DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning and Costing of Agricultural Adaptation in the Integrated Hill Farming Systems of Nepal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning and Costing of Agricultural Adaptation in the Integrated Hill Farming Systems of Nepal Planning and costing of agricultural adaptation in the integrated hill farming systems of Nepal Bikash Paudel, B.B. Tamang, Krishna Lamsal and Pratima Paudel September, 2011 Planning and costing of agricultural adaptation with reference to integrated hill farming systems in Nepal Contacts: Local Initiatives for Biodiversity, Research and Development (LI-BIRD), P.O. Box 324, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal • Tel: (+977) 61 535357/526834 • Fax: (+977) 61 539956 • E-mails: Bikash Paudel: [email protected]; B.B. Tamang: [email protected]; Krishna Lamsa: [email protected]; Pratima Paudel: [email protected] International Institute for Environment and Development, IIED, 80-86 Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1X 8NH, UK • Tel: +44 (0)20 3463 7399 • Fax: +44 (0)20 3514 9055 • Email: [email protected] Citation: Paudel, B., Tamang, B.B., Lamsal, K. and Paudel, P. 2011. Planning and costing of agricultural adaptation with reference to integrated hill farming systems in Nepal. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London, UK. This report is part of a five-country research project on planning and costing agricultural adaptation to climate change, led by the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) and the Global Climate Adaptation Partnership (GCAP). This project was funded by the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) under the Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Policy Research Programme. All omissions and inaccuracies in this document are the responsibility of the authors. The views expressed do not necessarily represent those of the institutions involved, nor do they necessarily represent official policies of DFID Acknowledgement: The contribution of stakeholders, including the DDC, DADO and DLSO in Dhading, the DoA, DLS, NARC, MOAC and ASC in Benighat, and the VDCs in Jogimara and Salang, is duly acknowledged. The technical contributions of Mr Keshab Thapa, Mr Sajal Sthapit, Mr Abishkar Subedi, Dr S.N. Neopane, Ms Rachana Devkota, Dr R.B. Rana, Ms Laxmi Rai and Mr Durga N. Shrestha are also acknowledged. We appreciate the participation of the communities in Salang and Jogimara. Lastly, thanks go to IIED, SEI and GCAPP for technical support. - 1 - Planning and costing of agricultural adaptation with reference to integrated hill farming systems in Nepal Table of contents Acronyms and abbreviations .................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary .................................................................................................................. 6 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Country background ...................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Agriculture as the mainstay of the Nepalese economy ................................................. 7 1.3 The intersection of food insecurity and climatic vulnerability ......................................... 7 1.4 The growth of the Nepalese economy and sensitivity to weather variability ................. 8 1.5 Nepalese farming systems and altitude differentials ..................................................... 9 1.5.1 The unique integrated hill farming system ........................................................... 9 1.5.2 The importance of the integrated hill farming system to Nepal .......................... 10 1.5.3 The indifference of government policy towards the integrated hill farming system ............................................................................................ 11 2. Case study objectives and methodology ........................................................................... 12 2.1 Objectives of the case study ........................................................................................ 12 2.2 Methodology for the case study ................................................................................... 12 2.2.1 General characteristics of the sites .................................................................... 13 2.2.2 Agricultural characteristics of the sites .............................................................. 14 2.2.3 Tools and techniques......................................................................................... 14 3. Impacts of climate change ................................................................................................. 17 3.1 Increase in temperature; increase in intensity of rainfall; and longer dry spells .......... 17 3.2 Locally-observed trends are similar to the predictions ................................................ 18 3.3 Impacts of climate change observed by communities ................................................. 18 3.4 Effects of climate change on the farming systems ...................................................... 20 3.4.1 Perceptions of the respondents regarding changes in productivity of major crops/animals in the farming system ................................................... 20 3.4.2 Major causes perceived by farmers for the decrease in the productivity of major crops/animals in the farming system ................................................................. 21 3.4.3 Effects of reduced precipitation on the farming system ..................................... 23 3.4.4 Increased frequency of extreme weather events ............................................... 25 3.4.5 Effects on the livestock system .......................................................................... 25 3.5 Other significant recent changes in the farming system not directly attributed to climate change ....................................................................................................... 25 3.6 Climate change as a contributing factor to overall changes ........................................ 26 - 2 - Planning and costing of agricultural adaptation with reference to integrated hill farming systems in Nepal 4. Planning for adaptation ...................................................................................................... 28 4.1 Adaptation pathway and signatures ............................................................................ 28 4.1.1 Descriptions of the adaptation signatures .......................................................... 29 5. Cost of adaptation signatures ............................................................................................ 32 5.1 Costing at different levels (household, community, district and national) ................... 32 5.2 Costs of immediate and long-term signatures ............................................................. 34 5.3 Distribution of costs for agricultural development (and in particular for adaptation) ... 35 5.4 Implications drawn from costing of the adaptation signatures .................................... 36 5.5 Distribution of costs for adaptation among different stakeholders .............................. 37 6. Institutional and policy analysis for agricultural adaptation in Nepal .................................. 38 6.1 Institutional analysis ..................................................................................................... 38 6.2 Current fund flow in agricultural development and climate change adaptation ............ 40 6.2.1 Trends of government expenditure in related sectors ....................................... 40 6.2.2 Possibilities for private sector investment .......................................................... 41 6.2.3 Trend of foreign aid in the agricultural sector .................................................... 41 6.2.4 Bilateral and multilateral donors ........................................................................ 42 6.3 Analysis of climate change and development policies ................................................ 43 6.4 Climate change information ......................................................................................... 44 6.5 Integration of climate change knowledge in current agriculture plans ......................... 45 7. Conclusions and policy messages ..................................................................................... 46 References ............................................................................................................................. 47 - 3 - Planning and costing of agricultural adaptation with reference to integrated hill farming systems in Nepal Acronyms and abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank AICC Agriculture Information and Communication Centre AMD Agrometeorological Division ASC Agriculture service centre CC Climate change CCM Climate Change Management Division CFUG Community forest user group CRISTAL Community-based Risk Screening Tool – Adaptation and Livelihoods DADO District agriculture development office Danida Danish International Development Agency DDC District development committee DFID Department for International Development, UK DFO District forest office DHM Department of Hydrology and Meteorology DIO District irrigation office DLS Department of Livestock Services DLSO District livestock service office DoA Department of Agriculture DoC Department of Cooperatives DoF Department of Forests DoI Department of Irrigation DSC Department of Soil Conservation DSCO District soil conservation office FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FY Financial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Real Crisis of Scottish Agriculture
    Scottish Government Yearbook 1985 THE REAL CRISIS OF SCOTTISH AGRICULTURE DUNCAN CAMPBELL DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH Scottish and British agriculture has over the past fifty years undergone a transformation so profound that it is barely recognisable from the past. State support, technological innovation, new practices, new products have all transformed the agrarian economy and society of Scotland, and, in many places, the face of the land itself. This article attempts to identify and evaluate the most important economic and political developments bearing upon Scottish agriculture in the Seventies and Eighties. We start, however, with a brief history of agriculture support policies in Britain. The "Great Depression" to 1939 British agriculture reached its zenith of prosperity in the 1860s. Around 1875 it entered a period of sustained depression-of falling product and land prices, lower rents and untenanted farms- which was to continue for almost forty years, ending only with the outbreak of world war. It was in this period that farming finally ceased to be Britain's major industry, unable to compete with imports of cheap grain and meat from Latin America, Australia, New Zealand and the American prairies. The effects of what became known as the "Great Depression" were most marked in the wheat growing areas of England. Scottish farming, being more dependent on stock activities and with only a small-scale involvement in wheat production, survived the shock of the depression better. If Symon is to be believed this was due also in no small measure to the moral sturdiness and resourcefulness of the Scottish farmer, who countered adversity by, " ..
    [Show full text]
  • Forests and Watershed Profile of Local Level (744) Structure of Nepal
    Forests and Watershed Profile of Local Level (744) Structure of Nepal Volumes: Volume I : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 1 Volume II : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 2 Volume III : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 3 Volume IV : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 4 Volume V : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 5 Volume VI : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 6 Volume VII : Forest & Watershed Profile of Province 7 Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Department of Forest Research and Survey Kathmandu July 2017 © Department of Forest Research and Survey, 2017 Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part should mention the title and credit DFRS. Citation: DFRS, 2017. Forests and Watershed Profile of Local Level (744) Structure of Nepal. Department of Forest Research and Survey (DFRS). Kathmandu, Nepal Prepared by: Coordinator : Dr. Deepak Kumar Kharal, DG, DFRS Member : Dr. Prem Poudel, Under-secretary, DSCWM Member : Rabindra Maharjan, Under-secretary, DoF Member : Shiva Khanal, Under-secretary, DFRS Member : Raj Kumar Rimal, AFO, DoF Member Secretary : Amul Kumar Acharya, ARO, DFRS Published by: Department of Forest Research and Survey P. O. Box 3339, Babarmahal Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: 977-1-4233510 Fax: 977-1-4220159 Email: [email protected] Web: www.dfrs.gov.np Cover map: Front cover: Map of Forest Cover of Nepal FOREWORD Forest of Nepal has been a long standing key natural resource supporting nation's economy in many ways. Forests resources have significant contribution to ecosystem balance and livelihood of large portion of population in Nepal. Sustainable management of forest resources is essential to support overall development goals.
    [Show full text]
  • National 4/5 Geography Rural Change Summary Notes and Past
    National 4/5 Geography Rural Change Summary Notes and Past Paper Questions 1 National 4/5 Geography Rural Change By the end of this unit you will: 1. Be able to explain key terms in farming 2. Be able to describe and explain the main characteristics of a rural landscape in a developed country (extensive commercial farming in East Anglia) 3. Be able to describe and explain changes that have taken place, the reasons and the impact of these, in a rural landscape in a developed country 4. Be able to describe and explain the main characteristics of a rural landscape in a developing country (intensive subsistence farming in India) 5. Be able to describe and explain changes that have taken place, the reasons and the impact of these, in a rural landscape in a developing country Introduction Types of Farming Intensive Farming Intensive farms generally take up a fairly small area of land, but aim to have a very high output, through massive inputs of capital and labour. These farms use machines and new technologies to become as efficient and cost-effective as possible. Extensive Farming Extensive farming is the direct opposite of intensive farming. The farms are large in comparison to the money injected into them or the labour used. The cattle ranches of central Australia area good example of extensive agriculture, where often only a few farm workers are responsible for thousands of acres of farmland. Subsistence Farming Subsistence farmers only produce enough to feed themselves and their family, without having any more to sell for profit.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctoral Dissertation Vulnerability, Impact and Adaptation to Climate
    Doctoral Dissertation Vulnerability, Impact and Adaptation to Climate Change: Livelihoods of Chepang Community in the Rural Mid-Hills of Nepal Luni PIYA Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation Hiroshima University September 2012 Vulnerability, Impact and Adaptation to Climate Change: Livelihoods of Chepang Community in the Rural Mid-Hills of Nepal D095259 Luni PIYA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation of Hiroshima University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2012 We hereby recommend that the dissertation by Ms. Luni PIYA entitled “Vulnerability, Impact and Adaptation to Climate Change: Livelihoods of Chepang Community in the Rural Mid-Hills of Nepal” be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY. Committee on Final Examination: Keshav Lall MAHARJAN, Professor Chairperson Shinji KANEKO, Professor Kensuke KAWAMURA, Associate Professor Koki SEKI, Associate Professor Akinobu KAWAI, Professor The Open University of Japan Date: Approved: Date: Akimasa FUJIWARA, Professor Dean Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation Hiroshima University Dedicated to my first learning institution, my parents: Iswar Kumar Shrestha and Mana Maya Shrestha Without the firm academic foundation that you have built for me right from my childhood, I could have never achieved this academic milestone today Summary of the dissertation Occurrence of climate change is no longer a contested issue. Whilst many researches have focused on the biophysics of climate change, the social dimensions have been neglected at least until recently. This research focuses on the socio-economic aspects of climate change. Such types of studies are more important for policy implications compared to the bio-physical studies as factors like temperature and rainfall are beyond the immediate influence of the policy makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Hill Agriculture: Challenges and Opportunities∗
    Ind. Jn. of Agri.Econ. Vol.66, No.1, Jan.-March 2011 Hill Agriculture: Challenges and Opportunities∗ Tej Partap† I PREFACE The Farmers Commission, “Serving farmers and saving farming” points to rising acute agricultural distress in the rainfed areas of the country, which also includes hilly areas. It lists five basic cause factors that are central to the crisis; unfinished land reforms, water scarcity, technology fatigue-access-adequacy, institutional support and opportunities for marketing. While working for the National Commission on Farmers as a hill agriculture expert, the contributions on the hill agriculture perspective, gathered knowledge and information about the Himalayan farmers’ state of affairs, of global experiences etc., made by me in compiling the hill farmers section of the main report of the commission also form the basis of this paper. The focus of this paper is on highlighting the challenges facing hill farmers and how they can be addressed. The paper first dwells on the scale and dimensions of the problems of hill farmers including the two most significant common concerns, increasing crop land scarcity and water scarcity to maintain agriculture on marginal lands. It explains various dimensions of the new thinking on marginal lands and implications. The next section, describes how similar problems were addressed by other nations successfully. To highlight the point that technological options are and have been available, the report cites examples of right technological hits of the Himalayan region. The last section analyses the opportunities to find solutions to the hill farmers’ distress. Much of the farming development efforts made in the hills in the past were based on the poor understanding of the hill/mountain conditions, resources, environment and the socio-cultural setting of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • What Determines Indigenous Chepang Farmers' Swidden Land-Use Decisions in the Central Hill Districts of Nepal?
    sustainability Article What Determines Indigenous Chepang Farmers’ Swidden Land-Use Decisions in the Central Hill Districts of Nepal? Sharif A. Mukul 1,2,3,* and Anja Byg 4 1 Tropical Forests and People Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland 4556, Australia 2 Centre for Research on Land-Use Sustainability, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh 3 Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA 4 Social, Economic and Geographical Science Group, The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-041-664-8544 Received: 28 May 2020; Accepted: 30 June 2020; Published: 1 July 2020 Abstract: Swidden or shifting cultivation is a widespread yet controversial land-use in the tropical forest–agriculture frontier. In recent years, the extent of land under swidden and the people who rely on it for subsistence and income have declined. We report swidden land-use changes in two central hill districts of Nepal by indigenous Chepang communities—a stronghold of swidden cultivation in mountainous Nepal. Despite a common trend of swidden decline, as in other parts of South and Southeast Asia, we found that swidden is important in the life and livelihoods of smallholder rural Chepang farmers in the area. Swidden cultivation was found to be more important to farmers with limited off-farm opportunities and in areas where alternative land-uses were scarce. We discuss biophysical, socio-economic, institutional, and other key drivers affecting farmers’ decision to shift away from or continue with swidden in the area. Using linear mixed effect models, we also examined households’ attributes that may expedite swidden decisions in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming in the Uplands
    House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Farming in the Uplands Third Report of Session 2010–11 Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/efracom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 9 February 2011 HC 556 Published on 16 February 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and its associated bodies. Current membership Miss Anne McIntosh (Conservative, Thirsk and Malton) (Chair) Tom Blenkinsop (Labour, Middlesborough South and East Cleveland) Thomas Docherty (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) Richard Drax, (Conservative, South Dorset) Bill Esterson (Labour, Sefton Central) George Eustice (Conservative, Camborne and Redruth) Barry Gardiner (Labour, Brent North) Mrs Mary Glindon (Labour, North Tyneside) Neil Parish (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Dan Rogerson (Liberal Democrat, North Cornwall) Amber Rudd (Conservative, Hastings and Rye) Nigel Adams (Conservative, Selby and Ainsty) and Mr David Anderson (Labour, Blaydon) were members of the Committee during this inquiry. Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Earthquake: One Year On
    ne year has passed since a devastating magnitude-7.8 earthquake struck Nepal on 25 April 2015, with the epicenter about 80 kilometers northwest of the capital, Kathmandu. This was the worst disaster to hit Nepal in decades. Only 17 days later a second earthquake of magnitude 7.4 hit near Mount Everest, taking more lives and destroying more homes. According to government estimates, the earthquakes EXECUTIVE Oleft over 750,000 houses and buildings destroyed or damaged and caused over 8,790 deaths. It is estimated that the earthquakes affected the lives of approximately eight million people, constituting almost one-third of the population of Nepal. With the situation dire, the Nepal government declared a state of emergency, and appealed for international aid. Along with other agencies, Habitat SUMMARY for Humanity answered the call to assist the people of Nepal. During the emergency phase, Habitat distributed 5,142 temporary shelter kits to families whose homes were destroyed or left uninhabitable. Habitat volunteers removed 650 tons of earthquake rubble, and distributed 20,000 water backpacks to families in earthquake-affected areas. As the emergency phase ended, Habitat’s programs shifted into reconstruction. Engineers completed safety assessments on 16,244 earthquake- damaged homes. Initial construction began on permanent homes in the community in Kavre district. As months passed, winter brought the threat of cold weather exposure, and Habitat distributed 2,424 winterization kits to families at risk to the elements. In addition, 32 trainers and 632 people in affected communities received instruction on the Participatory Approach for Safe Shelter Awareness. Overall in the first year since the earthquakes, Habitat for Humanity provided assistance to more than 43,700 families through various disaster response programs.
    [Show full text]
  • ZSL National Red List of Nepal's Birds Volume 5
    The Status of Nepal's Birds: The National Red List Series Volume 5 Published by: The Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK Copyright: ©Zoological Society of London and Contributors 2016. All Rights reserved. The use and reproduction of any part of this publication is welcomed for non-commercial purposes only, provided that the source is acknowledged. ISBN: 978-0-900881-75-6 Citation: Inskipp C., Baral H. S., Phuyal S., Bhatt T. R., Khatiwada M., Inskipp, T, Khatiwada A., Gurung S., Singh P. B., Murray L., Poudyal L. and Amin R. (2016) The status of Nepal's Birds: The national red list series. Zoological Society of London, UK. Keywords: Nepal, biodiversity, threatened species, conservation, birds, Red List. Front Cover Back Cover Otus bakkamoena Aceros nipalensis A pair of Collared Scops Owls; owls are A pair of Rufous-necked Hornbills; species highly threatened especially by persecution Hodgson first described for science Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson and sadly now extinct in Nepal. Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of participating organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of any participating organizations. Notes on front and back cover design: The watercolours reproduced on the covers and within this book are taken from the notebooks of Brian Houghton Hodgson (1800-1894).
    [Show full text]
  • Updates of Dhading
    20th May 2015 Updates of Dhading: Joint team of Area Humanitarian Coordinator (AHC), Area Security Coordinator (ASC) of RC Nepalgunj, OCHA Officer, Gorkha Hub ER Coordinator (UNDP) conducted a joint field visit to Dhading. The team met with DDRC members and Humanitarian Actors in Dhading. Meeting with CDO (The meeting was attended By the AHC of Gorkha hub, ASC, OCHA, UNDP) 1) Meeting with CDO. (The meeting was attended By the AHC of Gorkha hub, OCHA, UNDP). Gorkha AHC introduced the Humanitarian hub to the CDO with explanation about the mandate of the Gorkha hub and OCHA and Early Recovery (UNDP) in brief. Gorkha Hub ER Coordinator briefed CDO about the three pillars of ER, its importance and Organizational arrangement of MOFALD being the lead and UNDP being the Co- lead. 2) Second Meeting with CDO before the departure from Dhading (The meeting was attended by Gorkha Hub ER Coordinator and OCHA Officer): In response to the question of OCHA Officer Question regarding the urgent needs, CDO emphasized on the Transitional shelter, WASH and Health. The CDO also clarified that the response has been completed and we should start with early recovery projects. 3) Meeting With LDO (The meeting was attended by Gorkha Hub ER Coordinator and OCHA Officer): ER Coordinator briefed LDO about the three Pillars of ER in detail. Out of 50 VDCs in Dhading district, five VDCs in the northern part are still inaccessible by road and trek. Trekking routes were also blocked due to the Landslides. 90 % of the building of these VDCs totally destroyed and 10 % are partially destroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mountain Institute Pragatishil Pahad Project
    THE MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE PRAGATISHIL PAHAD PROJECT OCTOBER 2016 INTRODUCTION The Mountain Institute had been earthquake affected working areas. PPP is an integration of the MAPs implementing a program on the program in central and eastern Nepal Focusing on advancing the long-term sustainable cultivation of Medicinal with additional support for rebuilding. resilience of these hard-hit and Aromatic Plants (MAPs) since communities, as well as rehabilitating The project is being implemented in 2009 in Rasuwa, Dhading, Gorkha and their livelihoods and ecosystems on partnership with three local NGOs: (i) Sankhuwasabha districts with the which they depend, TMI designed the Rural Tourism and Environmental support from numerous individuals “Pragatishil Pahad Project” (PPP) for a Education Society in Rasuwa; (ii) and foundations. period of two years. The Project’s goal Health, Education, Empowerment After the devastating 2015 was to support 2,000 households in and Development in Dhading and earthquakes, TMI was committed to the most remote mountain Gorkha; and (iii) Upper Arun Valley continue supporting the communities communities of Rasuwa, Dhading, Development and Conservation where we have been working through Gorkha and Sankhuwasabha Society in Sankhuwasabha. The project the years, post-earthquake as well. districts to rebuild their lives and is also coordinating with the District TMI focused on providing strategic livelihoods in a manner that Disaster Relief Committees (DDRC) relief support, followed by a post- improves their resilience to future
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Population Estimates As of May 1, 2015 for More on Methodology, Updates and Datasets: &
    Nepal Population Estimates as of May 1, 2015 For more on methodology, updates and datasets: www.flowminder.org & www.worldpop.org The Flowminder team pioneered the analysis of mobile network data to support responses to natural disasters and epidemics (Zanzibar 2009 malaria, Haiti 2010 earthquake and cholera outbreak). WorldPop is the leading open data repository for population densities and distributions, and is Flowminder’s main dissemination platform. Nepal has 23 million mobile phone subscribers out of a population of 27 million people. Ncell has a market share of 46% [1]. For these estimates we analyze the movements of de-identified Ncell SIM cards which made or received at least one call during the week prior to the earthquake (April 25) and which also made or received at least one call after the earthquake. The former criterion excludes relief workers arriving after the earthquake, while the latter excludes SIM cards that were lost or destroyed in the earthquake. Population movement estimates are calculated by combining de-identified data on SIM card movements with available population data. Changes in mobility pattern are identified by comparing SIM card movements to normal pre-earthquake movements. Estimates will be updated and calibrated as more data becomes available. Processing infrastructure is currently being developed to allow timely future updates. Mobile phone use is relatively lower in several groups including women, children, the elderly, and the poorest. If these groups have substantially different movement patterns than groups with high mobile phone use, results will be biased. In general the relative distributions of flows across the country are more reliable than absolute numbers given per area.
    [Show full text]