Referrals by Domain for 2015-01-01 Through 2015-12-31 for Scholars' Mine
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Duckduckgo Search Engines Android
Duckduckgo search engines android Continue 1 5.65.0 10.8MB DuckduckGo Privacy Browser 1 5.64.0 10.8MB DuckduckGo Privacy Browser 1 5.63.1 10.78MB DuckduckGo Privacy Browser 1 5.62.0 10.36MB DuckduckGo Privacy Browser 1 5.61.2 10.36MB DuckduckGo Privacy Browser 1 5.60.0 10.35MB DuckduckGo Privacy Browser 1 5.59.1 10.35MB DuckduckGo Privacy Browser 1 5.58.1 10.33MB DuckduckGo Privacy Browser 1 5.57.1 10.31MB DuckduckGo Privacy browser © DuckduckGo. Privacy, simplified. This article is about the search engine. For children's play, see duck, duck, goose. Internet search engine DuckDuckGoScreenshot home page DuckDuckGo on 2018Type search engine siteWeb Unavailable inMultilingualHeadquarters20 Paoli PikePaoli, Pennsylvania, USA Area servedWorldwideOwnerDuck Duck Go, Inc., createdGabriel WeinbergURLduckduckgo.comAlexa rank 158 (October 2020 update) CommercialRegregedSeptember 25, 2008; 12 years ago (2008-09-25) was an Internet search engine that emphasized the privacy of search engines and avoided the filter bubble of personalized search results. DuckDuckGo differs from other search engines by not profiling its users and showing all users the same search results for this search term. The company is based in Paoli, Pennsylvania, in Greater Philadelphia and has 111 employees since October 2020. The name of the company is a reference to the children's game duck, duck, goose. The results of the DuckDuckGo Survey are a compilation of more than 400 sources, including Yahoo! Search BOSS, Wolfram Alpha, Bing, Yandex, own web scanner (DuckDuckBot) and others. It also uses data from crowdsourcing sites, including Wikipedia, to fill in the knowledge panel boxes to the right of the results. -
EFF, Duckduckgo, and Internet Archive Amicus Brief
Case: 17-16783, 11/27/2017, ID: 10667942, DktEntry: 42, Page 1 of 39 NO. 17-16783 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HIQ LABS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. LINKEDIN CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Case No. 3:17-cv-03301-EMC The Honorable Edward M. Chen, District Court Judge BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, DUCKDUCKGO, AND INTERNET ARCHIVE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE Jamie Williams Corynne McSherry Cindy Cohn Nathan Cardozo ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 815 Eddy Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Email: [email protected] Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Counsel for Amici Curiae Case: 17-16783, 11/27/2017, ID: 10667942, DktEntry: 42, Page 2 of 39 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS AND OTHER ENTITIES WITH A DIRECT FINANCIAL INTEREST IN LITIGATION Pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Amici Curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation, DuckDuckGo, and Internet Archive each individually state that they do not have a parent corporation and that no publicly held corporation owns 10 percent or more of their stock. i Case: 17-16783, 11/27/2017, ID: 10667942, DktEntry: 42, Page 3 of 39 TABLE OF CONTENTS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS ..................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................... ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ............................................................................... -
The Autonomous Surfer
Renée Ridgway The Autonomous Surfer CAIS Report Fellowship Mai bis Oktober 2018 GEFÖRDERT DURCH RIDGWAY The Autonomous Surfer Research Questions The Autonomous Surfer endeavoured to discover the unknown unknowns of alternative search through the following research questions: What are the alternatives to Google search? What are their hidden revenue models, even if they do not collect user data? How do they deliver divergent (and qualitative) results or knowledge? What are the criteria that determine ranking and relevance? How do p2p search engines such as YaCy work? Does it deliver alternative results compared to other search engines? Is there still a movement for a larger, public index? Can there be serendipitous search, which is the ability to come across books, articles, images, information, objects, and so forth, by chance? Aims and Projected Results My PhD research investigates Google search – its early development, its technological innovation, its business model of the past 20 years and how it works now. Furthermore, I have experimented with Tor (The Onion Router) in order to find out if I could be anonymous online, and if so, would I receive diver- gent results from Google with the same keywords. For my fellowship at CAIS I decided to first research search engines that were incorporated into the Tor browser as default (Startpage, Disconnect) or are the default browser now (DuckDuckGo). I then researched search engines in my original CAIS proposal that I had come across in my PhD but hadn’t had the time to research; some are from the Society of the Query Reader (2014) and others I found en route or on colleagues’ suggestions. -
GOGGLES: Democracy Dies in Darkness, and So Does the Web
GOGGLES: Democracy dies in darkness, and so does the Web Brave Search Team Brave Munich, Germany [email protected] Abstract of information has led to a significant transfer of power from cre- This paper proposes an open and collaborative system by which ators to aggregators. Access to information has been monopolized a community, or a single user, can create sets of rules and filters, by companies like Google and Facebook [27]. While everything is called Goggles, to define the space which a search engine can pull theoretically still retrievable, in practice we are looking at the world results from. Instead of a single ranking algorithm, we could have through the biases of a few providers, who act, unintentionally or as many as needed, overcoming the biases that a single actor (the not, as gatekeepers. Akin to the thought experiment about the tree search engine) embeds into the results. Transparency and openness, falling in the forest [3], if a page is not listed on Google’s results all desirable qualities, will become accessible through the deep re- page or in the Facebook feed, does it really exist? ranking capabilities Goggles would enable. Such system would be The biases of Google and Facebook, whether algorithmic, data made possible by the availability of a host search engine, providing induced, commercial or political dictate what version of the world the index and infrastructure, which are unlikely to be replicated we get to see. Reality becomes what the models we are fed depict without major development and infrastructure costs. Besides the it to be [24]. -
Mass Surveillance
Mass Surveillance Mass Surveillance What are the risks for the citizens and the opportunities for the European Information Society? What are the possible mitigation strategies? Part 1 - Risks and opportunities raised by the current generation of network services and applications Study IP/G/STOA/FWC-2013-1/LOT 9/C5/SC1 January 2015 PE 527.409 STOA - Science and Technology Options Assessment The STOA project “Mass Surveillance Part 1 – Risks, Opportunities and Mitigation Strategies” was carried out by TECNALIA Research and Investigation in Spain. AUTHORS Arkaitz Gamino Garcia Concepción Cortes Velasco Eider Iturbe Zamalloa Erkuden Rios Velasco Iñaki Eguía Elejabarrieta Javier Herrera Lotero Jason Mansell (Linguistic Review) José Javier Larrañeta Ibañez Stefan Schuster (Editor) The authors acknowledge and would like to thank the following experts for their contributions to this report: Prof. Nigel Smart, University of Bristol; Matteo E. Bonfanti PhD, Research Fellow in International Law and Security, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna Pisa; Prof. Fred Piper, University of London; Caspar Bowden, independent privacy researcher; Maria Pilar Torres Bruna, Head of Cybersecurity, Everis Aerospace, Defense and Security; Prof. Kenny Paterson, University of London; Agustín Martin and Luis Hernández Encinas, Tenured Scientists, Department of Information Processing and Cryptography (Cryptology and Information Security Group), CSIC; Alessandro Zanasi, Zanasi & Partners; Fernando Acero, Expert on Open Source Software; Luigi Coppolino,Università degli Studi di Napoli; Marcello Antonucci, EZNESS srl; Rachel Oldroyd, Managing Editor of The Bureau of Investigative Journalism; Peter Kruse, Founder of CSIS Security Group A/S; Ryan Gallagher, investigative Reporter of The Intercept; Capitán Alberto Redondo, Guardia Civil; Prof. Bart Preneel, KU Leuven; Raoul Chiesa, Security Brokers SCpA, CyberDefcon Ltd.; Prof. -
Applying Library Values to Emerging Technology Decision-Making in the Age of Open Access, Maker Spaces, and the Ever-Changing Library
ACRL Publications in Librarianship No. 72 Applying Library Values to Emerging Technology Decision-Making in the Age of Open Access, Maker Spaces, and the Ever-Changing Library Editors Peter D. Fernandez and Kelly Tilton Association of College and Research Libraries A division of the American Library Association Chicago, Illinois 2018 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of Ameri- can National Standard for Information Sciences–Permanence of Paper for Print- ed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992. ∞ Cataloging-in-Publication data is on file with the Library of Congress. Copyright ©2018 by the Association of College and Research Libraries. All rights reserved except those which may be granted by Sections 107 and 108 of the Copyright Revision Act of 1976. Printed in the United States of America. 22 21 20 19 18 5 4 3 2 1 Contents Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................ix Peter Fernandez, Head, LRE Liaison Programs, University of Tennessee Libraries Kelly Tilton, Information Literacy Instruction Librarian, University of Tennessee Libraries Part I Contemplating Library Values Chapter 1. ..........................................................................................................1 The New Technocracy: Positioning Librarianship’s Core Values in Relationship to Technology Is a Much Taller Order Than We Think John Buschman, Dean of University Libraries, Seton Hall University Chapter 2. ........................................................................................................27 -
Comparison of Web Search Engines Using User-Based Metrics in Survey Statistics *Ogunyinka, P
Futo Journal Series (FUTOJNLS) e-ISSN : 2476-8456 p-ISSN : 2467-8325 Volume-6, Issue-2, pp- 190 - 200 www.futojnls.org Research Paper December 2020 Comparison of web search engines using user-based metrics in survey statistics *Ogunyinka, P. I.1, Aigbogun, L. I.1, Iheanyichukwu, B. F.2, Ekundayo, O. M.3, Banjo, O.1, Olubanwo, O. O.1 and Dehinsilu, O. A.1 1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria. 2Olabisi Onabanjo University Library, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria. 3Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. *Corresponding Author’s Email: [email protected] Abstract Different web search engines had been rated based on different metrics. However, almost none had considered the search query length, the retrieved quantity and retrieval time for evaluation of web search engines. This study had rated five web search engines (Google, Yahoo, WOW, AOL and Bing) using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test for significant mean difference and single-phase sampling for regression estimation and examination of internal error. The retrieval time was used as the study variable while the retrieved quantity of the organic search results and the search query length were used as the auxiliary variables. The correlation coefficient, mean square error, percentage coefficient of variation and percentage relative efficiency were used for the evaluation and comparison of the estimated population mean of the retrieval time. Results revealed that Google was the most rated web search engine with the highest significant retrieved quantity and significant retrieval time while Bing was the least rated web search engine. -
[email protected] [email protected] Izadi [email protected]
Boolify Safe Search Kids KidzSearch Safe Search Kids KidzSearch Boolify Kid'sSearch KidRex [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] . 1. Chromium Hope . Boolify Dib Dab Doo and Dilly Too 1. Broch 2. Talib, Mahmuddin & Husni 3. Large, Beheshti & Rahman 4. Large, Beheshti 5. Large Ask Kids Yahoo kids KidsClick 1. Huan-ling 2.Vanderschantz, Hinze, & Cunningham 3. Waikato 1. Duarte Torres, Weber & Hiemstra GoGooligans, Kiddle, Searchy Pants, Dmoz, Yahoo Kids (Yahooligans), Study Search, Famhoo, Onekey, SweetSearch KidzSearch Boolify Safe Search Kids Dib Dab Doo and Kidtopia Kid's Search Dilly Too IPL2 for Kids Awesome Library Thinga Cybersleuth kids y s s s r d d d s a i r i i o t h r e h d s k s e o K t B i c k r K b s c a i r s k d e c r r x i a h d N D o i K h r i a t i n l a e b L o p l g a c o r e f u b e o e K y r o e n K R l C r o e a S t - i c a m S i a l r f s d f r M k d i a s m h z i e d p s D ' i y d s i t 2 u r u i o g d o S T d t K c i b e s K i q L A K i n e T A K a e b i S K f P K F D y I u a w C S Q A + - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + ry ds ds ds a i i i r er ds k et oo t B i ch K b K ch r i s ks ds ck r er r ia h ds N D i o r h K t i l ex L o li ga a c o ea r f u b e on ea K yb r op n e R l C o e a K t S - i a c S i m l rr f s d f r M k d i s m i h z ea d s D i d y s i t 2 u r u i o d ga op S T d' t K i b e i K A K i n e K T A ac es b i Sq K f PL K F D y I u a w C S Q A + - - + - - + + + + - + + + - + - + + - - - + - - - -
Grade 6 Learning from Home: Day 2 Here Is Your Learning to Complete Whilst You Are at Home Today
Grade 6 Learning from Home: Day 2 Here is your learning to complete whilst you are at home today. If you have any questions please feel free to send your teacher an email via Compass. Have a wonderful day of learning. Reading Learning Intention: To make a prediction before reading and give evidence from Focus the text Success Criteria: I am successful when I can: Visit the website storybox online. The username and password are below: Activity Username: taylorshill Password: taylorshill Search for the following text: When the Wind Changed by Colin Lane https://storyboxlibrary.com.au/stories/when-the-wind-changed Firstly, using information on the front cover, make a prediction. Don’t forget to activate your prior knowledge. Record your prediction in your Reading Slide on Google Drive. Remember to include the date, title of the text and your response. Then, listen to the story and check if your prediction was correct. Record the reasons why or why not your prediction was correct or incorrect. After this you are to complete 30mins of Independent Reading and complete a Track or work on your Reading Goal. Access Reading Eggspress and complete your assigned activities Writing / Writer’s Notebook / Spelling Learning Intention: To research and develop a plan Focus Success Criteria: I am successful when I can: - Use keywords to research my topic - Find useful and appropriate websites - Put findings into my own words - Develop a user friendly plan - Plan the structure of a persuasive text (Title, opening statement, arguments with evidence and concluding statement) Activity Reflect on the topic you chose yesterday and begin to research, finding evidence to support your arguments . -
19 Western Berlin Policemen Kidnaped by Soviet Gunners
M, *“ ‘ K w S 4 t i TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER T, IHB n s W i B t h d B VAGI rOUBTEEir iianrliPB tw EofttitiB A vstm ^ Daily Net Press Bun I Feeeeais of U. s. Wgaftar B v M SWthaMemhefAeseMlSa gradea. Ih a cuatodlana bava eom- y aad w ana'^ aflwB^'' village Camera Club members Mr. and Mrs. Joseph H. Marsh- pleted amaJl repairs and general Men and women o f the Cove eeal wlada aaar goaot) vofttlM will resume monthly meetings to bum of Norman, Oklahoma, who Well Again After Schools Ready cleaning In all buildings duitog the nant-Congregations* church are re- were here for the wedding of their 9,243. JordoMMl MiiM M# oueated to meet at the church thi« morrow night at eight o’clock at summer months. WANTED A bout Town the y . M. C. A. Started iMt son. Joseph H. Marshbum, Jr. and 2 Years in Hospitals partly deadly norgdag. evening at 6 o’clock to make pw- Mias Patricia E. Dowd, aalled to For Reopening The Board of Bducatlcm haa March the enrollment la now 30. hired 35 new teaohera to till va narattona for the dedication of the day for England where they plan M ancheM ler^^ CUy of rOlago Charm ' 8 t BOTiwdatte’* Ifethcn Clrel; ^ church addition, and family Several leettirea were given In cancies. The new teachere have CASHIER I UlU BBMt tCBlght »t * June, and ten membera completed to spend a year. They have been banquet at 6:30 o'clock Saturday. visiting Mr. and Mrs. Page Bennett Sessions to Start at’8:45 filled all vacanoiee In the Man PLEASANT WOBKINO tiM ¥<-«• V t Mn- Mward Faber of an early summer course. -
Traffic 65788 93.29% 61375 1.22% 2.48 00:00:38 0.00% 0
Why DO http://why.do Go to this report All Web Site Data All Traffic Dec 18, 2013 Mar 18, 2014 All Visits 100.00% Explorer Summary Visits 1,200 600 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 Acquisition Behavior Conversions Source / Medium Pages / Goal Goal % New Visits Bounce Avg. Visit Visits New Visits Visit Conversion Completions Goal Value Rate Duration Rate 65,788 93.29% 61,375 1.22% 2.48 00:00:38 0.00% 0 $0.00 % of Total: Site Avg: % of Total: Site Avg: Site Site Avg: Site Avg: % of Total: % of Total: 100.00% (65,786) 93.26% 100.03% (61,355) 1.22% Avg: 00:00:38 0.00% 0.00% (0) 0.00% ($0.00) (0.03%) (0.25%) 2.48 (0.00%) (0.00%) (0.00%) 1. google / organic 46,350 (70.45%) 93.78% 43,467 (70.82%) 0.71% 2.42 00:00:35 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 2. (direct) / (none) 12,223 (18.58%) 91.47% 11,180 (18.22%) 3.41% 2.67 00:00:48 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 3. bing / organic 3,295 (5.01%) 94.54% 3,115 (5.08%) 0.67% 2.45 00:00:35 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 4. yahoo / organic 919 (1.40%) 93.69% 861 (1.40%) 0.44% 2.34 00:00:28 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 5. r.search.yahoo.com / referral 362 (0.55%) 95.86% 347 (0.57%) 0.83% 2.20 00:00:28 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 6. -
Case Study Aug A5 Revised
may 2017 Author Fahmi Ramadhiansyah Editor Dirgayuza Setiawan, M.Sc Viyasa Rahyaputra Designer and Layouter Ristyanadya Laksmi Gupita Summary The internet is growing at the rate that is unstoppable. It does not only grow in terms of contents and adaptability, but most importantly, it also grows in terms of users. Children, in particular, have begun to access the internet, and they might be exposed to ‘unsafe’ information swarming all over the internet. Search engines with content fltering features then began to emerge, as a way to ‘protect’ the children. However, this drew backlashes from the proponents of freedom and wise internet usage, claiming the efort to flter contents from children is taking away parts of the children’s rights. This case study is solely dedicated to cover the controversy and will be concluded with where the controversy is heading. introduction The unceasing development of information technology has created a world where the internet becomes an integral part of a child life. Whether for educational purpose or sole entertainment, children nowadays have become increasingly literate in the usage of internet service. Terms such as ‘digital native’ and ‘net generation’ are being used to empha- size the importance of new technologies within the lives of young people.i When it comes to education, the internet is valuable for children both because it enhances the class environment and it introduces children, from early stages of their lives, into today’s information society.ii One of the most essential services of the internet that are used the most by children is the Internet Search Engine (ISE).