25 Years Freight Villages: Experiences in and Europe

25th Europlatforms Anniversary in 2017

DGG Deutsche GVZ-Gesellschaft mbH

CERTIFI CATE

“Ranking of the European

Freight Village locations 2009”

ST

DGG

PLACE Interporto 1 Quadrante Europa, 1

Verona

Bremen, 8 March 2010 ______Dr. Thomas Nobel - Managing Director Deutsche GVZ-Gesellschaft mbH

Dr. Thomas Nobel / Steffen Nestler 2 Agenda

Freight Villages (FV) in Germany - introduction

3 FV Network Germany

Kiel

Planning Lübeck Wilhelmshaven and developing Emsland Stage Europark Coevorden Hannover/ -Emlichheim - West Lehrte City GVZ Berlin Rheine Osnabrück Berlin-Ost Berlin- Süd Herne / /O. Operating stage Emscher Göttingen

Erfurt Köln Südwestsachsen

Trier Hof

Nürnberg

Ulm Weil/Rhein Status 4/2017 The main advantages

• Advantages in urban planning: relocation of distribution facilities from sensitive districts, reducing noise emissions • Positive effects for City/Urban Logistics - exposed location at the intersection of transport corridors, link between long-haulage and last mile transportation • Expansion areas • low conflict potential (24h operation possible) • Highly developed infrastructure, often trimodal FV in Germany: Ecological Effects

• Modal shift road/rail

• Over 650.000 t (2015) of CO2 – emissions were reduced

„ecological milestone“ Agenda

Rankings of Freight Villages

7 Rankings of Freight Villages

Goal: Regularly surveys of the DGG in • Inventory of the present stage of the years: development of the German FV • 2004 (Europe FV) • 2008/2009 • Identification of future trends in the • 2010 (Europe) FV-landscape • 2012 • Consideration of current results in • 2015/2016 (Europe) context with data from past surveys Main Subjects of the investigation are: Strengths Weaknesses . Structure and development of FV-areas . Companies and employees of the FV

. Intermodality S W

. Endogenous FV potentials

. Exogenous FV potentials O T . SWOT analysis Opportunities Threats

8 Results: „TOP 20 in 2010

4 German Freight Villages in TOP 20 Source: DVZ Cluster and evaluation criteria Cirteria weightings and characteristics

example: Cluster FV settlements

max. criterion criterion weighting max. value performance number point

6 current number of 3 3 9 companies 7 final expansion number 3 3 9 of companies 8 current number of 6 3 18 employees

9 final expansion of the 4 3 12 number of employees

10 employees per ha 3 3 9 exploited area

max. performance points 380 Results 2015/16: focus TOP 20

• more German FV sites in TOP 20 compared to 2010 • as newcomer in TOP 20 • and Germany still well represented as in 2010

„Best in Europe in 2015/16“

Second Ranking of European Freight Villages – Results of 2015

6 German Freight Villages in TOP 20 Best in class (1)

structure and development category best in class value PLAZA Logistica storage capacity 4,270,000 m2 PLAZA Logistica current: 300 number of companies Zaragoza final stage: 400 current: 13,000 number of employees Interporto Verona final stage: 25,000 Best in class (2) mode of transport category best in class value 1,400,000 unit loads capacity of terminal Interporto Verona current capacity about 50 % green logistics

category best in class value amount of measures implemented 9 out of10 measures GVZ Nürnberg regarding green with high intensity logistics Stages – 2015/16 (FV-Developer)

7,5 6,5 6,3 6,2 5,8 5,2

2010 2015 Stage of development - Europe Stage of development - own country Stage of development - own FV

1 – low stage of 10 – high level of development development DGG: Publication

• comprehensive results published in Volume 6 of the DGG series „Macrologistics Nodes“

RRT Kouvola 6

Port of Tallin

Freight Village Vorsino

Vilnius Logistics Park

Prilesie Logistics Center Feliks Mackenthun / Steffen DIRFT GVZ JadeWeserPort GVZ Bremen GVZ Berlin Ost Freienbrink Nestler/ Thomas Nobel GVZ Emsland GVZ Berlin West GVZ Wolfsburg GVZ Frankfurt (Oder) Europark Coevorden GVZ Berlin City GVZ Rheine CLIP Logistics GVZ Osnarbrück GVZ HansehafenGVZ Berlin Großbeeren Gateway GVZ Göttingen GVZ Leipzig GVZ Kassel GVZ Emscher Delta 3 Dourges GVZ GVZ Südwestsachsen GVZ GVZ Hof

GVZ Nürnberg Kelet-Trans 2000 kft GVZ Ingolstadt Slovenska 2. Ranking der europäischen GVZ GVZ Augsburg DELOG Debrecen Metrans Dunjaská Streda Logistikai Gysev Cargo Zrt. Bi-Ka Logistikai GVZ-Standorte – Ergebnisse und Cargo Center RC Terminal BILK Logistics Center ALPLOG Kärnten Baja Public Port Erfahrungen Interporto Padova Interporto Verona Branch Robni terminali () Interporto Novara Adria Terminali Industrijska Zona Bakar CdT Gijon Interporto Torino ZALIA Interporto Pordenone ZAISA Irun Interporto Parma Bourgos Free Zone CdT Bizkai European Freight Center Interporto Bologna Free Zone Pirot Centro Logístico León Centro Logístíco Miranda Interporto Marche Centro Benaventano de Transport CIdT Vitoria-Gasteiz Toscana Centrale Centrolid CdT Burgos CdT Antequera Logistics Area Parque Logistico Cabanillas R-2 PLAZA Zaragoza CdT Zaragoza Terminal Intermodal Empora Interporto Regionale Puglia Dry Port (Coslada TC) Plataforma Central Iberum Interporto Nola Campano

Cordoba Logistics Area Nijar Logistics Area Sevilla Logistics Area Malaga Logistics Area Parque Empresarial Carrida Algeciras Logistics Area Rankings: Perspective 1

• worldwide ranking  Volume 5: first recording of worldwide sites (1st basis exists)

• evaluation of sites based on reduced or other number of criteria Rankings: Perspective 2 awarding of the „Golden Platform“ – According to film awards like the „Goldene Palme“  in different categories(clusters) e.g. • best management • green logistics • intermodality

Most positive effects of Freight Villages

AVERAGE RATING 2015/16

6,4 7,3 8

N=79 N=79 N=79

Green Logistics Urban-Logistics Modal shift

1 – low valuation 10 – high valuation Agenda

Urban Logistics and Freight Villages

22 Findings in Urban Logistics 4.0

• Increase in "distance selling" (b2c) leads to a boom of CEP services

• At the same time problem of “last mile” – “too many delivery attempts lead to frustration of recipients” (DVZ no. 2, p. 5, 2015)

• passive role of urban trade companies

• Internet “giants” like AMAZON and ZALANDO discover logistics (e.g. fresh supply, same-day-delivery, development of decentralized storage structure, Logistics is more and more key business,“petrol- station”- pacelshops) Solutions – Technology (1)

• „Cubicycle“ (DHL) and „StreetScooter“

Source: DVZ Online Illustration Andreas Voltmer, 05.02.2016

• Electric Truck (“new”: refrigerated truck, “urban eTruck”

Source: Trans aktuell Nr. 16/2016, p. 1

Source: DPDHL.com Solutions – Technology (2)

. Commercial use-sing of drones (z.B. Google, Amazon, Post-companies)

. Studie „Vision Van“ (DVZ Nr. 72, S. 1, 2016 and photo Mercedes Benz) Solutions – Technology (3)

. Studie „Vision Van“ (DVZ Nr. 72, S. 1, 2016 and photo Mercedes Benz)

Solutions – Technology (4)

. Parcel-delivery („Starship-Robot“)

Source: Hermes Solutions – concepts

• Freight Village • “Mikro-Depot-concept“ on the “very last mile“ („Nachhaltige Stadtlogistik durch KEP“, BIEK (Hrsg.), 2015)

Source: Source: DPD

Thanks

29 Save the date

Jubiläumsveranstaltung: „25 Jahre Deutsche GVZ-Gesellschaft“

Im Jahr 1993 wurde die Deutsche GVZ-Gesellschaft in Bremen durch die GVZ-Entwicklungsgesellschaften aus Bremen und Erfurt gegründet. Seit dem hat die GVZ-Entwicklung in Deutschland eine rasante Entwicklung genommen. Ausdruck dieser sind u.a. die hervorragenden Platzierungen in den Europäischen GVZ-Rankings.

22. Juni 2018 - 11 Uhr Handelskammer Bremen

Mit freundlicher Unterstützung von:

Dr. Thomas Nobel / Steffen NestlerWeitere Infos unter: [email protected] oder 0421 - 220 96 12 Contact

Universitaetsallee 11-13 Dr. Thomas Nobel 28359 Bremen Managing Director

Tel.: 0049 - 421- 2209612 Fax.: 0049 - 421- 2209655

E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.gvz-org.de www.gvz-org.eu