DOCSLIB.ORG

Traffic 65788 93.29% 61375 1.22% 2.48 00:00:38 0.00% 0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Traffic 65788 93.29% 61375 1.22% 2.48 00:00:38 0.00% 0 Why DO ­ http://why.do Go to this report All Web Site Data All Traffic Dec 18, 2013 ­ Mar 18, 2014 All Visits 100.00% Explorer Summary Visits 1,200 600 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 Acquisition Behavior Conversions Source / Medium Pages / Goal Goal % New Visits Bounce Avg. Visit Visits New Visits Visit Conversion Completions Goal Value Rate Duration Rate 65,788 93.29% 61,375 1.22% 2.48 00:00:38 0.00% 0 $0.00 % of Total: Site Avg: % of Total: Site Avg: Site Site Avg: Site Avg: % of Total: % of Total: 100.00% (65,786) 93.26% 100.03% (61,355) 1.22% Avg: 00:00:38 0.00% 0.00% (0) 0.00% ($0.00) (0.03%) (0.25%) 2.48 (0.00%) (0.00%) (0.00%) 1. google / organic 46,350 (70.45%) 93.78% 43,467 (70.82%) 0.71% 2.42 00:00:35 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 2. (direct) / (none) 12,223 (18.58%) 91.47% 11,180 (18.22%) 3.41% 2.67 00:00:48 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 3. bing / organic 3,295 (5.01%) 94.54% 3,115 (5.08%) 0.67% 2.45 00:00:35 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 4. yahoo / organic 919 (1.40%) 93.69% 861 (1.40%) 0.44% 2.34 00:00:28 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 5. r.search.yahoo.com / referral 362 (0.55%) 95.86% 347 (0.57%) 0.83% 2.20 00:00:28 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 6. ask / organic 323 (0.49%) 92.88% 300 (0.49%) 0.62% 2.59 00:00:55 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 7. google.com / referral 150 (0.23%) 96.00% 144 (0.23%) 1.33% 2.59 00:00:12 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 8. ux.stackexchange.com / referral 134 (0.20%) 95.52% 128 (0.21%) 0.00% 4.72 00:01:37 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 9. search.tb.ask.com / referral 122 (0.19%) 91.80% 112 (0.18%) 3.28% 2.38 00:00:30 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 10. webcrawler.com / referral 117 (0.18%) 90.60% 106 (0.17%) 0.85% 2.41 00:01:19 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 11. huffingtonpost.com / referral 104 (0.16%) 97.12% 101 (0.16%) 0.00% 2.68 00:00:26 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 12. m.facebook.com / referral 103 (0.16%) 61.17% 63 (0.10%) 0.00% 2.43 00:01:17 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 13. google.co.in / referral 93 (0.14%) 98.92% 92 (0.15%) 0.00% 2.61 00:00:26 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 14. facebook.com / referral 91 (0.14%) 82.42% 75 (0.12%) 0.00% 2.55 00:00:50 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 15. aol / organic 86 (0.13%) 95.35% 82 (0.13%) 1.16% 2.66 00:00:18 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 16. semalt.com / referral 79 (0.12%) 98.73% 78 (0.13%) 1.27% 1.99 00:00:00 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 17. google.fr / referral 57 (0.09%) 98.25% 56 (0.09%) 0.00% 2.91 00:00:19 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 18. google.de / referral 50 (0.08%) 94.00% 47 (0.08%) 2.00% 2.46 00:00:04 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 19. comcast / organic 36 (0.05%) 91.67% 33 (0.05%) 0.00% 2.22 00:00:04 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 20. statcounter.com / referral 36 (0.05%) 0.00% 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 4.22 00:06:29 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 21. us.wow.com / referral 34 (0.05%) 97.06% 33 (0.05%) 0.00% 2.50 00:00:39 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 22. search­results / organic 33 (0.05%) 84.85% 28 (0.05%) 0.00% 2.42 00:00:50 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 23. search.mywebsearch.com / referral 32 (0.05%) 100.00% 32 (0.05%) 0.00% 2.12 00:00:10 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 24. ecochunk.com / referral 29 (0.04%) 93.10% 27 (0.04%) 0.00% 3.86 00:00:35 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 25. babylon / organic 26 (0.04%) 96.15% 25 (0.04%) 0.00% 2.38 00:01:23 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 26. google.com.pk / referral 26 (0.04%) 92.31% 24 (0.04%) 7.69% 2.08 00:00:04 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 27. search.snapdo.com / referral 26 (0.04%) 92.31% 24 (0.04%) 0.00% 3.42 00:00:41 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 28. avg / organic 23 (0.03%) 95.65% 22 (0.04%) 0.00% 2.52 00:03:02 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 29. r.duckduckgo.com / referral 21 (0.03%) 95.24% 20 (0.03%) 4.76% 2.05 00:01:11 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 30. info.com / referral 17 (0.03%) 94.12% 16 (0.03%) 0.00% 2.24 00:00:06 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 31. disqus.com / referral 16 (0.02%) 100.00% 16 (0.03%) 0.00% 2.12 00:00:03 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 32. google.com.ph / referral 16 (0.02%) 100.00% 16 (0.03%) 0.00% 2.25 00:00:30 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 33. google.ca / referral 15 (0.02%) 93.33% 14 (0.02%) 0.00% 2.13 00:00:08 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 34. google.co.uk / referral 15 (0.02%) 93.33% 14 (0.02%) 13.33% 2.13 00:00:01 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 35. translate.google.co.in / referral 15 (0.02%) 66.67% 10 (0.02%) 0.00% 2.27 00:01:18 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 36. search.icafemanager.com / referral 12 (0.02%) 100.00% 12 (0.02%) 0.00% 2.17 00:00:14 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 37. dogpile.com / referral 11 (0.02%) 100.00% 11 (0.02%) 0.00% 4.36 00:00:35 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 38. google.com.eg / referral 11 (0.02%) 81.82% 9 (0.01%) 18.18% 2.09 00:00:37 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 39. newsearch.pch.com / referral 11 (0.02%) 100.00% 11 (0.02%) 0.00% 2.73 00:01:13 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 40. t.co / referral 11 (0.02%) 90.91% 10 (0.02%) 0.00% 2.00 00:00:00 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 41. technorati.com / referral 11 (0.02%) 90.91% 10 (0.02%) 0.00% 3.45 00:01:23 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 42. conduit / organic 10 (0.02%) 90.00% 9 (0.01%) 0.00% 2.00 00:00:00 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 43. delta­search.com / referral 10 (0.02%) 100.00% 10 (0.02%) 0.00% 2.60 00:00:32 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 44. duckduckgo.com / referral 10 (0.02%) 100.00% 10 (0.02%) 0.00% 2.00 00:00:00 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 45. google.ae / referral 10 (0.02%) 90.00% 9 (0.01%) 10.00% 2.50 00:00:48 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 46. google.com.sa / referral 10 (0.02%) 80.00% 8 (0.01%) 0.00% 2.00 00:00:00 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 47. kik.com / referral 10 (0.02%) 90.00% 9 (0.01%) 20.00% 2.20 00:00:09 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 48. reliancenetconnect.co.in / referral 10 (0.02%) 80.00% 8 (0.01%) 0.00% 2.20 00:01:00 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 49. searchmobileonline.com / referral 10 (0.02%) 100.00% 10 (0.02%) 0.00% 3.20 00:02:18 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 50. static.flipora.com / referral 10 (0.02%) 100.00% 10 (0.02%) 0.00% 2.00 00:00:00 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 51. thechunkmedia.com / referral 9 (0.01%) 88.89% 8 (0.01%) 0.00% 4.89 00:00:47 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 52. google.co.za / referral 8 (0.01%) 100.00% 8 (0.01%) 0.00% 2.25 00:00:31 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 53.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparison of Web Search Engines Using User-Based Metrics in Survey Statistics *Ogunyinka, P
    Futo Journal Series (FUTOJNLS) e-ISSN : 2476-8456 p-ISSN : 2467-8325 Volume-6, Issue-2, pp- 190 - 200 www.futojnls.org Research Paper December 2020 Comparison of web search engines using user-based metrics in survey statistics *Ogunyinka, P. I.1, Aigbogun, L. I.1, Iheanyichukwu, B. F.2, Ekundayo, O. M.3, Banjo, O.1, Olubanwo, O. O.1 and Dehinsilu, O. A.1 1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria. 2Olabisi Onabanjo University Library, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria. 3Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. *Corresponding Author’s Email: [email protected] Abstract Different web search engines had been rated based on different metrics. However, almost none had considered the search query length, the retrieved quantity and retrieval time for evaluation of web search engines. This study had rated five web search engines (Google, Yahoo, WOW, AOL and Bing) using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test for significant mean difference and single-phase sampling for regression estimation and examination of internal error. The retrieval time was used as the study variable while the retrieved quantity of the organic search results and the search query length were used as the auxiliary variables. The correlation coefficient, mean square error, percentage coefficient of variation and percentage relative efficiency were used for the evaluation and comparison of the estimated population mean of the retrieval time. Results revealed that Google was the most rated web search engine with the highest significant retrieved quantity and significant retrieval time while Bing was the least rated web search engine.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] [email protected] Izadi [email protected]
    Boolify Safe Search Kids KidzSearch Safe Search Kids KidzSearch Boolify Kid'sSearch KidRex [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] . 1. Chromium Hope . Boolify Dib Dab Doo and Dilly Too 1. Broch 2. Talib, Mahmuddin & Husni 3. Large, Beheshti & Rahman 4. Large, Beheshti 5. Large Ask Kids Yahoo kids KidsClick 1. Huan-ling 2.Vanderschantz, Hinze, & Cunningham 3. Waikato 1. Duarte Torres, Weber & Hiemstra GoGooligans, Kiddle, Searchy Pants, Dmoz, Yahoo Kids (Yahooligans), Study Search, Famhoo, Onekey, SweetSearch KidzSearch Boolify Safe Search Kids Dib Dab Doo and Kidtopia Kid's Search Dilly Too IPL2 for Kids Awesome Library Thinga Cybersleuth kids y s s s r d d d s a i r i i o t h r e h d s k s e o K t B i c k r K b s c a i r s k d e c r r x i a h d N D o i K h r i a t i n l a e b L o p l g a c o r e f u b e o e K y r o e n K R l C r o e a S t - i c a m S i a l r f s d f r M k d i a s m h z i e d p s D ' i y d s i t 2 u r u i o g d o S T d t K c i b e s K i q L A K i n e T A K a e b i S K f P K F D y I u a w C S Q A + - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + ry ds ds ds a i i i r er ds k et oo t B i ch K b K ch r i s ks ds ck r er r ia h ds N D i o r h K t i l ex L o li ga a c o ea r f u b e on ea K yb r op n e R l C o e a K t S - i a c S i m l rr f s d f r M k d i s m i h z ea d s D i d y s i t 2 u r u i o d ga op S T d' t K i b e i K A K i n e K T A ac es b i Sq K f PL K F D y I u a w C S Q A + - - + - - + + + + - + + + - + - + + - - - + - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 6 Learning from Home: Day 2 Here Is Your Learning to Complete Whilst You Are at Home Today
    Grade 6 Learning from Home: Day 2 Here is your learning to complete whilst you are at home today. If you have any questions please feel free to send your teacher an email via Compass. Have a wonderful day of learning. Reading Learning Intention: To make a prediction before reading and give evidence from Focus ​ the text Success Criteria: I am successful when I can: Visit the website storybox online. The username and password are below: Activity ​ ​ Username: taylorshill Password: taylorshill Search for the following text: When the Wind Changed by Colin Lane ​ https://storyboxlibrary.com.au/stories/when-the-wind-changed Firstly, using information on the front cover, make a prediction. Don’t forget to activate your prior knowledge. ​ ​ Record your prediction in your Reading Slide on Google Drive. Remember to ​ ​ include the date, title of the text and your response. Then, listen to the story and check if your prediction was correct. Record the ​ ​ reasons why or why not your prediction was correct or incorrect. After this you are to complete 30mins of Independent Reading and complete a Track or work on your Reading Goal. Access Reading Eggspress and complete your assigned activities Writing / Writer’s Notebook / Spelling Learning Intention: To research and develop a plan Focus ​ Success Criteria: I am successful when I can: - Use keywords to research my topic - Find useful and appropriate websites - Put findings into my own words - Develop a user friendly plan - Plan the structure of a persuasive text (Title, opening statement, arguments with evidence and concluding statement) Activity Reflect on the topic you chose yesterday and begin to research, finding evidence to support your arguments .
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Western Berlin Policemen Kidnaped by Soviet Gunners
    M, *“ ‘ K w S 4 t i TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER T, IHB n s W i B t h d B VAGI rOUBTEEir iianrliPB tw EofttitiB A vstm ^ Daily Net Press Bun I Feeeeais of U. s. Wgaftar B v M SWthaMemhefAeseMlSa gradea. Ih a cuatodlana bava eom- y aad w ana'^ aflwB^'' village Camera Club members Mr. and Mrs. Joseph H. Marsh- pleted amaJl repairs and general Men and women o f the Cove­ eeal wlada aaar goaot) vofttlM will resume monthly meetings to­ bum of Norman, Oklahoma, who Well Again After Schools Ready cleaning In all buildings duitog the nant-Congregations* church are re- were here for the wedding of their 9,243. JordoMMl MiiM M# oueated to meet at the church thi« morrow night at eight o’clock at summer months. WANTED A bout Town the y . M. C. A. Started iMt son. Joseph H. Marshbum, Jr. and 2 Years in Hospitals partly deadly norgdag. evening at 6 o’clock to make pw- Mias Patricia E. Dowd, aalled to­ For Reopening The Board of Bducatlcm haa March the enrollment la now 30. hired 35 new teaohera to till va­ narattona for the dedication of the day for England where they plan M ancheM ler^^ CUy of rOlago Charm ' 8 t BOTiwdatte’* Ifethcn Clrel; ^ church addition, and family Several leettirea were given In cancies. The new teachere have CASHIER I UlU BBMt tCBlght »t * June, and ten membera completed to spend a year. They have been banquet at 6:30 o'clock Saturday. visiting Mr. and Mrs. Page Bennett Sessions to Start at’8:45 filled all vacanoiee In the Man­ PLEASANT WOBKINO tiM ¥<-«• V t Mn- Mward Faber of an early summer course.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Aug A5 Revised
    may 2017 Author Fahmi Ramadhiansyah Editor Dirgayuza Setiawan, M.Sc Viyasa Rahyaputra Designer and Layouter Ristyanadya Laksmi Gupita Summary The internet is growing at the rate that is unstoppable. It does not only grow in terms of contents and adaptability, but most importantly, it also grows in terms of users. Children, in particular, have begun to access the internet, and they might be exposed to ‘unsafe’ information swarming all over the internet. Search engines with content fltering features then began to emerge, as a way to ‘protect’ the children. However, this drew backlashes from the proponents of freedom and wise internet usage, claiming the efort to flter contents from children is taking away parts of the children’s rights. This case study is solely dedicated to cover the controversy and will be concluded with where the controversy is heading. introduction The unceasing development of information technology has created a world where the internet becomes an integral part of a child life. Whether for educational purpose or sole entertainment, children nowadays have become increasingly literate in the usage of internet service. Terms such as ‘digital native’ and ‘net generation’ are being used to empha- size the importance of new technologies within the lives of young people.i When it comes to education, the internet is valuable for children both because it enhances the class environment and it introduces children, from early stages of their lives, into today’s information society.ii One of the most essential services of the internet that are used the most by children is the Internet Search Engine (ISE).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    International Journal of Management & Information Systems – Fourth Quarter 2011 Volume 15, Number 4 History Of Search Engines Tom Seymour, Minot State University, USA Dean Frantsvog, Minot State University, USA Satheesh Kumar, Minot State University, USA ABSTRACT As the number of sites on the Web increased in the mid-to-late 90s, search engines started appearing to help people find information quickly. Search engines developed business models to finance their services, such as pay per click programs offered by Open Text in 1996 and then Goto.com in 1998. Goto.com later changed its name to Overture in 2001, and was purchased by Yahoo! in 2003, and now offers paid search opportunities for advertisers through Yahoo! Search Marketing. Google also began to offer advertisements on search results pages in 2000 through the Google Ad Words program. By 2007, pay-per-click programs proved to be primary money-makers for search engines. In a market dominated by Google, in 2009 Yahoo! and Microsoft announced the intention to forge an alliance. The Yahoo! & Microsoft Search Alliance eventually received approval from regulators in the US and Europe in February 2010. Search engine optimization consultants expanded their offerings to help businesses learn about and use the advertising opportunities offered by search engines, and new agencies focusing primarily upon marketing and advertising through search engines emerged. The term "Search Engine Marketing" was proposed by Danny Sullivan in 2001 to cover the spectrum of activities involved in performing SEO, managing paid listings at the search engines, submitting sites to directories, and developing online marketing strategies for businesses, organizations, and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Motori Di Ricerca E Portali, Dei
    2 Repertorio Il testo è un repertorio di oltre 180 motori di ricerca e portali, dei escluse le piattaforme commerciali come Amazon, iTunes, ecc. motori I motori di ricerca sicuri e consigliati, quali SearX, Qwant, Startpage e DuckDuckGo, sono stati omessi, così come Google (analizzato esclusivamente per il carattere quasi monopolistico), in quanto di Repertorio dei trattati nel volume Motori di ricerca, Trovare informazioni in rete. ricer Strumenti per le ricerche sul web. Il catalogo è articolato per macro-aree tematiche relative alle ca. motori di ricerca possibili ricerche: privacy e sicurezza, tipologia di contenuti e T risultati, musica, video, foto, immagini, icone, eBook, documenti. r ovar Il capitolo primo tratta i motori di ricerca sicuri e a tutela della Trovare informazioni in rete privacy. e Il capitolo secondo riporta i motori di ricerca focalizzati sulla infor Strumenti per le ricerche sul web tipologia di contenuti e risultati. Un esempio sono CC Search, per la ricerca di contenuti multimediali non coperti da copyright, mazioni oppure FindSounds per l’individuazione di suoni in fonti aperte. I capitoli successivi hanno come oggetto le risorse per la ricerca di contenuti documentali e multimediali. Flavio Gallucci in Il capitolo terzo raccoglie le risorse per la ricerca di foto, immagini r e icone. TinEye merita attenzione per la tecnica di reverse image ete. search, ovvero la ricerca a partire dal caricamento di una foto. Strumenti Il capitolo quarto elenca strumenti e risorse per la ricerca di brani musicali, l’ascolto di musica in streaming e l’individuazione di eventi. Il capitolo quinto propone i portali dedicati alla ricerca di video.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Search Engine
    Web Search Engine Bosubabu Sambana, MCA, M.Tech Assistant Professor, Dept of Computer Science & Engineering, Simhadhri Engineering College, Visakhapatnam, AP-531001, India. Abstract: This hypertext pool is dynamically changing due to this reason it is more difficult to find useful The World Wide Web (WWW) allows people to share information.In 1995, when the number of “usefully information or data from the large database searchable” Web pages was a few tens of millions, it repositories globally. We need to search the was widely believed that “indexing the whole of the information with specialized tools known generically Web” was already impractical or would soon become as search engines. There are many search engines so due to its exponential growth. A little more than a available today, where retrieving meaningful decade later, the GYM search engines—Google, information is difficult. However to overcome this problem of retrieving meaningful information Yahoo!, and Microsoft—are indexing almost a intelligently in common search engines, semantic thousand times as much data and between them web technologies are playing a major role. In this providing reliable sub second responses to around a paper we present a different implementation of billion queries a day in a plethora of languages. If this semantic search engine and the role of semantic were not enough, the major engines now provide much relatedness to provide relevant results. The concept higher quality answers. of Semantic Relatedness is connected with Wordnet which is a lexical database of words. We also For most searchers, these engines do a better job of made use of TF-IDF algorithm to calculate word ranking and presenting results, respond more quickly frequency in each and every webpage and to changes in interesting content, and more effectively Keyword Extraction in order to extract only useful eliminate dead links, duplicate pages, and off-topic keywords from a huge set of words.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Various Kids Search Engines
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATION IN BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING Journal homepage: http://scienceq.org/Journals/JCLS.php Review Open Access Analysis of Various Kids Search Engines Deepshikha Patel1*, Prashant Kumar Singh2 1. Dr. K. N. Modi University, 2. ISC Software Pvt Ltd, *Corresponding author: Deepshikha Patel Dr. K. N. Modi University, Newai, Rajasthan, India. E-mail: [email protected] Received: December 30, 2013, Accepted: January 6, 2014, Published: January 8, 2014. ABSTRACT Web is the most commonly used resource type for finding information these days. Most search engines results are not kids oriented that’s why there are several search engines available in the market to fulfill the need of kids. In this paper we will analyze various search engines on different points like design, interactivity, ease of access, technology used, graphics etc. Keywords: Search Engines; Web Search Engines; Meta Search Engines; Searching; Kids, Kids Search. INTRODUCTION Kids are active information seeker these days. The age Boolify of surfing the web is decreasing day by day. Kids use internet Website: http://www.boolify.com/ for their school project work, playing games, watching cartoons This is based on Google’s customized search. Boolify[1] etc. World Wide Web is enormous in size and it contains lots of helps children to bridge the gap by visualizing the process and information that may not be appropriate for the kids. To protect letting them interact with the concept behind the search process kids from this inappropriate information need of search engines in a hand-on way. Boolify’s primary audience is elementary specific to kids arose.
    [Show full text]
  • So Many Choices!
    LESSON PLAN Level: Grades K to 3 About the Author: Thierry Plante, Media Education Specialist, MediaSmarts Duration: 45 minutes So Many Choices! This lesson is part of USE, UNDERSTAND & CREATE: A Digital Literacy Framework for Canadian Schools: http:// mediasmarts.ca/teacher-resources/digital-literacy-framework. Overview This lesson introduces the students to the first steps in finding information on the Internet. Specifically, this lesson helps students understand the basic good practices of searching for something online: be accompanied by a trusted adult, start with a safe site and understand the use and power of using good links and keywords to find what they are looking for and to avoid bad results. Learning Outcomes Students demonstrate: knowledge of where to go to do safe searches online how to use links and keywords an understanding of the need for an adult presence when they go online Preparation and Materials Print copies of the What’s My Name Again? handout for each student and bookmark the following sites: https://kids.nationalgeographic.com/animals/ http://www.kidrex.org/ http://www.kiddle.co https://www.kidzsearch.com/ https://www.factmonster.com/ www.mediasmarts.ca 1 © 2019 MediaSmarts So Many Choices! ● Lesson Plan ● Grades K-3 Procedure Ask students: “Who here has looked for something on the Internet? Did you do it on your own or did you get help from someone like your older brother or your mom? How did you do the search?” (Depending on the age of the student, answers might include “On my Mom’s computer”, “my Dad’s phone” or “Google”.) Write the answers on the board.
    [Show full text]
  • Package 'Rwsearch'
    Package ‘RWsearch’ May 29, 2019 Title Lazy Search in R Packages, Task Views, CRAN, the Web. All-in-One Download Description Search by keywords in R packages, task views, CRAN, the web and display the re- sults in console, txt, html or pdf pages. Download the whole documentation (html in- dex, pdf manual, vignettes, source code, etc) with a single instruction. Visualize the package de- pendencies. Several functions for task view maintenance and explo- ration of CRAN archive. Quick links to more than 70 web search engines. Lazy evaluation of non- standard content is available throughout the package and eases the use of many functions. Version 4.6 Date 2019-05-29 Depends R (>= 3.4.0) Imports brew, latexpdf, networkD3, sig, sos, XML Suggests ctv, cranly, findR, foghorn, knitr, pacman, pkgnet, rmarkdown License GPL-2 Maintainer Patrice Kiener <[email protected]> Author Patrice Kiener [aut, cre] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0505-9920>) Encoding UTF-8 NeedsCompilation no LazyData false Language en-GB VignetteBuilder knitr RoxygenNote 6.1.1 Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2019-05-29 09:40:07 UTC R topics documented: RWsearch-package . .2 archivedb . .4 cnsc.............................................6 1 2 RWsearch-package crandb . .7 e_check . .9 funmaintext . 10 f_args . 11 f_pdf . 12 h_direct . 12 h_engine . 13 h_R ............................................. 17 h_ttp . 18 n_graph . 19 p_deps . 20 p_display . 21 p_down . 22 p_html . 24 p_inun . 25 p_table2pdf . 26 p_text2pdf . 28 s_crandb . 30 s_crandb_tvdb . 32 s_hs............................................. 34 s_sos . 35 s_tvdb . 36 tvdb............................................. 37 zcrandb . 38 ztvdb . 38 Index 40 RWsearch-package Package RWsearch Description Search by keywords in R packages, task views, CRAN, the web and display the results in console, txt, html or pdf pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Search Engines
    “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SEARCH ENGINES USEFUL FOR LIBRARIANS” A Dissertation Submitted to the Tilak Maharashtra Vidyapeeth, Pune For Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.) In LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE Submitted By Mr. SUSHANT KORE Under the Guidance of Dr. N. B. DAHIBHATE Principal Technical Officer Information Division (DIRC) National Chemical Laboratory, Pune TILAK MAHARASHTRA VIDYAPETH DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE PUNE - 411 037. December, 2014 DECLARATION I hereby declare that the dissertation entitled “Comparative study of search engines useful for librarians” completed by me for the degree of Master of Philosophy in library and Information Science. The entire work embodied in this thesis has been carried out by me under the guidance of Dr. N.B. Dahibhate, National Chemical Laboratory, and Digital Information Resource Center (DIRC), Pune. (Mr. Sushant Kore) Research Student (M.Phil.) Place: Pune Date: 26th December, 2014 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled “Comparative study of search engines useful for librarians” which is being submitted herewith for the award of the Degree of Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.) in Library and Information Science of Tilak Maharashtra Vidyapeeth, Pune is the result of original research work completed by Mr. Sushant Kore under my supervision and guidance. To the best of my knowledge and belief the work incorporated in this thesis has not formed the basis for award of any Degree or similar title of this or any other University or examining body. (Dr. N.B. Dahibhate) Principal Technical Officer Information Division (DIRC) NCL, Pune Place: Pune Date: 26th December , 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am very thankful to my respectable parents for their kind support in my life as well as completing my dissertation and bringing me to this stage in the educational field.
    [Show full text]