DOCSLIB.ORG

Air Quality Improvement Guide for Local Governments Air Quality Improvement Guide for Local Governments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air Quality Improvement Guide for Local Governments Air Quality Improvement Guide for Local Governments Air Quality Improvement Guide for Local Governments Air Quality Improvement Guide for Local Governments Produced by the Community Services Division of the County Services Department July 2007 About NACo – The Voice of America’s Counties The National Association of Counties (NACo) is the only national organization that represents county governments in the United States. Founded in 1935, NACo provides essential services to the nation’s 3,066 counties. NACo advances issues with a unifi ed voice before the federal government, improves the public’s understanding of county government, assists counties in fi nding and sharing innovative solutions through education and research, and provides value-added services to save counties and taxpayers money. For more information about NACo, visit www.naco.org. For more information about this publication or to request copies, please contact: Kelly Zonderwyk Senior Community Services Associate The National Association of Counties 25 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20001 Phone: 202.942.4224 Email: [email protected] This guide was published in July 2007 and made possible through support from USEPA Purchase Order #EP06H002650. It was written by Kelly Zonderwyk, NACo Senior Community Services Associate and through contributions from featured counties. The guide was edited by Abby Friedman, Program Director, and Alison Abbors, Environmental Intern, and graphic design and layout was performed by Sonia Chu of NACo. The opinions in this publication are those of the contributors, and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the USEPA, or NACo. Acknowledgements NACo wishes to thank the county staff , departments, and offi cials who provided information for the case studies and are acknowledged at the end of each case study. National Association of Counties Table of Contents Featured Local Governments Map . .5 Truck and Bus Fleet Retrofi ts . 22 Introduction . .6 Local Government Snapshots: Air Awareness Programs . 9 Hamilton County, Ohio . 22 Local Government Snapshots: San Diego County, California . 22 Broward and Miami-Dade Counties, Florida . 9 Butte County, California . 23 Clark County, Nevada . 10 Information Box Johnson County, Kansas . 10 USEPA Regional Collaborative Partnerships . 23-24 Spokane County, Washington . 10 Additional Resources . 24 Information Boxes SEQL – Sustainable Environment for Quality of Life . 11 Port Retrofi ts . 25 “It All Adds Up to Cleaner Air” Campaign . 11 Local Government Snapshots: AIRNow Site . 11 Santa Barbara County, California . 26 New York City, New York . 26 Woodstove Programs . .12 Additional Resources . 26 Local Government Snapshots: Allegheny County, Pennsylvania . .12 Airport Ground Equipment Emissions . 27 Lane County, Oregon . .12 Local Government Snapshot: Lincoln County, Montana . .13 Broward County, Florida . 27 Missoula County, Montana . .13 Additional Resources . 28 Washoe County, Nevada . .14 Additional Resources . .14 Energy Effi ciency, Alternative Fuels, and Renewable Energy . 29 Public Transportation and Commuter Local Government Snapshots: Benefi t Programs . 15 Story County, Iowa . 29 Local Government Snapshots: Winona County, Minnesota . 30 Arlington County, Virginia . 15 King County, Washington . 30 Boulder County, Colorado . 16 Henrico County, Virginia . 30 Fulton County, Georgia . 16 Fairfax County, Virginia . 31 Pinal County, Arizona . 16 Information Boxes Westchester County, New York . 16 NACo ENERGY STAR Challenge for Counties . 31 Additional Resources . 17 NACo County ENERGY STAR Change a Light Campaign . 31 Neighborhood Connectivity . 18 Using Energy Effi ciency and/or Local Government Snapshots: Renewable Energy Projects for SIP Credits . 32 Arlington County, Virginia . 18 Additional Resources . 32 Broward County, Florida . 19 Additional Resources . 19 Anti-Idling and Truck-Stop Electrifi cation . 33 Local Government Snapshots: Non-Road Diesel Engines, Hamilton County, Ohio . 33 Equipment, and Vehicles . 20 Rowan County, North Carolina . 34 Local Government Snapshots: Anderson County, South Carolina . 34 Denver County, Colorado . 20 Additional Resources . 34 Louisville - Jeff erson County Metro Government, Kentucky . 20 San Diego County, California . 21 Additional Resources . 21 Table of Contents (continued...) Tree Planting Programs . 35 Air Monitoring and Air Emergencies . 43 Local Government Snapshots: Local Government Snapshots: Sarasota County, Florida . 35 Mecklenburg County, North Carolina . 43 Marion County, Indiana . 36 Hamilton County, Ohio . 44 City of San Antonio, Texas . 36 Boulder County, Colorado . 44 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania . 36 Additional Resources . 44 Montgomery County, Maryland . 36 Information Box Air Quality Partnerships . 45 Urban Heat Islands . 37 Local Government Snapshots: Additional Resources . 37 Dane County, Wisconsin . 45 Forsyth County, North Carolina . 46 Infi ll and Brownfi elds Redevelopment . 38 Information Box . 46 Local Government Snapshots: Green Gas Stations Project . 46 New Castle County, Delaware . 38 Resource Tools . 46 City of Alamosa, Colorado . 39 Lane County, Oregon . 39 Air Quality Glossary . 47 City of Phoenix, Arizona . 39 General Air Quality Resources Washtenaw County, Michigan . 39 for Local Governments . 49 Additional Resources . 40 Greenways and Open Spaces . 41 Local Government Snapshots: Lake County, Illinois . 41 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania . 41 Broward County, Florida . 42 Information Box County Leadership in Conservation Award . 42 Additional Resources . 42 National Association of Counties Air Quality Improvement • 5 National Association of Counties INTRODUCTION any scientifi c studies have linked breathing ozone each of the six criteria air pollutants for which USEPA has set and particle pollution to signifi cant health prob- national standards: carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, Mlems. To help communities reduce air pollution and ground-level ozone, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide. achieve new federal health-based standards, NACo has devel- These pollutants come from factories; mobile sources such as oped the Air Quality Improvement Guide for Local Governments. cars, trucks, buses and construction equipment; and domestic The guide includes examples of local government strategies sources such as woodstoves. Although the USEPA sets the and best practices to reduce air pollution from a wide range of standards, states and local governments are free to adopt sources, as well as techniques to inform and educate citizens stricter standards for industrial and commercial operations. about air quality issues. In September 2006, the USEPA announced revisions to the The examples and best practices can help counties meet NAAQS for particle pollution, also known as particulate mat- new federal standards. The U.S. Environmental Protection ter (PM). States must develop State Implementation Plans Agency (USEPA) announced revisions to the National Ambi- (SIPs) to.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water-Quality Standards, Maximum Loads, and the Clean Water Act: the Eedn for Judicial Enforcement Lawrence S
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 34 | Issue 5 Article 9 5-1983 Water-Quality Standards, Maximum Loads, and the Clean Water Act: The eedN for Judicial Enforcement Lawrence S. Bazel Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lawrence S. Bazel, Water-Quality Standards, Maximum Loads, and the Clean Water Act: The Need for Judicial Enforcement, 34 Hastings L.J. 1245 (1983). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol34/iss5/9 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Comments Water-Quality Standards, Maximum Loads, and the Clean Water Act: The Need for Judicial Enforcement In 1972, Congress replaced the existing Federal Water Pollution Control Act with what has become known as the Clean Water Act.' a complicated 2 and ambitious program in- The new Act established 3 tended to eliminate water pollution. Congress incorporated two methods of pollution control into the Act. The first regulates wastewater discharges; it requires all point sources,4 which are primarily industries and municipalities, to use the "best practicable" and "best available" technologies for treating waste- water.5 The second method regulates the cleanliness of the nation's waters. Simply described, it requires federal and state pollution-con- trol agencies to find pollution problems and solve them. To find problems, the agencies must divide the nation's waters into segments, set water-quality standards (WQS) for each segment, and discover which segments are violating their WQS.
    [Show full text]
  • Enforcing Environmental Standards Under State Law: the Louisiana Environmental Quality Act Kenneth M
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 57 | Number 2 Winter 1997 Enforcing Environmental Standards Under State Law: The Louisiana Environmental Quality Act Kenneth M. Murchison Repository Citation Kenneth M. Murchison, Enforcing Environmental Standards Under State Law: The Louisiana Environmental Quality Act, 57 La. L. Rev. (1997) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol57/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Enforcing Environmental Standards Under State Law: The Louisiana Environmental Quality Act Kenneth M.Murchison" In the United States, analysis of environmental law tends to concentrate on federal law. The focus is understandable given the primacy of federal law in the field and the diversity of state environmental statutes. Nonetheless, the focus is unfortunate with respect to enforcement issues. Major federal statutes envision that states will assume primary responsibility for routine enforcement, subject always to the oversight of the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).' Understanding state law relating to enforcement is, therefore, an essential step for evaluating the effectiveness of pollution control legislation in the United States. This Article analyzes the statutory provisions for enforcing environmental standards in Louisiana. After a brief overview of the state's constitutional protection for the environment and the Louisiana Environmental Quality Act,' the Article describes the methods the Act provides for detecting violations; analyzes the statute's provisions for administrative sanctions and emergency orders, civil actions initiated by the government, criminal prosecutions, and enforcement by private parties; and compares the state provisions to analogous provisions of federal law.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Regulations Handbook for Small Communities
    Everything You Wanted to Know About Environmental Regulations And Related Programs…. But Were Afraid to Ask! A Guide for EPA Region 8 Small Communities 2010 Revised Edition Preface This handbook was prepared by Region 8 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with small units of local government (communities) in mind. The handbook was prepared for use by officials of such communities as a quick reference to information on environmental regulations, related programs and associated issues facing their constituencies. Information presented in this handbook is meant only as a summary of basic environmental requirements and/or EPA guidance. It is not intended to serve as a definitive statement of the specific ways in which a community can ensure environmental compliance. Rather, it is a quick guide to the environmental regulatory and associated programs that typically apply to most small communities. The requirements and guidance described in this handbook are based on federal regulations and/or guidance documents in place in the fall of 2010. It should be expected that some of these requirements and associated guidance documents will change in the future. In addition to the federal requirements described here, states and Indian tribes can adopt rules that may be different and, in some cases, more stringent than the federal rules. Be sure to ask for and read the rules from the appropriate agency in your area. This handbook is intended only as a reference source. The statutory provisions and regulations described in this document contain legally binding requirement but this document does not itself create any legal rights, benefits, or obligations. EPA may deviate from any approach described in this document in a given case if consistent with legal requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Evaluation of Misting Fans in Hot and Humid Climate
    Building and Environment 45 (2010) 2666e2678 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Building and Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/buildenv Performance evaluation of misting fans in hot and humid climate N.H. Wong*, Adrian Z.M. Chong Department of Building, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, 117566 Republic of Singapore article info abstract Article history: Singapore experiences a hot and humid climate throughout the year. This in turn results in heavy reli- Received 3 March 2010 ance on mechanical systems especially air-conditioning to achieve thermal comfort. An alternative would Received in revised form be the use of evaporative cooling which is less energy intensive. Objective and subjective measurements 14 May 2010 were conducted at an experimental setup at the National University of Singapore (NUS) to evaluate the Accepted 27 May 2010 thermal conditions and thermal sensations brought about by misting fans. Field measurements were also conducted at food centres in Singapore to determine if they are coherent with the objective and Keywords: subjective measurements conducted. Analysis of objective and subjective data showed that the misting Misting fan fi Evaporative cooling fan was able to signi cantly reduce the dry-bulb temperature and thermal sensation votes. This is fi Singapore consistent with eld measurements taken, where regression analysis showed that with the misting fan, Hot thermal neutrality can be obtained at a higher outdoor effective temperature (ET*). However, the Humid reduction in temperature comes at the expense of higher relative humidity which results in consistently greater biological (bacterial and fungal) pollutants being enumerated from samples collected under the misting fan system.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Assurance Project Plan (Qapp)
    FCEAP Criteria Air Pollutants QAPP September 2017 Page 1 of 109 Revision 0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN (QAPP) FOR AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING OF CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS 9/5/17 SUBMITTED BY THE FORSYTH COUNTY OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE AND PROTECTION (FCEAP) FCEAP Criteria Air Pollutants QAPP September 2017 Page 2 of 109 Revision 0 Quality Assurance Project Plan Acronym Glossary A&MD- Analysis and Monitoring Division A&MPM- Analysis and Monitoring Program Manager AQI – Air Quality Index AQS - Air Quality System (EPA's Air database) CFR – Code of Federal Regulations DAS - Data Acquisition System DQA - Data Quality Assessment DQI - Data Quality Indicator DQO - Data Quality Objective EPA - Environmental Protection Agency FCEAP-Forsyth County Office of Environmental Assistance and Protection FTS - Flow Transfer Standard FEM – Federal Equivalent Method FRM – Federal Reference Method LAN – Local Area Network MQO – Measurement Quality Objective NAAQS - National Ambient Air Quality Standards NCDAQ - North Carolina Division of Air Quality NIST - National Institute of Science and Technology NPAP - National Performance Audit Program PEP – Performance Evaluation Program PQAO – Primary Quality Assurance Organization QA – Quality Assurance QA/QC - Quality Assurance/Quality Control QAPP - Quality Assurance Project Plan QC – Quality Control SD – Standard Deviation SLAMS - State and Local Air Monitoring Station SOP - Standard Operating Procedure SPM - Special Purpose Monitor TEOM - Tapered Elemental Oscillating Microbalance TSA - Technical
    [Show full text]
  • National Air Quality Status and Trends Through 2007
    National Air Quality STATUS AND TRENDS THROUGH 2007 Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable process chlorine-free paper with 100% post-consumer fiber using vegetable-oil-based ink. National Air Quality STATUS AND TRENDS THROUGH 2007 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Air Quality Assessment Division Research Triangle Park, North Carolina EPA-454/R-08-006 November 2008 Table of Contents Highlights ... 1 Air Pollution ... 4 Six Common Pollutants ... 10 Ground-Level Ozone ... 14 Particle Pollution ... 19 Lead ... 26 Nitrogen Dioxide ... 27 Carbon Monoxide ... 27 Sulfur Dioxide ... 27 Toxic Air Pollutants ... 28 Atmospheric Deposition ... 32 Visibility in Scenic Areas ... 34 Climate Change and Air Quality ... 36 International Transport of Air Pollution ... 38 Terminology ... 40 Web Sites ... 41 HIGHLIGHTS This summary report highlights EPA’s most recent ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). Ground- evaluation of the status and trends in our nation’s air level ozone and particle pollution still present quality. challenges in many areas of the country. LEVELS OF SIX COMMON POLLUTANTS • Though PM2.5 concentrations were higher in 2007 CONTINUE TO DECLINE than in 2006, partly due to weather conditions, annual PM2.5 concentrations were nine percent • Cleaner cars, industries, and consumer products lower in 2007 than in 2001. have contributed to cleaner air for much of the U.S. • 8-hour ozone concentrations were fi ve percent • Since 1990, nationwide air quality for six air lower in 2007 than in 2001. Ozone levels did not pollutants for which there are national standards improve in much of the East until 2002, after has improved signifi cantly.
    [Show full text]
  • A Citizen's Guide to Using Federal Environmental Laws to Secure
    A Citizen’s Guide to Using Federal Environmental Laws to Secure Environmental Justice Copyright © 2002 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. All rights reserved. ISBN No. 1-58576-033-1. ELI Project No. 981624. An electronically retrievable copy (PDF file) of this report may be obtained for no cost from the Environmental Law Institute web site <www.eli.org>, click on “Publications” then “2002 Research Reports” to locate the file. [Note: ELI Terms of Use will apply and are available on site.] (Environmental Law Institute®, The Environmental Forum®, and ELR® – The Environmental Law Reporter® are registered trademarks of the Environmental Law Institute.) acknowledgement This project was supported by the Office of Environmental Justice of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Assistance Agreement No. CR82675501. The views expressed herein should not be attributed to EPA nor should any official endorsement be inferred. table of contents Chapter 1. Introduction to Environmental Laws and Available Resources ...............................35 Environmental Justice Funding and Other Assistance for Public Participation. ..35 Other Grants . ......................... ......36 Introduction to Environmental Justice Issues.............1 Program Funding ..............................36 How Environmental Laws Can Help You to Protect Your Community ...............................3 How This Handbook Can Help You to Use Appendix A - Summary Descriptions of Selected Environmental Laws to Your Advantage...............4 Environmental Statutes..........................39 How This Handbook Is Organized, and What It Covers . 5 What This Handbook Does Not Cover.................6 Appendix B - Overview of Additional U.S. EPA Community Grant Programs .....................83 Chapter 2. Understanding the Players and the Laws Appendix C - Selected Other Environmental Justice Resources ...............................87 Identifying the Players..............................9 The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodrome Actual Weather – METAR Decode
    Aerodrome Actual Weather – METAR decode Code element Example Decode Notes 1 Identification METAR — Meteorological Airfield Report, SPECI — selected special (not from UK civil METAR or SPECI METAR METAR aerodromes) Location indicator EGLL London Heathrow Station four-letter indicator 'ten twenty Zulu on the Date/Time 291020Z 29th' AUTO Metars will only be disseminated when an aerodrome is closed or at H24 aerodromes, A fully automated where the accredited met. observer is on duty break overnight. Users are reminded that reports AUTO report with no human of visibility, present weather and cloud from automated systems should be treated with caution intervention due to the limitations of the sensors themselves and the spatial area sampled by the sensors. 2 Wind 'three one zero Wind degrees, fifteen knots, Max only given if >= 10KT greater than the mean. VRB = variable. 00000KT = calm. 31015G27KT direction/speed max twenty seven Wind direction is given in degrees true. knots' 'varying between two Extreme direction 280V350 eight zero and three Variation given in clockwise direction, but only when mean speed is greater than 3 KT. variance five zero degrees' 3 Visibility 'three thousand two Prevailing visibility 3200 0000 = 'less than 50 metres' 9999 = 'ten kilometres or more'. No direction is required. hundred metres' Minimum visibility 'Twelve hundred The minimum visibility is also included alongside the prevailing visibility when the visibility in one (in addition to the 1200SW metres to the south- direction, which is not the prevailing visibility, is less than 1500 metres or less than 50% of the prevailing visibility west' prevailing visibility. A direction is also added as one of the eight points of the compass.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Pollution by Stephen Davis − 2/26/08
    1 Prepared for SAB's review of EPA "Report on the Environment (2007)" [minor changes 3/11/08] Light Pollution by Stephen Davis − 2/26/08 One thing the EPA has been pushing is its "Green Lights" program. Using energy efficient light bulbs is not good enough: a) When too much light is being used, b) When aimed improperly, or c) When nobody is there to use it.[1] This is "Light Pollution!" And there is way too much of it costing the USA some $4.5 billion or more annually. This energy and money could be put to far better use. [2,3] Light Pollution and all its ramifications are missing from the EPA "Report on the Environment."[4,5] The #1 and #2 problems in Congress, needing immediate attention, are the economy and climate change. Both are directly related to energy independence and homeland security.[6] There is a connection between Light Pollution and what Congress considers as in our best interests. Unfortunately, government hasn't been watching were the money goes and how it is spent. We need accountability[7,8] and awareness[9] at all levels right down to the common man on the street before it's too late and we are all looking for life boats. What happened to "conservation" − the word that is never to be spoken?[10,] What if the money and other resources aren't there, or could they be put to better use elsewhere? The federal government can lead the way and get others involved through policy, guidance, and monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Light Pollution in a Tourism-Based Economy, with Recommendations for a National Lighting Ordinance
    REDUCING LIGHT POLLUTION IN A TOURISM-BASED ECONOMY, WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A NATIONAL LIGHTING ORDINANCE Prepared by the Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network (WIDECAST) Kimberley N. Lake and Karen L. Eckert __________________________________________________________ WIDECAST Technical Report No. 11 2009 Cover photos: Tree-mounted double spotlights at the Frangipani Beach Resort, with new hotel construction in the background (photo by Kimberley Lake); Leatherback sea turtle hatchling attracted by beachfront lighting and unable to find the sea (photo by Sebastien Barrioz). For bibliographic purposes, this publication should be cited as follows: Lake, Kimberley N. and Karen L. Eckert. 2009. Reducing Light Pollution in a Tourism-Based Economy, with Recommendations for a National Lighting Ordinance. Prepared by the Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network (WIDECAST) for the Department of Fisheries and Marine Resources, Government of Anguilla. WIDECAST Technical Report No. 11. Ballwin, Missouri. 65 pp. ISSN: 1930-3025 Copies of the publication may be obtained from: Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network (WIDECAST) 1348 Rusticview Drive Ballwin, Missouri 63011 Phone: + (314) 954-8571 Email: [email protected] Online at www.widecast.org REDUCING LIGHT POLLUTION IN A TOURISM-BASED ECONOMY, WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A NATIONAL LIGHTING ORDINANCE Kimberley N. Lake Karen L. Eckert 2009 Lake and Eckert (2009) ~ Reducing Light Pollution in a Tourism-Based Economy ~ WIDECAST Technical Report 11 PREFACE AND INTENT For more than two decades, the Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network (WIDECAST, www.widecast.org), with Country Coordinators in more than 40 Caribbean nations and territories, has linked scientists, conservationists, natural resource users and managers, policy-makers, industry groups, educators, and other stakeholders together in a collective effort to develop a unified management framework, and to promote a region-wide capacity to design and implement science-based sea turtle conservation programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Pollution Prevention
    This guidance is not a regulatory document and should be considered only informational and supplementary to the MPCA permits (such as the construction storm water general permit or MS4 permit) and local regulations. CHAPTER 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 7.00 POLLUTION PREVENTION..............................................................................................7.00-1 7.01 Nonstructural Practices: PLAN DEVELOPMENT.....................................................7.01-1 7.02 Nonstructural Practices: EMPLOYEE TRAINING....................................................7.02-1 7.03 Nonstructural Practices: INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ............................7.03-1 7.04 Nonstructural Practices: MONITORING AND EVALUATION ...............................7.04-1 7.20 GENERAL PRACTICES.....................................................................................................7.20-1 7.22 General Practices: SPILL PLANS...............................................................................7.22-1 7.23 General Practices: LITTER CONTROL .....................................................................7.23-1 7.24 General Practices: LAWN MANAGEMENT.............................................................7.24-1 7.25 General Practices: DUST CONTROL ........................................................................7.25-1 7.26 General Practices: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL...................................7.26-1 7.27 General Practices: STREET SWEEPING...................................................................7.27-1
    [Show full text]
  • WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality : Selected Pollutants
    WHO GUIDELINES FOR INDOOR AIR QUALITY WHO GUIDELINES FOR INDOOR AIR QUALITY: WHO GUIDELINES FOR INDOOR AIR QUALITY: This book presents WHO guidelines for the protection of pub- lic health from risks due to a number of chemicals commonly present in indoor air. The substances considered in this review, i.e. benzene, carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, naphthalene, nitrogen dioxide, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (especially benzo[a]pyrene), radon, trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethyl- ene, have indoor sources, are known in respect of their hazard- ousness to health and are often found indoors in concentrations of health concern. The guidelines are targeted at public health professionals involved in preventing health risks of environmen- SELECTED CHEMICALS SELECTED tal exposures, as well as specialists and authorities involved in the design and use of buildings, indoor materials and products. POLLUTANTS They provide a scientific basis for legally enforceable standards. World Health Organization Regional Offi ce for Europe Scherfi gsvej 8, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Tel.: +45 39 17 17 17. Fax: +45 39 17 18 18 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.euro.who.int WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants The WHO European Centre for Environment and Health, Bonn Office, WHO Regional Office for Europe coordinated the development of these WHO guidelines. Keywords AIR POLLUTION, INDOOR - prevention and control AIR POLLUTANTS - adverse effects ORGANIC CHEMICALS ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE - adverse effects GUIDELINES ISBN 978 92 890 0213 4 Address requests for publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe Scherfigsvej 8 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for per- mission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
    [Show full text]