H063--FRONT Leaving Earth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

H063--FRONT Leaving Earth by Robert Zimmerman Joseph Henry Press Washington, D.C. Joseph Henry Press • 500 Fifth Street, N.W. • Washington, D.C. 20001 The Joseph Henry Press, an imprint of the National Academies Press, was created with the goal of making books on science, technology, and health more widely available to professionals and the public. Joseph Henry was one of the founders of the National Academy of Sciences and a leader in early American science. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences or its affiliated institutions. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Zimmerman, Robert, 1953- Leaving earth : space stations, rival superpowers, and the quest for interplanetary travel / by Robert Zimmerman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-309-08548-9 (Hardcover) 1. Astronautics—History. 2. Outer space—Exploration—History. 3. Astronautics—Political aspects—History. I. Title. TL788.5.Z55 2003 2003007637 Cover: First two modules of the International Space Station. Photo by NASA/ Science Photo Library. Copyright 2003 by Robert Zimmerman. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. To my wife Diane, who knows how to help me write. Contents Acknowledgments ix Preface xi 1. Skyscrapers in the Sky 1 2. Salyut: “I Wanted Him to Come Home.” 19 3. Skylab: A Glorious Forgotten Triumph 48 4. The Early Salyuts: “The Prize of All People” 81 5. Salyut 6: The End of Isolation 114 6. Salyut 7: Phoenix in Space 163 7. Freedom: “You’ve Got to Put on Your Management Hat . .” 207 8. Mir: A Year in Space 227 9. Mir: The Road to Capitalism 270 10. Mir: The Joys of Freedom 303 vii viii CONTENTS 11. Mir: Almost Touching 326 12. Mir: Culture Shock 375 13. Mir: Spin City 416 14. International Space Station: Ships Passing in the Night 446 Bibliography 467 Notes 483 Index 509 List of Illustrations 1. Salyut with approaching Soyuz, 28 2. Skylab with docked Apollo spacecraft and Salyut for scale, 52 3. Salyut 3, 87 4. Salyut 4 with approaching Soyuz, 93 5. Salyut 6, 115 6. Salyut 7 with transport-support module, 166 7. Mir core module, 230 8. Mir core with Kvant, 240 9. Mir, Kvant, Kvant-2, 274 10. Mir, Kvant, Kvant-2, Kristall, 284 11. Mir, Kvant, Kvant-2, Kristall, with Sofora, Strela, and docked Soyuz-TM and Progress-M, 312 12. Mir, Kvant, Kvant-2, Kristall, Spektr, with docked Soyuz-TM, 385 13. Mir complete, with Kvant, Kvant-2, Kristall, Spektr, Priroda, with docked Soyuz-TM and Progress-M, 407 14. International Space Station, as of December 2002, 450 Acknowledgments No book can be written without the help and support of others. I must give special thanks to my interpreter, Andrew Vodostoy, and to all those who made my trip to Moscow possible, including Nina Doudouchava and her two children, Alice and Philip, Nicholai Mugue, Anatoli Artsebarski, Alexander Cherniavsky, and Galina Nechitailo. I must also thank the many cosmonauts, engi- neers, and scientists who gave me so much of their time in inter- views when I met them in Russia. Authors Michael Cassutt and James Harford as well as Soviet space historians Asif Saddiqi, Bert Vis, and Charles Vic also deserve my gratitude for their advice about working in Moscow. Thanks must also go to David Harland and Michael Cassutt for reviewing my manuscript, Glen Swanson for helping me obtain Valeri Ryumin’s diary, David S. Hamilton at Boeing for creating the International Space Station graphic, and Janet Ormes and the librarians at the Goddard Space Flight Center as well as Jane Odom, Colin Fries, and John Hargenrader and every- one else at the NASA History Office in Washington, D.C., for pro- viding me more information than I imagined existed. I also thank my editor, Jeff Robbins, for having faith in my writing talent, as well as all the talented people at the Joseph Henry Press for making my writing shine. This book would not exist with- out their effort. Finally, I must recognize and praise the men and women, Rus- sian and American, who risked their lives to fly into space and extend the range of human experience. It was their courage and dedication that actually wrote this history. ix Preface Societies change. Though humans have difficulty perceiving this fact during their lifetimes, the tide of change inexorably rolls forward, sometimes for better, sometimes for worse. The story of the first space stations and the men and women who built and flew them is in most ways a story of the evolution of the Russian people. When they began their journey to the stars in 1957, they were an isolated, xenophobic, authoritarian culture ruled by an oppressive elite who believed that they had the right to dictate how everyone else should live their lives. Forty years later, that same nation has become one of the world’s newest democracies. Its borders are open, its people free, and its economy booming. In the years between, driven by an inescapable, generations-old insecurity, Russia went out into space to prove itself to the world, and ended up taking the first real, long-term steps toward the colo- nization of the solar system. Cosmonauts, using equipment built by people only one generation removed from illiteracy, hung by their fingernails on the edge of space and learned how to make the first real interplanetary journeys. Sometimes men died. Sometimes they rose above their roots and did glorious and brave things. In the process, and most ironically, the space program that the commu- nists supported and funded in their futile effort to reshape human nature helped wean Russia away from communism and dictator- ship and toward freedom and capitalism. xi xii PREFACE Leaving Earth is my attempt to tell that story. Nor is this book solely about how Russia changed in the late twentieth century. For Americans, this story carries its own les- sons, lessons that some might find hard to take. For at the same time the Russians were pulling themselves out of tyranny as they lifted their eyes to the stars, the United States evolved from an innovative, free society to a culture that today seems bogged down with bureaucracy, centralization, and too much self-centeredness. In the early 1970s, the United States had the tools, the abili- ties, the vision, the freedom, and the will to go to the stars. We had already explored the moon. Our rockets were the most powerful ever built. And we had launched the first successful space station, with capabilities so sophisticated that the Soviets took almost three decades of effort to finally match it. With only a little extra labor, that station could have been turned into a space vessel able to carry humans anywhere in the Solar System. The road was open before us, ours for the taking. And then the will faded. For the next 30 years, the trail-blazing was taken up by others, as Americans chose to do less risky and possibly less noble tasks. More importantly, just as the bold Soviet space program helped teach the Russians to live openly and free, the top-heavy and timid American space program of the late twen- tieth century helped teach Americans to depend, not on freedom and decentralization, but on a centralized Soviet-style bureau- cracy—to the detriment of American culture and its desire to con- quer the stars. That these facts might reflect badly on my own country sad- dens me beyond words. I was born into a nation of free-spirited individuals, where all Americans believed they were pioneers, able to forge new paths and build new communities wherever they went. Or, as stated in 1978 by one much-maligned but principled politician, born of a Jewish father and a Christian mother, We are the “can-do” people. We crossed the oceans; we climbed the mountains, forded the rivers, traveled the prairies to build on this continent a monument to human freedom. We came from many lands with different tongues united in our belief in God and our thirst for freedom. We said governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. We said the people are sovereign.1 Whether this describes the American nation today I do not know. If one were to use as a guide our accomplishments in space since Barry Goldwater said these words, one would not feel encouraged. Preface xiii Yet, the true test of a free and great people is whether they have the stomach to face difficult truths, and do something about it. It is what the American public did in the 1860s, when it freed the slaves. It is what that same society did in the 1950s, when it ended racial discrimination. And it is what the Russian people did in 1991, when they rejected a communist dictatorship and became free. I sincerely hope that future Americans will be as courageous, performing acts as noble. Above us, the stars still gleam, beckoning us. “A man’s reach should exceed his grasp, or what’s a heaven for?” said the poet Rob- ert Browning. Who shall grab for that heaven? Who will have the courage, boldness, and audacity to reach for the stars, and bring them down to us all? For the last 40 years far-sighted dreamers in both the United States and Russia struggled to assemble the first interplanetary spaceships. For many political reasons, they called them space sta- tions, and pretended that their sole function was to orbit the earth and perform scientific research in space.
Recommended publications
  • Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11 International Space
    SSP 54311 Baseline WWW.NASAWATCH.COM Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11 International Space Station Program Baseline June 2006 National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Space Station Program Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas Contract Number: NNJ04AA02C WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM REVISION AND HISTORY PAGE REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE - Initial Release (Reference per SSCD XXXXXX, EFF. XX-XX-XX) XX-XX-XX WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 CHANGE SHEET Month XX, XXXX Baseline Space Station Control Board Directive XXXXXX/(X-X), dated XX-XX-XX. (X) CHANGE INSTRUCTIONS SSP 54311, Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11, has been baselined by the authority of SSCD XXXXXX. All future updates to this document will be identified on this change sheet. WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 Baseline (Reference SSCD XXXXXX, dated XX-XX-XX) LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Month XX, XXXX The current status of all pages in this document is as shown below: Page Change No. SSCD No. Date i - ix Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 1-1 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 2-1 - 2-2 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 3-1 - 3-3 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 4-1 - 4-15 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 5-1 - 5-10 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 6-1 - 6-4 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 7-1 - 7-61 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX A-1 - A-9 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX B-1 - B-3 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX C-1 - C-2 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX D-1 - D-92 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 JUNE 2006 i SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSCB APPROVAL NOTICE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 JUNE 2006 Michael T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Space Challenge and Soviet Science Fiction
    Corso di Laurea magistrale ( ordinamento ex D.M. 270/2004 ) in Relazioni Internazionali Comparate – International Relations Tesi di Laurea The space challenge and Soviet science fiction Relatore Ch.mo Prof. Duccio Basosi Correlatore Ch.ma Prof. Donatella Possamai Laureanda Serena Zanin Matricola 835564 Anno Accademico 2011 / 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………...1 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………...…………..7 CHAPTER I The science fiction in the Soviet bloc: the case of Stanislaw Lem’s “Solaris”…………………….…………………………………....…………...…16 CHAPTER II The space race era from the Soviet bloc side …………..….........37 CHAPTER III The enthusiasm for the cosmos and Soviet propaganda ……………….. …………………………...……...………………………………..73 FINAL CONSIDERATIONS ……………...………………………………...101 APPENDIX ........……………………………………………………..……..…106 REFERENCES …..……………………………………………………………113 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS …………………………………………………..118 ABSTRACT La studiosa Julia Richers sottolinea come le ricerche sulla storia dell’esplorazione spaziale sovietica abbiano tre principali direzioni. La prima riguarda la storia politica della Guerra Fredda che considera la conquista dello spazio e lo sviluppo di potenti missili come parte di una più grande competizione tra gli USA e l’URSS. La seconda esamina in particolar modo lo sviluppo scientifico e tecnologico a partire dagli anni Ottanta, ossia da quando l’abolizione della censura ha permesso l’apertura al pubblico di molti archivi storici e la rivelazione di importanti informazioni. La terza include la propaganda sovietica e la fantascienza come parte fondamentale della storia culturale e sociale sia dell’URSS che della Russia post-rivoluzione. Il presente lavoro analizza la storia dell’esplorazione spaziale sovietica e, partendo dalle sue origini (fine XIX° secolo), prende in considerazione i principali successi che portarono al lancio del primo satellite artificiale nel 1957 e il primo uomo sulla luna nel 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • Residency CV IV
    Yuri Gagarin 17 Famous Cosmonauts Ave. Space, CA 99999 (415) 555-5555 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION 0000 – 0000 University of California San Francisco School of Pharmacy, San Francisco, CA Doctor of Pharmacy, June 0000 0000 – 0000 Santa Clara University Santa Clara, CA Bachelor of Science, Biology, June 0000 PHARMACY PRACTICE EXPERIENCE March 0000 – Intern Pharmacist June 0000 Pharmaceutical Infusion Therapy, 1606 Fifth Street, Berkeley, CA Supervisor: Svetlana Savitskaya, Pharm.D. Provided clinical services for patients receiving home infusions. Reviewed patients’ past medical history, medication profile and indication for home infusion therapy. Spoke with patients over the phone, as well as physicians and nurses regarding patients’ medications and regimens. Monitored appropriate laboratory parameters and performed pharmacokinetic analyses of aminoglycosides and vancomycin. October 0000 – Research Assistant March 0000 UCSF Department of Clinical Pharmacy Supervisor: Valentina Tereshkova, Pharm.D. Participated in pharmacy resident’s project evaluating the antibiotic prescribing practices of physicians at UCSF. Activities included a retrospective analysis of antibiotic ordering sheets (AOS). June 0000 – Intern Pharmacist June 0000 Peninsula Hospital, 1783 El Camino Real, Burlingame, CA Supervisor: Yuri Gagarin, Pharm.D. Responsibilities included prescription filling, IV and TPN compounding, PCA and epidural compounding, utilizing computerized patient profiles, entering IV orders, communicating with pharmacists, nurses and physicians, and working with Pyxis machines. Yuri Gagarin, CV Page 1 November 0000 – Research Assistant April 0000 UCSF Department of Clinical Pharmacy Supervisors: Georgi Dobrovolski, Pharm.D. and Anatoli Filipchenko, Pharm.D Participated in a pharmacy resident’s and pharmacy fellow’s research project studying the nephrotoxicity of Amphotericin B to determine the risk factors for developing nephrotoxicity due to Ampho B.
    [Show full text]
  • VII Congress
    Association of Space Explorers 7th Planetary Congress Berlin, Germany 1991 Commemorative Poster Signature Key Viktor Afanasyev Vladimir Aksyonov Alexander Alexandrov (Bul.) Soyuz TM-11 Soyuz 22, Soyuz T-2 Soyuz TM-5 Joe Allen Alexander Balandin John-David Bartoe STS 5, STS 51A Soyuz TM-9 STS 51F Patrick Baudry Gerald Carr Robert Cenker STS 51G Skylab IV 7 STS 61C Jean-Loup Chretien Charles Conrad, Jr. Samuel Durrance Soyuz T-6, Soyuz TM-7 Gemini 5, Gemini 11 STS 35 Apollo 12, Skylab II Lev Dyomin John Fabian Bertalan Farkas Soyuz 15 STS 7, STS 51G Soyuz 36 Reinhard Furrer Drew Gaffney Viktor Gorbatko STS 61A STS 40 Soyuz 7, Soyuz 24, Soyuz 37 Georgi Grechko Miroslaw Hermaszewski Alexander Ivanchenkov Soyuz 17, Soyuz 26 Soyuz 30 Soyuz 29, Soyuz T-6 Soyuz T-14 Georgi Ivanov Yevgeni Khrunov Vladimir Kovolyonok Soyuz 33 Soyuz 5 Soyuz 25, Soyuz 29, Soyuz T-4 Alexei Leonov Don Lind James Lovell, Jr. Voskhod 2, Apollo-Soyuz STS 51B Gemini 7, Gemini 12 Apollo 8, Apollo 13 Vladimir Lyakhov Oleg Makarov Gennadi Manakov Soyuz 32, Soyuz T-9 Soyuz 12, Soyuz 27, Soyuz T-3 Soyuz TM-10 Soyuz TM-6 Musa Manarov Jon McBride Bruce McCandless II Soyuz TM-4, Soyuz TM-11 STS 41G STS 41B, STS 31 Ernst Messerschmid William Nelson Wubbo Ockels STS 61A STS 61C STS 61A Donald Peterson Leonid Popov Dumitru Prunariu STS 6 Soyuz 35, Soyuz 40, Soyuz T-7 Soyuz 40 Vladimir Remek Stuart Roosa Rusty Schweickart Soyuz 28 Apollo 14 Apollo 9 Vitali Sevastyonov Thomas Stafford Gennadi Strekalov Soyuz 9, Soyuz 18 Gemini 6, Gemini 9, Apollo 10 Soyuz T-3, Soyuz T-8 Apollo-Soyuz Soyuz TM-11 Valentina Tereshkova Lodewijk van den Berg Igor Volk Vostok 6 STS 51B Soyuz T-12 Charles Walker Donald Williams Boris Yegorov STS 41D, STS 51D, STS 61B STS 51D, STS 34 Voskhod 1 Vyacheslav Zhudov Soyuz 23 This poster commemorates the 7th Planetary Congress of the Association of Space Explorers (ASE).
    [Show full text]
  • *Pres Report 97
    42 APPENDIX C U.S. and Russian Human Space Flights 1961–September 30, 1997 Spacecraft Launch Date Crew Flight Time Highlights (days:hrs:min) Vostok 1 Apr. 12, 1961 Yury A. Gagarin 0:1:48 First human flight. Mercury-Redstone 3 May 5, 1961 Alan B. Shepard, Jr. 0:0:15 First U.S. flight; suborbital. Mercury-Redstone 4 July 21, 1961 Virgil I. Grissom 0:0:16 Suborbital; capsule sank after landing; astronaut safe. Vostok 2 Aug. 6, 1961 German S. Titov 1:1:18 First flight exceeding 24 hrs. Mercury-Atlas 6 Feb. 20, 1962 John H. Glenn, Jr. 0:4:55 First American to orbit. Mercury-Atlas 7 May 24, 1962 M. Scott Carpenter 0:4:56 Landed 400 km beyond target. Vostok 3 Aug. 11, 1962 Andriyan G. Nikolayev 3:22:25 First dual mission (with Vostok 4). Vostok 4 Aug. 12, 1962 Pavel R. Popovich 2:22:59 Came within 6 km of Vostok 3. Mercury-Atlas 8 Oct. 3, 1962 Walter M. Schirra, Jr. 0:9:13 Landed 8 km from target. Mercury-Atlas 9 May 15, 1963 L. Gordon Cooper, Jr. 1:10:20 First U.S. flight exceeding 24 hrs. Vostok 5 June 14, 1963 Valery F. Bykovskiy 4:23:6 Second dual mission (withVostok 6). Vostok 6 June 16, 1963 Valentina V. Tereshkova 2:22:50 First woman in space; within 5 km of Vostok 5. Voskhod 1 Oct. 12, 1964 Vladimir M. Komarov 1:0:17 First three-person crew. Konstantin P. Feoktistov Boris G. Yegorov Voskhod 2 Mar. 18, 1965 Pavel I.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2011 Issue 2
    Issue 2 October 2011 All about the Chinese Space Programme GO TAIKONAUTS! Editor’s Note As promised, this issue is delivered as a special issue on the Chinese space station Cover Story programme. The flawless launch of the Tiangong 1 was really ... page 2 Quarterly Report April - June 2011 Launch Events There were two success- ful space launches in the second quarter of 2011. On 10 April 2011 at 4:47:04 Beijing Time, a Long March 3A (Y19) lifted-off from Pad 3 in Xichang Satellite Launch Centre, putting the Beidou IGSO 3 navigation sat- ellite into orbit. It was the first Chinese Dawn of the Chinese Space Station Era space launch of 2011 and the eighth op- A Textbook Launch erational Beidou satellite. The satellite History turned a new page at 21:16:03 Beijing Time on 29 September 2011, entered its working orbit ... page 3 when a Long March 2F (CZ-2F T1) rocket lifted-off from Pad 921 at the Jiu- quan Satellite Launch Centre in China. In contrast with other launch vehicles that took-off from the same pad on previous occasions, ... page 6 Proposal Mutual Rescue Operations Between the On The Spot Tiangong and ISS? Background Touch the Chinese Space Programme in Three Days The ISS began six-crew member opera- Report from the 4th CSA-IAA Conference on Advanced Space Technology tion in 2009, and the U.S. shuttle retired in Shanghai in July 2011. Crew transportation and An Open and International Conference emergency rescue now totally depends To the Chinese space programme and people paying attention to it, early upon the Russian Soyuz vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Closing Comments
    Closing Comments The concept of a Shuttle supporting the assembly of a space station was not an entirely new idea when Space Station Freedom was authorized in 1984. Such concepts had been evaluated during the late 1960s, as the United States and the Soviet Union competed in the race to the Moon. By the early 1970s, the two nations were on more friendly terms and keen to participate in a joint project as Apollo was being phased out and a series of Salyut space stations were being introduced. The American proposal for an Apollo to dock with a Salyut was rejected, as was a proposal to have a Soyuz dock with Skylab. So Apollo docked with Soyuz in the summer of 1975. That program was so successful that talks began almost immediately to assess the pros- pects for a Shuttle-Salyut docking in the early 1980s. In parallel, NASA devised plans for the Shuttle to reactivate Skylab. Neither of these proposals bore fruit. By the early 1980s, the idea of using a Shuttle to assemble and resupply a large space station remained, and would become the lynchpin of the Space Station Freedom before plans for that, too, were revised. By the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 the assembly of Mir had been underway for several years. But Russia, which inherited the station and the spacecraft which serviced it, was hard pressed to continue the requisite funding. Looking back two decades to the 1990s, the merger of the American Shuttle and the Russian space station programs seems so logical, since they complemented each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Distribution Trends in Central Asia Nora Tesch 1*, Niels Thevs 2
    Central Asian Journal of Water Research (2020) 6(1): 39-65 © The Author(s) 2020 ISSN: 2522-9060 Wetland Distribution Trends in Central Asia Nora Tesch 1*, Niels Thevs 2 1 Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen 2 World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Central Asia Programme *Corresponding author Email: [email protected] Received: 30 April 2019; Received in revised form: 11 March 2020; Accepted: 25 April 2020; Published online: May 1, 2020. doi: 10.29258/CAJWR/2020-R1.v6-1/39-65.eng Abstract Anthropogenic activities and climate change contribute to the deterioration of wetlands worldwide with Central Asia (CA) being among the regions which are most severely affected. This study examined how the distribution of wetlands in CA has changed in the last two decades. Emphasis was put on inland wetlands protected as International Bird and Biodiversity Areas. Time series of maps of wetlands (i.e. reed beds) were created for the years 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015 and 2018. A supervised classification approach was applied using NDVI of MODIS satellite images with 1000m resolution for the respective years. Ground control points were acquired through fieldtrips to the lower Chu River, upper Ili River and Ili River Delta in Kazakhstan and the Amu Darya River Delta and the Lower Amu Darya State Biosphere Reserve in Uzbekistan. The applied method is not applicable for the classification of wetlands in northern Kazakhstan. The vegetation there is too alike to the wetland vegetation in terms of values and seasonality of NDVI. For the remaining part of the study area, the applied method delivers satisfying results.
    [Show full text]
  • Lockheed-Martin OV-200 Class Space Shuttle (2011 –2138)
    - 1 - Original texts and document concept copyright © 2007 by Richard E. Mandel STAR TREK, its on-screen derivatives, and all associated materials are the property of Paramount Pictures Corporation. Multiple references in this document are given under the terms of fair use with regard to international copyright and trademark law. This is a scholarly reference work intended to explain the background and historical aspects of STAR TREK and its spacecraft technology and is not sponsored, approved, or authorized by Paramount Pictures and its affiliated licensees. All visual materials included herein is protected by either implied or statutory copyright and are reproduced either with the permission of the copyright holder or under the terms of fair use as defined under current international copyright law. All visual materials used in this work without clearance were obtained from public sources through public means and were believed to be in the public domain or available for inclusion via the fair use doctrine at the time of printing. Cover art composited from the work of Andrew J. Hodges (DY-100) and Industrial Light and Magic (Excelsior) This work is dedicated to Geoffery Mandel, who started it for all of us. Memory Alpha and SFHQ/Mastercom cataloging data: UFP/SFD DTA HR:217622 - 2 - Gfefsbujpo!Tqbdfgmjhiu!Dispopmphz! First History (Prime Two) Edition Modified Okuda Timeline preview build 20070915 by Richard E. Mandel - 3 - Table of Contents Notes to self: no more than five major starships per section, ONLY canon/semi-canon/licensed/“reality”
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE for DOMINANCE on AIRLINERS Page 18
    May 2015 THE BATTLE FOR DOMINANCE ON AIRLINERS Page 18 DARPA’s tailless cargo drone/10 Cosmonaut diary/38 A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS COSMONAUT Anatoly Berezovoy (Russian Federal Space Agency) Roscosmos DIARIES 38 AEROSPACE AMERICA/MAY 2015 Copyright 2015 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Soviet cosmonaut Anatoly Berezovoy made only one space flight during his career, but it was one for the books. His 1982 mission, the first expedition to the Salyut 7 space station, lasted a then-record of 211 days. That record was broken 16 months later by Leonid Kizim, Vladimir Soloviev and Oleg Atkov, the third crew aboard the Salyut-7, whose mission lasted 237 days. During much of Berezovoy’s time in space — as well as afterwards — he chronicled his observations on paper. After Berezovoy died last September at age 72, his widow, Lidia Berezovaya, contacted Aerospace America through her husband’s longtime interpreter, Olga Tunison. Berezovaya and Tunison wanted to know if we were interested in publishing excerpts of his writings in English. We were very inter- ested, because the writings give a fascinating glimpse of a budding Soviet human space flight pro- gram, from the physical travails of learning to live in space to the social breakthroughs required for men and women to work together effectively in space. As commander, Berezovoy lifted off with flight engineer Valentin Lebedev on May 13, 1982 aboard the Soyuz rocket bound for Salyut 7, the final spacecraft in the Salyut series before the launch of the Mir space station.
    [Show full text]
  • Jilili Abuduwaili · Gulnura Issanova Galymzhan Saparov Hydrology and Limnology of Central Asia Water Resources Development and Management
    Water Resources Development and Management Jilili Abuduwaili · Gulnura Issanova Galymzhan Saparov Hydrology and Limnology of Central Asia Water Resources Development and Management Series editors Asit K. Biswas, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore Cecilia Tortajada, Institute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore Editorial Board Dogan Altinbilek, Ankara, Turkey Francisco González-Gómez, Granada, Spain Chennat Gopalakrishnan, Honolulu, USA James Horne, Canberra, Australia David J. Molden, Kathmandu, Nepal Olli Varis, Helsinki, Finland Hao Wang, Beijing, China [email protected] More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7009 [email protected] Jilili Abuduwaili • Gulnura Issanova Galymzhan Saparov Hydrology and Limnology of Central Asia 123 [email protected] Jilili Abuduwaili and State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology Faculty of Geography and Environmental and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences Sciences Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Urumqi Almaty China Kazakhstan and and Research Centre of Ecology and Research Centre of Ecology and Environment of Central Asia (Almaty) Environment of Central Asia (Almaty) Almaty Almaty Kazakhstan Kazakhstan Gulnura Issanova Galymzhan Saparov State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Research Centre of Ecology and Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology Environment of Central Asia (Almaty) and Geography, Chinese Academy of U.U. Uspanov Kazakh Research Institute of Sciences Soil Science and Agrochemistry Urumqi Almaty China Kazakhstan ISSN 1614-810X ISSN 2198-316X (electronic) Water Resources Development and Management ISBN 978-981-13-0928-1 ISBN 978-981-13-0929-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0929-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018943710 © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 Almaz, Salyut, And
    Part 2 Almaz/Salyut/Mir largely concerned with assembly in 12, 1964, Chelomei called upon his Part 2 Earth orbit of a vehicle for circumlu- staff to develop a military station for Almaz, Salyut, nar flight, but also described a small two to three cosmonauts, with a station made up of independently design life of 1 to 2 years. They and Mir launched modules. Three cosmo- designed an integrated system: a nauts were to reach the station single-launch space station dubbed aboard a manned transport spacecraft Almaz (“diamond”) and a Transport called Siber (or Sever) (“north”), Logistics Spacecraft (Russian 2.1 Overview shown in figure 2-2. They would acronym TKS) for reaching it (see live in a habitation module and section 3.3). Chelomei’s three-stage Figure 2-1 is a space station family observe Earth from a “science- Proton booster would launch them tree depicting the evolutionary package” module. Korolev’s Vostok both. Almaz was to be equipped relationships described in this rocket (a converted ICBM) was with a crew capsule, radar remote- section. tapped to launch both Siber and the sensing apparatus for imaging the station modules. In 1965, Korolev Earth’s surface, cameras, two reentry 2.1.1 Early Concepts (1903, proposed a 90-ton space station to be capsules for returning data to Earth, 1962) launched by the N-1 rocket. It was and an antiaircraft cannon to defend to have had a docking module with against American attack.5 An ports for four Soyuz spacecraft.2, 3 interdepartmental commission The space station concept is very old approved the system in 1967.
    [Show full text]