DOCSLIB.ORG

Publications (Annual Reports, Brochures)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Publications (Annual Reports, Brochures) Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Tribunal d’appel de l’aménagement local ISSUE DATE: December 04, 2020 CASE NO(S).: PL190242 The Ontario Municipal Board (the “OMB”) is continued under the name Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the “Tribunal”), and any reference to the Ontario Municipal Board or Board in any publication of the Tribunal is deemed to be a reference to the Tribunal. PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(24) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended Appellant: Damis Properties Limited Appellant: Loblaws Properties Ltd. Subject: Proposed Official Plan Amendment No. OPA 404 Municipality: City of Toronto LPAT Case No.: PL190242 LPAT File No.: PL190242 LPAT Case Name: Damis Properties Limited v. Toronto (City) Heard: November 24, 2020 by Video Hearing APPEARANCES: Parties Counsel City of Toronto Jessica Braun and Michael Mahoney Loblaws Properties Ltd. Patrick Harrington Damis Properties Limited Matthew Lakatos-Hayward for Max Laskin The Independent Order of Michael Cara Foresters MEMORANDUM OF ORAL DECISION DELIVERED BY JATINDER BHULLAR ON NOVEMBER 24, 2020 AND ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL 2 PL190242 [1] This is a decision based on a settlement hearing on consent of the parties. The parties seek final approval of the policies, maps and appendices in the City’s Official Plan Amendment No. 404 (“OPA 404”). In a previous decision dated June 25, 2020, the Tribunal approved OPA 404 in part. The OPA 404 creates the Don Mills Crossing Secondary Plan, which applies to an area generally surrounding the intersection of Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East. [2] Loblaws Properties Ltd. (“Loblaws”) and Damis Properties Limited (“Damis”) had filed appeals of OPA 404 to the Tribunal. The appeal filed by Loblaws addressed a number of policies on a Plan-wide basis. The appeal filed by Damis addressed portions of policy 6.5 and Map 40-9 only. The Independent Order of Foresters (“Foresters”) was an Added Party to these proceedings. It sheltered under issues raised by the appellants. WITNESS [3] The only witness was Annely Zonena who is employed by the City as a land use planner. The Tribunal affirmed and qualified Ms. Zonena to provide expert land use planning opinion evidence. Ms. Zonena’s affidavit was marked as Exhibit 1. SETTLEMENT [4] Ms. Zonena opined that the policies in OPA 404 have regard for the provincial interest. She specifically cited s. (h), (k) and (r) of s. 2 of the Planning Act. She elaborated that OPA 404 will provide for the orderly development of safe and healthy communities; the adequate provision of employment opportunities; and the promotion of built forms that are well-designed, encourage a sense of place, and provide for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant. 3 PL190242 [5] Ms. Zonena stated that OPA 404 is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement 2020 (“PPS 2020”). She reviewed policies 1.1.1 a), 1.1.7 e) and 1.6.7.4 and opined that OPA 404 is consistent with these policies. She stated that OPA 404 promotes efficient land use patterns; allows for transit-supportive development, intensification and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns and optimization of transit investment. She stated that OPA 404 aligns with the cross town Eglinton light rail transit implementation. She added that OPA 404 is also supportive of active transportation as set out in PPS 2020. [6] Ms. Zonena opined that OPA 404 conforms to A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2019 as amended (“Growth Plan”). She opines that it maintains the intent and purpose of the City’s Official Plan and has regard for the matters of provincial interest set out in s. 2 of the Planning Act. She states that it also represents good planning and is in the public interest. [7] Thus, based on the uncontroverted evidence of Ms. Zonena and taking into account the consent of the parties, the Tribunal finds that OPA 404 has regard for the provincial interest, is consistent with PPS 2020, conforms to the Growth Plan, and that it maintains the intent and purpose of the City’s Official Plan. Similarly, the Tribunal finds that OPA 404 represents good land use planning and is in the public interest. ORDER [8] The Tribunal orders that the appeals are allowed in part and Amendment No. 404 to the Official Plan of the City of Toronto is modified as set out in Attachment 1 to this order, and as modified is approved. 4 PL190242 “Jatinder Bhullar” JATINDER BHULLAR MEMBER If there is an attachment referred to in this document, please visit www.olt.gov.on.ca to view the attachment in PDF format. Local Planning Appeal Tribunal A constituent tribunal of Ontario Land Tribunals Website: www.olt.gov.on.ca Telephone: 416-212-6349 Toll Free: 1-866-448-2248 ATTACHMENT 1 PL190242 1 City of Toronto By-law 589-2019 Amendment 404 to the Official Plan of the City of Toronto For lands generally in the vicinity of the intersection of Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East, bound by the CP Rail Corridor, Don Mills Road, Wynford Drive, Gervais Drive, Ferrand Drive, Rochefort Drive and a portion of the west branch of the Don River Valley. Amendment 404 to the Official Plan of the City of Toronto is as follows: 1. Chapter 6, Secondary Plans, is amended by adding Secondary Plan No. 40, attached as Schedule I for lands generally in the vicinity of the intersection of Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East, bound by the CP Rail Corridor, Don Mills Road, Wynford Drive, Gervais Drive, Ferrand Drive, Rochefort Drive and a portion of the west branch of the Don River Valley, identified in Map 40-1. 2. Map 3 of the Official Plan is amended by designating the planned right-of-way of Wynford Drive from Don Mills Road to the southbound off-ramp of the Don Valley Parkway to 30 metres, and Gervais Drive from Eglinton Avenue East to Wynford Drive to 27 metres. 3. Schedule 1, Existing Minor Streets with Right-of-Way Widths Greater Than 20 Metres, is amended by removing Gervais Drive – All, and replacing it with the following: Street Name From To Planned Right-of- Way Width Gervais Drive Wynford Drive North End 23 metres 4. Schedule 2: The Designation of Planned but Unbuilt Roads, is amended by adding new planned but unbuilt roads and links as follows: Street Name From To Wynford Drive Extension The intersection of Don Mills Eglinton Avenue East Road and Wynford Drive, running west, then southwest New Link A Don Mills Road, running Eglinton Avenue East southwest, then south New Link C Don Mills Road, running west Wynford Drive Extension New Link D New Link A, running west New Link F New Link E New Link A, running west New Link F New Link F New Link D, running north Wynford Drive Extension New Link G Eglinton Avenue East, running Don Mills Road south from New Link A New Link H New Link G Don Mills Road New Link I Don Mills Road Ferrand Drive New Link J Don Mills Road Gervais Drive New Link K Sonic Way Rochefort Drive 2 City of Toronto By-law 589-2019 Schedule I to Amendment 404 40 – Don Mills Crossing Secondary Plan 1. Vision and Guiding Principles 1.1 The lands subject to the policies of this Secondary Plan are identified on Map 40-1 Secondary Plan Area. Vision 1.2 Development within the Don Mills Crossing Secondary Plan Area will advance the following vision: 1.2.1 Between the branches of the Don River Valley system, a distinct and complete community will emerge around the intersection of Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East that celebrates natural heritage and builds on the area's tradition of cultural and technological innovation. 1.2.2 Supported by new public transit infrastructure, the community will evolve to include a full range of mobility options integrated into a well-designed public realm that supports civic life, intensification, and opportunities to connect the new community with the places and people in the surrounding areas. Guiding Principles 1.3 The following Guiding Principles will inform the Vision: 1.3.1 Create a Vibrant Mixed-Use Community: a. a complete community with varied levels of planned intensification will accommodate a range of land uses, concentrating employment, commercial and community uses in close proximity to transit; b. high quality buildings with a range of built forms, massing and setbacks will frame the public realm with good proportion ensuring a comfortable and positive pedestrian experience; c. civic and community life will be supported by a high quality public realm framed by buildings with active, at-grade uses, appropriate glazing on the lower levels and direct entrances from the public sidewalk; and d. new development and public spaces will reinforce the historical character of the Secondary Plan Area through the conservation of heritage structures and designed landscapes. 3 City of Toronto By-law 589-2019 1.3.2 Connect with Nature and Build Resiliency: a. the Don River Valley system is integral to the Secondary Plan Area's identity. The policies of this Plan provide opportunities for people to both actively engage with and passively enjoy the ravine and its natural heritage; b. new trail connections and views into the valley will integrate the ravine with the community and provide for the protection and enhancement of the natural areas; c. natural systems will inform and be integrated with landscape treatments in both the public realm and private development sites to build resiliency by capturing and treating stormwater, increasing biodiversity, creating new habitat or being a source for low-carbon energy; and d.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Physical Plan and Its Implications for Active Transportation
    The Physical Plan and Its Implications for Active Transportation BY JEFFREY WARD, MCIP, LPP above, left and right: Parts of Don Mills’ trails seems virtually indistinguishable from . the Imkerspad in Houten. below, left and right: Shopping in Houten remains small in scale, while Don Mills retailing is focused on the region. SUMMARY In Canada, we build tens of thousands of new homes—detached, semi- Denmark is impractical, since there are detached and low rise apartments—in subdivisions across the land. At best, in our vast cultural diff erences between North planning documents we only pay lip service to the concept of human-powered transpor- Americans and Europeans and that there tation. Few if any examples of suburban land developments show any attempt to are longstanding histories of cycling use in address active transportation (AT) as a real and viable alternative transportation mode. Europe. While it is true that cycling is an We have plenty of trails, but few destinations. We seem to view trails as recreational old tradition there, it is also true that as assets; nothing more. In this article, I’ll compare the Dutch new town of Houten with a recently as the 1970s, bicycling as a travel model suburban Canadian community of about the same mid-20th century vintage— mode was endangered in many European Don Mills, Ontario—Canada’s most famous and infl uential planned community. I’ll cities that are now seen as cycling havens: compare the approach taken towards the physical plan specifi cally as it relates to AT— cars had overrun many urban centres.
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Cycling Network Plan Update
    IE6.11 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Cycling Network Plan Update Date: June 13, 2019 To: Infrastructure and Environment Committee From: General Manager, Transportation Services Wards: All SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the implementation progress for the City's Cycling Network Plan, establish a priority framework for Major City-Wide Cycling Routes, and share next steps for effective implementation of proposed cycling infrastructure. The Cycling Network Plan, alongside the draft Official Plan cycling policies currently under review, present a strong vision for improving cycling across the city. More people are riding bicycles in Toronto than ever before, especially where new or improved cycling infrastructure has been provided. In some Toronto neighbourhoods, the cycling mode share is now over 20%. Demand for safe, connected cycling routes throughout the city is on the rise, and recent polls demonstrate the majority of residents support protected bike lanes. This report provides information requested by City Council as part of a two year review of the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan (2016), including status, changes to project timing, and recommendations for the initiation of major studies. This updated Cycling Network Plan also reflects enhanced analyses and lessons from implementation challenges to date. Moving forward, the Cycling Network Plan will consist of two components: a near-term capital implementation program for cycling infrastructure (currently 2019 to 2021), and an overall proposed network (currently 2022+). The Cycling Network Plan Update maintains the originally established goals of Connect, Grow, and Renew, with newly articulated objectives and measures that correspond to each of the three overarching goals, providing additional clarity and indicators for evaluating success.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Toronto, ON
    What’s Out There® Toronto Toronto, ON Welcome to What’s Out There Toronto, organized than 16,000 hectares. In the 1970s with urban renewal, the by The Cultural Landscape Foundation (TCLF) waterfront began to transition from an industrial landscape with invaluable support and guidance provided by to one with parks, retail, and housing—a transformation that numerous local partners. is ongoing. Today, alluding to its more than 1,400 parks and extensive system of ravines, Toronto is appropriately dubbed This guidebook provides fascinating details about the history the “City within a Park.” The diversity of public landscapes and design of just a sampling of Toronto’s unique ensemble of ranges from Picturesque and Victorian Gardenesque to Beaux vernacular and designed landscapes, historic sites, ravines, Arts, Modernist, and even Postmodernist. and waterfront spaces. The essays and photographs within these pages emerged from TCLF’s 2014 partnership with This guidebook is a complement to TCLF’s much more Professor Nina-Marie Lister at Ryerson University, whose comprehensive What’s Out There Toronto Guide, an interactive eighteen urban planning students spent a semester compiling online platform that includes all of the enclosed essays plus a list of Toronto’s significant landscapes and developing many others—as well overarching narratives, maps, and research about a diversity of sites, designers, and local themes. historic photographs— that elucidate the history of design The printing of this guidebook coincided with What’s Out There of the city’s extensive network of parks, open spaces, and Weekend Toronto, which took place in May 2015 and provided designed public landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoff Kettel Cathie Macdonald Co-Chair, Fontra Co-Chair, Fontra
    July 14, 2021 12th floor, West Tower, City Hall 100 Queen Street West Toronto, ON M5H 2N2 Attention: Marilyn Toft RE: MM35.4 Completing The Missing Link and Building the East Toronto Railpath - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy (Ward 10, 11) Dear Mayor Tory and Members of City Council, This is to express our strong support for the Members Motion to move forward with this exciting project to convert a disused rail line and bridge to an active transportation corridor in the Don Valley. This will connect and expand the City’s trail system, dramatically expanding recreational opportunities for Torontonians, provide an opportunity to memorialize the historic railway story of Toronto, realise part of the Don Valley Park vision, and create a new tourism magnet for Toronto. The West Toronto Railpath and the Don Mills Trail serve as local models for how rail to trail conversions can provide low cost sustainable recreational opportunities provided other orders of government are willing to cooperate, and providing we (and they) are willing to make the upfront investment. The East Toronto Railpath project is extraordinarily significant as a “place-keeping” opportunity, and we urge City Council to recognize the opportunities therein for Indigenous partnership. We note a couple of possible “flies in the ointment” that the City needs to pay attention to as this project proceeds: The route (undefined) of the VIA RAIL High Frequency Rail Toronto to Ottawa via Peterborough; The site of the Metrolinx Don Valley Train Layover Facility north of the Bloor Viaduct (for which project FoNTRA has requested a federal environmental assessment be conducted).
    [Show full text]
  • Don Mills Crossing Secondary Plan
    Authority: Planning and Housing Committee ~ as adopted by City of Toronto City Council on ~, 20~ CITY OF TORONTO Bill: BY-LAW ~ - 2019 To adopt an amendment to the Official Plan for the City of Toronto respecting the Don Mills Crossing Secondary Plan generally in the vicinity of the intersection of Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East, bound by the CP Rail Corridor, Don Mills Road, Wynford Drive, Gervais Drive, Ferrand Drive, Rochefort Drive and a portion of the west branch of the Don River Valley; and Whereas authority is given the Council under the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13, as amended, to pass this By-law; and Whereas Council of the City of Toronto has provided adequate information to the public and has held at least one public meeting in accordance with the Planning Act: The Council of the City of Toronto enacts: 1. The text and maps attached hereto are adopted as an amendment to the Official Plan for the City of Toronto. 2. This is Official Plan Amendment No. 404. Enacted and passed on ( ), 2019. Frances Nunziata, Ulli S. Watkiss, Speaker City Clerk (Seal of the City) Page 1 of 55 Amendment No. 404 To the Official Plan of the City of Toronto City of Toronto By-law No. ~~-20~ For lands generally in the vicinity of the intersection of Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East, bound by the CP Rail Corridor, Don Mills Road, Wynford Drive, Gervais Drive, Ferrand Drive, Rochefort Drive and a portion of the west branch of the Don River Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Major City-Wide Cycling Routes
    Attachment 2 - Updated Major City-Wide Cycling Routes IE6.11 Attachment 2 CITY OF CITY OF Major City-Wide VAUGHAN MARKHAM Cycling Routes Steeles Ave E Steeles Ave W Steeles Ave W Steeles Ave E Finch Corridor Trail Status of Routes Finch Corridor Trail Kipling Ave Kipling Finch Ave W Martin Grove Rd Rd Grove Martin Finch Ave E Keele St Jane St C2 Beecroft Rd Brimley Rd Rd Brimley Midland Ave Midland Weston Rd C1 Wilmington Ave Ave Wilmington Warden Ave Warden Sheppard Ave E A1 A2 Sheppard Ave E B1 B2 Conlins Rd Humber River Trail Wilson Ave Leslie St The Meadoway Ellesmere Rd Port Union Rd Rd Union Port ve Kingston Rd Yonge St Dufferin St F1 F2 Lawson Rd Lawrence Ave W Rd Avenue Don Mills Trail Warden Hydro Corridor Hydro Warden Lawrence Ave E Morningside A Waterfront Trail The Westway Martin Grove Rd Rd Grove Martin D2 D1 Gatineau Corridor Trail D3 Don Mills Rd Eglinton Ave W Eglinton Ave E Kingston Rd Eglinton Ave E Eglinton Ave W Humber River Trail Brimley Rd Rd Brimley Midland Ave Ave Midland Mt Pleasant Rd Winona Dr Lower Don Trail Avenue Park Victoria Waterfront Trail Bloor St W Bloor St W Bloor St W Danforth Ave ve College St West Toronto Rail Path Path Rail Toronto West Shaw St Shaw Yonge StYonge University A University Waterfront Trail Richmond/Adelaide St Sherbourne Eastern Ave Martin Goodman Trail CITY OF Kipling Ave Kipling MISSISSAUGA Line Brown’s Lake Shore Blvd W Bloor St W Danforth Ave E2 College St E1 Yonge St Yonge ve Shaw St Shaw Dundas St W Bay St Bay Sherbourne St St Sherbourne Data Source: City of Toronto University A University Lower Don Trail Projection: NAD 1927 MTM 3 Sudbury St Richmond St W Richmond St E Eastern Ave Cartography: City of Toronto LAKE Adelaide St W Adelaide St E ± ONTARIO Martin Goodman Trail Date: June 2019 0 2.5 5 10 Km .
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of Toronto (Part 2)
    41 Checklist of Warmwater Fishes of Toronto Fish Status: (N) Native (I) Introduced or Invasive (XP) Extirpated Fish Statistics: (Average Ontario Length, Record Ontario Length, Maximum Age) Common Name Status Comments North American Catfishes Black Bullhead N The Black Bullhead was documented in Toronto in 1927, but has not been recorded since. Black Bullhead and Brown Bullhead are (15.5 cm, 26.0 cm, 10 yrs) difficult to distinguish and it is possible that the fish was misidentified. Brown Bullhead N The Brown Bullhead is Toronto’s most common catfish. The eight fleshy “whiskers” or barbels around the head of the bullhead are filled (28.0 cm, 44.6 cm, 12 yrs) with taste buds that allow it to taste its food before it eats it. Channel Catfish N Canada’s largest catfish, this species is sometimes sought by anglers. It is the only catfish in Toronto with a forked tail. This tail and its (44.5 cm, 88.9 cm, 16 yrs) more streamlined body adapt it for life in swifter waters. Its species name, punctatus, refers to the scattered dark spots on the body. Stonecat N The largest madtom in Canada. Madtoms are small catfishes that have their adipose fin fused to their tail fin. It is usually found under (17.5 cm, 26.7 cm, 7 yrs) stones in fast-flowing segments of streams throughout Toronto. Its fin spines can deliver a painful venomous sting if handled carelessly. Tadpole Madtom N The Tadpole Madtom resembles a tadpole. Like most madtoms, its spines are venomous and, when it stabs, can cause pain similar to a (7.0 cm, 11.7 cm, 3 yrs) bee sting for up to two hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Multi-Use Trail Design Guidelines
    TORONTO MULTI-USE TRAIL DESIGN GUIDELINES Shade Tree Interpretation Signage Fence 1.0m min. Trail Clearance Area of Special Interest 1.0m min. Bench Clearance Figure 3.08: Lateral clearances for rest stops or other trail amenity areas Transportation Services Parks, Forestry & Recreation Toronto Multi-Use Trail Design GuidelinesJanuary 20151 Acknowledgements The Toronto Multi-use Trail Guidelines are a joint project of the City of Toronto’s Transportation Services and Parks, Forestry and Recreation Divisions. The following individuals and their organizations are recognized here for their contribution to the development of these guidelines. CONSULTANT TEAM Victor Ford and Associates Inc Landscape Architects Victor Ford, OALA, CSLA, ASLA Jeremy Craig Lori Philp Mehran Ataee Jocelyn Hirtes with support from Bríd Ní Leidhin, Cole Engineering Group Limited STEERING COMMITTEE Transportation Services Daniel Egan, Manager; Cycling Infrastructure & Programs Jennifer Hyland, Transportation Planner; Cycling Infrastructure & Programs Sibel Sarper, Assistant Planner; Cycling Infrastructure & Programs Parks, Forestry & Recreation Alex Shevchuk, Project Manager, Landscape Architecture Unit; Planning, Design & Development Stewart McIntosh, Landscape Architect; Landscape Architecture Unit; Planning, Design & Development Ruthanne Henry, Project Co-ordinator; Parks Development & Capital Projects Shade Tree Wendy Strickland, Natural Environment Specialist; Natural Environment & Community Programs Shade Tree TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Interpretation Signage Interpretation Signage City Planning Fence Fence 1.0m min. Hamish Goodwin, Urban Designer; Civic Design; City Planning / Design Review Panel Coordinator 1.0m min. Trail Clearance Kristina Reinders, Urban Designer; Civic Design; City Planning Trail Clearance Area of Special Area of Special Interest Engineering and Construction Services Interest Penelope Palmer, Senior Engineer, Capital Works Delivery A 1.0m min. 1.0m min.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition to Develop Innovative Design Options
    COMPETITION BRIEF #2009-60 SUBMISSIONS DUE JUNE 25, 2010 COMPETITION TO DEVELOP INNOVATIVE DESIGN OPTIONS FOR THE GARDINER EXPRESSWAY AND LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD RECONFIGURATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TORONTO, ONTARIO Waterfront Toronto 20 Bay Street, Suite 1310 Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2N8 Canada T 416.214.1344 waterfrontoronto.ca 1 COMPETITION BRIEF #2009-60 Competition to Develop Innovative Design Options for the Gardiner Expressway and Lake Shore Boulevard Reconfi guration Environmental Assessment COMPETITION BRIEF COMPETITION TO DEVELOP INNOVATIVE DESIGN OPTIONS FOR THE GARDINER EXPRESSWAY AND LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD RECONFIGURATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TORONTO, CANADA CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 04 2 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW 06 3 GOALS OF THE COMPETITION 12 4 REQUIRED DESIGN ELEMENTS 13 5 SITE PROGRAM & PROPERTY OWNERSHIP 19 6 STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION 33 7 REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS 34 8 DELIVERABLES AND TIMETABLE 35 9 COMPETITION PROCESS TERMS AND CONDITIONS 37 10 LEGAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 42 11 APPENDICES 48 Waterfront Toronto & City of Toronto 2 April 2010 View of the Gardiner Expressway and Lake Shore Boulevard Corridor looking west from the Don Roadway in Lower Don Lands. 3 COMPETITION BRIEF #2009-60 Competition to Develop Innovative Design Options for the Gardiner Expressway and Lake Shore Boulevard Reconfi guration Environmental Assessment 1 INTRODUCTION Waterfront Toronto (legally known as Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Each selected Proponent that submits a completed proposal will receive an Corporation) and the City of Toronto are seeking input from the world’s honorarium of CA$50,000, subject to conditions set out in this Competition most talented and creative design and engineering professionals in Brief. At the conclusion of the competition, Waterfront Toronto and the City developing bold new concepts for the future of the elevated Gardiner of Toronto may choose to retain one, more than one, or none of the fi rms or Expressway and Lake Shore Boulevard, including the adjacent lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Variance Explanations.Pdf
    ATTACHMENT 5: VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS OPERATING REPORTABLE VARIANCE NOTES ‐ EXPENDITURES (Figures in 000's) A The York Region permit review staff compensation account and Metrolinx environmental assessment review projects have lower than anticipated expenditures as a result of staff gapping. Once these are taken into consideration, the variance is ($328) and ‐8% which is within the acceptable threshold. B The Claremont and Albion Hills Field centre expenditures are lower than anticipated as a result of staff gapping. Once these are taken into consideration, the variance is ($446) and ‐8% which is within the acceptable threshold. C The lower than anticipated recoveries are due to timing, as there were delays in the execution of capital projects. Once this is taken into consideration, the variance is ($1) and 0% which is within the acceptable threshold. OPERATING REPORTABLE VARIANCE NOTES ‐ REVENUES (Figures in 000's) D Revenue is lower than anticipated due to a limited number of high value permit applications throughout 2019. Once this is taken into consideration, the variance is $7 and 0% which is within the acceptable threshold. E The lower than anticipated revenues are as a result of both reduced bookings at Kortright from school board job action in Q4, and staff gapping which resulted in fewer funding applications for education programming support. Once this is taken into consideration, the variance is ($411) and ‐8% which is within the acceptable threshold. F This variance is reflective of the 2018 and 2019 NEER rebate which was received in 2019. Once this is taken into account, the variance is $0 and 0% which is within the acceptable threshold.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning with Uncertainty ——— Planifier Pour Faire Face À L'incertitude
    ’ / 2012 / . 3 . 52 Planning with Uncertainty ——— Planifi er pour faire face à l’incertitude 40010080 PCQ2_2012_00_CoverFull_R1.indd 1 2012-09-19 12:00 PM Edmonton.... a city well planned Edmonton has its eye on the future. Guided by a citizen-driven vision, The Way Ahead, and with billions of dollars worth of investment occurring in Alberta’s capital city, Edmonton is a city fuelled by the energy of its citizens with a solid plan to guide its development to 2040. Learn more about our vision for Edmonton in 2040 at www.edmonton.ca/vision2040 . www.edmonton.ca PCQ2_2012_00_CoverFull_R1.indd 2 2012-09-19 12:00 PM CONTENTS SOMMAIRE PLANNING COLUMNS 2 A Word from the President / Le mot de la Présidente WITH UNCERTAINTY / 4 cip news échos de l’icu 10 From the Editorial Board Chair / PlaniFier POur Le mot du président du Comité de rédaction Planning Journals: Between Orthodoxy and Contrarianism in Challenging Times/Les revues d’urbanisme : jongler entre confor- FAIRE FACE À misme et contre-vérité en période d’incertitude By/par Michael Dudley, MCIP 44 the learning curve / L’incertituDE l’acquisition du savoir Summer School: Learning Beyond the Classroom/L’école d’été : apprendre plan canada | fall · automne 2012 | vol. 52 no. 3 ailleurs qu’en classe By/par Abby Besharah 46 Planning Notes From Home and ARTICLES Abroad/L’Urbanisme Chez Nous 13 WHAT ONTARIO’S GREENBELT 32 A TALE OF TWO SUBURBS: et à L’étranger AND PLACES TO GRow The physical plan and its implications The Spirit of Change: International LEGISLATION MEANS FOR for
    [Show full text]
  • REGULARS FEATURES TFN for All Seasons!
    Number 598 October 2013 Eroded cliff at Warden Woods, watercolour by Gail Gregory (see p 2) REGULARS FEATURES Coming Events 23 TFN for all Seasons! 6 Extracts from Outings Reports 8 From the Archives 19 TFN Financial Statements 11 In the News 21 Proposed TFN By-law Changes 15 Keeping in Touch 16 Monthly Meetings Notice 3 Nominating Committee Report 15 Monthly Meeting Report 7 Diverse Local Members of the Pea Family 17 President’s Report 6 Great Backyard Bird Count Results 18 TFN Outings 4 Weather – This Time Last Year 22 TFN Grant Report: Trees for Toronto 20 TFN 598-2 October 2013 Toronto Field Naturalist is published by the Toronto Field BOARD OF DIRECTORS Naturalists, a charitable, non-profit organization, the aims of President & Outings Margaret McRae which are to stimulate public interest in natural history and to Past President Bob Kortright encourage the preservation of our natural heritage. Issued Vice President & monthly September to December and February to May. Views Monthly Lectures Nancy Dengler expressed in the Newsletter are not necessarily those of the Secretary-Treasurer Charles Crawford editor or Toronto Field Naturalists. The Newsletter is printed Communications Alexander Cappell on 100% recycled paper. Membership & Newsletter Judy Marshall ISSN 0820-636X Monthly Lectures Corinne McDonald Monthly Lectures Lavinia Mohr IT’S YOUR NEWSLETTER! Nature Reserves & Charles Bruce- We welcome contributions of original writing of observations Outings Thompson on nature in and around Toronto (up to 500 words). We also Outreach Stephen Kamnitzer welcome reports, reviews, poems, sketches, paintings and Webmaster Lynn Miller digital photographs. Please include “Newsletter” in the subject line when sending by email, or on the envelope if sent by mail.
    [Show full text]