Appendix G-1: Frameworks for the 2016 MTP/SCS Update Process
Table of Contents
1) Schedule of Board Actions Leading to Final Plan Adoption ………………………………….. 2
2) Policy Framework for the MTP/SCS Update Process ………………………………………… 3
3) MTP/SCS Approach to Scenario Development ………………………………………………… 27
4) Framework for a Draft Preferred Scenario ……………………………………………………… 30
5) Endorse 2016 Draft Preferred Scenario …………………………………………………………. 53
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 1 2016 MTP/SCS Update: Schedule of Board Actions Leading to Final Plan Adoption
Board Action Date of Action Contents/Direction Framework 1.0: Adopted December 2013 • Set implementation-focused theme for plan update with Policy Framework five policy themes: transportation funding, investment strategy, investment timing, land use forecast, plan effects. • Set region-level growth projections of population, employment and housing for the plan horizon year (2036). • Set overall schedule for the plan update. Framework 1.5: Adopted March 2014 • Set parameters for three regional land use and Scenarios transportation scenarios for use in public workshops and Development plan development. Framework • Initiated phasing analysis of transportation investments in current plan. • Initiated analysis of different levels and types of transportation revenue sources. • Set schedule for creation of Framework 2.0. Framework 2.0: Targeted for November or • Sets guidelines, task and process for developing a draft December 2014 adoption Draft Preferred preferred scenario (land use forecast, revenue forecast, Scenario project list, performance outcomes). Framework • Sets a minimum of six weeks for review and vetting of a preliminary draft preferred scenario.
Framework 3.0: Targeted for April 2015 • Sets details of Draft Preferred Scenario (for years 2020, Draft Preferred 2035, and 2036) for use in development of Draft Plan and Scenario EIR:
o Land use forecast o Revenue Forecast o Budget and Project List o Performance Outcomes Draft Plan (2016 Targeted for September 2015 • Release Draft 2016 MTP/SCS for public comment. Draft MTP/SCS) Plan includes written discussion of the detailed land use and transportation information above plus: policies and strategies, an environmental justice analysis, discussion of natural resources.
Final Plan (2016 Targeted for February 2016 • Adopt 2016 MTP/SCS, certify Final EIR, adopt air quality MTP/SCS) conformity finding.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 2
Policy Framework for the 2016 MTP/SCS Update November 19, 2013 The 2016 update to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 MTP/SCS) will focus on implementation (Framework challenges 1.0) and commitments of the current plan with the goal of moving toward the transportation, air quality and quality of life outcomes set forth in the plan. These implementation challenges and commitments are broadly defined in the below Implementation Themes table, along with examples of the research and analysis that will be used to address these issues.
Foundational Assumptions for the Update: Regional Growth Projections The same regional growth projections of the 2012 MTP/SCS will be used for the 2016 MTP/SCS except that the growth is assumed to arrive one year later, 2036. This equates to 361,000 new jobs, 871,000 new people and 303,000 new housing units from 2008:
Year Jobs Population Housing Units 2008 966,316 2,215,044 884,725 2036 1,327,424 3,086,213 1,187,744
Implementation Themes for the 2016 MTP/SCS Update Implementation Examples of research and analysis to address question/challenge Question/Challenge Transportation Funding: Can • Update revenue projections for local, state and federal sources, considering long- the region capture the term/historic and short-term/recent losses or revenue. revenues projected to come • Identify strategies for new revenue generation and cost-effective investments. from all sources local, state and federal?
Investment Strategy: Is there • Identify and compare local and state system maintenance needs for different modes of enough emphasis on system travel. maintenance (“fix-it-first”) • Identify tradeoffs between system maintenance and system expansion priorities. investments? • Identify unique challenges and opportunities in urban, suburban and rural communities, with particular attention to suburban economic challenges. • Identify new strategies for SACOG planning and funding efforts that consider fix-it-first. Investment Timing: Should • Examine the cost effectiveness of moving certain projects forward or backward in the there be changes in the planning period. timing of transportation • Analyze the effect of project phasing on performance of the regional transportation investments? system, air quality, and land use pattern. • Identify short-term strategies to improve regional travel patterns. Land Use Forecast • Inventory adopted and proposed land use plans in the region. (allocation): What is the • Analyze the effect of more greenfield versus more infill growth, and vice versa, on economic viability of the transportation system performance. projected greenfield and infill • Analyze recent market performance for greenfield and infill, residential and non- growth? residential development. • Determine if and how the estimated growth in Center/Corridor, Established, Developing, and Rural Residential Community Types should be changed or refined. Plan Effects: Follow through • Track travel behavior, land development pattern, demographic, air quality and on the implementation transportation project delivery trends to better understand how the MTP/SCS is being commitments of the 2012 implemented over time. MTP/SCS to better measure • Develop additional performance metrics to assess the impact of the MTP/SCS on the effects of the plan on different groups of people and issues (e.g. environmental justice communities; health; different people and issue access to jobs, services, and affordable housing). areas. • Develop decision-making support tools to support regional and local decision-making. • Research the effect of our growing region on the agricultural economy and open space.
(Appendix A contains more description of the Implementation Commitments in the MTP/SCS)
Update Schedule and Public Outreach The greater part of 2014 will be focused on research, analysis and public engagement around implementation questions and challenges broadly defined in this policy framework. SACOG staff will conduct research and analysis in consultation with member jurisdictions, partner agencies and interested stakeholders. The SACOG Board will use the results of the research and public input to direct the update of the draft plan and technical assumptions in 2015. Appendix B contains the plan update schedule and Appendix C contains the outreach plan.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 3
1. Performance Monitoring: Track and strive to better understand how the 2012 MTP/SCS is being implemented over time in the areas of a) transportation trends, b) development pattern, c) demographics, d) transportation project delivery and e) air quality. Performance monitoring allows the agency to determine what kinds of adjustments to make to future MTP/SCS’ and supports SACOG’s strategic goal to maximize the quality of life benefits that the MTP/SCS contributes to the region (See Strategic Plan Goal 2, attached).
a. Transportation trends: monitor how people are traveling in the region and the impacts of their travel on the transportation system.
Examples of monitoring metrics: • Vehicle miles traveled; • Congested travel; • Travel by auto, transit, bicycling or walking (mode split); • Transit passenger boardings.
b. Development pattern: monitor how private and public sector influences are shaping growth in the region to compare to projected land use patterns in the 2012 MTP/SCS and inform the projected land use patterns for the 2016 MTP/SCS.
Examples of monitoring metrics: • Residential construction in center and corridor, established, developing and rural residential communities; • Construction of different types of housing (e.g., large lot single family, small lot single family, attached multi-family); • Changes to federal, state and local policies and regulations that affect the rate and location of development; • Financial incentives and tools such as funding for affordable housing or infill development; • Viability of agriculture and open spaces.
c. Demographics: monitor demographic characteristics that influence where people live, work and how they travel.
Examples of monitoring metrics: • Household size, age and income; • Auto ownership.
d. Transportation Project Construction (Project Delivery): monitor construction of transportation projects and how those projects align with the policies of the 2012 MTP/SCS.
Examples of monitoring metrics:
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 4 • Efficient use of federal and state transportation dollars; • Blueprint supportive projects; • Projects supporting rural economies; • Projects that support a variety of modes including transit, bicycle, pedestrian, roads, and highways; • Condition of existing transit and road infrastructure.
e. Air Quality: monitor regional air quality.
Examples of monitoring metrics: • Levels of ozone, particulate matter, and other air pollutants; • Number of days per year with Spare the Air notifications.
2. Impact Assessment: Improve SACOG’s ability to accurately estimate the impacts of the MTP/SCS on different people and issue areas. This supports SACOG’s strategic goals of information-based decision making and serving as a source of high-quality information (See Strategic Plan Goals 1 and 3, attached). The 2012 MTP/SCS made great strides in measuring the impacts of the plan on travel, air quality, the environment, and low income and minority residents (environmental justice populations).
Examples of impact assessments to improve: a. Air quality related health impacts of locating housing near major roadways. b. Balance of jobs and housing within communities and across the region; c. Access to key services (e.g., medical, schools, colleges and universities, parks); d. Public safety and health; e. Effects on specific populations such as youth, the elderly, low income and minorities; f. Climate change.
3. Decision-Making Support Tools: Improve decision-making support tools for regional and local decisions so that member cities and counties, partner agencies, stakeholders and residents of the region have information about transportation investments, growth patterns, and policies that relate to the 2012 MTP/SCS. This will increase opportunities for member jurisdictions to utilize regional data, models and analysis to analyze impacts of their decisions on transportation, land use, air quality and other policy areas that affect quality of life. These tools support SACOG’s strategic plan goal to sustain the agency’s emphasis on information-based decision making (see Strategic Plan Goal 1, attached).
Examples of decision-making support tools: a. Software that models the economic effects of land use and transportation policies (PECAS); b. Bus and light rail inventory information readily available to emergency operations centers; c. Support changes to federal and state regulations that increase local flexibility and encourage use of existing streamlining options that will help implement the 2012 MTP/SCS.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 5 d. Work to align federal natural resources, habitat and clean air policies and regulations with the goals of the 2012 MTP/SCS; e. Quantify the importance of the rural economy within the region (Rural-Urban Connections Strategy).
4. Financial Tools & Incentives: Support financial tools and incentives to help implement the 2012 MTP/SCS to realize its performance. These tools and incentives will support the construction of projects critical to the MTP/SCS’ performance and bring real quality of life benefits to the region (see Strategic Plan Goals 2 and 3, attached).
Examples: a. Reestablish some tools that redevelopment agencies previously had such as tax- increment financing to promote infill and revitalization; b. Provide local governments more funding flexibility and options, particularly for transit operations and capital and road maintenance and rehabilitation, in both rural and urban areas; Reform regulations to speed up review and approval of transportation and land use projects with low environmental impacts and positive benefits to state regional, and local goals.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 6 Goals 1-3 from the SACOG Strategic Plan
Goal 1: Sustain the agency’s emphasis on information-based decision making by providing state-of-the-art data and tools to members, partners, stakeholders and residents to help them shape the futures of their communities and the region.
Goal 1 Strategies:
1. Increase opportunities for member jurisdictions to utilize regional data, models and analysis to analyze impacts of their decisions on transportation, land use, air quality and other policy areas that affect quality of life.
2. Increase agency capacity to provide scientific information and analysis of transportation, land use, air quality and other matters of regional importance.
Goal 1 Performance Indicators:
A. Members and planning partners routinely use a combination of appropriate planning tools (e.g., I-PLACE3S and SACSIM) to conduct technical analysis of general plan updates, corridor plans, transportation circulation plans, and neighborhood and community plans, and use of such planning tools by stakeholders and residents to evaluate proposed development projects.
B. Interactive, information-based citizen engagement practices are commonly used by members in support of general plan updates, development of neighborhood and community plans, and evaluation of the impacts of significant proposed development projects. The Agency has an effective and active process for sharing information about SACOG activities with staff in service to local government
C. Appointment to the SACOG Board is viewed as an attractive opportunity for local elected officials and SACOG’s Board members are actively engaged in pursuing the mission of the agency and the agency’s local, state and national recognition for leadership in the implementation of information rich, consensus-driven regional efforts to improve the quality of life in the region continues to be enhanced. SACOG actively engages in providing information to all elected leaders about the role it plays in regional affairs and how this role contributes to an improved quality of life.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 7
Goal 2: Maximize strategic influence for the region through developing and implementing integrated regional transportation plans that produce unique and significant quality of life benefits for residents of the region.
Goal 2 Strategies:
1. Consolidate, expand and maximize strategic advantage from the agency’s state and national leadership role and access to the best tools and methods for preparing an outstanding MTP.
2. Maximize the benefits of comprehensive planning and project implementation in the Sacramento region.
Goal 2 Performance Indicators:
A. SACOG’s MTP will remain a leader in the state in improving per capita VMT, congestion, air emissions and other performance measures that advance the quality of life.
B. SACOG will leverage its high performing MTP to secure additional funding and policy support from federal, state and local sources to build key projects sooner than would otherwise be possible.
C. SACOG and its member agencies continue to be leaders in the State in the timely delivery of projects.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 8
Goal 3: Serve as a source of high quality information, convener, and/or advocate on a range of regional issues when the agency’s involvement would provide unique, added value to promoting a sustainable future for the region.
Goal 3 Strategies:
1. Continue to expand SACOG’s data and modeling capabilities to include topics that influence transportation behavior and planning (e.g., energy, climate change, land use economics and infrastructure).
2. Assist regional partners with the evaluation of functional service delivery opportunities and act upon the ones that will most assist the agencies.
3. Analyze options for increasing SACOG’s financial analysis and capacity so that it is able to serve the region if and when new service needs are identified.
Goal 3 Performance Indicators:
1. Deliver cost savings to local governments by building the capacity of the agency in areas of highest need to member jurisdictions, and/or leveraging new revenues in collaboration with local governments.
2. SACOG’s member services program will increase coordination activities relating to assistance with policy development, joint project delivery, grant development, and requests for technical assistance as measured by increase in requests from member jurisdictions for assistance and resulting grant acquisition or more integrated policy making
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 9
Major Deliverables and Milestones SACOG Complete By Action FY13/14 – Focused on: Issue Identification, Policy Framework Development, Research and Analysis Update Public Participation Plan Board action complete Early public and stakeholder outreach on planning and Board direction complete policy issues; Board consideration and identification of policy issues Develop draft regional growth projections Board direction complete Adopt policy framework for 2016 MTP/SCS update; Adopt Board action December 2013 draft regional growth projections for use in plan update Technical work to refresh land use and transportation Staff work with Fall 2013 – Fall 2014 planning assumptions including inventorying of local land local agencies use plans and Call for Review of Transportation Projects1 Board direction2 Board direction February 2014
Board direction2 Board direction June 2014 FY 14/15 – Focused on: Public Workshops, Update of Planning Assumptions and Draft Plan Development Conduct at least 8 public workshops on policy choices and Board receive & Summer/Fall 2014 issues related to the MTP/SCS consider Review public workshop results Board direction Summer/Fall 2014 Board direction2 Board direction September 2014 Create Framework for Draft 2016 MTP/SCS Board action December 2014 Release Notice of Preparation for Environmental Impact Staff work December 2014 Report Develop draft land use forecast and transportation Staff work with Dec. 2014 – Mar. 2014 project list assumptions local agencies Endorse draft land use forecast and transportation Board action March 2014 project list assumptions for use in development of Draft Plan, Draft EIR, and Draft Air Quality Conformity Direction on Draft Plan Policies and Strategies Board action Jan. 2015 – Mar. 2015 Draft Plan and Draft EIR development Staff work Mar. 2015 – Aug. 2015 Board direction2 Board direction June 2015 FY 15/16 – Focused on: Draft Plan and Draft EIR Completion, Public Comment Period on Draft Plan, Adoption Draft Plan and Draft EIR development Staff work Mar. 2015 - Aug. 2015 Board direction2 Board direction August 2015 Adoption of RTPs/EIRs by El Dorado County Coordination3 Fall 2015 Transportation Commission and Placer County Transportation Agency
1 There are ongoing meetings with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to determine when CARB will revisit the SB 375 greenhouse gas targets for all California MPOs. 2 Staff anticipates periodic check-ins with the Board in addition to major actions noted in the calendar. Some key check-ins with the Board during the 2012 MTP/SCS update included input on revenue forecast assumptions, updating policies and strategies, direction on CARB greenhouse gas target-setting scenarios, and coordination with the Regional Housing Needs process. 3 This milestone is included in the Work Plan for reference. The SACOG Board does not act on the RTPs of either PCTPA or EDCTC. SACOG coordinates with PCTPA and EDCTC to incorporate their adopted plans into the SACOG MTP/SCS.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 10 (continued)
Major Deliverables and Milestones SACOG Complete By Action FY 15/16 – Focused on: Draft Plan and Draft EIR Completion, Public Comment Period on Draft Plan, Adoption Release Draft 2016 MTP/SCS for 30-day public comment Board action September 2015 period Release Draft EIR for public comment (60-day comment Staff work September 2015 period) Hold at least 6 information meetings with local elected Board receive & Sept. 2015 – Dec. 2015 officials consider Hold 3 public hearings on Draft 2016 MTP/SCS Board receive & Sept. 2015 – Dec. 2015 consider Review public comments and recommendations on Final Board direction January 2016 Draft Plan and Final EIR Certify Final EIR Board action February 2016 Adopt 2016 MTP/SCS Adopt Air Quality Conformity Determination
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 11 Working document that can be added to throughout the engagement process
BOARD MEMBER, JURISDICTION STAFF & PUBLIC AGENCY COMMUNICATIONS • Regular communication and updates will occur at all SACOG board committee meetings and at board meetings as needed o Timing: Ongoing • Regular communication and opportunity for feedback from the Planners Committee, Transit Coordinating Committee, Regional Planning Partnership, Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee, with membership drawn from member jurisdictions and partner agencies o Timing: Ongoing • Meetings with and communications to member jurisdiction staff on the process, requesting information, providing information for review and feedback o Timing: Ongoing • Regional Managers Meetings o Timing: Quarterly • Meetings with state and federal agencies o Timing: As needed to align with planning calendar and as dictated by statutory requirements • Presentations to various public agency staff and boards in the region. o Timing: As coordinated by SACOG staff or by request
STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH In addition to ongoing communications outlined above, staff will use methods such as those listed below to engage communities across the region about the 2016 MTP/SCS update: • A comprehensive stakeholder list including stakeholders who participated in the previous MTP/SCS process will be updated and utilized. o Timing: Ongoing • A one-stop request for information on the 2016 MTP/SCS update will be on the SACOG website for access to key input and feedback points for the public, key decision points for the Board, technical information, and meeting/workshop information. o Timing: Winter 2013/2014, dependent on board adoption of 2016 MTP/SCS Framework • Early engagement of a cross-sectoral stakeholder group o Timing: complete • To maintain a consistent message, a PowerPoint presentation will be prepared to highlight both background on the MTP/SCS and the process for the update. The presentation will be used by various staff at presentations throughout the region coordinated by staff and/or by request from stakeholders and board members. o Timing: March 2014 • Stakeholder meetings, member and partner agency coordination, and public communications on policy issues and areas of research for the 2016 MTP/SCS o Timing: 2013-2015 • Staff will collaborate with key partners to publicize and present a greenhouse gas target-setting public workshop (contingent on actions of the California Air Resources Board). • Staff will provide updates and gather feedback from SACOG advisory groups • Public Workshops o Timing: Summer/Fall 2014 o Staff will conduct at least eight public workshops in the region o Workshops held in El Dorado and Placer counties will be coordinated with EDCTC and PCTPA.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 12 • Stakeholder meetings, member and partner agency coordination, and public communications on development of draft plan and next steps o Timing: Summer 2014-Fall 2015 • Elected Official Information Meetings on draft Sustainable Communities Strategy o Staff will conduct at least six elected official information meetings on the draft Sustainable Communities Strategy/Alternative Planning Strategy (SCS/APS) in the update, one in each county with representatives of the county board of supervisors and city councils that represent a majority of the cities representing a majority of the population in the incorporated areas of that county. Meetings held in El Dorado and Placer counties will be coordinated with EDCTC and PCTPA. o Timing: Fall/Winter 2015 • At least three public hearings on the draft SCS/APS. Any meetings held in El Dorado and Placer counties will be coordinated with EDCTC and PCTPA. o Timing: Fall/Winter 2015 • Tribal consultation will occur in alignment with the outreach and communication principles, and as guided by the adopted Public Participation Plan. Outreach will occur on a government-to-government basis. For the Tribal Governments with land within Placer and El Dorado counties, tribal consultation will occur through collaboration with the Regional Transportation Planning agencies (RTPAs) in those counties. o Timing: Ongoing and in coordination with PCTPA and EDCTC
MASS COMMUNICATIONS To supplement the ongoing routine media coverage of transportation issues, the following strategies will be used to inform and engage interested stakeholders • A series of articles in the electronic newsletter Regional Report on the content of the current MTP/SCS, what projects have begun or been completed in the interim, and an overview of the planning process with opportunities for feedback noticed in a timely manner o Timing: Beginning September 2013 • On the MTP/SCS website general information and a timeline for the update, including but not limited to why the update is taking place, contact information, meeting locations. The website will be easily accessible and updated as needed. The link to the MTP/SCS website will be prominent on the SACOG homepage. o Timing: September 2013 • Press releases and media outreach as needed. • White papers and issue briefs may be developed on specific policy issues as the MTP/SCS Update process evolves, or new information or technical analysis needs to be communicated • Staff will continue to reach out to community newsletters, social media, blogs and other similar publications outside of traditional media that work with SACOG in its media outreach. o Timing: Ongoing • Staff will develop and place op-ed pieces by board members as appropriate.
Staff contacts: Kacey Lizon, Project Manager, [email protected] (916) 340-6265 Monica Hernández, Communications Coordinator, [email protected], (916) 340-6237 Jennifer Hargrove, Land Use Coordinator, [email protected], (916) 340-6216 Clint Holtzen, Transportation Coordinator, [email protected], (916) 340-6246
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 13 Background Information: MTP/SCS Stakeholder Meeting Summary Report
On Friday, October 18, 2013 staff met for 5 hours with stakeholders representing agriculture, active transportation, affordable and market rate developers, the environment, social equity, rural communities, public health, air quality, and economic development. The day consisted of topic-specific presentations followed by prompted discussions on each topic. As staff presented the meeting outcomes for the day, participants were encouraged to ask questions during the presentations for clarification and share their opinions, concerns, and ideas during the discussions.
Meeting Desired Outcomes:
• Hear participant perspectives on issues the SACOG Board will consider when adopting a framework for the development of the 2016 MTP/SCS o This includes issues around growth projections, investing more into fix-it-first projects, and the infrastructure and economic challenges of infill and Greenfield development. • Create a shared base of knowledge of the state and federal requirements for developing the MTP/SCS • Create a shared understanding of the Blueprint and the 2012 MTP/SCS • Create opportunity for cross-sectoral conversations o Build a cross-sectoral sounding board that staff can tap into during the plan update to provide the SAOCG Board with feedback throughout the process. o As a sounding board, participants are critical in presenting the interests of your constituents, and helping staff understand the impacts of our work on your constituents in the near- and long-term.
Below are the prompt questions used to start the stakeholder discussions. For each question, themes are teased out with the supporting comments made by meeting participants.
Question 1: Is the direction of the Blueprint consistent with the mission/goals of your work? Of the information presented, what are priority issues for you?
This discussion varied from table to table but the conversations were primarily about challenges and opportunities related to the implementation of the Blueprint. The conversations also identified issues related both to the Blueprint and the 2012 and 2016 MTP/SCS.
Theme: There are Blueprint implementation challenges that should be addressed at the local and regional level.
• Barriers to infill need to be removed; infill is far more difficult without subsidies. • SACOG should work to get a form of Redevelopment back. • There is a challenge with people or groups thinking growth is growth. There are differences in how to plan for economic growth in rural settings while maintaining the rural character. There is no cookie cutter for growth. • Agricultural lands need to be preserved, spheres of influence are moving into agricultural lands. • Local plans i.e. general plans/specific plans need to better align with the Blueprint and Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS)
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 14 Theme: There are no local incentives to implement the Blueprint.
• There are fewer or no incentives for infill/smart growth in rural communities where there is already a lack of water/sewer infrastructure increasing costs to developers. • Blueprint is only a plan with no teeth, there are no carrots or sticks-how do you keep people interested? There should be some incentives to implementation. If not financial then some policy related levers/incentives. • SB 375 CEQA streamlining is not enough, local governments need to make infrastructure improvements.
Theme: What are unintended positive and negative consequences of the Blueprint?
• There are other issues besides transportation that have an effect on communities such as education, job training, and access to other areas. • There needs to be more emphasis on rural land (ag/open space/habitat) planning. • A strategy to build affordable housing not just plan for it across the region. • Blueprint implementation is important in the downward trend of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the region. • Where are the jobs going in the Blueprint, regional planning should support neighborhood planning. • Need to identify the unintended consequences to rural areas because of the urban infill focus, rural towns and cities need their own infill. • The lack of planned public investment in rural areas can lead to more segregation.
Theme: Blueprint (and MTP/SCS) should do more.
• Additional work on how the road/transit systems and other transportation modes affect public health. • There should be more emphasis on bringing/linking destinations closer to existing and planned transit, biking and walking. • Good infill needs better transit. • Air quality should be considered at the base of the Blueprint. • How do we begin to frame and plan for growth and sustainability that is appropriate for rural areas? Centers of development and public investment are needed to support local rural economies.
Question 2: How do you see the transportation and land use elements of the MTP/SCS affecting your work? What are your thoughts on updating the current MTP/SCS with a focus on addressing challenges to implementation?
Some of the issues described below came naturally from the first group discussion about the Blueprint presentation, but are separated out to align with the topic they most relate to.
Theme: More incentives are needed to implement the SCS, and there are challenges to implementing the SCS at the regional, local, and neighborhood scales.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 15 • There is a need for incentives/planning to make the SCS more meaningful at the neighborhood level. • There are challenges with implementation at the local level, and very little resident capacity in certain areas to drive the implementation investments from the local government. • There are no local incentives to implement the SCS. • There needs to be planning to prevent displacement when gentrification occurs in transit priority areas. • General Plans are not consistent with the MTP/SCS. • CEQA streamlining is not enough to support infill and SCS implementation; would like to see some type of streamlined public review process. • The MTP/SCS should consider and identify new funding to make up for the loss of Redevelopment and other lost revenue. • There are analytical gaps due to limitations of the regional travel model. There is need to better understand neighborhood/local travel to understand the needs of the community i.e. the underserved by affordable housing and transit.
Theme: The current SCS does not adequately address the growth of rural areas.
• Transit does not serve the rural areas of the region well; it is infrequent and unaffordable. • What are the unintended consequences of the emphasis of investment and planning in the transit priority areas (TPA)? Particularly, what will be the effect on rural areas? • The next MTP should include information on what rural investment looks like with rural centers helping to reduce commutes and support smart planning. • The SCS has little impact on what greenfield developers will do.
Theme: Additional or enhanced analysis of low income and minority populations should be included in the next plan.
• Better environmental justice analysis that looks at people in place, housing + transportation cost burden and access to education and jobs. • TOD investment in low income areas is hard because of the market demand, how do you support the low income areas rather than maintaining areas of poverty? • There needs to be ways to encourage job growth that will meet the needs of all economic levels. Is it prescriptive or market based? • There are many unmet needs in transportation and housing. • Public transit fares are too high and should be part of the discussions. • There are historic and unintended bad decisions. We have to make sure growth and investment meet the needs of low income people, we cannot only think of the future markets. • How do you link public transportation investment in building more affordable housing? Create trade-offs and incentives.
Theme: Better understanding of the health impacts of the MTP/SCS should be developed. Health impacts include the traditional issues around air quality, chronic disease, but in the growing practice of research on health and the built environment, also includes access to: affordable health care, affordable housing, affordable food, affordable transportation, affordable education/training, employment opportunities, and parks and open space.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 16 • People don’t understand the link of transportation and jobs. There is a need to provide information on the implications of jobs and housing getting further separated. • If you have a strong SCS you should have a strong Regional Housing Needs Plan. • There should be emphasis on the health impacts (positive/negative) of the transportation system. • There should be consideration/research done on the health impacts of transit-oriented development (TOD).
Question 3: What do you think about the current proposed approach to updating the growth projections for the 2016 MTP/SCS (i.e., using the same projected amounts of growth in the current MTP/SCS and extending the end year from 2035 to 2036?
This conversation also included comments on new approaches or issues for implementing the MTP/SCS.
Theme: An approach that considers only minor refinements to the growth projections for the 2016 is a strategic move that will better allocate resources to focus on the implementation issues with the current MTP/SCS.
• It seems like a sound approach; there is the still the same growth speed projected; better to use available resource for research on implementation issues. • Are there other innovative lower-cost ways, besides public transit, to move people efficiently such as pay-as-you-go or private transportation opportunities that are not being considered in the MTP/SCS? • When considering the growth projection approach, consider what the goal is and that the best use of resources may be spent on implementation. • Not enough time has passed to re-do growth projections; four years in planning is no time at all. • Better use of resources is to work on the current financial/performance monitoring implementation commitments presented in the current plan. Help local governments get and use the data. • The growth projections should stay the same; they may already be too aggressive. • Jobs drive population increases, not housing. It’s not clear yet what the economy will look like in the future, so there is no basis for updating the projections. • Given the past few years, the reliability of the growth forecast is questionable and it updating it wouldn’t spur a policy change • There could be issues with redoing the growth assumptions given the uncertainty of the current economic climate. • Implementation should include plans for station planning, with a look at displacement issues associated with TOD, develop impact assessments. Provide more assessment information to policy makers and provide funding for project implementation. • The MTP/SCS should focus on researching and addressing implementation challenges. It is a reasonable approach and it’s best to keep the projections where they are so that they don’t decrease. • Are we so focused on the status of the current transit system that we aren’t innovating new transit ideas?
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 17 Question 4: What do you think of the trade-off issues presented associated with a transportation system maintenance strategy?
Theme: Better data and tools are needed to understand the near- and short-term trade-offs of different types of investment.
• Provide us with more tools/analyses are needed to better weigh projects. For example, comprehensive return on investment. • Need a clearer understanding of the colors of money, and eligible projects in order to weigh in. • What are equivalent measures for different types of measures? • What type of road lifecycle should we target, what is long term payoff? • Should we reconsider pavement types and the overlay/patch maintenance model? What are the cost tradeoffs over time? • There needs to be more information to understand road system efficiencies.
Theme: A maintenance approach should be context sensitive.
• It is difficult to determine where to put transportation monies because there are so many competing needs. • You should maintain roads that transport tourists to farms and other agricultural-related travel, especially in areas where the economy is dependent on these sectors (e.g. El Dorado County). • A maintenance plan should also focus on where we want to concentrate growth. • There needs to be balance in maintaining the transportation needs in rural areas. • Since maintenance of existing roads is key to avoid spending more money later, the real wiggle room in transportation funding is in developing new roads. More money should be shifted from new roads to transit and other modes of transportation. Plus new roads also have an air quality component and may generate more use, thus increasing the need for maintenance funds in the future.
Theme: There needs to be more clarity in the process of how projects get funded.
• The MTIP list of improvements is a black box to the public. It’s difficult to know what projects have the most impact. The public depends on SACOG staff to do that analysis. • Clarity in the process (MTP/SCS and local road investment) is important. • It is important to know the specific trade-offs and amounts of grant/discretionary funds to make good decisions.
Theme: Additional funding should be secured for the 2016 MTP/SCS.
• We should look into financing mechanisms and funding sources that do not require us to tap into funding for other modes (e.g., maintenance). We need new compelling financing models and we need to change public’s opinion that they shouldn’t pay more for something they already get. We could consider road tolls as a revenue source, but would need to weigh the impacts on tourists. Mode shifts also means less revenue from the gas tax. • There needs to be plans to increase resources for system maintenance.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 18 Question 5: Does the information presented reflect your understanding of the current economic, housing, and transportation climate? Are we missing anything? (Full Group Discussion)
Theme: Additional reporting that breaks out the current conditions in low income and minority communities and by income and age.
• The report could use more demographic breakdowns by race, income and other factors against the trends we’re seeing. • Can you break down the report by different communities? • There should be more detail on the economic reporting that includes breakdown by race, ethnicity, household size, and age. • The type of data reported at the regional level would be useful at the community/neighborhood level, to better understand local needs. • More information on Generation Y/Millennials would be good to have and consider. They are still doing many of the same things as Generation X and Baby Boomers, just later in life, and their early choices are different than previous generations.
Theme: Better understanding of the job market is needed.
• Jobs are a driving factor to growth in the region. The report shows job loss; is there information about corresponding higher education enrollments, retraining etc? • Types of jobs are changing.
Theme: More housing information is needed.
• SACOG can make assumptions about jobs and transportation but it needs to include housing and the types that we need. • There could be more information on housing costs trends. • You are missing a housing piece, on the trend of new housing and preference, current vacancy rates for different housing types and economic factors related to housing. • This should include housing cost information, this is an important market factor to understand. • Do we expect a housing market comeback? Generation Y is a big market – bigger than the Baby Boomers, and they are getting married and having kids later and buying their first house later. They will also drive the housing type demand differently than previous generations.
Theme: Additional comments.
• The information is helping to quantify what we are observing. • “The Lost Decade” of economic growth (2008-2018) is an interesting observation, does this hold true for education and other areas?
Question 6: Which of the performance measures presented are the most important to you/your work? Which additional performance measures would you be interested in seeing? (full group discussion)
A deeper presentation and conversation on performance measure will occur at the next meeting of this group. Participants, expressed interest in more detail on current performance measures, and what types
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 19 of data are needed to create new measure to better address their questions. As such, staff committed to the topic for the next meeting in early 2014.
Theme: Additional transportation measures.
• The report could measure proximity to medical services and the relationship between transportation and housing costs. • Is there a metric for connectivity, such as density of intersections in an area? • Is there a way to show how we performed as a region (looking backwards) versus what we projected it to be (looking forward)? • Jobs are not equitably distributed throughout the region. Jobs that require work at night are not conducive to transit and they don’t go into the neighborhoods that need them.
Theme: Additional measure for environmental justice communities is needed.
• One request is that we measure EJ areas versus non-EJ areas for transportation performance. We need to look at the age and condition of housing in those areas. • The problem with the federal poverty data is that it doesn’t including the cost of housing. • The relationship between displacement and community development should be examined. • Are local governments meeting the goals of RHNA? • How do you assess, especially in environmental justice areas, that you are increasing opportunity?
Theme: Measures associated with quality of life.
• The Human Impact Partners has quality of life performance metrics that we should consider using. • We should consider coverage of green trees as a metric, and housing units per acre. We could also include access to parks and open space. • It would be good to share what innovations are working at the local government level.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 20 October 18, 2013 Stakeholder Representation Organization Sector WALKSacramento Active Trans California League of Women Voters Active Transportation/Transit Sacramento Housing Alliance Affordable Housing Advocate Housing California Affordable Housing Advocate El Dorado County Agriculture Sacramento County Agriculture BREATHE CA Air Quality Resources for Independent Living Disabled Residents El Dorado County Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Sacramento Metro Chamber Economic Development Environmental Council of Sacramento Environment The Nature Conservancy Environment Sacramento Tree Foundation Environment/Trees Domus Development For-Profit Affordable Housing Developer California Endowment Health Foundation Sierra Health Foundation Health Foundation Cordova Hills, LLC Market Rate Developer Taylor-Wiley Law Market Rate Development North State Building Industry Association Market Rate Development StoneBridge Properties Market Rate Development Sacramento County Public Health California Rural League Assistance, Inc. Rural Social Equity/Housing UC Davis Social Equity/Equitable SB 375 Implementation
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 21 MTP/SCS Cross-Sectoral Sounding Board List Title Agency/Organization City Jurisdiction Sector Executive Director WALKSacramento Sacramento Region Active Transportation Program Director Woodland Bike Woodland Yolo Active Campaign Transportation/Biking Advocate CA League of Womens Sacramento Region Active Voters Transportation/Transit/ Seniors Board Member Sac Housing Alliance Sacramento Region Affordable Housing Policy Director Housing California Sacramento State Affordable Housing District Director US Department Housing Sacramento Region Affordable Housing & Urban Development
Deputy Director of CA Department of Sacramento State Affordable Housing Housing Policy Housing & Community Development
President/CEO Nehemiah Corp Sacramento Region Affordable Housing Developer Agricultural El Dorado County Placerville El Dorado Agriculture Commissioner Agricultural Sacramento County Sacramento Sacramento Agriculture Commissioner County Executive Director Capay Valley Vision Esparto Capay Valley Agriculture Agricultural Yolo County Woodland Yolo County Agriculture Commissioner Agricultural Placer County Auburn Placer County Agriculture Commissioner Agricultural Yuba County Marysville Yuba County Agriculture Commissioner Ag Commissioner Sutter County Yuba City Sutter County Agriculture Executive Director BREATHE CA Sacramento Region Air Quality President/CEO Valley Vision Sacramento Region Community Based Organization Executive Director Ubuntu Green Sacramento Sacramento Community Based City Organization
Executive Director Mutual Assistance Sacramento Sacramento Community Based Network City Organization Executive Director Asian Resources Sacramento Sacramento Community Based City Organization
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 22 Title Agency/Organization City Jurisdiction Sector Advocate/Community Resources for Sacramento Region Disabled Community Organizer Independent Living Branch Manager FREED-Center for Marysville Yuba & Sutter Disabled Community Independent Living Counties President Rainbow Chamber Sacramento Region Economic Development Executive Director Greater Sacramento Sacramento Region Economic Development Urban League President/CEO Sacramento Asian- Sacramento Region Economic Development Pacific Chamber of Commerce President/CEO El Dorado County Placerville El Dorado Economic Development Chamber of Commerce County
President/CEO El Dorado Hills Chamber El Dorado Hills El Dorado Economic Development of Commerce Hills
Senior Vice President, Sac Metro Chamber of Sacramento Region Economic Development Public Policy & Economic Commerce Development
Senior Vice President SACTO Sacramento Region Economic Development President/CEO Sacramento Hispanic Sacramento Region Economic Development Chamber of Commerce
President/CEO Sacramento Black Sacramento Region Economic Development Chamber of Commerce
Director Center for Strategic Sacramento Region Economic Economic Research Development/Regional Data Supervisor, Electric SMUD Sacramento Region Energy Transportation Economic Development PG & E Sacramento Region Energy Executive, Greater Sacramento Region
Executive Director Sac Tree Foundation Sacramento Region Environment Executive Director ECOS Sacramento Region Environment External Affairs Manager The Nature Conservancy Sacramento Region Environment
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 23 Title Agency/Organization City Jurisdiction Sector Conservation Program Sierra Club Sacramento Region Environment Coordinator Public Information Sacramento Metro Fire Sacramento Sacramento Fire Officer County President/Co-founder Domus Development Sacramento State For-Profit Affordable Housing Developer/Infill Developer Manager of CA Trucking Assn Sacramento State Goods/Freight Environmental Policy Manager of CA Trucking Assn Goods/Freight Environmental Policy Project Director Cordova Hills, LLC Sacramento Sacramento Greenfield Developer
Health in All Policies CA Department of Public Sacramento State Health & Built Coordinator Health Environment/Active Transportation Community Benefits Sutter Health Sacramento Region Health Care Provider Director Program Manager The CA Endowment Sacramento State/So Health Foundation Sacramento & County Program Manager Sierra Health Sacramento Region Health Foundation Foundation Director, Local UC Davis Davis Region Higher Education Government Affairs Associate Vice Los Rios CC District Sacramento Sacramento Higher Education/TOD Chancellor: Workforce & County Economic Development
President/CEO Community Link Sacramento Sacramento Human Services County Executive Director Capitol Health Network Sacramento Sacramento Human Services County Public Information CA Highway Patrol West Region Law Enforcement Officer Sacramento
Principal & President MacKay & Somps Roseville Region Market Rate Development Executive Director Region Builders Sacramento Region Market Rate Development Capitol Area CADA Sacramento Sacramento Infill Development Development Manager
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 24 Title Agency/Organization City Jurisdiction Sector President StoneBridge Sacramento Sacramento Market Rate Developer
Vice President Richland Homes Roseville Region Market Rate Developer Managing Principal Economic & Planning Sacramento Region Market Rate Developer Systems Director of Governmental North State Building Roseville Region Market Rate Development & Legislative Affairs Industry Association
Founding Partner/Legal Taylor Wiley Sacramento Sacramento Market Rate Development Counsel Attorney Executive Director Mutual Housing Sacramento Yolo & Non-profit Affordable California Sacramento Housing Developer Counties Public Health Officer Sacramento County Sacramento Sacramento public health County Director of Litigation, CA Rural League Marysville Yuba, Sutter, Rural Social Equity Advocacy & Training Assistance, Inc. El Dorado counties Senior Planner Area 4 Agency on Aging Sacramento Placer, Seniors/Aging Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo & Yuba counties Professor Community & Regional Davis Region Social Equity Development
Counsel Western Poverty Law Sacramento State Social Equity Center Deputy Director Opening Doors Sacramento Region Social Equity Director UCD Center for Regional Davis Region Social Equity Change President CA Capital/CDFI Sacramento Region Social Equity/Economic Development Associate Professor UC Davis Davis Region Social Equity/Equitable SB 375 Investment Tribal Liaison Yocha Dehe Wintun Brooks Sovereign Tribal Government Nation Nation Government Affairs United Auburn Indian Auburn Sovereign Tribal Government Community Nation Legal Counsel Shingle Springs Band of Shingle Springs Sovereign Tribal Government Miwok Indians Nation
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 25 Title Agency/Organization City Jurisdiction Sector Executive Director Regional Water Sacramento Region Water Authority Executive Director Yolo Children's Alliance Davis Yolo Youth Services
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 26 MTP/SCS Framework: Approach to Creating and Analyzing Scenarios (Framework 1.5)
Consistent with the Board’s direction to focus this MTP/SCS update on implementation issues, the following approach will be used to create and analyze scenarios to inform the 2016 MTP/SCS update. The scenarios developed in this process will be used to illustrate trade-offs and effects of different development patterns and transportation investments compared to the adopted MTP/SCS. In keeping with the implementation themes of the plan update, the scenarios will be used in the following ways: to inform discussions of the Board, stakeholders, member and partner agencies, and public workshop participants on policy issues of the plan update; as alternatives for the environmental impact report; as the basis for making necessary refinements to Scenario 2 (the adopted MTP/SCS).
1. Three scenarios for plan horizon year 2036 will be based on the current plan plus two updated/refined scenarios from last plan cycle.
Discussion: Scenarios should bracket a reasonable range of possible futures, taking into account all major market and policy/regulatory influences. All scenarios are designed to represent reasonable possibilities of what might occur (i.e. not idealized futures driven solely by 1 or 2 considerations to the exclusion of others). The three scenarios analyzed last time met this real world test, and varied principally by how much housing and transportation choice they created. The S\scenario (#3) with the most use of a range of transportation modes had the most amounts of new development in Centers and Corridors and Established Communities and attached housing. On the other end, the scenario (#1) with the least use of transportation modes other than the automobile had the most amounts of new development in Developing Communities and Rural Communities and large lot single family housing. The final plan adopted by the Board was most like the scenario in the middle (#2), but it included elements of both Scenarios #1 and #3 based on input from our members, the public and stakeholders and technical analysis. (See attached Table to compare the adopted MTP/SCS with the three scenarios analyzed during that plan’s development process.)
For the 2016 MTP/SCS update staff suggests that the existing MTP/SCS be one of the scenarios, with the other 2 scenarios being similar to the first and third Scenarios from the last plan cycle, refreshed and updated to reflect relevant actions and trends that have occurred in the interim. For example, the updated Scenario 1 would have similar amounts of new growth in each of the 4 community types as Scenario 1 from the last plan cycle, but the specific properties forecasted to be developed within each community type would differ based on local government land use approvals since the last plan, market trends, and the intentions and capability of the property owners/developers. Similarly this updated Scenario 1 would have similar amounts of housing growth in the lower density and higher density housing types as Scenario 1 from the last cycle, though they may be located to some extent in different places. A preliminary look at the data leads staff to believe that this approach likely creates sufficient flexibility to ensure that the Plan and EIR documents this cycle analyze a reasonable range of alternatives that might be likely to occur.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 27 While this step will be important, we are trying to keep the level of effort contained so that it is possible to maximize the effort available for Step 2.
2. Analyze different timing to construction of transportation and land use components of current MTP/SCS.
Discussion: Key components of the Board’s December 2013 action focusing this plan cycle on implementation issues were to explore the full potential for a “fix-it-first” investment strategy, and to analyze whether there are reasons to alter the timing that land use and transportation projects in the current plan should be constructed. In other words, even if the end state in 2035 (now 2036) was the same, does it make a difference how (in what order) the region builds the projects that lead to that end condition? Staff has done some very preliminary thinking on this topic and believes that in some areas differences in timing might have a substantial impact on the life cycle costs and benefits of the plan. To illustrate the point at the extremes, there may be significant differences in variables such as total new lane miles, vehicle miles traveled, air pollution and water use from first building the growth forecast in the plan for Rural Communities and Developing Communities versus first building the growth forecast for Centers and Corridors and Established Communities. SACOG has never focused on this type of information when constructing the plan (except to ensure compliance with federal clear air act and SB 375 standards) and staff believes it could really help the Board and stakeholders focus on new policy issues that might improve life cycle plan performance (i.e. even if the end state in 2036 remained substantially the same as the current plan).
3. Analyze different levels and types of transportation revenue
Discussion: Every plan cycle SACOG must refresh its revenue assumptions, consistent with federal requirements that our plan contain “reasonably reliable” revenues. Mainly this involves scrutinizing existing, long-term revenue streams like federal, state and local transportation taxes and local development fees, but within reasonable limits it can also involve new future revenue streams that we forecast to be available in the plan. Staff suggests that this revenue analysis first be focused on the currently adopted MTP/SCS (i.e. will we have the same, more or less revenues to build the projects included in the plan?). Then, if the scenario and timing analyses conducted under #1 and #2 above indicate there may be a need for new revenue (which seems likely), that we analyze the merits and viability of a focused list of new revenue sources. For example, the following new revenue sources are potential candidates for consideration: state cap and trade revenue, new local transportation sales taxes, statewide vehicle registration fee.
4. Prepare draft plan scenario
Discussion: Based on input from public workshops, stakeholders (including our cross-sectoral working group), member and partner staff and Board members over the next several months staff will create by the end of 2014 a framework for a draft preferred scenario for Board consideration that includes both the end state condition in 2036, and a timing sequence for building the transportation network and estimating when development projects will be constructed.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 28
Table A-1. Description of 2012 MTP/SCS Scenarios 1, 2 and 3 (for the planning period 2008-2035) Scenario #2 Land Use Inputs Scenario #1 (Adopted Scenario #3 MTP/SCS) Share of growth in Center & Corridor 1 Communities 19% 30% 36% (percent of new homes) Share of growth in Established Communities 2 30% 26% 27% (percent of new homes) Share of growth in Developing Communities 3 46% 42% 35% (percent of new homes) Share of growth in Rural Residential 4 Communities 5% 1% 2% (percent of new homes) Share of growth in large-lot single-family homes 5 39% 28% 25% (percent) Share of growth in small-lot, single-family 6 homes 30% 28% 23% (percent) Share of growth in attached homes 7 31% 43% 52% (percent) Scenario #2 Transportation Inputs Scenario #1 (Adopted Scenario #3 MTP/SCS) New or expanded roads 8 32% 29% 26% (lane miles, percent increase from 2008) Transit service 9 (Vehicle Service Hours, percent increases from 54% 98% 127% 2008) Funding for transit 10 $10.7 $11.3 $13.7 ($ in billions) Funding for road, bike and pedestrian 11 maintenance $10.9 $11.3 $11 ($ in billions) Funding for new road capacity 12 $8.7 $7.4 $6.7 ($ in billions) Funding for bike and pedestrian street and trail 13 improvements $2.8 $3.0 $3.0 ($ in billions) Additional miles of bicycle paths, lanes and 14 routes 800 1,100 1,300 (Class 1, 2 and 3 = 1,700 in 2008) Funding for Programs 15 $1.5 $2.2 $1.7 ($ in billions)
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 29
Table B-1 (continued) Description of 2012 MTP/SCS Scenarios 1, 2 and 3 (for the planning period 2008-2035) Scenario #2 Performance Outcomes Scenario #1 (Adopted Scenario #3 MTP/SCS) Square miles of farmland converted to 16 development 93 57 50 (4,166 square miles of farmland in 2008) Square miles of vernal pools affected by 17 9 7 7 development Share of new homes near high-frequency 18 transit 22% 38% 35% (percent of new homes) Share of new jobs near high-frequency transit 19 26% 39% 44% (percent of new jobs) 20 Transit costs recovered by ticket sales (percent) 38% 38% 51% Total homes in environmental justice areas near 21 high-frequency transit 43% 55% 47% (percent of homes, 30% in 2008) Share of trips by transit, bike or walk 22 12% 33% 31% (percent increase per capita from 2008) Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) 23 -6% -6.9% -9% (percent change per capital from 2008) Vehicle miles traveled in heavy congestion 24 5% 6% 7% (percent of total VMT) Travel time spent in car per capita (percent 25 -3% -4% -4% change from 2008) Weekday passenger vehicle CO2 emissions 26 -14% -16% -17% (percent change per capita from 2005)
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 30 Framework for the 2016 MTP/SCS Draft Preferred Transportation and Land Use Scenario (Framework 2.0)
This framework for a Draft Preferred Scenario provides the guiding principles, method and process for developing a preferred scenario for the 2016 MTP/SCS Update. The Draft Preferred Scenario consists of a land use forecast, revenue forecast, transportation projects and programs, and performance outcomes. There are policy and regulatory objectives that need to be met in the development of the Draft Preferred Scenario. These key requirements include:
• Land Use Forecast: The land use forecast must be based on the most recent information about regulatory, policy and market conditions and a reasonable economic growth forecast of employment, population and housing. It must identify general location of uses, residential densities and building intensities, and areas within the region sufficient to house all of the projected population of the region.
• Revenue Forecast: The MTP/SCS must constrain its budget by assuming only revenues that can reasonably be expected over the planning period. This is a financial constraint test.
• Balance revenues and expenditures over the planning period: Projects must be scheduled to match the pace at which revenues are available to pay for them, proportionally over 20 years, which limits the number of projects that can be planned for any given year and forces decisions about relative priority. This is a financial constraint test.
• Performance Outcomes: For several plan cycles SACOG has evaluated land use and transportation scenarios with a number of performance outcomes1. Many of these are helpful to determining if a scenario is achieving policy goals of the plan. Others measure the co-benefits of the MTP/SCS. Two performance outcomes are important for the added reason that they are required under federal and state law:
o Support attainment of air quality standards: The MTP/SCS must be analyzed as an overall package via technical modeling to verify that its implementation would meet federal air quality requirements in the region’s Rate of Progress State Implementation Plan, and the sequence in which projects are scheduled could make a difference in that analysis. This is the air quality conformity test.
o Achieve regional greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets set by the California Air Resources Board (CARB): The MTP/SCS must demonstrate a reduction in GHG emissions via technical modeling of the forecasted land use pattern and supporting transportation network designed to serve the regional transportation needs. This is the SB 375 test.
Knowing with certainty how different Plan scenarios will perform against SB 375 greenhouse gas emission targets and Federal Clean Air Act conformity budgets for criteria pollutants is more
1 Appendix G-6 Performance Measures for the MTP/SCS, http://sacog.org/mtpscs/files/MTP-SCS/appendices/G- 6%20Performance%20Measures.pdf
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 31 problematic this plan update cycle than in the past. It is known that the current plan barely meets the SB 375 target for greenhouse emission reductions for 2035 and that the region must pass a test for PM2.5 emissions that basically does not allow any more emissions than the current plan. But current uncertainties regarding which version of CARB’s air quality model will be required for this plan cycle, plus the very lengthy technical requirements for determining air emissions at multiple time periods for the conformity analysis, make it impossible for SACOG to know precisely at this time the answers to these questions. This information is expected to be available before the Board acts on the detailed land use forecast and transportation investment portfolio in April 2015. For now, the most prudent perspective is to assume the air quality performance of the updated plan must be at least as good as the current plan.
Conceptual Basis of the Preferred Scenario: Policy Framework In August 2013, staff began engaging the board and stakeholders on an approach to the 2016 MTP/SCS update that focuses on implementation. During this early issue identification and exploration period, the board heard a number of presentations related to funding challenges and needs, road and transit maintenance needs, the 2012 Regional Transportation Monitoring Report, and regional growth projections. This led to a Board action in December of 2013 to adopt a Policy Framework2 for the 2016 MTP/SCS, which focuses the plan update on five policy themes: revenues, investment strategy, investment timing, land use forecast, and plan commitments. These implementation-focused policy themes, combined with public and stakeholder input and scenario analysis, are the conceptual basis for creating a draft Preferred Scenario. A discussion of each of these input pieces is provided below.
1. Scenario Analysis Three land use and transportation scenarios were developed to inform the development of a draft plan. These three scenarios are the same general scenarios used for the 2012 MTP/SCS update, in keeping with the update and refinement theme set by the SACOG Board. In practice, the three scenarios represent a range of reasonable potential land use and transportation futures based on updated economic, demographic, revenue, regulatory, environmental and market factors. The three scenarios bracket a reasonable range of possible futures. Essentially the current MTP/SCS was updated to a new base year of 2012 and became Scenario 2. Scenarios 1 and 3 were then created as bookends to Scenario 2 and followed the regional themes and targets of Scenario 1 and 3 in the last plan cycle. A summary of the transportation and land use inputs and performance outcomes for each of the three scenarios is provided here and in Table 1, based on the current scenario definitions and modeling results:
Scenario Performance • Scenario 2, based closely (but not precisely) on the current plan, performs well on a range of metrics, but has degraded slightly in greenhouse gas emission performance in 2036 and will need to be improved by a small margin on that variable. Modeling for federal air quality conformity is very complex and is not completed but a similar result is expected (i.e., meet or just slightly fail all of the tests). One key outcome of the current adopted plan, which is not reported in Table 1, is the rate of growth in travel on congested roadways, relative to the 2008 base year. The current adopted plan was the first long range plan for SACOG for which the per
2Policy Framework for MTP/SCS Update Process, http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2013/12/board/pdf/12B- Framework.pdf
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 32 capita rate of travel on congested roadways declines rather than increases. This key outcome still holds true for Scenario 2 as well as Scenarios 1 and 3.
• Scenario 1, the scenario designed to measure the impacts of a less compact land use pattern than Scenario 2, performs worse than last round’s Scenario 1 on congestion and air quality and a few other indicators. Although there are some higher performing new Developing Communities in this scenario, there are also some lower performing Developing Communities. The performance data will be one of the factors considered when determining which Developing Communities in Scenario 1 might be added to Scenario 2.
• Scenario 3, the scenario designed to measure the impacts of a more compact land use pattern than Scenario 2, performs quite a bit better than the Scenario 3 created for the last plan cycle, especially on vehicle miles travelled, greenhouse gas emissions, air quality and congestion. Some elements of Scenario 3 can be added to the current Scenario 2 to boost its performance.
• Regional accessibility, or the number of jobs within a reasonable drive time from a place of residence, explains much of the travel performance difference between the three scenarios. In areas within the existing urbanized area, regional accessibility is usually higher, and in outlying areas or areas on the urban/suburban edge, it tends to be lower. From Scenario 1 to 2 to 3 there is an increasing amount of jobs within an average (20-minute) drive time from place of residence. Scenario 3 increases regional accessibility to jobs the most in large part because more new housing units in this scenario are added in close proximity to employment centers, more new jobs are added in close proximity to housing-rich areas, and the least number of new housing units are added on the urban edge, where job accessibility is lower than in urban and suburban centers. However, all three scenarios make significant increases in job accessibility as shown in Table 1.
Federal and state law, and good planning practice, require SACOG to use the most up to date information whenever it updates its plan. This includes using current forecasts for the future price of gas, incomes, household structure (i.e., age, number of people in households). Sometimes this means a new air quality model and/or improved travel model are used to forecast future travel patterns and air emissions. And because four years go by on the calendar with every plan update, what actually was built in the region in those four years compared to what was forecasted must be trued up. Some of these details are still being tied down for this plan update, but it is the sum of them in their current form that has led to the conclusion that Scenario 2 performs slightly worse on greenhouse gas emissions than the currently adopted plan. It is not a very big change, but when plan performance is right on the margin, it is important.
It is worth reminding that the land use forecast is not a prescriptive, regulatory element of the MTP/SCS. SACOG has no land use authority, and local governments retain their exclusive ability to make land use decisions which are either consistent or not consistent with the plan. In fact, because SACOG’s basic responsibility is to forecast the land use pattern most likely to occur, its technical approach to executing this requirement includes some very important flexibility, reflective of how development markets actually function. Within each of the Community Types there is more capacity for growth in currently adopted (or expected to be adopted) local plans than is forecast to occur by 2036. The 2012 MTP/SCS has approximately 69 percent more housing capacity and 198 percent more employment capacity than forecasted to be built by 2035. In other words, many Developing Communities and infill areas included
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 33 in the current plan are not expected to be fully built-out by 2035. One of the implications of this real- world approach to building the land use forecast is that it inherently provides flexibility. In other words, the plan provides the appropriate flexibility If market and policy/regulatory factors lead to more or less construction in infill areas. And because transportation investments have some impact on shaping that growth pattern, the Board can choose to build the transportation investment portfolio to incentivize high performing land use patterns. The “fix it first” discussion the Board is having is one example.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 34 Table 1. Description of Regional Land Use and Transportation Scenarios Scenario Scenario Adopted 2012 Performance Outcomes 1 Scenario 2 3 Plan Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) (percent change in total vehicle miles traveled per person from 2008) -5% -7% -12% -7% Vehicle miles traveled in heavy traffic (percent of total vehicle miles traveled) 5% 6% 5% 6% Jobs within 20-minute drive of residence (200,100 jobs in 2008) 253,500 260,100 267,800 263,100 Vehicle miles traveled to jobs centers In progress Trips by transit, bike, or walk to jobs centers In progress Travel time spent in car per person (percent change from 2008) -3% -4% -4% -4% Trips by transit, bike, or walk (percent increase in per capita transit, bike, walk share from 2008) +12% +24% +27% +33% Transit costs recovered by ticket sales (percent) 38% 41% 51% 38% Share of new jobs near high-frequency transit (percent of new jobs) 40% 44% 43% 39% Share of new homes near high-frequency transit (percent of new homes) 27% 39% 39% 38% Total homes in environmental justice areas near high-frequency transit (percent of homes, 30% in 2012) 51% 53% 56% 55% Square miles of farmland converted to development (out of 4,193 square miles of farmland in 2010) 93 61 45 57 Square miles of vernal pools affected by development 7 5 2 7 Weekday passenger vehicle CO2 emissions (percent change per person from 2005)* -13.0% -14.8% -19.7% -15.6% *Final GHG reduction percentages are subject to state review and approval of technical methodology. This review won’t take place until updated SCS is complete in 2015. Scenario Scenario Adopted 2012 Transportation inputs 1 Scenario 2 3 Plan New or expanded roads (lane miles, percent increase from 2008) 34% 31% 25% 32% Transit service (vehicle service hours, percent increase from 2008) 54% 88% 127% 98% Additional miles of bicycle paths, lanes and routes (Class 1, 2 and 3 = 1,700 in 2008 ) 800 1100 1300 1100 Funding for maintaining and operating the road and highway system $10.9 $11.5 $11.0 $11.5 Funding for maintaining and operating the transit system $7.5 $7.9 $9.6 $7.9 Funding for new or expanded bus and light rail lines $3.2 $3.4 $4.1 $3.4 Funding for new or expanded roads and highways $8.7 $7.4 $6.7 $7.4 Funding for bike and pedestrian routes, trails and paths $2.8 $2.8 $3.0 $2.8 Funding for Programs and planning (e.g., Community Design, Spare the Air, Sacramento Region 511, May is Bike Month) $1.5 $2.2 $1.7 $2.2 Scenario Scenario Adopted 2012 Land Use inputs 1 Scenario 2 3 Plan Jobs-Housing Ratio (within 4 miles of primary and secondary jobs centers) Regional average = 1.1 In progress Share of growth in Center and Corridor Communities percent of new homes 20% 31% 36% 30% Percent of new jobs 27% 36% 35% 29% Share of growth in Established Communities percent of new homes 29% 25% 27% 26% Percent of new jobs 57% 49% 53% 52%
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 35 Share of growth in Developing Communities percent of new homes & jobs 47% 42% 36% 42% Percent of new jobs 15% 14% 12% 18% Share of growth in Rural Residential Communities percent of new homes 4% 2% 2% 1% Percent of new jobs 1% 1% <1% 1% Share of growth in large-lot, single-family homes 39% 28% 24% 28% Share of growth in small-lot, single-family homes 29% 28% 23% 28% Share of growth in attached homes 32% 43% 53% 43%
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 36 2. Member Agency, Stakeholder and Public Input to Date Early collaborations between SACOG staff and local agency staff have included work on the land use assumptions, the call for projects, and the development of regional-scale land use and transportation scenarios. The following partner and member agency coordination has occurred to date:
• The first vetting of plan update assumptions occurred in Summer 2013, with local staff review of the 2012 existing conditions land uses. • In Fall 2013, local staff provided input on the proposed scope, cost, and timing of transportation investments for consideration in the plan update. • The next period of land use review occurred in Winter 2013 with local staff review of the modeled inventory of adopted and proposed local land use plans. • In July 2014, both transportation and land use assumptions of the regional scenarios were vetted through local staffs in preparation for the October public workshops and information to the SACOG Board. • For each of the aforementioned milestones, staff has also been coordinating with partner agency staff at the El Dorado County Transportation Commission (EDCTC) and Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA). The objective has been to align planning assumptions as each of these agencies concurrently update their long-range transportation plans.
As a result, the land use projections and the range of investments for the workshop scenarios were taken from existing plans and new proposals developed through agency collaborations.
Additionally, most of the research and discussion items presented to the SACOG Board throughout the year have also been shared with the SACOG advisory committees, including the Regional Planning Partnership, the Transit Coordinating Committee, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and the Planners Committee. Many of the key items relating to the policy framework issues have also been shared with and informed by the “Sounding Board,” a cross-sector stakeholder group formed for this 2016 MTP/SCS update.
Public workshops for the 2016 MTP/SCS Update have been completed. The results of public opinion at these workshops (or the online version of them) plus the results of the telephone poll were presented at the SACOG Board meeting in November. Staff will consider the results of these outreach efforts in developing the Draft Preferred Scenario Framework and will present as part of that package the places where the framework reflects or varies from this input. Early results from six of the eight workshops indicate a large percentage of participants identifying increased funding for road and/or transit system maintenance as very important or important. Many cited funding for new and expanded roads as the funding source they would like to see for some or all of this money to come from.
3. Implementation Theme: Land Use Forecast What is the economic viability of the projected greenfield and infill growth?
The land use forecast must represent the future development pattern judged to be the most likely to occur, based on a large number of market/economic and policy/regulatory factors. While many aspects of the land use forecast affect performance, the three most significant are:
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 37 • The share of future growth projected in Centers and Corridors and Established Communities, and the performance of the projects included as Developing Communities; • The share of housing growth projected for small-lot single-family and attached products, compared to large-lot single-family; • The amount of housing projected to be added near primary and secondary jobs centers in the region, and the amount of jobs realistically expected to be added in a few “housing rich” areas of the region.
Plan Development Status: In short, research supports the conclusion that the ultimate Preferred Scenario for this plan cycle can meet or slightly exceed these three components in the current plan. There are not sufficient data to support making major changes in any of these areas from the current plan, but targeted and measured improvements in some or all of these three areas may be warranted after additional research scheduled for the next few months is completed.
The current plan forecasts a gradual ramp-up of the three Blueprint-based land use practices described above, i.e., the market shares of growth in Centers and Corridors and Established Communities, small-lot single-family and attached housing, and improved jobs-housing balance in subareas of the region are highest in the later plan years and lowest in the earlier years. A variety of market and policy/regulatory factors point towards the conclusion that some or all of these three practices might realize higher market shares in the early years of the planning period than forecast in the current plan. Again, large changes in the assumptions probably are not justifiable, but some earlier absorption of on-average higher performing projects likely will be warranted.
Given that Scenario 2 greenhouse gas emissions do not quite achieve the SB 375 target for 2035, and the unique condition of our PM2.5 compliance requirement that does not allow any increase in emissions at all from the current plan, the land use components of the plan will likely need to be refined some from Scenario 2 to improve performance. It was always expected that the final updated plan would contain some elements of Scenarios 1 and 3. With additional time for study and refinement, it is very likely that it will be possible to develop a preferred alternative that meets all air quality standards.
Recommended Implementation Theme Actions:
1. Prepare a Preliminary Draft Land Use Forecast that fulfills federal requirements and is based on the best available information that can be researched and analyzed and that includes:: a) as much or slightly more growth in infill areas (Centers and Corridors and Established Communities, combined), and correspondingly, slightly less or the same amount of growth in greenfield areas (Developing Communities), and the same amount of growth in Rural Residential Communities (around two percent of total growth); b) as much or slightly more growth in construction of small- lot single family and attached housing as in Scenario 2, but not as much as in Scenario 3, and correspondingly, slightly less or the same amount of construction of large-lot single family housing; and c) as much or slightly more improvement in sub-regional jobs-housing balance as in the current plan.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 38 2. Continue to monitor, and update as needed, the market and regulatory/policy factors that could influence the pace, location, and shape of growth in the region for the planning period. Factors that have been researched and reported on to date include the following: • Inventory of Adopted and Proposed Land Use Plans 3 • Habitat Conservation Plans/Natural Communities Conservation Plans Development 4 • Floodplain and Levee Improvement 5 • Research of Water Supply Factors Influencing Development Pattern 6 • Airports Constraints Analysis 7 • Trends in Demographics and Housing Demand 8 • Suburban Economics Research 9
4. Implementation Theme: Transportation Funding Can the region capture the revenues projected to come from all sources (local, state, federal)?
Federal law requires the MTP/SCS to be financially constrained, meaning that the plan must contain a budget forecast that estimates the revenues that can be “reasonably expected” to come to the region during the period covered by the plan. Forecasting future revenue is challenging, particularly at this time of uncertainty for state and federal transportation funding programs. In the near term, funding projections are fairly specific and frequently based on funding formulas that provide some level of certainty about the level of funding available. However, as with many of the assumptions in long-range planning documents, the uncertainty about funding levels grows as the projections move farther into the future.
Plan Development Status: To address the key policy question behind this implementation theme, staff efforts have focused on updating the plan’s revenue projections. Efforts involved the analysis of long-term and historic trends, near-term and recent economic changes, and potential changes in the local, state, and federal funding landscape. In August, staff presented a preliminary revenue discussion and recap of the 2012 MTP/SCS financial assumptions. Since that time staff has prepared the Preliminary Revenue Analysis update in Attachment B-1. The item is intended to provide the Board with some background on the current set of financial assumptions underlying the 2012 MTP/SCS and to receive Board input and direction on new revenues and additional considerations to address through the development of the draft preferred scenario.
The revenue forecasts are provided as a range due to considerable variability at the federal, state and local level:
3 http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/04/transportation/pdf/6B-Inventory.pdf 4 http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/06/Transportation/pdf/6B-Habitat.pdf 5 http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/06/Transportation/pdf/6C-Floodplain.pdf 6 http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/06/Transportation/pdf/6D-Water.pdf 7 http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/06/Transportation/pdf/6E-Airport%20Revised.pdf 8 http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/08/transportation28/pdf/6A-Housing.pdf 9 http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/09/board/pdf/18- HANDOUT%20First%20Tier%20Suburbs%20Presentation.pdf
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 39
• The current federal transportation authorization, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), was extended through the Spring of 2015. In anticipation of new legislative actions next year, Congress is considering a number of proposals to shore up the Highway and Transit Trust Funds and adopt a new authorization package that will fund federal transportation investments for a number of years. • At the state level, new revenue from the Cap and Trade program and other competitive, discretionary grant sources are not yet clear. • Local funding structures, including fees and taxes, are also subject to considerable change based on rates of development and commercial activity, so SACOG staff has been working with its member agencies to better understand the likely trajectory of these funding sources.
As described in greater detail in Attachment B-1, there are a number of new revenue sources that are also being analyzed as part of the ongoing efforts on the 2016 MTP/SCS update. If the new revenue sources are determined to be reasonable-to-assume then they may be added to the plan budget. In some cases, the new revenues are simply meant to supplant existing sources that are declining over time. In other cases, the new revenues can support new types of transportation investment that would not otherwise be possible.
Staff analysis of new revenue sources, along with further review of the existing sources, will continue over the next month or so. The revenue forecast that results from this effort will be the basis of a draft budget for the 2016 MTP/SCS. The draft budget will establish new investment-level targets for each of the categories in the 2012 MTP/SCS. These categories are: Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation, Road Capital & Operations, Transit Capital & Operations, Bike/Pedestrian, and Programs/Planning/Enhancements.
As with prior plans, maintaining financial constraint is a likely challenge in the preparation of the draft preferred scenario. Transportation project nominations received from local, member agencies exceed the budget availability of the current plan. If the forecasted revenues for the 2016 MTP/SCS are at the same level, or lower, a number of new project nominations will not be able to be included in the financially constrained project list. Beyond financial constraint, other considerations, such as air quality conformity, will inform how many new system capacity projects can be included in the plan update.
Recommended Implementation Theme Actions:
1. Prepare a Preliminary Draft Revenue Forecast that fulfills federal requirements and is based on the best available information that can be researched and analyzed. To the extent possible, apply revenue growth rates for federal and state sources that result in consistency with the forecasts developed for the El Dorado County Transportation Commission (EDCTC) and Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) long-range transportation plan updates.
2. Continue coordinating with local member agency staff on local revenue forecasts, focusing on whether impact fees assumed to be captured from land development are well documented and consistent with the amount of build-out anticipated in the 2016 MTP/SCS land use allocation.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 40 3. Research new and innovative funding sources that are reasonable-to-assume for the plan and prepare budget strategies to optimize the use of such funds to support Board investment priorities in the 2016 MTP/SCS.
4. Based on the updated revenue forecast, prepare a preliminary draft transportation budget that establishes new investment-level targets in each of the budget categories from the 2012 MTP/SCS. Coordinate with EDCTC and PCTPA to align all three transportation plan updates to the greatest extent possible at this stage of plan development.
5. Implementation Theme: Investment Strategy
Is there enough emphasis on system maintenance (“fix-it-first”) investments? The 2012 MTP/SCS puts an emphasis on the preservation of the existing transportation system when making investment decisions with revenues that can be used for maintenance and rehabilitation purposes. Unfortunately, revenues for road maintenance are forecasted to be limited in the early years of the current plan and do not keep pace with escalating costs and deteriorating conditions for the balance of the planning period. As a result, there is a shortfall in the funds available for the maintenance of roads and operation of transit services to maintain a state-of-good repair. Unless there is an increased policy commitment to system maintenance investments in the 2016 MTP/SCS, the overall condition of the region’s roadways will not improve and transit vehicles will be kept in service long past their useful lives.
Plan Development Status: The first staff briefing on this investment theme covered transit capital and operation needs. As shared with the Board in February, significantly higher levels of funding for transit are needed for the region to meet its goals for a safe, efficient and robust transit system.
Transit providers in the region have limited dedicated revenues for operations and maintenance costs, and often use flexible funds that could otherwise be utilized for capital expansion to help support operational costs. Limited state and federal funding places a higher emphasis on local sources. Over time, the methods of paying for transit operations have changed and funding sources have shrunk. Increasingly, Congress and the State Legislature have restricted the use of federal and state funds for transit operations (with the exception of vehicle preventative maintenance), on the principle that transit is a local responsibility.
As federal and state funding support for transit operations has declined, transit operators have been increasingly dependent on more volatile sources of local funds that have been most affected by the sagging economy. A significant percentage of total operating revenues for the region’s operators now comes from volatile sales taxes sources.
Although not as underfunded as operating needs, transit capital needs in the current plan exceed available revenues. Funding shortfalls include improving light rail stations and bus stops and covering the significant replacement costs for the region’s nearly 400 transit buses, 200 paratransit small buses and 100 light rail vehicles. In addition, new state clean air rules will require many suburban operators to convert fleets from diesel fuels to clean fuels in upcoming years, making buses costlier, posing new fueling arrangements, and perhaps requiring earlier retirement of older diesel coaches.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 41
A second Board dialogue on the fix-it-first implementation theme followed in April. This presentation focused on road maintenance funding needs. Information and analysis was offered on the challenges facing the region to keep up with the growing backlog of maintenance investment needs. A key performance indicator, the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), was presented as a commonly used tool to monitor performance over time. Road conditions vary considerably across the region today, ranging from good to poor, but the trend line for the future is clearly towards a declining PCI average in the region towards an “at-risk” or “poor” level.
The staff presentation explained that ongoing and regular preventive maintenance is important for controlling long-term costs, but limited funding levels lead many agencies to put off these activities and end up with more costly reconstruction expenses later. The challenge is especially acute in local jurisdictions where the only local funds available for maintenance are local shares of the gas tax and local general funds. In many jurisdictions, maintenance and reconstruction expenses already consume about 70 percent of the typical local road budget today, leaving 30 percent for any local improvements and new construction.
In light of the significant Fix-it-First funding challenge, the April briefing to the Board committees offered four funding scenarios for discussion. Two of the scenarios do not result in the region reaching a state- of-good repair over the course of the MTP/SCS planning period. One of these scenarios is the current 2012 MTP/SCS. The other two scenarios do result in the region reaching a state-of-good repair for roads and transit, but vary considerably in cost. One scenario requires $1.7 billion more in funding from the funding level in the current plan and the alternative scenario requires $10.5 billion more in funding. The key difference in cost is that more funding in the early plan years towards Fix-it-First investment is ultimately less expensive in the latter years of the planning period because only routine maintenance will be required. While each of the promising state-of-good repair scenarios have practical implementation challenges, they illustrate the potential for the 2016 MTP/SCS to support the Board’s Fix-it-First policy priority.
Staff efforts continue on developing a recommendation for the level of Fix-it-First funding in the draft preferred scenario. The recommended investment target will not be available by December, but included as part of the preliminary draft budget that is prepared in early 2015.
Recommended Implementation Theme Actions:
1. Develop a Preliminary Draft Budget that increases the Fix-it-First funding commitment in the 2016 MTP/SCS.
2. Find budget capacity in the 2016 MTP/SCS for an increase in Fix-it-First investments from either adding new revenues that are reasonable-to-assume or reducing the funding available for system expansion projects.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 42 6. Implementation Theme: Investment Timing Should there be changes in the timing of transportation investments?
Increasing a plan policy commitment towards Fix-it-First investments will require that some system expansion projects are delayed or deferred in the 2016 MTP/SCS. The challenge is that to actually change the completion date of transportation projects varies widely by project. Transportation projects with the least flexibility in the current plan are those currently in the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP), with project development, right-of-way acquisition, or even construction activity already started and some portion of funds already expended. Some transportation projects are tied to land development projects through impact fees, CEQA mitigations, or fronting improvements; in these cases, the transportation and land development projects are linked and must be phased together. Transportation projects with the most flexibility are those in later years of the MTP/SCS, with no direct ties to specific land development projects.
Plan Development Status: One focus of staff work on this investment theme has been the collection and analysis of project nominations from local agency sponsors. Since sending out a call for projects in the fall of 2013, staff has been working with local agencies to prepare a database of proposed additions or changes to the current MTP/SCS project list. As mentioned in the preceding investment theme, project nominations received exceed the funding level in the current plan for road expansion projects. Specifically, local agencies have proposed a number of new road capacity projects in developing community areas and want to build many of these projects within the first 10 years of the planning period. The timing and need for these projects needs to be carefully aligned with the phasing of the plan’s land use forecast. Additionally, other policy and regulatory objectives for the 2016 MTP/SCS will only be met if a financially constrained project list is prepared and the sequence of investments phased in a manner that allows the region to meet air quality conformity requirements and maintain the high performance of the current plan.
Staff has also been analyzing project nominations against the Board’s Fix-it-First policy priority. As such, increased staff efforts have gone towards gathering more information on local agency levels of investment towards ongoing operations and maintenance needs. This information can ultimately inform the staff recommendation on the right balance between the maintenance of the existing transportation system and strategic transportation system expansion investments.
Another focus of staff work on this investment theme has been the detailed documentation of project phasing in the 2012 MTP/SCS. The purpose of this effort has been to provide new information to help the Board decide whether the timing of some projects in the current plan should be altered, i.e., moved sooner, moved later, possibly in a few instances even moved past the horizon year of the plan. Capital projects that are delayed in the plan provide an opportunity to make earlier investments on system maintenance needs that move the region towards a state-of-good repair.
The main source of transportation project data has been the 2012 MTP/SCS project list, which includes line-item descriptions, costs, and completion dates for over a thousand projects. Where project listings were specific enough, this information was used to create a geographic database of projects for this analysis. However, a high percentage of project costs were included in “lump sum” projects, without specific geography or phasing listed.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 43 Significant progress has been achieved in putting data on all transportation projects listed in the MTP/SCS into a form usable for the phasing analysis. The focus has been on significant projects in the later years of the MTP/SCS with the most flexibility in their timing. Late year projects in the plan typically have limited, if any, project development financial commitments.
With this information and discussion in mind, the following policy framework elements will guide the development of project phasing in the draft preferred scenario:
Recommended Implementation Theme Actions:
1. Prepare a draft transportation project list that has a strategic and phased sequence of investments that aligns with a draft land use allocation, meets the Board’s policy priorities and fulfills all regulatory objectives.
2. Focus the recommendations for phasing changes on projects with limited project development phases completed and/or limited amounts of secured funding. • Projects already in the MTIP, with funding commitments already made to the project, and with significant design work and right-of-way already acquired, have little-to-no flexibility to significantly change project phasing. • Projects in the later years of the plan, with no firm funding commitments, and with little or no project development work completed, typically have maximum flexibility to consider changes in project phasing (e.g., delaying or advancing the project).
2. Optimize the performance potential of the 2016 MTP/SCS project list through strategic changes in project phasing. • Projects which are targeted to serve growth beyond the MTP/SCS planning horizon are candidates for delay in the MTP/SCS, including delaying past the 2036 horizon year in order to free up budget capacity for Fix-it-First investments. • Projects which address existing or future notable access and mobility needs, and which are currently phased in the later years of the MTP/SCS, are candidates for advancement in the MTP/SCS.
7. Implementation Theme: Plan Effects Can the plan update follow through on the implementation commitments of the 2012 MTP/SCS to better measure the effects of the plan on different people and issue areas?
Because the MTP/SCS is a long-range plan, the degree to which it enhances the performance of the region’s transportation system, protects the environment and improves quality of life of residents over time are key measures of success.
As the first plan after the adoption of Senate Bill 375, the 2012 MTP/SCS planning effort focused more attention on the land use-transportation connection than prior plans, and required a much higher level
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 44 of effort on the part of all of SACOG’s member agencies and planning partners to maximize the connection between the land use pattern and the multi-modal transportation system.
The 2012 MTP/SCS offers high performance while also fulfilling statutory and regulatory requirements. Following through on the implementation commitments in the plan will require addressing the plan requirements and sharpening the focus on measuring and reporting plan effects.
Plan Development Status: Transportation performance indicators — the basic relationships between land use, the transportation system, and travel outcomes — have been a focus of the process to prepare the 2016 MTP/SCS update.
Technical work and Board briefings have spotlighted the emphasis in the current plan on a balance of transportation projects that collectively offer high performance and promising implementation opportunities. As part of that work, a set of performance outcomes was prepared for the regional scenarios used in the public workshops and CEQA alternatives. These performance outcomes are being used again for the plan update work. They provide critical insights into the performance of each of the three plan scenarios and for the work ahead to develop a draft preferred scenario.
Ideally, project timing and phasing recommendations would be made through an analysis of plan effects at the project-level. Several staff presentations on this subject were made to the Board over the past several months and support was received for developing this capacity over a period of time. An initial focus has been on a benefit-cost method that is largely based on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s national best practice. Initial results are promising, but also confirm that the application of this method requires considerable time and staff resources to implement.
There is an opportunity to continue developing project-level performance evaluation methods. Schedule and resource constraints will require many of these methods to be implemented over an extended period of time. Other performance measurement commitments of the current plan including working to enhance our ability to measure the impact of the plan on public health, safety and active transportation, are also underway.
Recommended Implementation Theme Actions:
1. Analyze the Scenarios Performance Outcomes as a key input for shaping a high-performing Draft Preferred Scenario that meets statutory requirements and supports Board policy objectives.
2. Report a broad set of performance measures in the Draft Preferred Scenario that go deeper than the Scenarios Performance Outcomes and reflect the range and diversity of policy areas in the six guiding principles of the MTP/SCS.
3. Continue the development of project-level performance evaluation methods, such as a benefit/cost method to compare the performance benefit of large projects or programs. Provide the Board a proposed strategy for incorporating a benefit/cost method into SACOG planning and programming activities.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 45 The Collaborative Process for Developing a Draft Preferred Scenario
The following coordination will occur after the Board acts on the Framework 2.0 that directs the development of a preferred scenario at the end of 2014:
• SACOG staff will develop a preliminary draft preferred scenario based on this framework and vet it again through EDCTC, PCTPA, and member agency planning and public works staff in January 2015. This vetting period will provide an opportunity for local elected bodies to provide input on the assumptions in early 2015 if desired. • In addition to coordinating directly with member agency staffs, input from the Sounding Board and SACOG advisory groups will also be sought on the preliminary draft scenario that circulates in January 2015.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 46 One of the implementation themes included in the Policy Framework for the 2016 MTP/SCS asks whether the region can capture the revenues projected to come from all sources (federal, state, and local). To answer this question and ensure that the 2016 MTP/SCS passes federal financial constraint tests, SACOG is exploring a number of factors that could affect the revenues forecast for the plan. The tables and descriptions below provide a range of potential future revenues for existing and new sources of funding and discuss what variables could affect the amount of revenues generated from these various sources.
Existing Revenue Sources Supporting the MTP/SCS
2012 MTP/SCS 2016 MTP/SCS Budget Framework Adopted Budget Amount (in Revised Range (in billions of billions of 2012 Reason for Change
2012 dollars) dollars) -Federal Highway and Transit Federal Highway Administration funds Trust Funds are dependent on including formula funds that pay for federal taxes on fuel. SACOG's regional funding programs Improvements to average fuel (CMAQ & RSTP) and other federal $2.1 $1.7 - $2.1 economy of passenger and discretionary programs funded through freight vehicles have eroded the Highway Trust Fund the purchasing power of these funding source over time and required transfers from the general fund to maintain the accounts' solvency.
-Federal and state forecasts Federal transit programs that come to predict that fuel economy will the region and/or directly to transit continue to improve faster operators including formula funds and $1.4 $1.0 - $1.4 than growth in vehicle miles federal discretionary programs such as traveled, further reducing the New Starts ability of current fuel taxes to support transportation needs.
-Fuel prices are predicted to rise, but have not increased as fast as forecast in the current MTP/SCS.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 47
Caltrans funding for state system -State transportation funding expansion and preservation including programs are dependent on SHOPP funding, highway maintenance, $5.2 $4.6 - $5.3 transfers from the Federal and the Interregional Improvement Trust Fund and statewide Program diesel and gasoline taxes that feed the State Highway and State discretionary grant programs $0.6 $0.5 - $0.7 Public Transportation State formula (STIP) funds that Accounts. contribute to SACOG's regional funding $1.4 $1.1 - $1.4 programs -As described above, State transit programs that flow directly improvements in fuel to transit operators including State economy resulting in overall Transit Assistance and Intercity Rail $1.2 $1.1 - $1.2 lower fuel consumption *LTF funds included under sales taxes impact state resources in the below same way federal resources have the potential to decline Portion of state excise taxes on over the MTP/SCS planning transportation fuels (currently period. $0.36/gallon) distributed to cities and $3.0 $2.3 - $3.0 counties for transportation purposes. -Annual revenues generated by state and local (Sacramento County's Measure A) sales taxes have kept pace with the forecasts in the current plan.
-A new 1/2 cent sales tax or equivalent (Measure B) included in the current plan needs to be revisited for this plan update.
State and local sales taxes supporting -The Sacramento transportation investments $6.1 $5.9 - $6.1 Transportation Authority (STA) is testing public support for a new measure through polling and a public outreach campaign.
-The revenues that would be generated by a new measure are an important component of funding the level of transit service and road maintenance contained in the current MTP/SCS.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 48 -Locally derived revenues will be based on a combination of historic allocations reported to the state controller and growth in new land use Locally derived streets and roads developments forecast for the funding (developer fees, general fund $9.1 $9.1 - $9.9 preferred scenario. contributions, special assessments, etc.) -Faster annual housing and employment growth in the later years of the plan could result in higher total revenues than the current plan. -Transit fare revenues will be Transit Fares $2.2 $2.2 - $2.5 based on modeled ridership and forecasted average fares. SUBTOTAL EXISTING REVENUES $32.3 $29.5 - $33.6
State and Federal Fuel Taxes A large part of the MTP/SCS budget is dependent on funding sources supported by state and federal transportation fuel taxes. Current projections at the state and federal level foresee a continued decline in these revenue sources resulting from improvements in average fuel economy and lower overall consumption. The lower budget ranges for these sources are consistent with projections for fuel price and fleet-wide fuel efficiency proposed by the Regional Targets Advisory Committee (RTAC) for the next round of sustainable communities strategies. The potential decrease in these revenue sources based on projected vehicle miles traveled in the SACOG region and the updated RTAC assumptions could be as much as $2.6 billion over the life of the plan.
State and Local Sales Taxes The region has kept pace, or even slightly exceeded, the anticipated growth in sales tax revenues forecast in the current plan for both the state sales tax and the local Measure A sales tax in Sacramento County. The primary risk to sales tax revenues supporting the plan surrounds the uncertainty of an additional ½ cent sales tax measure or its equivalent in Sacramento County (Measure B). The current plan assumes these new revenues would become available beginning in 2014. However, it is unlikely given current progress on a new measure that action by voters is possible within the timeframe anticipated by the plan. For the 2012 MTP/SCS, the Board elected to push the assumption for a new measure back by two years, from 2012 to 2014, to be consistent with financial constraint requirements of the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP). If the Board took similar action for this plan, the effect would be fairly small, only around $200 million. For reference, the Measure B assumption contributes $2.3 billion to the MTP/SCS budget.
Locally Derived Street and Roads Funding These revenues are supported by local developer fees, general funds, special assessments, and other local funding programs. These programs are expected to stay fairly stable over the planning period, but are fairly dependent on future housing and employment growth. The Board has elected to maintain the same amount of total housing and employment growth from the 2012 MTP/SCS for this plan update. Due to the
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 49 shorter planning period, this would require slightly faster growth, likely in the later years of the plan, to catch the region up from a slower than anticipated growth since the current plan was adopted. The effect of this faster growth would be slightly higher local revenues adding up to $800 million to the budget. However, these revenues can vary depending on the final land use assumptions for the draft preferred scenario and feedback from local staff.
Transit Fares SACOG bases the forecast of transit fares on ridership and average fares paid by riders. The total fare revenue captured by the plan will be dependent on the productivity of transit services included in the plan. The fairly wide range in potential transit fares is due to uncertainty about how a draft preferred scenario will perform. The current plan achieves a very productive transit system that covers nearly 40% of the operating costs of transit in fare revenue by 2035. However, without sufficient funding support from state and federal revenue sources, and in particular without additional local revenues from a Measure B assumption in Sacramento County, achieving this same level of productivity will be very difficult. Assuming that the draft preferred scenario can perform at least as well as the current MTP/SCS, there would be little change in fare revenues. If the draft preferred scenario can outperform the current plan, fare revenue could increase by as much as $300 million (up to 45% farebox recovery).
Potential New Revenue Sources to Support the MTP/SCS
2016 MTP/SCS Budget Framework
Range (in billions of Reason for Change 2012 dollars)
-Per the Placer County Transportation Commission's draft RTP financial plan and Placer County 1/2 cent Sales Tax $0.0 - $1.5 recent polling that shows significant support for a potential county-wide sales tax measure. -Based on forecasts from the California State Cap and Trade Program through Association of Councils of Government 2020 $0.5 - $2.5 (low-end) and the Legislative Analyst's Office (high-end) -Maintain the Cap and Trade Program through 2036 with slight reductions in State Cap and Trade Program if annual revenues generated from the extended 2021 through 2036 $1.0 - $5.0 purchase of allowances to account for improvements in technology
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 50 -Two national reports commissioned under SAFETEA-LU call for the long term replacement of existing fuel taxes with a mileage-based system.
-A $0.05 per mile tax would yield roughly State and/or federal mileage-based user $0.8 to $1.1 billion per year to the region fee (2025-2036) to replace existing gas based on SACOG's projections of annual taxes (net over existing revenue $2.2 - $5.5 VMT. sources) -These fees would replace existing federal and state gas taxes, yielding a net increase of $200 to $500 million per year that could be distributed through existing state and federal programs in a manner consistent with current formulas. -Assume a future state bond program or New state discretionary program $0.1 - $0.5 similar funding mechanism roughly equivalent to Propositions 1A & 1B -Assume future federal discretionary programs for transportation purposes New federal discretionary program $0.5 $1.0 supported by funds outside of the Highway Trust Fund similar to the TIGER program SUBTOTAL POTENTIAL NEW REVENUES $4.3 - $16.0 TOTAL CORE AND NEW REVENUES $33.8 - $49.6
Potential New Revenue Sources There are a number of new revenue sources that can be considered as part of this plan update. These funding sources carry an additional level of uncertainty and risk beyond forecasts of the more traditional funding sources included in the current plan. However, additional funding could be an important part of making up any gap left by a more conservative estimate of existing resources. One of the new funding sources, as proposed by the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, is a ½ cent county-wide sales tax in its updated regional transportation plan that would add up to $1.5 billion to its financial plan. Another new funding source is a program funded with revenues generated from California’s Cap and Trade program. Funding from cap and trade is anticipated to begin this fiscal year and could generate anywhere from $9 to $45 billion statewide by 2020. The more conservative estimate from the California Association of Councils of Government (CALCOG) could add $500 million to the MTP/SCS budget, while the Legislative Analyst’s Office more aggressive forecast could bring in as much as $2.5 billion. If the program is assumed to run beyond 2020, it could bring in an additional $1.0 to $5.0 billion for the region.
The Board could also consider additional revenues coming from state and/or federal mileage-based user fees or equivalent adjustments that would replace or modify existing taxes on transportation fuels. Two national reports commissioned by the previous federal transportation bill (SAFETEA-LU) suggested that mileage-based fees should be considered as a long-term solution to the shortfalls plaguing the Highway Trust Fund. California is also just beginning a pilot program to look at the feasibility of such programs in
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 51 the state. These types of programs, assumed in the later years of the MTP/SCS, could generate between $2.2 and $5.5 billion for the region based on SACOG forecasts of regional vehicle miles traveled.
New federal or state discretionary programs funded through sources other than the Highway Trust Fund or State Highway Account such as through new bond measures or TIGER style programs provide another potential stream of funding for the region. Based on the region’s competitiveness in previous programs, these sources could provide between $600 million and $1.5 billion for the region.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 52
Item #15-4-14 SACOG Board of Directors Action April 9, 2015
Endorse 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Update: Preferred Scenario
Issue: Should the Board endorse the Draft Preferred Scenario (transportation project list, budget and land use forecast assumptions) as the Preferred Scenario for the Draft 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy.
Recommendation: The Transportation Committee recommends that the SACOG Board endorse the Draft Preferred Scenario, which consists of a transportation project list and budget (Attachment B), and land use forecast for the years 2020 and 2036 (Attachment C), as the Preferred Scenario for use in the 2016 update of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS) and associated environmental impact report (EIR).
Committee Action/Discussion: Following Board direction, staff has been working to develop a Draft Preferred Scenario for the 2016 update of the MTP/SCS through a multi-month process with the Board, member and partner agencies, and stakeholders. The Framework for developing the Draft Preferred Scenario was adopted by the SACOG Board in December 2014 (Framework 2.0 in Attachment A). Framework 2.0 has provided the guiding principles, method, and process for developing the Draft Preferred Scenario. Based on prior regional scenario modeling and analysis, the three primary directives of the Framework have been to: 1) develop a Draft Preferred Scenario that meets federal air quality conformity requirements and achieves state greenhouse gas targets, 2) develop a land use forecast that meets federal and state requirements and supports those air quality objectives, and 3) shift budget to system maintenance (Fix-it-First) investments and find new, reasonably foreseeable revenues to put towards those investments, consistent with the Board’s adopted policy themes for this plan update.
A Discussion Draft Preferred Scenario (Discussion Draft) was developed earlier this year according to Framework 2.0. The Discussion Draft was vetted with member and partner agencies over a six-week period that ended on March 9th. At the Board’s March 19th meeting, staff presented a preliminary assessment of how the Discussion Draft land use and transportation assumptions might be modified into a final Draft Preferred Scenario based on the local agency comments received during the vetting period.
Land use Forecast: Summary of Comments and Recommended Changes As staff shared with the Board on March 19th, SACOG received requests for changes to the Discussion Draft for the 2012 to 2036 time period from five jurisdictions (Elk Grove, Folsom, Placer County, Rocklin and West Sacramento). Three jurisdictions – Elk Grove, Placer County and Rocklin – requested additional housing and employment growth. West Sacramento requested the removal of two Developing Communities within its city limits, which would result in less projected housing growth. Folsom suggested changing the location of employment growth within the city limits, which would not
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 53 change the jurisdiction’s total employment projection. The sum of these requested edits amounts to an additional approximately 4,100 new homes and 12,400 new employees, which is one percent and three percent of the regional 2036 growth forecast, respectively. Additionally, two jurisdictions (Rocklin and Elk Grove) suggested edits to the Discussion Draft for the 2012 to 2020 time period that sum to approximately 1,400 new homes and 3,400 new employees, or two percent and three percent of the regional 2020 growth forecast, respectively. Not all of these requests for 2020 and 2036 could be accommodated within the Board’s adopted regional growth forecast.
Consistent with staff’s preliminary assessment in mid-March, staff is recommending minimal land use changes from the Discussion Draft to the Draft Preferred Scenario. Staff did not include all proposed changes and in most cases included only a small amount of the proposed changes: less than one-half of a percent of the regional housing and jobs growth was shifted around the region in the 2036 forecast; in the 2020 forecast it is two percent of regional housing growth and less than one percent of regional jobs growth. The staff-recommended changes allow the land use forecast to remain consistent with the land use directives spelled out in Framework 2.0. Staff has communicated with the individual jurisdictions on the proposed changes and at this time does not believe there will be any objections to the Draft Preferred Scenario land use forecast.
Transportation Project List & Budget: Summary of Comments and Recommended Changes SACOG received feedback or requests for changes to the Discussion Draft from the following 13 agencies:
City of Elk Grove Yolo County City of Folsom Yuba County City of Rancho Cordova Caltrans District 3 City of Sacramento Capital SouthEast Connector Joint Powers City of West Sacramento Authority City of Woodland El Dorado County Transportation Commission Sacramento County Placer County Transportation Planning Agency
SACOG received comments from a number of other agencies that did not suggest or result in changes to the Discussion Draft. The comments requesting changes generally consisted of refinements to project scopes, costs, and timing of projects. A number of comments were requests to add projects not included in the Discussion Draft back in for the Draft Preferred Scenario. In general, requests to add or expand projects were accompanied by suggestions of projects that could be delayed until after 2036 or otherwise removed from the Draft Preferred Scenario. In total, SACOG received about 40 requests to add projects or increase the scope of projects included in the Discussion Draft. Another 20 comments suggested scope reductions to existing or new projects that would slim down the total project cost and reduce the budget impact of including the project in the Draft Preferred Scenario. Staff received about 50 comments suggesting projects or concurring with SACOG recommendations for projects that could be removed or delayed from the Draft Preferred Scenario.
The Draft Preferred Scenario includes about $400 million less in total road and highway capacity expenditures compared to the Discussion Draft. Based on local agency feedback, staff added roughly $400 million in road and highway capacity investments to the Draft Preferred Scenario. This number was offset by $800 million in capacity projects that were delayed until after 2036, removed from the plan, or reduced in scope and cost. The Draft Preferred Scenario also includes a reduction of $100
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 54 million in the programs and planning budget, primarily coming from lump sum projects where costs are not likely to occur during the MTP/SCS planning period.
It is important to note that not all of the $500 million in reductions from the budget categories described above is available for other categories. Some of the funding is tied to specific projects that are delayed past the plan period. The net impact of the changes is an additional $300 million for maintenance and rehabilitation and a $200 million reduction in the total budget from $35.2 billion to $35 billion. The sum of all of the changes made in the Draft Preferred Scenario from the Discussion Draft represents about one percent of the total MTP/SCS budget.
The one known controversy at the time of the Committee packet mail-out on March 26 concerned the project listing for the Capital Southeast Connector. Shortly thereafter, on March 30, a constructive SACOG/Connector JPA meeting occurred between the Chairs, Vice-Chairs and executive management of the two organizations. Outcomes from that meeting were shared as part of the MTP/SCS discussion at the Board committee meetings. The primary agreement reached between SACOG and the Connector JPA representatives was to keep the project development listing for the middle segment of the Connector (Grant Line Road between Douglas Road and Bradshaw Road) the same as it was at the time the Draft Preferred Scenario project list was released. A second outcome of the SACOG/Connector JPA meeting was to review the timing of a segment of the Connector in the City of Folsom. For this segment of White Rock Road between Prairie City Road and the county line, active staff coordination and analysis led to a staff recommendation to move up the completion year target of the project to 2020. Comments of support for this change were received at each Board committee meeting and is included as part of this Transportation Committee recommendation for Board action. No objections or requests for other substantive changes to the Draft Preferred Scenario project list were received at the three Board committee meetings.
SB 375 Greenhouse Gas Targets and Air Quality Conformity The Draft Preferred Scenario achieves the SB 375 greenhouse gas targets for the years 2020 and 2035. The GHG reduction targets as adopted by the California Air Resources Board are: 7 percent reduction per capita by the year 2020 and 16 percent per capita by the year 2035. The Draft Preferred Scenario results in 7.73 percent per capita reduction for the year 2020 and a 15.55 percent per capita for the year 2035. It will be another month before there is information on how the Draft Preferred Scenario will perform on federal air quality standards (i.e., ozone pre-cursors and particulate matter or PM).
Next Steps after April If the Board endorses the Draft Preferred Scenario as the final Preferred Scenario for the plan update, technical modeling and analysis will continue. Staff will also ask the Board to review the policies and strategies of the current MTP/SCS and engage the Board on whether and how these policies and strategies should be updated to reflect the implementation themes of the 2016 MTP/SCS update.
The following provides more detail on the attachments to this staff report:
Attachment B: Transportation Project List and Summary of Expenditures and Revenues The project list categorizes investments included in the Draft Preferred Scenario into two time periods: constructed by 2020 and constructed by 2036. Projects not included for construction by 2036 are listed as “Project Development Only.” These projects may begin early stages of project analysis, project environmental clearance, and right-of-way acquisition during the plan horizon, but construction
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 55 activities are expected to occur after 2036. For reference, the project list shows the total cost of Project Development Only projects. However, for budgeting purposes, the Draft Preferred Scenario assumes only 10% of the total project costs would be captured during the planning period of the MTP/SCS.
The Summary of Expenditures and Revenues describes the total investments by budget category compared to the 2012 MTP/SCS and the revenues that support these investments. Column D of the summary table describes the changes to budget categories from the Discussion Draft.
Attachment C: Land Use Forecast This attachment includes three pieces of information: 1) a table by jurisdiction and Community Type showing the housing and employment assumptions of the Draft Preferred Scenario; 2) a map that corresponds to the table; and 3) a narrative overview of the land use forecast.
Attachment D: Key Performance Outcomes This is the same table of performance outcomes included in the Board’s adopted Framework 2.0. The scenarios reported in this table include Scenarios 1, 2 and 3, the adopted 2012 MTP/SCS, and the Draft Preferred Scenario. For more background on these scenarios and the purpose of this performance outcomes table, see Framework 2.0 (http://sacog.org/calendar/2014/12/board/pdf/10- MTP%20Framework.pdf).
Attachment E: Narrative Description of the Draft Preferred Scenario This attachment includes a description of how the Draft Preferred Scenario aligns with the Board’s adopted policy themes (described as Framework 1.0 in Attachment A) and compares to the 2012 MTP/SCS.
Approved by:
Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer
MM:KL:ds Attachments
Key Staff: Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services, (916) 340-6276 Sharon Sprowls, Senior Program Specialist, (916) 340-6235 Kacey Lizon, MTP/SCS Manager, (916) 340-6265
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 56 Attachment A
2016 MTP/SCS Update: Schedule of Board Actions Leading to Final Plan Adoption (Updated January 12, 2015 to reflect Board adoption of Framework 2.0)
Board Action Date of Action Contents/Direction Framework 1.0: Adopted December 2013 • Set implementation-focused theme for plan update with Policy Framework five policy themes: transportation funding, investment strategy, investment timing, land use forecast, plan effects. • Set region-level growth projections of population, employment and housing for the plan horizon year (2036). • Set overall schedule for the plan update. Framework 1.5: Adopted March 2014 • Set parameters for three regional land use and Scenarios transportation scenarios for use in public workshops and Development plan development. Framework • Initiated phasing analysis of transportation investments in current plan. • Initiated analysis of different levels and types of transportation revenue sources. • Set schedule for creation of Framework 2.0. Framework 2.0: Adopted December 2014 • Sets guidelines, task and process for developing a draft Draft Preferred preferred scenario (land use forecast, revenue forecast, Scenario Framework project list, performance outcomes). • Sets a minimum of six weeks for review and vetting of a preliminary draft preferred scenario.
Framework 3.0: Targeted for April 2015 • Sets details of Draft Preferred Scenario (for years 2020, Draft Preferred 2035, and 2036) for use in development of Draft Plan and Scenario EIR:
o Land use forecast o Revenue Forecast o Budget and Project List o Performance Outcomes Draft Plan (2016 Targeted for September 2015 • Release Draft 2016 MTP/SCS for public comment. Draft MTP/SCS) Plan includes written discussion of the detailed land use and transportation information above plus: policies and strategies, an environmental justice analysis, discussion of natural resources.
Final Plan (2016 Targeted for February 2016 • Adopt 2016 MTP/SCS, certify Final EIR, adopt air quality MTP/SCS) conformity finding.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 57 B. Base Revenue Expenditures by C. Base + New Revenue Expenditures D. Change from A. Current MTP/SCS Budget Category by Budget Category Discussion Draft
Changes in total Plan % of Total expenditures from Budget Category Expenditures % of Total Expenditures % of Total Expenditures Expenditures January, 2015 Discussion Draft
Maintenance & Rehabilitation $10.5 32% $11.1 35% $12.6 36% +$0.3 System Management, Operations, and ITS $0.8 2% $0.8 2% $1.5 4% $0.0 Road & Highway Capacity $6.4 20% $5.8 18% $5.8 17% -$0.4 Bicycle & Pedestrian $2.5 8% $2.6 8% $2.8 8% $0.0 Transit Capital $3.3 10% $3.0 9% $3.5 10% $0.0
1) Expenditures Transit Operations & Maintenance $7.1 22% $6.9 22% $7.1 20% $0.0 Programs & Planning $1.8 6% $1.7 5% $1.7 5% -$0.1 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $32.4 100% $31.9 100% $35.0 100% -$0.2
Discussion Revenue Source Notes DPS Budget Base Revenues $31.9 Federal Highway $2.1 Federal Transit $1.4 State Fuel Taxes $9.2 All projections are preliminary and subject to change through additional research, refinement, and State Transit $1.2 Sales Tax $6.1 coordination with partner agencies. Other Local Revenues $9.7 Transit Fares $2.2 New Revenues $3.1
These additional revenues more fully account for funds from the Highway Bridge Program (HBP). The purpose of the HBP is to replace or rehabilitate public highway bridges over waterways, other Highway Bridge Program (Bridge $0.6 topographical barriers, other highways, or railroads when the State and the Federal Highway Maintenance & Preservation) Administration determine that a bridge is significantly important and is unsafe because of structural deficiencies, physical deterioration, or functional obsolescence.
Placer 1/2 cent Sales Tax $1.5 Based on the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency draft RTP financial element. 2) Revenues 2)
Cap & Trade (by 2020) $0.2 Cap and Trade revenues are made up of the 35% of auction proceeds that are allocated to Affordable Housing & Sustainable Communities-20%, with 10% available to projects that reduce VMT and auto trips under the Sustainable Communities program, Intercity Rail-10%, and Low Carbon Transit-5%. The region's capture of these revenues assumes SACOG member agencies receive revenues roughly equivalent to the region's share of statewide population. Consistent with Board direction to focus this plan update on fix-it-first projects, the Draft Preferred Scenario assumes revenues captured under the Sustainable Communties program will support roadway rehabilitation projects that provide strong Cap & Trade (2021-2036) $0.8 complete streets opportunities that encourage biking, walking, and transit use.
TOTAL REVENUES (Base + New) $35.0
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 58 Potential Statewide Cap and Trade Revenues Potential Potential Program Share Revenues By Revenues Assumptions and Program Descriptions 2020 2021-2036 Assumes all available state-owned allowances will be purchased at the minimum reserve price through 2020. For 2021 to 2036, assume 5% growth in reserve price as set by the state Total Auction Proceeds 100% $11.5 $46.7 and maintain a consistent number of allowances available in each fiscal year based on the average number of allowances sold between FYs 2013/14 and 2019/20. Actual revenues available will vary depending on state policy, technology, and the market prices for allowances. High Speed Rail 25% $2.9 $11.7 These funds will support the construction of the California High-Speed Rail project. These funds will be allocated annually to support a variety of other programs aimed at Other Programs (allocated annually) 40% $4.6 $18.7 reducing greenhouse gas emissions such as clean energy, energy conservation, low or zero emission vehicles, and fire prevention and urban forestry. Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities 20% $2.3 $9.3 Half (10% of the 20%) must be used for affordable housing that supports infill and compact Affordable Housing 10% $1.2 $4.7 development. Half (10% of the 20%) may be available for projects aimed at reducing auto trips and vehicle Sustainable Communities 10% $1.2 $4.7 miles traveled in regional transportation plans/sustainable community strategies, including complete streets and active transportation style projects. Intercity Rail 10% $1.2 $4.7 These funds are for commuter and inter-regional rail and bus rapid transit projects. Funding goes out under the State Transit Assistance formula for new and expanded service Low Carbon Transit Operations 5% $0.6 $2.3 (including equipment); and 50% of the funding must be expended for disadvantaged communities.
Share of Potential Potential Statewide Revenues By Revenues Assumptions and Program Descriptions Potential Discussion DPS Cap and Trade Revenues Revenues 2020 2021-2036
Sustainable Communities $0.1 $0.3 Included in expanded Discussion DPS Maintenance and Rehabilitation budget to support fix- Equal to it-first investments that present complete streets and active transportation opportunities. population Share Intercity Rail (roughly 6.2% $0.1 $0.3 Included in expanded Discussion DPS transit capital budget for eligible intercity rail and BRT increasing to 7% projects. by 2036) Included in expanded Discussion DPS transit operating budget for new and expanded service Low Carbon Transit Operations $0.04 $0.2 in eligible communities. Funds are distributed via existing State Transit Assistance formulas to transit operators. Total $0.2 $0.8
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 59 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) In El Dorado County on SR 49 and US 50, and also in Sacramento and Yolo Counties on I-80 at Various Locations - Yes Apply high friction surface treatment (HFST) [EFIS ID G- System Management, 0314000157; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0980] (Toll Credits for PE, Completion by CAL20525 El Dorado Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS ED/Sac/Yol High Friction Surface Treatment ROW, CON) 2020 $1,055,000 In El Dorado County, in and near Placerville, on US 50 and SR 193 at various locations; also in Placer County on I-80 at PM Yes C- Maintenance & 3.5 - Place polyester overlay [EFIS ID 0314000027; CTIPS ID Completion by CAL20534 El Dorado Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Highway Bridge Deck Rehab 107-0000-0990] (Toll credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $3,772,000 In El Dorado County, near Placerville, from the Amador County line to Pleasant Valley Road - Bonded wearing course Yes C- Maintenance & overlay (ED-49-0.0/9.6) [HM1 - Pavement Preservation (Fed- Completion by CAL20536 El Dorado Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Maintenance Overlay near Placerville Funded)] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $3,198,000 In Placerville, at the intersection of Spring Street and US 50, and at the intersection of Spring Street and Coloma Street - Yes Upgrade curb ramps, sidewalks, and adjust turn lane to install crosswalk (PM 14.9/15.1) [EFIS ID 0300020632; CTIPS ID 107- Completion by CAL20529 El Dorado Caltrans D3 A- Bike & Ped Placerville ADA Curb Ramps 0000-0985] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $1,938,000 Near Pollock Pines, 11 miles east of Placerville at Sly Park Yes Road Undercrossing #25-42 - Replace bridge (PM R31.3) Completion by CAL20458 El Dorado Caltrans D3 D- Programs & Planning Sly Park Road UC Replacement [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0864) (Toll Credits) 2020 $8,563,000 In El Dorado County, on SR 49, near Placerville, from Coloma Yes C- Maintenance & to Cool - Pavement rehabilitation (PM 23.9/35.0) [Toll Credits] Completion by CAL20493 El Dorado Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 49 - Lotus Road to Cool CAPM (CTIPS ID 107-0000-0930) 2020 $7,932,000 On SR 49, from Southview Ct. in Placerville (south of US 50) to Southview Yes Gold Hill Rd (Approximately 5 miles north of US 50), where Court ED 49 Gold Hill Road ED 49 CAL20634 El Dorado Caltrans D3 A- Bike & Ped SR 49 - Construct Class II Bike Lane feasible Construct Class II Bike Lane SR 49 PM3.095 PM 5.210 2021-2036 $2,880,000 In El Dorado County, near Placerville, at South Fork American River Bridge #25-0021 - Cross bracing seismic retrofit and enhancement to provide safe and efficient Yes pedestrian/bicyclist facilities (PM 24.0) [CTIPS STIP ID 107- C- Maintenance & SR 49 South Fork American River Bridge 0000-0878, CTIPS SHOPP ID 107-0000-0907; EFIS ID Completion by CAL20476 El Dorado Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Retrofit/Enhancement 0300000078] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $19,654,000 Construct an undercrossing, median barrier, modify local road connections and/or associated operational and safety Yes C- Maintenance & U.S. 50 - Camino Operational / Safety improvements on and adjacent to U.S. 50. PM 24.521 to ED 50 PM CAL18190 El Dorado Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Improvements 27.027 US 50 24.521 ED 50 PM 27.027 2021-2036 $51,723,000 El Dorado County, US 50, near Pollock Pines, at Bridal Veil Yes C- Maintenance & Falls - Repair culvert damaged by wildfire (PM 36.8) [CTIPS ID Completion by CAL20542 El Dorado Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation US 50 Culvert Damage Repair 107-0000-0994] 2020 $498,000
On US 50 in Placerville at 0.5 mile west of junction with SR 49 - Yes G- System Management, Install slotted drain and drainage inlets in median (ED-50- Completion by CAL20487 El Dorado Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS US 50 Drainage Improvements 17.0/17.3) [SHOPP Program 201.015] (Toll credits for CON) 2020 $780,000
Yes G- System Management, From Missouri Flat Road in Placerville to Echo Summit, Install CAL20644 El Dorado Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS US 50 ITS ITS (PM 15.055/67.295) US 50 PM 15.055 PM 67.295 2021-2036 $2,600,000 On US 50 near Placerville, from 0.8 mile east of Bridal Veil Falls Road to Strawberry Lodge Drive - Construct traction sand Yes traps [Stormwater Mitigation] (PM 38.0/58.0) [EFIS ID G- System Management, 0300020539; CTIPS ID 120-0000-0072] [Total Project Cost Completion by CAL20515 El Dorado Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS US 50 Traction Sand Traps $6,205,000 in 17/18 FY] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $6,205,000 Project In Placerville, from west of Coloma Road offramp to the Development B- Road & Highway Placerville Drive offramp, Construct WB Auxiliary Lane (PM Completion after CAL20649 Only El Dorado Caltrans D3 Capacity US 50 WB Auxiliary Lane 17.111/17.778) US 50 PM 17.111 PM 17.778 2036 $13,000,000 Blairs Ln, over Hangtown Creek, 150' south of Broadway: Yes B- Road & Highway Replace 1 lane bridge with 2 lane bridge. (Toll Credits for Completion by ELD19256 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Blairs Ln / Hangtown Creek Bridge CON) 2020 $4,365,000 In Placerville, on Broadway, from Blairs Lane to Point View Drive: Widen shoulders to add Class II Bike Lanes. (Emission Yes Benefits in kg/day: 0.02 ROG, 0.01 NOx. Toll Credits for PE & Completion by ELD19373 El Dorado City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Broadway Bike Lanes ROW) 2020 $1,575,000 ELD19423 Yes El Dorado City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Broadway Bike Lanes Add bike lanes: Main Street to Schnell School Road Broadway St. Main Street Schnell School Road 2021-2036 $300,000 On Broadway between Mosquito Rd and Schnell School Rd: Stripe bike lanes between Blairs Lane and Schnell School Yes G- System Management, Road. Install speed feedback signs, lights, warning signs; Completion by ELD19370 El Dorado City of Placerville Operations, and ITS Broadway Safety Improvements Upgrade crosswalks. (HSIP6-03-012) 2020 $245,600
Yes G- System Management, Install traffic signals on Broadway at Mosquito Road and ELD19388 El Dorado City of Placerville Operations, and ITS Broadway Traffic Signals Blairs Lane. 2021-2036 $1,032,650
Yes G- System Management, Completion by ELD19436 El Dorado City of Placerville Operations, and ITS Bush Court/Roddan Court Bush Court/Roddan Court 2020 $705,482
Yes B- Road & Highway Clay St. over Hangtown Creek, 150' north of Main St.: Replace Completion by ELD19257 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Clay St. / Hangtown Creek Bridge 1 lane bridge with 2 lane bridge. (Toll Credits for ROW & CON) 2020 $2,925,000 In Placerville, Clay Street at Main/Cedar Ravine: realign to a four-way intersection. (To be constructed in conjunction with Yes Clay Street Bridge Replacement, ELD19257. Bridge G- System Management, construction, will be funded through Highway Bridge Completion by ELD14090 El Dorado City of Placerville Operations, and ITS Clay Street at Cedar Ravine Program, shown in HBP Grouped Listing). 2020 $870,590
Yes G- System Management, Completion by ELD19421 El Dorado City of Placerville Operations, and ITS Clay Street Realignment Main Street/Cedar Ravine/Clay Street Intersection Project 2020 $3,372,877 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct a new 2-lane road connecting Cold Springs to Completion after ELD19411 Only El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Cold Springs Road Connector Placerville Drive for future Fair Lane Road Extension. Cold Springs Rd Placerville Drive 2036 $3,865,000 Construct 150-foot 2-lane roadway with sidewalk and gutter Yes B- Road & Highway on both sides to extend Coleman Street from Bedford Avenue ELD19418 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Coleman Street Extension to Spring Street Coleman St. Bedford Ave Spring St 2021-2036 $1,762,000 B- Road & Highway Yes ELD19419 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Combellack Road Extension Road Extension: Combellack Road Combellack Road 2021-2036 $3,466,000 Project Construct a new 4,200-foot 2-lane roadway with sidewalk to Development B- Road & Highway extend Emigrant Ravine Road from the Carson Road to the Emigrant Ravine Completion after ELD19441 Only El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Emigrant Ravine Road Extension proposed Clay Street Extension Road Carson Road 2036 $15,422,000 B- Road & Highway Gateway Yes ELD19450 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Gateway Drive/Broadway Roundabout Build roundabout at Gateway Drive and Broadway. Drive/Broadway 2021-2036 $1,286,000 Install bicycle lanes and route signage on Main Street from Yes ELD19442 El Dorado City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Main Street Bicycle Improvements Spring Street to Clay Street. Main Street Spring Street Clay St 2021-2036 $7,500 Construct 700-foot of new 2-lane road. Includes sidewalks to Project City collector street standards between Broadway and Main Development B- Road & Highway Street. New road will extend Main Street down Spanish Completion after Only ELD19420 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Main Street Realignment Ravine Road. 2036 $8,121,768 Project Development B- Road & Highway Build a new 2-lane roadway connecting Mallard Lane to Completion after ELD19422 Only El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Mallard Lane Extension Placerville Drive. Mallard Lane Placerville Drive 2036 $3,756,000 Install bicycle lanes on Mallard Lane from the City limit to Mallard Yes Green Valley Road, and on Green Valley Road from Mallard Lane/Green Valley ELD19443 El Dorado City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Mallard Lane/Green Valley Road Bike Lanes Lane to Placerville Drive. Road 2021-2036 $150,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct a new 2-lane roadway connecting Ray Lawyer Drive Completion after ELD19407 Only El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Mallard Lane/Ray Lawyer Drive Extension Extension to Mallard Lane. 2036 $10,785,362 Install bike lanes on Middletown Road from Canal Street to Yes ELD19447 El Dorado City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Middletown Road Bike Lanes Cold Springs Road. Middletown Rd Canal St Cold Spring Rd 2021-2036 $300,000 Phase II - Construct an additional 50-car parking lot with Yes E- Transit Capital lighting landscaping, install public restrooms, and install the Completion by ELD16070 El Dorado City of Placerville (Minor) Mosquito Rd./ Clay St. Park & Bus El Dorado Trail facility 2020 $1,440,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after ELD19464 Only El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Mosquito Road Interchange New Interchange: Mosquito Road and US50 Interchange Mosquito Road 2036 $60,000,000 Hangtown Creek Bridge at Placerville Drive, 0.3 mi west of Yes B- Road & Highway Cold Springs Rd: Replace 2-lane bridge with a new 4-lane Completion by ELD19185 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Placerville Dr Bridge Widening bridge. 2020 $4,335,550 Install bike lanes on Placerville Drive from Green Valley Road Green Valley Yes ELD19455 El Dorado City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Placerville Drive Bike Lanes to Forni Road / US 50. Placerville Drive Road Forni Rd/US 50 2021-2036 $150,000 Widen Placerville Drive from Cold Springs Road to US 50 to Yes B- Road & Highway Placerville Drive Widening - Cold Springs Road accomodate 4 lanes of traffic, a dual left turn lane, sidewalks, ELD19408 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity to US 50 and bike lanes on both sides. Placerville Drive Cold Springs Rd US 50 2021-2036 $6,515,000 Widen Placerville Drive from Fair Lane to Ray Lawyer Drive to Yes B- Road & Highway Placerville Drive Widening - Fair Lane to Ray accomodate 4 lanes of traffic, a dual left turn lane, sidewalks, ELD19409 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Lawyer Drive and bike lanes on both sides. Placerville Drive Fair Lane Ray Lawyer Drive 2021-2036 $3,169,000 Widen Placerville Drive from Ray Lawyer Drive to Cold Springs Yes B- Road & Highway Placerville Drive Widening - Ray Lawyer Drive to Road to accomodate 4 lanes of traffic, a dual left turn lane, Ray Lawyer ELD19410 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Cold Springs Road sidewalks, and bike lanes on both sides. Placerville Drive Drive Cold Spring Rd 2021-2036 $10,352,000 Ray Lawyer Drive Extension East - Construct a new 2,500 ft. 2- Yes B- Road & Highway lane road to City collector street standards from Forni Road ELD19412 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Ray Lawyer Drive Extension East southeast to the City Limit (US 50 to Main Street) Forni Road city Limit 2021-2036 $8,122,000 Project Ray Lawyer Drive Extention West - Construct a new 2,500 ft. 2- Development B- Road & Highway lane road to City collector street standards form Forni Road Completion after Only ELD19413 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Ray Lawyer Drive Extention West southeast to the City Limit (Forni Road to the City Limit) Ray Lawyer Drive Forni Road City limit 2036 $16,046,000
Yes G- System Management, Completion by ELD19415 El Dorado City of Placerville Operations, and ITS Schnell School Road Traffic Signal Install traffic signal at Schnell School Road. 2020 $550,000 Install bike lanes on Upper Broadway from Schnell School Schnell School Yes ELD19465 El Dorado City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Upper Broadway Bike Lanes Road to Point View Drive. Upper Broadway Rd Point View Dr 2021-2036 $300,000 B- Road & Highway US 50 Broadway Eastbound Exit (#47) - Lengthen eastboud exit ramp of US 50 at Broadway (#47) and Yes ELD19417 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Signalization and ramp lengthening install traffic signal. US 50 2021-2036 $2,000,000 Project Widen Washington Street and Turner Street to City collector Development B- Road & Highway standards from Main Street to Cedar Ravine Road to create a Completion after ELD19466 Only El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Washington Street and Turner Street Widening parallel route to Cedar Ravine Road. 2036 $9,458,060 In Placerville: Construct a sidewalk along the north side of Fair Lane between the County Government Center and County Fair Plaza Commercial center. Widen and construct Yes Class II Bike Lanes on the same segment of Fair Lane in both directions. (ENV/ENGR included on ELD16060, Phase 1A) (Toll credits for ROW and CON) (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.03 Completion by ELD19358 El Dorado City of Placerville A- Bike & Ped Western Placerville Interchanges Phase 1B ROG, .01 NOx) 2020 $762,000
In Placerville: Phase 2 includes local road improvements to Ray Lawyer Drive and Forni Road and an eastbound US 50 offramp to Ray lawyer Drive. A Class I Bike path will be Yes constructed along Forni Road from Ray Lawyer Drive to the existing bike path on Forni Road. Sidewalks and Class II bike lanes will be constructed along Forni Road and Ray Lawyer B- Road & Highway Drive. (Toll Credits PE & CON)(Emission Benefits for sidewalks Completion by ELD19347 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Western Placerville Interchanges Phase 2 and Class I & II bike facilities in kg/day: 0.03 ROG, 0.02 NOx) 2020 $7,847,839
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 60 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Replacement and widening of the Forni Road/Placerville Drive US 50 Overcrossing, improved operations at the Forni Project Road/Placerville Drive/US 50 interchange, a westbound US 50 Development offramp and offramps at the existing Ray Lawyer Drive Only overcrossing, and an eastbound auxiliary lane between the B- Road & Highway Forni Road/Placerville Drive/ US 50 interchange and the Ray Completion after ELD19363 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Western Placerville Interchanges Phase 3 Lawyer Drive interchange. 2036 $23,374,018 Wiltse Road (Alt 1) Construct 400 feet of 2 lane roadway with Yes B- Road & Highway sidewalk, curb and ELD19387 El Dorado City of Placerville Capacity Wiltse Road gutter both sides. A new bridge over Hangtown Creek 2021-2036 $4,728,000 Create map for the area of El Dorado County from the Tahoe Yes Western El Dorado County Bicycle Travel Regional Planning Agency/EDCTC border along the Sierra Completion by ELD19383 El Dorado EDCTC A- Bike & Ped Opportunities Map Crest to the western El Dorado County line. 2020 $56,478
Alder Dr, over E.I.D. Canal, at Pony Exp Trail. Replace existing Yes C- Maintenance & functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. Completion by ELD19336 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Alder Dr/E.I.D. Canal Bridge Replacement Toll credits programmed for PE, R/W, & CON. (CIP77123) 2020 $2,236,000
Yes G- System Management, Perform roadway operational improvements on Bass Lake ELD19331 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Bass Lake Road Frontage Improvements Road constructed by Silver Springs development. (CIP66115) 2021-2036 $1,576,000 Widen and reconstruct Bass Lake Road from US 50 to Hollow Oak Road to 2-lane divided road with 4-foot shoulders and bicycle/pedestrian paths. Includes an 8-foot median, sidewalk and bike lane from Hollow Oak Road to US 50; median Yes improvements only from Hollow Oak Road to Serrano Parkway; improvements of park-and-ride lot with frontage B- Road & Highway road improvement to Old Bass Lake Road and Tierra de Dios. ELD19224 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Bass Lake Road Improvements - Phase 1A (CIP66109) Bass Lake Road US 50 Holllow Oak Road 2021-2036 $7,437,000 Widen Bass Lake Road from US 50 to Silver Springs Pkwy to Yes B- Road & Highway accomodate 4 lanes of traffic (divided), curb, gutter, and ELD19225 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Bass Lake Road Improvements - Phase 1B sidewalk. (See ELD19224 for Phase 1A) (CIP GP166) Bass Lake Road US 50 Silver Springs Pkwy 2021-2036 $15,385,000 Bass Lake Road, from the intersection of Old Sienna Ridge Yes C- Maintenance & Road to Parkdale Lane, approximately 2 miles long, 24 feet Completion by ELD19386 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Bass Lake Road Overlay wide: Overlay. (CIP 72189) (Toll Credits for PE & CON). 2020 $900,000 Bassi Rd, over Granite Creek, 0.3 mi N/W of Lotus Rd. Yes C- Maintenance & Replace this structurally deficient 1-lane bridge with a new 2- Add to RTP 2015- Completion by ELD19337 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Bassi Rd/Granite Creek Bridge Replacement lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, R/W, & CON.) (CIP77128) 2035 2020 $3,970,000 Blair Rd, over EID Canal, 0.7 mi N/O Pony Express Trail. Replace the existing 1 lane functionally obsolete bridge with a Yes C- Maintenance & new 2 lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, & CON) Add to Short Term Completion by ELD19341 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Blair Rd/EID Canal Bridge Replacement Various(CIP77119) locations in El Dorado County: Implement Bridge RTP 2015-2035 2020 $3,499,000 Preventive Maintenance Program. Locations: 1. Bayne Rd over Dutch Creek, 0.46 miles south of Mt Murphy Rd: Reinforce wingwall connection to abutment; remove and replace north abutment backfill. (CIP77132)2. Cosumnes Mine Rd over North Fork Cosumnes River, 4 miles north of Grizzly Flat Rd: Clean debris from abutments, joints, bearings, drains; Yes stabilize slope adjacent to abutment(s); replace deck boards. (CIP77133)3. Ice House Rd over Jones Fork Silver Creek, 12.8 miles north of US50: Replace with elastomeric bearing pads; remove and replace abutment backfill. (CIP77131)4. Mount Aukum Rd over North Fork Cosumnes River, 2.6 miles south C- Maintenance & of Pleasant Valley Rd: Replace joint seals; deck overlay; spot Completion by ELD19356 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program painting. (CIP77130) 2020 $1,634,454 Bucks Bar Rd over north fork of Cosumnes River, 1.2 miles Yes C- Maintenance & Bucks Bar Rd/North Fork Cosumnes River north of Mount Aukum Rd: Replace existing 1 lane bridge Completion by ELD19321 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Bridge Replacement with new 2 lane bridge, including approaches. (CIP77116) 2020 $7,806,940 Install bike lanes on entire length of Cameron Park Drive. Completion by Yes ELD19424 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Cameron Park Drive Bike Lanes (CIP72307) 2020 $162,000 Widen Cameron Park Drive from Durock Road to Coach Lane to 5-lanes: 2 northbound through lanes (with right and left turn pockets) and 3 southbound through lanes (with dual right turn lanes at Robin Lane). Project also includes median Yes and signal modification at Coach Lane intersection, realignment of Robin Lane intersection for future extension to Rodeo Drive and construction of a new traffic signal. (Needs B- Road & Highway Cameron Park Drive Widening - Durock to coordination with US 50/Cameron Park Drive Interchange Cameron Park ELD19243 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Coach (ELD19177/CIP72361). CIP72367 Drive Durock Rock Coach Lane 2021-2036 $7,338,000 Widen Cameron Park Drive to 4 lanes (divided) from Palmer Yes B- Road & Highway Cameron Park Drive Widening - Palmer Drive to Drive to Meder Road Includes a curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Cameron Park ELD15930 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Meder Road (CIP GP144) Drive Palmer Drive Meder Road 2021-2036 $12,520,000 Install bike lanes on Carson Road from Jacquier Road to Yes ELD19425 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Carson Road Bike Lanes Larsen Drive (on climbing shoulder). Carson Road Jacquier Road Larsen Drive 2021-2036 $787,500 Clear Creek Rd over Clear Creek, 0.25 mi east of Sly Park Rd.: Yes C- Maintenance & Clear Creek Rd/Clear Creek (0.25 mi E of Sly Replace 1-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (Toll Credits Completion by ELD19350 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Park Rd) Bridge Replacement for PE, ROW, & CON.) (CIP77139) 2020 $4,494,000 Clear Creek Rd over Clear Creek, 1.82 miles east of Sly Park Yes C- Maintenance & Clear Creek Rd/Clear Creek (1.82 mi E of Sly Rd.: Replace 1-lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. Toll Completion by ELD19351 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Park Rd) Bridge Replacement credits for PE, ROW, & CON. (CIP77138) 2020 $4,106,500 ELD19426 Yes El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Coach Lane Bike Lanes Install bike lanes on entire length of Coach Lane. Coach Lane 2021-2036 $131,250 Cold Springs Rd at Mt. Shasta Ln-Realign/superelevate curve between MP 3.4 and MP 3.55, widen roadway, add Yes shoulders, drainage improvements, and add flashing beacon G- System Management, warning signs. Coordinates with ELD19344. (CIP73360) (HSIP3- Completion by ELD19308 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Cold Springs Rd at Mt. Shasta Ln - Realignment 03-008) 2020 $1,147,447 Cold Springs Rd from Fox Print Ct to Skyview Ln: Modify super- elevation, widen southbound right shoulder, install traffic Yes Cold Springs Rd Safety Improvements - Fox warning signage and re-stripe roadway. Coordinates with Completion by ELD19344 El Dorado El Dorado County D- Programs & Planning Print Ct to Skyview Ln ELD19308. (CIP73360) HSIP4-03-008 2020 $764,965 Install bicycle route signs and markings on entire length of Yes ELD19427 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Commerce Way Bike Route Commerce Way. 2021-2036 $1,000 Phase 1: Install bike lanes on Country Club Drive from Bass Yes ELD19429 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Country Club Drive Bike Lanes Lake Road to Cambridge Road Country Club Drive Bass Lake Rd Cambridge Road 2021-2036 $350,000 Construct 2-lane extension of Country Club Drive from Bass Lake Road to Silver Dove Road. Roadway includes 6-foot Yes B- Road & Highway Country Club Drive Extension - Bass Lake Road paved shoulders and new intersection at Bass Lake Road. ELD19227 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity to Silver Dove Road (Curb, gutter and sidewalk may be included.) CIP#GP124 Country Club Drive Bass Lake Rd Silver Dove Rd 2021-2036 $1,121,000 Construct new 2-lane extension of Country Club Drive from Silver Dove Road to the west end of Bass Lake Hills Specific Yes Plan boundary for future connection to Silva Valley Parkway. Bass Lake Hills B- Road & Highway Country Club Drive Extension - Silver Dove to Project includes 6-foot paved shoulders. (Curb, gutter and Silver Dove specific plan ELD19228 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity west end Bass Lake Hills sidewalk may be included). CIP#GP125 Country Club Drive Road boundary 2021-2036 $5,413,000 Realign Country Club Drive from Bass Lake Road to the east end of Bass Lake Hills Specific Plan boundary. Includes east end of Bass Lake Yes B- Road & Highway Country Club Drive Realignment - Bass Lake constructing a 2-lane road with 6-foot paved shoulders. Hills specific plan ELD19229 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Road to east end Bass Lake Hills (Curb, gutter and sidewalk may be included.) CIP#GP126 Country Club Drive Bass Lake Rd boundary 2021-2036 $5,043,000 Realign SR-49/Diamond Rd from Pleasant Valley Rd to north of Lime Kiln Rd; Improvements include: two 12-ft lanes and 8- ft shoulders, signal modification at Pleasant Valley Rd/SR-49 Yes intersection, residential frontage road, and potential B- Road & Highway Diamond Springs Pkwy - Phase 1A (SR-49 underground utility district. Phase 1A was split from Phase 1 Completion by ELD19348 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Realignment) (CIP72334/ELD15990) which is now Phase 1B. (CIP72375) 2020 $7,813,100 Construct new 2-lane divided arterial roadway from Missouri Flat Rd east of Golden Center Dr to a new T-intersection with SR-49 south of Bradley Dr; includes planning, environmental Yes clearance, grading and right of way for the ultimate 4-lane road, required improvements to SR-49 and three new signals. B- Road & Highway See ELD19348/CIP72375 for Phase 1A and ELD15990 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Diamond Springs Pkwy - Phase 1B ELD19203/CIP72368 for Phase 2. (CIP72334) 2021-2036 $28,638,000 ELD19430 Yes El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Durock Road Bike Lanes Install bike lanes on entire length of Durock Road. Durock Road 2021-2036 $350,000 Widening Durock Road from Robin Lane to South Shingle Yes B- Road & Highway Road. Work includes widening the roadway to accommodate ELD19393 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Durock Road Widening a two-way left turn pocket (CIP GP171) Durock Road Robin Lane South Shingle Road 2021-2036 $7,210,000 Install electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure to support Yes E- Transit Capital El Dorado County Fleet Electrification - EV new vehicles (purchased in ELD19382) at their respective Completion by ELD19385 El Dorado El Dorado County (Minor) Infrastructure County facilities. 2020 $55,735 Pay for the incremental cost difference between a plug-in electric (PEV) or plug-in electric gasoline hybrid vehicle and its gasoline-powered version for the El Dorado County Fleet new Yes vehicle purchases. (ELD19385 is the installation of electric E- Transit Capital vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure to support the new Completion by ELD19382 El Dorado El Dorado County (Minor) El Dorado County Fleet Electrification/Hybrid vehicles). 2020 $222,940 Realign existing El Dorado Hills Boulevard / Francisco Drive / Brittany Way intersection and approach roadways to result in a new 4-way intersection with extensions and signal installation. Northern portion of El Dorado Hills Boulevard (at Yes this intersection) will become new minor traffic way, and current Francisco Drive between El Dorado Hills Boulevard B- Road & Highway El Dorado Hills Boulevard / Francisco Drive - and Green Valley Road will become new major traffic way. ELD19168 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Realignment CIP72332 2021-2036 $9,452,000 Widen El Dorado Hills Boulevard from Lassen Lane to Park Drive from 4 to 5 lanes (divided) by adding a third Yes B- Road & Highway El Dorado Hills Boulevard Widening - Lassen southbound lane. Project includes curb, gutter and sidewalk. El Dorado Hills ELD15960 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Lane to Park Drive CIP#GP183 Blvd Lassen Lane Park Drive 2021-2036 $1,096,000 Construct a Class I bike path from Los Trampas Drive to Yes ELD19432 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped El Dorado Trail Halcon Road. Los Trampas Dr Halcon Rd 2021-2036 $500,000 Construct a multi-use bike and ped over-crossing structure with a 12 to 14 foot wide concrete deck on the El Dorado Trail Yes over Missouri Flat Road. (Emission benefits in kg/day: 0.07 El Dorado Trail - Missouri Flat Road ROG, 0.04 NOx, 0.02 PM10)(CIP #97015) (Toll Credits for PE, Completion by ELD19380 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Bike/Pedestrian Overcrossing ROW) 2020 $2,705,000 El Dorado Trail, from Los Trampas Dr to Halcon Rd: Extend trail approx. 5,800 ft. Improvements include: asphalt paving of 8-ft wide Class I bike path with 2-ft wide graded shoulders, Yes and grading of an approx. 6-ft wide multi-use trail adjacent to El Dorado Trail Ext. - Los Trampas Dr to Halcon the bike path, where feasible. (CIP#97012) (Emission Benefits Completion by ELD19364 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Rd in kg/day: 0.01 ROG) 2020 $1,013,248 El Dorado Trail Ext. - Missouri Flat Rd Construct a bicycle/pedestrian overcrossing as part of the El Completion by Yes ELD19394 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Bike/Pedestrian Overcrossing Dorado Trail at Missouri Flat Road (CIP97015) 2020 $2,705,000 El Dorado Trail, from Missouri Flat Rd to El Dorado Rd: Construct Class I multi-use bike/ped path, approximately 2.54 miles. Improvements include: 10-foot wide paved path, Yes signage, roadway crossing at Forni/Blanchard Rds, and unpaved nature trail adjacent to the bike path. (Toll credits El Dorado Trail Ext. - Missouri Flat Rd to El for PE & ROW) (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.05 ROG, 0.03 Completion by ELD19371 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Dorado Rd NOx, 0.01 PM 10) 2020 $4,210,000 Install bicycle route signs and markings on entire length of Yes ELD19433 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Enterprise Drive Bike Route Enterprise Drive. 2021-2036 $1,000 Install bicycle route signs and markings on Gold Hill Road Yes ELD19434 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Gold Hill Road Bike Route from State Route 49 to Lotus Road. 2021-2036 $4,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 61 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars)
Yes B- Road & Highway Green Valley Rd Widening - Francisco to Salmon Widen Green Valley Rd from Francisco Dr to Salmon Falls Rd ELD19253 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Falls to 4-lanes divided with curb, gutter and sidewalk. CIP#GP178 Green Valley Rd Francisco Dr Salmon Falls Rd 2021-2036 $1,898,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from Salmon Falls Rd. east to Deer Valley Rd. Completion after ELD15970 Only El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Green Valley Rd. (CIP GP 159) Green Valley Rd Salmon Falls Rd Deer Valley Rd 2036 $12,578,000 Green Valley Rd, over Indian Creek, 0.9 miles north of Yes C- Maintenance & Green Valley Rd/Indian Creek Bridge Greenstone Rd. Rehabilitate the existing 2 lane functionally Completion by ELD19335 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Replacement obsolete bridge.(CIP77127) 2020 $4,415,000 Green Valley Rd over Mound Springs Creek, 0.8 miles west of Yes C- Maintenance & Green Valley Rd/Mound Springs Creek Bridge Missouri Flat Rd. Rehabilitate functionally obsolete 2-lane Completion by ELD19353 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Rehabilitation bridge. No added lane capacity. (CIP77136) 2020 $4,414,500 Green Valley Rd, over Weber Creek, 0.7 miles west of Placerville Dr.: Replace existing structurally deficient 2 lane Yes bridge with new 2 lane bridge bridge. Widen and realign C- Maintenance & Green Valley Rd/Weber Creek Bridge Green Valley Rd at bridge approaches, and drainage Completion by ELD19326 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Replacement improvements. (CIP77114) 2020 $11,126,000 Widen Green Valley Road from Deer Valley Road to Lotus Yes B- Road & Highway Green Valley Road Widening - Deer Valley Road Road to two 12-foot lanes with paved shoulders. Project ELD19233 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity to Lotus Road includes adding six left-turn pockets. CIP#GP179 Green Valley Rd Deer Valley Rd Lotus Road 2021-2036 $4,784,000
Yes G- System Management, Green Valley Road/Deer Valley Intersection Green Valley Road/Deer Valley Intersection Improvements Completion by ELD19390 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Improvements (CIP76114) 2020 $1,209,000 Greenstone Rd over Slate Creek, 0.5 miles north of Mother Yes C- Maintenance & Lode Rd.: Replace existing 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane Completion by ELD19354 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Greenstone Rd/Slate Creek Bridge Replacement bridge. Toll credits for PE, ROW, & CON. (CIP77137) 2020 $3,436,500 Hanks Exchange Rd over Squaw Hollow Creek, 0.4 miles south of Pleasant Valley Rd.: Replace existing 1-lane bridge with Yes C- Maintenance & Hanks Exchange Rd/Squaw Hollow Creek Bridge new 2-lane bridge. Toll credits for PE, ROW, & CON. Completion by ELD19352 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Replacement (CIP77135) 2020 $3,836,000 Hazel Valley Rd, over E.I.D Canal, 0.8 miles southeast of SR50: Replace functionally obsolete 1 lane bridge with a new 2 lane Yes C- Maintenance & bridge. Toll credits programmed for PE, ROW, & CON. Completion by ELD19342 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Hazel Valley Rd/EID Canal Bridge Replacement (CIP77125) 2020 $2,534,000 Construct new 2-lane arterial with median extension of Yes B- Road & Highway Headington Rd from Missouri Flat Rd to El Dorado Rd. Does ELD19245 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Headington Rd Ext - Missouri Flat to El Dorado not include curb, gutter or sidewalk. (CIP71375) 2021-2036 $10,417,000 Minor ITS Improvement: Deployment of various ITS improvements along U.S. 50 and regionally significant Yes corridors in the County. Includes: implementation of ITS G- System Management, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) projects listed and prioritized in El Dorado County. (See ELD19240 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Improvements (Phase 2) ELD19239 for Phase 1) 2021-2036 $5,000,000 Identification of various Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) improvements along US 50 and regionally significant corridors in the County; projects may include upgrading all Yes controllers, building the communications infrastructure, G- System Management, adding CCTVs, adding DMS, connecting all the signals. (See ELD19239 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS ITS Improvements - Phase 1 ELD19240/CIP#GP168 for Phase 2) CIP31202 2021-2036 $5,833,200 Placerville City Yes ELD19438 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Jacquier Road Bike Lanes Placerville City limit to Carson Road Jacquier Road limit Carson Road 2021-2036 $175,000 Widen Latrobe Rd from Golden Foothill Pkwy (south end) to Investment Blvd from 2-lanes undivided to 4-lanes divided Yes B- Road & Highway Latrobe Rd Widening - Golden Foothill to with curb, gutter, and Class II bike lanes; modify signal at Golden ELD19236 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Investment Investment Blvd. CIP72350 Latrobe Rd Foothills Pkwy Investment Blvd 2021-2036 $3,516,000 B- Road & Highway Widen: 6 lanes (divided with 4-foot shoulders) from White Carlson Creek (Sunset Yes ELD19237 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Latrobe Rd. Rock Rd. to Carson Creek (Suncast Ln.) (CIP GP154) Latrobe Rd White Rock Rd. Ln.) 2021-2036 $8,987,000 New connector road from the El Dorado Hills Business Park to White Rock Rd west of Four Seasons/Stonebriar intersection; Initial work to perform route alignment study and prepare Yes PSR; Subsequent work will include environmental, design and construction; may require coordination with Sacramento B- Road & Highway Latrobe Rd/White Rock Rd Connector (New County, City of Folsom, Southeast Connector JPA and area Latrobe Rd/White El Dorado Hills ELD19232 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Road) developers. (CIP66116) Rock Rd Connector Business Park White Rock Rd 2021-2036 $19,445,000 Investment Yes ELD19439 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Latrobe Road Bike Lanes Investment Boulevard to Deer Creek/SPTC Latrobe Road Blvd Deer Creek/SPTC 2021-2036 $525,000 Golden Hill Yes ELD19440 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Lotus Road Bike Lanes Phase 1: Gold Hill Road to SR 49 Lotus Road Road SR 49 2021-2036 $525,000 Class II bike lanes from the top of Prospectors Road to Black Yes ELD19444 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Marshall Road Bike Lanes Oak Mine Road 2021-2036 $525,000 Class III Bike Route on Marshall Road from Black Oak Mine Black Oak Mine Yes ELD19445 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Marshall Road Bike Route Road to SR 193 Marshall Road Rd SR 193 2021-2036 $20,000 Cameron Park Yes ELD19446 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Meder Road Bike Lanes Phase 1: Cameron Park Drive to Paloran Court Meder Road Dr Paloran Court 2021-2036 $175,000 Roadway Safety Improvements: Construction/reconstruction of metal beam guardrail at various locations throughout the Yes G- System Management, Metal Beam Guardrail Installation - Various County. Federally funded (HSIP & RSTP) programs. (CIP ELD19333 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Locations OP005) 2021-2036 $672,000 Add two-way left-turn lane on Missouri Flat Rd from El Yes B- Road & Highway Missouri Flat Rd - Turn Lane, El Dorado to Dorado Rd to Headington Rd. No curb, gutter or sidewalk. ELD19194 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Headington CIP#GP163 Missouri Flat Rd El Dorado Rd Headington Rd 2021-2036 $1,202,000 B- Road & Highway Missouri Flat Rd Widening, Headington to Add 1 lane in each direction with a raised median (CIP GP Yes ELD19396 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Prospector's Plaza 165) Missouri Flat Road 2021-2036 $1,299,000 Phase 1: Campus Drive to existing Class II on the south side of Yes ELD19448 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Missouri Flat Road Bike Lanes US 50 Missouri Flat Road Campus Drive 2021-2036 $350,000 Golden Center Yes Phase 2: Golden Center Drive near Wal-Mart to Pleasant Drive near ELD19449 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Missouri Flat Road Bike Lanes Valley Road Missouri Flat Road WalMart Pleasant Valley Road 2021-2036 $175,000 Mosquito Rd, over South Fork American River, 5.7 miles north of US 50: Replace existing structurally deficient 1 lane bridge Yes C- Maintenance & Mosquito Rd/South Fork American River Bridge with new 2 lane bridge. (Toll credits programmed for PE, Completion by ELD19340 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Replacement ROW, & CON. CIP77126.) 2020 $32,585,000 Mother Lode Dr, Greenstone to Pleasant Valley: Add two-way Yes G- System Management, Mother Lode Dr Turn Lane, Greenstone to left-turn lane and widen road to accommodate the turn lane. ELD19238 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Pleasant Valley No curb, gutter or sidewalk. CIP#GP155 Mother Lode Dr Greenstone Rd. Placer Valley 2021-2036 $3,893,000 Reconfigure existing "Y" all-way stop to a signalized "T" Yes B- Road & Highway Mother Lode Dr/Pleasant Valley Rd - intersection including turn pockets and shoulder ELD19241 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Signalization improvements. CIP73307 2021-2036 $7,782,300 Missouri Flat Yes ELD19451 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Mother Lode Drive Bike Lanes Phase 1: Missouri Flat Road to Lindberg Ave Mother Lode Drive Rd Lindberg Ave 2021-2036 $175,000 Mt Murphy Rd, over South Fork American River, 0.1 mile east of SR49. Replace existing 1 lane truss bridge with new 2 lane Yes C- Maintenance & Mt. Murphy Rd/South Fork American River bridge. Toll credits programmed for PE, ROW, and CON. Completion by ELD19339 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Bridge Replacement (CIP77129) 2020 $20,550,000
Construct 1,233-feet of Class I bike path within the El Dorado Hills CSD property from the west end of the New York Creek Trail East - Phase 1 project to Stephen Harris Park. Yes Improvements include an 8-foot wide Class I bike path with 2- foot wide shoulders and a 12-foot wide prefabricated bridge over New York Creek. (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, and CON. Completion by ELD19375 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped New York Creek Trail East - Phase 2 Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.02 ROG, 0.01 NOx) 2020 $1,000,000 Newtown Rd., Over S Fork Weber Cr., 0.7Mi W Of Snows Rd. Yes C- Maintenance & Newtown Rd/South Fork Weber Creek - Bridge Rehabilitate existing 2 lane bridge. No added lane capacity. Completion by ELD19322 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Rehab CIP77122 2020 $5,569,000 Oak Hill Rd over Squaw Hollow Creek, 0.6 miles south of Yes C- Maintenance & Oak Hill Rd/Squaw Hollow Creek Bridge Pleasant Valley Rd: Replace existing 2 lane bridge with new 2 Completion by ELD19355 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Replacement lane bridge. Toll credits for PE, ROW, & CON. (CIP77134) 2020 $3,877,000 Phase 1: EDH to Bass Lake Connection. Between gates, using Yes Old Bass Lake Rd – EDH to Bass Lake existing roadway as Class I path from Tong Road to Old Bass ELD19452 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Connection Lake Road. 2021-2036 $200,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Palmer Dr/Wild Chaparral Dr - New Connector Construct new 2-lane undivided road connecting Palmer Dr to Completion after ELD15570 Only El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Rd Wild Chaparral Dr. Future CIP project. Palmer Drve Wild Chaparral Dr 2036 $9,700,000 ELD19453 Yes El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Palmer Drive Bike Lanes Add bike lanes along full length of Palmer Drive Palmer Drive 2021-2036 $87,500 Wild Chaparral Yes ELD19454 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Palmer Drive Bike Path Connection From Wild Chaparral Drive to Palmer Drive Palmer Drive Dr Palmer Drive 2021-2036 $200,000
Yes G- System Management, Signalize intersection including channelization and Completion by ELD19188 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Pleasant Valley Rd (SR-49)/Patterson Dr - Signal construction of associated improvements. (CIP73320) 2020 $4,738,936
Yes G- System Management, Pleasant Valley Rd Widening - Big Cut to Cedar Widen Pleasant Valley Rd from Big Cut Rd to Cedar Ravine Rd Pleasant Valley ELD19249 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Ravine to accommodate seven left-turn pockets. CIP#GP174 Road Big Cut Rd Cedar Ravine Rd 2021-2036 $2,291,000 Widen Pleasant Valley Rd from El Dorado Rd to SR 49 to Yes B- Road & Highway Pleasant Valley Rd Widening - El Dorado to SR accommodate 0.25 mile two-way left-turn lane at west end Pleasant Valley ELD16000 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity 49 and widen shoulders. CIP#GP160 Road El Dorado Rd SR 49 2021-2036 $1,099,000 Widen Pleasant Valley Rd from Pearl Pl (east of SR 49) to Big Cut Rd in Diamond Springs to accommodate three left-turn Yes G- System Management, pockets, 0.5 miles of 2-way left-turn lane, and shoulder Pleasant Valley ELD19248 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Pleasant Valley Rd Widening - Pearl to Big Cut widening. CIP#GP173 Road Pearl Pl Big Cut Road 2021-2036 $2,710,000 Intersection and roadway alignment improvements, widen Yes G- System Management, Pleasant Valley Rd/Oak Hill Rd - Intersection shoulders on north side and additional turn lanes. (CIP73358) Completion by ELD19192 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Improvements (HSIP2-03-018) 2020 $1,178,996 Pleasant Valley Yes ELD19456 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Pleasant Valley Road Bike Lanes Phase 1: Big Cut Road to Missouri Flat Road Road Big Cut Rd Missouri Flat Rd 2021-2036 $350,000 Pleasant Valley Missouri Flat Yes ELD19457 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Pleasant Valley Road Bike Lanes Phase 2: Missouri Flat Road to Mother Lode Drive Road Rd Mother Lode Drive 2021-2036 $525,000 Pleasant Valley Yes ELD19458 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Pleasant Valley Road Bike Lanes Big Cut Road to Sly Park Road Road But Cut Road Sly Park Road 2021-2036 $1,575,000 Widen Ponderosa Rd from N. Shingle Rd to Meder Rd to Yes G- System Management, accommodate four left-turn pockets and 0.3 miles of dual left- ELD19250 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Ponderosa Rd Widening - N. Shingle to Meder turn lane; shoulder repair and widening. CIP#GP175 Ponderosa Rd N. Shingle Rd Meder Rd 2021-2036 $2,798,000 ELD19459 Yes El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Ponderosa Road Bike Lanes US 50 to Meder Road Ponderosa Road US 50 Meder Road 2021-2036 $131,250 ELD19460 Yes El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Prospectors Road Class III Bike Route Class III bike route on the entire length of Prospectors Road Prospectors Rd 2021-2036 $12,500 Realign curves between MP 7.79 and 7.89 (south of private road Glenesk Ln), widen roadway, add shoulders, Yes superelevate curve, drainage improvements, add flashing G- System Management, Salmon Falls Rd south of Glenesk Ln beacon warning signs and rumble strips. (CIP73362) (HSIP3- Completion by ELD19309 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Realignment 03-009) 2020 $1,336,111 Class II Bike Lanes included in extension of Saratoga Way from Finders Way to County Line. (alternatively construct a Yes Class I bike path prior to consturction of extension of ELD19462 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Saratoga Way Extension – Class II Bike Lanes Saratoga Way to Iron Point Road) Saratoga Way Finders Way County line 2021-2036 $75,000 Construct new 2-lane arterial to extend Saratoga Wy from current terminus near Finders Wy to Sacramento County Line; includes median, 6-ft shoulders, right-turn pocket onto Yes Finders Way, asphalt path, drainage system, environmental clearance and secure ROW for future 4-lane road from County B- Road & Highway Line to El Dorado Hills Blvd. (Phase 2 CIP#GP147-See ELD16010 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Saratoga Wy Ext - Phase 1 ELD19234 in MTP.) CIP71324 2021-2036 $11,541,350
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 62 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Widen: 4 lanes from the Sacramento/El Dorado County line to Sacramento/El Yes B- Road & Highway El Dorado Hills Blvd. Includes: full curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Dorado County ELD19234 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Saratoga Wy. (Phase 2) (See ELD16010 for Phase 1) (CIP GP147) Saratoga Wy line El Dorado Hilld Blvd 2021-2036 $4,640,000
Silva Valley Pkwy, from Harvard Wy to Green Valley Rd: Design and construct approx. 1.1 mi Class I bike path from Harvard Wy to Appian Wy; Also design and construct approx. Yes 0.9 mi Class II bike lane on both sides of Silva Valley Pkwy from Appian Wy to Green Valley Rd, and on SB side only from Silva Valley Pkwy Class I/II Bike Path - Harvard Appian Wy to Harvard Wy. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, & CON) Completion by ELD19372 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Wy to Green Valley Rd (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.02 ROG, 0.01 NOx) 2020 $1,678,000
Yes G- System Management, Silva Valley Pkwy/Golden Eagle Ln - Signalize intersection at Silva Valley Pkwy and Golden Eagle Ln ELD19255 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Signalization (Silva Valley Elem School). CIP#GP182 2021-2036 $768,000 Silver Fork Rd over South Fork American River , 0.1 miles southeast of US 50: Rehabilitate existing 2 lane bridge. No Yes C- Maintenance & Silver Fork Rd/South Fork American River added lane capacity. 11/2/2010: Toll credits programmed for Completion by ELD19338 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Bridge Rehab PE, R/W, & CON. (CIP 77124) 2020 $3,158,000 It is anticipated that Silver Springs Parkway will be built as a two-lane standard divided roadway with shoulders. It is planned to realign Bass Lake Road south of Green Valley Road through the proposed Silver Springs subdivision, which is west of the existing Bass Lake Road. The new road is named Yes Silver Springs Parkway. That development is responsible for building Silver Springs Parkway through their development. There is a portion of the new alignment that falls to the south of the Silver Springs development that must also be built to B- Road & Highway connect the new road to the existing Bass Lake Road to the ELD19431 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Silver Springs Parkway to Bass Lake Road south. 2021-2036 $6,373,773 Construct new 2-lane divided road to Bass Lake Rd; includes Yes B- Road & Highway Silver Springs Pkwy to Bass Lake Rd (South median, curb, gutter, sidewalk, shoulders, and bike lanes. Completion by ELD19222 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Segment) Coordinates with ELD19221/CIP76107 (CIP76108) 2020 $8,605,534 Sly Park Rd., Over Clear Creek, 1.1 Miles East of Pleasant Yes C- Maintenance & Valley Rd. Replace the existing functionally obsolete 2 lane Completion by ELD19325 El Dorado El Dorado County Rehabilitation Sly Park Rd/Clear Creek - Bridge Replacement bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. CIP77115 2020 $6,440,497 Class I Bike Path from Missouri Flat Road to Mother Lode Missouri Flat Yes ELD19463 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped SPTC/El Dorado Trail Drive in El Dorado Rd Mother Lode Drive 2021-2036 $2,400,000 Project Development G- System Management, Completion after ELD19437 Only El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS SR 49 Realignment SR 49 Realignment 2036 $28,800,000 B- Road & Highway State Route 49 Passing Lanes from SR193 (in Cool) to the Yes ELD19494 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity State Route 49 Passing Lanes northern County Line 2021-2036 $3,482,000
Yes G- System Management, State Route 49 Widening from Pleasant Valley Road to ELD19495 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS State Route 49 Shoulder Widening Missouri Flat Road 2021-2036 $7,879,000
Add Auxiliary Lane: WB on US 50 between Bass Lake Rd. and Yes B- Road & Highway Cambridge Rd. interchanges. Includes: additional ramp, road ELD19217 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity U.S. 50 / Bass Lake Rd. (Phase 2) widening. (Phase 2) (See ELD19182 for Phase 1) (CIP GP148) WB US 50 Bass Lake Rd Cambridge Road 2021-2036 $19,063,000
Widen US 50 and add auxiliary lane to westbound US 50 connecting the El Dorado Hills Blvd/Latrobe Rd Interchange to the future Empire Ranch Rd Interchange located in the City of Yes Folsom; (City of Folsom will construct the EB aux lane.) Timing of construction to be concurrent with or after the El Dorado Hills Blvd Interchange (ELD15630/CIP71323) or Empire Ranch B- Road & Highway US 50 Aux Lane WB - El Dorado Hills to Empire Interchange. CEQA/NEPA cleared through the Empire Ranch ELD19273 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Ranch Interchange environmental document. CIP53115 US 50 2021-2036 $3,688,300 B- Road & Highway US 50 Auxiliary Lane Eastbound - Cambridge to Construct eastbound auxiliary lane on US50 between Cambridge Ponderosa Rd. Yes ELD19219 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Ponderosa Cambridge Rd and Ponderosa Rd interchanges. CIPGP150. US 50 Road interchanges 2021-2036 $14,550,000 Study to identify and analyze alternatives to improve access and reduce accidents at US 50 and Camino Rd. EDCTC is lead Yes agency on study. This project is EDCDOT's contribution to the US 50 Camino Area Parallel Capacity/Safety study. Preferred alternative to be implemented in project ELD19210 El Dorado El Dorado County D- Programs & Planning Study CAL18190. CIP71319 2021-2036 $2,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway HOV Lanes - Phase 3: US 50-Ponderosa Road to Greenstone Completion after ELD19406 Only El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity US 50 HOV Lanes Road (CIP53116) U.S. 50 Greenstone Rd. Ponderosa Rd. 2036 $34,730,208 Phase 2B (Cameron Park Dr to Ponderosa Rd) - Add HOV lanes in median of US50 between Cameron Park Dr and Ponderosa Rd Interchanges. PA&ED completed by Caltrans. Caltrans advancing project design through Cooperative Agreement Project with the County. Intergovernmental Agreement between the Development County and Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians for Only funding (coded as Local Agency Funds). (See ELD19211/CIP53110 for Phase 1, ELD19287/CIP53113 for B- Road & Highway Phase 2A and ELD19289/CIP53116 for future unfunded Phase Cameron Park Completion after ELD19290 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity US 50 HOV Lanes - Phase 2B 3 in MTP). CIP53122 US 50 Dr Ponderosa Rd. 2036 $22,637,000 Construct new westbound aux lane within median of US 50 between Silva Valley Pkwy and Empire Ranch Rd future new interchanges; requires coordination with Silva Valley I/C Yes (ELD15610/CIP71328), El Dorado Hills I/C B- Road & Highway (ELD15630/CIP71323) and Empire Ranch I/C (City of Folsom Silva Valley ELD19215 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity US 50 Mainline Widening at El Dorado Hills project). CIP53120 US 50 Pkwy Empire Ranch Rd 2021-2036 $2,161,000 Interchange Improvements: this phase includes detailed study to determine complete improvements needed; Phase 1 may include ramp widening, road widening, signals, and WB Yes auxiliary lane between Bass Lake and Silva Valley B- Road & Highway interchanges; Phase 1 assumes bridge replacement. (See ELD19182 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity US 50/Bass Lake Rd Interchange - Phase 1 ELD19217 for Phase 2) CIP71330 2021-2036 $16,532,000 Interchange Improvements: this phase includes widening existing EB and WB on-/off-ramps; addition of new WB on- Project ramp; reconstruction of local intersections; and installation of Development traffic signals at EB and WB ramp terminal intersections; Only B- Road & Highway preliminary engineering for Phase 2 to be performed under Completion after ELD19181 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity US 50/Cambridge Rd Interchange - Phase 1 Phase 1. (See ELD19218/GP149 for Phase 2) CIP#71332 US 50 2036 $7,843,000 Phase 2 Improvements to Cambridge Road Interchange. Phase 2 project consists of bridge widening to add lanes, Project widen ramps, and construct WB auxiliary lane from the Bass Development Lake Road Interchange to Cambridge Road Interchange. Only B- Road & Highway Preliminary engineering for Phase 2 to be performed with Completion after ELD19397 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity US 50/Cambridge Rd Interchange - Phase 2 Phase I project (ELD19181/71332). CIP #GP149 2036 $11,935,000
Interchange Improvements: this project includes detailed Project study to identify capacity improvements alternatives and Development selection of preferred alternative; assumes reconstruction of Only B- Road & Highway US 50/Cameron Park Dr Interchange existing US50 bridges to widen Cameron Park Dr to 8 lanes Completion after ELD19177 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Improvements under the overcrossing; road and ramp widenings. (CIP72361) 2036 $47,625,800 Reconstruct eastbound diagonal on-ramp and eastbound loop off-ramp for the ultimate configuration; add a lane to northbound El Dorado Hills Blvd under the overpass Yes (eliminates merge lane and improves traffic flow from the eastbound loop off-ramp); eastbound diagonal on-ramp will G- System Management, US 50/El Dorado Hills Blvd Interchange be metered and have an HOV bypass. Project split from ELD19345 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Eastbound Ramps ELD15630(CIP71323). 2021-2036 $5,904,400 Construct ped/bike overcrossing over US 50 just east of El Dorado Hills Blvd Interchange; includes a Class 3 mixed-use path; Construction and ROW acquisition for 10-ft wide Yes sidewalk and adjacent retaining walls, barriers, railings and US 50/El Dorado Hills Blvd Pedestrian landscape replacement included with CIP71323/ELD15630. ELD19173 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped Overcrossing (CIP71340) 2021-2036 $6,783,000 Interchange Improvements: includes signalization and Yes B- Road & Highway widening of existing ramps. (See ELD19272 for Phase 2). ELD19178 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity US 50/El Dorado Rd Interchange - Phase 1 CIP71347 2021-2036 $3,538,500 Interchange Improvements: this phase involves construction of left and right turn lanes and additional through traffic Yes lanes in all approaches to the interchange. (See B- Road & Highway ELD19178/CIP71347 for Phase 1). CIP71376 (Except for ELD19272 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity US 50/El Dorado Rd Interchange - Phase 2 Eastbound Loop Off/Eastbound On two lanes) 2021-2036 $5,870,000 Phase 1B2 is the second phase of the Class 1 bike path and pedestrian facility between Missouri Flat Road and Placerville Drive. The Phase 1B2 project will construct the bike and Yes pedestrian facility portion between Weber Creek Bridge and Placerville Drive overcrossing, and will include additional Completion by ELD19392 El Dorado El Dorado County A- Bike & Ped US 50/Missouri Flat Rd Interchange - Phase 1B2 safety enhancements. (CIP 71359) 2020 $1,452,300 Phase 1C (Riparian Restoration) is 3rd/final phase to construct Phase 1 option addressed in FEIR for "US 50/Missouri Flat Road Interchange" project; include design, specs, implementation plan, maintenance plan, maintenance Yes requirements and monitoring program for restoration of native riparian vegetation and trees that are or have been removed as part of the overall Phase 1 project construction. G- System Management, See ELD15690/CIP671317 for Phase 1A and Completion by ELD19295 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS US 50/Missouri Flat Rd Interchange - Phase 1C ELD19193/CIP71336 for Phase 1B. (CIP71346) 2020 $1,768,200 Realign approx. 1/4 mile of Durock Rd to Sunset Ln and signalize new intersection. Durock Rd will be two through lanes with turn pockets at the intersection and center turn Yes lane. PE for this phase included in ELD19180/CIP7133. G- System Management, US 50/Ponderosa Rd Interchange - Durock Rd Coordinates with ELD19170/CIP71339 and ELD19244 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Realignment ELD19180/CIP71333. (CIP71338) 2021-2036 $7,152,000 Realign approx. 1/4 mile of N. Shingle Rd about 600 ft north at Ponderosa Rd; realign WB off-ramp to align with Wild Chaparral Dr; and signalize the new intersection. Realigned N. Yes Shingle Rd will be two through lanes with turn pockets at the intersection. PE for this phase included in G- System Management, US 50/Ponderosa Rd Interchange - N. Shingle CIP71333/ELD19180. Coordinates with CIP71338/ELD19244, ELD19170 El Dorado El Dorado County Operations, and ITS Rd Realignment CIP71333/ELD19180 and CIP#GP150/ELD19219. (CIP71339) 2021-2036 $5,020,000 Interchange Improvements: includes detailed study to identify alternatives and select preferred alternative; widening existing US 50 overcrossing to accommodate 5 lanes, and realignment of WB loop on-ramp, ramp widenings, and Yes widening of Ponderosa Rd, Mother Lode Dr, and So. Shingle Rd; includes PE for all phases; (See ELD19170/CIP71339 and ELD19244/CIP71338). Coordinates with ELD19289/CIP53116, B- Road & Highway US 50/Ponderosa Rd/So. Shingle Rd ELD19219/CIP#GP150, ELD19246/CIPGP171, and ELD19180 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity Interchange Improvements ELD19250/CIP#GP175. (CIP71333) 2021-2036 $16,307,000 New Interchange: Phase 1 includes US 50 on-/off-ramps, Yes B- Road & Highway overcrossing, and US 50 aux lanes. See ELD19291/CIP71345 Completion by ELD15610 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity US 50/Silva Valley Pkwy Interchange - Phase 1 for Phase 2. (CIP71328) 2020 $56,817,400
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 63 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Final phase of US 50/Silva Valley Parkway Interchange: construction of eastbound diagonal and westbound loop on- Yes B- Road & Highway ramps to US 50. (See ELD15610/CIP71328 for Phase 1). Silva Valley Pkwy / ELD19291 El Dorado El Dorado County Capacity US 50/Silva Valley Pkwy Interchange - Phase 2 CIP71345 US 50 2021-2036 $12,070,000 E- Transit Capital Replace four gasoline powered minivans and two gasoline Completion by Yes ELD19349 El Dorado El Dorado County Transit (Vehicles) Bus and Minivan Replacement powered larger buses. (Uses Toll Credits for local match). 2020 $386,000 FTA 5310 funds will be used to replace five (5) Larger Buses that can accommodate 18 passengers (incl. 2 wheelchair Yes positions) & a driver, and one (1) Minivan that can E- Transit Capital El Dorado County Transit Authority 5310 Bus accommodate 6 passengers (incl. 2 wheelchair positions) & a Completion by ELD19368 El Dorado El Dorado County Transit (Vehicles) and Minivan Replacement driver. (Toll Credits for CON). 2020 $570,000 Operating assistance for rural transit services within El Dorado County. Outside the Sacramento Urbanized Area.FFY Yes 2015: $635,227FFY 2016: $635,227FFY 2017: $635,227FFY Completion by ELD19376 El Dorado El Dorado County Transit F- Transit O&M (Bus) Operating Assistance for Rural Transit Service 2018: $635,227 2020 $6,777,064 In Placerville: Construct a 150 stall park and ride lot on the south side of US Highway 50, between the proposed US 50 Yes Eastbound offramp to Ray Lawyer Drive and realigned Forni E- Transit Capital Road. (Toll credits for CON) (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.63 Completion by ELD19374 El Dorado El Dorado County Transit (Minor) Ray Lawyer Drive Park and Ride Lot ROG, 0.45 NOx, 0.49 PM10) 2020 $2,370,620 E- Transit Capital Develop a regional fueling station near the Sacramento/El Yes ELD19461 El Dorado El Dorado County Transit (Major) Regional Fueling Station Dorado County Line. 2021-2036 $20,310,000 Carryover PM funds from FY 11/12 used as Capital for Yes E- Transit Capital acquisition of three minivans for enhanced demand response Completion by ELD19467 El Dorado El Dorado County Transit (Vehicles) Vehicle Procurement service in urbanized area. 2020 $141,900
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, VAR56136 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS AVI/AVL For Emergency Vehicles AVI/AVL For Emergency Vehicles 2021-2036 $400,000 El Dorado County, Caltrans Completion by Yes VAR56143 El Dorado District 3 D- Programs & Planning Communications Plan Communications Plan 2020 $100,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Continued Signal Coordination Improvements Completion by VAR56145 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS 2010-2020 Continued Signal Coordination Improvements 2020 $50,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Continued Signal Coordination Improvements VAR56144 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS 2020-2030 Continued Signal Coordination Improvements 2021-2036 $50,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Completion by VAR56146 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Critical Intersection Improvements Critical Intersection Improvements 2020 $5,000,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Completion by VAR56147 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS El Dorado County Integration Project El Dorado County Integration Project 2020 $400,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Highway Advisory Radio Deployment and Highway Advisory Radio Deployment and Weather Stations – Completion by VAR56155 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Weather Stations – integrate with Caltrans integrate with Caltrans 2020 $6,500,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Install Animal Vehicle Collision Avoidance Install Animal Vehicle Collision Avoidance Systems-Hwy 49 VAR56156 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Systems-Hwy 49 and US 50 and US 50 2021-2036 $150,000 El Dorado County, Caltrans Install bicycle loop detection at all major Yes VAR56157 El Dorado District 3 A- Bike & Ped intersections Install bicycle loop detection at all major intersections 2021-2036 $6,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Completion by VAR56158 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Install Communication Phase II Install Communication Phase II 2020 $200,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Install Downhill Speed Warning System on U.S. Install Downhill Speed Warning System on U.S. 50 Near VAR56159 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS 50 Near Camino Camino 2021-2036 $100,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, VAR56160 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Install Ice Detection and Warning Systems Install Ice Detection and Warning Systems 2021-2036 $200,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Install Rock/Mudslide and Avalanche Detection Install Rock/Mudslide and Avalanche Detection and Warning VAR56161 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS and Warning System System 2021-2036 $200,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, VAR56162 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Installation of CCTV Installation of CCTV 2021-2036 $390,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Completion by VAR56163 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Landslide Sensor Integration Project Landslide Sensor Integration Project 2020 $60,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, VAR56164 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Long-Term Priority Corridor Deployment of ITS Long-Term Priority Corridor Deployment of ITS 2021-2036 $900,000 El Dorado County, Caltrans Yes VAR56165 El Dorado District 3 D- Programs & Planning Long-Term Regional ITS Plan Update Long-Term Regional ITS Plan Update 2021-2036 $200,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Completion by VAR56166 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Lower US 50 Freeway Management Lower US 50 Freeway Management 2020 $500,000 El Dorado County, Caltrans Yes VAR56167 El Dorado District 3 D- Programs & Planning Medium-Term Regional ITS Plan Update Medium-Term Regional ITS Plan Update 2021-2036 $200,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Completion by VAR56168 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Placerville Signal System Technology Advances Placerville Signal System Technology Advances 2020 $800,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, VAR56169 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Portable Traffic Management Devices Portable Traffic Management Devices 2021-2036 $350,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Priority Corridor Deployment of ITS Latrobe Priority Corridor Deployment of ITS Latrobe Road/El Dorado Completion by VAR56170 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Road/El Dorado Hills Hills 2020 $900,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Procure and deploy Portable Dynamic Message Procure and deploy Portable Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) Completion by VAR56171 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Signs (DMS) and Trailblazers and Trailblazers 2020 $90,000 El Dorado County, Caltrans Yes VAR56172 El Dorado District 3 D- Programs & Planning Remote Traffic Control Workstation Remote Traffic Control Workstation 2021-2036 $8,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Completion by VAR56176 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Traffic Control System (TCS) Upgrade Traffic Control System (TCS) Upgrade 2020 $30,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Completion by VAR56177 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Traffic Control System Procurement Traffic Control System Procurement 2020 $250,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Traveler Information Dissemination Devices at Completion by VAR56178 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS Key Locations Traveler Information Dissemination Devices at Key Locations 2020 $300,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Completion by VAR56179 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS US 50 Surveillance US 50 Surveillance 2020 $1,100,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Completion by VAR56180 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS US 50 Traveler Information US 50 Traveler Information 2020 $1,500,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Completion by VAR56181 El Dorado District 3 Operations, and ITS US 50 Winter Traffic Management US 50 Winter Traffic Management 2020 $250,000 El Dorado County, Caltrans Completion by Yes VAR56141 El Dorado District 3 D- Programs & Planning Web Page Development Web Page Development 2020 $100,000
Yes El Dorado County, Caltrans G- System Management, Completion by VAR56175 El Dorado District 3, SACOG Operations, and ITS STARNET Integration STARNET Integration 2020 $40,000 El Dorado County, El Dorado Green Valley Yes VAR56137 El Dorado Hills CSD A- Bike & Ped Bass Lake Road Bike Lanes Class II Bike Lanes from Green Valley Road to US 50 Bass Lake Road Road US 50 2021-2036 $1,500,000 El Dorado County, El Dorado Bike Path Parallel to US 50 on the north side - Phase 2: EDH to Bass Lake Connection From Silva Valley Road Yes VAR56142 El Dorado Hills CSD A- Bike & Ped EDH to Bass Lake Connection to El Dorado Hills Village Center Shopping Center 2021-2036 $300,000 El Dorado County, El Dorado El Dorado Hills Governor Drive/St. Yes VAR56148 El Dorado Hills CSD A- Bike & Ped El Dorado Hills Boulevard Bike Lanes Phase 1: Saratoga Way to Governor Drive/St. Andrews Blvd Saratoga Way Andrews 2021-2036 $297,500 Phase 2: Utilizing an existing golf cart undercrossing of Yes El Dorado County, El Dorado Serrano Parkway, extend the bike path from the current El Dorado Hills Serrano VAR56149 El Dorado Hills CSD A- Bike & Ped El Dorado Hills Boulevard Bike Path terminus at Serrano Parkway to Raley’s Center Blvd Parkway Raley's Center 2021-2036 $200,000 Sign and stripe existing Class I Paths in two locations: 1) from Yes El Dorado County, El Dorado Harvard Way to St. Andrews 2) from Governors Drive to VAR56150 El Dorado Hills CSD A- Bike & Ped El Dorado Hills Boulevard Bike Path (phase 1) Brittney Way 2021-2036 $10,000 El Dorado County, El Dorado El Dorado Hills to Bass Lake Connection (phase Class III Bike Route on Tong Road, Class III Bike Route on Old Yes VAR56151 El Dorado Hills CSD A- Bike & Ped 1) Bass Lake Road. 2021-2036 $25,000 Class II Bike Lanes from Francisco Dr. to Pleasant Grove Yes El Dorado County, El Dorado Middle School/Pleasant Grove Middle School to Lock and VAR56153 El Dorado Hills CSD A- Bike & Ped Green Valley Road Bike Lanes Lock to Francisco Dr. Francisco Dr 2021-2036 $550,000 El Dorado County, El Dorado Harvard Way Bike Yes VAR56154 El Dorado Hills CSD A- Bike & Ped Harvard Way Bike Path From Clermont Road to El do Hills Boulevard Path Clermont Road El Dorado Hills Blvd 2021-2036 $200,000 El Dorado County, El Dorado From the new connection with White Rock Road to Green Yes VAR56173 El Dorado Hills CSD A- Bike & Ped Silva Valley Road Bike Lanes Valley Road White Rock Rd. Green Valley Road 2021-2036 $700,000 El Dorado County, El Dorado Yes VAR56174 El Dorado Hills CSD A- Bike & Ped SPTC/El Dorado Trail Class I Bike Path from Latrobe Road to County Line Latrobe Rd County Line 2021-2036 $2,800,000 El Dorado Transit (Subrecipient) - Preventive maintenance for urban transit services within El Dorado County as well as Yes Sacramento Regional Transit El Dorado Transit - Preventive Maintenance - commuter service to / from Sacramento. (Sacramento Completion by ELD19365 El Dorado District F- Transit O&M (Bus) FTA 5307 Urbanized Area.FFY 2015: $258,434) 2020 $1,043,115 In El Dorado, Nevada, Placer, Sacramento and Yolo counties on Routes 5, 50, 51, 80, 89, 99 and 267 at Various Locations - Yes Upgrade closed caption televisions (CCTV) [EFIS ID Multiple G- System Management, 0313000197; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0966] (Toll Credits for PE, Completion by CAL20518 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS CCTV Cameras at Various Locations ROW, CON) 2020 $2,734,000 Complete Streets improvements in various locations on the Yes Multiple State Highway System (SHS) in El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, CAL20571 Counties Caltrans D3 A- Bike & Ped Complete Streets Improvements to the SHS Sutter, Yuba and Yolo Counties. 2021-2036 $50,000,000
In Sutter County near Yuba City, between SR 99 and SR 70 on Yes SR 20, at Feather River Bridge #18-009 - Scour mitigation (PM Multiple C- Maintenance & 17.0) [EFIS ID 0313000033; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0969] [Total Completion by CAL20509 Counties Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Feather River Bridge Scour Mitigation Project Cost $11,210,000 in 17/18 FY] (Toll Credits for PE) 2020 $11,210,000 In Sacramento, Butte, El Doardo, Nevada, Placer and Yolo Yes Multiple G- System Management, Counties, on Routes 5, 50, 70, 80, 89, 99 and 267 at various CAL20655 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS HAR Update at 25 locations in 11 counties locations. Upgrade Highway Advisory Radios 2021-2036 $3,130,000 In Sacramento, Butte, El Dorado, Nevada, Placer and Yolo Counties, on Routes 5, 50, 70, 80, 89, 99 and 267, at various Yes Multiple G- System Management, locations - Upgrade Highway Advisory Radios (HAR) [CTIPS ID Completion by CAL20548 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS HAR Upgrades - Various Counties and Routes 107-0000-1001] (Toll credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $3,130,000
Yes Multiple G- System Management, CAL20650 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS I-5 Install Vehicle Detection Stations In Sacramento and Yolo Counties on I-5 at 9 locations I-5 Various Various 2021-2036 $1,000,000 In Sacramento County, on Route 51 at PM L4.3; also in Yolo and El Dorado counties on I-5 (PM 9.3) and US 50 (PM Yes Multiple C- Maintenance & I-5, SR 51, US 50 High Friction Surface 61.1/61.3) - Install high friction surface treatment [CTIPS ID Completion by CAL20506 Counties Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Treatments 107-0000-0957] 2020 $880,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 64 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) US 50/I-5 interchange Bus/Carpool Lanes in both directions from Richards Blvd. (in Richards Blvd in downtown Yes Multiple B- Road & Highway I-80 / U.S. 50 Bus/Carpool Lanes in both Davis) to the I-5/US 50 Interchange. Inc. new bike bridge PM Yol 80 Sacramento PM SAC CAL18812 Counties Caltrans D3 Capacity directions across the Yolo Causeway. I-80 / U.S. 50 0.237 50 PM L 0.35 2021-2036 $300,000,000
Yes Multiple G- System Management, In Sacramento, from Yolo County line to 0.2 mile west of Watt CAL20653 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Installation of fiber optics communication lines Avenue Overcrossing. Install fiber optic cable 2021-2036 $9,500,000 I-80/US 50/SR Yes Multiple G- System Management, Installation of Ramp Meters: Various Locations in Placer, 160/ I-5/ SR 99/ SR Completion by CAL20609 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Ramp Meters Sacramento, and Yolo Counties. 65/ 51 Various Various 2020 $4,800,000 In Sacramento, El Dorado and Yolo counties, on US 50, I-5, SR 51, I-80 and SR 99 at various locations - Replace sign panels Yes Multiple G- System Management, Replace/Upgrade Sign Panels/Structures at and upgrade sign structures [EFIS ID 0314000244; CTIPS ID Completion by CAL20533 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Various Locations 107-0000-0987] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $2,782,000
In Sacramneto, El Dorado, Nevada, Placer and Yolo Counties, Yes Multiple G- System Management, on Routes 5, 28, 50, 51, 80, 89, 99 and 267 at various CAL20656 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Roadway Weather Information Stations (RWIS) locations. Repair and upgrade roadway information systems 2021-2036 $2,730,000
In Sacramento, El Dorado, Nevada, Placer and Yolo Counties, on Routes 5, 28, 50, 51, 80, 89, 99 and 267, at various Yes locations: Repair and upgrade roadway information systems Multiple G- System Management, (RWIS) also known as ITS, Intelligent Transportation Systems. Completion by CAL20547 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS RWIS Upgrades - Various Counties [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1000] (Toll credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $2,730,000 In Sacramento and Yolo Counties, install ramp meters and, if possible, HOV Bypass lanes on I-80, SR 51/Capital City Yes Freeway, and SR 99, focusing the project on SR 99 Multiple G- System Management, southbound afternoon traffic from downtown to Cosumnes Completion by CAL20502 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Sac and Yolo Ramp Meters River Blvd. [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0939] 2020 $11,500,000
Yes Multiple G- System Management, In Sacramento and Placer Counties, on Routes 51, 65 and 99 CAL20652 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Sac/Yolo Ramp Meters at various locations. Install ramp meters. 2021-2036 $28,530,000 Lump Sum - Emergency Repair (excluding Federal Emergency Yes Multiple Relief Program funds)for non-capacity increasing projects Completion by CAL17380 Counties Caltrans D3 D- Programs & Planning SACOG Region Emergency Repair Program only. 2020 $400,000 Multiple C- Maintenance & Various bridge preservation projects throughout the six- Lump Sum or Yes CAL20615 Counties Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SHOPP - Bridge Preservation county region. Ongoing $860,000,000 Multiple C- Maintenance & Lump Sum or Yes CAL20616 Counties Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SHOPP - Collision Reduction SHOPP - Collision Reduction Ongoing $505,000,000 Multiple C- Maintenance & Lump Sum or Yes CAL20617 Counties Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SHOPP - Emergency Response SHOPP - Emergency Response Ongoing $10,000,000 Multiple C- Maintenance & Lump Sum or Yes CAL20584 Counties Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SHOPP - Facilities SHOPP- Facilities Ongoing $20,000,000 Multiple C- Maintenance & Lump Sum or Yes CAL20618 Counties Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SHOPP - Mandates SHOPP - Mandates Ongoing $9,500,000 Multiple C- Maintenance & Lump Sum or Yes CAL20622 Counties Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SHOPP - Minor SHOPP - Minor Ongoing $200,000,000 Multiple C- Maintenance & Lump Sum or Yes CAL20619 Counties Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SHOPP - Mobility SHOPP - Mobility Ongoing $105,500,000 Multiple C- Maintenance & Lump Sum or Yes CAL20620 Counties Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SHOPP - Roadside Preservation SHOPP - Roadside Preservation Ongoing $15,000,000 Multiple C- Maintenance & Lump Sum or Yes CAL20621 Counties Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SHOPP - Roadway Preservation SHOPP - Roadway Preservation Ongoing $570,000,000 In Butte, Colusa, El Dorado, Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba counties at various locations - Install Yes Multiple G- System Management, Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips (Safety) shoulder and centerline rumble strips [CTIPS ID 102-0000- Completion by CAL20486 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS at Various Locations 0174] 2020 $3,470,000 Multiple B- Road & Highway Widen Bridge: six (6) lanes on 10th St. Bridge in Sutter and Sut 20 PM Yes CAL20430 Counties Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 20 10th St. Bridge Improvements Yuba Counties. SUT 20 PM 17.041 to YUB 20 PM 0.044 SR 20 17.041 Yuba 20 PM 0.044 2021-2036 $60,000,000 In Yuba City and Marysville, on SR 70 and SR 20: link traffic signals in each corridor to coordinate the operation of the Yes Multiple G- System Management, traffic in real time and adapt traffic signal timing to actual CAL20407 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 70 & SR 20 Adaptive Signals traffic conditions [EFIS ID 0300001108] 2021-2036 $3,075,001 Project Development Multiple B- Road & Highway Bus/Carpool Lanes in both directions from I-5 to the SR 99/ SR SR 99 PM Sut SR 70 SAC 99 PM R Completion after CAL18808 Only Counties Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 99 Bus/Carpool Lanes in both directions 70 Wye junction in Sacramento and Sutter Counties. SR 99 99 PM 7.805 32.152 2036 $10,000,000 Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed circuit television, highway advisory radio, changeable Yes Multiple G- System Management, System Management/Traffic Operations System message signs, and other system management infrastructure CAL20614 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS on U.S. 50 between I-80 and Cedar Grove in El Dorado and Sacramento Counties. 2021-2036 $4,000,000 Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed System Management/Traffic Operations System circuit television, highway advisory radio, changeable Yes Multiple G- System Management, on I-5 between the San Joaquin County Line message signs, and other system management infrastructure CAL20611 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS and SR113 in Placer, Sacramento and Yolo Counties. 2021-2036 $5,000,000 Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed System Management/Traffic Operations System circuit television, highway advisory radio, changeable Yes Multiple G- System Management, On I-80 between SR113 and Bell Road and on message signs, and other system management infrastructure CAL20610 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Rt-51 in Placer, Sacramento and Yolo Counties. 2021-2036 $5,000,000 Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed Project circuit television, highway advisory radio, changeable Development Multiple G- System Management, System Management/Traffic Operations System message signs, and other system management infrastructure Completion after Only CAL20612 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS on SR 65 between I-80 and SR 70 in Placer and Yuba Counties. 2036 $4,000,000 Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed System Management/Traffic Operations System circuit television, highway advisory radio, changeable Yes Multiple G- System Management, on SR99 between the San Joaquin County Line message signs, and other system management infrastructure CAL20613 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS and SR20 in Sacramento and Sutter Counties. 2021-2036 $5,000,000 In Sacramento, El Dorado, Nevada, Placer, Solano and Yolo Counties, on Routes 5, 50, and 80, at various locations - Yes Multiple G- System Management, Upgrade Changeable Message Sign (CMS) panels [CTIPS ID Completion by CAL20550 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Upgrade CMS Panels - Various Counties 107-0000-1003] (Toll credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $5,320,000 In Sacramneto, Butte, Colusa, El Dorado, Glenn, Nevada, Placer, Sierra, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba Counties on Routes 5, 50 Yes Multiple G- System Management, and 80 at various locations. Upgrae Changeable Message Sign CAL20654 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Upgrade CMS panels to LED (CMS) 2021-2036 $5,320,000 In Yuba, Sacramento, Placer, El Dorado and Butte counties on Various Routes at Various Locations - Upgrade pedestrian Yes facilities [EFIS ID 0312000071; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0974] [Total Multiple Upgrade Pedestrian Facilities @ Various Project Cost $3,482,000 in 17/18 FY] (Toll Credits for PE, Completion by CAL20516 Counties Caltrans D3 A- Bike & Ped Locations ROW, CON) 2020 $3,482,000
In Sacramento, Placer, Yolo and Yuba counties, on Routes 5, Yes 50, 51, 65, 70, 80, 99 and 113, at Various Locations - Upgrade Multiple G- System Management, Traffic Monitoring Stations (TMS) [EFIS ID 0313000198; CTIPS Completion by CAL20519 Counties Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Upgrade Traffic Monitoring Stations ID 107-0000-0967] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $5,226,000 Mobility management activities and travel training to assist current and potential paratransit/demand response users who are senior and/or persons with disabilities to learn to Yes use the fixed route transit systems in the SACOG region. Transportation Development Credits/Toll Credits are being Multiple F- Transit O&M FTA 5310 - Paratransit, Inc. Mobility used as match, and as allowable under FTA Section 5310 Completion by CAL20566 Counties Caltrans HQ (General) Management Travel Training federal funds will fund 100% of this project. 2020 $400,000 Replace three existing buses that provide transportation to persons with developmental and other disabilities in Placer and Sacramento counties. Transportation Development Yes Credits/Toll Credits are being used as match, and as allowable Multiple E- Transit Capital under FTA Section 5310 federal funds will fund 100% of this Completion by CAL20562 Counties Caltrans HQ (Vehicles) FTA 5310 - Pride Industries Replacement Buses project.. Toll Credits for CON 2020 $229,500 Provide mileage reimbursement and stipends for low-income volunteers to transport low-income isolated and frail seniors and people with disabilities where traditional transit and paratransit services are otherwise insufficient or Yes inappropriate. Transportation Development Credits/Toll Credits are being used as match, and as allowable under FTA Multiple F- Transit O&M FTA 5310 - Sacramento County DHHS Senior Section 5310 federal funds will fund 100% of this project.. Completion by CAL20553 Counties Caltrans HQ (Demand Response) Companions Transportation Program Toll Credits for CON 2020 $160,000 Video monitoring equipment for four replacement buses requested by UCP that will transport people with developmental disabilities. Transportation Development Yes Credits/Toll Credits are being used as match, and as allowable Multiple E- Transit Capital FTA 5310 - United Cerebral Palsy Bus Video under FTA Section 5310 federal funds will fund 100% of this Completion by CAL20558 Counties Caltrans HQ (Minor) Monitoring Equipment project.. Toll Credits for CON 2020 $8,000 Replace four of the existing 16 passenger buses that provide transportation services to people with developmental disabilities. Transportation Development Credits/Toll Credits Yes are being used as match, and as allowable under FTA Section Multiple E- Transit Capital FTA 5310 - United Cerebral Palsy Replacement 5310 federal funds will fund 100% of this project.. Toll Completion by CAL20556 Counties Caltrans HQ (Vehicles) Buses Credits for CON 2020 $306,000
Replace computers and software used to operate existing transportation services to seniors and people with disabilities Yes in Yolo and Sacramento counties. Transportation Development Credits/Toll Credits are being used as match, Multiple E- Transit Capital FTA 5310 - United Christian Centers and as allowable under FTA Section 5310 federal funds will Completion by CAL20561 Counties Caltrans HQ (Minor) Replacement Computers & Software fund 100% of this project.. Toll Credits for CON 2020 $2,599 Replace an existing minivan used to transport seniors and people with disabilities in Yolo and Sacramento counties. Transportation Development Credits/Toll Credits are being Yes used as match, and as allowable under FTA Section 5310 Multiple E- Transit Capital FTA 5310 - United Christian Centers federal funds will fund 100% of this project.. Toll Credits for Completion by CAL20560 Counties Caltrans HQ (Vehicles) Replacement Minivan CON 2020 $48,000 Provide paratransit/demand response services to ADA eligible individuals that go beyond what is required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Transportation Development Yes Credits/Toll Credits are being used as match, and as allowable Multiple F- Transit O&M FTA 5310 - Yolo County Transportation District under FTA Section 5310 federal funds will fund 100% of this Completion by CAL20555 Counties Caltrans HQ (Demand Response) Beyond ADA Service project.. Toll Credits for CON 2020 $300,000 Prepare the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA/ED) for Segment D2 of the Capital Southeast Connector: Grant Line Rd., from Jackson Highway to White Rock Road: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes as an expressway including a Class I multi-modal trail. Also includes intersection improvements at Yes Kiefer Blvd. and Douglas Road, and 5 new proposed intersections: Rancho Cordova Parkway, University Blvd., Chrysanthy Blvd., North Loop Rd (potential temporary Multiple Capital Southeast Connector Capital Southeast Connector Project - Project access), and Centennial Dr. (Phase 1). (PE ONLY. MTP Project: Capital Southeast Completion by VAR56128 Counties JPA D- Programs & Planning Development SAC24193) Connector 2020 $2,259,121
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 65 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Complete project development efforts, as needed, to identify and implement operational improvements to improve safety and traffic flow along the corridor segment. Intersection and frontage improvements funded by development or truck Yes mitigation fees are examples of operational improvements that could be made to benefit travel for automobiles and commercial vehicles. The project listing also allows for other near-term planned project development activities to advance Capital Southeast Multiple Capital SouthEast Connector Capital SouthEast Connector- Douglas Road to so that the corridor segment can eventually become a four Connector (Grant Counties JPA D- Programs & Planning Bradshaw Road lane facility. Line Rd) Bradshaw Douglas Rd. 2021-2036 TBD Capital SouthEast Connector Capital SouthEast Connector - Segment D2 - Capital SouthEast JPA, City of Rancho Cordova, From Douglas Road to White Rock Road. Connector Yes Sacramento County Segment D2 Multiple B- Road & Highway Partial Construction of Segment D2: Construct 4 lanes (Grantline Rd & VAR56133 Counties Capacity (Expressway), from Douglas Road to White Rock Road. White Rock Rd) Douglas Rd. White Rock Rd. 2021-2036 TBD Capital SouthEast Connector Capital SouthEast Connector - Segment D3 - Capital SouthEast JPA ,City of Folsom, Sacramento Prairie City Road to Sacramento/El Dorado Connector Yes County County Line Segment D3 Multiple B- Road & Highway Segment D3: Construct 4 lanes (Expressway), from Prairie City (Grantline Rd & Sacramento‐El Completion by VAR56131 Counties Capacity Road to the Sacramento County Line. White Rock Rd) Praire City Rd. Dorado County line 2020 $48,000,000 Capital SouthEast Connector - Segment E1- Capital SouthEast From Sacramento/El Dorado County Line to Segment E1: Widen White Rock Road from 2 to 4 lanes Connector Yes Multiple Capital SouthEast Connector B- Road & Highway Latrobe Road (thoroughfare), from the Sacramento-El Dorado County line Segment E (White Sacramento ELD19468 Counties JPA, El Dorado County Capacity to Latrobe Road. Rock Rd) County Line Latrobe Rd 2021-2036 $6,200,000 Capital SouthEast Connector - Segment E2 - Segment E2: Widen White Rock Road from 2 to 4 lanes Capital Southeast Yes Multiple Capital SouthEast Connector B- Road & Highway From Latrobe Road to the US 50/Silva Valley (thoroughfare), from Latrobe Road to the US 50/Silva Valley Connector (White US 50/Silva Valley ELD19469 Counties JPA, El Dorado County Capacity Pkwy Interchange Parkway Interchange. Rock Rd) Latrobe Rd Pkwy Interchange 2021-2036 $9,900,000 Capital SouthEast Connector Capital SouthEast Connector- Phase 2 Project JPA, City of Elk Grove, Rancho Capital SouthEast Connector Phase 2 will include adding HOV I-5/Hood Development Multiple Cordova, Folsom, Sacarmento B- Road & Highway lanes as needed and constructing interchanges at various Capital SouthEast Franklin Rd. US 50/Silva Valley Completion after Only VAR56132 Counties Capacity locations. Connector Phase 2 Interchange Parkway 2036 $209,300,000 County, El Dorado County On the UP mainline, from Elvas Tower in Sacramento County to Roseville Station in Placer County: Construct third track. Project involves: extension of freight lead track; construction of track and signal improvements; construction of satellite maintenance facility and other associated improvements; and Yes possible relocation of the Roseville rail station to address conflicting train movements that affect capacity. Project improvements will permit service capacity increases for Multiple E- Transit Capital Capitol Corridor in Placer County, with up to ten round trips CAL18320 Counties Capitol Corridor JPA (Major) Roseville Third Track to Roseville. 2021-2036 $250,800,000 New Northern Bridge: from Sacramento to West Sacramento across the Sacramento River. Includes: Auto, transit, bicycle Project and pedestrian facilities. The Sacramento River Crossings Development Alternatives Study analyzed a new crossing at either Richards Only Multiple City of Sacramento and City of B- Road & Highway Blvd or C Street, but final alignment options will be studied in Completion after SAC24420 Counties West Sacramento Capacity Sacramento River Crossing subsequent planning efforts. 2036 $150,000,000 From West Sacramento to Sacramento, across the Sacramento River, construct the Broadway Bridge, a new southern crossing of the Sacramento River. Project includes: Yes Auto, transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. (Local funding Multiple B- Road & Highway is split between the Cities of Sacramento and West YOL19328 Counties City of West Sacramento Capacity Broadway Bridge Sacramento) 2021-2036 $254,500,000 Multiple Lump sum for bicycle and pedestrian projects throughout the Lump Sum or Yes Regional Lump Sum 2 Counties Multiple Lead Agencies A- Bike & Ped Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements region 2011-2035. Ongoing $2,000,000,000 Multiple Regional Planning, Programs, and Project Lump sum for programs, planning, and project analysis Lump Sum or Yes Regional Lump Sum 4 Counties Multiple Lead Agencies D- Programs & Planning Analysis throughout the region 2011-2036. Ongoing $1,600,000,000 Multiple C- Maintenance & Road and Highway Maintenance and Lump sum for road and highway maintenance and Lump Sum or Yes Regional Lump Sum 3 Counties Multiple Lead Agencies Rehabilitation Rehabilitation rehabilitation throughout the region 2011-2036. Ongoing $8,640,000,000 Multiple F- Transit O&M Lump Sum or Yes Regional Lump Sum 1 Counties Multiple Lead Agencies (General) Transit Operations Transit operations and maintenance 2015-2036 Ongoing $5,910,000,000 Multiple E- Transit Capital Lump-sum for transit vehicle (light rail, bus, demand Yes Regional Lump Sum 5 Counties Multiple Lead Agencies (Vehicles) Transit Vehicle Replacements response, and shuttles. 2019-2036 $700,000,000 Replace two CNG powered buses currently in use by Placer County Transit. The new CNG buses will be used on regional Yes transit routes connecting Rocklin, Lincoln, Loomis, Auburn Multiple E- Transit Capital and Placer County to Roseville and the Watt/I-80 Light Rail Completion by PCT10503 Counties Placer County Transit (Vehicles) PCT Bus Replacements - 2015 Station. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 1.49 NOx) 2020 $1,082,000 Implement bike share system in three cities (Davis, Sacramento, and West Sacramento) and provide planning efforts for potential regional expansion of a Bike Share pilot Yes program and create a comprehensive Equity Action Plan. (SACOG Managed Funds are used on preliminary work Multiple separate from the federal project.) (Toll Credits for ENG, Completion by VAR56126 Counties SACOG A- Bike & Ped Bike Share CON). Toll Credits for ENG, CON 2020 $3,905,000 Connect Card (previously known as Universal Transit Fare Card): Implement Connect Card in the SACOG region, Yes including hiring a consultant. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: Multiple E- Transit Capital 0.06 ROG, 0.12 NOx) (Project in conjunction with VAR56081, Completion by VAR56028 Counties SACOG (Minor) Connect Card RT On-Board Survey for Connect Card) 2020 $11,590,696 Complete preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and design to develop the Downtown/Riverfront Transit Streetcar project in the Cities of Sacramento and West Yes Sacramento. Agencies include RT, YCTD, West Sacramento, and Sacramento. (See early PE in REG18017, YCT18089, CON Multiple E- Transit Capital Downtown/Riverfront Transit (Streetcar) in YCT18198, YCT18199) (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 1.55 Completion by VAR56127 Counties SACOG (Major) Project Development ROG, 0.89 NOx, 0.02 PM10) 2020 $11,570,000 This project will promote the "Connect Card" universal transit fare card system in the SACOG Region to low-income individuals and those that qualify for reduced fares. The Connect Card will help fulfill the goal of creating more Yes integrated, coordinated, and seamless regional transit systems by allowing users, especially those who cross jurisdictional and transit operator boundaries, in traveling to Multiple employment and/or training. ($17,344 in toll credits are Completion by VAR56113 Counties SACOG D- Programs & Planning JARC Connect Card Marketing being used for the CON match.) 2020 $69,376
Planning in SACOG Region: Implement strategies from the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Yes Strategy (MTP/SCS) 2035. Work includes modeling, data Multiple gathering, consulting, and support for local jurisdictions in Completion by VAR56121 Counties SACOG D- Programs & Planning MTP/SCS 2035 Implementation pursuing SB 375 CEQA benefits. (Toll Credits for CON) 2020 $265,000 Mobility Management Grant. Paratransit, Inc., will provide Yes Multiple F- Transit O&M Paratransit, Inc. - New Freedom Mobility travel training to low income and limited English speaking Completion by VAR56117 Counties SACOG (Demand Response) Management persons throughout the SACOG region. 2020 $312,500 Conduct necessary planning work to prepare 2016 MTP/SCS. Perform state and federal programming and monitoring activities, including revisions to the MTIP and STIP, ensuring timely delivery of projects using state and federal funds, Yes coordination with FHWA, FTA, Caltrans, CTC, transit operators, and local project sponsors. Ongoing. Multiple Planning Programming and Monitoring (RSTP) (Programming and Monitoring work is eligible for RSTP per 23 Completion by VAR56101 Counties SACOG D- Programs & Planning Phase 2 CFR, Part 450, section 133.) (Phase 1, VAR56008) 2020 $1,152,040 In the SACOG Region: develop regional standards for evaluating bicycle/pedestrian projects, procure automated Yes bicycle/pedestrian counters, and develop a smartphone Multiple application for collecting user’s bicycle/pedestrian travel data Completion by VAR56125 Counties SACOG D- Programs & Planning Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Data Collection (Toll Credits for CON). 2020 $559,510 Pre and post on-board survey of transit riders to determine current market and subsequent availability and usage of the Yes Connect Card (VAR56028). This will identify needs for Multiple Regional Transit On-Board Survey for Connect outreach and develop strategies to increase Connect Card Completion by VAR56081 Counties SACOG D- Programs & Planning Card availability and usage for underrepresented transit riders. 2020 $450,000 The proposed mobility management services would enhance the ability of passengers to successfully ride transit in multiple areas (Placer County, Loomis, Rocklin,Lincoln, Auburn and Yes Roseville). The goal of the program would include providing Multiple travel training from transit staff, trip planning training, and Completion by VAR56096 Counties SACOG D- Programs & Planning Roseville Transit Mobility Management practice trips with staff. 2020 $47,500 Support small Transit operators in preparation of the National Transit Database in order to maximize the amount of funds generated in the region. Support operators in developing transit asset management (TAM) plans which would include capital asset inventories and condition assessments. The asset inventory and condition data must Yes also be reported to the NTD. Continue to provide ongoing grants management support as well as planning and programming activities necessary to submit transit grant applications to the FTA. Transportation Development Credits/Toll Credits are being used as match, and as allowable Multiple F- Transit O&M SACOG Technical Assistance to Transit under FTA Section 5307 federal funds will fund 100% of this Completion by VAR56130 Counties SACOG (General) Operators project.. Toll Credits for CON 2020 $130,000 Provide mileage reimbursements to low-income seniors who provide rides to fellow seniors to non-emergency medical Yes Multiple F- Transit O&M Sacramento County Dept. of Human Assistance - appointments and other necessary travel not served by Completion by VAR56118 Counties SACOG (Demand Response) New Freedom Operating Assistance transit. 2020 $200,000 Construction of the Phase 1 of the Downtown/Riverfront Sacramento-West Sacramento Streetcar. The alignment runs from West Sacramento Civic Yes Multiple E- Transit Capital Downtown/Riverfront Streetcar Project (Phase Center/Riverfront Street to the Midtown entertainment, Completion by YCT18198 Counties SACOG (Major) 1) retail, and residential district of Sacramento. 2020 $150,000,000 Multiple E- Transit Capital Sacramento-West Sacramento An extension of the Phase 1 Downtown/Riverfront streetcar Yes YCT18199 Counties Multiple Lead Agencies (Major) Downtown/Riverfron Streetcar Extension in Downtown Sacramento and West Sacramento. 2021-2036 $45,000,000 TDM is a general term for strategies that result in more efficient use of transportation resources. SACOG's TDM program promotes alternative mode use in the SACOG region (rideshare, carpooling, vanpooling, public transit, bicycling, walking, and telecommuting. Outreach is done through Yes partners (TMAs, and public agencies working with employers). Provide funding for 12 Transportation Management Organizations (TMOs) in region through grants. Multiple Transportation Demand Management (TDM) (Emission Benefits: ROG 0.54 and NOx 0.5 kg/day) (This is a Completion by VAR56184 Counties SACOG D- Programs & Planning Phase 3 continuation of Phase 2, VAR56025) 2020 $1,554,999 Western Placer Consolidated Transportation Services Agency: Operating assistance for "Health Express," a low-to-no cost, Yes scheduled, door-to-door, shared ride service for Placer Multiple County residents needing transportation to non-emergency Completion by VAR56116 Counties SACOG F- Transit O&M (Bus) WPCTSA - New Freedom Operating Assistance medical appointments. 2020 $600,000 Provide Yolobus Special (paratransit) service to Yolo Co. Yes Multiple F- Transit O&M residents to/from medical appointments beyond YCTD's ADA Completion by VAR56119 Counties SACOG (Demand Response) YCTD - New Freedom Operating Assistance required area. 2020 $240,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 66 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) 2007 JARC CA-37-X114 ($52,119) Senior Volunteers Foster Grandparents/Senior Companion Program. 2008 JARC CA-37- X119 ($814,880) 1. Senior Volunteers Transportation Reimbursement Foster Grandparents and Senior Companion Programs. 2. Mather Community Campus Shuttle Services. 3. Yes Program Administration.2009 New Freedom CA-57-X043 ($152,275) 1. Senior Volunteers Senior Companion Program and the Asian Community Center (ACC) Meals on Wheels Multiple Sacramento County Department of Human Program. 2. ACC Meals on Wheels shuttle service. 3. Program Completion by SAC24669 Counties Sacramento County F- Transit O&M (Bus) Assistance JARC Administration. 2020 $1,983,961 Multiple Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital City of Folsom Stage Lines Replacement of Low City of Folsom (subrecipient): Replace one 30-foot bus Completion by Yes SAC24694 Counties District (Vehicles) Floor Buses including related equipment and spare parts. n/a n/a 2020 $419,046 Purchase replacement and some expansion vehicles and communication equipment to be used by Paratransit, Inc to Yes Multiple Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Paratransit Vehicle Replacement FY10/11 to provide complementary ADA paratransit service on behalf of Completion by REG18010 Counties District (Vehicles) FY13/14 RT. 2020 $7,297,205 Multiple Sacramento Regional Transit F- Transit O&M Paratransit, Inc. Travel Training and Mobility Paratransit, Inc. (Subrecipient): Provide regional travel Completion by Yes PAR10032 Counties District (Demand Response) Management training and mobility management services. 2020 $437,500 Provide operating assistance for the operation of 4.3 mile Yes Multiple Sacramento Regional Transit F- Transit O&M (Light South Sacramento Corridor Phase II Operating extension of the Blue Line light rail from Meadowview Station Completion by REG17954 Counties District Rail) Assistance to Cosumnes River College. 2020 $12,000,000 Sacramento Federal Non-attainment Area: Spare The Air Voluntary Driving Curtailment Program. [Continued from Yes Multiple SAC21080, Larger MTP project is VAR56022] (Emission Completion by VAR56006 Counties SMAQMD D- Programs & Planning Spare the Air Phase 2 Benefits in kg/day: ROG 0.2, NOx 0.2) 2020 $8,106,627 Multiple Update and reprint Forest Motorized Opportunity Guides. Completion by Yes ELD19367 Counties USFS El Dorado National Forest D- Programs & Planning Motorized Recreation Map (RM-13-013) 2020 $53,500 Operating Assistance for the rural portion of the "Health Express." This service is being provided as a new transportation alternative to traditional public transit fixed route and dial-a-ride services. The service is a low-to-no-cost Yes scheduled door-to-door transportation service to non- emergency medical appointments for rural Placer County residents. Service operates Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. Multiple to 5:00 p.m., and Thursdays, 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. in Completion by PLA25511 Counties Western Placer CTSA F- Transit O&M (Bus) New Freedom (Rural) Operating Assistance Sacramento. 2020 $416,176 The Western Placer CTSA operates non-emergency medical transportation demand-response paratransit service; Yes Multiple F- Transit O&M volunteer door-to-door transportation; & voucher program Completion by PLA25510 Counties Western Placer CTSA (Demand Response) Western Placer CTSA Operations within western Placer County. 2020 $4,900,000 Purchase 13 heavy-duty, low-floor, clean diesel, local fixed Yes Multiple E- Transit Capital Fixed Route Fleet Replacement & Minor Fleet route buses (30' - 35') to replace 11 buses and expand the Completion by YST10444 Counties Yuba Sutter Transit (Vehicles) Expansion local fixed route fleet from 22 to 24 buses. 2020 $5,525,000 Operating assistance to provide transit services for low income and transit dependent riders to employment and training outlets. Hours of operation are Monday through Friday, 7:55 am to 3:30 pm; 6:00 pm to 9:30 pm; and Saturdays 8:30 am to 5:30 pm. Services will be extended one weekday to downtown Sacramento and extended one hour Yes on Saturdays. (Small Urban is $303,050, Rural is $12,700.) (This amount includes $150,000 of JARC funds transferred to the 5307 account.) An additional $150,000 in small urban JARC funds were awarded to support the continuation and Multiple expansion of existing weekday and evening Dial-A-Ride Completion by YST10441 Counties Yuba Sutter Transit F- Transit O&M (Bus) JARC Small Urban & Rural Operating Assistance services. 2020 $781,500 Multiple Completion by Yes YST10442 Counties Yuba Sutter Transit F- Transit O&M (Bus) Operating Assistance for FY 2015 Yuba-Sutter Transit Operating Assistance for FY 2015 2020 $6,600,000 Multiple Completion by Yes YST10443 Counties Yuba Sutter Transit F- Transit O&M (Bus) Operating Assistance for FY 2016 Yuba-Sutter Transit Operating Assistance for FY 2016 2020 $6,930,000 Placer County, about 9.3 miles south of Truckee at Alpine Meadows Road - Construct signalized intersection at SR 89 Yes G- System Management, [FCO Only] (Pla-89-12.1/12.5) [SHOPP Minor A 201.310] (Toll Completion by CAL20497 Placer Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Alpine Meadows Road Traffic Signal Credits for CON) 2020 $974,000 I-80 at Canyon Way IC, Illinoistown OC and driveway entrance to Crispin Cider warehouse - Widen ramp pavement at three locations, modify overcrossing and install signage to Yes accommodate Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) G- System Management, (PM 31.1/31.9) [SHOPP Minor A program 201.310] (Toll Completion by CAL20538 Placer Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Crispin Cider STAA Access credits for CON) 2020 $2,020,000 On I-80 in Placer County, near Gold Run, at the Gold Run Safety Roadside Rest Area - Replace water distribution system Yes C- Maintenance & (PM 41.4/42.2) [EFIS ID 0313000017; CTIPS ID 107-0000- Completion by CAL20511 Placer Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Gold Run SRRA Water System Upgrades 0960] (Toll credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $3,061,000 Near Colfax on Route 80, from the Long Ravine UP to east of Magra Road OC - Construct eastbound truck climbing lane Yes C- Maintenance & and related improvements (PM 35.1/38.0) (Toll Credits for PE, Completion by CAL20424 Placer Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation I-80 3-Mile Truck Climbing Lane ROW, CON) [EFIS ID 0300020420] 2020 $50,637,337 Project Development B- Road & Highway I-80 Bus/carpool Lanes East of SR65 in both New bus/carpool lanes - one each direction - on I-80 from Completion after CAL20630 Only Placer Caltrans D3 Capacity directions SR65 east to SR49 in Auburn. I-80 Pla 80 4.473 Pla 80 17.437 2036 $200,000,000 In and near Colfax on Pla-80, from 0.3 mile south of Weimar overhead to 0.3 mile south of Illinoistown overcrossing - Yes C- Maintenance & Rehabilitate culvert (PM 28.5/31.5) [EFIS ID 0300020597; Completion by CAL20521 Placer Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation I-80 Culvert Rehabilitation CTIPS ID 107-0000-0959] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $1,918,000 Placer County, I-80, in and near Loomis at various locations from Brace Road to Magra Road - Improve vertical clearance Yes C- Maintenance & (PM 8.1/37.8) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0757; EFIS ID 0300000473] Completion by CAL18828 Placer Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation I-80 Vertical Clearance Improvements (Toll Credits) I-80 2020 $36,045,000 Near Auburn, at the Rattlesnake Bar Road intersection - Yes Construct left-turn channelization (PM R31.1) [CTIPS ID 107- Completion by CAL20459 Placer Caltrans D3 D- Programs & Planning Rattlesnake Bar Rd. Turn Pocket 0000-0865] (Toll Credits) 2020 $2,020,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Placer County, SR65: Right-of-way acquisition & construct a North Ingram Completion after CAL20633 Only Placer Caltrans D3 Capacity Route 65 Lincoln Bypass Phase 2B 4-lane expressway from North Ingram Slough to Sheridan. Route 65 Slough Sheridan 2036 $55,000,000 Near Lincoln, SR 193, from 0.1 mile west to 0.9 mile east of Clark Tunnel Road - Curve improvements and widening Yes C- Maintenance & (SHOPP Lump Sum - Collision Reduction) (PM 4.4/5.4) [CTIPS Completion by CAL20389 Placer Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 193 Curve Improvement ID 107-0000-0798; EFIS ID 0300000725] (Toll Credits) Hwy 193 2020 $17,393,000 C- Maintenance & Rehabilitate SR 193 roadway from Sierra College to Yes CAL20635 Placer Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 193 Pavement Rehabilitation Newcastle. SR 193 2021-2036 $6,500,000 In Placer County, on SR 267 near Truckee, from Nevada Yes C- Maintenance & County line to Brockway Summit - Pavement overlay (PM Completion by CAL20494 Placer Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 267 Pavement Rehab 0.0/6.8) [Toll Credits] 2020 $5,101,000 Extend the existing SR 267 SB truck-climbing lane; shoulder Yes G- System Management, widening from Northstar Dr to Brockway Summit (PM Northstar PM CAL20638 Placer Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 267 SB Truck Climbing Lane 3.76/PM 6.67) SR 267 PLA 3.76 PM PLA 6.667 2021-2036 $15,000,000 Project In eastern Placer County, widen SR 267 from 2 lanes to 4 Development B- Road & Highway lanes from Nevada County line (PM 0.001) to Northstar Drive Nevada County Northstar Dr. Pla 267 Completion after PLA25136 Only Placer Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 267 Widening (PM 3.785). SR 267 Line Pla 0.001 PM 3.785 2036 $10,000,000
In Auburn, SR 49, from 0.1 mile south of Routes 49/80 Yes separation to 0.1 mile north of Dry Creek Road - Rehabilitate C- Maintenance & Pavement (PM 3.1/7.5) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0992] [EFIS ID Completion by CAL20541 Placer Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 49 Bridge Rehab 0300020616] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, and CON) 2020 $29,400,000 On SR 49, construct Class II bicycle lane from Bell Rd to Dry Yes CAL20628 Placer Caltrans D3 A- Bike & Ped SR 49 Class II Bike Lane Creek Rd. SR 49 6.38 7.428 2021-2036 $480,000 On SR 49, construct Class II Yes bicycle lane from On SR 49, construct Class II bicycle lane from Lincoln Way to Lincoln Way to CAL20651 Placer Caltrans D3 A- Bike & Ped SR 49 Class II Bike Lane Luther Rd. Luther Rd. 3.095 5.21 2021-2036 $960,000
Yes G- System Management, Install signal at Shale Ridge Rd., coordinate to the north on CAL20573 Placer Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 49 Signal Coordination Dry Creek Rd. and to the south on Bell Rd. (PM 6.38/7.427) 2021-2036 $2,000,000 On SR 65, in and near Roseville, from I-80 to Twelve Bridges Drive - Pavement rehabilitation (PM 4.8/12.5) [EFIS ID Yes C- Maintenance & 0314000010; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0991] (Toll Credits for PE, Completion by CAL20531 Placer Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 65 Pavement Rehab ROW, CON) 2020 $10,445,000 Project Development G- System Management, Completion after CAL20583 Only Placer Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR89 UPRR Undercrossing Widening of SR89 (mousehole) under UPRR tracks 2036 $42,000,000 Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed Project circuit television, highway advisory radio, changeable Development G- System Management, System Management/Traffic Operations System message signs, and other system management infrastructure Completion after Only CAL20637 Placer Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS on SR49 in Placer County. 2036 $4,000,000 Upgrade Donner Pass Summit (UP Line) double track: Project including addition of crossovers, notching of tunnels, Auburn to Donner Summit Track Improvements Development reactivation & Phases 1 & 2 Only E- Transit Capital replacement of second mainline track between Auburn & Completion after CAL20639 Placer Caltrans Division of Rail (Major) Reno, Nevada Rail 2036 $86,000,000 Project UP Over/Under Crossing Development E- Transit Capital Build over/undercrossing at Union Pacific crossing of Sierra Completion after CAL20640 Only Placer Caltrans Division of Rail (Major) College Boulevard Rail 2036 $30,000,000 Transit Ambassador and Mobility Training programs. Assist new transit and paratransit/demand response transportation riders that are seniors and persons with disabilities in Placer County, as well as the South Placer County "One Stop" Call Center that distributes transit and paratransit/demand Yes response transportation information and handles reservations/transfers for paratransit/demand response transportation users in Placer County. Transportation Development Credits/Toll Credits are being used as match, F- Transit O&M FTA 5310 - City of Roseville Mobility and as allowable under FTA Section 5310 federal funds will Completion by CAL20563 Placer Caltrans HQ (General) Management Program fund 100% of this project.. Toll Credits for CON 2020 $234,000 Purchase training equipment (a laptop and LCD projector) for Call Center employees and Transit Ambassadors to use, as well as replacement digital recording system and TDD Yes equipment for the South Placer Call Center. Transportation Development Credits/Toll Credits are being used as match, E- Transit Capital FTA 5310 - City of Roseville South Placer Call and as allowable under FTA Section 5310 federal funds will Completion by CAL20565 Placer Caltrans HQ (Minor) Center Equipment fund 100% of this project.. Toll Credits for CON 2020 $28,100
Purchase 25 global positioning system (GPS) navigation units to assist demand response drivers serving seniors and people Yes with disabilities. Transportation Development Credits/Toll E- Transit Capital FTA 5310 - City of Roseville Transit Vehicle Credits are being used as match, and as allowable under FTA Completion by CAL20564 Placer Caltrans HQ (Minor) Navigation Units Section 5310 federal funds will fund 100% of this project. 2020 $6,900 Project Capitol Corridor operations & equipment maintenance, Development Capitol Corridor Joint Powers funded by the State of California/ Caltrans Division of Rail. Completion after VAR56134 Only Placer Authority F- Transit O&M (Rail) Capitol Corridor Operations & Maintenance (Total Cost: $728,000,000) 2036 $58,181,760
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 67 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Project Development Capitol Corridor Joint Powers E- Transit Capital Lump-sum of capital improvements between Colfax & Davis Completion after VAR56135 Only Placer Authority (Minor) Capitol Corridor Rail Replacement & Expansion (Total Cost: $120,720,000) 2036 $9,647,942 At the existing Auburn Multi Modal Station: Obtain right-of- Yes E- Transit Capital Auburn Multi Modal Station - Rail Platform way and install rail platform extension . (Emission Benefits in Completion by PLA25353 Placer City of Auburn (Minor) Extension kg/day: 0.93 ROG, 1.18 NOx, 0.43 PM10) 2020 $1,416,480 E- Transit Capital Completion by Yes PLA25569 Placer City of Auburn (Vehicles) Auburn Transit Bus Replacement Replace one bus. 2020 $408,469 Project Construct New Road: various roadways in the Baltimore Development B- Road & Highway Ravine area of Auburn. Includes: widening and construction Completion after PLA25234 Only Placer City of Auburn Capacity Baltimore Ravine Development of new local roadways as a result of new development. 2036 $200,000 For the ongoing operation of transit within the non-urbanized Yes City of Auburn Non-Urbanized Transit area of Auburn and a portion of non-urbanized Placer Completion by PLA25547 Placer City of Auburn F- Transit O&M (Bus) Operations County. 2020 $1,584,934 Marguerite Mine Road, from Marguerite Mine Road/State Route 49 intersection to the north and Marguerite Mine Road/Auburn Ravine Road intersection, approximately 2,200 Yes feet: install curb, gutter sidewalk on west side segments and Marguerite Mine Road Pedestrian and Bikeway install Class II Bike Lane for the entire length. (Toll Credits for Completion by PLA25639 Placer City of Auburn A- Bike & Ped Facilities CON). Toll Credits for CON 2020 $448,710 Class 2 bike lane and adjacent sidewalks along Nevada St from Placer St to Fulweiler Ave to allow for continuous Yes pedestrian and bicycle access from Old Town Auburn to the Auburn Station and EV Cain Middle School. (Emission Completion by PLA25471 Placer City of Auburn A- Bike & Ped Nevada Street Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities reductions in kg/day: ROG 0.01, NOx 0.01.) 2020 $1,700,645 Project Development G- System Management, Rail Crossing Project; above-grade crossing of UP Tracks from Grass Valley St / Completion after PLA25146 Only Placer City of Colfax Operations, and ITS Grass Valley St./UPRR Overcrossing east side (S Auburn)to west side (Main) UPRR S Auburn St Main St. 2036 $300,000 Construct of pedestrian improvements across UP railroad tracks to improve pedestrian safety, road rehabilitation, and Yes C- Maintenance & Grass Valley Street Railroad Crossing Pedestrian bike lane/route along Grass Valley St west of South Auburn Completion by PLA25439 Placer City of Colfax Rehabilitation and Bike Improvements St. 2020 $537,100 Project Canyon Wy/I-80 Development G- System Management, Intersection Improvements at Canyon Wy. / I-80 Overpass, to Overpass (east Completion after PLA20420 Only Placer City of Colfax Operations, and ITS I-80/Canyon Wy. Intersection Improvements include signalization, intersection realignment and striping. side) 2036 $50,000
Yes G- System Management, I-80/SR174 Interchange Improvements PLA25591 Placer City of Colfax Operations, and ITS (Construction funds) Reconstruct I-80/SR 174 Interchange 2021-2036 $15,000,000 Project Roadway Operational Improvements at Hwy. 174 & I-80, to Development G- System Management, I-80/SR174 Road Widening and Signal include 2 new signals and intersection widening with Hwy. 174 (S. Completion after PLA25490 Only Placer City of Colfax Operations, and ITS Improvements sidewalks and curb ramps Auburn) I-80 Overpass I-80 WB On-Ramp 2036 $100,000 Project Design and construction of a new traffic signal and turn-lane Development G- System Management, at the intersection of Main Street and Grass Valley Street. Completion after Only PLA25466 Placer City of Colfax Operations, and ITS Main and Grass Valley Signal Improvements (Emission reductions: ROG .02 kg/day; NOx .01 kg/day) 2036 $200,000 Along N. Main Street, from the Depot Transit Center to Highway 174: Construct class III bike route and associated improvements. Improvements include tree trimming, road Yes repairs, non-capacity road widening, re-striping, drain inlet upgrade, bike rack, and barrier curb. (Requesting state-only Completion by PLA25577 Placer City of Colfax A- Bike & Ped North Main Street Bike Route ATP.) 2020 $299,333 Project Development Add bike routes lanes on both sides of South Auburn Street Completion after PLA25237 Only Placer City of Colfax A- Bike & Ped S Auburn Street Bicycle Improvements from Mink Creek to Grass Valley UP Tracks. S. Auburn Street Mink Creek Grass Valley/UPRR 2036 $36,000 Project Intersection improvements on S. Auburn St. at Central S. Development G- System Management, S. Auburn/Central/Hwy.174 Intersection Ave./Hwy. 174 intersection, to include widening, Auburn/Central/H Completion after PLA25235 Only Placer City of Colfax Operations, and ITS Improvements signalization, and pedestrian improvements. wy. 174 2036 $60,000 B- Road & Highway Completion by Yes PLA25161 Placer City of Lincoln Capacity 12th St. Widen: 4 lanes from East Ave. to Harrison Ave. 12th St East Ave Harrison Ave 2020 $48,700 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 2 lanes from Weco Access Rd. to Wise Weco Access Completion after PLA20740 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Airport Rd. Rd. Rd Wise Rd 2036 $550,000 In Lincoln: Construction of multi-use bridge across Auburn Ravine: Preliminary Engineering, Environmental Yes Documentation, Permitting, and Construction of bicycle and Completion by PLA25022 Placer City of Lincoln A- Bike & Ped Auburn Ravine Bike/Ped Bridge Phase 1 pedestrian bridge crossing Auburn Ravine. 2020 $987,193 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Aviation Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes from Venture Dr. to terminus (0.5 miles Completion after PLA18650 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Aviation Blvd. terminus 0.5 miles north of Venture Dr. Aviation Blvd Venture Dr. north of Venture Dr.) 2036 $850,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after PLA25304 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Aviation Blvd. Road Extension: 4 lanes from Venture Dr. to Wise Rd. Aviation Blvd Venture Dr Wise Rd 2036 $1,500,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 6 lanes from Ferrari Ranch Rd. to Sterling Pkwy. Ferrari Ranch Completion after PLA18760 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity E. Joiner Pkwy. Includes: Hwy. 65 / UPRR overcrossing. E. Joiner Pkwy Road Sterling Pkwy 2036 $700,000 East side East Ave. between SR 93 (McBean Park Dr.) and 12th St.; east side E. Joiner Pkwy. between 12 Bridges Dr. and Yes East Ave. and East Joiner Pkwy. Sidewalks Westview Dr.: Construct sidewalk, curb and gutter, curb Completion by PLA25515 Placer City of Lincoln A- Bike & Ped (SRTS) ramps; install bike lanes. SRTS3-03-005 2020 $519,600 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen East Joiner Parkway from 2 to 4 lanes from Twelve East Joiner Twelve Bridges Completion after PLA18810 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity East Joiner Parkway Bridges Dr. to Rocklin city limits. Parkway Dr Rocklin City limits 2036 $290,000 B- Road & Highway Widen East Joiner Parkway from 2 to 4 lanes from Del Webb East Joiner Completion by Yes PLA18790 Placer City of Lincoln Capacity East Joiner Parkway Blvd. to Twelve Bridges. Parkway Del Webb Blvd Twelve Bridges 2020 $1,104,290 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from SR 65 to SR 193 STREET NAME: Completion after PLA25169 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Ferrari Ranch Road Ferrari Ranch Road Ferrari Ranch Road SR 65 SR 193 2036 $275,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Extend Ferrari Ranch Road from existing City Limit near Completion after PLA25467 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Ferrari Ranch Road Extension Caledon Circle to Moore Road (Village 7 boundary). 2036 $1,920,000 Project In Lincoln: from Nicolaus Rd.(near K Street)to East Avenue; Development B- Road & Highway including overpass over UPRR and SR 65 and connection to Completion after PLA20780 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Gladding Parkway 12th Street, construct a new 2 lane roadway. Gladding Parkway Nicolaus Rd East Avenue 2036 $2,300,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Industrial Blvd., from Route 65 to 12 Bridges Dr.: Widen from Completion after PLA18710 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Industrial Blvd. 2 to 4 lanes. 2036 $948,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Industrial Blvd., from 12 Bridges Dr. to Athens Blvd.: Widen Completion after PLA18720 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Industrial Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes. Industrial Blvd 12 Bridges Dr Athens Blvd 2036 $1,876,246 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after PLA25164 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Joiner Pkwy. Widen: 6 lanes from Nicolaus Rd. to Ferrari Ranch Rd. Joiner Pkwy Nicolaus Rd Ferrari Ranch Road 2036 $344,000 Lincoln Blvd. (SR 65) between Sterling Pkwy. and 7th St.: Yes G- System Management, Upgrade traffic signals; install safety lighting and bike lanes. Completion by PLA25531 Placer City of Lincoln Operations, and ITS Lincoln Blvd. Signal Upgrade and Lighting (HSIP5-03-006) 2020 $1,080,000 In Lincoln: Between 7th Street and McBean Park Drive; construct various pedestrian, bicycle, NEV, and ITS improvements along Lincoln Boulevard (old Highway 65 / G Street). Improvements will consist of gap sidewalk construction, pedestrian improvements to railroad crossings, Yes pedestrian crossings along Lincoln Boulevard, bicycle and NEV lanes, connection to the existing trail along Auburn Ravine east of Highway 65, roadway narrowing through the construction of landscape medians and frontage improvements where appropriate, and traffic signal interconnection and coordination along the corridor. Completion by PLA25464 Placer City of Lincoln A- Bike & Ped Lincoln Blvd. Streetscape - Phase 1 (Emission Benefits in kg/day: ROG 0.58, NOx 0.41, PM10 0.08) 2020 $3,278,812 Lincoln Blvd, First Street to McBean Park Drive: Provide a more pedestrian, bicycle and Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) friendly environment along the main street through the city. Pedestrian improvements include wider sidewalks, bulb- Yes outs at intersections and crosswalks. Bicycle and NEV improvements include Class 2 lanes on each side of the street. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: ROG 0.16, NOx 0.11, PM10 0.06) Completion by PLA25554 Placer City of Lincoln A- Bike & Ped Lincoln Blvd. Streetscape - Phase 2 (Toll Credits for PE and CON) 2020 $1,019,639 C- Maintenance & Completion by Yes PLA25540 Placer City of Lincoln Rehabilitation McBean Park Bridge Rehabilitation z 2020 $8,083,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway north Lincoln city Completion after PLA25162 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity McCourtney Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from 12th St. to north Lincoln city limits. McCourtney Rd 12th St limits 2036 $48,800 B- Road & Highway Yes PLA25595 Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Nelson Lane Extension Extend Nelson Lane south of SR-65 Bypass 2021-2036 $25,000,000 Nelson Ln, over Markham Ravine, 0.25 mi south of Nicolaus Yes B- Road & Highway Nelson Ln/Markham Ravine Bridge Rd. Replace existing functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge with a Completion by PLA25509 Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Replacement new 4 lane bridge. 2020 $8,212,828 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Nicolaus Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes from Airport Rd. to Completion after PLA15970 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Nicolaus Rd. Aviation Blvd. Nicolaus Rd Airport Rd Aviation Blvd 2036 $2,250,600 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 2 lanes between Sierra College Blvd. Sierra College Completion after PLA25305 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Oak Tree Extension and Wise Rd. / Hwy. 65 Oak Tree Blvd Wise Rd/Hwy 65 2036 $1,500,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Twelve Bridges Dr.from Industrial Blvd. to SR 65 Interchange: Completion after PLA19020 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Twelve Bridges Dr. widen from 2 to 4 lanes, including interchange improvements. 2036 $2,817,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 6 lanes from Hwy. 65 Interchange to Lincoln Pkwy. Hwy 65 Completion after PLA25166 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Twelve Bridges Dr. Includes: interchange improvements. Twelve Bridges Dr Interchange Lincoln Pkwy 2036 $225,200 In Lincoln, street rehabilitation of (1) Twelve Bridges Drive from Industrial Avenue east to Sierra College Boulevard and Yes C- Maintenance & Twelve Bridges Drive & Joiner Parkway (2) Joiner Parkway from the southern city limits to First Street. Completion by PLA25553 Placer City of Lincoln Rehabilitation rehabilitation (Toll Credits for CON) 2020 $1,332,655 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Lincoln: from Aviation Blvd. to Lakeside Dr., widen Venture Completion after PLA20760 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Venture Drive Dr. from 2 to 4 lanes. Ventura Drive Aviation Blvd Lakeside Dr 2036 $90,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: Local roads for various villages and SUD. Completion after PLA25315 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Village 1-7, SUD A-C local streets Includes: street enhancements. 2036 $11,800,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from McCourtney Rd. to east Lincoln city McCourtney Completion after PLA25163 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Virginiatown Rd. limits. Virginiatown Road Road east Lincoln city limits 2036 $50,200 Project Development B- Road & Highway Road Realignment: between Hwy. 65 Lincoln Bypass and Hwy 65 Lincoln Completion after PLA25310 Only Placer City of Lincoln Capacity Wise Rd. existing Hwy. 65. Includes: overcrossing. Wise Rd Bypass Existing Hwy 65 2036 $6,000,000 Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program, various locations in Yes C- Maintenance & City of Rocklin. See Caltrans Local Assistance HBP web site for Completion by PLA25566 Placer City of Rocklin Rehabilitation Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program backup list of bridges. 2020 $600,000 In Rocklin, Dominguez Road: extend with 2 lanes from Granite Yes B- Road & Highway Drive to Sierra College Boulevard, including new bridge over I- PLA19260 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Dominguez Road 80. 2021-2036 $11,000,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 68 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) At Rocklin Rd/Granite Dr., between east of Meyers St to the Caltrans WB on-ramp/right of way on Rocklin Road. : Replace Yes the existing four lane signalized intersection with a two lane G- System Management, roundabout (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON).. Toll Credits for Completion by PLA25635 Placer City of Rocklin Operations, and ITS Granite Drive at Rocklin Road Roundabout ENG, ROW, CON 2020 $2,707,607 Project Development E- Transit Capital Midas Ave., from Pacific St. to Third St., construct 2 lane Completion after PLA25373 Only Placer City of Rocklin (Minor) Midas Ave. Grade Separation grade separation of UP tracks including right of way. Midas Ave Pacific St. Third St. 2036 $5,650,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway SW of Sunset Completion after PLA25272 Only Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Pacific St. Widen: 6 lanes from SW of Sunset Blvd. to NE of Sunset Blvd. Pacific St. Blvd NE of Sunset Blvd 2036 $240,000
Yes G- System Management, Completion by PLA17820 Placer City of Rocklin Operations, and ITS Pacific Street On Pacific Street: Construct downtown improvements. 2020 $8,000,000 Construct & add striped median ,striping, pavement markings and signage on both NB and SB lanes of Pacific Street. The project will also construct a Class II bike path on the Yes northwest portion of Pacific Street from Town of Loomis Pacific Street-Bikeway/Neighborhood Electric border to Del Mar Ave.(Emission Benefits in kg/day: ROG Completion by PLA25552 Placer City of Rocklin A- Bike & Ped Vehicle Expansion Project 0.16; NOx 0.13; PM10 0.08) 2020 $1,698,542 B- Road & Highway In Rocklin, Rocklin Road: widen to 6 lanes from Granite Drive Completion by Yes PLA19400 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Rocklin Rd. Widening to westbound I-80 ramps. 2020 $1,320,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Rocklin, Rocklin Road from Aguilar Road / Eastbound I-80 Completion after PLA19401 Only Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Rocklin Road on-ramps to Sierra College Blvd: widen from 4 to 6 lanes. Rocklin Rd EB I-80 ramps Sierra College Blvd 2036 $1,534,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Rocklin Road from 2 to 4 lanes from Loomis town Loomis Town Completion after PLA25273 Only Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Rocklin Road Widening limits to east of Sierra College Boulevard. Rocklin Rd limits Sierra College Blvd 2036 $372,266 B- Road & Highway In Rocklin: from Rocklin Rd. onto both WB and EB I-80; Completion by Yes PLA25345 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Rocklin Road/I-80 Interchange construct roundabouts at ramp EB/WB ramp terminus. 2020 $26,150,000 B- Road & Highway In Rocklin, widen Sierra College Boulevard from 4 to 5 lanes Yes PLA15400 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Sierra College Blvd. Widening from I-80 to Aguliar Tributary. 2021-2036 $3,800,000 B- Road & Highway In Rocklin, Sierra College Boulevard from Aguilar Tributary to Yes PLA20460 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Sierra College Blvd. Widening Nightwatch: widen from 4 to 5 lanes. 2021-2036 $2,750,000 Project In Rocklin, Sierra College Boulevard: widen to 4 lanes from Development B- Road & Highway intersection with Valley View Parkway to Loomis Town limits Valley View Completion after PLA19330 Only Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Sierra College Boulevard (SPRTA Segment #2a). Sierra College Blvd Parkway Loomis Town limits 2036 $8,650,000 C- Maintenance & Reconstuct Sunset Blvd from Fairway Drive to Stanford Ranch Completion by Yes PLA25551 Placer City of Rocklin Rehabilitation Sunset Blvd Reconstruction Road. (Toll credits for CON.) 2020 $876,500 B- Road & Highway Sunset Boulevard: Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from north bound Yes PLA25156 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Sunset Blvd. Widening SR 65 ramp to West Stanford Ranch Road. 2021-2036 $1,100,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Sunset Boulevard from 4 to 6 lanes, from Standford Completion after PLA15620 Only Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Sunset Boulevard Ranch Road to Pacific Street Sunset Blvd Topaz Ave. South Whitney Blvd 2036 $4,177,406 B- Road & Highway Widen Sunset Boulevard bridge at UPRR from 4 to 6 lanes Yes PLA17910 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Sunset Boulevard from South Whitney Blvd. to Pacific St. 2021-2036 $2,600,000 B- Road & Highway Widen Sunset Boulevard from 4 to 6 lanes from Stanford Yes PLA19360 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Sunset Boulevard Ranch Rd. to Topaz. 2021-2036 $2,600,000 University Avenue: Construct new four lane roadway from the intersection of Whitney Ranch Parkway north to the Yes B- Road & Highway extension of West Ranch View Drive. One or more phases of Completion by PLA25268 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity University Avenue Phase 1 this project may require federal permitting. 2020 $2,500,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Valley View Parkway: Construct 2 lanes from Park Drive to Valley View Completion after PLA19250 Only Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Valley View Parkway Sierra College Blvd. Parkway Park Drive Sierra College Blvd 2036 $9,575,000 B- Road & Highway West Oaks Boulevard: Construct new 4-lane extension from existing Yes PLA25151 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity West Oaks Boulevard terminus to 4-lane portion to Whitney Ranch Parkway. West Oaks Blvd terminous Whitney Ranch Pkwy 2021-2036 $3,500,000 B- Road & Highway Whitney Ranch Parkway, construct new 4-lane facility from Whitney Ranch Old Ranch Yes PLA19290 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Whitney Ranch Parkway east of Wildcat Blvd. to Whitney Oaks Dr. Pkwy Road Whitney Oaks Dr. 2021-2036 $12,428,000 B- Road & Highway In Rocklin, Whitney Ranch Parkway: construct four-lane Completion by Yes PLA25025 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Whitney Ranch Parkway facility from SR 65 to east of Wildcat Boulevard. 2020 $1,730,000 At SR 65 and Whitney Ranch Parkway: Construct Phase 1A of the Whitney Ranch Interchange by constructing NB on- and Yes B- Road & Highway off-ramps, overcrossing structure, and southbound loop on- Completion by PLA25521 Placer City of Rocklin Capacity Whitney Ranch Parkway Interchange Phase 1A ramp. 2020 $3,800,000 In Roseville, resurface the following arterial roadways - Pleasant Grove Blvd from Hartley Wy to Fiddyment Rd & from Michner Dr to Foothills Blvd; Fiddyment Rd from Pleasant Grove Blvd to Blue Oaks Blvd; Foothills Blvd from Pleasant Grove Blvd to Junction Blvd & from Baseline Rd to Atkinson St; Galilee Rd from Industrial Ave to Pleasant Grove Blvd; Vineyard Rd from Brady Ln to Atkinson St; Denio Loop from Yes Foothills Blvd to Atkinson St; E Roseville Parkway from Douglas Blvd to Sierra College Blvd; Atlantic St from Wills Rd to I-80 WB On Ramp; Eureka Rd from Sunrise Ave to Douglas Blvd; Sunrise Ave from Smith Ln to Kensington Dr; N. Sunrise Ave from Frances Dr to Lead Hill Blvd; Sierra Gardens Dr from Santa Clara Dr to Douglas Blvd; Santa Clara Dr from Sierra C- Maintenance & gardens Dr to Douglas Blvd; and Douglas Blvd from N. Sunrise Completion by PLA25578 Placer City of Roseville Rehabilitation 2015 RSTP Arterial Microsurfacing Project Ave to Sierra Gardens. (Toll credits for CON.) 2020 $6,374,233 In Roseville, upgrade ADA pedestrian ramps along various arterial and collector roadways for safety and to meet current Yes ADA standards. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.10 ROG; 0.06 Completion by PLA25581 Placer City of Roseville A- Bike & Ped 2017 Pedestrian Facilities Improvement NOx; 0.02 PM2.5) 2020 $815,925 In Roseville, Atkinson St./PFE Rd.: widen from two to four Project lanes from Foothills Blvd to just south of Dry Creek, including Development connector road from Foothills to Atkinson (mirror image of Only B- Road & Highway existing Denio Loop connector on N/E side of Foothills) and Completion after PLA19810 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Atkinson St./PFE Rd. Widening signal removal. 2036 $7,000,000 B- Road & Highway In Roseville, Baseline Rd., from Brady Lane to Fiddyment Completion by Yes PLA15660 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Baseline Rd. Widening Road: widen from 3 to 4 lanes. 2020 $6,106,889 In Roseville, Baseline Road from Fiddyment Road to Sierra Yes B- Road & Highway Vista Western edge west of Watt Avenue: widen from 2 to 6 Completion by PLA15100 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Baseline Road lanes. 2020 $7,852,055 In Roseville, Extend 2 lanes of Blue Oaks Blvd from Hayden Yes B- Road & Highway Parkway to Westside Dr., Including south half of a 6-lane Completion by PLA25528 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Blue Oaks Blvd Extension - Phase 1 bridge over Kaseberg Creek. 2020 $6,000,000 B- Road & Highway In Roseville, Blue Oaks Blvd., from Westbrook Dr. to Santucci Completion by Yes PLA25539 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Blue Oaks Blvd. Extension Phase 2 Blvd. (formerly Watt Ave.), extend 2 lanes. 2020 $6,350,000 In Roseville, improve access to Civic Center transit transfer facility by constructing transit/bicycle/pedestrian related Yes improvements, including pedestrian bridge and Class I trail improvements. (Emission benefits in kg/day: ROG 0.55, NOx Completion by PLA25465 Placer City of Roseville A- Bike & Ped Downtown Pedestrian Bridge 0.34, PM2.5 0.11) 2020 $3,217,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Bikeway Facilities: from Darling Wy. to western Roseville City Riverside 0.75 miles west of Completion after PLA25318 Only Placer City of Roseville Capacity Dry Creek limits along Dry Creek. Dry Creek Bikeway Avenue Atkinson Street 2036 $550,000 In Roseville, along Dry Creek, Cirby Creek and Linda Creek, Yes construct class 1 bike trail. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.09 Completion by PLA19910 Placer City of Roseville A- Bike & Ped Dry Creek Greenway Trail ROG, 0.07 NOx, 0.03 PM2.5) 2020 $3,268,629 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 6 lanes from Cirby to Vineyard and from Switchman Cirby And Completion after PLA25496 Only Placer City of Roseville Capacity Foothills Boulevard to Pilgrims. Foothills Blvd Switrchman Vineyard and Pilgrims 2036 $2,390,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after PLA15740 Only Placer City of Roseville Capacity Galleria Blvd. Widen: 6 lanes from Berry to Roseville Pkwy. Galleria Blvd Berry Roseville Parkway 2036 $150,000 Interchange Modification: Hwy. 65 / Galleria Blvd. Project Interchange. Includes: re-stripe Galleria/ Stanford Ranch to 6 Development lanes; modify 3 NB & SB off ramps and SB Stanford Ranch Rd. Only B- Road & Highway to NB 65 on ramp; add 2nd N/B Galleria to NB Hwy. 65 left- SR 65 S/B on Completion after PLA25211 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Galleria Blvd. turn lane (Phase II). Galleria Blvd ramp Five Star Dr 2036 $400,000 Project In Roseville, at existing interchange on State Route Development B- Road & Highway Galleria Blvd./SR 65 Interchange Phase II 65/Galleria Blvd/Stanford Ranch Rd.: modify all on and off SR65 S/B on Completion after PLA25209 Only Placer City of Roseville Capacity Improvements ramps to provide improved operations. Galleria Blvd ramp SR 65 N/B off ramp 2036 $5,000,000 Roseville, Harding Blvd @ Dry Creek, I-80 to Royer Park: Construct class 1 bikeway in 2 phases. Phase 1 from I-80 to Harding Blvd completed in 2004 (PLA20870). Phase 2 Yes construction is separated into 3 segments: Segment 3 is located from Folsom Road to Lincoln Street/Royer Park. Completion by PLA25386 Placer City of Roseville A- Bike & Ped I-80 To Royer Park Bikeway Phase 2 - Segment 3 (Emission benefits in kg/day: 0.25 ROG, 0.2 NOx 0.09 PM10) 2020 $870,909 Industrial Ave, over Pleasant Grove Creek, 0.7 mi S Placer Yes C- Maintenance & Industrial Ave/Pleasant Grove Creek Bridge Blvd. Replace the existing 2 lane functionally obsolete bridge Completion by PLA25507 Placer City of Roseville Rehabilitation Replacement with a new 2 lane bridge. 2020 $4,960,000 In Roseville, on Louis Blvd at Orlando Ave.: Develop and construct an improved transfer point and intermodal facility Yes E- Transit Capital with a 35-space park and ride facility. (Includes previously Completion by REG17928 Placer City of Roseville (Minor) Louis/Orlando Transfer Point Improvements programmed PLA16080.) 2020 $4,738,000 B- Road & Highway City of Roseville, Market St., from approx. 800 feet north of Completion by Yes PLA25377 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Market St. Baseline Road to Pleasant Grove: Extend 2 lanes. 2020 $8,500,000 B- Road & Highway In Roseville, Market Street South, from Baseline Road to Completion by Yes PLA25571 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Market Street South approx. 800 feet north: construct 2-lane road. 2020 $500,000 Oak Ridge Dr, over Linda Creek, 0.2 mi N Cirby Way. Replace the existing functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge with a new 2 Yes C- Maintenance & lane bridge. 11/8/2010: (Toll Credits programmed for PE, Completion by PLA25508 Placer City of Roseville Rehabilitation Oak Ridge Dr/Linda Creek Bridge Replacement ROW, and & CON.) 2020 $3,250,000 In Roseville, Miners Ravine Trail, from Lincoln Street to Royer Park along the Dry Creek corridor: Extend class 1 trail, including relocation and safety upgrades to existing Ice House Bridge. From transit stop at Downtown Roseville Library to existing class 1 trail in Royer Park: provide bicycle and Yes pedestrian improvements including replacement of Taylor Street Bridge. (Emission benefits in kg/day: ROG 0.13, NOx 0.09, PM10 0.04) (FTA 5307 to be used on Taylor Street bridge and bike/ped improvements leading to transit stop at Completion by PLA25469 Placer City of Roseville A- Bike & Ped Oak Street Extension of Miners Ravine Trail library.) 2020 $3,046,159 In Roseville, reconstruct ADA pedestrian ramps along various arterial and collector roadways to current ADA standards. Yes (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.10 ROG, 0.06 NOx, 0.02 Completion by PLA25500 Placer City of Roseville A- Bike & Ped Pedestrian Facilities Improvement Project PM2.5) (Toll Credits for CON) 2020 $562,525 Construct New Road: 4 lane divided Hwy. between Foothills Yes B- Road & Highway Boulevard and Fiddyment Road. Includes signalized PLA25337 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Placer Parkway Phase 2 intersections at Fiddyment Rd. Placer Parkway Foothills Blvd Fiddyment Road 2021-2036 $14,500,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Extend 4-lanes from 1500 feet west of market to Santucci Pleasant Grove Completion after PLA25489 Only Placer City of Roseville Capacity Pleasant Grove Blvd. (Watt) Blvd W/O Market St Santucci Blvd 2036 $1,045,000 B- Road & Highway In Roseville, extend 4 lanes of Pleasant Grove from 1500 feet Completion by Yes PLA25527 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Pleasant Grove Blvd. Extension west of Market St to Santucci Blvd (Watt Ave). 2020 $5,300,000 B- Road & Highway In Roseville, from Foothills Blvd to Wood Creek Oaks, widen Yes PLA15760 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Pleasant Grove Blvd. Widening Pleasant Grove Blvd from 4 to 6 lanes. 2021-2036 $4,200,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 69 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) for various Yes B- Road & Highway Roseville Bridge Preventive Maintenance bridges in the City of Roseville. See Caltrans Local Assistance Completion by PLA25572 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Program HBP website for backup list of projects. 2020 $817,000 In Roseville, install Changeable Message Sign (CMS) on SW/B Pleasant Grove Blvd. approaching Roseville Pkwy. to reduce Yes traffic congestion by improving traffic information G- System Management, Roseville CMS Installation Project - Pleasant dissemination per the ITS Master Plan. (Qualitative emission Completion by PLA25545 Placer City of Roseville Operations, and ITS Grove Blvd. benefits on file.) 2020 $200,000 B- Road & Highway Roseville Rd. from Cirby Way to the city limits: Realign Completion by Yes PLA25534 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Roseville Rd. Realignment roadway. (HSIP5-03-017) 2020 $3,539,500 B- Road & Highway Widen Roseville Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes Between Cirby Way and Completion by Yes PLA15850 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Roseville Road Widening southern city limit. 2020 $2,500,000 To purchase and install electronic fareboxes, software, probes, software, automatic vehicle location devices, mobile Yes data computers, video security cameras and software, and E- Transit Capital digital readerboard equipment for transfer points. [Project Completion by PLA25214 Placer City of Roseville (Minor) Roseville Transit ITS Project replaces PCT10430 and PCT10420] 2020 $1,100,000 Maintenance of transit fleet and operating ADA transit services.2013 Preventive Maintenance = $0; 2013 ADA Operations = $260,000;2014 Operating Assistance = Yes $1,322,938; 2014 ADA Operations = $20,6952015 Preventive F- Transit O&M Roseville Transit Preventive Maintenance and Maintenance = $200,000;2016 Preventive Maintenance = Completion by PLA25498 Placer City of Roseville (Demand Response) ADA Operations 2011-2016 $200,000; 2020 $5,036,745 B- Road & Highway City of Roseville, Santucci Blvd. (North Watt Ave.): Extend four Completion by Yes PLA25378 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Santucci Blvd. Extension lanes from Vista Grande Blvd.to Blue Oaks Boulevard. 2020 $6,500,000 In Roseville, Santucci Boulevard South (Watt Ave.) from Yes B- Road & Highway Baseline Road north to Vista Grande Boulevard: Construct 4- Completion by PLA25570 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Santucci Boulevard South lane road. 2020 $1,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Sierra College Blvd from Sacramento County line to Olympus Completion after PLA15600 Only Placer City of Roseville Capacity Sierra College Blvd Widening Dr.: widen to 6 lanes. 2036 $1,661,100 Improve Sierra Gardens Transfer Point. Improvements may include new bus turnouts, shelters, restrooms, landscaping, Yes lighting, crosswalks, sidewalks, and other pedestrian E- Transit Capital improvements such as bulb-outs. (Emission benefits in Completion by PLA25323 Placer City of Roseville (Minor) Sierra Gardens Transfer Point kg/day: 63 ROG, 63 Nox, 25 PM10.) 2020 $1,012,151
Yes F- Transit O&M Operating cost contribution towards ADA complementary Completion by PLA25416 Placer City of Roseville (Demand Response) South Placer Call Center paratransit services provided for the South Placer Call Center. 2020 $187,500 Multiple Schools in the Roseville City School District: Expand Completion by Yes PLA25516 Placer City of Roseville D- Programs & Planning SRTS Toolkit Expansion Safe Routes to School (SRTS) toolkit. SRTS3-03-006 2020 $295,000 B- Road & Highway In Roseville; from just N/O E. Roseville Parkway to City Limits, Yes PLA15911 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Taylor Rd. widen Taylor Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes. Taylor Rd Roseville Pkwy City Limits 2021-2036 $5,042,390 B- Road & Highway In Roseville, from Fiddyment Rd west to Westbrook Blvd, Completion by Yes PLA25538 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Vista Grande Arterial construct new 4-lane arterial. 2020 $2,500,000 In Roseville, widen Washington Blvd from 2 to 4 lanes, including widening the Andora Underpass under the UPRR tracks, between Sawtell Rd and just south of Pleasant Grove Yes Blvd. and construct bicycle and pedestrian improvements adjacent to roadway. (CMAQ funds are for bicycle and B- Road & Highway Washington Blvd/Andora Undercrossing pedestrian improvements only. Emission Benefits in kg/day: Completion by PLA25501 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Improvement Project 0.9 ROG, 0.51 NOx, 0.16 PM10) 2020 $16,091,643 In Roseville, along Washington Boulevard from Kaseburg Drive to Pleasant Grove Boulevard, construct new concrete sidewalks, Class I & Class II bike facilities. Proposed facilities Yes cross under the Union Pacific tracks (aka "Andora Underpass"). (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.24 ROG; 0.16 Completion by PLA25582 Placer City of Roseville A- Bike & Ped Washington Boulevard Improvement NOx; 0.05 PM2.5). 2020 $1,242,517 Project Construct New Road: west of Fiddyment Road between Development B- Road & Highway Baseline and Pleasant Grove in proposed new Sierra Vista Completion after PLA25483 Only Placer City of Roseville Capacity Westbrook Blvd. Specific Plan. Westbrook Blvd Baseline Rd Pleasant Grove Blvd 2036 $7,500,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: west of Fiddyment and north of Blue Completion by Yes PLA25481 Placer City of Roseville Capacity Westbrook Blvd. Oaks in proposed new Creekview Specific Plan. Westbrook Blvd Blue Oaks Blvd Northern City Limits 2020 $6,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen from 2 - 4 lanes from Canavari Dr to North Branch of Woodcreek Oaks Completion after PLA19470 Only Placer City of Roseville Capacity Woodcreek Oaks Pleasant Grove Creek. Blvd Canavari Dr Blue Oaks Blvd 2036 $3,500,000
Yes G- System Management, At-Grade Railroad Crossings, including quit zones throughout PLA25626 Placer PCTPA Operations, and ITS At-Grade Railroad Crossings County 2021-2036 $500,000,000 Construct various bicycle facilities according to implement the Yes Regional Bicycle Master Plan and Local Bicycle Master Plans Lump Sum or PLA25588 Placer PCTPA A- Bike & Ped Bicycle Facilities as amended. Ongoing $40,000,000 Lump-sum for bus vehicles for fiscal years 2019-2036; does Yes E- Transit Capital not account for expansion of service. Placer County operators Lump Sum or PLA25632 Placer PCTPA (Vehicles) Bus Replacement only. Ongoing $63,153,000 Enhance pedestrian/bicycle and landscaping along Yes Complete Street & Safe Routes to School approximately 40 miles of roadway and construct Safe Routes Lump Sum or PLA25587 Placer PCTPA A- Bike & Ped Improvements to School improvements to implement local plans. Ongoing $52,000,000
Yes G- System Management, Electric Vehicle Charging and Alternative Fuels Develop and construct an electric vehicle charging and Lump Sum or PLA25586 Placer PCTPA Operations, and ITS Infrastructure alternative fuels infrastructure. Ongoing $20,000,000 In Placer County: Between Douglas Blvd. and Rocklin Road; Reconfigure I-80/SR 65 interchange to widen southbound to Yes eastbound ramp from 1 to 2 lanes, and replace existing B- Road & Highway eastbound to northbound loop ramp with a new 3 lane direct PLA25601 Placer PCTPA Capacity I-80/SR 65 Interchange Improvements Phase 2 flyover ramp. 2021-2036 $110,000,000 In Placer County: Between Douglas Blvd. and Rocklin Road; Widen Taylor Road from 2 to 4 lanes between Roseville Yes Parkway and Pacific Street, and Reconfigure I-80/SR 65 B- Road & Highway interchange to widen the southbound to westbound ramp PLA25602 Placer PCTPA Capacity I-80/SR 65 Interchange Improvements Phase 3 from 2 to 3 lanes. 2021-2036 $179,000,000 In Placer County: Between Douglas Blvd. and Rocklin Road; Reconfigure I-80/SR 65 interchange to construct one lane Yes HOV direct connectors from eastbound to northbound and B- Road & Highway southbound to westbound (HOV lanes would extend to PLA25603 Placer PCTPA Capacity I-80/SR 65 Interchange Improvements Phase 4 between Galleria Blvd. and Pleasant Grove Blvd. on SR 65). 2021-2036 $95,000,000 Capital Costs for a three route Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system serving South Placer County; including planning, engineering, environmental studies, right-of-way acquisition, vehicles, related roadway improvements, signalization, park & ride Yes facilities, signage, bus stop improvements, ITS elements, fare vending equipment. BRT Route 1-CSUS Placer to Galleria to Watt/I-80 LRT station via I-80 HOV lane. BRT Route 2 - CSUS Placer to Placer Vineyards to Watt/I-80 LRT station via Watt E- Transit Capital Avenue. BRT Route 3 - Galleria to Hazel & Sunrise LRT Lump Sum or PLA25634 Placer PCTPA (Major) Placer County - Bus Rapid Transit Capital stations via Sierra College Boulevard/Hazel Avenue. Ongoing $82,526,000 Annual operating & maintenance (O&M) costs ($5,704,000) Yes F- Transit O&M (BRT & specifically for a three route BRT system for Fiscal years 2019- Lump Sum or PLA25585 Placer PCTPA Express) Placer County - Bus Rapid Transit O&M 2036) for a TBD transit operator. Ongoing $142,600,001 SR 65, from Galleria Blvd. to Lincoln Blvd., make capacity and operational improvements. Phase 2: From Galleria Blvd. to Yes Blue Oaks Blvd., widen from 4 to 7 lanes with 1 carpool lane B- Road & Highway SR 65 Capacity & Operational Improvements and 1 general purpose lane southbound, and 1 lane as Galleria PLA25637 Placer PCTPA Capacity Phase 2 general purpose northbound. State Route 65 Boulevard Blue Oaks Blvd 2021-2036 $32,500,000 SR 65, from Galleria Blvd. to Lincoln Blvd., make capacity and operational improvements. Phase 3: From Blue Oaks Blvd. to Yes B- Road & Highway SR 65 Capacity & Operational Improvements Lincoln Blvd., construct auxillary lanes both northbound and PLA25638 Placer PCTPA Capacity Phase 3 southbound. State Route 65 Blue Oaks Blvd Lincoln Blvd. 2021-2036 $12,000,000 SR 65, from Galleria Blvd. to Lincoln Blvd., make capacity and operational improvements. Phase 4: From Lincoln Blvd. to Blue Oaks Blvd., widen southbound in median to add lane, Project and from north of Galleria Blvd. (end of the I-80/SR 65 Development Interchange project) to Lincoln Blvd., widen northbound in Only median to add lane. Future enviornmental document will be B- Road & Highway SR 65 Capacity & Operational Improvements completed to determine if widneing in median will be carpool Completion after Placer PCTPA Capacity Phase 4 or general purpose lanes. State Route 65 Blue Oaks Blvd Lincoln Blvd. 2036 $57,000,000 Lump-sum annual Operating & Maintenance costs for fiscal Lump Sum or Yes PLA25631 Placer PCTPA F- Transit O&M (Bus) Transit Operating & Maintenance years 2019-2036; does not account for expansion of service Ongoing $224,910,000
In Rocklin: Between SR 65 (PM 4.5) and Rocklin Rd. (PM 5.9); Yes Construct eastbound I-80 auxiliary lane, including two-lane B- Road & Highway I-80 Eastbound Auxiliary Lane: SR 65 to Rocklin off-ramp, concrete barrier/retaining walls, and shoulder Completion by PLA25519 Placer PCTPA Capacity Rd. improvements. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, and CON) 2020 $4,990,000 In Roseville: Between east of Douglas Blvd. off-ramp to west of Riverside Ave.; Extend I-80 westbound auxiliary lane (PLA25542) to the east and west to create continuous 5th Yes lane on westbound I-80. The Douglas Boulevard off‐ramp B- Road & Highway would be reduced from a 2‐lane off‐ramp to a 1‐lane Completion by PLA25576 Placer PCTPA Capacity I-80 Westbound 5th Lane off‐ramp. 2020 $3,700,000
In Roseville: Between Douglas Blvd.(PM 2.0) and Riverside Yes B- Road & Highway I-80 Westbound Auxiliary Lane - Douglas Blvd. Ave. (PM 0.2); Construct westbound I-80 auxiliary lane and Completion by PLA25542 Placer PCTPA Capacity to Riverside Ave. shoulder improvements. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, and CON) 2020 $5,910,000 In Placer County: Between I-80 and Pleasant Grove Blvd; Reconfigure I-80/SR 65 interchange to widen northbound and Yes southbound SR 65 from 2 to 3 lanes, and widen westbound to B- Road & Highway northbound ramp from 1 to 2 lanes. (PA&ED, PS&E, ROW, PLA25440 Placer PCTPA Capacity I-80/SR 65 Interchange Improvements Phase 1 and CON to be matched with Toll Credits.) 2021-2036 $66,000,000 Provide educational and outreach efforts regarding alternative transportation modes to employers, residents, and the school community through the Placer County Yes Congestion Management Program (CMP). CMP activities will be coordinated with the City of Roseville and SACOG's Placer County Congestion Management Regional Rideshare / TDM Program. (KG/day ROG 54.00; NOx Completion by PLA25468 Placer PCTPA D- Programs & Planning Program 60.00; PM10 39.00) 2020 $955,429
In Placer County: provide motorist assistance and towing of Yes disabled vehicles during am and pm commute periods on I-80 G- System Management, (Riverside Ave to SR 49) and SR 65 (I-80 to Twelve Bridges Dr). Completion by PLA25543 Placer PCTPA Operations, and ITS Placer County Freeway Service Patrol (Emission Benefits in kg/day: ROG 7.35; NOx 1.10; PM10 1.16) 2020 $550,000 PCTPA plan, program, monitor (PPM) for RTPA related Completion by Yes PLA25413 Placer PCTPA D- Programs & Planning Planning, Programming, Monitoring 2011-2015 activities. 2020 $1,455,000 SR 65, from Galleria Blvd. to Lincoln Blvd., make capacity and operational improvements. Phase 1: From Galleria Blvd. to Yes B- Road & Highway SR 65 Capacity & Operational Improvements Pleasant Grove Blvd., construct auxiliary lanes on northbound Galleria Completion by PLA25529 Placer PCTPA Capacity Phase 1 and southbound SR 65. State Route 65 Boulevard Pleasant Grove Blvd 2020 $16,520,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Sacramento/Placer County Sacramento Completion after PLA25479 Only Placer Placer County Capacity 16th St. Line to Baseline Rd. 16th Street County Line Baseline Road 2036 $12,955,800
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 70 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Alpine Meadows Rd over Truckee River, 0.1 miles west of SH 89: Replace the existing structurally deficient 2 lane bridge Yes C- Maintenance & with a new 2 lane bridge. (Toll Credits programmed for ROW Completion by PLA25477 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Alpine Meadows Rd Bridge Rehabilitation & CON) 2020 $22,625,063 On Auburn-Folsom Rd between Douglas Blvd and Joe Rodgers Rd, construct a Class II Bike lane on both sides of the road, including signing and striping; construct sidewalk on both Yes sides of Auburn-Folsom Rd from Wilcox Place north to Joe Rodgers. (Emission benefits in kg/day: ROG 0.06, NOx 0.04, Completion by PLA25472 Placer Placer County A- Bike & Ped Auburn Folsom Rd Class II Bike Lane PM10 0.03) [Toll Credits for CON] 2020 $1,227,674 Auburn Folsom Rd. from approximately 60' N of Willow Ln. to Robin Hood Ln.: Construct sidewalks, curb ramps, curb and Yes gutter; install mid-block crosswalk; improve pavement Completion by PLA25533 Placer Placer County A- Bike & Ped Auburn Folsom Rd. Safety Improvements friction; provide dynamic speed sign.(HSIP5-03-013) 2020 $746,300
Yes B- Road & Highway Auburn Ravine Road overcrossing over I-80 between Bowman PLA15070 Placer Placer County Capacity Auburn Ravine Road at I-80 Overcrossing Road to Lincoln Way: widen overcrossing from 2 to 4 lanes. 2021-2036 $29,000,000 From Placer / Sacramento County line to Douglas Blvd, : Yes B- Road & Highway Widen to 4 lanes. Install signal at Auburn-Folsom Blvd and Completion by PLA15080 Placer Placer County Capacity Auburn-Folsom Rd Widening Fuller Dr. 2020 $28,300,000 B- Road & Highway Baseline Road Four to Six Lane Widening (East Widen From 4 to 6 lanes from Watt Avenue to Yes PLA20680 Placer Placer County Capacity Portion) Fiddyment/Walerga Road. 2021-2036 $11,270,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Baseline Road Four to Six Lane Widening (West Placer County, Baseline Road from Watt Avenue to Sutter Completion after PLA25127 Only Placer Placer County Capacity Portion) County Line, widen from 4 to 6 lanes. Baseline Rd Watt Ave Sutter County Line 2036 $2,400,000 B- Road & Highway Baseline Rd. from Watt Avenue to future 16th street: Widen Completion by Yes PLA15105 Placer Placer County Capacity Baseline Road Widening Phase 1 (West Portion) from 2 to 4 lanes. 2020 $19,200,000 B- Road & Highway Baseline Road from Sutter County Line to Future 16th Street. Yes PLA25463 Placer Placer County Capacity Baseline Road Widening Phase 2 (West Portion) Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. 2021-2036 $29,000,000 Bowman Rd, over UP Railroad, BNSF RR and AMTRAK, 0.1 Yes C- Maintenance & miles south of 19C-62: Rehabilitate the existing bridge Completion by PLA25447 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Bowman Rd Bridge without adding additional lanes. 2020 $2,230,002 Bowman Rd, over UP Railroad, BNSF Railyards & AMTRAK, 0.1 Yes C- Maintenance & miles north of 19C-61: Rehabilitate the existing bridge Completion by PLA25448 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Bowman Rd Bridge without adding additional lanes. 2020 $2,230,002 Brewer Rd., over Pleasant Grove Creek, 4.2 miles north of Yes C- Maintenance & Baseline Rd.: Replace 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. Completion by PLA25518 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Brewer Rd. Bridge Replacement (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, & CON.) 2020 $5,518,500 In Placer County, bridge approach and non-HBP participating Yes C- Maintenance & Bridge Approach and Non-HBP Partipating costs at Alpine Meadows @ Truckee River and Dowd Road @ Completion by PLA25559 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Costs Yankee Slough. (Toll Credits for CON) 2020 $1,000,000 In various location ins Placer County, perform preventive maintenance on bridges.1. Squaw Valley Rd., over Squaw Creek, 2 mi west of SH 89, Bridge Rail Replacement, Deck Rehab.2. Donner Pass Rd., over S. Yuba River, north of Yuba Dr., Bridge Rail Replacement, Deck Rehab.3. Cisco Rd., over S. Yuba River, near Hampshire Rocks Rd., Replace Joint Seals, Yes Deck Rehab.4. Alpine Meadows Rd., over Bear Creek, 0.9 mi west of SH 89, Polyester Concrete Deck Overlay.5. Fowler Rd., over Auburn Ravine, 0.6 mi north of SH 193, Methacrylate Deck Overlay.6. Gold Hill Rd., over Doty Ravine, 0.3 mi south C- Maintenance & of Wise Rd., Methacrylate Deck Overlay.7. Develop Bridge Completion by PLA25458 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Bridge Preventive Maintenance Preventive Maintenance Plan. 2020 $1,356,000 Replace one CNG bus with one new cleaner CNG Bus for Yes E- Transit Capital Placer County Transit. (Emissions Benefits in kg/day: NOx Completion by PLA25583 Placer Placer County (Vehicles) CNG Bus 0.75.) 2020 $530,000 Pedestrian Pathway along Cook Riolo Rd from existing sidewalk at Creekview Ranch Middle School North (Emission Yes Benefits in kg/day: ROG 0.04, NOx 0.02, PM10 0.01) [Toll Completion by PLA25565 Placer Placer County A- Bike & Ped Cook Riolo Road Pathway Credits for PE, ROW, CON] 2020 $2,190,157 Crosby Harold Rd. Over Doty Creek, 0.9 mi N of Wise Rd.: Yes C- Maintenance & Replace an existing 1 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. Completion by PLA25536 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Crosby Harold Rd. Bridge (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $2,790,000 Dowd Rd. over Yankee Slough, just south of Dalby Rd.: Yes C- Maintenance & Replace existing structurally deficient 1 lane bridge with new Completion by PLA25453 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Dowd Rd at Yankee Slough Bridge Replacement 2 lane bridge. (Toll Credits for CON) 2020 $4,812,511 Dowd Rd over Coon Creek, 0.4 miles north of Wise Rd.: Yes C- Maintenance & Replace existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (Toll Completion by PLA25449 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Dowd Rd Bridge Replacement at Coon Creek Credits programmed for ROW & CON) 2020 $5,675,000 Dowd Rd, over Markham Ravine, 0.5 miles south Nicolaus Rd: Yes C- Maintenance & Dowd Rd Bridge Replacement at Markham Replace existing 2 lane structurally deficient bridge with a Completion by PLA25474 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Ravine new 2 lane bridge. (Toll credits for CON.) 2020 $5,050,000 Extend Dyer Lane west/north to Baseline Road at Brewer Project Road and east/north to Baseline Road west of Fiddyment Development B- Road & Highway Road and widen to four lanes in accordance with the Placer Completion after Only PLA18390 Placer Placer County Capacity Dyer Lane Extension Vineyards Specific Plan. Dyer Ln Baseline Rd 16th Street 2036 $18,247,600 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Fiddyment Road from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from Roseville Roseville City Completion after PLA25130 Only Placer Placer County Capacity Fiddyment Road Widening City Limits to Athens Road. Fiddyment Rd Limits Athens Rd 2036 $11,550,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Foothills Blvd.: Construct as a 2 lane road from the City of Roseville City Completion after PLA15220 Only Placer Placer County Capacity Foothills Boulevard Roseville to Sunset Blvd. Foothills Blvd Limits Sunset Blvd 2036 $4,062,300 Gold Hill Rd. over Auburn Ravine, 0.65 mi north of SR 193: Yes C- Maintenance & Replace existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (Toll Completion by PLA25541 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Gold Hill Rd. Bridge Replacement credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $5,018,250 Haines Rd, over Wise Canal, 0.45 miles North of Bell Rd: Yes C- Maintenance & Replace the existing functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge with a Completion by PLA25475 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Haines Rd Bridge Replacement new 2 lane bridge. (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, & CON) 2020 $5,180,000 In Placer County, hot mix asphalt (HMA) overlay on various County roads: (1) Douglas Boulevard from Barton to Auburn- Folsom, (2) Dry Creek Road from Joeger to HWY 49, (3) Yes Richardson Drive from Atwood Rd to Bell Rd, (4) Nevada Street from 150' east of Nevada Way to Auburn City Limits, C- Maintenance & (5) Edgewood Road from SR49 to Edgewood Place (Toll Completion by PLA25562 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation HMA Overlay, Various County Roads (Yr2) Credits for CON). Toll Credits for CON 2020 $2,809,435 In Placer County, hot mix asphalt (HMA) overlay on various County roads: (1) Sierra College Boulevard from Olympus Rd to Eureka Rd, (2) Old State Highway from Taylor Rd to HWY Yes 193, (3) Fruitvale Road from Fowler Rd to Gold Hill Rd, (4) C- Maintenance & West Wise Road from HWY 65 to Lincoln-Sheridan Blvd (Toll Completion by PLA25563 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation HMA Overlay, Various County Roads (Yr3) Credits for CON) 2020 $2,299,047 King Rd. between Auburn Folsom Rd. and Sudor Ln.: Widen Yes travel lanes; construct drainage improvements. HSIP4-03-007 Completion by PLA25512 Placer Placer County D- Programs & Planning King Rd. Safety Lane Widening [Toll Credits for CON] 2020 $1,200,000 In and near Auburn - adjacent to Route 49 between I-80 and Dry Creek Road - three new local connector roads; 1)Quartz Drive Connector from Route 49 to Locksley Lane, 2) Willow Creek Drive Connector from Route 49 to 1st Street in Dewitt Yes Center, and 3)Edgewood Road Conector from Route 49 to Alta Mesa Drive (City of Auburn) - state and local funding only. LIMITS: Auburn and north of Auburn, three connector roads intersecting with State Route 49. (1) Quartz Drive B- Road & Highway Connector, (2) Willow Creek Drive Connector (3) Edgewood Completion by PLA20350 Placer Placer County Capacity Local Roads in Auburn Road Connector. STREET NAME: Local Roads in Auburn 2020 $3,671,000 Complete a 10' wide paved Class I multipurpose trail connecting Northstar Village roundabout to the southerly Yes border of Army Corps property. (Emission Benefits in kg/day; Completion by PLA25549 Placer Placer County A- Bike & Ped Martis Valley Trail ROG 0.02;NOx 0.01;PM10 0.01) 2020 $4,700,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway North Antelope Rd: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Sacramento Sacramento Completion after PLA15270 Only Placer Placer County Capacity North Antelope Rd. County line to PFE Rd. North Antelope Rd County Line PFE Rd 2036 $1,551,000 Project In Placer County, east of Route 49, from Dry Creek Rd to Development B- Road & Highway Quartz Rd, construct a 2 lane road. Name of road shall be Completion after PLA15300 Only Placer Placer County Capacity Parallel Rd. determined in the future. Parallel Road Dry Creek Rd Quartz Dr 2036 $6,025,000 C- Maintenance & Various locations throughout Placer County: Install pavement Completion by Yes PLA25532 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Pavement Markings markings (HSIP5-03-011, HSIP5-03-012) 2020 $1,251,500 Along Hwy 49 on the westside from Bell Rd to Education St. South side of Education St. west to connect to existing Yes sidewalk and improve ADA ramps & crosswalks along Town Pedestrian Improvements along Hwy 49, Court (Emissions Benefits in kg/day: ROG 0.07, NOx 0.04, Completion by PLA25564 Placer Placer County A- Bike & Ped Education Street, and Town Court PM10 0.02) (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $925,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from North Antelope Rd. to Roseville City North Antelope Completion after PLA20690 Only Placer Placer County Capacity PFE Rd. Limits. PFE Rd Rd Roseville City Limits 2036 $2,215,100 B- Road & Highway PFE Rd, from Watt Ave. to Walerga Rd: Widen from 2 to 4 Completion by Yes PLA18490 Placer Placer County Capacity PFE Rd. Widening lanes and realign. 2020 $13,085,000 In Placer County: Between SR 65 and Foothills Boulevard; Construct phase 1 of Placer Parkway, including upgrading the SR 65/Whitney Ranch Parkway interchange to include a Yes southbound slip off-ramp, southbound loop on-ramp, northbound loop on-ramp, six-lane bridge over SR 65, and B- Road & Highway four-lane roadway extension from SR 65 (Whitney Ranch Completion by PLA25299 Placer Placer County Capacity Placer Parkway Phase 1 Parkway) to Foothills Boulevard. 2020 $70,000,000
Yes G- System Management, At 18 various locations throughout Placer County: install high Completion by PLA25567 Placer Placer County Operations, and ITS Safety Surface Treatment friction surface treatment. (HSIP6-03-010) 2020 $1,537,600 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Sierra College Blvd. from 2 to 4 lanes from Route 193 Completion after PLA15390 Only Placer Placer County Capacity Sierra College Blvd. to Loomis Town Limits. Sierra College Blvd SR193 Loomis Town Limits 2036 $13,000,000 Various corridors throughout Placer County: Conduct a Yes G- System Management, Roadway Safety Signing Audit and upgrade signs. (HSIP6-03- Completion by PLA25568 Placer Placer County Operations, and ITS Signage Upgrades 011) 2020 $1,658,522 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen from Bell Road to Dry Creek Road (total construction Completion after PLA25598 Only Placer Placer County Capacity SR 49 cost is $10,000,000) Highway 49 Bell Road Dry Creek Road 2036 $1,000,000 B- Road & Highway Widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes from Luther Road to Nevada Yes PLA25628 Placer Placer County Capacity SR 49 Street. Highway 49 Luther Rd Nevada St 2021-2036 $1,000,000
Yes G- System Management, Signalizations and Improvements along SR 49 in Completion by PLA25630 Placer Placer County Operations, and ITS SR49 Signalizations/ Improvements Auburn/North Auburn. 2020 $13,000,000 B- Road & Highway Sunset Blvd, from Foothills Boulevard to Fiddyment Rd: Completion by Yes PLA25170 Placer Placer County Capacity Sunset Blvd Phase 2 Construct a 2-lane road extension [PLA15410 is Phase 1.] 2020 $6,365,000 Widen Sunset Boulevard from State Route 65 to Cincinnati Yes B- Road & Highway Avenue from 2 to 4 lanes. Project includes widening Completion by PLA25044 Placer Placer County Capacity Sunset Blvd. Widening Industrial Blvd / UPRR overcrossing from 2 to 4 lanes. 2020 $8,675,000 Along SR89, from Squaw Valley Road to the USFS Silver Creek Yes Campground: construct 1.4 miles of multi-use trail . (Emission Completion by PLA25584 Placer Placer County A- Bike & Ped Truckee River Trail Benefits in kg/day; ROG 0.01; NOx 0.01) 2020 $4,500,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 71 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Walerga Rd, over Dry Creek, 1.1 mi S Base Line Rd. Yes C- Maintenance & Rehabilitate the existing 2 lane bridge without adding Completion by PLA25506 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Walerga Rd/Dry Creek Bridge Replacement additional lanes. High Cost Project agreement required. 2020 $21,870,000 B- Road & Highway Walerga Rd: Widen and realign from 2 to 4 lanes from Completion by Yes PLA15420 Placer Placer County Capacity Walerga Road Baseline Rd. to Placer / Sacramento County line. 2020 $13,781,700
Yes B- Road & Highway Watt Ave./Center Joint Ave., over Dry Creek, 0.4 mi north of Completion by PLA25535 Placer Placer County Capacity Watt Ave. Bridge Replacement P.F.E. Rd.: Replace existing 2 lane bridge with a 4 lane bridge. 2020 $19,892,750 B- Road & Highway Watt Avenue, from Baseline Rd. to Sacramento County Line: Sacramento County Yes PLA20700 Placer Placer County Capacity Watt Avenue Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Watt Ave Baseline Rd Line 2021-2036 $13,270,800 Wise Rd, over Doty Creek, 0.5 miles east of Garden Bar: Yes C- Maintenance & Replace existing 1-lane functionally obsolete bridge with a Completion by PLA25513 Placer Placer County Rehabilitation Wise Rd Bridge Replacement new 2-lane bridge. 2020 $4,759,200 Bridge No. 19C0002, Yankee Jim's Rd over North Fork American River, 1.5MI W of Shirttail Cyn Rd, Replace Yes B- Road & Highway Yankee Jim's Rd Bridge at North Fork American structurally deficient 1 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. Completion by PLA25505 Placer Placer County Capacity River (Toll credits programmed for PE, ROW & CON.) 2020 $14,999,400 Dewitt Center in Auburn: Increase of CNG compressor capacity at Placer County CNG fueling station in Auburn. Yes E- Transit Capital (Emissions Benefits in kg/day: 3.46 NOx, 0.12 PM10.) *Local Completion by PCT10494 Placer Placer County Transit (Minor) CNG Station Upgrade Phase 2 Funds are Air District Funds* 2020 $576,809 Lincoln Transit (Subrecipient)- Operating assistance and preventive maintenance for transit services within the City of Yes Lincoln. Sacramento Urbanized Area.FFY 2014 operating Lincoln Transit (Subrecipient) Operating assistance: $149,108FFY 2014 preventive maintenance: Completion by PLA25550 Placer Placer County Transit F- Transit O&M (Bus) Assistance $12,281 2020 $1,616,076 Replace four CNG powered buses currently in use by Placer County Transit. The new CNG buses will be used on regional Yes transit routes connecting Rocklin, Lincoln, Loomis, Auburn E- Transit Capital and Placer County to Roseville and the Watt/I-80 Light Rail Completion by PCT10501 Placer Placer County Transit (Vehicles) Placer County CNG Replacement Buses Station. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 3.16 NOx) 2020 $2,059,528 Operating assistance for rural transit services within Placer Yes Placer County Non-Urbanized Transit County. Outside the Sacramento Urbanized Area.FFY 2015: Completion by PCT10491 Placer Placer County Transit F- Transit O&M (Bus) Operations $291,197FFY 2016: $291,197 2020 $7,357,017 Operating assistance, preventive maintenance, and ADA operations for transit services for urban transit services within El Dorado County as well as commuter service to / from Sacramento. Sacramento Urbanized Area.FFY 2009 preventive maintenance: $324,890FFY 2009 ADA operations: $281,700FFY 2010 preventive maintenance: $300,000FFY 2010 ADA operations: $200,000FFY 2011 preventive Yes maintenance: $324,890FFY 2011 ADA operations: $206,700FFY 2012 preventive maintenance: $32,890FFY 2012 ADA operations: $217,000FFY 2012 Fuel: $84,429FFY 2013 Operating assistance: $539,341FFY 2014 Operating assistance: $563,744FFY 2014 preventive maintenance: $56,696FFY 2015 preventive maintenance: $341,000FFY 2015 F- Transit O&M Preventive Maintenance, ADA Operations, and ADA operations: $217,000FFY 2016 preventive maintenance: Completion by PCT10493 Placer Placer County Transit (Demand Response) Operating Assistance 2009-2016 $341,000FFY 2016 ADA operations: $217,000 2020 $8,821,325 E- Transit Capital Purchase of two (2) 35' CNG replacement buses for Placer Completion by Yes PCT10488 Placer Placer County Transit (Vehicles) Purchase 2 Replacement Buses County Transit. (Emission Benefits: 0.5 kg/day NOx) 2020 $1,000,000 E- Transit Capital Completion by Yes PCT10504 Placer Placer County Transit (Vehicles) T.A.R.T Bus Purchase Replace one 35-foot bus for Tahoe Area Reginal Transit. 2020 $525,000 TART operations (lump sum) on SR89 amd SR267 corridors Lump Sum or Yes PCT10505 Placer Placer County Transit F- Transit O&M (Bus) TART Operations within Placer County/SACOG region. Ongoing $22,000,000
FTA 5310 funds will be used to purchase one (1) Medium Bus Yes that accommodates up to 14 passengers (incl. 2 wheelchair E- Transit Capital Pride Industries One, Inc. 5310 Replacement positions) & a driver and thirty-eight (38) cameras for Pride Completion by VAR56123 Placer Pride Industries/CTSA (Vehicles) Bus and Cameras Industries. (Uses Toll Credits for local match). 2020 $105,989 Use FY 2011 & 2012 Urbanized Area JARC funds to operate two fixed route buses to extend routes A & B from 6:30 to Yes 9:30 PM M-F, and 1 DAR bus to extend service from 7:00 to Completion by VAR56109 Placer SACOG F- Transit O&M (Bus) Roseville Transit JARC Operating Assistance 9:30 PM. 2020 $371,680
New 4 lane connector (ultimate 6 lanes freeway) in 500'- to 1,000'-wide corridor connecting SR 70/99 (between Riego Project Road & Sankey Road) to Watt Avenue. (Note: as the project Development proceeds, Parkway segments will be administered by different Only lead agencies depending upon location of the segment. In South Placer Regional B- Road & Highway Placer County, it will be SPRTA or Roseville and/or Placer Completion after PLA20721 Placer Transportation Authority Capacity Placer Parkway County; in Sutter County it will be Sutter County.) 2036 $295,000,000 Construct New Road: 4 lane divided Hwy. between Fiddyment Yes South Placer Regional B- Road & Highway Rd and Watt Avenue. Includes signalized intersections at Watt PLA25592 Placer Transportation Authority Capacity Placer Parkway Phase 3 Avenue. 2021-2036 $85,000,000 Asphalt overlay and reconstruction repair of various streets in Yes C- Maintenance & the Loomis Downtown Core Area covered under the Capital Completion by PLA25579 Placer Town of Loomis Rehabilitation 2017 CIP Road Maintenance Project Improvement Program Schedule for 2017. 2020 $500,000 Project Bikeway Facilities: In Loomis along Antelope Creek, construct Development Class I bike and pedestrian facility. Federal permitting may be Completion after PLA25264 Only Placer Town of Loomis A- Bike & Ped Antelope Creek required as part of this project. Antelope Creek Sierra College King 2036 $50,000 Project Roadway Operational Improvements: Expand/ replace culvert Development G- System Management, along Antelope Creek at King Rd. from Sierra College Blvd. to Sierra College Blvd Completion after PLA25278 Only Placer Town of Loomis Operations, and ITS Antelope Creek Vet Clinic. Includes: ancillary road work. and King Road Sierra College King 2036 $60,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: from Brace Rd. to S. Town limits to standard lane Completion after PLA25260 Only Placer Town of Loomis Capacity Barton Rd. Widening widths. Includes: bike lanes. Barton Road S. Town Limits Brace Road 2036 $210,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen from Sierra College Blvd. to Horseshoe Bar Rd. to Completion after PLA25259 Only Placer Town of Loomis Capacity Brace Rd. standard lane widths. Includes: bike lanes. Brace Road Sierra College Horseshoe Bar 2036 $100,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Road Realignment: two existing intersections into one Horseshoe Bar Completion after PLA25258 Only Placer Town of Loomis Capacity Brace Rd. / Horseshoe Bar Rd. intersection. Includes: related signalization improvements. Road Brace Road Horseshoe Bar 2036 $60,000 Project Development C- Maintenance & Replace Bridge: at Secret Ravine creek. Includes: ancillary Completion after PLA25277 Only Placer Town of Loomis Rehabilitation Brace Rd. Bridge Improvements road work. Secrete Ravine Horseshoe Bar Horseshoe Bar 2036 $50,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Road Extension: 2 lanes, landscaped median and bike lanes Completion after PLA15290 Only Placer Town of Loomis Capacity Doc Barnes Dr. from Horseshoe Bar Rd. to King Rd. Doc Barnes Drive Horseshoe Bar King Road 2036 $200,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Horseshoe Bar Road at I-80 Overcrossing Widen Horseshoe Bar Rd. @ I-80 overcrossing 2 to 4 lanes Horseshoe Bar Completion after PLA16350 Only Placer Town of Loomis Capacity Widening and improve ramps. Interchange I-80 I-80 2036 $15,000,000 Project Widen from Taylor Rd. to Highway 80 Interchange 2000 feet Development B- Road & Highway of two-way left turn lanes/landscaped median, bike lanes, Horseshoe Bar Completion after Only PLA25597 Placer Town of Loomis Capacity Horseshoe Bar Road Widening sidewalk, curb, gutter & underground Drainage system Road Taylor Road I-80 2036 $800,000 Project Development C- Maintenance & Completion after PLA25261 Only Placer Town of Loomis Rehabilitation I-80 Modify Bridge: Brace Rd. Bridge to Caltrans standards. Brace Road I-80 I-80 2036 $1,000,000 Interchange Modification: existing King Rd. overcrossing to Project accommodate freeway access for traffic from King Rd. onto Development G- System Management, WB I-80. Includes: a transition auxiliary lane on I-80 from King King Rd Completion after Only PLA25262 Placer Town of Loomis Operations, and ITS King Rd. Rd. to Horseshoe Bar interchange. Interchange I-80 I-80 2036 $500,000 Project Roadway Operational Improvements: at Sucker Ravine and Development G- System Management, King Rd. expand culvert. Includes: ancillary road work. Federal Completion after Only PLA25279 Placer Town of Loomis Operations, and ITS King Rd. permitting may also be required as part of this project. Sucker Ravine King Road King Road 2036 $10,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Loomis, Rocklin Rd. from Barton Rd. to west town limits: Completion after PLA15350 Only Placer Town of Loomis Capacity Rocklin Rd. Widening widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Rocklin Road W. Town Limits Barton Road 2036 $1,200,000 Project Roadway Operational Improvements: Storm drain extension Development G- System Management, in the South Holly area. Includes: ancillary road work. Federal Completion after Only PLA25274 Placer Town of Loomis Operations, and ITS S. Holly Area permitting may also be required as part of this project. S.Holly Drainage Taylor Road Circle Drive 2036 $40,000 Project Bikeway Facilities: Along Secret Ravine creek system from Development north Loomis town limits to south Loomis town limits, Completion after PLA25263 Only Placer Town of Loomis A- Bike & Ped Secret Ravine construct Class I bike and pedestrian facility. Secrete Ravine N. Town Limits S. Town Limits 2036 $60,000 Project Roadway Operational Improvements: Culvert expansion at Development G- System Management, Loomis Tributary and Sierra College Blvd. Includes: ancillary Completion after PLA25280 Only Placer Town of Loomis Operations, and ITS Sierra College Blvd. road work. Sierra College Blvd Sierra College Sierra College 2036 $40,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Sierra College Blvd. Railroad Crossing Completion after PLA20510 Only Placer Town of Loomis Capacity Improvements Construct 4 lane overcrossing/undercrossing at UPRR Tracks. Sierra College Blvd Taylor Road UPRR 2036 $3,000,000 Project In Loomis, Sierra College Blvd. from railroad tracks (Taylor Development B- Road & Highway Rd.) to the north town limits: widen from 2 to 4 lanes and Completion after PLA20890 Only Placer Town of Loomis Capacity Sierra College Blvd. Widening construct turn lanes, bike lanes, and landscaped median. 2036 $5,899,180 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Loomis, Sierra College Blvd. from Granite Drive to Taylor Completion after PLA20960 Only Placer Town of Loomis Capacity Sierra College Boulevard Widening Road: widen from 4 to 6 lanes. Sierra College Blvd Granite Drive Bankhead 2036 $3,600,000 Project Roadway Operational Improvements: Upgrade storm drain Development G- System Management, facilities in the Sunrise-Loomis subdivision. Includes: ancillary Completion after PLA25276 Only Placer Town of Loomis Operations, and ITS Sunrise-Loomis Subdivision road work. Sunrise-Loomis Various Various 2036 $50,000
Project Roadway Operational Improvements: Construct storm drain Development facility from King Rd. to Sierra College Blvd. Includes: ancillary Only G- System Management, road work. Federal permitting may also be required as part of Taylor Road Completion after PLA25269 Placer Town of Loomis Operations, and ITS Taylor Rd. this project. Phase 1 is King Rd. to Walnut Street, $800,000. Drainage King Road Sierra College 2036 $230,000 Taylor Rd. complete streets improvements from Horseshoe Yes PLA15940 Placer Town of Loomis A- Bike & Ped Taylor Road Complete Streets Bar Road to King Road. Taylor Road Horseshoe Bar King Road 2021-2036 $425,000 C- Maintenance & Completion by Yes PLA25530 Placer Town of Loomis Rehabilitation Taylor Road Overlay Maintenance Project Taylor Road: Asphalt overlay. 2020 $460,000 Taylor Road, Horseshoe Bar Road to Walnut Street: Yes Town Center Implementation Plan streetscape improvements. (Emissions in kg/day: 0.06 ROG, Completion by PLA25548 Placer Town of Loomis D- Programs & Planning Improvements Phase 2 0.04 NOx, 0.02 PM10) 2020 $791,000 Project Extend from Laird St. to future Doc Barnes Dr. 1800 feet of Development B- Road & Highway two-way left turn lanes/landscaped median, bike lanes, Completion after PLA25600 Only Placer Town of Loomis Capacity Webb St. Extension sidewalk, curb, gutter & underground Drainage system Webb Street Laird Road Doc Barnes Drive 2036 $1,000,000 Outside of Foresthill, Sugar Pine Off Highway Vehicle (OHV) Staging Area: Renovation of an existing staging area, including Yes G- System Management, parking, accessible restrooms, and picnic facilities. (RM-13- Completion by PLA25556 Placer USFS Tahoe National Forest Operations, and ITS Sugar Pine OHV Staging Area 016) 2020 $325,950 Capital costs for CTSA Article 4.5 & complementary ADA dial-a- ride services for designated CTSA operating in Placer County, Yes Western Placer Consolidated E- Transit Capital including vehicles, miscellaneous capital items & facilities Lump Sum or PLA25594 Placer Transportation Service Agency (Major) Placer County - CTSA Capital expansion. Ongoing $55,490,317
Annual operation & maintenance (O&M) costs for Article 4.5 Yes Community Transit Services & complimentary Transit Services Western Placer Consolidated F- Transit O&M & complimentary ADA dial-a-ride services for designated CTSA Lump Sum or PLA25593 Placer Transportation Service Agency (Demand Response) Placer County - CTSA O&M of Placer County servicing Placer County & Cities Ongoing $28,233,907
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 72 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars)
Sacramento, near American River College Campus, Jo Smith Yes Nature Trail: Extend by approximately .7 miles and construct Completion by SAC24771 Sacramento Arcade Park Dist. A- Bike & Ped Jo Smith Trail Pedestrian Bridge a pedestrian bridge across Arcade Creek. (RT-34-022) 2020 $622,828
Yes G- System Management, Caltrans District 3 Traffic Management Center Upgrade Caltrans District 3 TMC to manage US 50, I-80 and Completion by CAL20625 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS (TMC) other ITS Deployments Var 2020 $1,500,000 In the City and County of Sacramento, on US 50, at Camellia Yes C- Maintenance & City Viaduct #24-0248R/L - Rehab bridge decks (PM 1.6) Completion by CAL20451 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Camellia City Viaduct [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0857; EFIS ID 0300000073] (Toll Credits) US 50 2020 $46,205,000 Bridge Widening: Widen SR51 over the American River NB Yes B- Road & Highway Capital City Freeway (SR 51) widening over the and SB, to 4 lanes plus a bus carpool lane in both directions. SAC 51 PM CAL20642 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity American River New Class I bike path next to the freeway. SR 51 2.682 SAC 51 PM 2.768 2021-2036 $131,000,000 In the city and county of Sacramento, at Fort Sutter Viaduct Bridge #24-188R (PM 0.2/1.1) (Toll Credits) - Grind asphalt Yes C- Maintenance & concrete and place methacrylate overlay on bridge deck [EFIS Completion by CAL20482 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Fort Sutter Viaduct Bridge ID #03-1200-0055] 2020 $9,347,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway I-5/SR 99 Interchange Reconstruction: includes: bus/carpool Sac 5 PM Completion after CAL20591 Only Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity I- 5 / SR 99 Interchange lane freeway to freeway connectors. I-5 / SR 99 30.220 n/a 2036 $200,000,000 In and near Sacramento, on I-5 and SR 99, from 0.6 mile south of Lambert Road Undercrossing to Elverta Road at Yes various locations - Provide vegetation control measures under C- Maintenance & guardrails and interchange areas (Toll Credits) [CTIPS ID 107- Completion by CAL20477 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation I-5 & SR 99 Vegetation Control Measures 0000-0916; EFIS ID 03-1200-0098] 2020 $2,967,000 Near Sacramento, at I-5 / Airport Boulevard northbound offramp - Lengthen deceleration lane (PM 31.8/32.8) [EFIS ID Yes B- Road & Highway 0313000316; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0984] (PE ONLY. Total Project Completion by CAL20527 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity I-5 Airport Boulevard Aux Lane Cost: $2,435,000) 2020 $2,435,000 Reconstruct I-5/I-80 Interchange, including high occupancy vehicle (HOV, bus/carpool) lane connectors, and construction Yes of HOV lanes from the I-5/I-80 Interchange to downtown B- Road & Highway I-5 and I-80 HOV Connectors and Lanes to Sacramento (PM 26.7/27.0) [EFIS ID 0300000313] (Emission CAL18410 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity Downtown Benefits in kg/day 1.0 ROG) I-5 / I-80 n/a n/a 2021-2036 $300,000,000 On I-5, in the City and County of Sacramento, from Florin Project Road to Pocket Road Southbound - Operational Development B- Road & Highway improvements, lane extension (PM 16.1/17.2) [EFIS ID Completion after Only CAL20417 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity I-5 Aux Lanes, Florin to Pocket 0300001102] I-5 PM 16.1 PM 17.2 2036 $1,500,000 On I-5, near Elk Grove, at Beach Lake Bridge #24-262R/L (PM Yes C- Maintenance & I-5 Beach Lake Bridge High Friction Surface 12.9/13.1) - Apply high friction treatment on bridge deck Completion by CAL20495 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Treatment [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0937] 2020 $1,117,000 In the city of Sacramento on I-5, at West End Viaduct #24- 0069R/L - Bridge deck rehabilitation (PM 23.6/24.2) [CTIPS ID Yes 107-0000-0906; EFIS ID 0300000074] [Project to be combined C- Maintenance & with EA 03-2F210/CAL20469 for Design-Build under EA 03- Completion by CAL20468 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation I-5 Bridge Rehab 2F21U] (Toll Credits) 2020 $11,188,000 Sacramento Project International Development B- Road & Highway Bus/Carpool Lanes: I-80 to Sacramento International Airport Airport Sac 5 Completion after Only CAL18790 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity I-5 Bus/Carpool Lanes in both directions I-5 PM 32.874 I-80 Sac 5 PM 26.08 2036 $100,000,000 B- Road & Highway Bus/Carpool Lanes: J St. to I-80 in both directions, including a Sac 5 PM Yes CAL20586 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity I-5 Bus/Carpool Lanes new Class I bike path over the American River I-5 22.565 Sac 5 PM 26.08 2021-2036 $116,000,000 In Sacramento and San Joaquin counties, on I-5, at various locations - Construct paved crossovers and California Highway Yes Patrol/Maintenance pullouts (PM 0.1/18.4) [EFIS ID G- System Management, 0314000145; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0986] (Toll credits for PE, Completion by CAL20530 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS I-5 CHP Crossovers ROW, CON) 2020 $1,900,000 I-5: Extend Southbound connector ramp from U.S. 50 Yes B- Road & Highway connector-ramp to the Sutterville Rd. off-ramp (PM 20.726 to Sutterville Rd. U.S. 50 Connector Sac CAL20589 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity I-5 Connector Ramp Extension 21.55). I-5 Sac PM 21.55 PM 20.726 2021-2036 $4,746,000 In Sacramento County on Routes 5, 50 and 80 at various locations, and in Butte County on Route 191 - Place high Yes C- Maintenance & friction surface treatment [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0938] (Toll Completion by CAL20500 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation I-5 High Friction Surface Treatment Credits for PE, ROW, and CON) 2020 $2,187,000 In Sacramento County on I-5, from US 50 to Morrison Creek - Add high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes (i.e., bus/carpool lanes) and soundwalls in both directions (PM 13.1/22.5) [EFIS Yes ID 0312000165]; see 03-3C002 (CAL20467) for Phase 2 [PA&ED being done under 03-3C000 (CAL17840)]. (Toll B- Road & Highway Credits for PE and ROW) (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 52.9 CAL20466 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity I-5 HOV Lanes - Phase 1 NOx, 50.4 ROG, 10.5 PM10) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0880] I-5 13.1 22.5 2021-2036 $125,200,000 In Sacramento County on I-5, from just north of Morrison Project Creek to south of Stone Lake Creek - Add high-occupancy Development vehicle (HOV) lanes (i.e., bus/carpool lanes) (PM 9.7/13.1) Only B- Road & Highway [EFIS ID 0312000171]; see 03-3C001 (CAL20466) for Phase 1 Completion after CAL20467 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity I-5 HOV Lanes - Phase 2 [PA&ED being done under 03-3C000 (CAL17840)]. I-5 2036 $70,600,000
Yes G- System Management, CAL20645 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS I-5 ITS - Fiber Optic - 5 In Sacramento County on I-5 from Pocket Road to Jct I-80 I-5 Pocket Road Jct I-80 2021-2036 $2,800,000
In Sacramento, on I-5, about 1.4 miles south of Richards Blvd. - Yes C- Maintenance & Replace all pump house components (mechanical and Completion by CAL20491 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation I-5 Pump House electrical) (PM 23.3) [Toll Credits] (CTIPS ID 107-0000-0932) 2020 $3,218,000 C- Maintenance & Yes CAL20658 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation I-5 Rehabilitate Pavement In Sacramento, from I-5 to Watt Avenue OC (Br #24-34) 2021-2036 $156,678,000 B- Road & Highway I-5 Transition Lane: SB, from Garden Hwy. off-ramp to the SAC 5 PM Yes CAL20587 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity I-5 Transition Lane Garden Hwy. on-ramp. I-5 25.526 SAC 5 PM 25.369 2021-2036 $4,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway I-5/US 50 Riverfront Interchange Reconstruct I-5/US50 Riverfront Interchange, including Sac 5 PM Completion after CAL18801 Only Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity Reconstruction bus/carpool lane connectors I-5 / U.S. 50 22.976 n/a 2036 $100,000,000 In and near Sacramento, on I-5, US 50, SR 51 and SR 99 at various locations - Roadside pavement and safe access for Yes C- Maintenance & I-5/US 50/SR 51/SR 99 Roadside Pavement and employees (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) [CTIPS ID 107-0000- Completion by CAL20478 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Safe Access 0915] 2020 $3,589,000 Sacramento County, on I-80 from RT Station (Longview) to the Sacramento River - construct high occupancy vehicle lanes (Emissions Benefits: ROG 67, NOx 62, PM10 55 kg/day) Yes [Project using "tapered match," matching CMAQ funds with bond funds during later phases] (PM M0.3/M10.4) [EFIS ID B- Road & Highway 0300000434]. Project was combined with 03-0A931 Sacramento Completion by CAL18450 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity I-80 HOV Across the Top (CAL20378) for construction using EA 03-3797U. I-80 River Longview Dr. 2020 $63,037,000 In Sacramento on Interstate 80, from the Sacramento River Bridge and Overhead to Norwood Avenue - Rehabilitate Yes roadway (PM M0.3/M8.9) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0768; EFIS ID C- Maintenance & 0300000011]. Project was combined with 03-37970 Completion by CAL20378 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation I-80 Rehabilitation (CAL18450) for construction using EA 03-3797U. I-80 2020 $69,998,000
Yes G- System Management, Upgrade video wall at Regional Transportation Management Completion by CAL20646 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS ITS - RTMC Video Wall Upgrade Center (RTMC). 2020 $1,000,000 In Folsom, Sacramento County, along US 50 at Natoma Overhead #24-120 (PM 16.9/17.4) - Widen Natoma Overhead by two lanes to accommodate EB loop on-ramp weave and Yes new transition lane for congestion relief [EB loop on-ramp B- Road & Highway Natoma Overhead Widening and On-Ramp includes an HOV bypass lane and ramp metering] (CTIPS ID Completion by CAL20496 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity Improvements 107-0000-0975) 2020 $8,500,000 I-5, Florin Road OC (Br #24-0264) and on I-80 Del Paso OH Yes C- Maintenance & Bridges R/L (Br #24-0193R/L) - Perform deck maintenance and CAL20669 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SAC 05/80 Bridge Deck Rehab and Rail Upgrade rehab of three bridges 2021-2036 $10,230,000 In Sacramento, from Florin Road OC (Br #24-264) to American Yes C- Maintenance & River Bridge (#24-68) - Preserve and extend life of existing CAL20659 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Sac Roadway Rehabilitation pavement and improve ride quality 2021-2036 $92,000,000 In Sacramento and Glenn counties on various routes/locations - Install and/or modify signals and signs (6 Yes G- System Management, locations in Sacramento county and 1 location in Glenn Completion by CAL20505 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Sac/Gle ITS Safety Improvements county) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0958] 2020 $1,118,000 Near Sacramento on US 50, from Watt Avenue overcrossing to Sacramento/El Dorado county line - Pave narrow areas, Yes install vegetation control and construct roadside signs (PM C- Maintenance & R5.3/23.1) [EFIS ID 0313000240; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0962] Completion by CAL20512 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Sac-50 Roadside Safety Improvement (Toll Credits for PE) 2020 $1,651,000 In the city of Sacramento, on Sac-160, at Sacramento River Bridge #24-0053 and North Sacramento Undercrossing #24- Yes 0111L; also in San Joaquin County, at Mokelumne River C- Maintenance & Bridge #29-0197R/L - Seismic retrofit (PM 20.9) [CTIPS ID 107- Completion by CAL20471 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Sacramento Seismic Retrofit on 4 Bridges 0000-0908] (Toll Credits) 2020 $10,463,000 In Sacramento and Solano counties, near Rio Vista, at Sacramento River Bridge #23-0024 - Clean and repaint steel Yes surfaces (PM 0.0/0.4) [EFIS ID 0313000139; CTIPS ID 107- C- Maintenance & 0000-0961] [Total Project Cost $22,705,000 in 16/17 FY] (Toll Completion by CAL20507 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 12 Bridge Rehab Near Rio Vista Credits for PE) 2020 $22,705,000 SR 12 Roadway Operational and Safety Improvements: Rio Vista to San Joaquin County line. Improvements will be Yes G- System Management, coordinated with San Joaquin and Solano counties and San Joaquin CAL20427 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 12 Operational Improvements anticipated corridor improvements. SR 12 County line Rio Vista 2021-2036 $10,000,000 Sacramento County, on SR 160, approximately 6.0 miles south of the City of Rio Vista at Sherman Island - Improve and Yes repair portion of the levee on which SR 160 is located [FCO C- Maintenance & Only] (Sac-160-L4.1/L4.5) [SHOPP Minor A 201.150] (Toll Completion by CAL20498 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 160 at Sherman Island Levee Repair Credits for CON) 2020 $435,000 On SR 160, in Isleton, from 1.4 miles south of Sherman Island Road to SR 12 - Rehabilitate pavement (PM L4.2/L10.8)[CTIPS Yes C- Maintenance & ID 107-0000-0993; EFIS ID 0300020595] (Toll Credits for PE, Completion by CAL20540 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 160 in Isleton AC Overlay ROW, CON) 2020 $6,875,000 In Sacramento County, near Rio Vista, SR 160, from SR 12 to Yes C- Maintenance & 0.5 mile north of SR 220 in Ryde - Pavement rehabilitation Completion by CAL20490 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 160 Pavement Rehab (PM R0.0/12.0) [Toll Credits] (CTIPS ID 107-0000-0933) 2020 $8,340,000 SR 160 from American River Bridge #24-01R/L to Junction SR Yes C- Maintenance & 51 - Grind PCC pavement CAL20657 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 160 Slab replacement 2021-2036 $11,500,000 In Sacramento County on SR 160, near Rio Vista, from Antioch Bridge (No. 28-0009) to Sherman Island Road - Pavement Yes C- Maintenance & preservation (PM L1.2/L4.4) [Toll Credits] (CTIPS ID 107-0000- Completion by CAL20492 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 160 South of Rio Vista HMA Overlay 0934) 2020 $4,240,000 SR 160, near Isleton, at Three Mile Slough Bridge #24-121 - Yes C- Maintenance & Paint entire bridge (PM L7.0) (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) Completion by CAL20481 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 160 Three Mile Slough Bridge [EFIS ID 03-1200-0219] 2020 $12,475,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 73 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) SR 51 Auxiliary Lane: SB, from Exposition Blvd. to E St. Includes bridge replacements for the following locations: B Street Underpass (#24-0023), A Street Overcrossing (#24- Yes 0131) and Elvas Underpass (#24-0031). The project cost B- Road & Highway includes temporary bridge costs for the B Street and Elvas CAL20595 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 51 Auxiliary Lane Underpasses. SR 51 E Street Exposition Blvd. 2021-2036 $84,200,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct a transition lane on SR 51 SB from Exposition Blvd. SAC 51 PM Completion after CAL20597 Only Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 51 Transition Lane slip off-ramp to Exposition Blvd. loop on-ramp. SR 51 3.508 SAC 51 PM 3.396 2036 $12,500,000 SR 51: Widen structure over Arden Way to 8 lanes plus 2 Yes B- Road & Highway bus/carpool lanes and construct a Transition Lane: NB, from SAC 51 3.194 SAC 51 PM 3.470 CAL20594 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 51 Auxiliary Lane SR160 off ramp to Arden Way on ramp SR 51 SR 160 Exposition Blvd. 2021-2036 $46,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after Only Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 51 Bus/Carpool Lanes: Arden to I-80 Bus/Carpool Lanes: Arden to I-80 in both directions SR 51 Arden I-80 2036 $265,000,000 B- Road & Highway Yes CAL20632 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 51 Bus/Carpool Lanes: J Street to Arden Bus/Carpool Lanes: J Street to Arden in both directions SR 51 J Street Arden 2021-2036 $100,000,000 In the City of Sacramento on SR 51 (Capital City Freeway), at Yes C- Maintenance & Arden Way - Repair failed culvert and sinkhole (PM 4.0) Completion by CAL20545 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 51 Culvert Repair [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0998] 2020 $925,000 In Sacramento on SR 51 (Capital City Freeway) at 0.1 mile north of Arden Way undercrossing - Construct concrete Yes G- System Management, median barrier (PM 4.1/4.4) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0996] (Toll Completion by CAL20543 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 51 Median Barrier credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $2,730,000 On SR 51 (Capital City Freeway), close E Street northbound onramp and extend the northbound transition lane from near E Street on-ramp to just south of Elvas Underpass near the Yes American River. Modify intersection at E Street and 30th Street. Also build local roadway improvements on 30th St. B- Road & Highway SR 51 NB Transition Lane and Local Roadway (Toll Credits for PA&ED.) $900k STIP for PA&ED [CTIPS ID 107- CAL20501 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity Improvements 0000-0940]. PS&E is not yet funded. 2021-2036 $8,300,000 Exposition Yes B- Road & Highway SR 51 Transition Lane: NB, from the Elvas Underpass to Blvd. SAC 51 American River Bridge CAL20592 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 51 Transition Lane Exposition Blvd. SR 51 2.988 SAC 51 PM 2.78 2021-2036 $7,500,000 B- Road & Highway SR 51 Transition Lanes: NB from Marconi Ave. to Fulton SAC 51 PM SAC 51 PM 5.374 Yes CAL20596 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 51 Transition Lanes Ave.and SB from Fulton Ave. to Watt Ave. SR 51 8.20 Watt Ave. Marconi Ave. 2021-2036 $84,700,000 SR 99 auxiliary lane: NB from WB Florin Rd. slip on ramp to Yes B- Road & Highway EB 47th Ave. slip off ramp. Right-of-way aquisition required. SAC 99 20.628 SAC 99 PM 19.747 CAL20600 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 99 Auxiliary Lane Soundwall relocation required. SR 99 47th Ave. Florin Rd. 2021-2036 $3,000,000 SR 99 Auxiliary Lane extension: SB, from Martin Luther King SAC 99 PM SAC 99 PM 21.44 Yes B- Road & Highway Blvd on ramp. to WB 47th Ave. slip off ramp. Right-of-way 21.048 47th Martin Luther King, Jr. CAL20601 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 99 Auxiliary Lane aquisition required. Soundwall relocation required. SR 99 Ave. Blvd. 2021-2036 $3,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct auxiliary lanes in both directions on SR 99 between Completion after CAL20572 Only Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 99 Auxiliary Lanes Laguna/Bond Rd and Elk Grove Boulevard 2036 $2,000,000 San Joaquin County Project Bus/Carpool Lanes in both directions from Elk Grove Line Grant Line Development B- Road & Highway Boulevard to San Joaquin County Line Kammerer Road/Grant Elk Grove (Kammerer Road) PM Completion after Only CAL20647 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 99 Bus/Carpool Lanes Line. SR 99 Blvd.12.531 9.926 2036 $36,000,000 In Sacramento County, from the San Joaquin County line to Mack Road - Install native planting at various locations (PM Yes C- Maintenance & 0.0/17.7) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0731; EFIS ID 0300020406] (Toll Completion by CAL20376 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 99 Corridor Native Planting Credits for PE, ROW, & CON) SR 99 2020 $1,197,000
Yes G- System Management, Interchange Improvements: Mack Road, Florin Road, 47th CAL20602 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 99 Interchange Improvements Ave., 12th Ave. SR 99 n/a n/a 2021-2036 $40,000,000 In Sacramento County, on SR 99, at PM 35.1/36.8; also in Sutter County, on SR 99, at PM 0.0/0.1 - Install double thrie Yes G- System Management, beam median barrier [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0997] (Toll credits Completion by CAL20544 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 99 Median Barrier Gap Closure for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $1,596,000 In Sacramento on SR 99, from Cosumnes River Bridge to Fruitridge Road overcrossing - Pave narrow areas, install Yes vegetation control, construct pullouts and construct roadside G- System Management, signs (PM 8.5/22.4) [EFIS ID 0313000241; CTIPS ID 107-0000- Completion by CAL20513 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 99 Roadside Safety Improvement 0965] (Toll Credits for PE) 2020 $2,310,000 Near Elk Grove, at Dillard Road Overcrossing Bridge #24-0163, Cosumnes River Overflow Bridge #24-0021R/L and Cosumnes Yes River Overflow Bridge #24-0020R/L - Bridge seismic retrofit C- Maintenance & and replace non-standard bridge rail (PM 7.4/8.4) [CTIPS ID Completion by CAL20470 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 99 Seismic Retrofit and Bridge Rail Upgrade 107-0000-0904] (Toll Credits) 2020 $19,035,000 SR 99 Transition Lane: NB, from WB 47th Ave. slip on ramp to EB Fruitridge Rd. slip on ramp, and from WB Fruitridge Rd. SAC 99 PM Yes B- Road & Highway loop off ramp to WB Fruitridge Rd. slip on ramp. Right-of-way 22.076 SAC 99 20.991 47th CAL20599 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 99 Transition Lane aquisition required. Soundwall relocation required. SR 99 Fruitridge Rd. Ave. 2021-2036 $3,000,000 Near Elk Grove on SR 99, from 0.1 to 0.2 mile south of Badger Creek Bridge - Replace Weigh in Motion (WIM) station Yes sensors and associated electronics (PM 6.8/6.9) [EFIS ID G- System Management, 0313000143; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0964] (Toll Credits for PE, Completion by CAL20517 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 99 Weigh in Motion (WIM) Facilities ROW, CON) 2020 $2,098,000 In Sacramento County, on SR 99 at Lagoon Creek Bridge #24- 0054L (PM 4.9), and on SR 160 (PM 44.5) at American River Yes Bridge #24-0001L - Scour mitigation [EFIS ID 0313000136; C- Maintenance & CTIPS ID 107-0000-0963] [Total Project Cost $6,915,000 in Completion by CAL20508 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 99/160 Scour Mitigation 17/18 FY] 2020 $6,915,000
Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed Yes G- System Management, System Management/Traffic Operations System circuit television, highway advisory radio, changeable Completion by CAL20598 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS on SR 51 between U.S. 50 and I-80 message signs, and other system management infrastructure. 2020 $3,000,000
Yes G- System Management, 110 locations thtoughout Sacramento County. Travel time Completion by CAL20574 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Traveler Information System detection and notification systems. 2020 $1,939,200 Project Development B- Road & Highway U.S. 50 / SR 99 / SR 51 Oak Park Interchange U.S. 50 / SR 99 / SR 51 Oak Park Interchange Reconstruction: US 50 PM Completion after CAL20606 Only Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity Reconstruction includes: bus/carpool lane freeway to freeway connectors. U.S. 50 / SR 99 0.158 US 50 PM 0.158 2036 $10,000,000 B- Road & Highway US 50 Auxiliary Lanes: EB and WB, from Sunrise Blvd. to Yes CAL20604 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lanes Zinfandel Dr. U.S. 50 Zinfandel Dr. Sunrise Blvd. 2021-2036 $5,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Westbound US 50 Transition Lane: NB, Howe Ave. on-ramp to US 50 PM Completion after CAL20603 Only Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity U.S. 50 Transition Lane SB Howe Ave. on-ramp. U.S. 50 3.915 US 50 PM 3.697 2036 $3,000,000 US 50 PM Yes B- Road & Highway US 50 Westbound Transition Lane: from Sunrise Blvd. slip off- 12.832 Sunrise US 50 PM 12.3 CAL20605 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity U.S. 50 Transition Lane ramp to Sunrise Blvd. slip on-ramp. U.S. 50 Blvd. Sunrise Blvd. 2021-2036 $3,000,000 Near Sacramento, from Bradshaw Road OC to Mather Field Yes B- Road & Highway OC - Add auxiliary lanes EB & WB (PM R7.8/R9.5) [EFIS ID CAL20379 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity US 50 Auxiliary Lanes, Bradshaw to Mather 0300001101] 2021-2036 $3,700,000 In Sacramento, on SR 50, from Yolo County line to 0.2 mile west of Watt Avenue Overcrossing [PM L0.0/R5.1] - Install Yes G- System Management, fiber optic cable [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1005] (Toll credits for PE, Completion by CAL20551 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS US 50 Fiber Optics ROW, CON) 2020 $9,500,000 In Sacramento County, on US 50, from 0.3 mile west of SR 99 Yes B- Road & Highway to 0.8 mile east of Watt Avenue - Construct high occupancy CAL18838 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity US 50 HOV Lanes (SR 99 to Watt Ave.) vehicle (HOV) lanes [PM L2.2/R6.1] 2021-2036 $68,315,000 In Sacramento County, US 50, from Watt Ave. to Sunrise Blvd., WB Lanes - Maintenance Asphalt Overlay (Sac-50- Yes C- Maintenance & 5.3/12.8) [HM1 - Pavement Preservation (Fed-Funded)] (Toll Completion by CAL20488 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation US 50 Maintenance - Watt Ave. to Sunrise Blvd. credits for CON) 2020 $4,556,500 Sacramento County, in and near Rancho Cordova, along US 50, from Bradshaw Rd. to Sunrise Blvd.: Improve, enhance and establish planting along designated HOV lane(s) as a Yes continuation of plant establishment period for US 50 HOV Watt Ave. to Sunrise Blvd. project. [03-44161/CAL16790] (PM Completion by CAL20484 Sacramento Caltrans D3 D- Programs & Planning US 50 Plantings R07.4/R12.2) 2020 $1,250,000
In Rancho Cordova at the Regional Transportation Yes Management Center (RTMC) [PM 12.5] - Replace and upgrade G- System Management, video monitor and the supporting control system for US 50 Completion by CAL20549 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS US 50 RTMC Video Display Upgrade within Sacramento County. [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1002] 2020 $1,820,000 In Sacramento County on US 50, construct an eastbound Project transition lane from the Folsom Blvd slip off ramp to the Development Prairie City Rd slip off ramp, and construct an auxiliary lane Only B- Road & Highway from the Prairie City Rd slip on ramp to the Folsom Blvd slip Completion after CAL20648 Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity US 50 Transition and Auxiliary Lane off ramp US 50 Sunrise Blvd. Scott 2036 $5,000,000 Project US 50 Westbound Transition Lane from Stockton Blvd off- SAC US 50 PM Development B- Road & Highway ramp to Rt-51 connector on-ramp. Realign and add 0.789 Stockton SAC US 50 PM .595 Rt- Completion after CAL20641 Only Sacramento Caltrans D3 Capacity US 50 Transition Lane acceleration taper to Stockton loop off ramp US 50 Blvd 51 2036 $6,000,000 Rancho Cordova Yes Parkway PM Caltrans D3, City of Rancho B- Road & Highway Auxiliary lane from Rancho Cordova Parkway to East of SAC 13.5 Folsom PM SAC 17 VAR56138 Sacramento Cordova, Sacramento County Capacity Auxilary Lane Folsom US 50 approximately approximately 2021-2036 $3,000,000 Building Construction: new layover and servicing facility in Sacramento area for San Joaquin & Capitol Corridor trainsets. Yes E- Transit Capital Project will be coordinated with Sacramento Station Rail Completion by CAL20435 Sacramento Caltrans Division of Rail (Major) Sacramento Layover and Maintenance Facility Realignment. 2020 $110,000,000
Purchase four minivans to expand the ACC Rides Service that provides transportation to the ACC Rides Service client base of seniors and their caregivers to medical appointments and Yes other activities of daily living. Transportation Development Credits/Toll Credits are being used as match, and as allowable E- Transit Capital FTA 5310 - Asian Community Center Expansion under FTA Section 5310 federal funds will fund 100% of this Completion by CAL20559 Sacramento Caltrans HQ (Vehicles) Minivans project.. Toll Credits for CON 2020 $192,000 Expand the ACC Rides Service hours to 6 AM to 6 PM and the Volunteer Driver Program by recruiting and training more drivers as well as adding a Volunteer Driver Coordinator. The goal of the expansion of the program it to provide additional Yes transportation to the ACC Rides Service client base of seniors and their caregivers to medical appointments and other activities of daily living. Transportation Development Credits/Toll Credits are being used as match, and as allowable F- Transit O&M FTA 5310 - Asian Community Center Rides under FTA Section 5310 federal funds will fund 100% of this Completion by CAL20554 Sacramento Caltrans HQ (Demand Response) Service Expansion project.. Toll Credits for CON 2020 $300,000 Replace three existing buses and one minivan that provide transportation services to people with development and physical disabilities. Transportation Development Credits/Toll Yes Credits are being used as match, and as allowable under FTA E- Transit Capital Section 5310 federal funds will fund 100% of this project.. Completion by CAL20557 Sacramento Caltrans HQ (Vehicles) FTA 5310 - Easter Seals Vehicle Replacement Toll Credits for CON 2020 $277,500
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 74 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Rio Del Oro Parkway: New 4 lane roadway from Sunrise Yes B- Road & Highway Boulevard to Rancho Cordova Parkway. Includes intersection SAC24992 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Rio Del Oro Pkwy improvement at Sunrise (CP09-2070) 2021-2036 $3,251,000 construction; ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, traffic signal upgrades, LED street light Yes C- Maintenance & conversion, full road reconstruction, hardscape and SAC24920 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Antelope Road Complete Streets - Phase 2 landscape. Antelope Road Garden Gate Auburn Blvd. 2021-2036 $8,448,000 construction; ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, traffic signal upgrades, LED street light Yes C- Maintenance & conversion, full road reconstruction, hardscape and SAC24921 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Antelope Road Complete Streets - Phase 3 landscape. Antelope Road Auburn Blvd. Sunrise Blvd. 2021-2036 $10,500,000 construction; ADA, Ped, Bicycle, and Transit Improvements, Yes C- Maintenance & new street light installations, hardscape, landscape, full road SAC24922 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Auburn Blvd Complete Streets - Phase 2 reconstruction. Auburn Blvd Sylvan Corners Sycamore 2021-2036 $9,800,000 Design, ROW acquisition and construction; utility undergrounding, ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Yes Improvements, traffic signal upgrades, LED street light North City Limits C- Maintenance & conversion, full road reconstruction, hardscape and (north of Twin Oaks SAC24923 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Auburn Blvd Complete Streets - Phase 3 landscape. Auburn Blvd Rusch Park Avenue) 2021-2036 $32,000,000 Design and construction; ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, traffic signal upgrades, LED street light Yes C- Maintenance & conversion, full road reconstruction, hardscape and Greenback SAC24924 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Auburn Blvd Complete Streets - Phase 4 landscape. Auburn Blvd Lane Sylvan Corners 2021-2036 $20,000,000 Design, ROW, and construction; utility undergrounding, ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, traffic signal Yes C- Maintenance & upgrades, LED street light conversion, full road Greenback SAC24925 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Auburn Blvd Complete Streets - Phase 5 reconstruction, hardscape and landscape. Auburn Blvd Lane S/W of Devecchi Ave 2021-2036 $28,000,000 Rebuild and revitalize Auburn Blvd. from the northern city limits to as far south as Rusch Park by upgrading Yes infrastructure to support mixed land uses and improving Auburn Blvd. Complete Streets - Phase 2 (Rusch bicycle and pedestrian safety. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: SAC24732 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights A- Bike & Ped Park to Northern City Limits) 0.03 ROG, 0.02 NOx, 0.01 PM10) 2021-2036 $17,122,761
Yes C- Maintenance & Design and construction; ADA, Pedestrian and Bicycle SAC24929 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Fair Oaks Blvd Complete Streets Phase 1 improvements, LED street light conversion, road resurfacing. Fair Oaks Blvd Stacey Hills Old Auburn Road 2021-2036 $2,700,000
Design and construction; ADA and Pedestrian improvements Yes C- Maintenance & including sidewalk infill, Bicycle improvements, LED street Greenback SAC24930 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Fair Oaks Blvd Complete Streets Phase 2 light conversion, road resurfacing. Fair Oaks Blvd Lane Stacey Hills 2021-2036 $3,200,000
Design and construction; ADA and Pedestrian improvements Yes C- Maintenance & including sidewalk infill, Bicycle improvements, LED street SAC24931 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Fair Oaks Blvd Complete Streets Phase 3 light conversion, road resurfacing. Fair Oaks Blvd Madison Ave Greenback La ne 2021-2036 $8,500,000 construction; ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Yes C- Maintenance & Improvements, traffic signal modifications, full road SAC24919 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Greenback Lane Complete Streets reconstruction, LED street light conversion. Greenback Lane Birdcage Lane Fair Oaks Blvd. 2021-2036 $4,200,000 Construct one half mile of curb, gutters, sidewalks, bicycle lanes (Class II), curb access ramps and add street lighting Yes along the east side of Mariposa Ave. from Northridge Drive to Completion by SAC24733 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights A- Bike & Ped Mariposa Safe Routes to School Phase 3 Eastgate Ave. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: .01 ROG) 2020 $1,118,223
Design and construction; ADA and Pedestrian improvements Yes including sidewalk infill, Bicycle improvements, installation of SAC24932 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights A- Bike & Ped Oak Avenue Complete Streets Phase 1 new LED street lights, road resurfacing. 2021-2036 $3,800,000
Design and construction; ADA and Pedestrian improvements Yes including sidewalk infill, Bicycle improvements, installation of SAC24933 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights A- Bike & Ped Oak Avenue Complete Streets Phase 2 new LED street lights, road resurfacing. 2021-2036 $3,500,000 Design, ROW and construction; ADA, Pedestrian and Bicycle improvements (major sw infill for accessibility), traffic signal Yes C- Maintenance & upgrades, installation of new LED street lights, full road SAC24927 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Old Auburn Road Complete Streets Phase 1 reconstruction. Old Auburn Rd Sylvan Corners Sunrise Blvd. 2021-2036 $15,000,000 Design and construction ; ADA, Pedestrian and Bicycle improvements (major sw infill for accessibility), traffic signal Yes C- Maintenance & upgrades, installation of new LED street lights, full road SAC24928 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Old Auburn Road Complete Streets Phase 2 reconstruction. Old Auburn Rd Fair Oaks Blvd NE City Limits 2021-2036 $12,000,000 Design, ROW and construction; utility undergrounding, ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, traffic signal Yes C- Maintenance & upgrades, LED street light conversion, full road SAC24926 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation San Juan Ave Complete Streets reconstruction, hardscape and landscape. San Juan Ave Madison Ave Greenback La ne 2021-2036 $22,000,000 Design and construction; ADA compliant Pedestrian and Yes Saybrook/Misty Creek I-80 Pedestrian/bicycle Bicycle bridge/overpass connecting west side at Saybrook SAC24934 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights A- Bike & Ped overpass with east side at Misty Creek. 2021-2036 $15,000,000 construction; ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, traffic signal upgrades, LED street light Yes C- Maintenance & conversion, full road reconstruction, hardscape and SAC24917 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Sunrise Blvd Complete Streets - Phase 2 landscape. Sunrise Blvd Sayonara Drive Oak Avenue 2021-2036 $7,500,000 construction; ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements on east side of road including installation of North City Limits Yes C- Maintenance & new sw/c&g, LED street light conversion, full road (north of Twin Oaks SAC24918 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Sunrise Blvd Complete Streets - Phase 3 reconstruction, hardscape and landscape. Sunrise Blvd Antelope Road Avenue) 2021-2036 $5,002,000 Sunrise Blvd., from Antelope Rd to North City Limits: rehabilitate road, infill sidewalks, enhance bike lanes, and North City Limits Yes C- Maintenance & other upgrades. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 1.01 ROG, 0.77 (north of Twin Oaks Completion by SAC24496 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights Rehabilitation Sunrise Blvd. Complete Streets NOx, 0.41 PM10) Sunrise Blvd Antelope Road Avenue) 2020 $3,651,998 On Sunrise Blvd between Woodmore Oaks Dr and Sayonara Dr: Pavement overlay; Construct curb ramp, sidewalk, curb, Yes gutter, drain inlet; Install lighting, traffic signals (interconnect), storm drain, striping, and pavement markings Completion by SAC24708 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights A- Bike & Ped Sunrise Blvd. Safety Improvements (HSIP6-03-001) 2020 $934,222 Sunrise Blvd./Sungarden Dr. Safety At Sunrise Blvd. and Sungarden Dr.: Install traffic signals and Completion by Yes SAC24611 Sacramento City of Citrus Heights A- Bike & Ped Improvements sidewalks. HSIP4-03-003 2020 $1,113,900 Replace three 40' bluebird buses operated since 2000 with Yes E- Transit Capital three new CNG 40' buses. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 1.3 Completion by SAC24735 Sacramento City of Elk Grove (Vehicles) 40' Bus Replacements NOx, 0.03 PM10) 2020 $1,605,000 B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, Big Horn Blvd. from Whitelock Pkwy to Whitelock Completion by Yes SAC24099 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Big Horn Blvd. Spoonwood Dr.: Construct new 2-lane roadway Big Horn Blvd. Pkwy. Spoonwood Dr. 2020 $3,212,000 B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, Big Horn Blvd. from Spoonwood Dr. to Bilby Rd.: Yes SAC24981 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Big Horn Blvd. Construct new 2-lane roadway 2021-2036 $2,362,407 B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, Big Horn Blvd. from Bilby Rd. to Kammerer Rd.: Yes SAC24982 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Big Horn Blvd. Construct new 2-lane roadway 2021-2036 $5,669,500 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24983 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Big Horn Blvd. Widen to 4-lanes 2021-2036 $12,000,000 B- Road & Highway Construct extension of Big Horn Blvd. (4-lanes) from Bilby Rd. Completion by Yes SAC24773 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Big Horn Blvd. Extension - Bilby to Kammerer to Kammerer Rd. 2020 $2,283,000
Yes B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 2 lanes from Bruceville Rd. to McMillan McMillan Dr./Future SAC24551 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bilby Rd. Rd./Future Big Horn Blvd. extension (parallel to Kammerer). Bilby Rd. Bruceville Rd. Big Horn Blvd. 2021-2036 $3,500,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Lotz Pkwy. To West Yes SAC24790 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bilby Rd. Stockton Blvd. Bilby Rd. Lotz Pkwy. West Stockton Blvd. 2021-2036 $3,484,150 McMillan Yes B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lanes from McMillan Rd./Future Big Dr./Future Big SAC24972 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bilby Rd. Horn Blvd. extension to Lotz Pkwy. Bilby Rd. Horn Blvd. Lotz Pkwy. 2021-2036 $3,495,600 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24984 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bilby Rd. Widen to 4-lanes 2021-2036 $3,500,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24985 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bilby Rd. Widen to 4-lanes 2021-2036 $3,500,000
Yes G- System Management, Bond Rd./Bader Completion by SAC24791 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Operations, and ITS Bond Rd./Bader Rd. Intersection Install a trafic signal at the Bond Rd./Bader Rd. intersection Rd. n/a n/a 2020 $295,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, between Bradshaw Road and Grant Line Road: Completion after SAC24101 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bond Road Widening Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Bond Rd. Bradshaw Rd. Grant Line Rd. 2036 $648,170 In Elk Grove, at the intersection of Bradshaw and Sheldon Roads, over east branch of Laguna Creek: Intersection Yes B- Road & Highway improvements. Replace and widen existing 2 lane bridge Completion by SAC24072 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bradshaw / Sheldon Intersection & Bridge spanning East Branch of Laguna Creek with a 4 lane bridge. 2020 $10,388,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24073 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bradshaw Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Sheldon Rd. to Calvine Rd. Bradshaw Rd. Sheldon Rd. Calvine Rd. 2021-2036 $6,200,200 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24074 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bradshaw Rd. Widen: 4 to 6 lanes from Sheldon Rd. to Calvine Rd. Bradshaw Rd. Sheldon Rd. Calvine Rd. 2036 $380,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24075 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bradshaw Rd. Widen: 4 to 6 lanes from Bond Rd. to Sheldon Rd. Bradshaw Rd. Bond Rd. Sheldon Rd. 2036 $370,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24076 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bradshaw Rd. Widen: 4 to 6 lanes from Grant Line Rd. to Bond Rd. Bradshaw Rd. Grant Line Rd. Bond Rd. 2036 $620,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, between Bond Road and Sheldon Road: Widen Completion after SAC24102 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bradshaw Road Widening from 2 to 4 lanes. Bradshaw Rd. Bond Rd. Sheldon Rd. 2036 $696,120 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, from Grant Line Road to Bond Road, widen from Completion after SAC24103 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bradshaw Road Widening 2 to 4 lanes. Bradshaw Rd. Grant Line Rd. Bond Rd. 2036 $1,043,550 Project Development B- Road & Highway Whitelock Completion after SAC24081 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bruceville Rd. Widen: 6 lanes from Whitelock Pkwy. to Bilby Rd. Bruceville Rd. Pkwy. Bilby Rd. 2036 $1,845,900 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24082 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bruceville Rd. Widen: 6 lanes from Bilby Rd. to Kammerer Rd. Bruceville Rd. Bilby Rd. Kammerer Rd. 2036 $83,420 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from Elk Grove Blvd. to Whitelock Completion after SAC24949 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bruceville Rd. Parkway Bruceville Rd. Elk Grove Blvd. Whitelock Pkwy. 2036 $1,683,600 Bruceville Yes G- System Management, Bruceville Rd. and Poppy Ridge/Quail Run Install a trafic signal at the Bruceville Rd. and Poppy Rd./Poppy Ridge Completion by SAC24792 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Operations, and ITS Intersection Ridge/Quail Run intersection. Rd/Quail Run Ln. n/a n/a 2020 $338,100 B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, from Whitelock Parkway to Bilby Road: Widen Whitelock Yes SAC19010 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bruceville Road Widening from 2 to 4 lanes. Bruceville Rd. Pkwy. Bilby Rd. 2021-2036 $3,719,000 B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, Bruceville Road from Bilby Road to Kammerer Yes SAC24105 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Bruceville Road Widening Road: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Bruceville Rd. Bilby Rd. Kammerer Rd. 2021-2036 $2,200,000 Rehabilitate ten (10) Orion V transit buses with new CNG Yes E- Transit Capital tanks, engine and transmission, and other improvements as Completion by SAC24696 Sacramento City of Elk Grove (Vehicles) Bus Rehab needed. 2020 $859,683 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Calvine Road from Vineyard Road to Grant Line Road Completion after SAC24084 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Calvine Road from 2 to 4 lanes Calvine Rd. Vineyard Rd. Grant Line Rd. 2036 $14,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Center 2 lanes & median; Frontage imp. Allowance from Completion after SAC24951 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Elk Grove Blvd Bradshaw Rd. to Grant Line Rd. Elk Grove Blvd Bradshaw Rd. Grant Line Rd. 2036 $2,661,500 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24966 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Elk Grove Blvd Right Turn pocket from EB Elk Grove Blvd to SB SR99 Elk Grove Blvd n/a n/a 2021-2036 $875,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 75 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Various bridges in the City of Elk Grove: perform preventive maintenance. See Caltrans Local Assistance HBP website for Yes backup list of projects: C- Maintenance & Elk Grove Bridge Preventive Maintenance http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hbrr99/HBP_MPO. Completion by SAC24685 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Rehabilitation Program html#SACOG 2020 $330,000 In Elk Grove, San Joaquin Rail Corridor, construct 100-space Yes E- Transit Capital parking lot, 800 foot platform, and passenger shelter area for CAL20370 Sacramento City of Elk Grove (Major) Elk Grove Intercity Rail Station intercity passenger rail station. 2021-2036 $8,500,000 Operating assistance for transit services within the City of Elk Grove as well as commuter service to / from Sacramento. Yes Sacramento Urbanized Area.FFY 2013 operating assistance: $98,063 (MAP-21)FFY 2014 operating assistance: $882,559 Completion by SAC24695 Sacramento City of Elk Grove F- Transit O&M (Bus) Elk Grove Operating Assistance (MAP-21) 2020 $3,222,460
Multiple Schools in the Elk Grove Unified School District: Implement Project AWARE (Advancing Walk and Roll Yes Environments); needs assessment for each school/community through parent surveys and walk audits; hire a full-time SRTS Completion by SAC24631 Sacramento City of Elk Grove A- Bike & Ped Elk Grove Schools AWARE SRTS Program Coordinator to train staff and parents. SRTS3-03-004 2020 $472,837 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Elk Grove-Florin Road from 4 to 6 lanes from Calvine Elk Grove-Florin Completion after SAC24086 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Elk Grove-Florin Road Road to Bond Road Rd. Calvine Rd. Bond Rd. 2036 $7,900,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24952 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Excelsior Rd Full 2 lane Improvement from Sheldon Rd. to Calvine Rd. Excelsior Rd Sheldon Rd. Calvine Rd. 2021-2036 $5,000,000 In Sacramento County, Grant Line Road from Bond Road to Completion by Yes SAC20510 Sacramento City of Elk Grove D- Programs & Planning Grant Line Road Calvine Road: alignment study. Grant Line Rd Bond Rd Calvine Rd 2020 $800,000 In Elk Grove, from East Stockton Blvd to Waterman Road: Yes B- Road & Highway Grant Line Road Widening (Capital Southeast Widen Grant Line Road from 2 to 4 lanes, including grade Capital Southeast Completion by SAC24118 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Connector - Segment B1) separation over the UP Railroad Tracks. Connector 2020 $31,978,000 In Elk Grove, Grant Line Road; from New Waterman Road to Mosher Road: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes and preserve right of Yes way for 6 lanes; design and clear environmental from New B- Road & Highway Grant Line Road Widening Phase 2 (Capital Waterman to Bradshaw. Part of Capital Southeast Connector - Capital Southeast Completion by SAC24119 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Southeast Connector - Segment B2) Segment B2. Connector Waterman Rd. Bradshaw Rd. 2020 $6,152,000 In Elk Grove, Grant Line Road; from Mosher Road to Yes B- Road & Highway Grant Line Road Widening Phase 3 (Capital Bradshaw: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes and preserve right of way Capital Southeast SAC24700 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity SouthEast Connector - Segment B2 for 6 lanes. Connector 2021-2036 $12,021,000
Yes G- System Management, Widen Grant Line Road, between Bond Road and Calvine Completion by SAC24795 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Operations, and ITS Grant Line Two-Way-Left -Turn-Lane Road, to provide a two-way left turn lane. Grant Line Rd. Bond Rd. Calvine Rd. 2020 $12,200,000 This project is to develop an enhanced bus corridor 8.5 miles Yes E- Transit Capital along Bruceville Rd to Big Horn to Kammerer to 99 between Cosumnes SAC24962 Sacramento City of Elk Grove (Major) Hi Bus from CRC to Elk Grove Cosumnes River College and Elk Grove. Big Horn Blvd. River College Kammerer Rd. 2021-2036 $37,813,160 Project Development B- Road & Highway Develop an East-West enhanced bus corridor in Elk Grove Completion after SAC24788 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Hi Bus from I-5 to Bradshaw Rd along Elk Grove Blvd. from I-5 to Bradshaw Road. Elk Grove Blvd. I-5 Bradshaw Rd. 2036 $1,000,000 Transit Capital/Operations: Purchase fareboxes that integrate with other transit operators. Purchase software and Yes E- Transit Capital hardware for an automated dispatch, vehicle locator system SAC24312 Sacramento City of Elk Grove (Minor) Intelligent Transportation Systems and other intelligent transportation systems. n/a n/a n/a 2021-2036 $2,400,000 In Elk Grove, at intersections along Elk Grove-Florin Road, Big Horn Blvd., Franklin Blvd, Bruceville Rd., West Stockton Blvd, Elk Grove Blvd., and Grant Line Rd.: Install new traffic signal controllers and interconnect cable. Provide integration of the Yes new signal controllers into the City's existing Transportation Management Center. Closed circuit television cameras will be installed at key intersections to help monitor, coordinate, and B- Road & Highway maintain traffic flow. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.36 ROG, Completion by SAC24706 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity ITS Master Plan - Phase 4 Implementation 0.24 NOx, 0.01 PM 2.5.) 2020 $2,693,975 Construct new 4 lane Kammerer Rd extension from Bruceville Rd to I-5 (at Hood Franklin Rd), modifying the I-5/Hood Franklin interchange, and construction of a railroad grade separation at UP railroad tracks. (Toll Credits for PA&ED, Yes 11.47% of $1,164,000) Environmental Studies (NEPA and CEQA) also include the following scope, planned in the MTP/SCS for SAC24114, Kammerer Road Extension: In Elk B- Road & Highway Grove, from approximately 6000' west of SR 99 to Bruceville Completion by SAC24094 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Kammerer Rd Extension Road: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Kammerer Road Bruceville Rd. I-5 2020 $37,581,000 In Elk Grove, from approximately 6000' west of SR 99 to Bruceville Road: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. This Project is Yes B- Road & Highway included in the Environmental Studies (NEPA and CEQA) for Lent Ranch Completion by SAC24114 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Kammerer Road Widening SAC24094, Kammerer Road Extension. Kammerer Road Pkwy. Bruceville Rd. 2020 $18,862,000
This project is a combination class I bike trail and class II bike Yes lane project, connecting Camden neighborhoods to existing and future trails in Elk Grove. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: Completion by SAC24640 Sacramento City of Elk Grove A- Bike & Ped Laguna Creek Trail - Camden North Spur 0.14 ROG, 0.12 NOx, 0.03 PM10) (Toll credits for CON) 2020 $791,000 Construct trail segment from Bond Road to Camden Park/Lake and the existing Laguna Creek Trail. Includes a trail Yes crossing and weir over Laguna Creek at Camden Lake. Completion by SAC24699 Sacramento City of Elk Grove A- Bike & Ped Laguna Creek Trail - Camden South Spur (Emission Benefits in kg/day: ) 2020 $2,097,026 Lotz Pkwy. Extension - 0.5 miles south of In Elk Grove, Lotz Parkway from 0.5 miles south of Whitelock Yes B- Road & Highway Whitelock Pkwy (Sterling Meadows) to Bilby Pkwy (Sterling Meadows) to Bilby Road: Construct new 2-lane SAC24774 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Road roadway 2021-2036 $3,962,000 B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, from Laguna Springs Drive to Whitelock Laguna Spings Completion by Yes SAC24110 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Lotz Parkway Parkway: Construct new 2 lane roadway. Lotz Pkwy. Dr. Whitelock Pkwy. 2020 $3,700,000
In Elk Grove, Lotz Parkway from Whitelock Parkway to Poppy Ridge Road: Construct new 4-lane roadway; and Lotz Parkway Yes from Poppy Ridge Road to 0.5 miles south of Whitelock Pkwy B- Road & Highway at the northern boundary of the Sterling Meadows Whitelock 0.5 miles south of Completion by SAC24111 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Lotz Parkway development area: Construct new 2-lane roadway. Lotz Pkwy. Pkwy. Whitelock Pkwy 2020 $6,162,500 B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, Lotz Pkwy. from Bilby Rd to Kammerer Rd: Completion by Yes SAC24775 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Lotz Parkway Construct new 2-lane roadway 2020 $5,649,500 B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, from Laguna Springs Drive to Whitelock Yes SAC24980 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Lotz Parkway Parkway: widen to 4-lanes. 2021-2036 $3,500,000 B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, Lotz Pkwy. from Whitelock Pkwy to Kammerer Yes SAC24987 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Lotz Parkway Rd: widen to 4-lanes 2021-2036 $10,000,000 In Elk Grove: across the Lower Laguna Creek Open Space Preserve from Elk Spring Way to Laguna Creek near Fieldale Yes Dr.; Construct Class I Bikeway/multi-use trail and 60,000 square foot educational area with 8’ wide decomposed Completion by SAC24759 Sacramento City of Elk Grove A- Bike & Ped Lower Laguna Creek Open Space Preserve Trail granite paths and interpretive sign stations. 2020 $1,778,000 Elk Grove Boulevard, from School St. to Waterman Rd.: street frontage improvements, including: expanded decorative sidewalks & landscape strips, corner bulb-outs,landscaped Yes median islands at intersections/pedestrian crossings, crosswalks, bike lanes/routes, signs and striping, bus shelters, Old Town Elk Grove Improvement Project Phase related frontage improvement features and potential utility Completion by SAC24169 Sacramento City of Elk Grove A- Bike & Ped 2 undergrounding. Elk Grove Blvd. School St. Waterman Rd. 2020 $6,377,000 Purchase eight CNG replacement buses for the City of Elk Grove's E-Tran bus transit buses. The CNG buses replace six CNG buses that are beyond their useful life and adds two buses as spares because the current spare ratio is below 15%. Yes Includes automatic passenger counters for buses. Emission Benefits in kg/day: (0.16 NOx, 0.01 PM10). The FTA 5307 funds are comprised of the following amounts: 6 Buses E- Transit Capital Replacement CNG Buses for E-Tran Including $1,249,705; 2 Buses $864,000; Automatic Passenger Counters Completion by SAC24418 Sacramento City of Elk Grove (Vehicles) Automatic Passenger Counters $186,088 2020 $4,174,576 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Sheldon Road from Elk Grove-Florin Road to Elk Grove- Completion after SAC19160 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Sheldon Road Widening Waterman Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Sheldon Rd. Florin Rd. Waterman Rd. 2036 $7,651,500 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, from Waterman Road to Bradshaw Road: Widen Completion after SAC24120 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Sheldon Road Widening from 2 to 4 lanes. Sheldon Rd. Waterman Rd. Bradshaw Rd. 2036 $572,930
Yes G- System Management, Sheldon/Waterman Rd. Intersection In Elk Grove; Construct a roundabout intersection at Sheldon Sheldon Completion by SAC24798 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Operations, and ITS Improvements Rd. and Waterman Rd. Rd./Waterman Rd. n/a n/a 2020 $2,800,000
Yes G- System Management, Shoulder Safety Improvements - Various Various locations on Grant Line Rd, Bradshaw Rd., Kammerer Completion by SAC24709 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Operations, and ITS Locations Rd., and Waterman Rd.: Modify shoulders. (HSIP6-03-002) 2020 $130,000 Franklin Blvd. between Elk Grove Blvd. and Big Horn Blvd.; Yes G- System Management, Bruceville Rd. between Elk Grove Blvd. and Big Horn Blvd.: Completion by SAC24675 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Operations, and ITS Signal Upgrades Upgrade traffic signals. (HSIP5-03-005) 2020 $150,000 B- Road & Highway Southbound Auxiliary Lane from Elk Grove Blvd. to Laguna Yes SAC24968 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity State Route 99 Blvd. State Route 99 Elk Grove Blvd. Laguna Blvd. 2021-2036 $561,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Northbound Auxilary Lane on SR99 from Northbound On Completion after SAC24963 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity State Route 99 Auxillary Lanes Ramp to SR99 State Route 99 Elk Grove Blvd. Bond Rd. 2036 $724,600 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24097 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Waterman Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Elk Grove Blvd. to Bond Rd. Waterman Rd. Elk Grove Blvd. Bond Rd. 2021-2036 $4,800,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Waterman Road from Calvine Road to Sheldon Road: Completion after SAC24095 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Waterman Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Waterman Rd. Calvine Rd. Sheldon Rd. 2036 $3,000,000 B- Road & Highway Widen Waterman Road from Sheldon Road to Bond Road Yes SAC24096 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Waterman Road from 2 to 4 lanes. Waterman Rd. Sheldon Rd. Bond Rd. 2021-2036 $357,540 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, from Elk Grove Blvd to Grant Line Road: Widen Completion after SAC24112 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Waterman Road from 2 to 4 lanes. Waterman Rd. Elk Grove Blvd. Grant Line Rd. 2036 $7,500,000 Waterman Rd., from Bond Rd. to Sheldon Rd.: pavement Yes C- Maintenance & Waterman Road Complete Streets reconstruction with bicycle and pedestrian path Completion by SAC24720 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Rehabilitation Reconstruction improvements. 2020 $3,275,726 On West Stockton north of Promenade to Whitelock Pkwy, construct full 2 lane improvements and realign road to Yes B- Road & Highway intersect with Lotz Pkwy south of Whitelock. Rename to West Stockton Whitelock SAC24960 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity West Stockton Blvd Promenade. Blvd Pkwy. 1300' n/o Kyler Rd. 2021-2036 $1,583,039 B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, from Big Horn Blvd to West Stockton Blvd: Yes SAC20320 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Whitelock Parkway Widening Widen to 4 lane roadway. Whitelock Pkwy. Big Horn Blvd. West Stockton Blvd. 2021-2036 $520,280 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Interchange: Hwy 99 / Whitelock Pkwy, Whitelock Pkwy. / Completion after SAC24098 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Whitelock Pkwy./SR99 Interchange including pedestrian bridge over SR99 SR99 n/a n/a 2036 $4,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from Whitelock Pkwy. to South Bilby Whitelock Completion after SAC24954 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Willard Parkway Rd. Willard Pkwy. Pkwy. Bilby Rd. 2036 $1,854,100 Project Development B- Road & Highway Center Lanes & Widen Median from South Bilby Rd. to New Completion after SAC24955 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Willard Parkway Kammerer Rd. 2036 $26,187,200 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Elk Grove, Willard Parkway from Bilby Road to Kammerer Completion after SAC20340 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Willard Parkway Extension Road, construct new four lane roadway. Willard Pkwy. Bilby Rd. Kammerer Rd. 2036 $15,000,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 76 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24088 Only Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Willard Pkwy. Widen: 6 lanes from Bilby Rd. to Kammerer Rd. Willard Pkwy. Bilby Rd. Kammerer Rd. 2036 $370,800 B- Road & Highway 1 mi. s/e/o Grant Line Yes SAC24961 Sacramento City of Elk Grove Capacity Wilton Rd Full 2 lane improvements from Grant Line Rd. to City Limit Wilton Rd. Grant Line Rd. Rd. 2021-2036 $7,789,900 In Folsom, East Natoma St from Fargo Way to Folsom Lake Yes B- Road & Highway Crossing: widen from 2 to 4 lanes and construct bicycle trail SAC22060 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity East Natoma Street Widening undercrossing. 2021-2036 $3,150,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Prairie City Rd. to Empire Easton Valley Yes SAC24331 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Easton Valley Pkwy. Ranch Rd. Extension south of U.S. 50. Pkwy Prairie City Rd Empire Ranch Rd 2021-2036 $45,000,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24327 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Empire Ranch Rd. Road Extension: 4 lanes from U.S. 50 to White Rock Rd. Empire Ranch Rd U.S. 50 White Rock Rd 2021-2036 $18,000,000 Project includes the construction of a Class I bikeway adjacent to Empire Ranch Road and Highway 50 from Saratoga Road in Yes Empire Ranch Road Interchange Bikeway El Dorado Hills to Iron Point Road. (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, Completion by SAC24616 Sacramento City of Folsom A- Bike & Ped Connection Project CON.) 2020 $1,440,000 In Folsom, at Folsom Blvd. and Humbug-Willow Creek Parkway, construct a bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing of Yes Folsom Blvd. Includes connections to existing trails on both Completion by SAC24400 Sacramento City of Folsom A- Bike & Ped Folsom Blvd. Bike/Ped Overcrossing sides of Folsom Blvd. 2020 $2,500,000 Various bridges in the City of Folsom: perform preventive maintenance. See Caltrans Local Assistance HBP website for Yes backup list of projects. C- Maintenance & Folsom Bridge Preventive Maintenance http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hbrr99/HBP_MPO. Completion by SAC24686 Sacramento City of Folsom Rehabilitation Program html#SACOG n/a n/a 2020 $1,110,000 In Folsom, along the Folsom Lake Trail corridor from the main Folsom Prison Road to the existing trail along Folsom Lake Crossing Road. Project includes the construction of Yes approximately 1 mile of Class I Bike Trail, including a bike/pedestrian overcrossing at Folsom Dam Road. (Other Folsom Lake Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail & State funds are State EEM and BTA Grant funds.) (Emission Completion by SAC24399 Sacramento City of Folsom A- Bike & Ped Overcrossing Benefits: 0.1 kg/day ROG) 2020 $4,610,650 In Folsom, along the Folsom Lake Trail corridor from the Yes Folsom Lake Crossing Bike/Pedestrian overcrossing to Green Completion by SAC24324 Sacramento City of Folsom A- Bike & Ped Folsom Lake Trail Valley Road, construct approx 2-miles of class 1 bike trail. 2020 $2,500,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lanes, East-West arterial for SOI Yes SAC24542 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Folsom Plan Area Street A development. Street B Scott Rd White Rock Rd 2021-2036 $11,500,000
Yes B- Road & Highway Add Turn Lanes: Folsom-Auburn Rd. / Oak Ave. Includes: left SAC22930 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Folsom-Auburn Rd. and right turn lanes and intersection signal modifications. n/a n/a Completion by 20 $2,000,000 On Green Valley Road, from East Natoma Street to Sophia Yes B- Road & Highway Parkway: widen from 2 lanes to 4 lanes and provide Class II Completion by SAC21280 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Green Valley Road Widening bicycle paths. (Toll Credits for PE and CON.) Green Valley Rd East Natoma St Sophia Pkwy 2020 $3,600,000 Greenback Lane, over the American River, 0.2 miles east of Yes C- Maintenance & Folsom-Auburn Rd.: Structural rehabilitation of the 2 lane Completion by SAC24506 Sacramento City of Folsom Rehabilitation Greenback Lane Bridge Rehabilitation bridge. 2020 $8,644,000 B- Road & Highway Add Turn Lanes: left and right turn lanes at Folsom-Auburn Greenback/Folsom- Yes SAC22920 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Greenback Ln. and Folsom-Auburn Rd. Rd. and Greenback Ln. Includes: signal inprovements. Auburn n/a n/a 2021-2036 $1,200,000 Provide parking within the Folsom Historic District bounded Yes G- System Management, by Leidesdorff Street, Sutter Street, Riley Street, and Folsom Completion by SAC20220 Sacramento City of Folsom Operations, and ITS Historic District Parking Boulevard. 2020 $555,000 In Folsom, construct class I bike/ped trail from existing terminus of the Historic Powerhouse Trail near the Historic Truss Bridge to the soon to be constructed bike/ped Yes overcrossing at the new Folsom Lake Crossing Rd. Also construct class I trail connection from the main trail to the Historic Powerhouse/Folsom Lake Regional Folsom State Prison employee entrance. (Emission Benefits in Completion by SAC24483 Sacramento City of Folsom A- Bike & Ped Trail kg/day: 0.03 ROG, 0.02 NOx, 0.01 PM10) n/a n/a 2020 $3,428,000 Approximately 1,000 linear feet south of the intersection of Blue Ravine Road and Folsom Blvd. to the intersection with Yes the existing Lake Natoma Trail: Construct approximtely 2,200 Humbug-Willow Creek Trail/Lake Natoma Trail linear feet of Class I trail connecting the Humbug-Willow Completion by SAC24692 Sacramento City of Folsom A- Bike & Ped Connection Creek (HBWC) Trail with the Lake Natoma Trail. n/a n/a 2020 $344,000 B- Road & Highway Widen: 6 lanes from Black Diamond Dr. to Prairie City and Black Diamond Yes SAC21210 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Iron Point Rd. Outcropping to Broadstone Pkwy. Iron Point Rd Dr Prairie City Rd 2021-2036 $5,000,000 City of Folsom, From the terminus of the class I trail from behind the Lake Natoma Inn to the Scott Street/Riley Street Intersection: Construct upgrades to the existing Scott St./Riley St. at-grade signalized intersection. Extend a class I trail (cycle- track) along a portion of Leidesdorf St. from Gold Lakes Dr. to Yes just past the driveway entrance to the Lake Natoma Inn. Also make minor pavement striping improvements along Gold Lakes Dr. to connect the class I trail from the Lake Natoma Crossing Bridge to Leidesdorf St. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: Completion by SAC24641 Sacramento City of Folsom A- Bike & Ped Lake Natoma Trail – Gap Closure 0.01 ROG, 0.01 NOx) 2020 $1,510,000 Construction of approximatly 2,000 linear feet of trail along the shoreline of Lake Natoma with fully accessible access Yes from the Folsom Historic District to the shoreline of Lake Completion by SAC24697 Sacramento City of Folsom A- Bike & Ped Lake Natoma Waterfront Trail Access Natoma. n/a n/a 2020 $1,282,800 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from Folsom-Auburn Rd. to Baldwin Dam Rd. Folsom-Auburn Completion after SAC22280 Only Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Oak Ave. Pkwy. with Class I trail and ped facilities Oak Avenue Pkwy Rd Baldwin Dam Rd 2036 $3,000,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24543 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Oak Ave. Pkwy. Construct new road: 4 lanes from U.S. 50 to White Rock Rd. Oak Avenue Pkwy U.S. 50 White Rock Rd 2021-2036 $14,400,000 Oak Parkway Trail at Natoma Street: Between the Oak Yes Oak Parkway Trail Undercrossing and Johnny Parkway Trail and Johnny Cash Trail: Construct a bike trail Completion by SAC24761 Sacramento City of Folsom A- Bike & Ped Cash Trail Connection undercrossing. 2020 $1,121,000 Orangevale Ave over Gold Creek, 0.1 mile west of American Yes C- Maintenance & River Canyon: Replace 1 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge. Completion by SAC24515 Sacramento City of Folsom Rehabilitation Orangevale Ave Bridge Replacement Does not qualify for lump sum programming. Orangevale Ave n/a n/a 2020 $2,500,000 B- Road & Highway Widen existing Scott Road from 2 to 4 lanes between US 50 Yes SAC24328 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Scott Road Widening and White Rock Road Scott Rd U.S. 50 White Rock Rd 2021-2036 $16,000,000 B- Road & Highway In Folsom, Sibley Street from Glenn Drive to Blue Ravine Completion by Yes SAC21270 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Sibley Street Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Sibley St Glenn Dr Blue Ravine Rd 2020 $1,800,000 US 50 at Empire Ranch Road: Construct 4 lane interchange Yes B- Road & Highway with US 50 at Empire Ranch Road (formerly Russell Ranch SAC19890 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity US 50 at Empire Ranch Road Road). HPP #337 2021-2036 $37,652,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Interchange: 4 lanes at US 50 at Oak Avenue U.S. 50/Oak Completion after SAC24969 Only Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity US 50 at Oak Avenue Parkway Parkway Avenue n/a n/a 2036 $50,500,000 Ramp modifications and overpass widening for US 50/East Yes B- Road & Highway Bidwell/Scott Road Interchange to improve access to SAC24463 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity US 50 at Scott Road development south of US 50. U.S. 50/Scott n/a n/a 2021-2036 $3,180,000 Prairie City Road PM SAC Yes B- Road & Highway 19.233 Oak Avenue PM SAC SAC24888 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity US 50 Auxilary Lane Prairie City to Oak Avenue EB Auxiliary lane from Prairie City Road to Oak Avenue US 50 approximately 20 approximately 2021-2036 $3,000,000 Empire Ranch Yes B- Road & Highway US 50 Auxiliary Lane Empire Ranch to Latrobe SAC PM 22 Latrobe Road PM ELD SAC24891 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Road EB Auxiliary lane from Empire Ranch to Latrobe Road US 50 approximately 0.599 2021-2036 $3,000,000 Oak Avenue Yes B- Road & Highway PM SAC 20 Scott Road PM SAC SAC24889 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity US 50 Auxiliary Lane Oak Avenue to Scott Road EB Auxiliary lane from Oak Avenue to Scott Road US 50 approximately 21.5 approximately 2021-2036 $3,000,000 Scott Road PM Yes B- Road & Highway US 50 Auxiliary Lane Scott Road to Empire SAC 21.5 Empire Ranch SAC PM SAC24890 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity Ranch EB Auxiliary lane from Scott Road to Empire Ranch US 50 approximately 22 approximately 2021-2036 $3,000,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Overcrossing: 4 lanes between Iron Point Yes SAC24970 Sacramento City of Folsom Capacity US50 Rowberry Overcrossing Road and Easton Valley Parkway over US50 U.S. 50/Rowberry n/a n/a 2021-2036 $3,000,000 On West Leidesdorff St., develop land use plan after City Corp Completion by Yes SAC24737 Sacramento City of Folsom D- Programs & Planning West Leidesdorff St. Master Plan Yard relocation. 2020 $110,000 Complete street improvements on 4th Street and C Street in Historic Old Town and Downtown; Improvements consist of Yes enhanced pedestrian, landscaping and drainage Completion by SAC24642 Sacramento City of Galt A- Bike & Ped C St./Central Galt Complete Streets improvements. 2020 $2,551,600 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24337 Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Carillion Extension new 4 lane road from Simmerhorn to A Street / Boessow Simmerhorn A Street/Boessow 2021-2036 $2,500,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway On/Off Ramp Improvement: widen 1,280 linear feet of Hwy. Completion after SAC24341 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Highway 99 / Ayers Ln. 99 on/off ramps at Ayers Lane. 2036 $500,000 C- Maintenance & Lincoln Wy. from Elm Ave. to Meladee Ln.: Rehabilitate Completion by Yes SAC24770 Sacramento City of Galt Rehabilitation Lincoln Wy. Rehab pavement. (PE programmed separately on SAC24767) 2020 $400,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24829 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Marengo Extension new 4 lane road (Simmerhorn to A Street @ Crystal) Marengo Simmerhorn A Street @ Crystal 2036 $2,500,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24830 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Mingo I/C new interchange at Mingo Road on / off ramps 2036 $20,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24831 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity New Road New 4 Lane Road (Mingo I/C to Twin Cities @ Carillion) New Road Mingo I/C Twin Cities at Carillion 2036 $15,300,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Twin Cities (west SR Completion after SAC24832 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity New Road New 4 Lane Road (Mingo I/C to Twin Cities [west sr99]) New Road Mingo I/C 99) 2036 $8,500,000 Operating assistance for transit services within the City of Yes Galt. Urban area under 50,000 population.FFY 2015: Completion by SAC24671 Sacramento City of Galt F- Transit O&M (Bus) Operating Assistance 2015-2016 $100,000FFY 2016: $100,000 2020 $300,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Galt: Simmerhorn Road overcrossing of SR 99; Construct Completion after SAC24165 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Simmerhorn Road Overcrossing Replacement realigned overcrossing. 2036 $4,450,000
Lincoln Wy. from Elm Ave. to Meladee Ln.: Do PE work, but no CON. (CON is programmed separately on SAC24770). A St from Central Galt Interchange to City Limits: Rehabilitate Yes pavement. On 2nd Street between D St. and F. St.: Install infill concrete sidewalks, curb, gutter, and ADA improvements. Greer Elementary, Valley Oaks Elementary and Galt High School: pedestrian, bicycle and ADA improvements. Completion by SAC24767 Sacramento City of Galt A- Bike & Ped South Galt SRTS and Rehab (Toll Credits for CON of the RSTP and ATP components) 2020 $3,560,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24833 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Twin Cities widening 2 to 4 lanes (Carillion to Cherokee) Twin Cities Carillion Cherokee 2036 $10,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24834 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Twin Cities widening 4 to 6 lanes (Carillion to Marengo) Twin Cities Carillion Marengo 2036 $5,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24835 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Twin Cities widening 2 to 4 lanes (Fermoy to Carillion) Twin Cities Fermoy Carillion 2036 $3,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24836 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Twin Cities widening 4 to 6 lanes (Fermoy to Carillion) Twin Cities Fermoy Carillion 2036 $2,000,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 77 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24837 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Twin Cities I/C new interchange at Twin Cities Road 2036 $15,300,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Twin Cities Rd. Interchange on Hwy. 99: widen 4 lanes. Completion after SAC20590 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Twin Cities Rd. Includes: bicycle lanes. 2036 $5,105,100 Project Construct New Interchange: Project Development for Development B- Road & Highway eventual Hwy 99 / Walnut Ave. Includes full access freeway Completion after SAC24288 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Walnut Ave. / Highway 99 interchange and overcrossing. 2036 $3,649,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24838 Only Sacramento City of Galt Capacity Walnut I/C new interchange at Walnut Avenue on / off ramps Walnut Avenue 2036 $25,200,000 West of the Union Pacific railroad tracks and south of West Yes Elm St., on various streets, install class II and class III bicycle Completion by SAC24739 Sacramento City of Galt A- Bike & Ped Westside Bike Lanes/Routes routes. 2020 $302,270 Update the City of Isleton’s 2000 General Plan and Completion by Yes SAC24740 Sacramento City of Isleton D- Programs & Planning General Plan and Housing Element Updates incomplete 2006 Housing Element 2020 $110,000 C- Maintenance & Historic District Parking lot paving and Pave existing parking lot, add shade trees, landscaping and Completion by Yes SAC24946 Sacramento City of Isleton Rehabilitation landscaping parking lot lighting 2020 $125,000 Completion by Yes SAC24945 Sacramento City of Isleton A- Bike & Ped Main Street Landscaping & Beautification Street Trees, curb-gutter & sidewalk repairs 2020 $180,000
Yes G- System Management, Install Solar Powered Street Lights as part of City's Green Completion by SAC24947 Sacramento City of Isleton Operations, and ITS Main Street Solar street lights Program 2020 $150,000 C- Maintenance & Remove & replace existing street surface & subgrade due to Completion by Yes SAC24944 Sacramento City of Isleton Rehabilitation Street Repairs degradation 2020 $1,000,000 In Rancho Cordova: Continue ADA Transition Plan project delivery including reconstructing curb ramps, repairing Yes sidewalks, installing new curb ramps and new sidewalks, sidewalk bus pad modifications, removal of walkway barriers Lump Sum or SAC24316 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova A- Bike & Ped ADA Transition Plan and traffic signal retrofits. Ongoing $2,300,000 Project Construct New Road: 2 lanes from Kiefer Blvd. to Chrysanthy Development B- Road & Highway Blvd. Includes: intersection improvements at Keifer Blvd. and Completion after SAC24185 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Americanos Rd. Chrysanthy Blvd. Americanos Rd. Kiefer Blvd. Chrysanthy Blvd. 2036 $3,276,000 Project Construct New Road: 2 lanes from Douglas Rd. to Development B- Road & Highway International Dr. Includes: intersection improvements at Completion after SAC24376 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Americanos Rd. International Dr. and Villagio (Phase III) Americanos Rd. Douglas Rd. International Dr. 2036 $8,849,000 B- Road & Highway New 4 lane roadway from Chrysanthy to North of Douglas Chrysanthy Yes SAC24375 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Americanos Road, Phase I Road. (Phase 1) Americanos Rd. Blvd. Douglas Rd. 2021-2036 $2,969,000
Yes G- System Management, Aramon Dr. (Studarus Dr.)/Coloma Rd.: Install traffic signals. Completion by SAC24676 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Operations, and ITS Aramon Dr./Coloma Rd. Signals (HSIP5-03-014) 2020 $532,200 Project New 2 lane road off International Drive South connecting to Development B- Road & Highway Grant Line Road including intersection improvements at International Completion after SAC24971 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Centennial Drive International, Americanos and Grant Line Rd. Centennial Dr. Dr. Grant Line Rd. 2036 $9,903,710 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Sunrise Blvd. to Rancho Completion by Yes SAC24187 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Chrysanthy Blvd Cordova Parkway. Chrysanthy Blvd. Sunrise Blvd. Grant Line Rd. 2020 $3,690,000 Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Rancho Cordova Parkway to Americanos and new 2 lanes from Americanos to Grant Yes B- Road & Highway Line Rd. Includes: intersection improvements at Rancho SAC24988 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Chrysanthy Blvd Cordova Pkwy., Americanos, and Grant Line Rd. 2021-2036 $10,091,000 Add new Class I bike trails consistent with the City Bike Completion by Yes SAC24996 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova A- Bike & Ped Class I Bike Trails Master Plan 2020 $5,000,000 Coloma Rd. between Folsom Blvd. and Sunrise Blvd.: Upgrade Yes G- System Management, traffic signals (interconnect) and install traffic cameras. (HSIP5- Completion by SAC24677 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Operations, and ITS Coloma Rd. Signals 03-015) 2020 $935,500 C- Maintenance & Rehabilitate Sunrise Blvd. from Folsom Blvd. to Douglas Rd. Completion by Yes SAC24824 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Rehabilitation Complete Streets Rehabilitation - Sunrise Blvd And construct bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Sunrise Blvd Folsom Blvd White Rock Rd 2020 $5,495,000 Widen Douglas Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes from Sunrise Blvd. to the West City Limit. Includes the addition of a new bridge over Yes B- Road & Highway the Folsom South Canal adjacent to the existing bridge. (See Completion by SAC24473 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Douglas Rd. Widening SAC20240) Douglas Rd Sunrise Blvd. West City Limits 2020 $13,000,000 Douglas Rd./Grant Line Rd.: Install traffic signal; widen Yes B- Road & Highway Douglas Rd./Grant Line Rd. Safety roadway (to accommodate left-turn and right-turn pockets Completion by SAC24678 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Improvements and bike lanes)(HSIP5-03-016) 2020 $1,040,600
Douglas Rd, from Rancho Cordova Parkway to Americanos Blvd.: Widen from 2 to 5 lanes with striping for three Yes eastbound lanes and two westbound lanes. New signals will B- Road & Highway be installed at the intersections of Rancho Cordova Parkway, Rancho Completion by SAC24628 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Douglas Road Phase 2 Timberlands Drive and an interim signal at Americanos Blvd. Douglas Rd Cordova Pkwy Americanos Blvd 2020 $2,600,000 Widen Douglas Road from 2 to 4 lanes from Americanos Blvd Yes B- Road & Highway to Grant Line Rd and intersection improvements at Grant Line SAC24629 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Douglas Road Phase 3 Road. 2021-2036 $6,488,000 Construct Easton Valley Parkway as a new 4-lane road from Yes B- Road & Highway Rancho Cordova Parkway to the City Limits including Easton Valley Rancho Completion by SAC24183 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Easton Valley Pkwy Phase 1 intersection improvements at Rancho Cordova Parkway. Pkwy Cordova Pkwy City Limits 2020 $9,758,000 Project Widen: from 4 to 6 lanes from Rancho Cordova Pkwy. to Development B- Road & Highway Hazel Ave. with enhanced intersection improvements at Easton Valley Rancho Completion after SAC24372 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Easton Valley Pkwy. Rancho Cordova Pkwy. and Hazel Ave. (Phase II) Pkwy Cordova Pkwy Hazel Ave 2036 $47,090,000 Folsom Blvd., from Horn to Rod Beaudry, and from Sunrise Blvd. to Kilgore Rd.: provide streetscape improvements by Yes B- Road & Highway installing new and bifurcated sidewalks and landscaped Completion by SAC24717 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Folsom Blvd. Complete Streets (Phase 4) medians. 2020 $5,095,135 Project Streetscape Project: On Folsom Blvd from Bradshaw Rd. to Development Sunrise Blvd. Includes: landscape and safety improvements Completion after SAC24825 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova A- Bike & Ped Folsom Blvd. Enhancements Phase 5 for bicycle and pedestrian access to transit. (Phase IV) Folsom Blvd Bradshaw Rd Sunrise Blvd. 2036 $34,703,000 Amenities including, but not limited ot, way finding signs, bike Yes repair stations, shade strictures, striping, and other amenities Completion by SAC24993 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova A- Bike & Ped Folsom South Canal Bike Trail Amenities as appropriate 2020 $300,000 Project Development G- System Management, Rail Crossing Project: at Bradshaw Road, plan and construct a Completion after SAC24243 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Operations, and ITS Grade Separate RT Gold Line At Bradshaw Road rail grade seperation for RT s Gold line. 2036 $12,500,000 Project Development G- System Management, Grade Separate RT Gold Line At Mather Field Rail Crossing Project: at Mather Field Road, plan and Completion after SAC24245 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Operations, and ITS Road Construct a Rail Grade Seperation for RT s Gold line. 2036 $25,000,000 Project Development G- System Management, Rail Crossing Project: at Routier Road, plan and Construct a Completion after SAC24244 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Operations, and ITS Grade Separate RT Gold Line At Routier Road Rail Grade Seperation for RT s Gold line. 2036 $25,000,000
Yes G- System Management, Rail Crossing Project: at Zinfandel Drive plan and Construct a SAC24247 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Operations, and ITS Grade Separate RT Gold Line At Zinfandel Drive Rail Grade Seperation for RT s Gold line. 2021-2036 $25,000,000 Project Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Sunrise Blvd. to Rancho Development B- Road & Highway Cordova Parkway Includes: intersection improvements at Completion after SAC24276 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity International Dr. Sunrise Blvd. International Dr Sunrise Blvd. Rancho Cordova Pkwy 2036 $31,289,000 Construct New Road: 4-lanes from Luyung Drive (western Rio Del Oro Specific Plan Boundary) to White Rock Rd. Includes: Yes B- Road & Highway intersection improvements at Rancho Cordova Parkway, and SAC24471 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity International Dr. White Rock Road. International Dr Sunrise Blvd. Rancho Cordova Pkwy 2021-2036 $7,513,341 Construct New Road: International Drive northern 4-lane loop Project from White Rock Road back to Rancho Cordova Parkway. Development B- Road & Highway Includes: intersection improvements at Rancho Cordova Completion after Only SAC24989 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity International Dr. Parkway. 2036 $5,025,000 In Rancho Cordova, extend Kiefer Blvd from Rancho Cordova Pkwy to Grant Line as 4 lane road. Includes intersection Yes B- Road & Highway improvements at Americanos and Grant Line. Developer will SAC24707 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Kiefer Blvd Extension deliver project 2021-2036 $5,621,000 B- Road & Highway Widen Kiefer Blvd. from 2-4 lanes from Sunrise Blvd. to Completion by Yes SAC24374 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Kiefer Boulevard, Phase 2 Rancho Cordova Parkway. Kiefer Blvd Sunrise Blvd. Americanos Blvd 2020 $3,510,000
Yes G- System Management, Roadway enhancements from International Dr. to White Rock International SAC24201 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Operations, and ITS Kilgore Rd. Rd. Kilgore Rd. Dr. White Rock Rd 2021-2036 $693,000
Yes B- Road & Highway Construct New Road:4 lanes from Rockingham Rd. to SAC24202 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Mather Blvd. Zinfandel Dr. Includes: widening existing roadway to 4 lanes. Mather Blvd Rockingham Rd Zinfandel Dr 2021-2036 $17,266,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 6 lanes from Rockingham Rd. to Folsom Blvd. Completion after SAC24204 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Mather Field Rd. Includes: intersection improvements at Rockingham Rd. Mather Field Rd Rockingham Rd Folsom Blvd 2036 $2,514,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24219 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Mather Field Rd./U.S. 50 Interchange Interchange Modification: at U.S. 50/Mather Field Rd. 2036 $20,000,000 Construct intersection modification at Mather Field Road., Yes B- Road & Highway modify on and off ramp configuration and turn pockets, and SAC24990 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Mather Field Rd./U.S. 50 Interchange improve pedestrian connectivity 2021-2036 $2,000,000 This project will provide a Class 1 bike trail along the rail corridor between Folsom and Rockingham Drive. This project will add sidewalks and enhance pedestrian and disabled access on the west side of Mather Field Road, between Yes Folsom Boulevard and Rockingham Drive. This will allow for greater access to the historic "Mills Station" Light Rail Station and enhance access to both bus transit. (2010 Demo ID Completion by SAC24455 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova A- Bike & Ped Mather Railroad Spur Rails to Trails CA859) 2020 $2,777,715 Project Widen to 4 lanes from Bradshaw Rd. to Peter McCuen Blvd. Development B- Road & Highway Includes: intersection improvements at Routier Rd. & Mather Old Placerville Rd: Completion after SAC24550 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Old Placerville Rd.:International Drive Blvd. International Dr Bradshaw Rd Zinfandel Dr 2036 $9,389,000 Project Widen to 6 lanes from Bradshaw Rd. to Peter McCuen Blvd. Development B- Road & Highway Includes: intersection improvements at Routier Rd. & Mather Completion after SAC24991 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Old Placerville Rd.:International Drive Blvd. 2036 $30,886,000 Pedestrian Improvements: Throughout Rancho Cordova, construct new pedestrian facilities based on Pedestrian Yes Master Plan. Continue Sidewalk Gap project delivery. Lump Sum or SAC24317 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova A- Bike & Ped Pedestrian Facilities and Sidewalk Gap program Includes: grade separations at key locations. Ongoing $12,200,000
Bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing of Folsom Bouleard connecting the Mather Field/Mills SACRT Lght Rail Station to Yes the Bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing of Folsom Bouleard connecting the new Folsom Lake College campus to the Mather Field/Mills SACRT Lght Rail Station to the new Completion by SAC24997 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova A- Bike & Ped Pedestrian Overcrossing at Folsom Lake College 2020 $4,000,000 Bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing of U.S. 50 connecting Olsen Drive to Prospect Park Drive as defined in The Yes Promenade: Connecting and Revitalizing Rancho Cordova Completion by SAC24180 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova A- Bike & Ped Pedestrian Promenade Planning Study (reference SAC24157). 2020 $8,500,000 Widen to 4 lanes from Mather Blvd. to International Dr. (including Femoyer St). Includes: intersection improvements Yes B- Road & Highway at Mather Boulevard, Mather Field Road, Femoyer Street/Air Peter A. McCuen SAC24586 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Peter A. McCuen Blvd. Park Dr. and International Dr. Blvd Mather Blvd International Dr. 2021-2036 $17,571,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 78 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) This project consists of constructing two Bridge structures directly adjacent to the bike/ped Bridge (Pedestrian Promenade). Each of these new Bridge structures will Project accommodate a transit way (rubber tired or fixed guideway Development streetcar) in addition to bike and pedestrian movements if Only desired. The project would provide directl transit linkage B- Road & Highway between the town center and the employment and Prospect Park Completion after SAC24826 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Promenade Stage 2, Transit Bridges residential areas south of Hwy 50. Crosses Hwy 50 Drive Olson Drive 2036 $21,600,000 E- Transit Capital Replace contracted shuttle fleet with city owned or leased Yes SAC24239 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova (Vehicles) Purchase or Lease 23 Shuttles fleet, including three back-up vehicles (23 shuttles total) 2021-2036 $5,750,000
Along Chasella Wy. and Pedro Wy. between Malvasia Dr. and Zinfandel Dr., on Malaga Wy. and Sarda Wy. between Yes Vernaccia Wy. and Furmint Wy., and on Furmint Wy. between Malaga Wy. and north of Saltana Wy.: Fill in gaps in Rancho Cordova Elementary School Bicycle and sidewalks, crosswalks, and bicycle routes. (Emission Benefits Completion by SAC24718 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova A- Bike & Ped Pedestrian Improvements in kg/day: 0.02 ROG, 0.01 NOx, 0.01 PM10, 0.01 PM2.5) 2020 $1,848,456 Construct Rancho Cordova Parkway as a six lane roadway from White Rock to Villagio and a 4 lane roadway from Yes B- Road & Highway Rancho Cordova Parkway - Douglas to White Villagio to Douglas Road, including intersection improvements Rancho Cordova SAC22980 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Rock at Villagio and White Rock Road. Pkwy Douglas Rd. White Rock Rd 2021-2036 $17,000,000 B- Road & Highway Rancho Cordova Parkway, Chrysanthy Blvd to Rancho Cordova Parkway: Widen existing road 2-4 lanes Rancho Cordova Chrysanthy Yes SAC24630 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Kiefer Road from Chrysanthy Blvd to Kiefer Road Pkwy Blvd. Kiefer Blvd 2021-2036 $3,654,348 B- Road & Highway Rancho Cordova Parkway, Douglas Road to Construct a new 4 lane road Rancho Cordova Parkway, from Rancho Cordova Completion by Yes SAC24511 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Chrysanthy Boulevard Douglas Road to Chrysanthy Boulevard. Pkwy Douglas Rd. Chrysanthy Blvd. 2020 $3,426,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Grant Line Rd. to Kiefer Rancho Cordova Yes SAC24295 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Rancho Cordova Pkwy, Grant Line to Kiefer Blvd. Includes intersection improvement at Grant Line Rd. Pkwy Grant Line Rd Kiefer Blvd 2021-2036 $3,709,000 Rio Del Oro Parkway: New 2 lane road from Rancho Cordova Project Parkway to White Rock Road including intersection Development B- Road & Highway improvements at Rancho Cordova Parkway, Americanos Blvd., Rio Del Oro Completion after Only SAC24181 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Rio Del Oro Pkwy and White Rock Road (CP09-2070) Parkway Sunrise Blvd. White Rock Rd 2036 $8,211,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: from 2 to 4 lanes from Rancho Cordova Pkwy. to Rio Del Oro Rancho Completion after SAC24371 Only Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Rio Del Oro Pkwy. White Rock Rd. (Phase III) Parkway Cordova Pkwy White Rock Rd 2036 $3,000,000 Projects includes a raised barrier to protec t cyclists from Completion by Yes SAC24995 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova A- Bike & Ped Rod Beaudry Cycle Track Improvements traffic, painted bike lane or other identifier 2020 $250,000 B- Road & Highway Widen: from Old Placerville Rd. to Folsom Blvd. including Old Placerville Yes SAC24221 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Routier Rd. structure over U.S. Hwy. 50. Routier Rd Rd Folsom Blvd 2021-2036 $8,743,000 Projects includes a raised barrier to protec t cyclists from Completion by Yes SAC24994 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova A- Bike & Ped Routier Road Cycle Track Improvements traffic, painted bike lane or other identifier 2020 $500,000 Widen Sunrise Boulevard: 2 to 4-lanes from Kiefer Boulevard to State Route 16 (Jackson Highway) and construct partial intersection improvements at Sunrise Boulevard and State Route 16. The project includes modifications to the bridge on Yes Sunrise Boulevard over Laguna Creek. (The $5,227,000 of local agency funds is Sac County funding. City will advance B- Road & Highway costs and enter into MOU with County for reimbursement for Completion by SAC24468 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Sunrise Blvd - Kiefer Blvd to SR16 County share.) Sunrise Blvd Kiefer Blvd. SR16 2020 $12,000,000 B- Road & Highway Construct 6x6 intersection with two bridge sections over the Yes SAC24349 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Sunrise Blvd. and Jackson Hwy. Intersection creek at Sunrise Boulevard and Jackson Highway. 2021-2036 $10,355,460 Sunrise Blvd., from Coloma to 762 feet north of Gold Express Drive: rehabilitate northbound and southbound lanes with a Yes minimum of 2 inches of asphalt. Complete streets C- Maintenance & improvements include new crosswalks as well as other bike Completion by SAC24635 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Rehabilitation Sunrise Blvd. Complete Streets Rehabilitation and pedestrian improvements. 2020 $3,359,000 On Sunrise Blvd, construction intersection modifications and Project pedestrian improvements and include road widening along Development B- Road & Highway Sunrise or capacity increasing improvements and Completion after Only SAC24210 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Sunrise Complex Improvements modifications at US 50. Sunrise Blvd White Rock Rd. American River 2036 $50,000,000 In the City of Rancho Cordova: install a traffic management center. At various locations on Sunrise Blvd, Folsom Blvd, Zinfandel Dr, Mather Field and Rockingham and White Rock Yes Rd.: Install new traffic signal controllers, expand the existing coordinated signal system, and install fiber to connect to B- Road & Highway traffic operations center. Intelligent Transportation System Completion by SAC24710 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Traffic Management Center & ITS Upgrades (ITS).(HSIP6-03-013, Toll credits for PE and CON) 2020 $4,000,000 At US 50 and Rancho Cordova Pkwy.: Construct new interchange including auxiliary lanes on U.S. 50 between Yes Hazel Ave. and Sunrise Blvd. and a four lane arterial B- Road & Highway connection to US 50 of Rancho Cordova Pkwy. to White Rock Completion by SAC24220 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity US 50 / Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Rd.(CP05-2003) 2020 $100,000,000 Construct New Road: 2 lanes from Douglas Rd. to White Rock Project Rd. Includes: intersection improvements at Douglas Rd., Development B- Road & Highway Rancho Cordova Pkwy., International Dr., Americanos Rd., Completion after Only SAC24182 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Villagio and White Rock Rd. Villagio Douglas Rd. White Rock Rd 2036 $2,496,000 Environmental will be for both this project and the County of Sacramento project SAC24249. Enviornmental will be done for White Rock Road Sunrise Blvd to Grant Line Road. Construction will include: On existing 6-lane White Rock Rd., from Sunrise Blvd. to Luyung Dr.: construct improvements, including Class II bikeway. On White Rock Rd from Luyung Dr. Yes to eastern City Limits: widen and reconstruct from 2 to 4 lanes and construct Class II bikeway. (CMAQ funds only to be used for new bicycle facilities.) (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.03 ROG, 0.03 NOx, 0.02 PM10). Additional construction will B- Road & Highway White Rock Rd. - Construct Sunrise Blvd. to City be completed under the Sacramento County project Completion by SAC24470 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Capacity Limits; Environmental Sunrise to Grant Line SAC24662. 2020 $18,366,000 On Zinfandel Blvd, modify US 50 ramp intersections, lengthen Yes G- System Management, turn pockets, add additional overhead signage, and build Completion by SAC24703 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova Operations, and ITS Zinfandel Complex Improvements pedestrian refuge islands. 2020 $5,410,000 Construct intersection and pedestrian improvements on Zinfandel Drive between White Rock Road and Folsom Blvd, including modifications at US 50/Zinfandel to improve safety Yes and ease congestion along the corridor, including bridge widenings, ramp and intersection reconstruction and SAC24828 Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova A- Bike & Ped Zinfandel Complex Improvements - Phase2 reconstruction of intersections. Zinvandel Dr White Rock Rd. Folsom Blvd 2021-2036 $45,968,000 12th St. between Richards Blvd. and L St.: Upgrade traffic signal system; repair conduit infrastructure between signals; Yes G- System Management, provide dynamic train and vehicle signs; improve signing and Completion by SAC24500 Sacramento City of Sacramento Operations, and ITS 12th St. Signal Upgrades striping. HSIP3-03-001 (T15115000) 2020 $1,300,000 Sacramento. Extension of 14th Avenue from Power Inn Rd to Florin-Perkins. Phase I includes environmental/PE for four lane roadway and construction of two-lane roadway with class II bicycle lanes and landscape planter/sidewalks on the Yes south side of the roadway. Also includes new water and drainage facilities, new streetlights, new traffic signal at 14th B- Road & Highway Ave/Florin Perkins Rd, and modification to existing traffic Completion by SAC24610 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity 14th Ave. Extension Phase 1 signal. (Phase 2 SAC24656, Phase 3 SAC24657) 2020 $7,058,000 Sacramento. 14th Ave., from Power Inn Road to Florin Project Perkins, widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Construction includes bike Development lanes, landscaped center median, landscaping and sidewalk Only B- Road & Highway on north side of street. Retaining wall along north side of Completion after SAC24656 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity 14th Ave. Extension Phase 2 project. (PE/ENV included in Phase 1, SAC24610) 2036 $3,750,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Sacramento. 14th Avenue from Florin-Perkins Rd to Watt Ave: Completion after SAC24657 Only Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity 14th Ave. Extension Phase 3 extend as a four lane road. 2036 $8,500,000 On 16th Street from S Street to N Street, pedestrian improvements including bulb-outs, landscaping and trees, Yes banners, pavement treatments, bike racks, and street Completion by SAC24623 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped 16th Street Streetscape furniture,and street lights. 2020 $2,660,000 In Downtown Sacramento Railyards, extension of 5th Street from H Street to Railyards Boulevard, including bridge over relocated mainline railroad tracks, and construction of four Yes lane Railyards Boulevard from east of Bercut to 7th Street, B- Road & Highway including frontage improvements and utilities. (See MTP Completion by SAC24758 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity 5th Street and Railyards Blvd Project SAC24537, Downtown Sacramento Circulation) 2020 $32,000,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC23630 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity 65th St. Widen: 5 lanes from Hwy. 50 to Broadway. 65th street Highway 50 Broadway 2021-2036 $4,000,000 In Downtown Sacramento Railyards, from H Street to Railyards Blvd. Construct 3-lane roadway with frontage Yes improvements and utilities, including bridges over relocated B- Road & Highway mainline railroad tracks. (See MTP Project SAC24537, Completion by SAC24757 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity 6th Street Extension Downtown Sacramento Circulation) 2020 $20,040,000 C- Maintenance & Auburn Blvd. over Arcade Creek, at Winding Way: Replace Completion by Yes SAC24693 Sacramento City of Sacramento Rehabilitation Auburn Blvd. Bridge Replacement existing five lane bridge with a new five lane bridge 2020 $5,917,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC22840 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Bell Ave. Widen: 3 lanes from Norwood Ave. to Raley Blvd. Bell ave Norwood Ave Raley Blvd 2021-2036 $20,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC22850 Only Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Bell Ave. Widen: 3 lanes from Raley Blvd. to Winters St. Bell Ave Raley Blvd Winters St 2036 $1,200,000 Various Locations in the City of Sacramento: rehabilitate bridges. For locations and detail, see Yes C- Maintenance & www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hbrr99/2011_10_20_hbp Completion by SAC24633 Sacramento City of Sacramento Rehabilitation Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program _lists/PM00063%20City%20of%20Sacramento.pdf 2020 $962,881 Environmental clearance/PE for Riverfront Reconnection. Construct connection over I-5 between approximately Capitol Yes B- Road & Highway Ave. to "O" St. (T15998100) Phase 1 constructed under SAC22530 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Bridging I-5/Riverfront Reconnection SAC24705 2021-2036 $7,432,709 On Carlson Dr between approx. 250' north of H St and 250' south of J St; On H ST between Camilla Ave and Carlson Dr: Yes Upgrade traffic signals, signs, and striping; Construct curb Completion by SAC24712 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Carlson Dr. Safety Improvements ramps and crosswalks. (HSIP6-03-015) 2020 $1,314,695 Power Inn Rd., from Folsom Blvd. to Alpine Ave.: Pavement Yes C- Maintenance & rehabilitation and complete streets improvements. (Toll Completion by SAC24723 Sacramento City of Sacramento Rehabilitation Complete Street Rehabilitation - Power Inn Rd. Credits for PE and CON) T15145400 2020 $2,597,989 Bell Ave. from Bollenbacher Ave. to Astoria St.,: rehabilitate pavement, fill in sidewalk gaps, add new bicycle lanes, add Yes C- Maintenance & two-way left turn lanes, and add bus pullouts. (Toll Credits for Completion by SAC24719 Sacramento City of Sacramento Rehabilitation Complete Streets Rehabilitation - Bell Ave. PE and CON)- T15145600 2020 $5,759,968 Fruitridge Rd., from 65th St. to Power Inn Rd.,: rehabilitate sidewalks up to standard, and add bicycle lanes, actuated Yes C- Maintenance & crosswalks, and new crosswalks. (Toll Credits for PE and Completion by SAC24722 Sacramento City of Sacramento Rehabilitation Complete Streets Rehabilitation - Fruitridge Rd. CON). T15036300 2020 $3,100,000 B- Road & Highway In Sacramento,from I-5 N/B offramp to East Commerce (north East Commerce Yes SAC24139 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Del Paso Rd side only), widen Del Paso Road. Del Paso Road I-5 N/B offramp (north side only) 2021-2036 $516,000 In Sacramento, extend pedestrian/bicycle riverfront promenade from R St to Pioneer Bridge. Relocation and Yes reconstruction of main rail line. Pedestrian/bicycle paths, benches, lighting, interpretative signs, rail crossings, and on- Completion by SAC24499 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Docks Riverfront Promenade street bicycle lanes. 2020 $12,518,290
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 79 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars)
Roadway Operational Improvements: Unspecified funding for Yes G- System Management, future operational improvements to accommodate increased Lump Sum or SAC24557 Sacramento City of Sacramento Operations, and ITS Downtown Sacramento Circulation bus and rail traffic, auto, trucks, in downtown Sacramento. Ongoing $100,000,000 Downtown Sacramento, bounded by Broadway, Sacramento River, American River, and Alhambra Blvd.: Study the cost and Yes priority of the $100 million in improvements planned in the Completion by SAC24497 Sacramento City of Sacramento D- Programs & Planning Downtown Sacramento Transportation Study MTP2035. 2020 $1,200,000 B- Road & Highway In Sacramento, East Commerce Way from Club Center Drive Club Center Yes SAC18460 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity East Commerce Way to Del Paso Rd, extend as a 6-lane facility. Drive Del paso Road 2021-2036 $8,142,225 B- Road & Highway In Sacramento, extend East Commerce Way from Arena Blvd. East Commerce Natomas Crossing Yes SAC18570 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity East Commerce Way to Natomas Crossing Drive, as a 6 lane road. Way Arena Blvd Drive 2021-2036 $3,329,000 B- Road & Highway Extend East Commerce Way from planned Natomas Crossing East Commerce Natomas Yes SAC18580 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity East Commerce Way Drive to San Juan Rd. as a 4 lane road. Way Crossing Drive San Juan Road 2021-2036 $4,000,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC18740 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity El Centro Rd. New Overcrossing: El Centro Rd. overcrossing. 2021-2036 $11,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC23690 Only Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Elder Creek Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Power Inn Rd. and Florin Perkins Rd. Elder Creek Rd Power Inn Rd. Florin Perkins Rd 2036 $1,900,000 B- Road & Highway Florin Perkins Yes SAC23680 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Elder Creek Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Florin Perkins Rd. to South Watt Ave. Elder Creek Rd Rd South Watt Ave 2021-2036 $7,000,000 B- Road & Highway In Sacramento, Elkhorn Boulevard from SR 99 to east city Yes SAC18510 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Elkhorn Boulevard limits: widen from 2 to 6 lanes. Elkhorn Blvd SR 99 east city limits 2021-2036 $7,073,566
Yes G- System Management, 9 locations throughout the City of Sacramento: Install flashing Completion by SAC24711 Sacramento City of Sacramento Operations, and ITS Flashing Beacons beacon. (HSIP6-03-014) T15145800 2020 $1,665,967 Folsom Blvd. from Power Inn Road to Watt Avenue; streetscape project including pedestrian and bicycle Yes improvements, a raised landscaped median, landscaped planters, improvements to signal operations, frontage Completion by SAC24402 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Folsom Blvd Operations and Maintenance landscaping, and enhanced connections to transit facilities. 2020 $19,500,000 SAC24535 Yes Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Folsom Blvd. Streetscape Project: Folsom Blvd from Power Inn. to 65th St. Folsom Blvd Power Inn Rd. 65th Street 2021-2036 $18,500,000 Folsom Blvd., from 65th St. to the Union Pacific Railroad underpass: rehabilitate roadway. Complete streets features Yes include new bicycle lanes and new sidewalks to fill in missing C- Maintenance & sections. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.13 ROG, 0.1 NOx, Completion by SAC24636 Sacramento City of Sacramento Rehabilitation Folsom Blvd. Complete Streets Rehabilitation 0.06 PM10) - T15135100 2020 $1,997,000 Near intersection of Folsom Blvd. and Power Inn: Ramona Ave., extend northward from Brighton Ave. to connect to Yes B- Road & Highway Folsom Blvd./Power Inn Rd. Intersection Folsom Blvd. This will improve the operations of the Folsom Completion by SAC22610 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity (Ramona Ave Phase I) Blvd./Power Inn Intersection. (Phase 2, SAC24654) 2020 $8,629,889 On Freeport Blvd., from Sutterville Rd. to 4th Ave./21st St.: reduce travel lanes from 4 to 2 with median turn pockets, add Yes Class II bike paths, install transit turnouts, and rehabilitate C- Maintenance & pavement. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.02 ROG, 0.01 NOx) Completion by SAC24704 Sacramento City of Sacramento Rehabilitation Freeport Blvd. Road Diet K15125100 2020 $2,059,200 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC23810 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Highway 99 Meister Way Overcrossing New Overcrossing: Meister Wy. / Hwy. 99. 2021-2036 $6,500,000 I Street Bridge, over Sacramento River and complex of bridge approach structures. Replace existing 2 lane bridge with a 2 Yes lane bridge on a new alignment. Project includes bridge C- Maintenance & approaches 22C0154, 24C0006, 24C0364L, 24C0364R, Completion by SAC24683 Sacramento City of Sacramento Rehabilitation I St. Bridge Replacement 24C0351J. 2020 $86,620,900 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC18660 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity I-5 Add Auxiliary Lane: NB from Del Paso Rd. to Hwy. 99. I-5 Del Paso Rd Hwy 99 2021-2036 $857,000 B- Road & Highway On/Off Ramp Improvement: Add 2nd on-ramp at I-5 / Hwy. Yes SAC18670 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity I-5 / Highway 99 99 Interchange. 2021-2036 $216,000 B- Road & Highway Extend Cosumnes River Boulevard from Franklin to Freeport Completion by Yes SAC18380 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity I-5 at Cosumnes River Blvd. with an interchange at I-5. (EA: 03-0L1068L) (T15018000) 2020 $85,315,164 C- Maintenance & Sacramento, Richards Blvd. and I-5; reconstruct interchange Yes SAC18170 Sacramento City of Sacramento Rehabilitation I-5 at Richards Blvd. Interchange (ult). (HPP #3784)(T15088200) 2021-2036 $40,535,000 B- Road & Highway Expand the West El Camino interchange on I-80 from 2 to 4 Yes SAC18650 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity I-80 @ West El Camino Interchange lanes and modify ramps. I-80 2021-2036 $22,000,000 B- Road & Highway Road Realignment: 4 lane Rd. from Power Inn Rd. to South Yes SAC16040 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Jackson Hwy. (SR 16) Watt Ave. jackson hwy Power Inn Rd. South Watt Ave 2021-2036 $25,000,000
Yes G- System Management, Completion by SAC24886 Sacramento City of Sacramento Operations, and ITS K Street Streetscaping Streetscape improvements along K Street 2020 $2,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Florin Perkins Completion after SAC23410 Only Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Kiefer Blvd. Widen: 4 lanes from Florin-Perkins Rd. to S. Watt Ave. Kiefer Blvd Rd S. Watt Ave 2036 $1,000,000 New all-modal Bridge: between downtown Sacramento and South Natomas across the Lower American River. Includes: Yes Auto, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilties. Scale and B- Road & Highway features to be determined through need and purpose study SAC24539 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Lower American River Crossing anticipated to begin in 2012. 2021-2036 $150,000,000
Yes G- System Management, Mack Rd./Valley Hi Dr. (La Mancha Way): Upgrade traffic Completion by SAC24679 Sacramento City of Sacramento Operations, and ITS Mack Rd./Valley Hi Dr. Signal Upgrade signals; install right-turn lane. (HSIP5-03-018) T15146400 2020 $550,955 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC23430 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Main Ave. Widen: 4 lanes from Norwood Ave. to Rio Linda Blvd. Main Avenue Norwood Ave Rio Linda Blvd 2021-2036 $7,000,000 B- Road & Highway Road Extension: 2 lanes from Rio Linda Blvd. to Marysville Yes SAC24536 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Main Ave. Blvd. Maine Ave Rio Linda Blvd Marysville Rd. 2021-2036 $2,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Sacramento Completion after SAC24541 Only Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Main Ave. Widen: 4 lanes from Norwood Ave to Marysville Blvd. Main Avenue City limit Norwood Ave 2036 $4,000,000 Bikeway Facilities: 0.6 mile in City of Sacramento Mangen Yes Park from 24th St. to Freeport Blvd. Bike trail south in Freeport Blvd bike SAC23440 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Mangan Park Executive Airport right-of-way. 24th Street trail 2021-2036 $800,000 Meadowview Rd. from the light rail station to I-5 and along Yes 24th St from Meadowview Rd. to Florin Rd. including Completion by SAC24742 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Meadowview Rd. Streetscape Project medians, sidewalk treatments, and crosswalks. T15145500 2020 $3,700,395 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC18720 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Natomas Crossing Dr. New Overcrossing: Natomas Crossing Dr. at I-5. 2021-2036 $11,000,000 B- Road & Highway In City of Sacramento, build new Natomas Crossing Drive as 2 Natomas Crossing Yes SAC18560 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Natomas Crossing Drive lane road from Duckhorn Drive to El Centro Rd. Drive Duckhorn Drive El Centro Road 2021-2036 $4,340,715 North 12th St. between North B St. and Richards Blvd., construct six to eight feet sidewalks, drainage, and adding Yes wrought iron fencing to separate pedestrians from light rail Completion by SAC24743 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped North 12th St. Streetscape Project tracks. T15136200 2020 $1,355,473 On/Off Ramp Improvement: Extend existing I-5 WB off-ramp Yes B- Road & Highway at Northgate Blvd. / I-80 Interchange. Includes: auxiliary lane SAC18700 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Northgate Blvd. to WB on-ramp. 2021-2036 $10,000,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC16070 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Power Inn Rd. Widen: 6 lanes from Fruitridge Rd. to 14th. Power Inn Rd. Fruitridge Rd. 14th 2021-2036 $25,000,000
Sacramento, R Street between 16th & 18th Streets, develop Yes pedestrian pathway, streetscape improvements, community gathering place, and reconstruct roadway. T15068300 Completion by SAC24472 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped R Street Market Plaza (16th to 18th St) (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.03 ROG, 0.02 NOx, 0.01 PM10) 2020 $4,215,000 Sacramento, construct streetscape improvements, streetlighting, landscaping, hardscaping, and pedestrian Yes enhancements on R Street between 13th Street and 16th Completion by SAC24673 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped R Street Phase 3 Street T15135900 2020 $4,822,950 Railyard Boulevard, between Jibboom Street and Bercut Street: construct approximately 200 feet of new roadway Yes B- Road & Highway (one lane each direction) to provide access to Downtown Completion by SAC24615 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Railyard Boulevard Extension Railyards. (See MTP Project SAC24537.) 2020 $1,000,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: various roads in the Railyards Yes SAC24537 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Railyards Streets Redevelopment Area. 2021-2036 $154,200,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC19550 Only Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Raley Blvd. Widen: 4 lanes from Santa Ana Ave. to Ascot Ave. Raley Blvd Santa Ana Ave. Ascot Ave 2036 $1,200,000
Ramona Avenue: Widen and add new frontage improvements Yes B- Road & Highway from Cucamonga to Brighton. Environmental review SAC24654 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Ramona Avenue Phase II completed under SAC22610. (No new travel lanes.) 2021-2036 $3,000,000 Intersection Improvements: at Rio Linda Blvd. and Main Ave. Yes G- System Management, Includes: traffic signal installation and intersection re- Completion by SAC24538 Sacramento City of Sacramento Operations, and ITS Rio Linda & Main Intersection Improvements configuration. 2020 $4,500,000 C- Maintenance & Rio Linda Blvd., Over Magpie Creek, 0.92 miles north of FAI Completion by Yes SAC24517 Sacramento City of Sacramento Rehabilitation Rio Linda Blvd. Bridge Rehab 880: Rehabilitate the existing 2 lane bridge. 2020 $4,000,000 At Capitol Mall and Second St,. build a new ramp to Old Sacramento. On Capitol Mall, build a new traffic signal at Second St., build new sidewalks and add Class II bicycle paths. Extend design phase to accommodate potential Streetcar Yes Transit Service. (Toll Credits for CON, CMAQ funds for new bike/ped facilities only. Emissions in kg/day: 0.04 ROG, 0.03 NOx, 0.02 PM10. See delivered project SAC24497 for PE work. B- Road & Highway Project included in the MTP/SCS as SAC22530, Bridging I-5.) Completion by SAC24705 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Riverfront Reconnection Project-Phase I T15998100 2020 $10,225,400 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC23530 Only Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Roseville Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Connie Dr. to Sacramento limits. Roseville Rd. Connie Dr. Sacramento limits 2036 $3,000,000 Roseville Rd. Over Arcade Creek, 0.4 miles south of S.R 80.: Yes C- Maintenance & Replace existing structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with new Completion by SAC24516 Sacramento City of Sacramento Rehabilitation Roseville Rd. Bridge Replacement 2 lane bridge. T15068500 2020 $6,710,029 Sacramento, Sacramento City College/UPRR line. Bike/ped overcrossing of railroad to provide access to Sacramento City Yes College Light Rail Station from existing and future Completion by SAC24461 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Sacramento City College Bike/Ped Overcrossing development to the east.(T15065700) (Toll Credits for CON) 2020 $11,107,958 Design and construct access improvements at 3rd & I (HPP Yes B- Road & Highway Sacramento Intermodal Circulation Phase 2 #2788 and #3784). Feasibility Studies, preliminary design SAC24658 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity (3rd & I) included in Phase 1. 2021-2036 $2,417,165
Sacramento Intermodal Transportation Facility Valley Station: Improvements to the existing station including: relocating the existing LRT station to a north-south alignment; relocating Yes (repave/restripe) the existing RT and Amtrak bus berths; providing enhanced passenger connections; relocating E- Transit Capital passenger vehicle and bicycle parking; upgrading the Depot's Completion by SAC20350 Sacramento City of Sacramento (Major) Sacramento Intermodal Trans. Facility - Phase 2 electrical system; providing a transit way. 2020 $40,663,140
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 80 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Sacramento Intermodal Transportation Facility Valley Station: Intermodal Facility Phase 2B project is a complete makeover and rehabilitation of the historic Depot to make the facility fully usable and attractive, arrest deterioration and meet code. The project elements will consist of repair and upgrade Yes to the interior and exterior sections of the building including architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, energy, internal circulation, access and other work. Historic rehabilitation will involve features such as façades, canopies, E- Transit Capital Sacramento Intermodal Trans. Facility - Phase openings, windows, doors, the mural and decorative SAC24883 Sacramento City of Sacramento (Major) 2b Sacramentotreatments, finishesIntermodal and Transportation other items. Facility: Realign and 2021-2036 $27,000,000 straighten the existing mainline UPRR freight and passenger rail tracks, provide passenger facilities that connect the Depot to the relocated platforms. (Project includes Prelim. Engineering for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Sac. Intermodal Transp. Facility). Between Old Sacramento, the Central Business District, and the Railyards Development and River District: Construct a 247-foot pedestrian/bicycle tunnel Yes beneath the re-aligned mainline Union Pacific tracks. (Other Fed-Project of National & Regional Significance is Section 1301 and are Earmarked funds from SAFETEA-LU. CMAQ funds are being used for straightening and realigning a 3,300- foot-long section of the UPRR mainline. The project will allow UPRR’s trains to operate at higher speeds and reduce train E- Transit Capital Sacramento Intermodal Transportation Facility - idling. Emission Benefits in kg/day: NOx 1.2, CO 0.1, PM10 Completion by SAC24414 Sacramento City of Sacramento (Major) Phase 1 0.1) 2020 $97,348,821 Intermodal Facility Phase 3 project is the creation of a larger multi-modal transportation center that can meet the region’s expanded transportation needs and accommodate high speed trains, commuter rail, light rail, streetcars, transit bus Yes lines, and intercity buses. It will involve expansion of the terminal facilities including passenger amenities and spaces, E- Transit Capital Sacramento Intermodal Transportation Facility - transportation operations areas, site and circulation SAC24898 Sacramento City of Sacramento (Major) Phase 3 improvements and joint development 2021-2036 $225,000,000 New Overcrossing: for the planned Snowey Egret Wy. that will Yes B- Road & Highway run east-west from El Centro Rd. to Commerce Wy. crossing SAC18710 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Snowey Egret Wy. over I-5. 2021-2036 $11,000,000 Adjacent to I-5, south of Pocket Road/Meadowview Road and Freeport Boulevard, build Class I bike trail connecting the Yes Freeport Shores Bike Trail to the existing North Delta Shores Bike Trail. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.12 ROG, 0.07 NOx, Completion by SAC24745 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped South Sacramento Parkway Trail - West 0.02 PM 2.5, 0.02 PM10) 2020 $914,000 In Sacramento County :Expand the Elkhorn Blvd. interchange Yes B- Road & Highway on Route 99 to accommodate the widening of Elkhorn Blvd. SAC18690 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity SR 99 Elkhorn Boulevard Interchange from 2 to 6 lanes SR 99 2021-2036 $11,909,000 Multi-Use Crossing: Sacramento, Sutter's Landing Bridge, Yes between American River Pkwy. and Sutter Landing Park. Completion by SAC23890 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Sutter's Landing Bridge Construct bike/ped Bridge over American River. 2020 $30,000,000 Construct New Road: 1.6 mile 4-lane arterial on new Project alignment between Hwy. 160 and Hwy. 51. Includes: Development sidewalks and bike lanes in both directions, a grade Only B- Road & Highway separation with the railroad, and a full interchange at the Sutter's Landing Completion after SAC24600 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity Sutter's Landing Parkway connection with Hwy. 51. Parkway Hwy 160 Hwy 51 2036 $100,000,000 On the American River Parkway, construct a new Class I Western segment between Sutter's Landing and the California Yes State University of Sacramento (CSUS) campus. PE for Phase Completion by SAC24755 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Two Rivers Trail Phase 3 2 and 3 was completed as part of SAC24486. 2020 $672,800 Study and design bike/ped connections between the Northern Bicycle Trail and Sutter's Landing Park (Phase 2 and 3). Build Phase 2, construct the eastern segment of the multi- use path, connecting the American River Parkway at H St. in East Sacramento to the trail at Sutter’s Landing Park in Yes Midtown. Additional study future bicycle trial connections across the American River, Crossing the Capitol City Freeway, and extending east along the American River towards California State University at Sacramento. Phase 3 construction scope shown in SAC24755. (Emission Benefits in Completion by SAC24486 Sacramento City of Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Two Rivers Trail Phase II kg/day: 0.02 ROG, 0.02 NOx, 0.02 PM10) K15125000 2020 $2,515,638 B- Road & Highway Widen: 6 lanes West El Camino Interchange. Includes: bike Yes SAC16130 Sacramento City of Sacramento Capacity W. El Camino Ave. lanes at I-80 / Natomas Main Drainage Canal. W. El Camino Ave. 2021-2036 $24,000,000 FTA 5310 funds to replace one (1) Large Bus that can Yes E- Transit Capital Easter Seals Superior CA 5310 Large Bus accommodate 16 passengers (incl. two wheelchair positions) Completion by VAR56124 Sacramento Easter Seals (Vehicles) Replacement and a driver. (Toll Credits for CON). 2020 $73,000 E- Transit Capital Purchase up to fourteen CNG powered large buses for fleet Completion by Yes PAR10020 Sacramento Paratransit Inc. (Vehicles) Bus Expansion expansion. (Uses Toll Credits for local match). 2020 $980,000 Purchase of three CTSA vehicles for Paratransit, Inc. Included in the project cost shall be purchase of the vehicles, radios, Yes cameras, zonar and other necessary equipment to put the E- Transit Capital vehicle into service. Costs shall also include vehicle line Completion by PAR10027 Sacramento Paratransit Inc. (Vehicles) CTSA Vehicle Purchase assembly inspection. 2020 $161,406 Purchase and Installation of 150 Personal/Mobile Data Yes E- Transit Capital Paratransit, Inc. Ranger 4 Implementation Terminals (Ranger 4) and associated wiring, hardware, Completion by PAR10030 Sacramento Paratransit Inc. (Minor) Project software and administrative costs 2020 $592,500 Purchase up to six CNG powered buses including related Yes E- Transit Capital Purchase of 6 CNG Buses (including equipment to include data/maintenance terminal Trapeze Completion by PAR10029 Sacramento Paratransit Inc. (Vehicles) data/maintenance terminal Ranger units) Ranger units. (Uses Toll Credits for local match). 2020 $525,867 Replace up to thirty-nine demand response with Type III vehicles including related equipment to include mobile data Yes E- Transit Capital terminals, cable assembly mounts, mobile radios, and zonar Completion by PAR10019 Sacramento Paratransit Inc. (Vehicles) Replacement Buses and Associated Equipment systems. 2020 $3,750,000 E- Transit Capital Replace up to twenty-five paratransit vehicles including Completion by Yes PAR10022 Sacramento Paratransit Inc. (Vehicles) State of Good Repair 25 Replacement Vehicles related equipment. 2020 $2,125,000 E- Transit Capital Completion by Yes PAR10025 Sacramento Paratransit Inc. (Minor) Transit Asset Management System Tracking system for capital assets. 2020 $311,250 Purchase transit related equipment including 14 mobile Yes E- Transit Capital radios, Zonar, and Fleetlink software. (Uses Toll Credits for Completion by PAR10021 Sacramento Paratransit Inc. (Minor) Transit Operating Equipment local match). 2020 $76,300 FTA 5310 funds to replace one (1) Larger Bus that can Yes E- Transit Capital Pride Industries CA 5310 Larger Bus accommodate 20 passengers (incl. two wheelchair positions) Completion by VAR56129 Sacramento Pride Industries/CTSA (Vehicles) Replacement and a driver. 2020 $105,001
FY 2011 & 2012 JARC funds will allow e-tran to serve the Yes downtown Sacramento to Elk Grove reverse commute by creating two new routes using buses that previously operated Completion by VAR56107 Sacramento SACOG F- Transit O&M (Bus) e-tran (Elk Grove) JARC Operating Assistance as "deadhead" or closed door from downtown to Elk Grove. 2020 $304,000 Wheels to Work program providing transportation to social service, educational, and training opportunities as well as Yes connections with fixed route transit and mobile "office resource bus." FY 2011 & 2012 funds will allow completion of Completion by VAR56106 Sacramento SACOG F- Transit O&M (Bus) Paratransit, Inc. JARC Operating Assistance this project. 2020 $500,000 Completion by Yes SAC21710 Sacramento SACOG D- Programs & Planning Sacramento County PPM Plan, program and monitor for Sacramento County. 2020 $6,971,000 E- Transit Capital Sacramento Regional Transit District - New Construct shelters over disabled access ramps (mini-high Completion by Yes VAR56115 Sacramento SACOG (Minor) Freedom Capital Assistance platforms) at light rail stations. 2020 $287,500 Phase 2 of Sacramento Emergency Clean Air Transportation Program (SECAT), Heavy-Duty NOx control strategies. (Phase 1 Yes SAC22090) (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 236 NOx, 21 PM10, 9 ROG. And in kg/day for each $3m increment: 835 NOx, 109 Completion by VAR56037 Sacramento SACOG D- Programs & Planning SECAT Program Phase 2 ROG) 2020 $33,271,133
The requested FFY 2011 & 2012 JARC funding would restore Yes evening service to both of RT’s light rail lines, as well as five F- Transit O&M (Light major connecting bus routes (1, 23, 51, 56, & 80) and Completion by VAR56103 Sacramento SACOG Rail) SRTD JARC Operating Assistance paratransit service within three quarter miles of this service. 2020 $1,820,000 B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from Ascot Blvd. to Sacramento/Placer County Yes SAC24389 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity 16th St. Line. 16th Street Ascot Blvd 2021-2036 $44,500,000 Facilities Plan: In Sacramento County, various locations, Yes construct ADA compliant improvements in accordance with Lump Sum or SAC21530 Sacramento Sacramento County D- Programs & Planning ADA Transition Plan the county DOTs ADA Transition Plan. Ongoing $15,000,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New 4 lane road between Easton Valley Parkway Easton Valley Yes SAC24839 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Aerojet Rd and Folsom Blvd. Aerojet Rd Parkway Folsom Blvd. 2021-2036 $10,000,000 Project Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Power Inn Rd. to Florin- Development B- Road & Highway Perkins Rd. (Runs parallel and north of Florin Rd.) Includes: Completion after SAC24280 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Alta Florin Rd. Railroad grade separation. Alta Florin Rd Power Inn Rd. Florin Perkins Rd 2036 $5,000,000 Alta Mesa Rd over Laguna Creek, 0.4 mi north of SR 104: Yes C- Maintenance & Replace existing structurally deficient 2-lane bridge with a Completion by SAC24618 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Alta Mesa Rd Bridge Replacement new 2-lane bridge. 2020 $7,980,321 B- Road & Highway In Sacramento County, Antelope North Road, from Poker Ln. Antelope North Yes SAC22020 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Antelope North Road Widening to Olive Ave.: Realign and widen to 4 lanes. Road Poker Ln Olive Ave 2021-2036 $3,020,000 Widen: 4 lanes from Watt Ave. to Elverta Rd and 6 lanes from Elverta Rd. to Roseville Rd. Project addresses: congestion, Yes B- Road & Highway safety and aesthetics, and mobility for bicycles, pedestrians SAC24264 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Antelope Rd. and transit. Antelop Rd Watt Ave. Roseville Rd. 2021-2036 $9,307,473 Project In Sacramento County, Antelope Road from Don Julio Development B- Road & Highway Boulevard to Roseville Road Antelope Road North, widen Completion after SAC19790 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Antelope Road Widening from 4 to 6 lanes. Antelope Road Don Julio Blvd Roseville Rd. 2036 $4,000,000 Apple Rd, over Fruit Channel, 0.65 mi SE/O Dillard Rd. Replace Yes C- Maintenance & the existing 2 lane functionally obsolete bridge with a new 2 Completion by SAC24608 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Apple Rd/Fruit Channel Bridge Replacement lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, ROW & CON.) 2020 $1,400,000 Bikeway Facilities: In various Sacramento County locations. Lump Sum or Yes SAC19840 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Bike/Ped Improvements Includes: 2010 Bikeway Master Plan Implementation. Ongoing $50,000,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New 4 lane road between Easton Valley Parkway Easton Valley Yes SAC24840 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Birkmont Drive and Folsom Blvd. Birkmont Drive Parkway Folsom Blvd. 2021-2036 $10,000,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24224 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Bradshaw Rd. Widen: 6 lanes between Old Placerville Rd. and Florin. Bradshaw Rd. Florin Rd. Old Placerville Rd 2021-2036 $37,500,000 Safety Enhancement: in Sacramento County, various Yes locations. Includes: streetscaping, lighting, and other safety Lump Sum or SAC22030 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Commercial Corridor Enhancements enhancements to enhance bicycle and pedestrian use. Ongoing $50,000,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 81 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars)
1. Sunrise Ave. from 700 ft. north of Gold Express to American River Bridge: Rehabilitate Sunrise Ave., multi-use path crossings, install bicycle detection and curb ramps, and repair damaged and discontinuous sidewalks.2. Eastern Ave. from El Camino Ave. to Marconi Ave.: rehabilitate damaged and discontinuous sidewalks, add new bicycle lanes, and install bicycle detection and curb ramps.3. El Camino Ave. from Howe Ave. to Fulton Ave.: rehabilitate damaged and Yes discontinuous sidewalks, install bicycle detection at traffic signals, install curb ramps, and close bicycle lane gaps.4. Greenback Lane from Chestnut Ave. to Folsom City Limits.,: rehabilitate Greenback Lane and add new bicycle lanes, repair damaged and discontinuous sidewalks, install curb ramps, and add bicycle detection at traffic signals.5. Marconi Ave. from Highway 80 to Howe Ave.: rehabilitate road, add new C- Maintenance & bicycle lanes, repair damaged and discontinuous sidewalks, Completion by SAC24729 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Complete Streets Rehabilitation install curb ramps, and add bicycle detection at traffic signals. 2020 $4,196,205 Folsom Blvd. from Butterfield Wy. to Bradshaw Rd.,: Yes C- Maintenance & Rehabilitate Folsom Blvd. and fill a sidewalk gap, fill bicycle Completion by SAC24726 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Complete Streets Rehabilitation - Folsom Blvd. lane gaps and upgrade the existing bicycle lanes. 2020 $443,465
Yes C- Maintenance & Complete Streets Rehabilitation of Fulton Fulton Avenue from Marconi Avenue to Auburn Boulevard: Completion by SAC24730 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Avenue - 1 Rehabilitate pavement and re-stripe with on-street bike lanes. 2020 $872,850 Fulton Avenue from Arden Way to Auburn Boulevard: add bike lanes, construct new sidewalks, repair and infill damaged/discontinuous sidewalks, install curb ramps and the Yes required ADA improvements, and modify traffic signals. C- Maintenance & Complete Streets Rehabilitation of Fulton Rehabilitate pavement between Arden Way and Marconi Completion by SAC24731 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Avenue - 2 Avenue. 2020 $3,332,995
New 4 lane roadway on North Loop Road from Grant Line Project Road to Street "F" with NEV/Bike lanes, median, landscaping, Development sidewalks, 4 traffic signals at Town Center Blvd, Street "D" Only B- Road & Highway and Primary Residential Street between Street "D" and Street Completion after SAC24841 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cordova Hills "F" and Street "F", roundabout at Street "A" North Loop Road Grant Line Rd Street "F" 2036 $20,990,000 New 4 lane roadway on University Blvd from Grant Line Road Project to Street "A" with NEV/Bike lanes, median, landscaping, Development sidewalks, 3 traffic signals (at Town Center Blvd, and 2 Only B- Road & Highway between Town Center Blvd and Street "A"), roundabout at Completion after SAC24842 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cordova Hills Street "A" University Blvd Grant Line Rd Street "A" 2036 $12,056,000 Project New 2 lane roadway from University Blvd to North Loop Rd Development B- Road & Highway with Class 2 Bike Lines, NEV Compact, median, landscaping, Completion after SAC24843 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cordova Hills sidewalks, 3 traffic signals and 2 roundabouts Town Center Blvd University Blvd North Loop Rd 2036 $6,875,000 Project New 4 lane roadway on Chrysanthy Blvd Ext. from Grant Line Development B- Road & Highway Road to Town Center Blvd with median, landscaping, Chrysanthy Blvd Completion after SAC24844 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cordova Hills sidewalks, 1 traffic signals at Town Center Blvd Ext. Grant Line Rd Town Center Blvd 2036 $2,160,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway New 2 lane roadway from Street "A" to Street "F" with Completion after SAC24845 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cordova Hills NEV/Bike lanes, median, landscaping, sidewalks University Blvd Street "A" Street "F" 2036 $7,651,000 New 2 lane roadway from Street "E" to North Loop Rd with Project Class 2 Bike Lines, NEV Compact, median, landscaping, Development B- Road & Highway sidewalks, traffic signal at Street "B" and 1 roundabout at Completion after Only SAC24846 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cordova Hills Street "D" Street "A" Street "E" North Loop Rd 2036 $7,334,000 Project New 2 lane roadway from Street "A" (south of St. "B") to Street "A" Development B- Road & Highway Street "A" (south of North Loop Rd.) with Class 2 Bike Lines, (south of St. Street "A" (south of Completion after SAC24847 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cordova Hills NEV Compact, landscaping, sidewalks Street "C" "B") North Loop Rd.) 2036 $5,800,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway New 2 lane roadway from Street "A" to Street "C" with Class 2 Completion after SAC24848 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cordova Hills Bike Lines, NEV Compact, landscaping, sidewalks Street "B" Street "A" Street "C" 2036 $1,160,000 New 2 lane roadway from Street "A" to North Loop Rd with Project Class 2 Bike Lines, NEV Compact, median, landscaping, Development B- Road & Highway sidewalks, and 2 roundabouts at Street "A" and University Completion after Only SAC24849 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cordova Hills Blvd Street "D" Street "A" North Loop Rd 2036 $8,167,500 Project Development B- Road & Highway New 2 lane roadway from Street "A" to University Ave with Completion after SAC24850 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cordova Hills Class 2 Bike Lines, NEV Compact, landscaping, sidewalks Street "E" Street "A" University Blvd 2036 $3,480,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway New 2 lane roadway from University Ave to North Loop Rd Completion after SAC24851 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cordova Hills with Class 2 Bike Lines, NEV Compact, landscaping, sidewalks Street "F" University Blvd North Loop Rd 2036 $2,320,000 On Cottage Way between Cortez Lane and Watt Ave: Install Yes bike lanes, a "road diet" (reduce travel lanes from 4 to 3), Completion by SAC24713 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Cottage Way Road Diet and modify intersections. (HSIP6-03-016) 2020 $700,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC19610 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cypress Ave. Widen: 4 lanes from Pasadena Ave. to Manzanita Ave. Cypress Ave Pasadena Ave Manzanita Ave 2036 $10,441,000 C- Maintenance & Dillard Rd., over Cosumnes river, 0.2 miles south of S.R. 16: Completion by Yes SAC24520 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Dillard Rd. Bridge Scour Countermeasures Install scour countermeasures on scour critical bridge. 2020 $1,278,751 B- Road & Highway Douglas Rd. - Zinfandel Dr. to Rancho Cordova Widen Douglas Road, from Zinfandel Drive to Rancho Cordova Yes SAC24663 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity City Limit west City Limits, from 2 to 4 lanes. 2021-2036 $2,400,000 In Sacramento County, Douglas Road from Zinfandel Drive to Kiefer Boulevard; new 4 lane roadway with raised landscaped median, curb, gutter and sidewalk, improvements also Yes include installation of traffic signals at Douglas/Kiefer and B- Road & Highway Douglas/Excelsior Road. No R/W acquisition, only SAC22410 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Douglas Road Extension conveyance/process costs. Douglas Road Zinfandel Dr. Kiefer Blvd 2021-2036 $19,837,200 In Sacramento County, Zinfandel Drive from Jackson Road Project (State Route 16) to Kiefer Boulevard, construct and widen Development from 2 to 4 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, raised Jackson Road Only B- Road & Highway landscaped median and traffic signal modification at Jackson (State Route Completion after SAC24975 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Eagles Nest Road Widening Road (State Route 16). Eagles Nest Road 16) Kiefer Boulevard 2036 $4,800,000 In Sacramento County, Eagles Nest Road Zinfandel Drive from Kiefer Boulevard to Douglas Road, construct and widen from 2 to 4 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, raised landscaped Yes median; improvements also include the installation of a box B- Road & Highway culvert and traffic signal at Eagles Nest Road/Kiefer Kiefer SAC22430 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Eagles Nest Road Zinfandel Drive Widening Boulevard. Zinfandel Drive Boulevard Douglas Rd. 2021-2036 $11,800,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Hazel Ave. to Prairie City Eastern Valley Yes SAC24529 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Easton Valley Pkwy. Rd. Pkwy Hazel Ave Prairie City Rd 2021-2036 $36,000,000 In Sacramento County, on El Camino Avenue from Watt Avenue to Verna Way; Project features include sidewalk and walkway construction, installation of bicycle lanes, Yes improvements to existing signalized and unsignalized intersections, drainage improvements, transit stops, and El Camino Avenue Phase 2 - Street and other improvements to benefit bicycle and pedestrian access Completion by SAC24766 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Sidewalk Improvements and safety. 2020 $2,250,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24973 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity El Centro Rd. 4 lanes from I-80 to Arena Blvd (City of Sacramento Limits) El Centro Rd Interstate 80 Arena Blvd 2036 $8,500,000 B- Road & Highway South Watt Yes SAC24943 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elder Creek Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from South Watt Ave. to Excelsior Rd. Elder Creek Rd Ave. Excelsior Rd. 2021-2036 $2,100,000 Elk Grove-Florin Rd, over Elder Creek, 0.1 mi north of Gerber Yes B- Road & Highway Rd.: Rehabilitate functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge and Completion by SAC24380 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elk Grove-Florin Rd. Bridge widen to 6 lanes. 2020 $6,097,301 In Sacramento County, Elk Grove-Florin Road from North of Elder Creek to Florin Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. (Existing Yes B- Road & Highway Elder Creek bridge is being replaced and widened to 6 lanes Completion by SAC15170 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elk Grove-Florin Rd. Widening SAC24380) 2020 $6,215,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24525 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elkhorn Blvd. Widen: 4 lanes from Lone Tree Rd. to Hwy. 99. Elkhorn Blvd Lone Tree Rd Hwy 99 2036 $210,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24526 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elkhorn Blvd. Widen: 6 lanes from Lone Tree Rd. to Hwy. 99. Elkhorn Blvd Lone Tree Rd Hwy 99 2036 $110,000 Airport Yes B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 2 lanes from Airport Blvd. / Crossfield Blvd/Crossfield SAC24527 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elkhorn Blvd. Dr. to Power Line Rd. Includes: landscaped medians. Elkhorn Blvd Dr Power Line Rd 2021-2036 $8,200,000 B- Road & Highway Sacramento Yes SAC24531 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elkhorn Blvd. Widen: 4 lanes from Sacramento City limit east to 2nd Street. Elkhorn Blvd City limit east 2nd St 2021-2036 $3,065,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Metro Air Completion after SAC24938 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elkhorn Blvd. Widen: 6 Lanes from Metro Air Parkway to Lone Tree Rd Elkhorn Blvd Parkway Lone Tree Road 2036 $640,000 Project Airport Development B- Road & Highway Blvd/Crossfield Completion after SAC24974 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elkhorn Blvd. 4 lanes from Airport Blvd. / Crossfield Dr. to Lone Tree Rd Elkhorn Blvd Dr Lone Tree Rd 2036 $14,800,000 B- Road & Highway In Sacramento County, Elkhorn Blvd. from Watt Ave. to Don Yes SAC15230 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elkhorn Blvd. Widening Julio Blvd.: widen from 4 to 6 lanes. 2021-2036 $14,284,000 In Sacramento County, Elkhorn Boulevard from Rio Linda Boulevard to SR 99: widen from 2 to 4 lanes, including bridge Yes B- Road & Highway over Natomas east main drain, landscaping, new RR crossing SAC15180 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elkhorn Boulevard Widening and bike/ped facilities. Elkhorn Blvd Rio Linda Blvd SR 99 2021-2036 $14,000,000 Project Widen: 4 lanes from Rio Linda Blvd. to connection to north North side of Development B- Road & Highway side of the Sacramento International Airport. Includes: bicycle Sacramento Completion after SAC22300 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elverta Rd. and pedestrian facilities. Elverta Rd Rio Linda Blvd International Airport 2036 $2,600,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24533 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elverta Rd. Widen: 6 lanes from Watt Ave. to Dutch Haven Ave. Elverta Rd Watt Ave Duth Haven Ave 2036 $750,000 Widen Elverta Rd. from Dutch Haven Blvd. to Watt Ave. from 2 to 4 lanes. North Channel Dry Creek Bridge, between 28th Yes B- Road & Highway St. and Gibson Ranch Park Rd.: replace 2 lane bridge with 6 Completion by SAC19620 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elverta Road & Dry Creek Bridge Widening lane bridge. 2020 $16,408,452 In Northern Sacramento County: Extension of Elverta Road from just south east of Sand City Drive to Don Julio Boulevard; new 6 lane roadway extension to Don Julio Boulevard with a Yes traffic signal modification at the intersection of Elverta Road B- Road & Highway and Don Julio Boulevard and a possible realignment of south of San SAC24248 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elverta Road Extension Antelope Road to Elverta Road. Elverta Rd City Drive Don Julio Blvd 2021-2036 $750,000 Widen Elverta Rd. from Rio Linda Blvd. to Dutch Haven Blvd. Yes B- Road & Highway from 2 to 4 lanes including landscaped median, ADA SAC19621 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Elverta Road Widening improvements, transit access and bike/pedestrian facilities. Elverta Road Rio Linda Blvd Duth Haven Blvd 2021-2036 $14,797,000 Widen: 4 lanes from Hwy. 16 to Calvine Rd. Includes: Project landscaped median, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, Development B- Road & Highway new traffic signal(s), traffic signal modification(s), and ADA Completion after Only SAC24391 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Excelsior Rd. compliant improvements. Excelsior Rd Hwy 16 Calvine Rd. 2036 $22,500,000 In Sacramento County: Between Kiefer Boulevard/Douglas Road Extension and Jackson Road (SR16); construct and Yes widen to 4 lanes with raised landscaped median and curb and Kiefer B- Road & Highway gutter. Improvements also include the construction of a pit Blvd/Douglas SAC24263 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Excelsior Road Widening pump station. Excelsior Road Road Extension Jackson Road 2021-2036 $12,000,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 82 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24799 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Fair Oaks Blvd Widening Widen 2 to 4 Lanes from Sunset Ave to Madison Ave Fair Oaks Blvd Sunset Ave Madison Ave 2036 $4,000,000 Fair Oaks Blvd. between Howe Ave. and Munroe St.,: Develop Yes Fair Oaks Blvd. Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Fair Oaks Master Plan, Design and construct two traffic Completion by SAC24749 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Project signals within the project limits. 2020 $1,600,011 Fair Oaks Blvd., from north of Marconi Ave. to Stanley Ave., with design work continuing north to North Ave.,: Sidewalk Yes gap closures and improvements, landscaped medians, and continuous bicycle lanes. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.05 Completion by SAC24748 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Fair Oaks Blvd. Phase 3 (FOBI-3) ROG, 0.04 NOx, 0.02 PM10) 2020 $4,419,971 Fair Oaks Blvd. between Day Dr. and Arden Way: Install Completion by Yes SAC24680 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Fair Oaks Blvd. Sidewalks and Curbs Insidewalks, Sacramento curb County ramps, and curb Community and gutter. of (HSIP5-03-019) Carmichael: The 2020 $607,460 project includes roadway and pedestrian improvements along Fair Oaks Boulevard from 400 feet south of Landis Avenue to Engle Road. Improvements along Fair Oaks Boulevard will consist of rehabilitating the roadway, bike lanes, medians, consolidated curb cuts, enhanced bus stops, separated sidewalks, landscaping and streetscape, ADA compliant Yes improvements, and transit access. The project also includes a new traffic signal at Landis Avenue and traffic signal modifications at Grant Avenue and Engle Road that will facilitate pedestrian connections on either side of Fair Oaks Boulevard. Installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the south side of Grant Avenue from the Fair Oaks Boulevard G- System Management, intersection to 900 feet west of Fair Oaks Boulevard is also Completion by SAC16800 Sacramento Sacramento County Operations, and ITS Fair Oaks Boulevard Improvements Phase 2 included. 2020 $6,056,665
In Sacramento County and Community of Carmichael: On Fair Oaks Boulevard, 500' north of Marconi Avenue to 400' south of Landis Avenue: Various improvements to improve, safety Yes and mobility. Construction improvements include, rehabilitating the roadway, landscaping and streetscape, medians, ADA compliant improvements, transit access, bike C- Maintenance & and pedestrian facilities, traffic signal modification at Stanley Completion by SAC24650 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Fair Oaks Boulevard Improvements, Phase 3 Avenue and a new traffic signal at Robertson Avenue. 2020 $3,000,000 Operating assistance for rural transit services within Yes FFY 2010-2016 Operating Assistance for Sacramento County. Outside the Sacramento Urbanized Completion by SAC24597 Sacramento Sacramento County F- Transit O&M (Bus) Sacramento County Rural Transit Program Area.FFY 2015: $340,000FFY 2016: $340,000 2020 $3,516,548 Florin Creek Trail and on Florin Mall Dr.,: provide bicycle Yes Florin Creek Trail/SOFA Bike & Pedestrian parking racks,way finding signage, and ADA street crossing Completion by SAC24750 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Improvements improvements. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.01 ROG) 2020 $1,280,922
Widen: 4 lanes from Elk Grove-Florin Rd. to Vineyard Rd. Yes B- Road & Highway Includes: a traffic signal modification at Bradshaw and a SAC24281 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Florin Rd. couple of new traffic signals at Hedge Ave. and Waterman Rd. Florin Road Vineyard Rd. 2021-2036 $23,700,000 Project Widen: 4 lanes from Vineyard Rd. to Sunrise Blvd. Includes: 3 Development B- Road & Highway new traffic signals at the intersections of Excelsior Rd., Eagles Completion after SAC24282 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Florin Rd. Nest Rd. and Sunrise Blvd. Florin Road Vineyard Rd Sunrise Blvd. 2036 $1,850,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Florin Perkins Completion after SAC24578 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Florin Rd. Widen: 6 lanes from Florin Perkins to Elk Grove-Florin Florin Road Rd Elk Grove - Florin 2036 $500,000
Franklin Blvd over Mokelumne River overflow, 1.8 miles north Yes C- Maintenance & San Joaquin county line: Replace the existing structurally Completion by SAC24518 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Franklin Blvd Bridge Replacement deficient 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. 2020 $11,716,001 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24941 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Fruitridge Rd Widen: 4 Lanes from S. Watt Ave to Bradshaw Fruitridge Rd S. Watt Ave Bradshaw Rd. 2021-2036 $600,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24800 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Garfield Ave 4 Lanes from Cypress Ave to Winding Way Garfield Ave Cypress Ave Winding Way 2036 $2,300,000 Garfield Avenue from Whitney Avenue to Madison Avenue: Install bicycle lanes, construct sidewalks (Whitney Avenue to Yes Gibbons Drive), and install a new traffic signal at the Garfield Ave. Bike Lanes and Pedestrian intersection of Garfield Avenue and Engle Road. (Emission Completion by SAC24754 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Connectivity Project Benefits in kg/day: .03 ROG, .07 NOx, .01 PM10) 2020 $2,500,166 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24942 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Gerber Road Widen: 4 lanes from Vineyard Rd. to Excelsior Rd. Gerber Road Vineyard Road Excelsior Rd. 2036 $450,000 B- Road & Highway In Sacramento County, Gerber Road from Bradshaw Road to Yes SAC19690 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Gerber Road Widening Vineyard Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Gerb Road Bradshow Road Vineyard Rd. 2021-2036 $6,688,000 Widen Gerber Road between Elk Grove-Florin Road and Bradshaw Road from 3 to 4 lanes. (This road is already 3 lanes Yes B- Road & Highway (two westbound and one eastbound)from Elk Grove-Florin Completion by SAC24035 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Gerber Road Widening Road to about 1/4-mile west of Bradshaw Road.) 2020 $3,854,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New 4 lane road between Easton Valley Parkway Easton Valley Yes SAC24852 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Glenborough Drive and Folsom Blvd. Glenborough Drive Parkway Folsom Blvd. 2021-2036 $26,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Greenback Lane from Fair Oaks Blvd to Hazel Ave from Completion after SAC19090 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Greenback Lane Widening 4 to 6 lanes. Greenback Lane Fair Oaks Blvd Hazel Ave 2036 $3,550,200
In Sacramento County, Hazel Avenue, between Folsom Yes Boulevard and US Highway 50: multi-modal corridor B- Road & Highway improvements, interchange improvements, and widening of SAC24255 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Hazel Ave - U.S. 50 to Folsom Blvd Hazel Avenue between Folsom Boulevard and US Highway 50. 2021-2036 $66,418,000 Sacramento County, Hazel Avenue, from Sunset Ave. to Madison Ave.: Widen from 4 to 6 lanes. New traffic signals at Roediger Lane and Phoenix Avenue. Improve existing and Yes projected traffic congestion; enhance pedestrian and bicycle B- Road & Highway mobility in the corridor, address safety concerns, and improve Completion by SAC24626 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Hazel Ave Widening Phase 3 the aesthetics of the corridor. 2020 $14,649,000 Sacramento County between Curragh Downs Drive and Sunset Avenue; Widen Hazel Avenue from four to six lanes. Includes appraisals and acquisitions of necessary right of way adjacent to the proposed improvements. Traffic signal Yes modifications at Curragh Downs Drive, Winding Way, Sunset Avenue, and La Serena Drive. Improvements also include new facilities for pedestrians and bicycles including class II bike B- Road & Highway lanes and separated sidewalks. (CMAQ to only fund new Completion by SAC24625 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Hazel Ave Widening, Phase 2 bicycle and pedestrian facilities) 2020 $23,518,000 Project Construct New Road: 4 lane limited access Rd. through Development B- Road & Highway Aerojet s property between Easton Valley Pkwy. and Grant Eastern Valley Grant Line Rd/White Completion after SAC23160 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Hazel Ave. extension Line Rd./White Rock Rd. Hazsel Ave Pkwy Rock Rd 2036 $18,000,051 In Sacramento County and City of Rancho Cordova: Between Easton Valley Parkway and Folsom Boulevard; joint project Yes B- Road & Highway with the City of Rancho Cordova to construct a new 6-lane Completion by SAC24268 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Hazel Ave. Improvements expressway with special treatment. 2020 $15,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Sacramento County, Hazel Avenue from Madison to Sacramento/Placer Completion after SAC23080 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Hazel Avenue Sacramento/Placer County line: Widen from 4 to 6 lanes. Hazel Avenue Madison County line 2036 $105,000,000 This is phase 1 of a two-phase project. NEPA is done in Phase 1 and covers the whole project scope (both phases). The project is designed and constructed in two phases:Phase 1- between El Camino Avenue and Red Robin Drive/Tallac Street: reduce travel lanes from 4 to 2 lanes with a center Yes two-way left-turn lane, new bike lanes and sidewalks, curb and gutter. Modify mid-block pedestrian signal. (HSIP5-03- 020)Phase 2 - between Red Robin Drive/Tallac Street and Marconi Avenue: reduce travel lanes from 4 to 2 lanes with a center two-way left-turn lane, new bike lanes and sidewalks, B- Road & Highway curb and gutter. Modify the intersection of Howe Avenue and Completion by SAC24681 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Howe Ave. Road Diet Marconi Avenue. (SAC24760) 2020 $1,614,660
Howe Avenue between Red Robin Drive/Tallac Street and Marconi Avenue: reduce travel lanes from 4 to 2 lanes with a Yes center two-way left-turn lane (Road Diet); install new bike lanes, sidewalks, curb and gutter. Modify the intersection of Howe Avenue and Marconi Avenue. (ATP# 0092)(Toll Credits Completion by SAC24760 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Howe Avenue Bike & Ped (Road Diet) Phase 2 for PE, ROW, CON) (NEPA done in Phase 1, SAC24681) 2020 $1,853,000 In Sacramento County, conduct studies, and environmental Yes work for a bicycle/pedestrian crossing of I-80 west of SAC22290 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped I-80 Bicycle / Pedestrian Crossing Madison Avenue. 2021-2036 $550,000 Ten (10) signalized intersections throughout the city: Provide advanced "dilemma zone" protection for the high speed main Yes G- System Management, street approaches at ten existing signalized intersections. Completion by SAC24682 Sacramento Sacramento County Operations, and ITS Intersection Dilemma Zone Protection (HSIP5-03-021) 2020 $313,800 Ione Rd, over Buckeye Creek, 0.2 mi S of Meiss Rd. Replace Yes C- Maintenance & the existing structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with a new 2 Completion by SAC24604 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Ione Rd/Buckeye Creek Bridge Replacement lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, CON.) 2020 $1,990,000 Ione Rd, over Willow Creek, 0.5 mi S Carbondale Rd. Replace Yes C- Maintenance & the existing structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with a new 2 Completion by SAC24606 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Ione Rd/Willow Creek Bridge Replacement lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, ROW & CON) 2020 $2,842,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct a new roadway grade separation interchange at the Completion after SAC24884 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Jackson Hwy (SR 16) @ Watt Ave. intersection of Jackson Hwy and Watt Ave. 2036 $25,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Jackson Hwy (SR Completion after SAC24940 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Jackson Hwy. (SR 16) Widen: 4 Lanes from Grant Line Rd. to Murrieta Parkway 16) Grant Line Rd Murrieta Parkway 2036 $30,000,000 B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from South Watt Ave. to Excelsior Rd. Jackson Hwy (SR South Watt Yes CAL15410 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Jackson Hwy. (SR 16) Includes: continuous left turn lane. 16) Ave. Excelsior Rd. 2021-2036 $60,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Jackson Hwy (SR South Watt Completion after SAC24287 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Jackson Hwy. (SR 16) Widen: 6 lanes from South Watt Ave. to Excelsior Rd. 16) Ave. Excelsior Rd. 2036 $40,000,000 Jibboom St. over American River, 0.1 miles north or Richards Yes C- Maintenance & Blvd.: Rehabilitate bridge, no added lane capacity. (Toll Completion by SAC24688 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Jibbom St. Bridge Rehabilitation credits for PE & CON) 2020 $10,117,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24801 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Kenneth Avenue 4 Lanes from Madison Ave to Oak Ave Kenneth Ave Madison Ave Oak Ave 2036 $10,300,000
Kiefer Blvd over Deer Creek, 0.7 Mi NW State Rte 16. Replace Yes C- Maintenance & the existing functionally obsolete one lane structure with a Completion by SAC24769 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Kiefer blvd Over Deer Creek new two lane bridge. (Toll Credits for PE & CON) 2020 $1,820,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Bradshaw Rd. to Sunrise Completion after SAC22320 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Kiefer Blvd. Blvd. Includes: bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Kiefer Blvd Bradshaw Rd Sunrise Blvd. 2036 $51,200,000
Yes G- System Management, In Sacramento County, various locations, installation of left Completion by SAC15200 Sacramento Sacramento County Operations, and ITS Left Turn Lanes turn lanes. 2020 $705,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 83 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24570 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Lone Tree Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Meister Wy. to Elverta Rd. Lone Tree Rd Meister Wy Elverta Rd 2036 $9,125,000
This project will widen Madison ave from 4 to 6 lanes between Hazel Ave and Greenback Lane in the Fair Oaks area. Project The project proposes to widen the roadway to accommodate Development two additional traffic lanes, a raised landscaped median, Only bicycle and pedestrian facilities, traffic signal modifications B- Road & Highway and traffic operations system upgrades, landscaping and Completion after SAC24257 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Madison Ave Widening streetscape enhancements, and soundwalls. Madison Ave Hazel Ave Greenback Lane 2036 $22,361,626 B- Road & Highway Madison Avenue from Fair Oaks Blvd. to Hazel Ave.: Widen Yes SAC16500 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Madison Avenue Widening from 4 to 6 lanes. 2021-2036 $28,246,752 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24802 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Main Avenue 4 Lanes from Madison Ave to Oak Ave Main Avenue Madison Ave Oak Ave 2036 $7,900,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 6 lanes from Fair Oaks to Cypress; 4 lanes from Completion after SAC24571 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Manzanita Ave. Cypress to Madison Ave. Manzanita Ave Fair Oaks Madison Ave 2036 $1,600,000 McKenzie Rd, over Laguna Creek, 0.9 mi S of Arno Rd. Replace Yes C- Maintenance & the existing structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with a new 2 Completion by SAC24605 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation McKenzie Rd/Laguna Creek Bridge Replacement lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE,R/W & CON.) 2020 $4,994,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lane Rd. from Metro Air Pkwy. to Lone Metro Air Completion after SAC24573 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Meister Way Rd. Tree Rd. Meister Way Rd Parkway Lone Tree Rd 2036 $2,500,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24574 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Meister Way Road Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Lone Tree Rd. to Hwy. 99. 2036 $3,640,000 B- Road & Highway In Sacramento County, Metro Air Parkway from north of I-5 to Completion by Yes SAC24512 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Metro Air Parkway Elverta Road: Widen roadway from 2 to 4 lanes. 2020 $5,320,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24937 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Metro Air Parkway Widen: from 4 to 6 Lanes from I-5 to Elverta Rd Metro Air Parkway I-5 Elverta Road 2036 $2,350,800 In Sacramento County, I-5 @ Metro Air Parkway near Sacramento International Airport: Construct the first phase of a five-lane partial clover Type L-9 interchange for Metro Air Parkway at Interstate 5 (I-5). Construct a three lane overcrossing facility with a median, bike lanes and a sidewalk on the west side. Metro Air Parkway will connect on the north of the interchange and terminate south of I-5 with a cul- Yes de-sac. South Bayou Rd will realigned to provide the r/w for partial completion of two-quadrant partial cloverleaf interchange. Project also includes a one-lane northbound I-5 exit ramp and diagonal entrance ramp, one-lane southbound I-5 exit ramp, a two-lane southbound I-5 loop entrance ramp with auxiliary lane, street lighting, striping, signs, relocation of an existing drainage ditch on the south side of the freeway, B- Road & Highway construction of drainage improvements with the interchange, Completion by SAC18150 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Metro Air Parkway Interchange at I-5 and relocation of utilities. 2020 $19,122,000
Michigan Bar Rd, over Cosumnes River, 1.2 mi north of SR 16. Yes C- Maintenance & Michigan Bar Rd/Cosumnes River Bridge Replace the existing one lane structurally deficient bridge Completion by SAC24609 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Replacement with a new 2 lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, & CON) 2020 $13,783,000
New Hope Rd over Grizzley Slough, 0.5 mi north of San Yes C- Maintenance & Joaquin/Sacramento County Line: replace existing structurally Completion by SAC24620 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation New Hope Rd Bridge Replacement deficient 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. 2020 $5,683,403 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24251 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Oak Ave. Widen: 4 lanes from Hazel Ave. to Folsom City Limits. Oak Ave Kenneth Ave Folsom City Limits 2036 $16,400,000
Florin Rd. out to Power Inn Rd. to the west and Florin Perkins Rd/French Rd. to the east.,: Augment phase 1 of the Yes streetscape by installing continuous separated sidewalks, bicycle lanes, improved transit facilities, median channelization, and improved street lighting. (CMAQ Emission Completion by SAC24753 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Old Florin Town Streetscape Phase 2 Reductions in kg/day: 0.02 ROG, 0.02 NOx 13, 0.01 PM10) 2020 $4,516,947
Yes Various locations throughout Sacramento County: Construct Completion by SAC24714 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Pedestrian Improvements, Various Locations sidewalks, curb ramps, curbs and gutters. (HSIP6-03-017) 2020 $1,265,000 Various locations in Sacramento County: Construct sidewalks, Completion by Yes SAC24715 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Pedestrian Improvements, Various Locations curb ramps, curbs and gutters. (HSIP6-03-018) 2020 $1,576,618 This project will include the road widening of Power Inn Rd between Florin Rd and Elder Creek Rd to accommodate two Yes through lanes in each direction, a center two way left turn B- Road & Highway lane, a 6-foot bike lane on the east side, and a 5-foot bike SAC24274 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Power Inn Rd Widening lane with curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the west side. Power Inn Rd Florin Road Elder Creek Road 2021-2036 $1,662,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24803 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Power Line Road 4 Lanes from Road A to Placer County Line Power Line Road Road A Placer County Line 2036 $7,200,000 B- Road & Highway Widen Prairie City Road from 2 to 4 lanes between US 50 and Yes SAC24330 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Prairie City Road Widening White Rock Road. Prairie City Road US 50 White Rock Rd 2021-2036 $11,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway (Elverta Specific Plan Mitigation) Completion after SAC24804 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Rio Linda Blvd 4 Lanes from Elverta Rd to Sorento Rd Rio Linda Blvd Elverta Rd Sorento Rd 2036 $8,500,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24805 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Rio Linda Blvd 4 Lanes from Elkhorn Blvd to Elverta Rd Rio Linda Blvd Elkhorn Blvd Elverta Rd 2036 $8,250,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24935 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Rio Linda Blvd Widen: 4 Lanes from Ascot Ave to Elkhorn Blvd Rio Linda Blvd Ascot Ave Elkhorn Blvd 2036 $433,800 Rio Linda Blvd over North Channel of Dry Creek, 0.8 mi south Yes C- Maintenance & of Elkhorn Blvd: Replace 2-lane bridge with new 2-lane Completion by SAC24617 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Rio Linda Blvd Bridge Replacement bridge. 2020 $2,338,764 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24806 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Road A 4 Lanes from Power Line Road to Lone Tree Rd Road A Power Line Rd Lone Tree Rd 2036 $4,000,000 In Sacramento County: 1) on Palmer House Drive between Gerber Road and Skander Way, and 2) on Garfield Avenue between Verner Avenue (south) and Greenback Lane; overlay with rubberized or conventional asphalt concrete, repair damaged areas of the roadway (base repairs), install curb ramps, adjust utility covers, grind the existing pavement to Yes conform the overlay (wedge grind), replace traffic loop detectors, replace striping, and other work as necessary to complete the overlay. The project will also install bike lanes on Palmer House Drive from Renton Way to Skander Way, C- Maintenance & and on Garfield Avenue from Verner Avenue (south) to Completion by SAC24768 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Road Rehab Greenback Lane. 2020 $1,569,435 In Sacramento County, various locations: rehabilitate roadways with conventional or rubberized asphalt over existing pavement, ADA compliant upgrades and bike lane improvements; construction also includes base repair, raising manholes and utility valve covers to match pavement surface and grinding down sections of the existing pavement prior to paving. Locations include: 1. Palmerhouse Drive, Gerber Rd. Yes to Florin Rd., 2. Northrup Ave., Howe Ave. to Watt Ave., 3. Grantline Rd, Mosher Rd. to Elk Grove Rd., 4. El Centro Rd., San Juan Rd. to Arena Blvd. 5. Power Inn Rd., Elk Grove City Limit to Calvine Rd. 6. Garfield Ave., Auburn Blvd. to Verner Ave. 7. McClaren Dr., Kingsford Dr. to Arden Way 8. Central Ave., Kenneth Ave. to Hazel Ave. 9. Watt Ave., Antelope Rd. to Elverta Rd. 10. Huntsman Dr., Rosemont Dr. to Mayhew Rd. C- Maintenance & (CMAQ funds are for new bicycle lanes.) (Emissions in kg/day: Completion by SAC24413 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Road Rehab 0.11 ROG, 0.08 NOx, 0.03 PM10) 2020 $7,840,122 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC19680 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Roseville Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Watt Ave. to Walerga Rd. Roseville Rd. Watt Ave. Antelope Road 2021-2036 $38,422,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24575 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Roseville Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Antelope Rd. to Placer County line. Roseville Rd. Antelope Rd Placer County Line 2036 $6,750,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Road Extension: 4 lanes from Keifer Blvd. to Jackson Rd (Rte Completion after SAC24581 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Routier Road Extension Happy Ln. 16) Happy Ln Keifer Blvd Jackson Rd (Rte 16) 2036 $1,500,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Road Extension: 4 lanes from Old Placerville Rd. to Kiefer Old Placerville Completion after SAC24584 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Routier Road Extension Happy Ln. Blvd. Happy Ln Rd Kiefer Rd 2036 $1,300,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC23540 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity S. Watt Ave. Widen: 6 lanes from Elder Creek Rd. to Fruitridge Rd. S. Watt Ave Elder Creek Rd Fruitridge Rd 2021-2036 $20,000,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC23860 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity S. Watt Ave. / Elk Grove Florin Rd. Widen: 6 lanes from Fruitridge Rd. to Kiefer Blvd. Fruitridge Rd Kiefer Blvd. 2021-2036 $10,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24259 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity S. Watt Ave. / Elk Grove Florin Rd. Widen: 6 lanes from Folsom Blvd. to Calvine Rd. S. Watt Ave Folsom Blvd Calvine Rd. 2036 $3,250,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24807 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Sorento Rd Widen: 4 Lanes from Elverta Rd to Placer County Line Sorento Rd Elverta Rd Placer County Line 2036 $6,000,000 B- Road & Highway Widen South Watt Avenue from Florin Road to Jackson Road SOUTH WATT Yes SAC19290 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity South Watt Avenue Widening (Route 16) from 2 to 4 lanes AVENUE FLORIN ROAD JACKSON RD(SR16) 2021-2036 $18,871,917 Stevenson Ave. from the southeast corner of Anna Kirchgater Elementary School to the existing sidewalk near Marjon Way: Yes Construct sidewalk, curb, gutter, and curb ramps. SRTS3-03- Completion by SAC24632 Sacramento Sacramento County A- Bike & Ped Stevenson Ave. Sidewalks (SRTS) 007 2020 $768,700 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC19700 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Stockton Blvd. Widen: 6 lanes from 65th Ave. to Hwy. 99. Stockton Blvd. 65th Ave Hwy 99 2036 $23,800,000 B- Road & Highway In Sacramento County: Sunrise Blvd. between Jackson Jackson Yes SAC19710 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Sunrise Blvd. Highway and Grantline Road; Widen from 2 to 4 lanes Sunrise Blvd Highway Grantline Road 2021-2036 $12,000,000 Project Widen: from Madison Ave. to Gold Country Blvd. ITS Development B- Road & Highway Strategies and partial grade separation at Fair Oaks Blvd and Completion after SAC24261 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Sunrise Blvd. transit enhancements Sunrise Blvd Madison Ave Cold Country Blvd 2036 $6,162,807 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24808 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Sunset Ave 4 Lanes from San Juan Avenue to Fair Oaks Blvd Sunset Ave San Juan Ave Fair Oaks Blvd 2036 $6,100,000
Yes G- System Management, At 32 intersections throughout Sacramento County: Upgrade Completion by SAC24716 Sacramento Sacramento County Operations, and ITS Traffic Signal Upgrades traffic signals. (HSIP6-03-019) 2020 $1,060,900 Twin Cities Rd, over Snodgrass Slough: Replace the existing 2 Yes C- Maintenance & lane structurally deficient structure with a new 2 lane Completion by SAC24522 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Twin Cities Rd Bridge Replacement structure. 2020 $17,550,002
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 84 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Tyler Is Br Rd over Georgiana Slough, 1.5 Mi E of Isleton. Yes C- Maintenance & Replace the existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. Completion by SAC24772 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Tyler Rd Over Georgiana Slough Toll Credits for PE & CON. 2020 $13,618,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: Enhanced 2 4 lanes from Gerber Rd. to Completion after SAC24283 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Vineyard Rd. Jackson Hwy. Vineyard Rd Gerber Rd Jackson Hwy 2036 $2,900,000 Vineyard RD, over Laguna Creek, 0.8 MI North of Calvine RD. Yes C- Maintenance & Replace existing 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge. [See Completion by SAC24036 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Vineyard Road Bridge Replacement also SAC24156] 2020 $4,141,360 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24809 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity W. 6th Street - Rio Linda 4 Lanes from Elkhorn Blvd to Elverta Rd W. 6th Street Elkhorn Blvd Elverta Rd 2036 $1,000,000 C- Maintenance & In Walnut Grove, Walnut Grove crossing, over Sacramento Completion by Yes SAC24687 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Walnut Grove Bridge Rehab River: Rehabilitate existing bridge. 2020 $2,769,375 In Sacramento County: Between Vintage Park Drive to Florin Road; widen existing roadway to 4 lanes and extend roadway Yes B- Road & Highway from Gerber Road to Florin Road with an at-grade rail road Vintage Park SAC24285 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Waterman Road Widening crossing. Waterman Road Drive Florin Rd. 2021-2036 $20,000,000 B- Road & Highway In Sacramento County: Between Florin Rd. to Jackson Rd.; Yes SAC24885 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Waterman Road Widening construct roadway to 4 lanes Waterman Road Florin Road Jackson Road 2021-2036 $16,500,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 6 Lanes from Antelope Rd Elverta Rd to Placer County Completion after SAC24939 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Watt Ave Line Watt Avenue Antelope Rd Placer County Line 2036 $327,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SAC24352 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Watt Ave. Construct New Interchange: Watt Ave. / Folsom Blvd. 2036 $7,500,000 B- Road & Highway Yes SAC24585 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Watt Ave. Widen: 6 lanes from I-80 to Palm Ave. Don Julio Blvd. Watt Avenue I-80 Palm Ave 2021-2036 $16,250,000 In Sacramento County, Watt Ave: Between Palm Ave. Don Julio Blvd. and Antelope Rd. Elkhorn Blvd. widen to 6 lanes; 3 Yes lanes north bound on Watt Ave and 3 lanes southbound on B- Road & Highway 34th St; smart growth st. with proposed BRT/HI Bus - Watt Avenue/34th SAC15750 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Watt Avenue Couplet exclusive lanes. St. Palm Ave Antelope Road 2021-2036 $15,600,000 B- Road & Highway In Sacramento County, Watt Ave.: Between Elkhorn Blvd and Yes SAC15720 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Watt Avenue Widening Antelope Rd widen from 4 to 6 lanes 2021-2036 $9,641,800 Widen White Rock Road, from Grant Line Road to Rancho Yes B- Road & Highway White Rock Road - Grant Line Rd. to Rancho Cordova easterly City limits, from 2 to 4 lanes. Environmental Completion by SAC24662 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Cordova City Limits to be cleared as part of SAC24470. 2020 $10,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 Lanes from Auburn Blvd to San Juan Ave Garfield Completion after SAC24936 Only Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Winding Way Ave Winding Way Auburn Blvd San Juan 2036 $1,432,500 Winding Way over Chicago Creek, 0.1 mi west of Chicago Ave: Yes C- Maintenance & Replace existing functionally obsolete 2-lane bridge with a Completion by SAC24619 Sacramento Sacramento County Rehabilitation Winding Way Bridge Replacement new 2-lane bridge. 2020 $2,787,800
In Sacramento County: Zinfandel Drive, from Douglas Rd. to 7,100 ft south of Douglas Rd.: reconstruct Zinfandel Drive as a Yes two lane road. From 7,100 ft south of Douglas Rd. to Kiefer Blvd.: extend Zinfandel Dr. as a two lane road on a slightly B- Road & Highway different alignment than the existing dirt road. Construct Completion by SAC24622 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Zinfandel Drive Extension & Realignment concrete box culvert over creek just north of Kiefer Blvd. 2020 $5,873,000 Zinfandel Drive, from Southern boundary of the Villages of Southern Zinfandel to Douglas Road: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes with a boundary of Yes B- Road & Highway raised landscaped median. (For other phases see SAC24473 Zinfandel Road the Villages of SAC20240 Sacramento Sacramento County Capacity Zinfandel Road Widening and SAC24467) Widening Zinfandel Douglas Road 2021-2036 $1,050,000 Complete project analysis efforts, as needed, to identify and implement operational improvements to improve safety and traffic flow along the corridor in the near-term. Improvements to study may include intersection improvements, access management strategies, and traffic signalization enhancements that benefit travel for Yes automobiles and commercial vehicles. The project listing also allows other project development activities to advance so the corridor segment can eventually become a four lane facility in a manner that is consistent with the City and County's Jackson Hwy. (SR 16) from Excelsior to Grant design guidelines. Rancho Cordova would contribute to Sacramento County and City of Line Road: Project Development and portions of work between Sunrise and Grant Line within the SAC24222 Sacramento Rancho Cordova D- Programs & Planning Operational Improvements city's limits. jackson hwy Excelsior Grant Line Rd. 2021-2036 $5,000,000
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Install new in cab surveillance camers in RT's light rail fleet to Completion by SAC24976 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS LRV Cab Cameras comply with CPUC General Ofer 172 2020 $305,482 This project would make ADA improvements at the 12th & I Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital 12th & I Street Light Rail Station ADA Street Light Rail Station. Scope includes constructing a new SAC24860 Sacramento District (Minor) Improvements platform and realigning the track. 2021-2036 $11,222,078 29th St. Light Rail Station, located at R St. between 29th St. and 30th St.: Add two shelters, a surveillance camera, flashing Yes pedestrian crossing signs, two visible message signs, and Sacramento Regional Transit other transit amenities. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: ROG Between 29th & 30th Completion by REG17953 Sacramento District A- Bike & Ped 29th St. Light Rail Station Enhancements 0.15, NOx 0.15, PM10 0.06) 29 Street R Street Street 2020 $280,500 Rehabilitation/ Renovation to Enhance ADA Accessibility at Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Transit Stops/Stations. Provide enhanced system access for Completion by REG18019 Sacramento District (Minor) ADA Rehabilitation/ Renovation persons with disabilities. 2020 $356,643 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Replace fifty paratransit vehicles to provide complementary Completion by Yes REG18011 Sacramento District (Vehicles) ADA Service Vehicle Replacement ADA services within the Regional Transit District area. 2020 $4,335,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Passenger Amenities: Complete facility modifications, as Yes REG17962 Sacramento District (Minor) ADA Transition Plan Improvements required, in order to make all RT facilities accessible. 2021-2036 $3,281,885 Enhance light rail capacity on the Gold Line to the city of Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Folsom, light rail system modifications that will give RT the Completion by SAC24977 Sacramento District (Major) Amtrak-Folsom Limited Stop Service capacity to provide limited stop express service. 2020 $12,000,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital This project is to maintain existing artwork at light rail Yes SAC24858 Sacramento District (Minor) Artwork at Light Rail Stations stations 2021-2036 $70,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Passenger counters for 97 LRVs to facilitate NTD reporting. 8 Yes SAC24869 Sacramento District (Minor) Automatic Passenger Counters counters per LRV. 2021-2036 $1,052,070 Conduct study determining amenities to be provided at each Yes Sacramento Regional Transit stop, design choices, maintenance of waiting areas, safe, Completion by SAC24810 Sacramento District D- Programs & Planning Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements Study attractive access to stops. 2020 $300,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Inspection and repair of Bridge stucture elements as found in Yes SAC24978 Sacramento District (Minor) Biennial Bridge Inspection Repairs the periodic inspection. 2021-2036 $1,295,843
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Completion by SAC24979 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Building Access System Upgrade Upgrade card based building access system 2020 $111,507 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Completion by Yes SAC24874 Sacramento District (Minor) Bus Maintenance Facility #1 Rehabilitation Rehabilitate the District's existing Bus Maintenance Facility. 2020 $10,000,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Completion by Yes REG18012 Sacramento District (Minor) Bus Stop Improvements- Citrus Heights Bus turn outs and associated improvements. N/A 2020 $1,976,604
City of Folsom (Subrecipient) Operating assistance, preventive maintenance, and ADA operating assistance for transit services within the City of Folsom. Sacramento Urbanized Yes Area.FFY 2011 preventive maintenance: $265,000FFY 2011 ADA operations: $130,000FFY 2012 preventive maintenance: $278,000FFY 2012 ADA operations: $136,000FFY 2014 Sacramento Regional Transit City of Folsom Stage Lines Operating Assistance operating assistance: $184,538FFY 2014 preventive Completion by SAC24596 Sacramento District F- Transit O&M (Bus) FFY 2011-2014 maintenance: $137,446FFY 2014 ADA operations: $89,395 n/a n/a 2020 $1,663,877 City of Folsom Stagelines (Subrecipient) Replace up to six 22- Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital City of Folsom Stagelines Replacement of foot Cutaway Buses including related equipment and spare Completion by SAC24637 Sacramento District (Vehicles) Cutaway Buses parts. n/a n/a 2020 $542,475 Replace up to eleven CNG powered paratransits vehicles to provide services to elderly and disabled passengers. (Toll Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Credits for CON. Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.07 ROG, 1.45 Completion by REG18025 Sacramento District (Vehicles) CNG Paratransit Vehicle Replacement NOx, 0.03 PM10.) 2020 $1,571,200 Replace up to twenty 40-foot CNG buses including related equipment and spare parts. Procurment for buses and parts Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital to be in three phases. (Uses Toll Credits for local match). Completion by REG18014 Sacramento District (Vehicles) CNG Replacement Buses & Related Spare Parts (Emission Benefits: 77 kg/day NOx) 2020 $28,393,427 Replace radio communication equipment as needed. These funds will be used to purchase hand held radios, vehicle Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, radios, rail car radios, MDCs, radio batteries, and equipment SAC24777 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Communication Equipment Replacement that is used to charge these radios. 2021-2036 $1,455,000 Construct secondary data center @ RT's Light Rail Facility Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Data Center Redundancy & Reliability (Academny Way) as a backup in the event of a failure at the Completion by SAC24778 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Equipment primary data center at 1225 R St 2020 $53,709 Technology Upgrade: Upgrade the Data Warehouse that is currently used by RT staff for enterprise reporting, data analysis, and application data storage and presentation Yes services. Once upgraded, the new data warehouse will Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, provide significant new functionality and performance for RT REG17812 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Data Warehouse Upgrade staff for analysis, reporting, and business intelligence. 2021-2036 $175,000 On Blue Line light rail, on the east side of 12th St., south of Richards Blvd.: build new light rail station. The station is part Yes of the redevelopment of Twin Rivers public housing Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital development. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 1.02 ROG, 0.97 Completion by REG18023 Sacramento District (Major) Dos Rios Light Rail Station NOx, 0.58 PM10) 2020 $9,500,000
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Technology Upgrade: Portal for Real Estate for acquisitions REG17983 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Enhance Public Web Based Services (Phase II) and asset management. 2021-2036 $108,363
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Completion by SAC24779 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS ERP System Disaster Response Upgrade RT's Enterprise Mgmt System 2020 $245,000
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Technology Upgrade: Develop a FIBER Infrastructure REG17980 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS FIBER Infrastructure Management Application Management Application. 2021-2036 $120,000
Along Fulton Ave., from Arden Wy. to Auburn Blvd.: Design Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital and install 8 to 11 bus shelters, including easements. Completion by REG17952 Sacramento District (Minor) Fulton Ave. Bus Shelters (Emission Benefits in kg/day: ROG 0.13, NOx 0.13, PM10 0.05) Along Fulton Ave. Arden Way Auburn Blvd. 2020 $169,435 Transit Capital/Operations: Implement general facility Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital General Facilities Maintenance & improvements and maintain facilities throughout the district REG17816 Sacramento District (Minor) Improvements as needed. 2021-2036 $12,724,439 Sacramento Regional Transit District: provide for various minor upgrades and improvements to district facilities, such Yes as roof replacement, better lighting, security systems, Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital ventilation, accessibility modifications, and safety Completion by REG18009 Sacramento District (Minor) General Facility Improvements enhancements. 2020 $764,241
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 85 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS pj p g NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) (MOS) 2 and a MOS 3. REG17935 includes the Final Design and Construction for the project (excluding MOS-1).This phase of the Green Line to the Airport (DNA) Light Rail Project will consist of two discreet, yet connected efforts. For the segment of the Green Line near and adjacent to the Sacramento Intermodal Transfer Center (SITF), the effort will entail the preparation of Draft EIS (and EIR), its circulation for public review and comment, addressing the comments and will culminate with a Final EIS (and EIR). The segment of the project adjacent to the SITF will be coordinated with on-going Sacramento Streetcar planning, environmental review, and design development. For the remainder of the 13-mile Yes corridor, the effort will entail the preparation of a Draft EIS (and EIR) only and its circulation for public review and comments. An MOS will also be identified for this segment. The effort will also evaluate low-floor LRT vehicles and their integration into the RT system, evaluate LRT vehicle maintenance locations for the Green Line, evaluate downtown Sacramento rail/traffic effects of the proposed service, prepare the necessary technical information and for a New Starts evaluation under MAP-21, and involve the community and stakeholders in an outreach program for both efforts. Advanced conceptual engineering and preliminary Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital engineering in key areas with potential for environmental Completion by REG17943 Sacramento District (Major) Green Line (DNA) Light Rail - Overall impacts that may require mitigation strategies for the EIS will 2020 $14,810,336 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Extend rail from Richards Blvd. to Sacramento International Sacramento Yes REG17935 Sacramento District (Major) Green Line: MOS2 & MOS3 Airport Richards blvd International Airport 2021-2036 $698,286,782
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Completion by SAC24780 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Handheld Smart Card Reader Purchase hand held smart card readers 2020 $116,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Develop 9-mile enhanced bus corridor on Arden Way. Include Yes SAC24817 Sacramento District (Major) Hi-bus on Arden Way 7 artic buses Arden Way 2021-2036 $20,635,000 Develop an enhanced bus corridor along 6.5 miles along Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Auburn Boulevard between Watt/I-80 and Citrus Heights. Completion by SAC24813 Sacramento District (Major) Hi-bus on Auburn Blvd Include 5 artic buses. (precursor to LRT to Citrus Heights). Auburn Blvd Watt/I-80 Citrus Heights 2020 $14,700,000 Project Development Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Develop 10.5-mile BRT corridor on Easton Valley Pkwy. Eastern Valley Completion after SAC24879 Only Sacramento District (Major) Hi-bus on Easton Valley Pkwy Include 8 artic buses Pkwy 2036 $48,226,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Develop an enhanced bus corridor along 15.5 miles Sunrise Yes SAC24814 Sacramento District (Major) Hi-bus on El Camino Ave Mall to the Royal Oaks station. Include 11 artic buses El Camino Ave Sunrise Mall Royal Oaks Station 2021-2036 $34,315,000 Develop Hi Bus corridor on Florin Road with enhanced bus from JFK High School to Old Town Florin (8 miles), and BRT Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital from Old Town Florin to Bradshaw (3.5 miles). Include 9 artic SAC24815 Sacramento District (Major) Hi-bus on Florin Rd buses Florin Road 2021-2036 $34,547,000 Project Development Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Develop 8-mile enhanced bus corridor on Freeport blvd. Completion after SAC24877 Only Sacramento District (Major) Hi-bus on Freeport Blvd Include 6 artic buses 2036 $18,085,000 Project Development Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Develop 10-mile BRT corridor along the Jackson Hwy Corridor. Jackson Hwy Completion after SAC24878 Only Sacramento District (Major) Hi-bus on Jackson Rd Include 8 artic buses Corridor 2036 $46,371,000 Project Develop 11-mile enhanced bus corridor on Marconi Ave from Development Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital American River College to the Power Inn light rail station. American River Power Inn light rail Completion after SAC24816 Only Sacramento District (Major) Hi-bus on Marconi Ave Include 8 artic buses Marconi Ave College station 2036 $24,577,000 Develop an enhanced bus corridor along 12 miles along Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Stockton Boulevard between Downtown Sacramento and Downtown Consumnes River Completion by SAC24870 Sacramento District (Major) Hi-bus on Stockton Blvd Cosumnes River College. Include 9 artic buses Stockton Blvd. Sacramento College 2020 $27,127,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Develop 8-mile enhanced bus corridor on Sunrise Blvd. Yes SAC24818 Sacramento District (Major) Hi-bus on Sunrise South Include 6 artic buses 2021-2036 $18,085,000 Develop a 12.5 mile Hi Bus corridor on Watt Avenue between Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Watt/Manlove station to Placer County Line. Include 9 artic Watt/Manlove Completion by SAC24812 Sacramento District (Major) Hi-bus on Watt Ave buses Watt Ave Station Placer 2020 $56,804,000 On the Gold Line, between Butterfield and Mather/Mills stations, at Horn Rd. and Old Winery Pl, construct new light Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital rail station. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.27 ROG, 0.26 NOx, Completion by REG18024 Sacramento District (Major) Horn Light Rail Station 0.15 PM10) 2020 $3,600,000 Technology Upgrade: Implement a document archival system Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, that converts financial and engineering documents to an Completion by REG17991 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Implement Document Archival System electronic and/or microfilm format. 2020 $224,000
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Integrated Contract Admin System (ICAS) Technology Upgrade: Replace the Integrated Contract Completion by REG17832 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Replacement Administration System (ICAS). 2020 $160,150 Minor ITS Improvement: Support the Intelligent Transportation Systems Strategic Deployment Plan for the Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Sacramento Region being coordinated by the Sacramento REG17833 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems Area Council of Governments (SACOG). 2021-2036 $9,048,000 Landscaping improvements to existing sound walls located along Folsom Boulevard and the south side of the Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Sacramento Regional Transit light rail Gold Line within the Completion by REG18022 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Landscaping - ROW Improvements City of Rancho Cordova. N/A 2020 $120,803 This project is to replace existing High intensity Discharge (metal halide or high pressure sodium) pole lights with LED Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital lighting at light rail stations, park-and-ride lots, light rail Completion by SAC24781 Sacramento District (Minor) LED Lighting Retrofil Metro yard, and bus and administrative parking lots. 2020 $1,880,000 This project is to improve the Light Rail Control Center. Scope includes physical upgrades, probably new control center, Yes computers displays, and external interfaces to Passenger Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Information Signs + RR interlocking SCADA, and SAC24862 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Light Rail Control Center Upgrade (LRCC) communications system upgrades 2021-2036 $4,500,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Transit Capital/Operations: Purchase and install, as needed, a Yes REG17999 Sacramento District (Minor) Light Rail Crossing Enhancements variety of components in the grade crossing mechanisms. 2021-2036 $1,826,624
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Develop new central management software system for RT's Completion by SAC24782 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Light Rail Digital Messaging control System digital Light Rail public messaging systems 2020 $103,250 Pedestrian Improvements: At the Fruitridge, Cosumnes River Yes Sacramento Regional Transit College, and City College light rail stations, improve REG17966 Sacramento District A- Bike & Ped Light Rail Station Pedestrian Improvements pedestrian access. 2021-2036 $8,852,113 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Passenger Amenities: Add and improve light rail station Yes REG18008 Sacramento District (Minor) Light Rail Station Shelter Improvement Program shelters. 2021-2036 $1,136,000 Enhancement of Sacramento Regional Transit District bus stops including but not limited to: addition of i-stops; benches and trash cans; security improvements, and installation of braille signage. Enhancement of Light Rail Yes Stations including but not limited to: lighting improvements; replacing braille signage; improved pedestrian access to Sacramento Regional Transit stations; security improvements; and audio enhancements to Completion by REG17940 Sacramento District A- Bike & Ped Light Rail Station/Bus Stop Enhancements signage. 2020 $1,186,250 Develop procurement specifications for the light rail vehicles Yes Sacramento Regional Transit prior to planned replacements and purchases for light rail Completion by SAC24859 Sacramento District D- Programs & Planning Light Rail Vehicle Specification Development extensions. 2020 $86,261 SRTD mid-life overhaul of light rail vehicles. (FFY 2007 funds Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital will rehabilitate 6 to 8 vehicles.) (FTA 5307 funds are unused Completion by REG15880 Sacramento District (Vehicles) LRV Mid-Life Overhaul funds from FFY 2005) 2020 $9,946,412
Passenger Amenities: Light rail stations. Includes:parking Yes lot/sidewalk repairs, mini high shelters, slurry seal, restriping, Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital curb replacement, planter construction, landscape replanting, REG17930 Sacramento District (Minor) Major LRT Station Enhancements drainage improvements, and fencing repairs. 2021-2036 $31,768,589 Modify, reconfigure and expand the Metro light rail yard (or Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital other terminal yards). Add storage yard tracks at Academy SAC24783 Sacramento District (Minor) Metro Light Rail Yard Expansion Way site 2021-2036 $10,521,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Metro West LR Maintenance Facility (Specialty Transit Capital/Operations: Renovate building at 2531 Land Completion by Yes REG18005 Sacramento District (Minor) Steel) Avenue for use as a light rail body shop. 2020 $1,026,660 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Purchase 14 Neighborhood Ride CNG Vehicles to replace Completion by Yes REG18028 Sacramento District (Vehicles) Neighborhood Ride Vehicle Replacement vehicles which have surpassed their useful lives. 2020 $1,919,114
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Technology Upgrade: Upgrade/replace RT's data backup and Completion by REG17975 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Network Backup and Data Archive Upgrade archive system. 2020 $104,320 Technology Upgrade: Upgrade RT's network security Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, infrastructure by retiring and replacing the aging and obsolete REG17967 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Network Firewall Upgrade network firewall. 2021-2036 $32,030 Project is to build stations previously deferred during Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital construction of the light rail system: such as Dos Rios, Horn, T SAC24864 Sacramento District (Major) New Light Rail Stations St, Mineshaft, Ramona or others. 2021-2036 $17,000,000 Sacramento Regional Transit New Transit Oriented Development-Related Assistance and approvals in developing TOD projects on RT Yes SAC24811 Sacramento District D- Programs & Planning Professional Services property 2021-2036 $225,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Transit Capital/Operations: construct soundwalls at various Yes REG17959 Sacramento District (Minor) Noise Attenuation Soundwalls locations along the light rail system. 2021-2036 $1,722,245 Double track existing single track sections and improve alignment of Northeast Corridor LRT, upgrade the traction power system and signaling to provide limited-stop service, Yes make enhancements to yard track and maintenance facility, Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital and installation of communications infrastructure. (Local Completion by REG16470 Sacramento District (Major) Northeast Corridor Enhancements Agency Funds are from selling a parcel of land.) 2020 $40,000,000
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Computer Upgrades and replacements for various RT Completion by SAC24784 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Operations Computer Systems Upgrades operating/support departments 2020 $205,000 Paratransit, Inc. (Subrecipient): In Paratransit’s service area: provide transportation to all “lifeline” destinations except shopping and day care facilities. Provide service to medical Yes facilities, job training and resources, the Department of Human Assistance, the Department of Rehabilitation, one Sacramento Regional Transit F- Transit O&M Paratransit, Inc. Mobility Training and Job stop career centers, the Department of Motor Vehicles, and Completion by PAR10031 Sacramento District (Demand Response) Search Shuttle Service for the Homeless Social Security Administration. 2020 $250,000 Sacramento Regional Transit Yes SAC24866 Sacramento District D- Programs & Planning Planning/Studies "planning studies" to be conducted by RT Planning 2021-2036 $500,000
The Sacramento Police Department will begin implementation of a program to replace their entire inventory of Mobile Data Computers that are installed in their marked patrol vehicle Yes fleet. This work, called the "NextGen Project", will replace the outdated and discontinued computers in the patrol cars that are used for all types of emergency call dispatching, Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Police Vehicle Mobile Data Computer Terminals information gathering and dissemination, criminal history and SAC24785 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Replacement records checks, and officer safety information. 2021-2036 $135,296 Sacramento Regional Transit Professional Development Efforts for Planning "Professional development efforts" to be completed by RT Yes SAC24867 Sacramento District D- Programs & Planning Staff Planning 2021-2036 $200,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital System-wide rail surface profiling/grinding to regain the Completion by Yes REG18026 Sacramento District (Minor) Rail Profiling original design parameters for rail surface. 2020 $300,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 86 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Retrofit 21 UTDC light rail vehicles purchased from Valley Completion by Yes REG17946 Sacramento District (Vehicles) Retrofit 21 UTDC Light Rail Vehicles Transit. 2020 $33,150,546 Sacramento Regional Transit C- Maintenance & RT road/curb repair on its right of way adjacent to locations Yes SAC24855 Sacramento District Rehabilitation Road/Curb Repair where City/County of Sacramento road/curb repair. 2021-2036 $6,208,872 ADA operations for transit services within the RT District Paratransit Area. Sacramento Urbanized Area.FFY 2015 : Yes Sacramento Regional Transit F- Transit O&M $2,100,000FFY 2016 : $2,100,000FFY 2017 : $2,100,000FFY Completion by REG17955 Sacramento District (Demand Response) RT ADA Operations 2018 : $2,100,000 2020 $18,782,731 Continued operation and maintenance of bus, light rail, and paratransit services. (Local Agency Funds include revenues Yes Sacramento Regional Transit F- Transit O&M from investments, advertising, commercial real estate,sales Completion by REG17957 Sacramento District (General) RT Operating Assistance and contracted services.) 2020 $968,052,419 Sacramento Regional Transit F- Transit O&M Provide for scheduled and unscheduled maintenance for bus Completion by Yes REG17956 Sacramento District (General) RT Preventive Maintenance and light rail revenue vehicles and facilities. 2020 $260,445,387 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital RT Projects funded by future Prop 1B Transit Various RT Transit Security Projects Funded by Future Completion by Yes SAC24786 Sacramento District (Minor) Security Funds Proposition 1B Transit Security Funds 2020 $3,769,521
Provide experience for students pursuing a career in transit Yes planning field: compiling statistical data, outreach, data Sacramento Regional Transit Sacramento Regional Transit Internship analysis and validation, preparation of reports, conducting SAC24868 Sacramento District D- Programs & Planning Program customer surveys and passenger counting (annual program). 2021-2036 $750,000
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Technology Upgrade: Enhance security throughout the REG17917 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Security System Enhancement RT'system. Includes: fiber and DVR. 2021-2036 $4,913,283 Technology Upgrade: Place new equipment and clustering Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, software in order to build a highly available and extremely REG17970 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Server Clustering resilient server infrastructure. 2021-2036 $25,878
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Technology Upgrade: Triennial server replacement program REG17864 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Server Replacement to retire and replace aging and obsolete servers. 2021-2036 $66,999 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Purchase a variety of equipment as needed for vehicle and Yes SAC24871 Sacramento District (Minor) Shop Equipment - Bus shop maintenance. 2021-2036 $2,585,000 Technology Upgrade: Upgrade the Union Switch and Signal Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, controllers to the new design being built with the AMTRAK Completion by REG17867 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Signal Improvements project. 2020 $240,000 Line Phase 1 (Blue Line) at Meadowview Station further south to Cosumnes River College (CRC). Includes 4.2 miles of track, 4 new stations, and 2700 park & ride spaces. (The SRTD planned date of revenue service is September 2015.) The total capital cost is estimated to be $270,000,000 in YOE dollars. RT is seeking $135,000,000 in Section 5309 New Starts funds, a 50% federal share. The Section 5309 New Starts Funds are broken out as follows: $4,410,000, FTA 5309 New Starts, FFY 2010, $6,930,000, FTA 5309 New Starts, FFY 2011, $24,011,926, FTA 5309 New Starts, FFY 2012, $53,988,074, Yes FTA 5309 New Starts, FFY 2013, $45,660,000, FTA 5309 New Starts, FFY 2014, The non New-Starts balance of funds totaling $135,000,000 will come from the following sources: $7,100,000 CMAQ, $8,100,000 TCRP, $4,307,000 STIP, $10,713,141 State Prop 1B PTMISEA, $7,200,000 State Prop 1B SLPP, $156,660 STA, $25,265,683 Measure A Sales Tax, $1,481,421 Laguna Community Facilities District (LCFD), $4,198,388 Elk Grove/West Vineyard Fee District, $544,057 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital South Sacramento Light Rail (Blue Line) - Phase Vineyard Transit Development Fees, $65,933,651 RT Revenue Completion by REG15053 Sacramento District (Major) 2 Bonds. 2020 $270,000,000 The project will maintain current bus service levels for nine key routes (19, 24, 26, 51, 54, 55, 56, 75, 80) serving low- Yes Sacramento Regional Transit income, transit dependant residents connecting them to Completion by REG18027 Sacramento District F- Transit O&M (Bus) SRTD JARC Operating Assistance work, education and services. 2020 $2,546,784 Pavement Rehabiltation: Sacramento Regional Transit District. Includes: repairing paving as needed in the RT system that is Yes Sacramento Regional Transit C- Maintenance & deteriorated and needs to be repaired/replaced to maintain a REG17907 Sacramento District Rehabilitation SRTD Paving Restoration Program state of good repair. 2021-2036 $3,000,000 In Sacramento: Acquire land and construct a new bus maintenance facility in McClellan Park. Plans for this facility include two fueling stations, one land bus wash, and a Yes revenue collection center. Also includes site work for parking Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital SRTD Satellite Bus Maintenance Facility #2 and building modifications to support 125 buses. A Phase 2 Completion by REG17300 Sacramento District (Major) Phase 1 will follow. 2020 $25,426,630 Transit Capital/Operations: At the Sunrise interlocking, add a turnout to the east end of the tail track. This would turn the Yes Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital tail track into a siding providing two ways for trains to enter REG17995 Sacramento District (Minor) Sunrise Siding (Side Track Switch) and exit the siding. 2021-2036 $227,023 Technology Upgrade: Design, procure, and install SCADA Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Supervisory Control & Data Acquisition System equipment into traction power substations to control and REG17868 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS (SCADA) monitor traction power distribution systems. 2021-2036 $2,167,264
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Surveillance and Security Facilities Completion by SAC24787 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Enhancement New facility for surveillance systems monitoring 2020 $252,000 RT's next light rail vehicle (LRV) procurement, likely associated with the Green Line to the Airport project, will include low- floor vehicles. This study will include technical evaluation associated with type of vehicle to be specified (light rail vehicle, European tram, etc.) and the physical design requirements of the new and existing light rail stations. The Yes evaluation of existing stations will need to detail the level of effort (design and construction) needed to accommodate low- floor vehicles. Preliminary cost estimates (by station) and schedule of design and construction activities will also be developed. Recommendations for maintaining light rail Sacramento Regional Transit System wide Impacts of Low-Floor Light Rail operations while the station construction activities are under Completion by SAC24863 Sacramento District D- Programs & Planning Vehicles Environmental Clearance and Design way will also be developed. 2020 $565,558 Purchase approximately 250 bicycle racks with capacity to Yes Sacramento Regional Transit hold three bicycles each, which includes 14 racks as spares. Completion by REG18015 Sacramento District A- Bike & Ped Three-Capacity Bicycle Racks for Buses (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 2 ROG, 2 NOx, 2 PM10) 2020 $373,885 Transit Capital/Operations: Make improvements to the Folsom line Traction Power (TPS) system that will improve Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, service availability during peak service on the Folsom corridor Completion by REG17960 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Traction Power Upgrades and improved contingency operation. 2020 $890,193 Sacramento Regional Transit Completion by Yes REG18002 Sacramento District D- Programs & Planning Transit Master Plan Update Service Plan: Update the RT Transit Master Plan. 2020 $524,468 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Transit Vehicle Replacement (CNG) & Related Replace up to ten 40-foot CNG buses including related Completion by Yes REG18016 Sacramento District (Vehicles) Equipment equipment and spare parts. 2020 $6,250,000
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Completion by SAC24789 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Update Data Backup Systems New hardware/software for ERP and security systems backup 2020 $104,320 Technology Upgrade: Upgrade rail interlocking status and Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Upgrading Rail Interlockings (Remote control functions to provide modem connection to Central REG17990 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Indication) Train Tracking/Operations Central Control. 2021-2036 $406,546 Aesthetic improvements to Sacramento Regional Transit utility buildings located along Folsom Boulevard and the Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Sacramento Regional Transit light rail Gold Line within the Completion by REG18021 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Utility Buildings ROW Improvements City of Rancho Cordova. N/A 2020 $225,000 Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Passenger Amenities: Procure and install Wayfinding signage Completion by Yes REG17979 Sacramento District (Minor) Wayfinding Signage to light rail stations. 2020 $88,849
Yes Sacramento Regional Transit G- System Management, Technology Upgrade: Detailed analysis and design REG18000 Sacramento District Operations, and ITS Wayside Signal Reconfiguration Phase 2 modification to the existing wayside signaling system. 2021-2036 $361,211 Project Development Sacramento Regional Transit E- Transit Capital Rancho Cordova Town Center Loop Streetcar- Phase 1 (7.5 Completion after SAC24311 Only Sacramento District, City of Rancho Cordova (Major) Rancho Cordova Streetcar miles) 2036 $182,918,000 At 16 schools within Sacramento County: Conduct Safe Routes to School non-infrastructure programs, which include Yes education, promotion, and school site assessments. (Toll Completion by SAC24763 Sacramento San Juan USD D- Programs & Planning Safe Routes to School Credits) 2020 $250,000 Adjacent to the City of Folsom within the Folsom Lake State Yes American River Parkway Bike Trail Renewal Recreation Area: between Beals Point and Negro Bar area; Completion by VAR56120 Sacramento State Dept. of Parks and Rec. A- Bike & Ped Project - Phase 1 rehabilitation paved bike trail. 2020 $433,100 Replace six buses. Each with sufficient capacity to carry 16 Yes E- Transit Capital ambulatory and 2 wheelchair passengers. (Uses Toll Credits Completion by UCP10001 Sacramento UCP of Greater Sacramento (Vehicles) Bus Replacement Purchase for local match). 2020 $438,000 C- Maintenance & ROW Acquisition and Construction: Railroad Crossing. North Yes CAL20429 Sutter Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Lomo Railroad Crossing of SR 99 / Live Oak Blvd. intersection. SR 99 n/a n/a 2021-2036 $10,000,000
Yes G- System Management, ROW Acquisition: for urban interchange at existing SR 20 / SR CAL15780 Sutter Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 20 / SR 99 Interchange ROW Acquisition 99 intersection SR 20 / SR 99 n/a n/a 2021-2036 $25,000,000 B- Road & Highway Yes CAL15770 Sutter Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 20 Improvements Widen: SR 20 to six (6) lanes from Walton Rd. to Rocca Wy. SR 20 Rocca Wy. Walton Rd. 2021-2036 $2,000,000 Sutter County, in Yuba City, SR 20 at Plumas Street - Replace Yes C- Maintenance & signal poles (PM 16.5) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0929] (Toll Credits Completion by CAL20489 Sutter Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 20 Signal Poles at Plumas Street for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $1,405,000 Bogue Road Yes SUT 99 PM SR 20 Sut 99 PM CAL20569 Sutter Caltrans D3 A- Bike & Ped SR 99 Class II Bike Lane On SR 99, construct bike lane from Bogue Road to SR 20 Jct. SR20 27.648 30.594 2021-2036 $1,440,000
In Sutter and Sacramento Counties, SR-99 at Riego Road, construct Type L-9 partial cloverleaf interchange with 8-lane Yes overcrossing structure (Sut-99-0.0/1.6; Sac-99-36.3/36.9) B- Road & Highway (project will use tapered match funding) [ID changed from Completion by SUT16950 Sutter Caltrans D3 Capacity SR 99 / Riego Road Type L-9 Interchange CAL16950] [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0494; EFIS ID 0300000614] 2020 $30,790,000 In Sutter County in and near Yuba City on Rte. 99 from SR 20 to 0.9 mile north of Queens Avenue - Highway planting and Yes upgrade irrigation (PM 30.6/32.7) [SHOPP Roadside C- Maintenance & Preservation - Highway Planting Restoration] [CTIPS ID 107- Completion by CAL20409 Sutter Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 99 Landscaping 0000-0822; EFIS ID 0300020036] 2020 $2,526,000
Yes G- System Management, Completion by CAL20608 Sutter Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 99 Operational Improvements Operational Improvements: Bogue Rd. to Pease Rd. 2020 $3,000,000 C- Maintenance & Butte County Yes CAL20607 Sutter Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 99 Passing Lanes Passing Lanes: Yuba City to Butte County Line. SR 99 Line Yuba City 2021-2036 $20,000,000 Near Yuba City on SR 20, from Sutter Bypass to Lytle Road - Rehabilitate roadway and widen shoulders (PM 5.0/11.3) Yes C- Maintenance & [EFIS ID 0300020608; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0968] (Toll Credits Completion by CAL20522 Sutter Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Sutter Bypass Rehab and Widening for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $26,041,000 Near Yuba City, Route 99 from Nicholas Ave/Garden Highway to Sacramento Avenue: widen from 2 to 4 lanes, with a Yes B- Road & Highway median left-turn lane, new bridge (PM 11.0/14.3) [CTIPS ID Sacramento Nicholas Ave. / Completion by CAL17660 Sutter Caltrans D3 Capacity Sutter SR 99 Corridor Widening 107-0000-0688; EFIS ID 0300000206] SR 99 Ave. Garden Hwy. 2020 $57,811,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 87 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) In Sutter County, on SR 99, in and near Yuba City, from Bogue Road to Pease Road - Install signal and add/upgrade Traffic Yes G- System Management, Operating Systems (TOS) [PM 27.6/R32.7] [CTIPS ID 107-0000- Completion by CAL20552 Sutter Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Yuba City Operational Improvements 1007] (Toll credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $4,430,000 Construct New Road: 2 lane collector from Samuel St. to Yes B- Road & Highway Richard Ave. Includes: drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and SUT18914 Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Apricot St. bike lanes. Apricot St. Samual St. Richard Ave 2021-2036 $1,716,000 C- Maintenance & Pavement Rehabilitation: in Live Oak from N St. to Samuel St. Yes SUT17011 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Apricot St. Includes: resurface existing pavement. Apricot St. N St. Samual St 2021-2036 $360,000 C- Maintenance & Pavement Rehabilitation: from L St. to K St. Includes: curb, Yes SUT17009 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Archer Ave. gutter, sidewalks, and drainage improvements. (Phase II) Archer Ave L St K St 2021-2036 $486,000 Pavement Rehabilitation: from K St. to City Limit. Includes: Yes C- Maintenance & curb, gutter, sidewalks, and drainage improvements. (Phase SUT17025 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Archer Ave. III) Archer Ave K St City limit 2021-2036 $480,000 Create a Live Oak Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to integrate bicycle and pedestrian features into future Yes development, as well as identify improvements for existing Completion by SUT18857 Sutter City of Live Oak D- Programs & Planning Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan facilities. 2020 $59,281 C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from SR 99 to Planning Area Limits Yes SUT18915 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Bishop Ave. Includes drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Bishop Ave SR 99 Planning area limits 2021-2036 $1,047,000 C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Pennington Rd. to Elm St. Yes SUT17007 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Broadway St. Includes: sidewalk, bike lanes, drainage improvements. Broadway St. Pennington Rd Elm St 2021-2036 $810,000 Road Reconstruction from Apricot St. to the Elm St./SR 99 Yes C- Maintenance & intersection. Includes: drainage improvements, curb, gutter SUT18916 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Broadway St. and Elm St. and sidewalk and bike lanes Broadway St. Apricot Street Elm St/SR 99 2021-2036 $581,000 C- Maintenance & Pavement Rehabilitation: from Pennington Rd. to Elm St. Yes SUT17023 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Center St. Includes: drainage improvements. Center St. Pennington Rd Elm St 2021-2036 $800,000 Construct New Class I Bikeways off-street and along various Yes SUT18907 Sutter City of Live Oak A- Bike & Ped Class I Bikeways new and existing City streets 2021-2036 $3,405,000 C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from SR 99 to Sinnard Ave. Includes Yes SUT18918 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Coleman Rd. drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Coleman Rd SR 99 Sinnard Ave 2021-2036 $2,110,000
Yes C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Broadway to N St. Includes: curb, SUT17020 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Elm St. gutter, sidewalks, bike lanes, and drainage improvements. Elm St Broadway N Street 2021-2036 $567,000 In Live Oak: Elm Street from Larkin Road to L Street; Yes C- Maintenance & reconstruct, install curb, gutter, sidewalks, drainage SUT17024 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Elm Street Reconstruction improvements. Elm St Larkin St L Street 2021-2036 $580,000 Road Reconstruction: from Broadway to N Street. Includes: Yes C- Maintenance & curb and gutter, and new sidewalk from California St. to N SUT17021 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Fir St. Street. Fir St Broadway N Street 2021-2036 $486,000 C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Broadway to N St. Includes: curb, Yes SUT17022 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Gum St. gutter, sidewalks, and drainage improvements. Gum St Broadway N Street 2021-2036 $425,000 Widen: Add 2 travel lanes from Kola St. to Nevada St. (N. Yes B- Road & Highway end); Includes: curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drainage SUT17013 Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Highway 99 improvements. (Phase II) Kola St Nevada St. (N end) 2021-2036 $7,956,000 Widen: Add 2 travel lanes from Nevada St. (N. end) to Riviera Yes B- Road & Highway Rd. Includes: curb, gutter, sidewalks, and drainage SUT17014 Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Highway 99 improvements. (Phase IV) Highway 99 Nevada St. Riviera Rd. 2021-2036 $5,661,000 B- Road & Highway Widen: Add 2 travel lanes from Elm St. to Kola St. Includes: Yes SUT17015 Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Highway 99 sidewalks and drainage improvements. (Phase I) Highway 99 Elm St Kola St 2021-2036 $3,213,000 B- Road & Highway Widen: Add 2 travel lanes from Elm St. to Coleman Rd. Yes SUT17016 Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Highway 99 Includes: sidewalks and drainage improvements. (Phase III) Highway 99 Elm Str. Coleman Rd 2021-2036 $6,120,000 Project Widen: Add 2 travel lanes from Coleman Rd. to Paseo Ave. Development B- Road & Highway Includes: curb, gutter, sidewalks, and drainage Completion after SUT18906 Only Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Highway 99 improvements. (Phase V) Highway 99 Coleman Rd Paseo Ave 2036 $734,400 C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Hwy. 99 to Larkin Rd. Includes: Yes SUT17018 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Ivy St. curb, gutter, sidewalks, and drainage improvements. Ivy St Hwy 99 Larkin Rd 2021-2036 $480,000 In Live Oak; Kola Street from State Route 99 to Larkin Road; reconstruct street, install curb, gutters, sidewalks, drainage Yes improvements, new cross walk striping and pedestrian SUT17001 Sutter City of Live Oak A- Bike & Ped Kola Street Sidewalks crossing warning lights. Kola St SR 99 Larkin Rd 2021-2036 $391,100 C- Maintenance & In Live Oak: L Street from Elm St. to Ash Street, reconstruct, Yes SUT18921 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation L Street Reconstruction install curb, gutter, sidewalks, drainage improvements. L Street Elm St Ash St 2021-2036 $1,013,000 In Live Oak: L Street from Pennington Road to Elm Street, Yes C- Maintenance & reconstruct, install curb, gutter, sidewalks, drainage SUT17005 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation L Street Reconstruction improvements. L Street Pennington Rd elm St 2021-2036 $242,300 In Live Oak on Larkin Road from Nevada Street to Riviera Yes C- Maintenance & Road reconstruct road and install drainage, curb and gutter, SUT16984 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Larkin Road sidewalk, and bike lanes. 2021-2036 $9,350,000 In Live Oak on Larkin Road from current City Limit to Paseo Yes C- Maintenance & Ave. reconstruct road and install drainage, curb and gutter, SUT18880 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Larkin Road sidewalk, and bike lanes. Larkin Rd City limit Paseo Ave 2021-2036 $4,510,000 In Live Oak on Larkin Road from current City Limit to Riviera Yes C- Maintenance & Rd.. reconstruct road and install drainage, curb and gutter, SUT18881 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Larkin Road sidewalk, and bike lanes. Larkin Rd City limit Riviera Rd. 2021-2036 $3,040,000 In Live Oak on Larkin Road from Apricot St. to current City Yes C- Maintenance & Limit. reconstruct road and install drainage, curb and gutter, SUT18882 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Larkin Road sidewalk, and bike lanes. Larkin Rd Apricot Street city limit 2021-2036 $2,450,000 In Live Oak on Larkin Road from Road 3 to current City Limit. Yes C- Maintenance & reconstruct road and install drainage, curb and gutter, SUT18879 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Larkin Road sidewalk, and bike lanes. Larkin Rd Road 3 city limit 2021-2036 $1,251,000 In Live Oak on Larkin Road from Archer Ave. to the Elm St./SR Yes C- Maintenance & 99 intersection. reconstruct road and install drainage, curb SUT18922 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Larkin Road and Elm Street and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Larkin Rd Archer Ave Elm St/SR 99 2021-2036 $581,000 In Live Oak, SR 99, from Ash Street to Ramsdell Drive: widen Yes B- Road & Highway Live Oak Collaborative Highway 99 Streetscape from 2 to 4 lanes and build streetscape improvements. (PE SUT18865 Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Improvements Only. Toll Credits for PE.) 2021-2036 $1,899,084 In Live Oak, SR 99, from Paseo Avenue to Riviera Road: widen Yes B- Road & Highway Live Oak Collaborative Highway 99 Streetscape from 2 to 4 lanes and build streetscape improvements. Completion by SUT18872 Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Improvements (PSR only) (PSR_PDS Lite only) 2020 $100,000 Construct New Class I Bikeway along O St. from Pennington Yes SUT18887 Sutter City of Live Oak A- Bike & Ped Live Oak Community Trail Rd. to Kola St. (Phase 3) O St. Pennington Rd Kola St 2021-2036 $520,000 Construct New Class I Bikeway along the abandon Yes Sacramento Northern Railroad right-of-way from Elm St. to Live Oak Pennington Rd/O St SUT18917 Sutter City of Live Oak A- Bike & Ped Live Oak Community Trail the Pennington Rd./O St. Intx. (Phase 2) Community Trail Elm St Intx. 2021-2036 $885,000 Road Reconstruction: from the current existing city boundary Yes C- Maintenance & to Riviera Rd. Includes: drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, SUT16987 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Luther Rd. and bike lanes. Luther Rd City Boundary Riviera Rd. 2021-2036 $5,887,000 Project Construct New Road: 2 lane collector from current City Limit Development B- Road & Highway to Paseo Ave. Includes: drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and Completion after SUT18884 Only Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity N St. bike lanes. N. Street City Limit Paseo Ave 2036 $6,786,000 C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Fir St. to Apricot St. Includes Yes SUT18885 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation N St. drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. N St Fir St Apricot St 2021-2036 $1,418,000 Road Reconstruction: from Kola St. to Epperson Way. Yes C- Maintenance & Includes: curb, gutters, sidewalks, drainage improvements, SUT17017 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation N St. and bike lanes. N St Kola St Epperson Way 2021-2036 $1,256,000
Yes C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Pennington Road to Fir St. SUT18883 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation N St. Includes drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. N St Pennington Rd Fir St 2021-2036 $623,000 C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Hwy. 99 to Larkin Rd. Includes: Yes SUT17019 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Nevada St. curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drainage improvements. Nevada St Hwy 99 Larkin Rd 2021-2036 $600,000
Yes C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Pennington Road to Apricot St. SUT18890 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation P St. Includes drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. P St Pennington Rd Apricot St 2021-2036 $1,870,000
Yes C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Park St. to Pennington Road SUT18889 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation P St. Includes drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. P St Park St Pennington Road 2021-2036 $567,000 Reconstruct roadway from Hwy. 99 to Township Road, realign Yes C- Maintenance & west 0.5 mi. Includes: drainage improvements, curb, gutter, SUT18891 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Paseo Ave. sidewalk, and bike lanes. Paseo Ave Hwy 99 Township Rd 2021-2036 $11,150,000
Yes C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Township Rd. to Luther Rd. SUT16985 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Pennington Rd. Includes: drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Pennington Rd Township Rd Luther Rd 2021-2036 $3,973,000 Road Reconstruction from K St. to Sinnard Ave. Includes: curb Yes C- Maintenance & and gutter, sidewalk, drainage improvements, bike lanes and SUT18892 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Pennington Rd. underground utilities. Pennington Rd K St Sinnard Ave 2021-2036 $1,800,000 Road Reconstruction from Larkin Rd. to K St. Includes: curb Yes C- Maintenance & and gutter, sidewalk, drainage improvements, bike lanes and SUT16992 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Pennington Rd. underground utilities. Pennington Rd Larkin St K St 2021-2036 $1,500,000 Project Widen and Reconstruct: add 2 traffic lanes from Hwy. 99 to N Development B- Road & Highway Street. Includes: center median with turn pockets, drainage Completion after Only SUT17004 Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Pennington Rd. improvements, bike lanes, and underground utilities. Pennington Rd Hwy 99 N Street 2036 $1,500,000
Yes C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction from Connecticut Ave. to Luther Rd. SUT17010 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Pennington Rd. Includes: drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Pennington Rd Connecticut Luther Rd 2021-2036 $1,370,000 C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Sinnard Ave. to Sheldon Ave. Yes SUT16997 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Pennington Rd. Includes: drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Pennington Rd Sinnard Ave Sheldon Ave 2021-2036 $1,079,000 Road Reconstruction from Hwy. 99 to Larkin Rd. Includes: Yes C- Maintenance & curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage improvements, bike lanes SUT17012 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Pennington Rd. and underground utilities. Pennington Rd Hwy 99 Larkin Rd 2021-2036 $1,000,000
Yes C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction from P St. to Connecticut Ave. Includes: SUT17008 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Pennington Rd. drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Pennington Rd P St. Connecticut Ave 2021-2036 $415,000 C- Maintenance & Pennington Rd., from Connecticut Ave. to Broadway: Completion by Yes SUT18858 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Pennington Rd. Complete Streets Rehabilitation reconstruct roadway and restripe existing bicycle lanes. 2020 $1,094,776 In Live Oak: Pennington Road from N Street to P Street, reconstruct adding 2 new traffic lanes and center median Yes B- Road & Highway with turn pockets, drainage improvements, bike lanes and SUT17006 Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Pennington Road Widening Phase 2 undergrounding utilities. Pennington Rd N St. P St. 2021-2036 $243,100 Road Reconstruction: from Township Rd. to Hwy. 99. Yes C- Maintenance & Includes: drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. SUT16990 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Riviera Rd. (Phase II) 2021-2036 $7,332,000 In Live Oak, Riviera Road from SR99 to Larkin Road Yes C- Maintenance & reconstruct road and install drainage, curb and gutter, SUT16983 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Riviera Road sidewalk, and bike lanes. Riviera Road SR 99 Larkin Rd 2021-2036 $4,518,000 Project Construct New Road: 2 lane collector from Richard Ave. to Development B- Road & Highway Linda St. Includes: drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike Completion after SUT18898 Only Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Road 9 lanes. Richard Ave Linda St. 2036 $2,808,000
Yes B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 2 lane collector from SR 99 to Riviera SUT18900 Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Road E Rd. Includes: drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Road E SR 99 Riviera Rd. 2021-2036 $3,822,000
Yes B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 2 lane collector from Luther Rd. to Road SUT18902 Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Sean Drive C. Includes: drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Luther Road Road C 2021-2036 $2,028,000
Yes C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Fir St. to Pennington Rd. Includes: SUT16991 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Sinnard Ave. drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Sinnard Ave Fir St Pennington Road 2021-2036 $542,700 Project In Live Oak, phase-1 Township to Sinnard, construct South Development B- Road & Highway Loop Road, a new 4 lane connector including drainage, curb Completion after SUT16981 Only Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity South Loop Road and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes 2036 $1,581,650
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 88 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars)
Yes C- Maintenance & Road Reconstruction: from Pennington Road to Riviera Road. SUT16989 Sutter City of Live Oak Rehabilitation Township Rd. Includes drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. 2021-2036 $9,436,000 Project In Live Oak, Phase-1 from Paseo Road to Pennington Road Development B- Road & Highway construct Township Road a new 4 lane connector including Completion after SUT16988 Only Sutter City of Live Oak Capacity Township Road drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Paseo Road Pennington Road 2036 $17,083,000 At 14 intersections within the City limits: Upgrade bike lane Completion by Yes SUT18864 Sutter City of Yuba City A- Bike & Ped Bike Lane Striping Upgrades striping. (HSIP5-03-025) 2020 $128,600 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SUT16956 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Bogue Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Harter Pkwy. to Garden Hwy. Bogue Rd Harter Pkwy Garden Hwy 2036 $15,991,800 Project George Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from George Washington Blvd. to Harter Washington Completion after SUT16957 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Bogue Rd. Pkwy. Bogue Road Blvd Harter Pkwy 2036 $140,720 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from Township Rd. to George Washington George Washington Completion after SUT16976 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Bogue Rd. Blvd. Bogue Road Township Road Blvd 2036 $437,390 Bogue Rd., from Railroad Ave. to Garden Highway: rehabilitate roadway, widen shoulders to accommodate new Yes C- Maintenance & bicycle lanes and add bicycle video detection at intersection Completion by SUT18859 Sutter City of Yuba City Rehabilitation Bogue Rd. Complete Streets Rehabilitation of Bogue Rd. and Garden Highway. 2020 $514,100 B- Road & Highway Yes SUT16953 Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Bridge St. Widen: 4 lanes from Western Pkwy. to Walton Ave. Bridge Street Western Pkwy Walton Ave 2021-2036 $14,633,100 B- Road & Highway In Yuba City, Widen Bridge Street from Cooper Street to Gray Yes SUT10250 Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Bridge Street Widening Avenue: widen to 4 lanes. 2021-2036 $9,393,543 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SUT16961 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Butte House Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Township Rd. to Tharp Rd. Butte House Rd Township Rd Tharp Rd 2036 $1,348,640
Yes B- Road & Highway Roadway Operational Improvements: from Richland Rd. to SUT16963 Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Clark Ave. Franklin Ave. add a continuous left-turn lane and bike lanes. 2021-2036 $6,016,405 B- Road & Highway Roadway Operational Improvements: from Hwy. 20 to Yes SUT16969 Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity El Margarita Rd. Franklin Rd. add a continuous left turn lane and bike lanes. El Margarita Rd Hwy 20 Franklin Rd 2021-2036 $2,689,965 5th St/Bridge St crossing over the Feather River/2nd St, Yes B- Road & Highway between Marysville and Yuba City: Replace two-lane bridge Completion by SUT10828 Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Feather River Bridge at 5th St with 4-lane bridge. (HPP# 3631) 2020 $94,391,864 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SUT16977 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Franklin Ave. Widen: 4 lanes from Plumas Blvd. to Garden Hwy. Franklin Ave Plumas Blvd Garden Hwy 2036 $558,443 B- Road & Highway Widen Franklin Avenue from 2 to 4 lanes from Route 99 to Yes SUT10530 Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Franklin Avenue Clark Avenue. 2021-2036 $5,224,500 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SUT16954 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Franklin Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Township Rd. to Hwy. 99. Franklin Rd Township Rd Hwy 99 2036 $2,368,460 Yuba City on Franklin Road, between Harding Road and Walton Avenue: Install a mid-block high visibility crosswalk, Yes fill in sidewalk gaps, add full length Class II Bicycle Lanes, update all pedestrian access ramps, and provide associated Completion by SUT18874 Sutter City of Yuba City A- Bike & Ped Franklin Road Improvements road improvements. 2020 $393,000 Garden Highway, from Lincoln Rd to Winship Rd: Construct Yes class II bike lanes and sidewalks. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: Completion by SUT18837 Sutter City of Yuba City A- Bike & Ped Garden Highway Bicycle Lanes and Sidewalks 0.03 ROG, 0.02 NOx, 0.01 PM10) 2020 $814,101 Bike Lane Facilities: From Franklin Ave. to Second St provide Yes SUT10540 Sutter City of Yuba City A- Bike & Ped Garden Hwy. bicycle facilities. Includes: on-street improvements . 2021-2036 $1,100,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway George Completion after SUT16970 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity George Washington Blvd. Widen: 4 lanes from Hwy. 20 to Bogue Rd. Washington Blvd Hwy 20 Bogue Rd 2036 $17,356,800 B- Road & Highway George Yes SUT16971 Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity George Washington Blvd. Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Pease Rd. to Hwy. 20. Washington Blvd Pease Rd Hwy 20 2021-2036 $13,911,100 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Yuba City, construct 4 lanes, Harter Road between Lassen Completion after SUT10260 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Harter Road Boulevard and Bridge Street. Harter Road Lassen Blvd Bridge St. 2036 $1,644,201 Highway 20 Opportunity Based Implementation Highway 20 corridor in Yuba City.,: identify specific Completion by Yes SUT18871 Sutter City of Yuba City D- Programs & Planning Plan improvements including sidewalks, lighting, and signage. 2020 $100,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SUT16964 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Highway 99 Widen: 6 lanes from Hwy. 20 to Bogue Rd. Highway 99 Hwy 20 Bogue Rd 2036 $31,434,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SUT16955 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Lincoln Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Township Rd. to Garden Hwy. Lincoln Rd Township Rd Garden Hwy 2036 $3,276,290 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after SUT16962 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Pease Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Township Rd. to Hwy. 99 Pease Rd Township Rd Hwy 99 2036 $3,317,690 B- Road & Highway Construct New Interchange: 4 lanes at Pease Rd. / Hwy 99. Yes SUT16974 Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Pease Rd. Includes: overcrossing and connecting ramps at Hwy 99. Pease Rd 2021-2036 $57,880,554 B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from Franklin Ave. to Garden Hwy. Includes: Yes SUT16975 Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Percy Ave. landscaped medians. Percy Ave Franklin Ave Garden Hwy 2021-2036 $6,632,500 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen State Route 20 from 4 to 6 lanes from Stabler Lane to Completion after SUT16960 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity State Route 20 - Stabler Lane to State Route 99 State Route 99 State Route 20 Stabler Lane State Route 99 2036 $874,540 B- Road & Highway Yes SUT16958 Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Sunsweet Blvd. Construct New Road: 2 lanes from Hwy. 99 to Gray Ave. Sunsweet Blvd Hwy 99 Gray Ave 2021-2036 $8,675,500 B- Road & Highway Yes SUT16966 Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Tharp Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Hwy. 20 to Butte House Rd. Tharp Rd Hwy 20 Butte House Rd 2021-2036 $2,351,734 Widen Walton Ave from Lincoln Rd. to Franklin Rd. from 2-3 Yes B- Road & Highway lanes to 5 lanes including upgrades to bike lanes, sidewalks, SUT10241 Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Walton Avenue Widening curbs, gutters, and drainage. Walton Ave Lincoln Rd Franklin Rd 2021-2036 $13,762,794 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Walton Avenue to 4-lanes from Bogue Road to Completion after SUT16965 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Walton Avenue Widening Augusta Lane Walton Avenue Bogue Road Augusta Lane 2036 $9,879,408 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct Western Parkway (4 lanes) from State Route 20 to Completion after SUT10813 Only Sutter City of Yuba City Capacity Western Parkway Butte House Road Western Parkway SR 20 Butte House Rd 2036 $10,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Sutter County, north of Sacramento: along Route 99 between Completion after CAL18590 Only Sutter PCTPA Capacity Route 99, New Interchange Riego Road and Sankey Road, construct new interchange 2036 $1,100,000 Completion by Yes SUT10450 Sutter SACOG D- Programs & Planning Sutter County PPM Plan, program and monitor for Sutter County. 2020 $708,000 Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program, Various locations.: See Yes C- Maintenance & http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hbrr99/HBP_MPO. Completion by SUT18850 Sutter Sutter County Rehabilitation Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program html#SACOG web site for backup list of locations. Various Locations 2020 $685,000 Brittan Elementary School.: Provide six-feet wide sidewalks Yes Brittan Elementary School Pedestrian around the perimeter. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.01 Completion by SUT18869 Sutter Sutter County A- Bike & Ped Improvements ROG) 2020 $527,505 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen Howsley Rd between Pleasant Grove Rd and Natomas Pleasant Grove Completion after SUT18876 Only Sutter Sutter County Capacity Howsley Rd Widening Rd Howsley Rd Rd Natomas Rd 2036 $3,960,000 Kent Road over Sutter Butte Canal, 0.2 Mi South of McDonald Yes C- Maintenance & Ave.: Replace two lane bridge with two lane bridge. (Toll Completion by SUT18875 Sutter Sutter County Rehabilitation Kent Road Bridge at Sutter Butte Canal. credits for ROW & CON.) 2020 $1,220,000 Larkin Rd. over South Birch Sutter-Butte Canal, 0.2 miles Yes C- Maintenance & north of Encinal Rd.: Replace the existing 2-lane bridge with a Completion by SUT18856 Sutter Sutter County Rehabilitation Larkin Rd. Bridge Replacement new 2-lane bridge. Larkin Rd Encinal Rd Encinal Rd 2020 $958,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 2 lanes from Jones Rd. to Walton Rd. Includes: center Completion after SUT10370 Only Sutter Sutter County Capacity Lincoln Rd. lane. Lincoln Rd Jones Rd Walton Ave 2036 $3,000,000 Nicolaus Ave., over Coon Creek, 1 mile west of Pleasant Grove Yes C- Maintenance & Rd.: Replace the existing 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane Completion by SUT18855 Sutter Sutter County Rehabilitation Nicolaus Ave. Bridge Replacement bridge Nicolaus Ave Warren Rd Pleasant Grove Rd 2020 $1,332,000 Pennington Rd, over Sutter-Butte Canal, 0.5 mi E Sheldon Rd. Yes C- Maintenance & Pennington Rd/Sutter-Butte Canal Bridge Replace the existing functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge with a Completion by SUT18854 Sutter Sutter County Rehabilitation Replacement new 2 lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, & CON.) Pennington Rd Sheldon Ave Feather River 2020 $1,832,000
Yes G- System Management, Various locations in Sutter County: Install stripping, pavement Completion by SUT18868 Sutter Sutter County Operations, and ITS Reflective Safety Impovements markers, and raised pavement reflectors. (HSIP6-03-020) 2020 $897,300 B- Road & Highway Yes SUT10340 Sutter Sutter County Capacity Riego Rd Widening Widen Riego Rd to 4 lanes, Route 99 to Placer Co. Riego Rd Route 99 Placer Co 2021-2036 $3,142,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from Pleasant Grove Blvd. to Hwy. 99 / Hwy. Pleasant Grove Completion after SUT10500 Only Sutter Sutter County Capacity Sankey Rd. 70. Sankey Road Rd Hwy 99/Hwy 70 2036 $250,000 Intersection improvements to add turn lanes, address drainage issues and sound attenuation as needed along both Yes G- System Management, sides of State Route 99 at Bogue Rd, Lincoln Rd, Richland Rd Completion by SUT18830 Sutter Sutter County Operations, and ITS SR 99 Intersection Improvements and Franklin Rd. 2020 $3,800,000 Tisdale Rd., over Westside Canal, 100 E Cranmore Rd.: Replace the existing structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with a Yes C- Maintenance & new 2 lane bridge, (Toll Credits programmed for PE, R/W, & Completion by SUT18873 Sutter Sutter County Rehabilitation Tisdal Rd, Over Westside Canal-Sutter County CON.) Bridge 18C-0057 2020 $1,321,000 B- Road & Highway Phase 2 - Construct northbound I-5 to southbound SR 113 Yes CAL15881 Yolo Caltrans D3 Capacity I-5 / 113 Connector Phase 2 freeway to freeway connection. I-5 / SR 113 SR 113 I-5 2021-2036 $113,851,850 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Interchange: NB SR 113 to SB I-5 freeway to Completion after CAL15882 Only Yolo Caltrans D3 Capacity I-5 / SR 113 Interchange freeway connection. Phase 3. I-5 / SR 113 Yol 5 R7.464 2036 $66,000,000 In and near Woodland, on I-5 and SR 113 at various locations - Yes C- Maintenance & Place polyester overlay or methacrylate seal [EFIS ID Completion by CAL20535 Yolo Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation I-5/SR 113 Bridge Deck Rehab 0314000029; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0988] 2020 $3,579,000 In Yolo County, from SR 505 in Madison to Pedrick Road in Woodland - Maintenance asphalt overlay (Yol-16-31.7/40.6) Yes C- Maintenance & [HM1 - Pavement Preservation (Fed-Funded)] (Toll Credits for Completion by CAL20537 Yolo Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Maintenance Overlay near Woodland PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $2,422,500 C- Maintenance & In Davis, on SR 113, at Covell Boulevard - Repair roadway Completion by Yes CAL20546 Yolo Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 113 & Covell Blvd. Roadway Repair embankment failure (PM R2.2) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0999] 2020 $1,255,000 Where ROW permits, construct Class II bike lane on SR 128 Yes from Valley Oak Dr. to E. Main St., Winters (PM 7.755 to Yol 128 PM Completion by CAL20626 Yolo Caltrans D3 A- Bike & Ped SR 128 Class II Bike Lane 9.359) SR 128 7.751 Yol 128 PM 8.128 2020 $2,730,000
Yes G- System Management, Completion by CAL20627 Yolo Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 16 & CR 85B Intersection modification Install intersection controls at SR 16 and County Road 85B SR 16 2020 $2,000,000 C- Maintenance & SR 16 from Colusa Co Line to Cache Creek Indian Casino - Cold Yes CAL20664 Yolo Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 16 CIR with HIMA Overlay in-place recycle with Hot Mix Asphalt Overlay 2021-2036 $23,400,000 Near Capay, SR 16, from 0.3 mile west of County Road 82B to County Road 82B - Shoulder widening and curve correction Yes lanes(PM 23.2/23.5) [EFIS ID 0314000271; CTIPS ID 107-0000- C- Maintenance & 0548] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON); Phase 2 of project is 03- Completion by CAL18743 Yolo Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 16 Safety Improvement Project - Phase 1 0C472 / CAL20528 SR 16 2020 $22,047,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 89 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Near Cadenasso, from 0.4 mile west of County Road 79 to 0.4 mile east of County Road 79; also from Esparto to 0.2 mile west of Route 505 - Shoulder widening, curve correction, left- Yes turn channelization, signalization and two-way left-turn lanes (PM 20.5/31.6 [EFIS ID 0314000272; CTIPS ID 10700000983]; G- System Management, Phase 1 of project is 03-0C471 / CAL18743 (Toll Credits for PE, Completion by CAL20528 Yolo Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 16 Safety Improvement Project - Phase 2 ROW, CON) 2020 $36,160,000 In West Sacramento, on SR 275, at the Tower Bridge (Sacramento River Bridge #22-0021) - Replace existing fender Yes system (PM 13.1) [EFIS ID 0313000137; CTIPS ID 107-0000- C- Maintenance & 0971] [Total Project Cost $8,609,000 in 17/18 FY] (Toll Credits Completion by CAL20510 Yolo Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 275 Tower Bridge Fender Replacement for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $9,924,000 C- Maintenance & SR 45 from Junction 113 in Knights Landing to Colusa Co Line - Yes CAL20663 Yolo Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 45 CIR with HIMA Overlay Cold in-place recycle with Hot Mix Asphalt Overlay 2021-2036 $15,200,000 In West Sacramento on Sac-50 at Sacramento River Viaduct #24-0004R/L - Bridge deck rehab (viaduct and ramps) (PM Yes 2.5/3.2) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0905] [Project to be combined C- Maintenance & US 50 - Sac. River Viaduct and Ramps Bridge with EA 03-0F240/CAL20468 for Design-Build under EA 03- Completion by CAL20469 Yolo Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Rehab 2F21U] (Toll Credits) 2020 $46,837,000 In Yolo County, near West Sacramento on US 50, 0.4 mile west of the westbound I-80 on-ramp onto eastbound SR 50 - Yes Relocate weigh in motion (WIM) stations (PM 0.4/0.6) [EFIS ID G- System Management, 0313000151; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0970] (Toll Credits for PE, Completion by CAL20520 Yolo Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS US 50 Weigh in Motion (WIM) Stations ROW, CON) 2020 $2,542,000 In Yolo and Colusa counties, on Routes 5, 80 and 505, at Yes C- Maintenance & various locations - Rehabilitate bridge decks [CTIPS ID 107- Completion by CAL20504 Yolo Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Yolo Bridge Decks 0000-0956] 2020 $8,211,000 Approx. 8 miles south of West Sacramento, from Solano Co Yes C- Maintenance & Line to 4 miles north of Babel Slough Road - Cold in-place CAL20662 Yolo Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Yolo SR 84 Overlay recycle with Hot Mix Asphalt Overlay 2021-2036 $21,250,000 Implement a bicycle and pedestrian wayfinding system and install permanent and temporary automated bicycle and Yes G- System Management, Bicycle and Pedestrian Wayfinding & Data pedestrian counters at strategic locations throughout the city Completion by YOL19332 Yolo City of Davis Operations, and ITS Collection Program of Davis. 2020 $207,000 Add Turn Lanes: Covell Blvd. / Hwy. 113. Includes: turn lanes Yes G- System Management, for access-egress to Hwy. 113 including the overcrossing YOL17130 Yolo City of Davis Operations, and ITS Covell Blvd. structure. Covell Blvd 2021-2036 $15,000,000 B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from Shasta Dr. to Denali Dr. Includes: bike Yes YOL17180 Yolo City of Davis Capacity Covell Blvd. lanes and a center median. Covell Blvd Shasta Dr. Denali Dr. 2021-2036 $1,600,000 Multiple Schools in the Davis Joint Unified School District: Conduct walk/bike audits; vehicle speed feedback signs; save Yes a gallon scan + notify system; website improvements; parent Completion by YOL19296 Yolo City of Davis A- Bike & Ped Davis School District SRTS incentive program. SRTS3-03-003 2020 $283,800 In Davis, improve entrance to Amtrak Depot and parking lot, provide additional parking, construct bike/ped crossing of the railroad tracks, and improve service by increasing the frequency of bus service to the facility. This improved bus Yes service will require the purchase of an additional one to two heavy-duty buses. (Buses would be purchased with Earmarks E- Transit Capital CA-E2007–BUSP-0060 for $200,640 and CA-2008-BUSP-0060 YOL19210 Yolo City of Davis (Minor) Downtown Multimodal Parking Structure for $217,380) 2021-2036 $15,370,000 Eighth St., from F St. to J St.: rehabilitate roadway. At the railroad crossing, reconstruct the subgrade and install pre- Yes cast concrete sections. Reconfigure the northern half of the J St. intersection to reduce the crossing distance for Completion by YOL19302 Yolo City of Davis A- Bike & Ped Eighth St. RR Xing Bike/Ped Safety pedestrians heading to Holmes Junior High School. 2020 $237,000 Reconstruct the north side of Richards Blvd. interchange to remove the loop on and off ramps and replace with new Yes C- Maintenance & ramp in diamond configuration. Includes traffic signal YOL17140 Yolo City of Davis Rehabilitation I-80/Richards Interchange installation. 2021-2036 $6,600,000 L St. from Fifth St. to Claremont Dr.: rehabilitate street and upgrade bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including a buffered Yes C- Maintenance & bicycle lane between Fifth and Eighth Streets. (Toll Credits for Completion by YOL19330 Yolo City of Davis Rehabilitation L St. Improvements PE) 2020 $1,547,562
Yes G- System Management, YOL17160 Yolo City of Davis Operations, and ITS Lake Blvd. / Covell Blvd. Traffic Signalization: at Lake Blvd/Covell Blvd. 2021-2036 $250,000 On Mace Blvd, from Blue Oak Place to Cowell Blvd, reduce travel lanes from 4 to 2 lanes, rehabilitate pavement, add Yes buffered bike lanes, add two-way buffered cycle-track; At C- Maintenance & Mace and Cowell, improve intersection for bicycles and Completion by YOL19327 Yolo City of Davis Rehabilitation Mace Blvd Road Improvements pedestrians; At Mace and San Marino, Install traffic signal. 2020 $2,159,720 Widen Mace from Alhambra Dr. to Alhambra Dr. (Mace curve) Yes B- Road & Highway from 2 to 4 lanes, provide bike lanes, a landscaped median, YOL17170 Yolo City of Davis Capacity Mace Curve and turn lanes. 2021-2036 $2,300,000 In Davis, operate Safe Routs to School Program through 2018. Work includes continuing outreach, marketing, education, printing maps, supporting school site coordinators, and Yes continuation of "Active4.me" scanning system (captures every trip and can instantly notify a parent that their student arrived on campus). Work also may include improving signage Completion by YOL19337 Yolo City of Davis D- Programs & Planning Safe Routes to School near schools. 2020 $626,461
Streetscape improvements plan for primary retail streets downtown to enhance pedestrian spaces, better Yes accommodate bicycles, and strengthen linkages between parking areas and downtown destinations. The Study and design of Downtown core improvements plan shall include but not be limited to Completion by YOL19357 Yolo City of Davis D- Programs & Planning streetscape improvements directional signage, street trees, street furniture and lighting. 2020 $200,000 Access and circulation plan to improve connectivity and safety for all modes of travel consistent with complete streets. The Yes plan shall include but not be limited to the I-80 / Richards Study and design of Richards Boulevard / Olive interchange, Richards / Olive intersection, and "gateway" Completion by YOL19358 Yolo City of Davis D- Programs & Planning Drive area access and circulation improvements enhancements. 2020 $200,000 Explore the feasibility of access to the Nishi property including motor vehicles, delivery vehicles, transit buses, Yes emergency vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. The study and Study and preliminary design of access prelimnary design shall include but not be limited to access Completion by YOL19359 Yolo City of Davis D- Programs & Planning alternatives for Nishi property to UC Davis to/from the UC Davis campus and West Olive Drive. 2020 $150,000 In Davis, at the eastern entrance to the UC Davis campus, for Yes a two-block segment of Third St. between A St. and B St.: Completion by YOL19301 Yolo City of Davis A- Bike & Ped Third St. Improvements Project Construct streetscape improvements. 2020 $4,756,000 In West Sacramento, throughout the City: 10.3 miles of new Completion by Yes YOL19345 Yolo City of West Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Citywide BIke Lane Gap Closure bike lanes. 2020 $592,000 Construction of Bike Trail from River City High School to City River City High Yes YOL19376 Yolo City of West Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Clarksburg Branch Line Trail and Bridge-Phase2 Limits Clarksburg Trail School City Limits 2021-2036 $1,000,000
Yes G- System Management, Construct cold ironing infrastructure as required by the Port of West Completion by YOL19350 Yolo City of West Sacramento Operations, and ITS Cold Ironing-Port of West Sacramento California Air Resources Board (CARB) Sacramento 2020 $2,000,000 B- Road & Highway Harbor Blvd., West Capitol Ave. to Industrial: widen 4 to 6 West Capitol Yes YOL15130 Yolo City of West Sacramento Capacity Harbor Blvd. Widening lanes. Harbor Blvd. Ave. Industrial Blvd. 2021-2036 $6,000,000 Construct Bike Trail under I Street Bridge and new C Street Sacramento Indian Heritage Yes YOL19377 Yolo City of West Sacramento A- Bike & Ped I Street to Indian Heritage Bike Trail Bridge then continue atop levee to Indian Heritage Center Riverfront Trail I Street Bridge Center 2021-2036 $2,000,000 B- Road & Highway In West Sacramento, I-80 at Enterprise Boulevard: construct Completion by Yes YOL15891 Yolo City of West Sacramento Capacity I-80 Enterprise Boulevard eastbound on-ramp. 2020 $4,800,000 I-80 at Reed Ave. interchange: widen ramps at the intersection with Reed Avenue, widen Reed Avenue, and limit Yes B- Road & Highway some local street access. Add ramp metering to the on- YOL15670 Yolo City of West Sacramento Capacity I-80/Reed Ave. Interchange ramps. Reed Avenue 2021-2036 $12,350,000 In West Sacramento, Industrial Boulevard from the Yes B- Road & Highway Palamidessi Bridge at the Barge Canal to Harbor Boulevard: Palamedessi YOL15160 Yolo City of West Sacramento Capacity Industrial Boulevard Widening widen from 4 to 6 lanes. Industrial Blvd. Bridge Harbor Blvd. 2021-2036 $16,440,000 Widen Lake Washington Blvd. from 2 to 6 lanes from Yes B- Road & Highway Jefferson Blvd. to the new Palamidessi Bridge at the barge Lake Washington Palamedessi YOL15940 Yolo City of West Sacramento Capacity Lake Washington Blvd. canal. Blvd. Bridge Jefferson Blvd. 2021-2036 $4,000,000 B- Road & Highway Lake Washington Blvd.: Widen the Palamidessi Bridge over Lake Washington Palamedessi Yes YOL15950 Yolo City of West Sacramento Capacity Lake Washington Blvd. the barge canal from 4 to 6 lanes. Blvd. Bridge Palamedessi Bridge 2021-2036 $10,100,000 In West Sacramento, South River Rd., 0.42 miles, from the new Pioneer Bluff Bridge across the old barge canal to the Stone Lock facility: Build 2 lane road roadway, sidewalk, bike Yes lane, landscaping, water and storm drain utilities, and will accommodate a future north-south streetcar line that would B- Road & Highway Pioneer Bluff Bridge Phase 2 - Village Parkway extend from Stone Lock north to the Bridge District. (see Completion by YOL19329 Yolo City of West Sacramento Capacity Extension YOL19317 for Phase 1) 2020 $4,900,000
This project includes the construction of a new port entrance, including the installation of a new rail crossing near Beacon and Industrial Boulevards. This project will increase the Yes efficiency and safety of travel to, from and within the Port, and is required prior to the construction of a new area G- System Management, project. This project will improve transportation operations, YOL19361 Yolo City of West Sacramento Operations, and ITS Port of West Sacramento Entrance and is likely to lead to significant positive economic benefits. Port Entrance Industrial Blvd. Beacon Blvd. 2021-2036 $2,400,000 Service Plan: Study rail relocation and reconfiguration through West Sacramento. The intent of the study will be to Yes seek implementing a proposed solution and leveraging public Completion by YOL19288 Yolo City of West Sacramento D- Programs & Planning Rail relocation & reconfiguration study and private funding for implementation. North Terminal 2020 $1,000,000 Dredge remainder of 35 miles of 43 mile ship channel an additional 5' to 35' in depth. This 15% increase in channel depth will allow larger ships and thus will increase allowable Yes ship capacity by 40% (from 25,000 tons to 35,000 tons). Ship G- System Management, Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel channel boundaries are from Collinsville (just above Suisun Deep Water Ship YOL19223 Yolo City of West Sacramento Operations, and ITS Deepening Bay) up to West Sacramento. Channel 2021-2036 $157,464,000 B- Road & Highway Construct internal roadway, utilities and storm drainage Port of West Yes YOL19351 Yolo City of West Sacramento Capacity Seaway Property Infrastructure network for Port Property Development Sacramento 2021-2036 $5,000,000 Reconstruct and widen South River Road to 4-lanes from Yes B- Road & Highway US50 on-ramp to Stonegate Boulevard, including restriping YOL15180 Yolo City of West Sacramento Capacity South River Rd. Widening the 4-lane bridge from 2-lanes to 4-lanes over barge canal. South River Road US-50 Barge Canal 2021-2036 $16,250,000 Rice Ave. to West Capitol Ave., Harbor Blvd. and 3rd St., Jefferson Blvd. to Michigan Rd.,: construct 0.5 miles of a multi- Yes use path, street crossing enhancements, and two bicycle Sycamore Trail/Westacre and Bryte Bicycle routes. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.12 ROG, 0.06 NOx, Completion by YOL19335 Yolo City of West Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Routes 0.03 PM 2.5, 0.03 PM 10) 2020 $905,324 Construction of Bike Trail from Tony Lopes Park to Stone Tony Lopes Completion by Yes YOL19378 Yolo City of West Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Sycamore Trail-Phase 2 Boulevard. Includes Bike/Ped Bridge over US Hwy 50. Sycamore Trail Park Stone Blvd. 2020 $10,000,000 Construction of Bike Trail from Sacramento Avenue to Sacramento Yes YOL19349 Yolo City of West Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Sycamore Trail-Phase 3 Westfield School Sycamore Trail Ave. Westfield School 2021-2036 $5,000,000 Jefferson Blvd interchange--expand the ramps and signals Yes B- Road & Highway from 1 to 2 lanes, add ramp metering and turn lanes, and Jefferson Blvd./US- YOL15900 Yolo City of West Sacramento Capacity U.S. 50/Jefferson Blvd. Interchange related street closures. 50 2021-2036 $26,450,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 90 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars)
Yes G- System Management, U.S. 50: Install ramp meters and modify ramp design at South YOL15680 Yolo City of West Sacramento Operations, and ITS U.S. 50/South River Road River Rd interchange. 2021-2036 $23,625,000 This project includes the design of, procurement of right of way for and construction of Village Parkway from Stonegate Drive to Davis Road. This new street will serve the Northeast and Southeast villages of the Southport area, improve circulation in the eastern portion of the city, and relieve traffic congestion on Jefferson Boulevard. This segment will Yes provide the primary connection to the planned South River Road Bridge across the Barge Canal, thereby connecting the Stone Lock, Pioneer Bluff and redevelopment areas to the growing residential areas to the south. Flood program to B- Road & Highway construct interim improvements from Lake Washington to Stonegate YOL19360 Yolo City of West Sacramento Capacity Village Parkway Southern Extension Gregory. Village Parkway Drive Davis Road 2021-2036 $10,500,000 Multiple Schools in the Washington Unified School District in West Sacramento: Create citywide (Safe Routes to Schools) SRTS Parent Corps by training one parent champion to implement education and encouragement programs at their Yes schools; provide pedestrian and bicycle safety skills training; implement walk- and bike-to-school events, frequent walker/rider miles contests, and distribution of safe routes to Completion by YOL19297 Yolo City of West Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Washington School District Partent Corps SRTS school maps. SRTS3-03-008 Various 2020 $496,000 West Capitol Avenue between 5th St. and Garden St.: Pedestrian improvements and raised "cycle track" (a physically separated bike path within the public right of way), Yes convert the travel way from two-way to one-way, and reconfigure the two intersections at 5th St. and at Garden St., Completion by YOL19348 Yolo City of West Sacramento A- Bike & Ped West Capitol Ave Cycle Track including removing a signalized intersection. 2020 $87,000
In West Sacramento on West Capitol Avenue from Westacre Road to Sycamore Avenue, construction of streetscape Yes improvements, including wider sidewalks, flatter road cross- West Capitol Avenue Streetscape section, reconfigure lanes, roundabout, utility relocation, new YOL19284 Yolo City of West Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Improvements - Phase 3 lighting, and substantial planting and hardscape treatments. West Capitol Ave. Westacre Rd. Sycamore Ave. 2021-2036 $12,420,000
In West Sacramento on West Capitol Avenue from Sycamore Avenue to Harbor Boulevard, construction of streetscape Yes improvements, including wider sidewalks, flatter road cross- West Capitol Avenue Streetscape section, reconfigure lanes, utility relocation, new lighting, and YOL19285 Yolo City of West Sacramento A- Bike & Ped Improvements - Phase 4 substantial planting and hardscape treatments. West Capitol Ave. Sycamore Road Harbor Blvd. 2021-2036 $12,720,000 Feasibility Study for realighment of freright rail out of the cities of Davis, Woodland and West Sacramento to area east Yes City of West Sacramento. City of of Davis to create enhanced freight operations, remove safety Woodland, City of Davis, Yolo issues in cities, to encourage redevelopment of communities Completion by VAR56182 Yolo County D- Programs & Planning Yolo Regional Freight Rail Project and to improved regional flood contrrol Yolo County 2020 $500,000 Railroad Ave. from between Grant Ave. and Niemann St.,: complete environmental review, design, construction of Yes C- Maintenance & street improvements, and street rehabilitation of deficient Completion by YOL19331 Yolo City of Winters Rehabilitation Railroad Ave. Improvements pavement. 2020 $140,000 Railroad Ave, over Dry Slough, 0.37 mi N of CR 33. Replace the Yes C- Maintenance & existing structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane Completion by YOL19291 Yolo City of Winters Rehabilitation Railroad Ave/Dry Slough Bridge Replacement bridge. 2020 $2,020,181
Grant Ave (SR128) and Walnut Lane; Construct a roundabout, which includes demolition of existing curbs, sidewalks, gutters, median island, striping asphalt paving, storm drains, Yes and drainage inlets. These features will be replaced with new curbs, gutters, median islands, pedestrian and bicycle ramps, asphalt paving, concrete paving, signing and striping, sewer G- System Management, services, water services, storm drain lines, drainage inlets, Completion by YOL19336 Yolo City of Winters Operations, and ITS Walnut Lane Roundabout manholes, and landscaping. 2020 $925,156 In Woodland: Safe Routes to School non-infrastructure Completion by Yes YOL19344 Yolo City of Woodland D- Programs & Planning 2014 SRTS planning. (ATP# 0105 Toll Credits for CON) 2020 $539,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 2 lane collector from County Rd. 24A to Yes YOL17390 Yolo City of Woodland Capacity College St. County Rd. 24C County Rd 24A County Road 24C. 2021-2036 $539,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 2 lane collector from County Rd. 24A to Yes YOL17380 Yolo City of Woodland Capacity Coloma Wy. County Rd. 24C. Coloma Wy County Rd. 24A County Road 24C. 2021-2036 $619,851 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after YOL17310 Only Yolo City of Woodland Capacity County Rd. 102 Widen: 4 lanes from Beamer St. to East Main St. County Road 102 Bearner St East Main St 2036 $2,896,851 Project Development B- Road & Highway In Woodland, from Kentucky Ave to Beamer St, on CR102: Completion after YOL17330 Only Yolo City of Woodland Capacity County Rd. 102 widen from 2 to 4 lanes. 2036 $2,896,851 B- Road & Highway Yes YOL17550 Yolo City of Woodland Capacity County Rd. 102 Widen: 4 lanes from Gibson Rd. to Heritage Pkwy. County Road 102 Gibson Rd Heritage Pkwy 2021-2036 $4,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 2 lanes from Pioneer Ave. to County Rd. Completion after YOL19287 Only Yolo City of Woodland Capacity County Rd. 25A 102 County Road 25A Pioneer Ave Country Rd 2036 $4,500,000 In Woodland on Main St., between Third St. and Sixth St.: Construct streetscape improvements, including improved Yes sidewalks, landscaping, trees, bulb-outs, A.D.A. ramps, a pedestrian actuated signal, etc. Also construct frontage Completion by YOL19281 Yolo City of Woodland A- Bike & Ped Downtown Streetscape (Main St.) improvements at Freeman Park. (Toll Credits for CON) 2020 $1,065,000 In the City of Woodland along East Main Street, from East Street to east of Pioneer Avenue. Construct sidewaks, 10-foot off-street bike path and associated landscape and irrigation, class II bike lanes and bus turnouts. Project will also Yes construct safety improvements to include medians, updated freeway and local street signage and lane striping changes to improve traffic flow near the freeway entrances/exits. (Toll Completion by YOL19305 Yolo City of Woodland A- Bike & Ped East Main St. Improvements credits for PE and CON) 2020 $2,880,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from County Rd. 24A to 1320' south of Gibson 1320' south of Gibson Completion after YOL17560 Only Yolo City of Woodland Capacity East St. Rd. East St. County Rd 24A Rd 2036 $1,900,000 B- Road & Highway Farmer's Central Road - Harry Lorenzo to In Woodland, Farmer's Central Road, from Harry Lorenzo Ave Completion by Yes YOL19321 Yolo City of Woodland Capacity Pioneer to Pioneer Avenue: Construct new 2-lane road. 2020 $1,600,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 2 lane arterial from East St. to College Heritage Parkway Completion after YOL17350 Only Yolo City of Woodland Capacity Heritage Parkway Dr. St. Dr. East St. College St. 2036 $3,359,151 C- Maintenance & Interchange Reconstruction: on I-5 at County Rd. 102 Yes YOL19286 Yolo City of Woodland Rehabilitation I-5 / CR 102 Interchange (Phase 2) including overcrossing of I-5. 2021-2036 $7,000,000 In Woodland, within the limits of the I5/CR102 Interchange project: Construct landscaping and irrigation associated with Yes B- Road & Highway the I-5 / CR 102 Interchange Project (SACOG ID# YOL17300) Completion by YOL19290 Yolo City of Woodland Capacity I-5 / CR 102 Interchange Landscaping (Toll Credits for CON.) 2020 $1,151,989 B- Road & Highway Yes YOL17290 Yolo City of Woodland Capacity Kentucky Ave. Widen: 4 lanes from College St. to West St. Kentucky Ave College Street West St. 2021-2036 $3,537,189 Widen Kentucky Avenue from 2 to 4 lanes from East Street to College St. Also Kentucky Ave., from East St. to West St.: reconstruct roadway as a complete street. Project includes a major redesign of the street with new bicycle lanes, new Yes landscape-separated sidewalks, drainage improvements, a landscaped median, a new traffic signal at College St., and modifications to signals at West St. and at East St. (Toll B- Road & Highway Credits for PE & CON. $600k local for CON is non- Completion by YOL17400 Yolo City of Woodland Capacity Kentucky Avenue Widening & Complete Streets participating) 2020 $14,500,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Kentucky Avenue Widening College to West Widen Kentucky Avenue from College Street to West Street Completion after YOL19307 Only Yolo City of Woodland Capacity Streets from 2 lanes to 4 lanes. 2036 $3,300,000
Yes G- System Management, Roadway Operational Improvements: from Ashley Ave. to YOL17420 Yolo City of Woodland Operations, and ITS Main St. Cottonwood St., construct south side improvements 2021-2036 $360,000 Completion by Yes YOL19292 Yolo City of Woodland D- Programs & Planning Main St. / Cleveland St. Signal Ugrade Main St./Cleveland St.: Upgrade traffic signals HSIP4-03-009 2020 $280,222 B- Road & Highway In Woodland, Marston Avenue, from Parkland Ave to Harry Completion by Yes YOL19320 Yolo City of Woodland Capacity Marston Avenue - Parkland to Harry Lorenzo Lorenzo Ave: Construct new 2-lane roadway. 2020 $500,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 2 lane arterial from Pioneer Ave. to East Yes YOL17360 Yolo City of Woodland Capacity Parkland Ave. St. Parkland Ave Pioneer Ave East St 2021-2036 $9,044,751 B- Road & Highway In Woodland, from Heritage Parkway to Marston, extend Completion by Yes YOL19295 Yolo City of Woodland Capacity Parkland Avenue Extension Parkland Avenue. 2020 $1,300,000 B- Road & Highway In Woodland, Parkland Drive, from Pioneer Avenue to Harry Completion by Yes YOL19326 Yolo City of Woodland Capacity Parkland Drive - Pioneer to Harry Lorenzo Lorenzo Ave: construct new 4-lane roadway. 2020 $2,300,000 B- Road & Highway Pioneer Avenue - Widen Patriot to Farmer's In Woodland, Pioneer Avenue, from Patriot Way to Farmers Completion by Yes YOL19322 Yolo City of Woodland Capacity Central Central Road: Widen 2 to 4 lanes. 2020 $2,300,000 Project Class 1 bike/low speed electric vehicle path between Davis Development City of Woodland, City of Davis, Alternative Transportation Corridor- Davis to and Woodland, along alignment identified in September 2009 Completion after VAR56140 Only Yolo Yolo County A- Bike & Ped Woodland feasibility study. 2036 $10,000,000 Use FFY 2011 & 2012 JARC funding to continue weekday, weekend and holiday service on the routes 35, 40, 41, 240, Yes 241 and 340, with a focus on the early morning and late Completion by VAR56111 Yolo SACOG F- Transit O&M (Bus) YCTD JARC Operating Assistance evening services. 2020 $380,000 Completion by Yes YOL17010 Yolo SACOG D- Programs & Planning Yolo County PPM Plan, program and monitor for Yolo County. 2020 $1,497,000
On UC Davis Campus, La Rue Ave. (formerly California St.) Yes C- Maintenance & over Putah Creek: Replace functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge Completion by YOL19293 Yolo UC Davis Rehabilitation La Rue Ave. Bridge Replacement with 2 lane bridge including bike lanes and pedestrian access. 2020 $6,443,617
Implement bicycle and pedestrian capacity improvements at Yes the intersection of La Rue and Orchard Park Dr. Construct UC Davis West Entry Bicycle and Pedestrian intersection modifications at La Rue and Orchard Road, which Completion by UCD10001 Yolo UC Davis A- Bike & Ped Improvements includes a dedicated bicycle and pedestrian signal phase. 2020 $301,000 Purchase and installation of 16 video monitoring systems (6 Yes E- Transit Capital new and 10 replacement) for 16 buses. (Uses Toll Credits for Completion by UCP10002 Yolo UCP of Greater Sacramento (Minor) Video Monitoring Systems Purchase local match). 2020 $39,888 Operating assistance for transit services within the City of Completion by Yes UNI10466 Yolo Unitrans F- Transit O&M (Bus) Operating Assistance Davis. Davis Urbanized Area. FFY 2015 to FFY 2018 2020 $19,125,000 For Davis Community Transit, replace up to four paratransit vehicles plus related equipment (radios, fareboxes, etc). For Unitrans, purchase up to six standard 40-foot buses and two Yes double-deck buses between FY 2015 and FY 2018 to replace existing CNG fueled buses when they have surpassed their E- Transit Capital useful lives plus related equipment (radios, fare boxes, Completion by UNI10469 Yolo Unitrans (Vehicles) Rolling Stock Replacement security equipment, etc). 2020 $6,040,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 91 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Major overhaul to the MU terminal to provide operational and passenger amenity improvements, in particular to accommodate a higher volume of 40-foot buses as are Yes operated now (compared to smaller buses being operated when the terminal was first used in the 1970s). Project will E- Transit Capital UC Davis Memorial Union Terminal also provide for improved regional connections with YoloBus Completion by UNI10464 Yolo Unitrans (Minor) Improvement and FAST routes which serve the terminal. 2020 $3,017,664 Unitrans bus stop improvements, accessibility, and passenger amenities, including real-time information. Implement real- Yes time Automatic Vehicle Location, Automatic Passenger E- Transit Capital Unitrans Bus Stop Access and Passenger Counter, Computer Aided Dispatching and other related ITS Completion by UNI10465 Yolo Unitrans (Minor) Amenties elements. 2020 $400,000 E- Transit Capital Replace operating equipment in the maintenance facility that Completion by Yes UNI10471 Yolo Unitrans (Minor) Unitrans Maintenance Facility Improvements has surpassed its useful life. 2020 $2,000,000 Office, shop, operating equipment, facility, security Yes E- Transit Capital Unitrans Miscellaneous Capital Improvements enhancements, and non-revenue vehicles for existing Completion by UNI10467 Yolo Unitrans (Minor) for Ops facilities. 2020 $400,000 Replace two (Medium) Buses that can carry up to 14 Yes E- Transit Capital Yolo Adult Day Health Care 5310 Bus Purchase passengers, including a driver and two wheelchair positions. Completion by VAR56122 Yolo Yolo Adult Day Health Center (Vehicles) (2) (Toll Credits for CON) 2020 $134,000 In Yolo County, Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program, Various locations. See Yes C- Maintenance & http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hbrr99/HBP_MPO. Completion by YOL19298 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program html#SACOG web site for backup list of locations. 2020 $1,982,400 C- Maintenance & Bridge Rehabilitation on County Road 19 over Yes YOL19352 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation Slough S3 Rehabilitate or replace functionally obsolete Bridge 2021-2036 $400,000 C- Maintenance & Bridge Rehabilitation on County Road 85 over Yes YOL19353 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation Goodnow Slough Rehabilitate or replace functionally obsolete Bridge 2021-2036 $400,000 C- Maintenance & Bridge Replacement on County Road 25 over Yes YOL19374 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation Cottonwood Slough Replacement of structurally deficient Bridge 2021-2036 $815,000 C- Maintenance & Bridge Replacement on County Road 96 over Yes YOL19354 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation Dry Slough Replacement of functionally obsolete Bridge 2021-2036 $700,000 C- Maintenance & Bridge Replacement on County Road 96 over Yes YOL19375 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation Union Slough Replacement of structurally deficient Bridge 2021-2036 $950,000 C- Maintenance & Bridge Replacement on County Road49 over Yes YOL19355 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation Hamilton Creek Replacement of functionally obsolete Bridge 2021-2036 $400,000 Roadway Safety Improvements: from 1400 feet south of Yes G- System Management, County Rd. 29 to the Solano County line. Includes: paved south of Completion by YOL19248 Yolo Yolo County Operations, and ITS County Rd. 98-Phase 2 shoulders, clear recovery zone, and bike lanes. County Rd 98 County Rd 29 Solano Caounty Line 2020 $15,600,000 C- Maintenance & Pavement Rehabilitation: from County Rd. 27 to County Road Completion by Yes YOL19249 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation County Rd. 99 25A. Includes: bike lanes. County Rd 99 County Rd 27 County Rd 25A 2020 $2,000,000 Widen County Road 102 between Davis and Woodland. Yes G- System Management, Project may be implemented in phases as funding allows. YOL19371 Yolo Yolo County Operations, and ITS County Road 102 Widening Turn pockets and center medians are highest priority. County Road 102 Davis Woodland 2021-2036 $12,600,000 Roadway Safety Improvements: from County Road 89 to Yes C- Maintenance & County Road 102. Includes: pavement rehabilitation, paved County Road YOL19370 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation County Road 27 shoulders & clear recovery zone. County Road 89 89 County Road 102 2021-2036 $38,000,000 CR 12, over Zamora Creek, 0.69 miles east of CR 92: Replace 2 Yes C- Maintenance & lane structurally deficient, scour critical bridge with a new 2 Completion by YOL19289 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation CR 12 Bridge Replacement lane bridge. (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, & CON) 2020 $1,693,000 CR 27, from CR 98 to CR 99, reconstruct and rehabilitate Yes C- Maintenance & pavement, and add wider paved shoulders for bicycles, Completion by YOL19334 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation CR 27 Complete Streets Road Reconstruction consistent with the rural character of the road. 2020 $916,638 CR 29 Over Dry Slough, 0.77 mi west of CR 98: Replace 2-lane Yes C- Maintenance & bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, Completion by YOL19318 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation CR 29 Bridge Replacement CON.) 2020 $3,033,791
Yes G- System Management, County Road 31/County Road 95: Install left-turn lanes. Completion by YOL19315 Yolo Yolo County Operations, and ITS CR 31/CR 95 Turn Lanes (HSIP5-03-024) 2020 $1,000,000 CR 41, over Cache Creek, 500' east of SR 16: Rehabilitate or Yes C- Maintenance & replace existing structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with new 2 Completion by YOL18235 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation CR 41 Bridge Rehabilitation or Replacement lane bridge: (Toll credits for PE, ROW, & CON.) 2020 $5,694,000 CR 86A, over Cottonwood Slough, 0.22 miles north of CR #25: Yes C- Maintenance & Replace existing functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge with new Completion by YOL18233 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation CR 86A Bridge Replacement 2 lane bridge. (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, & CON) 2020 $2,137,000 CR 95 over Dry Slough, 0.06 mi north of CR 31: Replace 2-lane Yes C- Maintenance & bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, Completion by YOL19319 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation CR 95 Bridge Replacement CON.) 2020 $1,704,987 CR 96 over Dry Slough, 0.45 Mi North of CR 31: Replace two Yes C- Maintenance & lane bridge with two lane bridge. (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, & Completion by YOL19347 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation CR 96 Bridge at Dry Slough CON.) 2020 $2,474,344 County Road 96 over Union School Slough, 1.38 Mi South of Yes C- Maintenance & CR 27: Replace two lane bridge with two lane bridge. (Toll Completion by YOL19346 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation CR 96 Bridge at Union School Slough Credits for PE, ROW, & CON) 2020 $1,741,779 County Road (CR) 98, from 1300 feet south of CR 29 to the Solano County line. Rehabilitate, widen shoulders, add multi- Yes use paths and bicycle lanes, and install roundabouts at CR31, Completion by YOL19333 Yolo Yolo County A- Bike & Ped CR 98 Bike and Safety Improvement - Phase 2 Russell Blvd., and Hutchison Dr. 2020 $15,600,000
County Road 99W, over Buckeye Creek, 0.48 miles southeast Yes C- Maintenance & of CR 1: Replace the 2 lane structurally deficient structure Completion by YOL18236 Yolo Yolo County Rehabilitation CR 99W Bridge Replacement with a new 2 lane structure. (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, & CON) 2020 $2,751,500 Yolo County Transportation E- Transit Capital Engineering, Environmental, and Construction of the City of Completion by Yes YCT18252 Yolo District (Major) Capitol Corridor Multimodal Facility in Davis Davis-Amtrak Multimodal station 2020 $25,000,000 Yolo County Transportation E- Transit Capital Engineering, Environmental and Construction of a new Completion by Yes YCT18253 Yolo District (Minor) New Satellite Facility satellite facility for bus parking, maintenance and dispatch. 2020 $10,000,000 ADA Operations for transit services within the YCT District as well as service to / from Sacramento. Sacramento Urbanized Yes F- Transit O&M Area and Woodland Urbanized Area. FFY 2015 : $220,000 FFY Completion by YCT18239 Yolo Yolobus/YCTD (Demand Response) ADA Operating Assistance (FTA 5307) 2016 : $220,000 2020 $8,115,816 Operating assistance to provide transit services for medical Yes F- Transit O&M Beyond ADA Paratransit Service (New Freedom appointments only, for Yolo County residents. This service Completion by YCT18243 Yolo Yolobus/YCTD (Demand Response) Large Urban/MAP 21 5310) will be Monday through Friday, 4 hours a day. 2020 $1,096,986 F- Transit O&M Beyond ADA paratransit service (New Freedoms Expansion of paratransit service for medical appointments Completion by Yes YCT18241 Yolo Yolobus/YCTD (Demand Response) Small Urban/ MAP 21 5310) beyond the three-fourths of a mile required by ADA. 2020 $976,794 Operating assistance for continuation of service on routes 45, Yes 210, 211, 212, 214, 215, 216, 217, 242, and 243. FFY 2014: Completion by YCT18251 Yolo Yolobus/YCTD F- Transit O&M (Bus) Operating Assistance (FTA Small Urban 5307) $472,830 FFY 2015: $496,472 FFY 2016: $521,295 2020 $2,981,194
Operating Assistance for continuation of service on routes 35, 40, 41, 240, 241, and 340. This service provides low income Yes individuals with alternative transportation options between Operating Assistance (JARC Large Urban/ MAP their homes and employment related activities. Includes Completion by YCT18250 Yolo Yolobus/YCTD F- Transit O&M (Bus) 21 5307) operating assistance for FY11-12, FY12-13, FY13-14 & FY14-15 2020 $6,850,033 Operating Assistance for continuation service on Route 215. This service provides low income and rural individuals transit Yes service to and from employment related activities. Includes Operation Assistance (RURAL JARC/ MAP-21 operating assistance for FY 11-12, FY 12-13, FY 13-14 FY 14- Completion by YCT18187 Yolo Yolobus/YCTD F- Transit O&M (Bus) 5311) 15. 2020 $7,424,782 Preventive Maintenance for transit services within the YCT District as well as service to / from Sacramento. Sacramento Yes Urbanized Area and Woodland Urbanized Area. FFY 2015 : Completion by YCT18238 Yolo Yolobus/YCTD F- Transit O&M (Bus) Preventive Maintenance (5307) $1,109,780 FFY 2016 : $1,109,780 2020 $14,503,250 Operating Assistance for continuation of service on Route 42. This service provides transit service to low income individuals who work non-traditional schedules, including evenings, Yes weekends, and holidays. This amount includes $150,000 of Route 42 Operating Assistance (Small Urban JARC funds transferred to the 5307 account. This also Completion by YCT18186 Yolo Yolobus/YCTD F- Transit O&M (Bus) JARC MAP 21 5307) includes new 5307 Small Urban (Davis UZA) funds. 2020 $2,249,699 Operating assistance for rural transit services within the YCT Yes District. Outside the Sacramento Urbanized Area and the Completion by YCT18240 Yolo Yolobus/YCTD F- Transit O&M (Bus) Rural Operating Assistance (FTA 5311) Woodland Urbanized Area. FFY 2014: $110,000 2020 $7,241,405
Purchase nine (9) replacement 40-foot Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) transit buses including automatic vehicle location [AVL] equipment, fare collection equipment and security Yes camera equipment; Rehabilitate and re-tank eight (8) fully equipped CNG transit buses. The buses have 36 – 42 seats, E- Transit Capital be completely ADA accessible and have two (2) wheelchair tie Completion by YCT18244 Yolo Yolobus/YCTD (Vehicles) Yolobus Fixed Route Bus Replacement down positions. (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 8.58 NOx) 2020 $7,169,000 Repair, replace shop equipment, and perform maintenance Yes E- Transit Capital Yolobus Maintenance Facility Improvements & for Yolobus maintenance shop. (FTA 5309(c) funds are State Completion by YCT18165 Yolo Yolobus/YCTD (Minor) Equipment of Good Repair funding) 2020 $650,000 Replace seven Paratransit vehicles fully equipped with radios, Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) Systems and fareboxes. Yes E- Transit Capital (Emission Benefits in kg/day: 0.36 NOx)(FTA 5339 is MAP-21 Completion by YCT18245 Yolo Yolobus/YCTD (Vehicles) Yolobus Paratransit Vehicle Replacement from FFY 2013.) 2020 $1,118,312 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after CAL18824 Only Yuba Caltrans D3 Capacity Feather River Expressway Passing Lanes: Marysville to Butte County line. 2036 $74,400,000 Near Marysville on Yub-20, from 0.1 mile east of Loma Rica Road to 0.2 mile west of Spring Valley Road - Rehabilitate Yes roadway and widen shoulders (PM 8.0/10.2) [EFIS ID C- Maintenance & Loma Rica Rd./Spring Valley Rd. Rehab and 0300020594; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0972] (Toll Credits for PE, Completion by CAL20523 Yuba Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Widening ROW, CON) 2020 $10,979,000 On SR 20 in Marysville, from I Street to F Street; also on SR 70, from 4th Street to 5th Street - Install left-turn pockets and Yes G- System Management, modify signals [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0627; EFIS ID 0300000273) Completion by CAL18782 Yuba Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Marysville Operational Improvements (Toll Credits) 2020 $6,667,000 In Marysville on SR 70 from First St. undercrossing to east of Binney Junction and on SR 20 from Feather River Bridge #18-9 Yes to 0.1 mile east of Levee Rd. - Roadway rehab (Yub-70 PM C- Maintenance & 14.1/15.4 and Yub-20 PM 0.5/3.5) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0841; Completion by CAL20441 Yuba Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation Marysville Roadway Rehab EFIS ID 0300020139] 2020 $44,881,000
Yes G- System Management, Underpass Improvements: widen the UPRR Underpass. Phase CAL20585 Yuba Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Marysville UPRR Underpass I and Phase II 2021-2036 $10,000,000 In and near Marysville, on SR 20 from Sutter County Line to Levee Road; also on SR 70 from E Street Bridge to 24th Street Yes (Yub-20-0.0/3.4; Yub-70-13.2/15.4) - Upgrade pedestrian infrastructure [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0982] (Toll Credits for PE, Completion by CAL20526 Yuba Caltrans D3 A- Bike & Ped SR 20 & SR 70 ADA Infrastructure Upgrade ROW, CON) 2020 $7,047,000 On SR 20 in Marysville between 17th Street and 22nd Street, Yes G- System Management, extend acceleration lanes; construct median refuge (PM Completion by CAL20629 Yuba Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 20 Acceleration Lane R2.610/R2.940) SR 20 17 Street 22nd St. 2020 $1,000,000 Near Marysville, on SR 20, from Marysville Road to 0.3 mile east of Lower Smartville Road - Rehabilitate pavement (PM Yes C- Maintenance & 13.3/20.5) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0903; EFIS ID 0312000028] Completion by CAL20473 Yuba Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 20 Lower Smartville Road Pavement Rehab (Toll Credits) 2020 $8,138,000 C- Maintenance & Yes CAL20431 Yuba Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 20 Passing Lanes Passing Lanes: Loma Rica Rd. to Kibbe Rd. (PM 7.9/9.4) SR 20 Kibbe Rd. Loma Rica Rd. 2021-2036 $2,500,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 92 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars)
Roadway Safety Improvements: Parks Bar Rd. to Hammonton- Yes C- Maintenance & Smartville Rd. Includes: standard shoulders, vertical and Hammonton- CAL20432 Yuba Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 20 Safety Improvements horizontal curve improvements, and EB & WB left-turn lanes. SR 20 Smartville Rd. Parks Bar Rd. 2021-2036 $6,500,000 Roadway Safety Improvements: Marysville Rd. to Sicard St. Includes: standard shoulders, vertical and horizontal curve Yes C- Maintenance & improvements, and EB & WB left-turn lanes. (PM CAL20437 Yuba Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 20 Safety Improvements 13.27/19.98) SR 20 Sicard St. Marysville Rd. 2021-2036 $5,500,000 In Yuba County on SR 20 near Smartsville, from east of the Yuba River Bridge to 0.1 mile east of Smartsville Road - Yes Realign and widen roadway (PM 18.2/20.2) [EFIS ID G- System Management, 0313000020; CTIPS ID 107-0000-0973] (Toll Credits for PE, CAL20514 Yuba Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 20 Shoulder Widening ROW, CON) 2021-2036 $47,672,000
In Yuba County near Lakewood, on SR 20, from 0.4 mile east of McGanney Lane to Yuba/Nevada county line and Nevada Yes county from Yuba/Nevada county line to Mooney Flat Rd. - G- System Management, Shoulder widening and curve improvements (PM 20.1/21.6) Completion by CAL20475 Yuba Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 20 Smartsville Safety Enhancements (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0912] 2020 $24,489,000 On SR 65 near Wheatland, from Placer County line at Bear River Bridge to 0.3 mile north of South Beale Road - Pavement Yes C- Maintenance & rehabilitation (PM 0.0/4.8) [EFIS ID 0314000016; CTIPS ID 107- Completion by CAL20532 Yuba Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 65 Pavement Rehab Near Wheatland 0000-0989] (Toll credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $6,768,000 Near Wheatland, SR 65, at Dry Creek Bridge #16-0002 - Bridge Yes C- Maintenance & scour mitigation (PM 2.2) [CTIPS ID 107-0000-0806; EFIS ID Completion by CAL20408 Yuba Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 65 Scour Structure Rehab 0300000076] (Toll Credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $1,588,000
Yes G- System Management, Butte County CAL18815 Yuba Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS SR 70 Passing Lanes Passing Lanes: Marysville to Butte County line. SR 70 Line Marysville 2021-2036 $30,000,000 Near Marysville, on SR-70, at Simmerly Slough Bridge #16- Yes C- Maintenance & 0019 - Replace bridge (scour) (PM 15.5/16.4) [CTIPS ID 107- Completion by CAL20472 Yuba Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR 70 Simmerly Slough Bridge Replacement 00000909; EFIS ID 0312000068] (Toll Credits) 2020 $24,014,000 Yuba County, SR 49 at 10.0 miles west of the Town of Downieville - Remove unsuitable material, reconstruct cut Yes bank and embankment, modify storm water elements and C- Maintenance & place erosion control (PM 5.9/6.4) [SHOPP Minor A Program Completion by CAL20539 Yuba Caltrans D3 Rehabilitation SR-49 Repair Cut Slope/Embankment 201.150] (Toll credits for CON) 2020 $1,510,000
Yes G- System Management, Near Marysville, from Marysville Road to Yuba River (Parks CAL20660 Yuba Caltrans D3 Operations, and ITS Yuba SR 20 Shoulder Widening Bar) bridge. Rehabilitate Roadway. 2021-2036 $42,600,000 In the County of Yuba, at the intersection of Ellis Road and Yes G- System Management, UPRR tracks:Eliminate hazards at railroad grade crossing. (RR Completion by CAL20524 Yuba Caltrans Div. of Rail Operations, and ITS Ellis Rd/ UPRR Safety Xing #834954B) 2020 $905,175 Operating Assistance for marketing of the CalVans Voucher Program in Yuba County to those not aware of the Yes transportation options provided by the CalVans. The CalVans Rural Yuba County JARC Vanpool vouchers provide a 50% reduction in the actual cost for the Completion by CAL20485 Yuba CalVans F- Transit O&M (Shuttle) Subsidy (Operating) rider. (Toll credits for CON) 2020 $25,000 City of Marysville.,: Develop an updated master plan for Completion by Yes YUB16037 Yuba City of Marysville D- Programs & Planning Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan bicycle and pedestrian access routes. 2020 $88,500 City of Marysville.: Complete community planning, urban Completion by Yes YUB16038 Yuba City of Marysville D- Programs & Planning Marysville Bounce Back Initiative design and economic optimization study. 2020 $100,000 Pavement Rehabilitation: 25th St. from Sampson to Covillaud, Sicard St. from East 16th St. to East 19th St., Freeman St. from Yes C- Maintenance & East 18th St. to East 19th St. and East 19th St. from Covillaud YUB15981 Yuba City of Marysville Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab. to Ramirez. (Project IV) 2021-2036 $700,000 Pavement Rehabilitation: Rideout Wy. from Covillaud to Yes C- Maintenance & Ramirez St., Greeley from East 19th St. to East 22nd St. and YUB15982 Yuba City of Marysville Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab. Boulton from East 19th St. to East 22nd St. (Project V) 2021-2036 $700,000 In the City of Marysville, around three schools: Improve infrastructure an non-infrastructure. Infrastructure includes new striping, signage, and raised crosswalks. The non- Yes infrastructure portion of the project is to be completed in conjunction with the school district to create programs to promote walking and biking to school safely. (Toll Credits for Completion by YUB16043 Yuba City of Marysville A- Bike & Ped SRTS Projects and Programs PE & CON. ATP# 0109) 2020 $489,000
Yes G- System Management, Traffic Signalization: Upgrade the 4 existing traffic signals (in YUB15979 Yuba City of Marysville Operations, and ITS Upgrade Signals Marysville) that are not on the State Hwy. System. 2021-2036 $1,200,000 C- Maintenance & Completion by Yes YUB16053 Yuba City of Wheatland Rehabilitation C Street Resurfacing Repair base failures, resurface and replace ped ramps. C Street Main St Northern terminus 2020 $202,000
Update the City's community and residential design standards Yes to provide developers desired community features, amenities, Community and Residential Design Standards landscaping, infrastructure, and transportation facilities, and Completion by YUB16039 Yuba City of Wheatland D- Programs & Planning and Housing Element Update would update the City’s housing element. 2020 $100,000 B- Road & Highway Yes YUB16052 Yuba City of Wheatland Capacity Olive Street Extension Obtain right of way and construct arterial roadway. 2021-2036 $2,400,000 Purchase pavement management software, perform condition assessments of all roads, input data, prepare Yes descision tree, prepare budget scenarios, hold public Completion by YUB16045 Yuba City of Wheatland D- Programs & Planning Pavement Management System outreach workshops and present results to City Council. 2020 $28,000 Construct ADA compliant sidewalks, detectable warning Yes Pedestrian Safety Enhancements at Railroad surfaces and extend rail crossings, and modify railroad YUB16051 Yuba City of Wheatland A- Bike & Ped Grade Crossings warning devices. 2021-2036 $980,000 E St. between Wheatland Rd. and Third St.; Hooper Rd. between Wheatland Rd. and Olive St.; SR 65 between Hooper Yes Rd. and McDevitt Dr.; SR 65 from Evergreen Dr. to 210' south of Evergreen Dr.: Construct sidewalks, curb and gutter, and Completion by YUB16024 Yuba City of Wheatland A- Bike & Ped Various Sidewalks (SRTS) curb ramps; install crosswalks. (SRTS3-03-009) 2020 $304,600 Project Construct New Road: 2 lane expressway from the future Development B- Road & Highway north end of Hwy. 65 Lincoln Bypass to the existing Hwy. 65, Completion after CAL18280 Only Yuba City of Wheatland Capacity Wheatland Pkwy. near South Beale Rd. Includes: access control. 2036 $15,000,000 Wheatland Rd. between "G" St. and Wheatland Park Dr.: Yes Construct bike path; upgrade pedestrian path, curb ramps Completion by YUB16025 Yuba City of Wheatland A- Bike & Ped Wheatland Rd. Bike/Ped Improvements (SRTS) and driveway approaches. SRTS3-03-010 2020 $341,200 C- Maintenance & Completion by Yes YUB16046 Yuba City of Wheatland Rehabilitation Wheatland Rd. Rehab Pavement rehab and ADA pedestian compliance. Wheatland Road G Street Wheatland Park Dr. 2020 $400,000 Completion by Yes YUB15630 Yuba SACOG D- Programs & Planning Yuba County PPM Plan, program and monitor for Yuba County. 2020 $553,000 Alleghany Rd., over Oregon Creek, 0.1 miles east of SR 49: Replace the existing 1 lane historic bridge with a new 2 lane Yes C- Maintenance & bridge while preserving the existing structure. (Toll Credits for Completion by YUB15993 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Alleghany Rd Bridge Replacement R/W & CON) 2020 $2,867,001 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen from 2 to 3 lane collector from Feather River Blvd. to Feather River Completion after YUB15903 Only Yuba Yuba County Capacity Anderson Rd. Links Pkwy. Anderson Rd Blvd Links Pkwy 2036 $230,000 B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from McGowan Pkwy. to Erle Rd. Includes: McGowan Yes YUB15883 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Arboga Rd. curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping. Arboga Rd. Pkwy Erle Rd 2021-2036 $3,250,000 New modified 4-lane arterial from Broadway Rd to Ella Ave, Yes B- Road & Highway including pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk and back of curb YUB15880 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Arboga Road landscaping Arboga Rd. Broadway Rd Ella Ave 2021-2036 $6,600,000 Various bridges in Yuba County: conduct preventive maintenance. See the Caltrans website for a detailed list of Yes locations: C- Maintenance & http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hbrr99/HBP_MPO. Completion by YUB16021 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Bridge Preventive Maintenance html#SACOG 2020 $68,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15893 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Broadway St. Traffic Signalization: at Broadway St / Links Pkwy 2021-2036 $270,000 B- Road & Highway Widen 2 lanes to 4 lane arterial. Includes pavement, curb, Yes YUB15887 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Broadway St. gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping. Broadway St. 2021-2036 $3,200,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen 2 to 3 lane collector from Feather River Blvd. to Links Feather River Completion after YUB15889 Only Yuba Yuba County Capacity Broadway St. Pkwy. Broadway St. Blvd Links Pkwy 2036 $200,000 C- Maintenance & Pavement Rehabilitation: from Spenceville Rd. to end of Completion by Yes YUB15896 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Camp Far West Rd. pavement. Camp Far West Rd Spencerville Rd end of pavement 2020 $1,000,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15910 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Country Club Ave. Traffic Signalization: 4-way signal at Feather River Blvd. 2021-2036 $267,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15912 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Country Club Ave. Traffic Signalization: 3-way signal at Links Pkwy. 2021-2036 $215,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 3 lanes from Feather River Blvd. to Plumas Lake Golf Feather River Plumas Lake Golf Completion after YUB15907 Only Yuba Yuba County Capacity Country Club Ave. Course. Includes: curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping. Country Club Ave Blvd Course 2036 $363,800
Yes B- Road & Highway Widen 2 to 3 lane collector from Feather River Blvd. to Arboga Feather River YUB15895 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Ella Ave. Rd. Includes: curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping. Ella Ave. Blvd Arboga Rd 2021-2036 $3,756,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15897 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Ella Ave. / Arboga Rd. Traffic Signalization: at Ella Ave/Arboga Rd. 2021-2036 $215,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15901 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Ella Ave. / Feather River Blvd. Traffic Signalization: at Ella Ave/Feather River Blvd. 2021-2036 $267,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15899 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Ella Ave. / Links Pkwy. Traffic Signalization: at Ella Ave/Link Pkwy. 2021-2036 $267,000 In the unincorporated Community of Olivehurst in Yuba County; Seventh Avenue between Olivehurst Avenue and Yes Powerline Road; widen roadway for bicycles lanes and install new sidewalk, curb and gutter, storm drain system and a Completion by YUB16044 Yuba Yuba County A- Bike & Ped Ella Elementary School Safe Routes to School raised median island. (Toll Credits for PE) 2020 $1,350,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after YUB15902 Only Yuba Yuba County Capacity Erle Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Edgewater East to Griffith Ave. Erle Rd. Edgewater East Griffith Ave 2036 $2,656,000
Yes G- System Management, Completion by YUB15905 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Erle Rd. / Goldfields Pkwy. Traffic Signalization: 3-way traffic signal. 2020 $215,000 B- Road & Highway Modify ex Interchange: South of Marysville, SR 70 at Erle Yes YUB16050 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Erle Rd/SR70 Intch Mod Road Interchange. 2021-2036 $2,000,000
Yes G- System Management, Feather River Blvd Traffic Signal at River Oaks Construct new traffic signal at Feather River Blvd and River Completion by YUB15928 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Blvd Oaks Blvd. 2020 $300,000 B- Road & Highway south of Country Club Yes YUB15927 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Feather River Blvd. Widen: 4 lanes from Ella Ave. to south of Country Club Rd. Feather River Blvd Ella Ave Rd 2021-2036 $9,725,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15904 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Feather River Blvd. / Anderson Rd. Traffic Signalization: at Feather River Blvd/Anderson St. 2021-2036 $267,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 93 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars)
Yes G- System Management, YUB15894 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Feather River Blvd. / Broadway Street Traffic Signalization: at Feather River Blvd/Broadway St. 2021-2036 $270,000
Yes G- System Management, On Feather River Blvd between CR 512 and Algodon Rd: Completion by YUB16036 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Feather River Blvd. Safety Improvements Improve horizontal alignments. (HSIP6-03-023) 2020 $1,276,778 B- Road & Highway 2 lane extension of regional arterial from Orchards Completion by Yes YUB16013 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Goldfields Parkway Subdivision to North Beale Road (0.6 miles) 2020 $1,000,000
Yes G- System Management, Install new traffic signal at the intersection of North Beale Completion by YUB15881 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Goldfields Parkway Traffic Signal Road and Goldfields Parkway 2020 $300,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lanes (of 6 lane arterial) from Orchard Yes YUB15929 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Goldfields Pkwy. S.S. to North Beale Rd. Orchard S.S. North Beale Rd 2021-2036 $2,100,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lanes from North Beale Rd. to north of north of Hammonton- Yes YUB15930 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Goldfields Pkwy. Hammonton-Smartsville Rd. North Beale Rd Smartsville Rd 2021-2036 $995,000 B- Road & Highway Construct New Interchange: Goldfields Pkwy. at Hwy. 65 / Yes YUB15931 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Goldfields Pkwy. Hwy 70 connection. Goldfields Pkwy 2021-2036 $66,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after YUB15933 Only Yuba Yuba County Capacity Goldfields Pkwy. Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from Erle Rd. to North Beale Rd. Goldfields Pkwy Erle Rd North Beale Rd 2036 $600,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 3 lanes from Hammonton-Smartsville Rd. to Linda Hammonton- Completion after YUB15934 Only Yuba Yuba County Capacity Griffith Ave. Ave. Griffith Ave Smartville Rd. Linda Ave 2036 $6,600,000 Hammonton Smartville Rd between South Golden Parkway Yes B- Road & Highway and approx. 1 mile west: Widen and pave shoulder, including Completion by YUB16035 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Hammonton Smartville Rd. Shoulder Widening installation of safety edge. (HSIP6-03-022) 2020 $665,000
Yes G- System Management, Traffic Signalization: at Hammonton-Smartsville Rd/Goldfields YUB15939 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Hammonton-Smartsville Rd. / Goldfields Pkwy. Pkwy. 2021-2036 $300,000
Yes G- System Management, Traffic Signalization: at Hammonton-Smartsville Rd/Griffith YUB15940 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Hammonton-Smartsville Rd. / Griffith Ave. Ave. 2021-2036 $300,000 Hammonton-Smartsville Rd. from 0.18 mile E of Doolittle Gate Yes B- Road & Highway Hammonton-Smartsville Rd. Shoulder Rd. to 2.28 miles E of Doolittle Gate Rd.: Widen and pave Completion by YUB16030 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Improvements shoulders, curve corrections. (HSIP5-03-026) 2020 $1,123,600
Yes G- System Management, Traffic Signalization: at Hammonton-Smartsville Rd/Dantoni YUB15938 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Hammonton-Smartville Rd. / Dantoni Rd. Ave. 2021-2036 $300,000
Yes G- System Management, Widen: overpass at McGowan Pkwy. Includes: new traffic YUB15867 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Highway 70 signals. Highway 70 2021-2036 $4,200,000 Iowa City Rd. over Jack Slough, 0.35 miles east of Fruitland Yes C- Maintenance & Rd.: Replace existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. Completion by YUB16032 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Iowa City Rd. Bridge Replacement (Toll credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $903,000 B- Road & Highway Yes YUB15942 Yuba Yuba County Capacity La Porte Rd. Widen and Realign: from Butte County to Willow Glen Rd. La Porte Rd. Butt County Willow Glen Rd 2021-2036 $3,200,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway From Plumas Arboga Rd to Country Club Rd., construct new Plumas Arboga Completion after YUB15944 Only Yuba Yuba County Capacity Links Parkway Extension to County Club Road extension of Links Parkway. Links Parkway Rd Country Club Rd 2036 $12,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Construct New Road: 4 lane arterial from Ella Ave. to Plumas Completion after YUB15943 Only Yuba Yuba County Capacity Links Pkwy. Arboga Rd. Ella Ave Plumas Arboga Rd 2036 $850,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15906 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Links Pkwy. / Anderson Rd. Traffic Signalization: at Links Pkwy/Anderson Rd. 2021-2036 $267,000 Roadway Operational Improvements: Widen and construct Yes G- System Management, turn pockets at various locations. Includes: shoulder Completion by YUB15945 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Loma Rica Rd. widening. Loma Rica Rd 2020 $2,650,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15946 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Loma Rica Rd. Traffic Signalization: at Hwy. 20 / Loma Rica Rd. 2021-2036 $300,000
Yes C- Maintenance & Los Verjeles Rd., over South Honcut Cr., at Butte County Line: Completion by YUB16031 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Los Verjeles Rd. Bridge Replacement Replace existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. 2020 $3,151,000 Roadway Operational Improvements: Construct turn pockets Yes G- System Management, and widen shoulders at various intersections from Hwy. 20 to Completion by YUB15949 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Marysville Rd. Willow Glen Rd. Marysville Rd. Hwy 20 Willow Glen Rd 2020 $3,955,000 Matthews Ln., from Woodruff Ln. to Ramirez. Rd., and Ramirez Rd., from Matthews Ln. to Fruitland Rd.,: Rehabilitate Yes C- Maintenance & Mathews Ln. and Ramirez Rd. Farm-to-Market lanes and improve intersection to connect to Farm-to-Market Completion by YUB16040 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Project truck destinations. 2020 $2,460,400 B- Road & Highway Construct 3-lane collector McGowan Parkway from Arboga Yes YUB15950 Yuba Yuba County Capacity McGowan Parkway Road to Union Pacific Railroad. 2021-2036 $1,300,000
Yes G- System Management, McGowan Parkway and Arboga Road Traffic Install new Traffic Signal at the intersection of McGowan Completion by YUB15871 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Signalization Parkway and Arboga Road. 2020 $250,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Widen: 4 lanes from UPRR to Hwy. 65. Includes: turn lane, Completion after YUB15951 Only Yuba Yuba County Capacity McGowan Pkwy. curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping. McGowan Pkwy UPRR Highway 65 2036 $278,000
Yes G- System Management, Rail Crossing Project: Upgrade the existing at grade YUB15868 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS McGowan Pkwy. / UPRR intersection at the UPRR tracks. 2021-2036 $810,000
Yes G- System Management, Traffic Signalization: at the intersection of North Beale Rd. / YUB15886 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS N. Beale Rd. / Griffith Rd. Griffith Rd. 2021-2036 $215,000 New York House Rd over Dry Creek, 0.2 miles northeast of Frenchtown Rd: Replace the existing structurally deficient 2 Yes lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (Toll Credits for PE, C- Maintenance & ROW & CON). Toll Credits for ENG, Toll Credits for ROW, Toll Completion by YUB16018 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation New York House Rd Bridge Replacement Credits for CON 2020 $1,680,000 North Beal Rd.,from Hammonton Smartsville Rd. to Linda Yes Ave.: construct bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalks, Completion by YUB16041 Yuba Yuba County A- Bike & Ped North Beale Rd. Complete Streets Phase 2 drainage facilities, lighting and other improvements. 2020 $3,233,138 Construct complete streets improvements for a one-mile stretch on North Beale Rd. from Lindhurst Ave. to Hammonton Smartsville Rd. in the community of Linda. The project will construct curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ADA Yes compliant corner ramps, transit stop enhancements, intersection improvements and several other streetscape North Beale Rd. Complete Streets Revitalization features. (PE is programmed on YUB16008) (Toll Credits for Completion by YUB16027 Yuba Yuba County A- Bike & Ped Phase 1 CON) 2020 $1,995,000
Construct complete streets improvements for a 9400 ft stretch on North Beale Rd. from Linda Avenue. to Griffith Ave. Yes in the community of Linda. The project will construct curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ADA compliant corner ramps, transit stop North Beale Rd. Complete Streets Revitalization enhancements, intersection improvements and several other Completion by YUB16029 Yuba Yuba County A- Bike & Ped Phase 3 streetscape features. (PE is programmed on YUB16008) 2020 $11,450,000 B- Road & Highway Widen Roadway from 2-lanes to 4-lanes and install curb Completion by Yes YUB15877 Yuba Yuba County Capacity North Beale Road Improvements gutter and sidewalk from Linda Ave to Griffith Rd. 2020 $2,000,000
Yes G- System Management, Traffic Signalization: at the intersection of McGowan Pkwy. Completion by YUB15892 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Olivehurst Ave. / McGowan Pkwy. and Olivehurst Ave. 2020 $215,000 Olivehurst Ave., from 7th Ave. to McGowan Pkwy: Install curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bicycle lanes, center turn lane, Yes improved transit stops, and associate drainage Completion by YUB16012 Yuba Yuba County A- Bike & Ped Olivehurst Ave. Complete Street improvements. 2020 $1,820,000 At intersection of Olivehurst Ave. and Powerline Rd.: construct a roundabout, widen sidewalks to facilitate pedestrians and bicyclists around the perimeter of the Yes roundabout, install lighting and provide refuge islands at Powerline Rd. to the east and Oliverhurst Ave. to both the Completion by YUB16042 Yuba Yuba County A- Bike & Ped Olivehurst Ave. Roundabout north and south. 2020 $810,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15913 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Plumas Arboga Rd. Rail Crossing Project: Upgrade at the Union Pacific Railroad. 2021-2036 $815,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15915 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Plumas Arboga Rd. Traffic Signalization: at Plumas Arboga Rd. / Arboga Rd. 2021-2036 $267,000
Yes G- System Management, Traffic Signalization: at Plumas Arboga Rd. / Feather River YUB15917 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Plumas Arboga Rd. Blvd. 2021-2036 $267,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15918 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Plumas Arboga Rd. Traffic Signalization: at Plumas Arboga Rd. / Links Pkwy. 2021-2036 $267,000 B- Road & Highway Yes YUB15908 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Plumas Arboga Rd. Widen 2 to 3 lane collector from Arboga Rd. to UPRR. Plumas Arboga Rd Arboga Rd UPRR 2021-2036 $2,000,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after YUB15909 Only Yuba Yuba County Capacity Plumas Arboga Rd. Widen from 2 to 3 lane collector from UPRR to Algodon Rd. Plumas Arboga Rd UPRR Algodon Rd 2036 $8,700,000 B- Road & Highway Widen 2 to 3 lane collector from Feather River Blvd. to Arboga Feather River Yes YUB15916 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Plumas Arboga Rd. Rd. Plumas Arboga Rd Blvd Arboga Rd 2021-2036 $2,500,000 Project Development B- Road & Highway Completion after YUB15958 Only Yuba Yuba County Capacity Plumas Arboga Rd. Ext Plumas Arboga Rd. Extension to the new interchange at SR 65 2036 $2,675,000 Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Plumas Lake Blvd. Plumas Lake Yes B- Road & Highway Interchange to Plumas Arboga Rd. Includes: a structure over Blvd YUB15919 Yuba Yuba County Capacity Plumas Lake Blvd. the RR tracks. Plumas Lake Blvd Interchange Plumas Arboga Rd 2021-2036 $2,700,000 Olivehurst, on Powerline Rd, from 15th Ave. to 9th Ave.: Yes Construct new sidewalks and bicycle lanes. (Emission Completion by YUB16006 Yuba Yuba County A- Bike & Ped Powerline Rd Bike/Ped Improvements Phase 2 Benefits: 0.01 ROG kg/day.) 2020 $1,342,800 Rices Crossing Rd, Over Oregon House Creek, 0.04 MI S/E Yes C- Maintenance & Marysville Rd., replace structurally deficient 2 lane bridge Completion by YUB16034 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Rices Crossing Rd. Bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (Toll Credits for PE, R/W, & CON.) 2020 $921,000 B- Road & Highway Construct new 4-lane modified arterial from Algodon Rd to Draper Ranch South Yes YUB15920 Yuba Yuba County Capacity River Oaks Blvd Draper Ranch South development. River Oaks Blvd Algodon Rd development 2021-2036 $7,500,000
Yes G- System Management, YUB15925 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS River Oaks Blvd. Traffic Signalization: at River Oaks Blvd. / Broadway St. 2021-2036 $270,000 B- Road & Highway Road Extension: 4 lanes from Broadway St. to Draper Ranch Broadway Draper Ranch South Completion by Yes YUB15921 Yuba Yuba County Capacity River Oaks Blvd. South development. River Oaks Blvd Street development 2020 $6,300,000 B- Road & Highway Road Extension: 2 inner lanes of 4-lane arterial from Feather Feather River Yes YUB15923 Yuba Yuba County Capacity River Oaks Blvd. River Blvd. to Lateral 16. River Oaks Blvd Blvd Lateral 16 2021-2036 $2,000,000 Scales Rd, over Slate Creek, 3 miles northeast of La Porte Rd.: Yes C- Maintenance & replace existing 1 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (Toll Completion by YUB16017 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Scales Rd Bridge Widening Credits for PE, ROW & CON) 2020 $3,076,000 Spring Valley Rd. over Little Dry Creek, 0.3 miles west of Yes C- Maintenance & Marysville Rd.: Replace existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 Completion by YUB16033 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Spring Valley Rd. Bridge Replacement lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, CON) 2020 $1,703,000
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 94 Projects listed as "Project Development Only" are anticipated to begin early stages of development including project planning, design, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and ROW acquisition by 2036. These projects remain eligible to seek federal and state funding, but under the financial constraint Included in PRIMARY STREET FROM Completion TOTAL COST Project ID COUNTY LEAD AGENCY CATEGORY TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO (LOCATION) DPS NAME(S) (LOCATION) Timing (2015 Dollars) Spring Valley Rd, over Browns Valley Ditch, 2 mi NE of SH 20. Replace the existing functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge with a Yes C- Maintenance & Spring Valley Rd/ Browns Valley Ditch Bridge new 2 lane bridge. (Toll credits programmed for PE, ROW, & Completion by YUB16022 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Replacement CON.) 2020 $1,506,000 South of Marysville, SR 65 at Forty Mile Road Interchange: Yes B- Road & Highway construct interchange to accommodate traffic from the Yuba SR 65 at Forty Mile YUB15580 Yuba Yuba County Capacity SR 65 Interchange at Forty Mile Road County Motorplex. Road 2021-2036 $2,070,000 Yuba County, near Plumas Lake, north of Bear River, SR 70 at Yes G- System Management, Feather River Blvd.: Remove signal and construct interchange. Completion by YUB15360 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS SR 70/Feather River Blvd. Interchange (Phase 2) 2020 $20,826,000 In Yuba County: Timbuctoo Road, over Deep Ravine No.1, 1 mile NW/O SR 20. Replace the existing structurally deficient Yes C- Maintenance & one lane bridge with a new two lane bridge. (Toll Credits for Completion by YUB15965 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Timbuctoo Rd. Bridge Replacement ROW & CON) 2020 $1,946,000 Waldo Rd, over Dry Creek. Replace the existing one lane truss Yes C- Maintenance & bridge with a new two lane bridge. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, Completion by YUB16023 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Waldo Rd/Dry Creek Bridge Replacement & CON.) 2020 $2,868,000
Yes G- System Management, Roadway Safety Improvements: Widen shoulders on each YUB15956 Yuba Yuba County Operations, and ITS Woodruff Ln. side of road from Hwy. 70 to Hwy. 20. Woodruff Ln Hwy 70 Hwy 20 2021-2036 $2,300,000 C- Maintenance & Completion by Yes YUB15967 Yuba Yuba County Rehabilitation Woodruff Ln. Pavement Rehabilitation: from Hwy. 70 to Jack Slough Rd. Woodruff Ln Hwy 70 Jack Slough Rd 2020 $600,000 Construction of an ADA accessible path to a currently inaccessible, but high use bus stop on North Beale Road in the unincorporated community of Linda. Includes curbs, Yes gutters, and sidewalks; accessible curb cuts; accessible pedestrian signals; and other accessibility features as E- Transit Capital necessary and appropriate for the selected bus stops. (Toll Completion by YST10440 Yuba Yuba Sutter Transit (Minor) New Freedom Accessible Path in Linda Credits for CON) 2020 $200,000 At North Beale Rd & Lowe Ave: Construct an ADA accessible path to a high use Yuba-Sutter Transit bus stop including the curbcuts, sidewalks, accessible pedestrian signals and other Yes accessibility features as necessary. (FFY 2007 and FFY 2008 E- Transit Capital FTA Section 5317 funds programmed in 2008 with Yuba Completion by YST10435 Yuba Yuba Sutter Transit (Minor) North Beale Rd & Lowe Ave Transit Accessibility County General Funds for the local match.) 2020 $57,500
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 95 Attachment C SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Placerville Center and Corridor Communites 2,976 172 3,311 182 4,243 235 335 10 1,267 62 3,073 172 4,243 235 4,160 212 4,939 316 Established Communitites 6,362 4,357 6,574 4,514 7,304 5,221 212 157 942 865 7,551 4,958 7,164 5,286 7,304 5,225 7,096 5,336 Jurisdiction Total 9,338 4,529 9,884 4,696 11,546 5,456 546 167 2,208 927 10,624 5,130 11,407 5,521 11,464 5,438 12,034 5,652
El Dorado County Unincorporated Center and Corridor Communities (listed below) El Dorado Hills Town Center 1,791 0 2,642 250 3,510 265 851 250 1,719 265 3,510 0 3,510 15 3,716 16 3,867 265 Diamond Springs Rd 290 104 343 104 489 104 53 0 199 0 490 104 489 104 582 104 612 105 Established Communities (includes Placerville SOI area) 17,456 29,458 21,868 30,344 32,599 34,713 4,412 886 15,143 5,256 34,870 37,706 32,618 35,152 31,469 32,802 49,287 50,525 Central El Dorado Hills 13 0 13 17 38 435 0 17 25 435 Rural Residential Communities 9,356 24,940 9,430 25,187 9,640 26,142 74 246 284 1,202 10,356 29,435 10,131 25,290 9,640 26,397 13,931 28,827 Developing Communities (listed below) Bass Lake Hills 59 155 76 166 125 953 17 11 66 798 59 956 125 1,310 59 916 109 1,458 Carson Creek 163 460 180 578 226 1,162 17 118 63 702 163 1,162 226 1,161 163 1,161 3,879 1,700 El Dorado Hills 1,435 3,558 1,910 3,801 2,035 4,560 475 243 600 1,002 3,235 4,996 2,048 4,926 2,177 6,159 3,368 6,162 1 Marble Valley 0 1 0 17 0 398 0 16 0 397 500 1,801 29 647 0 98 0 398 Missouri Flats 3,129 408 3,212 419 3,709 452 83 11 580 44 3,628 498 3,444 471 3,611 455 6,497 853 Valley View 134 746 134 895 161 1,630 0 149 27 885 284 1,642 197 1,630 134 1,333 156 2,839 Jurisdiction Total 33,826 59,829 39,808 61,777 52,532 70,813 5,982 1,948 18,706 10,984 57,095 78,604 52,817 70,707 51,551 69,441 81,705 93,132 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) Lime Rock Valley n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 305 n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown unknown San Stino n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a - 814 n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown unknown Dixon Ranch n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a - 484 n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown unknown
EL DORADO COUNTY TOTAL 43,164 64,358 49,692 66,473 64,079 76,269 6,528 2,115 20,915 11,911 67,720 83,734 64,224 76,227 63,015 74,879 93,739 98,784 1 The Build Out Estimate shown reflects adopted planning documents. However, the county is processing an application for this area that could result in a change to these estimates. *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 96 SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Auburn Center and Corridor Communities (Amtrak station and Hwy 49) 2,304 482 2,507 483 2,944 749 203 1 640 267 2,827 635 2,942 744 3,304 802 3,811 856 Established Communities 5,456 5,631 5,903 5,785 6,889 5,910 447 154 1,433 280 6,888 6,236 6,891 5,910 6,952 6,247 9,114 7,352 Developing Communities (listed below) Baltimore Ravine 1 12 1 12 227 729 0 0 226 718 1 723 64 697 1 721 226 725 Jurisdiction Total 7,761 6,124 8,410 6,279 10,060 7,389 650 155 2,299 1,264 9,716 7,594 9,897 7,351 10,257 7,770 13,151 8,932
Colfax
Center and Corridor Communities (I-80 Corridor Study area) 522 205 693 215 1,128 258 171 9 606 53 1,011 229 1,281 269 1,128 257 2,380 263 Established Communities 293 706 314 715 370 758 20 9 77 52 380 774 353 755 371 759 899 1,073 Jurisdiction Total 815 911 1,007 929 1,498 1,016 191 19 683 105 1,391 1,003 1,634 1,024 1,499 1,016 3,279 1,336
Lincoln Center and Corridor Communities 2,598 292 3,604 516 6,246 1,042 1,006 224 3,648 750 4,915 1,071 4,423 798 6,200 1,118 8,846 1,117 Established Communities 3,470 17,739 4,388 18,921 6,469 20,572 918 1,182 2,999 2,833 7,563 20,518 8,172 20,805 6,999 20,649 17,679 21,651 Developing Communities (listed below) Hwy 65 area 2,263 0 3,263 0 5,463 0 999 0 3,199 0 5,261 0 5,456 0 6,262 0 11,007 0 Village 1 13 34 13 203 513 2,041 0 169 500 2,007 413 3,404 590 2,041 513 2,807 677 5,640 Village 5/SUD B 76 148 76 148 361 2,147 0 0 285 1,999 278 5,027 76 148 76 148 11,402 8,318 Village 7 0 33 0 585 296 3,286 0 552 296 3,252 111 3,294 396 3,298 295 3,284 397 3,285 Jurisdiction Total 8,420 18,246 11,343 20,373 19,347 29,087 2,923 2,127 10,927 10,841 18,540 33,313 19,347 29,134 20,344 28,006 50,008 40,011 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) Village 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 235 2,045 n/a n/a 351 3,874 Village 3 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown 4,841 Village 4 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown 5,421 Village 6 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown 5,082 SUD A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown 2,967 SUD C n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown 0 Remainder SOI n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown 0
Loomis Center and Corridor Communities (Town Center area) 200 148 255 148 801 552 55 0 602 404 406 228 1,164 597 1,100 750 1,288 688 Established Communities 2,336 1,473 2,454 1,495 3,253 1,752 118 22 918 279 3,940 1,880 3,236 1,754 2,928 1,726 4,039 1,947 Rural Residential Communities 747 848 747 885 856 944 0 37 110 96 747 1,249 794 920 767 860 784 1,319 Jurisdiction Total 3,282 2,469 3,455 2,529 4,911 3,248 173 60 1,629 779 5,093 3,357 5,195 3,270 4,794 3,336 6,112 3,954 *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014. Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 97 SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Rocklin Center and Corridor Communities (Rocklin Downtown Plan area and Amtrak station area) 984 1,000 1,036 1,078 1,318 1,319 52 79 334 320 1,563 1,235 1,531 1,845 2,884 2,574 1,987 1,960 Established Communities 16,226 19,609 17,369 21,059 19,315 22,881 1,143 1,450 3,089 3,272 18,942 21,496 18,913 20,984 18,852 21,526 35,759 24,235 Developing Communities (listed below) Clover Valley 0 2 0 2 0 142 0 0 0 140 0 566 97 551 0 2 128 561 Highway 65 Corridor 429 0 1,893 146 4,004 370 1,464 146 3,575 370 4,428 0 4,126 0 4,429 0 10,041 370 I-80 Commercial 85 4 1,487 198 2,555 199 1,402 194 2,471 195 985 4 936 5 985 4 2,936 304 Sunset Ranchos 160 1,665 354 2,379 1,245 4,358 194 713 1,085 2,692 2,068 4,361 842 4,623 2,068 4,295 1,436 4,358 Jurisdiction Total 17,884 22,280 22,138 24,862 28,438 29,269 4,254 2,582 10,554 6,989 27,986 27,663 26,445 28,008 29,217 28,400 52,287 31,789
Roseville Center and Corridor Communities (Amtrak station area and Douglas/Sunrise) Dowtown Master Plan and remaining Amtrak station 1,931 1,512 2,431 1,558 3,787 2,315 500 46 1,856 803 3,385 1,837 3,782 1,991 3,830 2,722 10,791 2,784 Douglas West 1,365 299 1,481 300 1,885 416 116 0 520 117 1,866 351 1,901 441 1,930 421 1,915 416 Sunrise 1,738 313 2,411 318 3,422 493 673 5 1,685 180 3,418 396 3,411 391 3,422 496 3,500 493 Established Communities 59,122 44,177 67,193 46,129 82,123 47,166 8,070 1,952 23,000 2,989 83,572 47,369 80,585 46,723 83,527 47,777 91,285 47,168 Developing Communities (listed below) Creekview 3 2 3 102 421 1,207 0 100 418 1,205 421 1,207 383 579 422 1,814 418 2,011 Sierra Vista 0 18 0 469 3,500 6,116 0 450 3,500 6,098 3,499 5,291 4,797 6,117 3,000 6,047 9,003 8,679 West Roseville 483 2,926 1,214 5,629 2,983 9,428 731 2,703 2,500 6,502 1,479 7,505 2,688 8,723 2,983 9,427 3,251 10,478 Amoruso Ranch 0 0 0 0 145 1,001 0 0 145 1,001 50 1,008 0 0 0 0 1,463 3,011 Jurisdiction Total 64,642 49,247 74,733 54,504 98,266 68,143 10,091 5,257 33,624 18,896 97,690 64,964 97,547 64,964 99,115 68,704 121,627 75,040 *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 98 SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Placer County Unincorporated Established Communities 7,478 9,461 11,847 9,961 20,162 10,353 4,368 500 12,683 892 19,678 10,269 19,643 10,482 17,477 10,301 46,998 13,425 Auburn Sphere of Influence Area 10,479 5,988 11,581 6,114 14,248 6,684 1,102 126 3,770 696 15,883 8,027 14,765 6,557 13,877 8,234 24,338 9,228 Colfax Sphere of Influence Area 270 694 301 697 368 709 31 4 97 16 350 695 368 711 270 695 403 1,111 Rural Residential Communities 7,527 26,922 7,740 27,884 8,330 29,421 214 962 804 2,499 8,734 30,147 8,329 28,651 8,326 28,505 27,195 50,527 Developing Communities (listed below) Bickford Ranch 108 6 108 247 200 1,433 0 241 92 1,427 108 1,428 108 1,433 108 1,438 312 1,890 Placer Vineyards 0 213 0 213 1,499 4,737 0 0 1,499 4,524 3,000 6,840 3,007 8,100 1,499 4,739 9,037 14,132 Regional University 0 0 0 0 381 1,448 0 0 381 1,448 901 2,779 349 2,780 554 2,102 1,875 4,387 Riolo Vineyards 66 17 66 71 150 939 0 54 84 922 66 931 150 942 66 620 166 932 Placer Ranch 0 0 0 0 2,003 2,900 0 0 2,003 2,900 2,006 2,213 0 0 1,613 0 20,155 5,376 Squaw Village 180 6 180 64 180 351 0 58 0 345 180 351 180 6 180 6 574 850 Jurisdiction Total 26,108 43,307 31,823 45,251 47,520 58,975 5,715 1,944 21,412 15,668 50,907 63,679 46,898 59,662 43,969 56,641 131,052 101,858 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) Curry Creek n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown unknown
PLACER COUNTY TOTAL 128,912 142,583 152,910 154,726 210,040 197,127 23,998 12,143 81,128 54,544 211,323 201,573 206,962 193,413 209,195 193,872 377, 516 262,920 *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 99 SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Citrus Heights Center and Corridor Communities (listed below) Sunrise Blvd 4,441 1,025 5,294 1,025 7,232 1,840 853 0 2,791 815 5,236 1,225 7,217 2,066 7,232 1,840 7,232 2,066 Riverside-Auburn (Boulevard Plan) 2,383 688 2,577 730 3,122 917 195 41 740 228 2,853 889 3,122 917 3,282 1,502 4,915 2,028 Established Communities 11,115 33,764 11,815 33,955 13,456 35,302 699 190 2,341 1,538 14,115 35,075 13,467 35,310 13,483 34,836 13,456 36,991 Jurisdiction Total 17,939 35,477 19,686 35,709 23,810 38,059 1,747 232 5,871 2,581 22,204 37,188 23,807 38,292 23,996 38,178 25,603 41,085
Elk Grove Center and Corridor Communities (Old Town Plan area) 541 53 647 53 947 53 106 0 406 0 664 53 947 53 1,012 70 1,043 71 Established Communities 27,286 45,476 29,659 45,948 35,421 47,268 2,372 471 8,135 1,791 34,286 47,268 34,105 46,859 37,093 47,300 35,518 47,296 Rural Residential Communities 1,712 3,982 1,712 4,106 1,777 4,683 0 125 65 701 1,727 5,923 1,712 5,938 1,777 4,683 1,800 5,876 Developing Communities (listed below) Laguna Ridge 1,336 1,541 2,221 4,910 4,371 7,586 885 3,370 3,036 6,045 4,298 7,570 4,289 7,881 4,289 7,582 4,400 7,826 Lent Ranch 0 1 2,439 30 3,222 280 2,439 29 3,222 279 4,015 1 3,222 280 3,365 246 4,400 280 Southeast Planning Area 4 38 565 295 5,004 4,061 561 257 5,000 4,023 5,004 3,990 3,497 4,098 2,495 3,989 24,720 4,790 Sterling Meadows 0 0 0 90 0 950 0 90 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 965 0 980 Triangle Special Plan 123 282 123 301 123 401 0 19 0 119 123 401 123 401 334 403 343 701 Jurisdiction Total 31,001 51,372 37,365 55,733 50,865 65,282 6,364 4,361 19,863 13,909 50,117 66,157 47,895 66,461 50,365 65,237 72,225 67,820
Folsom Center and Corridor Communities (light rail station areas and Bidwell) 7,109 1,330 9,323 1,440 9,852 2,011 2,214 110 2,743 681 9,832 1,791 10,684 2,067 10,112 2,198 9,852 2,192 Established Communities 28,739 24,895 32,242 25,980 32,495 28,174 3,503 1,085 3,756 3,278 39,170 28,020 36,157 27,454 35,821 28,172 32,495 28,174 Developing Communities (listed below) Folsom South Area 0 0 621 1,182 7,194 8,665 621 1,182 7,194 8,665 4,026 6,663 1,291 6,688 2,718 8,983 13,619 10,210 Jurisdiction Total 35,848 26,225 42,186 28,602 49,541 38,850 6,338 2,377 13,693 12,625 53,029 36,473 48,132 36,209 48,652 39,353 55,966 40,576
Galt Center and Corridor Communities (downtown and Twin Cities) 1,299 470 1,598 477 2,308 605 298 7 1,009 135 1,800 474 2,704 607 3,045 485 3,299 610 Established Communities 2,805 7,338 3,509 7,431 4,960 9,195 704 94 2,155 1,858 4,105 8,183 4,959 9,191 4,077 9,175 9,230 9,331 Developing Communities (listed below) SOI 460 199 460 200 904 1,090 0 0 443 890 1,423 1,205 523 1,091 1,423 201 24,180 7,212 Jurisdiction Total 4,565 8,007 5,567 8,108 8,172 10,890 1,002 101 3,607 2,883 7,327 9,861 8,186 10,889 8,544 9,861 36,709 17,153 *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 100 SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Isleton Established Communities 123 388 125 394 139 419 2 6 16 31 139 404 135 479 123 404 171 510 Developing Communities (listed below) Villages on the Delta 21 12 21 12 21 40 0 0 0 28 21 55 21 12 21 42 21 300 Jurisdiction Total 144 400 146 406 160 459 2 6 16 59 160 459 156 491 144 446 192 810
Rancho Cordova Center and Corridor Communities (Folsom Blvd Corridor Plan area and light rail station areas) 16,192 5,988 17,895 6,286 22,008 8,176 1,703 298 5,816 2,188 19,371 6,904 20,230 10,764 22,082 8,199 40,758 8,228 Established Communities 32,296 16,556 38,694 16,998 54,340 18,039 6,398 442 22,044 1,484 57,739 18,028 53,526 18,037 56,134 18,213 66,878 18,215 Developing Communities (listed below) Arboretum 0 0 0 0 115 1,525 0 0 115 1,525 115 1,933 53 572 0 0 3,488 4,742 Ranch at Sunridge 0 0 0 0 98 711 0 0 98 711 191 2,246 355 2,296 0 0 358 1,610 Rio Del Oro 0 0 0 827 2,090 5,119 0 827 2,090 5,119 2,000 5,969 4,322 8,057 1,348 4,120 12,558 12,189 Suncreek 0 21 0 21 226 3,391 0 0 226 3,369 226 4,004 185 1,854 33 3,029 1,408 4,893 Sunridge 114 3,054 718 4,504 2,170 7,707 604 1,450 2,055 4,653 1,115 7,481 2,170 7,707 1,105 8,764 3,563 8,763 Westborough 32 0 32 0 155 765 0 0 123 765 32 0 149 755 32 0 5,447 4,200 Jurisdiction Total 48,634 25,619 57,340 28,637 81,201 45,433 8,706 3,017 32,567 19,814 80,788 46,566 80,990 50,042 80,733 42,324 134,459 62,840 *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 101 SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Sacramento Center and Corridor Communities (listed below) Blue Line Station Areas- American River to Swanston 7,619 3,036 9,615 3,110 11,524 4,091 1,997 74 3,906 1,055 8,189 3,953 11,731 4,092 11,633 4,480 14,550 6,045 Blue Line Station Areas- Marconi 1,394 1,254 1,501 1,327 1,648 1,895 106 73 254 641 1,394 1,721 1,789 1,902 1,447 1,896 1,358 1,902 Blue Line Station Areas- Roseville Rd/Watt 837 17 877 17 993 22 41 0 156 5 1,148 18 993 23 993 23 2,130 40 Green Line Station Areas- South Natomas 2,744 6,791 2,940 6,796 3,730 6,824 196 5 986 34 3,796 6,824 3,730 6,828 3,608 6,824 3,609 6,828 Green Line Station Areas- North Natomas Marketplace 7,854 2,158 8,267 2,328 9,283 3,333 413 170 1,429 1,175 9,289 3,344 8,105 2,530 8,796 4,175 14,919 6,199 Green Line Station Areas- Commerce Pkwy 1,815 1,667 2,259 2,141 3,330 4,755 444 475 1,515 3,088 3,329 4,221 3,441 4,657 3,330 4,755 3,442 4,755 Green Line Station Areas- Greenbriar 0 0 0 0 309 2,434 0 0 309 2,434 700 2,964 344 2,438 744 2,964 1,137 4,137 Downtown (East of 16th St) 24,489 12,230 26,490 12,804 31,308 16,229 2,001 574 6,818 3,999 29,971 14,830 30,816 14,327 31,007 16,109 39,276 16,405 Downtown (West of 16th St) 64,391 8,073 84,389 11,758 102,880 27,081 19,998 3,685 38,490 19,008 105,207 21,851 104,994 26,859 101,603 31,468 124,372 31,538 Franklin Blvd 2,401 1,832 2,573 1,918 2,939 2,220 172 86 538 388 2,549 2,086 3,023 2,328 2,695 2,198 3,041 2,257 Gold Line Station Areas- 39th to 59th 6,523 3,709 7,047 3,745 8,374 3,853 524 36 1,851 145 7,086 3,841 8,390 3,928 8,918 3,933 9,289 3,917 Gold Line Station Areas- 65th to Power Inn 8,371 2,145 9,621 2,378 12,991 7,602 1,251 233 4,620 5,457 12,270 6,796 13,280 7,681 13,405 7,914 14,039 7,901 Gold Line Station Areas- College Greens and part of watt 2,618 1,182 2,658 1,184 2,863 1,402 40 2 245 220 3,545 1,336 2,785 1,195 2,863 1,402 4,865 2,338 Blue Line Station Areas- Broadway to 47th 6,116 5,346 6,705 5,823 8,165 6,139 589 477 2,049 793 6,724 5,965 8,304 6,428 8,147 6,197 9,935 6,221 Blue Line Station Areas- Florin 2,973 1,343 3,194 1,565 3,737 2,661 221 222 764 1,317 3,863 2,216 3,655 2,709 3,751 2,562 3,699 2,709 Blue Line Station Areas- Meadowview to CRC 2,657 6,678 2,857 7,052 3,184 9,795 200 374 527 3,118 3,068 9,523 3,102 9,891 3,154 10,277 2,696 10,279 Blue Line Station Areas- 14th Ave to Florin Rd 3,306 1,903 3,306 2,020 3,370 3,090 0 117 64 1,188 3,306 2,934 3,305 3,339 3,370 3,106 3,331 3,183 Established Communities 111,260 132,386 121,959 135,386 147,734 155,515 10,700 3,000 36,475 23,129 153,859 153,945 148,279 153,157 150,835 154,978 194,590 156,139 Developing Communities (listed below) Delta Shores 0 0 795 460 2,223 5,077 795 460 2,223 5,077 1,975 4,458 2,223 5,077 980 4,940 6,660 5,115 Jurisdiction Total 257,367 191,749 297,053 201,811 360,585 264,018 39,686 10,061 103,218 72,269 361,269 252,827 362,288 259,389 361,278 270,201 456,939 277,908 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) Camino Norte n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Panhandle n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 102 SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Sacramento County Unincorporated Center and Corridor Communities (listed below) Auburn Blvd North/Madison Ave 6,025 243 7,125 313 9,804 1,090 1,100 70 3,780 847 9,022 603 9,885 1,139 9,890 1,288 11,935 1,299 Blue Line Station Areas- Roseville Rd/Watt 1,788 144 2,418 211 3,900 799 630 67 2,112 654 3,578 594 4,141 943 4,210 786 4,210 3,035 Fair Oaks Blvd West- Howe to Fulton 4,584 2,711 5,212 2,721 6,709 2,932 629 10 2,125 220 6,542 2,712 6,709 2,932 6,642 2,807 6,890 2,932 Fair Oaks Blvd Central- El Camino to Winding 5,792 3,704 6,382 3,783 7,824 4,556 590 78 2,032 851 7,768 3,883 7,980 4,611 7,646 3,993 10,290 5,209 Fair Oaks Blvd East- Fair Oaks Village 1,714 934 2,001 935 2,731 1,289 287 1 1,017 355 2,681 1,029 2,804 1,292 2,731 1,289 3,000 1,292 Florin Rd 6,808 1,408 7,261 1,526 8,396 2,708 453 118 1,588 1,299 7,968 2,156 8,575 2,711 8,728 2,698 12,487 6,933 Franklin Blvd 2,822 2,109 3,410 2,223 5,011 3,360 588 114 2,189 1,251 3,741 2,871 5,058 3,369 4,728 3,442 5,677 3,794 Fulton Ave 6,487 803 7,115 803 8,637 826 628 0 2,150 23 8,402 803 8,651 826 8,451 857 8,881 1,041 Gold Line Station Areas- Watt to Butterfield 10,230 4,986 11,779 5,384 15,493 9,566 1,549 398 5,262 4,581 14,258 7,490 15,511 9,566 14,385 10,260 16,962 12,707 Gold Line Station Areas- Hazel/Easton 1,133 337 3,077 704 5,864 2,120 1,944 367 4,730 1,783 5,131 1,966 8,415 2,636 3,765 4,425 19,411 4,203 Gold Line Station Areas- Folsom Blvd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,232 0 900 0 0 0 1,214 0 Greenback Ln 3,321 1,817 3,711 2,016 4,504 2,399 390 199 1,183 582 3,652 2,172 4,629 2,354 4,245 2,384 4,640 2,399 Stockton Blvd- 14th Ave to Florin Rd 249 836 287 862 403 1,156 38 26 154 320 249 999 403 1,159 315 1,089 428 1,156 Stockton Blvd- Florin Rd to Mack Rd 3,054 2,658 3,590 2,786 4,895 4,244 536 128 1,841 1,586 3,872 3,450 4,918 4,271 4,931 4,808 5,627 5,825 Watt Ave Central- Auburn to Arden 9,359 2,408 11,860 2,466 13,278 3,200 2,501 58 3,918 792 12,442 2,823 13,288 3,213 13,137 3,055 13,419 3,200 North Watt and West of Watt 3,776 1,372 4,839 1,630 7,625 4,973 1,063 258 3,849 3,601 7,752 4,431 12,182 8,543 10,576 8,379 12,231 8,415 Established Communities 94,239 171,653 102,880 173,758 128,649 182,718 8,641 2,105 34,410 11,065 137,440 184,911 124,206 179,732 135,765 184,080 202,421 189,159 Rural Residential 10,480 13,726 11,056 13,867 12,458 14,314 576 141 1,977 588 11,160 15,527 12,458 14,464 11,460 14,259 15,537 18,369 Developing Communities (listed below) Elverta 47 78 47 325 358 1,510 0 247 312 1,432 418 1,505 358 1,510 418 570 404 6,000 Florin Vineyard 1,319 557 1,389 894 1,528 2,575 70 337 209 2,018 1,530 2,559 1,528 2,586 1,619 2,535 6,243 9,917 Glenborough at Easton 453 0 453 560 1,780 3,271 0 560 1,327 3,271 1,780 3,271 1,794 3,262 1,280 3,271 1,796 3,239 West Jackson 2,169 145 2,169 145 4,028 5,141 0 0 1,859 4,996 2,902 3,689 4,019 5,140 2,169 146 32,839 15,658 North Vineyard Station 93 363 158 1,261 379 3,415 64 898 285 3,052 393 3,315 379 3,417 587 2,970 563 6,062 Mather South 48 0 48 0 265 1,030 0 0 217 1,030 265 1,030 358 1,039 48 1,030 5,075 3,529 Vineyard Springs 369 2,400 611 2,634 764 3,820 242 234 395 1,420 764 3,731 1,394 3,799 992 3,659 764 5,943 Vineyard 1,156 4,591 1,240 4,714 1,546 5,353 83 123 390 762 1,546 5,253 1,668 5,344 1,937 5,344 1,546 6,610 Jurisdiction Total 177,516 219,986 200,119 226,522 256,828 268,366 22,603 6,536 79,312 48,381 257,667 268,861 262,210 269,857 260,656 269,421 404,490 327,924 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) Cordova Hills n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 232 3,024 n/a n/a n/a n/a 13,556 9,010 Jackson Township n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 770 2,057 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8,044 6,143 Newbridge n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 178 1,008 n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,556 3,075 Northwest Special Planning Area (excluding Sacramento International Airport and Metro Air Park which are included as Established Communities) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 70,608 25,000 SACRAMENTO COUNTY TOTAL 573,014 558,836 659,462 585,527 831,161 731,357 86,448 26,691 258,147 172,521 832,562 718,392 833,663 731,630 834,368 735,022 1,186,582 836,116 *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014. Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 103 SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Live Oak Center and Corridor Communities (downtown area) 296 53 461 53 856 91 165 0 560 37 685 53 856 91 878 154 1,972 336 Established Communities 548 2,498 695 2,704 1,051 3,682 147 206 503 1,184 974 4,169 1,051 3,695 1,178 3,454 2,446 4,339 Jurisdiction Total 844 2,551 1,155 2,757 1,907 3,773 311 206 1,063 1,222 1,659 4,222 1,907 3,785 2,057 3,608 4,418 4,676 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) Recent annexation areas n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 7,593 2,716 Sphere of Influence Area n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,304 10,887
Yuba City Center and Corridor Communities (Central City and Hwy 20 corridor) 7,222 1,683 8,073 1,691 9,990 1,908 851 8 2,768 226 9,223 1,731 10,039 1,972 9,990 1,908 10,036 2,076 Established Communities 16,467 22,864 18,677 23,212 24,065 28,062 2,210 349 7,598 5,198 26,073 28,572 24,025 27,543 24,583 26,862 29,210 28,048 Developing Communities (listed below) Lincoln East (SOI) 116 183 116 183 338 975 0 0 222 791 116 957 288 975 166 1,348 1,570 4,868 South SOI/Hwy 99 Corridor 15 36 15 36 412 230 0 0 397 194 392 687 472 715 412 36 1,826 723 Jurisdiction Total 23,820 24,766 26,881 25,122 34,804 31,175 3,061 357 10,984 6,409 35,804 31,946 34,825 31,204 35,151 30,154 42,642 35,715 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) Remainder Sphere of Influence area n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 3,492 7,575
Sutter County Unincorporated Established Communities 3,974 6,456 3,990 6,521 4,098 6,845 16 65 124 389 5,184 6,865 4,147 7,106 5,188 6,869 13,787 7,374 Developing Communities (listed below) Sutter Pointe 887 18 887 18 2,995 3,027 0 0 2,108 3,010 2,587 3,275 3,289 3,493 887 18 55,045 17,500 Jurisdiction Total 4,861 6,474 4,877 6,539 7,093 9,872 16 65 2,232 3,398 7,772 10,140 7,436 10,598 6,075 6,887 68,832 24,874 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) Employment Centers n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14,225 n/a
SUTTER COUNTY TOTAL 29,525 33,790 32,913 34,418 43,804 44,820 3,388 628 14,279 11,030 45,235 46,308 44,168 45,588 43,282 40,649 115,892 65,264 *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 104 SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Davis Center and Corridor Communities (listed below) Core Area Plan area 2,658 515 3,070 515 3,496 543 412 0 838 27 3,064 519 3,498 540 3,607 595 3,654 646 Amtrak station area 1,873 1,314 2,274 1,346 2,689 1,703 401 32 816 389 2,771 1,401 2,891 2,014 2,689 1,703 3,254 1,798 Nishi 0 0 0 0 413 600 0 0 413 600 801 602 413 600 1,100 600 1,497 600 Established Communities 10,899 24,611 11,844 25,130 13,743 26,483 945 519 2,844 1,872 12,802 25,832 13,642 26,488 13,047 26,533 14,253 26,533 Jurisdiction Total 15,430 26,440 17,188 26,992 20,341 29,329 1,758 552 4,911 2,888 19,438 28,354 20,444 29,642 20,443 29,431 22,657 29,578
West Sacramento Center and Corridor Communities (listed below) Bridge District 339 124 2,450 923 7,568 4,568 2,111 799 7,229 4,444 5,348 2,622 7,560 4,151 7,137 4,577 13,715 4,566 Pioneer Bluff 523 0 523 0 3,391 1,682 0 0 2,869 1,682 1,223 276 3,391 1,395 3,001 1,672 28,939 5,757 Washington 2,542 855 3,088 1,249 4,432 3,091 546 394 1,890 2,236 3,347 1,748 3,549 3,079 4,419 2,580 5,693 3,079 remaining center and corridor area 1,841 1,004 2,052 1,049 3,346 3,970 212 45 1,506 2,966 2,648 1,509 3,197 3,972 3,296 5,009 21,289 7,342 Established Communities 19,355 16,650 28,358 17,553 31,518 20,663 9,003 903 12,164 4,014 32,294 19,539 31,430 18,729 31,390 18,984 38,436 20,639 Developing Communities (listed below) NE Village of Southport (Liberty only) 6 18 6 18 95 532 0 0 89 513 44 924 6 245 6 19 4 1,900 Southport Industrial Park 1,255 228 2,716 228 5,010 428 1,461 0 3,754 200 4,622 468 4,200 462 4,200 428 5,010 1,383 Jurisdiction Total 25,860 18,879 39,193 21,020 55,360 34,933 13,333 2,141 29,500 16,054 50,636 32,039 53,662 33,047 54,238 40,178 113,086 44,667 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) SE Village of Southport n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 67 893 38 741 75 1,817 121 3,433 SW Village of Southport (partial) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,042 4,061 290 2,851 714 5,092 1,060 6,500
Winters Center and Corridor Communities (Downtown Master Plan area) 147 39 155 39 176 40 8 0 29 1 147 40 176 40 195 51 203 56 Established Communities 1,774 2,333 2,135 2,425 2,942 3,303 361 92 1,169 970 2,677 3,086 2,940 3,315 2,941 3,206 4,937 4,254 Jurisdiction Total 1,921 2,372 2,290 2,465 3,119 3,343 369 92 1,198 970 2,824 3,126 3,116 3,356 3,136 3,257 5,140 4,310 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) Sphere of Influence Area n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 105 SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Woodland Center and Corridor Communities (Downtown and East St Corridor Plan areas) 2,852 726 3,012 753 3,385 1,349 160 27 533 623 2,952 1,048 3,470 1,457 4,674 1,615 4,744 1,550 Established Communities 17,923 18,111 20,977 18,301 28,397 18,779 3,054 190 10,474 668 27,840 18,690 28,098 18,877 25,365 18,693 43,144 18,779 Developing Communities (listed below) Spring Lake Master Plan 572 1,217 826 1,741 1,244 4,053 254 524 672 2,836 1,257 3,850 1,530 4,051 1,430 4,055 1,242 7,954 Jurisdiction Total 21,347 20,054 24,815 20,796 33,027 24,181 3,468 741 11,680 4,127 32,049 23,589 33,098 24,385 31,469 24,363 49,130 28,283 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) General Plan identified potential growth areas SP 2/3 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown unknown
Yolo County Unincorporated Center and Corridor Communities (UC Davis) 21,700 717 23,644 2,410 24,213 3,383 1,944 1,692 2,513 2,666 23,638 2,648 23,638 2,648 23,638 2,648 29,134 2,648 Established Communities (including the established communities of Dunnigan, Madison, Knights Landing) 6,684 7,090 7,560 7,178 9,680 7,602 876 88 2,996 512 9,683 7,592 9,641 8,235 10,111 7,712 12,500 8,220 Jurisdiction Total 28,384 7,807 31,204 9,587 33,893 10,985 2,820 1,780 5,509 3,178 33,321 10,240 33,279 10,883 33,749 10,360 41,634 10,868 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) Dunnigan n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 10,656 9,230 Elkhorn n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9,553 - Madison n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 250 1,335 Knights Landing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 100 800
YOLO COUNTY TOTAL 92,943 75,553 114,690 80,859 145,739 102,771 21,747 5,306 52,797 27,218 138,268 97,348 143,599 101,313 143,036 107,589 231,647 117,705 *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 106 SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Marysville Center and Corridor Communities (Downtown Economic Development Strategic Plan area) 2,950 325 3,043 332 3,297 422 93 8 347 97 3,000 355 3,298 424 3,244 426 3,344 435 Established Communities 5,523 5,025 5,723 5,047 6,294 5,293 201 22 771 268 6,423 5,270 6,287 5,291 6,387 5,334 6,197 5,356 Jurisdiction Total 8,473 5,349 8,766 5,379 9,591 5,714 293 30 1,118 365 9,423 5,624 9,585 5,715 9,631 5,759 9,541 5,791
Wheatland Center and Corridor Communities (dowtown area) 63 102 63 102 64 105 0 0 1 3 63 102 64 105 64 109 55 113 Established Communities 368 1,220 523 1,233 901 1,566 155 13 532 346 750 1,667 900 1,295 858 1,566 761 1,667 Developing Communities (listed below) Jones Ranch and Heritage Oaks - 15 122 184 493 754 122 169 493 739 493 594 465 594 387 415 1,295 1,326 Jurisdiction Total 431 1,337 708 1,519 1,458 2,425 277 182 1,026 1,087 1,306 2,363 1,636 2,430 1,309 2,090 2,110 3,106 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 (listed below) Nichols Grove n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 207 436 n/a n/a 243 1,618 Hop Farm/Johnson Rancho n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 7,861 14,144 Rodden Ranch n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown unknown Yuba County Unincorporated Center and Corridor Communities (listed below) North Beale Corridor Reinvestmant Plan area 546 143 732 143 1,184 184 186 0 638 41 645 183 1,184 184 1,127 208 1,180 209 Olivehurst Ave 189 202 220 202 307 254 31 0 118 51 189 242 307 254 541 284 548 450 Established Communities 3,204 6,962 3,961 7,058 4,640 8,143 758 96 1,436 1,182 4,172 9,561 4,641 8,144 5,140 8,792 6,058 10,522 Established Communities-Beale AFB 3,551 509 4,079 509 4,550 618 528 0 999 109 5,551 618 5,551 618 5,551 618 5,551 618 Developing Communities (listed below) East Linda 76 2,213 510 2,624 1,565 4,444 434 411 1,489 2,231 1,046 4,542 1,274 4,647 1,565 4,446 4,426 6,009 North Arboga Study Area 177 1,147 192 1,262 551 1,416 15 115 374 269 177 1,416 233 1,334 551 1,416 2,564 2,504 Plumas Lake 195 2,613 894 2,918 2,556 4,894 699 304 2,361 2,280 3,495 7,122 3,298 6,428 2,555 4,895 16,176 18,130 Highway 65 Employment Center 206 36 206 36 2,719 36 0 0 2,513 0 2,707 36 2,719 36 3,206 36 23,730 - Rural Residential Communities 3,360 7,819 3,360 7,841 3,380 7,875 0 22 20 57 3,457 9,280 4,264 7,871 3,360 7,916 5,094 12,884 Jurisdiction Total 11,503 21,644 14,154 22,593 21,451 27,864 2,651 949 9,948 6,220 21,438 33,002 23,470 29,516 23,595 28,610 65,328 51,325
YUBA COUNTY TOTAL 20,408 28,331 23,629 29,491 32,500 36,003 3,221 1,160 12,092 7,672 32,167 40,989 34,691 37,662 34,535 36,460 76,979 60,221 *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 107 SCENARIO INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED IN AUGUST 2014* 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Draft Preferred Communities Strategy Update Existing Conditions Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Draft Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (Current Plan) Scenario 3 Build Out Estimate
Growth from 2012 Growth from 2012 to Draft Preferred Scenario - April 16, 2015 Total in Year 2012 Total in Year 2020 Total in Year 2036 to 2020 2036 Total in Year 2036 Total at Build Out
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing Jurisdiction/Community Type Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Jobs Units Region Total 887,965 903,451 1,033, 297 951,495 1,327, 323 1,188, 347 145,332 48,045 439,358 284,896 1,327,276 1,188,345 1,327,308 1,188,410 1,327,431 1,188,471 2,234,929 1,564,662 Center and Corridor Communities 307,652 107,718 365,274 120,297 459,750 193,885 57,622 12,580 152,097 86,167 429,690 165,077 466,946 197,548 462,465 209,745 633,282 236,212 Established Communities 527,095 686,075 599,208 702,471 742,211 764,825 72,113 16,379 215,116 78,750 774,893 767,222 739,896 754,672 755,094 761,723 1,018,936 805,215 Developing Communities 20,037 31,422 34,770 48,958 88,922 146,258 14,733 17,536 68,885 114,836 86,513 164,484 82,777 153,057 74,544 134,383 365,796 281,782 Rural Residential Communities 33,181 78,237 34,045 79,770 36,441 83,380 864 1,533 3,260 5,143 36,181 91,562 37,689 83,133 35,329 82,619 64,341 117,802 Areas Not Identified for Growth in the MTP/SCS by 2036 152,574 123,650 *Note that the scenarios include some amount of techncial refinement which may alter any value slightly from the draft scenarios dated August 2014.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 108 Attachment C
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 109 Attachment C Overview of Draft Land Use Forecast March 25, 2015
Overview of Draft Preferred Scenario Land Use Forecast
The land use forecast was developed within the same basic policy framework as the transportation system. The Board has directed that the emphasis of this particular four‐year plan update shall be on improving implementation of an existing high performing plan and examining a short list of policy issues, such as the timing of transportation investments and whether more funds should be spent on transportation maintenance needs.1 Nevertheless, during each update cycle SACOG updates its empirical data and future‐predicting analytical tools, and this new knowledge informs changes to the existing plan. The changes included in this draft land use forecast can accurately be described as refinements to the current plan.
The most important elements of the land use forecast include the Board’s decisions to:
Use the same regional economic growth forecast through 2036 (the end of year of this plan) as the forecast through 2035 in the current plan; and Strive for similar shares of future growth in the four Community Types (Centers and Corridors, Established, Developing and Rural Residential Communities) and in housing types (attached, small‐lot single‐family and large‐lot single‐family) as in the current plan.2 The third major land use issue is jobs‐housing balance within commuting sheds of the region’s largest employment centers. These three key land use components all relate strongly to the challenges the region faces in meeting federal and state clean air targets. To meet the air quality standards, increases from current conditions are essential in the shares of future growth in infill areas, medium and higher density housing products, and jobs‐housing balance around the region’s employment centers. The Board’s decisions on how to focus transportation investments can help to support the needed land use changes. Highlighted below are some of the refinements from the current plan included in this draft land use forecast, first at the regional scale. Keep in mind that all of these changes are of a relatively small scale and within the context of the policy framework of not altering the current plan unless there is clearly an information‐based reason to do so.
REGIONAL‐SCALE REFINEMENTS
The dominant overarching consideration, by far, has been that the economy has been recovering more slowly than expected, with the housing market in particular being stalled at about a 3,000‐unit‐per‐year production level. This is well below the current Plan’s forecasted annual rate through 2035 of over 11,000 units per year, and even further below the peak of the market in 2005, when over 17,000 new units were built. While there are some changes to market conditions in both the infill and greenfield areas, the big‐picture story is that the economics of significantly increasing housing construction of any type and in virtually any location remain very challenged.
1 SACOG, Policy Framework for MTP/SCS Update Process, December 12, 2013. http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2013/12/board/pdf/12B‐Framework.pdf. 2 SACOG, Framework for Draft Preferred Scenario, December 18, 2014. http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/12/board/pdf/10‐MTP%20Framework.pdf.
Page 1 of 6 Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 110 Overview of Draft Land Use Forecast March 25, 2015
Infill and Greenfield Development
Consumer preference and demographic studies, as well as market performance around the state and nation, continue to indicate that it will take more growth in infill areas and in attached and small‐lot single‐family products to satisfy the future demand that will come from the millennial generation and the fast‐growing senior population. The main differences in 2015 compared to 2011, when the current plan was written, are summarized below.
For infill development, there are somewhat improved regulatory and financial conditions. Two more changes to CEQA have been signed into law (SB226 and SB743), both designed to reduce barriers to infill development. Although neither has been fully implemented, both show promise of making a difference. In the fall of 2014, Governor Brown signed Infrastructure Financing District legislation to restore a portion of the tax increment financing capacity lost when redevelopment authority was eliminated, although it is not yet clear whether this new law will yield big change or small change. A state law also was passed directing a very substantial portion of Cap and Trade funding to infill areas for transportation, housing and other greenhouse gas‐reducing development projects. Local governments continue to revise their codes to ease the barriers to infill, such as the City of Sacramento’s major changes to its zoning code and parking regulations, both of which quickly helped to increase infill development. While it would be very unwise to understate the continued hurdles to large‐scale infill, the situation for this sector is decidedly better than four years ago.
For greenfield development, on balance conditions are about the same as four years ago. There has not been a large master planned community that has broken ground in this region in approximately the last decade. Recent good news from the federal government regarding levee work and flood designation issues in the North Natomas Basin means that construction of new homes is likely to re‐start in that area, enabling the build‐out of the current North Natomas Community Plan (approximately 3,000 new homes).3 While that supply of available lots will not last long, this is an important step in the right direction. One of the new trends in the last four years is an uptick in construction in approved projects that lend themselves to being built in small pieces or phases.
All of the natural resource conservation planning efforts throughout the region have made progress in the last four years, but all are at the minimum a few years from being completed to the point that construction using those plans can begin.4 While there is hope for eventual success of all of these initiatives, big challenges remain. It is difficult to confidently project a firm completion/implementation date for any of them, especially because all of them except Yolo County have made it a priority to address the impacts regulated by all three relevant
3 SACOG, Floodplains and Levee Improvements Update, June 5, 2014. http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/06/Transportation/pdf/6C‐Floodplain.pdf. 4 SACOG, Habitat Conservation Plans/Natural Communities Conservation Plans Development, June 5, 2014. http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/06/Transportation/pdf/6B‐Habitat.pdf.
Page 2 of 6 Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 111 Overview of Draft Land Use Forecast March 25, 2015
federal agencies (Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Environmental Protection Agency). While this comprehensive coverage is essential in order to truly achieve the clarity and certainty both development and environmental interests are seeking, it is a feat that has never been accomplished in prior plans. An HCP is a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service instrument to help implement the U.S. Endangered Species Act, but the Army Corps of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency have responsibilities under the U.S. Clean Water Act that must be addressed as well. All three federal agencies believe that in Placer and Sacramento Counties, absent an HCP with this type of expanded coverage, there is a substantial chance that limited available resource lands for protection and mitigation will make it impossible for all of the developments being planned in those areas to occur. Some of them suggest that even with such an HCP, it may not be possible to provide for all of the planned development. Regardless of how many projects are ultimately covered, the specific costs and regulatory streamlining that the HCPs will provide for any development project are not yet clear. On balance, the input SACOG received from the three federal agencies is that the Placer County Conservation Plan at this moment appears to be on a somewhat faster track to completion than the South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan. The large majority of new greenfield growth projected for the region is affected by these two plans. Nearly all developments affected by these plans are also pursuing individual federal permits, as an insurance policy in case the HCP efforts stall or are terminated. But the mitigation requirements for individual permits are typically higher than for projects covered by an adopted HCP and, due to labor shortages, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is currently focusing its staff time on the HCPs rather than processing individual permits.
A final big trend in the greenfield sector this plan cycle is the very large oversupply of housing and employment capacity in Developing Communities that are already entitled or very far along in the entitlement process.5 There are sites for about three new homes being planned for every one home of market demand through 2036 and sites for seven new employees for every projected new employee that the economy is likely to produce. Some have argued that this oversupply is good and necessary because, for a variety of reasons, not all of the projects will be built, and the market needs some flexibility to operate efficiently. Both the current plan and this draft land use forecast, in fact, provide slightly more than twice the capacity for growth within included Developing Communities as the projected amount to be actually built by 2035 or 2036, providing for a very substantial amount of extra capacity and market flexibility.
Southwest Placer County, especially in and around the city of Roseville, is projected to be a particularly strong performer in the Developing Community sector, and is projected in the draft land use forecast to see somewhat higher amounts of growth than in the current plan.
5 SACOG, Inventory of Adopted and Proposed Land Use Plans, April 3, 2014. http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/04/transportation/pdf/6B‐Inventory.pdf.
Page 3 of 6 Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 112 Overview of Draft Land Use Forecast March 25, 2015
Housing Product Types
Development conditions have been so unusual over the last few years that it is very difficult, and maybe dangerous, to interpret any empirical evidence as setting a trendline in one direction or another for anything. With that important qualifier, here are a few observations:
1. Traditional single‐family homes continue to have a fairly high market share in a very depressed homebuilding market.
2. Small‐lot and attached homes are being built, but mainly in the areas of the region with the highest property values in infill areas.
3. There has been a significant rise in demand for, and construction of, rental multi‐family projects. The evidence indicates that construction is not nearly as great as the current market demand, with rising rents and very low vacancy rates being the clearest proof of this. The depth of the long‐term market demand for rental products is a matter of debate throughout the country, but there seems little doubt that it will be greater than we have seen in this region in the past. There may be uncertainty about how long millenials’ current overwhelming pattern of renting instead of buying will last, and whether the future will bring better or worse conditions for home mortgages, but it seems very clear that to meet market demand, this region is going to have to be able to build a significantly greater amount of rental housing than it has in the past.6
The abundance of development capacity in the entitled and planned Developing Communities creates a special challenge for predicting the “most likely” development pattern to be built by 2036. We have found virtually no disagreement with the regional growth forecast that SACOG is using for this plan update. But few, if any, of the development teams or local government staff we interviewed are conducting market studies that estimate what portion of the regional or subregional market an individual development is likely to realize in the next few decades. As people review the details of this draft land use forecast, we strongly encourage you to keep in mind this basic dynamic of the large difference between projected regional market demand for housing and jobs and the sum of housing and employment capacity in these Developing Community plans.
Employment Sectors
As the regional economy recovers from the recession, much of the employment growth will refill existing vacant buildings and sites where there is and will continue to be significant capacity to absorb new employment. In the near term the recovery among the commercial markets (industrial, office and retail) is varied, with some sectors seeing less vacancy than others. Heavy industrial and light industrial sites are doing very well and light industrial is doing the best in terms of low vacancy rates and high demand. Industry experts expect these spaces to continue to do well in the region. On the other hand, research and development flex sites have high vacancy rates given the large amounts of vacant
6 SACOG, Trends in Demographics and Housing Demand, August 28, 2014. http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/08/transportation28/pdf/6A‐Housing.pdf.
Page 4 of 6 Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 113 Overview of Draft Land Use Forecast March 25, 2015 suburban office space that is available and competing with these sites. The office sector in general has a high vacancy rate, meaning that in the near term there will likely be very little new construction until these vacancy rates significantly decrease. The size of offices demanded by business is also changing. Except for large employers (e.g., the health care industry), few office users need or want 100,000 square feet or larger buildings. Most of the office demand is for 50,000 to 100,000 square feet. As employers try to attract millennial workers, there is evidence that some are moving from suburban to urban locations where many of these workers prefer to live and work. In the retail sector, businesses are continuing to locate in existing vacant retail buildings built in the last several years. Some new retail buildings are being constructed but it is questionable how much more of the traditional retail format is needed.
Although there is a large supply of existing and planned employment capacity in the region, predicting the most likely development pattern is somewhat less challenging than predicting the residential development pattern because employment tends to agglomerate in existing employment centers, and employment projects tend to build in much smaller increments than the large master planned residential communities. The largest of these centers are Downtown Sacramento, Rancho Cordova and Roseville and the latter two are faster growing. Several secondary (smaller) job centers and aspiring job centers are located throughout the region. The majority of the job growth projected occurs in all three of these employment centers, and among them the growth rate varies depending on how strong the current and historic job market has been in each center. Some aspiring centers, located in historically housing‐rich areas of the region, are forecast to see some uptick in their job growth compared to the current plan, although the changes are modest compared to the vision in their plans. Future plans may forecast greater amounts of employment growth in these aspiring centers if market performance warrants.
DRAFT PLAN SCENARIO PERFORMANCE ON REGULATED AIR EMISSIONS
SACOG is required to meet Federal Clean Air Act standards as a condition of receiving transportation funding from the Federal Government and must also meet performance targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from cars and light duty trucks set by the California Air Resources Board, if feasible.7 Current computer modeling indicates that, like the adopted plan, this Draft Preferred Scenario just meets the state’s greenhouse gas emission targets for the Sacramento region in 2035.
The modeling to establish Federal Clean Air Act compliance is much more complex and will not be completed until later in the spring. Total regional air emissions of all types correlate very closely with basic building blocks of the land use pattern, including the percentage of total growth projected in the “infill” areas (Centers/Corridors and Established Communities) compared to the sum of growth in Developing Communities and Rural Residential areas; the amount of housing growth in the sum of small‐lot single‐family and attached products versus large‐lot single‐family; and the balance of jobs and homes around the major employment centers in the region. See chart below.
7 Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, Regional Air Quality Planning Update, August 28, 2014. http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2014/08/transportation28/pdf/AQ%20Presentation%20HANDOUT.pdf
Page 5 of 6 Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 114 Overview of Draft Land Use Forecast March 25, 2015
Discussion Draft Preferred Scenario: Distribution of Jobs and Housing Units among Community Types New New Housing Housing Jobs Units Housing Jobs in Units in (2012‐ (2012‐ Jobs in Units in Community Type 2012 2012 2036) 2036 2036 2036 Center and Corridor Communities 34% 12% 35% 30% 35% 16% Established Communities 60% 76% 49% 28% 56% 64% Developing Communities 2% 4% 16% 40% 7% 12% Rural Residential Communities 4% 9% <1% 2% 3% 7%
Page 6 of 6 Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 115 Performance Outcomes Description of Regional Land Use and Transportation Scenarios Draft Scenario Scenario Scenario Adopted Performance Outcomes Preferred 1 2 3 2012 Plan Scenario Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) (percent change in total vehicle -5% -7% -12% -7% -8% miles traveled per person from 2008)
Vehicle miles traveled in heavy traffic (percent of total vehicle 5% 6% 5% 6% 6% miles traveled)
Jobs within 20-minute drive of residence (200,100 jobs in 253,500 260,100 267,800 263,100 272,700 2008)
Vehicle miles traveled to jobs centers (change in commute -15% -15% -22% -15% -15% VMT per worker at job centers, compared to 2008)
Trips by transit, bike, or walk to jobs centers (change in transit/bike/walk commute trips per worker at jobs centers, +82% +74% +112% +107% +93% compared to 2008)
Travel time spent in car per person (percent change from -3% -4% -4% -4% -4% 2008)
Trips by transit, bike, or walk (percent increase in per capita +12% +24% +27% +33% +24% transit, bike, walk share from 2008)
Transit costs recovered by ticket sales (percent) 38% 41% 51% 38% 38%
Share of new jobs near high-frequency transit (percent of new 40% 44% 43% 39% 42% jobs)
Share of new homes near high-frequency transit (percent of 27% 39% 39% 38% 37% new homes)
Total homes in environmental justice areas near high- 51% 53% 56% 55% 55% frequency transit (percent of homes, 30% in 2012)
Square miles of farmland converted to development (out of 93 61 45 57 57 4,251 square miles of farmland in 2012)
Square miles of vernal pools affected by development 7 5 2 7 6
Weekday passenger vehicle CO2 emissions (percent change -13.0% -14.8% -19.7% -15.6% -15.55% per person from 2005)*
*Final GHG reduction percentages are subject to state review and approval of technical methodology. This review won’t take place until updated SCS is complete in 2015.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 116 Draft Scenario Scenario Scenario Adopted Transportation Inputs Preferred 1 2 3 2012 Plan Scenario New or expanded roads (lane miles, percent increase from +34% +31% +25% +32% +27% 2008)
Transit service (vehicle service hours, percent increase from +54% +88% +127% +98% +94% 2008)
Additional miles of bicycle paths, lanes and routes (Class 1, 2 800 1100 1300 1100 1100 and 3 = 1,700 in 2008 )
Funding for maintaining and operating the road and highway $10.9 $11.5 $11.0 $11.5 $12.6 system
Funding for maintaining and operating the transit system $7.5 $7.9 $9.6 $7.9 $7.1
Funding for new or expanded bus and light rail lines $3.2 $3.4 $4.1 $3.4 $3.5
Funding for new or expanded roads and highways $8.7 $7.4 $6.7 $7.4 $5.8
Funding for bike and pedestrian routes, trails and paths $2.8 $2.8 $3.0 $2.8 $2.8
Funding for Programs and Planning (e.g., Community Design, $1.5 $2.2 $1.7 $2.2 $1.7 Spare the Air, Sacramento Region 511, May is Bike Month) Draft Scenario Scenario Scenario Adopted Land Use Inputs Preferred 1 2 3 2012 Plan Scenario Jobs-Housing Ratio (within 4 miles of primary and secondary jobs centers) 1.27 1.26 1.26 1.29 1.25 Regional average = 1.2
Share of growth in Center and Corridor Communities Percent of new homes 20% 31% 36% 30% 30% Percent of new jobs 27% 36% 35% 29% 35%
Share of growth in Established Communities Percent of new homes 29% 25% 27% 26% 28% Percent of new jobs 57% 49% 53% 52% 49%
Share of growth in Developing Communities Percent of new homes & jobs 47% 42% 36% 42% 40% Percent of new jobs 15% 14% 12% 18% 16% Share of growth in Rural Residential Communities Percent of new homes 4% 2% 2% 1% 2% Percent of new jobs 1% 1% <1% 1% <1% Share of growth in large-lot, single-family homes 39% 28% 24% 29% 29%
Share of growth in small-lot, single-family homes 29% 28% 23% 28% 26%
Share of growth in attached homes 32% 43% 53% 43% 45%
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 117 Comparison of Draft Preferred Scenario to the 2012 MTP/SCS
The Board’s adopted Policy Framework 1.01 focused the 2016 update of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS) on refinement of the current high-performing plan, with attention to the following policy themes:
• Land Use Forecast: what is the economic viability of projected greenfield and infill growth? • Transportation Funding : capture all reasonably foreseeable revenues from local, state and federal sources; • Investment Strategy: shift budget to road and transit system maintenance to the extent feasible; • Investment Timing: consider changes to the timing of transportation investments in order to make budget available earlier for system maintenance and maintain or improve the travel and air quality performance of the transportation system; • Plan Effects: make progress on developing new measures of the effects of the plan on different people & issues.
The following describes how the Draft Preferred Scenario supports these policy themes and compares to the adopted 2012 MTP/SCS.
Policy Theme: Land Use Forecast The draft land use forecast is largely the same as the forecast of the 2012 plan. As reported in Attachment C, and consistent with the Board’s Framework 2.0 for a Draft Preferred Scenario, the draft land use forecast changed slightly from the 2012 plan in overall regional distribution of housing growth. The draft forecast has two percent more growth in infill areas (Center and Corridor and Established Communities), and two percent less growth in greenfield areas (Developing Communities), than the 2012 plan.
At a subregional level, the draft land use forecast has a slightly higher rate of greenfield growth in Southwest Placer County and Folsom, and somewhat higher levels of infill growth in the urban core of the region (downtown Sacramento and West Sacramento) compared to the 2012 plan. Recall that the framework for evaluating growth plans and projects was presented to the SACOG Board and stakeholders in the fall.2 Also new to this land use forecast is the partial buildout of two universities in southwest Placer County (a private university based in England and a new Sacramento State University campus).
1 http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2013/12/board/pdf/12B-Framework.pdf 2 http://sacog.org/calendar/2014/10/transportation/pdf/6B- MTP%20SCS%20Land%20Use%20Methodology.pdf
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 118 Policy Theme: Transportation Funding The Draft Preferred Scenario revenue projections maintain all of the same funding sources from the 2012 plan and add a number of new revenue sources. Slower projected growth in fuel prices and consumption reduce the amount of traditional federal and state revenue sources by about $500 million from the current plan. However, the Draft Preferred Scenario identifies three new revenue sources that increase the overall budget compared to the current plan by about $2.6 billion:
• A new ½-cent sales tax in Placer County, which constitutes the largest change in the budget by adding $1.5 billion for strategic capacity, operational, and maintenance projects; • Nearly $1 billion in projected state Cap and Trade revenues that could be available to the region for certain greenhouse gas-reducing investments; • A more full accounting of $600 million in state Highway Bridge Funding to replace or rehabilitate public highway bridges over waterways, topographical barriers, other highways, or railroads.
Policy Theme: Investment Strategy Compared to the 2012 plan, the Draft Preferred Scenario budget adds more than $2 billion to system maintenance needs by rearranging current sources of funding and finding new sources of funding to dedicate to system maintenance. Like the last two plans, the Draft Preferred Scenario includes revenue equivalent to a new half-cent sales tax in Sacramento County, which is assumed to be split equally between road maintenance and transit operations. As mentioned above, the Draft Preferred Scenario varies from the current plan in assuming two additional new revenue sources: a new half-cent sales tax in Placer County that would likely generate additional funding for road maintenance, and a portion of state Cap and Trade funding for road rehabilitation projects that would also enhance or complete streets for multi-modal travel.
The draft project list reduces the amount of funding for road and highway expansion by $600 million by delaying until after 2036 or scaling down capacity expansion projects. Overall funding for transit capital increases by $200 million compared to the current plan to help pay for additional vehicle replacements. Some capital-intensive transit expansion projects, such as a new streetcar in Rancho Cordova, were delayed past the plan period to make more funding available for vehicle replacements and operations of fixed route bus services.
Policy Theme: Investment Timing To support the policy goal of increased investment in system maintenance, the Draft Preferred Scenario was developed with an eye toward identifying capacity projects – both road and transit projects – that could be right-sized or right-timed, in part to make room in the budget for more system maintenance, but also to honor financial constraint requirements and to help meet federal and state air quality standards. In the Draft Preferred Scenario, there are 196 fewer lane miles of new roads, a three percent reduction from the current plan, and 21 fewer daily vehicle service hours of transit, less than a one percent reduction from the current plan.
To determine where road investments were needed or could be delayed or scaled down, staff used a set of screening criteria. The screening questions were:
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 119
1) Is the roadway congested during peak demand periods, either in the base year (2012) or the planning horizon year? 2) Is the increase in capacity on the roadway greater than the projected increase in travel on the roadway? 3) Is the roadway significantly under-utilized during peak periods?3
SACOG staff used the screening criteria to work with local agency partners to recommend projects for delay or scaling. Most of the projects where construction was delayed past the plan horizon remain in the project list with project development-only funding. These projects are still eligible to seek federal or state funding and move forward with project analysis, environmental, and right-of-way activities that will prepare them for inclusion in future updates of the plan, as needed. Examples of projects that were delayed out of the Draft Preferred Scenario include portions of the Capital Southeast Connector, a widening of Hazel Avenue between Madison Avenue and the Placer County Line, the Feather River Expressway in Yuba County, and Sutter’s Landing Parkway in the City of Sacramento. In total, over 100 road or highway capacity projects that were included in the 2012 MTP/SCS were delayed out of the Draft Preferred Scenario.
Despite fewer capacity projects, the Draft Preferred Scenario includes some new notable projects: an expanded set of improvements on the Capital City Freeway to address one of the region’s major bottlenecks, additional capacity and operational improvements on Highway 65 in Placer County, and new capacity along Jackson Highway in Sacramento County. Region-wide, about 60 new road or highway expansion projects are included in the Draft Preferred Scenario that were not part of the 2012 plan. These new projects occur in areas where there is an anticipated increase in travel demand caused by housing or employment growth.
Policy Theme: Plan Effects
The project list refinement work that staff conducted with local agencies has resulted in a Draft Preferred Scenario that is more efficient in terms of expenditures and travel performance. Although the Draft Preferred Scenario projects four percent less transit ridership than the current plan, the combined reductions in road capacity investments result in greater reductions in vehicle miles traveled compared to the current plan (-8 percent per capita reduction in the Draft Preferred Scenario compared to -7 percent in the 2012 plan) while holding congested travel steady from the current plan. In addition to holding this congestion metric steady, the Draft Preferred Scenario achieves the region’s SB 375 greenhouse gas targets for the years 2020 and 2035.
The Draft Preferred Scenario also has better overall transit performance than the 2012 plan despite less overall transit investment and forecasted lower fuel prices (lower fuel prices tend to result in more travelers choosing to drive over other modes of travel). This enhanced performance is due to a more efficient transportation system resulting from slightly more infill growth overall, and more detailed work with local agencies on the timing of transportation investments to match the projected land use pattern.
3 http://www.sacog.org/calendar/2015/02/board/pdf/12- MTPSCS%203%20Screening%20Questions%20for%20Project%20Phasing%20Supplement.pdf
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 120
Notably, the Draft Preferred Scenario improves both sub-regional jobs-housing balance from the 2012 plan and the supporting transportation investments that feed into regional job centers. This results in a number of travel improvements into regional employment centers:
• Average commute vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per worker within the regional employment centers declines over time by 15 percent; • Transit, bike and walk mode share for commute travel to regional employment centers increases over time by 93 percent; and • The number of jobs within a 20-minute drive of a residence increases by 36 percent.
Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 121