DOCSLIB.ORG

Risk Assessment – Environmental Impacts of Norwegian Aquaculture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Risk Assessment – Environmental Impacts of Norwegian Aquaculture Extracts from “Fisken og havet, særnummer 3-2010” printed August 2011 Risk assessment – environmental impacts of Norwegian aquaculture Extracts from “Fisken og havet, særnummer 3-2010” – printed August 2011 Risk assessment – environmental impacts of Norwegian aquaculture Editors: Geir Lasse Taranger, Karin Kroon Boxaspen, Abdullah S. Madhun and Terje Svåsand Contributing authors from IMR: Jan Aure, Pål Arne Bjørn, Geir Dahle, Arne Ervik, Kevin Glover, Bjørn Einar Grøsvik, Pia Kupka Hansen, Kjellrun Hiis Hauge, Vivian Husa, Knut Jørstad, Egil Karlsbakk, Stein Mortensen, Sonal Patel, Ole B. Samuelsen, Nina Sandlund, Ove Skilbrei, Øystein Skaala, Terje van der Meeren and Vidar Wennevik www.imr.no 2 RISK assessment – enviRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF NORWEGIAN AQUACULTURE Preface The current report presents translated extracts from ”Fisken og havet, særnummer 3-2010” that was published in Norwegian by the Institute of Marine Research, Norway, in January 2011. The current translation contains the Summary, and Chapters 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 of the original publication. The original Norwegian version “Risikovurdering – miljøvirkninger av norsk fiskeoppdrett” and the current report are available at www.imr.no. Summary............. ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Chapter 2 Methods for risk assessment ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 About risk assessment ............................................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Risk assessment approaches in this report ................................................................................................................................ 9 2.2.1 Topics included .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.2.2 Implementing consensus and quality control ...........................................................................................................10 2.2.3 Defining the problem and scientific implementation ...........................................................................................10 Chapter 3 Current status of fish farming in Norway ..........................................................................................................................11 Chapter 5 Environmental impact and risk assessment ..................................................................................................................15 5.1 Disease and dispersal of infection ................................................................................................................................................16 5.1.1 Salmon lice .....................................................................................................................................................................................16 Contents 5.1.2 Spread of other infectious agents .....................................................................................................................................27 5.2 Genetic effects ...........................................................................................................................................................................................29 5.2.1 Genetic effects – salmon ........................................................................................................................................................29 5.2.2 Genetic effects – cod .................................................................................................................................................................35 5.3 Nutrient salts ..............................................................................................................................................................................................38 5.4 Organic impact ..........................................................................................................................................................................................39 5.5 Medication ...................................................................................................................................................................................................40 5.6 Summary and conclusion of risk assessment ........................................................................................................................41 Chapter 6 Recommendations for the work ahead...............................................................................................................................43 6.1 Further work on risk assessments in Norwegian aquaculture ....................................................................................44 6.2 Need for monitoring, effect indicators and threshold values ......................................................................................45 6.2.1 Salmon lice .....................................................................................................................................................................................45 6.2.2 Spread of other infectious agents .....................................................................................................................................45 6.2.3 Genetic effects – salmon ........................................................................................................................................................46 6.2.4 Genetic effects – cod .................................................................................................................................................................47 6.2.5 Nutrient salts .................................................................................................................................................................................48 6.2.6 Organic impact ...........................................................................................................................................................................48 6.2.7 Medication ......................................................................................................................................................................................48 6.2.8 Other undesirable substances ............................................................................................................................................48 4 4 The Institute of Marine Research has conducted an initial risk assessment of the environmental effects of Norwegian Aquaculture for the Ministry of Fish eries and Coastal Affairs. The assessment builds on goals specified in the Ministry’s “Strategy for an Environmentally Sustainable Norwegian Aquaculture Industry” from 2009. We have focused on the environmental goals for disease dispersal, genetic impact of escapees and the release of nutrient salts, organic waste and drugs. Infection pressure from salmon lice and genetic impact There seems to be a connection between the scale of of escapees came out as the most problematic factors salmon farming within a county and the probability in this analysis. We consider that there is a moderate to of unwanted environmental effects in the same area. high probability for these effects to be in conflict with Given the biological, operational and technological Summary the goals specified in the sustainability strategy along limitations of salmon farming today, we assess that a large parts of the Norwegian coast. This builds on pro- further increase in biomass in the counties from Roga- posed threshold values for effect indicators described land to Troms can exacerbate the situation in terms of in this report. The development of resistance towards negative environmental impact. several drugs used against salmon lice may exacerbate the situation. On the basis of this initial risk assessment, we have identified a need for a strengthening of the monito- We do not have enough data on disease dispersal ring and research, especially on impact of salmon lice from fish farming to wild fish of other pathogens than on wild stocks, dispersal of other pathogens and the salmon lice to do a regionalized analysis. However, genetic impact of escapees. It is essential to get a bet- several other pathogens are recognized as potential ter scientific basis for the suggested thresholds for the threats against the wild stocks. environmental effect indicators used in this analysis. It is also important to improve the geographical coverage There is low probability of negative effects of nutrient in the national monitoring programmes. There are also salts and organic load on a regional scale. The legis- knowledge gaps on potential environmental effects of lated monitoring programme on the local impact of drugs, local effects of nutrient salts and the impact of organic load shows an overall good situation. Drugs organic waste on hard bottoms. used against salmon lice can potentially be environ- mentally problematic,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master Thesis
    A study in environmental chemistry: natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in sediment cores from the Norwegian Trench and the Vefsnfjord by Lena Helvik Master of Science Thesis Department of Chemistry University of Bergen Bergen, June 2019 SUMMARY In this work the anthropogenic radionuclide 137Cs and the naturally occurring radionuclides 226Ra, 228Ra, 210Pb and 40K have been studied in sediment cores from the Norwegian Trench and from the Vefsnfjord in Nordland. Caesium-137 is a fission product, introduced to the environment by nuclear weapons tests in 1950s and -60s, discharges from reprocessing plants for spent nuclear fuel, and from accidents like the Chernobyl accident in 1986. Levels of 137Cs in Norwegian marine areas are generally low, and the levels are routinely monitored. Investigations in selected Norwegian fjords have, however, shown elevated levels of 137Cs in surface sediments and sediment profiles, compared to adjacent open marine areas. The Vefsnfjord, which is investigated in this work, is one of the fjords in Norway with the highest measured levels of 137Cs. The contamination source is most likely the Chernobyl accident. Potassium-40 is a naturally occurring radioactive isotope of potassium (isotopic abundance of 0.012%). radium-226 and lead-210 are members of the natural radioactive “uranium series”, while radium-228 is member of the natural radioactive “thorium series”. All four are found in various amounts in bedrock and the marine environment. However, it is well known that different industries, including the oil and gas industry, also discharge naturally occurring radionuclides to the marine environment. In this thesis, local and regional variations of 137Cs, 226Ra, 228Ra, 210Pb and 40K in the two study areas have been investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Reetableringsprosjektet I Vefsnaregionen
    Rapport 14 · 2015 Reetableringsprosjektet i Vefsnaregionen - Årsrapport for aktiviteten i 2014 Norwegian Veterinary Institute`s Report Series Institute`s Norwegian Veterinary Espen Holthe Thomas Bjørnå Håvard Lo Veterinærinstituttets rapportserie Veterinærinstituttets rapportserie · 14 – 2015 Tittel Reetableringsprosjektet i Vefsnaregionen - Årsrapport for aktiviteten i 2014. Publisert av Veterinærinstituttet · Pb. 750 Sentrum · 0106 Oslo Form omslag: Graf AS Forsidefoto: Forsjordforsen i Drevja, Veterinærinstituttet Miljø- og smittetiltak, Trondheim Foto: Veterinærinstituttet, Miljø-og Smittetiltak, Trondheim Bestilling [email protected] Faks: + 47 23 21 60 01 Tel: + 47 23 21 63 66 ISSN 1890-3290 elektronisk utgave Forslag til sitering: Holthe E, Bjørnå T, Lo H. Reetableringsprosjektet i Vefsnare- gionen - Årsrapport for aktiviteten i 2014. Veterinærinstitut- tets rapport-serie 14-2015. Oslo: Veterinærinstituttet; 2015 © Veterinærinstituttet Kopiering tillatt når Veterinærinstituttet gjengis som kilde Veterinærinstituttets rapportserie Norwegian Veterinary Institute`s Report Series Rapport 14 · 2015 Reetableringsprosjektet i Vefsnaregionen - Årsrapport for aktiviteten 2014 Forfattere Espen Holthe, Veterinærinstituttet Thomas Bjørnå, MON KF Håvard Lo, Veterinærinstituttet Oppdragsgiver Miljødirektoratet 02.06.2015 ISSN 1890-3290 elektronisk utgave Sammendrag Holthe, E. Bjørnå, T. & Lo, H. 2015. Reetableringsprosjektet i Vefsnaregionen. Årsrapport 2014. Veterinærinstituttets rapportserei 14-2015. 33 s. Rapporten omhandler alle vassdragene i regionen der det er gjennomført tiltak i forbindelse med reetableringsprosjektet, bortsett fra Vefsna. For Vefsna er det utarbeidet egen rapport, se (Holthe mfl. 2015). I 2014 ble det i alt satt ut ca. 773.000 individer av laks i elvene Fusta, Drevja, Halsanelva, Hestdalselva, Dagsvikelva og Hundåla. I tillegg ble det satt ut 102.000 sjøørretunger i Fustavassdraget, da i hovedsak oppstrøms Forsmoforsen. Det er også satt ut ca. 38.000 individer av stasjonær ørret og ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Reetableringsprosjektet I Vefsnaregionen - Årsrapport 2016 VETERINÆRINSTITUTTET
    Rapport 17 - 2017 Reetableringsprosjektet i Vefsnaregionen - Årsrapport 2016 VETERINÆRINSTITUTTET Reetableringsprosjektet i Vefsnaregionen – Årsrapport 2016 Innhold Sammendrag ................................................................................................................. 2 Forord ......................................................................................................................... 3 1. Innledning .............................................................................................................. 4 2. Metode og materiale .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Innsamling av ungfisk .............................................................................................. 5 2.2 Innsamling av voksenfisk .......................................................................................... 5 2.3 Gytefiskregistrering ................................................................................................ 5 2.4 Utsettingsmaterialet ............................................................................................... 6 2.5 Bademerking av øyerogn .......................................................................................... 6 2.6 Utsetting av fiskemateriale i Vefsnaregionen ................................................................. 6 2.7 Otolitt og skjellanalyse ............................................................................................ 7 3. Resultat fra ungfiskundersøkelser
    [Show full text]
  • Reetablering Av Laks I Vefsna Nedstrøms Laksforsen - Sluttrapport VETERINÆRINSTITUTTET
    Rapport 12 - 2019 Reetablering av laks i Vefsna nedstrøms Laksforsen - Sluttrapport VETERINÆRINSTITUTTET Reetablering av laks i Vefsna nedstrøms Laksforsen Sluttrapport Innhold Innhold ........................................................................................................................ 2 Sammendrag ................................................................................................................. 4 Forord ......................................................................................................................... 6 1. Innledning ........................................................................................................... 7 2. Områdebeskrivelse ................................................................................................. 9 3. Metode og materiale .............................................................................................. 11 3.1 Utsettingsmaterialet .............................................................................................. 11 3.2 Bademerking av øyerogn ......................................................................................... 11 3.3 Utsetting av fiskemateriale ...................................................................................... 11 3.4 Innsamling av ungfisk ............................................................................................. 12 3.5 Innsamling av voksenfisk ......................................................................................... 15 3.6 Otolitt- og skjellanalyser
    [Show full text]
  • Granasen, a Dolomite-Brucite Deposit with Potential for Industrial Development
    NGU -BULL 436, 2000 - PAGE 75 Granasen, a dolomite-brucite deposit with potential for industrial development ODD 0VERENG 0vereng, O. 2000: Granasen, a do lomite-brucite deposi t wi th pote ntial for indust rial develo pm ent. Norges geolog iske und ersekelse Bulletin 436, 75-84. Granasen, situated close to Mo sjoen in north ern Norway, is a deposit containing several milli on tonn es of dolomite and brucite. The deposit has been investig ated and characte rised in preparati on fo r future deve lopment and exploitation. The ore consists of dol omi te and brucite . Brucite has fo rmed as a result of hydro th ermal alte rat ion associated with intrusion of gabbro. Tests have been carried out to evaluate the com mercial value of the dolom ite resources. A variet y of different bene ficiation met hods were investigated to achieve co mmerc ial concent rates of brucite . The most successful result was obtai ned by selective flocculat ion , w hich up-gr ades th e ore to a maximum gra de of 95.5 % brucite, with a recovery of 80 %. As an alte rnative, or by-product of bru cite concent rate produ ction, th e deposit cou ld also be w orked for dolomite. Odd 0vereng, Norgesgeologi ske undersekelse,N-749 1 Trondh eim, Norw ay. of th e Granasen dol om it e marble (Faye & 0 vereng 1979). Introduction Extensive mi neralogical and geo log ical investigat ions, Since the beg inning of the 1970s, the Geologica l Survey of including diamond drill ing, were carried out in 1979 and Norway (NGU) has investigated a large number of indu strial 1980 (0 vereng 1981), and confirmed th e interpretation th at min eral occurrence s.
    [Show full text]
  • Vefsnfjorden. Beskrivelse Av Hydrofysiske Forhold I Fjordens Indre Del
    RAPPORT L.NR. 5939-2010 Vefsnfjorden. Beskrivelse av hydrofysiske forhold i fjordens indre del Norsk institutt for vannforskning RAPPORT Hovedkontor Sørlandsavdelingen Østlandsavdelingen Vestlandsavdelingen NIVA Midt-Norge Gaustadalléen 21 Televeien 3 Sandvikaveien 41 Thormøhlensgate 53 D Pirsenteret, Havnegata 9 0349 Oslo 4879 Grimstad 2312 Ottestad 5006 Bergen Postboks 1266 Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 7462 Trondheim Telefax (47) 22 18 52 00 Telefax (47) 37 04 45 13 Telefax (47) 62 57 66 53 Telefax (47) 55 31 22 14 Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 Internett: www.niva.no Telefax (47) 73 54 63 87 Tittel Løpenr. (for bestilling) Dato Vefsnfjorden. Beskrivelse av hydrofysiske forhold i fjordens indre 5939-2010 3.3.2010 del. Prosjektnr. Sider 29321 23 Forfatter(e) Fagområde Distribusjon Jarle Molvær Oseanografi Fri Geografisk område Trykket Nordland NIVA Oppdragsgiver(e) Oppdragsreferanse Alcoa Mosjøen Helge Nes Sammendrag Det gis en oversikt over vannmasser og strømforhold i ca. 0-30 m dyp i den indre delen av Vefsnfjorden. Vannmasser og strømforhold ned til 6-8 m dyp preges av den store ferskvannstilførselen fra Vefsna, som danner et 2-5 m dypt brakkvannslag som raskt strømmer ut fjorden – og en mindre og langsommere inngående sjøvannsstrøm under denne. Typisk strømhastighet i brakkvannslaget synes å være 0,1-0,3 m/s. Strømmålinger i 10 m dyp og 5 m over bunnen like utenfor havneområdet viste at for ca. 90% av målingene var <2 cm/s og maksimal hastighet var 7 cm/s.
    [Show full text]
  • Soapstone in the North Quarries, Products and People 7000 BC – AD 1700
    UBAS University of Bergen Archaeological Series Soapstone in the North Quarries, Products and People 7000 BC – AD 1700 Gitte Hansen and Per Storemyr (eds) 20179 Soapstone in the North Quarries, Products and People 7000 BC – AD 1700 UniversityUBAS of Bergen Archaeological Series Soapstone in the North Quarries, Products and People 7000 BC – AD 1700 Gitte Hansen and Per Storemyr (eds) 9 2017 UBAS – University of Bergen Archaeological Series 9 Copyright: Authors, 2017 University of Bergen Bergen University Museum and Department of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and Religion P.O. Box 7800 NO-5020 Bergen NORWAY ISBN: 978-82-90273-90-8 UBAS 9 UBAS: ISSN 0809-6058 Editors of this book Gitte Hansen Per Storemyr Editors of the series UBAS Nils Anfinset Randi Barndon Knut Andreas Bergsvik Søren Diinhoff Lars L. Forsberg Layout Beate Helle, Bergen University Museum Cover: Arkikon, www.arkikon.no Print 07 Media as Peter Møllers vei 8 Postboks 178 Økern 0509 Oslo Paper: 100 g Arctic volume white Typography: Adobe Garamond Pro and Myriad Pro Preface This book has been a long time in the making. It is an outcome of the five Norwegian University Museums’ joint research programme Forskning i Felleskap (FIF, 2010–2015), supported by the Research Council of Norway. FIF kindly facilitated a number of workshops and meetings between archaeologists, geologists and craftspeople, all with a common interest in premodern soapstone quarrying and use. The result is the chapters of this book, which are based on studies carried out over the last two decades and, for the most part, are published scientifically for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluering Av Bekjempelsesmetoder for Gyrodactylus Salaris Rapport Fra Ekspertgruppe
    Utredning 2008-7 Evaluering av bekjempelsesmetoder for Gyrodactylus salaris Rapport fra ekspertgruppe Miljøsamarbeid Naturområder Dyr og planter Friluftsliv og arealbruk Evaluering av bekjempelsesmetoder for Gyrodactylus salaris Rapport fra ekspertgruppe Utredning 2008-7 Ekstrakt: Abstract: En uavhengig ekspertgruppe har evaluert An independent expert group has evaluated ulike bekjempelsesmetoder som har vært different methods which have been used to Utgiver: brukt i kampen mot G. salaris. exterminate G. salaris. Direktoratet for naturforvaltning Rotenonbehandling har vist seg å være en Rotenone treatment has turned out to be Dato: effektiv metode for å utrydde G. salaris i effective in exterminating G. salaris from Juni 2008 små og mellomstore vassdrag. Av 21 små small and middle-sized rivers. Of 21 treat- og mellomstore, fullskala behandlinger ments in small and middle-sized rivers 17 Antall sider: resulterte 17 (81 %) i friskmelding. I store (81 %) turned out to be successful. In large 140+vedlegg vassdrag har imidlertid metoden vært lite rivers, however, the method has not shown effektiv idet kun en av sju behandlinger har the same efficiency since only one out of Emneord: gitt friskmelding. seven treatments has been successful. Gyrodactylus salaris, lakseparasitt, bekjempelse, rotenon, Behandling med surt aluminium kan, under In experimental conditions, treatment with aluminiumsulfat, fiskesperre eksperimentelle betingelser, være vellykket acid aluminium may be successful in exter- når det gjelder å utrydde G. salaris uten at minating G. salaris without harming the laksunger berøres i vesentlig grad. Et forsøk young salmon. An extermination attempt in a Keywords: på utryddelse i et fiskeanlegg var ikke vel- hatchery was, however, not successful. There Gyrodactylus salaris, salmon lykket.
    [Show full text]
  • Planbeskrivelse Detaljregulering For
    PLANBESKRIVELSE Revidering av Detaljregulering for «Tømmervika» i Alstahaug kommune, gbnr. 85/5, 129, 130, 131, 132 og 133 Plan ID: 20150059 Plankonsulent: Prodeco AS, Hallgeir Bjørkavåg Forfatter: Dr. landskapsøkolog Annette Bär Dato: 14.06.2016 Innhold 1 Bakgrunn............................................................................................................................................... 4 2 Planprosessen ....................................................................................................................................... 4 3 Planstatus og rammebetingelser .......................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Overordnete planer ....................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Temaplaner.................................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Gjeldende reguleringsplaner ......................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Statlige retningslinjer/rammer/føringer ....................................................................................... 6 4 Beskrivelse av planområdet, eksisterende forhold .............................................................................. 7 4.1 Beliggenhet .................................................................................................................................... 7 4.2
    [Show full text]
  • Skogstatistikk 1961 Og 1962 Forestry Statistics OGES OISIEE SAISIKK II
    oges oisiee saisikk, ekke II oways Oicia Saisics, seies II ekke II yk 64 Nr. 127 Økonomisk utsyn over året 1963 Economic survey — 128 Veterinærvesenet 1959 Service veterinaire — 129 Folketelling 1960 III Folkemengden etter næring, stilling og sosial status Population census III Population by industry, occupation and status - 130 Meieribruket i Noreg 1962 Norway's dairy industry - 131 Elektrisitetsstatistikk 1962 Electricity statistics - 132 Psykiatriske sykehus 1961 Hospitals for mental disease - 133 Folketelling 1960 IV Utdanning Population census IV Education - 134 Samferdselsstatistikk 1962 Transport and communication statistics — 135 Helsestatistikk 1962 Health statistics — 136 Utenrikshandel 1963 I External trade I — 137 Kredittmarkedstatistikk 1962 Credit market statistics - 138 Kommunevalgene 1963 Municipal elections - 139 Forsikringsselskaper 1962 Societes d'assurances - 140 Folketelling 1960 VIII Trossamfunn, fødested m. v. Population census VIII Religious denomination, place of birth etc. - 141 Syketrygden 1962 National health insurance - 142 Statistisk årbok 1964 Statistical yearbook of Norway — 143 Industristatistikk 1962 Industrial statistics - 144 Fiskeristatistikk 1962 Fishery statistics 145 Norges postverk 1963 Statistique postale - 146 Folkemengdens bevegelse 1962 Vital statistics and migration statistics — 147 Utenrikshandel 1963 II External trade II - 148 Psykiatriske sykehus 1962 Hospitals for mental disease — 149 Jordbruksstatistikk 1963 Agricultural statistics — 150 Alkoholstatistikk 1963 Alcohol statistics 151 Folketelling
    [Show full text]
  • Strontium Isotope Composition of the Bindal Batholith, Central Norwegian
    Strontium isotope composition of the Bindal Batholith , Central Norwegian Caledonides 0 YSTEIN NORDGULEN & BJ0 RN SUNDVOLL Nordgulen,0 & Sundvoll,B. 1992: Strontium isotope composition of the Bindal Batholith, Central Norwe gian Caledonides. Nor. geol. unders . Bull. 423, 19-39. A strontium isotope study of the Bindal Batholith has been carried out. The data generally do not permit precise and accurate age calculations; however, good estimates for initial Sr ratios are commonly obtained. Low initial ratios (c. 0.704-0.705) with little internal variation are pres ent in granitoids in the southeastern part of the oatnontn. Rocks with intermediate initial ratios (0.705­ 0.710 ) predominate and are present throughout most of the bathouth, whereas very high ratios (> 0.715) are found in tour maline granites and anatectic granitoids in the west. Considering a subduct ion related setting for the pluton ism , tne geographical distribution of Sr initial ratios would be consistent with a westward -dipping subduction zone. Contamination of the magmas at the level of emplacement is thought to be of minor importance, and disturba nce of the isotope system by secondary alterat ion appears to be relatively uncom­ mon. Cons iderable isotopic variation within plutons are prob ably a result of isotopic hetero geneity in the source materials which has not been obliterated by magmatic processes. The range in Sr initial ratios in the Bindal Batho lith reflec ts that the granitoids were derived in variable proportions from relatively non-r adiogen ic upper mantle to lower crust as well as isotopically heterogeneous crusta l rocks. 0 ystein Nordgulen, Norges geologisKeunderseketse.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Plan for Vannforvaltning»
    0 Frist for høringsinnspill: 31. mai 2021 Hvordan gi innspill? Høringsinnspill sendes til Nordland fylkeskommune, e-post [email protected] . Høringsinnspill kan også lastes opp via nettsiden: https://www.nfk.no/politikk/du-kan- bestemme/horinger/aktive/ . Alternativt kan innspill sendes per post til: Nordland fylkeskommune, Fylkeshuset, 8048 Bodø. Post merkes med «Regional plan for vannforvaltning». Kontaktinformasjon: Leder for vannregionen fylkesråd Kirsti Saxi [email protected] Seksjonsleder for plan og ressursutvikling Katrine Erikstad [email protected] Rådgiver Lars Ekker [email protected] Rådgiver Håkon Roald [email protected] Forsidebilde: Andøy bading. Foto: Nordland fylkeskommune 1 Innhold Vårt verdifulle vann (forord) ................................................................................................................... 6 Kortversjon av planen (sammendrag) ..................................................................................................... 9 DEL 1: Planbeskrivelse med vurdering i henhold til forskrift om konsekvensutredning og naturmangfoldloven kapittel II .............................................................................................................. 14 1 Vi trenger en plan for vannet (planbeskrivelse) ............................................................................ 15 Bakgrunn for vannforvaltningen ........................................................................................... 15 Hvorfor trenger vi en plan om vannforvaltning? (formål) ...................................................
    [Show full text]