Operation Crossroads

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Operation Crossroads kite official pictorial record V OPERATION CROSSROADS The Official Pictorial Record The Office of the Historian Joint Task Force One 1946 Wm. H. Wise g Co., Inc. New York Copyright, 1946 Wm. H. Wise & Co., Inc. Credits: All photographs are Joint Task Force One pho- tographs except as follows: Acme: Pages 16, 40, 93, 95, 103, 122 Press Association: Pages 22, 137, 173,214 International News: Pages 25,31,38,39,41,51, 66, 1 40, 157, 158 (lower), 161, 169, 206 Life Magazine: Pages 67, 80-81, 86, 87, 94. 123, 174 Fritz Goro of Life Magazine: Pages 34, 35, 53, 59, 88, 90, 91, 97, 98, 99, 108. 158, 159, 160, 161, 171 (lower), 201 Printed in the U.S.A. A Message from the Commander Joint Task Force One THIS pictorial record of Operation CROSSROADS must be dedicated to the 42,000 men—civilians and servicemen, who made the gigantic experiment possible. It is the record of a job well done. It is a record which makes impressively clear the extent of the preparations made over a period of months. The variety of activities constituting Joint Task Force ONE is also evident. The Operation called for a multitude of skills and talents. And from every man it demanded hard work. All this is apparent from the record. From the standpoint of the general public, Operation CROSSROADS constitutes a further example of the type of cooperation between the services—the Navy, Army Air Forces, Army Ground Forces, and civilian scientists and technicians, to which the people of the United States became accustomed during the recent war. page 6 For obvious reasons these photographs no more than hint at the tremendous amount of data obtained concerning the effect of the bombs upon ships and material. They necessarily slight the technical and scientific lessons learned at Bikini. They do, however, evidence an incontestable truth. The Atomic Age is here. It is no myth. Nor is the atomic bomb "just another weapon." It is the most lethal destructive agent yet devised by man. Its energy release is staggering; its radioactivity is slow killing poison. The purpose of these tests was to determine the effect of the atom bomb against various types of naval vessels. With the information secured, we can improve our ship design, tactics, and strategy, to minimize our losses in the unfortunate event of war waged with atomic weapons. A reliable and continuously effective plan to avoid com- petition in atomic armaments is the best possible defense against surprise attacks. With such a plan, atomic energy can in time become the controlled slave of man's peacetime pursuits. In the face of this new knowledge, these recently discovered truths concerning the atom, so suddenly thrust upon an already chaotic world, not only warfare but civi- lization itself literally stands at the Crossroads. Hence the name of this operation. *, + *m^ /^5^X ^-j Foreword NO MAN really saw what happened at Bikini. Previous Bombs Approximately 42,000 persons, drawn from nRIOR to July 1946 three atomic bombs had the four corners of the globe, travelled thousands been detonated—one above the New Mexico of miles to stage and witness the tests. But an desert, two more above the Japanese cities of atomic bomb defies scrutiny. It shuns publicity. Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For an already weaken- It shields its intense life-span in a flash of light ing Japan these bombs spelled defeat. The bomb- many times the brilliance of the sun. It dazzles ing of Hiroshima, on August 5, 1945 (Greenwich human eyes. It limits its life to a matter of mil- Mean Time) constituted the first military use of lionths of a second. It enshrouds itself in a cloud. the bomb. Nagasaki was hit on August 9 (G.M.T.). And then it dies, mushrooming grotesquely to On August 14, only nine days after Hiroshima, high altitudes as if for a better view of the havoc Japan surrendered unconditionally. it has produced. Now it could be told . the "best-kept secret Even if pent up beneath the surface of a la- of the war," the story of secret research in the goon it resists observation. Where before it field of nuclear physics, the successful tapping of blinded the eye here it succeeds in blinding the the tremendous energy of the atom, the mass mind. In a matter of seconds it tosses up a column production of materials to make use of this energy of tons of water higher than the Empire State in the form of a bomb. The perplexing language Building. It sinks ships in a moment and crushes of science dominated the columns of the daily others into the deformed, stepped-on shape of a press. Laymen throughout the United States child's bath-tub toy. Itself the result of man's in- scratched their heads and attempted to under- tellect, the bomb defies examination by its creator. stand. And yet the Bikini tests were thoroughly ob- One thing was clear. The bomb constituted a served. Supplementing human onlookers were revolution in pre-existing concepts of tactics and 10,000 instruments, and among them cameras, strategy. The tremendous striking power of the constructed to record what the human eye could single, unaccompanied bomber over Japan, taken never see. Cameras are inquisitive instruments to be a reconnaissance weather plane by those on with long memories. In the field of atomic re- the ground, was retold with each succeeding bul- search they are indeed star witnesses. Their story letin describing the doomed cities. But just how may appear differently to the scientist and the much of a revolution did the bomb represer layman. But all may grasp its general significance. one knew the answer to that question. For those who attended the tests these photo- Trinity Test graphs may serve as the lasting momento of <i unique experience. For those who did not they It was true that Bomb Number One, the first should serve to provide perspective concerning atomic bomb ever detonated by man, had been the atomic bomb, and give better knowledge of exploded "under laboratory conditions." l r one of the largest scale ventures in experiment the so-called Trinity Test, conducted in the great, ever attempted by man. This foreword has been roofless laboratory of the New Mexico desert near written with that end in view, and to place Opera- Alamogordo on July 16. 1945. Th«- tion CROSSROADS properly in the history of had been observed by scientists, military oh the bomb. and by hastily-set up instruments. Bi.- page mentation was meagre. The test was carried out and a second detonation in the water, slightly be- during wartime with emphasis on secrecy and the low the surface. rapid development of a bomb for use in bringing Two tests were necessary. The air and subsur- to an end a war that had already cost the lives face bursts constituted quite different test situa- of millions. Alamogordo represented a proving tions. This difference can be quickly told. When ground, not an elaborately instrumented experi- exploded in air at low altitude, as in Test "Able," ment. As a source of scientific data concerning an atomic bomb subjects everything in its vicinity the bomb it left much to be desired. to violent air-blast and intense radioactivity. Much The subsequent uses of the bomb at Hiroshima of the radioactivity is dissipated into the upper and Nagasaki were carried out under combat con- atmosphere in the so-called "mushroom cloud." ditions. They, too, were of little significance from Ships subjected to the bomb were expected to re- a technical point of view. They did provide data ceive, and did receive a severe air blast or con- concerning the effect of the bomb on a city of cussion. Crews on the test ships, had there been the Japanese type; but this data was entirely in any, would undoubtedly have suffered many cas- the form of rough estimates proving little. ualties from the lethal radioactivity. Test "Baker," the underwater shot, utilized the Bomb vs Ships bomb's tremendous energy release in a different way. The huge pressure built the bomb TO many this question arose: What ettect would up by an atomic bomb have on a fleet of naval ves- under the water was transmitted to the under- water portions ships. Ship sels? Much thought had been given to this ques- of the neighboring tion during the development phases of the bomb. hulls were by this pressure forced inward on all As early as 1944 the Manhattan Engineer District, sides at once. Furthermore, since the bomb was charged with development of the bomb, had given submerged in the lagoon, its radioactivity was serious consideration to the possibility of "testing" prevented from passing instantly into the upper lasting radioactivity was one of its atomic bombs against the Japanese atmosphere. Intense and ships, Navy at Trulc Island. And just after the surrender produced in the water of the lagoon. The of Japan Senator Brien McMahon of Connecticut drenched by tons of water thrown up by the ex- made a speech in the Senate in which he advo- plosion, became similarly contaminated. The ex- cated the use of the atomic bomb against the tent of such contamination proved a matter of captured Japanese fleet. great interest. Speculation on this subject followed diverse Bikini lines. What amount and type of damage would THE Bikini Atoll, a typical Pacific Ocean island the bombs produce in the first instance? To what group in the Marshalls, was chosen as the site extent should accepted principles of ship design of the test.
Recommended publications
  • WINTER 2013 - Volume 60, Number 4 the Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A
    WINTER 2013 - Volume 60, Number 4 WWW.AFHISTORICALFOUNDATION.ORG The Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A. “Tooey” Spaatz MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS and other air power pioneers, the Air Force Historical All members receive our exciting and informative Foundation (AFHF) is a nonprofi t tax exempt organization. Air Power History Journal, either electronically or It is dedicated to the preservation, perpetuation and on paper, covering: all aspects of aerospace history appropriate publication of the history and traditions of American aviation, with emphasis on the U.S. Air Force, its • Chronicles the great campaigns and predecessor organizations, and the men and women whose the great leaders lives and dreams were devoted to fl ight. The Foundation • Eyewitness accounts and historical articles serves all components of the United States Air Force— Active, Reserve and Air National Guard. • In depth resources to museums and activities, to keep members connected to the latest and AFHF strives to make available to the public and greatest events. today’s government planners and decision makers information that is relevant and informative about Preserve the legacy, stay connected: all aspects of air and space power. By doing so, the • Membership helps preserve the legacy of current Foundation hopes to assure the nation profi ts from past and future US air force personnel. experiences as it helps keep the U.S. Air Force the most modern and effective military force in the world. • Provides reliable and accurate accounts of historical events. The Foundation’s four primary activities include a quarterly journal Air Power History, a book program, a • Establish connections between generations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 04 Newsletter
    United States Atmospheric & Underwater Atomic Weapon Activities National Association of Atomic Veterans, Inc. 1945 “TRINITY“ “Assisting America’s Atomic Veterans Since 1979” ALAMOGORDO, N. M. Website: www.naav.com E-mail: [email protected] 1945 “LITTLE BOY“ HIROSHIMA, JAPAN R. J. RITTER - Editor April, 2012 1945 “FAT MAN“ NAGASAKI, JAPAN 1946 “CROSSROADS“ BIKINI ISLAND 1948 “SANDSTONE“ ENEWETAK ATOLL 1951 “RANGER“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1951 “GREENHOUSE“ ENEWETAK ATOLL 1951 “BUSTER – JANGLE“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1952 “TUMBLER - SNAPPER“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1952 “IVY“ ENEWETAK ATOLL 1953 “UPSHOT - KNOTHOLE“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1954 “CASTLE“ BIKINI ISLAND 1955 “TEAPOT“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1955 “WIGWAM“ OFFSHORE SAN DIEGO 1955 “PROJECT 56“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1956 “REDWING“ ENEWETAK & BIKINI 1957 “PLUMBOB“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1958 “HARDTACK-I“ ENEWETAK & BIKINI 1958 “NEWSREEL“ JOHNSTON ISLAND 1958 “ARGUS“ SOUTH ATLANTIC 1958 “HARDTACK-II“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1961 “NOUGAT“ NEVADA TEST SITE 1962 “DOMINIC-I“ CHRISTMAS ISLAND JOHNSTON ISLAND 1965 “FLINTLOCK“ AMCHITKA, ALASKA 1969 “MANDREL“ AMCHITKA, ALASKA 1971 “GROMMET“ AMCHITKA, ALASKA 1974 “POST TEST EVENTS“ ENEWETAK CLEANUP ------------ “ IF YOU WERE THERE, YOU ARE AN ATOMIC VETERAN “ The Newsletter for America’s Atomic Veterans COMMANDER’S COMMENTS knowing the seriousness of the situation, did not register any Outreach Update: First, let me extend our discomfort, or dissatisfaction on her part. As a matter of fact, it thanks to the membership and friends of NAAV was kind of nice to have some of those callers express their for supporting our “outreach” efforts over the thanks for her kind attention and assistance. We will continue past several years. It is that firm dedication to to insure that all inquires, along these lines, are fully and our Mission-Statement that has driven our adequately addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Fstate Scientist: Omond Mckillop Solandt and Government Science
    fState Scientist: Omond McKillop Solandt and Government Science in War and Hostile Peace, 1939-1956/ Scientifique.de l'Etat: Omond McKillop Solandt et la Science du Gouvernement lors de la Guerre et de la Paix Hostile, 1939-1956 A Thesis Submitted to the Division of Graduate Studies of the Royal Military College of Canada by Jason Sean Ridler, MA Royal Military College of Canada, 2001 BA (Hons.) York University, 1999 In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2008 ©This thesis may be used within the Department of National Defence but copyright for open publication remains the property of the author. Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-47901-8 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-47901-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of an Atomic Bomb
    (Image: Courtesy of United States Government, public domain.) INTRODUCTORY ESSAY "DESTROYER OF WORLDS": THE MAKING OF AN ATOMIC BOMB At 5:29 a.m. (MST), the world’s first atomic bomb detonated in the New Mexican desert, releasing a level of destructive power unknown in the existence of humanity. Emitting as much energy as 21,000 tons of TNT and creating a fireball that measured roughly 2,000 feet in diameter, the first successful test of an atomic bomb, known as the Trinity Test, forever changed the history of the world. The road to Trinity may have begun before the start of World War II, but the war brought the creation of atomic weaponry to fruition. The harnessing of atomic energy may have come as a result of World War II, but it also helped bring the conflict to an end. How did humanity come to construct and wield such a devastating weapon? 1 | THE MANHATTAN PROJECT Models of Fat Man and Little Boy on display at the Bradbury Science Museum. (Image: Courtesy of Los Alamos National Laboratory.) WE WAITED UNTIL THE BLAST HAD PASSED, WALKED OUT OF THE SHELTER AND THEN IT WAS ENTIRELY SOLEMN. WE KNEW THE WORLD WOULD NOT BE THE SAME. A FEW PEOPLE LAUGHED, A FEW PEOPLE CRIED. MOST PEOPLE WERE SILENT. J. ROBERT OPPENHEIMER EARLY NUCLEAR RESEARCH GERMAN DISCOVERY OF FISSION Achieving the monumental goal of splitting the nucleus The 1930s saw further development in the field. Hungarian- of an atom, known as nuclear fission, came through the German physicist Leo Szilard conceived the possibility of self- development of scientific discoveries that stretched over several sustaining nuclear fission reactions, or a nuclear chain reaction, centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Grappling with the Bomb: Britain's Pacific H-Bomb Tests
    Timeline and glossary Nuclear timeline, 1945–1963 16 July 1945 Alamogordo, United States conducts first-ever nuclear New Mexico, USA test, codenamed ‘Trinity .’ 6 August 1945 Hiroshima, Japan US aircraft Enola Gay drops the atomic weapon ‘Little Boy’ on Hiroshima, killing 80,000 people immediately and an estimated 100,000 people within six months . 9 August 1945 Nagasaki, Japan US aircraft Bockscar drops the atomic weapon ‘Fat Man’ on Nagasaki, killing 70,000 people immediately and tens of thousands in following months . 30 June 1946 Bikini Atoll, Marshall Under Operation Crossroads, United Islands States conducts the first of two atomic tests at Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands. ‘Able’ and ‘Baker’ are the first of 67 atmospheric tests in the Marshall Islands between 1946–1958 . 6 August 1948 Hiroshima, Japan Hiroshima’s first Peace Festival. 29 August 1949 Semipalatinsk, USSR conducts first atomic test Kazakhstan RDS-1 in Operation Pervaya molniya (Fast lightning), dubbed ‘Joe-1’ by United States . 1950–1954 Korean peninsula United States, Britain and Australia, under a United Nations mandate, join military operations in Korea following clashes between forces from the south and north of Korea. The Democratic People’s Republic is backed by the newly created People’s Republic of China . 3 October 1952 Monte Bello Islands, Under Operation Hurricane, United Western Australia Kingdom begins its nuclear testing program in Australia with a 25 kiloton atomic test . xi GRAPPLING WITH THE BOMB 1 November 1952 Bikini Atoll, Marshall United States conducts its first Islands hydrogen bomb test, codenamed ‘Mike’ (10 .4 megatons) as part of Operation Ivy .
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity and Beyond: the Atomic Bomb Movie
    Trinity and Beyond: The Atomic Bomb Movie 1. Why did scientists detonate 100 tons of TNT be- 9. How many died in Hiroshima? 20. How heavy was the housing that contained the fore they tested their bombs? Mike test bomb? 10. How many buildings were destroyed? 2. Who was put in charge of the Manhattan Project? 21. During the 1953 Nevada desert tests, why did the smaller yield bomb cause more damage than the 11. How many died in Nagasaki? larger yield bomb? 3. Was the scientist Edward Teller at first in favor of the bomb project? 12. How many were injured? 22. What were the scientists studying when they ex- ploded bombs in the ocean off of San Diego? 4. Did he ever regret working on the bombs? 13. What percent of the buildings were destroyed? 23. On later Pacific Island tests, why were floating 5. When the first test bomb exploded at the Trinity barges needed to carry the bombs? site in New Mexico, what were the values associated 14. During Operation Crossroads, which caused with each of the following? more damage; the airdrop, or the underwater explo- sion? 24. How high up was the Teak test shot detonated? a) temperature: b) pressure: 15. What was the purpose of Operation Sandstone? 25. What happened in the atmosphere as a result? c) distance at which a person would go temporarily blind: d) number of times greater than the explosion of 100 16. In what year did Russia first test an atomic 26. How far away were these effects felt, and how tons of TNT: bomb? long did they last? 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Topographic Power Spectra of Cratered Terrains: 10.1002/2014JE004746 Theory and Application to the Moon
    JournalofGeophysicalResearch: Planets RESEARCH ARTICLE Topographic power spectra of cratered terrains: 10.1002/2014JE004746 Theory and application to the Moon Key Points: Margaret A. Rosenburg1, Oded Aharonson2, and Re’em Sari3 • Impact cratering produces characteristic variations in the 1Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA, 2Department topographic PSD of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Technology, Rehovot, Israel, 3Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew • The size-frequency distribution and shape of craters control University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel PSD variations • We investigate the topographic PSD on model terrains and Impact cratering produces characteristic variations in the topographic power spectral density lunar topography Abstract (PSD) of cratered terrains, which are controlled by the size-frequency distribution of craters and the spectral content (shape) of individual features. These variations are investigated here in two parallel Correspondence to: approaches. First, a cratered terrain model, based on Monte Carlo emplacement of craters and benchmarked M. A. Rosenburg, [email protected] by an analytical formulation of the one-dimensional PSD, is employed to generate topographic surfaces at a range of size-frequency power law exponents and shape dependencies. For self-similar craters, the slope of the PSD, , varies inversely with that of the production function, , leveling off to 0 at high (surface Citation: Rosenburg, M. A., O. Aharonson, topography dominated by the smallest craters) and maintaining a roughly constant value ( ∼ 2) at low and R. Sari (2015), Topographic (surface topography dominated by the largest craters). The effects of size-dependent shape parameters power spectra of cratered terrains: and various crater emplacement rules are also considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity Scientific Firsts
    TRINITY SCIENTIFIC FIRSTS THE TRINITY TEST was perhaps the greatest scientifi c experiment ever. Seventy-fi ve years ago, Los Alamos scientists and engineers from the U.S., Britain, and Canada changed the world. July 16, 1945 marks the entry into the Atomic Age. PLUTONIUM: THE BETHE-FEYNMAN FORMULA: Scientists confi rmed the newly discovered 239Pu has attractive nuclear Nobel Laureates Hans Bethe and Richard Feynman developed the physics fi ssion properties for an atomic weapon. They were able to discern which equation used to estimate the yield of a fi ssion weapon, building on earlier production path would be most effective based on nuclear chemistry, and work by Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls. The equation elegantly encapsulates separated plutonium from Hanford reactor fuel. essential physics involved in the nuclear explosion process. PRECISION HIGH-EXPLOSIVE IMPLOSION FOUNDATIONAL RADIOCHEMICAL TO CREATE A SUPER-CRITICAL ASSEMBLY: YIELD ANALYSIS: Project Y scientists developed simultaneously-exploding bridgewire detonators Wartime radiochemistry techniques developed and used at Trinity with a pioneering high-explosive lens system to create a symmetrically provide the foundation for subsequent analyses of nuclear detonations, convergent detonation wave to compress the core. both foreign and domestic. ADVANCED IMAGING TECHNIQUES: NEW FRONTIERS IN COMPUTING: Complementary diagnostics were developed to optimize the implosion Human computers and IBM punched-card machines together calculated design, including fl ash x-radiography, the RaLa method,
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013.Pdf
    ATOMIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION Preserving & Interpreting Manhattan Project History & Legacy preserving history ANNUAL REPORT 2013 WHY WE SHOULD PRESERVE THE MANHATTAN PROJECT “The factories and bombs that Manhattan Project scientists, engineers, and workers built were physical objects that depended for their operation on physics, chemistry, metallurgy, and other nat- ural sciences, but their social reality - their meaning, if you will - was human, social, political....We preserve what we value of the physical past because it specifically embodies our social past....When we lose parts of our physical past, we lose parts of our common social past as well.” “The new knowledge of nuclear energy has undoubtedly limited national sovereignty and scaled down the destructiveness of war. If that’s not a good enough reason to work for and contribute to the Manhattan Project’s historic preservation, what would be? It’s certainly good enough for me.” ~Richard Rhodes, “Why We Should Preserve the Manhattan Project,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May/June 2006 Photographs clockwise from top: J. Robert Oppenheimer, General Leslie R. Groves pinning an award on Enrico Fermi, Leona Woods Marshall, the Alpha Racetrack at the Y-12 Plant, and the Bethe House on Bathtub Row. Front cover: A Bruggeman Ranch property. Back cover: Bronze statues by Susanne Vertel of J. Robert Oppenheimer and General Leslie Groves at Los Alamos. Table of Contents BOARD MEMBERS & ADVISORY COMMITTEE........3 Cindy Kelly, Dorothy and Clay Per- Letter from the President..........................................4
    [Show full text]
  • On R.E Size Effect Measurements Fermi
    V "" ON R.E SIZE EFFECT MEASUREMENTS FERMI SURFACE IN INDIUM D.G.deGROOT V-' VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT TE AMSTERDAM ON R.F. SIZE EFFECT MEASUREMENTS AND THE FERMI SURFACE IN INDIUM ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT TER VERKRIJGING VAN DE GRAAD VAN DOCTOR IN DE WISKUNDE EN NATUURWETENSCHAPPEN AAN DE VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT TE AMSTERDAM, OP GEZAG VAN DE RECTOR MAGNIFICUS MR.I.A.DIEPENHORST, HOOGLERAAR IN DE FACULTEIT DER RECHTSGELEERDHEID, IN HET OPENBAAR TE VERDEDIGEN OP DONDERDAG 2 MEI 1974 TE 13.30 UUR IN HET HOOFDGEBOUW DER UNIVERSITEIT, DE BOELELAAN 1105 DOOR DIRK GEERT DE GROOT. GEBOREN TE EINDHOVEN *hk r r PROMOTOR: DR. A. LODDER COREFERENT: DR. J.H.P. VAN WEEREN This investigation was part of the research program of the "Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (F.O.M.)", which is financially supported by the "Nederlandse Organisatie voor Zuiver Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Z.W.O.)". STELLINGEN 1. Het is gewenst in de berekening van de laag freguente ruis in de verzadigingsstroom in avalanche diodes naast de schrootruis in de injectiestroom andere ruiscomponenten te betrekken. 2. Bij het onderzoek van anomalieen in de transmissie van electromagnetische golven door metaalkristallen vormt de ondergrond in de transmissie in vele gevallen een niet te scheiden component van het signaal. 3. De benaming O.P.W. berekening voor een pseudopotentiaal interpolatie schema, waarbij de Fouriercomponenten van de pseudopotentiaal als aan te passsen parameters worden ge- hanteerd, wekt ten onrechte de indruk dat de gebruikte golffuncties orthogonaal staan op de atomaire pit golf- functies. 4. Het is gewenst dat de Nederlandse regering een prejudiciele beschikking uitlokt, die tot gevolg zal hebben dat dienst- merken onder de beschermende werking van de Eenvormige Beneluxwet op de Warenmerken worden gebracht.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Chemical Incidents on First Responders
    2019 The Effect of Chemical Incidents on First Responders: An Interview with Bruce Evans (MPA, NRP, CFOD, SEMSO), Fire Chief, Upper Pine River Fire Protection District A massive leak of liquefied chlorine gas created a dangerous cloud over the city of Henderson, NV, in the early morning hours of May 6, 1991. Over 200 people (including firefighters) were examined at a local hospital for respiratory distress caused by inhalation of the chlorine and approximately 30 were admitted for treatment. Approximately 700 individuals were taken to shelters, and between 2,000 and 7,000 individuals were evacuated from the area. ASPR TRACIE interviewed Chief Bruce Evans (who was a firefighter- paramedic at the time of the incident), asking him to share his my first large-scale incident: the experiences and highlight how the PEPCON explosion. PEPCON was Access these U.S. Fire Administration Technical Reports fire and emergency response to a rocket fuel plant that supplied propellant used for the space for more information on these chemical incidents has changed incidents: over the years. shuttle program. This explosion sent a shock wave over the • Fire and Explosions at Rocket Corina Solé Brito, ASPR TRACIE entire Las Vegas Valley, blew out Fuel Plant (CSB): Can you please share windows that were miles away, • Massive Leak of Liquefied your experience in Henderson and created a small, multicolored Chlorine Gas and other related incidents, how mushroom cloud on the south end you think the field has changed of the valley. The Professional since then, and what you think Golfers’ Association (PGA) was the future holds? also in town, so there were satellite or injuries from flying debris were I am fortunate trucks and news trucks present.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters
    Joint Publication 3-33 Joint Task Force Headquarters 30 July 2012 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides joint doctrine for the formation and employment of a joint task force (JTF) headquarters to command and control joint operations. It provides guidance on the JTF headquarters’ role in planning, preparing, executing, and assessing JTF operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations and provides the doctrinal basis for US military coordination with other US Government departments and agencies during operations and for US military involvement in multinational operations. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs) and prescribes joint doctrine for operations, education, and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing their appropriate plans. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of the overall objective. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subunified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise.
    [Show full text]