DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact Effects and Regional Tectonic Insights: Backstripping the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impact Effects and Regional Tectonic Insights: Backstripping the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure Impact effects and regional tectonic insights: Backstripping the Chesapeake Bay impact structure Travis Hayden* Department of Geosciences, Western Michigan University, 1187 Rood Hall, 1903 W. Michigan Avenue, Michelle Kominz Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008, USA David S. Powars United States Geological Survey, National Center, Reston, Virginia 20192, USA Lucy E. Edwards Kenneth G. Miller James V. Browning Department of Geosciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA Andrew A. Kulpecz ABSTRACT day sediment thickness must be decompacted The Chesapeake Bay impact structure is a ca. 35.4 Ma crater located on the eastern sea- to estimate its thickness at the time of deposi- board of North America. Deposition returned to normal shortly after impact, resulting in a tion. This is done using porosity-depth curves unique record of both impact-related and subsequent passive margin sedimentation. We use generated from nearby cores. We used compac- backstripping to show that the impact strongly affected sedimentation for 7 m.y. through tion curves based on New Jersey Coastal Plain impact-derived crustal-scale tectonics, dominated by the effects of sediment compaction and cores (Van Sickel et al., 2004). Because these the introduction and subsequent removal of a negative thermal anomaly instead of the expected curves are based on sediment composition, positive thermal anomaly. After this, the area was dominated by passive margin thermal sub- detailed lithology is also required. Isostatic sidence overprinted by periods of regional-scale vertical tectonic events, on the order of tens of unloading of the sediment yields an estimate meters. Loading due to prograding sediment bodies may have generated these events. of how much of the hole was fi lled with sedi- ment. In order to estimate the total subsidence, Keywords: impact processes, passive margin, Chesapeake Bay, tectonics, Eocene, backstripping. an estimate of paleowater depth must also be made. This water depth estimate is based on PREVIOUS WORK impact craters. The most recent studies include inferred depth preferences of selected benthic The Chesapeake Bay impact structure (Fig. 1) several continuously cored locations, both organisms. Organisms that live in shallower was identifi ed from core drilling and seismic inside and outside the crater (Fig. 1; e.g., water depths tend to have a more limited range refl ection studies in Chesapeake Bay region Poag 1997; Powars and Bruce, 1999; Powars, of suitable habitat, while organisms that live (e.g., Powars et al., 1992, 1993; Poag et al., 2000; Powars et al., 2005; Edwards et al., deeper tend to have wider habitable zones. This 1992, 1994). The Chesapeake Bay impact struc- 2005). These studies provided chronological, leads to increasing uncertainty in water depth ture correlates with the North American tektite paleobathymetric, and lithologic constraints on ranges for increasingly deeper water facies fi eld, which has been dated as 34.3–35.5 Ma the post-impact sediment packages. translating directly into increasing error ranges (Glass, 1989; Koeberl, 1989; Poag et al., 1994; Previous studies of impact processes at this for subsidence estimates. Horton and Izett, 2006). At 85 km in diam- and other impact locations have focused on The steps outlined above are codifi ed in eter, this crater is the largest known crater in immediate impact-related events, and were the following equation (modifi ed from Steckler the United States, the seventh largest known limited to hours and or years just after impact and Watts, 1978): on Earth, and one of the best preserved marine (e.g., Melosh and Ivanov, 1999; Melosh, 1989). In the Chesapeake Bay impact structure, the (ρm −ρs) (ρm ) preservation of the impact-related sequences, as TS = S* −ΔSL + Wd. (1) (ρm −ρw) (ρm −ρw ) 76°N well as the immediate post-impact sequences, Washington D.C. Del provides a record of the effects of the impact aware on time scales of millions of years. In addi- This equation allows for the calculation of tion, the impact structure provides a relatively tectonic subsidence (TS) from decompacted ρ Maryland complete record of the post-impact, normal, sediment thicknesses (S*), densities ( s), and shallow-marine sedimentation. water depths (Wd), given the change in sea Chesapeake Bay Δ ρ ρ level ( SL). The values of m and w represent ρ 3 METHODS the density of the mantle ( m = 3.33 g/cm ) and Fentress Central In this work we use backstripping to esti- seawater (ρ = 1.03 g/cm3). S*, ρ , and Wd are Virginia w s MW4-1 Crater Bethany Beach mate the subsidence of the basement under the unknowns that can be estimated from a W Exmore ′ water (Bond and Kominz, 1984). Backstrip- sedimentary section. Kiptopeke 37°16 Langley Annular ping removes the variable sedimentation by Our analysis of backstripping results is Trough Dismal Swamp compensating for the subsidence caused by the time-dependent, requiring numerical age esti- Eyreville sediment load. This yields both tectonic and mates of the sediment packages. In the case Virginia eustatic basement subsidence. of this study, low age resolution makes the North Carolina Backstripping quantitatively estimates the study of only slower (a million years or more) Figure 1. Location map showing Chesapeake depth of the hole or accommodation space that processes possible. Bay impact structure and coreholes used in is fi lled with a combination of sediments and The goal of our backstripping is to deter- this study. water. The thickness of the sediments deposited mine the subsidence of the basement under provides a limit on the minimum amount of sub- water. This is the fi rst reduction, or R1, of Bond *E-mail: [email protected]. sidence that took place. However, the present- et al. (1989): © 2008 The Geological Society of America. For permission to copy, contact Copyright Permissions, GSA, or [email protected]. GEOLOGY,Geology, April April 2008; 2008 v. 36; no. 4; p. 327–330; doi: 10.1130/G24408A.1; 4 fi gures. 327 (ρ −ρ ) One of the major limiting factors for core removal of part of the upper crust. The scale R1 = S* m S + Wd (ρ −ρ ) selection was paleoenvironmental data. For the of the diagram does not allow for a detailed m w (ρ ) (2) purposes of this study, previous work provided view of this event, which occurred in hours or = TS +ΔSL m . paleoenvironmental indicators. When possible, days (Poag et al., 1994). All three of the crater- (ρ −ρ ) m w the authors of those works were contacted to interior cores record higher than expected sub- better understand and interpret these into a sidence rates after impact, that decrease into a It is important to note that this R1 curve framework suitable for backstripping. hiatus ~3 m.y. after impact (Fig. 3, event B). includes both eustatic and tectonic signals. R1 The other major limiting factor for selec- The rapid subsidence event was followed by a data can be compared to a theoretical model of tion of cores was availability of age estimates. dramatic uplift event ranging between 50 m and passive margin subsidence based on the work of Relative dates based on strontium isotope tech- 125 m in all three crater-interior cores (Fig. 3). McKenzie (1978) or Royden and Keen (1980). niques were used to backstrip the Oligocene– The uplift is documented by an unconformity These are theoretical models of the expected Miocene sections of the Bethany Beach core (Fig. 3, event C), and deposition (Fig. 3, event amount and timing of subsidence due to thermal (Browning et al., 2006) and the Miocene in the D) above the hiatus was shallower than below cooling of stretched continental lithosphere. As Kiptopeke core (Powars and Bruce, 1999). In the hiatus. The uplift magnitudes range from the Chesapeake Bay impact structure is under- most cases, however, age estimates were based 100 ± 5 m recorded at Kiptopeke to between 50 lain by the rifted passive margin of North Amer- on biostratigraphy. These age estimates were and 125 m at Langley. These uplifts occurred ica, these theoretical models are applicable. The made using the Gradstein et al. (2004) bio- between 0.8 and 2.9 m.y. in Kiptopeke and general forms of the R1 backstripping results stratigraphic time scale. Langley, respectively. Sub sequent to the uplift are similar to the McKenzie (1978) models event, Exmore and Kiptopeke both record (Fig. 2A). The difference between expected sub- RESULTS unconformities between 28.6 and 18.8 Ma sidence from thermal cooling and the actual R1 Of the four R1 curves from outside the impact and between 31.7 and 16.5 Ma, respectively. subsidence recorded by the sediments is a com- crater, three show remarkable internal consis- The Langley core documents slow deposition bination of eustatic and non-thermal tectonic tency in the magnitude and timing of subsidence throughout this time. Improved age control for effects. The interpretation of these results is the (Fig. 2B). At the time of the impact none of these this core may reveal hiatuses during this inter- basis of this paper and we refer to more or less cores recorded deposition (the Bethany Beach val (Fig. 3, event D). Note that the Langley R1 subsidence in comparison to the predicted core, however, did not penetrate sediments core shows evidence of water depth changes McKenzie (1978) model of thermal subsidence older than ca. 28 Ma.) An excess sub sidence at higher frequency than we can analyze, due (MK means) (e.g., Figs. 2A, 2B). event is recorded in the Bethany Beach core to limited age control during this time frame ( Browning et al., 2006) beginning at 22 Ma. (Powars et al., 2005). DATA This event began at 14 Ma in the MW4–1 core, Sedimentation resumed ca. 18.8 Ma in the The input data sets were collected and inter- and at 13 Ma in the Fentress core.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Constraining Basin Parameters Using a Known Subsidence History
    geosciences Article Constraining Basin Parameters Using a Known Subsidence History Mohit Tunwal 1,2,* , Kieran F. Mulchrone 2 and Patrick A. Meere 1 1 School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, T23 TK30 Cork, Ireland; [email protected] 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Road, T12 XF62 Cork, Ireland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +353-21-490-4580 Received: 5 June 2020; Accepted: 6 July 2020; Published: 9 July 2020 Abstract: Temperature history is one of the most important factors driving subsidence and the overall tectono-stratigraphic evolution of a sedimentary basin. The McKenzie model has been widely applied for subsidence modelling and stretching factor estimation for sedimentary basins formed in an extensional tectonic environment. Subsidence modelling requires values of physical parameters (e.g., crustal thickness, lithospheric thickness, stretching factor) that may not always be available. With a given subsidence history of a basin estimated using a stratigraphic backstripping method, these parameters can be estimated by quantitatively comparing the known subsidence curve with modelled subsidence curves. In this contribution, a method to compare known and modelled subsidence curves is presented, aiming to constrain valid combinations of the stretching factor, crustal thickness, and lithospheric thickness of a basin. Furthermore, a numerical model is presented that takes into account the effect of sedimentary cover on thermal history and subsidence modelling of a basin. The parameter fitting method presented here is first applied to synthetically generated subsidence curves. Next, a case study using a known subsidence curve from the Campos Basin, offshore Brazil, is considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Coupled Onshore Erosion and Offshore Sediment Loading As Causes of Lower Crust Flow on the Margins of South China Sea Peter D
    Clift Geosci. Lett. (2015) 2:13 DOI 10.1186/s40562-015-0029-9 REVIEW Open Access Coupled onshore erosion and offshore sediment loading as causes of lower crust flow on the margins of South China Sea Peter D. Clift1,2* Abstract Hot, thick continental crust is susceptible to ductile flow within the middle and lower crust where quartz controls mechanical behavior. Reconstruction of subsidence in several sedimentary basins around the South China Sea, most notably the Baiyun Sag, suggests that accelerated phases of basement subsidence are associated with phases of fast erosion onshore and deposition of thick sediments offshore. Working together these two processes induce pressure gradients that drive flow of the ductile crust from offshore towards the continental interior after the end of active extension, partly reversing the flow that occurs during continental breakup. This has the effect of thinning the continental crust under super-deep basins along these continental margins after active extension has finished. This is a newly recognized form of climate-tectonic coupling, similar to that recognized in orogenic belts, especially the Himalaya. Climatically modulated surface processes, especially involving the monsoon in Southeast Asia, affects the crustal structure offshore passive margins, resulting in these “load-flow basins”. This further suggests that reorganiza- tion of continental drainage systems may also have a role in governing margin structure. If some crustal thinning occurs after the end of active extension this has implications for the thermal history of hydrocarbon-bearing basins throughout the area where application of classical models results in over predictions of heatflow based on observed accommodation space.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern and Ancient Hiatuses in the Pelagic Caps of Pacific Guyots and Seamounts and Internal Tides GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Modern and ancient hiatuses in the pelagic caps of Pacific guyots and seamounts and internal tides GEOSPHERE; v. 11, no. 5 Neil C. Mitchell1, Harper L. Simmons2, and Caroline H. Lear3 1School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK doi:10.1130/GES00999.1 2School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska-Fairbanks, 905 N. Koyukuk Drive, 129 O’Neill Building, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA 3School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK 10 figures CORRESPONDENCE: neil .mitchell@ manchester ABSTRACT landmasses were different. Furthermore, the maximum current is commonly .ac .uk more important locally than the mean current for resuspension and transport Incidences of nondeposition or erosion at the modern seabed and hiatuses of particles and thus for influencing the sedimentary record. The amplitudes CITATION: Mitchell, N.C., Simmons, H.L., and Lear, C.H., 2015, Modern and ancient hiatuses in the within the pelagic caps of guyots and seamounts are evaluated along with of current oscillations should therefore be of interest to paleoceanography, al- pelagic caps of Pacific guyots and seamounts and paleotemperature and physiographic information to speculate on the charac- though they are not well known for the geological past. internal tides: Geosphere, v. 11, no. 5, p. 1590–1606, ter of late Cenozoic internal tidal waves in the upper Pacific Ocean. Drill-core Hiatuses in pelagic sediments of the deep abyssal ocean floor have been doi:10.1130/GES00999.1. and seismic reflection data are used to classify sediment at the drill sites as interpreted from sediment cores (Barron and Keller, 1982; Keller and Barron, having been accumulating or eroding or not being deposited in the recent 1983; Moore et al., 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 Classical Numerical Models of Basin Formation and Evolution with Applications to the Central European Basin System
    Part 1 Classical numerical models of basin formation and evolution with applications to the Central European Basin System (CEBS) 1.1 Kinematic models for basin formation and evolution 1.1.1 Purely thermal models The first class of models to explain vertical movements in continental regions closely resembled the thermal model which has been successfully used for oceanic lithosphere (e.g. Vogt & Ostenso, 1967). Following this approach, the subsidence of continental shelves could in principle be related to thermal contraction beneath the crust. This conclusion reflects the concept that the tectonic subsidence of continental lithosphere decreases exponentially as a function of time with a time constant very close to that typical of a mid-ocean ridge (Sleep, 1971; Steckler & Watts, 1978). Sleep (1971) proposed a major thermal perturbation as the driving mechanism for subsidence, see Figure 1. Following his model, the thermal anomaly heats the entire lithosphere causing consequent uplifting of the crust by thermal expansion. Subsequent removal of the upper crustal layers by erosion together with the resultant cooling produce subsidence below the original surface level creating a basin. Figure 1. Cartoon illustrating the thermal driven subsidence as proposed by Sleep (1971). Doming due to thermal perturbation causes uplift. Erosion and subsequent subsidence creates a basin. - 1 - The model of Sleep (1971) accounts rather well for the time history of subsidence, however, the explanation is inconsistent with the large sediment accumulations frequently observed. Once the temperature of the lithosphere increased, first the surface is elevated and then starts to subside to its original position due to the cooling of the lithosphere, Case A of Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Resource Analysis of Shale Gas and Shale Oil in Europe
    Draft Report for DG JRC in the Context of Contract JRC/PTT/2015/F.3/0027/NC "Development of shale gas and shale oil in Europe" European Unconventional Oil and Gas Assessment (EUOGA) Geological resource analysis of shale gas and shale oil in Europe Deliverable T4b mmmll Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe June 2016 I 2 Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................. 3 Abstract ........................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 7 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 8 Item 4.1 Setup and distribute a template for uniformly describing EU shale plays to the National Geological Surveys .........................................................................12 Item 4.2 Elaborate and compile general and systematic descriptions of the shale plays from the NGS responses ....................................................................................15 T01, B02 - Norwegian-Danish-S. Sweden – Alum Shale .........................................16 T02 - Baltic Basin – Cambrian-Silurian Shales ......................................................22 T03 - South Lublin Basin, Narol Basin and Lviv-Volyn Basin – Lower Paleozoic Shales ......................................................................................................................37
    [Show full text]
  • Melt-Induced Buoyancy May Explain the Elevated Rift-Rapid Sag Paradox
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Melt-induced buoyancy may explain the elevated rift-rapid sag paradox during breakup of Received: 26 January 2018 Accepted: 12 June 2018 continental plates Published: xx xx xxxx David G. Quirk 1 & Lars H. Rüpke 2 The division of the earth’s surface into continents and oceans is a consequence of plate tectonics but a geological paradox exists at continent-ocean boundaries. Continental plate is thicker and lighter than oceanic plate, foating higher on the mantle asthenosphere, but it can rift apart by thinning and heating to form new oceans. In theory, continental plate subsides in proportion to the amount it is thinned and subsequently by the rate it cools down. However, seismic and borehole data from continental margins like the Atlantic show that the upper surface of many plates remains close to sea-level during rifting, inconsistent with its thickness, and subsides after breakup more rapidly than cooling predicts. Here we use numerical models to investigate the origin and nature of this puzzling behaviour with data from the Kwanza Basin, ofshore Angola. We explore an idea where the continental plate is made increasingly buoyant during rifting by melt produced and trapped in the asthenosphere. Using fnite element simulation, we demonstrate that partially molten asthenosphere combined with other mantle processes can counteract the subsidence efect of thinning plate, keeping it elevated by 2-3 km until breakup. Rapid subsidence occurs after breakup when melt is lost to the embryonic ocean ridge. Te aim of this paper is to test the geological causes of problematic subsidence patterns at the margins of ocean basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Drilling Program Scientific Results Volume
    Haggerty, J.A., Premoli Silva, I., Rack, F., and McNutt, M.K. (Eds.), 1995 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 144 33. PHYSIOGRAPHY AND ARCHITECTURE OF MARSHALL ISLANDS GUYOTS DRILLED DURING LEG 144: GEOPHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS ON PLATFORM DEVELOPMENT1 Douglas D. Bergersen2 ABSTRACT Drilling during Ocean Drilling Program Leg 144 provided much needed stratigraphic control on guyots in the Marshall Islands. Information from geophysical surveys conducted before drilling and the ages and lithologies assigned to the sediments sampled during Leg 144 make it possible to compare the submerged platforms of Limalok, Lo-En, and Wodejebato with each other and with various islands and atolls in the Hawaiian and French Polynesian chains. The gross physiography and stratigraphy of the platforms drilled during Leg 144 are similar in many respects to modern islands and atolls in French Polynesia: perimeter ridges bound lagoon sediments, transition zones of clay and altered volcaniclastic sediments separate the shallow-water platform carbonates from the underlying volcanic flows, and basement highs rise toward the center of the platforms. Ridges extending from the flanks of these guyots conform in number to rift zones observed on Hawaiian volcanoes. Edifices appear to remain unstable after moving away from the hotspot swell on the basis of fault blocks perched along the flanks of the guyots. The apparent absence of an extensive carbonate platform on Lo-En, the 100-m-thick sequence of Late Cretaceous shallow- water carbonates on Wodejebato, and the 230-m-thick sequence of Paleocene to middle Eocene platform carbonates on Limalok relate to differing episodes of volcanism, uplift, and subsidence affecting platform development.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation and Evolution of the Lower Published Online 26 November 2020 Magdalena Valley Basin and San Jacinto
    Volume 3 Quaternary Chapter 2 Neogene https://doi.org/10.32685/pub.esp.37.2019.02 Formation and Evolution of the Lower Published online 26 November 2020 Magdalena Valley Basin and San Jacinto Fold Belt of Northwestern Colombia: Paleogene Insights from Upper Cretaceous to Recent Tectono–Stratigraphy 1 [email protected] Hocol S.A. Cretaceous Vicepresidencia de Exploración Josué Alejandro MORA–BOHÓRQUEZ1* , Onno ONCKEN2, Carrera 7 n.° 113–46, piso 16 Bogotá, Colombia Eline LE BRETON3, Mauricio IBAÑEZ–MEJIA4 , Gabriel VELOZA5, 2 [email protected] Andrés MORA6, Vickye VÉLEZ7, and Mario DE FREITAS8 Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ Telegrafenberg 14473 Potsdam, Germany Jurassic Abstract Using a regional geological and geophysical dataset, we reconstructed the 3 [email protected] stratigraphic evolution of the Lower Magdalena Valley Basin and San Jacinto fold belt Freie Universität Berlin Institute of Geological Sciences of northwestern Colombia. Detailed interpretations of reflection seismic data and new Malteserstraβe 74–100, D–12249 geochronology analyses reveal that the basement of the Lower Magdalena Basin is the Berlin, Germany 4 [email protected] Triassic northward continuation of the basement terranes of the northern Central Cordillera Department of Geosciences and consists of Permian – Triassic metasedimentary rocks intruded by Upper Creta- University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona, 85721, USA ceous granitoids. Structural analyses suggest that the NE–SW strike of faults in base- 5 [email protected] ment rocks underlying the northeastern Lower Magdalena is inherited from a Jurassic Hocol S.A. Vicepresidencia de Exploración rifting event, while the ESE–WNW striking faults in the western part originated from a Carrera 7 n.° 113–46, piso 16 Permian Late Cretaceous to Eocene strike–slip and extensional episode.
    [Show full text]
  • Program and Abstracts for the 2014 GCSSEPM Bob F. Perkins
    Sedimentary Basins: Origin, Depositional Histories, and Petroleum Systems 33rd Annual Gulf Coast Section SEPM Foundation Bob F. Perkins Research Conference 2014 Program and Abstracts OMNI Houston Westside Houston, Texas January 26–28, 2014 Edited by James Pindell Brian Horn Norman Rosen Paul Weimer Menno Dinkleman Allen Lowrie Richard Fillon James Granath Lorcan Kennan Sedimentary Basins: Origin, Depositional Histories, and Petroleum Systems i Copyright © 2014 by the Gulf Coast Section SEPM Foundation www.gcssepm.org Published December 2014 The cost of this conference has been subsidized by generous grants from ION Geophysical, Shell, and Hess Corporation. ii Program and Abstracts Foreword “Mommy, where do basins come from?” Children do ask good questions! On the one hand, it might seem that this is a rather esoteric question; on the other hand, the simple explanation of plates ramming together or pulling apart does not fully suffice as a satisfactory answer. From the exploration point of view, how the basin formed is of fundamental importance in determining source rock, reservoir, and their distribution in the basin. Although the exact origin of basins is not the main theme of this conference, our goal is cognizance of their origin and to understand better how this affects petroleum systems. For us in the oil and gas business, this is a matter of prime importance. Our talks, therefore, start with rifting, as passive margins are from the hydrocarbon point-of-view of extreme importance, and then by area. Finding analogs to plays is as important as finding inspiration in the ideas of others and we certainly hope that all attendees will get something out of the conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern and Ancient Hiatuses in the Pelagic Caps of Pacific Guyots And
    1 Modern and ancient hiatuses in the pelagic caps of Pacific guyots and seamounts and internal tides Neil C. Mitchell1, Harper L. Simmons2 and Caroline H. Lear3 1School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK 2School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska-Fairbanks, 905 N. Koyukuk Drive, 129 O'Neill Building, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA 3School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK This is an open access version of an article published in Geosphere in 2015: http://www.crossref.org/iPage?doi=10.1130%2FGES00999.1 Keywords: internal tides, guyot pelagic caps, pelagic sediment erosion, Pacific plate tectonics Abstract Incidences of non-deposition or erosion at the modern seabed and hiatuses within the pelagic caps of guyots and seamounts are evaluated along with paleo-temperature and physiographic information to speculate on the character of Late Cenozoic internal tidal 2 waves in the upper Pacific Ocean. Drill core and seismic reflection data are used to classify sediment at the drill sites as having been either accumulating or eroding/non- depositing in the recent geological past. When those classified sites are compared against predictions of a numerical model of the modern internal tidal wave field (Simmons, 2008), the sites accumulating particles over the past few million years are found to lie away from beams of the modeled internal tide, while those that have not been accumulating are in internal tide beams. Given the correspondence to the modern internal wave field, we examine whether internal tides can explain ancient hiatuses at the drill sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Passive Margins
    C. R. Geoscience 337 (2005) 1395–1408 http://france.elsevier.com/direct/CRAS2A/ Concise review paper Volcanic passive margins Laurent Geoffroy Laboratoire de géodynamique des rifts et des marges passives, EA 3264, UFR Sciences et Techniques, université du Maine, av. Olivier-Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans cedex 09, France Received 7 June 2004; accepted after revision 11 October 2005 Available online 17 November 2005 Written on invitation of the Editorial Board Abstract Compared to non-volcanic ones, volcanic passive margins mark continental break-up over a hotter mantle, probably subject to small-scale convection. They present distinctive genetic and structural features. High-rate extension of the lithosphere is associated with catastrophic mantle melting responsible for the accretion of a thick igneous crust. Distinctive structural features of volcanic margins are syn-magmatic and continentward-dipping crustal faults accommodating the seaward flexure of the igneous crust. Volcanic margins present along-axis a magmatic and tectonic segmentation with wavelength similar to adjacent slow-spreading ridges. Their 3D organisation suggests a connection between loci of mantle melting at depths and zones of strain concentration within the lithosphere. Break-up would start and propagate from localized thermally-softened lithospheric zones. These ‘soft points’ could be localized over small-scale convection cells found at the bottom of the lithosphere, where adiabatic mantle melting would specifically occur. The particular structure of the brittle crust at volcanic passive margins could be interpreted by active and sudden oceanward flow of both the unstable hot mantle and the ductile part of the lithosphere during the break-up stage. To cite this article: L.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Subsidence of the Early Paleozoic Passive Continental Margin in Eastern California and Southern Nevada
    Tectonic subsidence of the early Paleozoic passive continental margin in eastern California and southern Nevada MARJORIE LEVY* } Department of Geological Sciences and Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia University, NICHOLAS CHRISTIE-BLICK Palisades, New York 10964 ABSTRACT hinge zone, and that the observed subsidence is exaggerated by flex­ ural loading in a deeper basin to the west. Quantitative analysis of tectonic subsidence in Cambrian and Or­ INTRODUCTION dovician platform carbonates and associated strata exposed in the Spring Mountains (Nevada) and the Nopah, Funeral, andloyo Ranges Evidence for fragmentation of the Laurentian supercontinent during (California) indicates that subsidence associated with this segment of Late Proterozoic and early Paleozoic time is widespread. Grabens and the early Paleozoic passive continental margin is exponential in form, passive continental margins of this age are preserved on many continents consistent with thermal contraction of the lithosphere following ex­ (Bond and others, 1984), and continental dispersal appears to have been tension. As in other parts of the North American Cordillera, confuten­ accompanied by a global rise of sea level related to a decrease in the mean tal separation in the southern Great Basin appears to have taken place age of the oceanic crust (Bond and others, 1988, 1989). Critical to at­ between 590 and 545 Ma. These results are not sensitive to uncertain­ tempts to reconstruct the Laurentian supercontinent is determining pre­ ties in stratigraphic thickness, biostratigraphic age control, or paleo­ cisely the time of breakup for specific passive-margin segments. bathymetry. Uncertainties in the Cambrian time scale lead to predict­ Counterpart margins mayor may not have a common history prior to able variations in the inferred time of onset ofthermal subsidence, but breakup, depending on the distribution of older sutures for example, but they have no effect on the inferred stratigraphic position of the rift to they should be of the same age.
    [Show full text]