DOCSLIB.ORG

Environment Committee Report 21 27

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environment Committee Report 21 27 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE 37 COMITÉ DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT REPORT 21 RAPPORT 21 27 FEBRUARY 2013 LE 27 FÉVRIER 2013 2. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 HIGHWAY 174 STORM SEWER PIPE COLLAPSE ANALYSE DES CAUSES FONDAMENTALES - AFFAISSEMENT DE LA CHAUSSÉE SUR L’AUTOROUTE 174 LE 4 SEPTEMBRE 2012 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION That Council receive this report for information as supplemental to the 2013 rate budget. RECOMMANDATION DU COMITÉ Que le Conseil de prendre connaissance du présent rapport en tant que document complémentaire au budget de 2013 soutenu par les tarifs. DOCUMENTATION / DOCUMENTATION 1. Kent Kirkpatrick, City Manager’s report dated 3 February 2013 / Rapport du Directeur municipal daté du 3 février 2013 (ACS2013-CMR-OCM-0001). 2. Extract of Minute, 15 January 2013, following the French report. ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE 38 COMITÉ DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT REPORT 21 RAPPORT 21 27 FEBRUARY 2013 LE 27 FÉVRIER 2013 Report to/Rapport au : Environment Committee Comité de l’environnement and Council / et au Conseil January 3, 2013 3 janvier 2013 Submitted by/Soumis par : Kent Kirkpatrick, City Manager / Directeur municipal Contact Person / Personne ressource: Steve Box, Director, Corporate Programs & Business Services / Directeur, programmes municipales et Services opérationnels 613-580-2424 ext. 24200; [email protected] ORLÉANS (1) Ref N°: ACS2013-CMR-OCM-0001 SUBJECT: ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 HIGHWAY 174 STORM SEWER PIPE COLLAPSE OBJET : ANALYSE DES CAUSES FONDAMENTALES - AFFAISSEMENT DE LA CHAUSSÉE SUR L’AUTOROUTE 174 LE 4 SEPTEMBRE 2012 REPORT RECOMMENDATION That the Environment Committee recommend Council receive this report for information as supplemental to the 2013 rate budget. RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT Que le Comité de l’environnement recommande au Conseil de prendre connaissance du présent rapport en tant que document complémentaire au budget de 2013 soutenu par les tarifs. ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE 39 COMITÉ DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT REPORT 21 RAPPORT 21 27 FEBRUARY 2013 LE 27 FÉVRIER 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On September 4, 2012, while undergoing preparatory work to make structural repairs, a section of storm sewer pipe collapsed under the southern exit ramp of Highway 174 near Jeanne D’Arc Boulevard. Immediate measures were undertaken to stabilize the site and implement emergency repairs. On September 12, 2012, Council directed the City Manager to: “Initiate an independent, arms-length, review of the root cause of the Highway 174 sinkhole and determine what, if anything, the City could have done differently to prevent the sinkhole and the subsequent failure of the east bound lanes of Highway 174 and report back to the Finance and Economic Development Committee within 90 days.” Additionally, Council directed that the City Manager: “Undertake an immediate review of any similar pieces of City infrastructure located in and around our critical City streets (i.e. any critical infrastructure similar in age or materials to the pipe that failed under Highway 174) and that this work be completed no later than September 30th.” On November 28, 2012, Council further directed that staff: “Re-direct the consultant’s report on the independent, arms-length, review of the root causes of the Highway 174 sinkhole and subsequent failure of the eastbound lanes of Highway 174 to the Environment Committee; and that the consultant’s report be publicly released on or before December 12, 2012, to ensure it is available within the 90 days as directed by Council in addition to the release that will occur with the January Agenda for the Environment Committee.” Pursuant to Council direction, the analysis of critical infrastructure was completed and reported to Council on September 28, 2012. Additionally, as per Council direction, a statement of work was drafted to undertake the root cause analysis of the storm sewer pipe collapse. Recognizing that the successful proponent had to specialize in drainage and possess structural, soils and hydrology expertise coupled with a requirement to ensure that the proponent had not performed work for either the City or any of the contractors associated with the work being ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE 40 COMITÉ DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT REPORT 21 RAPPORT 21 27 FEBRUARY 2013 LE 27 FÉVRIER 2013 performed on the Highway 174 storm sewer pipe, staff consulted with the Chief Executive Officer of the Consulting Engineers of Ontario and the President of the Drainage Superintendents of Ontario to obtain input regarding suitable firms to undertake such a review. To ensure that the review was undertaken within the timeline specified by Council, five firms were identified and contacted to submit proposals in response to the statement of work (Document 1, Appendix A, to this report). Based on the submissions, B.M. Ross and Associates was retained to undertake a root cause analysis of the incident and prepare a report with recommendations. B.M. Ross and Associates has the pre-requisite technical expertise and has not previously worked for the City, the contractor or the consultant working on the Highway 174 storm sewer pipe repair project. A Technical Briefing was held for Members of Council on December 7, 2012, at which time the results of the independent review were released to the public. The purpose of this report is to present the findings and recommendations of the independent review and outline the actions undertaken or planned by the City in response to those recommendations related to the management of critical storm sewer assets. B.M. Ross and Associates found that Ottawa’s practices were similar to those of the peer municipalities that were consulted as part of the review. Their independent review identified five recommendations aimed at strengthening current asset management practices. Staff concur with all of the recommendations contained in the consultant’s report and outline the measures already in place or underway which respond to these recommendations and that will assist in improving asset management practices at the City. BACKGROUND On September 4, 2012, a 3.6 metre (m) diameter storm sewer pipe crossing Highway 174 at Jeanne D’Arc Boulevard collapsed creating a large sinkhole and closing the eastbound lanes. The City immediately coordinated an emergency response involving several City departments, including Infrastructure Services, Public Works, Transit Services, Environmental Services and Ottawa Police Services, to close the roadway and replace the pipe. The City then implemented interim measures to mitigate traffic pressures resulting from the road closure. By implementing a 24-hour response by staff and the contractor, the road was reopened to the public on September 17, 2012. On September 12, 2012, Council directed the City Manager to initiate an independent, arms-length review of the root causes of the Highway 174 sinkhole and report back within 90 days, to the Finance and Economic Development Committee with findings and recommendations to be implemented that would reduce the risk of a reoccurrence. ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE 41 COMITÉ DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT REPORT 21 RAPPORT 21 27 FEBRUARY 2013 LE 27 FÉVRIER 2013 Pursuant to Council direction, the firm B.M. Ross and Associates was retained to undertake a root cause analysis of the incident and prepare a report with recommendations, where warranted. This firm was selected after obtaining input from the Chief Executive Officer of the Consulting Engineers of Ontario and the President of the Drainage Superintendents of Ontario regarding suitable firms to undertake such a review. B.M. Ross and Associates was also selected based on the fact that it had not previously done work for the City, the contractor or the consultant working on the project. On November 28, 2012, Council directed that the consultant’s report on the Highway 174 sinkhole be brought to Environment Committee, rather than to the Finance and Economic Development Committee. The purpose of this report is to present the findings and recommendations of the independent review and outline the actions undertaken or planned in response to the consultant’s recommendations regarding the management of critical storm sewer assets. It is also intended to report on the delegated authority exercised by senior management in responding to this emergency situation. The report prepared by B.M. Ross is included as Document 1 to this report. State of Storm Sewer Assets The City owns over $8 billion in sewer assets (based on replacement value) including 2,600 km of storm sewer pipes and 2,700 km of sanitary and combined storm sewer pipes. These assets exist to support the delivery of services to the residents of Ottawa that are important to our quality of life. Much of the City’s infrastructure was created to support growth as the City’s urban area expanded to include suburban areas, and to service rural communities. This infrastructure requires continued investment to ensure it is kept in good working order. It is an emerging industry best practice to develop comprehensive asset management programs to help prioritize these investments and ensure best value for taxpayer dollars. On October 10, 2012, Council approved the Comprehensive Asset Management (CAM) Program (Ref No: ACS2012-PAI-INF-0007). This report included approval of a program and associated target funding policy needed to keep the City’s infrastructure in a state of good repair. At the heart of the program is a framework aimed at making sure the City targets the right infrastructure renewal investments at the right time. To achieve this, the report recommended Council adopt new levels of service that take a risk-based approach to investment decisions. ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE 42 COMITÉ DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT REPORT 21 RAPPORT 21 27 FEBRUARY 2013 LE 27 FÉVRIER 2013 Applying a risk-based approach to the City’s sewer systems recognizes that not all pipes present the same risk to service. Risk is defined as the likelihood and consequence of failure. Likelihood of failure is a function of pipe material, operating environment, construction practices and remaining service life prediction.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notice of Round #1 of Public Open Houses Ottawa Road 174 / Prescott-Russell County Road 17 Class Environmental Assessment Study
    Notice of Round #1 of Public Open Houses Ottawa Road 174 / Prescott-Russell County Road 17 Class Environmental Assessment Study Tuesday, February 5, 2013 (Cumberland) Wednesday, February 6, 2013 (Orléans) Cumberland Lions Club, Maple Hall Sir Wilfrid Laurier Secondary School, Cafeteria 2552 Old Montreal Road, Cumberland 1515 Tenth Line Road, Orléans 6:30 to 9pm, presentation at 7:00 6:30 to 9pm, presentation at 7:00 Thursday, February 7, 2013 (Rockland) City Hall, Council boardroom 1560 Laurier Street, Rockland 6:30 to 9pm, presentation at 7:00 The United Counties of Prescott and Russell in partnership with the City of Ottawa are undertaking a Class Environmental Assessment (EA) study for the Ottawa Road 174 and Prescott-Russell County Road 17 corridor from Highway 417 to County Road 8 (Landry Road). This study will consider improvements to the existing OR 174-CR 17 corridor, improvements to other existing roads and the construction of new roads in the Study Area illustrated below. This Study is being carried out in accordance with the requirements for a Schedule ‘C’ project under the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (2007, 2011). The purpose of the first round of public open houses is to: x Introduce the project; x Review the Project Need and Existing Conditions; x Consult on the proposed evaluation criteria; x Identify the alternative solutions; and x Review the evaluation of alternative solutions. This is the first of three rounds of public consultation that will be held during the course of the study to review and discuss the project with the study team and solicit feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Synopsis
    Final Draft Road Network Development Report Submitted to the City of Ottawa by IBI Group September 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Report Structure .................................................................................................. 3 2. Background Information ...................................................................... 4 2.1 The TRANS Screenline System ......................................................................... 4 2.2 The TRANS Forecasting Model ......................................................................... 4 2.3 The 2008 Transportation Master Plan ............................................................... 7 2.4 Progress Since 2008 ........................................................................................... 9 Community Design Plans and Other Studies ................................................................. 9 Environmental Assessments ........................................................................................ 10 Approvals and Construction .......................................................................................... 10 3. Needs and Opportunities ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sixth Interprovincial Crossing Refresh
    NATIONAL CAPITAL COMMISSION SIXTH INTERPROVINCIAL BRIDGE CROSSING STUDY REFRESH Summary Report SIXTH INTERPROVINCIAL BRIDGE CROSSING STUDY REFRESH Summary Report NATIONAL CAPITAL COMMISSION V5 PROJECT NO.: 19M-01103-00 DATE: APRIL 8, 2020 WSP SUITE 300 2611 QUEENSVIEW DRIVE OTTAWA, ON, CANADA K2B 8K2 T: +1 613 829-2800 F: +1 613 829-8299 WSP.COM TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................. 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................ 2 2 NOISE & VIBRATION REPORT .......................... 3 2.1 Conclusions from Previous Report ................................. 3 2.2 Methodology for Refresh .................................................. 4 2.3 What has Changed ............................................................ 5 2.4 Potential Impacts Due to Change .................................... 5 3 LAND USE AND PROPERTY REPORT ............. 6 3.1 Conclusions from Previous Report ................................. 6 3.2 Methodology for Refresh .................................................. 6 3.3 What has Changed ............................................................ 7 3.4 Potential Impacts Due to Change .................................... 8 4 AIR QUALITY REPORT .................................... 10 4.1 Conclusions From Previous Report .............................. 10 4.2 Methodology for Refresh ................................................ 10 4.3 What has Changed .......................................................... 10 4.4 Potential
    [Show full text]
  • Ottawa Transportation Report.Pdf
    OTTAWA THE IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ON HOUSING VALUES IN THE OTTAWA REGION Don R Campbell, Senior Analyst Melanie Reuter, Director of Research Allyssa Epp, Research Analyst WWW.REINCANADA.COM AUTHORS Don R. Campbell, Senior Analyst, REIN Ltd Melanie Reuter, Director of Research, REIN Ltd Allyssa Fischer, Research Analyst, REIN Ltd © The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd. 6 – 27250 58 Cr Langley, BC V4W 3W7 Tel (604) 856-2825 Fax (604) 856-0091 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Page: www.reincanada.com Important Disclaimer: This Report, or any seminars or updates given in relation thereto, is sold, or otherwise provided, on the understanding that the authors – Don R. Campbell, Melanie Reuter, Allyssa Fischer, and The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd and their instructors, are not responsible for any results or results of any actions taken in reliance upon any information contained in this report, or conveyed by way of the said seminars, nor for any errors contained therein or presented thereat or omissions in relation thereto. It is further understood that the said authors and instructors do not purport to render legal, accounting, tax, investment, financial planning or other professional advice. The said authors and instructors hereby disclaim all and any liability to any person, whether a purchaser of this Report, a student of the said seminars, or otherwise, arising in respect of this Report, or the said seminars, and of the consequences of anything done or purported to be done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or part, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Report or the said seminars.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyses of Various Scenarios for Renaud Road
    Document 3 – Analyses of Various Scenarios for Renaud Road The primary purpose of this study is to undertake a high-level assessment of the transportation impacts associated with the potential closure/relocation of Renaud Road in the vicinity of the Bradley Estates community. More specifically, the analysis: Examines traffic conditions along Renaud Road, the nature and magnitude of the problem Identifies opportunities for alleviating traffic issues on Renaud Road Evaluates the traffic impacts associated with each alternative and the ability of the adjacent road network to accommodate diverted traffic While the focus of this assignment is Renaud Road, a much larger study area was selected for analysis purposes given the range of road network changes under consideration and the associated impacts on traffic flow. Traffic Flow to and from Anderson Road South Through-traffic on Renaud Road has essentially two destinations: To/from the east via Innes Road To/from the south via Anderson Road Based on the most recent traffic count from February, 2014, 65 per cent of the westbound traffic on Renaud Road during the AM peak hour (554 vehicles/hour) turns south on Anderson Road. Likewise, during the PM peak hour, 65 per cent of the traffic departing the Anderson Road/Renaud Road intersection in the eastbound direction (451 vehicles/hour) originates from the south on Anderson Road as shown in Figure 5. Such patterns indicate a significant desire line between the east and south. Given this desire line, any road network modification which improve access to Innes Road is likely to be only partially successful at attracting traffic from Renaud Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template
    1 Report to/Rapport au : Transportation Committee Comité des transports November 27, 2012 27 novembre 2012 Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Planning and Infrastructure/Urbanisme et Infrastructure Contact Person / Personne ressource: Bob Streicher, Acting Manager/Gestionnaire par intérim, Transportation Planning/Planification des transports, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x 22723, [email protected] CITY WIDE / À L’ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE Ref N°: ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0260 SUBJECT: JOINT STUDY TO ASSESS CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURES ON THE NATIONAL CAPITAL GREENBELT – STUDY REPORT OBJET : ÉTUDE CONJOINTE VISANT À ÉVALUER LES EFFETS CUMULATIFS DES INFRASTRUCTURES DE TRANSPORT SUR LA CEINTURE DE VERDURE DE LA CAPITALE NATIONALE – RAPPORT D’ÉTUDE REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Transportation Committee receive this report for information. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des Transports prenne connaissance de ce rapport. BACKGROUND The purpose of this study undertaken in partnership with the National Capital Commission (NCC) was to identify projects within the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) and other transportation projects that have emerged since the completion of the TMP that could have an impact on the environmental integrity of the federal Greenbelt lands. By examining the cumulative effects of the construction of this infrastructure on the Greenbelt lands, a framework now has been established to ensure that the associated Environmental Assessments (EAs) that require federal approval will move forward more expediently. 2 One of the NCC’s mandates is to protect the Greenbelt. Current practice has been that the NCC only comments or provides input on projects that are identified in its Greenbelt Master Plan (GBMP).
    [Show full text]
  • Comtés Unis De / United Counties Of
    COMTÉS UNIS DE / UNITED COUNTIES OF ORDRE DU JOUR AGENDA RÉUNION ORDINAIRE DU REGULAR MEETING OF 26 août 2015 August 26, 2015 9 h 00 9:00 a.m. _____________________________ _____________________________ 1. OUVERTURE DE LA RÉUNION 1. VISION / PRAYER 2. APPEL NOMINAL 2. ROLL CALL 3. DÉCLARATION D’INTÉRÊTS PÉCUNIAIRES 3. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST 4. ADOPTION DE L’ORDRE DU JOUR 4. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 5. ADOPTION DU PROCÈS-VERBAL 5. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES Réunion régulière et réunion extraordinaire Regular Meeting and Special Public Meeting of publique en date du 24 juin 2015 June 24, 2015 6. PETITIONS ET DÉLÉGATIONS 6. PETITIONS AND DELEGATIONS À 9h At 9:00 a.m. Demande de l’Association des résidences Request from the Association des résidences privées de rencontrer le Conseil suite à sa privées to meet Council following its decision to décision de maintenir le statu quo sur le per maintain the status quo on the per diem diem alloué aux résidents subventionnés allocated to subsidized residents in private des centres d’accueil privés domiciliary hostels 7. COMMUNICATIONS 7. COMMUNICATIONS 7.1 Correspondance d’information 7.1 Information Correspondence 1) Du ministre de l’Énergie concernant (1) From the Minister of Energy providing une mise à jour sur la gestion de an update on local energy planning as l’énergie locale ainsi que le projet well as the TransCanada Energy East d’oléoduc Énergie Est de Trans pipeline Canada 2) Avis d’audience publique de la (2) Notice of Public Hearing from the Commission de l’énergie de Ontario Energy Board to
    [Show full text]
  • MTO 2018-4025 Notice Public
    Aecon Construction Ontario East Ltd. MTO 2018-4025 Nicholas Street Underpass Replacement Agency Notice NOTICE TO AFFECTED AGENCIES Nicholas Street Bridge Replacement & Highway 417 from 400 m West of Nicholas Street to Ottawa Road 174 Dear Affected Agencies, This notice is to advise you that Aecon Construction Ontario East Ltd was awarded MTO Contract 2018-4025 on Highway 417 to construct a new Nicholas Street Bridge, asphalt resurfacing and to convert existing Transit Priority Lanes on Highway 417 mainline / ramps / intersections to general use lanes. As construction activities progress, additional notices will be distributed throughout the duration of the project to advise you of progress and upcoming work. WHO: The Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, has hired the contractor, Aecon Construction Ontario East, to complete the work. WHEN: Construction activities are scheduled to begin on April 23, 2019. The construction will be staged over this time, work areas will change as operations are initiated and completed. Completion will be fall 2020. WHERE: Construction will occur at the following locations: - Highway 417 from 400 m west of Nicholas Street to Ottawa Rd 174 - Nicholas Street North - Nicholas Street Bridge - Nicholas Street Ramps - Lees Avenue between Highway 417 eastbound off-ramp to Lees Avenue and Highway 417 eastbound on-ramp from Lees Avenue - Vanier Parkway Northside Ramps - Highway 417 off-ramp to Riverside Drive & Tremblay Road - Highway 417 off-ramp to St Laurent Boulevard WHAT: The Contract includes the following work: Highway 417 from 400 m west of Nicholas Street to Ottawa Rd 174 - Convert existing Transit Priority Lanes on Hwy 417 mainline / ramps / intersections to general use lanes, asphalt resurfacing of Highway 417, median barrier wall replacement, removal of toe wall, manhole adjustments, sewer work and subdrain, curb and gutter removal, placement of new overhead signs, asphalt removals, clearing & grubbing, and asphalt paving.
    [Show full text]
  • General Committee Agenda Be Adopted As Recommended
    Corporation of the City of Cambridge General Committee Meeting No. 08-19 Historic City Hall - 46 Dickson Street Tuesday, September 3, 2019 7:00 p.m. AGENDA Meeting Called to Order Disclosure of Interest Presentations Delegations 1. Sheri-Lyn Roberts, Chair – Accessibility Advisory Committee, re: item 8, Dynamic Symbol of Access Consent Procedure THAT all items listed under the heading of Consent Procedure for Tuesday, September 3, 2019, General Committee Agenda be adopted as recommended. Items # 1. Archives Board Minutes – Thursday, March 28, 2019 2. Archives Board Minutes – Thursday, May 2, 2019 3. Archives Board Minutes – Thursday, June 6, 2019 4. Beverly Street (Dundas Street North to Elgin Street North) – Detailed Design and Project Scope Change 5. Riverside Dam Design Update 6. Doors Open Waterloo Region Application NOTE: General Committee Members, if you wish an item to be pulled from the Consent Agenda, please notify the City Clerk so the item can be listed on the Other Business Memo for 1 tonight's meeting to be dealt with separately by General Committee. You will also have the opportunity to pull an item at the Meeting. Minutes of Advisory Committee Meetings 1. Archives Board Minutes – Thursday, March 28, 2019 PP. 5-8 Recommendation – That the Committee recommends to Council: THAT the minutes from the Archives Board meeting held on Thursday, March 28, 2019 be approved. 2. Archives Board Minutes – Thursday, May 2, 2019 PP. 9-12 Recommendation – That the Committee recommends to Council: THAT the minutes from the Archives Board meeting held on Thursday, May 2, 2019 be approved. 3. Archives Board Minutes – Thursday, June 6, 2019 PP.
    [Show full text]
  • Tamarack (Queen Street Corp.)
    Tamarack (Queen Street Corp.) Official Plan Amendment Submission Planning Rationale Cardinal Village East Urban Boundary Expansion Project Number: RH-1-11-PO1 Prepared By: Richard W. Harrison & Associates Date Submitted December, 2011 Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 2 The Study Area ........................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Location and General Characteristics ....................................................................... 2 2.2 Background Documentation ...................................................................................... 2 2.3 LAND OWNERSHIP ................................................................................................. 5 3 Existing Planning Policy Framework ........................................................................ 6 3.1 Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) ............................................................................ 6 3.2 Official Plan .............................................................................................................10 3.3 The City‟s 2008 OP Review .....................................................................................11 3.4 OPA 76- The City‟s Recommended Urban Boundary Expansion for Area 11 ...........13 3.5 Requested Amendment to Schedule R37 ................................................................14 4 The Proposal .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project Description for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry
    AECOM Delcan Future Interprovincial Crossings in the National Capital Region Environmental Assessment Study Project Description for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry NCC File No : SC2050 AECOM Delcan Ref : 05-19680 January 2010 AECOM Delcan This report has been prepared by the following personnel of AECOM Delcan: 14 January 2010 Valerie McGirr, P. Eng. Tomasz Wlodarczyk, M.E.S. Catherine Parker, B.Soc. Sc. 14 January 2010 Patrick G. Déoux, MCIP, OUQ, RPP Distribution 1 pdf NCC/CCN Project folder Project Description for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry, Future Interprovincial Crossings in the National Capital Region iii Ref : 05-19680 AECOM Delcan Table of Contents page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of This Document ..................................................................................... 6 1.2 Proponents .............................................................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Contact Information .................................................................................... 6 2. Environmental Assessment and Approvals ........................................... 7 2.1 Provincial and Municipal Permits ............................................................................ 7 2.2 Federal Permits and Authorizations ........................................................................ 7 2.3 Federal-Provincial Financial Support to the EA study ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Clarence-Rockland Expansion Lands Secondary
    CITY OF CLARENCE-ROCKLAND EXPANSION LANDS SECONDARY PLAN Report No. 01-2019 June 2019 A000817 CONTACT Gordon Scobie [email protected] T 613-860-2462 ext. 6663 CIMA CANADA INC. (CIMA+) 110–240 Catherine Street, Ottawa, ON K2P 2G8 T 613-860-2462 F 613-860-1870 cima.ca June 2019 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Planning Context ......................................................................................................1 Provincial Planning .....................................................................................................2 County Planning .........................................................................................................2 Municipal Planning Context .........................................................................................2 Study Area .................................................................................................................3 2. Existing Conditions .............................................................................................. 4 Study Area Road Network ........................................................................................4 Study Area Intersections ..........................................................................................5 Existing Active Transportation ................................................................................7 Pedestrian Facilities ....................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]