Download Full Report 742.1KB .Pdf File

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Full Report 742.1KB .Pdf File Museum Victoria Science Reports 10: 1–42 (2006) ISSN 1833-0290 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mvsr.2006.10 A checklist and bibliography of the Opisthobranchia (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Victoria and the Bass Strait area, south-eastern Australia ROBERT BURN Honorary Associate, Museum Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia Abstract Burn, R. 2006. A checklist and bibliography of the Opisthobranchia (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Victoria and the Bass Strait area, south-eastern Australia. Museum Victoria Science Reports 10: 1–38. A checklist of the opisthobranch fauna (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia) of Victoria and the Bass Strait area, south- eastern Australia comprises a total of 364 nominal species, divided as follows: Acteonida and Cephalaspidea 77 species, Rhodopemorpha 1 species, Sacoglossa 31 species, Anaspidea 10 species, Umbraculida 2 species, Pleurobranchida 6 species, Pteropoda 25 species, and Nudibranchia 212 species. One hundred and thirty eight species (38%) are assigned to genus only; these include both unidentified and unnamed species. Forty species (11%) are yet to be taken alive within the checklist area. The bibliography includes references for the original descriptions of all the genera and all the named species, together with all literature pertinent in some way to the opisthobranch fauna of Victoria, the Bass Strait area, and south- eastern Australia. Keywords Mollusca, Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia, Australia, Victoria, Bass Strait, checklist Introduction collected. For the Australian area, at least six such guides have been published within the past 20 years (Willan & Coleman, 1984; Coleman, 1989, 2001; Burn, 1989; Wells & Bryce, 1993; This checklist is a compilation of the 364 opisthobranch Marshall & Willan, 1999), each of which illustrates some mollusc species recorded from, or otherwise known to the species occurring within the Victoria and Bass Strait area. Most author as occurring in, Victoria and the Bass Strait area, south- species however are small to very small, often not easily seen in eastern Australia. Many entries are of unidentified and life and difficult to distinguish clearly from their food host, and unnamed species, even generic placement is in doubt in some problematic to photograph and draw. No guide is available to instances. Geographically, the checklist covers the help identify these small species. opisthobranch fauna of the area enclosed by a line in the west from the Victoria/South Australia border to the north-west Opisthobranchs are a very common component of the intertidal corner of Tasmania, a line in the east from the Victoria/New shorelines of Victoria and the Bass Strait area, both in numbers South Wales border to the north-east corner of Tasmania, the of species and number of specimens. The majority of species entire coastline of Victoria along the north, and the north are small to very small and are therefore easily overlooked or coastline of Tasmania along the south (roughly 37°30–41°S, not recognised. Nevertheless, by exploring the various habitats 140°–150°E). Bass Strait itself is generally less than 100 m on and around a rocky reef on the central Victorian coastline deep. However, the area delineated above includes slope waters (Wilsons Promontory to Cape Otway), it is possible for an up to 600 m deep in the west and 2000 m in the east, hence experienced person to observe 20-30, exceptionally more than inclusion of some few deep-water species in the checklist. 40, species on a single low tide. Repeated fortnightly observation and exploitation of all accessible habitats over two Zoogeographically, Victoria and the Bass Strait area lies within years at a single location (Point Danger, Torquay, 1980-1981, the southern Australian temperate region, and many R. Burn unpublished observations) resulted in a list of 95 opisthobranch species have wide distributions across southern species, at least 10% of which were new to science or Australia. At times, warmer-water incursions, more commonly previously unrecorded for Victoria. Over a longer period and from the east than from the west, bring warm-temperate species by more than one observer, the channel banks at San Remo, into the Bass Strait area, and on rarer occasions, tropical and Westernport produced a list exceeding 120 species, again with sub-tropical species to eastern Bass Strait. Cool-temperate both new and unrecorded species (Burn, 1990). In deeper species from south-eastern Tasmania are also sometimes waters, the Bass Strait Survey 1979-1984 showed that recorded from Victoria and the Bass Strait area. Further afield, opisthobranchs are common and diverse throughout the Strait, New Zealand too influences the Victorian and Bass Strait fauna some 140 live-taken species having been separated from benthic with about 20 species in common, not including the pteropods. samples. Five stations, sampled by epibenthic sled in depths of 55-130 m, averaged 21 species per station (Burn in Poore et al., Opisthobranchs are found from the intertidal to the deepest seas. 1985). However, large sampling gaps remain to be investigated: The species in this checklist have a depth range of 0-1760 m, little is known of the shallow water opisthobranch fauna of with the vast majority occurring in the top 30 m. Because of eastern Victoria (Wilsons Promontory to Cape Howe) or of the their beauty, opisthobranchs are favoured animals, especially of eastern and western sections of the north coast of Tasmania. the SCUBA-diving fraternity, and many regional guides are available to help identify species seen, photographed or 2 Robert Burn Some species in the checklist have yet to be found alive in species included in the inventory were: Ceratosoma Victoria and the Bass Strait area. These species are marked brevicaudatum, Hoplodoris nodulosa (as Staurodoris with an asterisk (*). This applies particularly to records of shell- pustulata), Dendrodoris nigra (as D. melaena) Doriopsilla bearing species (Cephalaspidea, Anaspidea, Thecosomata). No carneola (as Dendrodoris carneola), Paradoris dubia (as attempt has been made to assess the interstitial opisthobranchs Alloiodoris marmorata), Aphelodoris berghi (as Archidoris that may occur in the marine meiobenthos of south-eastern varia), and Armina sp. 1 (as Armina cygnea Bergh, 1876, a Australia. Species likely to occur include members of the small large species known from NSW, SA and WA, and possibly the order Acochlidioidea, as well as cephalaspideans (Philine, northern coastline of Australia). At this stage, the checklist of Philinoglossa) and aeolidoideans (Pseudovermis). Victorian and Bass Strait numbered 44 shell-bearing and eight shell-less or nudibranch species, totalling 52 species. The systematic classification followed in the checklist is Shortly after, the writer collected his first nudibranch, essentially that tabled in Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis Ceratosoma brevicaudatum, under stones among seagrass, San (Beesley et al., 1998). Papers published since 1995 (date of the Remo, Westernport, 13 March 1954. A burgeoning interest final acceptance of manuscripts for the above publication) and soon led to a single-minded concentration on nudibranchs and the closing date (30 September 2006) of the checklist present shelled opisthobranchs, and the rapid expansion of knowledge many changes, some major, some minor, some well supported, of the Victorian fauna. The next listing of Victorian marine some speculative. At the time of writing, the newest “Working molluscs (Macpherson & Gabriel, 1962) included 58 shelled Classification of Gastropoda” (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005) and 62 nudibranch species, a total of 120 species. In a little summarizes recent phlyogenetic research, and speculates upon more than 10 years, the known opisthobranch fauna had more things to come. Reference to many of these changes is inserted than doubled (Burn, 1957a, 1957b, 1958, 1960b). By 1980, the at various points of the checklist. opisthobranch fauna known to the writer from Victoria and the Bass Strait area had more than doubled again to 250 species. History of discovery This number included many species described or recorded in papers published from 1963 to 1979 (Burn, see bibliography), “The history of discovery of opisthobranchs in Australia is best as well as many species awaiting description for want of considered separately for those with shells and those without. additional material and time to work up the descriptive text. Species with shells were included with other shelled molluscs by early collectors and so their discovery follows the path The last quarter century have seen the number increase further described elsewhere for other marine shells.” (Rudman, 1998: with the descriptions of new species (Rudman, 1982, 1983, 919). Shell-less species were too much of a problem for early 1986, 1987a, 1987b, 1990; Willan, 1988; Miller & Willan, collectors, so much so that they were almost totally ignored. 1986). Intensive intertidal and subtidal field work by the writer The history of discovery of opisthobranchs in Victoria and the and colleagues, and deeper water survey work in Bass Strait by Bass Strait area mirrors that for Australia. Museum Victoria, have revealed additional new records and new species. All species, named, unnamed, and unidentified, The very first shell-less opisthobranch reported from Victoria have an entry in the checklist, the total now standing at 363, of and the Bass Strait area was Pleurobranchaea maculata by which 152 are shell-bearing and 212 nudibranch species. And Quoy & Gaimard
Recommended publications
  • Journal of Natural History
    This article was downloaded by:[Canadian Research Knowledge Network] On: 5 October 2007 Access Details: [subscription number 770938029] Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Natural History Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713192031 Revision of the nudibranch gastropod genus Tyrinna Bergh, 1898 (Doridoidea: Chromodorididae) Michael Schrödl; Sandra V. Millen Online Publication Date: 01 August 2001 To cite this Article: Schrödl, Michael and Millen, Sandra V. (2001) 'Revision of the nudibranch gastropod genus Tyrinna Bergh, 1898 (Doridoidea: Chromodorididae)', Journal of Natural History, 35:8, 1143 - 1171 To link to this article: DOI: 10.1080/00222930152434472 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930152434472 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article maybe used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary
    July 15, 2013 Final Report Project SR12-002: Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary Gary L. Taghon, Rutgers University, Project Manager [email protected] Judith P. Grassle, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Charlotte M. Fuller, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Rosemarie F. Petrecca, Rutgers University, Co-Manager and Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Patricia Ramey, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Frankfurt Germany, Co-Manager [email protected] Thomas Belton, NJDEP Project Manager and NJDEP Research Coordinator [email protected] Marc Ferko, NJDEP Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Bob Schuster, NJDEP Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring [email protected] Introduction The Barnegat Bay ecosystem is potentially under stress from human impacts, which have increased over the past several decades. Benthic macroinvertebrates are commonly included in studies to monitor the effects of human and natural stresses on marine and estuarine ecosystems. There are several reasons for this. Macroinvertebrates (here defined as animals retained on a 0.5-mm mesh sieve) are abundant in most coastal and estuarine sediments, typically on the order of 103 to 104 per meter squared. Benthic communities are typically composed of many taxa from different phyla, and quantitative measures of community diversity (e.g., Rosenberg et al. 2004) and the relative abundance of animals with different feeding behaviors (e.g., Weisberg et al. 1997, Pelletier et al. 2010), can be used to evaluate ecosystem health. Because most benthic invertebrates are sedentary as adults, they function as integrators, over periods of months to years, of the properties of their environment.
    [Show full text]
  • SNH Commissioned Report 765: Seagrass (Zostera) Beds in Orkney
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 765 Seagrass (Zostera) beds in Orkney COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 765 Seagrass (Zostera) beds in Orkney For further information on this report please contact: Kate Thompson Scottish Natural Heritage 54-56 Junction Road KIRKWALL Orkney KW15 1AW Telephone: 01856 875302 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Thomson, M. and Jackson, E, with Kakkonen, J. 2014. Seagrass (Zostera) beds in Orkney. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 765. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2014. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Seagrass (Zostera) beds in Orkney Commissioned Report No. 765 Project No: 848 Contractors: Emma Jackson (The Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom) and Malcolm Thomson (Sula Diving) Year of publication: 2014 Keywords Seagrass; Zostera marina; Orkney; predictive model; survey. Background Seagrasses (Zostera spp) are marine flowering plants that develop on sands and muds in sheltered intertidal and shallow subtidal areas. Seagrass beds are important marine habitats but are vulnerable to a range of human induced pressures. Their vulnerability and importance to habitat creation and ecological functioning is recognised in their inclusion on the recommended Priority Marine Features list for Scotland’s seas. Prior to this study, there were few confirmed records of Zostera in Orkney waters. This study combined a predictive modelling approach with boat-based surveys to enhance under- standing of seagrass distribution in Orkney and inform conservation management.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Norwegian Sea Slugs (Nudibranchia): New Species to Norwegian Coastal Waters and New Data on Distribution of Rare Species
    Fauna norvegica 2013 Vol. 32: 45-52. ISSN: 1502-4873 Diversity of Norwegian sea slugs (Nudibranchia): new species to Norwegian coastal waters and new data on distribution of rare species Jussi Evertsen1 and Torkild Bakken1 Evertsen J, Bakken T. 2013. Diversity of Norwegian sea slugs (Nudibranchia): new species to Norwegian coastal waters and new data on distribution of rare species. Fauna norvegica 32: 45-52. A total of 5 nudibranch species are reported from the Norwegian coast for the first time (Doridoxa ingolfiana, Goniodoris castanea, Onchidoris sparsa, Eubranchus rupium and Proctonotus mucro- niferus). In addition 10 species that can be considered rare in Norwegian waters are presented with new information (Lophodoris danielsseni, Onchidoris depressa, Palio nothus, Tritonia griegi, Tritonia lineata, Hero formosa, Janolus cristatus, Cumanotus beaumonti, Berghia norvegica and Calma glau- coides), in some cases with considerable changes to their distribution. These new results present an update to our previous extensive investigation of the nudibranch fauna of the Norwegian coast from 2005, which now totals 87 species. An increase in several new species to the Norwegian fauna and new records of rare species, some with considerable updates, in relatively few years results mainly from sampling effort and contributions by specialists on samples from poorly sampled areas. doi: 10.5324/fn.v31i0.1576. Received: 2012-12-02. Accepted: 2012-12-20. Published on paper and online: 2013-02-13. Keywords: Nudibranchia, Gastropoda, taxonomy, biogeography 1. Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Corresponding author: Jussi Evertsen E-mail: [email protected] IntRODUCTION the main aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific Differences in the Reaction to Atropine and in the Histology of the Esophagi of the Common California Sea Hares of the Genus Aplysia
    Interspecific Differences in the Reaction to Atropine and in the Histology of the Esophagi of the Common California Sea Hares of the Genus Aplysia LINDSAY R. WINKLER and BERNARD E. TILTON! DURING A STUDY of the effects of certain cho­ through two 5 gal. carboys maintained in a re­ linergic agents on the tissues of Aplysia, it was frigerator. It was thus possible to keep the water noted that the esophagi of the two California clean and cooled to approximately the tempera­ species (A. califarnica and A. vaccaria) reacted ture of the intertidal environment of these ani­ divergently to atropine. This is of interest to mals. Parsley obtained in the local market was both the taxonomy and physiology of the genus eaten in quantity by A. califarnica but was re­ as well as potentially to a better understanding fused by A. vaccaria. Consequently all speci­ of the mode of action of atropine. Other drugs mens of the latter were used as soon as prac­ commonly known to show activity on muscle ticable. tissue were also tested on the two species to Animals were sacrificed by incising the entire determine if any other interspecifically diver­ length of the foot, turning the animal inside out gent reactions existed. These pharmacological and removing the esophagus after tying it at reactions will be reported later. both ends. The esophagi were suspended from Botazzi (1898) observed the periodic con­ a plastic holder in conventional baths using 30 tractions of the esophagus of the European ml. of sea water. The movable end of the esoph­ Aplysia and made a thorough study of its phys­ agus was ligated to a Grass force-displacement iology.
    [Show full text]
  • Metagenetic Analysis of 2017 Plankton Samples from Prince William Sound, Alaska
    Metagenetic Analysis of 2017 Plankton Samples from Prince William Sound, Alaska. Report to Prince William Sound Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council (PWSRCAC) From Molecular Ecology Laboratory Moss Landing Marine Laboratory Dr. Jonathan Geller Melinda Wheelock Martin Guo Any opinions expressed in this PWSRCAC-commissioned report are not necessarily those of PWSRCAC. December 1, 2018 Revised August 15, 2019 Abstract This report describes the methods and findings of the metagenetic analysis of plankton samples from the waters of Prince William Sound (PWS), Alaska. The study was done to identify zooplankton, in particular the larvae of invasive benthic species. Plankton samples, collected by the Prince William Sound Science Center (PWSSC), were analyzed by the Molecular Ecology Laboratory at the Moss Landing Marine Laboratories. The samples were taken from five stations in May of 2017 in Port Valdez and elsewhere in PWS. DNA was extracted from bulk plankton and a portion of the mitochondrial Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene, the most commonly used DNA barcode for animals, was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Products of PCR were sequenced using Illumina reagents and MiSeq instrument. 211 operational taxonomic units (an approximation of biological species) were found and 52 were identified to species. Most species were crustaceans and molluscs, and none were non-native. We also compared PWSRCAC samples taken in 2016 to the current set of samples. Fewer species were identified in 2017 than in 2016, but sampling methods varied across years. Standardization of methods and a longer time series are necessary to investigate temporal trends. Page 1 of 17 952.431.190815.MLMetagenetic Introduction Monitoring marine habitat for species of concern, including invasive species, can be costly and time-consuming, which limits the information available to resource managers, scientists, and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachor, E., Bönsch, R., Boos, K., Gosselck, F., Grotjahn, M., Günther, C
    Rachor, E., Bönsch, R., Boos, K., Gosselck, F., Grotjahn, M., Günther, C.-P., Gusky, M., Gutow, L., Heiber, W., Jantschik, P., Krieg, H.J., Krone, R., Nehmer, P., Reichert, K., Reiss, H., Schröder, A., Witt, J. & Zettler, M.L. (2013): Rote Liste und Artenlisten der bodenlebenden wirbellosen Meerestiere. – In: Becker, N.; Haupt, H.; Hofbauer, N.; Ludwig, G. & Nehring, S. (Red.): Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere, Pflanzen und Pilze Deutschlands, Band 2: Meeresorganismen. – Münster (Landwirtschaftsverlag). – Na- turschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 70 (2): S. 81-176. Die Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere, Pflanzen und Pilze Deutschlands, Band 2: Meeres- organismen (ISBN 978-3-7843-5330-2) ist zu beziehen über BfN-Schriftenvertrieb – Leserservice – im Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH 48084 Münster Tel.: 02501/801-300 Fax: 02501/801-351 http://www.buchweltshop.de/bundesamt-fuer-naturschutz.html bzw. direkt über: http://www.buchweltshop.de/nabiv-heft-70-2-rote-liste-gefahrdeter-tiere-pflanzen-und- pilze-deutschlands-bd-2-meeresorganismen.html Preis: 39,95 € Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 70 (2) 2013 81 –176 Bundesamtfür Naturschutz Rote Liste und Artenlisten der bodenlebenden wirbellosen Meerestiere 4. Fassung, Stand Dezember 2007, einzelne Aktualisierungenbis 2012 EIKE RACHOR,REGINE BÖNSCH,KARIN BOOS, FRITZ GOSSELCK, MICHAEL GROTJAHN, CARMEN- PIA GÜNTHER, MANUELA GUSKY, LARS GUTOW, WILFRIED HEIBER, PETRA JANTSCHIK, HANS- JOACHIM KRIEG,ROLAND KRONE, PETRA NEHMER,KATHARINA REICHERT, HENNING REISS, ALEXANDER SCHRÖDER, JAN WITT und MICHAEL LOTHAR ZETTLER unter Mitarbeit von MAREIKE GÜTH Zusammenfassung Inden hier vorgelegten Listen für amMeeresbodenlebende wirbellose Tiere (Makrozoo- benthos) aus neun Tierstämmen wurden 1.244 Arten bewertet. Eszeigt sich, dass die Verhältnis- se in den deutschen Meeresgebietender Nord-und Ostsee (inkl.
    [Show full text]
  • A Blind Abyssal Corambidae (Mollusca, Nudibranchia) from the Norwegian Sea, with a Reevaluation of the Systematics of the Family
    A BLIND ABYSSAL CORAMBIDAE (MOLLUSCA, NUDIBRANCHIA) FROM THE NORWEGIAN SEA, WITH A REEVALUATION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FAMILY ÁNGEL VALDÉS & PHILIPPE BOUCHET VALDÉS, ÁNGEL & PHILIPPE BOUCHET 1998 03 13. A blind abyssal Corambidae (Mollusca, Nudibranchia) SARSIA from the Norwegian Sea, with a reevaluation of the systematics of the family. – Sarsia 83:15-20. Bergen. ISSN 0036-4827. Echinocorambe brattegardi gen. et sp. nov. is described based on five eyeless specimens collected between 2538 and 3016 m depth in the Norwegian Sea. This new monotypic genus differs from other confamilial taxa in having the dorsum covered with long papillae and a radula formula n.3.1.3.n. The posterior notch in the notum and gill morphology, which have traditionally been used as generic characters in the family Corambidae, are considered to have little or no taxonomical value above species level. Instead of the currently described 11 nominal genera, we recognize as valid only Corambe and Loy, to which is now added Echinocorambe. Loy differs from Corambe in the asym- metrical lobes of the posterior notal notch and the presence of spicules in the notum. All other nominal genera are objective or subjective synonyms of these two. Ángel Valdés, Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas, Laboratorio de Zoología, Universidad de Oviedo, E-33071 Oviedo, Spain (E-mail: [email protected]). – Philippe Bouchet, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire de Biologie des Invertébrés Marins et Malacologie, 55 Rue de Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France. KEYWORDS: Mollusca; Nudibranchia; Corambidae; new genus and new species; abyssal waters; Norwegian Sea. cal with transverse lamellae.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
    FOREWORD Abundant fish and wildlife, unbroken coastal vistas, miles of scenic rivers, swamps and mountains open to exploration, and well-tended forests and fields…these resources enhance the quality of life that makes South Carolina a place people want to call home. We know our state’s natural resources are a primary reason that individuals and businesses choose to locate here. They are drawn to the high quality natural resources that South Carolinians love and appreciate. The quality of our state’s natural resources is no accident. It is the result of hard work and sound stewardship on the part of many citizens and agencies. The 20th century brought many changes to South Carolina; some of these changes had devastating results to the land. However, people rose to the challenge of restoring our resources. Over the past several decades, deer, wood duck and wild turkey populations have been restored, striped bass populations have recovered, the bald eagle has returned and more than half a million acres of wildlife habitat has been conserved. We in South Carolina are particularly proud of our accomplishments as we prepare to celebrate, in 2006, the 100th anniversary of game and fish law enforcement and management by the state of South Carolina. Since its inception, the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) has undergone several reorganizations and name changes; however, more has changed in this state than the department’s name. According to the US Census Bureau, the South Carolina’s population has almost doubled since 1950 and the majority of our citizens now live in urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Phidiana Lynceus Berghia Coerulescens Doto Koenneckeri
    Cuthona abronia Cuthona divae Austraeolis stearnsi Flabellina exoptata Flabellina fusca Calma glaucoides Hermosita hakunamatata Learchis poica Anteaeolidiella oliviae Aeolidiopsis ransoni Phidiana militaris Baeolidia moebii Facelina annulicornis Protaeolidiella juliae Moridilla brockii Noumeaella isa Cerberilla sp. 3 Cerberilla bernadettae Aeolidia sp. A Aeolidia sp. B Baeolidia sp. A Baeolidia sp. B Cerberilla sp. A Cerberilla sp. B Cerberilla sp. C Facelina sp. C Noumeaella sp. A Noumeaella sp. B Facelina sp. A Marionia blainvillea Aeolidia papillosa Hermissenda crassicornis Flabellina babai Dirona albolineata Doto sp. 15 Marionia sp. 10 Marionia sp. 5 Tritonia sp. 4 Lomanotus sp. E Piseinotecus sp. Dendronotus regius Favorinus elenalexiarum Janolus mirabilis Marionia levis Phyllodesmium horridum Tritonia pickensi Babakina indopacifica Marionia sp. B Godiva banyulensis Caloria elegans Favorinus brachialis Flabellina baetica 1 Facelinidae sp. A Godiva quadricolor 0.99 Limenandra fusiformis Limenandra sp. C 0.71 Limenandra sp. B 0.91 Limenandra sp. A Baeolidia nodosa 0.99 Crosslandia daedali Scyllaea pelagica Notobryon panamica Notobryon thompsoni 0.98 Notobryon sp. B Notobryon sp. C Notobryon sp. D Notobryon wardi 0.97 Tritonia sp. 3 Marionia arborescens 0.96 Hancockia cf. uncinata Hancockia californica 0.94 Spurilla chromosoma Pteraeolidia ianthina 0.92 Noumeaella sp. 3 Noumeaella rehderi 0.92 Nanuca sebastiani 0.97 Dondice occidentalis Dondice parguerensis 0.92 Pruvotfolia longicirrha Pruvotfolia pselliotes 0.88 Marionia sp. 14 Tritonia sp. G 0.87 Bonisa nakaza 0.87 Janolus sp. 2 0.82 Janolus sp. 1 Janolus sp. 7 Armina sp. 3 0.83 Armina neapolitana 0.58 Armina sp. 9 0.78 Dermatobranchus sp. 16 0.52 Dermatobranchus sp. 21 0.86 Dermatobranchus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrastructure of the Sperm of Aplysia Californica Cooper
    Medical Research Archives 2015 Issue 2 ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE SPERM OF APLYSIA CALIFORNICA COOPER Jeffrey s. Prince1,2 and Brian Cichocki2 1 Department of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, 33124 USA; 2Dauer Electron Microscopy Laboratory, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, 33124 USA. Running Head: STRUCTURE OF APLYSIA SPERM Correspondence: J. S. Prince; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract—The structure of the sperm of Aplysia californica was studied by both transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Aplysia californica, a species with internal fertilization, has the modified type of molluscan sperm structure. Spermatids had a glycogen helix spiraled about the flagellum, both enclosed by a common microtubular basket. A second vacuole helix was periodically seen only in spermatids and absent in spermatozoa. An additional basket of microtubules appeared to direct the elongation and spiraling of the nucleus about the flagellum/glycogen helix. A flat acrosome was present while the centriolar derivative was embedded in a deep nuclear fossa with strands of heterochromatin arranged nearly perpendicular to its long axis. The mitochondrial derivative consisted of small, frequently electron dense, closely spaced rods but individual mitochondria were also seen surrounding the axoneme of spermatids. The axoneme consisted of dense fibers that appeared to have a "C" shape substructure with a central dense fiber thus providing a 9+1 arrangement of singlet units; the typical 9+2 microtubule arrangement of flagella was absent. Flagella with two axonemes were frequently seen as well as an extra axoneme within the head of immature sperm. Keywords—Aplysia californica; sperm; ultrastructure Copyright © 2015, Knowledge Enterprises Incorporated.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]