Binding the Almancı to the “Homeland” – Notes from Turkey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Binding the Almancı to the “Homeland” – Notes from Turkey Binding the Almancı to the “Homeland” – Notes from Turkey Barbara PUSCH* and Julia SPLITT* Abstract The Turkish- German migration movement particular, the last group- the young and highly did not start with the recruitment agreement educated- cannot be called returnees as such in 1961. However, with this agreement, as they were born in the country where their migration from Turkey became a new dynamic. forebears settled. However, this group of young As migration is usually accompanied by return and educated migrants is often lucky in the migration, we may also say that the Turkish- sense that their professional skills correspond to German migration movements have not been the needs of the Turkish labour market. While only characterised by the migration of Turkish previous returnees often drove taxis or delivery citizens to Germany, but also by their return. trucks, built rental houses or set up small Consequently, we can observe different types businesses and became part of the service sector, of return migration parallel to the changing they now work in many different sectors ranging nature of migration movements to Germany from arts and culture to telecommunications, in the last 50 years. Today, more than 50 years engineering, banking and are often involved in after the recruitment agreement, the population the global economy. In this article, we will first with Turkish migration background has give an overview of the return migration from significantly changed. For immigrants with the 1960s onwards. Then we will refer to the Turkish background in Germany, we can return and reintegration policies of the Turkish identify several aspects, such as rising age, state. By doing so, we will not only point to the the increasing number of naturalisations and changing nature of these policies in general, but the rising educational level of the second and particularly look at rather new developments, particularly the third and fourth generations. such as the introduction of the Mavi Kart (Blue As a result, the type of people returning to Card) and the foundation of the Yurtdışı Türkler Turkey has also varied: A rough segmentation ve Akraba Topluluklar Başkanlığı (Presidency reveals three types of returnees today: (i) those of Turks Abroad and Related Communities) retirees who decided to live their retirement for binding highly educated Almancıs to their days in Turkey, (ii) those retirees who spend half of the year in Germany and half of the parents’ or grandparents’ homeland. year in Turkey and (iii) those second and third generation young and educated people Key Words who come to Turkey for job possibilities. In Almancı, return migration, Turkey, * Orient-Institut Istanbul Germany, reintegration policy. 129 PERCEPTIONS, Autumn 2013, Volume XVIII, Number 3, pp. 129-166. Barbara Pusch and Julia Splitt Introduction German migration movement did not start with the recruitment agreement Migration is as old as human history in 1961. History has a number of and return migration has always been examples. We neither have the time nor an integral part of humans’ geographical the historical expertise to go into this movements. This also applies to the large field in detail, but we would like to Turkish context. However, the large- point to some examples in order to make scale migration since the early 1960s clear that Turkish-German migration is from Turkey to Europe in general and not a new phenomenon as such. Germany in particular has considerably Many years before the recruitment influenced the general image of the agreement Ottoman subjects and Turkish migration nexus and has led Turkish citizens migrated for a long or to the simplistic notion that Turkey is short time to Germany. Beside envoys, exclusively a migrant-sending country. visitors, authors and businessmen who This image of Turkey, however, went to Germany either on diplomatic characterises only one aspect of the or private basis, there were also Young rather diverse Turkish migration reality. Turks such as Mehmet Talat Pasha who An analysis of these manifold migration were fleeing the late Ottoman Empire in processes would go beyond the scope of 1918.2 However, also ordinary people this article. Therefore, we would just like such as workers, students and craftsmen3 to point out some important dimensions settled in Germany for a particular time, related to this multi-faceted migration mainly for education or professional activities as a preliminary remark: First, training.4 Figure 1 indicates the rising throughout history, Turkey has also number of Ottoman subjects or Turkish always been a host country for important citizens in Berlin between the middle of population movements.1 Second, it the 19th and the beginning of the 20th has to be underlined that the Turkish- century. 130 Binding the Almancı to the “Homeland” – Notes from Turkey Figure 1: Ottoman Subjects and Turkish Citizens in Berlin 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Number of Turks in Berlin Turks of Number 1846/1850 1876/1880 1905 1913 1920 1926 1932 1938 Years Source: Gültekin Emre, 300 Jahre Türken an der Spree. Ein vergessenes Kapitel Berliner Kulturgeschichte, Berlin, Ararat Verlag, pp. 94-95. Calculation by the authors. Third, it has to be stressed that and domestic workers,7 migrating to migration from Germany to Turkey also Istanbul. Due to their settlement in goes back to earlier times. On the one Turkey, a large number of institutions, hand, we can observe- sociologically such as the German Hospital,8 the spoken- “return migration” from the German School9 and German speaking above mentioned groups from Germany Christian churches,10 were founded.11 to Turkey. On the other hand, a In spite of this, there is no doubt that glance into historical sources reveals the migration from Turkey became a that Germans without Ottoman and/ new dynamic with the ratification of or Turkish background settled in the Ottoman Empire or the young Turkish the recruitment agreement in 1961. The republic. Well-known examples in this number of Turkish citizens, who went context are the German officers who mainly as so-called “guest-workers” to were invited to reform the Ottoman Germany, rose rapidly from 10,000 12 13 Army.5 The German scientists in Turkish in 1962 to 1,607,161 in 2011. exile who fled Nazi Germany are another The number of migrants with Turkish well-known examples.6 However, there background- this includes Turkish were not the only prominent people citizens, former Turkish citizens who from Germany who ended up in the have naturalised in Germany and their Ottoman Empire. The first half of the descendents- is even higher at 2,956,000 19th century also many other Germans, in 2011.14 Turkish citizens and people including craftsmen, businessmen with Turkish migration background are 131 Barbara Pusch and Julia Splitt the largest group of all foreigners and introduction of the Mavi Kart (Blue persons with migration backgrounds in Card). In order to contextualise our Germany, comprising 18.5% and 23.2% analysis, we initially give an overview on of the totals, respectively.15 Turkish-German migration flows from the 1960s onwards and evaluate the different stages. Migration from Turkey to Germany continued, less due The Main Characteristics to labour migration but mainly due to family reunification in of the Turkish-German this period. Migration Nexus Turkish labour migration to Germany Needless to say that the dynamics of started as a temporary vocational return migration have changed over the training programme invented by time, parallel to the altering patterns of the World Economic Institute out-migration from Turkey to Germany (Weltwirtschaftsinstitut) in Kiel in 1957, and the modifying characteristics of the through which trainees from Turkey were Almancı16 in Germany today. Currently, sent to Germany with the objective of the total number of people in Turkey facilitating German capital investments with life experience in Germany is high, and branches in Turkey where the 19 estimated to be around 4 million.17 trainees should work as foremen. In fact, this was the beginning of a long- In this article we want to analyse the lasting unofficial labour recruitment official Turkish state policies to bind without bilateral agreements or 18 Almancıs to their “homeland” or regulations and which was organised Turkey. In this context, we will first refer by private persons and institutions. It to the return and reintegration policies was ignored by the Turkish government of the Turkish state. However, we will before it turned into an official labour not only point to the changing nature recruitment agreement between both of these policies, but particularly look at states.20 With the ratification of a other and rather new developments such recruitment agreement in 1961, the as the foundation of the Presidency of migration from Turkey became a new Turks Abroad and Related Communities dynamic as mentioned above. More (Yurtdışı Türkler ve Akraba Topluluklar and more workers from Turkey were Başkanlığı, hereafter YTB) and the sent to Germany for a limited time, 132 Binding the Almancı to the “Homeland” – Notes from Turkey most of them of middle and “upper of Turkish citizens in Germany rose lower” socio-economic background in from around 10,000 in 1962 to around the beginning, followed by members of 530,000 in 1973.23 Figure 2 shows the poorer households.21 We can characterise number of workers who were sent from this first stage of migration as circular Turkey to Germany every year. By 1973 migration organised and controlled by it is estimated that about 2 million the two states involved. However, the Turkish state had little influence on the migrants from Turkey were involved increasing extent of out-migration in in this cyclical form of temporary this first period.22 So the total number migration.24 Figure 2: The Turkish-German Migration Balance (1961-1973) 300000 250000 200000 Migration from Turkey to Germany 150000 (Turkish Citizens) (Re)Migration from Germany to 100000 Turkey (Turkish Citizens) 50000 0 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 Source: Statistische Jahrbücher 1961-1973, calculated by the authors.
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Production and Urban Locality in the Fields of Jazz and Fashion Design: the Case of Kuledibi, Istanbul
    CULTURAL PRODUCTION AND URBAN LOCALITY IN THE FIELDS OF JAZZ AND FASHION DESIGN: THE CASE OF KULEDİBİ, İSTANBUL A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF THE MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY ALTAN İLKUÇAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2013 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof.Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Ayşe Saktanber Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Helga Rittersberger-Tılıç Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Eminegül Karababa (METU-MAN) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Helga Rittersberger-Tılıç (METU-SOC) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tahire Erman (BİLKENT-POLS) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sibel Kalaycıoğlu (METU-SOC) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Yıldırım (METU-SOC) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Altan İlkuçan Signature : iii ABSTRACT CULTURAL PRODUCTION AND URBAN LOCALITY IN THE FIELDS OF JAZZ AND FASHION DESIGN: THE CASE OF KULEDİBİ, İSTANBUL İlkuçan, Altan Ph.D., Department of Sociology Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Helga Rittersberger-Tılıç September 2013, 230 pages This study aims to analyze the relationship between cultural producers in Istanbul and the wider processes of neoliberal urban restructuring that takes in their surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • Al-Jedda-Preliminary-Issue-Judgment
    Appeal No: SC/66/2008 Hearing Dates: 2nd – 4th and 7th July 2014 Date of Judgment: 18th July 2014 SPECIAL IMMIGRATION APPEALS COMMISSION Before: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE FLAUX UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WARR SIR STEWART ELDON Hilal Abdul Razzaq Ali AL-JEDDA APPELLANT and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT For the Appellant: Mr Tom Hickman and Ms Samantha Knights Instructed by: Public Interest Lawyers For the Respondent: Mr Jonathan Swift QC, Ms Karen Steyn QC and Mr Rupert Jones Instructed by: The Treasury Solicitor JUDGMENT Page 1 The Honourable Mr Justice Flaux: Introduction 1. On 1 November 2013, the Respondent (referred to hereafter as “the Secretary of State” made an order in exercise of the power under section 40(2) of the British Nationality Act 1981 as amended (“the 1981 Act”) depriving the appellant (referred to hereafter as “Mr Al-Jedda”) of his British citizenship. Mr Al-Jedda appeals against that order to the Commission pursuant to section 2B of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997 (“the 1997 Act”). 2. By Order of Irwin J dated 13 February 2014, the Commission ordered the determination of the following preliminary issues: (1) Did the deprivation order made by the Secretary of State on 1 November 2013 render Mr Al-Jedda stateless contrary to section 40(4) of the 1981 Act (including the sub-issues of issue estoppel and abuse of process which are referred to in the Scott Schedule and the Grounds of Appeal)? (2) Is the Secretary of State required to provide a minimum level of disclosure and information about the case against Mr Al-Jedda pursuant to the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights and/or European Union law? (3) Was the deprivation of citizenship unfair by failing to provide Mr Al- Jedda with an adequate opportunity to make representations to the Secretary of State before it was made? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 394Ff57e71b60eca7e10344e37c4c9fc.Pdf
    global history of the present Series editor | Nicholas Guyatt In the Global History of the Present series, historians address the upheavals in world history since 1989, as we have lurched from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Each book considers the unique story of an individual country or region, refuting grandiose claims of ‘the end of history’, and linking local narratives to international developments. Lively and accessible, these books are ideal introductions to the contemporary politics and history of a diverse range of countries. By bringing a historical perspective to recent debates and events, from democracy and terrorism to nationalism and globalization, the series challenges assumptions about the past and the present. Published Thabit A. J. Abdullah, Dictatorship, Imperialism and Chaos: Iraq since 1989 Timothy Cheek, Living with Reform: China since 1989 Alexander Dawson, First World Dreams: Mexico since 1989 Padraic Kenney, The Burdens of Freedom: Eastern Europe since 1989 Stephen Lovell, Destination in Doubt: Russia since 1989 Alejandra Bronfman, On the Move: The Caribbean since 1989 Nivedita Menon and Aditya Nigam, Power and Contestation: India since 1989 Hyung Gu Lynn, Bipolar Orders: The Two Koreas since 1989 Bryan McCann, The Throes of Democracy: Brazil since 1989 Mark LeVine, Impossible Peace: Israel/Palestine since 1989 James D. Le Sueur, Algeria since 1989: Between Terror and Democracy Kerem Öktem, Turkey since 1989: Angry Nation Nicholas Guyatt is assistant professor of history at Simon Fraser University in Canada. About the author Kerem Öktem is research fellow at the European Studies Centre, St Antony’s College, and teaches the politics of the Middle East at the Oriental Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Galata Electroacoustic Orchestra (GEO) Lifelong Learning Programme IP N° 2012-1-IT2-ERA10-38878
    Genova, 15-26 July 2013 Conservatorio Niccolò Paganini Via Albaro 38, Genova Galata Electroacoustic Orchestra (GEO) Lifelong Learning Programme IP n° 2012-1-IT2-ERA10-38878 COORDINATOR CONSERVATORIO STATALE DI MUSICA "N. PAGANINI" [I GENOVA02] PARTNERS ISTANBUL BILGI ÜNIVERSITESI [TR ISTANBU11] ISTANBUL TEKNIK ÜNIVERSITESI [TR ISTANBU04] UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA [E BARCELO15] CONSERVATORIO DI MUSICA "G. PIERLUIGI DA PALESTRINA" [I CAGLIAR02] 1. Introduction The GEO project (Galata Electroacoustic Orchestra) is inspired by the historical relations between Genova and Istanbul. The general objectives of GEO IP is: 1) to found the Galata Electroacoustic Orchestra, a small group orchestra based on an idea of live collective composition; 2) to merge of the Western Classical tradition of score- based music and the Improvisational techniques, in particular of Turkish Maqam Music. As the dialogue between the three Countries (Turkey, Spain and Italy) involved in the IP is an important objective for GEO, we adopted the sealing map ( portolano ) as a guide metaphor for the project (when a ship docks, the goods – in our case: the musical products – from one country are unloaded and goods from another country are loaded). The expected learning outcomes are related to the acquisition of skills and abilities in the following disciplinary areas: theoretic, ethnomusicological, technological, performing and compositional. The expected outputs of the GEO IP project are: - a concert by the Galata Electroacustic Orchestra at the end of the IP; - a permanent
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Background Check Procedures
    Shaping the future of international education New Edition Criminal Background Check Procedures CIS in collaboration with other agencies has formed an International Task Force on Child Protection chaired by CIS Executive Director, Jane Larsson, in order to apply our collective resources, expertise, and partnerships to help international school communities address child protection challenges. Member Organisations of the Task Force: • Council of International Schools • Council of British International Schools • Academy of International School Heads • U.S. Department of State, Office of Overseas Schools • Association for the Advancement of International Education • International Schools Services • ECIS CIS is the leader in requiring police background check documentation for Educator and Leadership Candidates as part of the overall effort to ensure effective screening. Please obtain a current police background check from your current country of employment/residence as well as appropriate documentation from any previous country/countries in which you have worked. It is ultimately a school’s responsibility to ensure that they have appropriate police background documentation for their Educators and CIS is committed to supporting them in this endeavour. It is important to demonstrate a willingness and effort to meet the requirement and obtain all of the paperwork that is realistically possible. This document is the result of extensive research into governmental, law enforcement and embassy websites. We have tried to ensure where possible that the information has been obtained from official channels and to provide links to these sources. CIS requests your help in maintaining an accurate and useful resource; if you find any information to be incorrect or out of date, please contact us at: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • German External Cultural and Educational Policies in Turkey: Cooperation As Equal Partners?
    IPC–MERCATOR POLICY BRIEF June 2021 GERMAN EXTERNAL CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL POLICIES IN TURKEY: COOPERATION AS EQUAL PARTNERS? Elena Dück Executive Summary This policy brief analyzes German External Cultural and Educational Policies (GECEP) in Turkey. It focuses on the successful implementation of “fair cooperation,” based on the self-proclaimed goal of reciprocal cooperation and encounters as equals rather than a hierarchical donor–recipient relationship. It is based on an analysis of the activities of the German Cultural Academy Tarabya, the German-Turkish Youthbridge, German Schools in Turkey, and the Turkish-German University (TAU). The analysis is enriched by interviews with representatives of German institutions in Turkey as well as students of the TAU. The guiding questions of this policy brief examine the long-term orientation of the activities and to what extent the parties are able to implement the goal of cooperation between equal partners. It addresses the most pressing issues of GECEP in Turkey and closes with examples of best practices and recommendations to further strengthen cooperation between Germany and Turkey in the field of culture and education. GERMAN EXTERNAL CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL POLICIES IN TURKEY: COOPERATION AS EQUAL PARTNERS? Turkish-German Relations in Times German-Turkish relations. The refugee agreement is the most recent example of a problem-driven of Crisis German foreign policy toward Turkey12 rather than a long-term oriented approach. The year 2021 marks the 60th anniversary of the German-Turkish labor agreement that facilitat- In contrast to these current approaches, Ger- ed labor migration from Turkey to Germany. This many’s External Cultural and Educational Policy agreement marked the beginning of a change in (GECEP) aims at promoting a long-term orienta- German-Turkish relations as well as German soci- tion through creating mutual understanding and ety.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey 2011 Progress Report
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 12.10.2011 SEC(2011) 1201 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER TURKEY 2011 PROGRESS REPORT Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2011-2012 {COM(2011) 666} EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Preface.......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Context ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Relations between the EU and Turkey......................................................................... 3 2. Political criteria and enhanced Political dialogue ........................................................ 5 2.1. Democracy and the rule of law .................................................................................... 5 2.2. Human rights and the protection of minorities ............................................................ 5 2.3. Regional issues and international obligations............................................................ 20 3. Economic criteria....................................................................................................... 43 3.1. The existence of a functioning market economy ....................................................... 45 3.2. The capacity to cope with
    [Show full text]
  • DEUTSCHE AUSLANDSSCHULEN Chancen Weltweit – Lehrer Und Erzieher Gesucht
    GEMEINSAM ZUKUNFT TRAGEN DEUTSCHE AUSLANDSSCHULEN Chancen weltweit – Lehrer und Erzieher gesucht. Mit Verzeichnis aller WDA-Mitglieds- schulen EIN EINZIGARTIGES GLOBALES NETZWERK INHALT Die Deutschen Auslandsschulen ermöglichen weltweit Bildung ZAHLEN UND FAKTEN 4 „Made in Germany“ − auf allen Kontinenten, in mehr als 70 Ländern. Als Orte der Begegnung bereiten die Schulen Kinder LEHRER-WELTWEIT.DE 5 und Jugendliche verschiedener Kulturkreise auf eine gemein- same Zukunft vor. Sie bieten fundierte Wissensvermittlung, vom LEHRKRÄFTE IM AUSLAND IM PORTRÄT 6 Kindergarten bis zum Abitur. Und sie leisten einen wesentlichen Beitrag zur Förderung der deutschen Sprache. Seit Generatio- LEHRKRÄFTE WELTWEIT: nen, für Generationen. EIN AUFTRAG, ZWEI WEGE 12 Die Abschlüsse der Deutschen Auslandsschulen gelten interna- tional als Qualitätsbegriff. Sie stehen für hochwertige Bildung, PRAKTIKA AN AUSLANDSSCHULEN 14 die zum Studium an deutschen und ausländischen Hochschulen befähigt – und damit weit über einen Sprachkurs hinausgeht. Sie CHECKLISTE: BEWERBUNG ALS ORTSLEHRKRAFT ODER machen die Deutschen Auslandsschulen zu Leuchttürmen der Auswärtigen Kultur- und Bildungspolitik und zu verlässlichen ORTSKRAFT 16 Partnern für Schulbildung auf höchstem Niveau. WDA-MITGLIEDSCHAFT: IHRE VORTEILE 17 Bund, Länder und die freien Schulträger nehmen diese Aufgaben gemeinschaftlich wahr. Diese öffentlich-private Partnerschaft WDA-MITGLIEDERVERZEICHNIS 18 sichert eine gleichbleibend hohe Qualität der Lehre. Der Welt- verband Deutscher Auslandsschulen, kurz WDA, vertritt die freien, gemeinnützigen Schulträger der Deutschen Auslands- schulen und fasst ihre Einzelstimmen zu einer starken Stimme zusammen. Etwa 20.000 deutsche und 64.000 nichtdeutsche Schüler besu- chen derzeit die Deutschen Auslandsschulen. Mehr als 8.400 Lehrkräfte sind dort tätig. Lehrern, Erziehern und Führungskräften im Bildungswesen bieten die Deutschen Auslandsschulen viel- fältige berufliche Perspektiven. Lernen Sie dieses einzigartige globale Netzwerk kennen und werden Sie ein Teil davon.
    [Show full text]
  • Ayça Tunç Cox
    Chapter 12 HypHenated IdentItIes: tHe ReceptIon of tuRkIsH GeRman cInema In tHe tuRkIsH daIly pRess Ayça Tunç Cox The success of Turkish German filmmaker Fatih Akın initiated new debates on the identity of Turkish diasporic filmmakers in Germany. While star director Akın and other Turkish German filmmakers have been celebrated in the German media with the slogan “the new German cinema is Turkish,” the Turkish media seems to downplay the German side of their hyphenated identity.1 Instead, the Turkish press uses the achievements of these Turkish filmmakers in Germany to bolster a positive image for Turkey in an international context. In this essay, I am particularly concerned with how hyphenated identities, which allow for “simultaneous denial and acceptance of their cultural and ethnic specificities,” are reconstructed in Turkey in the context of wider Turkish politics (Mani 2007: 124). Investigating the reception of these filmmakers in the Turkish press sheds light on a number of pertinent issues. First, the Turkish press utilizes the success of the filmmakers in order to make a case about Turkey’s accession to the EU. The emotionally charged controversies surrounding Turkish German filmmakers suggest that more is at stake than just the reputations of individual filmmakers. Second, it also endeavors to establish a national sentiment about Turkish identity by making them appear more or even exclusively Turkish. Celebrating the international success of these hyphenated filmmakers seems to be intended to revive Turkish national pride. Particularly prominent in the press are nationalist discourses, which challenge the filmmakers’ ambiguous sense of belonging (for a comparative perspective, see Karolin Machtans in this volume).
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey: Minorities, Othering and Discrimination, Citizenship Claims
    Turkey: Minorities, Othering and Discrimination, Citizenship Claims Document Identifier D4.9 Report on 'Turkey: How to manage a sizable citezenry outside the country across the EU'. Version 1.0 Date Due 31.08.2016 Submission date 27.09.2016 WorkPackage WP4 Rivalling citizenship claims elsewhere Lead Beneficiary 23 BU Dissemination Level PU Change log Version Date amended by changes 1.0 26.09.2016 Hakan Yilmaz Final deliverable sent to coordinator after implementing review comments. Partners involved number partner name People involved 23 Boğaziçi University Prof. dr. Hakan Yilmaz and Çağdan Erdoğan Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 4 PART I) MINORITIES IN TURKEY: HISTORICAL EVOLUTION AND CONTEMPORARY SITUATION ...................... 5 1) A Brief History of Minority Groups in Turkey .................................................................................... 5 2) The End of the Ottoman Millet System ............................................................................................ 5 3) Defining the Minority Groups in the Newly Emerging Nation- State ................................................ 6 4) What Happened to the Non-Muslim Population of Turkey? ............................................................. 7 5) What Happened to the Unrecognized Minorities in Turkey? .......................................................... 10 PART II) THE KURDISH QUESTION: THE PINNACLE OF THE
    [Show full text]
  • Informationen Für Absolventen Deutscher Schulen Im Ausland 2 Partnerschulen Der Universität Heidelberg
    INFORMATIONEN FÜR ABSOLVENTEN DEUTSCHER SCHULEN IM AUSLAND 2 PARTNERSCHULEN DER UNIVERSITÄT HEIDELBERG Alexander von Humboldt Schule Montréal, Kanada Deutsche Schule Washington, D.C., USA Colegio Alemán de Guadalajara, Mexiko Colegio Alemán Alexander von Humboldt La Herradura, Mexiko Colegio Alemán Alexander von Humboldt Lomas Verdes, Mexiko Colegio Alemán Alexander von Humboldt Xochimilco, Mexiko Colegio Alemán, Cali, Kolumbien Deutsche Schule Medellín, Kolumbien Deutsche Schule Barranquilla, Kolumbien Colegio Humboldt Caracas, Venezuela Deutsche Schule Rio de Janeiro, Brasilien Deutsche Schule Helsinki, Finnland Deutsche Schule zu Porto, Portugal Deutsche Schule Madrid, Spanien Deutsche Schule San Alberto Magno, San Sebastián, Spanien Galabov-Gymnasium Sofia, Bulgarien Deutsche Schule Athen, Griechenland Deutsche Schule Thessaloniki, Griechenland Ellinogermaniki Agogi, Pallini, Griechenland Istanbul Lisesi, Türkei Deutsche Schule Istanbul, Türkei Deutsche Schule Rom, Italien Deutsche Schule Genua Deutsche Schule der Borromäerinnen Alexandria, Ägypten Deutsche Schule Nairobi, Kenia Deutsche Botschaftsschule Addis Abeba, Äthiopien Deutsche Internationale Schule Kapstadt, Südafrika Deutsche Internationale Schule Beirut, Libanon (Stand: September 2018) Liebe Schülerinnen und Schüler, liebe Absolventen, liebe Lehrerinnen und Lehrer, liebe Eltern, Anfang des Jahres 2008 rief der Deutsche Akademische Austauschdienst (DAAD) das Programm „BetreuungsInitiative Deutsche Auslands- und Partnerschulen“ (BIDS) ins Leben. Seit Mai 2008 engagiert sich
    [Show full text]
  • German External Cultural and Educational Policies in Turkey: Cooperation As Equal Partners?
    IPC–MERCATOR POLICY BRIEF June 2021 GERMAN EXTERNAL CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL POLICIES IN TURKEY: COOPERATION AS EQUAL PARTNERS? Elena Dück Executive Summary This policy brief analyzes German External Cultural and Educational Policies (GECEP) in Turkey. It focuses on the successful implementation of “fair cooperation,” based on the self-proclaimed goal of reciprocal cooperation and encounters as equals rather than a hierarchical donor–recipient relationship. It is based on an analysis of the activities of the German Cultural Academy Tarabya, the German-Turkish Youthbridge, German Schools in Turkey, and the Turkish-German University (TAU). The analysis is enriched by interviews with representatives of German institutions in Turkey as well as students of the TAU. The guiding questions of this policy brief examine the long-term orientation of the activities and to what extent the parties are able to implement the goal of cooperation between equal partners. It addresses the most pressing issues of GECEP in Turkey and closes with examples of best practices and recommendations to further strengthen cooperation between Germany and Turkey in the field of culture and education. GERMAN EXTERNAL CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL POLICIES IN TURKEY: COOPERATION AS EQUAL PARTNERS? Turkish-German Relations in Times German-Turkish relations. The refugee agreement is the most recent example of a problem-driven of Crisis German foreign policy toward Turkey12 rather than a long-term oriented approach. The year 2021 marks the 60th anniversary of the German-Turkish labor agreement that facilitat- In contrast to these current approaches, Ger- ed labor migration from Turkey to Germany. This many’s External Cultural and Educational Policy agreement marked the beginning of a change in (GECEP) aims at promoting a long-term orienta- German-Turkish relations as well as German soci- tion through creating mutual understanding and ety.
    [Show full text]