DOCSLIB.ORG

The City of El Dorado Wind Energy Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The City of El Dorado Wind Energy Project DOE/EA 1833 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT THE CITY OF EL DORADO WIND ENERGY PROJECT EL DORADO, BUTLER COUNTY, KANSAS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office FEBRUARY 2011 DOE/EA 1833 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT THE CITY OF EL DORADO WIND ENERGY PROJECT EL DORADO, BUTLER COUNTY, KANSAS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office FEBRUARY 2011 COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Environmental Assessment for the City of El Dorado Wind Energy Project, El Dorado, Butler County, Kansas (DOE/EA 1833). CONTACT: For additional copies or more information on this Environmental Assessment (EA), please contact: Amy Van Dercook NEPA Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy Golden Field Office 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3305 Phone: 720.356.1666 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: DOE has provided an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Development Block Grant (EECBG) award to the State of Kansas and proposes to authorize the State to expend $250,000 of this Federal grant to assist with financing of the design, permitting and construction of the City of El Dorado Wind Energy Project (the proposed project), a proposed 1.0-megawatt wind turbine to be located immediately west of the El Dorado Wetlands and Water Reclamation facility located at 105 Wetlands Drive in El Dorado, Butler County, Kansas. DOE has authorized the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) to use a percentage of Federal funding for preliminary activities, which includes preparation of this EA, analyses and agency consultation. These activities do not significantly impact the environment nor represent an irreversible or irretrievable commitment by DOE in advance of the conclusion of the EA. The proposed site is in a rural area, approximately 1.5 miles south of downtown El Dorado and adjacent to U.S. Route 77. The City has selected the Nordic Windpower N1000 wind turbine, which would provide approximately 2,430 megawatt-hours of renewable energy annually to the Reclamation Facility and result in a net decrease in emissions of approximately 2,223 short tons of carbon dioxide equivalents for each year of operation. The wind energy produced would meet approximately 98 percent of the Facility’s average annual electricity needs. This EA analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the proposed construction, operation, and eventual decommissioning of the proposed project and the alternative of not implementing this project (the No-Action Alternative). PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: The public was provided with an opportunity to comment on the draft EA via email or written correspondence. Details regarding the comments and responses are included in Appendix E. AVAILABILITY: This EA is available on the DOE Golden Field Office Public Reading Room website, (http://www.eere.energy.gov/golden/reading_room.aspx) and on the DOE NEPA Website (http://nepa.energy.gov/DOE_NEPA_documents.htm). DOE/EA 1833 iii February 2011 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS APE area of potential effect ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 BMP best management practice CFR Code of Federal Regulations dBA decibel on an A-weighted scale, used to approximate the human ear's response to sound DNL Day Night Average Sound Level DOE U.S. Department of Energy EA Environmental Assessment EECBG Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant EMF electromagnetic fields EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map FR Federal Register GHG greenhouse gas IBA Important Bird Area KAR Kansas Administrative Regulations KCC Kansas Corporation Commission KDHE Kansas Department of Health and Environment KDWP Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks KSHS Kansas Historical Society MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act NAGPRA Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NOA Notice of Availability NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NRHP National Register of Historic Places NTIA National Telecommunication and Information Administration SHPO State Historic Preservation Office (Officer) SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan US-77 U.S. Highway 77 U.S.C. U.S. Code USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service WSU Wichita State University DOE/EA 1833 iv February 2011 Contents CONTENTS Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act and Related Procedures ......................................................... 1 1.2 Background .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 DOE’s Purpose and Need .......................................................................................................... 2 1.3.2 Kansas’s Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3.3 Kansas’ EECBG Project Selection Process ............................................................................... 3 1.4 Public and Agency Involvement .................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1 Public Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.4.2 Public and Agency Coordination............................................................................................... 3 1.4.3 Draft Environmental Assessment .............................................................................................. 4 2. PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................. 6 2.1 DOE’s Proposed Action ................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Kansas’ Proposed Project ............................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Project Location ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.2 Construction and Installation ..................................................................................................... 6 2.2.3 Operations and Maintenance ..................................................................................................... 8 2.2.4 Decommissioning ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Alternatives .................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.1 DOE Alternatives ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.2 No-Action Alternative ............................................................................................................... 9 2.3.3 Alternatives Considered by the City of El Dorado .................................................................... 9 2.3.3.1 Turbine Selection.................................................................................................................. 9 2.3.3.2 Site Selection ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.3.3.3 Disposition of Energy and Utility Interconnections ........................................................... 10 2.4 Permits, Approval, and Notifications ........................................................................................... 10 2.5 Project Proponent-Committed Practices ...................................................................................... 11 2.5.1 Visual Quality.......................................................................................................................... 11 2.5.2 Cultural and Historic Resources .............................................................................................. 11 2.5.3 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................................... 11 2.5.4 Biological Resources ............................................................................................................... 11 2.5.5 Human Health and Safety ........................................................................................................ 12 2.5.6 Water Resources ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.5.6.1 Ground and Surface Water ................................................................................................. 12 2.5.6.2 Floodplains and Wetlands .................................................................................................. 12 2.5.7 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................... 12 2.5.8 Utilities and Energy ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yearly Report on IRPWIND and EERA JP Wind Activities Work Package 2
    Integrated Research Programme on Wind Energy Project acronym: IRPWIND Grant agreement no 609795 Collaborative project Start date: 01st March 2014 Duration: 4 years Title: Yearly report on IRPWIND and EERA JP Wind Activities Work Package 2 - Deliverable number 2.12 Lead Beneficiary: DTU Delivery date: 25 April 2016 Dissemination level: PU The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme under the agreement GA-2013-609795. 1 Table of contents Contents 1. Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Status on the EERA Joint Programme on Wind Energy and the Integrated Research Programme on Wind Energy (IRPWIND) ........................................................................................4 1.2 Mobility.................................................................................................................................4 1.3 IRPWIND KPIs – 2014 values ............................................................................................5 1.4 Contact points .....................................................................................................................8 1.5 Reporting on Research Themes ...................................................................................... 10 1.6 Reporting on Milestones and deliverables ..................................................................... 15 1.7 International collaboration in 2015 ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • US Wind Turbine Manufacturing
    U.S. Wind Turbine Manufacturing: Federal Support for an Emerging Industry Michaela D. Platzer Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business September 23, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42023 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress U.S. Wind Turbine Manufacturing: Federal Support for an Emerging Industry Summary Increasing U.S. energy supply diversity has been the goal of many Presidents and Congresses. This commitment has been prompted by concerns about national security, the environment, and the U.S. balance of payments. More recently, investments in new energy sources have been seen as a way to expand domestic manufacturing. For all of these reasons, the federal government has a variety of policies to promote wind power. Expanding the use of wind energy requires installation of wind turbines. These are complex machines composed of some 8,000 components, created from basic industrial materials such as steel, aluminum, concrete, and fiberglass. Major components in a wind turbine include the rotor blades, a nacelle and controls (the heart and brain of a wind turbine), a tower, and other parts such as large bearings, transformers, gearboxes, and generators. Turbine manufacturing involves an extensive supply chain. Until recently, Europe has been the hub for turbine production, supported by national renewable energy deployment policies in countries such as Denmark, Germany, and Spain. Competitive wind turbine manufacturing sectors are also located in India and Japan and are emerging in China and South Korea. U.S. and foreign manufacturers have expanded their capacity in the United States to assemble and produce wind turbines and components.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Technology Yearbook
    Offshore Technology Yearbook 2 O19 Generation V: power for generations Since we released our fi rst offshore direct drive turbines, we have been driven to offer our customers the best possible offshore solutions while maintaining low risk. Our SG 10.0-193 DD offshore wind turbine does this by integrating the combined knowledge of almost 30 years of industry experience. With 94 m long blades and a 10 MW capacity, it generates ~30 % more energy per year compared to its predecessor. So that together, we can provide power for generations. www.siemensgamesa.com 2 O19 20 June 2019 03 elcome to reNEWS Offshore Technology are also becoming more capable and the scope of Yearbook 2019, the fourth edition of contracts more advanced as the industry seeks to Wour comprehensive reference for the drive down costs ever further. hardware and assets required to deliver an As the growth of the offshore wind industry offshore wind farm. continues apace, so does OTY. Building on previous The offshore wind industry is undergoing growth OTYs, this 100-page edition includes a section on in every aspect of the sector and that is reflected in crew transfer vessel operators, which play a vital this latest edition of OTY. Turbines and foundations role in servicing the industry. are getting physically larger and so are the vessels As these pages document, CTVs and their used to install and service them. operators are evolving to meet the changing needs The growing geographical spread of the sector of the offshore wind development community. So is leading to new players in the fabrication space too are suppliers of installation vessels, cable-lay springing up and players in other markets entering vessels, turbines and other components.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy Outlook for North America Wind Power Generation Capacity and Turbine Deployments: Market Analysis and Forecasts
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Wind Energy Outlook for North America Wind Power Generation Capacity and Turbine Deployments: Market Analysis and Forecasts NOTE: This document is a free excerpt of a larger research report. If you are interested in purchasing the full report, please contact Pike Research at [email protected]. Published 3Q 2009 Gali Beh Industry Analyst Clint Wheelock Managing Director Wind Energy Outlook for North America Section 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2008, U.S. wind power generation capacity passed the 25 GW mark by adding over 8 GW from the year before, which represented the largest individual gain of any country in the world. This growth rate of 50% exceeded that of the year before (45%) indicating that the market is still relatively young and the economic crisis that began in 2008 has not slowed it down—at least not yet. In 2007, generation capacity from renewable sources made up only 4% of the world’s electricity sources, but 16% of new electricity generation capacity additions were from renewables with wind power making up more than 80% of these gains by renewables. The year 2009 will be a defining moment for wind power markets around the world. The global economic crisis that began in late 2008 has thrown the industry into confusion, along with most other global industries. Two competing market views exist, and representatives from each camp were interviewed for this report across the wind power value chain, such as components suppliers, turbine OEMs, wind developers, and power providers. The optimist sees this moment as one of great opportunity and potential growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Retooling for Wind – Onshore to Offshore -- SECWC March 8-9, 2012
    Retooling for Wind – Onshore to Offshore -- SECWC March 8-9, 2012 Patrick Fullenkamp – Director, Technical Services [email protected] © Copyright 2012 GLWN™ A WIRE-Net Initiative Agenda Manufacturing Workshop March 8, 1:30 – 3:00 1:30 Offshore/Onshore Wind Business Opportunities for Manufacturers in Southeast Region and Global Trends Driving Market Demand for Key Components – Patrick Fullenkamp, GLWN 2:15 Gamesa Offshore Wind Turbine Project – Dan Renshaw March 9, 8:30 – 10:00 8:30 Offshore/Onshore Wind Supply Chain Structure, How to get engaged – Ed Weston, GLWN 9:15 Round Table Discussions: “What are manufacturers needs and concerns to prepare for this new Offshore Business? Wind Turbine OEM – Gamesa, Dan Renshaw Offshore Developer – APEX Offshore Wind, Tim Ryan Engineering – SAIC, Neil Rondorf Vessels – Stevens Towing, Benjamin Smith Electrical Infrastructure – ABB, Tom Weinandy at Baldor Industry Heavy Fabrication © Copyright 2012 GLWN™ A WIRE-Net Initiative Topics to be covered Onshore History Update on What’s Happening Now Description of Forces and Major Players Offshore OEM and Manufacturing Drivers – Offshore vs Onshore Opportunities: Ports, Foundations, Vessels, Turbines USA Offshore Project Summary SE Region Offshore Projects How to maximize US SE Regional Supply Chain © Copyright 2012 GLWN™ A WIRE-Net Initiative GLWN……Call us Global Membership-based, Non-Profit International Supply Chain Advisory Group 1600 companies across 35 States + Canada Supplier Headhunters for the Wind Industry Resource for
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing Climate Solutions Carbon-Reducing Technologies and U.S
    Manufacturing Climate Solutions Carbon-Reducing Technologies and U.S. Jobs CHAPTER 11 Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Employment Gloria Ayee, Marcy Lowe and Gary Gereffi Contributing CGGC researchers: Tyler Hall, Eun Han Kim This research is an extension of the Manufacturing Climate Solutions report published in November 2008. It was prepared on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (http://www.edf.org/home.cfm). Cover Photo Credits: 1. Courtesy of DOE/NREL, Credit – Iberdrola Renewables, Inc. (formerly PPM Energy, Inc.) 2. Courtesy of DOE/NREL, Credit – Iberdrola Renewables, Inc. (formerly PPM Energy, Inc.) 3. Courtesy of DOE/NREL, Credit – Reseburg, Amanda; Type A Images © September 22, 2009. Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, Duke University The complete report is available electronically from: http://www.cggc.duke.edu/environment/climatesolutions/ As of September 22, 2009, Chapter 11 is not available in hardcopy. 2 Summary Wind power is a cost effective, renewable energy solution for electricity generation. Wind power can dramatically reduce the environmental impacts associated with power generated from fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas). Electricity production is one of the largest sources of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United States. Thus, adoption of wind power generating technologies has become a major way for the United States to diversify its energy portfolio and reach its expressed goal of 80% reduction in green house gas (GHG) emissions by the year 2050. The benefits of wind power plants include no fuel risk, no carbon dioxide emissions or air pollution, no hazardous waste production, and no need for mining, drilling or transportation of fuel (American Wind Energy Association, 2009a).
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Wind Turbine Manufacturing: Federal Support for an Emerging Industry
    U.S. Wind Turbine Manufacturing: Federal Support for an Emerging Industry Michaela D. Platzer Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business December 18, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42023 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress U.S. Wind Turbine Manufacturing: Federal Support for an Emerging Industry Summary Increasing U.S. energy supply diversity has been the goal of many Presidents and Congresses. This commitment has been prompted by concerns about national security, the environment, and the U.S. balance of payments. Investments in new energy sources also have been seen as a way to expand domestic manufacturing. For all of these reasons, the federal government has a variety of policies to promote wind power. Expanding the use of wind energy requires installation of wind turbines. These are complex machines composed of some 8,000 components, created from basic industrial materials such as steel, aluminum, concrete, and fiberglass. Major components in a wind turbine include the rotor blades, a nacelle and controls (the heart and brain of a wind turbine), a tower, and other parts such as large bearings, transformers, gearboxes, and generators. Turbine manufacturing involves an extensive supply chain. Until recently, Europe has been the hub for turbine production, supported by national renewable energy deployment policies in countries such as Denmark, Germany, and Spain. However, support for renewable energy including wind power has begun to wane across Europe as governments there reduce or remove some subsidies. Competitive wind turbine manufacturing sectors are also located in India and Japan and are emerging in China and South Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH AMERICAN POWER LIST Our Guide to Wind’S Top People in the US and Canada
    NORTH AMERICAN POWER LIST Our guide to wind’s top people in the US and Canada Featuring interviews with Ray Wood from Bank of America Merrill Lynch, MUFG’s Beth Waters, and Enel’s Rafael Gonzalez CONTENTS Compiling the top 100: Advisory panel and ranking process 5 Interview: BAML’s Ray Wood on consolidation, tax and more 8 Interview: Lincoln Clean Energy’s Declan Flanagan 11 Analysing the top 100: Statistics about this year’s table 13 Profiles: Numbers 100 to 81 14 Q&A interview: Enel’s Rafael Gonzalez on securing corporate deals 16 Profiles: Numbers 80 to 51 19 Interview: Greengate’s Dan Balaban discusses Canada’s green hotspot 23 Profiles: Numbers 50 to 21 24 Interview: MUFG’s Beth Waters on tax changes and new energy buyers 28 Profiles: Numbers 20 to 6 32 Top five: The most influential people in wind in North America 34 Top 100 list: The full North American Power List for 2018 36 Coming up: Key dates for your diary in 2018 38 28 Taxing times: Beth Waters talks about why MUFG is still keen on tax equity deals despite Trump tax reforms 2 North American Power List 2018 Editorial A WORD ABOUT WIND www.awordaboutwind.com [email protected] US: +1 (917) 3103 307 EDITORIAL US: +1 512 216 7117 UK: +44 (0)20 7100 1616 Editor-in-Chief: Richard Heap Firms are looking to Associate Editor: Ilaria Valtimora Designer: Mike Ward rationalise and cut Client Services: Matt Rollason Membership: Zoe Wicker costs, to drive down Marketing: Frances Salter the price of wind as the Publisher: Adam Barber end of the production Registered office: 2nd Floor, tax credit looms.
    [Show full text]
  • 風力発電の現状と展望 荒川 忠一＊1 ARAKAWA Chuichi
    65 日本ガスタービン学会誌 Vol.40 No.2 2012.3 特集：風力発電の技術開発動向 風力発電の現状と展望 荒川 忠一＊1 ARAKAWA Chuichi キーワード：風力発電，風車，洋上風車，系統連系，社会受容性 wind power generation，wind turbine，off shore wind，grid connection，social acceptance 1．はじめに 一方，日本で大きな話題となる太陽光は，おおよその世 世界風力エネルギー学会（WWEA）から，風力発電 界のその設備容量は20GWに過ぎず，風力エネルギーの 設備容量の最新データが届いた。2011年末の世界の総 1 ／ 10に過ぎないのが実績である。なぜ，日本では風力 設備容量は239GWに達し，1年間の新設は42GWであっ エネルギーがこれまで普及しなかったのであろうか。 た。世界の電力需要のおよそ3％を賄うに相当する量で 筆者が10年前に，風力エネルギーの研究を開始しよう ある。図1は最近10年の設備容量の成長を示し，10年で としたとき，「日本には風力に適した風はない，場所も 10倍に増加していることが読み取れる。当分の間，世界 ない，普及するはずはない」との批判をいただいた。し の成長は続くものと予想されている。図2は国別の設備 かし，ヨーロッパの情報を知る限りにおいて，日本にも 容量を示しているが，ここ2年ほどは中国が圧倒的な伸 風力が普及する十分なチャンスがあると信じていた。も びを示し，63GWで世界のトップを占めている。米国は ちろん，日本では，台風を代表とする強風，山岳地形に 47 GWで2位，長年首位を走っていたドイツは29GWで よる乱流，冬の日本海に発生する強烈な冬季雷があり， 3位となっている。残念ながら，日本は世界13位であり， 世界基準を超えた大きさであるため，導入当初はさまざ 2.5GWに留まり，筆者がWWEAの副会長を務めている まなトラブルが発生した。これらの課題は，日本型風車 という因縁で，トップ13位という不自然なグラフのなか のガイドラインを設定することにより，乗り越えつつあ で，辛うじて名前を残しているといった寂しい状況である。 る。現在は，風力に立ちはだかる大きな課題は，電力系 世界の視点としては，風力がもっとも経済的なエネル 統への接続問題，そして社会受容性であると判断している。 ギーであることから，世界各地で大規模に普及している。 東日本大震災と原子力発電のトラブルを受けて，風力 図1 世界の風力エネルギー総設備容量の推移（2000年から2011年末まで，WWEAより） 原稿受付 2012年2月20日 ＊1 東京大学 大学院 工学系研究科 機械工学専攻 〒113-8656 東京都文京区本郷7-3-1 ー1ー Download service for the GTSJ member of ID , via 170.106.203.244, 2021/10/11. 1 / 78 66 風力発電の現状と展望 日本ガスタービン学会誌 エネルギーの重要性が増している今般の情勢を踏まえて， の地域間の連系の運用可能性はあるが，再生可能エネル 技術的視点からこれらの展望を解説する。 ギー導入を促進する役割には利用されていない。最近の 事情でもわかるように，非常時の運用には利用されてい 2．電力系統と風車 る。 国内の風力の最適地は，風の強い北海道，東北，ある ヨーロッパで風力エネルギーが普及した要因のひとつ いは九州と言った電力の大消費地から離れている。また， に，国境を越えた連系線の存在があり，国ごとの風力エ 地域毎の電力会社は，従来の手法により，それぞれの地
    [Show full text]
  • Wkj Basislayout 11.02.12 15:43 Seite 26
    -26-29, schäden:wkj basislayout 11.02.12 15:43 Seite 26 Schäden und Unfälle Wales, Grossbritannien In einem schweren Wintersturm havarierte bei Llanidloes (Pen- rhyddlan and Llidiarytwaun Wind Farm) in Wales am 12.1.2012 eine Mitsu bishi 300 kW Anlage. Der Rotor mit Nabe und das Maschinenhaus stürzten auf freiem Feld ab, gefährdet oder verletzt wurde niemand. Der Betriebsführer, die Scottish Power, schaltete den Windpark ab, um auch die anderen Anlagen auf Schäden zu untersuchen. In den Windparks bei Llanidloes arbeiten 103 Mitsubishi 300 kW Anlagen, errichtet wurde der Park 1992. Es ist fast der älteste Windpark in Grossbritannien, der Standort ist sehr windstark. Die Mitsubishi Anlagen haben in den vergangenen 20 Jahren schon viele Stürme überstanden und sollen auch bald repowert werden. Sie haben ja auch wirklich genug geleistet. A7 bei Kassel : Schwertransport abgebrannt Am 13.12.2011 brannte ein Schwertransporter mit einem Ma- schinenhaus auf der A7 bei Kassel aus. Die Autobahn musste für einige Stunden gesperrt werden, zwischen 22 Uhr und 1 Uhr 15. Bei dem Schwertransporter platzte zunächst ein Reifen, dann fing der Auflieger Feuer. Der Fahrer reagierte vorbildlich: Er fuhr das brennende Gespann auf den Seitenstreifen, sicherte den Auflieger, koppelte die Zug- maschine ab und fuhr sie vor. Dann alamierte er die Feuerwehr und versuchte vergeblich, den Brand zu löschen. Als die Feuerwehr ankam, brannte das Maschinenhaus bereits vollständig, die Flammen loderten über die Autobahn. Das Feuer konnte schnell gelöscht werden, aber Maschinenhaus und Auflie- ger wurden vollständig zerstört, Schaden ca. 3 Mio. Euro. Belgien : Ölunfall Ein Ölunfall im belgischen Windpark Leuze-en-Hainaut regte im Januar die Anwohner auf.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Approach to Blade Manufacturing
    mARCH 2010 feAtureS Company Profile: Carolina Gear & Components Tribological Challenges to the System Remote Site Construction Direct Drive to Sustainable Wind Energy Systems for Sleeker Turbine Production Optical Sensors for Ice Detection AutomAtedApproAchto BlAdemAnufActuring depArtmentS Construction—Hayward Baker Maintenance— Rev1 Power Services Technology—SandiaNational Laboratories Logistics—BDP Project Logistics Q&A: Jonathan Wilson Renewable Energy Committee Gearing Up Your Business You speak, we listen, and together we develop solutions CAPABILITIES CURRENT FUTURE to your complex manufacturing challenges. With years of experience in designing and manufacturing gears, CGC Gear Cutting 8m 10m also understands the importance of project management Gear Gashing 5m 10m and logistics, ensuring on-time delivery of high-quality Gear Grinding products made to meet AGMA, ISO, and DIN standards. 1.5m 2.8m So give us a call, and we’ll give you a listen. Machine Turning 2m 4.5m Carolina Gear & Components Ltd. P.O. Box 20100 | 1615 Bishop Street North | Cambridge, Ontario | N1R 8C8 P: 519-623-8806 | F: 519-623-4886 | E: [email protected] | W: cgc-group.net MARCH 2010 FEATURES COMPANYPROFILE 24 CAROLINA GEAR & COMPONENTS BY RUSS WILLCUTT Are you in the market for high-quality large gearing and components? Here’s a resource you’ll definitely want to take advantage of. TRIBOLOGICAL CHALLENGES TO THE SYSTEM 26 BY ELON J. TERRELL, PH.D., WILLIAM M. NEEDELMAN, AND JONATHAN P. KYLE As wind turbines increase in size, and their operating conditions become more extreme, a number of current and future tribological challenges exist. REMOTE SITE 32 CONSTRUCTION BY MANEL ROMEU BELLÉS With the global expansion of the wind industry, the placement of towers and farms will grow more remote.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Wind Technologies Market Report
    2010 WIND TECHNOLOGIES MARKET REPORT JUNE 2011 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 phone: 865.576.8401 fax: 865.576.5728 email: mailto:[email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 phone: 800.553.6847 fax: 703.605.6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.aspx This publication received minimal editorial review at NREL Printed on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 10% post consumer waste.
    [Show full text]