DOCSLIB.ORG

Maruleng Local Municipality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Page 1 MARULENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY GENERAL VALUATION ROLL FOR THE PERIOD 1 JULY 2017 TO 30 JUNE 2022 FOR MARULENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY NAME OF GEOGRAPHICAL AREA: MARULENG PROPERTIES DATE: 25 JANUARY 2017 CATEGORY DETERMINED IN TERMS OF SECTION 8 PHYSICAL ADDRESS OF THE OF THE ACT IN WHICH PROPERTY ANY OTHER REGISTERED OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY EXTENT OF NAME OF REGISTERED THE PROPERTY FALLS MARKET VALUE PERSCRIBED PROPERTY OWNER. PARTICULAR ESTATE STREET POSTAL ERF NO, PTN RE UNIT FARM NAME SCH/NO TOWN ZONING LAND USE NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS PRIVATE BAG X 9469;POLOKWA LIMPOPO PROVINCIAL 1 0 HOEDSPRUIT EDU VAC JAKKALS STR NE 0700 0.8616 R 600 000.00 GOVERNMENT P.O.BOX 1885 HOEDSPRUIT SANTOS PALO 2 0 RE HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 1380 0.0494 R 740 000.00 SARDINHA DOS P.O.BOX 224 HOEDSPRUIT 2 1 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 1380 0.0504 R 740 000.00 ROXY FAMILY TRUST P.O.BOX 224 HOEDSPRUIT SANTOS FRANCISCO 2 2 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 1380 0.0508 R 740 000.00 DOS P.O.BOX 597 HOEDSPRUIT,1 LOCHNER MELODIE 3 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 380 0.1500 R 800 000.00 ANGELIQUE P.O.BOX 612 HOEDSPRUIT , HAVENSTEIN RALPHA & 4 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 1380 0.1500 R 660 000.00 CHRISRINA P.O.BOX 386, HOEDSPRUIT,1 5 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 380 0.1500 R 1 200 000.00 SANDERS CLARENCE POSBUS 685;HOEDSPRU IT;1380 (015 793 SANTOS ANTONIO 6 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 0011) 0.1500 SARDINHA DOS , SANTOS LAUDELINA M R 1 200 000.00 DE A DOS P.O.BOX 375, HOEDSPRUIT ZYL ALBERTUS PETRUS 7 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 1380 0.1500 J. V ZYL WILHELMINA R 1 400 000.00 HUBERDINA V Page 2 CATEGORY DETERMINED IN TERMS OF SECTION 8 PHYSICAL ADDRESS OF THE OF THE ACT IN WHICH PROPERTY ANY OTHER REGISTERED OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY EXTENT OF NAME OF REGISTERED THE PROPERTY FALLS MARKET VALUE PERSCRIBED PROPERTY OWNER. PARTICULAR ESTATE STREET POSTAL ERF NO, PTN RE UNIT FARM NAME SCH/NO TOWN ZONING LAND USE NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS P .O BOX 302 ; HOEDSPRUIT , SMIT ANTON CORNELIUS 8 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 1380 0.1500 R 1 200 000.00 & SMIT ANNIQUE P.O.BOX 595, HOEDSPRUIT SCHEEPERS MATTHYS 9 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 VAC JAKKALS STR 1380 0.1000 R 411 000.00 JOHANNES 9 1 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 VAC JAKKALS STR 0,0500 R 206 000.00 HONIBALL HENRY FRANK POSBUS 595;HOEDSPRU 10 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 BUS JAKKALS STR IT 1380 0.1500 R 1 400 000.00 SCHEEPERS LORRAINE P.O.BOX 1348, HOEDSPRUIT HANEKOM SCHALK 11 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 1380 0.1500 WILLEM P. R 1 100 000.00 HANEKOM ANNA CECILIA PRIVATE BAG X 501, HOEDSPRUIT NED. HERV KERK V 12 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 1380 0.1500 R 1 200 000.00 AFRIKA-K/RUS POSBUS 1003, HOEDSPRUIT, WEIDEMAN LETETHIA 13 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 1380 0.1500 R 1 100 000.00 ELIZABETH P O BOX 31 ; HOEDSPRUIT , WOLMARANS ANNA 14 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 1380 0.1500 R 1 100 000.00 MAGDALENA P.O BOX 617 ; HOEDSPRUIT BOSBOK OLIE 15 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 1380 0.1500 R 900 000.00 BARBERTON CC P.O.BOX 764, HOEDSPRUIT RIEKERT FRANCOIS 16 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL JAKKALS STR 1380 0.1500 ALWYN RIEKERT CHRISTINA R 1 200 000.00 MARIA Page 3 CATEGORY DETERMINED IN TERMS OF SECTION 8 PHYSICAL ADDRESS OF THE OF THE ACT IN WHICH PROPERTY ANY OTHER REGISTERED OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY EXTENT OF NAME OF REGISTERED THE PROPERTY FALLS MARKET VALUE PERSCRIBED PROPERTY OWNER. PARTICULAR ESTATE STREET POSTAL ERF NO, PTN RE UNIT FARM NAME SCH/NO TOWN ZONING LAND USE NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS P.O.BOX 617, HOEDSPRUIT, 17 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL BLESBOK STR 1380 0.1423 R 1 100 000.00 GUELDENHUYS H. P.O BOX 1819, HOEDSPRUIT, JACQUES BURGER 18 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL BLESBOK STR 1380 0.1300 R 1 200 000.00 FAMILIE TRUST P.O BOX 1778;HOEDSPR J & W HOEDSPRUIT 19 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL BLESBOK STR UIT 1380 0.1600 R 800 000.00 PROPERTIES P.O.BOX 5 ,MOETILADIMO, 20 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL BLESBOK STR 0891 0.1500 R 600 000.00 RAKOMA FLORA P.O.BOX 1069, HOEDSPRUIT, 21 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL BLESBOK STR 1380 0.1500 FIVAZ BERNARDO R 1 400 000.00 FIVAZ MARLA CRISTINA P.O.BOX172 HOEDSPRUIT,1 MERWE PIETER 22 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL BLESBOK STR 380 0.1500 R 900 000.00 JACOBUS VD P.O BOX 508 ; HOEDSPRUIT THOBEJANE 23 0 RE HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL 1380 0.0895 MAHLOMOLA PETRUS THOBEJANE PHINAH R 700 000.00 MMABATHO P.O BOX 80 ; HOEDSPRUIT , FERREIRA ERICH 23 1 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL 1380 0.0605 R 900 000.00 WERNER & RIKA P.O.BOX 420 HOEDSPRUIT 24 0 RE HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL ANTELOPE STR 1380 0.0841 R 900 000.00 MORE CYRIL PATRICK POSBUS 1243 ; HOEDSPRUIT GERMISHUYS ANTHONY 24 1 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL ANTELOPE STR 1380 0.0659 R 800 000.00 AND MCHELLE ANN Page 4 CATEGORY DETERMINED IN TERMS OF SECTION 8 PHYSICAL ADDRESS OF THE OF THE ACT IN WHICH PROPERTY ANY OTHER REGISTERED OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY EXTENT OF NAME OF REGISTERED THE PROPERTY FALLS MARKET VALUE PERSCRIBED PROPERTY OWNER. PARTICULAR ESTATE STREET POSTAL ERF NO, PTN RE UNIT FARM NAME SCH/NO TOWN ZONING LAND USE NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS P.O.BOX 1105, HOEDSPRUIT WALLAGE MATTHYS 25 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL ANTELOPE STR 1380 0.1500 R 1 200 000.00 JACOBUS P.O.BOX 625,HOEDSPRU 26 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL ANTELOPE STR IT 1380 0.1500 PRETORIUS SHAUN R 1 200 000.00 PRETORIUS MELANE P.O.BOX 349 HOEDSPRUIT POTGIETER JOHANNES 27 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL ANTELOPE STR 1380 0.1500 PHILLIPPUS POTGIETER MAGDALENA R 1 300 000.00 MARIA P.O BOX 189, HOEDSPRUIT, 28 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL ANTELOPE STR 1380 0.1500 R 900 000.00 NORTJE ANDRE 47 BOTHA STREET; LADYBRAND, SILVA MARIA DOS 29 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL ANTELOPE STR 9745 0.1500 R 800 000.00 R.JUSTINA DA P.O BOX 4001 ; ACORNHOEK MKHONTO BUTHELEZI 30 0 RE HOEDSPRUIT RES1 DWL 1360 0.1519 R 900 000.00 PHINA P.O BOX 1856, SELABI NELSON WISANI ACORNHOEK, AND THALITHA 30 1 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL 1360 0.0519 R 700 000.00 HLANGANANI POSBUS 1749; HOEDSPRUIT DU RANDT FAMILY 31 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR 1380 0.1448 R 1 300 000.00 TRUST P.O BOX 1668, HOEDSPRUIT, FOURIE WILLIAM 32 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR 1380 0.1448 R 900 000.00 JACOBUS P.O.BOX 347 HOEDSPRUIT RAJA AMBER AND RAJA 33 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR 1380 0.1500 R 1 200 000.00 SOHAIL AFZAL Page 5 CATEGORY DETERMINED IN TERMS OF SECTION 8 PHYSICAL ADDRESS OF THE OF THE ACT IN WHICH PROPERTY ANY OTHER REGISTERED OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY EXTENT OF NAME OF REGISTERED THE PROPERTY FALLS MARKET VALUE PERSCRIBED PROPERTY OWNER. PARTICULAR ESTATE STREET POSTAL ERF NO, PTN RE UNIT FARM NAME SCH/NO TOWN ZONING LAND USE NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS P.O BOX 1046, HOEDSPRUIT, 34 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR 1380 0.1500 R 1 200 000.00 LEOPARD TRUS P.O BOX 1046 ; HOEDSPRUIT , 35 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR 1380 0.1500 R 1 200 000.00 LEOPARD TRUST P.O BOX 844 ; HOEDSPRUIT , STANDER CELESTE 36 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR 1380 0.1500 R 980 000.00 VANESSA P O BOX 698 ; HOEDSPRUIT, RAUTENBACH 37 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR 1380 0.1500 GERHARDUS IGNATIUS R 2 100 000.00 RAUTENBACH SUNETTE P.O BOX 2557; ACORNHOEK, 38 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR 1360 0.1500 R 800 000.00 UBISI ADELAIDE ZENZILE P.O BOX 2881 ; ACORNHOEK , MKHANTSWA SIBONGILE 39 RE HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR 1360 0.0729 R 750 000.00 GERTRUDE P.O BOX 905 39 1 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR Hoedspruit,1380 0.0771 R 880 000.00 MORABA ERICK P O BOX 464; HOEDSPRUIT 40 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR 1380 0.1500 R 1 100 000.00 DE KOCK FAMILY TRUST P.O BOX 27, BARBERTON, 41 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR 1300 0.1500 R 1 100 000.00 GELDENHUYS JACQUES P.O BOX 39266, BOOYSENS, MOTLHASEDI ALFRED 42 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL DUIKER STR 2016 0.1400 R 700 000.00 ABIA P.O BOX 829, SAVANHA SPRINGBOK HOEDSPRUIT, CONSTRUCTION & 43 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL STR 1380 0.1501 R 1 300 000.00 MAINTENANCE CC Page 6 CATEGORY DETERMINED IN TERMS OF SECTION 8 PHYSICAL ADDRESS OF THE OF THE ACT IN WHICH PROPERTY ANY OTHER REGISTERED OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY EXTENT OF NAME OF REGISTERED THE PROPERTY FALLS MARKET VALUE PERSCRIBED PROPERTY OWNER. PARTICULAR ESTATE STREET POSTAL ERF NO, PTN RE UNIT FARM NAME SCH/NO TOWN ZONING LAND USE NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS P O BOX 445; SPRINGBOK HOEDSPRUIT 44 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL STR 1380 0.1500 R 650 000.00 RAS NATALIE ALICE P.O BOX 1091, SPRINGBOK JOHANNESBUR STYLESTAR PROP 25 45 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL STR G, 2000 0.1550 R 650 000.00 PTY LTD P.O.BOX 848 SPRINGBOK HOEDSPRUIT VAN EEDEN JOHANNES 46 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL STR 1380 0.1550 MARTHINUS VAN EEDEN CATHERINA R 1 100 000.00 FRANCINA 47 SPRINGBOK SPRINGBOK STRAAT, MEYER FRANS 47 0 HOEDSPRUIT RES 1 DWL STR HOEDSPRUIT 0.1501 R 900 000.00 JOHANNES PRIVATE BAG X SPRINGBOK 9469;POLOKWA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID 49 0 HOEDSPRUIT GOV DWL STR NE 0700 0.1600 R 650 000.00 AFRIKA PRIVATE BAG X SPRINGBOK 9469;POLOKWA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID 50 0 HOEDSPRUIT GOV OFFICES STR NE 0700 0.1500 R 1 400 000.00 AFRIKA P O BOX 21; SPRINGBOK HOEDSPRUIT HOEDSPRUIT 51 0 HOEDSPRUIT POW CHURCH STR 1380 0.2205 R 1 200 000.00 COMMUNITY CHURCH P.O BOX 1064, HOEDSPRUIT, 52 0 R/E HOEDSPRUIT BUS SHOPS BUFFEL STR 1380 0.4921 R 1 320 000.00 NEXOR 889 CC BONELA GEZI P.O BOX 30 ; ELECTRICAL 52 2 HOEDSPRUIT BUS SHOPS BUFFEL STR TZANEEN , 0850 0.4757 R 1 880 000.00 CONTRACTORS CC P O BOX 72501; PARKVIEW 52 4 HOEDSPRUIT TRANS RAIL BUFFEL STR 2124 0.0399 R 380 000.00 TRANSNET LTD P.O.
Recommended publications
  • 1 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction

    1 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction

    1 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction People and things are given names for identification purposes. A name is a title given to a person or a thing. A name is defined by Sebashe (2003:12) as a word or words by which a person, animal, place or a thing is spoken of or referred to. In other words, a name distinguishes a particular thing from others. Names have political, social, economic and religious significance. As far as this study is concerned, the emphasis would be on the political significance of a name. The Black South Africans suffered a significant harm during the apartheid regime. The Europeans dominated in everything which resulted in Blacks losing their identity, culture, values, heritage an tradition. The European domination interfered with the naming patterns of the indigenous people of South Africa. Names of places were virtually Eurocentric. This is evident in town names, for example, Johannesburg, Pretoria, Pietersburg and Potgietersrus. Tables turned when a democratic government was elected in 1994. The affected people started to realize the negative impact of apartheid on numerous things, places names inclusive. The new government started to implement political changes. Some place names are changed to strike a balance between races, new places are named according to what the people want. Place naming starts to shift a distance away from Eurocentric to African names. Towns, streets, sporting facilities, names of settlements, businesses and 2 educational institutions are the most places affected by name changes and new naming patterns. 1.2 Background to the problem The problem of place naming in Africa in general and South Africa in particular started during the colonial period when many European countries scrambled for Africa in the 17th century.
  • Improving Newborn Care in South Africa

    Improving Newborn Care in South Africa

    Improving Newborn Care in South Africa Lessons learned from Limpopo Initiative for Newborn Care (LINC) January 2011 Commissioned by UNICEF With technical guidance and collaboration with the National Department of Health, the Limpopo Provincial Department of Health, and the Department of Paediatrics, University of Limpopo in South Africa. Acknowledgements to Dr Fge Bonnici, Dr L Bamford, Dr S Crowley, Dr A Robertson-Sutton Published by UNICEF South Africa 6th Floor, Metro Park Building 351 Schoeman Street i Pretoria PO Box 4884 Pretoria 0001 Telephone: +27 12 354 8201 Facsimile: +27 12 354 8293 www.unicef.org/southafrica www.facebook.com/unicefsouthafrica First published 2011 Design and typesetting by Farm Design, www.farmdesign.co.za ii Contents List of abbreviations iv List of figures iv List of tables v Introduction – Newborn care in district hospitals in South Africa 1 Limpopo Province 5 Limpopo Province 6 Comparison with other Provinces 8 The LINC approach 11 What is LINC and how does it work? 12 Impact on capacity, quality and outcomes of neonatal care 15 Impacts on capacity for and quality of neonatal care 16 Impacts on human resources 22 Impact on neonatal health outcomes 24 Cost & resources 29 At provincial level 30 At facility level 31 Summary of key achievements 33 Advancing the commitment to newborn care 34 Building system-wide capacity 34 Outputs and outcomes 35 Lessons for policy makers & programme officers 37 At national and provincial levels 38 At health facility level 38 What are the key strengths and limitations of the
  • Households' Adaptation to Climate Change Hazards in Semi-Arid

    Households' Adaptation to Climate Change Hazards in Semi-Arid

    Chapter Households’ Adaptation to Climate Change Hazards in Semi-Arid Region of Mopani, South Africa Musa Yusuf Jimoh, Peter Bikam, Hector Chikoore, James Chakwizira and Emaculate Ingwani Abstract New climate change realities are no longer a doubtful phenomenon, but realities to adapt and live with. Its cogent impacts and implications’ dispositions pervade all sectors and geographic scales, making no sector or geographic area immune, nor any human endeavor spared from the associated adversities. The consequences of this emerging climate order are already manifesting, with narratives written beyond the alterations in temperature and precipitation, particularly in urban areas of semi-arid region of South Africa. The need to better understand and respond to the new climate change realities is particularly acute in this region. Thus, this chapter highlights the concept of adaptation as a fundamental component of managing cli- mate change vulnerability, through identifying and providing insight in respect of some available climate change adaptation models and how these models fit within the premises and programmes of sustainable adaptation in semi-arid region with gaps identification. The efforts of governments within the global context are exam- ined with households’ individual adaptation strategies to climate change hazards in Mopani District. The factors hindering the success of sustainable urban climate change adaptation strategic framework and urban households’ adaptive systems are also subjects of debate and constitute the concluding remarks to the chapter. Keywords: households, adaptation, climate change, semi-arid, South Africa 1. Introduction Adaptation to climate change hazard is attracting growing international atten- tion as confidence in forecasts for climate change is rising [1].
  • The Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on Households' Vulnerability to Climate Change in Semiarid Towns of Mopani, South Afric

    The Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on Households' Vulnerability to Climate Change in Semiarid Towns of Mopani, South Afric

    climate Article The Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on Households’ Vulnerability to Climate Change in Semiarid Towns of Mopani, South Africa Musa Yusuf Jimoh 1,2,*, Peter Bikam 1 and Hector Chikoore 3 1 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, Limpopo 0950, South Africa; [email protected] 2 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Ilorin, Ilorin 240003, Nigeria 3 Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +27-68-072-631 or +234-818-871-9036 Abstract: The changing climate and its current rate, frequency, as well as its life-threatening impacts are undoubtedly abnormal and globally worrisome. Its effects are expected to be severely differ- ent across segments of the society. It is disposed to leaving no facet of human endeavor immune, particularly in vulnerable cities of developing countries where there is dearth of empirical studies. For the context-specific nature of climate change impacts and place-based character of vulnerability, this study explores the influence of socioeconomic attributes on household vulnerability in Mopani District northeast of South Africa to provide basis for targeting, formulating, evaluating, and moni- toring adaptation policies, programs, and projects. The study adopted a multistage random sampling to draw 500 households from six towns in Mopani District, Limpopo Province. Mixed methods approach was used for data collection, while Household Vulnerability Index (HVI) was estimated using principal component analysis and regressed with socioeconomic attributes. The study reveals that climate is changing with high HVI across selected towns.
  • Amazon Missions

    Amazon Missions

    AMAZON MISSIONS APRIL 2015 LIMPOPO & MPUMALANGA TOUR Chief Gustavo (Get us to work ) OUR TOUR COVERS THESE AREAS YOU’RE WELCOME TO INVITE US LIMPOPO: Ellisras, Soutpansberg, Valley of the Olifants, Ba-Phalaborwa, Bela-Bela, Bosbokrand, Me and Grant Duiwelskloof, Lephalale, Giyani, Hoedspruit, Waterberg, Letsitele, Leydsdorp, Louis Trichardt, Modimolle, Mogwadi, Mokopane, Potgietersrus, Nylstroom, Dendron, Giant Water Lily Leaves Messina, Naboomspruit, Mookgophong, Phalaborwa, Polokwane (Pietersburg), Seshego, Thabazimbi, Thohoyandou, Tzaneen, Vaalwater, Soutpansberg, Capricorn, Moria, Bandelierkop, Dendron, Roedtan. MPUMALANGA: Witbank, White River, Waterval Boven, Wakkerstroom, Volksrust, Vaalbank, Trichardt, Standerton, Skukuza, Makuna Mask Secunda, Sabie, Piet Retief, Ohrigstad, Komatipoort, Kaapmuiden, Hectorspruit, Hartebeeskop, Greylingstad, Amersfoort, Amsterdam, Avontuur, Asai Palm Fruit Badplaas, Balfour, Balmoral, Barberton, Belfast, Bethal, Breyten, Bushbuckridge, Carolina, Chrissiesmeer, Delmas, Dullstroom, Ermelo, Greylingstad. And everywhere in between. Please CALL, WHATSAPP or SMS us if you, your family or friends live in these areas and we’d love to arrange and address your group at your home, school, church, guesthouse, men’s -, ladies’ group etc. HOT OFF THE PRESS 2014 flowed excellently into 2015 which began with a bang! After a seasonal stretch in South America, we’re excited to share about the progress amongst the Indian Tribes. With Grant from NZ in Colombia Presently here now in April until May 2015, we’re on tour in Limpopo and Mpumalanga, sharing about reaching the unreached Indian Tribes in the Amazon jungle and supporting reached communities. Makuna Chiefs You’re welcome to invite us to share at any venue in your community or any other gathering you can think of! We do this with music, video, photo projection, props from the Amazon and testimonies of “Saved from the claws of death.” (See contact details below.) The pictures in this newsletter give you a good idea about what is happening.
  • The Child Support Grant and the Fertility of Recipient Parents in Lenyenye Township

    The Child Support Grant and the Fertility of Recipient Parents in Lenyenye Township

    The child support grant and the fertility of recipient parents in Lenyenye Township Motheo Rabaji WITS Graduate School of Governance Thesis presented in partial fulfilment for the degree of Master of Management (in the field of Public and Development Management) to the Faculty of Commerce, Law, and Management, University of the Witwatersrand March 2016 Name of candidate Motheo Rabaji Student number 9613347p Telephone numbers 060 533 1051 Email address [email protected] Name of supervisor Dr. Kambidima Wotela ii DECLARATION I declare that this thesis/dissertation titled ‘The child support grant and the fertility of recipient parents in Lenyenye Township’ is my own, unaided work. I have acknowledged and referenced all sources that I have used and quoted. I hereby submit it in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Management (Public and Development Management) in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. I have not submitted this report before for any other degree or examination to any other institution. Motheo Rabaji Johannesburg, March 2016 iii ABSTRACT Author: Motheo Rabaji Thesis title: The child support grant and the fertility of recipient parents in Lenyenye Township Johannesburg, March 2016 The research aimed to find out whether one of the unintended outcomes of governments’ top-down implementation of the child support grant was increased fertility among recipients in the rural areas, which generally have higher levels of fertility in the country. South Africa does not have a fertility problem, but development is still much needed in the rural areas. The plight of government, having inherited one of the most unequal society is not minimised.
  • Phalaborwa Main Seat of Ba-Phalaborwa Magisterial District

    Phalaborwa Main Seat of Ba-Phalaborwa Magisterial District

    # # !C # # ### !C^# #!.C# # !C # # # # # # # # # ^!C# # # # # # # # ^ # ^ # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # !C # # # # # # ## # #!C # # # # # # #!C# # # # !C# ^ ## # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # #!C # # # #!C^ # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # !C ## # #!C # # !C# # # # # # #^ # # # # # # # # # # # #!C# # # # # ## # # # # # # # ##!C # ## # # # # ## # # # ## # # # ## # # # !C # # # # # # # # # !C## # #!C # # ## # # # # # ## # # !C# !C# # #^ # # # # # ### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # #!C !C #!C# # # # # #^# # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # !C# ^ ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### # ## # ## # # # !C # # #!C # # #!C # ## !C## ## # # # # !C# # # # # ## # # # # # # ## # # # # # ## # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # ## ## # # # # # # # # # ## # # ^!C # # # # # # ^ # # # # ## # # ## ## # # # # # # #!C # # # # !C # # !C ## # !C## # #!C # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # !C# # # ## # # ## # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### !C### # # # # !C !C# # # # # !C# # # # # # #!C ## !C# # !.# # # # # # # # # ## ## # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## ## ##^ ## # # # # ^ # !C ## # # ## # # # # # !C## # # ## # # # # # # ## # # # # # ### # # # #!C### !C# # !C# # # # # # !C ### # # # !C##!C# # # # ^ !C # ## # !C# ^ !C # # # #!C # ## ## ## # # ## # # # # # # ## !C# # # # # # #!C # ## # ## ## # # # # # !C # # ^ # ## ## ## # # # # !.!C### ### # # # # # # !C # # # !C # ##!C# # # # # # # ### # ### # ## ## # # # # #!C ## # ## ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # ## PPhhaallaabboorrwwaa
  • Tekplan8 8000

    Tekplan8 8000

    South African Heritage Resources Agency P.O. Box 4637 Cape Town TEKPLAN8 8000 Tel: 015 2914177 Fax: 086 218 3261 ATIENTION: Mr. Phillip Hine [email protected] Our ref.: TE1A259 22 May 2012 APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION IN TERMS OF SECTION 24(5) OFTHE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT,1998 (ACT 107 OF 1998) PROJECT: PROPOSED PLANNING AND LAYOUT OF 312 ADDITIONAL ERVEN AT BALLOON VILLAGE, MARULENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, MOPANI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, LIMPOPO PROVINCE 1. As an Interested and Affected Party, notice is hereby given, that the Department of Local Government and Housing (Limpopo) is applying for Environmental Authorisation in terms of the Natkmal Environmental ManagementAet, 1998 (AetNo. 107 of 1998) from the Limpopo Department of Economic Development. Environment and Tourism (DEDET)forthefolowing activity: Project name: Balloon Demarcation Project Project description: The project consists of the proposed planning and layout of approximately 312 additional residential erven. The size of the affected area measures approximately 28 ha in extent. Project location: The proposed site is located northeast of the existing Balloon village on the Remainder and Portion 27 of the farm Lofdal42 KT, Maruleng Local Municipality, Mopani District Municipality area (co-ordinates: 240 11' 00,6"5 30 0 23'12,1"E). 2. The project has been registered with the Limpopo Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism (DEDET) under ref nr. 12/119/2-M9 3. Please find attached a copy of Heritage Impact Assessment Report for your comment. 4. It is respectfully requested that should you have any comments on the attached Report, it must be forwarded to the undersigned as well as the Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism (DEDET) no later than 40 days from the date of this letter (2 July 2012).
  • Agri-Hubs Identified by Limpopo

    Agri-Hubs Identified by Limpopo

    ONE PAGER EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES – AGRI-HUBS as on 6 November 2015 Agri-Hubs Identified by the Province LIMPOPO PROVINCE 27 PRIORITY DISTRICTS PROVINCE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROPOSED AGRI-HUB Limpopo Vhembe Nwanedi Mopani Tzaneen Sekhukhune Groblersdal Capricorn Ga-Poopedi Waterberg Modimolle 1 Capricorn District Municipality Proposed Agri-Hub Location :Ga-Poopedi District Context Demographics The district is situated at the core of economic development in The district has 1 1261 463 people and the total number of households the Limpopo Province and includes the capital of the province, the is 342838 with an average household size of 3.7 (Census 2011). City of Polokwane. Total Area: 21 705km². Capricorn District 59.9% of the population is within the 15 to 64 year age group. Municipality falls under the Limpopo province, located on the northern Unemployment rate is at 37.2% with 49.9% of all households that are side of South Africa. It derives its name from the Tropic of Capricorn, female headed. According to Census 2011, half of the population along which it is situated. It is predominantly rural in nature. It of the CDM resides in the Polokwane Municipality, followed by consists of the following five local municipalities: Aganang, Blouberg, Lepelle-Nkumpi, Blouberg and Aganang with 18%, 13% and 10% Lepelle-Nkumpi, Molemole and Polokwane. Limpopo's capital, respectively, while Molemole Local Municipality accounts for 9% Polokwane (previously Pietersburg), lies in the heart of the Capricorn of the population of the district. Although the population of the region. The district has an internal airport, and is linked to Gauteng by district is growing, the rate of growth is declining.
  • A Comparative Study of Rural Water Governance in the Limpopo Basin

    A Comparative Study of Rural Water Governance in the Limpopo Basin

    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RURAL WATER GOVERNANCE IN THE LIMPOPO BASIN PINIMIDZAI SITHOLE A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of the Western Cape Institute for Poverty Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS) Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences University of the Western Cape Supervisors: Dr Mafaniso Hara, Dr Barbara van Koppen, and Prof Bill Derman September 2011 1 KEY WORDS Hydraulic Property Rights Creation Integrated water resources management Institutions Water governance Informal and formal arrangements Multiple water uses Power and discourse Gender Infrastructure investments Access rights Water resources Catchment management institutions Rural development 2 ABSTRACT A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RURAL WATER GOVERNANCE IN THE LIMPOPO BASIN D Phil Thesis, Institute for Poverty Land and Agrarian Studies, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Western Cape In this thesis I examine and explore whether and if Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) inspired water reforms respond to- and address the diverse realities of women and men in informal (and formal) rural economies of Sekororo, South Africa and Ward 17 in Gwanda, Zimbabwe which are both in the Limpopo basin. South Africa and Zimbabwe, like other southern African countries, embarked on IWRM- inspired water reforms, culminating in the promulgation of the National Water Acts in 1998, four years after the attainment of South Africa’s democracy in 1994 and 18 years after Zimbabwe attained
  • Limpopo Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within the Proposed

    Limpopo Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within the Proposed

    !C !C^ !.!C !C ^!C ^ ^ !C !C !C!C !C !C !C ^ ^ !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !. !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ ^ !C !C !C !. !C GGaa--KKggaappaannee MMaaiinn SSeeaatt ooff LLeettaabbaa MMaaggiisstteerriiaall DDiissttrriicctt ^!C ^ !C !C !C ^ LouisT richardMt ainS eat ^ JOHNOLLY Mulima KLEINFONTEIN SETALI GOEDE Muwaw!Ceni AANGENAAM KOEDOESFONTEIN ZEERMOOI Makhado NU !COlifantshoek PLAISERFONTEIN NOBLE Phikela KREMETART 128 123 UITZICHT SCHAAPLAAGTE Tiva Ta Bode R578 231 KLEIN 411 Makhado NU HOOP 113 110 Khwarha OLIFANTSHOEK 103 HOEK Maxabela KaDizingidzingi ST 114 108 Wana KEMP Tshitale 120 Mayona 106 56 KaDizingidzingi 409 Donkerhoek SETALI GOEDVERWACHT Kolobetona Witkoppies MOOIMEISJESFONTEIN Muhlahlandlela Giyani PAARDEKRAAL Iketleng Mallamullelle Naledi NDENGEZA $ Basani Zone 2 OVERSCHOT 122 121 BlalalaZonke 141 Tshitale Slenger Phooko B 2 a Tshitale 135 Naledi b 408 S a Sub Ndzaku Ka t Rivala o Kwatane B 1 Makhado NU e Magiisteriiall Mokgegolo New e Main Seat MULIMA Ntshava L k - e l Ghandlanani t Se Ntatele Stand MATIKO se SETALI GaPhooko e Greater ^!C Tiyani d 898 FARM RIETVLEI d MSENGI Raphahlelo STERKWATER i District 131 Diistriict HARTEBEESTFONTEIN Giyani NU 664 KaNgove Thembisa Mulima 130 139 140 M Makgakgapatse 898 STUKFONTEIN Muumoni Makwidibung Mahembeni Dingamanzi KLAARSTROOM
  • Maruleng Local Municipality

    Maruleng Local Municipality

    Maruleng Local Municipality Draft IDP 2017/18 TABLE OF CONTENT FOREWORD BY THE MAYOR……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….ix 1. Planning Framework ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..6 2. Municipal Profile ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………12 3. Situational Analysis ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..18 3.1 Spatial Rational ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………18 3.2 Basic Service Delivery analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..26 3.3 Environmental, Social and Economic analysis ………………………………………………………………………………………37 3.4 Financial Viability ….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..49 3.5 Good Governance and Public Participation ………………………………………………………………………………………….56 3.6 Municipal Transformation and Organizational Development………………………………………………………………..60 3.7 Environment and Waste Analysis …………………………………………………………………………………………………………65 3.8 Waste Management …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….67 3.9 Social Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..68 3.10 Telecommunications ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….75 3.11 Disaster Risk Management in the Municipality ……………….…………………………………………………………………76 3.12 Municipal SWOT Analysis ……………………………………………….………………………………………………………………….77 3.13 Prioritization …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…78 4. Developmental Strategies ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..83 5. Project Phase ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….110