DOCSLIB.ORG

2019-Symposium-Booklet.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

0 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Abstracts ................................................................................................................................................ 2 COLLEGE OF BUSINESS Department of Management ....................................................................................................................... 3 Department of Marketing and Finance ........................................................................................................ 5 COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Department of Kinesiology and Recreation ................................................................................................. 6 COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES Department of Biology ............................................................................................................................... 10 Department of Chemistry ........................................................................................................................... 25 Department of Communication ................................................................................................................. 28 Department of Computer Science and Information Technologies ............................................................ 29 Department of English and Foreign Languages .......................................................................................... 31 Department of Geography ......................................................................................................................... 39 Department of History ................................................................................................................................ 51 Department of Mathematics ...................................................................................................................... 56 Department of Physics and Engineering .................................................................................................... 57 Department of Political Science ................................................................................................................. 64 Department of Psychology ......................................................................................................................... 65 Department of Social Work ........................................................................................................................ 68 Department of Visual Arts .......................................................................................................................... 69 Special Thanks ............................................................................................................................................ 70 Map of the ARMAH.....................................................................................................................................71 Oral Presentation Schedule……………………………………………………………………………………………………................72 1 Frostburg State University Undergraduate Research Symposium THE ABSTRACTS This Symposium includes 126 presentations featuring the work of 248 students, mentored by 52 Faculty and Staff across all three colleges and 15 departments. The projects presented at this Symposium took place in 2018 and 2019 and include coursework and independent study activities. Abstracts are organized alphabetically by college, department and by project title. The Presentation number in parentheses following the title refers to the table locations of the Poster and/or Physical Displays in the ARMAH. Oral presentations are scheduled in Lane Center 108, 111 and 113. A map of the ARMAH and the schedule for the oral presentations are at the end of this abstract booklet. Each presentation includes the following information: Project Title (Poster, Physical Display, Oral Presentation, Table #) Name(s) of presenting student(s) Name(s) of contributing student(s) (if applicable) Name(s) of faculty/staff mentor(s) 2 Frostburg State University Undergraduate Research Symposium COLLEGE OF BUSINESS DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT Peer Leadership, Group Mentoring, and Servant Leaders: Leadership among Students and the Impact of the College of Business Fall Mountain Leadership Retreat (Poster, Table 3) Presenting Students: Jenna Puffinburger, Sarah Dignan Contributing Students: Arin Custer, Brady Gaumer, Mason Holloway, Abiodun Olojo, Daniel Ryzeck Faculty Mentor: Dr. Ryan Kentrus The Student Business Leadership Committee (SBLC) is a student organization and self-managed team that seeks to develop leaders within the college of business. This committee strives to promote the three pillars from which the organization was founded on: giving, leadership, and alumni connections. Experiential learning is a keystone of an exemplary leadership program that allows students to engage and connect with an idea or concept. One of the most effective ways to impact students is by allowing them to develop leaders and take ownership of the process. The College of Business (CoB) Fall Mountain Retreat held at WISP Resort in McHenry, MD allows students to put their leadership to practice. The SBLC is responsible for not only organizing this event but leading it as well. Students that attend the retreat are able to partake in a networking event comprised of College of Business professors and alumni, participate in leadership workshops, and take advantage of the outdoor adventures that WISP offers to build team mentality and group communication skills. Through these activities, students gain real-world experiences such as networking, group communication, and leadership skill development. The development and implementation of the CoB Fall Mountain Retreat allows students to gain real world experience in leadership, while impacting those that attend the retreat in a positive way. The goal of the retreat is to put ideas and theories that are taught in the classroom into practice. Peer leadership, group mentoring, and servant leadership are all prevalent theories that have emerged as part of the leadership process. The nature of the SBLC leadership team has allowed for group mentoring to occur, where the group can achieve the suggested benefits of one- on-one mentoring with the bonus of group interaction. Through peer leadership, both at the retreat and in the development of the retreat, students are able to learn leadership skills and practice leadership in peer groups. Servant leadership was found to be another component in this process as a large part of servant leadership is to have a leadership style where the leader is willing to selflessly give back to others. Using these theories, a model and framework was created that can be used to illustrate the leadership process. Also, the benefits that the students have received from being a part of this unique team, as well as the impact this team has had on our college of 3 Frostburg State University Undergraduate Research Symposium business and other student leaders, will be addressed. This team of students has personally benefited through development of unique alumni connections, becoming more passionate about teaching leadership development, and development of an attitude of servant leadership. 4 Frostburg State University Undergraduate Research Symposium DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING AND FINANCE Swap Ed: Student Exchange New Platform (Oral Presentation) Presenting Students: Madison Finnan, Benjamin McClanahan Contributing Student: Haley Coleman Faculty Mentor: Dr. Lilly Ye Project Description: SwapEd is a phone application centered around college campus, and it serves as a new idea associated with the growing sharing economy. The app provides the opportunity for students to swap and sell textbooks and other education related items. The name “SwapEd” also opens up opportunities for educational product extension. Selling Proposition: See it, Sell it, Swap it. SwapEd. Marketing Research: Target audience: college students who needs affordable textbook Positioning: Sustainable textbook, affordability, and college life focused social network Budget: $150,000 for app development and $1,000 for start-up advertising Promotion: Snapchat and Word-of-mouth, student center for physical spots. Video Link: https://youtu.be/rhYpDwLRvnk Skills Assessment of Regional Workforce among Employers and Employees (Oral Presentation) Presenting Student: Travon Johnson Contributing Student: Nicholas DeMichele Faculty Mentor: Dr. Eyad Youssef As time has gone by the challenges within the economy have increased in the Western Maryland region have increased due to the declination of the population. Reasons such as opioid abuse have caused a lack of investment as well as a decline in industry in the region. The area has also been stricken with a lack of career opportunities for employees, and employers have expressed a concern of finding qualified applicants for their companies. An examination among the workforce has been triggered by these concerns. Throughout the tri-state area (Mineral County, Allegany County, and Garrett County), surveys were composed to figure out what is causing the divide within the force. The surveys were used to figure out what regional employers were looking for when scouting out applicants. They were also used to figure out what contributes to what hinders applicants from obtaining a position within the area. Demographics, economic growth, and hiring practices were all focused on within the survey questions. Results to the surveys are still pending due to submissions still being accepted. 5 Frostburg State University
Recommended publications
  • Maryland's Wildland Preservation System “The Best of the Best”

    Maryland's Wildland Preservation System “The Best of the Best”

    Maryland’s Wildland Preservation System “The“The Best Best ofof thethe Best” Best” What is a Wildland? Natural Resources Article §5‐1201(d): “Wildlands” means limited areas of [State‐owned] land or water which have •Retained their wilderness character, although not necessarily completely natural and undisturbed, or •Have rare or vanishing species of plant or animal life, or • Similar features of interest worthy of preservation for use of present and future residents of the State. •This may include unique ecological, geological, scenic, and contemplative recreational areas on State lands. Why Protect Wildlands? •They are Maryland’s “Last Great Places” •They represent much of the richness & diversity of Maryland’s Natural Heritage •Once lost, they can not be replaced •In using and conserving our State’s natural resources, the one characteristic more essential than any other is foresight What is Permitted? • Activities which are consistent with the protection of the wildland character of the area, such as hiking, canoeing, kayaking, rafting, hunting, fishing, & trapping • Activities necessary to protect the area from fire, animals, insects, disease, & erosion (evaluated on a case‐by case basis) What is Prohibited? Activities which are inconsistent with the protection of the wildland character of the area: permanent roads structures installations commercial enterprises introduction of non‐native wildlife mineral extraction Candidate Wildlands •23 areas •21,890 acres •9 new •13,128 acres •14 expansions Map can be found online at: http://dnr.maryland.gov/land/stewardship/pdfs/wildland_map.pdf
  • Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River

    Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River

    Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River North Fork Watershed Project/Friends of Blackwater MAY 2009 This report was made possible by a generous donation from the MARPAT Foundation. DRAFT 2 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 TABLE OF Figures ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 THE UPPER NORTH BRANCH POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ................................................................................... 7 PART I ‐ General Information about the North Branch Potomac Watershed ........................................................... 8 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Geography and Geology of the Watershed Area ................................................................................................. 9 Demographics .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Land Use ............................................................................................................................................................
  • May 20, 2019 VIA EMAIL & COURIER Ms. Ruby Potter

    May 20, 2019 VIA EMAIL & COURIER Ms. Ruby Potter

    May 20, 2019 VIA EMAIL & COURIER Ms. Ruby Potter [email protected] Health Facilities Coordination Officer Maryland Health Care Commission 4160 Patterson Avenue Baltimore, Maryland 21215 Re: Application for Certificate of Need Construction of a Cancer Center at the University of Maryland Medical Center Dear Ms. Potter: On behalf of applicant University of Maryland Medical Center, enclosed are six copies of the “Response to Additional Information Questions 1-21 Dated April 18, 2019” with respect to the CON Application for construction of a cancer center at the University of Maryland Medical Center. I hereby certify that a copy of this submission has also been forwarded to the appropriate local health planning agencies as noted below. Sincerely, Thomas C. Dame Ella R. Aiken TCD/ERA:blr Enclosures #663928 006551-0238 Ms. Ruby Potter May 20, 2019 Page 2 cc: Kevin McDonald, Chief, Certificate of Need Paul Parker, Director, Center for Health Care Facilities Planning & Development Suellen Wideman, Esq., Assistant Attorney General Mary Beth Haller, Interim Baltimore City Health Commissioner Megan M. Arthur, Esq., Senior Vice-President & General Counsel Sandra H. Benzer, Esq., Associate Counsel, UMMS Mohan Suntha, M.D., MBA, President and CEO Dana D. Farrakhan, FACHE, Sr. VP, Strategy, Community and Business Development Joseph E. Hoffman III, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, UMMC Georgia Harrington, Senior Vice President, Operations, UMMC Craig Fleischmann, Senior Vice President, Finance, UMMC Leonard Taylor, Jr., Senior
  • MARKET AREA ANALYSIS* Cumberland Overview

    MARKET AREA ANALYSIS* Cumberland Overview

    MARKET AREA ANALYSIS* Cumberland Overview Cumberland, officially “the City of Cumberland,” is a western gateway city and seat of Allegany County, Maryland, and the primary city of the Cumberland, MD-WV Metropolitan Statistical Area. At the 2010 census, the city had a population of 20,859 and the metropolitan area had a population of 103,299. Cumberland is a regional business and commercial center for Western Maryland and the Potomac Highlands of West Virginia. It is equidistant from Baltimore, Washington D.C. and Pittsburg, approximately 130 miles from each city. ______________ *The majority of the material, charts, and tables contained in this section was supplied by the Cities of Frostburg and Cumberland, Maryland, or was supplied by numerous pertinent websites and interviews with key government and industry leaders. Hampton Inn & Suites • Cumberland, Maryland • Feasibility Study Page C-1 History Cumberland is named after the son of King George II, Prince William, the Duke of Cumberland. It is built on the site of the old Fort Cumberland, the starting point for British General Edward Braddock's ill-fated attack on the French stronghold of Fort Duquesne (located on the site of present-day Pittsburgh) during the French and Indian War. Cumberland was also an outpost of Colonel George Washington during the French and Indian War and his first military headquarters was built here. Washington later returned to Cumberland as President in 1794 to review troops that had been assembled to thwart the Whiskey Rebellion. Cumberland was a key road, railroad and canal junction during the 19th century and at one time the second largest city in Maryland (second to the port city of Baltimore — hence its nickname "The Queen City").
  • 2016 Long Range Transportation Plan Cumberland Area

    2016 Long Range Transportation Plan Cumberland Area

    Prepared for: Cumberland Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by: with Crossroads Transportation Financial Assistance Provided By: February 26, 2016 MPO Adopted: March 24, 2016 Federal Concurrence: Table of Contents Chapter 1: The Process, Purpose, and the Plan ..................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.1 What is Transportation Planning? ....................................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.2 What Is the Role of an MPO in Regional Transportation Planning? .................................................................................... 1‐2 1.3 Why are MPOs required? .................................................................................................................................................... 1‐3 1.4 What is the Cumberland Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO)? ................................................................. 1‐4 1.5 Where is the CAMPO Region? ............................................................................................................................................. 1‐4 1.6 What is CAMPO’s Organizational Structure? ...................................................................................................................... 1‐6 1.7 What is Plan 2040? .............................................................................................................................................................
  • COAL MEASURES OP MARYLAND1 (Bead

    COAL MEASURES OP MARYLAND1 (Bead

    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 30, PP. 567-596, PL8. 14-15 DECEMBER 31, 1919 PROCEEDINGS OF THE PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY COAL MEASURES OP MARYLAND1 BY CHARLES K. SWARTZ, W. ARMSTRONG PRICE, AND HARVEY BASSLER (Bead before the Paleontological Society, December 28, 1918) CONTENTS Page Introduction ................................................................................................................. 567 Area ........................................................................................................................ 567 Earlier investigation ......................., ................................................................ 569 Present investigation .................................... .................................................. 570 Part I. Stratigraphy of the Coal Measures, by Charles K. Swartz............... 570 In general ............................................................................................................ 570 Pottsville formation .......................................................................................... 571 Character and thickness .......................................................................... 571 Members ...... ................................................................................................. 571 Faunas ........................................................................................................... 571 Allegheny formation .........................................................................................
  • Allegany County Water Resources Element, As an Addendum to the 2002 Allegany County Comprehensive Plan Update

    Allegany County Water Resources Element, As an Addendum to the 2002 Allegany County Comprehensive Plan Update

    ALLEGANY COUNTY, MD WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT OCTOBER 2010 AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Acknowledgements The Planning & Zoning Commission of Allegany County has developed the 2010 Allegany County Water Resources Element, as an addendum to the 2002 Allegany County Comprehensive Plan Update. Allegany County Commissioners at Allegany County Commissioners at the time of Preparation: the time of Adoption: James J. Stakem, President Michael McKay Dale R. Lewis Creade Brodie Robert M. Hutcheson WilliamValentine Allegany County Planning & Zoning Commission Members E. William Duvall, II, Chairman Dwight W. Perrin, Vice-Chairman William R. Davis, Jr. Rodger L. Uphold Edward T. Robinette, Sr. Kimberly R. Heavner N. Lois Crossland Steve K. MacGray Wesley W. McKee, Esquire, Legal Counsel Allegany County Planning Services Staff Philip Hager, Executive Director Amy Baker, Associate Planner Linda Simpson, Office Associate Contributing Staff Elizabeth Stahlman, GIS Manager Greg Hildreth, GIS Specialist Mark W. Yoder, Utilities Division Chief, P.E. James L. Webber, Engineer III, Public Works, P.E. Dan DeWitt, Public Works, E.I.T. Brent T. Walker, Planning Technician Jennifer Townsend, Planning Intern Prepared by: S&S Planning and Design, LLC 76 Baltimore Street Cumberland, MD 21502 Allegany County Water Resources Element October 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Water Resources ..............................................................................................................
  • How Baltimore Became the New York of the South: European Immigration Between 1867-1914 and the Development of Ethnic Neighborhoods Around the Port of Baltimore

    How Baltimore Became the New York of the South: European Immigration Between 1867-1914 and the Development of Ethnic Neighborhoods Around the Port of Baltimore

    HOW BALTIMORE BECAME THE NEW YORK OF THE SOUTH: EUROPEAN IMMIGRATION BETWEEN 1867-1914 AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ETHNIC NEIGHBORHOODS AROUND THE PORT OF BALTIMORE A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies and of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Studies By Ron Cassie Georgetown University Washington, D.C. April 15, 2016 HOW BALTIMORE BECAME THE NEW YORK OF THE SOUTH: EUROPEAN IMMIGRATION BETWEEN 1867-1914 AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ETHNIC NEIGHBORHOODS AROUND THE PORT OF BALTIMORE Ron Cassie, MA Mentor: Charles Edward Yonkers, JD ABSTRACT Located 40 miles south of the Mason-Dixon Line, Baltimore was the fourth – largest city in the U.S. and the largest in the South before the Civil War, serving as the economic hub of the Mid-Atlantic region. Although Baltimore was always home to a significant free black population, the city was centered in a largely slave-holding state. Although Maryland choose neither Union or Confederate sides during the Civil War before President Abraham Lincoln sent federal troops into Baltimore, the city’s port business in the middle of the 19th century focused on the rural exports of tobacco, cotton, grain, and flour; ship building; and the importation of sugar. Politically, economically, and culturally, Maryland was, at the time, a Southern state full of plantations from the Eastern Shore across the state’s central area around Baltimore. The city, however, was more a blend of white Southern and white Northern influences, a marginalized African-American citizenry, a significant group of German immigrants, and more recent Irish arrivals at the start of the Civil War.
  • Georges Creek Watershed Restoration Action Strategies Plan

    Georges Creek Watershed Restoration Action Strategies Plan

    GG EE OO RR GG EE SS CC RR EE EE KK Watershed Restoration Action Strategies P L A N June 2002 IDEAS FOR TODAY AND TOMORROW. Georges Creek Watershed Restoration Action Strategies Plan This plan was developed through a cooperative effort of federal, state, and local agencies, non-profit organizations, and the citizens of the Georges Creek Watershed. This project has been funded in part by a Section 319 Clean Water Act Grant from the U. S. EP A. Although, the EP A funds this Program, the contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the opinion or position of the EPA. Special thanks are extended to the members of the Georges Creek Watershed Association who donated their time and ideas to this planning effort. Abstract The Georges Creek Watershed Restoration Action Strategies Plan has been developed by a steering committee comprised of representatives from both the public and private sector. This plan is intended to serve local decision-makers as a guide to planning, developing, and implementing comprehensive meaningful restoration projects that are a part of a larger watershed-wide approach. Listed within this plan are twelve problem categories divided into two large groups; water quality, and water quantity. Each problem category contains a brief problem description, associated data, and action examples. In the last section of this plan “What Steps Do We Take To Get There?” the Action Plan can be found. This Action Plan details next step items for the community to engage in. This section of the plan provided action items that the community can engage in making their vision of the Georges Creek Watershed a reality.
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This Form Is for Use in Nominating Or Requesting Determinations for Individual Properties and Districts

    National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This Form Is for Use in Nominating Or Requesting Determinations for Individual Properties and Districts

    inev lu-au) AL-IV-A-164 United States Department of th* .enor National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in Hew to Complete the National Register > of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking V in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" fa "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a) Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Greene Street Historic District other names/site number 2. Location street & number Greene Street between Spruce Alley & Riverside Pknot for publication N/A city or town Cumberland vicinity N/A 1stat e Maryland code MP county Allegany code 001 zip code 21502 t 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this A nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register1'of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property jC meets does not meet the National Register Criteria I recommend that this property be considered significant nationally statewide Y locally.
  • Maryland Geological Survey Volume One Baltimore The

    Maryland Geological Survey Volume One Baltimore The

    MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY VOLUME ONE BALTIMORE THE JOHNS HOPKINS PRESS 1897 ILLUSTRATIONS. PLATE FACING PAGE I. View of Model of the State of Maryland 23 II. The Potomae River Valley at Williamsport, on the Western Maryland Railroad 64 III. View of the Great Valley from Blue Mountain, on the Western Mary- land Railroad ; 104 IV. Map showing Atlas Sheets and Charts in Maryland 114 V. Map showing leading Triangnlation in Maryland 123 VI. Hypsometric Map of Maryland 142 VII. View showing Estuary of the Chesapeake Bay near Queenstown 146 VIII. The Falls of the Potomac 148 IX. View of the Youghiogheny Valley In the Alleghany Mountains, on the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad 152 X. The Gorge of the Potomac, at Harper's Ferry looking east, on the Bal- timore and Ohio Railroad 176 XI. Folded Strata of Lewistown Formation at Hancock, on the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad 182 XII. View of "Devil's Backbone" in Lewistown Formation north of Cum- berland, on the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad 186 XIII. Geological Map of Maryland 204 XIV. Isogonic Map of Maryland 404 XV. Instruments used in Magnetic Observations 450 XVI. Map showing the Preliminary Lines of Equal Magnetic Inclination and the Preliminary Lines of Equal Horizontal Force for Mary- land on January 1, 1897 4j93 XVII. Map showing the Lines of Equal Magnetic Declination for Maryland in the years 1700 and 1800 494 MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY VOLUME TWO BALTIMORE THE JOHNS HOPKINS PRESS 1898 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE facing page I, The Potomac River near Cherry Run, at the Junction of the Balti- more and Ohio and Western Maryland Railroads 37 II.
  • Youghiogheny Basin Environmental Assessment of Stream Conditions

    Youghiogheny Basin Environmental Assessment of Stream Conditions

    YOUGHIOGHENYYOUGHIOGHENY RIVERRIVER BASIN BASIN ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT OFOF STREAM STREAM CONDITIONS CONDITIONS CHESAPEAKE BAY AND WATERSHEDWATERSHED PROGRAMS MONITORING AND NON-TIDALNON-TIDAL ASSESSMENT CBWP-MANTA- EA-00-3 Parris N. Glendening Kathleen K. Townsend Governor Lieutenant Governor A message to Maryland’s citizens The Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) seeks to preserve, protect and enhance the living resources of the state. Working in partnership with the citizens of Maryland, this worthwhile goal will become a reality. This publication provides information that will increase your understanding of how DNR strives to reach that goal through its many diverse programs. J. Charles Fox Stanley K. Arthur Secretary Deputy Secretary Maryland Department of Natural Resources Tawes State Office Building 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Toll free number: 1-(877) 620 8DNR x8611 www.dnr.state.md.us THE FACILITIES AND SERVICES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ARE AVAILABLE TO ALL WITHOUT REGARD TO RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, AGE, NATIONAL ORIGIN, PHYSICAL OR MENTAL DISABILITY. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THIS REPORT, PLEASE CALL 410-260-8611. OR TOLL FREE : 1 (877) 620-8DNR x 8611 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER YOUGHIOGHENY BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF STREAM CONDITIONS Matthew J. Kline Paul F. Kazyak Daniel M. Boward Anthony P. Prochaska Report Completed October 2000 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Resource Assessment Service Monitoring and Non-Tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, MD 21401 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Youghiogheny Basin FOREWORD ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Much of this report is based on results of the Maryland We are grateful to Mick Burkett, Dave Neely, Doug Biological Stream Survey (MBSS), a program funded Orr, Rod McLeod, Sandy Davis, Brent Murry, Molly primarily by the Power Plant Research Program and Kline, Amy Gottesfeld, and Rachel Burke of the AL the United States Environmental Protection Agency.