DOCSLIB.ORG

STAFF REPORT to CISM COMMITTEE – December 6, 2017 10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Agenda Item No. STAFF REPORT TO CISM COMMITTEE – December 6, 2017 10 AGENDA ITEM Discussion on the public comment received at the Thomas Street Phase II PIM held Wednesday, November 29, 2017 BACKGROUND A PIM was held on November 29, 2017 related to the 30% design plans for Thomas Street from South 4th Ave to the Bridge. Comments and responses/recommendations from the design engineer and city staff is or will be included and attached to this staff report. Comments from the PIM are being compiled and reviewed/discussed for the CISM meeting. Once these items are prepared they will be included in the CISM packet prior to the meeting. FISCAL IMPACT None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION N/A Staff contact: Eric Lindman 715-261-6745 Memorandum Date: December 6, 2017 To: File From: Ryan Barz, AECOM Subject: Public Involvement Meeting Minutes Thomas Street: Phase II 4th Avenue – Wisconsin River Bridge City of Wausau, Wisconsin Distribution: Eric Lindman – Director of Public Works and Utilities On Wednesday, November 29, 2017, a public involvement meeting was held at the Wausau City Hall, 407 Grant Street, Wausau, Wisconsin. The meeting was held from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. with a short presentation and an open house format. The purpose of the meeting was to update the public on the project, present information about the conceptual design options, and to receive public comments. Phase I construction of the Thomas Street project from 17th Avenue to 4th Avenue was completed this fall. This project included constructing a two-lane roadway with a raised median and the addition of dedicated turn lanes at the designated intersections. Bicycle accommodations were added along with sidewalk on both sides of the street. Underground sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main were also replaced. The design of Phase II between 4th Avenue and the Wisconsin River Bridge is 30% complete. Like in Phase I, bicycle accommodations and sidewalk are proposed to be included. Underground utilities will be replaced, and dedicated turn lanes are proposed to be added to the intersections. The design will also include a raised median to improve safety and streamline traffic flow. The meeting was announced through a news release and in a letter to adjacent property owners. Approximately 50 people attended the meeting. Exhibits included a handout and full-size aerial drawings showing the proposed 30 percent design. The project displays were available for people to review and the design team was available to answer questions. Written comment forms were also available for people to record and submit their questions and/or concerns about the project. There were 26 written comments received. - 88% of comments came from Wausau residents - 40% of comments came from Thomas Street residents Some of the more recurring comments received either verbally or written are listed below: Public Information Meeting Minutes Thomas Street; 4th Avenue to Wisconsin River Bridge December 6, 2017 Page 2 1. There is concern about the raised median restricting access to residents and businesses. Driveways will not be accessible from both directions on Thomas Street. 2. There is concern about the existing soil contamination within the project area. The disturbed soil will present safety and financial issues. 3. Expanding Thomas Street will be expensive and is not necessary. Where is the money for the project coming from? 4. There was opposition to installing bike lanes on Thomas Street. They feel that this is unsafe for all traveling the roadway. 5. Why propose expanding Thomas Street when it will displace residents that are veterans, mentally ill, minority, and low income? Preserve the neighborhood. 6. Affordable housing is hard to find in the area. The displaced individuals and families will be greatly impacted because of the lack of affordable housing. 7. There was a lot of discussion about the U-turns not being a practical option for access. 8. There will be 1 on 1 conversation with business owners if the project proceeds beyond 30 percent. 9. The Hmong community would like to see some project descriptions and related information in their language. 10. There was concern about the backups 3M causes at certain times of the day with their truck and rail traffic. 11. There were several comments in regards to removing the railroad crossing just east of 1st ave. as it impedes traffic flow significantly. Lori Wunsch From: Eric Lindman Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 7:41 PM To: Lori Wunsch Subject: FW: Phase II Thomas Street Project Please upload to the public comments From: Judith Miller [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:40 AM To: Eric Lindman; Robert Mielke Subject: RE: Phase II Thomas Street Project Having reviewed the proposed construction plans for Thomas Street Phase II from 4th Avenue to the bridge, I have several objections and concerns. 1) The finished construction on the Phase ! aspect of this project clearly reveals that the destruction of the homes and businesses on the north side of the street was utterly unnecessary; further, the appearance of the "new" street is incongruous to the remaining neighborhood; I can only say that, had the original ;proposition of a four-lane road with turning lanes been instituted, we would now be looking at a miplaced would-be superhighway in the middle of a residential neighborhood; 2) The meridians are obviously an impediment to accessing residential and commercial driveways and to moving large vehicles such as campers in and out of driveways; they are clearly an unjustified expense and a glaringly impractical design feature that should certainly NOT be continued into the next phase of this project; 3) The proposed Phase II design also calls for destruction of the low-income housing units in the first building on the right side of the street past the bridge as one is heading west on Thomas which brings back the issue raised when the Kwik Trip wanted space on Bridge Street: where will these tenants go? Wausau has no available low-income housing for them; will the City move them out to Athens? Will they be compensated for loss of shelter? Or will it be only the owner of the building who is compensated? I think all citizens are aware that it will be the owner. I am amazed that the City has not, to the best of my knowledge, even had a serious discussion about the matter of a lack of available low-income housing here, and I strongly object to the idea of uprooting these people whose only recourse may be the Warming Center (when it is open), the Salvation Army Shelter, or seeking refuge under the bridges where they may well be subject to arrest for malingering or some such slight to the City. I submit that the "young professionals" the City is always saying it wants to attract here are unlikely to be drawn to an area which has not found better solutions to the dilemmas of growth than creating an expanding homeless population; 4) I am not aware that the City of Wausau has yet responded to the request of the citizens' group that has asked permission to conduct independent soil sampling of the Thomas Street area to assess the level of contamination there before any further excavation or construction begins; in that the soil sampling ordered by the Mayor was ordered solely by the Mayor, I fail to understand the delay in responding and would urge the City to respond quickly to this request, especially since the first sampling was not done according to well- established protocols as I stated at the last CISM meeting; if there is nothing there to hide, there is no legal or procedural reason for the delay; 5) I will conclude my objections by saying that I can find no rational justification for the expense of what has already been "constructed" on Phase I of Thomas Street or for the destruction of so many properties. and that I strenuously object to a continuation of that approach in Phase II; what construction has already been completed seems clearly to be an advance move toward gentrification of a working-class neighborhood in the hope of driving up real estate values there by attracting higher-priced retail and commercial development so as to better guarantee restitution of the TIF funds, thus enabling the City to propose further destruction of such neighborhoods throughout the Wausau area and so driving out the very people without whom Wausau would not exist; those who were made rich by logging and heavy manufacturing in Wausau would be destitute were it not for working-class people who accepted the hardships of the labor - and I, for one. really do not see the likes of Nordstrom's or Whole Foods rushing to this area. In short, I find the construction plans and the expense engendered by those plans to have no justification; I call on the Mayor to authorize the independent soil testing to be conducted as soon as possible so the public may truly know the extent of any 1 contamination and urge CISM and the City Council to DO NO MORE than correct any wiring/plumbing/electrical problems and then rebuild the rest of Thomas Street within its current footprint without endangering any more of the existing properties. Most sincerely, Judith M. Miller 903 Kickbusch Street Wausau, WI 54403 2 Lori Wunsch From: Eric Lindman Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 7:42 PM To: Lori Wunsch Subject: FW: Thomas Street public comments Please upload to the public comments From: Debra Ryan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 4:25 PM To: Eric Lindman Subject: Thomas Street public comments Hello- Below are my public comments and concerns with the Thomas Street proposed Phase 2 construction from 4th Avenue to the Wisconsin River.
Recommended publications
  • 2016 Event Schedule (March 16, 2016) April Ward Councillor Location Address Sat

    2016 Event Schedule (March 16, 2016) April Ward Councillor Location Address Sat

    2016 Event Schedule (March 16, 2016) April Ward Councillor Location Address Sat. April 2 8 Perruzza Black Creek Pioneer Village 1000 Murray Ross Prkwy (east of Jane St., off Steeles Ave.) Sat. April 2 20 Cressy Central Technical School 725 Bathurst St. (enter off Harbord St. & Borden St.) Sat. April 9 40 Kelly Agincourt Mall 3850 Sheppard Ave. E. (at Kennedy Rd.) Sat. April 9 12 Di Giorgio Amesbury Arena 155 Culford Rd (south of Lawrence Ave. W., east of Black Creek Dr.) Sat. April 16 11 Nunziata Weston Lions Arena 2125 Lawrence Ave. W Sat. April 16 13 Doucette City Parking Lot 2001 Lake Shore Blvd. (east of Ellis Ave.) Sat. April 23 14 Perks Sorauren Park Along Wabash Ave. (south of Dundas St. W.) Sat. April 23 33 Carroll Enbridge Gas West Parking Lot 500 Consumers Rd. (west of Victoria Park Ave.) Sat. April 30 28 McConnell Lower Sherbourne (David Crombie Park) Along Frederick St. (south of The Esplanade) Sat. April 30 19 Layton Fred Hamilton Park Along Shaw St. (south of College St.) May Sat. May 7 35 Berardinetti SATEC @ W.A. Porter Collegiate Institute 40 Fairfax Cres. (west of Warden Ave.) Sun. May 8 21 Mihevc Wychwood Barns Along Wychwood Ave. (south of St. Clair Ave. W.) Thurs. May 12 34 Minnan-Wong Donwoods Plaza 51-81 Underhill Dr. (north of Lawrence Ave. E.) Sat. May 14 18 Bailao Dufferin Mall Parking Lot 900 Dufferin St. (south of Bloor St.) Sat. May 14 4 Campbell Richview Collegiate Institute 1738 Islington Ave. (at Eglinton Ave. W.) Thurs.
  • Hike Leader Training 2018 Saturday April 7Th and Sunday

    Hike Leader Training 2018 Saturday April 7Th and Sunday

    Winter 2017-2018 THE QUARTERLY OF THE TORONTO BRUCE TRAIL CLUB Vol. LIV No. 4 www.torontobrucetrailclub.org | 416-763-9061 | [email protected] Hike Leader Training 2018 Saturday April 7th and Sunday April 8th, 2018 Have you ever considered becoming a Hike Leader for the Toronto Bruce Trail Club? This is your opportunity to give back to your Club and become a trailblazer. The Hike Leader Apprenticeship Program: 1. Attend the two‐day training workshop. 2. Serve as an assistant leader on three TBTC hikes. 3. Organize and lead one TBTC hike with a certified leader from the Club. Prerequisites: 1. You must have completed a two‐day Standard First Aid and Level C CPR course prior to attending the workshop. 2. Hiking experience with the TBTC is strongly recommended. Candidates at the training session will need to have a copy of the 29th edition of the Bruce Trail Reference Guide. These will be offered at a discounted price of $22. Upon successful completion of the apprenticeship program, the TBTC will refund your $60 registration fee and pay $75 towards the cost of your First Aid certification. To register and for more information: Visit the Toronto Bruce Trail Club website, www.torontobrucetrailclub.org or contact the registrar: Andrew Wood, [email protected] photos of the 2016 class, by Alina Lin. top: Peter Leeney instructing left: field practice www.torontobrucetrailclub.org Table of Contents Footnotes Toronto Bruce Trail Club is published quarterly by the Board of Directors (as of October 18, 2017) Hike Leader Training P1 Toronto Bruce Trail Club President: P.O.
  • Tommy Thompson Park Update

    Tommy Thompson Park Update

    Attachment 3: City of Toronto Report for Action REPORT FOR ACTION Tommy Thompson Park Update Date: May 10, 2021 To: Infrastructure and Environment Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Wards: Ward 14 - Toronto-Danforth SUMMARY Tommy Thompson Park (the Park) is the largest component of the broader Leslie Street Spit (the Spit), located at the base of Leslie Street where it meets the shore of Lake Ontario; all components of the Spit will ultimately be consolidated as Tommy Thompson Park (see Attachment 1). The Park is designated in the Official Plan as an Environmentally Significant Area and is recognized internationally as a Canadian Important Bird Area for supporting the conservation of birds and their habitat. The Park is owned by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and managed in partnership between TRCA and the City of Toronto. The Park demonstrates that nature can flourish in cities and contribute to the well-being of city residents; only minutes from downtown, the Park is an escape from the city, and a place to marvel at the force of nature. It is a pet-free urban wilderness that exists as the result of decades of careful management and stewardship of natural succession and habitat restoration processes by TRCA with the support of the City, community groups, and other partners. Its significant and diverse aquatic and terrestrial environments provide habitat for at-risk species who are otherwise challenged by the interrelated impacts of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, urbanization and climate change. The Park's evolution into an urban wilderness can also be attributed to the work of advocacy groups like the Friends of the Spit, founded in 1977 by naturalists advocating for the Spit to grow naturally, without development and the privatization of uses.
  • Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan

    Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan

    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan Date: April 27, 2012 To: Public Works and Infrastructure Committee From: Acting General Manager, Transportation Services Wards: All Wards Reference P:\2012\ClusterB\TRA\TIM\pw12012tim Number: SUMMARY City Council, at its meeting of July 12, 13 and 14, 2011, adopted, as amended, the staff report, titled “Bikeway Network – 2011 Update” (PW5.1) and directed Transportation Services to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on specific links and installation priorities of a multi-year Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan. Transportation Services staff have consulted with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation (PF&R), Hydro One, Toronto Water and a number of other stakeholders, and organized a public open house to receive input from cycling groups and individual cyclists, to identify opportunities for new bikeway trail connections to expand and enhance Toronto's bikeway network. A feasibility assessment was undertaken by staff that included a review of technical and design considerations, network connectivity, property implications, approval requirements and preliminary estimated costs. As a result of this consultation and feasibility assessment, 77 km of new bikeway trails is recommended to build on the existing network of 286 km of bikeway trails. Twelve new trail construction projects, totalling approximately 30 km, and four trail feasibility studies will be undertaken as short term priorities, to be implemented in 1-5 years. Staff also evaluated all of the existing major multi-use trails to identify gaps and links that need to be upgraded. The Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan includes an annual program to upgrade the existing trails where required to improve safety and connectivity.
  • Grand Opening of the Todd Bardes Meadowlands Side Trail by Nancy Tilt, TBTC Conservation Committee

    Grand Opening of the Todd Bardes Meadowlands Side Trail by Nancy Tilt, TBTC Conservation Committee

    Winter 2016-2017 THE QUARTERLY OF THE TORONTO BRUCE TRAIL CLUB Vol. LIII No. 4 www.torontobrucetrailclub.org | 416-763-9061 | [email protected] Grand Opening of the Todd Bardes Meadowlands Side Trail by Nancy Tilt, TBTC Conservation Committee Friends and family, hikers, and Toronto Bruce Trail Club Conservation Committee members, about 75 in all, gathered at Limehouse Com- munity Hall on a beautiful early September Sunday. The occasion was the Grand Opening of a new Side Trail in memory of Todd Bardes, a dedicated and treasured Bruce Trail volunteer. Car and bus thru-hikes had been organized for the day to coincide with the early afternoon opening of the Trail. Peter Leeney, friend of Todd and currently Land Stewardship Director and past President of the Toronto Club, spoke of Todd's long history with the Bruce Trail. Todd joined the Bruce Trail Association in 1994 and had been actively involved with trail activities since 1996 both at the club level, the broader Board level, and most recently as President. In 2001 the Bruce Trail purchased the 39-acre Springle property just north of Limehouse. Todd and his wife, Christina, subsequently took on the role of Land Stewards. Existing ATV disturbance in the mead- owland portion of the property was an issue needing attention. Fellow Bruce Trail volunteer, Andrew Costley, came up with the idea of a community-based and monitored Side Trail through the meadow. Todd, along with support from other volunteers, wholeheartedly agreed, and through their efforts the Side Trail came to life. Andrew Costley, on behalf of all volunteers who knew Todd, spoke Hike Leader Training 2017 of him as a friend and mentor, providing both advice and leadership with wise and patient counsel.
  • The Physical Plan and Its Implications for Active Transportation

    The Physical Plan and Its Implications for Active Transportation

    The Physical Plan and Its Implications for Active Transportation BY JEFFREY WARD, MCIP, LPP above, left and right: Parts of Don Mills’ trails seems virtually indistinguishable from . the Imkerspad in Houten. below, left and right: Shopping in Houten remains small in scale, while Don Mills retailing is focused on the region. SUMMARY In Canada, we build tens of thousands of new homes—detached, semi- Denmark is impractical, since there are detached and low rise apartments—in subdivisions across the land. At best, in our vast cultural diff erences between North planning documents we only pay lip service to the concept of human-powered transpor- Americans and Europeans and that there tation. Few if any examples of suburban land developments show any attempt to are longstanding histories of cycling use in address active transportation (AT) as a real and viable alternative transportation mode. Europe. While it is true that cycling is an We have plenty of trails, but few destinations. We seem to view trails as recreational old tradition there, it is also true that as assets; nothing more. In this article, I’ll compare the Dutch new town of Houten with a recently as the 1970s, bicycling as a travel model suburban Canadian community of about the same mid-20th century vintage— mode was endangered in many European Don Mills, Ontario—Canada’s most famous and infl uential planned community. I’ll cities that are now seen as cycling havens: compare the approach taken towards the physical plan specifi cally as it relates to AT— cars had overrun many urban centres.
  • Breathing New Life Into

    Breathing New Life Into

    Breathing New Life into 2003 Don Watershed Report Card A Message to Those Who Cherish the Don If you brought this report card home to your parents, you would be sent to bed without dinner. Far too many Cs and Ds, not a single A, and — heaven forbid — an F, glaring from the page. But restoration is hardly a series of simple questions and answers that can easily be slotted into good or bad, right or wrong. It's much more than that. It takes a longer view. The grades are nowhere near good enough, true, but some very important groundwork has been laid in the past 10 years to ensure major strides from here on. First off, let's address that F. We know we can do better in caring for water, and now, we have a means to improve that grade through the recently completed Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan for the City of Toronto. Once it's put in place, water quality will improve substantially, not only in the Don River, but everything it feeds. The plan will take at least 25 years to implement; we still must include the munici- palities outside of Toronto into a broader watershed plan. Bold commitments by federal, provincial, and municipal governments must be made to ensure we have the resources required to really make this happen. There are quantifiable victories as well. Thanks to changes to five weirs, salmon and other fish now migrate more freely up the Don for the first time in a century. We have seen the completion of the first phase of the Don Valley Brick Works, and a number of other regeneration projects: Little German Mills Creek, The Bartley Smith Greenway, Milne Hollow, and the establishment of the Charles Sauriol Nature Reserve.
  • West Toronto Railpath Environmental Stewardship Plan

    West Toronto Railpath Environmental Stewardship Plan

    West Toronto Railpath Environmental Stewardship Plan Milkweed plant at Ruskin Avenue Date of Last Revision: August 27, 2017 2 1 Introduction 1.1 The Railpath and the Friends The West Toronto Railpath (the “Railpath”) is a linear park located in the west end of Toronto, in the Junction Triangle neighbourhood. The Railpath is both a human-powered multi-use recreational path and a biologically beneficial nature corridor. Railpath supports many animal and insect species and is part of bio-diverse eco-system. Most of the Railpath is owned by the City of Toronto, and some of it is leased to the City by Canadian Pacific Railway. The West Toronto Railpath became a city park in 2009, and is maintained by the City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The Friends of the West Toronto Railpath (the “Friends”) is a community-based group that was founded in 2001 when members of the Roncesvalles Macdonell Residents’ Association (RMRA), got together, formed a partnership with the Community Bicycle Network and Evergreen to advocate for the creation of WTR. The Friends are dedicated to the maintenance, expansion, and improvement of the Railpath. Our vision is for the Railpath to be a community connector, an ecological asset, a meeting place for the neighbourhood, and a resource for the whole city. 1.2 History of the Railpath Planting The Railpath is located on land that was once a CP railway spur line serving industries in the west end of Toronto (see photo below). The land was purchased in 2003 by the City of Toronto. Old Bruce service track, looking south from Wallace Wallace Ave Looking North, October, 2009 Ave.
  • Exhibition Place Master Plan – Phase 1 Proposals Report

    Exhibition Place Master Plan – Phase 1 Proposals Report

    Acknowledgments The site of Exhibition Place has had a long tradition as a gathering place. Given its location on the water, these lands would have attracted Indigenous populations before recorded history. We acknowledge that the land occupied by Exhibition Place is the traditional territory of many nations including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples and is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit and Metis peoples. We also acknowledge that Toronto is covered by Treaty 13 with the Mississaugas of the Credit, and the Williams Treaties signed with multiple Mississaugas and Chippewa bands. Figure 1. Moccasin Identifier engraving at Toronto Trillium Park The study team would like to thank City Planning Division Study Team Exhibition Place Lynda Macdonald, Director Don Boyle, Chief Executive Officer Nasim Adab Gilles Bouchard Tamara Anson-Cartwright Catherine de Nobriga Juliana Azem Ribeiro de Almeida Mark Goss Bryan Bowen Hardat Persaud David Brutto Tony Porter Brent Fairbairn Laura Purdy Christian Giles Debbie Sanderson Kevin Lee Kelvin Seow Liz McFarland Svetlana Lavrentieva Board of Governors Melanie Melnyk Tenants, Clients and Operators Dan Nicholson James Parakh David Stonehouse Brad Sunderland Nigel Tahair Alison Torrie-Lapaire 4 - PHASE 1 PROPOSALS REPORT FOR EXHIBITION PLACE Local Advisory Committee Technical Advisory Committee Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Association Michelle Berquist - Transportation Planning The Bentway Swinzle Chauhan – Transportation Services
  • Toronto Central Waterfront Public Forum #2

    Toronto Central Waterfront Public Forum #2

    TORONTO CENTRAL WATERFRONT PUBLIC FORUM #2 Queens Quay Revitalization EA Bathurst Street to Lower Jarvis Street Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Schedule C) December 08, 2008 1 WATERFRONT TORONTO UPDATE 2 Central Waterfront International Design Competition 3 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 4 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 5 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 6 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 7 East Bayfront Waters Edge Promenade: Design Underway 8 Spadina Wavedeck: Opened September 2008 9 Spadina Wavedeck: Opened September 2008 10 Spadina Wavedeck: Opened September 2008 Metropolis Article 11 Rees Wavedeck: Construction Underway 12 Simcoe Wavedeck: Construction Underway 13 Spadina Bridge: Construction Early-2009 14 What Have We Been Doing for the Past 11 Months? • Consider and follow up on comments from Public Forum 1 • Assess baseline technical feasibility of design alternatives – Over 90 meetings in total: • City and TTC technical staff • Partner agencies •Stakeholders • Landowners/Property Managers • Adjacent project efforts • Advanced transit and traffic modelling • Develop Alternative Design Concepts and Evaluation (Phase 3) • Coordination with East Bayfront Transit EA 15 Study Area: Revised 16 Overview • Review of EA Phases 1 & 2 from Public Forum #1: January 2008 • EA Phase 3: Alternative Design Alternatives – Long list of Design Alternatives – Evaluation of Design Alternatives • Next Steps – Evaluation Criteria for Shortlisted Design
  • Publications (Annual Reports, Brochures)

    Publications (Annual Reports, Brochures)

    Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Tribunal d’appel de l’aménagement local ISSUE DATE: December 04, 2020 CASE NO(S).: PL190242 The Ontario Municipal Board (the “OMB”) is continued under the name Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the “Tribunal”), and any reference to the Ontario Municipal Board or Board in any publication of the Tribunal is deemed to be a reference to the Tribunal. PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(24) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended Appellant: Damis Properties Limited Appellant: Loblaws Properties Ltd. Subject: Proposed Official Plan Amendment No. OPA 404 Municipality: City of Toronto LPAT Case No.: PL190242 LPAT File No.: PL190242 LPAT Case Name: Damis Properties Limited v. Toronto (City) Heard: November 24, 2020 by Video Hearing APPEARANCES: Parties Counsel City of Toronto Jessica Braun and Michael Mahoney Loblaws Properties Ltd. Patrick Harrington Damis Properties Limited Matthew Lakatos-Hayward for Max Laskin The Independent Order of Michael Cara Foresters MEMORANDUM OF ORAL DECISION DELIVERED BY JATINDER BHULLAR ON NOVEMBER 24, 2020 AND ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL 2 PL190242 [1] This is a decision based on a settlement hearing on consent of the parties. The parties seek final approval of the policies, maps and appendices in the City’s Official Plan Amendment No. 404 (“OPA 404”). In a previous decision dated June 25, 2020, the Tribunal approved OPA 404 in part. The OPA 404 creates the Don Mills Crossing Secondary Plan, which applies to an area generally surrounding the intersection of Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East. [2] Loblaws Properties Ltd. (“Loblaws”) and Damis Properties Limited (“Damis”) had filed appeals of OPA 404 to the Tribunal.
  • BY SCOTT TORRANCE Six Tips for Refreshing the 6Ix

    BY SCOTT TORRANCE Six Tips for Refreshing the 6Ix

    NATURE: THE ULTIMATE DESIGN PARTNER BY SCOTT TORRANCE Six tips for refreshing the 6ix. In the booming city of Toronto, often so distracted by the urban buildings are soaring higher and environment and their devices higher and getting closer and and digital screens, they’ve closer to one another. But amid become disconnected from the concrete, glass and asphalt, natural processes. As the square there is plenty of opportunity for footage of condos gets smaller, parks, nature and people places. the need for natural spaces gets The city’s extensive ravine system bigger. We can’t magically snap and waterfront location are two our fingers and have another of its most valuable assets. And High Park open up in the middle sometimes your best design of downtown Toronto. So we partner can be nature itself. have to find innovative ways to let nature take its course through So how does a deep love of nature the city. square with the hard-edged realities of the city? People are WEST TORONTO RAILPATH, TORONTO VAUGHAN CIVIC CENTRE RESOURCE LIBRARY, TORONTO HERE ARE SIX SUGGESTIONS FOR DESIGNING NATURAL PUBLIC SPACES IN THE 6IX. 1. GO NATIVE Whenever possible, use native, non-invasive plants. These plants are meant to be here; they thrive in the local climate, they support birds and other pollinators, they change with our seasons. And because they’re meant to be here, they pretty much take care of themselves, when planted in the right conditions. Sensitive plant communities and habitat, including a functioning wetland, were key in the design for the West Toronto Railpath, a 2.1 km linear park that runs alongside an active rail corridor in the city’s west end.