A Laboratory Method for Rearing Catolaccus Hunteri (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a Parasitoid of the Pepper Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Laboratory Method for Rearing Catolaccus Hunteri (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a Parasitoid of the Pepper Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Scientific Notes 191 A LABORATORY METHOD FOR REARING CATOLACCUS HUNTERI (HYMENOPTERA: PTEROMALIDAE), A PARASITOID OF THE PEPPER WEEVIL (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE) EMILY VÁSQUEZ1, DAVID DEAN2, DAVID SCHUSTER1 AND PAUL VAN ETTEN1 1University of Florida, IFAS, Gulf Coast Research & Education Center, Wimauma, FL 33598 2Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Fruit Fly Identification Laboratory, Palmetto, FL 34221 The pepper weevil, Anthonomus eugenii Cano, Plastic Packaging, Inc., Menasha, WI) for presen- is a serious pest of cultivated Capsicum spp. pep- tation to parasitoid adults. This method was de- pers in the southern United States, Hawaii, Mex- veloped for exposing A. grandis grandis larvae to ico, Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, and Puerto ovipositing C. grandis (Cate 1987) and was mech- Rico (Schuster et al. 1996). Eggs are deposited in anized for mass production (Roberson & Harsh flower buds and fruit, where larvae and pupae 1993). Methods also were developed for producing complete their development. Infested buds and C. maculatus larvae in pieces of garbanzo beans fruit often abscise, but larvae and pupae can com- (chick peas), Cicer arietinum L. (Leyva et al. plete development if fallen buds and fruit do not 2002). The pieces were not large enough for lar- desiccate. Yield losses can reach 90% in Florida, if vae to complete their development within, thus the weevil is not controlled (Schuster & Everett forcing the larvae to exit the bean pieces. The lar- 1982). Broad spectrum insecticides have been vae then were easier to collect prior to encapsula- used most often to manage the pest but may lead tion. This method had been used successfully to to unintended consequences, including insecticide rear C. hunteri in the laboratory. Life history pa- resistance and outbreaks of non-target pests. Bio- rameters including pre-oviposition period, ovipo- logical control could be an alternative or adjunct sition period, adult longevity, fecundity, and egg to insecticides in managing the pepper weevil. to adult development period of C. hunteri on A. eu- At least three species of predators and seven genii were found to be the same whether the par- species of parasitoids have been reported to at- asitoid had originally been reared on either tack the pepper weevil (Riley & King 1994). The C. maculatus or A. eugenii (Seal et al. 2002). Col- most abundant parasitoid recovered from the lecting larvae and encapsulating them in Para- pepper weevil in Florida was Catolaccus hunteri film represents extra investments in time and Crawford (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) (Riley & equipment. Therefore, a method was developed Schuster 1992). While natural enemies generally for rearing C. hunteri on C. maculatus larvae di- are regarded as contributing little to control of rectly in garbanzo beans. the pest (Elmore & Campbell 1954), 50% parasit- Two colonies of C. maculatus were maintained ism of pepper weevil larvae by C. hunteri was ob- in a room at a temperature of about 27°C, relative served in fallen jalapeno buds and over 20% par- humidity of about 60% and a photoperiod of asitism in fallen bell pepper buds (Schuster et al. 14L:10D. The colonies were maintained on black- 1988). Augmentative releases of C. hunteri on al- eyed peas, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., and on ternative host plants during the summer off-sea- garbanzo beans. The black-eyed peas were used to son and on pepper at the initiation of flowering maintain the colony of C. maculatus and the gar- have resulted in reduced or delayed damage by banzo beans were used for exposing C. maculatus weevil larvae (Schuster unpublished data). Be- larvae to the C. hunteri parasitoid. cause C. hunteri has shown potential for bio-con- Three times a week, six narrow-mouth 800-ml trol of the pepper weevil, a method of rearing the “Mason” glass jars (Ball Corporation, Muncie, IN) parasitoid in the laboratory is needed. were filled with 300 g of black-eyed peas each. A commercial diet for rearing pepper weevil About 100 C. maculatus adults were collected larvae is available (Bio-Serv, Entomology Divi- with an aspirator connected to a vacuum pump sion, Frenchtown, NJ); however, the diet was not and were deposited in each jar, which then was used due to low egg hatch (Toapanta 2001). Be- sealed with a screen, filter disc, and metal ring. cause rearing the pepper weevil in pepper fruit is These jars were stored upright. A new generation time and space consuming, an alternative host of bruchid adults emerged about every 30 d. was sought. The cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus Three times a week, ca. 400 C. maculatus maculatus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), adults were collected with an aspirator and put was shown to be a suitable factitious host for rear- into each of ten 800-ml glass jars that contained ing Catolaccus grandis (Burks) (Rojas et al. 1998), 300 g each of garbanzo beans. The C. maculatus a closely related parasitoid of the boll weevil, adults were removed 48 h later by placing the A. grandis grandis Boheman. The C. maculatus beans and bruchids on a metal sieve placed in the larvae were encapsulated in Parafilm® (Pechiney large opening of a 25-cm diam galvanized funnel, 192 Florida Entomologist 88(2) June 2005 the narrow end of which was attached to a wet/ ery Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, two trays dry vacuum cleaner. The vacuum was operated were placed in each of two oviposition containers until all C. maculatus adults were drawn through consisting of No. 6 (2.8 liter) plastic jars (Newell the sieve. The beans then were returned to the Rubbermaid Co., Wooster, OH) laid on their sides jars, which were laid on their sides. In about 21 d, (Fig. 1b). Water was provided by inserting two wa- the hatching larvae were 4th instars, the lifestage ter-filled, cotton-plugged 1-dram vials through used previously for parasitism (Rodriguez-Leyva two 1.3-cm diameter holes in the upper surface of et al. 2000). The larvae form pupation cells and each container. A cloth sleeve was attached to the chew an emergence hole, leaving only the integu- mouth of each container and was sealed with a ment of the bean. These opaque “windows” can be rubber band when not in use. Drops of honey were seen readily and aid in the selection of beans with placed on the inside top of the containers to pro- 3rd instars present. These jars were moved to the vide food and were replenished when consumed C. hunteri rearing room, which was maintained by the parasitoids. About 50 female and 50 male under the same conditions as the C. maculatus parasitoids were introduced into each oviposition rearing room. container. The trays in the containers were The beans were placed in trays (9 × 8 × 2 cm) changed three times a week for 26 days, at which with 115-125 beans in each tray. The trays were time the oviposition containers were disassem- plastic strawberry baskets with the sides bled and cleaned for re-use. trimmed to 2 cm high (Fig. 1a). Corks were glued The beans that had been exposed 2-3 days to to the bottoms of the trays to elevate them, thus parasitoids were placed in No. 3, 2.4-liter rectan- allowing more accessibility of the female parasi- gular, plastic containers (Newell Rubbermaid Co., toids to the beans on the bottoms of the trays. Ev- Wooster, OH) with screen covered square holes cut in the lid to allow ventilation but prevent es- cape of emerging C. maculatus adults. The beans were divided into three containers and each con- tainer was placed individually in Plexiglas® (Ato- fina Chemicals, Inc., Philadelphia, PA) incubation cages (30.5 × 30.5 × 30.5 cm) with a cloth sleeve on one end. Two sides of the cage were covered with organdy fabric to allow ventilation. After about 7 d, adult parasitoids began to emerge and were collected with a vacuum pump aspirator. The garbanzo beans were sifted to re- move C. maculatus adults. The beans were then placed on a wax paper-lined fiberglass lunchroom tray (45 × 35 cm), one layer deep and the trays were placed on the shelves of an emergence box (Fig. 2a). The emergence boxes were constructed of wood and had 4-8 shelves with individual, seal- able doors for each shelf. The shelves did not ex- tend to the back of the emergence box and the bean-filled trays were not placed on the shelf all the way to the back. Thus, an open space was cre- ated at the back of the box from the bottom to the top. At the top of this open space, a hole (5 × 20 cm) was cut and covered with metal window screen that allowed passage of C. hunteri but pre- vented that of the C. maculatus adults. A Plexi- glas collection chamber (32 × 32 × 21 cm) (Fig. 2b) was attached to the top of the emergence box over the screen-covered slot. The sides of the Plexiglas box had cloth sleeves installed, allowing access for collecting parasitoid adults with a vacuum pump aspirator. Two water-filled, cotton-plugged vials were placed in the bottom of the Plexiglas box and honey was streaked on the inside of the top and front. Both were replenished as needed. Fig. 1. Strawberry basket (a) for exposing garbanzo Trays were replaced within the emergence box beans with 4th instar Callosobruchus maculatus in ovi- every 23 days as new parasitoid-exposed, C. mac- position containers to adult Catolaccus hunteri (b) in the ulatus-infested beans were added. Once a week, laboratory. the Plexiglas box was thoroughly cleaned with Scientific Notes 193 Anecdotal observations have indicated that bi- weekly releases of 1,500 C.
Recommended publications
  • Influence of Temperature and Host on Life History Parameters
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL Influence of Temperature and Host on Life History Parameters of Catolaccus Hunteri (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) 1 2 DAKSHINA R. SEAL, PHILIP A. STANSLY, AND DAVID J. SCHUSTER University of Florida-IFAS, Tropical Research and Education Center, Homestead, FL 33033 Environ. Entomol. 31(2): 354Ð360 (2002) ABSTRACT Catolaccus hunteri Crawford is an external parasitoid of cryptic Coleoptera, particularly of Bruchidae and Curculionidae in ßowerbuds, small fruits, and seeds. It is the most common parasitoid of the pepper weevil, Anthonomus eugenii Cano, in the United States, Mexico, and elsewhere, and was introduced from Guatemala to Hawaii for control of this pest. Studies were conducted to assess effects of temperature and host on life history parameters of C. hunteri as a step toward eventual mass rearing and inoculative release for pepper weevil control. Oviposition, postovipostion period and adult longevity were shorter at 30ЊC than at 20 or 25ЊC. Mean number of eggs oviposited per female was greater at the lower temperatures than at the highest temperature. Duration of all development stages was shorter at 30ЊC than at 20 and 25ЊC. Developmental period of C. hunteri was longer and adult longevity was shorter on boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman, than any other host. Female wasps laid most eggs on the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.), larvae. Transferring of C. hunteri reared on C. maculatus to pepper weevil or boll weevil caused a reduction in the mean number of eggs/female. Age-speciÞc life tables and age-speciÞc fecundity for C. hunteri were analyzed using three constant temperature regimes and Þve sources of host.
    [Show full text]
  • Control Biológico De Insectos: Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada Un Enfoque Agroecológico
    Control biológico de insectos: Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada un enfoque agroecológico Control biológico de insectos: un enfoque agroecológico Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada Ciencia y Tecnología Editorial Universidad de Antioquia Ciencia y Tecnología © Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada © Editorial Universidad de Antioquia ISBN: 978-958-714-186-3 Primera edición: septiembre de 2008 Diseño de cubierta: Verónica Moreno Cardona Corrección de texto e indización: Miriam Velásquez Velásquez Elaboración de material gráfico: Ana Cecilia Galvis Martínez y Alejandro Henao Salazar Diagramación: Luz Elena Ochoa Vélez Coordinación editorial: Larissa Molano Osorio Impresión y terminación: Imprenta Universidad de Antioquia Impreso y hecho en Colombia / Printed and made in Colombia Prohibida la reproducción total o parcial, por cualquier medio o con cualquier propósito, sin autorización escrita de la Editorial Universidad de Antioquia. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia Teléfono: (574) 219 50 10. Telefax: (574) 219 50 12 E-mail: [email protected] Sitio web: http://www.editorialudea.com Apartado 1226. Medellín. Colombia Imprenta Universidad de Antioquia Teléfono: (574) 219 53 30. Telefax: (574) 219 53 31 El contenido de la obra corresponde al derecho de expresión del autor y no compromete el pensamiento institucional de la Universidad de Antioquia ni desata su responsabilidad frente a terceros. El autor asume la responsabilidad por los derechos de autor y conexos contenidos en la obra, así como por la eventual información sensible publicada en ella. Nicholls Estrada, Clara Inés Control biológico de insectos : un enfoque agroecológico / Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada. -- Medellín : Editorial Universidad de Antioquia, 2008. 282 p. ; 24 cm. -- (Colección ciencia y tecnología) Incluye glosario. Incluye bibliografía e índices.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a Parasitoid of the Cotton Boll Weevil
    “main” — 2011/7/12 — 19:25 — page 1021 — #1 Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2011) 83(3): 1021-1029 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 www.scielo.br/aabc Effect of temperature on the reproduction of Bracon vulgaris Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of the cotton boll weevil FRANCISCO S. RAMALHO1, PAULO A. WANDERLEY2, JOSÉ B. MALAQUIAS1, FRANCISCO S. FERNANDES1, ANTÔNIO R.B. NASCIMENTO1 and JOSÉ C. ZANUNCIO3 1Embrapa Algodão, Unidade de Controle Biológico, Av. Osvaldo Cruz, 1143, 58107-720 Campina Grande, PB, Brasil 2Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciências e Tecnologia – IFPB, Rua Presidente Tancredo Neves, s/n, 58800-970 Sousa, PB, Brasil 3Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. PH Rolfs, s/n, Campus Universitário, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brasil Manuscript received on March 30, 2010; accepted for publication on December 21, 2010 ABSTRACT This research studied the effect of temperature on the reproduction of Bracon vulgaris Ashmead, an ectoparasitoid of cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis Boheman) at constant temperatures of 20, 25 and 30◦C, 70 ± 10% RH and a photophase of 14 h. Females of the parasitoid produced a greater number of eggs when exposed to 25◦C (124.65 eggs) in relation to those exposed to 20 (43.40 eggs) and 30◦C (49.60 eggs). The number of parasitized larvae per female of B. vulgaris at 25◦C (71.75) was greater than at 20◦C (31.40) and 30◦C (25.15). The daily intrinsic rates of increase (rm) were –0.007 at 20◦C, 0.07 at 25◦C and 0.03 at 30◦C, revealing that the temperature of 25◦C produced increases of 1,100 and 133% in the value rm in relation to temperatures of 20 and 30◦C, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Parasitismo De Catolaccus Grandis Y Catolaccus Hunteri
    Agrociencia ISSN: 1405-3195 [email protected] Colegio de Postgraduados México Cortez Mondaca, Edgardo; Martínez Carrillo, José Luis; Leyva Vázquez, Jorge Luis; Vargas Camplis, Jesús; Rodríguez del Bosque, Luis A. Parasitismo de catolaccus grandis y catolaccus hunteri (hymenoptera: pteromalidae) sobre el picudo del algodonero (anthonomus grandis boheman) Agrociencia, vol. 38, núm. 5, septiembre-octubre, 2004, pp. 497-501 Colegio de Postgraduados Texcoco, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=30238503 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto PARASITISMO DE Catolaccus grandis Y Catolaccus hunteri (HYMENOPTERA: PTEROMALIDAE) SOBRE EL PICUDO DEL ALGODONERO (Anthonomus grandis Boheman) PARASITISM BY Catolaccus grandis AND Catolaccus hunteri (HYMENOPTERA: PTEROMALIDAE) ON THE COTTON BOLL WEEVIL (Anthonomus grandis Boheman) Edgardo Cortez-Mondaca1, Nina M. Bárcenas-Ortega2, José L. Martínez-Carrillo3, Jorge L. Leyva-Vázquez2, Jesús Vargas-Camplis4 y Luis A. Rodríguez del-Bosque4 1Campo Experimental Valle del Fuerte. INIFAP. Km 1609. Carretera Internacional México- Nogales. Juan José Ríos, Sinaloa. 81110. ([email protected]). 2Programa en Entomología y Acarología. Instituto de Fitosanidad. IFIT. Colegio de Postgraduados. 56230. Montecillo, Estado de México. 3INIFAP-CIRNO-CEVY. 85000. Ciudad Obregón, Sonora. 4INIFAP-CIRNE- CERIB. 88900. Río Bravo, Tamaulipas. RESUMEN ABSTRACT En este estudio se evaluó por primera vez el parasitismo de In this research parasitism by Catolaccus hunteri Crawford was Catolaccus hunteri Crawford sobre el picudo del algodonero evaluated for the first time in the field to determine its Anthonomus grandis Boheman en condiciones de campo, com- effectiveness against the cotton boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis parándolo con el de Catolaccus grandis (Burks).
    [Show full text]
  • Vol.29 NO.L SOUTHWESTERNENTOMOLOGIST MAR.2004
    vol.29 NO.l SOUTHWESTERNENTOMOLOGIST MAR.2004 GENETIC VARIATION AND GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE GENUS RETICULITERMESItN Tpx.q,S JamesW. Austin2,Allen L. Szalanski2,Roger E. Gold3,and Bart T. Fost# ABSTRACT A molecular geneticsstudy involving DNA sequencingof a portion of the mitochondrialDNA 165 genewas undertakento determinethe extent of geneticvariation with Reticulitermesspp. and the distribution of Reticulitermesspp. subterraneantermites in Texas.From 42 Texascounties a total of 68 R. flavipes, sevenR. hageni,eight R. virginicus,and nine R. tibialis were identified. No geneticvariation was observedin R. virginicus andR. hageni,while sevenhaplotypes were observedin R. tibialis and 13 for R. flavipes.Among the 13.R.flavipes haplotypes,9nucleotides were variableand genetic variationranged from 0.2 to l.60/o.Phylogenetic analysis did not revealany relationships amongthe R. tibialis arld R. flavipes haplotypes,and there wasino apparentgeographical structureto the haplotypes.The high amount of genetic variation, but a lack of genetic structure in R. flavipes supports the hypothesis that this termite species has been distributedrandomly by mandue to its associationwith structures. INTRODUCTION The most abundant native termite in Texas is the subterranean genus ReticulitermesHolgren (Rhiniotermitidae).Four species, the eastern subtenanean Reliculitermesflavipes (Kollar), light southemR. hageniBanks, arid n. nDialis Banks,and dark southernR. virginicus (Banks),are known to occur in Texas(Howell et al. 1987). These speciesare among the most destructiveand costly termites for homeownersand businessesalike, and are of considerableeconomic importance. Su (1993)estimated that over $ I .5 billion is spentannually for termite control in the U.S., of which 80olois spentto control subterraneantermites, More recent estimatesby the National Pest Management Associationsuggest the cost to exceed$2.5 billion annually(Anonymous 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods Biodiversity Index in Bollgard (R) Cotton (Cry1ac) in Brazil
    Arthropods biodiVersity indeX in BOLLGard® cotton (Cry1Ac) in BraZIL Danielle Thomazoni, Miguel Ferreira Soria, Paulo Eduardo Degrande, Odival Faccenda and Pierre Jean Silvie SUMMARY Shannon-Wiener’s diversity index (SWI) was used under un- get herbivores was significantly higher in Bt-cotton. The mean treated conditions of a cotton field during the 2006/2007 crop number of Anthonomus grandis (Boh.) and Edessa meditabun- season in the Cerrado region, Brazil. Comparison was carried da (Fabr.) adults were significantly higher in NuOpal® with the out between the transgenic NuOpal® (Bollgard®)(Cry1Ac) and whole plant sampling method. However, such differences were the non-transgenic isogenic variety DeltaOpal®. SWI was cal- not observed with the beat sheet method. For the natural ene- culated for target pests, non-target herbivores and predators mies, SWI and mean number of larvae and adults of the domi- groups. Two sampling methods were used: whole plant obser- nant predators did not show any significant difference between vation and beat sheet. As expected, the mean number of target Bt and non-Bt cotton. These results confirm the conservation pests, especially Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Ala- of some tritrophic interactions inside the Bt (untreated) cotton bama argillacea (Hübner), was significantly smaller in Bt cot- and contributes to a better sustainable management of non- ton. In the whole plant method sampling the SWI for non-tar- target pests by enhancement of their natural biological control. Introduction vironment. The
    [Show full text]
  • GENETICS, EVOLUTION and BIOLOGICAL CONTROL Ch00-Prelims.Qxd 10/30/03 2:50 PM Page Ii Ch00-Prelims.Qxd 10/30/03 2:50 PM Page Iii
    ch00-prelims.qxd 10/30/03 2:50 PM Page i GENETICS, EVOLUTION AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL ch00-prelims.qxd 10/30/03 2:50 PM Page ii ch00-prelims.qxd 10/30/03 2:50 PM Page iii Genetics, Evolution and Biological Control Edited by L.E. Ehler University of California, Davis, USA R. Sforza USDA, Montpellier, France and T. Mateille IRD, Montpellier, France CABI Publishing ch00-prelims.qxd 10/30/03 2:50 PM Page iv CABI Publishing is a division of CAB International CABI Publishing CABI Publishing CAB International 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxon OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 617 395 4056 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.cabi-publishing.org ©CAB International 2004. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Genetics, evolution, and biological control/edited by L. E. Ehler, R. Sforza, and T. Mateille. p. cm Papers from an International Organization for Biological Control symposium held in Montpellier, France, 2002. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-85199-735-X (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Biological control--Congresses. 2. Biological pest control agents--Congresses. I. Ehler, Lester E. II. Sforza, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Between Catolaccus Grandis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) and Bracon Vulgaris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Parasitoids of the Boll Weevil
    371 Vol.50, n. 3 : pp.371-378 May 2007 BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF ISSN 1516-8913 Printed in Brazil BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Competition Between Catolaccus grandis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) and Bracon vulgaris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Parasitoids of the Boll Weevil Francisco de Sousa Ramalho 1*, Ana Maria Camêlo da Silva 2, José Cola Zanuncio 3 and José Eduardo Serrão 3 Embrapa Algodão; Unidade de Controle Biológico; C. P. 174; 58107-720; Campina Grande - PB - Brasil. 2Universidade Estadual da Paraíba; Departamento de Biologia; Campina Grande - PB - Brasil. 3 Departamento de Biologia Geral; Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Campus Universitário; Viçosa - MG - Brasil ABSTRACT The competition between populations of the parasitoids C. grandis and B. vulgaris was studied using larvae of Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaire) as an alternative host. A series of biological parameters was observed and related to the competitive abilities of both parasitoid species. They were capable of colonizing and maintaining their populations regardless of host location. The population growth of C. grandis and B. vulgaris , based on fecundity was not affected by the competition. The parasitism and survivorship to the adult stage were affected by competition, except when the host was located at the bottom of the rearing cage. C. grandis performed better than B. vulgaris independently of the competition and host location, but it did not exclude the other species. Key words: Biological control, Anthonomus grandis , competition between parasitoids INTRODUCTION (Ramalho et al., 1993; Ramalho et al., 1996; Ramalho et al., 2000). The family Braconidae presents many parasitoid Although both parasitoids exploit the same host, species of key-pests of agriculture and stored they are somewhat isolated because they prefer to grains (Wanderley, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control
    CHAPTER 15 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL Edgar G. King, Randy J. Coleman, Juan A. Morales-Ramos, and K. R. Summy USDA, ARS Subtropical Agricultural Research Laboratory Weslaco, Texas and Marion R. Bell and Gordon L. Snodgrass USDA,ARS Southern Insect Management Laboratory Stoneville, Mississippi INTRODUCTION Over 100 species of insects and mites are pests of cotton in the United States (see Chapter 2, this book). From 1980 to 1987, the aggregate damage attributed to these cotton insect and mite pests was about 7 to 14 percent despite the best control efforts (see Chapter 24, this book). In 1993, arthropod pests reduced cotton yields in the United States by about 6.9 percent resulting in a loss of 890 thousand bales from potential yield and $331 million in revenue (Hardee and Herzog, 1994). Moreover, $586 million were spent for pesticides to control these pests. So, the total direct cost of arthropod pests to United States cotton production was $917 million in 1993. Indirect costs not included are the value of the lost lint as it would have moved through the market place and the cost of environmental degradation caused by the application of about 1.6 pounds (active ingredient) of synthetic chemical insecticides and miticides applied per acre over 10 to 14 million acres of cotton in the United States each year (Chapter 24, this book). Obviously, the cost to United States cotton growers, consumers, and the environ- ment for arthropod pest control in cotton is unacceptably high, and there is an urgent need to develop less expensive pest management techniques. Perhaps even more importantly, United States cotton producers will be forced to consider non-chemical control measures more strongly because of public concern about synthetic chemical pesticides (see Chapter 28, this book; King et al., 1988a).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Predators, Parasies and Pathogens Attacking Insect And
    B--60476 7/8/05 1:17 PM Page 1 E-357 7-05 Field Guide to Predators, Parasites and Pathogens Attacking Insect and Mite Pests of Cotton RecognizingRecognizing thethe GoodGood BugsBugs inin CottonCotton by Allen Knutson and John Ruberson B--60476 7/8/05 1:17 PM Page 2 Field Guide to Predators, Parasites and Pathogens Attacking Insect and Mite Pests of Cotton by Allen Knutson and John Ruberson This publication was made possible in part through financial support provided by Cotton Incorporated. Cover photograph by W. Sterling of an immature (nymph) spined soldier bug, a predator of bollworms and other caterpillars in cotton. Authors: Allen Knutson, Professor and Extension Entomologist, Texas Cooperative Extension, Texas A&M Research and Extension Center-Dallas, 17360 Coit Road, Dallas, TX 75252 John Ruberson, Assistant Professor, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31794. Editor: Edna M. Smith, Communications Specialist, Texas Cooperative Extension. Designer: David N. Lipe, Assistant Graphic Designer and Communications Specialist, Texas Cooperative Extension. Texas Cooperative Extension Edward G. Smith, Director The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas B--60476 7/8/05 1:17 PM Page 3 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 4 How to Use This Book 6 Biology of Natural Enemies 7 Use of Natural Enemies 11 Sampling for Natural Enemies 12 Further Reading 15 Table of cotton pests and their natural enemies 16 Pesticides and Natural Enemies 20 Table of chemical classes and cotton insecticides 23 Predators
    [Show full text]
  • Drosophila | Other Diptera | Ephemeroptera
    NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL LIBRARY ARCHIVED FILE Archived files are provided for reference purposes only. This file was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated. Content may not appear in full or in its original format. All links external to the document have been deactivated. For additional information, see http://pubs.nal.usda.gov. United States Department of Agriculture Information Resources on the Care and Use of Insects Agricultural 1968-2004 Research Service AWIC Resource Series No. 25 National Agricultural June 2004 Library Compiled by: Animal Welfare Gregg B. Goodman, M.S. Information Center Animal Welfare Information Center National Agricultural Library U.S. Department of Agriculture Published by: U. S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service National Agricultural Library Animal Welfare Information Center Beltsville, Maryland 20705 Contact us : http://awic.nal.usda.gov/contact-us Web site: http://awic.nal.usda.gov Policies and Links Adult Giant Brown Cricket Insecta > Orthoptera > Acrididae Tropidacris dux (Drury) Photographer: Ronald F. Billings Texas Forest Service www.insectimages.org Contents How to Use This Guide Insect Models for Biomedical Research [pdf] Laboratory Care / Research | Biocontrol | Toxicology World Wide Web Resources How to Use This Guide* Insects offer an incredible advantage for many different fields of research. They are relatively easy to rear and maintain. Their short life spans also allow for reduced times to complete comprehensive experimental studies. The introductory chapter in this publication highlights some extraordinary biomedical applications. Since insects are so ubiquitous in modeling various complex systems such as nervous, reproduction, digestive, and respiratory, they are the obvious choice for alternative research strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Engineering for Pest Management Advances in Habitat Manipulation for Arthropods to Our Partners: Donna Read, Claire Wratten and Clara I
    Ecological Engineering for Pest Management Advances in Habitat Manipulation for Arthropods To our partners: Donna Read, Claire Wratten and Clara I. Nicholls. Ecological Engineering for Pest Management Advances in Habitat Manipulation for Arthropods Editors Geoff M. Gurr University of Sydney, Australia Steve D. Wratten National Centre for Advanced Bio-Protection Technologies, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand Miguel A. Altieri University of California, Berkeley, USA © CSIRO 2004 All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, duplicating or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Contact CSIRO PUBLISHING for all permission requests. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Ecological engineering for pest management: advances in habitat manipulation for arthropods. Includes index. ISBN 0 643 09022 3. 1. Ecological engineering. 2. Arthropod pests – Control. 3. Agricultural ecology. I. Gurr, G. M. (Geoff M.). II. Wratten, Stephen D. III. Altieri, Miguel A. 628.96 Available from CSIRO PUBLISHING 150 Oxford Street (PO Box 1139) Collingwood VIC 3066 Australia Telephone: +61 3 9662 7666 Local call: 1300 788 000 (Australia only) Fax: +61 3 9662 7555 Email: [email protected] Website: www.publish.csiro.au Front cover Caption and acknowledgement Back cover Caption and acknowledgement Set in Minion 10/12 Cover and text design by James Kelly Typeset by James Kelly Printed in Australia by xxx Foreword Professors Geoff Gurr, Steve Wratten and Miguel Altieri and colleagues present readers with a thoughtful outlook and perspective in Ecological Engineering for Pest Management: Advances in Habitat Manipulation for Arthropods.
    [Show full text]