DOCSLIB.ORG

Marl Lake (Habitat 3140) Survey and Assessment Methods Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marl Lake (Habitat 3140) Survey and Assessment Methods Manual ISSN 1393 – 6670 N A T I O N A L P A R K S A N D W I L D L I F E S ERVICE MARL LAKE (HABITAT 3140) SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT METHODS MANUAL Cilian Roden, Paul Murphy, James Ryan & Philip Doddy I R I S H W I L D L I F E M ANUAL S 125 National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) commissions a range of reports from external contractors to provide scientific evidence and advice to assist it in its duties. The Irish Wildlife Manuals series serves as a record of work carried out or commissioned by NPWS, and is one means by which it disseminates scientific information. Others include scientific publications in peer reviewed journals. The views and recommendations presented in this report are not necessarily those of NPWS and should, therefore, not be attributed to NPWS. Front cover, small photographs from top row: Limestone pavement, Bricklieve Mountains, Co. Sligo, Andy Bleasdale; Meadow Saffron Colchicum autumnale, Lorcan Scott; Garden Tiger Arctia caja, Brian Nelson; Fulmar Fulmarus glacialis, David Tierney; Common Newt Lissotriton vulgaris, Brian Nelson; Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris, Jenni Roche; Raised bog pool, Derrinea Bog, Co. Roscommon, Fernando Fernandez Valverde; Coastal heath, Howth Head, Co. Dublin, Maurice Eakin; A deep water fly trap anemone Phelliactis sp., Yvonne Leahy; Violet Crystalwort Riccia huebeneriana, Robert Thompson Main photograph: Snorkeller surveying charophyte vegetation in a marl lake, Cilian Roden Marl Lake (Habitat 3140) Survey and Assessment Methods Manual Cilian Roden, Paul Murphy1, James Ryan & Philip Doddy2 1Eireco, 2Woodrow Sustainable Solutions Keywords: marl lakes, Ireland, sampling methods, condition assessment, charophytes, cyanobacterial crust Citation: Roden, C., Murphy, P., Ryan, J. & Doddy, P. (2020) Marl Lake (Habitat 3140) Survey and Assessment Methods Manual. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 125. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Ireland. The NPWS Project Officer for this report was: Áine O Connor; [email protected] This IWM was edited by Áine O Connor ISSN 1393 – 6670 An tSeirbhís Páirceanna Náisiúnta agus Fiadhúlra 2020 National Parks and Wildlife Service 2020 An RoinnTithíochta, Rialtais Áitiúil agus Oidhreachta, 90 Sráid an Rí Thuaidh, Baile Átha Cliath 7, D07 N7CV Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, 90 North King Street, Dublin 7, D07 N7CV Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of this Irish Wildlife Manuals ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Defining and identifying marl lakes ................................................................................................. 2 2 Sampling charophytes and other macrophyte vegetation ...................................................................... 5 2.1 Planning field work ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Access ............................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Selection of sampling transects ..................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Field data-sheets ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Equipment ............................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2.1 Vehicle .............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2.2 Boat ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 Canoe ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2.4 Boat equipment ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.3.5 PPE Equipment ............................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.6 General survey equipment: ........................................................................................................... 8 2.2.7 Snorkelling gear .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Biosecurity ............................................................................................................................................ 9 2.3.1 Biosecurity risks .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.3.2 Biosecurity protocol ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.3 Reporting on invasive alien species ........................................................................................... 10 2.4 Field survey ....................................................................................................................................... 11 2.4.1 Snorkel survey ............................................................................................................................... 11 2.4.2 Scuba survey .................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4.3 Position location ............................................................................................................................ 12 2.4.4 Sampling and recording data ...................................................................................................... 13 2.4.5 Automation .................................................................................................................................... 14 2.4.6 Additional data ............................................................................................................................. 14 2.4.7 Photography .................................................................................................................................. 15 2.4.8 Follow up on shore ....................................................................................................................... 16 2.5 Storage of field data .......................................................................................................................... 16 2.6 Identification of plant specimens .................................................................................................... 16 2.7 Data management and analyses ..................................................................................................... 17 3 Sampling and analysing the cyanobacterial crust .................................................................................. 20 3.1 Site selection....................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Fieldwork equipment ....................................................................................................................... 20 3.3 Fieldwork 1: preparation.................................................................................................................. 21 3.4 Fieldwork 2: estimating crust cover ................................................................................................ 21 3.5 Fieldwork 3: crust sampling & transportation .............................................................................. 21 3.6 Microscopy ......................................................................................................................................... 22 3.7 Pigment analysis ................................................................................................................................ 23 4 Assessing the conservation condition of marl lakes .............................................................................. 25 4.1 Defining reference conditions for Irish marl lakes ....................................................................... 25 4.2 Parameters for assessing marl lake conservation condition ........................................................ 25 4.2.1 Area ................................................................................................................................................. 26 4.2.2 Charophyte species and vegetation zones ................................................................................. 26 4.2.3 Euphotic depth .............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Old Irish Goat Presentation Website
    The Old Irish Goat Society “To preserve and promote the Old Irish Goat" 'Handlebars', John Joyce Photography and Pamela Gray, Mulranny Heritage Map Flyer Artwork Old Irish Goat Heritage Value in Context Colin Johnston, Old Irish Goat Society Member Famine Reenactment, Mulranny Old Irish, Scottish and English Goat Heritage Value in Paintings Nora Drummond (1862 - 1949) Edgar Hunt (1876–1953) ‘Augustus Burke, Connemara Girl’, 1880 ‘A Mountain Goat’, Early 20th Century Old Irish Goat Heritage Value in Photographs 'A Hospitable Home in Ireland', 1909 Nanny Goat Market, Athlone, Ireland Travelling Herd, Wiltshire, England Travelling Herd, Surrey, England International Calls to Preserve the Old Irish Goat “The Irish goat, we maintain, is the best we have for the purpose, and it should be kept pure in type… to graft Nubian or Swiss blood into this breed does not add to its beauty, and, to our mind, impairs its usefulness.” Walter Paget, 1918 “There is a very compelling and urgent need to preserve the Old Irish Goat breed as a genetic and cultural resource. The Old Irish Goat is the ancient breed of the nation and the symbol of its past.” Raymond Werner, 2009 Old Irish Goat Breed Standard “The Old Irish Goat has a distinct regal image, with it’s long beard, oversized side-burns, flamboyant coiff, long coat and of course… it is ostentatiously adorned with a crown of impressive horns” - Seán Carolan Contrast between Old Irish and British Alpine Breeds Old Irish Goat Colour Patterns “…they moved off and then strung out like a neck-lace of multicoloured beads” - Ray Werner, Heritage Outlook, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Landscape Names
    Irish Landscape Names Preface to 2010 edition Stradbally on its own denotes a parish and village); there is usually no equivalent word in the Irish form, such as sliabh or cnoc; and the Ordnance The following document is extracted from the database used to prepare the list Survey forms have not gained currency locally or amongst hill-walkers. The of peaks included on the „Summits‟ section and other sections at second group of exceptions concerns hills for which there was substantial www.mountainviews.ie The document comprises the name data and key evidence from alternative authoritative sources for a name other than the one geographical data for each peak listed on the website as of May 2010, with shown on OS maps, e.g. Croaghonagh / Cruach Eoghanach in Co. Donegal, some minor changes and omissions. The geographical data on the website is marked on the Discovery map as Barnesmore, or Slievetrue in Co. Antrim, more comprehensive. marked on the Discoverer map as Carn Hill. In some of these cases, the evidence for overriding the map forms comes from other Ordnance Survey The data was collated over a number of years by a team of volunteer sources, such as the Ordnance Survey Memoirs. It should be emphasised that contributors to the website. The list in use started with the 2000ft list of Rev. these exceptions represent only a very small percentage of the names listed Vandeleur (1950s), the 600m list based on this by Joss Lynam (1970s) and the and that the forms used by the Placenames Branch and/or OSI/OSNI are 400 and 500m lists of Michael Dewey and Myrddyn Phillips.
    [Show full text]
  • Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre NBRC Newsletter 20
    Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre The home of quality ecological data in Northamptonshire NBRC Newsletter 20 Autumn/Winter 2020 You have been keeping us wonderfully busy with your submitted records of the species of Northamptonshire; the WILDside Recording Community has been a great home for sightings and support. You have not been stopped in noticing and supporting our local nature - recording in gardens, out on local exercise walks and further afield when restrictions allow. Our website has received over one thousand records, covering over five hundred taxa since the first lockdown began! Many of you will have noticed our website has had a re-vamp of late, shifting Beyond direct website submission, we know you also to the latest platform with SSL security, whilst submit directly to our county recorders (David James retaining all the recording features, ‘look out for’ recently reported over 25,000 butterfly records for surveys and resources to support local recording and 2020!) and via other online channels such as iRecord. ecological reporting. If you aren’t sure of which surveys we receive you can always check our annual report which lists our partners or ask the team [email protected]. Direct record submissions to our website or via our county recorders (as listed on our new resources for recorders page on the website) are generally processed more swiftly as we get all the needed parts and can contact you if required to complete a record. WILDside seems to have inspired us all to expand our recording repertoire. The ever-increasing taxonomic coverage in your submissions is fantastic to see! It seems many have used the wealth of virtual training at our fingertips this year through Wildlife Trust BCN Training Courses, the Field Studies Council and a host of others as can be seen through this wonderfully Thanks to the support of the Environment Agency, we compiled list of resources as put together by the have now launched our latest survey ‘Look out for South East Wales Biodiversity Records Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B. List of Special Areas of Conservation and Special Protection Areas
    Appendix B. List of Special Areas of Conservation and Special Protection Areas Irish Water | Draft Framework Plan. Natura Impact Statement Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) in the Republic of Ireland Site code Site name 000006 Killyconny Bog (Cloghbally) SAC 000007 Lough Oughter and Associated Loughs SAC 000014 Ballyallia Lake SAC 000016 Ballycullinan Lake SAC 000019 Ballyogan Lough SAC 000020 Black Head-Poulsallagh Complex SAC 000030 Danes Hole, Poulnalecka SAC 000032 Dromore Woods and Loughs SAC 000036 Inagh River Estuary SAC 000037 Pouladatig Cave SAC 000051 Lough Gash Turlough SAC 000054 Moneen Mountain SAC 000057 Moyree River System SAC 000064 Poulnagordon Cave (Quin) SAC 000077 Ballymacoda (Clonpriest and Pillmore) SAC 000090 Glengarriff Harbour and Woodland SAC 000091 Clonakilty Bay SAC 000093 Caha Mountains SAC 000097 Lough Hyne Nature Reserve and Environs SAC 000101 Roaringwater Bay and Islands SAC 000102 Sheep's Head SAC 000106 St. Gobnet's Wood SAC 000108 The Gearagh SAC 000109 Three Castle Head to Mizen Head SAC 000111 Aran Island (Donegal) Cliffs SAC 000115 Ballintra SAC 000116 Ballyarr Wood SAC 000129 Croaghonagh Bog SAC 000133 Donegal Bay (Murvagh) SAC 000138 Durnesh Lough SAC 000140 Fawnboy Bog/Lough Nacung SAC 000142 Gannivegil Bog SAC 000147 Horn Head and Rinclevan SAC 000154 Inishtrahull SAC 000163 Lough Eske and Ardnamona Wood SAC 000164 Lough Nagreany Dunes SAC 000165 Lough Nillan Bog (Carrickatlieve) SAC 000168 Magheradrumman Bog SAC 000172 Meenaguse/Ardbane Bog SAC 000173 Meentygrannagh Bog SAC 000174 Curraghchase Woods SAC 000181 Rathlin O'Birne Island SAC 000185 Sessiagh Lough SAC 000189 Slieve League SAC 000190 Slieve Tooey/Tormore Island/Loughros Beg Bay SAC 000191 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventy Years of Changes in the Abundance of Danish Charophytes
    Freshwater Biology (2013) 58, 1682–1693 doi:10.1111/fwb.12159 Seventy years of changes in the abundance of Danish charophytes LARS BAASTRUP-SPOHR, LARS LØNSMANN IVERSEN, JEPPE DAHL-NIELSEN AND KAJ SAND-JENSEN Freshwater Biological Laboratory, Biological Institute, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark SUMMARY 1. Charophytes grow attached to soft bottoms in ponds, streams, lakes and estuaries and are highly threatened throughout Europe according to the national Red Lists. We used Danish studies on fresh- water charophyte distributions conducted around 1940 and repeated measurements during recent years to evaluate the historical development of species richness and dominance patterns. We also tested to what extent historical changes of species abundance in 29 waterbodies were related to landscape features, water quality and species traits. 2. We found that three species of freshwater charophytes (Chara filiformis, Tolypella intricata and Nitella gracilis) have apparently disappeared from Denmark while one species (Chara connivens) has immigrated. National species richness has thus declined from 21 to 19 species. 3. Species abundance based on occurrence in many waterbodies followed a linear rank–log abun- dance relationship both in the historical and the recent studies. The dominance structure was stronger today than historically as common species have become relatively more abundant and uncommon species relatively rarer. 4. Among species traits, perenniality and preference for alkaline waters typical of deep-growing species in large alkaline lakes, a rare contemporary habitat, were significantly related to the historic species decline. Species increasing in abundance had wide tolerances to alkalinity and water nitrogen content. 5. Twenty-nine lakes and ponds studied repeatedly showed a significant decline of mean species richness from 3.4 to 2.4 during the 70 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Ireland ATLANTIC OCEAN 35 Belfast 34 31 33 32 Sligo 42 30 29 Keyof the Most Frequently Observed Cetaceans (Whales, Dolphins & Porpoises) in Irish Waters
    MAP_13 4/13/04 4:01 PM Page 1 37 39 40 Whale & Dolphin Watching 38 Derry 36 41 the energy of the sea Map of Ireland ATLANTIC OCEAN 35 Belfast 34 31 33 32 Sligo 42 30 29 Keyof the most frequently observed cetaceans (whales, dolphins & porpoises) in Irish waters HP - Harbour porpoise CD - Common Dolphin BND - Bottlenose Dolphin HP - Harbour porpoise 1 IRISH SEA 28 27 CD - Common dolphin BND - Bottlenose dolphin 2 Galway RD - Risso’s dolphin Dublin 4 KW - Killer whale 3 26 5 MW - Minke whale 25 HW - Humpback whale KW - Killer Whale MW - Minke whale Whale watchers on Loop Head, Co. Clare FW - Fin whale RD - Risso’s Dolphin 24 23 Limerick 22 Waterford 21 6 20 Killarney 8 7 Whale watchers on 18 Cape Clear Island, Co. Cork 19 Cork 9 ST. GEORGE'S CHANNEL HW - Humpback whale 17 FW - Fin whale The Foam Goddess 16 15 10 Photo credits: HP: P. Fisher, MW: H. Baptist, KW, HW, FW: Pádraig Whooley, RD: Graeme Cresswell, CD: Simon Berrow. Pádraig Whooley, FW: HW, H. Baptist, KW, MW: Fisher, Photo credits: HP: P. According to Greek myth the shape of the most beautiful goddess of all, Aphrodite, was formed out of the swirling sea foam & 14 12 11 spray & brought to land by dolphins on a giant scallop shell, brought up from the depths of the ocean on the back of a whale. 13 Leinster Munster Louth 1. Clogher Head (HP) Connaught Ulster Waterford 8. Helvick Head Kerry 17. Bolus Head Dublin 2. Howth Head 9.
    [Show full text]
  • SAC Selection Assessment Document
    Inshore and Offshore Special Area of Conservation (SAC): North Channel SAC Selection Assessment Document © Colin Speedie / Wave Action January 2017 Further information This document is available as a pdf file on JNCC’s website for download if required (www.jncc.gov.uk). Please return comments or queries to: Marine Species Advice Team Joint Nature Conservation Committee Inverdee House Aberdeen AB11 9QA Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1733 562626 Recommended citation: DAERA and JNCC (2017) SAC Selection Assessment: North Channel. January, 2017. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, UK. Available from: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page- 7242 North Channel Selection Assessment Document, January 2017 Page 2 of 22 1. Introduction This document provides detailed information about the North Channel site proposed for designation for the Annex II species harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and evaluates this interest feature according to the Habitats Directive1 selection criteria and guiding principles. This is a single feature site, proposed for designation solely for the purpose of aiding the management of harbour porpoise populations throughout UK waters, in accordance with EU legislation. The site includes parts of both Northern Ireland territorial waters (out to 12 nautical miles from the baseline) and offshore waters (from 12 nautical miles from the coast out to 200 nautical miles or to the UK Continental Shelf limit), and is therefore a joint responsibility of the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs in Northern Ireland (DAERA) and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC). The Conservation (Natural Habitats, etc.) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1995 (as amended)2 transpose the Habitats Directive into law on land and in territorial waters of Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Worldwide Range of the Charophyte Species Native to Germany
    Rostock. Meeresbiolog. Beitr. Heft 28 45-96 Rostock 2018 Heiko KORSCH* * Schillbachstraße 19, 07743 Jena [email protected] The worldwide range of the Charophyte species native to Germany Abstract Based on extensive evaluations, the worldwide distributions of the 36 Charophyte species native to Germany are presented. Some of these species are distributed almost worldwide (e.g. Chara braunii, C. vulgaris, Nitella hyalina), while others have much smaller ranges. Chara filiformis for example is restricted to a small part of continental Europe. For many species comments are made to explain the species concept used or to give hints about doubtful data. Keywords: Plant geography, Characeae, Charophytes, range-maps, Chara, Lamprothamnium, Lychnothamnus, Nitella, Nitellopsis, Tolypella Zusammenfassung: Areale der in Deutschland heimischen Characeen-Arten. Auf der Grundlage umfangreicher Recherchen werden die weltweiten Areale der in Deutschland vorkommenden 36 Characeen-Arten dargestellt. Von diesen Arten sind einige (z. B. Chara braunii, C. vulgaris, Nitella hyalina) fast weltweit verbreitet, andere haben deutlich kleinere Areale. So ist z. B. Chara filiformis auf kleine Teile Europas beschränkt. Zu einer ganzen Reihe von Arten werden Kommentare geben. Diese erläutern die verwendeten Artumgrenzungen oder geben Hinweise zu fraglichen Angaben. 1 Introduction In recent decades and after a phase of stagnation in Germany, interest in the Characeae has markedly increased. The Habitats Directive 92/43/EC (EC1992) and the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (EC 2000) of the European Union have intensified this process. Because of their size and their complex structure, the Charophytes are morphologically clearly distinguished from most other groups of Algae. The results of genetic investigations show that they are more closely related to the Mosses and higher plants rather than to the other algae (QUI 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Botanika – Steciana , , - ISSN -
    Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu CCCXCII Botanika – Steciana , , - www.up.poznan.pl/steciana ISSN - CHAROPHYTES CHARACEAE, CHAROPHYTA OF PEATLAND HABITATS IN THE VICINITY OF DRAWSKO AND MIAŁY NOTEĆ FOREST, NW POLAND P M, M G P. Mróz, Didactic and Scientifi c Branch in Piła, Adam Mickiewicz University, Kołobrzeska , - Piła, Poland, e-mail: pmr [email protected] M. Gąbka, Department of Hydrobiology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska , - Poznań, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] (Received: April , . Accepted: May , ) ABSTR ACT. This paper presents recent localities of charophytes in the peatland complex of the northern part of Noteć Forest (Wielkopolska, Poland). In alkaline or calcareous fens and shallow waters, seven spe- cies of charophytes were found: Chara globularis, C. intermedia, C. virgata, C. vulgaris, Nitella capillaris, N. mucronata and N. syncarpa. Some of the charophytes, which were observed in this area, are regarded as endangered and vulnerable in Poland, especially, C. intermedia, N. capillaris and N. syncarpa. The pre- liminary research results on the studied charophyte distribution and ecology are presented. KEY WORDS: Characeae, Chara, Nitella, peatland habitat, distribution, threatened and rare charophytes, Noteć Forest, Poland INTRODUCTION (e.g. G , L et . ) and Lublin regions (K and M , B , Charophytes (Characeae, Charophyta) are macro- U et . ), as well as the southern part of scopic algae that grow mainly in standing and fresh the country (K , C-M- waters, less frequently in fl owing and saline waters (e.g. and V ). D , , H and D , In Wielkopolska, where out of Polish represent- W , U ). In Poland, the ma- atives of Characeae are found, three species occur exclu- jority of studies of these macrophytes were conducted in sively in peatlands: Chara tenuispina, C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Midland Septs and the Pale [Microform]
    l!r;"(-«^j3rt,J!if '^ r-*:*g^ ^^TW^^^^''^''^WiT^7^'^'^' ^'^ : >'^^^}lSS'-^r'^XW'T?W^'^y?^W^^'. ' 3-,'V-'* f. THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY From tlia oolleotlon of ;raiD98 Ooilinsi Drumcondrai Ireland. Purohadedy 1918. 941 S H 63-m i -fe; Return this book on or before the m Latest Date stamped below. A charge is made on all overdue books. University of Illinois Library se DEC 20 !2 MAR 2 1! DEC 8 ','''*,; .I4») 2 1 -' . >#' fee JAN 2 I M32 ^^: M'' i c < f ^7,>:?fp^v^S*^^ift^pIV:?*^ THE MIDLAND SEPTS AND THE PALE AN ACCOUNT OF THE EARLY SEPTS AND LATER SEITLERS OF THE KING'S COUNTY AND OF LIFE IN THE ENGLISH PALE BY F. R. MONTGOMERY HITCHCOCK, M.A. ••' AUTHOR OF " CLEMENT OF ALEXANiDRIA," " MYSTERY OF THF CROSS," "SUGGESTIONS FOR BIBLE STUDY," "CELTIC TYPES OF LIFE AND ART," ETC DUBLIN: SEALY, BRYERS AND WALKER MIDDLE ABBEY STREET 1908 : '^*--'.- • -Wl^^'' vK.^Jit?%?ii'-^^^^^ ."'1 PRINTED BY SBALY, BRVERS AND WALKER, MIDDLE ABBEY STREET, DUBLIN, : ; ; UXORI BENIGNAE ET BEATAE. — : o : — Rapta sinu subito niteas per saecula caeli, Pars animi major, rerum carissima, conjux. Mox Deus orbatos iterum conjunget amantes Et laeti mecum pueri duo limina mortis, Delicias nostras visum, transibimus una. Tempora te solam nostrae coluere juventae Fulgebit facies ridens mihi sancta relicto Vivus amor donee laxabit vincula letL Interea votum accipias a me mea sponsa libellum. Gratia mollis enim vultus inspirat amantem, Mensque benigna trahit, labentem et dextera tollit. Aegros egregio solata venusta lepore es Natis mater eras, mulier gratissima sponso. Coelicolum jam adscripta choris fungere labore, In gremio Christi, semper dilecta, quiescens.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia) with Notes on a New Record of Chara Virgata
    Memoranda Soc. Soc. Fauna Fauna Flora Flora Fennica Fennica 89, 89: 2013 57–64. • Blinova 2013 & Koistinen 57 A review of Characeae (Charophyta) in Murmansk Region (Russia) with notes on a new record of Chara virgata Ilona V. Blinova & Marja Koistinen Blinova, I. V., Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institute, Kola Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kirovsk, Murmansk Region, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Koistinen, M., Finnish Museum of Natural History (Botany), P.O. Box 7, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: [email protected] Five species of Characeae are known in Murmansk Region from five biogeographic provinces (Lps, Lt, Lim, Ks, Lv). One of them, Chara strigosa A.Braun, is included in the Red Data Book of the Russian Federation. A new site for C. virgata Kütz. is described from a rich fen in the province of Lim. This is the second record of the species in the Region. The new site is situated about 100 km NW of the previous one in a lake near the White Sea coast. The status of this species in the Regional Red Data Book should be ’Vulnerable’. Introduction and A. Langangen (Oslo) in 1996–1997, and four species were recognized (Chara globularis, C. The Characeae are an important component in strigosa, Nitella flexilis, N. opaca). The Chara- aquatic ecosystems of lakes and smaller water ceae have been poorly studied in Murmansk Re- bodies (Coops 2002). In recent decades the role gion and no review has so far been prepared. This of this group has been re-assessed for conserva- paper presents the first synopsis of the family in tion purposes in Europe because stoneworts are the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Acarospora Benedarensis: a Rare Terricolous Maritime Lichen from Ireland, Scotland, and Wales
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 9: 31-34. 2011. Acarospora benedarensis: a rare terricolous maritime lichen from Ireland, Scotland, and Wales 1 2 KERRY KNUDSEN & HOWARD FOX ABSTRACT. – Acarospora benedarensis, a rare terricolous lichen endemic to Ireland, Scotland and Wales, is discussed. It is recognized as having a much higher hymenium than described in the protologue with correspondingly tall asci. It is probably not a member of the new genus Silobia but further study of its systematic position is needed. A lectotype is also designated. KEYWORDS. – Acarospora rhizobola, biological soil crusts, hypothallus, maritime lichens, morphology, nitrophiles, rhizohyphae, Silobia rhagadiza, taxonomy. INTRODUCTION In 1913, in “The Maritime and Marine Lichens of Howth” in the Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society, Matilda C. Knowles described Acarospora benedarensis M. Knowles from Howth Head in Ireland near Dublin. The species is rare in nature (Fletcher et al. 2009). While studying at the United States National Herbarium (US), the first author found a small but excellent specimen of A. benedarensis collected on Howth Head by Knowles and originally given to the American lichenologist C.C. Plitt. The mature apothecia were well developed as was the thallus, allowing for some new observations. The current description (Fletcher et al. 2009) is adequate for identification, except for hymenial height, which in mature apothecia is much higher, and ascus size is lacking. DISCUSSION Knowles discovered Acarospora benedarensis on lower “earth banks” of white fine clay forming steep lower slopes along the cliffs on the southwest coast of Howth Head. The distinct white soil type of Howth Head is Hippy Hole Formation sediments of Cambrian origin (van Lunsen & Max 1995) and this habitat is exposed to salt spray.
    [Show full text]