DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Literature Cited for the Sonotya Mud Turtle Final Rule for Critical Habitat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Literature Cited for the Sonotya Mud Turtle Final Rule for Critical Habitat Literature Cited for the Sonotya Mud Turtle Final Rule for Critical Habitat Akins, C. M. and T. R. Jones. 2010. Kinosternon sonoriense (Sonoran Mud Turtle) Predation. Herpetological Review 41:485-486. Congdon J. D., Dunham A. E., and R. C. van Loben Sels. 1993. Delayed sexual maturity and demographics of Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii): Implications for conservation and management of long - lived organisms. Conservation Biology 7:826 – 833. Congdon J. D., Dunham A. E., and R. C. van Loben Sels. 1994. Demographics of common snapping turtles (Chelydraser pentina): Implications for conservation and management of long - lived organisms. American Zoologist 34:397–408. Drost, C. A., Lovich, J. E., Madrak, S. V., and Monatesti, A. J. 2010. Removal of nonnative slider turtles (Trachemys scripta) and effects on native Sonora mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) at Montezuma Well, Yavapai County, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010–1177, 48 p. [http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1177/]. Duncan, D. K. 2013. Gila topminnow interactions with western mosquitofish: an update. Pages 283-287 in Gottfried, G.J., P.F. Ffolliott, B.S. Gebow, L G. Eskew, and L.C. Collins, comps., Merging Science and Management in a Rapidly Changing World: Biodiversity and Management of the Madrean Archipelago III and 7th Conference on Research and Resource Management in the Southwestern Deserts; 2012 May 1-5; Tucson, AZ, Proceedings, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, RMRS-P-67, Fort Collins, CO. 593 pp. Ernst, C. H. and Lovich, J. E. 2009. Turtles of the United States and Canada. Second edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Felger, R. S., P. L. Warren, and G. P. Nabhan. 1992. Vascular plants of a desert oasis: flora and ethnobotany of Quitobaquito, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Arizona. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History. Number 8. San Diego, California. 39 pp. Fernandez P. J., and P. C. Rosen. 1996. Effects of the introduced crayfish Orconectes virilis on native aquatic herpetofauna in Arizona. IIPAM Project I94054 Crayfish Impacts on Wetland Herpetofauna. Heritage Program. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix AZ. 51pp. Hall, D. H. 2017. In person interview with David Hall, Senior Wildlife Biologist, University of Arizona, in Tucson, Arizona (February 12, 2017). 1 Hall, D. H., and R. S. Steidl. 2007. Movements, activity, and spacing of Sonoran mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) in interrupted mountain streams. Copeia 2007(2):403–412. Hensley, F. R., T. R. Jones, M. S. Maxwell, L. J. Adams, and N. S. Nedella. 2010. Demography, terrestrial behavior, and growth of Sonora mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) in an extreme habitat. Herpetological Monographs 24: 174–193. Holm, P. 2016. Email from Peter Holm, Ecologist, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Arizona (November 21, 2016). Hulse, A. C. 1974. An autecological study of Kinosternon sonoriense LeConte (Chelonia : kinosternidae). Ph.D. Dissertation. Arizona State University, Tempe. Industrial Economic, Incorporated (IEc). 2017. Draft Screening Analysis of the Likely Economic Impacts of Critical Habitat Designation for the Sonoyta Mud Turtle. Draft report to the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, February 7, 2017. 9 pp. Ligon, D. B. and C. C. Peterson. 2002. Physiological variation in estivation among mud turtles (Kinsoternon spp.). Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 75(3):283–293. Ligon, D. B. and P. A. Stone. 2003. Radiotelemetry reveals terrestrial estivation in Sonoran mud turtles. Journal of Herpetology 37:750-754. Lovich, J., C. Drost, A. J. Monatesti, D. Casper, D. A. Wood, and M. Girard. 2010. Reptilian prey of the Sonora Mud Turtle (Kinosternon sonoriense) with comments on saurophagy and ophiophagy in North American turtles. The Southwestern Naturalist 55:135-138. National Park Service (NPS). 2015. Resource Brief–2015 Status of the Sonoyta Mud Turtle. Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Ajo, Arizona. 2 pp. Owens, A. 2016. Email from Audrey Owens, Ranid Frogs Project Coordinator, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, Arizona (November 21, 2016). Paredes Aguilar, R., and P. C. Rosen. 2003. Status of the Sonoyta Mud Turtle (Kinosternon sonoriense longifemorale) in Río Sonoyta, Mexico. Review Draft Final Report to Arizona Game and Fish Department and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, January 2003. Peterson, C. C., and P. A. Stone. 2000. Physiological capacity for estivation of the Sonoran mud turtle, Kinsternon sonoriense. Copeia 3:684-700. Rosen, P. C. 1986. Population decline of Sonoran Mud Turtles at Quitobaquito Springs. Report to U.S. National Park Service, Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. 2 Rosen, P. C. 1987. Female Reproductive variation among populations of Sonoran Mud Turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense). Master’s Thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. 100 pp. Rosen, P.C. 2003. Taxonomic status of the Sonoyta mud turtle (Kinosternon sonoriense longifemorale Iverson) based on mitochondrial Dloop sequence, with a discussion of phylogeography. Unpublished report, School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson. 33 pp. Rosen, P.C. 2016. Email from Phil Rosen, Research Scientist, University of Arizona, in Tucson, Arizona (November 21, 2016). Rosen, P. C., and C. H. Lowe, Jr. 1996. Population ecology of the Sonoran Mud Turtle (Kinosternon sonoriense) at Quitobaquito Springs, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Arizona. Final Report to Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Heritage Program, Phoenix. 52 pp + appendices. Rosen, P. C. and C. R. Schwalbe. 2002. Widespread effects of introduced species on reptiles and amphibians in the Sonoran desert region Pp. 220-240 in Tellman, B. 2002. Invasive exotic species in the Sonoran region. The University of Arizona Press and the Arizona- Sonora Desert Museum. Tucson, Arizona. Rosen, P. C., C. Melendez, J. D. Riedle, A. C. Pate, and E. Fernandez. 2010. Ecology and conservation in the Sonoya Valley, Arizona and Sonora. Pages 143-160 in Halvorson, W., C. Schwalbe, and C. van Riper, Eds. Southwestern Desert Resources, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona. 360pp. Schwendiman, A. L. 2001. Kinosternon sonoriense (Sonoran Mud Turtle) Attempted Predation. Herpetological Review 32:39. Stanila, B. D. 2009. Morphology and demography of Sonoran Mud Turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) along an aquatic habitat permanence gradient. M.S. Thesis, University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond, Oklahoma, USA. 68pp. Stanila, B. D., K. J. Locey, and P. A. Stone. 2008. Kinosternon sonoriense: Diet. Herpetological Review 39:345. Stone, P. A. 2001. Movements and demography of the Sonoran mud turtle, Kinosternon sonoriense. The Southwestern Naturalist 46(1):41-53. Stone, P. A., M.E. Babb, B. D. Stanila, G. W. Kersey, and Z. S. Stone. 2005. Kinosternon sonoriense (Sonoran mud turtle). Diet. Herpetological Review 36: 167–168. Stone, P. A., K. J. Locey, S. Laverty, B. D. Stanila, and M. E. B. Stone. 2015. Implications of male- biased movements in Sonoran mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) inhabiting intermittent aquatic habitats. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 10(2):728–739. 3 Taylor, J. N., W. R. Courtenay Jr, and J. A. McCann. 1984. Known impacts of exotic fishes in the continental United States. Pages 322-373 in Courtenay, W. R. and J. R. Stauffer. Distribution, biology, and management of exotic fishes. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland. 430 pp. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2016. Species Status Assessment Report for the Sonoyta Mud Turtle Version 1.0. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2. Albuquerque, New Mexico. 122 pp. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2017. Incremental Effects Memorandum for the Economic Analysis for the Proposed Rule to Designate Critical Habitat for the Sonoyta Mud Turtle (Kinosternon sonoriense longifemorale). Arizona Ecological Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Phoenix, Arizona. 25pp. van Loben Sels, R. C., J. D. Congdon, and J. T. Austin. 1997. Life history and ecology of the Sonoran Mud Turtle (Kinosternon sonoriense) in southeastern Arizona: a preliminary report. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 2:338–344. 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group SONORA MUD TURTLE Kinosternon sonoriense Family: KINOSTERNIDAE Order: TESTUDINES Class: REPTILIA R002 Written by: L. Palermo Reviewed by: T. Papenfuss Edited by: R. Duke, J. Duke Updated by: CWHR Program Staff, March 2000 DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY The Sonora mud turtle may be extinct in California (Jennings 1983). Historically, in California, its elevational range extended from 43 m (140 ft) to 155 m (510 ft) (Jennings and Hayes 1994). Early records were along the lower Colorado River at Palo Verde and the Yuma Indian Reservation, Imperial County (VanDenburgh 1922). Dill (1944) observed this species in the lower Colorado River in 1942, however, no specimens were collected. The most recent positive record was in 1962 in a canal near the Laguna Dam on the Arizona side of the Colorado River (Funk 1974). Occurs in lacustrine and riverine habitats. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Primarily carnivorous, although some aquatic plant material is taken. Feeds mainly on aquatic insects and larvae, and includes fish, frogs, carrion, small mollusks and crustaceans in the diet. Food animals are either benthic or associated with submergent vegetation. Plant material includes aquatic angiosperms and green algae. Opportunistic shifts in diet occur in response to shifts in prey availability. Turtles will shift to more omnivorous food habits in habitats where benthic invertebrates are less abundant. No difference between male and female feeding habits, nor shifts in diet with age. Forage by crawling slowly and methodically along bottom in shallow water in both dense vegetation and open water.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecol 483/583 – Herpetology Lab 11: Reptile Diversity 3: Testudines and Crocodylia Spring 2010
    Ecol 483/583 – Herpetology Lab 11: Reptile Diversity 3: Testudines and Crocodylia Spring 2010 P.J. Bergmann & S. Foldi Lab objectives The objectives of today’s lab are to: 1. Familiarize yourselves with extant diversity of the Testudines and Crocodylia. 2. Learn to identify species of Testundines that live in Arizona. Today's lab is the final lab on "reptile" diversity, and will introduce you to the Testudines, or turtles and tortoises, Crocodylia. Although there are no crocodylians in Arizona and the Testudine diversity is lower than that of the lizards or snakes, there is still a fair amount of material to learn, so use your time wisely. Tips for learning the material At this point in the course, your skills for learning herp diversity should be well honed, so continue with the strategies you have already learned during the semester. Learn how to differentiate the three major clades of Crocodylians, and the more numerous Testudine clades. There is another keying exercise in this lab, focusing on the Testudines. 1 Ecol 483/583 – Lab 11: Testudines & Crocs 2010 Exercise 1: Testudines (Modified from Bonine & Foldi 2008; Bonine, Dee & Hall 2006; Edwards 2002; Prival 2000) General information Turtles are probably the most instantly recognizable groups of all reptiles because of their shell and the ability to withdraw their heads and limbs into this protective structure. Turtles are a monophyletic group comprising the order Testudines also called Chelonia . Testudines is the term used to denote all members of the order (extant and extinct) whereas Chelonia is often used to denote extant turtles.
    [Show full text]
  • Montezuma Well U.S
    National Park Service Montezuma Well U.S. Department of the Interior Montezuma Castle National Monument Turtles in Trouble Montezuma Well’s unique habitat provides an ideal home for one of the desert’s more peculiar inhabitants, the Sonora mud turtle. The constant supply of warm, fresh water and an abundance of small invertebrates and aquatic insects is all these resilient turtles need to survive and to thrive. But there is trouble in paradise. Through the years people have released red- eared sliders, a turtle commonly sold in pet stores, into the waters of the Well. These aggressive invaders out-compete the smaller, native mud turtles and jeopardize the health of an aquatic ecosystem like no other in the © National Park Service world. To address this pressing issue and help protect Montezuma Well’s fragile ecosystem, the National Park Service is teaming with the USGS Southwest Biological Science Center, the Western National Parks Association, and the Arizona Game and Fish Department to conduct an ambitious project to study the negative impacts of the invasive red-eared sliders and relocate them to privately-owned habitats and public school classrooms outside the park. Sonora Mud Turtle The only turtle native to Montezuma Sonora mud turtles can reach six and a Well, Sonora mud turtles are easily half inches in length and may be (Kinosternon sonoriense) spotted basking on logs and swimming identified by their smooth, elongated around the water’s edge. These cold- carapace (upper part of the shell). The blooded reptiles depend on the shell generally has a uniform light- environment to determine their body brown or yellowish-brown color and is temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Overview Fact Sheet
    southwestlearning.org MONTEZUMA WELL Sonoran Mud Turtle FACTOVERVIEW SHEET U (Kinostemon sonoriense) SGS / DRO S The Sonoran mud turtle (Kinostemon sonoriense) is the only T E native turtle species living in Montezuma Well. The nor- T A mal geographic range of Sonoran mud turtles is throughout L. (2012:CO the Southwest, into southern California, and into northwest- ern Mexico. Montezuma Well is the most permanent water V ER) source in the Sonoran mud turtle range (Stanila 2009), with a near constant water temperature of about 70 degrees F (Blinn 2008). The Well is also unique in its high carbon dioxide con- centrations, number of endemic species (found nowhere else in the world), and lack of fish and amphibians. Sonoran mud turtles are medium-sized (up to 6 ½ inches long, with the females larger than the males), with high-domed smooth shells. The shells are light-brown to yellowish brown, Montezuma Well. and often covered in algae, and the skin is dark olive with yel- low and cream colored markings on the head and neck (Ollig 2008). As a water-dwelling species, Sonoran mud turtles also Sonoran mud turtles may live more than 40 years in the wild. have webbed feet. The females reach maturity between five and nine years old, and may lay two clutches of eggs per year (usually 6-7 eggs The Sonoran mud turtle is primarily carnivorous, but an op- per clutch). At Montezuma Well, the females move away portunistic forager (Lovich et al. 2010). At Montezuma Well, from the water to nest, laying eggs between May and October the mud turtles feed primarily on invertebrates (amphipods and (Drost et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Amendment to 21CFR124021
    Richard Fife 8195 S. Valley Vista Drive Hereford, AZ 85615 December 07, 2015 Division of Dockets Management Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 Reference: Docket Number FDA-2013-S-0610 Proposed Amendment to Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Volume 8 Revised as of April 1, 2015 21CFR Sec.1240.62 Dear Dr. Stephen Ostroff, M.D., Acting Commissioner: Per discussion with the Division of Dockets Management staff on November 10, 2015 Environmental and Economic impact statements are not required for petitions submitted under 21CFR Sec.1240.62 CITIZEN PETITION December 07, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED: I propose an amendment to 21CFR Sec.1240.62 (see exhibit 1) as allowed by Section (d) Petitions as follows: Amend section (c) Exceptions. The provisions of this section are not applicable to: By adding the following two (2) exceptions: (5) The sale, holding for sale, and distribution of live turtles and viable turtle eggs, which are sold for a retail value of $75 or more (not to include any additional turtle related apparatuses, supplies, cages, food, or other turtle related paraphernalia). This dollar amount should be reviewed every 5 years or more often, as deemed necessary by the department in order to make adjustments for inflation using the US Department of Labor, Bureau of labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index. (6) The sale, holding for sale, and distribution of live turtles and viable turtle eggs, which are listed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) Red List as Extinct In Wild, Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable (IUCN threatened categorizes).
    [Show full text]
  • Chelonian Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 4Th Edition December 2015
    Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) Chelonian Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 4th Edition December 2015 Editor Chelonian TAG Steering Committee 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Mission ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Steering Committee Structure ........................................................................................................... 3 Officers, Steering Committee Members, and Advisors ..................................................................... 4 Taxonomic Scope ............................................................................................................................. 6 Space Analysis Space .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Current and Potential Holding Table Results ............................................................................. 8 Species Selection Process Process ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Decision Tree ........................................................................................................................... 13 Decision Tree Results .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turtles of the World, 2010 Update: Annotated Checklist of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status
    Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation ProjectTurtles of the IUCN/SSC of the World Tortoise – 2010and Freshwater Checklist Turtle Specialist Group 000.85 A.G.J. Rhodin, P.C.H. Pritchard, P.P. van Dijk, R.A. Saumure, K.A. Buhlmann, J.B. Iverson, and R.A. Mittermeier, Eds. Chelonian Research Monographs (ISSN 1088-7105) No. 5, doi:10.3854/crm.5.000.checklist.v3.2010 © 2010 by Chelonian Research Foundation • Published 14 December 2010 Turtles of the World, 2010 Update: Annotated Checklist of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status TUR T LE TAXONOMY WORKING GROUP * *Authorship of this article is by this working group of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, which for the purposes of this document consisted of the following contributors: ANDERS G.J. RHODIN 1, PE T ER PAUL VAN DI J K 2, JOHN B. IVERSON 3, AND H. BRADLEY SHAFFER 4 1Chair, IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Chelonian Research Foundation, 168 Goodrich St., Lunenburg, Massachusetts 01462 USA [[email protected]]; 2Deputy Chair, IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202 USA [[email protected]]; 3Department of Biology, Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana 47374 USA [[email protected]]; 4Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 USA [[email protected]] AB S T RAC T . – This is our fourth annual compilation of an annotated checklist of all recognized and named taxa of the world’s modern chelonian fauna, documenting recent changes and controversies in nomenclature, and including all primary synonyms, updated from our previous three checklists (Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [2007b, 2009], Rhodin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 20110810 Finalprogram SWPA
    1 Southwest Chapter Partners in Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Annual Meeting Marriott Hotel Tucson University Park 10-13 August 2011 Year of the Turtle Conservation and Management of Arid-land Reptiles and Amphibians www.swparc.org 2 2011 Annual Meeting Organizing Committee and Functions Oversight: Larry Jones Venue: 2010 steering committee, Trevor Hare, Larry Jones Program Agenda: Larry Jones, steering committee, planning committee Website: Tom Giermakowski Save-the-date announcement: Larry Jones Program booklet: Larry Jones, Tom Giermakowski Registration (pre- and during meeting): Janet Jones, Larry Jones Registration form/costs: Larry Jones, Trevor Hare, and planning committee Name tags and stickers: Janet Jones Conservation and Management session: Larry Jones Year of the Turtle session: Cristina Jones Workshops: Larry Jones, Jim Rorabaugh, plus other leads Vendors and Booths: Esther Nelson, Kary Schlick, Polly Conrad Silent and live auction: Esther Nelson, Priya Nanjappa Call for Posters, Posters: Tom Giermakowski Spanish translation: Participants or Tom Giermakowski Social Events: Doug Duncan, Trevor Hare SunDay FunDay (at the AZ-Sonora Desert Museum): Stephane Poulin Tee Shirts: Dennis Caldwell Year-of-the-Turtle Booth: Brian Aucone Audiovisual: Tom Giermakowski, Sandy Volentine Sponsors: Esther Nelson, Kary Schlick Liaisons, CRHSD V: Trevor Hare, Cristina Jones, Heidi Flugstad Other: Debbie Sebesta, Glenn Frederick 2010-2011 SW PARC Steering Committee Brian Aucone (Sr. co-chair) Larry Jones (Jr. co-chair) Rob Lovich (outgoing co-chair) Tom Giermakowski Jason Jones Erin Muths Esther Nelson Erika Nowa Kary Schlick 2011 Tucson Annual Meeting Program design, layout, text and photographs by Larry Jones, Coronado National Forest. Photographs © Larry Jones 2011. Front Cover (clockwise): Green Toad ( Anaxyrus debilis ), Eastern Collared Lizard ( Crotaphytus collaris ), Sonoran Coralsnake ( Micruroides euryxanthus ), Sonora Mud Turtle ( Kinosternon sonoriense ), Bezy’s Night Lizard ( Xantusia bezyi ), Saddled Leaf-nosed Snake ( Phyllorhynchus browni ).
    [Show full text]
  • Billing Code 4333–15 DEPARTMENT of THE
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/21/2021 and available online at Billing Code 4333–15 federalregister.gov/d/2021-07402, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2013–0011; FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 212] RIN 1018–BE29 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Western Distinct Population Segment of the Yellow-billed Cuckoo AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), designate critical habitat for the western distinct population segment of the yellow-billed cuckoo (western yellow- billed cuckoo) (Coccyzus americanus) under the Endangered Species Act. In total, approximately 298,845 acres (120,939 hectares) are now being designated as critical habitat in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Texas, and Utah. This rule extends the Act’s protections to critical habitat for this species. DATES: This rule is effective [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: This final rule is available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov, and the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office website at http://www.fws.gov/sacramento. Comments and materials we received, as well as supporting documentation we used or developed in preparing this rule, are available for public inspection at http://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2013–0011. The coordinates or plot points or both from which the maps are generated are included in the decisional record for this critical habitat designation and are available at http://www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinosternon Abaxillare (Baur in Stejneger 1925) En La Localidad De Villa Hidalgo, Municipio De Villaflores, Chiapas, México
    UNIVERSIDAD DE CIENCIAS Y ARTES DE CHIAPAS INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS T E S I S Aspectos de la ecología poblacional y análisis morfológico de Kinosternon abaxillare (Baur in Stejneger 1925) en la localidad de Villa Hidalgo, municipio de Villaflores, Chiapas, México QUE PARA OBTENER EL TÍTULO DE LICENCIADO EN BIOLOGÍA PRESENTA EDUARDO REYES GRAJALES DIRECTOR Ph. D. WILFREDO A. MATAMOROS ORTEGA INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS. UNICACH ASESORES Dr. RODRIGO MACIP RÍOS ESCUELA NACIONAL DE ESTUDIOS SUPERIORES UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO Ph. D. JOHN B. IVERSON DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY EARLHAM COLLEGE Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas Noviembre 2018 Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas Octubre de 2019 Octubr de 2019 II DEDICATORIA A la mejor madre del mundo, Marilú Grajales Corzo, por todo su cariño, comprensión y amor que ni en mil vidas podría pagarle; a mi padre, Ricardo Reyes Paulino, por entender mis locuras y encargarse de mi educación a muy temprana a edad; a mi hermano, Ricardo Reyes Grajales, por su incondicional apoyo y entendimiento proporcionado siempre en mi vida. A mí siempre compañera de rebeldías, Doris Grajales Corzo (†), por enseñarme el amor a la vida y a la libertad. A Nora Patricia López León (†), cor tuum non morieris. I AGRADECIMIENTOS A mi madre, padre y hermano por apoyarme incondicionalmente en la realización de todo este trabajo. Su paciencia y aliento por fin han dado fruto. Al Biól. Carlos A. Guichard-Romero y Roberton por enseñarme, orientarme correctamente y apoyarme en este trabajo. Al PhD. John B. Iverson por financiar parcialmente este trabajo y permitirme interactuar con toda la comunidad de tortugueros a nivel mundial.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Program Co-Chairs: WELCOME to TUCSON!
    2019 From the Program Co-Chairs: WELCOME TO TUCSON! There is no better way to celebrate the month of August than attending the 17th Annual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles. After a very successful 2018 symposium in Fort Worth, Texas – to visit the city where the idea to create Turtle Survival Alliance was conceived – we are delighted to welcome you back to Tucson, Arizona! This year’s meeting, sponsored by Zoo Med Laboratories, is being co-hosted by the Turtle Survival Alliance and the IUCN Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group at the Loews Ventana Resort in Tucson, Arizona. Here, you will be greeted with a magnificent view of the Catalina Mountains, fall in love with big skies and long views, and desert life forms from the saguaro cactus to the Gila monster, which inspired books by Edward Abbey, Charles Bowden, Barbara Kingsolver, and more. Come early to enjoy some extra time in laid back Tucson – stay late to explore the wonders of the Sonoran Desert and savor the regional cuisine! We return to Tucson by popular demand, and have been assured by many locals and past Symposium attendees that the Old Pueblo was born ready to host the largest gathering of turtle biologists, zookeepers, husbandrists, and enthusiasts, anywhere in the world – for the fourth time! This year’s symposium starts with a keynote presentation on Chinese Turtles by Shi Haitao, and aptly closes with a more locally flavored featured presentation on Challenges in Conservation and Recovery of Desert Tortoises: The Importance of Long-term Studies by Roy Averill-Murray.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services Environmental Assessment Or
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE WILDLIFE SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ORAL VACCINATION TO CONTROL SPECIFIC RABIES VIRUS VARIANTS IN RACCOONS, GRAY FOXES, AND COYOTES IN THE UNITED STATES In cooperation with: United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service And In consultation with: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management December 2009 Prepared By: United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services 4700 River Road, Unit 87 Riverdale, MD 20737-1234 i TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION .............................................................................. 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Public Health Importance of Rabies ....................................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Raccoon Rabies in the Eastern U.S .......................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Gray Fox and Coyote Rabies in Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas ....................................................... 4 1.1.4 Primary Need for Action .......................................................................................................... 5 1.1.5 Development of Oral Rabies Vaccine Programs ...................................................................... 5 1.2 DESCRIPTION
    [Show full text]