Inside Military Machines Inside Military Machines
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Defence Acquisition
Defence acquisition Alex Wild and Elizabeth Oakes 17th May 2016 He efficient procurement of defence equipment has long been a challenge for British governments. It is an extremely complex process that is yet to be mastered with vast T sums of money invariably at stake – procurement and support of military equipment consumes around 40 per cent of annual defence cash expenditure1. In 2013-14 Defence Equipment and Support (DE&S) spent £13.9bn buying and supporting military equipment2. With the House of Commons set to vote on the “Main Gate” decision to replace Trident in 2016, the government is set to embark on what will probably be the last major acquisition programme in the current round of the Royal Navy’s post-Cold War modernisation strategy. It’s crucial that the errors of the past are not repeated. Introduction There has been no shortage of reports from the likes of the National Audit Office and the Public Accounts Committee on the subject of defence acquisition. By 2010 a £38bn gap had opened up between the equipment programme and the defence budget. £1.5bn was being lost annually due to poor skills and management, the failure to make strategic investment decisions due to blurred roles and accountabilities and delays to projects3. In 2008, the then Secretary of State for Defence, John Hutton, commissioned Bernard Gray to produce a review of defence acquisition. The findings were published in October 2009. The following criticisms of the procurement process were made4: 1 http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120913104443/http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/78821960-14A0-429E- A90A-FA2A8C292C84/0/ReviewAcquisitionGrayreport.pdf 2 https://www.nao.org.uk/report/reforming-defence-acquisition-2015/ 3 https://www.nao.org.uk/report/reforming-defence-acquisition-2015/ 4 http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120913104443/http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/78821960-14A0-429E- A90A-FA2A8C292C84/0/ReviewAcquisitionGrayreport.pdf 1 [email protected] Too many types of equipment are ordered for too large a range of tasks at too high a specification. -
The Third Battle
NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT PAPERS 16 The Third Battle Innovation in the U.S. Navy's Silent Cold War Struggle with Soviet Submarines N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O N L L U E E G H E T R I VI IBU OR A S CT MARI VI Owen R. Cote, Jr. Associate Director, MIT Security Studies Program The Third Battle Innovation in the U.S. Navy’s Silent Cold War Struggle with Soviet Submarines Owen R. Cote, Jr. Associate Director, MIT Security Studies Program NAVAL WAR COLLEGE Newport, Rhode Island Naval War College The Newport Papers are extended research projects that the Newport, Rhode Island Editor, the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies, and the Center for Naval Warfare Studies President of the Naval War College consider of particular Newport Paper Number Sixteen interest to policy makers, scholars, and analysts. Candidates 2003 for publication are considered by an editorial board under the auspices of the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies. President, Naval War College Rear Admiral Rodney P. Rempt, U.S. Navy Published papers are those approved by the Editor of the Press, the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies, and the President Provost, Naval War College Professor James F. Giblin of the Naval War College. Dean of Naval Warfare Studies The views expressed in The Newport Papers are those of the Professor Alberto R. Coll authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Naval War College or the Department of the Navy. Naval War College Press Editor: Professor Catherine McArdle Kelleher Correspondence concerning The Newport Papers may be Managing Editor: Pelham G. -
US Ships in Commission, Under Construction, and in Mothballs 1 September 1939
US Ships in Commission, Under Construction, and in Mothballs 1 September 1939 Ships in commission (Total 339 ships) Battleships USS Arizona (BB-39) USS Arkansas (BB-33) USS California (BB-44) USS Colorado (BB-45) USS Idaho (BB-42) USS Maryland (BB-46) USS Mississippi (BB-41) USS Nevada (BB-36) USS New Mexico (BB-40, ex-California) USS New York (BB-34) USS Oklahoma (BB-37) USS Pennsylvania (BB-38) USS Tennessee (BB-43) USS Texas (BB-35) USS West Virginia (BB-48) Aircraft Carriers USS Enterprise (CV-6) USS Lexington (CV-2, ex CC-1, ex Constitution) USS Ranger (CV-4) USS Saratoga (CV-3, ex CC-3) USS Yorktown (CV-5) Heavy Cruisers USS Astoria (CA-34, ex CL-34) USS Augusta (CA-31, ex CL-31) USS Chester (CA-27, ex CL-27) USS Chicago (CA-29, ex CL-29) USS Houston (CA-30, ex CL-30) USS Indianapolis) (CA-35, ex CL-35) USS Lousiville (CA-28, ex CL-28) USS Minneapolis (CA-36, ex CL-36) USS New Orleans (CA-32, ex CL-32) USS Northampton (CA-26, ex CL-26) USS Pensacola (CA-24, ex CL-24) USS Portland (CA-33, ex CL-33) USS Quincy (CA-39, ex CL-39) USS Salt Lake City (CA-25, ex CL-25) USS San Francisco (CA-38, ex CL-38) USS Tuscaloosa (CA-37, ex CL-37) USS Vincennes (CA-44, CL-44) USS Wichita (CA-45) Light Cruisers USS Boise (CL-47) USS Brooklyn (CL-40) USS Cincinnati (CL-6, ex CS-6) USS Concord (CL-10, ex CS-10) USS Detroit (CL-8, ex CS-8) USS Honolulu (CL-48) USS Marblehead (CL-12, ex CS-12) 1 USS Memphis (CL-13, ex CS-13) USS Milwaukee (CL-5, ex CS-5) USS Nashville (CL-43) USS Omaha (CL-4, ex CS-4) USS Philadelphia (CL-41) USS Phoenix (CL-46) USS Raleigh (CL-7, ex CS-7) USS Richmond (CL-9, ex CS-9) USS St. -
Ministry of Defence the United Kingdom's Future Nuclear Deterrent
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE The United Kingdom’s Future Nuclear Deterrent Capability REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL | HC 1115 Session 2007-2008 | 5 November 2008 The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending on behalf of Parliament. The Comptroller and Auditor General, Tim Burr, is an Officer of the House of Commons. He is the head of the National Audit Office which employs some 850 staff. He and the National Audit Office are totally independent of Government. He certifies the accounts of all Government departments and a wide range of other public sector bodies; and he has statutory authority to report to Parliament on the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which departments and other bodies have used their resources. Our work saves the taxpayer millions of pounds every year: at least £9 for every £1 spent running the Office. MINISTRY OF DEFENCE The United Kingdom’s Future Nuclear Deterrent Capability Ordered by the LONDON: The Stationery Office House of Commons £14.35 to be printed on 3 November 2008 REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL | HC 1115 Session 2007-2008 | 5 November 2008 This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act. Tim Burr Comptroller and Auditor General National Audit Office 28 October 2008 The National Audit Office study team consisted of: Tom McDonald, Gareth Tuck, Helen Mullinger and James Fraser, under the direction of Tim Banfield This report can be found on the National Audit -
Lessons from the United Kingdom's Astute
CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. JOHN F. SCHANK • FRANK W. LACROIX • ROBERT E. MURPHY • CESSE IP MARK V. ARENA • GORDON T. -
Research Guide to Submarine Arctic Operations
Research Guide To Submarine Arctic Operations A list of materials available at the Submarine Force Library & Archives Featuring images & documents from the archival collection Submarine Arctic Operations A list of Materials Available at the Submarine Force Library & Archives Introduction: This guide provides a listing of research material available at the Submarine Force Library and Archives on the topic of Submarine Arctic Operations. The collection includes both published and unpublished sources. The items listed in this guide may be viewed, by appointment at the museum library. Inter-library loan is not available. Library hours are; Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday 9:00 – 11:30 and 1:00 – 3:45. Currently, the library is unable to provide photocopy or photographic duplication services. Although a few courtesy copies can be provided, researchers should come prepared to take notes. Researchers are permitted to use their own cameras to take photographs of images in the collection. For further information, or to schedule a visit, please call the Archivist at (860) 694-3558 x 12, or visit our web site at: www.ussnautilus.org Table of Contents: Library Collections I Books II Periodical Articles III Vertical Files Archival & Special Collections IV Personal Papers/Manuscript Collections V Oral Histories VI “Boat Books” VII Audio Visual Materials VIII Memorabilia IX Foreign Navies--Arctic Submarine Resources Exhibits X Arctic Submarine Exhibits at the Submarine Force Museum On-line Links XI Links to additional Arctic Submarine Resources available on the Web Chronology XII U.S. Submarine Arctic Operations – Historical Timeline USS HAMPTON (SSN 767) – ICEX ‘04 Books Non-Fiction Fiction Children’s Rare Books Non-Fiction J9.80 Althoff, William F. -
Dwight D. Eisenhower Library Abilene, Kansas Edward L
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS EDWARD L. BEACH AND EVAN P. AURAND RECORDS 1953-1961 Pre Accession and A67-18 Processed by: HLP, LKS Date Completed: 3-29-83 SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE The records of the Office of the Naval Aide to the President span the years 1953 to 1961 and include the terms of two naval aides, Edward L. Beach (1953-1957) and Evan P. Aurand (1957-1961). About 60 per cent of the material is related to presidential trips and vacations, and this material tends to concentrate on matters of administrative detail and physical arrangement rather than matters of substance. These records are organized into five series. The first series is divided evenly into two subseries, one on the President's international trips and one on his domestic vacations and travels. The trips are arranged chronologically within each subseries, and the information on each trip is arranged either chronologically or topically. The bulk of this series consists of correspondence, including many classified naval messages and telegrams, briefing books, reports, schedules and itineraries, maps and diagrams, personnel and passenger lists, and printed logs of some trips. While there is only a small quantity of information on matters of policy and substance, detailed information on advance reparation for and the logistics of presidential travel are available in abundance in this series. The naval aide's office apparently served as a clearinghouse for routing requests and coordinating any Administration needs for Navy or Marine personnel or equipment. These needs could vary from a cook for Camp David to a heavy cruiser or aircraft carrier for a presidential cruise. -
Tomahawk and Astute – a 21St Century Firepower Display
Dec 11 Issue 43 desthe magazine for defenceider equipment and support Tomahawk and Astute – a 21st century firepower display Virtual warfare in focus See inside Warrior Wildcat Daring packs Support takes Mapping out upgrade goes to sea a punch on a new look the future FEATURES 6 24 Warfare staff go to war The Royal Navy has unveiled its new Maritime Composite Training System to a fanfare of trumpets and applause, marking the most radical change to its training for more than 40 years. 26 It’s the Army’s PlayStation generation Members of the British Army's PlayStation generation head to Helmand Province on the latest Operation Herrick deployment having honed their soldiering skills in virtual combat 28 Kestrel reaches full flight Project Kestrel – Information Systems and Services' reliable backbone communications network – is now complete, guaranteeing increased capacity and improved quality of communications in Afghanistan 2011 30 Defence Secretary praises ‘dedicated people’ New Defence Secretary Philip Hammond has praised 'the cover image most dedicated people in the public service' as he outlined A Tomahawk land attack missile is pictured being his vision for defence in his first public speech since fired byHMS Astute during her latest set of trials. The succeeding Dr Liam Fox missile, one of two fired on the trial, demonstrated complex evasive manoeuvres during flight and hit its designated target on a missile range DECEMBER desider NEWS Assistant Head, Public Relations: Ralph Dunn - 9352 30257 or 0117 9130257 5 Warrior in £1 billion -
Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
-- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type -
Major Projects Report 2015 and the Equipment Plan 2015 to 2025
Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ministry of Defence Major Projects Report 2015 and the Equipment Plan 2015 to 2025 Appendices and project summary sheets HC 488-II SESSION 2015-16 22 OCTOBER 2015 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 810 people. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice help government improve public services, and our work led to audited savings of £1.15 billion in 2014. Ministry of Defence Major Projects Report 2015 and the Equipment Plan 2015 to 2025 Appendices and project summary sheets Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 22 October 2015 This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act Sir Amyas Morse KCB Comptroller and Auditor General National Audit Office 20 October 2015 This volume has been published alongside a first volume comprising of – Ministry of Defence: Major Projects Report 2015 and the Equipment Plan 2015 to 2024 HC 488-I HC 488-II | £10.00 © National Audit Office 2015 The material featured in this document is subject to National Audit Office (NAO) copyright. -
Annotated Bibliography Primary Sources
Annotated Bibliography Primary Sources Online Interviews Admin. Surviving USS Nautilus Crew Member Recalls Battle of Midway. Military & Aerospace History, defaeroreport.com/2017/06/06/last-living-uss-nautilus-crew-member-recalls-battle- midway/. In this interview with Defense & Aerospace Report Editor Vago Muradian on June 5, 2017, former US Navy Chief Gunner’s Mate Henry “Hank” Kudzik, a surviving crew member from the USS Nautilus (SS-168), shared his experience. Kudzik was assigned to an old Narwhal-class submarine called Nautilus, which was built before the start of the war. Although there were some serious design flaws that made Nautilus slow to dive, hard to maneuver, and easy to detect, she played a significant role in the battle of Midway. He stated that during the Battle of Midway, his submarine sank two warships. He stated that the USS Nautilus somewhat led the Naval planes to the Japanese fleet, as the destroyer that unsuccessfully attempted to hunt it down served as the guide that the Enterprise air group commander, Wade McClusky, used to find the Kido Butai. Destination Midway: A Yorktown Veteran Remembers. Naval Historical Foundation. 22 March, 2017, www.navyhistory.org/destination-midway-a-yorktown-veteran-remembers/. This interview was conducted by Dr. David Winkler in March 2017 at the home of Captain John W. Crawford Jr. Assigned as an officer of the deck for watches aboard Yorktown, he remembered the battle that took place over the Yorktown at Midway. As being off duty on June 4th, he remembered going down below the hanger deck and hearing and seeing the planes flying and passing one another so quickly that they ended up heavily damaging the structure of Yorktown. -
Carlson's Marine Raiders
CARLSON’S MARINE RAIDERS Makin Island 1942 GORDON L. ROTTMAN © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CARLSON’S MARINE RAIDERS Makin Island 1942 GORDON L. ROTTMAN © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 ORIGINS 6 Raiders from out of the sea 6 Evans Carlson 6 Amphibious experiments 7 A role for the Raiders 9 The “Gung Ho” philosophy 10 A new kind of Marine battalion 14 Waiting for a job 15 INITIAL STRATEGY 18 Japan’s “islands of mystery” 18 The Japanese presence on Makin 19 A target for the Raiders 21 Concept of the operation 22 THE PLAN 27 The Raider company and task organization 30 The Makin raid as planned – Operations Order 1-42 32 Japanese dispositions and intelligence 35 THE RAID 39 Rendezvous off Makin 42 Landing the landing party 44 Onto the offensive 45 The fight starts 47 Peatross 50 At the command post 51 Air attacks 54 Withdrawal 55 Chaos on the beach 57 Stranded 58 The Raiders’ dilemma 59 The second day 60 Escape from Makin 62 AFTERMATH 66 A heroes’ welcome 68 The Japanese reaction 69 The missing 70 ANALYSIS 75 CONCLUSION 78 BIBLIOGRAPHY 79 INDEX 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION In the summer of 1942, the United States was battling to reverse the tide of the Pacific War. In the few months since the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the nation had taken further staggering blows with the loss of Guam and Wake Island, the humiliating fall of the Philippines in April 1942, and the surrender of Corregidor Island in May.