DOCSLIB.ORG

Konstantin Solntsev Papers Finding

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Amherst College Center for Russian Culture Konstantin Solntsev Collection 1828-1968 [1924-1959] Accession Number: CRC91-0019, CRC92-0006 Quantity: 27.5 linear feet Containers: 22 Record Storage Boxes 3 Archival Boxes 9 Flat Archival Boxes Processed: 1997 March-October Finding Aid Prepared: 1997 November-December by: Tanya Chebotarev, Assistant Curator of Russian Collections Access: In general, there is no restriction on access t o the Konstantin Solntsev Collection for research use. Selected items may be restricted to protect the privacy rights of individuals or for other legal reasons. Copyright: It is the responsibility of the researcher to identify and satisfy the holders of copyrights. Requests for permission to publish material from the collection should be directed to the Director of the Amherst College Center for Russian Culture. © Amherst College Center for Russian Culture 1997 December 1 Konstantin Solntsev Collection Scope and Content Notes The Konstantin Solntsev Collection was donated to the Amherst College Center for Russian Culture by Thomas Whitney, Amherst College Class of 1937. The material, which consists of correspondence, manuscripts, mementos, photographs, printed matter and clippings, documents K. Solntsev's personal life and professional activities. Konstantin Ivanovich Solntsev was born in 1894 in Spassk (near Riazan'). In 1914, after graduation from St. Petersburg University, where he was a student of history in Professor Shliapkin's class, he became a volunteer in the Russian Army. After the October Revolution Solntsev emigrated to the United St ates. Later he lived in Berlin and Paris. In 1948 he came back to America. In Paris K. Solntsev became a taxi-driver and a passionate collector of Russian émigré materials. His goal as a trained historian was to document not only Russian literary and cultural events abroad, but the everyday life of the Russian community in exile. Solntsev's intention to preserve Russian history led him to buy a small house near Paris, where he start ed collecting and processing Russian periodicals and mementos. Apparently, Solntsev's purpose was to organize a Museum of Russian Émigré Literature in Paris. His personal friendship with Russian writer Alexei Remizov and his wife Serafima Remizova-Dovgello helped him to acquire a part of the Remizov Papers as well as several other collections from the circle of Remizov's literary acquaintances. In the United States Solntsev taught Russian language and literature at Syracuse University. Beyond his teaching duties, Solntsev was a devoted archivist and bibliographer. His contributions to Russian periodicals in the U.S. played a pivotal role in reconstructing the historical significance of the Russian émigré community in the West. Konstantin Solntsev died in New York in July 1961. The collection is divided into two series described as follows. I. Konstantin Solntsev Papers, 1900-1968, 5 linear feet: This series is further divided into three subseries: Correspondence, Personal Materials, Pro fessional and Research Materials. 1. Correspondence, 1927-1961, 0.75 linear feet, contains K. Solntsev's correspondence with friends and general professional correspondence. The subseries is arranged alphabetically by correspondent and each folder is arranged in chronological order. Unidentified correspondence has been placed at the beginning of the series. Separate listings have been given for each correspondent with three or more letters. Individuals writing one or two letters have been placed in "Letter" general files. An asterisk indicates that the sender used a pseudonym. 2. Personal Materials, 1909-1959, 0.75 linear feet, consists of address books, diaries, financial records, memoirs and photographs. The subseries is arranged alphabetically by type and each folder is arranged in alphabetical order. © Amherst College Center for Russian Culture 1997 December 2 Konstantin Solntsev Collection 3. Professional and Research Materials, 1900-1968, 3.5 linear feet, contains bibliophilic materials, drafts and clippings of Solntsev articles, his correspondence and research materials on specific topics, his lecture notes and a literary miscellany. The subseries is arranged alphabetically by subject and then chronologically. II. Third Party Materials, 1828-1968, 22.5 linear feet: This series is compiled of collected materials, personal documents of Russian émigrés belonging to Solntsev's circle, correspondence, manuscripts, and printed materials. The series is divided into two subseries: Papers of Contemporaries and Printed Materials. 1. Papers of Contemporaries, 1828-1960, 3.00 linear feet, consists of biographical material, correspondence and manuscript s by various authors. The subseries is arranged alphabetically by personal subject. 2. Printed Materials, 1896-1968, 19.5 linear feet, contains booklists, bulletins, catalogs, clippings, journals, newspapers, mementos, programs and reprints by various authors. The subseries is arranged alphabetically by subject and then in chronological order. Related Material: The Amherst College Center for Russian Culture has information about K. Solntsev beyond that found in this collection. Sources include: A. Remizov and S. Remizova-Dovgello Papers. Contact the Amherst College Center for Russian Culture for further information. © Amherst College Center for Russian Culture 1997 December 3 Konstantin Solntsev Collection History of the Collection The Konstantin Solntsev Collection constituted a part of Thomas Whitney, Amherst College Class of 1937, donation. Mr. Whitney bought this collection in 1964 from the widow of Konstantin Solntsev, Mrs. Barbara Solntsev. In 1996, when the collection was reviewed, internal evidence suggested that K. Solntsev arbitrarily incorporated into his own collection a part of the Vladimir Zenzinov Papers. In 1997, this part of the Vladimir Zenzinov Papers was removed from the Solntsev Collection and added to the Vladimir Zenzinov Papers. On the other hand, Kuprin's and Shmelev's materials, which were formerly maintained as a separate collection, were incorporated into the Konstantin Solntsev Collection. © Amherst College Center for Russian Culture 1997 December 4 Box and Folder Listing Konstantin Solntsev Collection Series I, Konstantin Solntsev Papers, 1900-1968 Subseries 1, Correspondence, 1927-1961 Box Folder No. No. Dates Description Personal Correspondence: 1 1 [1930 Mar 7] Unidentified 1940 Dec 13; Unidentified 1941 Jun 15 1945 Sep 29; Aldanov, M.* 1946 Apr 22 1948 Jan 7; Avtonomov, N. 1948 Feb 2 1960 Apr 12 Berezniaia, P. 1927 Dec 22 - Bialkovskii, M. 1927 Nov 12 1958 Feb 22 - Butkovich, V. and A. 1960 Sep 10 2 1949 Dec 5-27; Dobuzhinskii, M. 1951 Apr 30 1948 Jun 6; Falkovskii, E. 1951 May 31 1949 Jan 12 Fedotov, G. 1930 Mar 19 Fokin, B. 1959 Jan 16 Giatsintov, E. 1960 Jan 5 Gurland, E. 1938 Dec 26; Karrik, V. 1938 Aug 7 1929 May 21; Kheraskov, I. 1939 Dec 20; 1958 Sep 6 © Amherst College Center for Russian Culture 1997 December 5 Box and Folder Listing Konstantin Solntsev Collection Series I, Konstantin Solntsev Papers, 1900-1968 Subseries 1, Correspondence, 1927-1961 Box Folder No. No. Dates Description 1 3 1952 Apr 10; Maevskii, V. 1959 May 4 1929 May 15 - Mel'gunov, S. 1934 Dec 4 4 1935 May 25 - Mel'gunov, P. and S. 1936 Dec 19 5 1937 Jan 3 - Mel'gunov, P. and S. 1938 Sep 14 6 1939 Jan 11 - Mel'gunov, P. and S. 1939 Dec 9 7 1948 Feb 18 - Mel'gunov, P. and S. 1951 Oct 25 8 1949 Jan 21; Nabokov, V. 1950 Dec 12 1951 Jan 25 Nabokova, V. 1960 Aug 19 Navrotskii, J. 9 1960 Dec 15 Ozeretskovskaia, N. 1959 Dec 15 - Ragozin, S. 1959 Dec 19; 1960 Dec 23 1929 May 24 Schah-Paronwantz, D. 1930 Jan 26 Sergeev, M. 1945 Nov 29 Shmelev, I. 1958 Dec 3 Sivtsov, G. 1951 Jan 16 - Slobodzinskii, G. and S. 1952 Jan 17 © Amherst College Center for Russian Culture 1997 December 6 Box and Folder Listing Konstantin Solntsev Collection Series I, Konstantin Solntsev Papers, 1900-1968 Subseries 1, Correspondence, 1927-1961 Box Folder No. No. Dates Description 1 9 1935 Nov 15 - Stepanova, P. 1936 Nov 27 1931 Jan 1; Svatikova, P. 1959 Oct 19 10 1945 Jun 26 - Timashev, T. 1948 Feb 18 1943 May 22 - Timoshevich, N. 1945 Apr 14 11 1947 Nov 19 - Vaulin, V. 1948 Aug 22 1948 Jan 12 - Vishniak, M. 1927 Jul 31 - Volianik, N. 1928 Aug 7 1946 Mar 21; Zaitsev, B. 1947 Sep 3; 1961 Mar 11 1949 Jan 15 Zenzinov, V. Professional Correspondence. Incoming: 1 12 1929 Jul 8; Unidentified 1947 Feb 1 - 1948 Feb 20; 1949 Feb 19 1929; 1950 "A" general 1958-1961 1959 May 29 - Andreevskii, B. 1960 Feb 21 © Amherst College Center for Russian Culture 1997 December 7 Box and Folder Listing Konstantin Solntsev Collection Series I, Konstantin Solntsev Papers, 1900-1968 Subseries 1, Correspondence, 1927-1961 Box Folder No. No. Dates Description 1 12 1952 Sep 15 - Aronson, G. 1961 Jul 22 13 1947; 1952; "B" general 1958; 1960; 1961 1947 Feb 8 - Beliaev, N. 1947 Jun 18 1951 Mar 6 - Bondarenko, V. 1951 Oct 30 1950 Apr 19 - Browsin, B. 1951 Dec 16; 1958 14 1952; 1960 "C", "D" general 1929; 1935; "F" general 1960-1961 1952; 1958; "G" general 1959 1958 Feb 2 - Gabrichevskii, G. 1959 Jun 10 15 1939; 1960 "I", "J" general 1947 16 1927; 1947; "K" general 1952; 1958 - 1961 1949 Nov 18 - Kartashev, A. and P. 1960 Jun 18 1947 Mar 24 - Kovalev, A. 1947 Dec 22 © Amherst College Center for Russian Culture 1997 December 8 Box and Folder Listing Konstantin Solntsev Collection Series I, Konstantin Solntsev Papers, 1900-1968 Subseries 1, Correspondence, 1927-1961 Box Folder No. No. Dates Description 1 16 1947 Jan 17 - Kozerchuk, D. 1947 Jun 2 17 1929; 1947; "L" general 1952 1938 Mar 30 - Losskii, N. 1938 Apr 29 18 1929; 1949; "M" general 1951; 1959 - 1961 19 1927; 1950 - "N" general 1951; 1959 1945 Nov 24 - Nikolaevskii, B. 1948 Feb 5 20 1929 Dec 31; Osorgin, M.* 1931 Apr 27 21 1938; 1947; "P" general 1950; 1958 - 1960 22 1949; 1958; "R" general 1960 1947 Nov 2 - Rudnitskii, A.
Recommended publications
  • My Wonderful World of Slapstick

    My Wonderful World of Slapstick

    THE THIS BOOK IS THE PROPERTY OF Georgia State Bo»r* of Education AN. PR,CLAun\;v eSupt of School* 150576 DECATUR -DeKALB LIBRARY REGIONAI SERVICE ROCKDALE COUNTY NEWTON COUNTY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from Media History Digital Library http://archive.org/details/mywonderfulworldOObust MY WONDERFUL WORLD OF SLAPSTICK MY WO/VDERFUL WORLD OF SLAPSTICK BUSTER KEATON WITH CHARLES SAMUELS 150576 DOVBLEW& COMPANY, lNC.,<k*D£H C(TYt HlW Yo*K DECATUR - DeKALB LIBRARY REGiOMA! $&KZ ROCKDALE COUNTY NEWTON COUNTY Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 60-5934 Copyright © i960 by Buster Keaton and Charles Samuels All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America First Edition J 6>o For Eleanor 1. THE THREE KEATONS 9 2. I BECOME A SOCIAL ISSUE 29 3. THE KEATONS INVADE ENGLAND 49 4. BACK HOME AGAIN IN GOD'S COUNTRY 65 5. ONE WAY TO GET INTO THE MOVIES 85 6. WHEN THE WORLD WAS OURS 107 7. BOFFOS BY MAN AND BEAST 123 8. THE DAY THE LAUGHTER STOPPED 145 9. MARRIAGE AND PROSPERITY SNEAK UP ON ME 163 10. MY $300,000 HOME AND SOME OTHER SEMI-TRIUMPHS 179 11. THE WORST MISTAKE OF MY LIFE 199 12. THE TALKIE REVOLUTION 217 13. THE CHAPTER I HATE TO WRITE 233 14. A PRATFALL CAN BE A BEAUTIFUL THING 249 15. ALL'S WELL THAT ENDS WELL 267 THE THREE KeAtOnS Down through the years my face has been called a sour puss, a dead pan, a frozen face, The Great Stone Face, and, believe it or not, "a tragic mask." On the other hand that kindly critic, the late James Agee, described my face as ranking "almost with Lin- coln's as an early American archetype, it was haunting, handsome, almost beautiful." I cant imagine what the great rail splitter's reaction would have been to this, though I sure was pleased.
  • Interview with Yulia Malysheva

    Interview with Yulia Malysheva

    A Revolution of the Mind INTERVIEW WITH YULIA MALYSHEVA ulia Sergeevna Malysheva is one of the leading youth activists in Russia. An elected Y municipal deputy in Moscow, a researcher at the Institute for the Economy in Transi- tion, and leader of the youth organization Oborona (which she cofounded) and of the youth branch of the SPS party, Malysheva also later became the leader of the youth branch of the People’s Democratic Union, the political movement led by former Prime Minister Mikhail Kasyanov. In this interview, she speaks about the possibility of a color revolution in Russia, cooperation with other domestic and international youth groups, the Kremlin’s worried reaction, the nature of the Nashi pro-Kremlin youth group, the attempts to unite the Russian democrats, the successes of Oborona, the chances the democrats have of returning to power, and what she expects from the West. Demokratizatsiya: Tell us about Oborona. Malysheva: Oborona is a youth organization that appeared with the Orange wave in Ukraine. It was important for us that many others were waiting for us, since youth have always been in the avant-garde. At that time, our adult colleagues kept arguing as to who was more important. In the end, they got 3 percent [in the Duma elections]. It was evi- dent that they were not well presented before the Russian voters. We founded Oborona not only with young people who sympathize with SPS, Yabloko, the [former SPS leader and independent candidate Irina] Khakamada movement and other such formations—but also with those who support the democratic process and oppose the Putin regime.
  • Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich. Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich

    Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich. Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich

    Photo courtesy Alaska State Library, Michael Z. Vinokouroff Collection P243-1-082. Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich. Sebastian Archimandrite Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich. Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich SERBIAN ORTHODOX APOSTLE TO AMERICA by Hieromonk Damascene . A A U S during the presidency of Abraham Lincoln, Archimandrite B Sebastian Dabovich has the distinction of being the first person born in the United States of America to be ordained as an Orthodox priest, 1 and also the first native-born American to be tonsured as an Orthodox monk. His greatest distinction, however, lies in the tremen- dous apostolic, pastoral, and literary work that he accomplished dur- ing the forty-eight years of his priestly ministry. Known as the “Father of Serbian Orthodoxy in America,” 2 he was responsible for the found- ing of the first Serbian churches in the New World. This, however, was only one part of his life’s work, for he tirelessly and zealously sought to spread the Orthodox Faith to all peoples, wherever he was called. He was an Orthodox apostle of universal significance. Describing the vast scope of Fr. Sebastian’s missionary activity, Bishop Irinej (Dobrijevic) of Australia and New Zealand has written: 1 Alaskan-born priests were ordained before Fr. Sebastian, but this was when Alaska was still part of Russia. 2 Mirko Dobrijevic (later Irinej, Bishop of Australia and New Zealand), “The First American Serbian Apostle—Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich,” Again, vol. 16, no. 4 (December 1993), pp. 13–14. THE ORTHODOX WORD “Without any outside funding or organizational support, he carried the gospel of peace from country to country….
  • The Role of Stanislavsky and the Moscow Art Theatre's 1923 And

    The Role of Stanislavsky and the Moscow Art Theatre's 1923 And

    CULTURAL EXCHANGE: THE ROLE OF STANISLAVSKY AND THE MOSCOW ART THEATRE’S 1923 AND1924 AMERICAN TOURS Cassandra M. Brooks, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2014 APPROVED: Olga Velikanova, Major Professor Richard Golden, Committee Member Guy Chet, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Brooks, Cassandra M. Cultural Exchange: The Role of Stanislavsky and the Moscow Art Theatre’s 1923 and 1924 American Tours. Master of Arts (History), August 2014, 105 pp., bibliography, 43 titles. The following is a historical analysis on the Moscow Art Theatre’s (MAT) tours to the United States in 1923 and 1924, and the developments and changes that occurred in Russian and American theatre cultures as a result of those visits. Konstantin Stanislavsky, the MAT’s co-founder and director, developed the System as a new tool used to help train actors—it provided techniques employed to develop their craft and get into character. This would drastically change modern acting in Russia, the United States and throughout the world. The MAT’s first (January 2, 1923 – June 7, 1923) and second (November 23, 1923 – May 24, 1924) tours provided a vehicle for the transmission of the System. In addition, the tour itself impacted the culture of the countries involved. Thus far, the implications of the 1923 and 1924 tours have been ignored by the historians, and have mostly been briefly discussed by the theatre professionals. This thesis fills the gap in historical knowledge.
  • The Noncommunist Left, Social Constituencies, and Political Strategies in Russia

    The Noncommunist Left, Social Constituencies, and Political Strategies in Russia

    The Noncommunist Left, Social Constituencies, and Political Strategies in Russia PAUL T. CHRISTENSEN efining and identifying the noncommunist Left in Russia is in many ways an Dexercise in frustration. Whereas the organizations of the noncommunist Left in Russia are somewhat more permanent than that analogy suggests, the sugges- tion that we are dealing with tenuous political formations, with few exceptions, very much to the point. There are many such organizations in Russia; some are relatively stable and have a history, many are not; and all of them are relatively small and have problematic constituencies. There are three central questions to address if we are to understand the potential political import of these groups for Russia’s political future. First, what are the organizations and parties of the non- communist Left that have any stature and political salience? Second, what are their actual or potential social constituencies? Third, what are the political strate- gies of the noncommunist Left, and why does it seem to have such a problem in carving out a political space in contemporary Russia? Before discussing the specific questions raised above, it is important to situ- ate the noncommunist Left in Russia, and indeed the entire Russian political spec- trum, on the conceptual map of political ideologies used in Western social science. Left—historically centered around socialist and communist movements—puts a high value on democracy in the economic as well as in the political realm, on eco- nomic egalitarianism, and traditionally views an expansive role for the state and organized social interests in the operation of society as necessary and positive.
  • 1998 Acquisitions

    1998 Acquisitions

    1998 Acquisitions PAINTINGS PRINTS Carl Rice Embrey, Shells, 1972. Acrylic on panel, 47 7/8 x 71 7/8 in. Albert Belleroche, Rêverie, 1903. Lithograph, image 13 3/4 x Museum purchase with funds from Charline and Red McCombs, 17 1/4 in. Museum purchase, 1998.5. 1998.3. Henry Caro-Delvaille, Maternité, ca.1905. Lithograph, Ernest Lawson, Harbor in Winter, ca. 1908. Oil on canvas, image 22 x 17 1/4 in. Museum purchase, 1998.6. 24 1/4 x 29 1/2 in. Bequest of Gloria and Dan Oppenheimer, Honoré Daumier, Ne vous y frottez pas (Don’t Meddle With It), 1834. 1998.10. Lithograph, image 13 1/4 x 17 3/4 in. Museum purchase in memory Bill Reily, Variations on a Xuande Bowl, 1959. Oil on canvas, of Alexander J. Oppenheimer, 1998.23. 70 1/2 x 54 in. Gift of Maryanne MacGuarin Leeper in memory of Marsden Hartley, Apples in a Basket, 1923. Lithograph, image Blanche and John Palmer Leeper, 1998.21. 13 1/2 x 18 1/2 in. Museum purchase in memory of Alexander J. Kent Rush, Untitled, 1978. Collage with acrylic, charcoal, and Oppenheimer, 1998.24. graphite on panel, 67 x 48 in. Gift of Jane and Arthur Stieren, Maximilian Kurzweil, Der Polster (The Pillow), ca.1903. 1998.9. Woodcut, image 11 1/4 x 10 1/4 in. Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Frederic J. SCULPTURE Oppenheimer in memory of Alexander J. Oppenheimer, 1998.4. Pierre-Jean David d’Angers, Philopoemen, 1837. Gilded bronze, Louis LeGrand, The End, ca.1887. Two etching and aquatints, 19 in.
  • Cross-Domain Coercion: the Current Russian Art of Strategy ______

    Cross-Domain Coercion: the Current Russian Art of Strategy ______

    PPrroolliiffeerraattiioonn PPaappeerrss 5544 ______________________________________________________________________ Cross-Domain Coercion: The Current Russian Art of Strategy ______________________________________________________________________ Dmitry (Dima) Adamsky November 2015 Security Studies Center The Institut Français des Relations Internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. In collaboration with the Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission ISBN: 978-2-36567-466-9 © Ifri – 2015 – All rights reserved Ifri Ifri-Bruxelles 27 rue de la Procession Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – FRANCE 1000 – Brussels – BELGIUM Tel : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 Tel : 32 (0)2 238 51 10 Fax : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Fax : 32 (0)2 238 51 15 Email : [email protected] Email : [email protected] Website : http://www.ifri.org/ Proliferation Papers Though it has long been a concern for security experts, proliferation has truly become an important political issue with the last decade, marked simultaneously by the nuclearization of South Asia, the weakening of international regimes and the discovery of frauds and traffics, the number and gravity of which have surprised observers and analysts alike (Iraq in 1991, Libya until 2004, North Korean and Iranian programs or the A.
  • A Survey of Groups, Individuals, Strategies and Prospects the Russia Studies Centre at the Henry Jackson Society

    A Survey of Groups, Individuals, Strategies and Prospects the Russia Studies Centre at the Henry Jackson Society

    The Russian Opposition: A Survey of Groups, Individuals, Strategies and Prospects The Russia Studies Centre at the Henry Jackson Society By Julia Pettengill Foreword by Chris Bryant MP 1 First published in 2012 by The Henry Jackson Society The Henry Jackson Society 8th Floor – Parker Tower, 43-49 Parker Street, London, WC2B 5PS Tel: 020 7340 4520 www.henryjacksonsociety.org © The Henry Jackson Society, 2012 All rights reserved The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and are not necessarily indicative of those of The Henry Jackson Society or its directors Designed by Genium, www.geniumcreative.com ISBN 978-1-909035-01-0 2 About The Henry Jackson Society The Henry Jackson Society: A cross-partisan, British think-tank. Our founders and supporters are united by a common interest in fostering a strong British, European and American commitment towards freedom, liberty, constitutional democracy, human rights, governmental and institutional reform and a robust foreign, security and defence policy and transatlantic alliance. The Henry Jackson Society is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales under company number 07465741 and a charity registered in England and Wales under registered charity number 1140489. For more information about Henry Jackson Society activities, our research programme and public events please see www.henryjacksonsociety.org. 3 CONTENTS Foreword by Chris Bryant MP 5 About the Author 6 About the Russia Studies Centre 6 Acknowledgements 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 INTRODUCTION 11 CHAPTER
  • Download May 2021 Pastoral Changes

    Download May 2021 Pastoral Changes

    PASTORAL CHANGES Official No. 646 May 2021 EPISCOPAL CONSECRATIONS (ELIEL), Archimandrite Gerasim was elected by the Holy Synod of Bishops as Bishop of Fort Worth on May 18, 2021. Bishop-elect Gerasim will be ordained on June 29, 2020, at St. Seraphim of Sarov Cathedral, Dallas, TX. RECEPTIONS ČIŽMÁR, Priest Ján was canonically received by vesting into the ranks of the clergy of the Orthodox Church in America effective May 5, 2021 by Archbishop Paul, on behalf of Metropolitan Tikhon. He was transferred to the omophorion of Archbishop Paul and is attached to the Diocese of the Midwest. (Diocese of the Midwest) ORDINATIONS ANDERSON, Curtis Christopher was ordained to the Holy Diaconate on May 3, 2021 by Archbishop Alexander at St. Seraphim of Sarov Cathedral, Dallas, TX. He is under the omophorion of Archbishop Alexander and attached to the Diocese of the South. (Diocese of the South) ASSIGNMENTS ANDERSON, Deacon Christopher was attached to St. Seraphim of Sarov Cathedral, Dallas, TX, effective May 3, 2021. (Diocese of the South) ČIŽMÁR, Priest Ján was assigned Priest-in-Charge of St. Theodosius Cathedral, Cleveland, OH, effective May 5, 2021. (Diocese of the Midwest) (DURANT), Igumen Cyprian was released from his duties at St. Mary of Egypt Church, Norcross, GA, and was attached to St. Seraphim of Sarov Cathedral, Dallas, TX, effective May 6, 2021. (Diocese of the South) FONSECA, Priest Elias was released from The Sign of the Theotokos Church, Montréal, QC, and assigned Priest-in-Charge of St. Benoît de Nursie Church, Verdun, QC, effective May 14, 2021. (Archdiocese of Canada) HODGES, Archpriest Mark had his suspension lifted, effective May 13, 2021.
  • A Review of Dissident Sacramental Theology

    A Review of Dissident Sacramental Theology

    A REVIEW OF DISSIDENT SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY Five years ago it was my privilege to address this Society, making a cursory review of the main points on which Catholics and Orthodox disagree in the realm of dogmatic theology. These points are neither too numerous nor too difficult to preclude a harmonious solution. The most fundamental issue is the primacy of the pope. But even here, since the Orthodox already believe in the infallibility of the Church and in an honorary primacy of the Bishop of Rome in that Church, it might not be too sanguine to posit the possibility of arriving at an understanding of the pope as the mouthpiece of the infallible Church. This year the officers of the Society have requested a review of Orthodox sacramental practice in the hope that this might furnish some summary of Orthodox moral theology by providing a glimpse of the actual religious life in an Orthodox parish, as well as bring- ing our Catholic theologians up to date on the practical questions they must face regarding intercommunion if any reunion should ever be achieved. At the outset we should express the caution that in this practical as well as in the theoretical sphere, we must beware of absolute predications—because there is apt to be a divergency of practice between the various national groups of Orthodox and even within the same national group. The chief bodies of Orthodox—at least as far as theological leadership is concerned—are the Greeks and the Russians. Usually the Syrian and Albanian Orthodox will follow Greek practice, while the various Slav groups like the Serbs, Bulgars and Ukrainians will be content to follow the hegemony of the Russian Orthodox Church.
  • Michael Z. Vinokouroff: a Profile and Inventory of His Papers And

    Michael Z. Vinokouroff: a Profile and Inventory of His Papers And

    MICHAEL Z. VINOKOUROFF: A PROFILE AND INVENTORY OF HIS PAPERS (Ms 81) AND PHOTOGRAPHS (PCA 243) in the Alaska Historical Library Louise Martin, Ph.D. Project coordinator and editor Alaska Department of Education Division ofState Libraries P.O. Box G Juneau Alaska 99811 1986 Martin, Louise. Michael Z. Vinokouroff: a profile and inventory of his papers (MS 81) and photographs (PCA 243) in the Alaska Historical Library / Louise Martin, Ph.D., project coordinator and editor. -- Juneau, Alaska (P.O. Box G. Juneau 99811): Alaska Department of Education, Division of State Libraries, 1986. 137, 26 p. : ill.; 28 cm. Includes index and references to photographs, church and Siberian material available on microfiche from the publisher. Partial contents: M.Z. Vinokouroff: profile of a Russian emigre scholar and bibliophile/ Richard A. Pierce -- It must be done / M.Z.., Vinokouroff; trans- lation by Richard A. Pierce. 1. Orthodox Eastern Church, Russian. 2. Siberia (R.S.F.S.R.) 3. Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church of America--Diocese of Alaska--Archives-- Catalogs. 4. Vinokour6ff, Michael Z., 1894-1983-- Library--Catalogs. 5. Soviet Union--Emigrationand immigration. 6. Authors, Russian--20th Century. 7. Alaska Historical Library-- Catalogs. I. Alaska. Division of State Libraries. II. Pierce, Richard A. M.Z. Vinokouroff: profile of a Russian emigre scholar and bibliophile. III. Vinokouroff, Michael Z., 1894- 1983. It must be done. IV. Title. DK246 .M37 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................. 1 “M.Z. Vinokouroff: Profile of a Russian Émigré Scholar and Bibliophile,” by Richard A. Pierce................... 5 Appendix: “IT MUST BE DONE!” by M.Z. Vinokouroff; translation by Richard A.
  • Putin's Youth

    Putin's Youth

    Putin’s Youth: Nashi and the Pro-Regime Youth Movement in Russia, 2000-2012 Angela Lee Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Prerequisite for Honors in History May 2013 © 2013 Angela Lee Table of Contents page I. Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………………iii II. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………1 III. Background: The Komsomol, 1918-1991 ……………………….………………...…………4 IV. Chapter 1: Idushchie Vmeste, 2000-2005……………………………………...……………17 V. Chapter 2: Nashi Emerges, 2005-2008………………………………….…………………..31 VI. Chapter 3: Nashi Recedes, 2008-2012…………………………….………………………...55 VII. Conclusion.…………………………………………………………………………………..66 VIII. Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………69 ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Nina Tumarkin for her patience, sound guidance, and endlessly good humor. I would also like to thank all my History professors at Wellesley for their dedication to teaching and their passion for the subject, and also to the Russian Language Department for making the process of learning Russian a joy during this past year. I am grateful to those who were part of the History Honors Thesis Seminar for the rich discussions and thought-provoking questions. I am thankful to Professors Mark Kramer, Ivan Kurilla, Valerie Sperling, and Elizabeth Wood for their willingness to direct me to the right sources for my research. And finally, I am indebted to the love and support of my parents and siblings for all these years. iii Introduction “The question for Russia now is what to do next. How can we make the new, market