DOCSLIB.ORG

Engineering, Procurement and Construction for the Infrastructures of the Réseau Électrique Métropolitain De Montréal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Engineering, Procurement and Construction for the Infrastructures of the Réseau Électrique Métropolitain De Montréal Request for Qualification Ref 01-7001 Engineering, Procurement and Construction for the Infrastructures of the Réseau électrique métropolitain de Montréal June 28, 2016 CDPQ Infra inc. Subsidiary of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec 1000 place Jean-Paul-Riopelle cdpqinfra.com Montréal, Québec H2Z 2B3 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Purpose and Contents of the Document ....................................................................................... 6 1.2 Brief Description of the Project ...................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Procurement Process .................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Objectives of the Request for Qualification ................................................................................... 7 1.5 Procurement and Project Completion Deadlines........................................................................... 8 1.6 Project Governance ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.7 Stakeholders .................................................................................................................................. 9 1.8 Process Auditor ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.9 Conflict of Interest Management .................................................................................................. 10 2. EPC INFRASTRUCTURES .................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Project Overview .......................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Planned Route for the Project...................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Project Components .................................................................................................................... 14 2.4 Division of Responsibilities .......................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Design and Construction Elements ............................................................................................. 16 2.6 Independent Certifier ................................................................................................................... 16 2.7 Planned Allocation of Risks Related to the EPC Works .............................................................. 16 2.8 Management of Interfaces ........................................................................................................... 17 2.9 Other Available Information ......................................................................................................... 21 3. REMUNERATION AND GUARANTEES .............................................................................................................................. 22 3.1 Payment Mechanism ................................................................................................................... 22 3.2 Proposal Security Deposit ........................................................................................................... 22 3.3 Performance Guarantees during the Design and Construction Period ....................................... 22 3.4 Performance Guarantees during the Warranty Period ................................................................ 22 3.5 Parent Company Guarantee ........................................................................................................ 22 3.6 Insurance Program ...................................................................................................................... 23 CDPQ Infra inc. Subsidiary of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec 1000 place Jean-Paul-Riopelle cdpqinfra.com Montréal, Québec H2Z 2B3 4. PROCUREMENT .................................................................................................................................................................. 23 4.1 Procurement Process .................................................................................................................. 23 4.2 Terms and Conditions .................................................................................................................. 23 4.3 Transparency in the Selection Process ....................................................................................... 25 5. INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESPONDENTS .............................................................................................................................. 25 5.1 Date and Place for Submitting a Response ................................................................................. 26 5.2 CDPQ Infra’s Representative ...................................................................................................... 27 5.3 Examination of Documents .......................................................................................................... 28 5.4 Requests for Clarification ............................................................................................................. 28 5.5 Information Session and Site Visit ............................................................................................... 29 5.6 Preparation and Presentation of a Response .............................................................................. 29 5.7 Format for a Response ................................................................................................................ 30 5.8 Form of Undertaking .................................................................................................................... 30 5.9 Withdrawal of a Response ........................................................................................................... 30 5.10 Request regarding a Conflict of Interest ...................................................................................... 31 6. EVALUATION OF RESPONSES .......................................................................................................................................... 31 6.1 Response Evaluation Process ..................................................................................................... 31 6.2 Evaluation Committee .................................................................................................................. 32 6.3 Eligibility Criteria .......................................................................................................................... 32 6.4 Compliance Requirements .......................................................................................................... 33 6.5 Evaluation Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 34 6.6 Selection of Qualified Respondents ............................................................................................ 35 6.7 Transmission of the Evaluation Results to the Respondents ...................................................... 35 7. LEGISLATIVE AND NORMATIVE FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................................. 35 7.1 Relevant Applicable Quebec Legislation (Partial List) ................................................................. 36 7.2 Applicable Canadian Legislation (Partial List) ............................................................................. 36 8. GENERAL CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... 36 8.1 Communications .......................................................................................................................... 36 8.2 Hiring of Certain Advisors or Experts by a Respondent .............................................................. 37 CDPQ Infra inc. Subsidiary of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec 1000 place Jean-Paul-Riopelle cdpqinfra.com Montréal, Québec H2Z 2B3 8.3 Access to Information .................................................................................................................. 37 8.4 Conflicts of Interest ...................................................................................................................... 38 8.5 Exclusivity .................................................................................................................................... 38 8.6 Canadian Content ........................................................................................................................ 38 8.7 Lobbying and Post-Employment Obligations ............................................................................... 38 8.8 Disclosure and Public Comments ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canadian Rail No182 1966
    Can..a. ia )RS.~nn November 1966 Number 18a Thanks, Emmons! HA T THE 1966 Fall Foliage excursion was a social success, no one T will deny. The comparatively short train, the small number of passengers, an excellent display by Mother Nature and an excel- lent performance by that noble steel steed, No. 6218, combined to make the event an enjoyable one, not only for the passengers but also for the trip committee. A subsidiary factor but, unfortunately, an important one , was that it lost a considerable amount of money for the Association, and while the purpose of our excursions has never been to make a profit per se, it is reasonable that an attempt be made to avoid loss. In de­ fense of the Trip Committee, however, it should be said tha t the fall trip deficit was more than offset by a profit on the spring excursion to Essex Junction SO that, taking 1966 operations as a whole, there is a "black" balance. This would not have been, however, had it not been for the spontan­ eous generosity of the 470 Railroad Club of Portland, Maine, and its dedicated and magnanimous Treasurer and Clerk of Corporation, our good friend Mr. J. Emmons Lancaster. No. 6218 was shared with the Portland club on the October 1/2 weekend, and this sharing made the inevitable large fixed costs of supplying the locomotive and operating it over such a long mileage, less of a burden on both the Portland club and ourselves. The Portland group had a tremendous turnout of passengers, over eight hundred in fact, in contrast to slightly more than one hundred adventurous souls who supported our own trip.
    [Show full text]
  • Réseau Électrique Métropolitain (REM) | REM Forecasting Report
    Réseau Électrique Métropolitain (REM) | REM Forecasting Report Réseau Électrique CDPQ Infra Inc. Métropolitain (REM) REM Forecasting Report Our reference: 22951103 February 2017 Client reference: BC-A06438 Réseau Électrique Métropolitain (REM) | REM Forecasting Report Réseau Électrique CDPQ Infra Inc. Métropolitain (REM) REM Forecasting Report Our reference: 22951103 February 2017 Client reference: BC-A06438 Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave CDPQ Infra Inc. Suite 970 - 355 Burrard Street 1000 Place Jean-Paul-Riopelle Vancouver, BC V6C 2G8 Montréal, QC H2Z 2B3 Canada Canada +1 (604) 629 2610 na.steerdaviesgleave.com Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material for CDPQ Infra Inc.. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer Davies Gleave has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Réseau Électrique Métropolitain (REM) | REM Forecasting Report Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Vision of Montreal's Downtown at the Core of a Polycentric City And
    Page 1 Montreal, November 3, 2016 Anton Dubrau The Vision of Montreal’s Downtown at the Core of a Poly­Centric City And How to Get there With Public Transit A Contribution to the Office de la Consultation Publique de Montreal on the “Strategie Centre­Ville”. Page 2 1. Intro 4 2. What is a Poly­Central City? 4 3. A Transit System for a Poly­Centric City: An S­Bahn 6 4. What would an S­Bahn look like in Montreal? 10 5. The REM ­ The North­South S­Bahn? 15 5.1. Intro 15 5.2. Low Capacity 17 5.4. Monopolization of Mount Royal Tunnel 20 5.4.1. A Second Tunnel? 25 5.4.2. A Solution: Shared System of REM, AMT, VIA 26 5.5. Bad Transfers At Gare Centrale 29 5.5.1. REM ⟷ Orange Line 29 5.5.2. Improving the transfer REM ⟷ Orange Line 30 5.5.3. Further Improving the transfer ­ Moving a Metro Station 31 5.5.4. REM ⟷ Reneve­Levesque 32 5.7. REM: bypassing Griffintown, the Old Port, Pt­St­Charles 35 5.8. Summary 35 5.9. Ridership 35 5.10. An Alternative: CN Rail Viaduct 36 5.11. A Note on Cost 40 6. Summary 41 7. APPENDICES 42 7.1. APPENDIX A: Description of a Shared System between AMT, VIA & REM 42 7.1.1. Frequency, Dwell times & Schedule 42 7.1.2. Track Layout and Station 47 7.1.3. The McGill Station 47 7.1.4. Signalling system / automation 48 7.1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Title EARLY RAILWAY SUBURBS and THEIR LINKS TO
    Title EARLY RAILWAY SUBURBS AND THEIR LINKS TO CONTEMPORARY TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENTS Case Study: Town of Mount Royal, Montreal Zahra Zarabi Urban Design and Housing School of Architecture McGill University, Montreal August 2014 A report submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Masters of Architecture ©Zahra Zarabi 2014 Acknowledgments It is a pleasure to thank those who made this report possible. First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Professor Vikram Bhatt for his constant support and encouragement throughout the production of this research paper. I would also like to thank Professor Avi Friedman who provided invaluable suggestions which contributed to the overall quality of this work. A special acknowledgment goes out to the Post-Professional Master of Architecture Class of 2013, who challenged me academically in a congenial work environment from which I learned enormously. I am also grateful to Miss Marcia King, secretory of graduate programs, for her unwavering helps and support. Finally, the completion of this degree would not have been possible without the love and support of my family who strove to provide me with the best opportunities in life. ii Table of content Title ......................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................. ii Table of content ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Rail No155 1964
    CJan..a Jffimnn Number 15 5 / May 1964 :-............... 11 ..............................................................: ••••• locomotive .5292 with a three-car train was substituted for the single unit diesel car ••••• and on October .5, 19.52, the Association ran its first chartered steam-powered train. : . .. .......... '..................... ....................................................... Ca nad ia n Ra i 1 Page 103 C N Passengers to find their P I ace i nth e Sun. .. Fe rro eN recently offered tangible "Skyvlew" cars. Specific CN proof that the sky's the limit names and numbers are not yet when it comes to passenger train known; on the Milwaukee Road luxury. Ten glass-topped pas­ the cars were: senger cars have been acquired from the Milwaukee Road, to meet an increasing demand for accom­ 12 - Alder Creek modation on CN mainline trains. 14 - Arrow Creek "It is quite Clear," said CN 15 - Coffee Creek Vice-president Pierre Delagrave, 16 - Gold Creek "that the response to our var­ 17 - Marble Creek ious campaigns to encourage use 18 - Spanish Creek of our passenger services, par­ ticularly the introduction of the Red, White, and Blue system The other four cars acquired of reduced fares, is developing by CN will introduce the ful1- to the point where we are faced length dome to Canada. The cars with an immediate need for spec­ will be placed in service almost ialized equipment." immediately on some runs of the Super Continental and the Panor­ Six of the cars are the dis­ ama,through the Rocky Mountains. tinctive Sky Top sleeper-lounges CN refers to the cars as "Scen­ which were introduced on the eramic" double-deck cars, thus Milwaukee Road's Hiawathas in avoiding a contradiction of not 1948 and 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Age Return of Transit Article 10-13-20
    Transit, Six Months After COVID-19: A Progress Report Written by David Peter Alan, Contributing Editor Transit is fighting its way back, after devastating decreases in ridership and revenue last spring, which necessitated severe service reductions on many lines and throughout many systems. Today, many of those systems are increasing service, both because many of the remaining riders need it, and in the hope that riders from the pre-COVID era will come back. Offices are re-opening slowly and carefully in some transit-rich cities, and many venues that historically attracted tourists (even if only for a day trip) are still shut down. Wherever it is located, transit must fight a protracted battle to remain relevant and regain some of the ground it captured during the past several decades, and then lost during the past several months. In this report, we will look at how transit providers in the US and Canada are doing, especially with respect to the amount of service they are offering. Some providers are back to offering the level of service that they offered before the virus hit. Others still offer reduced service, while some lines are still shut down completely. How is your local transit provider doing these days? Read on and find out. The Northeast: Where there is still plenty of transit, but not plenty of money to run it The Northeast is the home of three of the nation’s legacy rail systems (Boston, the New York area, and Philadelphia), a number of newer rail lines and systems, and Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor (NEC) to connect most of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian National Rai System
    ANNUAL REPORT -"F THE - CANADIAN NATIONAL RAI AY SYSTEM MoGttl University school 07 commerce ANNUAL REPORT -OF THE - CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY SYSTEM FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1931 ?.'cGill UniverGity SOhool of Commerce Library INDEX CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS Page Directors and Executive Officers .............................................. 4 Report to the Minister of Railway and Canals ................................. 5-10 Income Statement .......................................................... 12 ProfitandLossAccount ..................................................... 13 Consolidated Balance Sheet .................................................. 14-15 OperatingRevenues ......................................................... 16 Summary of Operating Expenses.............................................. 16 Maintenance of Wav and Structures Expenses.................................. 17 Maintenance of Equipment ................... Traffic Expenses............................. Transportation Expenses .................... Miscellaneous Operations .................... General Expenses........................... Additional Capital Expenditures ............. Funded Debt ............................... Loans from Dominion of Canada .............. Investments in Affiliated Companies ........ : . Companies comprised in the Canadian National Receipts and Expenditures-1923-1931 ..................... Equipment Owned .............................. ; ......... Tonnage by Commodities.................................. EASTERN LINES
    [Show full text]
  • Development Derailed: Calgary and the CPR, 1962–64
    Development DeraileD Copyright © 2013 Max Foran Published by AU Press, Athabasca University 1200, 10011 – 109 Street, Edmonton, AB T5J 3S8 ISBN 978-1-927536-08-1 (print) 978-1-927536-09-8 (PDF) 978-1-927536-10-4 (epub) Cover and interior design by Natalie Olsen, Kisscut Design. Printed and bound in Canada by Marquis Book Printers. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Foran, Max Development derailed : Calgary and the CPR, 1962–64 / Max Foran. Includes bibliographical references and index. Issued also in electronic formats. ISBN 978-1-927536-08-1 1. Economic development — Political aspects — Alberta — Calgary — History — 20th century. 2. City planning — Alberta — Calgary — History — 20th century. 3. Urban renewal — Alberta — Calgary — History — 20th century. 4. Public- private sector cooperation — Alberta — Calgary — History — 20th century. 5. Canadian Pacific Railway Company — Planning — History — 20th century. 6. Railroads — Political aspects — Alberta — Calgary — History — 20th century. 7. Calgary (Alta.) — Economic conditions — 20th century. I. Title. FC3697.4.F676 2013 971.23’3803 C2012-906353-3 We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada through the Canada Book Fund (CBF) for our publishing activities. Assistance provided by the Government of Alberta, Alberta Multimedia Develop- ment Fund. This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons licence, Attribution–Non- commercial–No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada: see www.creativecommons.org. The text may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes, provided that credit is given to the original author. To obtain permission for uses beyond those outlined in the Creative Commons licence, please contact AU Press, Athabasca University, at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Dykes Encountered in Mount Royal Tunnel •*-»•>••»»••
    DYKES ENCOUNTERED IN MOUNT ROYAL TUNNEL •*-»•>••»»•• DEPOSITED IB Y THE COMMITTEE OX (Srafcuate StuMes. M^QILL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY DYKES ENCOUNTERED; IN MOUNT ROYAI TUNNEL BETWEEN STATIONS 183+35 and 195+61, by Clara Muriel Aylard. Submitted in part requirement for degree of Master of Science. McGill University, April 30, 1924. Dykes Encountered in Mount Royal Tunnel between Stations 183+35 and 195+61. This paper contains a description of the dykes encountered in a section of the Canadian National Railway tunnel through Mount Royal. The section is 1226 feet in length from station 188+35 in Trenton limestone, 3492 feet west of the eastern portal of the tunnel, to station 195+61 within the essexite, 91 feet beyond its contact with the limestone. The material studied consisted of specimens collected by Dr. J.A. Bancroft. In the table below is a comparison of the types of dykes found in this section with those previously des­ cribed by A.W. Carlyle in the limestone beyond the western contact of the essexite and limestone* Type of dyke Determined by Determined by A.W.Carlyle C.M.Aylard Gabbro-diorite 0 4 Diorite porphyry 7 0 Augitite 0 ...... 2 Tinguaite 4 0 Tinguaite porphyry ....... 3 2 Porphyritic plagioclase tinguaite 0 1 Monchi quite • 0 1 Fourchite 1 2 Maenaite 13 3 Nepheline syenite porphyry ... 5 2 Camptonite 38 27 Unclassified 1 1 1. Carlyle, A.W., "A Study of the Dyke Rocks of Mount Royal Tunnel from stations 260+00 to 283+00." 2. As will be noted, of the 45 dykes examined, 27 are oamptonites, and a similar preponderance of these dykes over all others was observed by Carlyle-.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Action Newsletter – Vol. 35, No. 4
    TRANSPORT ACTION NEWSLETTER Volume 35 no 4 — December 2014 TIM HAYMAN IN THIS ISSUE Cape Breton Rail in jeopardy EASTERN ALL ABOARD FOR THE FUTURE ? SHORES Another piece of Canada’s national authority to order continued operation of an rail network could soon disappear. uneconomic line, but the provincial legislature The operator of the line that spans has just unanimously approved amendments to Cape Breton Island wants to aban- the Railway Act that will make it much more don service and tear up the tracks. difficult for the company to remove the track. Christmas gift But it won’t happen without a fight, The hearing in December will have little effect from VIA as strong local opposition is build- on G&W’s intention to withdraw service, but Page 2 ing momentum. ransport Action Atlantic will be an QUEBEC intervenor when the Nova Scotia Util- ities and Review Board holds public Thearings concerning the rail line between the Strait of Canso and the Sydney area. The 98 miles of former CN track, part of the Cape Breton and Central Nova Scotia Railway, is now owned by US-based Genesee & Wyoming, who want to abandon service and remove the TIM HAYMAN Rusty bridge needs rails. Since the closure of the Sydney steel CBNS NEAR SHUNACADIE, NS. paint ! mill and the coal mines that were once the Page 3 area’s economic lifeblood, plus the diversion it will afford numerous intervenors, includ- of intermodal traffic to highway, rail traffic has ing customers, business groups and municipal CANADA declined to only about 500 carloads per year – leaders, a high-profile opportunity to make a small fraction of what G&W claims is needed their voices heard and to offer solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Report Public Consultation Meeting on the Réseau
    REPORT PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETING ON THE RÉSEAU EXPRESS MÉTROPOLITAIN (REM) IN TOWN OF MOUNT ROYAL – OCTOBER 9, 2018 Background The REM The Réseau express métropolitain (REM) is a major public transportation project with an estimated cost of $6.3 billion. The project is managed by the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ Infra). When completed, the system will have 26 stations and cross the greater Montreal area on 67 km of tracks. The proposed REM project will comprise several branches, run 20 hours a day and have a service frequency of 2.5 to 15 minutes, depending on the time of day. The slightly over one- kilometre segment that will cross Town of Mount Royal is the most densely populated in the system and will handle trains connecting downtown with Montréal-Trudeau airport, Deux-Montagnes and Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue. Town of Mount Royal Town of Mount Royal is a garden city whose urban heritage dates back more than a century. The Town is renowned for the quality of its urban landscapes and the peacefulness of its neighbourhoods. The model city of Town of Mount Royal was designated a National Historic Site of Canada in 2008. Its impressive history is closely related to that the railway and the tunnel passing under the mountain. In 2016, the announcement of the REM project was greeted positively by residents, who, at the time, saw it as improving their quality of life as well as that of other commuter train users. However, when the details of the trains’ frequency of service were announced earlier this year, locals’ enthusiasm quickly dwindled.
    [Show full text]
  • JUL 20 1978 Leonar 1 O}'R Rodrigues, 1978 LIBRAR!ES
    MONTREAL The Building of Place Ville Marie and Its Effects on Central City Development by LEONARD OLIVER RODRIGUES B.Sc. (Arch.), McGill University, Montreal (1972) B.Arch. (honors), McGill University, Montreal (1974) SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREES OF MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE IN ADVANCED STUDIES AND MASTER OF CITY PLANNING AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OF TECHNOLOGY MAY 1978 JUL 20 1978 Leonar 1 O}'r Rodrigues, 1978 LIBRAR!ES Signature of author ... Oey&rtme t of Urban Studies and Planning D partme t of Architecture, May 1978 Certified by.......I Kevin Lynch, TheQ Supervisor A Accepted by ............. Julian Bei a , Chairman, Department Committee Accepted by ............. ... - -~ ------------. .-- . Ralph Gakenh imer, Chairman, Department Committee Room 14-0551 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Ph: 617.253.2800 MITLibraries Email: [email protected] Document Services http://Iibraries.mit.edu/docs DISCLAIMER OF QUALITY Due to the condition of the original material, there are unavoidable flaws in this reproduction. We have made every effort possible to provide you with the best copy available. If you are dissatisfied with this product and find it unusable, please contact Document Services as soon as possible. Thank you. The images contained in this document are of the best quality available. MONTREAL The Building of Place Ville Marie and Its Effects on Central City Development by LEONARD OLIVER RODRIGUES Submitted-to.the Department of Architecture and the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in May 1978 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degrees of Master of Architecture in Advanced Studies and Master of City Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology ABSTRACT The complexity of the urban environment has repeatedly evaded descrip- tions that attempt to encompass the range of that complexity.
    [Show full text]