DOCSLIB.ORG

Corporation of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell 5 Year Review: Room for Everyone - Homelessness Prevention in Prescott and Russell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Corporation of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell 5 Year Review: Room for Everyone - Homelessness Prevention in Prescott and Russell Corporation of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell 5 Year Review: Room for Everyone - Homelessness Prevention in Prescott and Russell Corporation of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell “Room for Everyone” Housing & Homelessness Prevention Plan 5 Year Review Report by Eco-Ethonomics Inc. November 2019 1 Corporation of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell 5 Year Review: Room for Everyone - Homelessness Prevention in Prescott and Russell This report was developed by Eco-Ethonomics Inc. in consultation with the following organizations and individuals: Project Working Group Alain Lacelle Social Housing Supervisor Sylvie Millette Social Services Department Director Christine Chamberlain Administrative Assistant, Social Services Department Jo-Anne Poirier Ontario Works Supervisor Dominique Lefebvre Senior Planner, Planning and Forestry Department Stephane Sarrazin Elected Mayor of Canton/Township of Alfred and Plantagenet Isabelle Péladeau Project Officer, Economic Development and Tourism Participating Organizations Pavillon Laurier Inc Canadian Mental Health Association, Champlain East Plantagenet Family Health Team Carefor Health and Community Services, Eastern Probation & Parole Office (Hawkesbury) Counties Centraide / United Way Prescott-Russell Résidence Limoges Centre Novas CALACS francophone Prescott Russell Résidence Place Mont Roc Clinique Juridique de Prescott et Russell Inc Résidence Servant Community Information Centre of Ottawa RMJ Properties Community Services Prescott-Russell Service Canada Conseil des écoles publiques de l'Est de l'Ontario Valoris for Children and Adults of Prescott-Russell Conseil Scolaire de District Catholique de l'Est Van Kleek Senior Citizens Manor Ontarien Corporation du Canton de Russell Participating Non-Profit Housing Corporations Corporation of the Town of Hawkesbury EarlyON Child and Family Centres, Prescott-Russell Centre Urgel J. Forget Eastern Ontario Health Unit Corporation de logement à but non-lucratif de Employment Service Centre, Prescott Russell Casselman Corporation de logement à but non-lucratif de Employment Services, Collège La Cité Hawkesbury Group Home pour la Santé Mentale Corporation de logement à but non-lucratif de St- Groupe Action pour l'enfant, la famille et la Isidore communauté de Prescott-Russell Corporation de logement du village de Plantagenet Hôpital Général de Hawkesbury et District Logement à but non lucratif de la corporation du L'Oasis Résidence Simon village d’Alfred La Résidence Lajoie De St-Albert Inc. Rockland Non-Profit Housing Corporation Le Centre Moi J'apprends Maillon Santé Maison Fraternité Maison Interlude House Montfort Renaissance Ontario Provincial Police, Hawkesbury Division Ontario Works, Social Services 2 Corporation of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell 5 Year Review: Room for Everyone - Homelessness Prevention in Prescott and Russell Table of Contents A. Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Project Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Assessment of Current Housing Needs ................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Housing Stock ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Future Housing Needs ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Achievements Towards the Plan ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Setting Housing Targets in Prescott-Russell .......................................................................................................... 9 1.7 Action Plan ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 B. Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 13 1. Project Objectives ............................................................................................................................... 13 2. Consultation Process ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Phase 1: Needs Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 13 2.2 Phase 2: Action Plan Development ..................................................................................................................... 16 C. Assessment of Current and Future Housing Needs ..................................................................... 17 1. Assessment of Current Housing Needs ................................................................................................ 17 1.1 Communities of Prescott and Russell .................................................................................................................. 17 1.2 Population Trends ............................................................................................................................................... 18 1.3 Economic Context ............................................................................................................................................... 19 1.4 Household Income and Housing Affordability .................................................................................................... 23 1.5 The Needs of the Populations at Risk of Homelessness in Prescott-Russell ....................................................... 25 1.6 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................... 32 2. Housing Stock ..................................................................................................................................... 34 2.1 New Housing Stock .............................................................................................................................................. 34 2.2 Updated Housing Stock by Municipality ............................................................................................................. 34 2.3 Housing Waiting List ............................................................................................................................................ 35 2.4 Condition of Housing Stock ................................................................................................................................. 38 2.5 Accessibility and Adapted Units .......................................................................................................................... 39 2.6 Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability ............................................................................................. 40 2.7 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................... 42 3. Assessment of Future Housing Needs in Prescott and Russell .............................................................. 43 3.1 Projected Population Growth ............................................................................................................................. 43 3.2 Housing Needs Reported by Community Stakeholders ...................................................................................... 43 3.3 Planned and Approved Private Market Developments ....................................................................................... 46 3.4 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................... 47 D. Objectives, Targets and Achievements ...................................................................................... 48 1. Accountability to the Plan ................................................................................................................... 48 1.1 Partnerships and Collaborations ......................................................................................................................... 48 1.2 Access to CMSM Services and Programs ............................................................................................................. 49 1.3 Prevention ........................................................................................................................................................... 50 1.4 Transportation .................................................................................................................................................... 51 1.5 Education and Training ....................................................................................................................................... 51 Eco-Ethonomics Inc. 3 Corporation of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell 5 Year Review: Room for Everyone - Homelessness Prevention in Prescott and Russell 1.6 Delivery of Programs and Services .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freedom Liberty
    2013 ACCESS AND PRIVACY Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Ontario, Canada FREEDOM & LIBERTY 2013 STATISTICS In free and open societies, governments must be accessible and transparent to their citizens. TABLE OF CONTENTS Requests by the Public ...................................... 1 Provincial Compliance ..................................... 3 Municipal Compliance ................................... 12 Appeals .............................................................. 26 Privacy Complaints .......................................... 38 Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) .................................. 41 As I look back on the past years of the IPC, I feel that Ontarians can be assured that this office has grown into a first-class agency, known around the world for demonstrating innovation and leadership, in the fields of both access and privacy. STATISTICS 4 1 REQUESTS BY THE PUBLIC UNDER FIPPA/MFIPPA There were 55,760 freedom of information (FOI) requests filed across Ontario in 2013, nearly a 6% increase over 2012 where 52,831 were filed TOTAL FOI REQUESTS FILED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,995 17,334 34,329 Provincial 7,029 14,402 21,431 Total 24,024 31,736 55,760 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,726 17,304 34,030 Provincial 6,825 13,996 20,821 Total 23,551 31,300 54,851 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY SOURCE AND JURISDICTION Municipal Provincial Total
    [Show full text]
  • Site Considerations Report
    Pendleton Solar Energy Centre Site Considerations Report Prepared for: EDF EN Canada Development Inc. 53 Jarvis Street, Suite 300 Toronto ON M5C 2H2 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Suite 1 – 70 Southgate Drive Guelph ON N1G 4P5 File No. 160950781 June 18, 2015 PENDLETON SOLAR ENERGY CENTRE SITE CONSIDERATIONS REPORT Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................... I 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1.1 2.0 METHODS .....................................................................................................................2.1 3.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................3.1 3.1 3.2.6 (A) MTCS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES CONFIRMATION ...................................... 3.1 3.2 3.2.6 (B) SITE CONSIDERATIONS INFORMATION .......................................................... 3.1 4.0 CLOSURE ......................................................................................................................4.1 5.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................5.1 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1: Site and Connection Point Approximate Coordinates .............................. 3.1 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Site Considerations Mapping Appendix B: Site Considerations Concordance
    [Show full text]
  • A Profile of Vulnerable Seniors in the United Counties of Prescott And
    A Profile of Vulnerable Seniors in the United Counties of Prescott and Russell, Lanark County, and Renfrew County Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the support and contributions of a great many community partners. In particular, we would like to acknowledge the work and generous input of Brian Schnarch, Champlain LHIN Special Advisor and Manager, Health System Performance, Dr. Al Lauzon, Guelph University’s School of Environmental Design and Rural Development, Nathalie Caron, Senior Analyst, Education, Labour and Income Statistics Branch, Statistics Canada, Kelly Milne, Director, Regional Geriatric Program of Eastern Ontario and Megan Richards, Rural Capacity Developer & Community Health Program Coordinator, Western Ottawa Community Resource Centre. Special thanks are also owed to Esri Canada for providing the mapping software, allowing us to spatially examine and highlight the circumstances of seniors within our regions. We also wish to acknowledge with our sincere appreciation the work of Paula Quig, a lawyer specializing in Aboriginal law generously seconded to us from the Department of Justice Canada, for undertaking the rigor required to assemble the volumes of qualitative and quantitative research that form this report. Foundational research support was provided by Shelby Johnson, Research Associate, provided through the Canada Summer Jobs program. Finally, within our regions – we called upon the deep knowledge and expertise of our many community leaders and organizations who play valuable roles in supporting vulnerable seniors in our rural communities and who have contributed to this report in several ways. The names of these organizational leaders are noted below. We collectively share a desire to better understand the needs impacting our communities and this report provides us with a common platform to continue our work together with a sharp focus on better outcomes for our most vulnerable seniors.
    [Show full text]
  • L'orignal, Ontario
    L’Orignal, Ontario June 14, 2017 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE To the Warden and Members of Council, United Counties of Prescott and Russell The Committee of the Whole met in L’Orignal at 9:58 a.m. on June 14, 2017. Were present: Gary J. Barton, Jeanne Charlebois, Guy Desjardins, Fernand Dicaire, Robert Kirby, Conrad Lamadeleine, Pierre Leroux and François St- Amour, Council Members. Stéphane P. Parisien, Michel Chrétien, Marc Clermont, Pierre Gauthier, Louise Lalonde, Carole Lavigne, Julie Ménard-Brault and Louis Prévost, Department Heads; and Justin Bromberg. Were absent: Anne Comtois Lalonde, and Andrée Latreille, Clerk. The report is presented as follows: 1. Amount allocated for Conferences As a follow-up, the Chief Administrative Officer asked members to provide the amount allocated for conferences at their own municipalities. Members declined to provide that information and reiterated their position that the amount of $6,000 per member be included in the 2018 budgetary section for Council’s evaluation and decision-making. 2. New Waste Free Ontario Act The Chief Administrative Officer recalled that Mrs. Charlebois suggested that a training session be hosted at the county level for municipalities interested by the new Waste Free Ontario Act. The CAO informed that there is little information available, but he will inquire for additional details and keep Council informed of any developments. 3. Rules of Procedure The Chief Administrative Officer noted that the Clerk’s Office will be reviewing the Procedural By-law in the fall but noted that he has not received many comments from Council members, other than from the Mayor of Russell.
    [Show full text]
  • The District Municipality of Muskoka
    The District Municipality of Muskoka Corporate & Emergency Services Committee Meeting CES-2-2017 Minutes Place: Council Chamber, District Administration Building Time: 1:00 p.m. Date: March 23, 2017 Present: Committee Chair S. Aitchison; District Chair J. Klinck; Members L. Braid, P. Donaldson, G. Smith Absent: Members D. Furniss, B. Young Officials Present: M. Duben, Chief Administrative Officer; J. Stevens, Commissioner of Finance & Corporate Services; D. Crowder, District Clerk Others Present: Councillor D. Smith; Inspector E. Medved, Inspector J. Graham – Ontario Provincial Police; S. Donald, Director of Budgets and Financial Planning; L. Bissonette, Director of Finance; J. Yeo, Manager, Facilities Services; M. Misko, Director, Continuous Improvement Unit; R. Francis, Manager, Continuous Improvement Unit; L. Kerswell, Coordinator, Records Management; J. Binkley, Administrative Assistant Call to Order Committee Chair Aitchison called the meeting to order at 1:04 p.m. Declaration of Pecuniary Interests None were declared. Delegations a) Use of Water Bubblers in Muskoka James Boyd, Director, Muskoka Ratepayers Association CES-2-2017-DEL-A – Presentation Earlier in the week, it was determined that Mr. Boyd would appear at the April 18, 2017 District Council meeting. Invited Presentations a) Ontario Provincial Police Inspector Ed Medved Inspector John-Paul Graham Re: OPP Reporting CES-2-2017-DEL-B Ms. Stevens advised that the Detachment Commanders were in attendance in order to receive input from Committee on what they would like to see the OPP report to District Council. Committee members suggested that they could report on emerging trends, critical issues and items with broader social implications. Ms. Stevens reiterated the differences between contracted services and the provision of police services through a section 5.1 agreement which is currently the case for the District.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the June 14, 2017 Special Meeting of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell
    MINUTES OF THE JUNE 14, 2017 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE UNITED COUNTIES OF PRESCOTT AND RUSSELL The Council of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell met on June 14, 2017, in the Counties’ Administration Building in L'Orignal to consider Official Plan Amendments No. 30 and No. 32 to the County Official Plan and the adoption of a Fire Dispatch Agreement between the Town of Hawkesbury and the United Counties of Prescott and Russell. WARDEN’S WELCOME AND ROLL CALL At 9:07 a.m., Warden Gary J. Barton called the meeting to order. Were present: Warden Gary J. Barton, Jeanne Charlebois, Guy Desjardins, Robert Kirby, Fernand Dicaire, Conrad Lamadeleine, Pierre Leroux and François St-Amour, Council Members. Also present: Stéphane P. Parisien, CAO, Michel Chrétien, Marc Clermont, Pierre Gauthier, Louise Lalonde, Carole Lavigne, Julie Ménard Brault, Louis Prévost, and Justin Bromberg. Absent : Anne Comtois Lalonde and Andrée Latreille, Clerk. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST (n/a) ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 131… Moved by Jeanne Charlebois Seconded by Pierre Leroux THAT the Agenda be adopted with the removal of the report at item 5.2 (Amendment No. 32) and the removal of By-law 2017-33. Carried AMENDMENT NO 30 TO THE UCPR OFFICIAL PLAN The Planning and Forestry Director provided the history of his report as well as the process and decisions taken by Council prior to this morning. He maintains his recommendation to Council, namely because the cement plant will meet the guidelines of the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. Council members asked questions and provided comments to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Comtés Unis De / United Counties Of
    COMTÉS UNIS DE / UNITED COUNTIES OF ORDRE DU JOUR AGENDA RÉUNION ORDINAIRE DU REGULAR MEETING OF 26 août 2015 August 26, 2015 9 h 00 9:00 a.m. _____________________________ _____________________________ 1. OUVERTURE DE LA RÉUNION 1. VISION / PRAYER 2. APPEL NOMINAL 2. ROLL CALL 3. DÉCLARATION D’INTÉRÊTS PÉCUNIAIRES 3. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST 4. ADOPTION DE L’ORDRE DU JOUR 4. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 5. ADOPTION DU PROCÈS-VERBAL 5. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES Réunion régulière et réunion extraordinaire Regular Meeting and Special Public Meeting of publique en date du 24 juin 2015 June 24, 2015 6. PETITIONS ET DÉLÉGATIONS 6. PETITIONS AND DELEGATIONS À 9h At 9:00 a.m. Demande de l’Association des résidences Request from the Association des résidences privées de rencontrer le Conseil suite à sa privées to meet Council following its decision to décision de maintenir le statu quo sur le per maintain the status quo on the per diem diem alloué aux résidents subventionnés allocated to subsidized residents in private des centres d’accueil privés domiciliary hostels 7. COMMUNICATIONS 7. COMMUNICATIONS 7.1 Correspondance d’information 7.1 Information Correspondence 1) Du ministre de l’Énergie concernant (1) From the Minister of Energy providing une mise à jour sur la gestion de an update on local energy planning as l’énergie locale ainsi que le projet well as the TransCanada Energy East d’oléoduc Énergie Est de Trans pipeline Canada 2) Avis d’audience publique de la (2) Notice of Public Hearing from the Commission de l’énergie de Ontario Energy Board to
    [Show full text]
  • OMERS Employer Listing (As at December 31, 2020)
    OMERS Employer Listing (As at December 31, 2020) The information provided in this chart is based on data provided to the OMERS Administration Corporation and is current until December 31, 2020. There are 986 employers on this listing with a total of 288,703 active members (30,067 NRA 60 active members and 258,636 NRA 65 active members). Are you looking for a previous employer to determine your eligibility for membership in the OMERS Primary Pension Plan? If you think your previous employer was an OMERS employer but you don’t see it on this list, contact OMERS Client Services at 416-369-2444 or 1-800-387-0813. Your previous employer could be related to or amalgamated with another OMERS employer and not listed separately here. Number of Active Members Employer Name NRA 60 NRA 65 Total 1627596 ONTARIO INC. * * 519 CHURCH STREET COMMUNITY CENTRE 48 48 AJAX MUNICIPAL HOUSING CORPORATION * * AJAX PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD 42 42 ALECTRA ENERGY SERVICES * * ALECTRA ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC. * * ALECTRA INC. * * ALECTRA POWER SERVICES INC. * * ALECTRA UTILITIES CORPORATION 1,283 1,283 ALGOMA DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 522 522 ALGOMA DISTRICT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION BOARD 120 120 ALGOMA HEALTH UNIT 178 178 ALGOMA MANOR NURSING HOME 69 69 ALGONQUIN AND LAKESHORE CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 558 558 ALMISE CO-OPERATIVE HOMES INC. * * ALSTOM TRANSPORT CANADA 45 45 APPLEGROVE COMMUNITY COMPLEX * * ART GALLERY OF BURLINGTON * * ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL MANAGERS, CLERKS AND TREASURERS OF * * ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPALITIES OF ONTARIO 42 42 ATIKOKAN HYDRO INC * * AU CHATEAU HOME FOR THE AGED 214 214 AVON MAITLAND DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 745 745 AYLMER POLICE SERVICES BOARD * * * BELLEVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD 29 29 * at least one of NRA 60 or NRA 65 number of active members is less than 25 The information is used for pension administration purposes, and may not be appropriate for other purposes, and is current to December 31, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • L'orignal, Ontario
    L’Orignal, Ontario May 10, 2017 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE To the Warden and Members of Council, United Counties of Prescott and Russell The Committee of the Whole met in L’Orignal at 9:00 a.m. on May 10, 2017. Were present: Gary J. Barton, Jeanne Charlebois, Guy Desjardins, Fernand Dicaire, Robert Kirby, Conrad Lamadeleine, Pierre Leroux and François St- Amour, Council Members. Stéphane P. Parisien, Marc Clermont, Pierre Gauthier, Louise Lalonde, Carole Lavigne, Julie Ménard-Brault and Louis Prévost, Department Heads; and Justin Bromberg. Were absent: Michel Chrétien, Anne Comtois Lalonde, and Andrée Latreille, Clerk. The Warden invited the Mayors and staff to observe one minute of silence in memory of Dr. Michael Markowski who will be sadly missed. He was the doctor of several residents at the Prescott and Russell Residence since the last 5 years. The report is presented as follows: 1. Meeting with the Mohawk Council of Kanesatake The Warden advised that due to flooding in the Kanesatake area, the Mohawk Council has requested that the meeting with Council be postponed to a later date. 2. Mileage Claim Reimbursement for attending social activities such as dinners, banquets, golf, etc. and Increase of the $4,000 allowance for conferences The Mayor of Clarence-Rockland requested reimbursement for mileage to attend dinners or social events on behalf of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell. In addition, given the numerous conferences held this year, he inquired about the increase in the allocation of members for conferences. According to the Council's policy, only the Warden can claim mileage for social events or activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Russell Township Economic Development Strategic Plan
    Russell Township Economic Development Strategic Plan December 21st, 2017 FINAL Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Purpose: Why an Economic Development Strategic Plan Now? .............................................. 6 1.2 Structure of the Strategic Plans ................................................................................................ 7 2. Understanding Our Economic Landscape ..................................................................... 10 2.1 Background Document Review .............................................................................................. 10 2.2 Economic Base Analysis .......................................................................................................... 11 3. Understanding Our Competitiveness ........................................................................... 14 3.1 Consultation Process Overview .............................................................................................. 14 3.2 SWOT and SOAR Analyses ...................................................................................................... 14 4. Articulating Our Unique Value Proposition .................................................................. 25 4.1 Township of Russell’s Economic Drivers ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • May 18, 2021 Honourable Maryam Monsef Minister for Women
    May 18, 2021 Honourable Maryam Monsef Minister for Women and Gender Equality and Rural Economic Development 180 Kent Street, Suite 1100 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 9B6 Honourable Laurie Scott Minister of Infrastructure 777 Bay Street, 5th Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2J3 Dear Ministers: We are writing to you today, as heads of our local councils, to express our strong support for EORN’s Gig Project. We stand together with the Chairs of the Eastern Ontario Wardens’ Caucus, the Eastern Ontario Mayors’ Caucus, and the Eastern Ontario Regional Broadband Network in their efforts to urge you to get behind the Project. The Gig Project is the right one for eastern Ontario. It ensures that homes, businesses, schools, medical offices, and other institutions as well as seasonal properties get connected through fibre optic cable - the best technology for today and the future. EORN studies highlight the economic benefits that would come our way with its Gig Project. Job creation, additional employment income, more innovation, reduced health care costs among other things add up to a winning solution for the people of eastern Ontario. The EORN model works. Over the years, we’ve seen EORN successfully get more private sector investment than anticipated in its public private partnership projects. EORN is efficient, cost effective and nimble. You know you can rely on its professionals to get the job done. We appreciate the leadership you have both shown by securing historic levels of funding for building out broadband infrastructure. You have made this critical infrastructure a priority for 1 both Canada and Ontario by together earmarking $7 billion for broadband.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawkesbury CIP Draft Report6
    Socio-Economic Benefits Study Hawkesbury CIP Lagoons Remediation Town of Hawkesbury December PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN 2007 Socio-Economic Benefits Study Hawkesbury CIP Lagoons Remediation Prepared for: Town of Hawkesbury Prepared by: McSweeney & Associates 900 Greenbank Road, Suite 201 Ottawa, Ontario K2J 1S8 FoTenn Consultants Inc. 223 McLeod Street Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0Z8 T: 613.730.5709 F: 613.730.1136 December www.FoTenn.com 2007 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 1 1.1.Background ...........................................................................................1 1.2.Purpose ..................................................................................................1 1.3.Approach ................................................................................................1 2. ASSUMPTIONS ..............................................................................3 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ...............................................................5 3.1. Community Context ..............................................................................5 3.2. Site Context ...........................................................................................8 3.3. Policy and Regulatory Context ...............................................................9 4. MARKET ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 13 4.1. Market Supply .....................................................................................13
    [Show full text]