuck Boyd conducts training for commission and board members and local officials at the Maryland Association of Counties summer conference.

9 A Better Maryland In the summer of 2017, Governor Hogan signed Executive Order 01.01.2017.18 directing the Maryland Department of Planning to coordinate with local governments and other stakeholders to prepare a new state development plan. This is an opportunity to work together on a 21st century plan moving Maryland forward – growing responsibly and “The process to protecting our resources. develop a new state development plan will The Department of Planning under be transparent and Governor Hogan has been focused on collaborative with the respect and support of local government primary goal of creating and working with stakeholders to achieve their vision for their community. As a Governor Larry Hogan announced the new state a better framework for development plan was to be completed by the a better Maryland. The result, our work has consisted of extensive Maryland Department of Planning. state will work closely outreach to solicit input from local leaders, with citizens, counties, the public and other stakeholders as we formulate the new plan. We are and local jurisdictions. Most importantly, we will finally put local proud that during the first round of outreach we had 72 meetings in our planning authority back planning23 counties staff; and and the the city public. of Baltimore. In addition, In each we jurisdictionmet with various we held interest three into the hands of local groups,meetings: held elected two webinars and appointed with more officials; than economic 150 participants development and hosted and governments – where it an online survey which garnered more than 1700 responses. Following belongs.” the initial 72 meetings, Planning staff compiled and analyzed input in Governor Larry Hogan partnership with other state agencies, the Smart Growth Subcabinet, the Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission, American Planning Association (APA) Maryland, and planning directors from across the state.

Nearing the-one year mark of the announcement, the Governor’s Smart Growth Subcabinet, chaired by Special Secretary of Smart Growth Wendi Peters convened an open forum on June 13, 2018 at the Maryland Municipal League summer conference to address comments gathered from the first round of listening sessions. The feedback submitted demonstrates that Marylanders overwhelmingly support both economic development and environmental preservation. We have strong communities that desire the opportunity to have a good job and a clean environment.

This new state development plan, A Better Maryland, is a dynamic, evolving plan that provides a framework to support a thriving economy and environmental stewardship. The plan will support collaboration among state and local governments and all other stakeholders, providing resources and tools for the long term economic success of Maryland. We completed our phase one outreach, spent the summer analyzing the feedback, identifying issues and developing strategies. We are back on the road in the fall of 2018 continuing the discussion and receiving feedback. Pursuant to the Executive Order, we will report back to the Governor before July 2019.

Chuck Boyd, Director of Planning Joe Griffiths, Local Assistance and Training Coordination, provides background on the manager, guides participants through a live A Better Maryland process at the Prince polling exercise at a public listening session George’s County public listening session. in Kent County. Infrastructure and Development Interagency Commission for School Construction Planning remains one of three state agencies involved as a member of the Interagency Commission for School Construction (IAC), the nine-member in K-12 school facilities. Planning staff works closely with the Executive commission that oversees Maryland’s $350 to $400 million investment Agencies (LEAs) across the state. Director, the Department of General Services, and the 24 Local Education Each year, Planning also works closely with local facility planners as enrollment projections are reconciled. This data forms the basis of each LEA’s Educational Facilities Master Plan, which is reviewed by Planning, and precedes the creation of a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) containing each IAC-approved project. Planning also began reviewing all State Rated Capacities for school facilities in the state in FY 2018. In FY 2018, Planning worked closely with IAC staff on proposed facility facility status to inform the need for future investments. Planning and sufficiency standards that will provide an objective measurement of of information with LEAs, and setting the stage for a new business managementIAC staff are also system working to be to implemented improve efficiencies, in by the IACincrease by FY the 2019. sharing

Allegany High School in Allegany County is an example of a modern school facility meeting the needs of an established community.

12 Transportation Planning To support Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) and transit investment, Planning develops a variety of planning tools to assist MDOT, local communities, stakeholders, developers, property owners, and others in their TOD planning and implementation efforts. scheme for all 129 transit stations in Maryland, including the Purple Line,In FY to2018, help Planning maximize completed investment a TOD effectiveness implementation and promote classification community transformation by addressing the need for socioeconomic equity in stakeholders and agencies to identify opportunities and challenges in eachdisadvantaged station area communities. and helps to The guide TOD TOD classification investment analysis in these enables areas. In addition, Planning is building a user-friendly web-based dashboard establish a streamlined process for future data maintenance and update. interface to enhance transit station area data profile presentation and In FY 2018, the unit participated in more than a dozen major transportation studies across the state and provides input on projects to promote multimodal transportation planning that supports state and local growth management policies and goals. Smart Growth Information Clearinghouse Planning manages the Smart Growth Information Clearinghouse under a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Clearinghouse is the online home of the Smart Growth organizations dedicated to promoting and implementing the principles of smartNetwork growth. (smartgrowth.org), a national partnership of more than 40 Planning generates and distributes a smart growth e-newsletter to more than 10,000 recipients nationwide and hosts a series of webinars directed

Planners continuing education credits. to planners where participants may earn American Institute of Certified Maryland’s Power Plant Research Program Planning serves on the Power Plant Research Program (PPRP) interagency committee, which reviews proposed medium to large-scale energy-generating facilities in Maryland, while ensuring that demand for electricity is met at a reasonable cost and the state’s valuable natural resources are protected. Recent legislative changes require that applicants comply with local plans and zoning, and Planning routinely checks in with is ongoing throughout the review process. Planning completed 12 PPRP reviewslocal planning in FY 2018, officials mostly to ensure solar thatprojects, communication and began a among preliminary the parties review of an additional 10. 13 Reinvest Maryland Resource Conservation and Planning collaborated with the Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission Management Maryland Toolkit, also known as Reinvest Maryland 2.0. After more than aand year its of Reinvest development, Maryland the workgroupToolkit was to released finalize to and the publish public thein June Reinvest 2018 State Clearinghouse for Intergovernmental Assistance The State Clearinghouse for Intergovernmental Assistance (the Clearinghouse) is Maryland’s designated single point of contact to and a new website went live with the first set of 25 case studies. community revitalization. This important resource addresses all aspects coordinate local government and state agency review of federal or state ofReinvest the redevelopment Maryland 2.0 process, is a guide including: to accelerating promoting infill, reinvestment; redevelopment and is mandated by federal and state executive orders and state law and of policy recommendations. regulations,projects involving facilitates financial alignment assistance of plans or development. and policies between The review, federal, which regulatory reform; and financing tools and programs. It also includes a set state and local government. All projects and reviews can be accessed on Reinvest Maryland 2.0 provides guidance for all levels of government to Planning’s website via the Intergovernmental Monitor. work together, strengthen collaborative efforts to support revitalization and reinvestment, and engage stakeholders in supporting Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay Restoration Planning communities to improve the quality of life. The report examines Planning provides long-term planning and local government perspective practices that support revitalization in existing communities. redevelopment in Maryland and identifies tools, case studies, and best The website is built upon an interactive platform that enables the public Maryland’sto the Maryland draft Bay Phase Workgroup, III Watershed which Implementation provides recommendations Plan, Planning to the to read about these redevelopment practices and click on maps and other Governor’s Bay Cabinet. In FY 2018, to support one component of media that illustrate these examples and provide links to contacts and other information. programsidentified aand detailed policies approach in Maryland. to account for the nutrient and sediment benefits of existing local and state land conservation and land use Planning staff will continue to build on the website, adding material and enhancing its functionality as state agencies and local jurisdictions continue to provide examples of the best ways to create vibrant places with a range of housing, employment, and transportation options in Maryland.

The Reinvest Maryland 2.0 website site contains case studies of infill development, redevelopment, and community revitalization projects across Maryland. The site displays maps, links visitors to more information about best practices, and includes a searchable toolbox of state programs supporting reinvestment.

14

Project Green Classrooms, established by Governor Hogan, is renewing Maryland’s commitment to environmental education to ensure that every child in Maryland has the opportunity to learn about their local environment, develop a connection with nature, and have a better sense of place in their natural surroundings. Project Green Classrooms is one of the statewide initiatives that Planning’s Resource Conservation and Management unit supports. Resource Conservation and Management State Clearinghouse for Intergovernmental Assistance The State Clearinghouse for Intergovernmental Assistance (the Clearinghouse) is Maryland’s designated single point of contact to coordinate local government and state agency review of federal or state

is mandated by federal and state executive orders and state law and regulations,projects involving facilitates financial alignment assistance of plans or development. and policies between The review, federal, which state and local government. All projects and reviews can be accessed on Planning’s website via the Intergovernmental Monitor. Chesapeake Bay Restoration Planning Planning provides long-term planning and local government perspective

Maryland’sto the Maryland draft Bay Phase Workgroup, III Watershed which Implementation provides recommendations Plan, Planning to the Governor’s Bay Cabinet. In FY 2018, to support one component of

programsidentified aand detailed policies approach in Maryland. to account for the nutrient and sediment benefits of existing local and state land conservation and land use

Planning by the Numbers FY 2018 72 Reviews of Water and Sewer Plan Amendments 9 Recertifications of Local Agricultural Preservation Programs 23 Application Reviews for Rural Legacy 6 Reviews of Land Preservation, Parks, and Recreation Plans 23 Review Letters for Program Open Space This adds up to: Preserving and protecting the environment with a focus on restoration and protection of our treasured Chesapeake Bay.

15

Project Green Classrooms, established by Governor Hogan, is renewing Maryland’s commitment to environmental education to ensure that every child in Maryland has the opportunity to learn about their local environment, develop a connection with nature, and have a better sense of place in their natural surroundings. Project Green Classrooms is one of the statewide initiatives that Planning’s Resource Conservation and Management unit supports. Planning Data and Research The Planning Data and Research section uses analytical tools and makers timely and accurate data and analysis. This section includes the Geospatialprocesses to Data provide and Analysis, the public, Projections local and stateand State officials, Data and Center, decision and Property Mapping units. Geospatial Data and Analysis Foundational Data Updates New Annexation PFA Determinations: Thirty-nine new annexations were submitted for review to regional planners to determine the potential Priority Funding Area (PFA) status after the annexation has been approved and completed. This process is completed before an annexation is approved by the submitting community to streamline the PFA approval process.

Municipal Annexations: municipalities were mapped once the community approved the annexation and submittedThirty-seven the appropriate new documentation annexations in to24 complete the process. Once mapped, data and applications were updated with the newest annexations.

Protected Lands GIS Database: Data are gathered from state and local agencies and private conservation organizations, aligned to MdProperty View parcel polygons, and integrated into a single geographic information systems (GIS) dataset. The data enable Planning to complete the analyses that support various local planning efforts and create custom maps showing the distribution of protected lands.

Statewide Sewer Service Area Update and Amendments: Planning works with every county and municipalities in the state in collecting sewer service area data. Planning also updated state sewer service data approved by MDE. Planning is the sole state agency which updates and maintainsto reflect hundreds a Statewide of recent Sewer countyService Water Area Database. and Sewer Plan amendments

16 MALPF Updates: Under an agreement with the Maryland Department of Agriculture, Planning updated GIS polygons for new Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Fund easements and produced maps integrated settled easements into Planning’s Protected Lands Database in supportin PDF format of GIS foranalyses. use at Board of Public Works hearings. The unit then

Generalized Zoning Update: Planning initiated a new update to one of the functional data layers, generalized zoning. This layer provides the only

Analysisstatewide comparative map of all 24 jurisdictions zoning maps. Bay Restoration Fund Analysis:

As statutory members of the Bay Restoration Fund Advisory Committee (BRFAC), Planning and MDE advise theAnnual BRFAC Rural with Legacy the best Submission available information Analysis: Planning and data completed analysis. an annual review and evaluation of Rural Legacy funding applications under a Memorandum of Understanding with DNR, to further the goals of preserving large, contiguous tracts of land that enhance natural resources, agricultural, forestry, and environmental protection.

Support for the Phase Six Chesapeake Bay Model: Planning criticalcollaborated to the with re-evaluation the Chesapeake of watershed Bay Program implementation and local governments plans to reduce by nutrientproviding and data sediment and analysis loads for under several the BayU.S. EPA’sModel Total scenarios. Maximum The dataDaily is Load (TMDL) regulations.

Volunteers plant sea grass as part of a restoration effort in the Patuxent River. Restoration of sea grass beds is beneficial to the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. It is key to our aquatic ecosystems due to its role in nutrient absorption and recycling.

17 Projections and State Data Center Data Publication and Availability The State Data Center maintains more than 90 datasets, including population and household projections, school enrollment, median income estimates, and statistics on retail establishments and farms. These are posted on the Maryland Open Data Portal and are foundational to the analysis of public and private sector users through the state. The Data Center also updated the Census Planning Database that is used also prepared a variety of data products for various purposes. to fulfill public and local government data requests. The State Data Center Statewide Public School Enrollment Projections The State Data Center prepared the 2018-2027 public school enrollment projections report which forecasts public school enrollments by grade for

Populationall 23 counties Estimates of Maryland and Baltimore City. The State Data Center prepared national and state-by-state analyses of were analyzed for Maryland and its counties and municipalities through 2018.the annual As part U.S. of Census the Maryland Bureau populationPopulation estimatesEstimates. analysis, Population Planning estimates also prepared detailed tables for age, race, and sex for the state and its

Population24 jurisdictions. and Household Projections Planning updated population and household projections by age, race, and sex for Maryland and its 24 jurisdictions. The projections are from 2015 Statewideto 2045 and areDemographic prepared at five-year Data andintervals. Analysis The State Data Center prepares an analysis report every quarter of the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s (FHFA) Home Price Index. The report examines trends in single-family home prices in the U.S., Maryland and its metropolitan regions. The State Data Center also prepared detailed tables and reports for the one-year data. This analysis of the data includes a comparison with prior year2012-2016 ACS data. and Data 2017 were American compiled Community for Maryland Survey and (ACS) its jurisdictions, five-year and Congressional districts, places and metro areas.

18 Additionally the State Data Center also prepared detailed county-to- county migration data for all Maryland jurisdictions, identifying county in and out-migration. Housing Sales and Development Data Planning prepared a residential sales summary report, which shows the number of residential sales by type of residence and the median residential sales value by type of residence. Data are provided inside PFA and outside PFA for all jurisdictions in Maryland. Annual, monthly, and quarterly building permit reports on single- family and multi-family residential units were updated and published

for all residential developments (single-family, multi-family, and other) werefor Maryland tabulated and monthly its 24 jurisdictions. and published Authorized on the State building Data Center permit website. data Annual reports are available online from FY 1999 to FY 2016 (FY 2017 to be online by end of 2018), quarterly reports through 2nd Quarter 2018, and monthly reports through July 2018.

Planning’s Projections and State Data Center unit monitors development trends, analyzes social, economic and other characteristics, and prepares population, housing, employment, labor force, and income projections, which provide the baseline for planning for growth and development in Maryland. A wealth of data and information products are published to users through the department’s website.

19 Localized Economic Analyses In support of the Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) project, a comprehensive database was developed to help identify the socioeconomic characteristics of the population within a half-mile radius of each train station in Maryland. Staff updated annual jobs and income data—available from the trendsU.S. Bureau and prepared of Economic rankings Analysis— for jobs for and the income50 states data. and the District of Columbia, and for Maryland’s 24 jurisdictions. Planning analyzed growth The analysis included personal income by major source and earnings by major industry, as well as wages and salaries by major industry in Maryland. Local Update of Census Addresses In FY 2018, Planning assisted in the completion of the Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA). LUCA was the only opportunity for the state, counties, and local governments to review and update the U.S. theCensus foundation Bureau’s for residential a full and addressaccurate list. count LUCA in 2020. enables The the Census Census effort willBureau use toa data-drivenreach every approachMaryland to address, ensure andthat its no completion Maryland resident provides is uncounted. Census Boundary Updates State Data Center and Planning staff were involved in other important activities that relate to the 2020 Census. Staff reviewed and updated

2020census Census block boundariesblock boundary for all update 24 jurisdictions process. in Maryland based on suggestions from the U.S. Census Bureau and submitted the changes for Using print maps and GIS applications, Planning staff also completed a timely review of all of the voting districts in Maryland, including: election districts; precincts; legislative districts; and wards established by state and local governments for voting purposes. The review was sent to the

Census Bureau as part of the Voter Tabulation District (VTD) process.

20 Statewide Emergency Operations Support Planning provided demographic, economic, housing, and social data products, GIS support and technical assistance to state agencies and local governments, and assisted with the development of operational plans. Staff monitored response activities to identify and locate vulnerable historic properties and cultural resources. Among the activities conducted during the year, highlights include: •• Worked with the Maryland Emergency Management Agency (MEMA), the Maryland Energy Administration (MEA), and the

grant awarded by the National Governors Association; Office of the Governor on a project funded through a competitive •• with effective governance, evaluating risk, critical infrastructure, economicSurveyed moreconsequences than 40 state and communityagencies on ties.problems Planning associated analyzed the agency responses and will host a State Resiliency Assessment and Planning Retreat, where critical issues in state resiliency

with the Governor and his Cabinet; that were identified through those responses will be discussed •• Prepared data products and provided technical support to the Department of Human Services and other State agencies that participated in a federally graded Emergency Exercise; and •• Participated in directing Statewide response and recovery

Howard, and Washington counties. activities after the flash flood events in Baltimore City, Baltimore,

Planning provides demographic, economic, housing, and social data products, GIS support and technical assistance to state agencies and local governments during the incident and recovery stages of state emergencies. The department assists with the development of operational plans. Shown here are Maryland state agencies and other partners at the State Emergency Operations Center in Reisterstown.

21 Property Mapping Planning by the Statewide Parcel Data Management Numbers

FY 2018 as well as parcel boundaries maintained and updated by Property Planning assembled parcel boundary files from local government sources, Data Products Downloads 9,045 MdProperty View files and online applications. This data is available as a free download from 2,202 FINDER Quantum files Planning’sMapping, then website, linked and the in files the tocase property of our FINDERassessment Quantum data for product use in GIS download, is bundled with free, open source GIS desktop software and a Online Parcel Map Visits 121,175 visits to FINDER Online Taxcustomized Map Productproject file. Updates and Enhancements 182,553 visits to Parcel Viewer Property Mapping performed updates and maintenance of the State’s This adds up to: Tax Assessment Maps, made available in paper or digital image format, Citizens and businesses having as well as for use in geographic information systems such as Planning’s important data available when downloadable data products including MdProperty View and FINDER they need it. Quantum, and as an image service on MD iMAP. Online Applications Enhancements The FINDER Online web application was enhanced with updated aerial imagery, a topographic base map, and an option to view Tax Assessment Maps in alternate colors for enhanced display. FINDER Online provides free public access to property-related information as well as other planning and environmental data viewable over high-resolution aerial imagery.

FINDER Online is Planning’s online property information and parcel mapping system. Tax maps, property information, and aerial imagery combine to make a robust database of Maryland’s 2.3 million parcels. Users can locate a property by searching or navigating the interactive map.

22 Maryland Historical Planning by the Numbers Trust 2018 In FY 2018, the Maryland Historical Trust (the Trust) administered a wide Heritage Areas Program 117 grant applications

$5.5 million requested undertakevariety of research, preservation-related protection, and activities. financial assistance programs that aid state and local governments, nonprofit organizations, and individuals to Office of Planning, Education and 50 projects awarded $2.7 million funded

Outreach $4.4 million leveraged

Heritage Areas Program This adds up to: Increased private investment in Governed by the Maryland Heritage Areas Authority (MHAA) and our future. administered by the Trust, the Maryland Heritage Areas Program locally designated Heritage Areas, each of which represents a unique aspectprovides of targetedMaryland’s financial historic and and technical cultural assistance character. withinIn FY 2018, thirteen 117 grant tourism projects and activities statewide. MHAA awarded $2,695,655 to 50applications projects that were foster submitted, economic totaling development $5,510,352 through in requests heritage for tourism, heritage leveraging $4,419,472 in non-state matching support.

Planning Secretary Robert McCord, as chair Dale Green of Morgan State University gives of the Maryland Heritage Area Authority, a tour of the Hill neighborhood in Easton, bestows Certificates of Appreciation to Maryland – part of the Stories of the outgoing Heritage Area Coalition chairs Chesapeake Heritage Area. Amanda Fenstermaker, Heart of Chesapeake Image courtesy of Talbot County Country Heritage Area, and Liz Shatto, Heart Government. of Civil War Heritage Area.

23 Statewide Preservation Plan Each year, the Trust monitors the implementation of PreserveMaryland, a five-year plan that calls upon public agencies, private organizations, and individuals•• Connect involved with in broaderpreservation audiences; to work toward five statewide goals: •• Improve the framework for preservation; •• Expand and update documentation; •• •• Collaborate toward shared objectives. Build capacity and strengthen networks; and In FY 2018, the Trust formed an interdisciplinary Advisory Committee to outreach. In addition to targeted surveys delivered online and in person, guide the update of the preservation plan for 2019-2024 and began public staff facilitated focus groups on specific topic areas and hosted open Localpublic meetings Government that drew Assistance more than 450 participants. partnership with the National Park Service (NPS), the Trust awarded As part of the Certified Local Government program, administered in supported preservation and archeology projects as well as education and training.$83,401 to 11 of the 21 local government program participants. Funds Weather It Together Program Supported by a grant through the federal Hurricane Sandy Disaster Relief Fund, the statewide Weather It Together Program is aimed at protecting historic places, archeological sites, and cultural landscapes from the effects of natural hazards, such as

FY 2018, staff offered one-on-one technical assistanceflooding, wind, to aid and local coastal governments erosion. Inready to embark on hazard mitigation planning and stewarded $280,000 in grants. With funding from the program, Talbot County, Dorchester County, the Town of Port Deposit, and the Town of Elkton completed planning projects to enhance their communities’ resilience to natural hazards.

MeetingStaff developed to share a theworkshop Trust’s “Hazardapproach Planning to the treatment for Small ofSites archeological and Museums” and presented at the Society for American Archaeology Annual sites endangered by flooding. 24 Office of Research, Survey and Registration Research and Survey In FY 2018, staff continued to administer six architectural and two archeological grant projects related to Hurricane Sandy, funded by the NPS, as well as deliverables for projects funded through the Weather It Together

Capital Grant Programand provided Certified $200,000 Local Government to assist local programs. governments For the first time in six years, in FY 2018, the Historic Preservation Non- archeological projects. and nonprofits for research, planning, and outreach activities, including Staff added 95 standing structures and survey districts, as well as well46 updates, as 66 updates, to the Maryland to the Maryland Inventory Inventory of Historic of Historic Properties Properties. - totaling One hundredmore than twenty-eight 4,561 acres. archeological Staff added 110 survey terrestrial reports archeological were accessioned sites, intoas

Nationalthe Library, Registercovering 3,571 of Historic acres. Places

RegisterThe National of Historic Park Service Places. added Through St. Brigid’sthese listings, School 1,207 and Convent Maryland and Remington Historic District – both in Baltimore City – to the National designation. The NPS also designated Schifferstadt in Frederick County as aproperties National Historicare afforded Landmark. the benefits The highest and protections level of designation of National within Register the federal historic preservation program, National Historic Landmark status, is reserved for properties that possess exceptional value or quality in illustrating or interpreting the heritage of the United States. Schifferstadt

Bay Breeze/Capt. is the 74th Maryland property to be so recognized. Robert S. Craig Cottage in Ocean City is one of nine Maryland historic properties to be added to the National Register of Historic Places in FY 2018.

25 Cultural Resources Information System In FY 2018, with the help of two grants from Maryland State Highway Administration, the Trust completed the conversion of Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties forms and associated records, including photographs, into digital format, making additional data made available online. Military Monuments and Roadside Markers In FY 2018, the Trust staff coordinated maintenance for fourteen monuments on the Western Shore and the World War I Memorial at the

markers were installed as part of the Maryland Roadside Historical Markerentrance Program. of the Fifth Regiment Armory in Baltimore. In FY 2018, seven

The dedication of a new roadside marker honoring Virginia Hall, a Baltimore native and World War II spy. The marker program memorializes significant history throughout Maryland.

26 Office of Preservation Services Review and Compliance pursuant to federal and state historic preservation legislation to assess theIn FY effects 2018, of the those Trust projects reviewed on culturalmore than resources. 6,400 public Staff formallyundertakings evaluated

National Register of Historic Places. Consultation resulted in 29 formal agreement324 resources documents identified to within resolve project the adverse areas effectsfor their of eligibilityprojects on in the

Capitalsignificant Grants cultural andresources Loans and afford pertinent mitigation measures. The Trust provided $1 million in capital grants to 12 projects under the 2018 African American Heritage Preservation Program. The program received 40 eligible applications for a total funding request of more withthan $3.3$600,000 million. available In FY 2018, for capital Governor projects Hogan including fully funded acquisition the Historic and Preservation Capital Grant Program for the first time since 2009, rehabilitation. The program received 74 applications requesting a total of $5,419,650 in funding for projects in 18 counties and Baltimore City.

At Silver Spring’s National Park Seminary campus, the formerly vacant Power Plant, Practice Hall, and Fire Station buildings are undergoing a major rehabilitation effort, which involves the conversion of the former institutional, educational, and support infrastructures into rental housing. The project has also been awarded a Maryland Heritage Structure Rehabilitation Tax Credit. The Trust’s easement resulted from the transfer of the campus out of federal ownership, and rehabilitation of the unique structures has been ongoing for 15 years. Below are before (left) and after (right) photos of the rehabilitation effort.

27 The 1914 Hearn Hardware Company building in Cambridge received $1,080,000 in 2018 Historic Structure Rehabilitation Tax Credits to restore its historic appearance and create a mix of rental apartments and first floor commercial spaces. The project, with estimated $5,400,000 in investment, will contribute to the revitalization of the streetscape. Heritage Structure Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program The Maryland Heritage Structure Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program has helped restore thousands of homes and commercial buildings that contribute to the distinct character and economic vibrancy of Maryland’s towns, cities, and rural areas. In FY 2018, 17 applicants sought $27.9 million in tax credits for construction projects totaling an estimated

FY$233.4 2018, million. the program The Trust approved awarded seven more proposed than $9 Smallmillion Commercial in tax credits, Tax expected to leverage private investment of more than $36 million. In

Credit projects worth $169,844 and 165 proposed Homeowner Tax Credit projects worth an estimated $1,832,492 across the state. Planning by the Numbers FY 2018

Heritage Structure Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program 17 applications $9 million funded $27.9 million requested $36 million leveraged. 8 projects awarded

This adds up to: Increased private investment in our future.

Historic Preservation Easement Program

encompassingIn FY 2018, the approximately Trust acquired 7,720 two new acres easements statewide, or most modifications. providing perpetualThe program protection. currently During holds the706 year, easements the Easement on 924 Committeeproperties, reviewed

to these easement properties, including full scale projects and minor approximately 114 requests from property owners/operators for changes

alterations. Staff conducted28 73 easement property inspections statewide. Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum Located on 560 acres on the Patuxent River in Calvert County, the Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum (JPPM) connects people to the past through history and archeology and supports the preservation of Maryland’s cultural resources. JPPM is the home of the Maryland Archaeological Conservation Laboratory (MAC Lab), a state-of-the-art facility dedicated to archeological conservation and research. Educational Programs and Events In FY 2018, more than 88,000 people visited the park. In the fall of 2017, JPPM invited the public to an open house at the Patterson House, prior to closing for renovations until 2021. More than 1,800 people

2017,enjoyed JPPM the celebratedfirst-ever Halloween American FestivalIndian Heritage and the Day withsecond hands-on annual 5kactivities Run/Walk and inprograms October. in In the November park’s recreated Indian Village. In early June 2018, Planning Two of the many happy visitors who attended JPPM’s first tostaff focus joined attention Senator on Bernie the need Fowler to clean for the up the31st Patuxent Annual River. Halloween Festival. More than Patuxent River Wade-In, as concerned citizens and elected officials joined 1,800 people came out for this JPPM’s commitment to serving area schools continued through two and other events in FY 2018. onsite programs, one designed for fourth graders and one designed for sixth graders. As in years past, staff members worked with students from Huntingtown High School on an archeology-based project. This year Huntingtown High School’s Archaeology Club presented their research children participated in educational programs in FY 2018. findings during JPPM’s annual Speaker Series. In total, more than 3,500 Maryland Archaeological Conservation Lab In FY 2018, MAC Lab staff conserved artifacts from clients throughout the United States, including: the NPS; Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation; the U.S. Navy; Delaware State Parks; City of Deadwood; Delaware Public Archives; New York State Museum; Alexandria Archaeology; Museum of

Railway Museum; George Washington’s Mount Vernon; James Madison’s Montpelier;the American Thomas Revolution; Jefferson’s Calvert Monticello; Marine Museum; Thomas Chesapeake Jefferson’s PoplarBeach Forest; University of Mary Washington; and the University of Maryland. In the spring of 2018, the MAC Lab held a two-day workshop focused on artifact identification and conservation strategies, which was open to any practicing professionals and graduate students in the field of archeology. 29

Maryland Department of Planning 301 W. Preston St., 11th Floor Baltimore, MD 21201 Planning.Maryland.gov (410) 767-4500 • (877) 767-6272 Publication Number: 2018-102 November 2018

Larry Hogan, Governor Robert S. McCord, Secretary Boyd Rutherford, Lt. Governor CALVERT COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 150 Main Street Greg Kernan Chair Prince Frederick, MD 20678 Phone: 410-535-2348 – 301-855-1243 Fax: 410-414-3092

June 20, 2019

Mr. Thomas E. Hutchins, President Calvert County Board of County Commissioners 175 Main Street Prince Frederick, MD 20678

Subject: Calvert County Planning Commission 2018 Annual Report

Dear President Hutchins:

I am pleased to submit to you the Calvert County Planning Commission 2018 Annual Report. The Planning Commission adopted the report at its meeting on June 19, 2019.

Required by Title 1-207 of the Land Use Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Planning Commission’s Annual Report identifies growth related changes in development patterns regarding transportation capacity improvements, new subdivisions, new schools or additions, changes to water and sewer service areas, and any zoning map amendments. The report does not include data from the two municipalities located within Calvert County, Chesapeake Beach and North Beach. These municipalities have their own planning and zoning authority and are not subject to Calvert County’s planning and zoning regulations.

The Annotated Code of Maryland, Land Use Article, Title 1-207, requires that the annual report be made available to the legislative body so they may direct any appropriate and necessary studies and other actions be undertaken to ensure the continuation of a viable planning and development process. The Planning Commission Annual Report for 2018 will also be mailed to the Secretary of the Maryland Department of Planning and posted to the county’s website for public review prior to July 1, 2019.

We hope you will find the report informative and helpful in setting land use policies and regulations. If the Board desires any additional studies or actions be undertaken, please contact Carolyn Sunderland, AICP, Planning Commission Administrator, at 410-535-1600, extension 2380.

Sincerely,

Gregory A. Kernan, Chair

Enclosure cc: J. Mark Willis, Director, Department of Planning & Zoning

Maryland Relay for Impaired Hearing or Speech 1-800-735-2258 CALVERT COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 150 Main Street Greg Kernan Chair Prince Frederick, MD 20678 Phone: 410-535-2348 – 301-855-1243 Fax: 410-414-3092

June 21, 2019

Mr. Robert S. McCord Secretary Maryland Department of Planning 301 West Preston Street, Suite 1101 Baltimore, Maryland 21201-2305

Subject: Calvert County Planning Commission 2018 Annual Report

Dear Secretary McCord:

I am pleased to submit to you the Calvert County Planning Commission 2018 Annual Report. This report documents and evaluates growth related changes in development patterns that occurred in our jurisdiction during 2018, as required by the Annotated Code of Maryland, Land Use Article, Title 1-207. The Planning Commission approved the 2018 report at its meeting on June 19, 2018 and this document has been filed with the local legislative body, the Calvert County Board of County Commissioners, by memorandum dated June 20, 2019. A copy of the 2018 Annual Report will also be posted to the county’s website for public review.

Please note that the report does not include data from the two municipalities within Calvert County, Chesapeake Beach and North Beach. These municipalities have their own planning and zoning authority, and thus are not subject to Calvert County’s Planning and Zoning regulations.

We hope you will find the 2018 report informative. If our staff can be of any additional assistance, please feel free to contact Carolyn Sunderland, AICP, Planning Commission Administrator at 410-535-1600, extension 2380.

Sincerely,

Gregory A. Kernan, Chair Calvert County Planning Commission

Enclosure cc: J. Mark Willis, Director, Department of Planning & Zoning

Maryland Relay for Impaired Hearing or Speech 1-800-735-2258 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

Jurisdiction Name: Calvert County Department of Planning & Zoning Planning Contact Name: Carolyn Sunderland, AICP, Planning Commission Administrator, P&Z Planning Contact Phone Number: 410-535-1600 Ext. 2380 Planning Contact Email: [email protected] Section I: Amendments and Growth Related Changes In Development Patterns

(A) Were any new comprehensive plan or plan elements adopted? Y N 1.If no, go to (B). 2.If yes, briefly summarize what was adopted.

(B) Were there any growth related changes in development patterns? Y N

(Note: Growth related changes in development patterns are changes in land use, zoning, transportation capacity improvements, new subdivisions, new schools or school additions, or changes to water and sewer service areas.)

1. If no, go to (C). 2. If yes, briefly summarize each growth related change(s).

See the following tables for growth related changes in Calvert County in 2018:

Table A.1 – Final Subdivisions Not Yet Recorded, 2018

Table A.2 – Final Approved & Recorded Subdivisions, 2018

Table B – Final Approved Site Plans, 2018

Table C – Summary of Final Site Plan Approvals in PFA/NON-PFA, 2018

Table D - Summary of Calvert County Road Transportation Systems Capacity Improvements, 2018

Table E - Summary of Calvert County Public Schools Capacity Improvements, 2018

Table F - Summary of Calvert County Public Facilities, Safety & Utilities, Capacity Improvements, 2018

Table G - Summary of Calvert County Water and Sewer Capacity Improvements, 2018

Table H - Summary of Text Amendments to Calvert County Zoning Ordinances, 2018

Page 1 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

Table I - Summary of Plan/Map Adoptions and Amendments in County Zoning, 2018

Table J- Summary of Other Growth Related Ordinances Adopted in Calvert County, 2018

NOTE: A map entitled “Calvert County Priority Funding Areas, Priority Preservation Areas and Town Centers 2018” has also been attached for reference as Appendix A.

TABLE A.1 – FINAL SUBDIVISIONS NOT YET RECORDED, 2018

NO. LOT REF. SUB. PAR. GROSS OPEN RESIDUE REC. OF AC. PFA ADDRESS NO. NO. & NAME NO. AC. SPACE AC. REF. LOTS (NET) Major Subdivisions – Non-Residential N/A ------Major Subdivisions - Residential - N/A ------Minor Subdivisions – Residential 1. MSD 02-05-30, Benjamin & 2270 Adelina P. 333 Grace Parker 2 6.796 6.796 N/A 0 No Rd., Prince N/A TM 30 Est., Lot 5 & Frederick Build. Residue 2. MSDFP 2017- 14290 South 060, Evans P. 18 Solomons Is. 2 0.641 0.641 N/A 0 Yes N/A Corner TM 44B Rd. & C St., Solomons 3. MSD 2018- 6500 Breezy P/O P. 81/MSDFP Knolls Lane, 224 3 6.15 6.15 N/A 0 No N/A 2018-061, Lower TM 10 Horton Sub. Marlboro 4. MSD 14- Corner of 1062/MSDFP Calvert St., P. 86 0.242 & 2018-063, 4 0.809 0.567 N/A Yes and C St., N/A TM 44B 0.44 (R/W) Virginia Lore, Solomons. 86 Avondale TM 39 MSDFP 2018- 2208 Garrity 5. P. 86 1 149.6 2.0 N/A 147.6 No Rd., St. N/A 064, Garrity’s (P. 6) Leonard Rest, Lot 4 TM 39

Page 2 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE A.1 – FINAL SUBDIVISIONS NOT YET RECORDED, 2018 – CONT’D

NO. LOT REF. SUB. PAR. GROSS OPEN RESIDUE REC. OF AC. PFA ADDRESS NO. NO. & NAME NO. AC. SPACE AC. REF. LOTS (NET) Minor Subdivisions – Residential – Cont’d 6. MSD 07-02- 7740 William 07/MSDFP Thomas Lane, P. 141 2018-065, 1 11.73 11.73 N/A 0 No Owings N/A TM 7 Thomas Acres, Lot 2 7. MSDFP 2018- 1580 Grays 066, Vaughn P. 211 Rd., Prince 7 36.10 17.25 18.05 0.80 No N/A Murray, Lots 1- TM 31 Frederick 7 8. MSD 2017- 1665 Wilson 0086/MSDFP P. 28 Rd., 1 105.82 25.01 N/A 80.81 No N/A 2018-67, Timber TM 19 Huntingtown Hills, Lot 1

MSDFP 2018- 9642 Boyd’s 9. P. 118 070, Windy Hill, 4 19.59 14.66 4.93 0 No Turn Rd., N/A TM 7 Lots 2-5 Owings 10. MSD 2017- 1995 Lower P. 30 & 0080/MSDFP N/A Marlboro 2018-071, Clay 224 3 20.91 5.39 15.518 No N/A TM 10 Rd., Hill Court Huntingtown 11. MSDFP 2018- P. 51 & 415 Pushaw 069, Firestone 449 6 125.81 125.07 N/A 0.743 No Station Rd., N/A Farm TM 11 Sunderland

12. MSDFP 2018- P. 27 6300 Quarles 090, Lines TM 33 Rd., St. 2 42.29 2.29 N/A 38.805 No N/A Prop., Lot 1& Leonard Build. Residue*

TOTALS 36 526.25 217.55 22.98 284.96 - (MINOR SUB ONLY): *A Buildable Residue is considered to be a buildable lot.

Page 3 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE A.2– FINAL APPROVED & RECORDED SUBDIVISIONS, 2018 NO. LOT REF. SUB. PAR. GROSS OPEN RESIDUE REC. OF AC. PFA ADDRESS NO. NO. & NAME NO. AC. SPACE AC. REF. LOTS (NET) Major Subdivisions - Residential 1. SD 00-16A, MD 4 & S. of 4/10/18 Oakland Hall, Sixes Rd., KPS

Phase 3, Lots 25 31 45.29 38.58 6.71 0 Prince 5/432 No 116-141& 144- Frederick 146 SUB-TOTALS (MAJORS): 31 45.29 38.58 6.71 0 - Minor Subdivisions – Residential 1. MSD 99-09A- 548 & 550 12/19/18 07, Lambertine Grovers Turn KPS P.98 Jones Prop. Lot 2 3.9 3.9 N/A 0 No Lane, 5/471 TM 7 1 & Build. Owings Residue* 2. MSD 16- 105835, Carriage 201 Old 9/06/18 P.2 Crossing II, 2 2.88 2.88 N/A 0 Yes Town Rd., KPS TM 18 Lots 1 & 2 & Huntingtown 5/460 Build. Res.*, Sec.2 3. MSD 2017-78A, 2470 Parkers 05/08/18 P.20 ACLT, Lot 1 1 36.0 2.0 N/A 34.0 No Creek Rd., KPS TM 28 Port Republic 5/437

4. MSDFP 2018- 340 Gott Rd., 5/10/18 P. 69 062, Guy Hall & 1 10.245 3.722 N/A 6.523 No Prince KPS TM 26 Girls, LLC Frederick 5/438

5. MSDFP 2018- 2870 Ross 02/15/18 P.132 068, Thomas 1 12.0 5.85 N/A 6.15 No Rd., Port KPS TM 34 Ross, FC Lot 1 Republic 5/477

SUB-TOTAL (MINORS): 7 65.025 18.352 0 46.673 - SUB-TOTAL (MAJORS) 31 45.29 38.58 6.71 0 - TOTALS 38 110.315 56.932 6.71 46.673 - *A Buildable Residue is considered to be a buildable lot.

Page 4 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE B – FINAL APPROVED SITE PLANS 2018 1

2

PLAN NO. NO. REF. PFA LOT/ DATE FINAL FINAL SQ. FT. SQ. FT. TOTAL TOTAL ACRES ACRES (GROSS) PARCEL NO./NAME IN ACRES LOCATION SITE SITE TAX MAP/ TAX SIZE (NET) (NET) SIZE BUILDING BUILDING APPROVAL APPROVED TOTAL LOT LOT TOTAL PARCEL SIZE SIZE PARCEL TOTAL GROSS TOTAL Site Plans - Residential

1. SPR 2017-244, Beechtree TM 24 P. Allnutt Ct., Apts. Lot 1 and Outlot A 838 & Prince 06/12/18 25.571 13.68 38,342 Yes 732 Frederick

Site Plans – Non-Residential

1. SPR 16-542143, Oakland TM 27 Comptrollers Hall Community Bldg. & P. 456 Ct., Prince 2/13/18 2.4 1.36 2,911 No Pool Frederick 2. SPR 16-540877, The TM 46A South Shoppes and Residences of P. 41 Solomons Is. 2/5/18 0.78 0.36 15,168 Yes Lighthouse Inn Rd., Solomons

3. SPR 2017-239, TM 18 35 Cox Rd., 06/12/18 7.08 1.52 14,868 No Life Church P. 147 Huntingtown 4. SPR 2017-242, Running TM 27 Adelina Rd., Hare Vineyard – Accessory P. 408 Prince 02/06/18 290.34 0.17 3,600 No Structure Frederick 5. SPR 2017-267, Harris TM 6 Dunkirk Way, 04/19/18 15.47 1.07 240 Yes Teeter Fuel Pumps at P. 472 Dunkirk Shoppes at Apple Greene Shopping Center

6. SPR 2018-272, Prince TM 24 450 S. Frederick Volunteer Fire P. 294 Solomons Is. Dept Rd., Prince 12/20/18 4.44 2.14 29,929 Yes Frederick

1 All site plans approved in 2018 were for commercial development and were issued building permits in 2018; therefore, all site plan information has been accounted for within the Report’s Commercial Tables. 2 Total Lot Area (Net) Area includes limit of disturbance.

Page 5 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE B - LIST OF APPROVED SITE PLANS 2018 1 – CONT’D

2

MAP/ NO. NO. REF. PFA LOT/ DATE FINAL FINAL SQ. FT. SQ. FT. TOTAL TOTAL ACRES ACRES (GROSS) PARCEL NO./NAME IN ACRES LOCATION SITE PLAN SITE TAX SIZE (NET) (NET) SIZE BUILDING BUILDING APPROVAL APPROVED TOTAL LOT LOT TOTAL PARCEL SIZE SIZE PARCEL TOTAL GROSS TOTAL

Site Plans – Non-Residential – Cont’d 7. SPR 2018-273, St. John TM 24 185 Holy Vianney Food Pantry P.204 Family Lane, 07/02/18 18.22 0.26 3,116 Yes Prince Frederick 8. SPR 2018-274, Prince TM 24 155 Frederick Ford Parking P. 174 Hallowing Pt. 12/11/18 1.1 0.7 0 Yes Expansion Rd., Prince Frederick 9. SPR 2018-277, Appeal TM 42. 425 Training Facility P. 19 Sweetwater 11/02/18 202.98 0.17 1,152 No Rd., Lusby

10. SPR 2018-281, Capps N. Solomons Mechanical, LLC, TM 21 P. Rd., Prince 12/11/18 1.0 0.096 4,209 No Renovation 197 Frederick

TOTALS: 569.381 21.526 113,535 - 1 All site plans approved in 2018 were for commercial development and were issued building permits in 2018; therefore, all site plan information has been accounted for within the Report’s Commercial Tables. 2 Total Lot Area (Net) Area includes limit of disturbance.

Page 6 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE C –SUMMARY OF FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVALS IN PFA/NON-PFA, 2018

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL GROSS LOT/ TOTAL LOT TOTAL LOT BUILD. BUILD. GROSS LOT/ PARCEL SIZE (NET) SIZE (NET) IN SQ. FT. SQ. FT. PARCEL SIZE SIZE IN IN ACRES, ACRES, APPROVED APPROVED IN ACRES, ACRES, PFA 2 NON-PFA (GROSS), (GROSS), PFA NON-PFA PFA NON-PFA

TOTALS: 65.581 503.97 18.21 3.316 86,795 26,740

TABLE D - SUMMARY OF CALVERT COUNTY ROAD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, 2018 REF. ON-GOING PROJECT DESCRIPTION PFA NO. FROM 2017 1. Brickhouse Road/MD Final design and acquisition in 2016-2017, with 260 Intersection construction in 2018. Yes No Dunkirk 2. Dowell Road Widening Improvements to Dowell Road include wider travel lanes to accommodate the “Share the Road” program for bicycles, a two-way center turn lane, drainage, and safety improvements. The project will increase the capacity of the road and improve efficiency. Phase I (HG Trueman Road to Yes Yes Appeal Lane) was completed in 2016, Phase II (Appeal Lane to Oyster Bay) completed in 2017, and Phase III (Harbours at Solomons) is to be completed in 2018. 3. Prince Frederick This project will construct approx. 600 linear feet of road Blvd./MD 231 from MD 231 south to connect with a portion of the Prince Intersection, Prince Frederick Blvd., CIP project under construction as part of Yes Yes Frederick the Prince Frederick Crossing Community. Ultimately, it is intended for the Blvd. to connect to MD 2/4, across from Main Street. Project, completed in 2018-2019. 4. Prince Frederick Loop Design and construction for portions of the Loop Road Road: Fox Run fronting the former Calvert Middle School property, Blvd./Dares Beach connecting with Fox Run Blvd., Dares Beach Road (MD Yes Yes Road/Armory Road, 402) and Armory Road to Main Street, is complete but the Prince Frederick construction plan has been extended to 2021. 5. Prince Frederick Loop Intersection improvements from a two-way stop to possibly Road & Traskers Blvd. roundabout, if warranted by traffic study. Planning & traffic study to begin 2017-2018, construction to begin in No Yes 2020. 6. Pushaw Station Road This project will relocate and realign approximately 800 Improvements, Owings linear feet of roadway and to reduce vertical grade from 13% to 10%, to improve sight distance. Project to be Yes No designed in 2016, with construction scheduled for 2018.

Page 7 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE D - SUMMARY OF CALVERT COUNTY ROAD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, 2018 – CONT’D REF. ON-GOING PROJECT DESCRIPTION PFA NO. FROM 2017 7. Sidewalk Program, Ongoing retrofit and repair program to meet ADA standards Town Centers, in the town centers, within state and county right-of-ways. Yes Yes Countywide Multiple project sites. 8. Barstow Road/ Reconstruction of intersection to improve sight distance and Leitches Wharf Rd., safety deficiencies. Construction on-going, with completion Yes No Prince Frederick by 2018. 9. West Dares Beach Project includes road widening from two to four travel lanes, Rd. Improvements, installation of curb gutter and sidewalks, from MD 2/4 west Yes Yes Prince Frederick to Prince Frederick Blvd., Architect/Engineering/Design initiated in 2017, with construction to begin in 2018.

10. Boyd’s Turn Rd. Project includes improvements to Boyd’s Turn Rd., from 5th Partial - Improvements, Street to MD 260. Final design and right-of-way acquisition Approx. Phase 2, Owings for Phase 2A, a right turn lane onto MD 260, is ongoing, and 730 linear Yes the construction of connector is scheduled 2017- 2018. The ft., final design and right-of-way acquisition for Phase 2B and adjacent road widening, from MD 260 to Paris Oaks Road, in 2017. to PFA Construction on-going.

TABLE E - SUMMARY OF CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, 2018 – CONT’D REF. PROJECT/ ON-GOING DESCRIPTION PFA NO. LOCATION FROM 2017

1. Northern Middle Design and construction of a sewer treatment plant in School 2019-2020. New construction/renovation of facility to Replacement, 2954 fulfill need for additional instruction space and No No Chaneyville modernization to begin in 2022-2023. Rd., Owings

2. Board of Education Partially remodel spaces within the building and site to Building, 1350 Dares accommodate the relocation of the Infants & Toddlers Beach Rd., Prince program from Hunting Creek Annex. Planning and initial No No Frederick construction in 2018.

3. Northern High Replacement of the existing 197,000 sq. ft. building (except School auditorium and gymnasium) with a new building consisting Replacement, 2950 of 212,000 sq. ft., for 1,440 student capacity. LEEDS Yes No Chaneyville Architecture/Design completed in 2016, with construction Rd., Owings to begin in 2017. Construction on-going. Estimated completion date is 2020.

Page 8 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE F - SUMMARY OF CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC FACILITIES, SAFETY & UTILITIES, CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, 2018 1 REF. ON-GOING PROJECT DESCRIPTION PFA NO. FROM 2017 Public Facilities & Safety: 1. Linda L. Kelly Animal A new shelter built in 2018, to include 14,850 sq. ft. of Shelter, Hallowing improvements. Project to be completed in 2018-2019. Yes No Point Rd., Prince Frederick 2. Prince Frederick Replacement and expansion of facility on-site. Planning Volunteer Fire and design in 2017-2018, with construction pushed back to Department, 755 2019. Yes Yes Solomons Island Rd., Prince Frederick 3. County Design and build a new County Administration Building; Administration four stories, 120,000 sq. ft. with parking garage. Design to Building, Armory Rd., begin in 2018. No Yes (ex. armory parcel) Prince Frederick 4. Calvert Pines Senior Design for expansion and renovation of senior center for Center Expansion, additional housing (elderly in financial need) and Office of 450 West Dares Aging. Planning and design in 2018-19 with construction No Yes Beach Rd., Prince to begin in 2020. Frederick 5. Barstow Convenience Design of existing facility to allow increased capacity. Center Upgrade, 350 Planning and design in 2016-2017, with construction in Yes No Stafford Rd., Barstow 2018 - 2019. 6. Appeal Landfill Construction of a county-owned facility to collect and store Transfer Station, 401 recycling. Feasibility study in 2018, planning and design in No No Sweetwater Rd., 2018-2019 with construction in 2020. Lusby 7. Solomons Volunteer Design and planning in 2019-2022 for new facility on-site. Rescue Squad & Fire Construction to begin in 2024. Dept., 13150 H.G. No Yes Trueman Rd., Solomons 8. St. Leonard Volunteer Design and planning in 2019-2022 for new facility on-site. Fire Dept. & Rescue Construction to begin in 2023. Squad, 200 Calvert No Yes Beach Rd., St. Leonard 1 The list does not include park and recreational improvement projects.

Page 9 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

WATER AND SEWER:

NOTE: The BOCC approved of and adopted the Calvert County Comprehensive Water & Sewer Plan, 2014 Update, on January 12, 2016 via Ordinance No. 15-110, which was recorded on January 13, 2016 (KPS 48/341).

TABLE G - SUMMARY OF CALVERT COUNTY WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, 2018 REF. ON-GOING PROJECT DESCRIPTION PFA NO. FROM 2017 Water System Capacity Improvements: 1. Back Creek Loop, Install 4,300 linear ft. of water line to connect the Dowell Rd. Dowell Rd. and and Solomons Island Rd. water mains. No Yes Williams St., Solomons 2. Cove Point To extend the system 11,250 linear ft. from the existing Community Water waterline fronting Dominion (Cove Point Liquid Natural Yes Yes System, Lusby Gas Terminal) to the existing Cove Point Road. Design in 2017, with construction pushed back to 2021. 3. Prince Frederick Install waterline along Prince Frederick Blvd.; between Blvd. Water Main, Allnutt Ct. and West Dares Beach Blvd.; between Auto Dr. Prince Frederick and Harrow Lane; and along MD 2/4, between Fox Run Yes Yes Shopping Center and Calvert Memorial Hospital. Architect/Engineering in 2016-2017, with construction to begin in 2018-2019. 4. Solomons Well In the event the county is unable to secure the Cove #3, Solomons Point Well, an additional well will need to be constructed to supplement the water supply. A new well of at least 630 gallons per minute will be Yes Yes necessary to meet the projected demands associated with the 10 year proposed conditions. Installation/Construction in 2019-2020. 5. St. Leonard Well The county will construct a new well, new 8” water and Elevated mains and an additional elevated storage tower of Storage, 100,000 gallons, to: 1) supplement the existing MD 765, production well, 2) meet current and future demands, St. Leonard 3) ensure proper distribution system pressure, 4) Yes No provide for adequate fire suppression reserves, and 5) balance the system supply in coordination with the existing water storage tank. Site acquired in 2015, permit obtained, with design in 2017-2018 and construction in 2019. 6. West Prince Results from a hydraulic analysis of the existing water Frederick Water system indicated the available fire flow in west Prince Storage Tank, Frederick needs to be increased. A new 100,000- Yes Yes Prince Frederick gallon elevated water storage tank is recommended for west Prince Frederick. Design in 2021, with construction in 2022.

Page 10 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE G - SUMMARY OF CALVERT COUNTY WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, 2018 REF. ON-GOING PROJECT DESCRIPTION PFA NO. FROM 2017 Sewer System Capacity Improvements 1. Cove Point Provide public sewer service to the Cove Point Community Sewer Community and convey the wastewater to the Solomons System, Lusby Wastewater Treatment Plant for processing and disposal. Yes Yes Architect/Engineering initiated in 2017, with construction to begin in 2021. 2. Dowell Road Upgrade of the Dowell Road WPS to meet the increased Wastewater Pump demands on the system, replace aged equipment, incorporate Station (WPS) improved safety features, modify station to increase Yes Yes Upgrade, Dowell emergency storage capacity, and comply with current state reqs. Design initiated in 2017, with construction in 2018. 3. Lusby Pump Station Properties in the Lusby Town Center tie into the Solomons & Collection System, force main to deliver wastewater to the Solomons Waste Lusby Town Center, Water Treatment Plant. The project is to provide an Lusby independent delivery system from Lusby to the existing plant, Yes Yes and to provide needed increased capacity. Architect/Engineering services initiated in 2016-2017, with construction in 2019. 4. Prince Frederick To extend a force main from the Pump Station #3 to the Force Main existing force main along MD 231. Architect/Engineering Replacement, Prince initiated in 2016, with construction to be complete in 2018. Yes Yes Frederick Blvd./MD 231, Prince Frederick 5. Prince Frederick This project will incorporate general repairs and upgrades Pump Station to wastewater pump stations throughout the Prince Improvements, Frederick service area under one contract. The project will Yes Yes Phase 1, Prince address most urgent operational needs. This upgrade is Frederick necessary to meet the increased demands on the system and replace aged equipment. Construction cited for 2021. 6. Prince Frederick Project will replace and upgrade Pump Station #6 for needed Pump Station additional capacity. Architect/Engineering/Design in 2016, Improvement, with construction initiated in 2018. Project to extend to 2020. Phases 2 & 3, Calvert Yes Yes Towne, South Main Street (MD 765), Hawk Hill Dr., Prince Frederick 7. Prince Frederick The Prince Frederick WTP #1 will be upgraded to increase Wastewater capacity and meet more stringent discharge limit Treatment Plant requirements. Preliminary Design in 2017-2018, with Yes No (WTP) #1 Upgrade, construction to begin in 2019 or 2020. 215-715 Sugar Notch Lane, Barstow 8. Solomons Wastewater The upgrade will provide for increasing treatment capacity Treatment Plant to ENR standards, replacing process components that are (WTP) & failing or undersized. A new laboratory is included to satisfy Enhanced Nutrient Maryland Department of Environment requirements for plant Yes No Removal (ENR) discharge limits. Preliminary design in 2018, with Upgrade, construction in 2022-2022. 500 Sweetwater Rd., Solomons

Page 11 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

(C) Were any amendments made to the zoning regulations? Y N 1. If no, go to (D). 2. If yes, briefly summarize any amendments that resulted in changes in development patterns.

See Table H, for text amendments to Calvert County Zoning Ordinances in 2018.

TABLE H - SUMMARY OF TEXT AMENDMENTS TO CALVERT COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCES, 2018

NO.

P.C. DATE BOCC TITLE/ PUBLIC DATE & REF. NUMBER CASE NO.CASE HEARING PLANNING ADOPTION APPROVAL, FINDING OF ORDINANCE REFERENCE RESOLUTION COMMISSION AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION CONSISTENCY RECORDATION

1. TA 17-01 Amendments to Sign Regulations as found in the CCZO, Dunkirk MP & ZO, Res. No. 04-18 PCR 17-07 Huntingtown ZO, 11/15/17 08/22/17 01/31/18 (11/15/17) Lusby TCZO, Owings KPS 53/218 TCZO, Prince Fred. ZO, St Leonard ZO & Solomons TCZO. Restructuring of the Res. No. 50-18 2. TA 17-03 PCR 18-08 Architectural Review 04/18/18 11/27/18 11/29/18 (11/27/18) Process. KPS 57/59 3. TA 17-04 To permit Day Care Centers with 20+ children in the Old Res. No. 22-18 PCR 18-03 Town Dist. of the 02/21/18 05/15/18 06/06/18 (05/15/18) Prince Frederick TC, KPS 54/323 with a Special Exception. 4. TA 17-05 To delete parking Res. No. 23-18 condition from CCZO, PCR 18-04 06/06/18 02/21/18 05/15/18 Land Use Charts for (05/15/18) KPS 54/327 CCZO, Article 5. TA 17-08 To allow garages to be 5. Res. No. 24-18 counted as parking 03/29/18 PCR 18-06 05/15/18 06/06/18 spaces for attached 04/18/18 (05/15/18) KPS 54/331 dwellings. TA 17-09 To permit places of 6. Res. No. 25-18 worship in the FFD, 02/21/18 05/15/18 PCR 18-06 06/06/18 with Special KPS 54/335 Exception.

Page 12 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE H - SUMMARY OF TEXT AMENDMENTS TO CALVERT COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCES, 2018 – CONT’D

P.C. DATE BOCC TITLE/ PUBLIC DATE & REF. NO. NUMBER CASE NO.CASE HEARING PLANNING ADOPTION APPROVAL, FINDING OF ORDINANCE REFERENCE RESOLUTION COMMISSION AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION CONSISTENCY RECORDATION

7. TA 18-01 Amendments to the Calvert County Agricultural Res. No. 18-18 Preservation Rules N/A 05/17/18 N/A 05/09/18 and Regulations KPS 54/49 (Purchase and Retire Fund) Applications. TA 18-02 Revision to the Res. No. 51-18 8. PCR 18-09 (FKA Critical Area Planting 04/18/18 11/27/18 05/09/18 (11/27/18) 18-21) Fee-In-Lieu. KPS 57/62 TA 18-03 Amend. to CCZO, 9. Res. No. 52-18 Section 7-1.05 PCR 18-10 09/19/18 11/27/18 11/29/18 Adequate Public (11/27/18) KPS 57/66 Facilities Ordinance. 10. N/A Repeal and Readoption with Res. No. 36-18 06/21/16 Amendments of the N/A N/A 07/25/18 07/24/18 Calvert County Road KPS 55/24 Ordinance.

(D) Were any amendments made to the zoning map? Y N 1. If no, go to Section II: Mapping and GIS Shapefiles. 2. If yes, briefly summarize each amendment(s) and include a copy of the locally approved zoning map following approval of the amendment.

NOTE: Historic Districts are a Zoning District Overlay Zone per the adopted Calvert County Zoning Map and Ordinance. Consequently, the creation of a new district is considered a Map Amendment to the adopted Calvert County Zoning Map

Please see the Tables I and J for growth related plan/map adoptions and amendments to the adopted county FY 2018-2019 budget/CIP in 2018:

Page 13 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE I - SUMMARY OF PLAN/MAP ADOPTIONS AND AMENDMENTS IN COUNTY ZONING, 2018

P.C. DATE BOCC TITLE/ PUBLIC DATE & REF. NO. NUMBER CASE NO.CASE HEARING PLANNING ADOPTION APPROVAL, FINDING OF ORDINANCE REFERENCE RESOLUTION COMMISSION AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION CONSISTENCY RECORDATION

1. HD Application for 2017 Historic District Res. No. 26-18 PCR 18-02 (Map designation, Kent- 01/17/18 05/15/18 06/06/18 (05/15/18) Amend.) Millard House, Olivet KPS 54/339 Rd., Lusby. 2. N/A Adoption of a Revised Res. No. 20-18 Plan Calvert County Land 5/15/18 05/15/18 PCR 18-01 05/22/18 Amend. Preservation, Parks KPS 54/122 and Recreation Plan. 3. N/A Adoption of the Plan Calvert County 2017 Res. No. 40-18 Amend. Hazard Mitigation 08/16/17 04/13/17 PCR 17-00 08/01/18 Plan Update & Flood KPS 55/245 Mitigation Plan. 4. SWTA 2019-2028 #17-01 Comprehensive Solid Res. No. 45-18 Waste Management 03/15/17 02/28/17 PCR 17-01 10/24/18 Plan Update and KPS 56/281 Letter of Consistency. 5. N/A To file an application Plan with the MD Transit Amend. Administration of the Res. No. 11-18 MD Dept. of Transit N/A N/A N/A 03/22/18 for various grants KPS 53/440 under the Federal Transit Act.

Section II: Mapping and GIS Shapefiles

(A) Does your jurisdiction utilize GIS to prepare planning related maps? Y N

1. If no, include an address, parcel identification number or other means to identify the type and location of all new growth related changes or zoning map amendments listed in Sections I(B) and I(D). Provide a paper map(s) that indexes the general location(s) of the growth related changes or zoning map amendment(s). Contact MDP for mapping assistance.

N/A

Page 14 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

2. If yes, include a map(s) of the location(s) of the amendment(s) and submit applicable GIS shapefiles for all new growth related changes and zoning map amendments listed in Sections I(B) and I(D). GIS shapefiles may be submitted via email or cd/dvd disk.

Please refer to the zip file sent through the FTP site. See Appendix C for contents.

Were there any growth related changes identified in Sections I(B) ? Y N

1. If no, go to (C).

2. If yes, then include GIS shapefiles and map(s), that identify the location of each growth related change identified in Section I(B). If your jurisdiction does not utilize GIS then clearly identify the growth related changes on a map(s). Contact MDP for mapping assistance.

Please refer to the zip file sent through the FTP site. See Appendix C for contents.

(B) Were there any zoning map amendments identified in Section I(D). Y N

1. If no to (A) and (B), skip to Section III: Consistency of Development Changes.

2. If yes, then include GIS shapefiles and map(s), that identify the location of each zoning map amendment identified in Section I(D). If your jurisdiction does not utilize GIS then clearly identify the growth related changes on a map(s). Contact MDP for mapping assistance.

Please refer to the zip file sent through the FTP site. See Appendix C for contents.

Section III: Consistency of Development Changes

(A) Were there any growth related changes identified in Sections I(B) through (D)? Y N

1. If no, skip to Section IV: Planning and Development Process. 2. If yes, go to (B).

(B) For each growth related change listed in Sections I(B) through (D), state how the development changes were determined to be consistent with:

1. Each other (if more than one);

2. Any recommendations of the last annual report;

3. The adopted plans of the local jurisdiction;

Page 15 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

4. The adopted plans of all adjoining jurisdictions;

5. Any adopted plans of the State and local jurisdictions that have responsibility for financing or constructing improvements necessary to implement the jurisdiction’s plan.

For Responses to Item (B) 1.-5. above, see Tables K - N:

Table K – Consistency of Calvert County Transportation Systems Capacity Improvements with Adopted Plans, 2018

Table L – Consistency of Calvert County Public Schools Capacity Improvements with Adopted Plans, 2018

Table M – Consistency of Calvert County Public Facilities, Safety & Utilities, Capacity Improvements with Adopted Plans, 2018

Table N – Consistency of Calvert County Water and Sewer Capacity Improvements, with Adopted Plans, 2018

NOTE: Acronyms used in tables and report are defined under “Abbreviations for Capacity Improvement Charts, Section III(B), Tables K - N” attached as Appendix B.

TABLE K – CONSISTENCY OF CALVERT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS WITH ADOPTED PLANS, 2018

REPORT PLANS REFERENCE NO. REFERENCE OTHER PROJECTS OTHER CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT FROM LAST ANNUAL ANNUAL LAST FROM CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS LOCALLY ADOPTED ADOPTED LOCALLY CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT IMPROVEMENTS TO PROJECT/DESCRIPTION ANY ADOPTED PLANS OF ADOPTED PLANS OF ALL OF ALL PLANS ADOPTED IMPLEMENT LOCAL PLANS WITH RESPONSIBILITYWITH FOR FINANCING/CONSTRUCTING ADJOINING JURISDICTIONS ADJOINING STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTIONS

1. Brickhouse Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent with Not No - Local Road/MD 260 Supports Recommendations CCCP & Applicable, Intersection Transportation & CCTP Dunkirk Infrastructure No Impact Improvement Objectives & Actions for All Plans

Page 16 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE K – CONSISTENCY OF CALVERT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS WITH ADOPTED PLANS, 2018 – CONT’D

REPORT PLANS REFERENCE NO. REFERENCE OTHER PROJECTS OTHER CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT FROM LAST ANNUAL ANNUAL LAST FROM CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS LOCALLY ADOPTED ADOPTED LOCALLY CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT IMPROVEMENTS TO PROJECT/DESCRIPTION ANY ADOPTED PLANS OF ADOPTED PLANS OF ALL OF ALL PLANS ADOPTED IMPLEMENT LOCAL PLANS WITH RESPONSIBILITYWITH FOR FINANCING/CONSTRUCTING ADJOINING JURISDICTIONS ADJOINING STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTIONS

2. Dowell Road Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent with Not No - Local Widening Supports Recommendations CCCP & Applicable, Transportation & CCTP Infrastructure No Impact Improvement Objectives & Actions for All Plans

3. Prince Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent with Not No - Local Frederick Supports Recommendations CCCP, CCTP Applicable, Blvd./MD 231 Transportation & & PFMP&ZO Intersection, Infrastructure No Impact Prince Improvement Frederick Objectives & Actions for All Plans

4. Prince Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent with Not No - Local Frederick Loop Supports Recommendations CCCP, Applicable, Road: Fox Run Transportation & CCTP & Blvd./Dares Infrastructure PFMP&ZO No Impact Beach Improvement Road/Armory Objectives & Road, Prince Actions for All Frederick Plans

Page 17 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE K – CONSISTENCY OF CALVERT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS WITH ADOPTED PLANS, 2018 – CONT’D

ON PLANS ADJOINING ADJOINING S FROM LAST LAST S FROM REFERENCE NO. REFERENCE ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL STATE/LOCAL OTHER PROJECTS OTHER JURISDICTIONS CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT ALL CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATION PROJECT/DESCRIPTI CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT LOCALLY ADOPTED ADOPTED LOCALLY CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT ADOPTED PLANS OF PLANS ADOPTED RESPONSIBILITY FOR JURISDICTIONS WITH G IMPROVEMENTS TO ANY ADOPTED PLANS OF FINANCING/CONSTRUCTIN IMPLEMENT LOCAL PLANS

5. Prince Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent with Not No - Local Frederick Loop Supports Recommendations CCCP, Applicable, Road & Transportation & CCTP & Traskers Blvd. Infrastructure PFMP&ZO No Impact Improvement Objectives & Actions for All Plans

6. Pushaw Station Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent with Not No - Local Road Supports Recommendations CCCP & Applicable, Improvements, Transportation & CCTP Owings Infrastructure No Impact Improvement Objectives & Actions for All Plans

7. Sidewalk Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent with Not Yes- Multiple Program, Supports Recommendations CCCP, CCTP, Applicable, grants such as TAP Town Centers, Transportation & DMP&ZO, 2 Countywide Infrastructure PFMP&ZO, No Impact Improvement HMP&ZO, Objectives & OTCMP&ZO, Actions for All SLMP, SLZO, Plans STCMP&ZO LTCMP&ZO

8. Barstow Road Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent with Not No - Local /Leitches Wharf Supports Recommendations CCCP & Applicable, Road, Transportation & CCTP Prince Infrastructure No Impact Frederick Improvement Objectives & Actions for All Plans

Page 18 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE K – CONSISTENCY OF CALVERT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS WITH ADOPTED PLANS, 2018– CONT’D

ON PLANS S FROM LAST LAST S FROM REFERENCE NO. REFERENCE ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL STATE/LOCAL OTHER PROJECTS OTHER JURISDICTIONS CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT ALL ADJOINING ADJOINING ALL CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATION PROJECT/DESCRIPTI CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT LOCALLY ADOPTED ADOPTED LOCALLY CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT ADOPTED PLANS OF PLANS ADOPTED RESPONSIBILITY FOR JURISDICTIONS WITH G IMPROVEMENTS TO ANY ADOPTED PLANS OF FINANCING/CONSTRUCTIN IMPLEMENT LOCAL PLANS

9. West Dares Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent with Not No - Local Beach Road Supports Recommendations CCCP, Applicable, Improvements, Transportation & CCTP & Prince Infrastructure PFMP & ZO No Impact Frederick Improvement Objectives & Actions for All Plans

10. Boyd’s Turn Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent with Not No - Local Road Supports Recommendations CCCP & Applicable, Improvements, Transportation & CCTP Phase 2, Infrastructure No Impact Owings Improvement Objectives & Actions for All Plans

Page 19 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE L – CONSISTENCY OF CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS WITH ADOPTED PLANS, 2018

S

PLAN

ISDICTIONS PROJECTS

LOCAL JUR REPORT PLANS REFERENCE NO. REFERENCE OTHER CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT FROM LAST ANNUAL ANNUAL LAST FROM CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS LOCALLY ADOPTED ADOPTED LOCALLY CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT IMPROVEMENTS TO PROJECT/DESCRIPTION ANY ADOPTED PLANS OF ADOPTED PLANS OF ALL OF ALL PLANS ADOPTED IMPLEMENT WITH RESPONSIBILITYWITH FOR FINANCING/CONSTRUCTING ADJOINING ADJOINING STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTIONS

1. Northern Middle Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not Yes – State, School Supports Recommendations with CCCP & Applicable, Approx. 45% of Replacement, Infrastructure CCPSCMP Total Project 2954 Chaneyville Improvement No Impact Budget Road, Owings Objectives & Actions for All Plans 2. Calvert Country Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No - Local School, 1350 Supports Recommendations with CCCP & Applicable, Dares Beach Infrastructure CCPSCMP Road Prince Improvement No Impact Frederick Objectives & Actions for All Plans 3. Northern High Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not Yes – State, School Supports Recommendations with CCCP & Applicable, Approx. 81% of Replacement, Infrastructure CCPSCMP Total Project 2950 Improvement No Impact Budget Chaneyville Objectives & Actions for All

Road, Owings Plans

Page 20 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE M – CONSISTENCY OF CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC FACILITIES, SAFETY & UTILITIES, CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS WITH ADOPTED PLANS, 2018

S

PLAN

ISDICTIONS PROJECTS

LOCAL JUR REPORT PLANS REFERENCE NO. REFERENCE OTHER CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT FROM LAST ANNUAL ANNUAL LAST FROM CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS LOCALLY ADOPTED ADOPTED LOCALLY CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT IMPROVEMENTS TO PROJECT/DESCRIPTION ANY ADOPTED PLANS OF ADOPTED PLANS OF ALL OF ALL PLANS ADOPTED IMPLEMENT WITH RESPONSIBILITYWITH FOR FINANCING/CONSTRUCTING ADJOINING ADJOINING STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTIONS

Public Facilities & Safety:

1. Linda R. Kelly PC approved site Consistent: No Consistent N/A No – Local Animal Shelter, plan, SPR 16- Recommendations with CCCP public/private Hallowing Pt. Rd., 541002, as partnership with Prince Frederick consistent on Marrick 01/18/17 Properties to lease a facility with option to acquire after three years.

2. Prince Frederick Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No - Local Volunteer Fire Supports Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, Department, Infrastructure CCTP & 755 Solomons Improvement PFMP&ZO No Impact Island Road, Objectives & Prince Frederick Actions for All Plans

3. County Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not Funding not yet Administration Supports County Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, fully determined. Building, Armory Infrastructure CCTP & Rd., Prince Improvement PFMP&ZO No Impact Frederick Objectives & Actions for All Plans

Page 21 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE M – CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC FACILITIES, SAFETY & UTILITIES, CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, 2018 – CONT’D

S

PLAN

ISDICTIONS PROJECTS

LOCAL JUR REPORT PLANS NT NT REFERENCE NO. REFERENCE OTHER CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT FROM LAST ANNUAL ANNUAL LAST FROM CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS LOCALLY ADOPTED ADOPTED LOCALLY CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT IMPROVEMENTS TO PROJECT/DESCRIPTION ANY ADOPTED PLANS OF ADOPTED PLANS OF ALL OF ALL PLANS ADOPTED IMPLEME WITH RESPONSIBILITYWITH FOR FINANCING/CONSTRUCTING ADJOINING ADJOINING STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTIONS

Public Facilities & Safety –Cont’d:

4. Calvert Pines Consistent: Consistent: No PC Consistent Not Funding not yet Senior Center Supports County Determination as with CCCP, Applicable, fully determined. Expansion, 450 Infrastructure yet. CCTP & West Dares Beach Improvement PFMP&ZO No Impact Rd., Prince Objectives & Frederick Actions for All Plans 5. Barstow Consistent Consistent Consistent Not No- Local Convenience with CCCP & Applicable, Center Upgrade, CCCSWMP 350 Stafford No Impact Road, Barstow

6. Appeal Landfill Consistent: Consistent Consistent Not No- Local Transfer Station, Upgrade with CCCP & Applicable, 401 Sweetwater Underway CCCSWMP Rd., Lusby No Impact

7. Solomons Consistent: Consistent: No PC Consistent Not Funding not yet Volunteer Rescue Supports County determination as yet. with CCCP & Applicable, fully determined. Squad & Fire Infrastructure STCMP&ZO Dept., 13150 H.G. Improvement No Impact Trueman Rd., Objectives & Solomons Actions for All Plans

Page 22 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE N - CONSISTENCY OF CALVERT COUNTY WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, WITH ADOPTED PLANS, 2018

S

PLAN

ANNUAL ISDICTIONS PROJECTS

LOCAL JUR REPORT PLANS REFERENCE NO. REFERENCE OTHER CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT FROM LAST LAST FROM CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS LOCALLY ADOPTED ADOPTED LOCALLY CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT IMPROVEMENTS TO PROJECT/DESCRIPTION ANY ADOPTED PLANS OF ADOPTED PLANS OF ALL OF ALL PLANS ADOPTED IMPLEMENT WITH RESPONSIBILITYWITH FOR FINANCING/CONSTRUCTING ADJOINING ADJOINING STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTIONS

Water System Capacity Improvements:

1. Back Creek Loop, Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No - Local Dowell Rd., and Supports Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, Farren Avenue, Solomons Master CCCW&SP & Solomons Plan and Zoning SMP & ZO No Impact Ordinance Infrastructure Improvement Objectives & Actions 2. Cove Point Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No - Local Community Supports Public Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, Water System, Water System CCCW&SP & Lusby Infrastructure LTCMP&ZO No Impact Improvement Objectives & Actions For All Plans 3. Prince Frederick Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No - Local Blvd. Water Supports Prince Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, Main, Prince Frederick Master CCCW&SP & No Impact Frederick Plan and Zoning PFMP&ZO Ordinance Infrastructure Improvement Objectives & Actions

Page 23 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE N - CONSISTENCY OF CALVERT COUNTY WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, WITH ADOPTED PLANS, 2018 – CONT’D

S

PLAN

ISDICTIONS PROJECTS

LOCAL JUR REPORT PLANS REFERENCE NO. REFERENCE OTHER CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT FROM LAST ANNUAL ANNUAL LAST FROM CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS LOCALLY ADOPTED ADOPTED LOCALLY CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT IMPROVEMENTS TO PROJECT/DESCRIPTION ANY ADOPTED PLANS OF ADOPTED PLANS OF ALL OF ALL PLANS ADOPTED IMPLEMENT WITH RESPONSIBILITYWITH FOR FINANCING/CONSTRUCTING ADJOINING ADJOINING STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTIONS

Water System Capacity Improvements – Cont’d:

4. Solomons Well #3, Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No - Local Solomons Supports Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, Solomons Master CCCW&SP & No Impact Plan and Zoning SMP&ZO Ordinance Infrastructure Improvement Objectives & Actions 5. St. Leonard Well Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not Yes – State, and Elevated Supports St. Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, MDE - Drinking Storage, St. Leonard’s CCCW&SP & No Impact Water Leonard Master Town SLTCMP Revolving Loan Center Master Fund Plan and Zoning Ordinance Infrastructure Improvement Objectives & Actions 6. West Prince Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No - Local Frederick Supports Public Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, Storage Tank, Water System CCCW&SP & No Impact Prince Frederick Infrastructure PFMP&ZO Improvement Objectives & Actions For All Plans.

Page 24 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE N - CONSISTENCY OF CALVERT COUNTY WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, WITH ADOPTED PLANS, 2018

S

PLAN

ISDICTIONS PROJECTS

LOCAL JUR REPORT PLANS REFERENCE NO. REFERENCE OTHER CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT FROM LAST ANNUAL ANNUAL LAST FROM CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS LOCALLY ADOPTED ADOPTED LOCALLY CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT IMPROVEMENTS TO PROJECT/DESCRIPTION ANY ADOPTED PLANS OF ADOPTED PLANS OF ALL OF ALL PLANS ADOPTED IMPLEMENT WITH RESPONSIBILITYWITH FOR FINANCING/CONSTRUCTING ADJOINING ADJOINING STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTIONS

Sewer System Capacity Improvements:

1. Cove Point Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No - Local Community Supports Public Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, Water System, Water System CCCW&SP & No Impact Lusby Infrastructure LTCMP&ZO Improvement Objectives & Actions For All Plans

2. Dowell Road Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No – Local Wastewater Pump Supports Public Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, Station Upgrade, Sewerage System CCCW&SP & No Impact Dowell Infrastructure SMP&ZO Improvement Objectives & Actions For All Plans

3. Lusby Pump Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No - Local Station & Supports Public Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, Collection System, Sewerage System CCCW&SP & No Impact Lusby Town Infrastructure LTCMP&ZO Center, Lusby Improvement Objectives & Actions For All Plans

Page 25 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE N - CONSISTENCY OF CALVERT COUNTY WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, WITH ADOPTED PLANS, 2018 – CONT’D

S

PLAN

ISDICTIONS PROJECTS

LOCAL JUR REPORT PLANS REFERENCE NO. REFERENCE OTHER CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT FROM LAST ANNUAL ANNUAL LAST FROM CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS LOCALLY ADOPTED ADOPTED LOCALLY CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT IMPROVEMENTS TO PROJECT/DESCRIPTION ANY ADOPTED PLANS OF ADOPTED PLANS OF ALL OF ALL PLANS ADOPTED IMPLEMENT WITH RESPONSIBILITYWITH FOR FINANCING/CONSTRUCTING ADJOINING ADJOINING STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTIONS

Sewer System Capacity Improvements – Cont’d:

4. Prince Frederick Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No – Local Force Main Supports Public Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, Replacement, Sewerage System CCCW&SP & No Impact Prince Frederick Infrastructure PFMP&ZO Blvd./MD 231, Improvement Prince Frederick Objectives & Actions For All Plans

5. Prince Frederick Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No – Local Pump Station Supports Public Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, Improvement, Sewerage System CCCW&SP & No Impact Phase 1, Prince Infrastructure PFMP&ZO Frederick Improvement Objectives & Actions For All Plans

6. Prince Frederick Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not No – Local Pump Station Supports Public Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, Improvement, Sewerage System CCCW&SP & No Impact Phases 2 & 3, Infrastructure PFMP&ZO Calvert Towne, Improvement South Main Street Objectives & (MD 765), Hawk Actions For All Hill Drive, Prince Plans Frederick

Page 26 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

TABLE N - CONSISTENCY OF CALVERT COUNTY WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, WITH ADOPTED PLANS, 2018 – CONT’D

S

PLAN

ISDICTIONS PROJECTS

LOCAL JUR REPORT PLANS REFERENCE NO. REFERENCE OTHER CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT FROM LAST ANNUAL ANNUAL LAST FROM CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS LOCALLY ADOPTED ADOPTED LOCALLY CONSISTENT WITH CONSISTENT IMPROVEMENTS TO PROJECT/DESCRIPTION ANY ADOPTED PLANS OF ADOPTED PLANS OF ALL OF ALL PLANS ADOPTED IMPLEMENT WITH RESPONSIBILITYWITH FOR FINANCING/CONSTRUCTING ADJOINING ADJOINING STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTIONS

Sewer System Capacity Improvements – Cont’d:

7. Prince Frederick Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not Yes - State, Wastewater Supports Public Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, MDE Revolving Treatment Plant Sewerage System CCCW&SP & No Impact Loan, Estimated (WTP) #1, Plant Infrastructure PFMP&ZO 100% Of Total Upgrade, Improvement Project Budget 415-715 Objectives & Sugar Notch Lane, Actions For All Prince Frederick Plans

8. Solomons Consistent: Consistent: No Consistent Not Yes - State, Wastewater Supports Public Recommendations with CCCP, Applicable, MDE, Treatment Plant Sewerage System CCCW&SP & No Impact Wastewater (WTP) & Infrastructure SMP&ZO Revolving Fund Enhanced Improvement Loan, Grant Nutrient Objectives & funding for ENR Removal (ENR) Actions for All Upgrade, 500 Plans Sweetwater Road, Solomons

Section IV: Plan Implementation and Development Process (5-Year Report)

(A) Has your community completed a five-year mid cycle review or recently updated its comprehensive plan, as indicated in the Comprehensive Plan 10-Year Transition Schedule under §1-207(c)(6) of the Land Use Article? Y N

(Note: See Municipal and County Transition Schedules at: http://planning.maryland.gov/OurWork/compPlans/ten-year.shtml Contact your Regional Planner for additional assistance)

Page 27 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

1. If yes, then skip to (B). Identify year five-year report completed: or; Identify year of comprehensive plan update: (Note: this date must be between 2012-2018)

2. If no, include a five-year mid cycle review summary of the following:

In December 2014, the Planning Commission decided to perform a full review and update of the Calvert County Comprehensive Plan (CCCP). The Planning Commission held a kick-off meeting with the consultants, WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff, in November 2015. In the summer of 2016, informational meetings (overview presentations) were held with the public, so that they could learn about the update process and share their ideas about challenges facing Calvert County.

In September and October of 2016, four interactive workshops were held with citizens, staff, and the consultants to discuss topics and issues in small groups. Five prevailing key topics emerged during the public workshops. In February 2017, the Planning Commission initiated the next step in the process, which was plan development. Five issue identification workshops were held with the public from February to May 2017. Each of these workshops focused on one of the five key topics identified through the public discussions held in 2016.

Also in 2017, the Planning Commission discussed progress on the CCCP update at eight of their regular meetings. The Planning Commission conducted three work sessions, held during special meetings of the Planning Commission, to provide guidance to staff and the consultant in preparing the first draft of the plan. The first draft of the CCCP update was released in October 2017. The draft CCCP was distributed for agency review, and three open house meetings for the public were held in November 2017. The Planning Commission received the first set of agency and public comments on the draft in December 2017.

In January 2018, the Planning Commission received additional comments on the first draft CCCP. Based upon comments, the Planning Commission directed staff and the consultant to include sections on historic preservation and government, include an implementation element, and mention appearance standards that the second draft. In February 2018, the Planning Commission held a joint work session with the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) to review and discuss proposed updates to the CCCP. For its meeting in March 2018, the Planning Commission received a draft of the Heritage Chapter, prepared by the county’s Historic Preservation Specialist, for review. In April 2018, the Planning Commission and staff discussed the direction of the second draft. In addition, there was discussion regarding the Planning Commission requesting funding from the BOCC to update the Calvert County Transportation Plan so that the update could contribute to updating the Calvert County Zoning Ordinance (CCZO).

The Planning Commission held a special meeting in May 2018 to review the second draft of the CCCP (May 2018 Draft) and directed staff to hold three public open houses. The three open houses were held in June 2018. Also in June, the Planning Commission decided to review the May 2018 Draft Plan segment by segment starting in July 2018 with Chapter I, allowing time for public input. The Planning Commission reviewed the draft plan during six work sessions, five of which were held during the Planning Commission’s regular meetings and one during a special meeting. During this time frame, the Planning Commission received and reviewed comments on the second draft

Page 28 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018 from agencies and the public. The Planning Commission took votes on updates and corrections to the draft plan.

At its meeting on November 14, 2018, the Planning Commission voted to send out the draft plan, with the updates and corrections, for agency review for 60 days as the recommended plan. A third draft of the CCCP (December 2018 Draft) was prepared and distributed to the agencies in December 2018. Per the Annotated Code of Maryland, Land Use Article, the Planning Commission must provide copies of the recommended plan to adjoining jurisdictions, state units, regional units, and local jurisdictions responsible for financing or constructing public improvements necessary to implement the plan, at least 60 days before holding its public hearing on the plan.

Also as part of the December 2018 draft review, the Planning Commission recommended to the BOCC that the 1997 Calvert County Transportation Plan also be updated. The December 2018 draft Plan was sent forward to the BOCC as the Planning Commission’s recommended CCCP on March 20, 2019 via Certification of Maryland Annotated Code, Land Use §3-203(f) and Resolution PCR 19-01.

The BOCC held a public hearing on the recommended plan on April 30, 2019 to receive public comments. A BOCC work session with Planning Staff was scheduled for May 14, 2019.

Once adopted, the updated CCCP will evaluate the progress made in achieving the goals, objectives, and benchmarks of the Comprehensive Plan since the 2010 amendment and will address Items 2(i) – (vi), below.

(i). Development trends contained in the previous annual reports filed during the period covered by the narrative;

(ii). The status of comprehensive plan implementation tools such as comprehensive rezoning to carry out the provisions of the comprehensive plan;

(iii). Identification of any significant changes to existing programs, zoning ordinances, regulations, financing programs, or State requirements necessary to achieve the visions and goals of the comprehensive plan during the remaining planning timeframe;

(iv). Identification of any state or federal laws, regulations, or requirements that have impeded local implementation of the comprehensive plan and recommendations to remove any impediments;

(v). Future land use challenges and issues; and

(vi). A summary and expected timeframe of any potential updates to the comprehensive plan.

Page 29 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

(Note: A copy of the 5-Year Report Form is available at: http://planning.maryland.gov/YourPart/SGGAnnualReport.shtml)

(B) In the current reporting year, did your jurisdiction identify any recommendations for improving the planning and development process within the jurisdiction? Y N 1. If no, go to (C).

2. If yes, what were those recommendations?

Publication of a new quarterly newsletter “Breaking Ground” to inform the development community of changes instituted in development review procedures to provide a more streamlined process and to improve communication and customer service for the county and its stakeholders.

(C) In the current reporting year, did your jurisdiction adopt any ordinances or regulations needed to implement the 12 planning visions under §1-201 of the Land Use Article? Y N 1. If no, go to Section V: Measures and Indicators.

2. If yes, what were those changes?

Section V: Measures and Indicators (§1-208(c)(1))

Note: The Measures and Indicators, Section VII, is only required for jurisdictions issuing more than 50 new residential building permits in the reporting year, as reported in Table 1).

Table 1: New Residential Permits Issued (Inside and Outside the PFA)

Residential PFA Non - PFA Total

# New Residential Permits Issued 266 111 377

(Note: At a minimum, each jurisdiction should submit the information requested in Table 1: New Residential Permits Issued (Inside and Outside the PFA) as part of their Annual Report. If no residential permits were issued, then indicate 0 in each column.)

Page 30 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

Table 2A: Amount of Residential Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA)

Residential – Calendar Year 2018 PFA Non - PFA Total Total # Minor Subdivisions Recorded† 1 4 5 Total # Minor Subdivisions Approved* 2 10 12 Total # Minor Subdivision Lots Approved* 6 30 36 Total # Minor Subdivision Units Approved* 6 30 36 Total Approved Minor Subdivision Area (Gross Acres)* 1.45 524.80 526.25 Total Approved Minor Subdivision Lot Area (Net Acres) 1.21 216.34 217.55 Total # Major Subdivisions Recorded † 0 1 1 Total # Major Subdivisions Approved* 0 0 0 Total # Major Subdivision Lots Approved* 0 0 0 Total # Major Subdivision Units Approved* 0 0 0 Total Approved Major Subdivision Area (Gross Acres)* 0 0 0 Total Approved Major Sub. Lot Area (Net Acres)* 0 0 0 Total # Units Constructed in Jurisdiction 347 147 494 Total # Units Demolished** N/A N/A N/A Total # Units Reconstructed/Replaced** N/A N/A N/A † See Table A.2 for information related to recorded Major subdivisions (Residential & Non-residential). * Applications that have received Preliminary approval and have been accepted for final subdivision review, but not yet recorded. Does not included subdivisions that have received conceptual or preliminary approval only. **Not required.

Table 2B: Net Density of Residential Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA) Residential PFA Non – PFA Total Total # Units Approved (Major + Minor Subdivisions)* 6 30 36 Total # Approved Lot Area (Major + Minor Sub.)* 1.21 216.34 217.55 * Applications that have received Preliminary approval and have been accepted for final subdivision review, but not yet recorded. Does not include subdivisions that have received conceptual or preliminary approval only.

Table 2C: Share of Residential Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA) Residential PFA Non – PFA Total Total # Units Approved (Major + Minor Subdivisions)* 6 30 36 % of Total Units (# Units/Total Units) 16.7% 83.3% 100%

* Applications that have received Preliminary approval and have been accepted for final subdivision review. Does not included subdivisions that have received conceptual or preliminary approval only.

Page 31 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

Table 3A: Amount of Commercial Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA)

Commercial – Calendar Year 2018 PFA Non - PFA Total Total Site Plan Area Final Approved (Gross Acres) 65.581 21.526 87.107 Total Building Square Feet Final Approved (Gross) 86,795 26,740 113,535 Total # New Permits Issued 18 19 37 Total Square Feet Constructed in Jurisdiction (Gross) 219,998 115,536 335,534

Table 3B: Net Density of Commercial Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA)

Commercial – Calendar Year 2018 PFA Non – PFA Total Total Building Square Feet Final Approved (Gross) 86,795 26,740 113,535 Total Lot Size (Net Acres) of Final Approval 18.17 3.32 21.49

Table 3C: Share of Commercial Growth (Inside and Outside the PFA) Commercial - Calendar Year 2018 PFA Non – PFA Total Total Building Square Feet Final Approved (Gross) 86,795 26,740 113,535

% of Total Building Square Feet of Final Approved 76.45% 23.55% 100% (Building Square Feet/Total Approved Square Feet)

Page 32 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018 Section VI: (Locally) Funded Agricultural Land Preservation (A) How many acres were preserved using local agricultural land preservation funding? Enter 0 if no acres were preserved using local funds. See Table O below.

TABLE O - LOCALLY FUNDED AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION, 2018 TAX RECORD PROGRAM APD NAME MAP PARCEL ACRES REFERENCE /DATE Calvert County APD APD Edith Lorraine Rerecording 27 116 58 5293/001 85-12 Bowen 12/19/18

Rural Legacy N/A King Calvert 6 309 64.86 5293/464 12/14/18

TOTAL: 122.86

Section VII: Local Land Use Percentage Goal

(A) Is all land within the boundaries of the jurisdiction in the PFA? Y N

1. If yes, then the local land use percentage goal does not need to be established. Skip to Section VIII: Development Capacity Analysis.

2. If no, then the jurisdiction must establish a local percentage goal to achieve the statewide land use goal, under §1-208(2) of the Land Use Article, to increase the current percentage of growth located inside the PFAs and decrease the percentage of growth (new lots and new residential units) located outside the PFAs. Go to (B).

(B) What is the jurisdiction’s established local land use percentage goal? The CCCP as amended in 2010 established at least 40,000 acres of farm and forest land are to be preserved (which equates to approximately 28.6% of County’s total land mass) and 90% of existing forest is to be retained.

(C) What is the timeframe for achieving the local land use percentage goal? Except for the provision of the ECTC Office Parks, no time frame has been established for the Benchmarks or CCCP, as amended in 2010.

(D) Has there been any progress in achieving the local land use percentage goal? Progress in achieving the established local land-use Benchmarks will be evaluated as part of the adopted Comprehensive Plan. As of 2018, the total amount of agricultural land preserved in Calvert County equates to approximately 27,789.72 acres. See (F) below for the amount of agricultual land preserved by program.

Page 33 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

(E) What are the resources necessary for infrastructure inside the PFAs? Funding resources for infrastructure construction are identified annually in the county’s six- year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The fiscal cycles for the county’s CIP begin July 1st and end June 30th. Consequently, all projects listed under Section IB and IIIB of this report were included in the Calvert County Adopted Operating and Capital Budget for Fiscal Years 2017- 2018 and 2018-2019 with funding, Design/Engineering and/or construction scheduled in calendar year 2018.

(F) What are the resources necessary for land preservation outside the PFAs? In 2010, the county adopted amendments to the 2004 Comprehensive Plan and designated “Priority Preservation Areas”. This element was required for the county to maintain its certification under the Maryland’s Agricultural Certification Program.

The following are the primary programs used by the county for land preservation:

Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation (MALPF): As of 2018, 35 easements have been purchased in Calvert County under this program, restricting 4,715 acres of land from development.

Maryland Rural Legacy Program (RL): In addition to the 64.86 acres preserved in 2018, 1,847.86 acres have been previously preserved under this program according to the Land Preservation Parks and Recreation Plan, for a total of 1,912.72 acres.

Maryland Environmental Trust (MET): Approximately 825 acres to date.

Calvert County Agricultural Preservation Program: Utilizes Transferable Development Rights (TDRs) to permanently preserve farm and forest lands. There are three mechanisms for preserving properties within the county’s program: private market sale of TDRs, the Purchase and Retirement (PAR) program, and Levering and Retirement (LAR) program. Funding for both PAR and LAR purchases have included such sources as: agricultural land transfer tax, recordation taxes, Southern Maryland Agricultural Development Commission grants, and the Tobacco Buyout Fund. Under the PAR program, the county sets the price and maximum number of the TDRs that may be purchased from the seller each year. Under the LAR program, there is no restriction on the number of TDRs that may be sold to the county. The seller receives annual tax free interest payments and then a lump sum payment of principal at the end of the specified term. A total of 20,337 acres have been preserved through the county’s TDR programs. The Department of Planning & Zoning is currently conducting an inventory of the Calvert County Agricultural Preservation Program.

Page 34 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

Section VIII: Development Capacity Analysis (DCA)

(A) Has an updated DCA been submitted with your Annual Report or to MDP within the last three years?

(Note: A DCA is required every 3-years and whenever there is a significant change in zoning or land use pattern. See §1-208(c)(iii) of the Land Use Article. A DCA may be submitted independently from the Annual Report, such as, part of a comprehensive plan update.)

Y N 1. If no, explain why an updated DCA has not been submitted, such as, no Substantial growth changes, etc.

2. If yes, skip to (B) (Note: MDP provides technical assistance to local governments in completing development capacity analyses. Please contact your MDP regional planner for more information.)

(B) When was the last DCA submitted? Identify Month and Year:

The most recent DCA was submitted June 2018, with the 2017 Annual Report.

(C) Using the DCA, provide the following data on capacity inside and outside the PFA in Table 9, Residential Development Capacity (Inside and Outside the PFA):

Table 9: Residential Development Capacity (Inside and Outside the PFA)*

Parcels & Lots w/ Residential Capacity PFA Non – PFA Total Residentially Zoned Acres w/ Capacity 1,055 19,935 20,990 Residential Parcel & Lots w/ Capacity 2,726 2,372 5,098 Residential Capacity (Units) 2,743 2,877 5,620 *Does Not include capacity within Town Centers.

Section IX: Adequate Public Facility Ordinance (APFO) Restrictions (Section IX is only required by jurisdictions with adopted APFOs)

(A) Does your jurisdiction have any adopted APFOs? Y N 1. If no, skip this Section. 2. If yes, go to (B).

Page 35 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

(B) Has your jurisdiction submitted a biennial APFO Report under §7-104 of the Land Use Article? Y N 1. If yes, skip this Section. 2. If no, then complete (C) through (I) below for each restriction. (Note: Jurisdictions with adopted APFOs must submit a biennial APFO report when a restriction within the PFA occurs within the reporting period. The APFO report is due by July 1 of each even year and covers the reporting period for the previous two calendar years. The last cycle included years 2014 and 2015 and the APFO report was due by July 1, 2016. APFO reports for 2016 and 2017 are due July 1, 2018.)

The Calvert County Biennial APFO Report for 2016-2017 was attached as Appendix C to the 2017 Annual Report. Copies of the Adequate Public Facilities Reports for Schools for April 1, 2018, (Appendix D.1) and November 1, 2018 (Appendix D.2) have also been included with this report.

(C) What is the type of infrastructure affected? (List each for Schools, Roads, Water, Sewer, Stormwater, Health Care, Fire, Police or Solid Waste.)

(D) Where is each restriction located? (Identify on a map if possible.)

(E) Describe the nature of what is causing each restriction.

(F) What is the proposed resolution of each restriction (if available)?

(G) What is the estimated date for the resolution of each restriction (if available)?

(H) What is the resolution that lifted each restriction (if applicable)?

(I) When was each restriction lifted (if applicable)?

(J) Has your jurisdiction reported the restrictions reported in (C) through (I) above as part of the required biennial APFO annual reporting requirements?

Y N

Page 36 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

Section X: Planning Survey Questions (Optional)

The information provided can assist MDP and MDOT staff with identifying potential pedestrian/bicycle projects and project funding.

(A) Does your jurisdiction have a bicycle and pedestrian plan? Y N

1. Plan name 2. Date Completed (MM/DD/YR) 3. Has the plan been adopted? Y N 4. Is the plan available online? Y N 5. How often do you intend to update it? (Every ____ years) 6. Are existing and planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities mapped? Y N

(B) Does your jurisdiction have a transportation functional plan in addition to your comprehensive plan? Y N

1. Plan name Calvert County Transportation Plan 2010 2. Date completed (MM/DD/YY) November 5, 1997 3. Has plan been adopted? Y N 4. Is the plan available online? Y N 5. How often do you intend to update it?

Note: Currently in the process of updating the 1997 Transportation Plan.

Section XI: Submitting Annual Reports and Technical Assistance

(A) Annual Reports may be submitted via email to [email protected] or one copy may be mailed to:

Office of the Secretary Maryland Department of Planning 301 W. Preston Street, Suite 1101 Baltimore, Maryland 21201-2305 Attn: David Dahlstrom, AICP

(B) Annual Reports should include a cover letter indicating that the Planning Commission has approved the Annual Report and acknowledging that a copy of the Annual Report has been filed with the local legislative body. The cover letter should indicate a point of contact(s) if there are technical questions about your Annual Report. Before emailing the Annual Report:

1. Was this Annual Report approved by the planning commission/board? Y N 2. Was this Annual Report filed with the local legislative body? Y N 3. Does the cover letter: a. Acknowledge that the planning commission/board has approved the Annual Report. Y N

Page 37 of 38 Annual Report Worksheet Reporting (Calendar) Year 2018

b. Acknowledge that the Annual Report has been filed with the local legislative body? Y N

c. Answer if all members of the Planning Commission/Board and Board of Appeals have completed an educational training course as required under under §1-206(a)(2) of the Land Use Article? Y N

(Note: See Planning.Maryland.gov/YourPart/MPCA/PCBZACompletedEd.shtml for a list having completed the course.)

d. Indicate a point of contact(s)? Y N

(C) You may wish to send an additional copy of your Annual Report directly to your MDP Regional Office via email or hardcopy.

(D) If you need any technical assistance in preparing or submitting your reports, our Regional Planners are available to assist you. Regional Planner contact information can be found at: Planning.Maryland.gov/OurWork/local-planning-staff.shtml

(E) Copies of this Annual Report worksheet and links to legislation creating these Annual Report requirements can be found on the Maryland Department of Planning website: Planning.Maryland.gov/YourPart/SGGAnnualReport.shtml

(F) If you have any suggestions to improve this worksheet or any of the annual report materials, please list or contact David Dahlstrom at [email protected].

Page 38 of 38 APPENDIX A μ Annual Report Calvert County Priority Funding Areas, Priority Preservation Areas, and Town Centers 2018

Legend

HIGHWAYS

Town Center

MUNICIPALITIES-NEW

Priority_Funding_Areas

Town Center 1 Mile Radius

PRIORITY_PRESERVATION_AREA

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 6-5-2019.

APPENDIX B

Abbreviations for Capacity Improvement Charts, Section III(B), Tables K-N

BOCC (Calvert County) Board of County Commissioners CCCP Calvert County Comprehensive Plan; adopted 2004, amended 2010 and 2017 CCCP Calvert County Comprehensive Plan not yet adopted by the BOCC DRAFT or DRAFT CCCP CCPSCMP Calvert County Public Schools 5-Year Comprehensive Master Plan; adopted 11/18/2016 CCTP Calvert County 2010 - 2030 Transportation Plan; adopted 03/10/1998 CCCSWMP Calvert County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan, 2006 – 2018; adopted 2010, last amended 2017 CCCW&SP Calvert County Comprehensive Water and Sewer Plan 2014 Update; adopted 01/13/ 2016 DMP&ZO Dunkirk Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance; adopted 07/28/1987, last revised 05/04/2012 HMP&ZO Huntingtown Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance; adopted 10/5/1993, last revised 09/04/2015 LTCMP&ZO Lusby Town Center Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance; adopted 01/08/2002, last amended 11/31/2018 MDE Maryland Department of the Environment OTCMP&ZO Owings Town Center Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance; adopted 06/27/2000, last amended 05/04/2012 PFMP&ZO Prince Frederick Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance; adopted 07/11/1989, last amended 06/06/2018 STCMP&ZO Solomons Town Center Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance; Master Plan adopted 08/25/2009, Zoning Ordinance effective date (adopted) 09/22/2009, and last amended 01/31/2018 SLMP St. Leonard Master Plan; Effective Date (Adopted) 11/26/2013 SLZO St. Leonard Zoning Ordinance; Adopted 09/19/1995, last amended 05/04/2012 TAP Maryland Department of Transportation/Transportation Assistance Program

APPENDIX C

Table of Contents for Maps Page Subject Section C.1 Residential (Section V)

C.2 Commercial (Section V)

C.3 Zoning (Section I)

C.4 Text Amendments (Section 1)

C.5 School Capacity (Section IB & IIIB)

C.6 Water Projects (Section IB & IIIB)

C.7 Sewer Projects (Section IB & IIIB)

C.8 School Adequate Public (Section IB & IIIB) Facilities C.9 Transportation (Section IB & IIIB)

C.10 Public Utilities (Section IB & IIIB)

C.11 Site Plans (Section IB & V)

C.12 Subdivisions (Section IB & V)

C.13 Development Review (Section V)

C.14 Residential Units Constructed (Section V Table 2A)

C.15 Commercial Sq. Ft. (Section V Table 3C) Constructed

µ Annual Report !( 1!(!(!( Residential Permits

!( «¬260!( 2018

2 !(!( 43 !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( 5 !( 76 «¬260 8 «¬4 !( !( !( «¬2 !( 261 !(«¬ 9 10 !(!(!( 12 !( «¬262 11!( !( !( 13 14 15 !( 16 !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( 263 !( 172/4 !(!( «¬ 19 !( «¬ 18 !( «¬521

20!( !( 21 22 402 !( !(!(!(!( «¬ !(!(

!( 23 24!(!( 25!(!( !( «¬2/4 !( 231 «¬ !(!(!( !( !( !( 26 27 !( !(!(!( 28 509 !( !( !( «¬ «¬506

!(!(!( 29 30 !( 31 32

!( 264 265 !( «¬ «¬ !( !( !( 33 !( 35 36 !( 34 «¬4

!( Legend !( !( 37 !(!( 403938 PRIORITY FUNDING !( !( Residential Permit = 2018 «¬497 !(!(!(!( 41 42!( 43 PFA In & Out !(!( !( IN PFA=265 !( 2/4 «¬ !( !( OUT PFA=112 !(!( !( !( 44!(!( !( 45 Total 377 Permits !( !( !( Tax Map Grid !( 4746 Miles 1.50.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 Appendix C.1 (Section V)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. µ Annual Report 1 Commercial Permits

«¬260!( 2018 2 3 4

!(

5 6 7 !( 8 «¬260 !( «¬4 !( «¬2 9 10 11 12 «¬261 «¬262 15 13 14 «¬2/4 16

17 18 19 !( «¬263

521 20 «¬ 21 22 !( !( «¬402 !(!(!(!(!( 2/4!( 23 24 «¬!( 25 !(

!( !( 26 «¬231 27 28 !( «¬509 «¬506

29 30 31 32

«¬2/4 34 33 «¬264 35 36 «¬265

Legend 37 38 39 40 PRIORITY FUNDING !( !( !( Commercial Permit = 2018 !( «¬497 41 42 «¬765 PFA In & Out 43 !( IN PFA=26 2/4 45 !( OUT PFA=11 «¬ 44 «¬760 Total = 37 Permits !(

Tax Map Grid 46 47 Miles 1.50.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 Appendix C.2 (Section V)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. µ Annual Report 1 Zoning Map Amendments 2018 «¬260 2 3 4 Legend PRIORITY FUNDING

Zoning Map Amendments = 2018 5 6 7 «¬260 8 «¬4 PFA In & Out !( IN PFA=3 - Countywide Programs «¬2 «¬261 !( OUT PFA=1 9 10 11 12 Total = 4 Permits 262 «¬ Tax Map Grid 13 14 15 16 «¬2/4 19 17 18 «¬263 «¬521

20 21 22 «¬2/4 «¬402 23 242. !( 4. 25

«¬231 3. 26 27 28 «¬508 «¬509 «¬506

29 30 31 32 «¬2/4 34 33 35 36 «¬264 «¬265 37 38 39 40

«¬497 1. Historic District - Kent-Millard House. Lusby 41 42 43 2. Adoption of Revised C.C. Land Preserv. Parks & Rec. Plan 1. !( «¬2/4 45 3. Adoption of the C. C. 2017 Hazard Mitagation Plan Update. 44 «¬760 4. Application with MD Transit Admin. with various grants under Fed. Transit Act. - Items 1-3 are Countywide Programs 46 47 Miles 1.50.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 Appendix C.3 (Section I-D & Section II-B)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. Annual Report µ 1 Text Amendments 2018 «¬260 2 3 4

5 76 8 «¬260 «¬4 «¬2 9 10 11 12 «¬261 «¬262 15 13 14 16 «¬2/4

17 18 19 «¬263 ¬263 «¬521 «

20 21 22 «¬2/4 «¬402 COUNTY WIDE 23 24 !( 25 «¬231

26 27 28 ¬508 «¬509 « «¬506

29 30 31 32

«¬2/4 33 «¬264 34 36 35 «¬265 Legend 37 38 39 40 PRIORITY FUNDING

Text Amendments = 2018 «¬497 «¬765 PFA In & Out 41 42 43 !( IN PFA=1

!( OUT PFA=0 «¬2/4 «¬760 Total = 1 Permit 44 45

Tax Map Grid 46 47 Miles 1.50.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 Appendix C.4 (Section 1-C)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. Annual Report µ 1 School Capacity

«¬260 2018 2 3 4

5 6 7 ¬260 8 «¬2/4 « NORTHERN MIDDLE SCHOOL !( «¬2 9 10 11 «¬261 12 «¬262 15 13 14 16 «¬2/4 NORTHERN HIGH SCHOOL !( 17 18 19 «¬263 «¬521 20 21 22 BOARD OF EDUCATION BUILDING !( «¬402 23 24 «¬2/4 25

«¬231 26 27 28 «¬509 «¬506

29 30 31 32 «¬265 «¬2/4 33 34 35 36 «¬264 Legend 37 38 39 40 PRIORITY FUNDING «¬2/4 School Capacity = 2018 «¬497 PFA In & Out 41 42 43 !( IN PFA=0

!( OUT PFA=3 760 Total = 3 Count 44 «¬ 2/4 45 Tax Map Grid «¬ 46 47 Miles 1.50.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 Appendix C.5 (Section 1-B & 3-B)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. Annual Report µ 1 Water Projects ¬«260 2018 2 3 4

Legend

5 6 7 ¬«260 8 PRIORITY FUNDING ¬«4 Water Projects = 2018

¬«2 PFA In & O ut ¬«261 9 10 11 12 !( IN PFA=5 !( OUT PFA=1 ¬«262 Total = 6 Count 15 Tax Map Grid 13 14 ¬«2/4 16

17 18 263¬« 19

¬«521

20 21 22

¬«402 3.!( ¬«2/4 23 6.!( 25

¬«231 24

26 27 28 ¬«508 ¬«509

¬«506

29 30 315. !( 32

¬«265

34 ¬«2/4 33 ¬«264 35 36

37 38 39 40 2. !( ¬«497 1. Back Creek Loop, Dowell Rd & Williams St, Solomons 41 42 43 2. Cove Point Community Water System, Lusby 3. Prince Frederick Blvd. Water Main, Prince Frederick ¬«2/4 45 44 !(1. ¬«760 4. Solomons Well #3, Solomons 4. !( 5. St. Leonard Well & Elevated Storage, Md 765, St. Leonard 6. West Prince Frederick Storage Tank, Prince Frederick 46 47 Miles 1.50.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 Appendix C.6 (Section 1-B & Section 3-B)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. µ Annual Report 1 Sewer Projects «¬260 2 3 4 2018

«¬260 Legend 5 6 7 8 «¬4 PRIORITY FUNDING Sewer Projects = 2018 «¬2 261 PFA In & Out 9 10 11 «¬ !( IN PFA=5 12 !( OUT PFA=3 «¬262 Total = 8 Count 13 14 «¬2/4 16 Tax M ap Grid 15

17 18 19 «¬263 «¬521 «¬263

20 21 22 «¬2/4 «¬402 7. 6. 234. 24 !(!( 25 !( !( 5. 27 26 «¬231 28 «¬509 «¬508 «¬506

29 30 31 32

«¬264 33 «¬2/4 36 34 «¬265 35

37 38 39 40

1. 1. Cove Point Community Sewer System, Lusby 8. 497 !( !( 765 «¬ 2. Dowell Rd Wastewater Pump Station (WPS) Upgrade, Dowell 41 42 3.!(«¬ 3. Lusby Pump Station & Collection System, Lusby Town Center 43 «¬2/4 4. Prince Frederick Force Main Replacement. P.F.Blvd./Md. 231 45 2. 5. Prince Frederick Pump Station Improvements, Phase I 44 !( «¬760 6. Prince Frederick Pump Station Improvements, Phase II & III 7. Prince Frederick Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP#1) 8. Solomons Wasterwater Treatment Plant (WTP & ENR) Upgrade. 46 47 Miles 1.50.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 Appendix C.7 (Section I-B & Section III-B)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. µ Annual Report 1 APF Schools

260 4 «¬ 2018 2 3 «¬ 4

Legend 1.!( PRIORITY FUNDING 5 6 7 260 8 «¬ Water Projects = 2018 2.!(!( PFA In & Out «¬2 !( IN PFA=0 261 9 3. 10 11 12 «¬ !( OUT PFA=3 Total = 8 Count ¬262 « Tax Map Grid 13 14 «¬2/4 16 15

17 18 19 «¬263 «¬263 «¬521

20 21 22

«¬402 23 24 25

«¬231 27 28 26 2/4 «¬ 509 «¬508 «¬506 «¬

29 30 31 32

«¬265 2/4 33 «¬264 «¬ 36 34 35

37 38 39 40

«¬497 «¬765 41 42 43 1. Mt. Harmony Elementary School 44«¬760 45 2. Northern High School «¬2/4 3. Northern Middle School 46 47

Miles 1.5 0.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 Appendix C.8 (Section I-B & Section III-B)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. µ Annual Report 1 Transportation 1.!( 2 3 4 2018

10. !( Legend 5 76 6. !( 8 PRIORITY FUNDING Transportation = 2018

PFA In & Out 9 10 11 12 !( IN PFA=6 !( OUT PFA=4

Total = 10 Count 13 14 15 16 Tax Map Grid

17 18 19

20 21 22

5.!( 4. 8.!( !( 9.!( 23 24 !(!( 7. 25 3.

26 27 28

29 30 31 32

33 34 35 36

1. Brickhouse Rd/Md. 260 Intersection. Dunkirk 37 38 39 40 2. Dowell Rd Widening 3. Prince Frederick Blvd./Md. 231 Intersection 4. Prince Frederick Loop Rd. Fox Run Bvld/ Dares Beach Rd 41 42 43 5. Prince Frederick Loop Rd & Traskers Blvd. 6. Pushaw Station Rd Improvements, Owings 2.!( 7. Sidewalk Program. Town Center, Countywide 44 45 8. Barstow Rd, Leitches Wharf Rd. Prince Frederick 9. West Dares Beach Rd Improvements, Prince Frederick 10. Boyd's Turn Rd Improvements, Phase 2. Owings 46 47

Miles 1.50.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 Appendix C.9 (Section I-B & Section III-B)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. µ Annual Report 1 Public U tilities ¬«260 2 3 4 2 0 1 8 ¬«4

Legend 5 6 7 ¬«260 8 PRIORITY FUNDING Transportation Projects = 2018 2 ¬« PFA In & Out 261 9 10 11 ¬« !( IN P F A = 6 12 !( O U T P F A = 2 ¬«262 Total = 8 Count 2/4 13 14 ¬« 16 Tax M ap G rid 15

17 18 19 ¬«263 ¬«263 ¬«521

20 21¬«2/4 22 4. ¬«402 3. !( 23 5.!( !(24 25 2.!( ¬«231 26 1.!( 27 28 ¬«508 ¬«509 ¬«506 ¬«264 8. 29 30 31 !( 32

34 ¬«2/4 33 ¬«264 265 36 ¬« 35

37 38 39 40

1. Linda L K elly Anim al Shelter, M d 231. Prince Frederick 6. ¬«497 !(765 2. Prince Frederick V.F.D . 755 S olom ons Island R d. P.F. 41 42 ¬« 43 3. C ounty Adm inistration building. Armory R d. P.F. 7. 4. Calvert Pines Senior Center Expansion. 450 W -Dares Beach Rd !( 5. Barstow Convenience Center Up-grade. 350 Stafford Rd. Barstow 44 ¬«760 45 ¬«2/4 6. A ppeal Landfill Transfer Station. 401 Sw eetw ater R d, Lusby 7. Solom ons V.R.S . & F. Dept. 13150 H.G . Truem an Rd. S oom ons 8. St. Leonard V.F.D. & Resue Sqaud. 200 Calvert Beach Rd. S t. Leonard. 46 47

M i le s 1 .50 .7 5 0 1 .5 3 4 .5 Appendix C.10 (Section I-B & Section III-B

Prepared by: The Departm ent of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. Annual Report µ Approved Site Plans 1 Residential & Non-Residential «¬260 2018 2 3 «¬4 4 5. Legend !( PRIORITY FUNDING

Site Plans = 2018 5 6 7 «¬260 8 PFA In & Out !( IN PFA=6 «¬2 !( OUT PFA=5 11 «¬261 9 10 12 Total = 11 C ount «¬2/4 «¬262 Tax Map Grid 13 14 15 16

3. !( 17 18 19 «¬263 «¬263 «¬521

10. 20 21!( 22 ¬402 1A. « !( 7. 23 24!( 25 8. !(!( 6. «¬231 4. 28 !( 27 26 2/4 «¬508 1. !(«¬ «¬509 «¬506 «¬264 29 30 31 32 «¬2/4 «¬264 33 35 36 34 «¬265 RESIDENTIAL 1A. Beachtree Apartments, lot 1 & outlot A NON-RESIDENTIAL 37 38 39 40 1. Oakland Hall Community Building & Pool 9. 2. The Shoppes & Residences of Lighthouse Inn !( «¬497 3. Life Church 41 42 «¬765 4. Running Hare Vineyard Accessory Stuctures 43 5. Harris Teeter Fuel Pumps at Shoppes at Apple Green 6. Prince Frederick V.F.D. «¬2/4 44 760 45 7. St. Johns Vianney Food Pantary «¬ 8. Prince Frederick Ford Parking Expansion 9. Appeal Training Facility !( 2. 10. Capps Mechanical, LLC Renvation 46 47

Miles 1.50.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 Appendix C.11 (Section I-B & Section V)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. µ Annual Report 1 Approved Subdivisions 2018 ¬«260 2 3 4

1. Legend 5 6 ¬«4 (! 7 ¬«260 8 PRIOR ITY FUNDING Approved Subdivisions = 2018 2 ¬« PFA In & Out 261 9 10 11 12 ¬« !( IN PFA=1 !( OUT PFA=4 262 ¬« Total = 5 Count

2/4 Tax M ap Grid 13 14 ¬« 16 4.(! 15 17 18 19 ¬«263 ¬«263 ¬«521

20 21¬«2/4 22 ¬«402 23 24 25 3. (! ¬«231 2. 26 27 1A. (! 508 28 ¬«509 ¬« ¬«506 (! ¬«264 29 30 31 32 ¬«2/4 33 ¬«264 34 35 36 ¬«265

37 38 39 40

MAJOR ¬«497 1A. Major-Oakland Hall Subdivision Phase III, Lots 116-141 & 144-146 41 42 43 MINOR ¬«2/4 1. Minor-Lambertine Jones Property - lot 1 & buildable Residue 2. Minor-ACLT - Lot 1 44¬«760 45 3. Minor-Guy Hall & Girls, LLC 4. Minor-Carriage Crossing - Lots 1-2 & Buildable Residue, Section 2 46 47 Miles 1.50.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 Appendix C.12 (Section 1-B & Section V)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. Annual Report µ 1 Development Review Recorded Documents «¬260 2 3!( 4 2018 !( !( !( !( Legend 5 6 4 7 260 8 «¬ !( «¬ PRIORITY FUNDING Developed Recorded Documents = 2018 2 «¬ PFA In & Out «¬261 !( IN PFA=20 9 10 11 12 !( OUT PFA=34 «¬262 Total = 54 Count Tax Map Grid «¬2/4 13 14 16 15!( !( !( !( !( !( 17 18 19 «¬263 «¬263 !( ¬521 20 « 21 22 !( «¬402 !( 2/4 23 24 «¬!(!( 25

!( «¬231 !(26!( 27 !( 28!( (! «¬509 «¬508 «¬506

29 30 !( 31 32 !(

Type of Recordation «¬264 «¬2/4 33 36 Subdivision = 10 34 «¬265 35 !( Site Plan = 0 37 38 39 40 Replatting = 34 !(

497 Boundary = 3 ¬765 «¬ 41 42 !( « Condo = 7 «¬760 43 !( Total Count = 54 (! !( !( 44!( !( 45 Miles «¬2/4 !( 1.50.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 !( 46 47 Note: Boundary Surveys & Condominium Plats are given a replat project number for Tracking Purposes. Appendix C.13 ( Section V)

Prepared by The Department of Technology Services 6/4/2019. Annual Report µ Total Residential 1(!! (!(!(!(! Units Constructed 260 «¬(! 2 3(! 4 2018 (!(! (! (! (! (! (! (!! ! ! (( 5 6 «¬4 ( 7 «¬260 ( 8 (! (! ! (! «¬2 ((! !¬261 9 10 11 12(!(!«(! «¬262 (! (! (! «¬2/4 13 14 15 (! 16 (! (!!(! (! (!(!(!(!!((! (!(!( (! 17 18 (! 19(! «¬263 (!(!(!(!(!263 (! (! «¬ (! (! 521 «¬(! «¬2/4 20 21 (! 22 (! (! (! (! «¬402 (!(!(!(! (! (!(! (!(! ( (! (! 23 24 25 ! ((!(!(! (!(! (!(!(!(! (! (!! 26«¬231 ( 27 ! 28 ! (!!((!(!!( (! ( (!(!(!(!(!( «¬509 (! (! (! «¬508 «¬506 (!(!(! 29 30 (! 31 32 2/4 (! «¬ (! (! «¬264 33 (! (!35 36 (! 34 ¬265 ! (!(! (! « ( «¬2/4 37 38 (!39 (! 40 (!(! (! (! (! 497 Legend (! (! «¬ ! PRIORITY FUNDING 41 42 43(!(!(!(!( (! (!(! (! Total Residential Units Constructed = 2018 2/4 (!(! «¬ PFA In & Out (! (! (! !( IN PFA=347 44(!(! «¬760 45 !( (! OUT PFA=147 (! (! (! Total = 494 Count (!(! Tax Map Grid 46 47 Miles 1.50.75 0 1.5 3 4.5 Appendix C.14 (Section V- Table 2A)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019. Annual Report µ Gross Commercial Constructed 1 Square Footage 2018 ¬«260!( 2 3 4 !( !(!( ¬«260 5 76 8 ¬«4 !( !( !( ¬«2 9 10 11 12 ¬«261 ¬«262 13 14¬«2/4 15 16

17 18 19 ¬«263 ¬«263

¬«521 20 21 22 !( ¬«402 !( 23 24 25 !( 28 231 26!(¬« 27 2/4 ¬« ¬«509 ¬«508 ¬«506 29 30 31 32 ¬«2/4 ¬«264 33 ¬«265 35 36 34

2/4 Legend ¬« PRIORITY FUNDING 37 3938 40

Gross Commercial Constructed = 2018 !(!( !( PFA In & Out !(!( ¬«497 !( IN PFA=34 41 42 43

Finish = 937 +218,861 = 219,798 SQ FT Un-Finished = 0 + 200 = 200 SQ FT 45 !( OUT PFA=21 44 Finish = 160 + 113,226 = 113,386 SQ FT ¬«760 ¬«2/4 Un-Finished = 2150 + 0 = 2150 SQ FT !( Total = 55 Count Tax Map Grid 46 47

Miles 2 1 0 2 4 6 Appendix C.15 (Section V- Table 3C)

Prepared by: The Department of Technology Services - 5/5/2019.

Attachment 1 CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES FOR SCHOOLS ENROLLMENTS COMPARED WITH APF RATED CAPACITIES Spring 2018

100% APF 2016-2017 PERCENT 100% APF 2017-2018 PERCENT 100% APF 2017-2018 PERCENT RATED SCHOOL YEAR OF RATED RATED SCHOOL YEAR OF RATED RATED SCHOOL YEAR OF RATED SCHOOL CAPACITY ENROLLMENTS CAPACITY CAPACITY ENROLLMENTS CAPACITY CAPACITY ENROLLMENTS CAPACITY Spring 2017 Spring 2017 Spring 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Spring 2018 Spring 2018 Spring 2018 Note 1 Note 2 Note 1 Note 2 Note 1 Note 2 Elementary Schools APPEAL ELEMENTARY Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 BARSTOW ELEMENTARY 723 551 76.2% 723 549 75.9% 723 563 77.9% BEACH ELEMENTARY 529 562 106.2% 529 557 105.3% 529 561 106.0% CALVERT ELEMENTARY 606 506 83.5% 606 531 87.6% 606 523 86.3% DOWELL ELEMENTARY 713 556 78.0% 713 531 74.5% 713 545 76.4% HUNTINGTOWN ELEMENTARY 601 487 81.0% 601 488 81.2% 601 490 81.5% MT. HARMONY ELEMENTARY 555 588 105.9% 555 606 109.2% 555 611 110.1% MUTUAL ELEMENTARY 562 396 70.5% 562 389 69.2% 562 394 70.1% PATUXENT ELEMENTARY Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 PATUXENT APPEAL CAMPUS* 1,113 826 74.2% 1,113 797 71.6% 1,113 801 72.0% PLUM POINT ELEMENTARY 601 546 90.8% 601 565 94.0% 601 577 96.0% ST. LEONARD ELEMENTARY 653 508 77.8% 653 520 79.6% 653 519 79.5% SUNDERLAND ELEMENTARY 795 692 87.0% 795 662 83.3% 795 670 84.3% WINDY HILL ELEMENTARY 720 689 95.7% 720 680 94.4% 720 689 95.7% Total Elementary 8,171 6,907 84.5% 8,171 6,875 84.1% 8,171 6,943 85.0%

Middle Schools CALVERT MIDDLE 827 594 71.8% 827 571 69.0% 827 571 69.0% MILL CREEK MIDDLE 848 502 59.2% 848 493 58.1% 848 487 57.4% NORTHERN MIDDLE 678 692 102.1% 678 647 95.4% 678 645 95.1% PLUM POINT MIDDLE 869 697 80.2% 869 672 77.3% 869 674 77.6% SOUTHERN MIDDLE 838 479 57.2% 838 473 56.4% 838 478 57.0% WINDY HILL MIDDLE 817 755 92.4% 817 740 90.6% 817 742 90.8% Total Middle 4,877 3,719 76.3% 4,877 3,596 73.7% 4,877 3,597 73.8%

High Schools CALVERT HIGH 1,342 1,200 89.4% 1,361 1,228 90.2% 1,353 1,215 89.8% HUNTINGTOWN HIGH 1,612 1,448 89.8% 1,620 1,467 90.6% 1,617 1,459 90.2% NORTHERN HIGH 1,263 1,446 114.5% 1,259 1,463 116.2% 1,259 1,455 115.6% PATUXENT HIGH 1,183 1,014 85.7% 1,178 1,038 88.1% 1,174 1,030 87.7% Total High 5,400 5,108 94.6% 5,418 5,196 95.9% 5,403 5,159 95.5%

County Total 18,448 15,734 85.3% 18,466 15,667 84.8% 18,451 15,699 85.1%

Notes: 1. High school capacities include the lower number of students attending the morning or afternoon session of the Career and Technology Academy at the beginning of the grading period. 2. FTEs for Pre-K and Special Pre-K are included in elementary school enrollments. Kindergarten students attend full day (policy began in 2006-07 school year). 3. As of Fall 2015, Patuxent Elementary and Appeal Elementary schools are reported as one school, Patuxent Appeal Campus. In previous reports, the schools were reported separately, and referred to as "Appeal Elementary" and "Patuxent Elementary." Based upon information provided by the Calvert County Board of Education, Spring 2018 Enrollment and Career and Technology Academy attendance as of Spring 2018 Prepared by the Department of Planning & Zoning, March 2018 CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Attachment 2 ENROLLMENT COUNT FEBRUARY 2018

SPreK*(93) PreK* (92) K(91) 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL

Barstow Elementary 9 53 82 98 88 85 88 91 532 Beach Elementary 0 38 91 80 90 80 86 115 542 Calvert Elementary 0 39 88 96 81 74 93 71 503 Dowell Elementary 0 40 73 76 82 102 97 95 525 Huntingtown Elementary 0 35 73 87 67 73 80 92 472 Mt. Harmony Elementary 0 0 92 111 101 106 95 106 611 Mutual Elementary 7 28 57 62 58 62 66 71 376 Patuxent Appeal Campus 19 90 97 132 127 119 140 131 746 Plum Point Elementary 5 10 97 95 84 91 96 106 569 St. Leonard Elementary 0 20 90 79 76 85 90 89 509 Sunderland Elementary 15 75 94 103 96 110 104 118 625 Windy Hill Elementary 0 20 113 93 107 105 132 129 679 TOTAL ELEMENTARY 55 448 1047 1112 1057 1092 1167 1214 6689

Calvert Middle 192 204 175 571 Mill Creek Middle 176 156 155 487 Northern Middle 202 216 227 645 Plum Point Middle 205 210 259 674 Southern Middle 182 163 133 478 Windy Hill Middle 249 247 246 742 TOTAL MIDDLE 1206 1196 1195 3597

Calvert High 297 329 277 312 1215 Huntingtown High 387 376 348 348 1459 Northern High 401 356 330 368 1455 Patuxent High 300 275 230 225 1030 TOTAL HIGH 1385 1336 1185 1253 5159

CCPS Alternative School 0 1 1 3 0 4 1 10

Calvert Country School 8 0 0 1 3 3 2 4 4 4 1 3 3 3 7 38 TOTAL SPECIAL SCHOOL 48

GRAND TOTALS 15493

* SP Pre-K and Pre-K Not included in count Home teaching students are included in grade level counts Total PreK 511 Attachment 3 CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS NUMBER OF ELEMENTARY CLASSROOMS AND MIDDLE & HIGH TEACHING STATIONS SCHOOL YEAR 2017-2018

Special ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Pre-K Kindergarten Grades 1-5 Total Education BARSTOW ELEMENTARY 1 4 25 4 34 BEACH ELEMENTARY 1 4 17 3 25 CALVERT ELEMENTARY 1 3 20 6 30 DOWELL ELEMENTARY 1 4 25 3 33 HUNTINGTOWN ELEMENTARY 0 4 21 3 28 MT. HARMONY ELEMENTARY 0 4 19 3 26 MUTUAL ELEMENTARY 1 4 18 4 27 PATUXENT APPEAL CAMPUS* 3 6 37 7 53 PLUM POINT ELEMENTARY 0 4 21 3 28 ST. LEONARD ELEMENTARY 1 5 21 4 31 SUNDERLAND ELEMENTARY 1 4 29 2 36 WINDY HILL ELEMENTARY 2 4 24 4 34

Special MIDDLE SCHOOLS Grades 6-8 Total Education CALVERT MIDDLE 4 37 41 MILL CREEK MIDDLE 4 38 42 NORTHERN MIDDLE 4 30 34 PLUM POINT MIDDLE 4 39 43 SOUTHERN MIDDLE 3 38 41 WINDY HILL MIDDLE 3 37 40

Special HIGH SCHOOLS Grades 9-12 Total Education CALVERT HIGH 2 59 61 HUNTINGTOWN HIGH 2 73 75 NORTHERN HIGH 4 56 60 PATUXENT HIGH 4 52 56

Career and Technology Academy A.M. P.M. Total Enrollment for Fall 2017 CALVERT HIGH 85 79 164 HUNTINGTOWN HIGH 45 74 119 NORTHERN HIGH 45 29 74 PATUXENT HIGH 41 29 70 Total 216 211 427

* As of Fall 2015, Patuxent Elementary and Appeal Elementary schools are reported as one school, Patuxent Appeal Campus. In previous reports, the schools were reported separately, and referred to as "Appeal Elementary" and "Patuxent Elementary." Source: Calvert County Public Schools Classroom/Teaching Station Data, Fall 2017 Career Center Enrollment, Spring 2018 Prepared by the Department of Planning & Zoning, March 2018 Attachment 4 CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENROLLMENTS PRE-KINDERGARTEN THROUGH GRADE 5 Spring 2018

Special Total FTE Round up Enrollment Enrollment School Pre-K Pre-K Pre-K Pre-K Pre-K K to 5 Pre-K to 5

BARSTOW ELEMENTARY 53 9 62 31 31 532 563 BEACH ELEMENTARY 38 0 38 19 19 542 561 CALVERT ELEMENTARY 39 0 39 19.5 20 503 523 DOWELL ELEMENTARY 40 0 40 20 20 525 545 HUNTINGTOWN ELEMENTARY 35 0 35 17.5 18 472 490 MT. HARMONY ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 0 611 611 MUTUAL ELEMENTARY 28 7 35 17.5 18 376 394 PATUXENT APPEAL CAMPUS* 90 19 109 54.5 55 746 801 PLUM POINT ELEMENTARY 10 5 15 7.5 8 569 577 ST. LEONARD ELEMENTARY 20 0 20 10 10 509 519 SUNDERLAND ELEMENTARY 75 15 90 45 45 625 670 WINDY HILL ELEMENTARY 20 0 20 10 10 679 689 TOTAL 448 55 503 251.5 254 6,689 6,943

FTE = Full Time Equivalent * As of Fall 2015, Patuxent Elementary and Appeal Elementary schools are reported as one school, Patuxent Appeal Campus. In previous reports, the schools were reported separately, and referred to as "Appeal Elementary" and "Patuxent Elementary." Enrollment provided by the Calvert County Public Schools, Spring 2018 Prepared by the Department of Planning & Zoning, March 2018 Attachment 5 CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND RATED ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CAPACITIES FOR SCHOOLS Spring 2018

SCHOOL Number of Number of Capacity for Number of Number of Capacity Number of Number of Capacity Number of Number of Capacity Total No. No. of Capacity Capacity Capacity Additional Total No. APF RATED Pre - K Pre - K Pre - K Kindergarten Kindergarteners for Grade 1-5 1-5 Graders for Special Special Ed. for of Students for non SPED for non SPED for Capacity for of CAPACITY Rooms per Rooms per Kindergarten Rooms per Grades 1-5 Education Students Special Ed. Teaching per Teaching Teaching Teaching High Career Classrooms/ Adopted Room Room Room Rooms / per Room / Rooms / Stations Station Stations Stations Schools Center Teaching County Formula Teaching Teaching Teaching (non SPED) (non SPED) Mid. & High Mid. & High SPED & Attendance** Stations Stations Stations Stations Mid. & High Mid. & High Rounded up non SPED ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS APPEAL ELEMENTARY* ------BARSTOW ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 4 22 88 25 23 575 4 10 40 34 723 BEACH ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 4 22 88 17 23 391 3 10 30 25 529 CALVERT ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 3 22 66 20 23 460 6 10 60 30 606 DOWELL ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 4 22 88 25 23 575 3 10 30 33 713 HUNTINGTOWN ELEMENTARY 0 20 0 4 22 88 21 23 483 3 10 30 28 601 MT. HARMONY ELEMENTARY 0 20 0 4 22 88 19 23 437 3 10 30 26 555 MUTUAL ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 4 22 88 18 23 414 4 10 40 27 562 PATUXENT ELEMENTARY* ------PATUXENT APPEAL CAMPUS* 3 20 60 6 22 132 37 23 851 7 10 70 53 1113 PLUM POINT ELEMENTARY 0 20 0 4 22 88 21 23 483 3 10 30 28 601 ST. LEONARD ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 5 22 110 21 23 483 4 10 40 31 653 SUNDERLAND ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 4 22 88 29 23 667 2 10 20 36 795 WINDY HILL ELEMENTARY 2 20 40 4 22 88 24 23 552 4 10 40 34 720 Total Elementary 12 240 50 1,100 277 6,371 46 460 385 8,171

MIDDLE SCHOOLS CALVERT MIDDLE 4 10 40 37 25 * 85% 786.25 787 41 827 MILL CREEK MIDDLE 4 10 40 38 25 * 85% 807.5 808 42 848 NORTHERN MIDDLE 4 10 40 30 25 * 85% 637.5 638 34 678 PLUM POINT MIDDLE 4 10 40 39 25 * 85% 828.75 829 43 869 SOUTHERN MIDDLE 3 10 30 38 25 * 85% 807.5 808 41 838 WINDY HILL MIDDLE 3 10 30 37 25 * 85% 786.25 787 40 817 Total Middle 220 219 4653.75 4654 241 4,877

HIGH SCHOOLS CALVERT HIGH 2 10 20 59 25 * 85% 1253.75 1,254 1,274 79 61 1,353 HUNTINGTOWN HIGH 2 10 20 73 25 * 85% 1551.25 1,552 1,572 45 75 1,617 NORTHERN HIGH 4 10 40 56 25 * 85% 1190 1,190 1,230 29 60 1,259 PATUXENT HIGH 4 10 40 52 25 * 85% 1105 1,105 1,145 29 56 1,174 Total High 120 240 5100 5100 5,221 182 252 5,403

County Total 18,451

* As of Fall 2015, Patuxent Elementary and Appeal Elementary schools are reported as one school, Patuxent Appeal Campus. In previous reports, the schools were reported separately, and referred to as "Appeal Elementary" and "Patuxent Elementary." ** The lower number of students attending the morning or afternoon session of the Career Center as of Spring 2018 Number of classrooms/teaching stations provided by the Board of Education, Fall 2017 Career Center attendance provided by Board of Education, Spring 2018 Prepared by the Department of Planning & Zoning, Spring 2018 CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND Attachment 6 ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REGULATIONS SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITH ADEQUATE/INADEQUATE CAPACITIES HISTORICAL CHART Spring 2018

Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2018 Note A Note B Note B Note B Note B Note B Note B APPEAL ELEMENTARY (Note B) ------BARSTOW ELEMENTARY Fall 2009) BEACH ELEMENTARY CALVERT ELEMENTARY DOWELL ELEMENTARY (Fall 1999) HUNTINGTOWN ELEMENTARY MT. HARMONY ELEMENTARY MUTUAL ELEMENTARY PATUXENT ELEMENTARY (Fall 1992) (Note B) ------PATUXENT APPEAL CAMPUS (Note B) ------PLUM POINT ELEMENTARY ST. LEONARD ELEMENTARY (Fall 1996) SUNDERLAND ELEMENTARY WINDY HILL ELEMENTARY (Fall 1996)

CALVERT MIDDLE MILL CREEK MIDDLE (Late Fall 2000) NORTHERN MIDDLE PLUM POINT MIDDLE SOUTHERN MIDDLE (expanded Fall 1996) WINDY HILL MIDDLE (Fall 1998)

CALVERT HIGH HUNTINGTOWN HIGH (Fall 2004) NORTHERN HIGH PATUXENT HIGH (Spring 1996)

Key: School with inadequate capacity. School district closed to recording of subdivisions/residential site development plans. A School with inadequate capacity. School district deemed adequate for recording of subdivisions/residential site development plans. - School not yet constructed/open.

Notes: A: The elementary school boundaries for Beach, Plum Point and Windy Hill elementary schools took effect in March 2014. New boundaries are included in the Fall 2014 APF Report. B: As of Fall 2015, Patuxent Elementary and Appeal Elementary schools are reported as one school, Patuxent Appeal Campus. In previous reports, the schools were reported separately and referred to as "Appeal Elementary" and "Patuxent Elementary." Prepared by the Department of Planning & Zoning, March 2018 Attachment 7

2017-2018 Student Transfers as of 3-20-18

School Year Building Ins Outs Net

2018 Barstow Elementary School 56 86 -30

Beach Elementary School 15 73 -58

Calvert Elementary School 48 104 -56

Dowell Elementary School 25 35 -10

Huntingtown Elementary School 110 33 77

Mt Harmony Elementary School 113 21 92

Mutual Elementary School 56 29 27

Patuxent Appeal Campus 17 67 -50

Plum Point Elementary School 75 63 12

St. Leonard Elementary School 36 64 -28

Sunderland Elementary School 96 80 16

Windy Hill Elementary School 75 64 11

Northern Middle School 34 15 19

Calvert Middle School 35 35 0

Mill Creek Middle School 20 20 0

Plum Point Middle School 40 19 21

Southern Middle School 19 41 -22

Windy Hill Middle School 17 35 -18

Calvert High School 29 30 -1

Huntingtown High School 30 13 17

Northern High School 10 22 -12

Patuxent High School 13 17 -4 Mar 20, 2018 Attachment 8 CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES FOR SCHOOLS ENROLLMENTS COMPARED WITH APF RATED CAPACITIES STUDENT TRANSFERS Spring 2018

100% APF ENROLLMENT PERCENT NET ENROLLMENT PERCENT RATED (Actual) OF RATED STUDENT WITH OF RATED CAPACITY CAPACITY TRANSFERS NET CAPACITY SCHOOL Spring 2018 Spring 2018 (Actual) STUDENT (DISTRICT) Note 1 Note 2 Spring 2018 TRANSFERS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS APPEAL ELEMENTARY Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 BARSTOW ELEMENTARY 723 563 77.9% -30 593 82.0% BEACH ELEMENTARY 529 561 106.0% -58 619 117.0% CALVERT ELEMENTARY 606 523 86.3% -56 579 95.5% DOWELL ELEMENTARY 713 545 76.4% -10 555 77.8% HUNTINGTOWN ELEMENTARY 601 490 81.5% 77 413 68.7% MT. HARMONY ELEMENTARY 555 611 110.1% 92 519 93.5% MUTUAL ELEMENTARY 562 394 70.1% 27 367 65.3% PATUXENT ELEMENTARY Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 PATUXENT APPEAL CAMPUS (Note 3) 1,113 801 72.0% -50 851 76.5% PLUM POINT ELEMENTARY 601 577 96.0% 12 565 94.0% ST. LEONARD ELEMENTARY 653 519 79.5% -28 547 83.8% SUNDERLAND ELEMENTARY 795 670 84.3% 16 654 82.3% WINDY HILL ELEMENTARY 720 689 95.7% 11 678 94.2%

Total Elementary 8,171 6,943 85.0% 3 6,940 84.9% MIDDLE SCHOOLS CALVERT MIDDLE 827 571 69.0% 0 571 69.0% MILL CREEK MIDDLE 848 487 57.4% 0 487 57.4% NORTHERN MIDDLE 678 645 95.1% 19 626 92.3% PLUM POINT MIDDLE 869 674 77.6% 21 653 75.1% SOUTHERN MIDDLE 838 478 57.0% -22 500 59.7% WINDY HILL MIDDLE 817 742 90.8% -18 760 93.0% Total Middle 4,877 3,597 73.8% 0 3,597 73.8%

HIGH SCHOOLS CALVERT HIGH 1,353 1,215 89.8% -1 1,216 89.9% HUNTINGTOWN HIGH 1,617 1,459 90.2% 17 1,442 89.2% NORTHERN HIGH 1,259 1,455 115.6% -12 1,467 116.5% PATUXENT HIGH 1,174 1,030 87.7% -4 1,034 88.1%

Total High 5,403 5,159 95.5% 0 5,159 95.5%

County Total 18,451 15,699 85.1% 3 15,702 85.1%

Notes: 1. High school capacities include the lower number of students attending the morning or afternoon session of the Career and Technology Academy at the beginning of the grading period. 2. Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) for Pre-K and Special Pre-K are included in elementary school enrollments. Kindergarten students attend full day (policy began in 2006-07 school year). 3. As of Fall 2015, Patuxent Elementary and Appeal Elementary schools are reported as one school, Patuxent Appeal Campus. In previous reports, the schools were reported separately and referred to as "Appeal Elementary" and "Patuxent Elementary." Based upon information provided by the Calvert County Public Schools, Spring 2018 Enrollment and Career and Technology Academy attendance as of Spring 2018 Prepared by the Department of Planning & Zoning, March 2018 Attachment 9

µ CALVERT COUNTY Mt. Harmony SCHOOL DISTRICTS Windy Hill *# Districts closed to the final *# recording of residential subdivisions and residential site development plans. Beach *# Sunderland *#

Elementary Schools: *# Beach Huntingtown Mt. Harmony *# Elementary School Site *# Plum Point

*# *# Calvert

Barstow Chesapeake Bay

Patuxent River # * *# St. Leonard

Mutual

Prepared by Calvert County Appeal/Patuxent Department of Planning & Zoning *#*# October 2017 *# 10,000 5,000 0 10,000 Fee t

Dowell Attachment 10

µ CALVERT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS Windy Hill !( Northern Districts closed to the final recording of residential subdivisions and !( residential site development plans.

Middle Schools:

!( (! Middle School Site

Calvert Plum Point !(

Chesapeake Bay

Patuxent River

Southern

!(

Prepared by Calvert County Department of Planning & Zoning October 2017 !( 9,800 4,900 0 9,800 Fee t Mill Creek µ Attachment 11 CALVERT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS

NORTHERN HS

Districts closed to the final ") recording of residential subdivisions and residential site development plans.

High Schools: ") Northern ") High School Sites HUNTINGTOWN HS CALVERT HS

")

Chesapeake Bay

Patuxent River

PATUXENT HS

Prepared by Calvert County Department of Planning & Zoning October 2017 ") 10,000 5,000 0 10,000 Fee t µ Attachment 12 CALVERT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS

Districts closed to the final recording of residential subdivisions and residential site development plans.

Elementary Schools:

Beach Mt. Harmony

High Schools:

Northern

Chesapeake Bay

Patuxent River

Prepared by Calvert County Department of Planning & Zoning October 2017

9,800 4,900 0 9,800 Fee t DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

TO: Board of County Commissioners VIA: Terry L. Shannon, Count Administrator VIA: J. Mark Willis, Directo / VIA: Britany J. Waddell, AIC', Deputy Director, P1anning3j VIA: Carolyn Sunderland, AICP, Planning Commission Admip.istrat VIA: Jenny Plummer-Welker, AICP, Long Range Planner FROM: Will Hager, Planner II - Environmental DATE: November 26, 2018 SUBJECT: Adequate Public Facilities Report for Schools - November 1, 2018

Background: Adequate public facilities (APF) regulations are a growth management tool that restricts development in areas where facilities are inadequate. Calvert County adopted APF regulations for schools and roads in 1988. The Calvert County Zoning Ordinance states in Article 7-1.05 D.1 that "Schools are adequate when all public elementary and secondary schools which will serve the proposed residential subdivision or residential development will accommodate the pupil yield from that residential subdivision or residential development without exceeding 100 percent of the rated capacity of any of those schools." If facilities are identified as having inadequate capacity, the Department of Planning & Zoning notifies the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners.

The Zoning Ordinance limits the delay of final approval of a residential subdivision or residential development due solely to the lack of adequate school capacity to seven years from the date of preliminary approval. The calculations for determining the elementary, middle, and high school APF rated capacities are specified in the Zoning Ordinance. Determination of school adequacy is not required for non-residential subdivisions or age-restricted housing communities. Subdivisions or parcels that meet certain criteria listed in the Zoning Ordinance are exempt from APF requirements for schools (Article 7-1.05. F).

The municipalities of Chesapeake Beach and North Beach have their own planning and zoning authority. The Calvert County APF regulations do not apply within the municipalities. Neither municipality has adopted APF regulations for schools or roads.

Discussion: Since the spring 2018 report, there was a change to the open/close status of Calvert County schools. Beach Elementary School's enrollment is now below 100% of its APF rated capacity for the first time since 2009.

Two of Calvert County's public schools are deemed to have inadequate capacity, exceeding 100% of the county's APF rated capacities for those schools (Attachment 1, Enrollments Compared with APF Rated Capacities, Fall 2018). Adequate Public Facilities Report - November 1, 2018 Page 2

The following schools have inadequate APF capacities: Mt. Harmony Elementary 110.1% Northern High 100.4%

The attached chart shows the fall 2018 enrollments compared with APF rated capacities for each school. The Calvert County Public School staff provided the enrollment counts and the Career and Technology Academy attendance. There were no changes to the number of elementary school classrooms and the number of middle school teaching stations.

In January 2019 the number of regular teaching stations at Northern High will increase from 56 to 65 due to the new high school opening. This increase in capacity was taken into account when calculating the percent of rated capacity for fall 2018. One more classroom will be added to the number of regular teaching stations at Northern High by fall 2020 to bring the total number of regular teaching stations at Northern High to 66.

For enrollment and teaching station data for each school refer to Attachments 2, 3, and 4. A chart showing the calculation for each school's APF rated capacity is shown in Attachment 5. Historic opening and closing of school districts is shown in Attachment 6.

Maps showing elementary, middle, and high school district status and a composite map of all school levels that are over 100% capacity are attached (Attachments 9, 10, 11 and 12). The maps are for illustrative purposes. The Calvert County Public Schools' written descriptions of school district boundaries determine which school districts serve a residential subdivision or residential development. If there is a question regarding which school district serves a parcel, the Calvert County Public Schools makes the final determination.

Elementary Schools Of the 12 elementary schools, Mt. Harmony Elementary is over capacity at 110.1%. Beach Elementary and Plum Point Elementary are between 90 and 99.9% capacity. The other elementary schools are below 90% capacity.

Middle Schools Of the six middle schools, none are over capacity. Northern Middle and Windy Hill Middle are between 90% and 99.9% capacity. The other middle schools are below 90% capacity.

High Schools Of the four high schools, Northern High is over capacity at 100.4%. Huntingtown High is between 90% and 99.9% capacity. The other high schools are below 90% capacity.

Schools Approaching 100% Capacity The number of lots/units that may be recorded is limited based upon the pupil yield by school level and housing type, which are detailed in the Zoning Ordinance.

Student Transfer Analysis In August, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners requested staff include in future reports an analysis of the impact Calvert County Public School's policy regarding student transfers has on the APF Adequate Public Facilities Report - November 1, 2018 Page 3 school capacities. Calvert County Public Schools provided a chart of student transfers for each school for the fall of 2018 (Attachment 7).

For fall of 2018, if the net effect of student transfers were taken into account (meaning if the transfers had not occurred and students remained in the school district in which they live), student transfers would have an impact on whether a school district is to be opened or closed to the recording of residential subdivisions or residential development. If student transfers had not occurred, Mt. Harmony Elementary would be under capacity and Beach Elementary would be over capacity. Student transfers would have no impact on the status of Northern High since it is over capacity and would remain over capacity without student transfers. Refer to the Enrollments Compared with APF Rated Capacities, Student Transfers (Attachment 8).

Fiscal Impact N/A

Conclusion/Recommendation: For your information. The next report will be the April 1, 2019 report.

Attachments: (1)APF for Schools, Enrollments Compared with APF Rated Capacities, Fall 2018 (2)Calvert County Public Schools, Enrollment Count, September 2018 (3)Calvert County Public Schools, Number of Elementary Classrooms/Middle & High Teaching Stations, School Year 2018-2019 (4)Elementary School Enrollments, Pre-Kindergarten through Grade 5, Fall 2018 (5)Rated Adequate Public Facilities Capacities for Schools, Fall 2018 (6)Calvert County APF Regulations, School Districts with Adequate/Inadequate Capacities, Historical Chart, Fall 2018 (7)Calvert County Public Schools, Student Transfers, Fall 2018 (8)APF for Schools, Enrollments Compared with APF Rated Capacities, Student Transfers, Fall 2018 (9)Elementary School Districts over 100% Capacity, Map, November 2018 (10)Middle School Districts over 100% Capacity, Map, November 2018 (11)High School Districts over 100% Capacity, Map, November 2018 (12)School Districts over 100% Capacity, Composite Map, November 2018

AICP American Institute of Certified Planners cc: Calvert County Public Schools, Superintendent and Director of School Construction Engineering/Survey Firms County Attorney Attachment 1 CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES FOR SCHOOLS ENROLLMENTS COMPARED WITH APF RATED CAPACITIES Fall 2018

100% APF 2017-2018 PERCENT 100% APF 2017-2018 PERCENT 100% APF 2018-2019 PERCENT RATED SCHOOL YEAR OF RATED RATED SCHOOL YEAR OF RATED RATED SCHOOL YEAR OF RATED SCHOOL CAPACITY ENROLLMENTS CAPACITY CAPACITY ENROLLMENTS CAPACITY CAPACITY ENROLLMENTS CAPACITY Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Spring 2018 Spring 2018 Spring 2018 Fall 2018 Fall 2018 Fall 2018 Note 1 Note 2 Note 1 Note 2 Note 1 Note 2 Elementary Schools APPEAL ELEMENTARY Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 BARSTOW ELEMENTARY 723 549 75.9% 723 563 77.9% 723 590 81.6% BEACH ELEMENTARY 529 557 105.3% 529 561 106.0% 529 521 98.5% CALVERT ELEMENTARY 606 531 87.6% 606 523 86.3% 606 534 88.1% DOWELL ELEMENTARY 713 531 74.5% 713 545 76.4% 713 558 78.3% HUNTINGTOWN ELEMENTARY 601 488 81.2% 601 490 81.5% 601 489 81.4% MT. HARMONY ELEMENTARY 555 606 109.2% 555 611 110.1% 555 611 110.1% MUTUAL ELEMENTARY 562 389 69.2% 562 394 70.1% 562 397 70.6% PATUXENT ELEMENTARY Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 PATUXENT APPEAL CAMPUS* 1,113 797 71.6% 1,113 801 72.0% 1,113 783 70.4% PLUM POINT ELEMENTARY 601 565 94.0% 601 577 96.0% 601 581 96.7% ST. LEONARD ELEMENTARY 653 520 79.6% 653 519 79.5% 653 518 79.3% SUNDERLAND ELEMENTARY 795 662 83.3% 795 670 84.3% 795 658 82.8% WINDY HILL ELEMENTARY 720 680 94.4% 720 689 95.7% 720 639 88.8% Total Elementary 8,171 6,875 84.1% 8,171 6,943 85.0% 8,171 6,879 84.2%

Middle Schools CALVERT MIDDLE 827 571 69.0% 827 571 69.0% 827 604 73.0% MILL CREEK MIDDLE 848 493 58.1% 848 487 57.4% 848 522 61.6% NORTHERN MIDDLE 678 647 95.4% 678 645 95.1% 678 675 99.6% PLUM POINT MIDDLE 869 672 77.3% 869 674 77.6% 869 633 72.8% SOUTHERN MIDDLE 838 473 56.4% 838 478 57.0% 838 509 60.7% WINDY HILL MIDDLE 817 740 90.6% 817 742 90.8% 817 771 94.4% Total Middle 4,877 3,596 73.7% 4,877 3,597 73.8% 4,877 3,714 76.2%

High Schools CALVERT HIGH 1,361 1,228 90.2% 1,353 1,215 89.8% 1,359 1,156 85.1% HUNTINGTOWN HIGH 1,620 1,467 90.6% 1,617 1,459 90.2% 1,613 1,466 90.9% NORTHERN HIGH 1,259 1,463 116.2% 1,259 1,455 115.6% 1,459 1,465 100.4% PATUXENT HIGH 1,178 1,038 88.1% 1,174 1,030 87.7% 1,185 1,050 88.6% Total High 5,418 5,196 95.9% 5,403 5,159 95.5% 5,616 5,137 91.5%

County Total 18,466 15,667 84.8% 18,451 15,699 85.1% 18,664 15,730 84.3%

Notes: 1. High school capacities include the lower number of students attending the morning or afternoon session of the Career and Technology Academy at the beginning of the grading period. 2. FTEs for Pre-K and Special Pre-K are included in elementary school enrollments. Kindergarten students attend full day (policy began in 2006-07 school year). 3. As of Fall 2015, Patuxent Elementary and Appeal Elementary schools are reported as one school, Patuxent Appeal Campus. In previous reports, the schools were reported separately, and referred to as "Appeal Elementary" and "Patuxent Elementary." Based upon information provided by the Calvert County Board of Education, Fall 2018 Enrollment and Career and Technology Academy attendance as of Fall 2018 Prepared by the Department of Planning & Zoning, November 2018 CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Attachment 2 ENROLLMENT COUNT SEPTEMBER 2018

SP PRE-K* PRE-K* K 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL

Barstow Elementary 6 55 95 83 110 92 91 88 559 Beach Elementary 29 72 90 81 90 81 92 506 Calvert Elementary 34 77 79 96 87 80 98 517 Dowell Elementary 35 87 87 82 81 105 98 540 Huntingtown Elementary 30 74 91 88 65 72 84 474 Mt. Harmony Elementary 104 90 116 102 104 95 611 Mutual Elementary 7 26 60 58 61 61 68 72 380 Patuxent Appeal Campus 10 81 130 92 131 128 119 137 737 Plum Point Elementary 8 7 82 112 96 94 94 95 573 St. Leonard Elementary 18 84 79 85 79 86 96 509 Sunderland Elementary 17 66 109 87 113 94 111 102 616 Windy Hill Elementary 19 100 97 94 105 108 125 629 TOTAL ELEMENTARY 48 400 1074 1045 1153 1078 1119 1182 6651

Calvert Middle 199 194 211 604 Mill Creek Middle 165 184 173 522 Northern Middle 248 208 219 675 Plum Point Middle 208 210 215 633 Southern Middle 160 176 173 509 Windy Hill Middle 271 259 241 771 TOTAL MIDDLE 1251 1231 1232 3714

Calvert High 254 298 303 301 1156 Huntingtown High 363 396 354 353 1466 Northern High 387 393 341 344 1465 Patuxent High 261 292 262 235 1050 TOTAL HIGH 1265 1379 1260 1233 5137

CCPS Alternative School 1 1 2

Calvert Country School 8 1 2 2 3 4 4 1 4 4 5 30 TOTAL SPECIAL SCHOOL 32

GRAND TOTALS 15534

* SP Pre-K and Pre-K Not included in count Home teaching students are included in grade level counts Total PreK 456 Attachment 3 CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS NUMBER OF ELEMENTARY CLASSROOMS AND MIDDLE & HIGH TEACHING STATIONS SCHOOL YEAR 2018-2019

Special ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Pre-K Kindergarten Grades 1-5 Total Education BARSTOW ELEMENTARY 1 4 25 4 34 BEACH ELEMENTARY 1 4 17 3 25 CALVERT ELEMENTARY 1 3 20 6 30 DOWELL ELEMENTARY 1 4 25 3 33 HUNTINGTOWN ELEMENTARY 0 4 21 3 28 MT. HARMONY ELEMENTARY 0 4 19 3 26 MUTUAL ELEMENTARY 1 4 18 4 27 PATUXENT APPEAL CAMPUS* 3 6 37 7 53 PLUM POINT ELEMENTARY 0 4 21 3 28 ST. LEONARD ELEMENTARY 1 5 21 4 31 SUNDERLAND ELEMENTARY 1 4 29 2 36 WINDY HILL ELEMENTARY 2 4 24 4 34

Special MIDDLE SCHOOLS Grades 6-8 Total Education CALVERT MIDDLE 4 37 41 MILL CREEK MIDDLE 4 38 42 NORTHERN MIDDLE 4 30 34 PLUM POINT MIDDLE 4 39 43 SOUTHERN MIDDLE 3 38 41 WINDY HILL MIDDLE 3 37 40

Special HIGH SCHOOLS Grades 9-12 Total Education CALVERT HIGH 2 59 61 HUNTINGTOWN HIGH 2 73 75 NORTHERN HIGH** 4 65 69 PATUXENT HIGH 4 52 56

Career and Technology Academy A.M. P.M. Total Enrollment for Fall 2018 CALVERT HIGH 99 85 184 HUNTINGTOWN HIGH 41 93 134 NORTHERN HIGH 37 37 74 PATUXENT HIGH 49 40 89 Total 226 255 481

* As of Fall 2015, Patuxent Elementary and Appeal Elementary schools are reported as one school, Patuxent Appeal Campus. In previous reports, the schools were reported separately, and referred to as "Appeal Elementary" and "Patuxent Elementary." **Number of teaching stations for the new Northern High School to open January 2019 Source: Calvert County Public Schools Classroom/Teaching Station Data, Fall 2018 Career Center Enrollment, Fall 2018 Attachment 4 CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENROLLMENTS PRE-KINDERGARTEN THROUGH GRADE 5 Fall 2018

Special Total FTE Round up Enrollment Enrollment School Pre-K Pre-K Pre-K Pre-K Pre-K K to 5 Pre-K to 5

BARSTOW ELEMENTARY 55 6 61 30.5 31 559 590 BEACH ELEMENTARY 29 0 29 14.5 15 506 521 CALVERT ELEMENTARY 34 0 34 17 17 517 534 DOWELL ELEMENTARY 35 0 35 17.5 18 540 558 HUNTINGTOWN ELEMENTARY 30 0 30 15 15 474 489 MT. HARMONY ELEMENTARY 0 0 0 0 0 611 611 MUTUAL ELEMENTARY 26 7 33 16.5 17 380 397 PATUXENT APPEAL CAMPUS* 81 10 91 45.5 46 737 783 PLUM POINT ELEMENTARY 7 8 15 7.5 8 573 581 ST. LEONARD ELEMENTARY 18 0 18 9 9 509 518 SUNDERLAND ELEMENTARY 66 17 83 41.5 42 616 658 WINDY HILL ELEMENTARY 19 0 19 9.5 10 629 639 TOTAL 400 48 448 224 228 6,651 6,879

FTE = Full Time Equivalent * As of Fall 2015, Patuxent Elementary and Appeal Elementary schools are reported as one school, Patuxent Appeal Campus. In previous reports, the schools were reported separately, and referred to as "Appeal Elementary" and "Patuxent Elementary." Enrollment provided by the Calvert County Public Schools, Fall 2018 Prepared by the Department of Planning & Zoning, November 2018 Attachment 5 CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND RATED ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CAPACITIES FOR SCHOOLS Fall 2018

SCHOOL Number of Number of Capacity for Number of Number of Capacity Number of Number of Capacity Number of Number of Capacity Total No. No. of Capacity Capacity Capacity Additional Total No. APF RATED Pre - K Pre - K Pre - K Kindergarten Kindergarteners for Grade 1-5 1-5 Graders for Special Special Ed. for of Students for non SPED for non SPED for Capacity for of CAPACITY Rooms per Rooms per Kindergarten Rooms per Grades 1-5 Education Students Special Ed. Teaching per Teaching Teaching Teaching High Career Classrooms/ Adopted Room Room Room Rooms / per Room / Rooms / Stations Station Stations Stations Schools Center Teaching County Formula Teaching Teaching Teaching (non SPED) (non SPED) Mid. & High Mid. & High SPED & Attendance** Stations Stations Stations Stations Mid. & High Mid. & High Rounded up non SPED ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS APPEAL ELEMENTARY* ------BARSTOW ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 4 22 88 25 23 575 4 10 40 34 723 BEACH ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 4 22 88 17 23 391 3 10 30 25 529 CALVERT ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 3 22 66 20 23 460 6 10 60 30 606 DOWELL ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 4 22 88 25 23 575 3 10 30 33 713 HUNTINGTOWN ELEMENTARY 0 20 0 4 22 88 21 23 483 3 10 30 28 601 MT. HARMONY ELEMENTARY 0 20 0 4 22 88 19 23 437 3 10 30 26 555 MUTUAL ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 4 22 88 18 23 414 4 10 40 27 562 PATUXENT ELEMENTARY* ------PATUXENT APPEAL CAMPUS* 3 20 60 6 22 132 37 23 851 7 10 70 53 1113 PLUM POINT ELEMENTARY 0 20 0 4 22 88 21 23 483 3 10 30 28 601 ST. LEONARD ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 5 22 110 21 23 483 4 10 40 31 653 SUNDERLAND ELEMENTARY 1 20 20 4 22 88 29 23 667 2 10 20 36 795 WINDY HILL ELEMENTARY 2 20 40 4 22 88 24 23 552 4 10 40 34 720 Total Elementary 12 240 50 1,100 277 6,371 46 460 385 8,171

MIDDLE SCHOOLS CALVERT MIDDLE 4 10 40 37 25 * 85% 786.25 787 41 827 MILL CREEK MIDDLE 4 10 40 38 25 * 85% 807.5 808 42 848 NORTHERN MIDDLE 4 10 40 30 25 * 85% 637.5 638 34 678 PLUM POINT MIDDLE 4 10 40 39 25 * 85% 828.75 829 43 869 SOUTHERN MIDDLE 3 10 30 38 25 * 85% 807.5 808 41 838 WINDY HILL MIDDLE 3 10 30 37 25 * 85% 786.25 787 40 817 Total Middle 220 219 4653.75 4654 241 4,877

HIGH SCHOOLS CALVERT HIGH 2 10 20 59 25 * 85% 1253.75 1,254 1,274 85 61 1,359 HUNTINGTOWN HIGH 2 10 20 73 25 * 85% 1551.25 1,552 1,572 41 75 1,613 NORTHERN HIGH*** 4 10 40 65 25 * 85% 1381.25 1,382 1,422 37 69 1,459 PATUXENT HIGH 4 10 40 52 25 * 85% 1105 1,105 1,145 40 56 1,185 Total High 120 249 5291.25 5292 5,413 203 261 5,616

County Total 18,664

* As of Fall 2015, Patuxent Elementary and Appeal Elementary schools are reported as one school, Patuxent Appeal Campus. In previous reports, the schools were reported separately, and referred to as "Appeal Elementary" and "Patuxent Elementary." ** The lower number of students attending the morning or afternoon session of the Career Center as of Fall 2018 *** Number of teaching stations for the new Northern High School, to open in January 2019 Number of classrooms/teaching stations and Career Center attendance provided by the Board of Education, Fall 2018 Prepared by the Department of Planning & Zoning, November 2018 CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND Attachment 6 ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REGULATIONS SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITH ADEQUATE/INADEQUATE CAPACITIES HISTORICAL CHART Fall 2018

Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2018 2018 Note A Note B Note B Note B Note B Note B Note B Note B APPEAL ELEMENTARY (Note B) BARSTOW ELEMENTARY (Fall 2009) BEACH ELEMENTARY CAL VERT ELEMENTARY DOWELL ELEMENTARY (Fall 1999) HUNTINGTOWN ELEMENTARY MT. HARMONY ELEMENTARY MUTUAL ELEMENTARY PATUXENT ELEMENTARY (Fall 1992) (Note B) PATUXENT APPEAL CAMPUS (Note B) PLUM POINT ELEMENTARY ST. LEONARD ELEMENTARY (Fall 1996) SUNDERLAND ELEMENTARY WINDY HILL ELEMENTARY (Fall 1996)

CALVERT MIDDLE MILL CREEK MIDDLE (Late Fall 2000) NORTHERN MIDDLE PLUM POINT MIDDLE SOUTHERN MIDDLE (expanded Fall 1996) WINDY HILL MIDDLE (Fall 1998)

CALVERT HIGH HUNTINGTOWN HIGH (Fall 2004) NORTHERN HIGH PATUXENT HIGH (Spring 1996) Key: School with inadequate capacity. School district closed to recording of subdivisions/residential site development plans. zzSchool with inadequate capacity. School district deemed adequate for recording of subdivisions/residential site development plans. 0 School not yet constructed/open.

Notes: A:The elementary school boundaries for Beach, Plum Point and Windy Hill elementary schools took effect in March 2014. New boundaries are included in the Fall 2014 APF Report. B:As of Fall 2015, Patuxent Elementary and Appeal Elementary schools are reported as one school, Patuxent Appeal Campus. In previous reports, the schools were reported separately and referred to as "Appeal Elementary" and "Patuxent Elementary." Prepared by the Department of Planning & Zoning, November 2018 Attachment 7

Date: 10/30/2018 Calvert County Public Schools Page: 1 Time: 7:13 AM Student Transfers 2018-2019SY

Net of # # Approved # Approved # Approved # Pending # Pending Current Building Year Approved Grade Net w/Pending Transfers In Out In Out # Transfers Transfers Barstow 2019 132 -22 01 10 21 0 0 -11 84 84 Elementary School 02 12 11 0 0 1 112 112 03 8 8 0 0 0 93 93 04 5 7 0 0 -2 91 91 05 8 15 0 0 -7 90 90 91 12 15 0 0 -3 95 95 Beach Elementary 2019 90 -70 01 5 14 0 0 -9 90 90 School 02 1 14 0 0 -13 81 81 03 0 13 0 0 -13 90 90 04 1 12 0 0 -11 81 81 05 1 18 0 0 -17 92 92 91 2 9 0 0 -7 74 74 Calvert Elementary 2019 135 -49 01 10 21 0 0 -11 79 79 School 02 13 17 0 0 -4 96 96 03 8 9 0 0 -1 87 87 04 4 18 0 0 -14 81 81 05 5 13 0 0 -8 99 99 91 3 14 0 0 -11 78 78 Calvert High 2019 47 -1 09 5 7 0 0 -2 255 255 School 10 4 7 0 0 -3 297 297 11 9 3 0 0 6 305 305 12 5 7 0 0 -2 299 299 Calvert Middle 2019 57 7 06 8 5 1 0 4 199 200 School 07 11 12 1 0 0 196 197 08 12 9 0 0 3 211 211 Dowell Elementary 2019 54 2 01 5 5 0 0 0 87 87 School 02 5 6 0 0 -1 83 83 03 4 4 0 0 0 81 81 04 5 3 0 0 2 105 105 05 4 3 0 0 1 98 98 91 5 5 0 0 0 87 87 Huntingtown 2019 134 78 01 19 4 0 0 15 88 88 Elementary School 02 17 6 0 0 11 88 88 03 12 5 0 0 7 65 65 04 18 3 0 0 15 73 73 05 20 5 0 0 15 84 84 91 20 5 0 0 15 75 75 Huntingtown High 2019 40 -2 09 9 10 0 0 -1 362 362 School 10 2 2 0 0 0 397 397 11 3 4 0 0 -1 354 354

Page 1 Date: 10/30/2018 Calvert County Public Schools Page: 2 Time: 7:13 AM Student Transfers 2018-2019SY

Net of # # Approved # Approved # Approved # Pending # Pending Current Building Year Approved Grade Net w/Pending Transfers In Out In Out # Transfers Transfers Huntingtown High 2019 40 -2 12 5 5 0 0 0 352 352 School Mill Creek Middle 2019 24 2 06 6 3 0 0 3 165 165 School 07 4 4 0 0 0 185 185 08 3 4 0 0 -1 174 174 Mt Harmony 2019 137 95 01 21 2 0 0 19 92 92 Elementary School 02 19 2 0 0 17 114 114 03 22 5 0 0 17 103 103 04 15 2 0 0 13 105 105 05 17 2 0 0 15 94 94 91 22 8 0 0 14 106 106 Mutual Elementary 2019 77 15 01 6 5 0 0 1 60 60 School 02 8 4 0 0 4 61 61 03 3 3 0 0 0 62 62 04 9 7 0 0 2 69 69 05 14 2 0 0 12 72 72 91 6 10 0 0 -4 60 60 Northern High 2019 32 4 09 7 6 0 0 1 389 389 School 10 2 1 0 0 1 392 392 11 2 5 0 0 -3 342 342 12 6 1 0 0 5 344 344 Northern Middle 2019 34 16 06 9 5 0 0 4 249 249 School 07 8 4 0 0 4 208 208 08 8 0 0 0 8 218 218 Patuxent Appeal 2019 83 -41 01 3 13 0 0 -10 90 90 Campus 02 1 14 0 0 -13 132 132 03 3 7 0 0 -4 129 129 04 2 8 0 0 -6 119 119 05 5 8 0 0 -3 137 137 91 7 12 0 0 -5 131 131 Patuxent High 2019 21 -1 09 2 0 0 0 2 259 259 School 10 4 2 0 0 2 291 291 11 2 4 0 0 -2 261 261 12 2 5 0 0 -3 237 237 Plum Point 2019 118 4 01 15 9 0 0 6 112 112 Elementary School 02 7 8 0 0 -1 96 96 03 8 11 0 0 -3 94 94 04 13 10 0 0 3 95 95 05 8 11 0 0 -3 95 95 91 10 7 0 0 3 83 83 Plum Point Middle 2019 41 8 06 6 4 0 1 1 207 206

Page 2 Date: 10/30/2018 Calvert County Public Schools Page: 3 Time: 7:13 AM Student Transfers 2018-2019SY

Net of # # Approved # Approved # Approved # Pending # Pending Current Building Year Approved Grade Net w/Pending Transfers In Out In Out # Transfers Transfers School 2019 41 8 07 12 7 0 0 5 210 210 08 7 5 0 0 2 213 213 Southern Middle 2019 46 -22 06 2 12 0 0 -10 159 159 School 07 7 9 0 0 -2 175 175 08 3 13 0 0 -10 175 175 St. Leonard 2019 83 -35 01 7 12 0 0 -5 77 77 Elementary School 02 3 14 0 0 -11 84 84 03 3 8 0 0 -5 79 79 04 4 4 0 0 0 84 84 05 5 11 0 0 -6 95 95 91 2 10 0 0 -8 81 81 Sunderland 2019 170 8 01 14 15 0 0 -1 87 87 Elementary School 02 18 13 0 0 5 116 116 03 10 10 0 0 0 94 94 04 14 17 0 0 -3 111 111 05 12 10 0 0 2 104 104 91 21 16 0 0 5 108 108 Windy Hill 2019 132 14 01 14 8 0 0 6 98 98 Elementary School 02 13 9 0 0 4 94 94 03 13 11 0 0 2 105 105 04 10 9 0 0 1 108 108 05 10 11 0 0 -1 126 126 91 13 11 0 0 2 101 101 Windy Hill Middle 2019 35 -10 06 5 6 0 0 -1 271 271 School 07 4 10 0 1 -7 258 257 08 4 6 0 0 -2 241 241

Page 3 Attachment 8 CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES FOR SCHOOLS ENROLLMENTS COMPARED WITH APF RATED CAPACITIES STUDENT TRANSFERS Fall 2018

100% APF ENROLLMENT PERCENT NET ENROLLMENT PERCENT RATED (Actual) OF RATED STUDENT WITH OF RATED CAPACITY CAPACITY TRANSFERS NET CAPACITY SCHOOL Fall 2018 Fall 2018 (Actual) STUDENT (DISTRICT) Note 1 Note 2 Fall 2018 TRANSFERS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS APPEAL ELEMENTARY Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 BARSTOW ELEMENTARY 723 590 81.6% -22 612 84.6% BEACH ELEMENTARY 529 521 98.5% -70 591 111.7% CALVERT ELEMENTARY 606 534 88.1% -49 583 96.2% DOWELL ELEMENTARY 713 558 78.3% 2 556 78.0% HUNTINGTOWN ELEMENTARY 601 489 81.4% 78 411 68.4% MT. HARMONY ELEMENTARY 555 611 110.1% 95 516 93.0% MUTUAL ELEMENTARY 562 397 70.6% 15 382 68.0% PATUXENT ELEMENTARY Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 Note 3 PATUXENT APPEAL CAMPUS (Note 3) 1,113 783 70.4% -41 824 74.0% PLUM POINT ELEMENTARY 601 581 96.7% 4 577 96.0% ST. LEONARD ELEMENTARY 653 518 79.3% -35 553 84.7% SUNDERLAND ELEMENTARY 795 658 82.8% 8 650 81.8% WINDY HILL ELEMENTARY 720 639 88.8% 14 625 86.8% Total Elementary 8,171 6,879 84.2% -1 6,880 84.2%

MIDDLE SCHOOLS CALVERT MIDDLE 827 604 73.0% 7 597 72.2% MILL CREEK MIDDLE 848 522 61.6% 2 520 61.3% NORTHERN MIDDLE 678 675 99.6% 16 659 97.2% PLUM POINT MIDDLE 869 633 72.8% 8 625 71.9% SOUTHERN MIDDLE 838 509 60.7% -22 531 63.4% WINDY HILL MIDDLE 817 771 94.4% -10 781 95.6% Total Middle 4,877 3,714 76.2% 1 3,713 76.1%

HIGH SCHOOLS CALVERT HIGH 1,359 1,156 85.1% -1 1,157 85.1% HUNTINGTOWN HIGH 1,613 1,465 90.8% -2 1,467 90.9% NORTHERN HIGH 1,459 1,466 100.5% 4 1,462 100.2% PATUXENT HIGH 1,185 1,050 88.6% -1 1,051 88.7% Total High 5,616 5,137 91.5% 0 5,137 91.5%

County Total 18,664 15,730 84.3% 0 15,730 84.3%

Notes: 1. High school capacities include the lower number of students attending the morning or afternoon session of the Career and Technology Academy at the beginning of the grading period. 2. Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) for Pre-K and Special Pre-K are included in elementary school enrollments. Kindergarten students attend full day (policy began in 2006-07 school year). 3. As of Fall 2015, Patuxent Elementary and Appeal Elementary schools are reported as one school, Patuxent Appeal Campus. In previous reports, the schools were reported separately and referred to as "Appeal Elementary" and "Patuxent Elementary." Based upon information provided by the Calvert County Public Schools, Fall 2018 Enrollment and Career and Technology Academy attendance as of Fall 2018 Prepared by the Department of Planning & Zoning, November 2018 µ Attachment 9 Mt. Harmony CALVERT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS Windy Hill #* Districts closed to the final #* recording of residential subdivisions and residential site development plans. Beach #* Sunderland #*

Elementary Schools:

Huntingtown #* Mt. Harmony #* Elementary School Site #* Plum Point

#* #* Calvert

Barstow Chesapeake Bay

Patuxent River #* #* St. Leonard

Mutual

Prepared by Calvert County Appeal/Patuxent Department of Planning & Zoning #*#* November 2018 #* 9,900 4,950 0 9,900 Feet

Dowell Attachment 10

µ CALVERT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS Windy Hill !( Northern Districts closed to the final recording of residential subdivisions and !( residential site development plans.

Middle Schools:

!( !( Middle School Site

Calvert Plum Point !(

Chesapeake Bay

Patuxent River

Southern

!(

Prepared by Calvert County Department of Planning & Zoning November 2018 !( 9,900 4,950 0 9,900 Feet Mill Creek µ Attachment 11 CALVERT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS

NORTHERN HS

)" Districts closed to the final recording of residential subdivisions and residential site development plans.

High Schools: )" Northern

High School Sites HUNTINGTOWN HS )" CALVERT HS

)"

Chesapeake Bay

Patuxent River

PATUXENT HS

Prepared by Calvert County Department of Planning & Zoning November 2018

9,900 4,950 0 9,900 Feet )" µ Attachment 12 CALVERT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS

Districts closed to the final recording of residential subdivisions and residential site development plans.

Elementary Schools:

Mt. Harmony

High Schools:

Northern

Chesapeake Bay

Patuxent River

Prepared by Calvert County Department of Planning & Zoning November 2018

9,900 4,950 0 9,900 Feet