DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrating the MAPS Program Into Coordinated Bird Monitoring in the Northeast (U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrating the MAPS Program Into Coordinated Bird Monitoring in the Northeast (U.S Integrating the MAPS Program into Coordinated Bird Monitoring in the Northeast (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5) A Report Submitted to the Northeast Coordinated Bird Monitoring Partnership and the American Bird Conservancy P.O. Box 249, 4249 Loudoun Avenue, The Plains, Virginia 20198 David F. DeSante, James F. Saracco, Peter Pyle, Danielle R. Kaschube, and Mary K. Chambers The Institute for Bird Populations P.O. Box 1346 Point Reyes Station, CA 94956-1346 Voice: 415-663-2050 Fax: 415-663-9482 www.birdpop.org [email protected] March 31, 2008 i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 3 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Collection of MAPS data.................................................................................................................... 5 Considered Species............................................................................................................................. 6 Reproductive Indices, Population Trends, and Adult Apparent Survival .......................................... 6 MAPS Target Species......................................................................................................................... 7 Priority Habitats.................................................................................................................................. 9 Station-Specific Recommendations.................................................................................................... 9 Goals for MAPS Program Growth ................................................................................................... 10 Federal and State Lands for Potential MAPS Growth in the Northeast ........................................... 10 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................................. 10 1. Captures, Habitat Associations, Plan Listings, Trends, and Vital Rates ..................................... 10 1.1. Northeast Regional Scale...................................................................................................... 10 1.2. BCR Scale............................................................................................................................. 11 2. Priority and Target Species.......................................................................................................... 13 2.1. Northeast Regional Scale...................................................................................................... 13 2.2. BCR scale ............................................................................................................................. 14 3. Priority Habitats and Target Species ........................................................................................... 15 4. MAPS Station Evaluation............................................................................................................ 16 4.1. Northeast Regional Scale...................................................................................................... 16 4.2. BCR Scale............................................................................................................................. 16 5. Goals for MAPS Program Growth in the Northeast.................................................................... 19 6. Geographic Gaps and Opportunities for Monitoring on Public Lands........................................ 19 DISCUSSION....................................................................................................................................... 20 Summary........................................................................................................................................... 21 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................................................. 22 LITERATURE CITED......................................................................................................................... 22 ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Landbird species considered for our analysis of the Northeast MAPS program. For each species, we summarize PIF and state plan listings, 1992-2003 Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) trends and MAPS data, and monitoring priority scores................................................................ 25 Table 2. Landbird species considered for our analysis in Bird Conservation Region 14, Atlantic Northern Forest. For each species, we summarize PIF and state plan listings, priority scores, 1980-2006 Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) trends and 1992-2003 MAPS data, and monitoring priority scores. .............................................................................................................................. 32 Table 3. Landbird species considered for our analysis in Bird Conservation Region 13, Lower Great Lakes/St. Lawrence Plain. For each species, we summarize PIF and state plan listings, priority scores,1980-2006 Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) trends and 1992-2003 MAPS data, and monitoring priority scores............................................................................................................. 38 Table 4. Landbird species considered for our analysis in Bird Conservation Region 28, Appalachian Mountains. For each species, we summarize PIF and state plan listings, priority scores,1980- 2006 Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) trends and 1992-2003 MAPS data, and monitoring priority scores. ........................................................................................................................................... 43 Table 5. Landbird species considered for our analysis in Bird Conservation Region 30, New England/Mid-Atlantic Coast. For each species, we summarize PIF and state plan listings, priority scores,1980-2006 Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) trends and 1992-2003 MAPS data, and monitoring priority scores............................................................................................................. 49 Table 6. Landbird species considered for our analysis in Bird Conservation Region 29, Piedmont. For each species, we summarize PIF and state plan listings, priority scores,1980-2006 Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) trends and 1992-2003 MAPS data, and monitoring priority scores.............. 55 Table 7. Landbird species considered for our analysis in Bird Conservation Region 27, Southeastern Coastal Plain. For each species, we summarize PIF and state plan listings, priority scores,1980- 2006 Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) trends and 1992-2003 MAPS data, and monitoring priority scores. ........................................................................................................................................... 60 Table 8. Forty-eight MAPS priority-target and control-target species for the Northeast region and their BCR-specific target status.................................................................................................... 64 Table 9. Target species by habitat in the Northeast region and in each BCR within the Northeast region. ........................................................................................................................................... 66 Table 10. 183 MAPS Stations operated in the Northeast region between 1989 and 2006.................. 67 Table 11. Goals for MAPS program growth in the Northeast region by BCR.................................... 75 Table 12. Federal and state land Parcels in the Northeast U. S. by Bird Conservation Region (BCR) and MAPS stations operated on those lands during 1989-2007................................................... 76 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Number of active MAPS stations operated by year in the Northeastern U.S... ................... 87 Figure 2. MAPS stations by habitat and Bird Conservation Region (BCR) in the Northeastern U.S. 88 Figure 3. MAPS stations and federal and state landholdings in the Northeastern U.S. ...................... 89 APPENDICES Appendix 1. Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) contained in the Northeast region (USFWS Region 5) and the Partners in Flight (PIF) Physiographic Areas and States that overlap these BCRs..... 90 Appendix 2. Common names, scientific names, National Partners in Flight (PIF) and State Wildlife Conservation Plan designations, and habitats of regular occurrence, for considered species in the Northeastern United States. .......................................................................................................... 91 The MAPS Program in the Northeast United States - 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Since 1989, The Institute for Bird Populations has been coordinating the Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) program, a cooperative effort among public and private agencies and individual bird banders in North America to operate annually a continent-wide network of nearly 500 constant-effort mist-netting and banding stations. MAPS was designed to provide information on the vital rates of landbirds to identify demographic causes of population declines of many North American landbird species. Here we evaluate the MAPS program with respect to its current potential, and future ability, to meet landbird demographic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ski Industry Leases Of
    Vermont State Auditor Douglas R. Hoffer Report to the Vermont Legislature and the Agency of Natural Resources State Land Leases Boost Ski Industry, but Are Dated and Inconsistent 1/20/2015 • Office of the Vermont State Auditor • Non-Audit Report 15-01 Mission Statement The mission of the Vermont State Auditor’s Office is to hold government accountable. This means ensuring taxpayer funds are used effectively and efficiently, and that we foster the prevention of waste, fraud, and abuse. Principal Investigator Andrew C. Stein Non-Audit Inquiry This is a non-audit report. A non-audit report is a tool used to inform citizens and management of issues that may need attention. It is not an audit and is not conducted under generally accepted government auditing standards. A non-audit report has a substantially smaller scope of work than an audit. Therefore, its conclusions are more limited, and it does not contain recommendations. Instead, the report includes information and possible risk-mitigation strategies relevant to the entity that is the object of the inquiry. DOUGLAS R. HOFFER STATE AUDITOR STATE OF VERMONT OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR January 20, 2015 The Honorable Shap Smith Speaker of the House of Representatives The Honorable John Campbell President Pro Tempore of the Senate The Honorable Peter Shumlin Governor Deb Markowitz Secretary of Natural Resources Dear Colleagues, More than 70 years ago, the State decided to catalyze a new industry by leasing public land to companies willing to invest in the infrastructure necessary for downhill skiing. By most measures, this partnership has been successful, and our iconic mountains are now home to world- famous ski areas.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland's Wildland Preservation System “The Best of the Best”
    Maryland’s Wildland Preservation System “The“The Best Best ofof thethe Best” Best” What is a Wildland? Natural Resources Article §5‐1201(d): “Wildlands” means limited areas of [State‐owned] land or water which have •Retained their wilderness character, although not necessarily completely natural and undisturbed, or •Have rare or vanishing species of plant or animal life, or • Similar features of interest worthy of preservation for use of present and future residents of the State. •This may include unique ecological, geological, scenic, and contemplative recreational areas on State lands. Why Protect Wildlands? •They are Maryland’s “Last Great Places” •They represent much of the richness & diversity of Maryland’s Natural Heritage •Once lost, they can not be replaced •In using and conserving our State’s natural resources, the one characteristic more essential than any other is foresight What is Permitted? • Activities which are consistent with the protection of the wildland character of the area, such as hiking, canoeing, kayaking, rafting, hunting, fishing, & trapping • Activities necessary to protect the area from fire, animals, insects, disease, & erosion (evaluated on a case‐by case basis) What is Prohibited? Activities which are inconsistent with the protection of the wildland character of the area: permanent roads structures installations commercial enterprises introduction of non‐native wildlife mineral extraction Candidate Wildlands •23 areas •21,890 acres •9 new •13,128 acres •14 expansions Map can be found online at: http://dnr.maryland.gov/land/stewardship/pdfs/wildland_map.pdf
    [Show full text]
  • Full Issue Vol. 27, No. 1
    r & S B E u 9 ^eipetolog^ Volume 27 ISSN 0892-0761 Number 1 Field Notes The field notes section of Catesbeiana provides a means for publishing natural history information on Virginia’s amphibians and reptiles that does not lend itself to full-length articles. Observations on geographic distribution, ecology, reproduction, phenology, behavior, and other topics are welcomed. Field Notes will usually concern a single species. The format of the reports is: scientific name (followed by common name in parentheses), state abbreviation (VA), county and location, date(s) of observation, observer(s), data, and observations. The name(s) and address(es) of the author(s) should appear one line below the report. Consult the editor if your information does not readily fit this format. All field notes must include a brief statement explaining the significance of the record (e.g., new county record) or observation (e.g., unusual or rarely observed behavior, extremely early or late seasonal record, abnormal coloration, etc.). Submissions that fail to include this information are subject to rejection. Relevant literature should be cited in the body of the text (see Field Notes in this issue for proper format). All submissions will be reviewed by the editor (and one other person if deemed necessary) and revised as needed pending consultation with die author(s). If the field note contains information on a new county (or state) record, verification is required in the form of a voucher specimen deposited in a permanent museum (e.g., Virginia Museum of Natural History) or a photograph (print, slide, or digital image) or recording (cassette tape or digital recording of anuran calls) deposited in the archives of the Virginia Herpetological Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Ridge Parkway DIRECTORY & TRAVEL PLANNER Includes the Parkway Milepost
    Blue Ridge Park way DIRECTORY & TRAVEL PLANNER Includes The Parkway Milepost Shenandoah National Park / Skyline Drive, Virginia Luray Caverns Luray, VA Exit at Skyline Drive Milepost 31.5 The Natural Bridge of Virginia Natural Bridge, VA Exit at Milepost 63.9 Grandfather Mountain Linville, NC Exit at Milepost 305.1 2011 COVER chosen.indd 3 1/25/11 1:09:28 PM The North The 62nd Edition Carolina Arboretum, OFFICIAL PUBLICATION BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY ASSOCIATION, INC. Asheville, NC. P. O. BOX 2136, ASHEVILLE, NC 28802 Exit at (828) 670-1924 Milepost 393 COPYRIGHT 2011 NO Portion OF THIS GUIDE OR ITS MAPS may BE REPRINTED WITHOUT PERMISSION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. Some Parkway photographs by William A. Bake, Mike Booher, Vickie Dameron and Jeff Greenberg © Blue Ridge Parkway Association Layout/Design: Imagewerks Productions: Fletcher, NC This free Travel Directory is published by the 500+ PROMOTING member Blue Ridge Parkway Association to help you more TOURISM FOR fully enjoy your Parkway area vacation. Our member- MORE THAN ship includes attractions, outdoor recreation, accom- modations, restaurants, 60 YEARS shops, and a variety of other services essential to the trav- eler. All our members are included in this Travel Directory. Distribution of the Directory does not imply endorsement by the National Park Service of the busi- nesses or commercial services listed. When you visit their place of business, please let them know you found them in the Blue Ridge Parkway Travel Directory. This will help us ensure the availability of another Directory for you the next time you visit the Parkway area.
    [Show full text]
  • Camping Places (Campsites and Cabins) with Carderock Springs As
    Camping places (campsites and cabins) With Carderock Springs as the center of the universe, here are a variety of camping locations in Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Delaware. A big round of applause to Carderock’s Eric Nothman for putting this list together, doing a lot of research so the rest of us can spend more time camping! CAMPING in Maryland 1) Marsden Tract - 5 mins - (National Park Service) - C&O canal Mile 11 (1/2 mile above Carderock) three beautiful group campsites on the Potomac. Reservations/permit required. Max 20 to 30 people each. C&O canal - hiker/biker campsites (no permit needed - all are free!) about every five miles starting from Swains Lock to Cumberland. Campsites all the way to Paw Paw, WV (about 23 sites) are within 2 hrs drive. Three private campgrounds (along the canal) have cabins. Some sections could be traveled by canoe on the Potomac (canoe camping). Closest: Swains Lock - 10 mins - 5 individual tent only sites (one isolated - take path up river) - all close to parking lot. First come/first serve only. Parking fills up on weekends by 8am. Group Campsites are located at McCoy's Ferry, Fifteen Mile Creek, Paw Paw Tunnel, and Spring Gap. They are $20 per site, per night with a maximum of 35 people. Six restored Lock-houses - (several within a few miles of Carderock) - C&O Canal Trust manages six restored Canal Lock-houses for nightly rental (some with heat, water, A/C). 2) Cabin John Regional Park - 10 mins - 7 primitive walk-in sites. Pit toilets, running water.
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types
    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Alverthorpe Manor BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Cultural Park (6422) 11-3 11 Development $223,000 $136,900 Key - Community Abington Township TAP Trail- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township (1101296) 22-171 22 Trails $90,000 $90,000 Key - Community Ardsley Wildlife Sanctuary- BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Development 22-37 22 Development $40,000 $40,000 Key - Community Briar Bush Nature Center Master Site Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1007785) 20-12 20 Planning $42,000 $37,000 Key - Community Pool Feasibility Studies BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1100063) 21-127 21 Planning $15,000 $15,000 Key - Community Rubicam Avenue Park KEY-PRD-1- Region 1 Abington Township (1) 1 01 Development $25,750 $25,700 Key - Community Demonstration Trail - KEY-PRD-4- Region 1 Abington Township Phase I (1659) 4 04 Development $114,330 $114,000 Key - Community KEY-SC-3- Region 1 Aldan Borough Borough Park (5) 6 03 Development $20,000 $2,000 Key - Community Ambler Pocket Park- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Ambler Borough (1102237) 23-176 23 Development $102,340 $102,000 Key - Community Comp. Rec. & Park Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Ambler Borough (4438) 8-16 08 Planning $10,400 $10,000 Key - Community American Littoral Upper & Middle Soc/Delaware Neshaminy Watershed BRC-RCP- Region 1 Riverkeeper Network Plan (3337) 6-9 06 Planning $62,500 $62,500 Key - Rivers Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Valley View Park - Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Aston Township (1100582) 21-114 21 Development $184,000 $164,000 Key - Community Comp.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Issue Vol. 29, No. 1
    BULLETIN INFORMATION Catesbeiana is published twice a year by the Virginia Herpetological Society. Membership is open to all individuals interested in the study of amphibians and reptiles and includes a subscription to Catesbeiana, two newsletters, and admission to all meetings. Annual dues for regular membership are $15.00 (see application form on last page for other membership categories). Payments received after September 1 of any given year will apply to membership for the following calendar year. See the last page of this issue for a membership application/renewal form. HERPETOLOGICAL ARTWORK Herpetological artwork is welcomed for publication in Catesbeiana. If the artwork has been published elsewhere, we will need to obtain copyright before it can be used in an issue. We need drawings and encourage members to send us anything appropriate, especially their own work. Digital submissions are preferred. EDITORIAL POLICY The principal function of Catesbeiana is to publish observations and original research about Virginia herpetology. Rarely will articles be reprinted in Catesbeiana after they have been published elsewhere. All correspondence relative to the suitability of manuscripts or other editorial matters should be directed to Dr. Paul Sattler, Editor, Catesbeiana, Department of Biology, Liberty University, 1971 University Blvd., Lynchburg, VA 24502 (email: [email protected]'). Major Papers Manuscripts for consideration of publication in Catesbeiana should be doublespaced and submitted to the Editor electronically or typewritten on good quality 814 by 11 inch paper, with adequate margins. Consult the style of articles in this issue for additional information, including the appropriate format for literature citations. The metric system should be used for reporting all types of measurement data.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar No. 781
    Calendar No. 781 110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2d Session SENATE 110–349 VIRGINIA RIDGE AND VALLEY ACT JUNE 16, 2008.—Ordered to be printed Mr. BINGAMAN, from the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, submitted the following R E P O R T [To accompany S. 570] The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, to which was referred the bill (S. 570) to designate additional National Forest System lands in the State of Virginia as wilderness or a wilderness study area, to designate the Kimberling Creek Potential Wilder- ness Area for eventual incorporation in the Kimberling Creek Wil- derness, to establish the Seng Mountain and Bear Creek Scenic Areas, to provide for the development of trail plans for the wilder- ness areas and scenic areas, and for other purposes, having consid- ered the same, reports favorably thereon with an amendment and recommends that the bill, as amended, do pass. The amendment is as follows: Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert in lieu thereof the following: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Virginia Ridge and Valley Act of 2008’’. SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) SCENIC AREAS.—The term ‘‘scenic areas’’ means the Seng Mountain Na- tional Scenic Area and the Bear Creek National Scenic Area. (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of Agriculture. SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF ADDITIONAL NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND IN JEFFERSON NA- TIONAL FOREST, VIRGINIA, AS WILDERNESS OR A WILDERNESS STUDY AREA. (a) DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS.—Section 1 of Public Law 100–326 (16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Go Camping Guide
    Let’s Go Camping Guide compiled by Amangamek-Wipit Lodge 470 Order of the Arrow National Capital Area Council May 2002 To: All NCAC Unit Leaders From: Amangamek-Wipit Camping Committee Subject: LET'S GO CAMPING GUIDE Date: May 2002 Greetings! This is your copy of the annual Let's Go Camping Guide. The National Capital Area Council Order of the Arrow Amangamek-Wipit Lodge updates this guide annually. This guide is intended to support the unit camping program by providing leaders with a directory of nearby campgrounds. The guide is organized into three sections. Section I lists public campgrounds in Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. Section II covers campgrounds administered by the Boy Scouts of America in Maryland, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia. Section III provides a place for leaders to record their favorite campgrounds for future reference. Many people have provided listings to this year's edition of the guide and we are grateful to all who have contributed. However, this guide is far from a complete listing of the camping resources available to NCAC units. If you would like to add a listing or if you discover a listing in need of correction please contact Philip Caridi at your convenience at [email protected]. Together we can make next year's guide even more useful. Yours in Scouting and Cheerful Service, Chuck Reynolds Lodge Chief Section I: Public Sites Section II: Boys Scouts of America Campgrounds Section III: Personal Favorites Section IV: Baloo Sites Section I: Public Campgrounds National Capital Area Council Let's Go Camping Guide Order of the Arrow May 2002 Amangamek-Wipit, Lodge 470 ST Camp Season Type Capacity Restricts Fires Toilets/Showers Activities/Features Reservations Directions DE Assawoman Wildlife Area flies/mosquitos 20 Take I 495 to Rte 50; 50 E to very bad in late Ocean City; take Rte 1 N to spring, summer, Fenwick Island; DE Rte 54 W early fall year to county Road 381; turn right and follow signs.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiny Pond Wildlife Management Area
    Tiny Pond Wildlife Management Area General Description The area is forested primarily with northern hardwoods, Tiny Pond Wildlife Management Area (WMA) is a such as red and sugar maple, yellow birch, and beech. 739-acre parcel owned by the State of Vermont and There are also red spruce-northern hardwood forests and red managed by the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department. The spruce-hemlock forests on the property. majority of the WMA, 517 acres, is located in the town of Vernal pools are good places for spotting amphibians. Ludlow; there are 174 acres in Plymouth and 48 acres in They can be found in the forest during the spring and early Mount Holly. The WMA can be accessed from Route 100 summer. which runs close to its eastern side. Tiny Pond WMA is part of the Coolidge West Management Unit, which Common Fish and Wildlife includes Coolidge State Forest (west of Route 100) and Mammals Tiny Pond WMA is a component of the Coolidge Plymsbury WMA. West Management Unit that acts as a landscape linkage for black bears between the north and south sections of the History Green Mountain National Forest. Bear tracks can be found The physical features in the area (the mountain, brook in the area and a visitor might be lucky enough to see a bear and pond) were originally named “Tinney” after a family passing through. White-tailed deer, coyotes, gray foxes and that had settled the area, but through mispronunciation came raccoons are more likely to be seen in the hardwood forests. to be called Tiny.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014
    PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014 What is Primitive Camping? Primitive camping is a simplistic style of camping. Campers hike, pedal or paddle to reach a location and spend the night without the presence of developed facilities. This primitive camping experience takes place off the beaten path, where piped water, restrooms and other amenities are not provided. You pack in all you need, exchanging a few conveniences for the solitude found in the back country setting. Fresh air, fewer people and out-of-the-way natural landscapes are some of the benefits of primitive camping. Once off the beaten path, however, additional advantages begin to surface such as a deeper awareness and greater appreciation of the outdoor world around you. Primitive camping also builds outdoor skills and fosters a gratifying sense of self-sufficiency. Where to Camp Pennsylvania has 2.2 million acres of state forest land with 2,500 miles of trails and 5,132 miles of Camping at rivers and streams winding through it. Hiking, biking and multi-use trails traverse most state forest districts and six districts have designated water trails that transect state forest land. Forest Districts State parks are not open to primitive camping. However, with the exception of William Penn State Forest, all state forest districts are open to this activity. Camping is not permitted in designated STATE FOREST DISTRICTS: natural areas or at vistas, trail heads, picnic areas and areas that are posted closed to camping. Bald Eagle State Forest (570) 922-3344 Contact a forest district office for specific information, maps and Camping Permits (if needed).
    [Show full text]