DOCSLIB.ORG

6.05 Heat Flow and Thermal Structure of the Lithosphere C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
6.05 Heat Flow and Thermal Structure of the Lithosphere C 6.05 Heat Flow and Thermal Structure of the Lithosphere C. Jaupart, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France J.-C. Mareschal, GEOTOP-UQAM-McGill, Montreal, QC, Canada ª 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 6.05.1 Introduction 218 6.05.2 Surface Heat Flux and Heat Transport in the Earth 219 6.05.2.1 Distribution of Heat Flux: Large-Scale Overview 219 6.05.2.2 Mechanisms of Heat Transport 220 6.05.2.3 Thermal Boundary Layer Structure 220 6.05.2.4 Basal Boundary Conditions 221 6.05.2.5 Controls on Lithosphere Thickness 222 6.05.2.6 The Thermal Lithosphere as Opposed to the Seismically Defined Lithosphere 222 6.05.2.7 Summary: Different Approaches to Thermal Studies of the Lithosphere 223 6.05.3 Oceanic Heat Flux, Topography and Cooling Models 223 6.05.3.1 Data 223 6.05.3.2 Hydrothermal Circulation 223 6.05.3.3 Heat Flux Measurements Near Rift Zones 224 6.05.3.4 Cooling Half-Space Model 224 6.05.3.5 Old Ocean Basins: Flattening of the Heat Flow versus Age Curve 226 6.05.3.6 Modified Thermal Model for the Oceanic Lithosphere 226 6.05.3.7 Variations of Lithospheric Thermal Structure due to Factors Other Than Age 228 6.05.3.7.1 Large-scale variations of mantle temperature 228 6.05.3.7.2 Hot spots 229 6.05.3.8 Summary 229 6.05.4 Continental Lithosphere in Steady State 229 6.05.4.1 Vertical Temperature Distribution 229 6.05.4.2 Crustal Heat Production 230 6.05.4.3 Mantle Heat Flux 233 6.05.4.4 Regional Variations of Heat Flow and Lithospheric Temperatures 234 6.05.4.5 Variations of Crustal Thickness 236 6.05.4.6 Summary 238 6.05.5 Continental Lithosphere in Transient Thermal Conditions 238 6.05.5.1 General Features 238 6.05.5.2 Compressional Orogens 238 6.05.5.3 Rifts and Zones of Extension 239 6.05.5.4 Thermal Relaxation of Thick Continental Lithosphere 239 6.05.5.4.1 Sedimentary basins 239 6.05.5.4.2 Tectonic and magmatic perturbations 240 6.05.5.5 Long-Term Transients 240 6.05.5.5.1 Archean conditions 240 6.05.5.5.2 Secular cooling in the lithosphere 241 6.05.6 Other Geophysical Constraints on the Thermal Regime of the Continental Lithosphere 242 6.05.6.1 Constraints from Seismology 242 6.05.6.2 Seismicity, Elastic Thickness, and Thermal Regime of the Lithosphere 242 6.05.6.3 Depth to the Curie Isotherms 244 6.05.6.4 Thermal Isostasy 244 6.05.7 Conclusions 244 References 246 217 218 Heat Flow and Thermal Structure of the Lithosphere 6.05.1 Introduction the oceans remain poorly sampled. Two methods have been used to circumvent this data gap. One Over the past 200 years, the cooling of the Earth has has been to search for a simple control variable on been the object of many studies (Fourier, 1820; lithospheric temperatures, such as age. Another has Thomson, 1864; Strutt, 1906; Holmes, 1915; been to develop increasingly precise and detailed McDonald, 1959; Urey, 1964; Birch, 1965). Since the seismic velocity profiles and to invert them for paper of Kelvin (Thomson, 1864), the estimate of the temperature. average heat flux has changed by a factor of less than 2, To set the stage for this chapter, we recapitulate but our understanding of this value and its implication briefly the advances made in one generation, as mea- for the Earth’s thermal structure has been turned sured against a comprehensive review paper (Sclater upside down several times. Kelvin obtained the solu- et al., 1980). When that review was published, the tion of the heat equation for the conductive cooling of oceanic heat flow problem was essentially solved. a half-space, initially at constant temperature, after a Since then, the model has passed a series of critical tests. For young sea floor, this has entailed docu- sudden dropp inffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi surface temperature. Because heat flux varies as 1= time, Kelvin used the present heat flux to menting and understanding hydrothermal determine the age of the Earth. The Kelvin model is circulation through fractured oceanic crust buried not correct for two reasons. One is that the Earth is not by variable thickness of low-permeability sediments cooling by conduction only; convective motions are and determination of small-scale heat flux variations. driven by temperature differences in the mantle. For old sea floor, this has involved precise measure- Another reason is that Kelvin ignored internal heat ments of heat flux through areas with flat topography unaffected by sedimentary perturbations (slumping, sources; the amount of heat generated by the radio- turbidity currents) and deep oceanic currents. On active decay of U, Th, and K in silicate rocks accounts continents, progress has been made thanks to sys- for a large fraction of the heat flow. This was first tematic measurements of heat flux and heat pointed out by Strutt (1906) who estimated from production in old cratons and determination of heat-production measurements that crustal thickness (P, T ) conditions in the lithospheric mantle through could not exceed 60 km. Following Bullard (1939, xenolith studies. Additionally, subsidence studies in a 1954) and Revelle and Maxwell (1952), systematic large number of sedimentary basins have documen- heat flow measurements on land and at sea were ted the transient response of the continental undertaken which showed that radiogenic heat pro- lithosphere to thermal perturbations. For both con- duction is not uniformly distributed. It is worth noting tinents and oceans, detailed seismic velocity profiles that in the 1950s, when Bullard undertook oceanic have been interpreted in terms of the thermal struc- heat flux measurements, he expected heat flux to be ture of the lithosphere and mantle. Complementary lower in the oceans than in the continents, because the information has come from many disciplines, leading oceanic crust is thin and poor in radioelements. to a very large data set and to a sound understanding The concept of lithosphere, as seen from the ther- of key issues. mal standpoint, and estimates for its thickness have Here, we review these advances focusing on two also evolved. The heat flux data do not fit the age issues. One is to assess the reliability of age as a variation predicted by the half-space conductive control variable on heat flow and lithospheric ther- cooling model. In the oceans, this is because heat is mal structure. In continents, variations of crustal heat brought to the base of the lithosphere, probably production are large in both the horizontal and ver- through small-scale convection. In the continents, tical directions and prevent the calculation of a single variations of heat flux with age are obscured by typical ‘geotherm’ for all provinces of the same age. large changes of radiogenic heat production in the In oceans, age is the main control variable but small crust. variations remain due to lateral variations of mantle How continents and oceans deform and are temperature. The other issue is the control on litho- affected by magmatism depends largely on their ther- spheric thickness and the mechanism of heat mal structures. Thus, current research on geological transport at the base of the lithosphere – in other and geodynamical processes requires accurate words, the bottom boundary condition to be used in knowledge of temperatures in specific regions. thermal models. In steady state, this boundary con- Despite many decades of measurements, many geo- dition is of small concern because the thermal logical provinces on the continents and large parts of structure can be determined by downward Heat Flow and Thermal Structure of the Lithosphere 219 continuation of surface measurements. It is a major flow map of North America (Figure 1) (Blackwell factor, however, if the thermal regime is transient. and Richards, 2004) illustrates the differences We have not aimed this chapter at heat flow spe- between continental and oceanic heat flow. Except cialists and pursue two different goals. One is to show in active regions (Basin and Range, Yellowstone, Rio how to use heat flux data, which involves an analysis of Grande Rift, etc.), heat flux is low throughout the available measurements and their uncertainties as well North American continent and lowest in the as a discussion of missing information. Our other goal Canadian Shield. In contrast, heat flux is higher in is to illustrate the controls on the different thermal the oceans than in the continents, and higher on the regimes that are observed and to describe the key steps western than on the eastern margin. In addition to in data interpretation. This will be achieved with these large-scale differences, many other features simple physical arguments instead of complicated need detailed interpretation. We shall see that one numerical calculations. In the following, for simplicity, cannot apply the same physical frame-work and the data and measurements refer only to heat flow studies same interpretation methods to oceans and conti- unless otherwise specified. nents. From a global perspective, the oceanic lithosphere is in a transient thermal state over most of its short residence time at the Earth’s surface, 6.05.2 Surface Heat Flux and Heat contrary to continents which are mostly in, or close Transport in the Earth to, thermal steady state. Oceanic heat flux follows a decreasing trend as a function of age which parallels 6.05.2.1 Distribution of Heat Flux: Large- that of elevation (or bathymetry). The continental Scale Overview lithosphere has experienced a longer evolution and There are more than 20 000 heat flux measurements is characterized by a complicated structure and com- at Earth’s surface, distributed about equally between position.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Constraining Basin Parameters Using a Known Subsidence History
    geosciences Article Constraining Basin Parameters Using a Known Subsidence History Mohit Tunwal 1,2,* , Kieran F. Mulchrone 2 and Patrick A. Meere 1 1 School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, T23 TK30 Cork, Ireland; [email protected] 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Road, T12 XF62 Cork, Ireland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +353-21-490-4580 Received: 5 June 2020; Accepted: 6 July 2020; Published: 9 July 2020 Abstract: Temperature history is one of the most important factors driving subsidence and the overall tectono-stratigraphic evolution of a sedimentary basin. The McKenzie model has been widely applied for subsidence modelling and stretching factor estimation for sedimentary basins formed in an extensional tectonic environment. Subsidence modelling requires values of physical parameters (e.g., crustal thickness, lithospheric thickness, stretching factor) that may not always be available. With a given subsidence history of a basin estimated using a stratigraphic backstripping method, these parameters can be estimated by quantitatively comparing the known subsidence curve with modelled subsidence curves. In this contribution, a method to compare known and modelled subsidence curves is presented, aiming to constrain valid combinations of the stretching factor, crustal thickness, and lithospheric thickness of a basin. Furthermore, a numerical model is presented that takes into account the effect of sedimentary cover on thermal history and subsidence modelling of a basin. The parameter fitting method presented here is first applied to synthetically generated subsidence curves. Next, a case study using a known subsidence curve from the Campos Basin, offshore Brazil, is considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Coupled Onshore Erosion and Offshore Sediment Loading As Causes of Lower Crust Flow on the Margins of South China Sea Peter D
    Clift Geosci. Lett. (2015) 2:13 DOI 10.1186/s40562-015-0029-9 REVIEW Open Access Coupled onshore erosion and offshore sediment loading as causes of lower crust flow on the margins of South China Sea Peter D. Clift1,2* Abstract Hot, thick continental crust is susceptible to ductile flow within the middle and lower crust where quartz controls mechanical behavior. Reconstruction of subsidence in several sedimentary basins around the South China Sea, most notably the Baiyun Sag, suggests that accelerated phases of basement subsidence are associated with phases of fast erosion onshore and deposition of thick sediments offshore. Working together these two processes induce pressure gradients that drive flow of the ductile crust from offshore towards the continental interior after the end of active extension, partly reversing the flow that occurs during continental breakup. This has the effect of thinning the continental crust under super-deep basins along these continental margins after active extension has finished. This is a newly recognized form of climate-tectonic coupling, similar to that recognized in orogenic belts, especially the Himalaya. Climatically modulated surface processes, especially involving the monsoon in Southeast Asia, affects the crustal structure offshore passive margins, resulting in these “load-flow basins”. This further suggests that reorganiza- tion of continental drainage systems may also have a role in governing margin structure. If some crustal thinning occurs after the end of active extension this has implications for the thermal history of hydrocarbon-bearing basins throughout the area where application of classical models results in over predictions of heatflow based on observed accommodation space.
    [Show full text]
  • D6 Lithosphere, Asthenosphere, Mesosphere
    200 Chapter d FAMILIAR WORLD The Present is the Key to the Past: HUGH RANCE d6 Lithosphere, asthenosphere, mesosphere < plastic zone > The terms lithosphere and asthenosphere stem from Joseph Barell’s 1914-15 papers on isostasy, entitled The Strength of the Earth's Crust, in the Journal of Geology.1 In the 1960s, seismic studies revealed a zone of rock weakness worldwide near the top of the upper part of the mantle. This zone of weakness is called the asthenosphere (Gk. asthenes, weak). The asthenosphere turned out to be of revolutionary significance for historical geology (see Topic d7, plate tectonic theory). Within the asthenosphere, rock behaves plastically at rates of deformation measured in cm/yr over lineal distances of thousands of kilometers. Above the asthenosphere, at the same rate of deformation, rock behaves elastically and, being brittle, it can break (fault). The shell of rock above the asthenosphere is called the lithosphere (Gk. lithos, stone). The lithosphere as its name implies is more rigid than the asthenosphere. It is important to remember that the names crust and lithosphere are not synonyms. The crust, the upper part of the lithosphere, is continental rock (granitic) in some places and is oceanic rock (basaltic) elsewhere. The lower part of lithosphere is mantle rock (peridotite); cooler but of like composition to the asthenosphere. The asthenosphere’s top (Figure d6.1) has an average depth of 95 km worldwide below 70+ million year old oceanic lithosphere.2 It shallows below oceanic rises to near seafloor at oceanic ridge crests. The rigidity difference between the lithosphere and the asthenosphere exists because downward through the asthenosphere, the weakening effect of increasing temperature exceeds the strengthening effect of increasing pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern and Ancient Hiatuses in the Pelagic Caps of Pacific Guyots and Seamounts and Internal Tides GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Modern and ancient hiatuses in the pelagic caps of Pacific guyots and seamounts and internal tides GEOSPHERE; v. 11, no. 5 Neil C. Mitchell1, Harper L. Simmons2, and Caroline H. Lear3 1School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK doi:10.1130/GES00999.1 2School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska-Fairbanks, 905 N. Koyukuk Drive, 129 O’Neill Building, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA 3School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK 10 figures CORRESPONDENCE: neil .mitchell@ manchester ABSTRACT landmasses were different. Furthermore, the maximum current is commonly .ac .uk more important locally than the mean current for resuspension and transport Incidences of nondeposition or erosion at the modern seabed and hiatuses of particles and thus for influencing the sedimentary record. The amplitudes CITATION: Mitchell, N.C., Simmons, H.L., and Lear, C.H., 2015, Modern and ancient hiatuses in the within the pelagic caps of guyots and seamounts are evaluated along with of current oscillations should therefore be of interest to paleoceanography, al- pelagic caps of Pacific guyots and seamounts and paleotemperature and physiographic information to speculate on the charac- though they are not well known for the geological past. internal tides: Geosphere, v. 11, no. 5, p. 1590–1606, ter of late Cenozoic internal tidal waves in the upper Pacific Ocean. Drill-core Hiatuses in pelagic sediments of the deep abyssal ocean floor have been doi:10.1130/GES00999.1. and seismic reflection data are used to classify sediment at the drill sites as interpreted from sediment cores (Barron and Keller, 1982; Keller and Barron, having been accumulating or eroding or not being deposited in the recent 1983; Moore et al., 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Velocity Structure of the Continental Lithosphere from Controlled Source Data
    Seismic Velocity Structure of the Continental Lithosphere from Controlled Source Data Walter D. Mooney US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA Claus Prodehl University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany Nina I. Pavlenkova RAS Institute of the Physics of the Earth, Moscow, Russia 1. Introduction Year Authors Areas covered J/A/B a The purpose of this chapter is to provide a summary of the seismic velocity structure of the continental lithosphere, 1971 Heacock N-America B 1973 Meissner World J i.e., the crust and uppermost mantle. We define the crust as 1973 Mueller World B the outer layer of the Earth that is separated from the under- 1975 Makris E-Africa, Iceland A lying mantle by the Mohorovi6i6 discontinuity (Moho). We 1977 Bamford and Prodehl Europe, N-America J adopted the usual convention of defining the seismic Moho 1977 Heacock Europe, N-America B as the level in the Earth where the seismic compressional- 1977 Mueller Europe, N-America A 1977 Prodehl Europe, N-America A wave (P-wave) velocity increases rapidly or gradually to 1978 Mueller World A a value greater than or equal to 7.6 km sec -1 (Steinhart, 1967), 1980 Zverev and Kosminskaya Europe, Asia B defined in the data by the so-called "Pn" phase (P-normal). 1982 Soller et al. World J Here we use the term uppermost mantle to refer to the 50- 1984 Prodehl World A 200+ km thick lithospheric mantle that forms the root of the 1986 Meissner Continents B 1987 Orcutt Oceans J continents and that is attached to the crust (i.e., moves with the 1989 Mooney and Braile N-America A continental plates).
    [Show full text]
  • Essentials of Geology
    INSTRUCTOR’S MANUAL AND TEST BANK Essentials of Geology Fourth Edition Stephen Marshak Instructor’s Manual by John Werner SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA Test Bank by Jacalyn Gorczynski TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY– CORPUS CHRISTI Heather L. Lehto ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY Daniel Wynne SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE B W • W • NORTON & COMPANY • NEW YORK • LONDON —-1 —0 —+1 5577-50734_ch00_2P.indd77-50734_ch00_2P.indd iiiiii 110/5/120/5/12 55:41:41 PPMM W. W. Norton & Company has been in de pen dent since its founding in 1923, when William Warder Norton and Mary D. Herter Norton fi rst published lectures delivered at the People’s Institute, the adult education division of New York City’s Cooper Union. The Nortons soon expanded their program beyond the Institute, publishing books by celebrated academics from America and abroad. By mid- century, the two major pillars of Norton’s publishing program— trade books and college texts— were fi rmly established. In the 1950s, the Norton family transferred control of the company to its employees, and today— with a staff of four hundred and a comparable number of trade, college, and professional titles published each year— W. W. Norton & Company stands as the largest and oldest publishing house owned wholly by its employees. Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2007, 2004 by W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Associate Editor, Supplements: Callinda Taylor. Project Editor: Thom Foley. Production Manager: Benjamin Reynolds. Editorial Assistant, Supplements: Paula Iborra. Composition and project management: Westchester Publishing Ser vices. Art by CodeMantra and Precision Graphics.
    [Show full text]
  • Controls of Subduction Geometry, Location of Magmatic Arcs, and Tectonics of Arc and Back-Arc Regions
    Controls of subduction geometry, location of magmatic arcs, and tectonics of arc and back-arc regions TIMOTHY A. CROSS Exxon Production Research Company, P.O. Box 2189, Houston, Texas 77001 REX H. PILGER, JR. Department of Geology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 ABSTRACT States), intra-arc extension (for example, convergence rate, direction and rate of the Basin and Range province), foreland absolute upper-plate motion, age of the de- Most variation in geometry and angle of fold and thrust belts, and Laramide-style scending plate, and subduction of aseismic inclination of subducted oceanic lithosphere tectonics. ridges, oceanic plateaus, or intraplate is caused by four interdependent factors. island-seamount chains. It is crucial to Combinations of (1) rapid absolute upper- INTRODUCTION recognize that, in the natural system of the plate motion toward the trench and active Earth, the major factors may interact and, overriding of the subducted plate, (2) rapid Since Luyendyk's (1970) pioneer attempt therefore, are interdependent variables. De- relative plate convergence, and (3) subduc- to relate subduction-zone geometry to some pending on the associations among them, in tion of intraplate island-seamount chains, fundamental aspect(s) of plate kinematics a historical and spatial context, their aseismic ridges, and oceanic plateaus and dynamics, subsequent investigations effects on the geometry of subducted litho- (anomalously low-density oceanic litho- have suggested an increasing variety and sphere can be additive, or by contrast, one sphere) cause low-angle subduction. Under complexity among possible controls and variable can act in opposition to another conditions of low-angle subduction, the resultant configurations of subduction variable and result in total or partial cancel- upper surface of the subducted plate is in zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 Classical Numerical Models of Basin Formation and Evolution with Applications to the Central European Basin System
    Part 1 Classical numerical models of basin formation and evolution with applications to the Central European Basin System (CEBS) 1.1 Kinematic models for basin formation and evolution 1.1.1 Purely thermal models The first class of models to explain vertical movements in continental regions closely resembled the thermal model which has been successfully used for oceanic lithosphere (e.g. Vogt & Ostenso, 1967). Following this approach, the subsidence of continental shelves could in principle be related to thermal contraction beneath the crust. This conclusion reflects the concept that the tectonic subsidence of continental lithosphere decreases exponentially as a function of time with a time constant very close to that typical of a mid-ocean ridge (Sleep, 1971; Steckler & Watts, 1978). Sleep (1971) proposed a major thermal perturbation as the driving mechanism for subsidence, see Figure 1. Following his model, the thermal anomaly heats the entire lithosphere causing consequent uplifting of the crust by thermal expansion. Subsequent removal of the upper crustal layers by erosion together with the resultant cooling produce subsidence below the original surface level creating a basin. Figure 1. Cartoon illustrating the thermal driven subsidence as proposed by Sleep (1971). Doming due to thermal perturbation causes uplift. Erosion and subsequent subsidence creates a basin. - 1 - The model of Sleep (1971) accounts rather well for the time history of subsidence, however, the explanation is inconsistent with the large sediment accumulations frequently observed. Once the temperature of the lithosphere increased, first the surface is elevated and then starts to subside to its original position due to the cooling of the lithosphere, Case A of Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Earth in Cross Section by Michael Osborn Fayetteville-Manlius HS
    Planet Earth in Cross Section By Michael Osborn Fayetteville-Manlius HS Objectives Devise a model of the layers of the Earth to scale. Background Planet Earth is organized into layers of varying thickness. This solid, rocky planet becomes denser as one travels into its interior. Gravity has caused the planet to differentiate, meaning that denser material have been pulled towards Earth’s center. Relatively less dense material migrates to the surface. What follows is a brief description1 of each layer beginning at the center of the Earth and working out towards the atmosphere. Inner Core – The solid innermost sphere of the Earth, about 1271 kilometers in radius. Examination of meteorites has led geologists to infer that the inner core is composed of iron and nickel. Outer Core - A layer surrounding the inner core that is about 2270 kilometers thick and which has the properties of a liquid. Mantle – A solid, 2885-kilometer thick layer of ultra-mafic rock located below the crust. This is the thickest layer of the earth. Asthenosphere – A partially melted layer of ultra-mafic rock in the mantle situated below the lithosphere. Tectonic plates slide along this layer. Lithosphere – The solid outer portion of the Earth that is capable of movement. The lithosphere is a rock layer composed of the crust (felsic continental crust and mafic ocean crust) and the portion of the mafic upper mantle situated above the asthenosphere. Hydrosphere – Refers to the water portion at or near Earth’s surface. The hydrosphere is primarily composed of oceans, but also includes, lakes, streams and groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Plate Tectonics
    Plate Tectonics Introduction Continental Drift Seafloor Spreading Plate Tectonics Divergent Plate Boundaries Convergent Plate Boundaries Transform Plate Boundaries Summary This curious world we inhabit is more wonderful than convenient; more beautiful than it is useful; it is more to be admired and enjoyed than used. Henry David Thoreau Introduction • Earth's lithosphere is divided into mobile plates. • Plate tectonics describes the distribution and motion of the plates. • The theory of plate tectonics grew out of earlier hypotheses and observations collected during exploration of the rocks of the ocean floor. You will recall from a previous chapter that there are three major layers (crust, mantle, core) within the earth that are identified on the basis of their different compositions (Fig. 1). The uppermost mantle and crust can be subdivided vertically into two layers with contrasting mechanical (physical) properties. The outer layer, the lithosphere, is composed of the crust and uppermost mantle and forms a rigid outer shell down to a depth of approximately 100 km (63 miles). The underlying asthenosphere is composed of partially melted rocks in the upper mantle that acts in a plastic manner on long time scales. Figure 1. The The asthenosphere extends from about 100 to 300 km (63-189 outermost part of miles) depth. The theory of plate tectonics proposes that the Earth is divided lithosphere is divided into a series of plates that fit together like into two the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. mechanical layers, the lithosphere and Although plate tectonics is a relatively young idea in asthenosphere. comparison with unifying theories from other sciences (e.g., law of gravity, theory of evolution), some of the basic observations that represent the foundation of the theory were made many centuries ago when the first maps of the Atlantic Ocean were drawn.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithospheric Strength Profiles
    21 LITHOSPHERIC STRENGTH PROFILES To study the mechanical response of the lithosphere to various types of forces, one has to take into account its rheology, which means knowing how it flows. As a scientific discipline, rheology describes the interactions between strain, stress and time. Strain and stress depend on the thermal structure, the fluid content, the thickness of compositional layers and various boundary conditions. The amount of time during which the load is applied is an important factor. - At the time scale of seismic waves, up to hundreds of seconds, the sub-crustal mantle behaves elastically down deep within the asthenosphere. - Over a few to thousands of years (e.g. load of ice cap), the mantle flows like a viscous fluid. - On long geological times (more than 1 million years), the upper crust and the upper mantle behave also as thin elastic and plastic plates that overlie an inviscid (i.e. with no viscosity) substratum. The dimensionless Deborah number D, summarized as natural response time/experimental observation time, is a measure of the influence of time on flow properties. Elasticity, plastic yielding, and viscous creep are therefore ingredients of the mechanical behavior of Earth materials. Each of these three modes will be considered in assessing flow processes in the lithosphere; these mechanical attributes are expressed in terms of lithospheric strength. This strength is estimated by integrating yield stress with depth. The current state of knowledge of rock rheology is sufficient to provide broad general outlines of mechanical behavior but also has important limitations. Two very thorny problems involve the scaling of rock properties with long periods and for very large length scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Magma-Lithosphere Interaction
    Magma-Lithosphere Interaction Chris Havlin1 ([email protected]) Ben Holtzman1, Jim Gaherty1, Patty Lin1, Terry Plank1, Sara Mana1, Natalie Accardo1, Roger Buck1 Mousumi Roy2, Marc Parmentier3, Greg Hirth3, Karen Fischer3, 1. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory; 2. University of New Mexico; 3. Brown University Holtzman and Kendall, G3, 2010 Magma-Lithosphere Interaction Melt Transport fracture propagation (magma chambers, dikes, sills, fault-interaction, eruptions) crust mantle lith. coupling somewhere between? porous flow (in a viscously deforming matrix) Magma-Lithosphere Interaction Melt Transport Lithosphere Inheritance: fracture propagation shear zones (magma chambers, dikes, sills, fault-interaction, grain size? eruptions) fabric? crust mantle lith. lith. thickness coupling somewhere depleted ?? between? dry porous flow (in a viscously refertilization? deforming matrix) (metasomatism) Magma-Lithosphere Interaction Melt Transport Lithosphere Inheritance: fracture propagation shear zones (magma chambers, dikes, sills, fault-interaction, grain size? eruptions) fabric? crust mantle lith. lith. thickness coupling somewhere depleted ?? between? + dry + porous flow (in a viscously refertilization? deforming matrix) (metasomatism) Magma-Lithosphere Interaction Melt Transport Lithosphere Inheritance: I. lithosphere inheritance and fracture propagation shear zones melt migration, accumulation, (magma chambers, grain size? infiltration dikes, sills, fault-interaction, eruptions) fabric? crust II. Intrusional heating mantle lith. lith. thickness
    [Show full text]