DOCSLIB.ORG

A Runic Inscription from Bergakker (Gelderland), the Netherlands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Runic Inscription from Bergakker (Gelderland), the Netherlands A RUNIC INSCRIPTION FROM BERGAKKER (GELDERLAND), THE NETHERLANDS by A.V.AJ. Bosman (Amersfoort) & T. Looijenga (Groningen) I. Archaeological context (A.V.AJ. Bosman) On the 12th of april 1996 the find of a gilded silver scabbard mount with a runic inscription was reported from Bergakker near Tiel in the Betuwe. This former habitat of the Batavi is situated in the river estuary of the Rhine. The site Bergakker is well-known for its metal finds. After a slit was dug on the former orchard earlier this year several amateur-archaeologists collected metal finds by using metal-detectors. It seems that on the site a large concentration of metal finds, mainly bronze, is available. Most of it can be described as scrap. It contains broken or damaged objects such as fibulae and cut off rimfragments from bronze vessels. Also some large lumps of melted bronze were discovered. One fibula fragment ;s also melted. All these finds indicate that scrap metal was collected and reused at this site. Pottery or building material have not been found. The oldest metal finds can be dated in the early Roman period: coins, of which one with an illegible countermark and Aucissa fibulae. Also finds from the rniddle and late Roman period occur. The latest finds are two early medieval 'vijfknoppenfibulae' dating around 500 AD. The most spectacular find is a scabbard mount in gilded silver. Its measurements are: length: 83 mm width: 19 mm (top); 10 mm (bottom) height: 14 mm weight: 33.9 gr. Also this piece can be described as scrap. The top part of the mount is rnissing, another decorated piece may have been welded onto the plate. Undemeath this plate is a decoration of half circles and points. The same decoration can be found on the front as the most inner line of a decoration with mainly ridges and grooves. The sides are decorated with larger ridges and grooves. Paral1els for this type of decoration occur on late Roman girdle mounts such as from Gennep (NL), dating in the second half of the 4th century AD. The Gennep finds are con­ sidered to be produced in Lower Germany. On the undecorated and ungilded back is a runic inscription. Except for the top and two cuts on the edge of the opening on the bottom no traces of wear are visible (the mount was cleaned electrolytic). Paral1els for the mount are hard to find. In general late Roman weapons are scarce, only small parts are found in fortresses. Very Downloaded from Brill.com09/27/2021 11:28:21PM via free access 10 seldom weapons occur in cemetaries. At the same site a Roman altarstone was found when a part of the field was leveled in the 1950s. The stone was dedicated to the indi­ genous (Batavian) goddess Hurstrga, dating in the second half of the 2nd or first half of the 3rd century AD. The toponym 'Bergakker' suggests that the site is higher than its surroundings. This may have been caused by riverain deposits. These graunds are in this region inhabited from the Iran Age well into medieval times. The site could have functioned as a ritual centre during the Roman period. On it metal votiv objects could have accumulated. The centre could have been dedicated to Hurstrga. A parallel can be found at the tempelsite Empel (NL) which was dedicated to the Batavian god Hereu/es Magusanus. Also at Empellarge quantities of metal were found. At Bergakker scrap metal was collected and reused. This may have taken place in early medieval times (end of the 5th - first half of the 6th century), based on the date of the fibulae. The melting of metal was probably done within or near a settlement. The scabbard mount must have arrived at the settlement as a fragment or the scabbard was dismantled at the site. The absence of finds later than 500 AD indicate that the site was in use until the late Roman or early medieval period. The object may be dated into the 4th or 5th c. II. The runic inscription (T.Looijenga) The inscription is at the undecorated back of the scabbard mount, as is usual for runic inscriptions. The runes are neatlY cut with some sharp instrument and clearly legible. The fashion according to which the runes are carved is not unlike other runic inscriptions on metal. Although some parts suffered from corrosion, the shapes of the characters can be made out without any difficulty. The runes are of the older fupark-type; there are no Anglo-Frisian features. One character is anomalous and hitherto unattested. It has the shape of a double-lined Roman capital V and occurs four times in the inscription. One other character, S, appears twice in double lines, and once in single lines. The S is in three strokes. It is remarkablysmall, shorter than the other runes (apart fram the k). There is one bindrune, forrning wa, an unusual combination. The runes run fram left to right. The words are separated by division marks: three times composed of two dots and one time of four dots. The inscription contains four words. The last word is followed by a zig­ zag line, filling up space. A similar technique can be found for instance on the Pforzen (South Germany) silver belt buckle (sixth c.). The significance of the Bergakker find is considerably. Never before have runes been found in the Rhine estuary. Also its age is significant; fifth century, but the fourth century is equally possible. As stated by the first author, its date has not yet finally been fixed. It might be the oldest Downloaded from Brill.com09/27/2021 11:28:21PM via free access 11 runic find from regions near the Rhine; the other runic finds in South Germany and the Rhineland are dated from the 6th-7th centuries. (One exception is the Aalen neck ring, a stray find from Baden­ Württemberg, dated fifth c.). Moreover, the Betuwe find emerged from the left bank of the Rhine, within the limes. This does not necessarily mean that runic writing was executed in the Rhine area at a rather late date. The fact that especially runic objects from the 6th-7th centuries have come to our knowledge may very weH be due to their way of depositing: in Merovingian row-grave fields. Runic knowledge may have existed considerably longer in these re­ gions. At any rate, the Betuwe find appears to be a missing link in the development and propagation of runic writing. Description 0/ the runes: Considering the fact that the inscription is neatly divided into four parts, one may assume that the carver meant to render a legible text, existing of four words. This is the starting point for trying to identify the value of the individual runes and finally to establish a transliteration. The first rune is an h, single-barred, which does not seem not to point to some Frisian or Continental influence, since these runic traditions used a double-barred h, as far as we know. The fact that it is single­ barred, could point to the Scandinavian or early English runic traditions. This deserves consideration only when the dating of the Bergakker find is at least fifth century; before that we are probably dealing with a common Germanic runic alphabet. The inscription contains double and single runeforms. The double runeforms are no 'mirror' runes in a strict sensel. To my mind both mirror runes and double runes are runic varieties, which may have been part of the initial runic stock; one may call both varieties 'ornamental' runes, restricted to form-variation only, having no consequences for the phonetic value. Such ornamental runes should therefore not be confused with the additional runes of the Anglo-Saxon runic alphabet. Ornamental runeforms appear relatively often in areas bordering or near the North Sea. Firstly, there are the famous mirror runes repre­ senting w and I' on the objects found in lllerup (Jutland) and Vimose (punen), dated circa 200 AD. The Gallehus (Jutland) inscription (circa 400 AD) has runes in double and single lines. As to ornamental runes, the Fallward (near the Weser mouth) inscription ksamella [a]lguska i (4/5th century) contains an a rune with three side twigs. The Spong HiH ums (East Anglia, 5/6th century) bear stamped mirror runes. The Oostum (prov. Groningen) inscription (8th century) has a b rune with 1 The existence of mirror runes, or "Spiegelrunen", has convincingly been demonstrated by Pieper 1987. Downloaded from Brill.com09/27/2021 11:28:21PM via free access 12 three loops and an h rune with three bars. The Westeremden B (prov. Groningen) inscription (no date) contains ornamental and mirror runes and double-barred h. The Britsum (Friesland) inscription (no date), the Kragehul (Fyn) and Lindholm (Skäne) inscriptions contain multi-lined runes. The Wijnaldum A antler piece (no date) contains mirror runes and single runes. Quite some bracteates (2nd half 5th - beginning of the 6th centuries) bear ornamental and mirror runes. Maybe the inscriptions carried out in the so-called 'tremolo' style, e.g. zig-zag lines, belong to the 'ornamental runes' category too: 0vre Stabu (Norway, 2nd half 2nd century), Nresbjerg (Jutland, circa 200 AD) and Meldorf (Schleswig­ Holstein, 50 AD). The Bergakker find has double runes and a single­ barred h. The second rune is a, the *ansuz rune. The third rune has only one side-twig to the right, at the middle of the head-staff. After scrutinizing the following runes, its value may be established. The fourth character is anomalous, at first sight it resembles no known rune.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire
    HUNNIC WARFARE IN THE FOURTH AND FIFTH CENTURIES C.E.: ARCHERY AND THE COLLAPSE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE A Thesis Submitted to the Committee of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science. TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Laura E. Fyfe 2016 Anthropology M.A. Graduate Program January 2017 ABSTRACT Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire Laura E. Fyfe The Huns are one of the most misunderstood and mythologized barbarian invaders encountered by the Roman Empire. They were described by their contemporaries as savage nomadic warriors with superior archery skills, and it is this image that has been written into the history of the fall of the Western Roman Empire and influenced studies of Late Antiquity through countless generations of scholarship. This study examines evidence of Hunnic archery, questions the acceptance and significance of the “Hunnic archer” image, and situates Hunnic archery within the context of the fall of the Western Roman Empire. To achieve a more accurate picture of the importance of archery in Hunnic warfare and society, this study undertakes a mortuary analysis of burial sites associated with the Huns in Europe, a tactical and logistical study of mounted archery and Late Roman and Hunnic military engagements, and an analysis of the primary and secondary literature. Keywords: Archer, Archery, Army, Arrow, Barbarian, Bow, Burial Assemblages, Byzantine, Collapse, Composite Bow, Frontier, Hun, Logistics, Migration Period, Roman, Roman Empire, Tactics, Weapons Graves ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Cgpt1; MAGNA GERMANIA; CLAUDIUS PTOLEMY BOOK 2, CHAPTER 10; FACT OR FICTION
    cgPt1; MAGNA GERMANIA; CLAUDIUS PTOLEMY BOOK 2, CHAPTER 10; FACT OR FICTION SYNOPSIS The locations of some +8000 settlements and geographical features are included within the text of Claudius Ptolemy‟s „Geographia‟. To control the text and ensure readers understood the methodology there-in utilised it is evident that Claudius Ptolemy determined a strict order and utilisation of the information he wished to disseminate. That strict methodology is maintained through the first 9 chapters of Book 2, but the 10th chapter breaks all of the rules that had been established. Chapters 11 to 15 then return to the established pattern. Magna Germania was basically unknown territory and in such a situation Claudius Ptolemy was able to ignore any necessity to guess thus leaving an empty landscape as is evinced in Book 3, chapter 5, Sarmatian Europe. Why in an unknown land there are 94 settlements indicated in Germania when the 3 provinces of Gallia have only a total of 114 settlements, is a mystery? And, why does Claudius Ptolemy not attribute a single settlement to a tribal group? It appears there are other factors at play, which require to be investigated. BASIC PTOLEMY When analysing a map drawn from the data provided by Claudius Ptolemy it is first necessary to ensure that it is segregated into categories. Those are; 1) reliable information i.e. probably provided via the Roman Army Cosmographers and Geometres; 2) the former information confirmed or augmented by various itineraries or from Bematists; 3) the possibility of latitudinal measurements from various settlements (gnomon ratios); 4) basic travellers tales with confirmed distances „a pied‟; 5) basic sailing distances along coastlines and those which can be matched to land distances; 6) guesses made by travellers who did not actually record the days travelled but only the length of time for the overall journey; 7) obscure references from ancient texts which cannot be corroborated.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk Institute of Archaeology and Natural History
    Proceedingsof the SUFFOLK INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND NATURAL HISTORY 4 °4vv.es`Egi vI V°BkIAS VOLUME XXV, PART 1 (published 1950) PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY BY W. E. HARRISON & SONS, LTD., THE ANCIENT HOUSE, IPSWI611. The costof publishing this paper has beenpartially defrayedby a Grant from the Council for British Archeology. THE SUTTON HOO SHIP-BURIAL Recenttheoriesand somecommentsongeneralinterpretation By R. L. S. BRUCE-MITFORD, SEC. S.A. INTRODUCTION The Sutton Hoo ship-burial was discovered more than ten years ago. During these years especially since the end of the war in Europe has made it possible to continue the treatment and study of the finds and proceed with comparative research, its deep significance for general and art history, Old English literature and European archmology has become more and more evident. Yet much uncertainty prevails on general issues. Many questions cannot receive their final answer until the remaining mounds of the grave-field have been excavated. Others can be answered, or at any rate clarified, now. The purpose of this article is to clarify the broad position of the burial in English history and archmology. For example, it has been said that ' practically the whole of the Sutton Hoo ship-treasure is an importation from the Uppland province of Sweden. The great bulk of the work was produced in Sweden itself.' 1 Another writer claims that the Sutton Hoo ship- burial is the grave of a Swedish chief or king.' Clearly we must establish whether it is part of English archxology, or of Swedish, before we can start to draw from it the implications that we are impatient to draw.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Roman Empire
    EDITIONLAUSANNE Limited to one tbousand registered sets N0.4'7 THE DECLINEAND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE VOL. I1 THE HISTORY OF THE DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE BY EDWARD GIBBON EDITED BY J. B. BURY, M.A. WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY THE RT. HON. W. E. H. LECKY VOL. I1 NEW YORK FRED DE FAU & COMPANY PUBLISHERS COPYRIGHT,I+, FRED DE FAU & COMPANY. CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME PACE... LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS......... xu1 CHAPTER X The Emperors Decks. Gallus. Amilianus. Valerian. and Galliersur - The General Irruption of the Barbarians - The Thirty Tyrads A.D. 248-268 The Nature of the Subject .......i The Emperor Philip .........a 249 Services.Revolt. Victory. and Reign of the Emperor Decius . a 250 He marchesagainst the Goths ......3 Origin of the Goths from Scandinavia .....4 Religion of the Goths ........5 Institutions and Death of Odin .......6 Agreeable. but uncertainHypothesis concerning Odin . 6 Emigration of the Goths fromScandinavia into Prussia . 7 -from Prussia to theUkraine ...... 8 The Gothic Nation increases in its March .... 9 Distinction of the Germans and Sarmatians ....10 Description ofUkraine the ......10 The Goths invade the Roman Provinces .....11 250 Various Events of the Gothic War ... ..12 251 Decius revives the ofice of Censor in the Person of Valerian . 14 The Design Impracticable. and without Effect ....15 Defeat and Death of Decius and his Son .....16 251 Election of Gallus .........IS 252 Retreat of the Goths ....... 18 gallus purchases Peace by the Payment of an annual Tnbut; 18 Popular Discontent .........19 253 Victory and Revolt of Ahilianus ......20 Gallus abandoned and slain .......20 Valerian revenges the Death of Gallus .....21 Is acknowledged Emperor ........21 'i Character of Valerian ....
    [Show full text]
  • Carlo Magno Europa2c
    Corso di laurea in Relazioni Internazionali Comparate Prova finale di laurea Charlemagne Rex Pater Europæ Relatore Prof. Antonio Trampus Correlatore Prof. Duccio Basosi Laureando Giacomo D’Ippolito Matricola 823388 Anno Accademico 2013/2014 Index Introduction pp. 4-5 Chapter I The history of a king 1.The Franks pp. 7-10 2 The birth of Charlemagne pp. 10-11 3 The special position pp. 12-13 4 The Pippinids pp. 13-15 5 The warlike nature of Charlemagne pp. 15-18 5.1 The invasion of the Italian peninsula pp. 18-22 5.2 The governance of the new territories: Capitulare Italicum pp. 22-24 5.3 The wars against the pagans: Saxons, Arabs and Avars pp. 24-36 6 The relation with the Roman Church: what brought to the coronation of Charlemagne in Rome pp. 37-41 7 The management of the Frankish territories: Spring Assembly, count and missus dominicus pp. 42-46 8 The situation of the inland revenue: how it was organised pp. 46-47 9 The modern aspects of Carolingian justice pp. 47-50 10 An interesting cultural innovation pp. 50-53 Chapter II The reasons to consider Charlemagne the ancestor of the European Union 1 A founding myth pp. 55-56 2 The Franco-German axis: a timeless element pp. 56-61 3 An unofficial recognition pp. 61-63 4 Elements in common: justice and currency pp. 63-66 Chapter III The point of view of the historians: what they think of Charlemagne as father of Europe 1 Le Goff and the Roman Empire pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Frisian Language, As It Is Probable That the Received Its Present Form Substantially at This Time
    T HE F RI S I A N LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE A HI S TORI CA L S T UD K A R L " E XT E N T F F RI S I A I . E O . 1 ‘ LA I CA L RE FE RENCE C SS S S . TO FRI IA 1 D “ lin . P 7 . : y , who wrote about A , says I n the Rhine itself is the most renowned islan d of the Batavi and the Can n en efate s and of Frisiav o n es S tu rii s other islands the Frisians , Chanci , , and Mar ii He lin iu m Fle v u m sac . , which are scattered between and These m on th are the names of the two s into which the Rhine divides . I t to empties its waters to the north into the lakes there , and the west ” l M a a tw o of into the s . The branches the Rhine here mentioned T he are the eastern and western . eastern was formed from the Sala or "ssel W l th which the waters of the Rhi n e were connected of L Ple v o by the canal Drusus, and which flowed through ake and o f entered the sea between the islands Terschelling and Ameland . m ’ I ts lower course bore later the na e of the Fli . The western 1 I n Rheno autem ips o nobili s s im a Ba tav o r u m in s ula e t Can n e n e fatiu m aliae F e t r isio r u m , Cha u co r u m , F r isiav o n u m , Stu r io r u m , M arsa cio ru m quae s te r n u n te r inter Helin iu m e t Fle v u m : ita appell an tu r o stia in quae ' e flu su s Rhe n u s a s e pte n tr io n e in Iacu s ab occidente in am n em Mo sam s e a it .
    [Show full text]
  • Lhe STORY ()F-THE, NATIONS -~Be §Tor~ of Tbejsations
    • lHE STORY ()F-THE, NATIONS -~be §tor~ of tbeJSations. _ THE- FRANKS THE STORY OF THE NATION S• • J. ROME. .By ARTKUR GILMAN, 30. THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE. M.A. lIy_ c. W. C. OMAN • •. THE JEWs. By Prof. J. K. 31. SICILY: Phc:elliclan, Greek HOSMER. and Roman. lIy tho late 3. GERMANY. By Rev. S. BAIliNG' Prof. E. A. f'I'REBMAN. GOULD, M.A. 32. THE TUSCAN REPUBLICS. 4. CARTHAGE. By Prof. A •. FRED BY_~F.LLA DUFP'Y. J. CHURCK. 33. POLAND. By w. R. MO •• ,LL, s· ALEXANDER'S EMPIRE. By M.A. Prof. J. P. MAKAFFV. 34- PARTHIA. By Prof. GEORGE 6. THE MOORS IN SPAIN. By RAWLINSON. STANLEY LANR.POO1' 35· AUSTRALIAN COMMON· 7. ANCIENT EGYPT. y Prof. WEALTH. By GREVILLB GEORt;P. RAWLINSON. TREGARTHEH. 8. HUNGARY. By Prof. ..MINlOS 36. SPAIN. By H. E. WAT,... VAMBRRY. 37. JAPAN. By DAYID AluKRAY, 9. THE SARACENS. By ARTKUR Ph.D. GILMAN, M.A. 38. SOUTH AFRIOA. By GF.ORGK 10. IRELAND. By the Hon. EMILY M. THKAL. • LAWLESS. 39. VENICE. By ALltTKEA W'EL. 11. CHALDBA. By Zt!NAiDE A. 40. THE CRUSADES. lIy T. A. RAGOZIN. ARCHER and C. L. K'NGs, 1" THE GOTHS. By HENRY BRAD· FORD. LEY. 41. VEDIa INDIA. By Z. A. R,,· 13. ABSYRIA. By ZgNAiDE A. RA. GOZIN. GOZIN. 42. WEST INDIES AND THE '14. TURKEY. By STANLEY LANE­ SPANISH MAIN. Ily JAME' POOLS. ){ODWAY. IS. HOLLAND. By Prof.' J. E. 43- BOHEMIA. By C. EDMUND THOROLD RoGERS. MAURICE. 16. MEDIEVAL FRANCE. By 44. THB BALKANS. By W.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric, Environmental and Historical Context
    Sutton Hoo 10 Chapter 10 5/12/05 2:12 PM Page 361 Part III Context Sutton Hoo 10 Chapter 10 5/12/05 2:12 PM Page 362 Sutton Hoo 10 Chapter 10 5/12/05 2:12 PM Page 363 Chapter 10 Environment and site formation Martin Carver (with contributions by Charles French and Rob Scaife,and using specialist studies by Steven Rothera) Introduction which can be dug out in lumps (‘crag’). The soil above the The Deben valley runs through a region of sandy flat seaboard subsoil is generally 300–400 mm of well-mixed ploughsoil, territory known as The Sandlings (Figure 13; Plate 1:b). Between either still under the plough, or capped by tough springy turf. them its two rivers, the Deben and the Alde, give access to an Buried soil under the mounds has also been ploughed, and lies archipelago of promontories and islands with woods, pasture, some 250–400 mm thick. arable, meadows, marshland and fishing grounds (Scarfe 1986 The studies described in this chapter concern the and 1987; Warner 1996). The Sutton Hoo cemetery is situated on development of soils and vegetation at the site and its immediate the 33 m (100 ft) contour, on a sand terrace east of the River surroundings. The purpose of these studies was, first, to produce Deben, about 15.5 km (10 miles) upstream from the North Sea – an environmental history for the use of the land before the 10 km (6.25 miles), as the crow flies, from the nearest sea-coast mounds were built and, second, to produce a sequence of the at Hollesley.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Evidence of a Large Northern European Roman Period Martial Event and Post-Battle Corpse Manipulation
    Direct evidence of a large Northern European Roman period martial event and post-battle corpse manipulation Mads Kähler Holsta,b, Jan Heinemeierc, Ejvind Hertzd, Peter Jensenb,e, Mette Løvschalb,1, Lene Mollerupd, Bent Vad Odgaardf, Jesper Olsenc, Niels Emil Søef, and Søren Munch Kristiansenf aMoesgaard Museum, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark; bDepartment of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, Aarhus University, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark; cAarhus AMS Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; dMuseum Skanderborg, 8660 Skanderborg, Denmark; eArchaeological IT, Aarhus University and Moesgaard Museum, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark; and fDepartment of Geoscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark Edited by George R. Milner, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Elsa M. Redmond April 12, 2018 (received for review December 13, 2017) New archaeological excavations at Alken Enge, Jutland, Denmark, period from 200 BC to AD 200 represents a lacuna before have revealed a comprehensive assemblage of disarticulated human the comprehensive postbattle weapon depositions (AD 200– remains within a 75-ha wetland area. A minimum of 82 individuals 550) (9). The historical sources indicate early large-scale mili- have been uncovered. Based on the distribution, the total population tary capabilities among the Germanic populations, but the is estimated to be greater than 380 individuals, exclusively male and numbers are highly uncertain and they refer primarily to con- predominantly adult. The chronological radiocarbon evidence of the flicts with the Romans (10, 11). human bones indicates that they belong to a single, large event in the The period has traditionally been seen as a form of tribal society early first century AD.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron, Steel and Swords Script - Page 1 Charibert I These Kids Did Not Do All That Well - They Fought Each Other Over Women
    The Frankish Empire And Its Swords Born to Rule (or to Be Killed) The Frankish Empire (also known as Frankish Kingdom, Frankia, Frankland) was the territory inhabited and ruled by the Franks, a confederation of Germanic tribes, during Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. It starts with the Merovingians, who we know from before. Here is a very brief history of the Fankish Empire (mostly based on Wikipedia). Clovis (ca. 466 – 511) was the first King of the Franks and the founder of the Merovingian dynasty that ruled the Franks for the next two centuries. His father was Childeric I, whose sword hilt we so admire. In the 150 or so years before his coronation in 496, a confederation of various tribes like Sicambri, Saliens, Bructeri, Ampsivarii, Chamavi and Chattuarii, fought the Romans, each other, or were allies of the Romans. Nevertheless they established some "Frankish" territory in what is now France. Around 428 the Salian King Chlodio, a member of the Germanic Franks from the Merovingian clan, ruled over an increasing number of Gallo- Roman subjects on both sides of the Rhine. Advanced His name is Germanic, composed of the elements "hlod" = "fame" and "wig" = combat. The French, of course, later wrote it "Clovis" and pronounced it like "Louis", the name born by 18 kings of France. The Frankish core territory then was Austrasia (the "eastern lands"); see the map below or on a larger scale here. Chlodio was a Christian and, like his forebears, under constant attack from the heathen Saxons in the North. After his death in 511 the Kingdom was partitioned into 4 parts, ruled by his four sons: Frankish empire evolution Numbers give date of "acquisition".
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Saxon Literature
    ANGLO-SAXON LITERATURE BY JOHN EARLE, M.A. PREFACE. The bulk of this little book has been a year or more in type; and, in the mean time, some important publications have appeared which it was too late for me to profit by. Among such I count the “Corpus Poeticum Boreale” by Dr. Gudbrand Vigfusson and Mr. York Powell; the “Epinal Gloss” and Alfred‟s “Orosius” by Mr. Sweet, for the Early English Text Society; an American edition of the “Beowulf” by Professors Harrison and Sharp; Ælfric‟s translation of “Alcuin upon Genesis,” by Mr. MacLean. To these I must add an article in the “Anglia” on the first and last of the Riddles in the Exeter Book, by Dr. Moritz Trautmann. Another recent book is the translation of Mr. Bernhard Ten Brink‟s work on “Early English Literature,” which comprises a description of thevi Anglo-Saxon period. This book is not new to me, except for the English dress that Mr. Kennedy has given to it. The German original has been often in my hand, and although I am not aware of any particular debt, such as it would have been a duty and a pleasure to acknowledge on the spot, yet I have a sentiment that Mr. Ten Brink‟s sympathising and judicious treatment of our earliest literature has been not only agreeable to read, but also profitable for my work. CHAPTER I. A PRELIMINARY VIEW. ANGLO-SAXON literature is the oldest of the vernacular literatures of modern Europe; and it is a consequence of this that its relations with Latin literature have been the closest.
    [Show full text]