DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL Program Environmental Impact Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINAL Program Environmental Impact Report Downtown/Natomas/Airport Corridor in the City and County of Sacramento FINAL Program Environmental Impact Report April 2008 TB072007001SAC Sacramento Regional Transit District Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Downtown/Natomas/Airport Corridor in the City and County of Sacramento Prepared in Accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, PRC 21000 et seq.; and the State of California CEQA Guidelines, California Administrative Code, 15000 et seq. by the SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT April 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page CHAPTER 1.0: INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------1-1 1.1 Purpose of the PEIR--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-1 1.2 Organization of the Final PEIR ------------------------------------------------------------------------1-1 1.3 Intended uses of the PEIR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-2 Chapter 2.0: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ------------------------------------------------------------2-1 2.1 Scope and Intended Use of this Document---------------------------------------------------------2-1 2.2 Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2-2 2.2.1 Definition of the DNA Study Area -----------------------------------------------------------2-2 2.2.2 Objectives of the Project-----------------------------------------------------------------------2-2 2.3 Project Description----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2-8 2.3.1 Alignment---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-11 2.3.2 Stations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2-12 2.3.3 Traction Electrification System------------------------------------------------------------- 2-13 2.3.4 DNA Project and Feeder Bus Operating Plan------------------------------------------ 2-13 2.3.5 Maintenance and Vehicle Storage Facilities-------------------------------------------- 2-13 2.3.6 Project Phasing-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-14 2.3.7 Capital and O&M Cost Summary---------------------------------------------------------- 2-17 2.4 Transportation Impacts -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-18 2.4.1 Transit Impacts--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-18 2.4.2 Street and Highway Impacts---------------------------------------------------------------- 2-19 2.4.3 Intersection Impacts-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-20 2.4.4 Parking Impacts-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-21 2.5 Environmental Consequences ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-21 2.6 Areas of Known Controversy and Issues to be Resolved------------------------------------- 2-22 2.6.1 Areas of Controversy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-22 2.6.2 Issues to be Resolved------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2-23 2.7 Alternatives Considered ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-23 2.8 Coordination and Consultation----------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-25 2.9 Implementation Strategy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2-26 2.9.1 Opportunities in the Making----------------------------------------------------------------- 2-26 2.9.2 Timing is Key ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-27 DNA Corridor Final PEIR iii Table of Contents TB072007001SAC/168338/081000004 Table of Contents CHAPTER 3.0: COMMENTS AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT PEIR --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-1 3.1 Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3-1 3.2 List of Commenters---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3-1 Comments and Responses to Comments ----------------------------------------------------------3-5 CHAPTER 4.0: ERRATA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-1 4.1 Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4-1 4.2 Changes and Edits to the Draft PEIR ----------------------------------------------------------------4-1 4.2.1 Table of Contents - Tables--------------------------------------------------------------------4-1 4.2.2 Executive Summary ----------------------------------------------------------------------------4-1 4.2.3 Chapter 1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4-3 4.2.4 Chapter 2------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4-4 4.2.5 Chapter 3------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4-7 4.2.6 Chapter 4---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-12 4.2.7 Chapter 5---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-19 4.2.8 Chapter 9---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-20 4.2.9 Appendices ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-20 Attachment Final Program EIR List of Tables 2-1 Capital Costs for DNA Project (Millions of 2006$) 2-2 Systemwide Annual O&M Cost Estimates (Millions of 2006$) 2-3 AM Peak Transit Travel Times (Transit/Walk Access in Minutes) 2-4 Average Weekday Systemwide Linked Transit Trips in the DNA Corridor 2-5 2027 Parking Demand and Parking Demand Decrease in the Central Business District 2-6 Summary of Impacts and Proposed Mitigation for the DNA Project 3.1 List of Commenters List of Figures 2-1 DNA Corridor Study Area 2-2 DNA Project 2-3 MOS-1 Project Area Table of Contentss iv DNA Corridor Final PEIR TB072007001SAC/168338/081000004 CHAPTER 1.0: INTRODUCTION This Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines (Section 15132). The Sacramento Regional Transit District (RT) is the lead agency for the environmental review of the Downtown-Natomas-Airport (DNA) project and has the principal responsibility for approving the project. As a California special district, RT’s action is subject to CEQA. This Final PEIR summarizes the expected environmental impacts resulting from approval and responds to comments received on the Draft PEIR. 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE PEIR As described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15121(a), an EIR is an informational document for decision-makers and the general public that analyzes the significant environmental impacts of a project, identifies possible ways to minimize those impacts found to be significant, and evaluates alternatives to the project that could reduce or avoid adverse environmental impacts. Preparation of an environmental impact report is required prior to approving any project that may have a significant effect on the environment. This document is the environmental analysis of the DNA project. It is a program-level analysis of the entire project – focused documents will be prepared for each individual segment as those projects are advanced to subsequent stages of project development. As a programmatic document, this analysis addresses the general environmental impacts of the DNA project as a whole based upon the general alignment adopted by RT in 2003. As indicated in the CEQA Guidelines (Section 15168), a PEIR can be prepared on a series of related actions that can be characterized as one large project. The DNA project is a series of related actions made up of individual segments that will be implemented over time. These actions are expected to be phased over a period of years depending on available funding. Tiering of environmental analyses is appropriate when the sequence of analysis is from a program-level to a project-level. This approach can eliminate repetitive discussions of the same issues allowing the later EIR to focus solely on the issues specific to the later project. The Draft PEIR was circulated for public and agency review on December 28, 2007. The 60-day comment period closed on February 26, 2008. During the review period, the Draft PEIR was discussed at five meetings as follows. • Presentation to the DNA Technical Review Panel on January 31, 2008. • Presentation to the DNA Citizen Review Panel on February 1, 2008. • Open Houses for the public on February 9, 2008 and February 11, 2008. • Public Hearing with the RT Board of Directors on February 25, 2008. The PEIR has been updated in response to comments received during the review period. 1.2 ORGANIZATION OF THE FINAL PEIR The PEIR evaluates the environmental impacts of the entire DNA project to the greatest extent possible. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines (Section 15126), this PEIR DNA Corridor Final PEIR 1-1 Introduction TB072007001SAC/168338/080980003 Chapter 1.0: Introduction should be used as the primary document to evaluate all subsequent planning and permitting actions associated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Save the Cost of Parking and Take Sacrt to The
    SAVE THE COST OF PARKING AND TAKE SACRT TO THE MARAFUNRUN 5K! Thanks to a partnership between the Runnin' for Rhett Foundation and SacRT, MaraFUNrun 5K participants and attendees can ride free on SacRT buses and light rail trains on Saturday,December 1, 2018, with a printed MaraFUNrun flyer (only one flyer needed per couple). A copy of the flyer is on the back of this paper and is your pass to ride for free on Saturday, December 1. GETTING THERE § SacRT recommends parking at one of our key light rail stations for better service (Sunrise, Watt/Manlove, Franklin or Roseville Road) § On weekends, light rail trains operate every 30 minutes. § Visit sacrt.com. for light rail schedules. DOWNTOWN ARRIVAL STATIONS (Closest to the race start on 13th & L Streets) § Passengers riding to the maraFUNrun race start (13th & L Streets) on the Blue Line from Citrus Heights/Roseville, from South Sacramento/Elk Grove, OR on the Gold Line from Folsom/Rancho Cordova should exit the train at the 13th Street Station. DOWNTOWN DEPARTURE STATIONS (Closest to the race start on 13th & L Streets) § Passengers taking the Blue Line toward Citrus Heights/Roseville should board a “Watt/I-80” train (check the train sign) at the 13th Street Station. § Passengers taking the Blue Line toward south Sacramento/Elk Grove should board a “Cosumnes River College” train (check the train sign) at the 13th Street Station. § Passengers taking the Gold Line toward south Folsom/Rancho Cordova should board a "Sunrise" or “Historic Folsom” train (check the train sign) at the 13th Street Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G-1: Frameworks for the 2016 MTP/SCS Update Process
    Appendix G-1: Frameworks for the 2016 MTP/SCS Update Process Table of Contents 1) Schedule of Board Actions Leading to Final Plan Adoption ………………………………….. 2 2) Policy Framework for the MTP/SCS Update Process ………………………………………… 3 3) MTP/SCS Approach to Scenario Development ………………………………………………… 27 4) Framework for a Draft Preferred Scenario ……………………………………………………… 30 5) Endorse 2016 Draft Preferred Scenario …………………………………………………………. 53 Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 1 2016 MTP/SCS Update: Schedule of Board Actions Leading to Final Plan Adoption Board Action Date of Action Contents/Direction Framework 1.0: Adopted December 2013 • Set implementation-focused theme for plan update with Policy Framework five policy themes: transportation funding, investment strategy, investment timing, land use forecast, plan effects. • Set region-level growth projections of population, employment and housing for the plan horizon year (2036). • Set overall schedule for the plan update. Framework 1.5: Adopted March 2014 • Set parameters for three regional land use and Scenarios transportation scenarios for use in public workshops and Development plan development. Framework • Initiated phasing analysis of transportation investments in current plan. • Initiated analysis of different levels and types of transportation revenue sources. • Set schedule for creation of Framework 2.0. Framework 2.0: Targeted for November or • Sets guidelines, task and process for developing a draft December 2014 adoption Draft Preferred preferred scenario (land use forecast, revenue forecast, Scenario project list, performance outcomes). Framework • Sets a minimum of six weeks for review and vetting of a preliminary draft preferred scenario. Framework 3.0: Targeted for April 2015 • Sets details of Draft Preferred Scenario (for years 2020, Draft Preferred 2035, and 2036) for use in development of Draft Plan and Scenario EIR: o Land use forecast o Revenue Forecast o Budget and Project List o Performance Outcomes Draft Plan (2016 Targeted for September 2015 • Release Draft 2016 MTP/SCS for public comment.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2011-2012 Capital Budget Represents the One Year Capital Spending Plan for RT
    Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Budget Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................ 1 General Manager/CEO Budget Message ........................................... 3 Board of Directors Board of Directors .................................................................................6 Budget Adoption Resolutions................................................................7 Budget Presentation Award......................................................................8 Executive Management Team ............................................................. 9 Organizational Structure ................................................................... 10 District Overview District Profile ......................................................................................11 Service Area Map................................................................................15 Strategic Plan......................................................................................17 Long-Term Financial Policies ..............................................................19 Budget Process...................................................................................27 Voting System .....................................................................................29 Trends.................................................................................................31 Peer Comparison ................................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION August 16, 2017 Advice Letter 5042-E Erik Jacobson Director, Regulatory Relations Pacific Gas An
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 August 16, 2017 Advice Letter 5042-E Erik Jacobson Director, Regulatory Relations Pacific Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street, Mail Code B10C P.O. Box 770000 San Francisco, CA 94177 SUBJECT: Encroachment Agreement with Sacramento Regional Transit District Request for Approval Under Section 851 and General Order 173 Dear Mr. Jacobson: Advice Letter 5042-E is effective as of August 10, 2017, per Resolution E-4856 Ordering Paragraph. Sincerely, Edward Randolph Director, Energy Division Erik Jacobson Pacific Gas and Electric Company Director 77 Beale St., Mail Code B10C Regulatory Relations P.O. Box 770000 San Francisco, CA 94177 Fax: 415-973-1448 March 30, 2017 Advice 5042-E (Pacific Gas and Electric Company ID U 39 E) Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Subject: Encroachment Agreement with Sacramento Regional Transit District – Request for Approval Under Section 851 and General Order 173 Purpose Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) requests approval under Public Utilities Code Section 851 (Section 851) and General Order 173 to grant an encroachment agreement (Agreement) to the Sacramento Regional Transit District, a Public Corporation (RT). The Agreement permits the encroachment of a light rail system and passenger station platform (Improvements) within PG&E’s Easement Area (PG&E Easement). A copy of the Agreement is attached hereto as Attachment 1. PG&E has inspected the encroachment agreement and has determined that granting the encroachment will not interfere with PG&E’s operations or its ability to provide utility services to its customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridership Report (October 2019)
    Ridership Report (October 2019) Year to Date Summary Category FY20 YTD FY19YTD Difference % Change Trailing 12 Month Trend Bus 3,518,921 3,415,852 103,069 3.0% 11,500,000 Light Rail 3,848,176 3,641,112 207,064 5.7% Rail Bus System Total 7,367,097 7,056,964 310,133 4.4% 11,000,000 10,500,000 Current Month Summary 10,000,000 Category October 2019 October 2018 Difference % Change Bus 1,059,668 1,014,352 45,316 4.5% 9,500,000 Light Rail 1,063,740 1,025,613 38,127 3.7% System Total 2,123,408 2,039,965 83,443 4.1% 9,000,000 Daily Summary Category October 2019 October 2018 Difference % Change Bus (M-F) 41,415 40,275 1,140 2.8% Bus (Sat) 15,390 13,266 2,124 16.0% Bus (Sun) 10,371 7,915 2,456 31.0% October Ridership by Mode Light Rail (M-F) 40,939 40,510 429 1.1% 6% Light Rail (Sat) 17,127 13,500 3,627 26.9% Light Rail Light Rail (Sun) 12,229 9,500 2,729 28.7% Fixed Route 48% Other Services E-Tran Ridership Summary (E-Van included) 46% Category Current Year Prior Year Difference % Change E-Tran (YTD) 280,319 266,440 13,879 5.2% E-Tran (Monthly) 84,775 81,648 3,127 3.8% Other services include E-Tran, Folsom, SmaRT Ride, CBS and Special Services E-Tran (Weekday) 3,560 3,426 134 3.9% Route Level Ridership Comparison (Bus) Weelday Route Comparison Saturday Route Comparison Route Oct 2019 Oct 2018 Difference % Change Route Oct 2019 Oct 2018 Difference % Change 1 2,067 2,190 (124) -6% 1 768 777 (9) -1% 11 972 715 257 36% 11 447 282 165 59% 13 678 315 362 115% 13 426 - 426 15 795 1,215 (420) -35% 15 381 558 (176) -32% 19 423 658 (234) -36% 19 209 271
    [Show full text]
  • City of Sacramento
    CITY OF SACRAMENTO LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT LAND USE POLICIES AND GUIDELINES April 2005 Prepared by Planning Division Long Range Planning Section Development Services Department Todd Leon, Project Manager Jim McDonald AICP, Senior Planner Stacia Cosgrove, Associate Planner Christopher Jordan, Student Assistant Nathan Stephens, Student Assistant http://www.cityofsacramento.org/dsd/planning/plngserv/lngrng/policies.htm TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................I I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 II. CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN...........................................................................5 SECTION 1: POLICIES........................................................................................................7 SECTION 2: RESIDENTIAL LAND USE ELEMENT.........................................................12 SECTION 4: COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY LAND USE ELEMENT ...............................15 SECTION 5: CIRCULATION ELEMENT............................................................................20 III. REGIONAL TRANSIT PLANS .............................................................................................25 A. REGIONAL TRANSIT MASTER PLAN (1993) ............................................................26 B. REGIONAL TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BUS AND LIGHT RAIL FACILITIES...............................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program
    - 2021-2024 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program SACOG MISSION BOARD MEMBERS AND MEMBER JURISDICTIONS Provide leadership and a Karm Bains, Sutter County dynamic, collaborative public Krista Bernasconi, City of Roseville forum for achieving an efficient regional transportation system, Gary Bradford, Yuba County innovative and integrated Chris Branscum, City of Marysville regional planning, and high quality of life within the greater Pamela Bulahan, City of Isleton Sacramento region. Trinity Burruss, City of Colfax Jan Clark-Crets, Town of Loomis Rich Desmond, Sacramento County Lucas Frerichs, City of Davis Sue Frost, Sacramento County Jill Gayaldo, City of Rocklin Lakhvir Ghag, City of Live Oak Bonnie Gore, Placer County Martha Guerrero, City of West Sacramento Shon Harris, City of Yuba City Rick Jennings, City of Sacramento Paul Joiner, City of Lincoln Patrick Kennedy, Sacramento County Mike Kozlowski, City of Folsom Rich Lozano, City of Galt Porsche Middleton, City of Citrus Heights Pierre Neu, City of Winters David Sander, City of Rancho Cordova Michael Saragosa, City of Placerville Don Saylor, Yolo County Jay Schenirer, City of Sacramento Matt Spokely, City of Auburn Tom Stallard, City of Woodland Darren Suen, City of Elk Grove Wendy Thomas, El Dorado County Rick West, City of Wheatland Amarjeet Benipal, Ex-Officio Member 2021-2024 MTIP Contents A Guide to the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Contents Page Number Introduction .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rider Alert Service Changes 6/17/19 September 8, 2019 Route Changes Route Changes Route Changes Route Changes
    Updated Changes take effect on Rider Alert Service Changes 6/17/19 September 8, 2019 Route Changes Route Changes Route Changes Route Changes Improve evening frequency and reduce early morning Combine with Route 22 and extend north and west in Shift trips beginning from Arden/Del Paso station at Combine Routes 30 and Route 38. Both routes would frequency. Add new trips from Sunrise Mall at 6:29, 6:59, Natomas. Discontinue part of existing route through 9:45 and 10:45 p.m. later approximately 5 minutes for use J/L Street from Sacramento Valley Station to 39th and 7:29 p.m. and from Watt/I-80 at 7:04, 7:34, 8:04, and Natomas. Improve headways to 45 minutes. Add train transfers. Adjust schedules to maintain more even Street. Route 30 would continue to CSUS as it does 8:34 p.m. Eliminate trips from Sunrise Mall at 5:14 and Saturday/Sunday service with 45 minute frequency from headways and passenger loads. Add outbound trips today. On weekdays, each route would have 30 minute 1 5:44 a.m. and from Watt/I-80 at 5:49 and 6:19 a.m. 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Extend north on Truxel Road, west from approximately 1:30 to 3:00 p.m. to help with base frequency. From downtown to 39th Street, 23 Eliminate weekend trips from Watt/I-80 at 5:06, 5:36, and on Del Paso Road to El Centro Rd. From Arden/Del Paso heavy passenger loads from Arden/Del Paso to Watt weekday customers would be able to catch either 6:06 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Folsom Short Range Transit Plan Update Project Appendix G.1 Public
    Folsom Short Range Transit Plan Update Project Appendix G .1 Public Comments Summary BUS SERVICE Commuter Feeder Service to Folsom Light Rail Stations Feeder bus essential for Folsom residents to take advantage of light rail; should run all day. Need fast, quick feeders to/from light rail during peak commuter hours only . Local feeder routes need to be within walking distance of residences, not just businesses. Draft bus service plan seems to cater to commercial traffic much more than commuters . Why can't the commuter public be covered during peak time (i.e ., 6 AM - 7 :30 PM & 4 PM - 5 :30 PM) and commercial traffic off-peak. Consider different routes for commuters (5am - 9 am, 3pm - 7pm) than for in-town customers (run all day). Commute routes should be designed to serve largest neighborhood populations possible and travel quickly to L.R. stations . Daytime in-town routes would serve major retail, city hall, college, etc. Early a.m. pick up (bus stop) at East Natoma & Briggs Ranch to light rail to get me to work by 6:30 a.m. Maintain service on Folsom-Auburn Road from Folsom Dam Road and provide feeder service to Historic Folsom light rail station. Add a peak-only loop up Folsom-Auburn, Oak Avenue Parkway, American River Canyon, Greenback, right on Folsom-Auburn, up unused center lane ramp to the Historic Folsom light rail station. Residents in Orangevale seemed to get better service even though they already have current RT service ; RT and Folsom could make arrangements so Folsom would no longer have to loop out to Madison/Main (e .g.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transit Facts & Figures
    Sacramento Regional Transit District Fact Sheet System Profile The Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) operates Sacramento, a 6.3-mile extension with seven new stations. approximately 70 fixed routes and one general public dial-a-ride In June 2004, light rail was extended from the Mather Field/ service, and 43 miles of light rail that covers a 367square-mile Mills Station to Sunrise Boulevard with three new stations. service area. Buses and light rail operate 365 days a year using In October 2005, light rail was extended 7.4 miles east from 97 light rail vehicles and 192 buses powered by compressed the Sunrise Station to the city of Folsom, which included four natural gas (CNG) and 20 shuttle vans. Buses operate daily new stations. In December 2006, SacRT completed the final from 5 a.m. to 11 p.m. every 12 to 60 minutes, depending on segment of the Gold Line when it opened the .5-mile light rail the route. Light rail trains begin operation at 4 a.m. with serv- extension to the Sacramento Valley Station (Amtrak) with the ice every 15 minutes during the day, and every 30 minutes in addition of two new stations. the evening and on weekends. Blue Line and Gold Line trains operate until approximately 12:30 a.m. and the Gold Line to In June 2012, SacRT opened the Green Line to the River Folsom operates until 7 p.m. Green Line trains operate every District, which is the first phase of the Green Line to the Air- 30 minutes Monday through Friday from approximately 6 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • GOLD Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    GOLD light rail time schedule & line map GOLD Downtown - Folsom View In Website Mode The GOLD light rail line (Downtown - Folsom) has 6 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →8th & K Station (Nb): 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM (2) Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →Sacramento Valley Station (Wb): 5:00 AM - 9:30 PM (3) Sacramento Valley Station (Eb) →Historic Folsom Station (Eb): 3:49 AM - 10:19 PM (4) Sacramento Valley Station (Eb) →Sunrise Station (Eb): 4:04 AM - 10:49 PM (5) Sunrise Station (Wb) →8th & K Station (Nb): 5:58 PM - 6:58 PM (6) Sunrise Station (Wb) →Sacramento Valley Station (Wb): 4:58 AM - 5:28 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest GOLD light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next GOLD light rail arriving. Direction: Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →8th & K GOLD light rail Time Schedule Station (Nb) Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →8th & K Station (Nb) 25 stops Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 8:00 PM - 9:30 PM Monday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Historic Folsom Station (Wb) 300 Reading St, Folsom Tuesday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Glenn Station (Wb) Wednesday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Thursday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Iron Point Station (Wb) Friday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Hazel Station (Wb) Saturday 10:00 PM - 11:30 PM Sunrise Station (Wb) Cordova Town Center Station (Wb) GOLD light rail Info Zinfandel Station (Wb) Direction: Historic Folsom Station (Wb) →8th & K Mather Field/Mills Station (Wb) Station (Nb) Stops: 25 Trip Duration: 55 min Butterƒeld Station (Wb) Line Summary: Historic Folsom Station
    [Show full text]
  • NSN August 2016 Final
    Next Stop News August 2016 Ride RT to Local Farmers’ Markets Ride RT to weekly local farmers’ markets featuring a wide variety of locally grown fruits and vegetables, baked goods, cheeses and fresh flowers, which are easily accessible by light rail on the Gold Line. Power Inn Station The Power Inn Alliance and Unseen Heroes have partnered together this year to open “Market at Power Inn,” a weekly farmers market conveniently located next to the Power Inn light rail station (Power Inn Road and Folsom Boulevard). Eat and shop from local farmers, food purveyors, artisans and food trucks. The Market at Power Inn takes place every Friday from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. through October 2016. Show your valid RT ticket or pass at the Power Inn Alliance table and receive a free tote bag. For more information, visit powerinn.org. Sunrise Station Celebrate the seasons and enjoy a bounty of locally grown fruits, vegetables and other products at the year-round Certified Farmers Market every Saturday from 8 a.m. to noon in the Sunrise Station park-and-ride lot (Sunrise Boulevard and Folsom Boulevard). For more information, visit california-grown.com. For route and schedule information, visit sacrt.com or call 916-321-BUSS (2877). Take RT to the Banana Festival Celebrate one of America’s favorite fruits by attending the 7th annual Banana Festival on Saturday, August 20 or Sunday, August 21 at Shasta Community Park in Elk Grove. The two-day festival will be held across the street from the new Cosumnes River College (CRC) light rail station and transit center, making it easy to attend without the hassles of driving and parking.
    [Show full text]