Master Document Template
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Copyright by Alexandra Caya 2014 The Thesis Committee for Alexandra Caya Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Characterization of the Microbial Community Aerosolized in Residential Showers APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Kerry Kinney Maria King Characterization of the Microbial Community Aerosolized in Residential Showers by Alexandra Caya, B.S. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering The University of Texas at Austin May 2014 Acknowledgements Funding for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation. I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Kerry Kinney, and our co-collaborator on this project, Dr. Maria King, for their guidance and expertise, without which this research would not have been possible. I would also like to thank Dr. Juan Pedro Maestre and Chloe Wooldridge for helping with sampling, data analysis, and a variety of other things; and Dr. Michal Ziv-El for her guidance and help with sequence processing. iv Abstract Characterization of the Microbial Community Aerosolized in Residential Showers Alexandra Caya, M.S.E. The University of Texas at Austin, 2014 Supervisor: Kerry Kinney A wide range of microorganisms are present in the tap water that reaches residential homes, including potential pathogens. Additionally, biofilms that contain potential pathogens grow in residential premise plumbing, in showerheads, and on shower- associated surfaces. Showers produce respirable droplets, and thus may aerosolize microbes from the water or from shower-associated biofilms. Inhalation of bioaerosols containing potential pathogens is an important human infection route, and previous studies have implicated showers as a source of airborne microbial infections. However, no previous studies have fully characterized the transient changes in the airborne microbial community resulting from residential shower operation. This study is the first to characterize the short-term changes in the airborne bacterial community resulting from shower operation using molecular methods. Shower aerosol samples were collected with a high-throughput bioaerosol sampler, which allowed the collection of short-duration samples to provide a time-series picture of the transient changes in the airborne microbial community during shower operation. Culture- v independent molecular methods were used to quantify the microbial aerosol loads during shower operation, and to identify the genus-level diversity and relative abundances of bacteria present in shower bioaerosols. The results of this research show that residential shower operation does result in an increase in airborne bacterial loads, and impacts the airborne bacterial community diversity. The relative abundances of many specific bacterial genera, some of which contain pathogenic species, were increased during shower operation. Overall, the airborne bacterial community during shower operation is different than the ambient, background airborne community. This research additionally compared different methods to extract DNA from short- duration, environmental bioaerosol samples. The results indicate that different extraction methods can significantly impact resultant microbial quantity and diversity estimates. An extraction method for bioaerosol samples should be chosen carefully based on the specific goals of each research project. vi Table of Contents List of Tables ......................................................................................................... ix List of Figures ..........................................................................................................x Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................1 Objectives .......................................................................................................3 Scope ...............................................................................................................3 Chapter 2: Background and Literature Review .......................................................4 Pathogenic Microbes in Showers ....................................................................4 Bioaerosol Sampling .......................................................................................7 Molecular Methods for Microbial Community Characterization ...................8 DNA Extraction ............................................................................................11 Chapter 3: Characterizing the Bacterial Communities in Residential Shower Aerosols .......................................................................................................................14 3.1 Materials and Methods ............................................................................14 3.2 Results and Discussion ...........................................................................23 3.3 Conclusions .............................................................................................46 Chapter 4: Optimizing DNA Extraction Efficiency for WWC Samples ...............48 4.1 Materials and Methods ............................................................................48 4.2 Results and Discussion ...........................................................................55 4.3 Conclusions .............................................................................................66 Chapter 5: Conclusions ..........................................................................................69 Appendix A: Detailed Protocols for DNA Extraction Methods ............................71 PowerWater (PW) .........................................................................................71 PowerWater + freeze/thaw lysis (PWF) .......................................................71 PowerWater + enzyme cocktail (PWE) ........................................................71 PowerWater with modified elution (PWM) ..................................................72 PowerWater + enzyme cocktail with modified elution (PWEM) .................72 PowerSoil + chemical + enzyme (PS) ..........................................................73 vii PowerSoil + enzyme cocktail (PSE) .............................................................73 Van Burik (VB).............................................................................................74 Van Burik + freeze/thaw lysis (VBF) ...........................................................74 FastDNA SPIN kit (FS) ................................................................................74 Alkaline Lysis (AL) ......................................................................................74 Appendix B: PowerWater DNA Isolation Kit Protocol .........................................76 Appendix C: PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit Protocol ............................................79 Appendix D: FastDNA Spin Kit Protocol .............................................................81 References ..............................................................................................................83 viii List of Tables Table 1: Drinking water source types for each residential site sampled. ...............15 Table 2: Number of each type of biological sample collected at each residential site. ...........................................................................................................15 Table 3: Equivalent number of E. coli cells per m3 of air during shower operation at each site. ............................................................................................26 Table 4: Genera with the highest relative abundances detected in Site 1 bioaerosols collected during shower operation. Each of these genera increased in relative abundance during shower operation. ...................................36 Table 5: Genera with the highest relative abundances detected in Site 2 bioaerosols collected during shower operation. Each of these genera increased in relative abundance during shower operation. ...................................36 Table 6: Genera with highest relative abundances detected in Site 3 bioaerosols collected during shower operation. The genera highlighted in red decreased in relative abundance during shower operation, while all others increased. ................................................................................37 Table 7: Summary of DNA extraction methods tested. .........................................50 Table 8: Genera with over 20% relative abundance in triplicate samples for each extraction method in the second round of extractions (FS excluded in rarefaction). .......................................................................................64 ix List of Figures Figure 1: Schematic showing sampling locations for residential showers. Sites of biofilm swabbing are marked with a red “X.” ..................................16 Figure 2: Schematic of the wetted wall cyclone bioaerosol sampler used in this study. [Figure from McFarland et al., 2010.] ..............................................18 Figure 3: qPCR standard curve used to convert CT value to equivalent concentration of E. coli cells per mL. ......................................................................19 Figure 4: Number concentration of bacterial 16S rDNA copies in each bioaerosol sample from Site 1. ...........................................................................23