Capstone Report Original

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Capstone Report Original Toward a Sustainable Food System for the City Beautiful Lucas Fernando Lopes DCP 4290 — Capstone Project in Sustainability and the Built Environment College of Design, Construction and Planning Spring 2016 LUCAS FERNANDO LOPES APRIL 2016 !1 Table of Contents 3 Abstract 4 Introduction 5 Connecting Sustainable Food Systems with a Sustainable Built Environment 6 Research Methodology and Objective 8 Project Background and Beginnings 9 What is Urban Agriculture? 14 Orlando: The City Beautiful 18 New York City 26 Seattle 32 Los Angeles 35 Moving Forward 40 Acknowledgments 41 Citations ***UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL SITE IMAGES WERE TAKEN BY LUCAS F. LOPES*** LUCAS FERNANDO LOPES APRIL 2016 !2 Abstract Image Source: The New York Times The purpose of this study was to provide the City of Orlando with the necessary background and recommendations to foster a local and sustainable food scene through specific government actions, policies and programs. Through a case study methodology, the food systems and recent advances in the cities of Seattle, Los Angeles, and New York City were analyzed to provide information that Orlando could utilize to improve its food system. The study also served to connect local food systems to the larger vision of sustainability in our built environment by showing how certain practices build community, foster education and enhance our urban environments. LUCAS FERNANDO LOPES APRIL 2016 !3 Introduction The 1987 Brundtland Commission’s Report, Our Common Future has come to influence many aspects of sustainability research. The study and program of Sustainability and the Built Environment here at the University of Florida has itself been formed upon the foundational words from that report. It states that sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability for future generations to meet their needs. Of particular importance to my research and my starting point is Chapter Five: Food Security: Sustaining the Potential. It provides detailed remarks on the state of the world’s food system in the late 1980’s. Many statements still ring true nearly thirty years after the report has been published; “There are places where too little is grown; there are places where large numbers cannot afford to buy food. And there are broad areas of the Earth, in both industrial and developing nations, where increases in food production are undermining the base for future production. The agricultural resources and the technology needed to feed growing populations are available. Much has been achieved over the past few decades. Agriculture does not lack resources; it lacks policies to ensure that the food is produced where it is needed… (Our Common Future 1987).” LUCAS FERNANDO LOPES APRIL 2016 !4 Connecting Sustainable Food Systems with a Sustainable Built Environment The United Nations Environmental Programme states that the Principles of Sustainable Development are rooted on a few central themes, some of these are the conservation of resources such as water and land, the use of environmentally sound materials, minimizing energy consumption and reducing overall waste. In planning and revitalizing our urban environments there is great potential to introduce aspects of sustainable food systems through design. Between private and publicly owned lands throughout our cities there are millions of acres of arable, unused or underutilized parcels that could be suitable for urban agricultural applications like community gardens or urban farms. In New York City alone, there are about 2,700 acres of roof tops that could be suitable for urban agriculture (Five Borough Farm 2015). Municipal governments, planning agencies, and city regulations have remained relatively silent on urban agriculture applications until recently (Lovell 2010). It is only within the past few decades that we have seen efforts from the public sector that begin to investigate and address such issues and topics. LUCAS FERNANDO LOPES APRIL 2016 !5 Research Methodology and Objective My research project utilized a comparative case study methodology in which I examined three major U.S. cities to answer the following question: How can the City of Orlando act to promote a local, sustainable, equitable, and vibrant food system? LUCAS FERNANDO LOPES APRIL 2016 !6 Advancements in the arena of sustainable food can come from all institutions and sectors of society. An example of this could be a large super market chain deciding to source its produce from local farms for each of its locations. Another example may be a grassroots citizen led effort to compost individual household food waste. For my research I analyzed what specific policies, programs and efforts municipal governments have made to examine and improve their food systems. Food systems are broad and overarching, therefore, not all areas will be touched upon or comprehensively examined. LUCAS FERNANDO LOPES APRIL 2016 !7 Project Background and Beginnings The topic of my Capstone Project in Sustainability and the Built Environment came about through my work as a city planning intern with the City of Orlando’s Economic Development Department during the Summer of 2015. I, alongside another intern, conducted a Food Policy Audit. This is a study tool that uses one- hundred yes or no questions to create a baseline analysis of the gaps and assets in a particular food system. A food system is defined as a complex set of activities and relationships related to every aspect of the food cycle. The Food Policy Audit was first developed by the University of Virginia as a planning research project for the Franklin County Ohio Food Policy Council. The questions are identified as best practices. While the project was considered a success, many questions could not be answered and simply did not apply due to Orlando’s unique development patterns and history of growth. I decided to use the City of Orlando as the subject of my capstone proposal because it is the city I have called home for the past fifteen years. Also, there is a young but quickly growing local food movement with great potential to positively impact the way our community eats and connects with its food. I analyzed major events, themes, and methods within the sustainable food movements of three different American cities — Los Angeles, Seattle, and New York City — and applied this knowledge in the form of potential recommendations for the City of Orlando to foster a local food scene. LUCAS FERNANDO LOPES APRIL 2016 !8 What is Urban Agriculture? The state of our ecosystems, lands and the seemingly never ending worldwide environmental degradation makes it quite clear that there are major issues with the way we feed our world. The connections weaving the patches of agricultural lands and polluted lands abound. Intensive industrial agriculture has been able to feed us for decades which is an impressive undertaking, but it is not without its risks and detriments. The United Nations World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision project that our global population should reach 8.5 billion by 2030 and 9.7 billion by 2050. To feed a rapidly growing population we should utilize industrial agriculture but we must also continue build and support localized and regional food systems. The Los Angeles Food Policy Council summarizes research into industrial food systems by stating that “conventional industrial farming methods, along with the practice of transporting food products over long distances, have been shown to cause severe ecological harm to the environment and climate, depleting non- renewable resources (e.g., soil, energy, biological diversity) and widening social inequities.” The end goal of a local food system is to abolish food deserts, to feed every person, from every age group, to every race, to every social class; but not just to feed them, to empower them with resources and access to a holistic diet, one that is tied to their nearest terra firma. LUCAS FERNANDO LOPES APRIL 2016 !9 Urban agriculture — which includes everything from community gardens to fruit trees, to small scale farming within or on the edges of a city or town — is a way in which we can reduce pollution, decrease natural resource imports, and overall, lessen our footprint on the Earth (Broadway 2009). In the Worldwatch Institute Blog, Emma Hansen points out that nearly eighty percent of the worlds population will be living in an urbanized setting by 2050 (2015). In May 2015, the United States Department of Agriculture recognized the Ohio City Farm as a national model for urban agriculture. In the Crain’s Cleveland Business, Kathy Ames Carr mentions how the Ohio City farm is not only the largest urban farm in the country but also an example of an urban agricultural application that has transformed underused land, improved community nutrition and food access all the while fostering local production and distribution (2015). This is not the only example of successful urban agriculture initiatives; communities throughout the Pacific Northwest, California, and the Northeast are embracing and promoting thriving community gardens, urban farms, and local farmers markets among other excellent practices. Bottom up approaches or grassroots efforts have been the basis for most urban agricultural initiatives throughout the country but as Lovell (2010) mentions, the benefits are now seen and understood; what is needed is a top down push through planning policies that improve coordination and increase benefits of urban agricultural efforts. LUCAS FERNANDO LOPES APRIL 2016 !10 Most of the barriers to urban agriculture revolve around the fact that city zoning, land use codes, and growth management plans have in the past neglected to integrate food system thinking and policies (Lovell 2010). In The Guardian, William McDonough states how as industrial agriculture negatively impacted our land throughout the years, our leaders forgot that the city and its residents were indeed a part of nature (2014). A lack of expertise and knowledge about food systems within city planning departments was once the main obstacle to government support for local food systems.
Recommended publications
  • The Native Plant Press
    Native Plant Press January 2020 The Native Plant Press The Newsletter of the Central Puget Sound Chapter of WNPS Volume 21 No. 11 January 2020 Holiday Party Recap On Sunday, December 8th, the Central Puget Sound Chapter held our annual holiday party. The event was a potluck, and the fare was wide-ranging and excellent. The native plant-focused silent auction offered several hand-made wreaths, numerous potted natives from tiny succulents to gangly shrubs, plant-themed books and ephemera, and a couple of experiences. The selection occasioned some intense bidding wars, with Franja Bryant and Sharon Baker arriving at a compromise in their battle over the Native Garden Tea Party. A highlight of the party was the presentation of awards to Member, Steward and Professional of the Year. Each year, nominations are submitted by members and the recipients are chosen by the CPS Board. Stewart Wechsler (left) was chosen Member of the Year. Stewart is a Botany Fellow for the chapter and for many years has offered well-attended plant ID sessions before our westside meetings. In addition, he often fields the many botanical questions that we receive from the public. David Perasso (center) is our Steward of the Year. David is a Native Plant Steward at Martha Washington Park on Lake Washington and has been working to restore the historic oak/camas prairie ecosystem at the site. The site is now at the stage where David was able to host a First Nation camas harvest recently. He is also an active volunteer at our native plant nursery, providing vital expertise in the identification and propagation of natives.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Forests: Their Services and Sustainability
    Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development ISSN: 2152-0801 online https://foodsystemsjournal.org Food forests: Their services and sustainability Stefanie Albrecht a * Leuphana University Lüneburg Arnim Wiek b Arizona State University Submitted July 29, 2020 / Revised October 22, 2020, and February 8, 2021 / Accepted Febuary 8, 2021 / Published online July 10, 2021 Citation: Albrecht, S., & Wiek, A (2021). Food forests: Their services and sustainability. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 10(3), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2021.103.014 Copyright © 2021 by the Authors. Published by the Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems. Open access under CC-BY license. Abstract detailed insights on 14 exemplary food forests in Industrialized food systems use unsustainable Europe, North America, and South America, practices leading to climate change, natural gained through site visits and interviews. We resource depletion, economic disparities across the present and illustrate the main services that food value chain, and detrimental impacts on public forests provide and assess their sustainability. The health. In contrast, alternative food solutions such findings indicate that the majority of food forests as food forests have the potential to provide perform well on social-cultural and environmental healthy food, sufficient livelihoods, environmental criteria by building capacity, providing food, services, and spaces for recreation, education, and enhancing biodiversity, and regenerating soil, community building. This study compiles evidence among others. However, for broader impact, food from more than 200 food forests worldwide, with forests need to go beyond the provision of social- cultural and environmental services and enhance a * Corresponding author: Stefanie Albrecht, Doctoral student, their economic viability.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Seattle Edward B
    City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor Finance and Administrative Services Fred Podesta, Director July 25, 2016 The Honorable Tim Burgess Seattle City Hall 501 5th Ave. Seattle, WA 98124 Councilmember Burgess, Attached is an annual report of all real property under City ownership. The annual review supports strategic management of the City’s real estate holdings. Because City needs change over time, the annual review helps create opportunities to find the best municipal use of each property or put it back into the private sector to avoid holding properties without an adopted municipal purpose. Each January, FAS initiates the annual review process. City departments with jurisdiction over real property assure that all recent acquisitions and/or dispositions are accurately represented, and provide current information about each property’s current use, and future use, if identified. Each property is classified based on its level of utilization -- from Fully Utilized Municipal Use to Surplus. In addition, in 2015 and 2016, in conjunction with CBO, OPI, and OH, FAS has been reviewing properties with the HALA recommendation on using surplus property for housing. The attached list has a new column that groups excess, surplus, underutilized and interim use properties into categories to help differentiate the potential for various sites. Below is a matrix which explains the categorization: Category Description Difficult building site Small, steep and/or irregular parcels with limited development opportunity Future Use Identified use in the future
    [Show full text]
  • The Cape Verde Project: Teaching Ecologically Sensitive and Socially
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations August 2014 The aC pe Verde Project: Teaching Ecologically Sensitive and Socially Responsive Design N Jonathan Unaka University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Architecture Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Unaka, N Jonathan, "The aC pe Verde Project: Teaching Ecologically Sensitive and Socially Responsive Design" (2014). Theses and Dissertations. 572. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/572 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TEACHING ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AND SOCIALLY RESPONSIVE DESIGN THE CAPE VERDE PROJECT by N Jonathan Unaka A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee August, 2014 Abstract TEACHING ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AND SOCIALLY RESPONSIVE DESIGN THE CAPE VERDE PROJECT by N Jonathan Unaka The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, August, 2014 Under the Supervision of Professor D Michael Utzinger This dissertation chronicles an evolving teaching philosophy. It was an attempt to develop a way to teach ecological design in architecture informed by ethical responses to ecological devastation and social injustice. The world faces numerous social and ecological challenges at global scales. Recent Industrialization has brought about improved life expectancies and human comforts, coinciding with expanded civic rights and personal freedom, and increased wealth and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Agriculture Central Puget Sound Food System Assessment
    FOOD PRODUCTION: URBAN AGRICULTURE CENTRAL PUGET SOUND FOOD SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REGIONAL FOOD POLICY COUNCIL & UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON June 2011 PREPARED FOR THE REGIONAL FOOD POLICY COUNCIL at the Puget Sound Regional Council Councilmember Richard Conlin, Chair Brad Gaolach, Vice-Chair SPECIAL THANKS TO Alon Bassok, Olivia Robinson, and Liz Underwood-Bultmann, Puget Sound Regional Council Staff Megan Horst, Food Policy Council Intern, Puget Sound Regional Council Roy Breiman, Chefs Collaborative Linda Neunzig, Snohomish County ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Erik Baker, Kitsap County Commissioner Charlotte Garrido, Kitsap Lindy Bannister, Wedge Community Co-op County Jim Barham, U.S. Department of Agriculture Kate Halstead, Sno-Valley Tilth Brynn Brady, Pierce County Dan Hulse, Tahoma Farms Laura Flores Cantrell, Washington Louis Javeta, Bounty Hunter Seafood Farmworker Housing Trust Carol Krause, Snohomish County Growers Kate Collier, Local Food Hub Alliance Doug Collins, Washington State University Bobby Moore, Willows Lodge Steve Evans, King County Elliott Ryan, Latona Pub PREPARED BY University of Washington Department of Urban Design and Planning Graduate Students Anne Broache Ginger Daniel Michael Goldman Andreas Piller Jenny Ngo Michael K. Ward Bo Wang Joel McMillan Michelle Umadhay Briana Lovell John Murphy Patrick Green Cameron Duncan Jonathon Morrison Winters Stefanie Young Emily Anne Lindsey Joming Lau Tim Lehman Erica Bush Josh Vitulli Ting Chen Erika Harris Kate Bonaparte Travis English Eun Jin Shin Lisa Sturdivant Virginia Werner Eva Ringstrom Matt Beal FACULTY Branden Born, Associate Professor of Urban Design & Planning Hossein Estiri, Teaching Assistant June 2011 For more information contact [email protected] View the studio team’s full reports at INSERT STUDIO WEBSITE URL HERE 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND This project represents the fi nal product of a twenty-week graduate studio course in the Department of Urban Design and Planning at the University of Washington’s College of Built Environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Every Drop Counts: Water-Saving Contest Results
    Published by the P-Patch Trust WINTER/SPRING 2012 Every drop counts: Water-saving contest results Article and photos by Nate Moxley Second place: Hazel Heights water gurus provided an adequate supply of watering cans and added signage encouraging gardeners to use water from the underground Contest? What contest? water cistern. Last year’s water-saving contest, running between June and October, was a worthwhile effort for the P-Patch Program. The impetus was to promote innovative approaches to water conservation with the goal of saving both water and money. Results varied from site to site with a variety of factors that affect water consumption, including weather, leaks, garden expansion and participation levels. The contest encompassed two approaches: water savings and innovative ideas for water conservation. In each category, the top three gardens received a prize. First prize in each category was a $100 gift certificate to Greenwood Hardware. Second-place gardens got a variety pack of new tools, and third-place winners received a copy of Seattle Tilth’s Maritime Northwest Garden Guide. Thanks to all of the sites that participated in the contest. You not only spread water conservation awareness but also reduced the P-Patch Program’s water costs. Contest results Category 1: Overall water savings In all, 30 gardens decreased their water consumption as compared to last year. Even though the P-Patch program brought new gardens online during the contest period, we achieved an overall reduction in water use of nearly 20,000 gallons from the year before. This outcome shows that when gardeners take an active role in water conservation, results can be significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnuson Park P-Patch
    Magnuson park p-patch click here to download at the Warren G. Magnuson Park – Seattle Parks and Recreation Magnuson's plot p-patch garden is managed through the Seattle Department of In addition to individual p-patch garden plots, there are garden plots dedicated to food. at the Warren G. Magnuson Park – Seattle Parks and Recreation Tranquility Committee at the Magnuson P Patch gets off the ground with Stone Soup The soups were provided by 6 P Patch volunteers, using lots of garden vegetables. Community Spirit The Magnuson Park P-Patch is located within the Magnuson Community Garden, a four-acre site built by neighborhood volunteers at Warren. The P-Patch Community Gardening Program, a program of the City of Seattle Department of Neighborhoods, oversees 89 P-Patches distributed throughout the . See 5 photos and 2 tips from 44 visitors to Magnuson Park P- patch. "No picking! Except for the daisies. Please pick the daisies.". Before I get into a tour of the Magnuson Park gardens I need to The main entrance to the P-Patch is tucked back behind The Brig (a one story. One of the plots at the Magnuson Park P-Patch community garden. An afternoon concert at Magnuson Park – and a $4, national award A day- long benefit concert for the P-Patch Trust, (which) supports local food banks. P Patches. Pocket Parks. Importance of creating community spaces. By using the vacant Magnuson Park P Patch, Seattle WA. Community Gardens. P Patches. Spring has arrived in Seattle! Today I am excited to share this super fun sister session held at the Magnuson Park P-patch.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Politics, Power Constellations, and Urban Social Sustainability: a Comparative-Historical Analysis Jason M
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2014 Institutional Politics, Power Constellations, and Urban Social Sustainability: A Comparative-Historical Analysis Jason M. Laguna Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTIONAL POLITICS, POWER CONSTELLATIONS, AND URBAN SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY: A COMPARATIVE-HISTORICAL ANALYSIS By JASON M. LAGUNA A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Sociology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2014 Jason M. Laguna defended this dissertation on May 30, 2014. The members of the supervisory committee were: Douglas Schrock Professor Directing Dissertation Andy Opel University Representative Jill Quadagno Committee Member Daniel Tope Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii This is dedicated to all the friends, family members, and colleagues whose help and support made this possible. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. vi Abstract .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Producing Edible Landscapes in Seattle's Urban Forest Rebecca J
    Ursinus College Digital Commons @ Ursinus College Environmental Studies Faculty Publications Environmental Studies Department 2012 Producing Edible Landscapes in Seattle's Urban Forest Rebecca J. McLain Portland State University Melissa R. Poe Northwest Sustainability Institute Patrick T. Hurley Ursinus College, [email protected] Joyce LeCompte University of Washington Marla R. Emery USDA Forest Service Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/environment_fac Part of the Environmental Studies Commons, Food Security Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Other Political Science Commons, Place and Environment Commons, Sustainability Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits oy u. Recommended Citation McLain, Rebecca J.; Poe, Melissa R.; Hurley, Patrick T.; LeCompte, Joyce; and Emery, Marla R., "Producing Edible Landscapes in Seattle's Urban Forest" (2012). Environmental Studies Faculty Publications. 7. https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/environment_fac/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Studies Department at Digital Commons @ Ursinus College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Ursinus College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11 (2012) 187–194 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
    [Show full text]
  • Locally Sourcedsourced
    InsideAgroforestryVOLUME 22 ISSUE 2 LocallyLocally SourcedSourced When we think about agroforestry, the production side of agroforestry – the trees, crops, and livestock that make up agroforestry systems – Inside is often what we think of first, not the economics or products. Plant a Many publications address the ecology The articles in this newsletter aren’t meant Tree of Life and management of agroforestry systems or to be comprehensive. There are many 4 their ecological benefits. Others focus on agroforestry systems not mentioned here the ecological benefits of these agroforestry that produce important food products, like FOOD HUB FACTS Food hubs manage the aggregation, practices, such as improved water, soils, meat from silvopasture systems and grain distribution and marketing of source-identified products primarily from local and regional = 5 producers producers to strengthen their ability to satisfy and wildlife habitat. Food sometimes gets from fields protected by windbreaks. Instead, wholesale, retail, and institutional demand. overlooked, even though its production is this newsletter tries to get us thinking about often a primary driver for landowners. emerging agroforestry markets and systems. Median number of producers The Emerging Role or suppliers per food hub This newsletter seeks to highlight the It addresses agroforestry in places where of Food Hubs 6 62% of food hubs FOOD HUB surveyed began foods that agroforestry producers grow. It we don’t traditionally think of them, like operations within also addresses how agroforestry producers backyards, and discusses new species that the last 5 years 62% Customers are usually within fit into food systems at different scales. can be grown in more traditional agroforestry 400 miles of the food hub In addition to being a component of the systems, like hazelnuts in windbreaks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 City Fruit Annual Report
    2012 Annual Report Introduction Seattle boasted a bumper crop of fruit in 2012. Weather. Community support. Experienced harvesters. All conspired to ensure that more fruit was harvested in Seattle than ever before. City Fruit brought in 18,000 pounds from three Seattle neighborhoods. This good news represents one side of the equation. On the other side, lines at Seattle food banks grew longer than ever. One of our recipients, the Rainier Valley Food Bank, is one of Seattle’s busiest, serving 11,000 people a month. Nearly 25 percent of the children in Washington don’t get enough to eat. The statistics go on and on, drilling home the fact that fruit doesn’t belong on the ground: Seattle-grown plums, apples, pears, grapes and crabapples belong in boxes -- on a delivery route – to people who are hungry. While harvesting and distributing urban fruit remained at the core of our mission, City Fruit continued to develop the infrastructure and services needed for a viable urban food system. Specifically, we have: developed a range of revenue streams, including an expanding member base, community sponsors and partners, product sales, classes, events, and donations, in addition to grants; maintained a roster of active orchard stewards who ultimately harvested hundreds of pounds of fruit from community trees -- trees that few knew existed just three years ago; developed a state-of-the art CRM system (Salesforce) that generates harvest histories of fruit trees going back four years and allows us to manage data on fruit trees, harvests, tree owners, classes, community contacts – you name it – efficiently and accurately; planted dozens of fruit trees and berry bushes in the Rainier Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • King Conservation District Funding Invested in the City of Seattle
    KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT FUNDING INVESTED IN THE CITY OF SEATTLE GRANT AWARDS KCD awards grants to local governments, nonprofit organizations, tribes, and other agencies to improve natural resources and increase regional conservation. KCD funds for projects listed below were collected from an annual, per-parcel assessment or rate and charge for projects in partnership with Member Jurisdictions and/or the three watershed forums. These monies support high-impact projects in both urban and rural areas and often leverage funding from state, federal, and other sources. For more information on these projects or about the grant programs, please contact Jessica Saavedra at 425-282-1906 or e-mail [email protected]. www.kingcd.org Social icon Rounded square Only use blue and/or white. For more details check out our SERVICES In addition to the conservation services and cost share awards listed below, KCD also provides services to cities Brand Guidelines. and residents in shoreline restoration, community agriculture and urban forestry. Summary of KCD–Seattle Member Jurisdiction Funding Available for Grants or Services 2014-2017 Rates and Charges Collections $1,493,899.67 2018 Rates and Charges Collections $375,940.52 Total Collections $1,869,840.19 Total Utilized to Date (since 1994) $6,704,689.92 Estimated 2019 Rates and Charges Collections $374,000.00 Estimated Total Amount Available to Utilize for Grants or Services (including estimated 2019 collections, subject to change) $379,776.60 King ConservationKing District Conservation • 1107 SW District Grady • Way, Renton, Suite WA 130 98057 • Renton, • 425-282-1900 WA 98057 • 425-282-1900www.kingcd.org • www.kingcd.org \\king-fs1\admin\Assessment\Seattle\City Outreach Information\2019_SeattleCityOutreachDoc_Stapled.indd January 23, 2019 5:26 PM KCD–Seattle Member Jurisdiction Grants Awarded In partnership with the City of Seattle’s Office of Sustainability and Environment, KCD accepts proposals from community organizations each year.
    [Show full text]