Comtés Unis De / United Counties Of
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Notice of Round #1 of Public Open Houses Ottawa Road 174 / Prescott-Russell County Road 17 Class Environmental Assessment Study
Notice of Round #1 of Public Open Houses Ottawa Road 174 / Prescott-Russell County Road 17 Class Environmental Assessment Study Tuesday, February 5, 2013 (Cumberland) Wednesday, February 6, 2013 (Orléans) Cumberland Lions Club, Maple Hall Sir Wilfrid Laurier Secondary School, Cafeteria 2552 Old Montreal Road, Cumberland 1515 Tenth Line Road, Orléans 6:30 to 9pm, presentation at 7:00 6:30 to 9pm, presentation at 7:00 Thursday, February 7, 2013 (Rockland) City Hall, Council boardroom 1560 Laurier Street, Rockland 6:30 to 9pm, presentation at 7:00 The United Counties of Prescott and Russell in partnership with the City of Ottawa are undertaking a Class Environmental Assessment (EA) study for the Ottawa Road 174 and Prescott-Russell County Road 17 corridor from Highway 417 to County Road 8 (Landry Road). This study will consider improvements to the existing OR 174-CR 17 corridor, improvements to other existing roads and the construction of new roads in the Study Area illustrated below. This Study is being carried out in accordance with the requirements for a Schedule ‘C’ project under the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (2007, 2011). The purpose of the first round of public open houses is to: x Introduce the project; x Review the Project Need and Existing Conditions; x Consult on the proposed evaluation criteria; x Identify the alternative solutions; and x Review the evaluation of alternative solutions. This is the first of three rounds of public consultation that will be held during the course of the study to review and discuss the project with the study team and solicit feedback. -
Project Synopsis
Final Draft Road Network Development Report Submitted to the City of Ottawa by IBI Group September 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Report Structure .................................................................................................. 3 2. Background Information ...................................................................... 4 2.1 The TRANS Screenline System ......................................................................... 4 2.2 The TRANS Forecasting Model ......................................................................... 4 2.3 The 2008 Transportation Master Plan ............................................................... 7 2.4 Progress Since 2008 ........................................................................................... 9 Community Design Plans and Other Studies ................................................................. 9 Environmental Assessments ........................................................................................ 10 Approvals and Construction .......................................................................................... 10 3. Needs and Opportunities .................................................................. -
Sixth Interprovincial Crossing Refresh
NATIONAL CAPITAL COMMISSION SIXTH INTERPROVINCIAL BRIDGE CROSSING STUDY REFRESH Summary Report SIXTH INTERPROVINCIAL BRIDGE CROSSING STUDY REFRESH Summary Report NATIONAL CAPITAL COMMISSION V5 PROJECT NO.: 19M-01103-00 DATE: APRIL 8, 2020 WSP SUITE 300 2611 QUEENSVIEW DRIVE OTTAWA, ON, CANADA K2B 8K2 T: +1 613 829-2800 F: +1 613 829-8299 WSP.COM TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................. 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................ 2 2 NOISE & VIBRATION REPORT .......................... 3 2.1 Conclusions from Previous Report ................................. 3 2.2 Methodology for Refresh .................................................. 4 2.3 What has Changed ............................................................ 5 2.4 Potential Impacts Due to Change .................................... 5 3 LAND USE AND PROPERTY REPORT ............. 6 3.1 Conclusions from Previous Report ................................. 6 3.2 Methodology for Refresh .................................................. 6 3.3 What has Changed ............................................................ 7 3.4 Potential Impacts Due to Change .................................... 8 4 AIR QUALITY REPORT .................................... 10 4.1 Conclusions From Previous Report .............................. 10 4.2 Methodology for Refresh ................................................ 10 4.3 What has Changed .......................................................... 10 4.4 Potential -
Freedom Liberty
2013 ACCESS AND PRIVACY Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Ontario, Canada FREEDOM & LIBERTY 2013 STATISTICS In free and open societies, governments must be accessible and transparent to their citizens. TABLE OF CONTENTS Requests by the Public ...................................... 1 Provincial Compliance ..................................... 3 Municipal Compliance ................................... 12 Appeals .............................................................. 26 Privacy Complaints .......................................... 38 Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) .................................. 41 As I look back on the past years of the IPC, I feel that Ontarians can be assured that this office has grown into a first-class agency, known around the world for demonstrating innovation and leadership, in the fields of both access and privacy. STATISTICS 4 1 REQUESTS BY THE PUBLIC UNDER FIPPA/MFIPPA There were 55,760 freedom of information (FOI) requests filed across Ontario in 2013, nearly a 6% increase over 2012 where 52,831 were filed TOTAL FOI REQUESTS FILED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,995 17,334 34,329 Provincial 7,029 14,402 21,431 Total 24,024 31,736 55,760 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,726 17,304 34,030 Provincial 6,825 13,996 20,821 Total 23,551 31,300 54,851 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY SOURCE AND JURISDICTION Municipal Provincial Total -
Ottawa Transportation Report.Pdf
OTTAWA THE IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ON HOUSING VALUES IN THE OTTAWA REGION Don R Campbell, Senior Analyst Melanie Reuter, Director of Research Allyssa Epp, Research Analyst WWW.REINCANADA.COM AUTHORS Don R. Campbell, Senior Analyst, REIN Ltd Melanie Reuter, Director of Research, REIN Ltd Allyssa Fischer, Research Analyst, REIN Ltd © The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd. 6 – 27250 58 Cr Langley, BC V4W 3W7 Tel (604) 856-2825 Fax (604) 856-0091 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Page: www.reincanada.com Important Disclaimer: This Report, or any seminars or updates given in relation thereto, is sold, or otherwise provided, on the understanding that the authors – Don R. Campbell, Melanie Reuter, Allyssa Fischer, and The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd and their instructors, are not responsible for any results or results of any actions taken in reliance upon any information contained in this report, or conveyed by way of the said seminars, nor for any errors contained therein or presented thereat or omissions in relation thereto. It is further understood that the said authors and instructors do not purport to render legal, accounting, tax, investment, financial planning or other professional advice. The said authors and instructors hereby disclaim all and any liability to any person, whether a purchaser of this Report, a student of the said seminars, or otherwise, arising in respect of this Report, or the said seminars, and of the consequences of anything done or purported to be done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or part, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Report or the said seminars. -
Site Considerations Report
Pendleton Solar Energy Centre Site Considerations Report Prepared for: EDF EN Canada Development Inc. 53 Jarvis Street, Suite 300 Toronto ON M5C 2H2 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Suite 1 – 70 Southgate Drive Guelph ON N1G 4P5 File No. 160950781 June 18, 2015 PENDLETON SOLAR ENERGY CENTRE SITE CONSIDERATIONS REPORT Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................... I 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1.1 2.0 METHODS .....................................................................................................................2.1 3.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................3.1 3.1 3.2.6 (A) MTCS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES CONFIRMATION ...................................... 3.1 3.2 3.2.6 (B) SITE CONSIDERATIONS INFORMATION .......................................................... 3.1 4.0 CLOSURE ......................................................................................................................4.1 5.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................5.1 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1: Site and Connection Point Approximate Coordinates .............................. 3.1 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Site Considerations Mapping Appendix B: Site Considerations Concordance -
A Profile of Vulnerable Seniors in the United Counties of Prescott And
A Profile of Vulnerable Seniors in the United Counties of Prescott and Russell, Lanark County, and Renfrew County Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the support and contributions of a great many community partners. In particular, we would like to acknowledge the work and generous input of Brian Schnarch, Champlain LHIN Special Advisor and Manager, Health System Performance, Dr. Al Lauzon, Guelph University’s School of Environmental Design and Rural Development, Nathalie Caron, Senior Analyst, Education, Labour and Income Statistics Branch, Statistics Canada, Kelly Milne, Director, Regional Geriatric Program of Eastern Ontario and Megan Richards, Rural Capacity Developer & Community Health Program Coordinator, Western Ottawa Community Resource Centre. Special thanks are also owed to Esri Canada for providing the mapping software, allowing us to spatially examine and highlight the circumstances of seniors within our regions. We also wish to acknowledge with our sincere appreciation the work of Paula Quig, a lawyer specializing in Aboriginal law generously seconded to us from the Department of Justice Canada, for undertaking the rigor required to assemble the volumes of qualitative and quantitative research that form this report. Foundational research support was provided by Shelby Johnson, Research Associate, provided through the Canada Summer Jobs program. Finally, within our regions – we called upon the deep knowledge and expertise of our many community leaders and organizations who play valuable roles in supporting vulnerable seniors in our rural communities and who have contributed to this report in several ways. The names of these organizational leaders are noted below. We collectively share a desire to better understand the needs impacting our communities and this report provides us with a common platform to continue our work together with a sharp focus on better outcomes for our most vulnerable seniors. -
Analyses of Various Scenarios for Renaud Road
Document 3 – Analyses of Various Scenarios for Renaud Road The primary purpose of this study is to undertake a high-level assessment of the transportation impacts associated with the potential closure/relocation of Renaud Road in the vicinity of the Bradley Estates community. More specifically, the analysis: Examines traffic conditions along Renaud Road, the nature and magnitude of the problem Identifies opportunities for alleviating traffic issues on Renaud Road Evaluates the traffic impacts associated with each alternative and the ability of the adjacent road network to accommodate diverted traffic While the focus of this assignment is Renaud Road, a much larger study area was selected for analysis purposes given the range of road network changes under consideration and the associated impacts on traffic flow. Traffic Flow to and from Anderson Road South Through-traffic on Renaud Road has essentially two destinations: To/from the east via Innes Road To/from the south via Anderson Road Based on the most recent traffic count from February, 2014, 65 per cent of the westbound traffic on Renaud Road during the AM peak hour (554 vehicles/hour) turns south on Anderson Road. Likewise, during the PM peak hour, 65 per cent of the traffic departing the Anderson Road/Renaud Road intersection in the eastbound direction (451 vehicles/hour) originates from the south on Anderson Road as shown in Figure 5. Such patterns indicate a significant desire line between the east and south. Given this desire line, any road network modification which improve access to Innes Road is likely to be only partially successful at attracting traffic from Renaud Road. -
Environment Committee Report 21 27
ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE 37 COMITÉ DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT REPORT 21 RAPPORT 21 27 FEBRUARY 2013 LE 27 FÉVRIER 2013 2. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 HIGHWAY 174 STORM SEWER PIPE COLLAPSE ANALYSE DES CAUSES FONDAMENTALES - AFFAISSEMENT DE LA CHAUSSÉE SUR L’AUTOROUTE 174 LE 4 SEPTEMBRE 2012 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION That Council receive this report for information as supplemental to the 2013 rate budget. RECOMMANDATION DU COMITÉ Que le Conseil de prendre connaissance du présent rapport en tant que document complémentaire au budget de 2013 soutenu par les tarifs. DOCUMENTATION / DOCUMENTATION 1. Kent Kirkpatrick, City Manager’s report dated 3 February 2013 / Rapport du Directeur municipal daté du 3 février 2013 (ACS2013-CMR-OCM-0001). 2. Extract of Minute, 15 January 2013, following the French report. ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE 38 COMITÉ DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT REPORT 21 RAPPORT 21 27 FEBRUARY 2013 LE 27 FÉVRIER 2013 Report to/Rapport au : Environment Committee Comité de l’environnement and Council / et au Conseil January 3, 2013 3 janvier 2013 Submitted by/Soumis par : Kent Kirkpatrick, City Manager / Directeur municipal Contact Person / Personne ressource: Steve Box, Director, Corporate Programs & Business Services / Directeur, programmes municipales et Services opérationnels 613-580-2424 ext. 24200; [email protected] ORLÉANS (1) Ref N°: ACS2013-CMR-OCM-0001 SUBJECT: ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 HIGHWAY 174 STORM SEWER PIPE COLLAPSE OBJET : ANALYSE DES CAUSES FONDAMENTALES - AFFAISSEMENT DE LA CHAUSSÉE SUR L’AUTOROUTE 174 LE 4 SEPTEMBRE 2012 REPORT RECOMMENDATION That the Environment Committee recommend Council receive this report for information as supplemental to the 2013 rate budget. -
Report Template
1 Report to/Rapport au : Transportation Committee Comité des transports November 27, 2012 27 novembre 2012 Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Planning and Infrastructure/Urbanisme et Infrastructure Contact Person / Personne ressource: Bob Streicher, Acting Manager/Gestionnaire par intérim, Transportation Planning/Planification des transports, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x 22723, [email protected] CITY WIDE / À L’ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE Ref N°: ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0260 SUBJECT: JOINT STUDY TO ASSESS CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURES ON THE NATIONAL CAPITAL GREENBELT – STUDY REPORT OBJET : ÉTUDE CONJOINTE VISANT À ÉVALUER LES EFFETS CUMULATIFS DES INFRASTRUCTURES DE TRANSPORT SUR LA CEINTURE DE VERDURE DE LA CAPITALE NATIONALE – RAPPORT D’ÉTUDE REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Transportation Committee receive this report for information. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des Transports prenne connaissance de ce rapport. BACKGROUND The purpose of this study undertaken in partnership with the National Capital Commission (NCC) was to identify projects within the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) and other transportation projects that have emerged since the completion of the TMP that could have an impact on the environmental integrity of the federal Greenbelt lands. By examining the cumulative effects of the construction of this infrastructure on the Greenbelt lands, a framework now has been established to ensure that the associated Environmental Assessments (EAs) that require federal approval will move forward more expediently. 2 One of the NCC’s mandates is to protect the Greenbelt. Current practice has been that the NCC only comments or provides input on projects that are identified in its Greenbelt Master Plan (GBMP). -
L'orignal, Ontario
L’Orignal, Ontario June 14, 2017 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE To the Warden and Members of Council, United Counties of Prescott and Russell The Committee of the Whole met in L’Orignal at 9:58 a.m. on June 14, 2017. Were present: Gary J. Barton, Jeanne Charlebois, Guy Desjardins, Fernand Dicaire, Robert Kirby, Conrad Lamadeleine, Pierre Leroux and François St- Amour, Council Members. Stéphane P. Parisien, Michel Chrétien, Marc Clermont, Pierre Gauthier, Louise Lalonde, Carole Lavigne, Julie Ménard-Brault and Louis Prévost, Department Heads; and Justin Bromberg. Were absent: Anne Comtois Lalonde, and Andrée Latreille, Clerk. The report is presented as follows: 1. Amount allocated for Conferences As a follow-up, the Chief Administrative Officer asked members to provide the amount allocated for conferences at their own municipalities. Members declined to provide that information and reiterated their position that the amount of $6,000 per member be included in the 2018 budgetary section for Council’s evaluation and decision-making. 2. New Waste Free Ontario Act The Chief Administrative Officer recalled that Mrs. Charlebois suggested that a training session be hosted at the county level for municipalities interested by the new Waste Free Ontario Act. The CAO informed that there is little information available, but he will inquire for additional details and keep Council informed of any developments. 3. Rules of Procedure The Chief Administrative Officer noted that the Clerk’s Office will be reviewing the Procedural By-law in the fall but noted that he has not received many comments from Council members, other than from the Mayor of Russell. -
The District Municipality of Muskoka
The District Municipality of Muskoka Corporate & Emergency Services Committee Meeting CES-2-2017 Minutes Place: Council Chamber, District Administration Building Time: 1:00 p.m. Date: March 23, 2017 Present: Committee Chair S. Aitchison; District Chair J. Klinck; Members L. Braid, P. Donaldson, G. Smith Absent: Members D. Furniss, B. Young Officials Present: M. Duben, Chief Administrative Officer; J. Stevens, Commissioner of Finance & Corporate Services; D. Crowder, District Clerk Others Present: Councillor D. Smith; Inspector E. Medved, Inspector J. Graham – Ontario Provincial Police; S. Donald, Director of Budgets and Financial Planning; L. Bissonette, Director of Finance; J. Yeo, Manager, Facilities Services; M. Misko, Director, Continuous Improvement Unit; R. Francis, Manager, Continuous Improvement Unit; L. Kerswell, Coordinator, Records Management; J. Binkley, Administrative Assistant Call to Order Committee Chair Aitchison called the meeting to order at 1:04 p.m. Declaration of Pecuniary Interests None were declared. Delegations a) Use of Water Bubblers in Muskoka James Boyd, Director, Muskoka Ratepayers Association CES-2-2017-DEL-A – Presentation Earlier in the week, it was determined that Mr. Boyd would appear at the April 18, 2017 District Council meeting. Invited Presentations a) Ontario Provincial Police Inspector Ed Medved Inspector John-Paul Graham Re: OPP Reporting CES-2-2017-DEL-B Ms. Stevens advised that the Detachment Commanders were in attendance in order to receive input from Committee on what they would like to see the OPP report to District Council. Committee members suggested that they could report on emerging trends, critical issues and items with broader social implications. Ms. Stevens reiterated the differences between contracted services and the provision of police services through a section 5.1 agreement which is currently the case for the District.