DOCSLIB.ORG

(CGE Marcoussis), G. Huet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(CGE Marcoussis), G. Huet The FINITE STRING Newsletter Announcements Announcements The Program Committe consists of: James Allen, Norm Badler, Mike Bauer, Wayne Davis, Mark Fox, Bill Havens, Hector Levesque, Charles Morgan, John NELS Meeting and Workshop Mylopoulos, Zenon Pylyshyn, Reid Smith, and Doug The Twelfth Annual Meeting of the North-Eastern Skuce. The Proceedings Editor is Brian Funt. Linguistic Society will be held November 6-8, 1981, at Correspondence should be addressed to: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Plans are Gordon McCalla, General Chairman also being made to hold a workshop immediately be- CSCSI/SCEIO Conference fore the Meeting on the topic "Free Word-Order and Department of Computational Science Syntactic Configuration". Questions to be addressed University of Saskatchewan at the workshop include: what are the functions of Saskatoon, Sask. CANADA S7N 0W0 word-order in syntax and semantics? what degrees of freedom are there of word-order? how should the Nick Cercone, Program Chairman different functions and degrees of word-order be ex- CSCSI/SCEIO Conference pressed within a theory of universal grammar? Computing Science Department Simon Fraser University For further information contact: Burnaby, B.C. CANADA V5A 1S6 NELS Committee Department of Linguistics and Philosophy M.I.T., 20C-128 ECAI-82: Call for Papers Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 The 1982 European Conference on Artificial Intel- ligence will be held July 12-14, 1982, in Orsay, France CSCSI/SCEIO: Call for Papers (just after COLING-82). The conference is sponsored by the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence The Fourth National Conference of the Canadian and the Simulation of Behavior (AISB), and succeeds Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence/ to the AISB meetings on Artificial Intelligence held at Soci6t6 Canadienne pour Etudes d'intelligence par Brighton (1974), Edinburgh (1976), Hamburg (1978), Ordinateur will be held at the University of Saskatche- and Amsterdam (1980). It is concerned with all as- wan in Saskatoon, Canada, May 17-19, 1982, in con- pects of Artificial Intelligence and its applications. junction with the 1982 National Conference of the Invited speakers include H. Berliner (Carnegie-Mellon Canadian Information Processing Society. Papers are University, Pittsburgh), H. Gallaire (CGE Marcoussis), solicited in all areas of Artificial Intelligence, including G. Huet (INRIA, Paris), R. Kowalski (Imperial Col- expert systems, natural language understanding, lege, London), R. Schank (Yale University, New Haven). knowledge representation, heuristic problem solving, automatic programming, computer perception and Both regular and short papers will be considered, vision, image analysis and understanding, robotics, but a paper should be submitted to the Program Chair- programming systems for AI, psychological aspects of man for one category only. The conference language AI, automatic theorem proving, learning, social impli- is English. Regular papers must not exceed 15 type- cations of AI, and advanced applications. written pages (A4 format). Short papers must not exceed 5 typewritten pages (A4 format). Papers in Four copies of an extended abstract of 1500-2000 both categories should include name(s) and words (6-10 double-spaced pages) must be submitted address(es) of the author(s), a 100-word abstract, and before December 7, 1981. All submissions will be a list of descriptive keywords. All papers will be re- read by several members of the program committee fereed. Office and/or home telephone number(s) and evaluated on the basis of significance, originality, should be included in an accompanying letter when and overall quality. The abstract must summarize the submitting a paper. Final papers must be typed novel ideas, contain enough information about the camera-ready on special forms for inclusion in the scope of work, and include comparisons to the rele- Conference Proceedings. The submission deadline is vant literature. November 30, 1981; notification of acceptance will be Authors will be notified of acceptance or rejection made by February 15, 1982; and camera-ready copy by January 31, 1982. The accepted papers, typed on will be due March 15, 1982. Conference Proceedings special forms, will be due March 21, 1982. Each ac- will be ready for distribution at the conference. cepted paper will be allotted 25 minutes (presentation The members of the Program Committe are: L. plus brief question period). Bolc (Warsaw), A. Bundy (Edinburgh), G. Guiho Information concerning local arrangements will be (Paris), I. Havel (Prague), L. Henschen (Evanston), Y. available from the general chairman. Proceedings will Kodratoff (Paris), J. Mayhew (Sheffield), D. Michie be distributed at the conference, and will be subse- (Edinburgh), R. de Mori (Turin), L.M. Pereira (Lisbon), quently available for purchase from CIPS. R. Poppelstone (Edinburgh), P. Raulefs (Bonn), D. 182 American Journal of Computational Linguistics, Volume 7, Number 3, July-September 1981 The FINITE STRING Newsletter Announcements Sleeman (Leeds), N.S. Sridharan (New Brunswick), W. FID/CR Secretariat Wahster (Hamburg), Y. Wilks (Colchester). Woogstr. 36a General inquiries about the conference should be D-6000 Frankfurt 50, WEST GERMANY addressed to: Yves Kodratoff, General Chairman Cognition and Brain Theory: Call for Papers Institut de programmation Cognition and Brain Theory is a new multidiscipli- 4, Place Jussieu nary journal devoted to issues in mind, brain, and F-75230 Paris Cedex 05, France language. The Editors are planning a special issue on 33-1-329 12 21, ext. 53-90 the topic of methodological principles for any one of For further information on details of submission con- the following disciplines: philosophy, psychology, -tact: linguistics, artificial intelligence, or brain theory. The Peter Raulefs, Program Chairman paper should delineate the key principles for framing Institut fur Informatik III and investigating problems as well as the criteria for Universitat Bonn evaluating solutions. The paper should also include a Postfach 2220 discussion of the ways in which the method of the D-5300 Bonn 1, WEST GERMANY discipline considered may relate -- or fail to relate 49-228-738721 to other methods in the cognitive sciences. One paper will be selected for each of the five disciplines men- tioned above. Optimum size is 20-30 typewritten Classification Research: Call for Papers pages. The 4th International Study Conference on Classi- For further information contact: fication Research will take place in Augsburg, near Dr. Martin Ringle, Editor Munich, from June 28 to July 2, 1982, together with Cognition and Brain Theory the 6th Annual Conference of the German Society for LEA, Inc. Classification. The conference is sponsored by the 365 Broadway F6d6ration Internationale de Documentation (FID) Hillsdale, New Jersey 07642 and is being hosted by the German Society for Docu- mentation in connection with the German Institution for Standardization. Cognitive Science at Buffalo The theme of the conference is Universal Classifi- The State University of New York at Buffalo has cation: Subject Analysis and Ordering Systems. Un- formed a Graduate Group in Cognitive Science to der this topic universal classification systems are dealt promote cognitive science research within the universi- with, and it is suggested that classification should be ty. The Graduate Group was founded by faculty and approached from a universal point of view, even when graduate students from the Departments of Communi- using special classification systems and thesauri. cation Sciences and Disorders, Computer Science, There will be plenary meetings and workshops with Education, Law, Linguistics, Philosophy, and Psychol- presentations and discussions of contributions from all ogy; members of other departments are being encour- aged to join this interdisciplinary endeavor. The chief those active and interested. Three major areas have concerns of the Graduate Group are in the areas of been identified for contributions: (1) general princi- language and knowledge representation. The first ples and policies, (2) structure and logics of classifica- Director of the Graduate Group is Stuart C. Shapiro tion systems, and (3) practical use and empirical inves- of the Department of Computer Science. tigation. Additional sessions organized by the Special Interest Group on Numerical Taxonomy of the Society During the 1980-81 academic year, discussions for Classification will be devoted to numerical me- were held on such topics as intentionality, metaphor, thods in classification. semantic representation, syntax and cognition, commu- nicative competence (and its development) and theo- Theoreticians and practitioners in the field of or- ries of reference. In addition to continuing these tri- ganization of knowledge (classification) are invited to weekly discussions, a series of colloquia in cognitive send abstracts of possible papers between 500 and science will be presented during the 1981-82 academic 1000 words in length by December 1, 1981. A jury year. In addition, several interdisciplinary graduate will then select the papers for presentation and authors courses in cognitive science are currently being plan- will be notified. Papers presented will be published in ned. The Graduate Group intends to expand their a proceedings volume. Papers will be due by May 1, activities to developing a pre- and post-doctoral pro- 1982. gram in cognitive science, along with the facilities Abstracts should be sent to: necessary to support
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Things and Places the Jean Nicod Lectures Franc¸Ois Recanati, Editor
    Things and Places The Jean Nicod Lectures Franc¸ois Recanati, editor The Elm and the Expert: Mentalese and Its Semantics, Jerry A. Fodor (1994) Naturalizing the Mind, Fred Dretske (1995) Strong Feelings: Emotion, Addiction, and Human Behavior, Jon Elster (1999) Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness, John Perry (2001) Rationality in Action, John R. Searle (2001) Varieties of Meaning, Ruth Garrett Millikan (2004) Sweet Dreams: Philosophical Obstacles to a Science of Consciousness, Daniel C. Dennett (2005) Reliable Reasoning: Induction and Statistical Learning Theory, Gilbert Harman and Sanjeev Kulkarni (2007) Things and Places: How the Mind Connects with the World, Zenon W. Pylyshyn (2007) Things and Places How the Mind Connects with the World Zenon W. Pylyshyn A Bradford Book The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England ( 2007 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any elec- tronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] or write to Special Sales Department, The MIT Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. This book was set in Stone Serif and Stone Sans on 3B2 by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong, and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pylyshyn, Zenon W. Things and places : how the mind connects with the world / by Zenon W. Pylyshyn. p. cm.—(The Jean Nicod lectures) ‘‘A Bradford book.’’ Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
    [Show full text]
  • Author Title 1 ? Mennyi? Szamok a Termeszetben 2 A. DAVID REDISH
    Author Title 1 ? Mennyi? Szamok a termeszetben 2 A. DAVID REDISH. BEYOND THE COGNITIVE MAP : FROM PLACE CELLS TO EPISODIC MEMORY 3 Aaron C.T.Smith Cognitive mechanisms of belief change 4 Aaron L.Berkowitz The improvising mind: cognition and creativity in the musical moment 5 AARON L.BERKOWITZ. THE IMPROVISING MIND : COGNITION AND CREATIVITY IN THE MUSICAL MOMENT 6 AARON T. BECK. COGNITIVE THERAPY AND THE EMOTIONAL DISORDERS 7 Aaron Williamon Musical excellence: strategies and techniques to enhance performance 8 AIDAN FEENEY, EVAN HEIT. INDUCTIVE REASONING : EXPERIMENTAL, DEVELOPMENTAL, AND COMPUTATIONAL APPROACHES 9 Alain F. Zuur, Elena N. Ieno, Erik H.W.G.Meesters A beginner`s guide to R 10 Alain F. Zuur, Elena N. Ieno, Erik H.W.G.Meesters A beginner`s guide to R 11 ALAN BADDELEY, Michael W. EYSENCK, AND Michael MEMORYC. ANDERSON. 12 ALAN GILCHRIST. SEEING BLACK AND WHITE 13 Alan Merriam The anthropology of music RYTHMES ET CHAOS DANS LES SYSTEMES BIOCHIMIQUES ET CELLULAIRES. ENGLISH. BIOCHEMICAL 14 ALBERT GOLDBETER OSCILLATIONS AND CELLULAR RHYTHMS : THE MOLECULAR BASES OF PERIODIC AND CHAOTIC BEHAVIOUR 15 Albert S Bregman Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound 16 Albert-Laszlo Barabasi Network Science 17 Alda Mari, Claire Beyssade, Fabio del Prete Genericity 18 Alex Mesoudi Cultural Evolution: how Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences 19 Alexander Easton The cognitive neuroscience of social behaviour. 20 ALEXANDER TODOROV Face Value the irresistible influence of first impression 21 ALEXANDER TODOROV, Susan T. FISKE & DEBORAHSOCIAL PRENTICE. NEUROSCIENCE : TOWARD UNDERSTANDING THE UNDERPINNINGS OF THE SOCIAL MIND 22 ALEXANDRA HOROWITZ INSIDE OF A DOG : WHAT DOGS SEE, SMELL, AND KNOW 23 Alfred Blatter Revisiting music theory: a guide to the practice 24 Alison Gopnik Bolcsek a bolcsoben: hogyan gondolkodnak a kisbabak 25 Alison Gopnik A babak filozofiaja 26 ANDREW DUCHOWSKI EYE TRACKING METHODOLOGY : THEORY AND PRACTICE 27 Andrew Gelman Bayesian Data Analysis 28 ANDREW GELMAN ..
    [Show full text]
  • Things and Places: How the Mind Connects with the World
    Things and Places: How the Mind Connects With the World Zenon W. Pylyshyn Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science Forthcoming, 2007, MIT Press (Jean Nicod Lecture Series) i 11/26/2006 Table of contents Preface & Acknowledgements Chapter 1. Introduction to the Problem: Connecting Perception and the World 1.1 Background 1.2 What’s the problem of connecting the mind with the world? Doesn’t every computational theory of vision do that ? 1.3 The need for a direct way of referring to certain individual tokens in a scene 1.3.1 Incremental construction of representations (and a brief sketch of FINSTs) 1.3.2 Using descriptions to pick out individuals 1.3.3 The need for demonstrative reference in perception 1.4 Some empirical phenomena illustrating the role of Indexes 1.4.1 Tagging/marking individual objects for attentional priority 1.4.2 Argument binding 1.4.3 Subitizing 1.4.4 Subset selection 1.5 What are we to make of such empirical demonstrations? Chapter 2. Indexing and tracking individuals 2.1 Individuating and tracking 2.2 Indexes and primitive tracking 2.3 What goes on in MOT? 2.3.1 FINSTs and Object Files 2.3.2 The explanation of tracking 2.4 Other empirical and theoretical issues surrounding MOT 2.4.1 Do we track by keeping a record of locations? 2.4.2 Can we select objects voluntarily? 2.4.3 Tracking without keeping track of labels 2.4.4 Nonconceptual individuation without reference? 2.5 Infants capacity for individuating and tracking objects 2.6 Summary and Implications for the Foundations of Cognitive Science 2.6.1 Review: Nonconceptual functions and Natural Constraints 2.6.2 Summary: Why are FINSTs needed? Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE John Bickle December 2020
    CURRICULUM VITAE John Bickle December 2020 Mailing Address: Department of Philosophy and Religion P.O. Box JS Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS 39762 (662) 325-2382 fax: (662) 325-3340 E-mail Addresses: [email protected] URLs: http://www.philosophyandreligion.msstate.edu/faculty/bickle.php https://www.umc.edu/Education/Schools/Medicine/Basic_Science/Neurobiology/John_Bi ckle,_PhD.aspx ___________________________________________________________________________ CURRENT ACADEMIC POSITIONS Professor (Tenured) of Philosophy Mississippi State University Affiliate Faculty Department of Neurobiology and Anatomical Sciences University of Mississippi Medical Center EDUCATION B.A. University of California, Los Angeles, June 1983 M.A., Ph.D. University of California, Irvine, June 1989 Field: Philosophy; Scientific Concentration: Neurobiology. Doctoral Dissertation: Toward a Scientific Reformulation of the Mind-Body Problem AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Philosophy of Neuroscience, Philosophy of Science (especially Scientific Reductionism), Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Cognition and Consciousness AREAS OF COMPETENCE Moral Psychology and the Moral Virtues, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Logical Positivism (especially the Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap), Libertarian Political Philosophy ______________________________________________________________________________ PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS (94) BOOKS (4) 2014 Engineering the Next Revolution in Neuroscience. (Co-authors: Alcino J. Silva and Anthony Landreth).
    [Show full text]
  • Pylyshyn: Mental Imagery
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2002) 25, 157–238 Printed in the United States of America Mental imagery: In search of a theory Zenon W. Pylyshyn Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, Busch Campus, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020. [email protected] http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/faculty/pylyshyn.html Abstract: It is generally accepted that there is something special about reasoning by using mental images. The question of how it is spe- cial, however, has never been satisfactorily spelled out, despite more than thirty years of research in the post-behaviorist tradition. This article considers some of the general motivation for the assumption that entertaining mental images involves inspecting a picture-like object. It sets out a distinction between phenomena attributable to the nature of mind to what is called the cognitive architecture, and ones that are attributable to tacit knowledge used to simulate what would happen in a visual situation. With this distinction in mind, the paper then considers in detail the widely held assumption that in some important sense images are spatially displayed or are depictive, and that examining images uses the same mechanisms that are deployed in visual perception. I argue that the assumption of the spatial or depictive nature of images is only explanatory if taken literally, as a claim about how images are physically instantiated in the brain, and that the literal view fails for a number of empirical reasons – for example, because of the cognitive penetrability of the phenomena cited in its favor. Similarly, while it is arguably the case that imagery and vision involve some of the same mechanisms, this tells us very little about the nature of mental imagery and does not support claims about the pictorial nature of mental images.
    [Show full text]
  • Return of the Mental Image: Are There Really Pictures in the Brain?
    Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.7 No.3 March 2003 113 Return of the mental image: are there really pictures in the brain? Zenon Pylyshyn Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA In the past decade there has been renewed interest in The picture theory of mental images the study of mental imagery. Emboldened by new find- Despite the problem of stating clearly what it means for ings from neuroscience, many people have revived the imagistic thought to be pictorial, claims that mental idea that mental imagery involves a special format of images have a special picture-like (or depictive) format thought, one that is pictorial in nature. But the evidence have persisted. One of the few explicit statements and the arguments that exposed deep conceptual and concerning what this means ([3], p. 5), defines a depictive empirical problems in the picture theory over the past representation as ‘…a type of picture, which specifies the 300 years have not gone away. I argue that the new locations and values of configurations of points in a space. evidence from neural imaging and clinical neuro- … [in which] each part of an object is represented by a psychology does little to justify this recidivism because pattern of points, and the spatial relation among these it does not address the format of mental images. I also patterns… correspond to the spatial relations among the discuss some reasons why the picture theory is so parts themselves.’ For obvious reasons I refer to such resistant to counterarguments and suggest ways in theories as ‘picture theories’.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Brian Patrick Keane October 2020
    CURRICULUM VITAE Brian Patrick Keane October 2020 University of Rochester Medical Center www.keanelab.com Department of Psychiatry ORCID: 0000-0002-7011-3380 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 603 [email protected] Rochester, NY 14642 Twitter: @BrianKeaneLab ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. • Asst. Professor of Psychiatry with a secondary appointment in Neuroscience (tenure track), 2/2020 – present, University of Rochester Medical Center. • Member, Center for Visual Science, 6/2020 – present, University of Rochester. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ • Asst. Professor of Psychiatry (tenure track), 3/2015 – 1/2020, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. • Research Associate, 11/2011 – 3/2015, University Behavioral Health Care. • Postdoctoral Fellow, 10/2009 – 10/2011, University Behavioral Health Care, Center for Cognitive Science. EDUCATION University of California, Los Angeles, CA from 2004–2009 (degree awarded 12/2009). Doctor of Philosophy: Psychology. Dissertation: Beyond phenomenological connectedness: Functional consequences of filling-in during contour interpolation. Committee: Philip Kellman (Chair), Hongjing Lu, Dario Ringach, Ladan Shams, Joaquin Fuster (outside). Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ from 1999–2004 (degree awarded 05/2006). Doctor of Philosophy: Philosophy. Certificate in Cognitive Science. Dissertation: Visual objects: Philosophical and cognitive science perspectives. Committee: Brian McLaughlin (Chair), Zenon Pylyshyn, Jerry Fodor, Alvin Goldman. University of Pittsburgh, PA, University Honors College, from 1995–1999 (degrees awarded 08/1999). Bachelor of Arts, Triple Major: Physics & Astronomy, Spanish, Philosophy (Intensive). Bachelor of Philosophy: Philosophy. Thesis: Constructive empiricism and minimal epistemic realism: A critical comparison. Advisors: Wesley Salmon and John Earman. G.P.A.: 3.85/4.00. RESEARCH INTERESTS • Visual perceptual abnormalities in schizophrenia: contour grouping and 3D shape perception deficits.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Vision Continuous with Cognition? the Case for Cognitive Impenetrability of Visual Perception
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (1999) 22, 341–423 Printed in the United States of America Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception Zenon Pylyshyn Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 [email protected] ruccs.rutgers.edu/faculty/pylyshyn.html Abstract: Although the study of visual perception has made more progress in the past 40 years than any other area of cognitive science, there remain major disagreements as to how closely vision is tied to cognition. This target article sets out some of the arguments for both sides (arguments from computer vision, neuroscience, psychophysics, perceptual learning, and other areas of vision science) and defends the position that an important part of visual perception, corresponding to what some people have called early vision, is prohibited from accessing relevant expectations, knowledge, and utilities in determining the function it computes – in other words, it is cognitively im- penetrable. That part of vision is complex and involves top-down interactions that are internal to the early vision system. Its function is to provide a structured representation of the 3-D surfaces of objects sufficient to serve as an index into memory, with somewhat differ- ent outputs being made available to other systems such as those dealing with motor control. The paper also addresses certain concep- tual and methodological issues raised by this claim, such as whether signal detection theory and event-related potentials can be used to assess cognitive penetration of vision. A distinction is made among several stages in visual processing, including, in addition to the inflexible early-vision stage, a pre-per- ceptual attention-allocation stage and a post-perceptual evaluation, selection, and inference stage, which accesses long-term memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Indexes and Nonconceptual Reference1
    Notes for the NYU Language and Mind Seminar: Please do not quote (I reserve the right to change my mind!) Visual Indexes and Nonconceptual Reference1 Zenon Pylyshyn, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science (Notes for NYU’s Language and Mind Seminar, March 2, 2004) First a little historical background Just as Moliere's Monsieur Jourdain discovered that he had been speaking prose all his life without realizing it, so I discovered not too long ago that what I had been doing without realizing it occupied a position in the philosophical landscape. It turns out that coming from a very different perspective I had taken a position on a set of questions that philosophers had been worrying about for much of the past 30 or more years. My clandestine involvement in philosophical issues began when a computer science colleague and I were trying to build a model of geometrical reasoning that would draw a diagram and notice things in the diagram as it drew it [1]. One problem we found we had to face was that if the system discovered a right angle it had no way to tell whether this was the intersection of certain lines it had drawn earlier, and if so which particular lines. Moreover, the model had no way of telling whether this particular right angle was identical to some bit of drawing it had earlier encountered and represented as, say, the base of a particular triangle. There was, in other words, no way to determined the identity of an element (I will use this neutral term until I discuss what qualifies as an element) at two different times if it was represented differently at those times.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Properties and the Computational Model of Mind
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1990 Semantic properties and the computational model of mind. Randall K. Campbell University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Campbell, Randall K., "Semantic properties and the computational model of mind." (1990). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 2062. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/2062 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UMASS/AMHERST 312Qt,bQ13S7t.lDS S) (j DATE DUE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AT AMHERST LD 3234 M267 1990 C1895 SEMANTIC PROPERTIES AND THE COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF MIND A Dissertation Presented by RANDALL K, CAMPBELL Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 1990 Department of Philosophy Copyright by (7) Randall K. Campbell 1990 All Rights Reserved SEMANTIC PROPERTIES AND THE COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF MIND A Dissertation Presented by RANDALL K. CAMPBELL Approved as to style and content by: Gareth Matthews, Chair Bruce Aune, Member Fred Feldman, Member Neil Stillings, Member! ABSTRACT
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Systematicity
    Systematicity: An Overview John Symons1 and Paco Calvo2 1 University of Kansas 2 Universidad de Murcia Introduction In 1988 Jerry Fodor and Zenon Pylyshyn published “Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis.” Their article presented a forceful and highly influential criticism of the explanatory relevance of neural network models of cognition. At the time, connectionism was reemerging as a popular and exciting new field of research, but according to Fodor and Pylyshyn, the approach rested on a flawed model of the human mind. Connectionism is the view that the mind can be understood in terms of an interconnected network of simple mechanisms. Its proponents contend that cognitive and behavioral properties can be modeled and explained in terms of their emergence from the collective behavior of simple interacting and adaptive mechanisms. According to Fodor and Pylyshyn, connectionist approaches neglect an essential feature of thought – its systematic nature. On their view, the basic psychological fact that thoughts are intrinsically related to some other thoughts in systematic ways becomes inexplicable if one denies that representations are structured in a syntactically and semantically classical combinatorial manner. 1 Connectionism, they argued, inevitably fails to provide a meaningful explanation of cognition insofar as it confuses the intrinsically systematic nature of thought with a system of associations.2 Connectionism might shed some light on the way that cognitive architectures happen to be implemented in brains, but the explanation of cognition does not take place at the level of biology or hardware. A cognitive architecture must be systematic to the core in order to shed light on the intrinsically systematic character of cognition.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Imagery Debate Over? If So, What Was It About?
    Draft of Mehler Festschrift paper Pylyshyn, Z.W. IS THE IMAGERY DEBATE OVER? IF SO, WHAT WAS IT ABOUT? Zenon Pylyshyn Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ Background Jacques Mehler was notoriously charitable in embracing a diversity of approaches to science and to the use of many different methodologies. One place where his ecumenism brought the two of us into disagreement is when the evidence of brain imaging was cited in support of different psychological doctrines, such as the picture-theory of mental imagery. Jacques remained steadfast in his faith in the ability of neuroscience data (where the main source of evidence has been from clinical neurology and neuro-imaging) to choose among different psychological positions. I personally have seen little reason for this optimism so Jacques and I frequently found ourselves disagreeing on this issue, though I should add that we rarely disagreed on substantive issues on which we both had views. This particular bone of contention, however, kept us busy at parties and during the many commutes between New York and New Jersey, where Jacques was a frequent visitor at the Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science. Now that I am in a position where he is a captive audience it seems an opportune time to raise the question again. I don’t intend to make a general point about sources of evidence. It may even be, as Jacques has frequently said, that we have sucked dry the well of reaction-time data (at least in psycholinguistics), and that it is time to look elsewhere.
    [Show full text]