Display PDF in Separate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Display PDF in Separate Melton En v ir o n m e n t Borough ENGLISH defro^ A g e n c y (D Council NATURE En v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE MIDLANDS REGION Olton Court, 10 Warwick Road Olton. Solihull B92 7HX The control structure Foreword by Councillor David Wright, Chairman: Rural, Economic and To complete this major flood alleviation scheme from a Environmental Affairs Committee, Melton Borough Council standing start on a Site of Special Scientific Interest and next to a main railway line, in less than five years is a Melton Mowbray residents have been unfortunate to remarkable achievement which I, for one, and the have suffered six serious flooding incidents in the five years people of Melton Mowbray, will always be indebted. since Easter 1998. 164 properties in Melton flooded at Easter 1998, many again the following Christmas day and again just three weeks after that. There have been a number of 'near misses' since. Melton Borough Council has always attempted to be as constructive as possible, there to help local people, because it is well placed to do so; to help not just during the immediacy of a flood emergency, but also resolving problems and issues for the longer term and wherever possible working in partnership with others. So much more can be achieved when organisations work together rather than independently. This is exactly the case here. I know it has been hard work, but there is a real sense of achievement for Melton Borough Council in working with, and supporting the work of, the Environment Agency on the Melton Mowbray Flood Alleviation Scheme. Innovation Innovation through partnership Melton Melton Mowbray flood alleviation scheme .CL ■C B EB t0 ex. • c 3 1 -c *o c o — 5 o 5 Introduction c0 1 2 The historic market town of The town has developed around the Melton Mowbray is situated in the confluence of the River Eye, north east of Leicestershire and has a Scalford Brook and Thorpe Brook population of over 25,000 people. which join together in the town to Melton Mowbray is home to form the River Wreake. manufacturers, and research and The River Wreake is the principal educational institutions of national tributary of the River Soar, which it importance. The town has a long joins at Cossington, south-east of established association with pork pies Loughborough approximately 24km and Stilton cheese. There is also a downstream of Melton Mowbray. long history of flooding. j * imln1 1 Ti 3; .3 3 | % ' * la* & History of flooding Flooding has occurred frequently in In the houses there, the water rose This rainfall was not exceptional, Melton Mowbray and surrounding so high that it swam the ornaments but it fell onto land that was already villages, with records dating back to off the chimney pieces in the rooms saturated and immediately ran off into 1828. On average, flooding has on the ground floor'. rivers and brooks whose flows were occurred approximately once every already high for the time of year. In August 1922, nearly four inches of five to six years. The worst recorded rain fell in 24 hours causing extensive The area that flooded was extensive. instances were in 1852, 1875, 1880, flooding. Huge volumes of water As well as significant flooding to 1882, 1897, 1900, 1922, 1932, 1954, flowed through the town. At its agricultural land downstream of the 1974, 1975 and 1998. height there was reported to be ten town, severe flooding was In November 1852, 2 inches of feet of water at the lowest part of experienced in Melton Mowbray itself. rain fell in Leicestershire in 24 hours. Burton Street. A relief fund was Here, the flooding was mainly caused At Melton Mowbray, 'many sheep opened in the town in order to assist by the River Eye spilling out of its and pigs were washed away and at some of the poorest sufferers. banks at the confluence with the Frisby on the Wreake the flood was Scalford and Thorpe Brooks. Some In Easter 1998, England and Wales greater than any the oldest inhabitant streets were up to a metre under were hit by one of the worst flood can remember'. water and 164 properties were events in living memory. The Midlands flooded in the town. This flooding has In July 1875, heavy and incessant suffered unusual meteorological since been categorised as a 1 in 50* rain added to already swollen streams conditions and Melton Mowbray was year flood event. in the area. The Scalford Brook and on the northernmost edge of the the River Wreake were 'swollen rainfall. Although the actual rainfall in The factory units of Pedigree to an extent unsurpassed in the Melton Mowbray was not as great as Masterfoods, one of the country's memory of any person living in in some other areas, 56mm of rainfall major suppliers of pet foods, were Melton Mowbray'. 'The rise of water in 24 hours was recorded at the amongst industrial premises flooded. in the Thorpe End was not only such Agency's rain gauge at Whissendine, Indeed, had the works not been on a that had never been known before, upstream of Melton Mowbray. holiday shutdown at the time of the but was so fearfully sudden as to give Easter 1998 floods, the financial losses no time for preparation. At its to the company would have been highest the water was just up to the much higher. Peacock Inn in Sherard Street. Innovation Innovation through partnership Left Easter 1998 • floods ore categorised by their site and the frequency with which they con be expected to occur. A 1 in 5 year flood is one that has a 20% chance of happening in any year - this Is a relatively minor flood. A I in 100 year flood has only a 196 chance of happening in any year, but its effects can be enormous. Melton Mowbray flood alleviation scheme Previous flood alleviation schemes on the River Wreake Between 1967 and 1969 the However, it was not considered to be A number of schemes have been former Trent River Authority carried economically viable to carry out the carried out on other local out pioneer improvement works full scheme. Subsequently, during the watercourses to reduce water levels in Innovation Innovation through partnership involving the removal of shoals and 1980s, some channel dredging and Melton Mowbray in minor flood tree clearance. re-sectioning work was carried out as events, eg. Scalford Dam on Scalford part of a maintenance programme Brook which controls the rate of Although the town's historic mills are no to increase the channel capacity at discharge from this watercourse into longer used and the navigation of the lower flows and to reduce the Melton town centre. river has long since been abandoned, frequency of flooding. weirs still remain and the resultant high water levels in the river give rise to poor In the late 1980s, Frisby balancing land drainage conditions and cause lakes were constructed downstream of frequent flooding of the washland. In Melton Mowbray. Here, a series of the late 1970s, these conditions worked out gravel pits were utilised to prompted the former Severn Trent provide an off-line water storage area Water Authority to investigate and to protect the lower reaches of the prepare an improvement scheme for the River Wreake from frequent flooding. River Wreake. The lake system is designed to contain sufficient water to provide a Melton Melton Mowbray flood alleviation scheme 1 in 5 year standard of protection to areas downstream of Frisby. Below Frisby balancing lake Background to the scheme Following the Easter 1998 floods, over 250 properties downstream the Environment Agency started a on the River Wreake were at risk from feasibility study to investigate whether a 1 in 100 year flood event. an alleviation scheme to cope with A computer model was used to such severe conditions was practical. identify the key factors affecting While this was taking place, the flood flooding and to investigate a warning service for Melton Mowbray variety of options for flood alleviation was extended so that in times of in Melton Mowbray. flood, residents could have a better chance of protecting their property Options investigated included and possessions. upstream work to control the flow, improvements to weirs and sluices, The assessment of flood risk in Melton dredging the channel, floodbanks or identified that approximately 400 walls, relief channels and providing residential, commercial and industrial additional capacity at a number of properties in the town, (including bridges on the river. schools and the railway station) and Partnerships and funding The Melton Mowbray Flood Alleviation Scheme was approved and financed by the Regional Flood Defence Committee. Contributions were made by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) in the form of Grant Aid. In partnership with Melton Borough Council, the Environment Agency promoted a private funding venture Innovation through partnership with local businesses to cover a proportion of the construction costs. Left The Ham Bridge Silt trap Mowbray flood alleviation scheme Consultation A scheme cannot be developed without Extensive consultations were carried out considering the effects it may have on the local with a wide range of organisations, population, landowners and occupiers and any groups and individuals including local Innovation Innovation through partnership special interests in the area such as archaeology, authorities. Government agencies, public utilities, nature conservation and recreation. landowners, wildlife groups, local interest groups, members of the public etc. Detailed consultation with all interested parties took place during the preparation of The main issues covered during the consultation the scheme.
Recommended publications
  • The London Gazette, 23Rd July 1965 7049
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 23RD JULY 1965 7049 Notice is hereby, given that an application 'is being beginning on 9th August 1965 and ending on 6th made to -the Hampshire River Authority by Reginald September 1965. Any parties who wish to make George King, New Manor Farm, Winterslow, Nr. representations about the application should do so in Salisbury, for a licence to abstract the following writing to the Clerk of the Northumbrian River quantities of water from the Chalke Strata at the Authority at 110 Osbome Road, Newcastle upon Tyne following point) of abstraction: before the end of the said period. 1440 gallons per day at O.S. No. 169, Winterslow A. J. P. Dickinson, on behalf of Imperial parish. Chemical Industries Limited. Further details of the application are: For agriculture and domestic use. 2nd August 1965. A copy of the application and of any map, plan (285) or other document submitted with it may be inspected free of charge at New Manor Farm, Winterslow, at all reasonable hours during the period beginning on 9th July and ending on 23rd July 196S. Notice is hereby given that an application is being Any person who wishes to make representations made to the Devon River Authority by City Steam about the application should do so in writing to Laundry (Exeter) Ltd., Edgerton Park, Exeter, for a the Clerk of the Hampshire River Authority at licence to abstract the following quantities of water The Castle, Winchester, before the end of the said from red marl with occasional bands of sandstone period. at the following point of abstraction: Existing well Dated 6th July 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Regulation
    L AKE S UPERIOR R EGULATION LAKE SUPERIOR REGULATION: : A ADDRESSING UNCERTAINTY IN UPPER DDRESSING GREAT LAKES WATER LEVELS U NCERTAINTY IN U PPER G REAT L AKES W ATER L EVELS FINAL REPORT TO THE INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION MARCH 2012 Report Cover Changing water levels can have significant effects on the lives of the more than 25 million people who live and work in the upper Great Lakes region. The front cover shows an integrated view of the key interests served by these waters. In the centre of the image is a photograph of the control structures at the outlet of Lake Superior on the St. Marys River, the only location in the entire Great Lakes basin upstream from Niagara Falls where water levels can be affected by regulation. Under the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909, domestic and sanitary water uses, navigation, and power and irrigation are given order of precedence. These uses must be taken into account in the development of regulation plans. Today, it is recognized that other interests have rights under the Treaty, consistent with the International Joint Commission’s balancing principle – providing benefits or relief to interests affected by water levels and flows without causing undue detriment to other interests. With this in mind, the International Upper Great Lakes Study added the interests of ecosystems, coastal zone uses and recreational boating and tourism to its analysis of Lake Superior regulation and uncertainty in future upper Great Lakes water levels. In addition, the Study recognized that First Nations in Canada, Native Americans and Métis represent an important perspective in the upper Great Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Management Plan Phase 1
    Southern Staffordshire Surface Water Management Plan Phase 1 Stafford Borough, Lichfield District, Tamworth Borough, South Staffordshire District and Cannock Chase District Councils July 2010 Final Report 9V5955 CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 General Overview 1 1.2 Objectives of the SWMP 1 1.3 Scope of the SWMP 3 1.3.1 Phase 1 - Preparation 5 1.3.2 Phase 2 - Risk Assessment 5 2 ESTABLISHING A PARTNERSHIP 7 2.1 Identification of Partners 7 2.2 Roles and Responsibilities 9 2.3 Engagement Plan 10 2.4 Objectives 10 3 COLLATE AND MAP INFORMATION 11 3.1 Data Collection and Quality 11 3.1.1 Historic Flood Event Data 12 3.1.2 Future Flood Risk Data 15 3.2 Mapping and GIS 18 3.2.1 Surface Water Flooding 18 3.2.2 Flood Risk Assets 19 3.2.3 SUDS Map 19 3.2.4 Summary Sheets 20 4 STAFFORD BOROUGH 23 4.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 23 4.2 Surface Water Management 24 4.3 Recommendations 25 5 LICHFIELD DISTRICT 27 5.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 27 5.2 Surface Water Management 28 5.2.1 Canal Restoration 29 5.3 Recommendations 31 6 TAMWORTH BOROUGH 33 6.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 33 6.2 Surface Water Management 34 6.3 Recommendations 35 7 SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE DISTRICT 37 7.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 37 7.2 Surface Water Management 38 7.2.1 Canal Restoration 39 7.3 Recommendations 41 Southern Staffordshire SWMP Phase 1 9V5955/R00003/303671/Soli Final Report -i- July 2010 8 CANNOCK CHASE DISTRICT 43 8.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 43 8.2 Surface Water Management 44 8.2.1 Canal Restoration 45 8.3 Recommendations 47 9 SELECTION OF AN APPROACH FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS
    [Show full text]
  • 8240 the LONDON GAZETTE, Sora JULY 1971
    8240 THE LONDON GAZETTE, SOra JULY 1971 Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey. July 1971. DISEASES OF ANIMALS ACT 1950—GREAT BRITAIN OUTBREAKS OF NOTIFIABLE DISEASES CONFIRMED BY THE MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FOOD DURING THE PERIOD 1st to 15th July 1971 Anthrax Foot and Mouth Fowl Rabies Disease Pest Period Animals Out- Number Out- slaughtered Out- Out- breaks of breaks as diseased breaks breaks confirmed deaths confirmed or exposed confirmed confirmed to infection 1st to 15th July 197! 63 Corres- f!970 5 5 ponding -{ 1969 10 12 — — — — period in |j968 5 6 3—7 — —4 — 1st January to 15th July 1971 43 57 3,505 — — — Corres- f!970 84 87 — 24 1 ponding •{ 1969 145 154 — 31 — period in (.1968 134 152 18—7 34,94—4 53 """ ~ NOTES 1. The following diseases were eradicated from Great Britain in the years indicated: Cattle plague or rinder- pest (pestis-bovind) 1877; epizootic lymphangitis (lymphangitis epizootica) 1906; glanders (including farcy) (malleus), 1928; parasitic mange (psoroptes et sarcoptes scabiei equi), 1948; pleuro-pneumonia (peripneumonia contagiosa bovum), 1898; sheep pox (variola ovium), 1866; and sheep scab (scabies ovium), 1952. Dourine (exanthema coitale paralyticum) has never existed in Great Britain. 2. The last confirmed case of swine fever was in June 1966 and the disease is now regarded as eradicated from Great Britain. 3. No bovine animal was slaughtered as an "affected" animal within the meaning of Article 3 of the Tuber- culosis Order 1964, during the period 1st January to 30th June 1971. WATER RESOURCES ACT, 1963 Any objection to the draft Order should be made Trent River Authority Area in writing and sent .to the Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Room 400, at the Lincolnshire River Authority Area above address within the period ending with 31st Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of State August 1971 quoting reference LDC 1153.
    [Show full text]
  • Béng Salang Drainage Basin Ghn'öm#Iaötii:;^Iiïmbóclia:;S:*' ;;; Sawa
    |||«|iBi-««ss«,,,,.,„ •<îouueirânià"fYon*afrtWi&WP*»**"«**»s «"••••-•-•••-!\i-olhörlanHc:ïnÏT^SAïyiilfÏftft M#**iiiii l ; 1 f s December11990 liiiilis OttWWIayts l''*t**. iMvr'fc^^sW«*i s ' '^*" "*'*'***™*** "yK'!.TiS'syW%sii!^^ii^ïl m •** ••,.. •.. "'. '""" '!IS ' h '' * *W*i*»*hWer8rrt«3(a^OeweJopmênt ' ' J|'* jj^jj^ ^f T^fOJD ê ratiïMT * * • * * * • < ; s is 111 41 II 622 KHPH90 * Mi M SM | i iitl Hi • j* UNI», S ' • !•) f J 'Itlli,. iNiiiiii 'MM! ill ( tuti s t illililiiilllllllll^^^ ••IIIINI 4 !i'» < :*iH:1::iN|M|()||:ï::|:::-:i::::..: :|!:;| lilli • < iBiitiiiiit lllllNilHIilltii: MîMM MMI ! M f ! H t II ÜÏ >**ii;ii|i!i|ï «IliliiNliiiiii •I ••••: Jill!:!*::::. Béng Salang Drainage Basin : ' i * * i hllil ghn'öm#iaötii:;^iiïmbóclia:;s:*' ;;; r, i I • Consultancy Group for Utrecht, The Netherlands sawa Watersupply, Sanitation, Agriculture and Waterrnanagement International Institute for Delft, The Netherlands Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering DELFT LIBRARY ïERMATiONAL RFFERENCE CENT -•? COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY ••i'M-ilTATIQN (IRC1 December 1990 Municipality of Phnom-Penh NOVIB Sewerage Department Drainage Study of Beng Salang Drainage Basin Phnom-Penh, Cambodia LIBRARY, INTERNATIONAL REFERENCE CENTRE FOR COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY •v^iD SANITATION (IRC) . ). Box 93190, 2509 AD The Hagu» u;l. 1070) 814911 ext 141(142 International Institute for Consultancy Group for Hydraulic and Environmental Watersupply, Sanitation, Agriculture Engineering and Watermanagement P.O. Box 3015 Schoolplein 7 2601 DA Delft 3581 PX Utrecht The Netherlands
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 2013 Appendix B5
    ID³ Location1 Watercourse and Cause2 Dates Source Comments Staffordshire Past-Track 1 Near Uttoxeter River Dove Oct-03 Photos showing waterlogged fields http://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/ Picknall brook Staffordshire Past-Track 3ft/1m depth 2 Hockley Road 1946 Cause i? http://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/ Photo included Picknall brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 3 Hockley Road 2000 81.34m AOD Cause i? Jun-06 Picknall brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 4 Downstream of Hockley Road 2000 81.20m AOD Cause i? Jun-06 Picknall brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 5 Bridge Street/Brookside Road 2000 77.67m AOD Cause i? Jun-06 Picknall brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 6 Station Road Brookside Road 2000 77.72m AOD Cause i? Jun-06 Picknall Brook Picknall Brook SFRM 2005-6, 7 Hockley Road Oct/Nov 2000 5 properties flooded. Cause i? Jun-06 8 Picknall Brook Flood Warning given (8a-8b) Stafford Road to Racecourse Cause i? Dec-03 Environment Agency ‘Provision of Flood Warnings’ Report to Defra April 2005 Floodplain flooded only Staffordshire Past-Track 9 Dove Bank Snow thaw so possibly Cause iv? 1946 Photo included http://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/ BBC Nottingham News 10 Railway line Cause iv? Nov-00 Railway line closed Stoke on Trent to Derby line http://www.bbc.co.uk/nottingham/news/2000_11/09/floods_traveldetails.shtml (Feeder brook to Picknall) Big flood problem just after the three tributaries join as the culvert is not big enough to cope 11 Foxglove Avenue Area Regular Emma Roberts (Council) Cause iii and cause i with the runoff from hills plus the new development (housing estate) (Feeder brook to Picknall Brook) 12 Kingfisher Way Winter 2006/7 and a few before Emma Roberts (Council) Problems with the capacity of the culvert Cause i and cause iii Very small section 13 Between Park Street and The Dove Way Cause iii ? Emma Roberts (Council) of culvert neglected by the EA.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 8 Page.Pub
    Raymond Waterways Newsletter Published by Raymond Waterways Protective Association “To protect and improve pond and lake water quality and foster watershed stewardship” June 2004 Dear Friends of Raymond Waterways; Inside this Issue: After experiencing a “non-winter” with cerned about and this one is very close to Milfoil Update 2 hardly any snow, we anxiously await a nor- us. Little Sebago Lake has a close relative mal summer, replete with warm tempera- of variable milfoil called Myrophyllum RWPA Structure 3 tures and sunny days. pinnatum. We know that this new (to us) Lake Associations 3 plant does not have flowers like variable First, a change of date... Thomas Pond 4 You may be a bit surprised by the early milfoil, making it even more difficult to Conservation Project arrival of this publication. We surmised identify! that most people’s interest in lake activities The first line of defense, our staff... Panther Pond 4 is greater in early summer rather than late We have been fortunate to acquire the ser- Watershed Survey in the season and it gives us a chance to let vices of Noralee Raymond as Executive Crescent & Raymond 5 you know about upcoming trainings and Director. She is in charge of education, Project Completed events, hence the change. Hope you agree. overall coordination, and is the person to Free Technical 5 And, what’s on our mind is... contact for all communications. She will Assistance Of course the milfoil situation. While it is be active in running both the Milfoil 2003 Water Quality 6 very true that Raymond is surrounded by Ranger Program and the Watershed Stew- Monitoring Results infected lakes (North-Parker Pond, East- ards Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Further Reading
    Guide to Further Reading This short list of books is not intended to be fully comprehensive, but aims to assist the reader in finding his way to a number of recent works, neither cited in the text nor specifically restricted to Britain, which contain abundant references to more specialised systematic fields. BRUCE, J. P., and CLARK, R. H. (1966). Introduction to Hydrometeorology, Pergamon, Oxford. CmLDs, E. C. (1969). Introduction to the Physical Basis of Soil Water Phenomena, Wiley, Chichester and New York. DAVIES, D. (1967). Fresh Water, Aldus Books, London. DE WIEST, R. J. M. (1965). Geohydrology, Wiley, New York. OVERMAN, M. (1968). Water, Aldus Books, London. PENMAN, H. L. (1963). Vegetation and Hydrology, Commonwealth Agri- cultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal. RAIKES, R. (1967). Water, Weather and Prehistory, Baker, London. TODD, D. K. (1959). Groundwater Hydrology, Wiley, New York. TwEEDm, A. D. (1966). Water and the World, Nelson, Melbourne. WIESNER, C. J. (1970). Hydrometeorology, Chapman and Hall, London. WISLER, C. 0., and BRATER, E. F. (1959). Hydrology, Wiley, New York. 218 References 1. The Global Context BARRY, R. G. (1969). The world hydrological cycle, Water, Earth and Man, (ed. R. J. Chorley), Methuen, London. BENTON, G. S., BLACKBURN, R. T., and SNEAD, V. O. (1950). The role of the atmosphere in the hydrologic cycle. Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 31, 61-73. CHORLEY, R. J., and KATES, R. W. (1969). Introduction, in Water, Earth and Man, (ed. R. J. Chorley), Methuen, London. ISAAC, P. C. G. (1965). Water, waste and wealth. An inaugural lecture, University of Newcastle-on-Tyne. LEOPOLD, L. B., and DAVIS, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Simonton Lake Diagnostic/Feasibility Study Elkhart County, Indiana
    Simonton Lake Diagnostic/Feasibility Study Elkhart County, Indiana May 2011 Prepared for: Simonton Lake Home Owners Association c/o William Broderick 1424 Johnson St. Elkhart, IN 46514 Prepared by: 708 Roosevelt Road Walkerton, Indiana 46574 (574) 586-3400 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Simonton Lake is a 301 acre (121.8 hectares) groundwater fed lake located in the northwest portion of Elkhart County Indiana. The Simonton Lake watershed extends north of Simonton Lake into Cass County, Michigan and encompasses approximately 5,233 acres (2,177.7 ha). The lake drains south through Lilly Creek (Osolo Township Ditch) into the St. Joseph River then to Lake Michigan. The soils surrounding the lake are primarily sands from glacial outwash or low muck areas that are wetlands. Soil erosion is not an issue as there are no permanently flowing surface streams entering Simonton Lake. Historically, the watershed was primarily upland deciduous forest pocketed with prairie, sedge meadow, swamp, and seeps. The watershed is now approximately 60 percent agricultural and 40 percent low intensity residential development, with residents in the vicinity of the lake connected to sewers since 1999-2000. A review of residential development around the lake noted 20 structures in 1939 on the south side of the west basin. By 1951, North Shore Drive had been extended to the narrows with over 30 homes along the northern lakeshore and approximately 30 homes on the south side. Development of the channels on the east end of the east basin began in 1957. By this time, as many as 100 structures existed on the south side of the west basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of Information to Inform USFWS Principals on the Potential Effects of the Proposed Klamath Basin Restoration Agreeme
    Introduction Compilation of information to Inform USFWS Principals on the Potential Effects of the Proposed Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement (Draft 11) on Fish and Fish Habitat Conditions in the Klamath Basin, with Emphasis on Fall Chinook Salmon Introduction In late 2007, the Regional Director (Region 8) of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) requested technical staff from the Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office to evaluate the potential effects of the proposed Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement (KBRA- Draft 11) on fish and fish habitat conditions. Staff had been providing various technical analyses and assistance to Service managers for several months during negotiation of the draft KBRA prior to receiving this assignment. Following public release of Draft 11 of the KBRA in February, 2008, staff completed a draft compilation in April 2008, and provided it to settlement parties for review and comment. On April 11 and 12, 2008, technical and policy representatives of settlement parties met in Mt. Shasta, CA to critically discuss the analyses contained in the report, and written comments were subsequently provided by several parties. The current draft version (November 2009) incorporates many of these comments, as well as additional comments solicited from State and Federal agencies in November, 2009. In addition, staff relied extensively on subject matter experts from both within and outside of the Service to review sections of the report that pertain to their specific area of expertise. The purpose of this report is to provide the Service managers involved in the on-going Klamath settlement negotiations with supporting information and documentation of the Service’s technical staff analyses, data interpretations, and professional opinions relating to anticipated changes in fish production and fish habitat conditions that would occur as a result of implementation of the KBRA and the draft Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement (KHSA), collectively referred to hereafter as the Agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton Keynes Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (April 2015)
    Milton Keynes Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report April 2015 47070452 UNITED KINGDOM & IRELAND Prepared for: Milton Keynes Council — Level 1 SFRA Update REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 September Draft for Comment Sarah Littlewood Elizabeth Gent Elizabeth Gent 2014 Consultant Principal Consultant Principal Consultant Richard Karooni Consultant Ewan McCracken Consultant 2 April 2015 Final Report Sarah Littlewood Helen Judd Jon Robinson (incorporating Consultant Senior Consultant Operations Director - comments from Water MKC, the Joanna Bolding Environment Consultant Agency and Bedford Group of Gemma Hoad Drainage Boards) Senior Consultant URS Infrastructure and Environment UK Ltd 6-8 Greencoat Place London SW1P 1PL United Kingdom Telephone: +44(0)20 7798 5000 Fax: +44(0)20 7798 5001 LEVEL 1 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT 47070452 April 2015 i Milton Keynes Council — Level 1 SFRA Update Limitations URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“URS”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Milton Keynes Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed (URS Quotation of Services ‘Milton Keynes SFRA Level 1 Update - Quotation of Services.pdf). No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise stated in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Introduction: Cslap Data and Copake Lake Ii. Cslap Sampling Parameters: What And
    I. INTRODUCTION: CSLAP DATA AND COPAKE LAKE Water quality monitoring serves a wide variety of purposes. It provides a window for observing and starting to understand the numerous and complex interactions of lakes. Monitoring can help to evaluate contemporary water quality conditions and project future water quality trends, and may serve as a bridge between lake conditions and use of the lake. However, even the most extensive and expensive monitoring program cannot completely assess the water quality of lakes, but by looking at some basic chemical, physical, and biological indicators, it is possible to gain a greater understanding of the general condition of lakes. Such information is critical for managing lakes, assessing short- and long-term water quality conditions and trends, and for comparing lakes sharing common geographic settings and lake uses. The Citizens Statewide Lake Assessment Program (CSLAP) is a volunteer lake monitoring program conducted by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and the NYS Federation of Lake Associations. Founded in 1986 with 25 pilot lakes, the program now involves more than 175 lakes, ponds, and reservoirs and 1200 volunteers from eastern Long Island to the Northern Adirondacks to the western-most lake in New York, including several Finger Lakes, Lake Ontario, and lakes within state parks. In this program, lay volunteers trained by the NYSDEC collect water samples, observations, and perception data every other week in a fifteen-week interval between May and October. Generally, water samples are collected from the lake surface at the deepest part of the lake, using standard limnological equipment and sampling procedures. Water samples are analyzed by the NYS Department of Health.
    [Show full text]