Permit Application for the Ferry M/V Adirondack Reefing Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Lake Encroachment Permit Application for the Ferry M/V Adirondack Reefing Project Appendices – Supporting Documentation A. Lake Champlain Transportation Company M/V Adirondack Specification Sheet (p.2) B. Dimensional drawing of M/V Adirondack (p.3) C. M/V Adirondack on bottom profile (p.4) D. Scientific Study Opportunities, Professor Ellen Marsden, Rubenstein Lab, University of Vermont. (p.5-6) E. National Guidance: Best Management Practices for Preparing Vessels Intended to Create Artificial Reefs. Published May 2006 by US Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Maritime Administration (p. 7-83) F. Ferry M/V Adirondack Reefing Project Vessel Preparation (p.84-87) G. KD Associates, Inc – PCB Testing, M/V Adirondack – January 2, 2019 (p.88-92) H. KD Associates, Inc – Lead in Paint Testing, M/V Adirondack – December 12,2018 (p.93-99) I. KD Associates, Inc – Asbestos Assessment, M/V Adirondack – December 12,2018 (p.100-101) J. M/V Adirondack Anchoring System Drawing (p.102) K. M/V Adirondack Sinking Procedure (p.103-106) L. Dive Historic Lake Champlain Booklet State of Vermont, Division for Historic Preservation, Lake Champlain Maritime Museum (p.107-122) M. Lake Champlain Basin Program Invasive Species Update (p.123) N. UHP Proximity Map (p.124) O. NOAA Burlington Harbor Water Intake map (p.125) P. Bottom Contour Map of Lone Rock Point/Appletree Bay Area (p.126) Q. CRB – Geological & Environmental Services, Inc/Artificial Reefs International - (ARI/CRB) Ferry Adirondack Evaluation Report – April 22, 2019 (p.127-133) R. ARI/CRB – Proposal to Sink M/V Adirondack – June 21, 2019 (p.134-139) S. M/V Adirondack Question & Answer Document (p.140-145) Appendices - Ferry Adirondack Project p.1 Appendix A Appendices - Ferry Adirondack Project p.2 Appendix B M/V Adirondack – Lake Champlain Transportation Co. • Depth at site: 68’ at 93.5’ Lake Level Elevation. • Height of Vessel: 43’0” Keel to top of Stack • Minimum depth over stack at proposed site: 25’ • Site Coordinates: N44° 28.819’ W73° 14.868’ • Top of Stack to Keel: 30’6” + 12’6” = 43’0” • Surface to Top of Stack 68 – 43 = 25’ (No Bottom Penetration, assuming ~3’ penetration of bottom) • Surface to top of Stack 25’ + 3’ = 28’ Appendices - Ferry Adirondack Project p.3 Appendix C Appendices - Ferry Adirondack Project p.4 Appendix D THE RUBENSTEIN SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES BIOLOGY PROGRAM Jonathan Eddy Waterfront Dive Shop Burlington, VT Jan 19, 2020 Dear Jonathan: As a follow-up to our conversations about the ferry sinking/artificial habitat project for Burlington Bay, I have summarized my thoughts about how this project could benefit fish populations and research on artificial reefs. Habitat degradation and restoration is a major issue in fisheries management and research. Artificial reefs have been discussed and used to remediate habitat loss for several decades; however, several major issues are associated with design and use of artificial reefs: • Poorly defined objectives – what is the purpose of the reef? What fish species will benefit? At what life stages? Is their natural habitat actually degraded? • Potentially conflicting objectives – is the purpose of the reef to benefit fish, or anglers? • Lack of long-term assessment – most post-construction assessment is only 1 to 2 years • Distinguishing attraction from production – does the reef simply attract fish from elsewhere (and diminish adjacent populations) or improve growth and/or reproductive success? The ferry sinking project inherently or explicitly addresses several of these issues. The ferry is likely to attract fishes of interest to anglers, and since few species in the lake are of management concern, additional angling pressure is unlikely to be detrimental to the fish populations. The ferry will also serve as an attractive diver destination. The ferry could also be a site of several short- or long-term research projects. While there is currently no funding in place to conduct a scientific evaluation of the impacts of the ferry, several potential studies would be of interest; several of these studies would benefit from observations by recreational divers. • Which fish species occupy the ferry? Both anglers and divers can document which species they catch or observe at the site. Use of GoPro cameras to take images of the ferry will enable collection of quantitative data, including relative fish size. • Does the ferry attract fish species relative to nearby habitat? This may be more challenging to address, because anglers will likely focus on the ferry site rather than Appendices - Ferry Adirondack Project p.5 Appendix D adjacent areas, but catch-per-effort data would be valuable to assess the attraction of fishes to the ferry. • Is the site used by fish for spawning? Fish presence and behavior would need to be studied as the site becomes occupied. • Do fish remain at the ferry site (i.e., they become territorial), or is the population of fish constantly moving in and out of the area? Fish can be marked with individually- numbered external colored tags that can be identified by divers and catch-and-release anglers. Mark-recapture data would allow estimation of the number of fish using the site, and whether the site becomes a ‘closed’ population (i.e., few individuals leaving or entering). • Is the ferry site used by spawning lake trout, or as feeding and refuge habitat for lake sturgeon? Both of these species are of particular management interest and the focus of restoration efforts. Two current research projects in Lake Champlain involve tagging lake trout and lake sturgeon with internal acoustic transmitters. The tags emit a unique signal every two minutes for several years. Signals are picked up by stationary receivers deployed around the lake, and data are used to determine what habitats these fish use during all seasons of the year, and particularly during spawning (lake trout) and as juveniles (sturgeon). A receiver could be deployed on the ferry to document number of visits to the site by each species, relative to adjacent sites currently being monitored. • Colonization of the ferry by zebra mussels also offers opportunities for research. Zebra mussel populations in Lake Champlain appear to have stabilized, either because they are now limited by availability of hard surfaces to colonize, or they have reached a carrying capacity of food availability. Documentation of the rates and pattern of colonization of the ferry (e.g., which surfaces are colonized first? Will molluscivorous fish suppress mussel populations?) would be of interest, and could involve interested members of the diving community. I am happy to discuss any of these ideas and address any questions you or others may have. Sincerely, J. Ellen Marsden Professor, Wildlife and Fisheries Biology Program, University of Vermont Appendices - Ferry Adirondack Project p.6 Appendix E U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Maritime Administration National Guidance: Best Management Practices for Preparing Vessels Intended to Create Artificial Reefs May 2006 Appendices - Ferry Adirondack Project p.7 Appendix E Page Left Intentionally Blank 2 Appendices - Ferry Adirondack Project p.8 Appendix E ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was jointly developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Oceans and Coastal Protection Division within the Office of Water and the Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration. To assist in early stages of document development, an interagency workgroup was established by Laura S. Johnson of EPA. The following agencies actively participated on this workgroup: • Maritime Administration • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration • United States Army Corps of Engineers • United States Fish and Wildlife Service • United States Coast Guard • United States Department of the Navy • United States Environmental Protection Agency M A R A D ’ s J a m e s R i Photo courtesy of Laura S. Johnson Maritime Administration’s James River Reserve Fleet, Virginia. Cover Photos Top photo: Ex-USS Spiegel Grove en route to artificial reef sink site. Photo courtesy of Andy Newman, Florida Keys News Bureau. Middle photo: Ex-USS Spiegel Grove resting at its artificial reef site. Photo courtesy of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Division of Marine Fisheries Management, Artificial Reef Program. Bottom photo: The scuttling of Navy Dive Tender YDT-14 on April 1, 2000, approximately 18 miles SE of Pensacola Pass, Escambia County, Florida. Photo courtesy of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Division of Marine Fisheries Management, Artificial Reef Program. 3 Appendices - Ferry Adirondack Project p.9 Appendix E TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary . 7 Introduction . 9 Siting of Artificial Reefs . 17 Guidance for Preparing Vessels to Create Artificial Reef Habitat Oil and Fuel Narrative Clean-up Goal . 22 What are oil and fuel? . 22 What are the potential environmental impacts of oil and fuel? . 22 Where are oils and fuels found in a ship? . 23 How should the vessel be prepared; what are the appropriate BMPs for oil and fuel? . 24 Asbestos Narrative Clean-up Goal . 30 What is asbestos? . 30 What are the potential environmental impacts of asbestos? . 31 Where is asbestos found on a ship? . 31 How should the vessel be prepared; what are the appropriate BMPs for asbestos? . 32 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Narrative Clean-up Goal . 35 What are PCBs? . 35 What are the potential environmental impacts of PCBs? . 35 Where are PCBs found on a ship? . 36 How should the vessel be prepared; what are the appropriate BMPs for PCBs? . 37 Paint Narrative Clean-up Goal . 40 What types of paint and anti-fouling systems are used on ships and where are they found? . 40 What are the potential environmental impacts of paint? . 41 How should the vessel be prepared; what are the appropriate BMPs for paint? . 41 4 Appendices - Ferry Adirondack Project p.10 Appendix E Solids/Debris/Floatables Narrative Clean-up Goal . 43 What are solids/debris/floatables? .