100 Years of Fighting Forest Fires in Maryland by William Offutt Johnson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

100 Years of Fighting Forest Fires in Maryland by William Offutt Johnson T H E Glades Star — Published by — THE GARRETT COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY The Garrett County Historical Society Salutes 100 Years of Fighting Forest Fires in Maryland by William Offutt Johnson Reprinted by: The Foundation for Maryland Conservation History, Inc. Fig. 1 THE GLADES STAR 1 September 2011, June and September 2012 The Garrett County Historical Society Salutes 100 Years of Fighting Forest Fires in Maryland by William Offutt Johnson With valuable contributions from the Maryland Forest Service, Will Williams, Education Specialist, Retired and Monte Mitchell, State Forest Fire Supervisor. Technical Assistance provided by Francis “Champ” Zumbrun and Joan Johnson his is the third part of “A Salute land from 1911 to 1915 is as follows: Tto 100 Years of Forestry and State Parks in Maryland.” Part 1, Year Amount of Damage “Conserving Forests,” appeared in (in 1916 dollars) the June 2006 Glades Star and Part 1911 .........................$225,801 2, the “Evolution of State Parks” was 1912 .............................48,212 published in the September 2006 is- 1913 ............................42,443 sue. Part 3, “Fighting Forests Fires,” 1914 ...........................129,844 completes the State Forest and Park 1915 ..........................108,966 Centennial Series. State Forester Besley continued, These centennial histories on “The damage caused by forest fires forestry and state parks in Maryland is not fully appreciated. This is one are dedicated to all the men and reason why so many are allowed women of Western Maryland’s State to occur, and that many which do Forests and Parks District 1 (aka the occur are given little attention by Western Region) who, for more than property owners. Not only do fires 100 years, have gone beyond the call damage fences and merchantable fighting wild fires, improving park timber, whose value is more clearly lands and reforesting the mountains recognized, but fires also destroy on and valleys to provide wood, water, the ground the seed which nature wildlife, cleaner air, scenic views, has provided for the perpetuation natural and historic heritage preserva- of the forest. The accumulated leaf tion, and recreation to Marylanders litter and partly decomposed organic and our out-of-state guests. We hope matter, so important in conserving these articles do justice describing the soil moisture and adding fertility to natural resource legacy that has been the soil, are completely destroyed, the Fig. 2 established. ground becoming dry and hard. The small Fire, when controlled, is one of our of unnecessary waste in the removal of seedlings are consumed, and where the fire most valuable phenomenas, but just let timber. Not only has an immense quan- is not intense enough to quickly destroy the it get away from us, and it will reek and tity of young growth been unnecessarily young growth, the bark is burned through pour down economic loss, destruction and destroyed, due to careless methods, but a on one side, exposing the living wood to death. Regardless of the location—city, study of the subject has shown that about decay. The tree may continue to grow, suburb or countryside—the ravages of half of the usable part of the tree is either but the decay also increases, stunting its fire out of control render damages beyond left in the woods or wasted in sawing. Not growth and reducing its timber value to calculation. only is there a large amount of unnecessary a great extent, frequently to the point of Fire causes more damage than meets waste, which improved methods would making it practically worthless. It is these the eye ... find it profitable to use, but this large fire-scars on the young trees and also on The following was printed in “The amount of debris left in the woods adds older ones which produce the decay ul- Forests of Maryland” in 1916 written by immeasurably to the fire risk. Records show timately resulting in hollowed trees and Maryland’s first State Forester Fred W. that forest fires almost invariably follow many other defects. Besley. lumbering operations. “A woodland that is repeatedly burned “There has also been a large amount “Fires: The forest fire damage in Mary- over by fires constantly deteriorates in 2 THE GLADES STAR quality, and the production is greatly re- ABUSE AND DESTRUCTIVE duced or ceases entirely. Fire protection is HABITS HAD TO GIVE WAY TO SCIENTIFIC FORESTRY the first requisite for improved conditions CONSERVATION PRACTICES. in woodlots; without it there can be no Such were the permanent improvement. Since, however, conditions in 1906 90% of the forest fires are the result of confronting State carelessness, the situation will improve as Forester Fred Bes- rapidly as people are educated to the nature ley. The results of and extent of the damage caused by forest his State Inventory fires.” Fred Besley truly believed in the published in 1916 basic principle that “conservation begins revealed the poten- with education.” tial forest lands in MARYLAND COLONISTS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS, CLEAR Maryland covered WHAT THEY THOUGHT WERE INEXHAUSTIBLE FORESTS... 2,228,046 acres of For more than 270 years following woodland, represent- the establishment of Lord Baltimore’s ing 35% of Mary- Maryland colony, there was no organized land’s original for- method to perpetuate and sustain forests. ested lands. However, The great pre-colonial forests covering because of numerous 95% of the State declined from clearing, fires, over cutting and timbering and burning to make space no effort to re-plant for settlements and agriculture. Further, trees and protect for- Fig. 3 people paid little or no attention to fires est lands from more started by natural causes that burned for fires, livestock grazing, insect infestation, attention of an incredible coalition of forest weeks and sometimes months out of con- and/or disease had made much of this and park conservation advocates to take trol. By the early 1900s the forests of this potential woodland unproductive and un- action to re-grow the forests of Maryland. state and the soil they grow in had become marketable. This crisis dovetailed at a time The goal was to renew forest lands into an seriously depleted. A similar condition was when development in Maryland demanded ongoing sustainable contributor of wood, found in many states east of the Mississippi lumber and forest byproducts be imported wood byproducts, water, wildlife and rec- River where it was estimated that only from other states and countries to meet the reation. Woodlands of beauty, green buffers 30% forest cover remained in 1907 in the need of growth and urbanization. to urban growth, and purifiers of air for the eastern United States. This phenomenal forest famine got the growing Maryland population. Parts 1 and 2 of the Centen- nial series detailed how brothers John and Robert Garrett gave land in Garrett County for the first state forest, providing a bill creating a state forest and park department pass in the Maryland General Assembly. These articles further account how State Senator McCulloch Brown of Garrett County wrote and introduced the forestry and state park bill and how Senate President Colonel Joseph B. Seth of Talbot County enthusiasti- cally supported Senator Brown’s bill; and how the first U.S. Chief Forester, Gifford Pinchot, gave Senator Brown wording for his forestry legislation and later recommended, to Gover- nor Edwin Warfield, one of his top foresters, Fred Besley, to be Maryland’s first State Forester. Also noted was the influence of Fig. 4. Fig. 5. THE GLADES STAR 3 the prominent State Geologist, William unteers to fight fires and carry his message Bullock Clark, who had promoted forestry to the public. His continuous horse and programs in Maryland prior to the 1906 buggy travels around the state to pre- legislation. Following shortly after- pare a comprehensive forest inven- wards was the good efforts of State tory (the first such study produced Senator Carville D. Benson and the by any state in the U.S.) put him Baltimore Municipal Arts Society in contact with prominent lo- and the Frederick Law Olmstead cal community leaders who Architects, sons of the New York were impressed with him City’s Central Park famous and interested in advancing planner, who recommended his program for the good of suburban state parks buffering the State. It was these men Baltimore City. to whom Besley appealed to Their actions were most their civic duty and recom- timely and dramatic and coupled mended their names to the with the indefatigable Fred Besley Governor to be commissioned leading his staff of three and with as Forest Wardens. a starting budget of only $2,000 When the Forestry Act was annually, Maryland began to practice amended in 1910, it gave wardens the art and science of managed forestry the powers of constables so far as ar- and providing state parks. Right from the resting and prosecuting persons for all beginning Mr. Besley recognized that if violations of any of the forest laws or of the he was to make any improvements in the Fig. 6. First logo of the Maryland State Board laws, rules, or regulations enacted or to be forests of Maryland, control of forest fires of Forestry was used in early publications. enacted for the protection of the State for- had to be one of the highest priorities in his Maryland where it remained until 1941, estry reservations. Soon 300 such dedicated campaign. Other top initiatives included when the Department of Forests and Parks and upstanding citizens were appointed as a county by county inventory of all forest was established and placed under the State Forest Wardens statewide. Most of their lands of 5 acres or more, establishing a Board of Natural Resources. work was volunteer; however, Maryland’s state forest tree nursery, improving the state Under the three agencies mentioned first Forestry Act provided the Forest War- owned demonstration forests at Patapsco above, between 1906 and 1970 a dynamic dens a small compensation of $20 per year Park, Swallow Falls and Fort Frederick foundation was laid for forestry and state for services rendered and expenses incurred Forest Reserves, and building a staff and park programs, and the evolution of Mary- during the execution of their duties.
Recommended publications
  • Maryland's Wildland Preservation System “The Best of the Best”
    Maryland’s Wildland Preservation System “The“The Best Best ofof thethe Best” Best” What is a Wildland? Natural Resources Article §5‐1201(d): “Wildlands” means limited areas of [State‐owned] land or water which have •Retained their wilderness character, although not necessarily completely natural and undisturbed, or •Have rare or vanishing species of plant or animal life, or • Similar features of interest worthy of preservation for use of present and future residents of the State. •This may include unique ecological, geological, scenic, and contemplative recreational areas on State lands. Why Protect Wildlands? •They are Maryland’s “Last Great Places” •They represent much of the richness & diversity of Maryland’s Natural Heritage •Once lost, they can not be replaced •In using and conserving our State’s natural resources, the one characteristic more essential than any other is foresight What is Permitted? • Activities which are consistent with the protection of the wildland character of the area, such as hiking, canoeing, kayaking, rafting, hunting, fishing, & trapping • Activities necessary to protect the area from fire, animals, insects, disease, & erosion (evaluated on a case‐by case basis) What is Prohibited? Activities which are inconsistent with the protection of the wildland character of the area: permanent roads structures installations commercial enterprises introduction of non‐native wildlife mineral extraction Candidate Wildlands •23 areas •21,890 acres •9 new •13,128 acres •14 expansions Map can be found online at: http://dnr.maryland.gov/land/stewardship/pdfs/wildland_map.pdf
    [Show full text]
  • Camping Places (Campsites and Cabins) with Carderock Springs As
    Camping places (campsites and cabins) With Carderock Springs as the center of the universe, here are a variety of camping locations in Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Delaware. A big round of applause to Carderock’s Eric Nothman for putting this list together, doing a lot of research so the rest of us can spend more time camping! CAMPING in Maryland 1) Marsden Tract - 5 mins - (National Park Service) - C&O canal Mile 11 (1/2 mile above Carderock) three beautiful group campsites on the Potomac. Reservations/permit required. Max 20 to 30 people each. C&O canal - hiker/biker campsites (no permit needed - all are free!) about every five miles starting from Swains Lock to Cumberland. Campsites all the way to Paw Paw, WV (about 23 sites) are within 2 hrs drive. Three private campgrounds (along the canal) have cabins. Some sections could be traveled by canoe on the Potomac (canoe camping). Closest: Swains Lock - 10 mins - 5 individual tent only sites (one isolated - take path up river) - all close to parking lot. First come/first serve only. Parking fills up on weekends by 8am. Group Campsites are located at McCoy's Ferry, Fifteen Mile Creek, Paw Paw Tunnel, and Spring Gap. They are $20 per site, per night with a maximum of 35 people. Six restored Lock-houses - (several within a few miles of Carderock) - C&O Canal Trust manages six restored Canal Lock-houses for nightly rental (some with heat, water, A/C). 2) Cabin John Regional Park - 10 mins - 7 primitive walk-in sites. Pit toilets, running water.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-Symposium-Booklet.Pdf
    0 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Abstracts ................................................................................................................................................ 2 COLLEGE OF BUSINESS Department of Management ....................................................................................................................... 3 Department of Marketing and Finance ........................................................................................................ 5 COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Department of Kinesiology and Recreation ................................................................................................. 6 COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES Department of Biology ............................................................................................................................... 10 Department of Chemistry ........................................................................................................................... 25 Department of Communication ................................................................................................................. 28 Department of Computer Science and Information Technologies ............................................................ 29 Department of English and Foreign Languages .......................................................................................... 31 Department of Geography ......................................................................................................................... 39 Department
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating the MAPS Program Into Coordinated Bird Monitoring in the Northeast (U.S
    Integrating the MAPS Program into Coordinated Bird Monitoring in the Northeast (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5) A Report Submitted to the Northeast Coordinated Bird Monitoring Partnership and the American Bird Conservancy P.O. Box 249, 4249 Loudoun Avenue, The Plains, Virginia 20198 David F. DeSante, James F. Saracco, Peter Pyle, Danielle R. Kaschube, and Mary K. Chambers The Institute for Bird Populations P.O. Box 1346 Point Reyes Station, CA 94956-1346 Voice: 415-663-2050 Fax: 415-663-9482 www.birdpop.org [email protected] March 31, 2008 i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 3 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Collection of MAPS data.................................................................................................................... 5 Considered Species............................................................................................................................. 6 Reproductive Indices, Population Trends, and Adult Apparent Survival .......................................... 6 MAPS Target Species......................................................................................................................... 7 Priority
    [Show full text]
  • Signal Knob Northern Massanutten Mountain Catback Mountain Browns Run Southern Massanutten Mountain Five Areas of Around 45,000 Acres on the Lee the West
    Sherman Bamford To: [email protected] <[email protected] cc: Sherman Bamford <[email protected]> > Subject: NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage draft multi-species habitat conservation plan comments - attachments 2 12/13/2011 03:32 PM Sherman Bamford Forests Committee Chair Virginia Chapter – Sierra Club P.O. Box 3102 Roanoke, Va. 24015 [email protected] (540) 343-6359 December 13, 2011 Regional Director, Midwest Region Attn: Lisa Mandell U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990 Bloomington, MN 55437-1458 Email: [email protected] Dear Ms. Mandell: On behalf of the Virginia Chapter of Sierra Club, the following are attachments to our previously submitted comments on the the NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage (“NiSource”) draft multi-species habitat conservation plan (“HCP”) and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (“Service”) draft environmental impact statement (“EIS”). Draft of Virginia Mountain Treasures For descriptions and maps only. The final version was published in 2008. Some content may have changed between 2007 and 2008. Sherman Bamford Sherman Bamford PO Box 3102 Roanoke, Va. 24015-1102 (540) 343-6359 [email protected] Virginia’s Mountain Treasures ART WORK DRAWING The Unprotected Wildlands of the George Washington National Forest A report by the Wilderness Society Cover Art: First Printing: Copyright by The Wilderness Society 1615 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202)-843-9453 Wilderness Support Center 835 East Second Avenue Durango, CO 81302 (970) 247-8788 Founded in 1935, The Wilderness Society works to protect America’s wilderness and to develop a nation- wide network of wild lands through public education, scientific analysis, and advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumter National Forest Revised Land and Resource Management Plan
    Revised Land and Resource Management Plan United States Department of Agriculture Sumter National Forest Forest Service Southern Region Management Bulletin R8-MB 116A January 2004 Revised Land and Resource Management Plan Sumter National Forest Abbeville, Chester, Edgefield, Fairfield, Greenwood, Laurens, McCormick, Newberry, Oconee, Saluda, and Union Counties Responsible Agency: USDA–Forest Service Responsible Official: Robert Jacobs, Regional Forester USDA–Forest Service Southern Region 1720 Peachtree Road, NW Atlanta, GA 33067-9102 For Information Contact: Jerome Thomas, Forest Supervisor 4931 Broad River Road Columbia, SC 29212-3530 Telephone: (803) 561-4000 January 2004 The picnic shelter on the cover was originally named the Charles Suber Recreational Unit and was planned in 1936. The lake and picnic area including a shelter were built in 1938-1939. The original shelter was found inadequate and a modified model B-3500 shelter was constructed probably by the CCC from camp F-6 in 1941. The name of the recreation area was changed in 1956 to Molly’s Rock Picnic Area, which was the local unofficial name. The name originates from a sheltered place between and under two huge boulders once inhabited by an African- American woman named Molly. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Landforms of Virginia
    Vol. 34 August 1988 No. 3 SCENIC LANDFORMS OF VIRGINIA Harry Webb . Virginia has a wide variety of scenic landforms, such State Highway, SR - State Road, GWNF.R(T) - George as mountains, waterfalls, gorges, islands, water and Washington National Forest Road (Trail), JNFR(T) - wind gaps, caves, valleys, hills, and cliffs. These land- Jefferson National Forest Road (Trail), BRPMP - Blue forms, some with interesting names such as Hanging Ridge Parkway mile post, and SNPMP - Shenandoah Rock, Devils Backbone, Striped Rock, and Lovers Leap, National Park mile post. range in elevation from Mt. Rogers at 5729 feet to As- This listing is primarily of those landforms named on sateague and Tangier islands near sea level. Two nat- topographic maps. It is hoped that the reader will advise ural lakes occur in Virginia, Mountain Lake in Giles the Division of other noteworthy landforms in the st& County and Lake Drummond in the City of Chesapeake. that are not mentioned. For those features on private Gaps through the mountains were important routes for land always obtain the owner's permission before vis- early settlers and positions for military movements dur- iting. Some particularly interesting features are de- ing the Civil War. Today, many gaps are still important scribed in more detail below. locations of roads and highways. For this report, landforms are listed alphabetically Dismal Swamp (see Chesapeake, City of) by county or city. Features along county lines are de- The Dismal Swamp, located in southeastern Virginia, scribed in only one county with references in other ap- is about 10 to 11 miles wide and 15 miles long, and propriate counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • AL-III-C-143 Evitts (Evart's) Home Site
    AL-III-C-143 Evitts (Evart's) Home Site Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 12-11-2003 ,A1.--111-c....-14'3 Rocky Gap State Park MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST Evitts Home Site Evitts Creek Quad INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY HISTORIC Evitts Home Site AND/OR COMMON fJLOCATION STREET & NUMBER Rocky Gap State Park CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT VICINITY OF Sixth STATE COUNTY Maryland Allegany DcLAsSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT x_PUBLIC _OCCUPIED _AGRICULTURE _MUSEUM -BUILDING(S) _PRIVATE --.XJNOCCUPIED _COMMERCIAL )LPARK -- _STRUCTURE -BOTH _WORK IN PROGRESS _EDUCATIONAL _PRIVATE RESIDENCE _XSITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE J{ENTERTAINMENT _RELIGIOUS _OBJECT _IN PROCESS _J(YES RESTRICTED _GOVERNMENT _SCIENTIFIC -BEING CONSIDERED _YES: UNRESTRICTED _INDUSTRIAL _TRANSPORTATION _NO _MILITARY _OTHER DOWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Maryland Department of Natural Resources Telephone #: STREET & NUMBER Taylor Avenue CITY.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX
    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadname Route Grid Range
    ROADNAME ROUTE GRID RANGE ABANA DR PVT 16 (100-267) ACADEMY RD SC 709 128 (100-227) ACADEMY RD SC 709 129 (228-753) ADAMS CEMETERY LN SC 773 103 (100-725) ADDINGTON FRAME RD SC 671 71 (100-1181) ADDINGTON FRAME RD SC 670 71 (1182-1925) ADDINGTON FRAME RD SC 670 72 (1926-2907) ADDINGTON FRAME RD SC 673 72 (2908-3941) ADDINGTON ST PVT 147 (100-123) ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DR PVT 80 (100-158) AKARD LN SC 756 178 (580-757) AKARD LN SC 756 174 (758-2183) ALASKA DR PVT 64 (100-379) ALLEY VALLEY RD SC 619 106 (100-289) ALLEY VALLEY RD SC 619 105 (290-2369) ALLEY VALLEY RD SC 619 86 (2370-2699) ALLEY VALLEY RD SC 619 87 (2700-4809) ALLEY VALLEY RD SC 619 68 (4810-4871) ALLEY VALLEY RD SC 619 69 (4872-6037) ALOE DR PVT 168 (100-145) ALPINE RIDGE LN SC 949 166 (100-499) AMERICANA DR PVT 167 (100-163) ANCHORED IN LOVE DR PVT 130 (100-255) ANDERSON ST T-835 146 (100-369) ANDREA ST SC 941 125 (100-287) ANGLERS WAY RD SC 625 120 (100-1441) ANGLERS WAY RD SC 625 119 (1442-2289) ANGLERS WAY RD SC 625 140 (2290-3541) ANGLERS WAY RD SC 625 139 (3542-5881) ANGLERS WAY RD SC 625 138 (5882-6999) ANGLERS WAY RD SC 625 159 (7000-8145) ANGLERS WAY RD SC 625 158 (8146-9295) ANGUS GLEN DR PVT 90 (100-1099) ANGUS GLEN DR PVT 72 (1100-1409) ANITA AVE T-1423 125 (100-193) ANITA AVE T-1423 146 (192-203) ANN GOODE COOPER RD SC 690 131 (100-555) ANN GOODE COOPER RD SC 689 131 (556-2555) ANN GOODE COOPER RD SC 689 130 (2556-3643) ANN GOODE COOPER RD SC 689 151 (3644-3807) ANNAK DR PVT 167 (100-185) ANNIES DR PVT 64 (100-179) ANTELOPE DR PVT 173 (100-441) ANTIOCH CIR SC 790
    [Show full text]
  • Savage River State Forest Is a Natural Area with Hunting Is Permitted Throughout the Forest
    DIRECTIONS Take Exit 22 off I-68, turn left and go south on Chestnut Ridge WELCOME Please Play Safe! HUNTING Savage River Reservoir Road. At the stop sign, turn left onto New Germany Road. Savage River State Forest is a natural area with Hunting is permitted throughout the forest. The Savage River Reservoir provides fishing and Continue for two miles. Turn right onto Headquarters Lane certain hazards such as overhanging branches, Boundaries are marked with yellow paint. No paddling opportunities. Boat launches are located and continue to the forest office on the right. rocky and slippery trails, and venomous hunting allowed where there are safety zone signs or at Big Run State Park, Dry Run Road and near the snakes. Bottles of water and sturdy shoes are where posted by private landowners. Hunters should breast of the dam. No gasoline motors are permitted. Approximately 3 hours from Washington, D.C./Baltimore, 2 hours from Pittsburgh. recommended while exploring, as well as blaze consult the Maryland Hunting Guide — available at Anglers can catch Catfish, Trout, Bass and Tiger orange clothing during hunting seasons. Some of dnr.maryland.gov/huntersguide — for exact season Muskie. Depending on the season, visitors may More information is available at dnr.maryland.gov/ the forest trails are gravel roads, which are open dates and bag limits. see grouse, great blue herons, king fishers, minks publiclands/western/savageriverforest.asp or by contacting to motor vehicles at various times. Remember, and eagles as well. Swimming in the Reservoir is the forest office. you are responsible for having the necessary Several access roads are available to hunters with prohibited.
    [Show full text]