DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Sacramento Regional Transit District 5-Year Capital Plan (FY 2008 – FY 2012) Table of Contents Section I: Introduction & Overview • Overview.............................................................................................................. I-1 • Process to Develop the 5-Year Capital Plan ............................................................ I-2 • Structure of the 5-Year Capital Plan........................................................................ I-3 • District Profile .........................................................................................................I-4 to I-5 • Funding Summary...........................................................................................................I-6 • Funding Sources .............................................................................................................I-7 • Guiding Documents ................................................................................I-8 to I-10 Section II: 5-Year Capital Plan Summary (FY 2008 – FY 2012) • 5-Year Plan Index...................................................................... Index-1 to Index-6 • 5-Year Plan Project Summaries .......................................................... II-1 to II-106 Tier I: Fund thru FY 2012: System Expansion: Light Rail: Northeast Corridor Enhancements (Phase 1) II-1 South Sacramento Phase 2 Light Rail Extension II-2 Downtown-Natomas-Airport Light Rail Extension II-4 Fleet Program: LR Vehicle Mid-Life Overhauls/Improvements: Siemens Light Rail Vehicle Mid-Life Overhaul II-6 UTDC Fleet Mid-Life Refurbishment II-7 Light Rail UTDC Vehicle Retrofit: UTDC Automatic Train Announcement & CCTV Retrofit II-8 Bus: CNG Bus Replacement (15 in 2012) II-9 Community Bus: Neighborhood Ride Vehicle Replacement (2008) II-10 Paratransit: Paratransit Vehicle Replacement (FY07 to 2030) II-11 Infrastructure Program: Supports Amtrak-Folsom LR Extension: Sunrise Siding (Side Track Switch) II-12 Light Rail: Traction Power Upgrades II-13 Light Rail System Enhancements II-14 Northeast Corridor Enhancements (Phase 2) II-15 Crossing / Traffic Signal Improvements: Light Rail Crossing Enhancements II-16 Transit Oriented Design: TOD Joint Development Projects II-17 Bus: Bus Stop Improvement Program II-18 00 Table of Contents.doc i 11/14/06 Sacramento Regional Transit District 5-Year Capital Plan (FY 2008 – FY 2012) Table of Contents Tier I: Fund thru FY 2012 - (Cont.): Facilities Program: Light Rail: Wayside Equipment Storage II-19 Metro West LR Maintenance Facility (Specialty Steel) II-20 Bus: Bus Maintenance Facility #2 (Phase 1) II-21 State of Good Repair: Major LRT Station Enhancements II-22 ADA Transition Plan Improvements II-23 Facilities Maintenance & Improvements II-24 Equipment Program: Light Rail: Wheel Truing Machine Controls II-25 Bus: Shop Equipment - Bus II-26 Communications: Communication Equipment Replacement II-27 General & Administrative: Non-Revenue Vehicle Replacement II-28 Transit Technologies Program: Communications: Automatic Stop Announcements for Buses II-29 Automated Vehicle Location System for Buses II-30 Universal Fare Program: Fare Vending Machines II-31 Farebox Collection / Smart Media Implementation II-32 Fiber Optics: FIBER Infrastructure Management Application II-33 Transit Security & Safety (Mandated): Safety/Security: Ahern/12th Street Improvements II-34 Repave Bus Berth at the Power Inn LR Station II-35 Mandated: General Order 95 System Upgrade II-36 Noise Attenuation Soundwalls II-37 Richards Blvd/12th & 16th Ave. Grade Crossing II-38 Planning/Studies: Light Rail: Light Rail Maintenance Facilities Study II-39 Light Rail Station Pedestrian Improvements Study II-40 General & Administrative: Administrative Campus Space Study Update II-41 Transit Master Plan Update II-42 Fleet & Facilities Plan Update II-43 Radio and Data System Replacement Study II-44 General Planning Support Services II-45 00 Table of Contents.doc ii 11/14/06 Sacramento Regional Transit District 5-Year Capital Plan (FY 2008 – FY 2012) Table of Contents Tier I: Fund thru FY 2012 - (Cont.): Other Programs: Information Technology: iSCSI SAN Implementation II-46 Network Firewall Upgrade II-47 General & Administrative: Certificates of Participation Payments II-48 General Construction Management Support Services II-49 General Engineering Support Services II-50 Capital Contingency II-51 Environmental Support Services II-52 Tier II: Want to Fund thru FY 2012: Fleet Program: Light Rail Fleet Acquisition/Replacement: Siemens 1st Series Fleet Replacement (26) II-53 LR Vehicle Mid-Life Overhauls/Improvements: Siemens E & H Ramp Replacement II-54 Infrastructure Program: Supports Amtrak-Folsom LR Extension: Folsom Corridor Soundwall Landscaping II-55 Crossing / Traffic Signal Improvements: Wayside Signal Reconfiguration Phase 2 II-56 Signal Improvements II-57 Passenger Facilities: Light Rail Station Pedestrian Improvements II-58 Wayfinding Signage II-59 Light Rail Station Shelter Improvement Program II-60 Swanston Pedestrian Bridge II-61 Bus: Operator Restrooms II-62 Facilities Program: Light Rail: Light Rail Maintenance Facility #2 II-63 General & Administrative: I.T. Training Center II-64 00 Table of Contents.doc iii 11/14/06 Sacramento Regional Transit District 5-Year Capital Plan (FY 2008 – FY 2012) Table of Contents Tier II: Want to Fund thru FY 2012 - (Cont.): Equipment Program: Bus: Bus Simulator II-65 Communications: Radio System Central Electronics Bank/CBS Dispatch Consoles II-66 Information Technology: Network Operations Center Environmental Control II-67 Power Systems for Network Operations Center II-68 Server Clustering II-69 Network Backup and Data Archive Upgrade II-70 Server Replacement II-71 Network Switch Semi-Decade Replacement II-72 Annual Hardware Replacement/Upgrade Program II-73 General & Administrative: Equipment to Move Historic Streetcar II-74 Non-Revenue Vehicle Expansion II-75 Transit Technologies Program: Light Rail: In-Service LR Vehicle Data Retrieval (Security/Maintenance) II-76 Upgrading Rail Interlockings (Remote Indication) II-77 Wi-Fi Light Rail System II-78 Supervisory Control & Data Acquisition System (SCADA) II-79 Communications: LR Station Video Surveillance & Recording System II-80 Systemwide Maintenance Management Software II-81 Enhance Public Web Based Services (Phase II) II-82 Intelligent Transportation Systems II-83 Fiber Optics: Incremental Lighting of Fiber II-84 Planning/Studies: Bus: Gold River Bus Way/Park & Ride Study II-85 Community Bus: Community Bus Service Study II-86 General & Administrative: Smart Card Transaction Study II-87 Other Programs: Information Technology: SAP Web Portal & NetWeaver Platform II-88 Integrated Contract Admin System (ICAS) Replacement II-89 Data Warehouse Upgrade II-90 SAP Upgrade from 4.6c to ERP 2005 II-91 General & Administrative: Right of Way Mapping (Phase 2) II-92 Implement Document Archival System II-93 00 Table of Contents.doc iv 11/14/06 Sacramento Regional Transit District 5-Year Capital Plan (FY 2008 – FY 2012) Table of Contents Tier III: Opportunity Based thru FY 2012: System Expansion: Light Rail: Gold Line Double Track (Past Hazel LR Station) II-94 Passenger Facilities: Light Rail Station at T Street II-95 Light Rail Station at Dos Rios II-96 Light Rail Station at Horn II-97 Bus: Bus Rapid Transit on Watt Avenue II-98 Bus Rapid Transit on Stockton Boulevard (Phase 2) II-99 Regional Projects: Regional Rail II-100 West Sacramento Streetcar II-101 Fleet Program: Bus: CNG Bus Expansion (through 2025) II-102 Community Bus: Neighborhood Ride Vehicle Expansion II-103 Paratransit: Paratransit Vehicle Expansion II-104 Paratransit Expansion Vehicle Replacement II-105 Facilities Program: General & Administrative: New Headquarters Building II-106 Section III: Future Capital Projects (Post 2012) • Future Project Index .................................................................. Index-1 to Index-6 • Future Project Summaries................................................................... III-1 to III-25 System Expansion: Light Rail: Laguna West Light Rail Extension III-1 South Sacramento Phase 3 Light Rail Extension III-2 Antelope Light Rail Extension III-3 Antelope to Roseville Light Rail Extension III-4 West Sacramento to Davis Light Rail Extension III-5 Cal-Traction Corridor Light Rail Extension III-6 Passenger Facilities: Light Rail Station at Mineshaft III-7 Bus: Bus Rapid Transit on Sunrise Boulevard III-8 Bus Rapid Transit on Florin Road III-9 00 Table of Contents.doc v 11/14/06 Sacramento Regional Transit District 5-Year Capital Plan (FY 2008 – FY 2012) Table of Contents Section III: Future Capital Projects (Post 2012) - Cont. Fleet Program: Light Rail Fleet Acquisition/Replacement: Siemens 2nd Series Fleet Replacement (10) III-10 UTDC Fleet Replacement III-11 CAF Series Fleet Replacement (40) III-12 LR Vehicle Mid-Life Overhauls/Improvements: CAF Fleet Component Overhaul III-13 Bus: CNG Replica Streetcar Replacement (4 in 2013) III-14 CNG Expansion Bus Replacement III-15 CNG Existing Bus Fleet Replacement (2013 - 2039) III-16 Community Bus: Neighborhood Ride Expansion Vehicle Replacement III-17 Facilities Program: Bus: Bus Maintenance Facility #1 Rehabilitation III-18 Bus Maintenance Facility #2 (Phase 2) III-19 State of Good Repair: Paving Restoration Program III-20 General & Administrative: Hallcraft Building Remodel III-21 Transit Technologies Program: Light Rail: Passenger Information Signs III-22 Central Train Tracking (Phase 2) III-23 Communications: Radio and Data System Replacement
Recommended publications
  • City of Elk Grove Public Transit Fares

    City of Elk Grove Public Transit Fares

    AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.2 CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: Consider 1) approving a proposal by MV Transportation for a new reverse commute service rate of $25/hour; and 2) authorizing staff to notice new fare rates and services for reverse commuting MEETING DATE: January 25, 2012 PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT HEAD: Richard Shepard, Public Works Director / City Engineer RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff recommends the City Council consider: 1) Approving a proposal by MV Transportation for a new reverse commute service rate of $25/hour; and 2) Authorizing staff to notice new fare rates and services for reverse commuting. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On December 14, 2011, City Council heard an item discussing costs of implementing reverse commute services between Elk Grove and Downtown Sacramento in order to support the relocation of the California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS) Department. Consistent with existing contract requirements, it was estimated that the net cost of this service would be approximately $94,000 per year. This net cost was estimated assuming the following: 1 Elk Grove City Council January 25, 2012 Page 2 of 6 Estimated Cost of New Reverse Commute Service New service costs at the $190,000 contracted rate of $53.09/hour Less new revenue based on 100 new monthly permits at a reduced <$96,000> cost of $80/month Estimated net annual cost $94,000 Since a majority of the reverse commute service would come from using buses that are “dead-heading” (returning empty), Council requested that staff negotiate with MV Transportation, Inc. (MV) to reduce the contracted rate to a level that would make the service revenue neutral to the City.
  • Appendix G-1: Frameworks for the 2016 MTP/SCS Update Process

    Appendix G-1: Frameworks for the 2016 MTP/SCS Update Process

    Appendix G-1: Frameworks for the 2016 MTP/SCS Update Process Table of Contents 1) Schedule of Board Actions Leading to Final Plan Adoption ………………………………….. 2 2) Policy Framework for the MTP/SCS Update Process ………………………………………… 3 3) MTP/SCS Approach to Scenario Development ………………………………………………… 27 4) Framework for a Draft Preferred Scenario ……………………………………………………… 30 5) Endorse 2016 Draft Preferred Scenario …………………………………………………………. 53 Appendix G-1 Draft 8/19 Page 1 2016 MTP/SCS Update: Schedule of Board Actions Leading to Final Plan Adoption Board Action Date of Action Contents/Direction Framework 1.0: Adopted December 2013 • Set implementation-focused theme for plan update with Policy Framework five policy themes: transportation funding, investment strategy, investment timing, land use forecast, plan effects. • Set region-level growth projections of population, employment and housing for the plan horizon year (2036). • Set overall schedule for the plan update. Framework 1.5: Adopted March 2014 • Set parameters for three regional land use and Scenarios transportation scenarios for use in public workshops and Development plan development. Framework • Initiated phasing analysis of transportation investments in current plan. • Initiated analysis of different levels and types of transportation revenue sources. • Set schedule for creation of Framework 2.0. Framework 2.0: Targeted for November or • Sets guidelines, task and process for developing a draft December 2014 adoption Draft Preferred preferred scenario (land use forecast, revenue forecast, Scenario project list, performance outcomes). Framework • Sets a minimum of six weeks for review and vetting of a preliminary draft preferred scenario. Framework 3.0: Targeted for April 2015 • Sets details of Draft Preferred Scenario (for years 2020, Draft Preferred 2035, and 2036) for use in development of Draft Plan and Scenario EIR: o Land use forecast o Revenue Forecast o Budget and Project List o Performance Outcomes Draft Plan (2016 Targeted for September 2015 • Release Draft 2016 MTP/SCS for public comment.
  • FY 2011-2012 Capital Budget Represents the One Year Capital Spending Plan for RT

    FY 2011-2012 Capital Budget Represents the One Year Capital Spending Plan for RT

    Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Budget Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................ 1 General Manager/CEO Budget Message ........................................... 3 Board of Directors Board of Directors .................................................................................6 Budget Adoption Resolutions................................................................7 Budget Presentation Award......................................................................8 Executive Management Team ............................................................. 9 Organizational Structure ................................................................... 10 District Overview District Profile ......................................................................................11 Service Area Map................................................................................15 Strategic Plan......................................................................................17 Long-Term Financial Policies ..............................................................19 Budget Process...................................................................................27 Voting System .....................................................................................29 Trends.................................................................................................31 Peer Comparison ................................................................................34
  • PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION August 16, 2017 Advice Letter 5042-E Erik Jacobson Director, Regulatory Relations Pacific Gas An

    PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION August 16, 2017 Advice Letter 5042-E Erik Jacobson Director, Regulatory Relations Pacific Gas An

    STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 August 16, 2017 Advice Letter 5042-E Erik Jacobson Director, Regulatory Relations Pacific Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street, Mail Code B10C P.O. Box 770000 San Francisco, CA 94177 SUBJECT: Encroachment Agreement with Sacramento Regional Transit District Request for Approval Under Section 851 and General Order 173 Dear Mr. Jacobson: Advice Letter 5042-E is effective as of August 10, 2017, per Resolution E-4856 Ordering Paragraph. Sincerely, Edward Randolph Director, Energy Division Erik Jacobson Pacific Gas and Electric Company Director 77 Beale St., Mail Code B10C Regulatory Relations P.O. Box 770000 San Francisco, CA 94177 Fax: 415-973-1448 March 30, 2017 Advice 5042-E (Pacific Gas and Electric Company ID U 39 E) Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Subject: Encroachment Agreement with Sacramento Regional Transit District – Request for Approval Under Section 851 and General Order 173 Purpose Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) requests approval under Public Utilities Code Section 851 (Section 851) and General Order 173 to grant an encroachment agreement (Agreement) to the Sacramento Regional Transit District, a Public Corporation (RT). The Agreement permits the encroachment of a light rail system and passenger station platform (Improvements) within PG&E’s Easement Area (PG&E Easement). A copy of the Agreement is attached hereto as Attachment 1. PG&E has inspected the encroachment agreement and has determined that granting the encroachment will not interfere with PG&E’s operations or its ability to provide utility services to its customers.
  • Alternatives Analysis for High Capacity Public Transit on the Rail

    Alternatives Analysis for High Capacity Public Transit on the Rail

    Proposal Alternatives Analysis for High Capacity Public Transit on the Rail Right of Way Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission in Partnership with Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District (METRO) RFP 2020-08-05 September 3, 2019 Contents 01 Transmittal Letter I 02 Work Plan 01 03 Schedule 09 04 Cost Proposal 10 05 Firm Qualifi cations 12 06 Project Team, Organization Chart, and Staffi ng Plan 16 07 Qualifi cations and Relevant Experience 19 08 Federally/State-Funded Transportation Project Experience 23 09 Management Approach 24 10 References 26 Appendix A Additional Information Appendix B Resumes Appendix C Exceptions and Deviations Appendix D Cost Proposal Detail by Task Appendix E Required Forms HDR supports sustainable resource conservation and material recycling practices. This proposal package is 100% recyclable. This page is intentionally left blank. September 3, 2019 Ginger Dykaar Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission 1523 Pacifi c Avenue Santa Cruz, CA 95060 RE: Proposal for Alternatives Analysis for High Capacity Public Transit on the Rail Right of Way RFP 2020-08-05 Dear Ms. Dykaar, HDR, a full service Planning and Engineering Corporation with a long-history of transportation planning and alternatives analysis experience, is pleased to submit this proposal to assist the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) and Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District (METRO) to conduct a high capacity transit alternatives analysis for the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line. We have thoughtfully developed a complete team to meet every technical challenge required of the RTC and METRO including expertise across all transit modes and systems; federal, state, and local transport fi nance; travel modeling and market assessment; active transportation and trails; performance-based planning using triple bottom line processes and linkages to vision and goals; economic growth analysis; environmental and engineering constraints and design needs; value engineering and business planning; and engaging public and stakeholder partners.
  • Ridership Report (October 2019)

    Ridership Report (October 2019)

    Ridership Report (October 2019) Year to Date Summary Category FY20 YTD FY19YTD Difference % Change Trailing 12 Month Trend Bus 3,518,921 3,415,852 103,069 3.0% 11,500,000 Light Rail 3,848,176 3,641,112 207,064 5.7% Rail Bus System Total 7,367,097 7,056,964 310,133 4.4% 11,000,000 10,500,000 Current Month Summary 10,000,000 Category October 2019 October 2018 Difference % Change Bus 1,059,668 1,014,352 45,316 4.5% 9,500,000 Light Rail 1,063,740 1,025,613 38,127 3.7% System Total 2,123,408 2,039,965 83,443 4.1% 9,000,000 Daily Summary Category October 2019 October 2018 Difference % Change Bus (M-F) 41,415 40,275 1,140 2.8% Bus (Sat) 15,390 13,266 2,124 16.0% Bus (Sun) 10,371 7,915 2,456 31.0% October Ridership by Mode Light Rail (M-F) 40,939 40,510 429 1.1% 6% Light Rail (Sat) 17,127 13,500 3,627 26.9% Light Rail Light Rail (Sun) 12,229 9,500 2,729 28.7% Fixed Route 48% Other Services E-Tran Ridership Summary (E-Van included) 46% Category Current Year Prior Year Difference % Change E-Tran (YTD) 280,319 266,440 13,879 5.2% E-Tran (Monthly) 84,775 81,648 3,127 3.8% Other services include E-Tran, Folsom, SmaRT Ride, CBS and Special Services E-Tran (Weekday) 3,560 3,426 134 3.9% Route Level Ridership Comparison (Bus) Weelday Route Comparison Saturday Route Comparison Route Oct 2019 Oct 2018 Difference % Change Route Oct 2019 Oct 2018 Difference % Change 1 2,067 2,190 (124) -6% 1 768 777 (9) -1% 11 972 715 257 36% 11 447 282 165 59% 13 678 315 362 115% 13 426 - 426 15 795 1,215 (420) -35% 15 381 558 (176) -32% 19 423 658 (234) -36% 19 209 271
  • City of Sacramento

    City of Sacramento

    CITY OF SACRAMENTO LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT LAND USE POLICIES AND GUIDELINES April 2005 Prepared by Planning Division Long Range Planning Section Development Services Department Todd Leon, Project Manager Jim McDonald AICP, Senior Planner Stacia Cosgrove, Associate Planner Christopher Jordan, Student Assistant Nathan Stephens, Student Assistant http://www.cityofsacramento.org/dsd/planning/plngserv/lngrng/policies.htm TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................I I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 II. CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN...........................................................................5 SECTION 1: POLICIES........................................................................................................7 SECTION 2: RESIDENTIAL LAND USE ELEMENT.........................................................12 SECTION 4: COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY LAND USE ELEMENT ...............................15 SECTION 5: CIRCULATION ELEMENT............................................................................20 III. REGIONAL TRANSIT PLANS .............................................................................................25 A. REGIONAL TRANSIT MASTER PLAN (1993) ............................................................26 B. REGIONAL TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BUS AND LIGHT RAIL FACILITIES...............................................................................................................33
  • Agenda Consent Calendar Regular Calendar

    Agenda Consent Calendar Regular Calendar

    AGENDA (530) 661-0816 NOTICE If requested, this agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Federal Rules and Regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Persons seeking an alternative format should contact Kathy Souza, Executive Assistant, for further information. In addition, a person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in a public meeting should telephone or otherwise contact Kathy Souza as soon as possible and preferably at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Kathy Souza may be reached at telephone number (530) 661-0816 or at the following address: 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776. It is the policy of the Board of Directors of the Yolo County Transportation District to encourage participation in the meetings of the Board of Directors. At each open meeting, members of the public shall be provided with an opportunity to directly address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board of Directors. Please fill out a speaker card and give it to the Board Clerk if you wish to address the Board. Speaker cards are provided on a table by the entrance to the meeting room. Depending on the length of the agenda and number of speakers who filled out and submitted cards, the Board Chair reserves the right to limit a public speaker’s time to no more than three (3) minutes, or less, per agenda item.
  • Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program

    Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program

    - 2021-2024 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program SACOG MISSION BOARD MEMBERS AND MEMBER JURISDICTIONS Provide leadership and a Karm Bains, Sutter County dynamic, collaborative public Krista Bernasconi, City of Roseville forum for achieving an efficient regional transportation system, Gary Bradford, Yuba County innovative and integrated Chris Branscum, City of Marysville regional planning, and high quality of life within the greater Pamela Bulahan, City of Isleton Sacramento region. Trinity Burruss, City of Colfax Jan Clark-Crets, Town of Loomis Rich Desmond, Sacramento County Lucas Frerichs, City of Davis Sue Frost, Sacramento County Jill Gayaldo, City of Rocklin Lakhvir Ghag, City of Live Oak Bonnie Gore, Placer County Martha Guerrero, City of West Sacramento Shon Harris, City of Yuba City Rick Jennings, City of Sacramento Paul Joiner, City of Lincoln Patrick Kennedy, Sacramento County Mike Kozlowski, City of Folsom Rich Lozano, City of Galt Porsche Middleton, City of Citrus Heights Pierre Neu, City of Winters David Sander, City of Rancho Cordova Michael Saragosa, City of Placerville Don Saylor, Yolo County Jay Schenirer, City of Sacramento Matt Spokely, City of Auburn Tom Stallard, City of Woodland Darren Suen, City of Elk Grove Wendy Thomas, El Dorado County Rick West, City of Wheatland Amarjeet Benipal, Ex-Officio Member 2021-2024 MTIP Contents A Guide to the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Contents Page Number Introduction .................................................................................................................................
  • High-Speed Rail: Big Changes Afoot? Afoot? Changes Big Rail: High-Speed

    High-Speed Rail: Big Changes Afoot? Afoot? Changes Big Rail: High-Speed

    PAGES 4-5: A SACRAMENTO REGIONAL RAIL STRATEGY Volume 29 Number 1 May 2019 – August 2019 High-Speed Rail: Big Changes Afoot? By David Schonbrunn TRAC Vice President, Policy The Governor’s startlingly candid admission that “Right now, there simply isn’t a path to get from Sacra- mento to San Diego, let alone from San Francisco to LA” has triggered what could become a major reassessment of the State’s commitment to this project. Governor Newsom’s candor was a total break from eight years of uncompromising support by Jerry Brown for a project that still has no realistic long-term funding. The release of the California High- Speed Rail Authority’s (CHSRA) 2019 Project Update Report. and the Trump Administration’s cancellation of a $929 million grant to the project, when added to the Governor’s statement, combine to create a highly dynamic situation. While the State has sued the federal Daniel Schwen, own work 2008.. Creative Commons Attribution/Share 4.0 International government to recoup the funds, no one knows where any of this will end up. HSR system will never be more than a The private sector has wanted to standalone Bakersfield-to-Merced line. invest in passenger rail in California, CHSRA’s new plan calls for HSR but has been blocked by politicians service between Bakersfield and While transportation projects are promoting CHSRA’s project. CHSRA was Merced. This $20 billion plan would judged on their cost/benefit ratio, the cost $15 billion more than the $5 billion new plan completely flunks that test. (continued on Page Two) that has already been spent.
  • 20 Trans 011 Sit Sp Pace E

    20 Trans 011 Sit Sp Pace E

    Jumpstarting the Transit Space Race: 2011 A Catalog and Analysis of Planned and Proposed Transit Projects in the US April 2011 Reconnecting America is a national nonprofit that is helping to transform promising ideas into thriving communities – where transportation choices make it easy to get from place to place, where businesses flourish, and where people from all walks of life can afford to live, work and visit. At Reconnecting America we not only develop research and innovative public policy, we also build the on-the-ground partnerships and convene the players necessary to accelerate decision-making. This work was made possible with generous support from the Rockefeller Foundation. This report was written by Jeff Wood and Elizabeth Wampler with support from Bill Sadler. Photos on cover by J. Brew and Jeff Wood. Reconnecting America, Reconnecting America, Reconnecting America, Washington DC Oakland Denver 1707 L Street, N.W., Suite 210 436 14th Street, Suite 1005 899 Logan Street, Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20036 Oakland, CA 94612 Denver, CO 80203 T 202-429-6990 T 510-268-8602 T 303-861-1421 F 202-315-3508 F 510-268-8673 F 303-573-1574 www.reconnectingamerica.org Table of Contents Introduction and Top Line Takeaways ........................................................................................................... 4 Connecting Jobs and Low Income Households: A detailed analysis of how proposed transit lines connect to jobs and low-income households. ............................................................................................................ 10 Understanding the Transit Planning Process. .............................................................................................. 15 Regional Themes: Six major themes of transit planning that we saw repeated again and again. ............. 21 Regional Stories: A brief overview of the state of transit planning in each region we surveyed.
  • Rider Alert Service Changes 6/17/19 September 8, 2019 Route Changes Route Changes Route Changes Route Changes

    Rider Alert Service Changes 6/17/19 September 8, 2019 Route Changes Route Changes Route Changes Route Changes

    Updated Changes take effect on Rider Alert Service Changes 6/17/19 September 8, 2019 Route Changes Route Changes Route Changes Route Changes Improve evening frequency and reduce early morning Combine with Route 22 and extend north and west in Shift trips beginning from Arden/Del Paso station at Combine Routes 30 and Route 38. Both routes would frequency. Add new trips from Sunrise Mall at 6:29, 6:59, Natomas. Discontinue part of existing route through 9:45 and 10:45 p.m. later approximately 5 minutes for use J/L Street from Sacramento Valley Station to 39th and 7:29 p.m. and from Watt/I-80 at 7:04, 7:34, 8:04, and Natomas. Improve headways to 45 minutes. Add train transfers. Adjust schedules to maintain more even Street. Route 30 would continue to CSUS as it does 8:34 p.m. Eliminate trips from Sunrise Mall at 5:14 and Saturday/Sunday service with 45 minute frequency from headways and passenger loads. Add outbound trips today. On weekdays, each route would have 30 minute 1 5:44 a.m. and from Watt/I-80 at 5:49 and 6:19 a.m. 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Extend north on Truxel Road, west from approximately 1:30 to 3:00 p.m. to help with base frequency. From downtown to 39th Street, 23 Eliminate weekend trips from Watt/I-80 at 5:06, 5:36, and on Del Paso Road to El Centro Rd. From Arden/Del Paso heavy passenger loads from Arden/Del Paso to Watt weekday customers would be able to catch either 6:06 a.m.