DOCSLIB.ORG

Traffic 518872 72.34% 375344 64.63% 2.10 00:01:54 0.00

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Traffic 518872 72.34% 375344 64.63% 2.10 00:01:54 0.00 http://www.obamasoundoff.com ­ http:/… Go to this report www.obamasoundoff.com All Traffic Sep 1, 2008 ­ Oct 21, 2014 All Sessions + Add Segment 100.00% Explorer Summary Sessions 1,200 600 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Acquisition Behavior Conversions Source / Medium % New Pages / Goal Goal Bounce Rate Avg. Session Sessions Sessions New Users Session Conversion Completions Goal Value Duration Rate 518,872 72.34% 375,344 64.63% 2.10 00:01:54 0.00% 0 $0.00 % of Total: Site Avg: % of Total: 99.89% Site Avg: Site Avg: Site Avg: Site Avg: % of Total: % of Total: 100.00% (518,872) 72.42% (375,760) 64.63% 2.10 00:01:54 0.00% 0.00% (0) 0.00% ($0.00) (­0.11%) (0.00%) (0.00%) (0.00%) (0.00%) 1. google / organic 390,499 (75.26%) 72.83% 284,396 (75.77%) 64.56% 2.09 00:01:53 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 2. (direct) / (none) 66,511 (12.82%) 69.51% 46,234 (12.32%) 69.15% 1.96 00:01:44 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 3. bing / organic 23,955 (4.62%) 70.13% 16,799 (4.48%) 58.79% 2.39 00:02:20 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 4. yahoo / organic 12,758 (2.46%) 70.06% 8,938 (2.38%) 60.58% 2.30 00:02:04 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 5. youtube.com / referral 2,768 (0.53%) 76.48% 2,117 (0.56%) 59.14% 2.65 00:03:01 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 6. facebook.com / referral 2,240 (0.43%) 76.07% 1,704 (0.45%) 65.76% 1.84 00:01:30 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 7. justinbieberprank.com / referral 2,039 (0.39%) 69.25% 1,412 (0.38%) 59.15% 2.31 00:03:09 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 8. search / organic 1,654 (0.32%) 68.80% 1,138 (0.30%) 57.98% 2.21 00:02:03 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 9. google.com / referral 1,454 (0.28%) 82.87% 1,205 (0.32%) 61.76% 1.98 00:01:23 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 10. ebaumsworld.com / referral 1,311 (0.25%) 72.01% 944 (0.25%) 66.13% 1.92 00:01:42 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 11. ask / organic 1,232 (0.24%) 72.97% 899 (0.24%) 59.50% 2.49 00:02:30 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 12. aol / organic 765 (0.15%) 79.35% 607 (0.16%) 56.73% 2.52 00:02:10 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 13. mileycyrusprank.com / referral 707 (0.14%) 68.88% 487 (0.13%) 60.82% 2.18 00:02:24 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 14. freerepublic.com / referral 556 (0.11%) 68.71% 382 (0.10%) 64.75% 1.97 00:01:54 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 15. search.mywebsearch.com / referral 554 (0.11%) 73.10% 405 (0.11%) 51.81% 2.77 00:02:50 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 16. search­results / organic 475 (0.09%) 74.11% 352 (0.09%) 58.11% 2.58 00:02:58 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 17. ladygagaprank.com / referral 473 (0.09%) 84.78% 401 (0.11%) 56.03% 2.37 00:03:23 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 18. avg / organic 469 (0.09%) 68.02% 319 (0.08%) 59.91% 2.39 00:02:53 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 19. babylon / organic 449 (0.09%) 70.82% 318 (0.08%) 60.13% 2.23 00:02:42 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 20. r.search.yahoo.com / referral 316 (0.06%) 73.10% 231 (0.06%) 70.57% 2.52 00:02:29 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 21. m.facebook.com / referral 232 (0.04%) 87.50% 203 (0.05%) 77.16% 1.44 00:00:49 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 22. twitch.tv / referral 182 (0.04%) 97.25% 177 (0.05%) 73.63% 1.69 00:00:37 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 23. forums.somethingawful.com / referral 162 (0.03%) 98.77% 160 (0.04%) 80.25% 1.53 00:01:20 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 24. search.incredibar.com / referral 162 (0.03%) 69.14% 112 (0.03%) 51.23% 2.35 00:03:32 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 25. reddit.com / referral 160 (0.03%) 98.75% 158 (0.04%) 86.25% 1.24 00:00:14 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 26. forums.govteen.com / referral 153 (0.03%) 72.55% 111 (0.03%) 58.82% 1.71 00:01:11 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 27. start.funmoods.com / referral 135 (0.03%) 55.56% 75 (0.02%) 51.85% 2.91 00:03:46 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 28. comcast / organic 131 (0.03%) 70.23% 92 (0.02%) 59.54% 3.52 00:03:29 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 29. google.co.uk / referral 105 (0.02%) 79.05% 83 (0.02%) 57.14% 1.89 00:02:03 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 30. t.co / referral 105 (0.02%) 92.38% 97 (0.03%) 86.67% 1.33 00:00:39 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 31. search.snapdo.com / referral 100 (0.02%) 75.00% 75 (0.02%) 58.00% 3.70 00:04:29 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 32. disqus.com / referral 95 (0.02%) 94.74% 90 (0.02%) 74.74% 1.53 00:01:06 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 33. swagbucks.com / referral 95 (0.02%) 74.74% 71 (0.02%) 52.63% 2.69 00:02:27 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 34. semalt.semalt.com / referral 93 (0.02%) 100.00% 93 (0.02%) 100.00% 1.00 00:00:00 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 35. ar15.com / referral 92 (0.02%) 97.83% 90 (0.02%) 61.96% 1.99 00:00:44 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 36. conduit / organic 85 (0.02%) 72.94% 62 (0.02%) 68.24% 1.92 00:01:44 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 37. hotair.com / referral 77 (0.01%) 89.61% 69 (0.02%) 85.71% 1.38 00:00:47 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 38. search.genieo.com / referral 77 (0.01%) 57.14% 44 (0.01%) 50.65% 4.92 00:04:38 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 39. sigforum.com / referral 74 (0.01%) 98.65% 73 (0.02%) 87.84% 1.45 00:00:30 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 40. thephoenix.com / referral 74 (0.01%) 79.73% 59 (0.02%) 55.41% 2.73 00:02:56 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 41. trapshooters.com / referral 74 (0.01%) 94.59% 70 (0.02%) 1.35% 2.84 00:00:59 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 42. wonkette.com / referral 71 (0.01%) 98.59% 70 (0.02%) 91.55% 1.18 00:00:15 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 43. webcrawler.com / referral 65 (0.01%) 89.23% 58 (0.02%) 52.31% 2.48 00:03:12 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 44. start.facemoods.com / referral 64 (0.01%) 51.56% 33 (0.01%) 60.94% 2.00 00:02:15 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 45. duckduckgo.com / referral 63 (0.01%) 85.71% 54 (0.01%) 73.02% 1.86 00:01:25 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 46. thetechgame.com / referral 58 (0.01%) 84.48% 49 (0.01%) 72.41% 1.66 00:01:15 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 47. tinychat.com / referral 57 (0.01%) 49.12% 28 (0.01%) 75.44% 1.51 00:00:50 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 48. aeonity.com / referral 54 (0.01%) 64.81% 35 (0.01%) 68.52% 1.83 00:02:01 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 49. claro­search.com / referral 54 (0.01%) 66.67% 36 (0.01%) 64.81% 2.59 00:03:20 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 50. hackforums.net / referral 53 (0.01%) 94.34% 50 (0.01%) 56.60% 2.77 00:02:04 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 51. search.sweetim.com / referral 53 (0.01%) 69.81% 37 (0.01%) 52.83% 2.53 00:02:31 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 52. searchmobileonline.com / referral 53 (0.01%) 83.02% 44 (0.01%) 52.83% 2.23 00:01:44 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 53.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparison of Web Search Engines Using User-Based Metrics in Survey Statistics *Ogunyinka, P
    Futo Journal Series (FUTOJNLS) e-ISSN : 2476-8456 p-ISSN : 2467-8325 Volume-6, Issue-2, pp- 190 - 200 www.futojnls.org Research Paper December 2020 Comparison of web search engines using user-based metrics in survey statistics *Ogunyinka, P. I.1, Aigbogun, L. I.1, Iheanyichukwu, B. F.2, Ekundayo, O. M.3, Banjo, O.1, Olubanwo, O. O.1 and Dehinsilu, O. A.1 1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria. 2Olabisi Onabanjo University Library, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria. 3Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. *Corresponding Author’s Email: [email protected] Abstract Different web search engines had been rated based on different metrics. However, almost none had considered the search query length, the retrieved quantity and retrieval time for evaluation of web search engines. This study had rated five web search engines (Google, Yahoo, WOW, AOL and Bing) using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test for significant mean difference and single-phase sampling for regression estimation and examination of internal error. The retrieval time was used as the study variable while the retrieved quantity of the organic search results and the search query length were used as the auxiliary variables. The correlation coefficient, mean square error, percentage coefficient of variation and percentage relative efficiency were used for the evaluation and comparison of the estimated population mean of the retrieval time. Results revealed that Google was the most rated web search engine with the highest significant retrieved quantity and significant retrieval time while Bing was the least rated web search engine.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Western Berlin Policemen Kidnaped by Soviet Gunners
    M, *“ ‘ K w S 4 t i TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER T, IHB n s W i B t h d B VAGI rOUBTEEir iianrliPB tw EofttitiB A vstm ^ Daily Net Press Bun I Feeeeais of U. s. Wgaftar B v M SWthaMemhefAeseMlSa gradea. Ih a cuatodlana bava eom- y aad w ana'^ aflwB^'' village Camera Club members Mr. and Mrs. Joseph H. Marsh- pleted amaJl repairs and general Men and women o f the Cove­ eeal wlada aaar goaot) vofttlM will resume monthly meetings to­ bum of Norman, Oklahoma, who Well Again After Schools Ready cleaning In all buildings duitog the nant-Congregations* church are re- were here for the wedding of their 9,243. JordoMMl MiiM M# oueated to meet at the church thi« morrow night at eight o’clock at summer months. WANTED A bout Town the y . M. C. A. Started iMt son. Joseph H. Marshbum, Jr. and 2 Years in Hospitals partly deadly norgdag. evening at 6 o’clock to make pw- Mias Patricia E. Dowd, aalled to­ For Reopening The Board of Bducatlcm haa March the enrollment la now 30. hired 35 new teaohera to till va­ narattona for the dedication of the day for England where they plan M ancheM ler^^ CUy of rOlago Charm ' 8 t BOTiwdatte’* Ifethcn Clrel; ^ church addition, and family Several leettirea were given In cancies. The new teachere have CASHIER I UlU BBMt tCBlght »t * June, and ten membera completed to spend a year. They have been banquet at 6:30 o'clock Saturday. visiting Mr. and Mrs. Page Bennett Sessions to Start at’8:45 filled all vacanoiee In the Man­ PLEASANT WOBKINO tiM ¥<-«• V t Mn- Mward Faber of an early summer course.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic 65788 93.29% 61375 1.22% 2.48 00:00:38 0.00% 0
    Why DO ­ http://why.do Go to this report All Web Site Data All Traffic Dec 18, 2013 ­ Mar 18, 2014 All Visits 100.00% Explorer Summary Visits 1,200 600 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 Acquisition Behavior Conversions Source / Medium Pages / Goal Goal % New Visits Bounce Avg. Visit Visits New Visits Visit Conversion Completions Goal Value Rate Duration Rate 65,788 93.29% 61,375 1.22% 2.48 00:00:38 0.00% 0 $0.00 % of Total: Site Avg: % of Total: Site Avg: Site Site Avg: Site Avg: % of Total: % of Total: 100.00% (65,786) 93.26% 100.03% (61,355) 1.22% Avg: 00:00:38 0.00% 0.00% (0) 0.00% ($0.00) (0.03%) (0.25%) 2.48 (0.00%) (0.00%) (0.00%) 1. google / organic 46,350 (70.45%) 93.78% 43,467 (70.82%) 0.71% 2.42 00:00:35 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 2. (direct) / (none) 12,223 (18.58%) 91.47% 11,180 (18.22%) 3.41% 2.67 00:00:48 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 3. bing / organic 3,295 (5.01%) 94.54% 3,115 (5.08%) 0.67% 2.45 00:00:35 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 4. yahoo / organic 919 (1.40%) 93.69% 861 (1.40%) 0.44% 2.34 00:00:28 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 5. r.search.yahoo.com / referral 362 (0.55%) 95.86% 347 (0.57%) 0.83% 2.20 00:00:28 0.00% 0 (0.00%) $0.00 (0.00%) 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    International Journal of Management & Information Systems – Fourth Quarter 2011 Volume 15, Number 4 History Of Search Engines Tom Seymour, Minot State University, USA Dean Frantsvog, Minot State University, USA Satheesh Kumar, Minot State University, USA ABSTRACT As the number of sites on the Web increased in the mid-to-late 90s, search engines started appearing to help people find information quickly. Search engines developed business models to finance their services, such as pay per click programs offered by Open Text in 1996 and then Goto.com in 1998. Goto.com later changed its name to Overture in 2001, and was purchased by Yahoo! in 2003, and now offers paid search opportunities for advertisers through Yahoo! Search Marketing. Google also began to offer advertisements on search results pages in 2000 through the Google Ad Words program. By 2007, pay-per-click programs proved to be primary money-makers for search engines. In a market dominated by Google, in 2009 Yahoo! and Microsoft announced the intention to forge an alliance. The Yahoo! & Microsoft Search Alliance eventually received approval from regulators in the US and Europe in February 2010. Search engine optimization consultants expanded their offerings to help businesses learn about and use the advertising opportunities offered by search engines, and new agencies focusing primarily upon marketing and advertising through search engines emerged. The term "Search Engine Marketing" was proposed by Danny Sullivan in 2001 to cover the spectrum of activities involved in performing SEO, managing paid listings at the search engines, submitting sites to directories, and developing online marketing strategies for businesses, organizations, and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Search Engine
    Web Search Engine Bosubabu Sambana, MCA, M.Tech Assistant Professor, Dept of Computer Science & Engineering, Simhadhri Engineering College, Visakhapatnam, AP-531001, India. Abstract: This hypertext pool is dynamically changing due to this reason it is more difficult to find useful The World Wide Web (WWW) allows people to share information.In 1995, when the number of “usefully information or data from the large database searchable” Web pages was a few tens of millions, it repositories globally. We need to search the was widely believed that “indexing the whole of the information with specialized tools known generically Web” was already impractical or would soon become as search engines. There are many search engines so due to its exponential growth. A little more than a available today, where retrieving meaningful decade later, the GYM search engines—Google, information is difficult. However to overcome this problem of retrieving meaningful information Yahoo!, and Microsoft—are indexing almost a intelligently in common search engines, semantic thousand times as much data and between them web technologies are playing a major role. In this providing reliable sub second responses to around a paper we present a different implementation of billion queries a day in a plethora of languages. If this semantic search engine and the role of semantic were not enough, the major engines now provide much relatedness to provide relevant results. The concept higher quality answers. of Semantic Relatedness is connected with Wordnet which is a lexical database of words. We also For most searchers, these engines do a better job of made use of TF-IDF algorithm to calculate word ranking and presenting results, respond more quickly frequency in each and every webpage and to changes in interesting content, and more effectively Keyword Extraction in order to extract only useful eliminate dead links, duplicate pages, and off-topic keywords from a huge set of words.
    [Show full text]
  • Package 'Rwsearch'
    Package ‘RWsearch’ May 29, 2019 Title Lazy Search in R Packages, Task Views, CRAN, the Web. All-in-One Download Description Search by keywords in R packages, task views, CRAN, the web and display the re- sults in console, txt, html or pdf pages. Download the whole documentation (html in- dex, pdf manual, vignettes, source code, etc) with a single instruction. Visualize the package de- pendencies. Several functions for task view maintenance and explo- ration of CRAN archive. Quick links to more than 70 web search engines. Lazy evaluation of non- standard content is available throughout the package and eases the use of many functions. Version 4.6 Date 2019-05-29 Depends R (>= 3.4.0) Imports brew, latexpdf, networkD3, sig, sos, XML Suggests ctv, cranly, findR, foghorn, knitr, pacman, pkgnet, rmarkdown License GPL-2 Maintainer Patrice Kiener <[email protected]> Author Patrice Kiener [aut, cre] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0505-9920>) Encoding UTF-8 NeedsCompilation no LazyData false Language en-GB VignetteBuilder knitr RoxygenNote 6.1.1 Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2019-05-29 09:40:07 UTC R topics documented: RWsearch-package . .2 archivedb . .4 cnsc.............................................6 1 2 RWsearch-package crandb . .7 e_check . .9 funmaintext . 10 f_args . 11 f_pdf . 12 h_direct . 12 h_engine . 13 h_R ............................................. 17 h_ttp . 18 n_graph . 19 p_deps . 20 p_display . 21 p_down . 22 p_html . 24 p_inun . 25 p_table2pdf . 26 p_text2pdf . 28 s_crandb . 30 s_crandb_tvdb . 32 s_hs............................................. 34 s_sos . 35 s_tvdb . 36 tvdb............................................. 37 zcrandb . 38 ztvdb . 38 Index 40 RWsearch-package Package RWsearch Description Search by keywords in R packages, task views, CRAN, the web and display the results in console, txt, html or pdf pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Manual, Vignettes, Source Code, Binaries) with a Single Instruc- Tion
    Package ‘RWsearch’ June 5, 2021 Title Lazy Search in R Packages, Task Views, CRAN, the Web. All-in-One Download Description Search by keywords in R packages, task views, CRAN, the web and display the re- sults in the console or in txt, html or pdf files. Download the package documentation (html in- dex, README, NEWS, pdf manual, vignettes, source code, binaries) with a single instruc- tion. Visualize the package dependencies and CRAN checks. Compare the package versions, un- load and install the packages and their dependencies in a safe order. Ex- plore CRAN archives. Use the above functions for task view maintenance. Ac- cess web search engines from the console thanks to 80+ bookmarks. All functions accept stan- dard and non-standard evaluation. Version 4.9.3 Date 2021-06-05 Depends R (>= 3.4.0) Imports brew, latexpdf, networkD3, sig, sos, XML Suggests ctv, cranly, findR, foghorn, knitr, pacman, rmarkdown, xfun Author Patrice Kiener [aut, cre] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0505-9920>) Maintainer Patrice Kiener <[email protected]> License GPL-2 Encoding UTF-8 LazyData false NeedsCompilation no Language en-GB VignetteBuilder knitr RoxygenNote 7.1.1 Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2021-06-05 13:20:08 UTC 1 2 RWsearch-package R topics documented: RWsearch-package . .2 archivedb . .5 checkdb . .7 cnsc.............................................8 crandb . .9 cranmirrors . 11 e_check . 11 funmaintext . 12 f_args . 13 f_pdf . 14 h_direct . 15 h_engine . 16 h_R ............................................. 20 h_ttp . 22 p_archive . 22 p_check . 23 p_deps . 25 p_display . 27 p_down . 28 p_graph . 30 p_html . 32 p_inst . 34 p_inun . 35 p_table2pdf . 36 p_text2pdf . 38 p_unload_all .
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of a Green Search Engine
    Article The Effect of Internet Searches on Afforestation: The Case of a Green Search Engine Pedro Palos-Sanchez 1,2,* ID and Jose Ramon Saura 3,* ID 1 Department of Business Management, University of Extremadura, Av. Universidad, s/n, 10003 Cáceres, Spain 2 Department of Business Organization, Marketing and Market Research, International University of La Rioja, Av. de la Paz, 137, 26006 Logroño, Spain 3 Department of Business and Economics, Rey Juan Carlos University, Paseo Artilleros s/n, 28027 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (P.P.-S.); [email protected] (J.R.S.); Tel.: +34-927-257-480 (P.P.-S.); +34-91-488-80-11 (J.R.S.) Received: 17 November 2017; Accepted: 19 January 2018; Published: 23 January 2018 Abstract: Ecosia is an Internet search engine that plants trees with the income obtained from advertising. This study explored the factors that affect the adoption of Ecosia.org from the perspective of technology adoption and trust. This was done by using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) and then analyzing the results with PLS-SEM (Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling). Subsequently, a survey was conducted with a structured questionnaire on search engines, which yielded the following results: (1) the idea of a company helping to mitigate the effects of climate change by planting trees is well received by Internet users. However, few people accept the idea of changing their habits from using traditional search engines; (2) Ecosia is a search engine believed to have higher compatibility rates, and needing less hardware resources, and (3) ecological marketing is an appropriate and future strategy that can increase the intention to use a technological product.
    [Show full text]
  • Usage of Internet for Academic Purposes on University Students' Achievement
    Nursing & Healthcare International Journal ISSN: 2575-9981 Usage of Internet for Academic Purposes on University Students’ Achievement: A Literature Review 1 1 1 2 Sumaiyah Jamaludin TS* , Kechik NA , Saidi S and Chan CM Research Article 1Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Kulliyyah of Nursing, International Islamic Volume 2 Issue 1 University Malaysia, Malaysia Received Date: December 15, 2017 2 Department of Nursing Science, University of Malaya, Malaysia Published Date: January 31, 2018 *Corresponding author: Thandar Soe Sumaiyah Jamaludin, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Kulliyyah of Nursing, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Hospital Campus, 25100, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia, Tel: 016- 6092641; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The aim of this literature review was to evaluate the effectiveness of internet usage for academic purposes among health- related undergraduate students from various courses. This paper has highlighted for understanding more deeply on the effectiveness of internet usage among university students in their studies. This review found that socio economic status of students has both positive and negative significant effect on their academic achievement. Furthermore, students spend more than one hour online depended on the many factors that cause them to be online. The purposes of using the internet were varied as communication and academic search purposes. On the top of that, Google was the most used search engine and Pub Med was popular among the databases for their academic search among the students. From this literature review, it can be concluded that the students believed of using internet has improved on their academic performances but depending on the time they spent in the online internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Frequency Identification Based Smart
    ISSN (Online) 2394-2320 International Journal of Engineering Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJERCSE) Vol 3, Issue 10, October 2016 History and Web Search Engines Works [1]Saurabh Kumar, [2] Maneesh Kumar, [3] Vipul Agarwal M .Tech Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Dr. A.P.J Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow (U.P), Abstract: -- A web search engine is a software system that is designed to search for information on the World Wide Web. The search results are generally presented in a line of results often referred to as search engine results pages(SERPs). The information may be a mix of web pages, images, and other types of files. Some search engines also mine data available in databases or open directories. Unlike web directories, which are maintained only by human editors, search engines also maintain real- time information by running an algorithm on a web crawler. I. INTRODUCTION Lycos Active Search engine is a web software program or Infoseek Inactive web based script available over the Internet that searches documents and files for keywords and returns the list of results containing those keywords. Today, there are 1995 AltaVista Inactive, redirected to Yahoo! numbers of different search engines available on the Internet, each with their own techniques and specialties. Daum Active Search Engine Optimization is a technique to improve visibility of a website in search engine. Magellan Inactive II. HISTORY Excite Active Timeline (full list) SAPO Active Year Engine Current status Yahoo! Active,
    [Show full text]
  • Search Engine: a Survey
    [Singh , 2(1): Jan., 2013] ISSN: 2277 -9655 IJESRT INTERNATIONAL JOURNA L OF ENGINEERING SCI ENCES & RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY Search Engine : A Survey Ankur Singh Bist Govind Ballabh P ant University of Agriculture And Technology, Pant, India [email protected] Abstract There is lot of information available on the internet so to fetch the relevant information is very typical task . In this paper our purpose is to make a survey on various issues related to search engines li ke semantic web search technology. Keywords: Crawler, Ontology .. Introduction AlltheWeb Inactive (URL redirected to Yahoo!) Searching is an important issue to retrieve the GenieKnows Active, rebranded Yellowee.com required data . Search engines are serving the same 1999 Naver Active task . There are various challenges covered by search Teoma Active engines in recent years . There are lot of challenges Viv isimo Inactive still to be solved . Answer the intelligent questions Baidu Active most efficiently is one of the major issue that is to be 2000 handled by search engines semantic web searching Exalead Inactive approaches are evolving that are responsible for 2002 Inktomi Acquired by Yahoo! making an appropriate results for intelligent input 2003 Info.com Active query . There are also various issues related to Active, Launched own web search Yahoo! Search vertical search engines that needed to be handled by (see Yahoo! Directory, 1995) 2004 applying efficient approaches .The timeline of search A9.com Inactive engines is provided below:-- Sogou Active AOL Search Active
    [Show full text]
  • Referrals by Domain for 2015-01-01 Through 2015-12-31 for Scholars' Mine
    Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine Scholars’ Mine Statistics Scholarly Communications Spring 01 Mar 2016 Referrals by Domain for 2015-01-01 through 2015-12-31 for Scholars' Mine James Roger Weaver Missouri University of Science and Technology, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/sm_stats Part of the Scholarly Communication Commons Recommended Citation Weaver, James Roger, "Referrals by Domain for 2015-01-01 through 2015-12-31 for Scholars' Mine" (2016). Scholars’ Mine Statistics. 9. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/sm_stats/9 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Data - Numeric is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholars’ Mine Statistics by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Scholars' Mine ‐ 2015 Referrals Report by Domain Missouri University of Science and Technology Domain URL Count Google total 187643 www.google.com/ http://www.google.com/ 33510 www.google.com http://www.google.com 26783 scholarsmine.mst.edu http://scholarsmine.mst.edu 20548 www.google.co.in/ http://www.google.co.in/ 14795 www.google.co.in http://www.google.co.in 8270 scholarsmine.mst.edu/ http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/ 5691 www.google.co.uk/
    [Show full text]