July 31 - August 5, 2017 Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

July 31 - August 5, 2017 Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan The 135th Meeting of American Ornithology July 31 - August 5, 2017 Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan Abstract Book The Inaugural Meeting of the American Ornithological Society & 35th Meeting of the Society for Canadian Ornithologists/ Société des ornithologistes du Canada Conference Program Cover & Logo – Kirtland’s Warbler perched on a Jack Pine Branch - Michigan’s iconic bird species and one of North America’s conservation success stories. Design by Kim Fake and Outer Designs and graphics by Outer Designs. Contents Oral Presenations ............................................................ 3 Poster Presentations .................................................... 181 Presenter Contact List .................................................. 237 2 Oral Presentations Meeting abstracts Please note that author abstracts are not indexed in this online document, but the document is searchable using the search function in your PDF reader. Presenting author is the first author listed unless indicated by a diamond ❖. Egg mimicry of one brood parasite host facilitates exploitation of new hosts with similar egg types Virginia Abernathy, Australian National University; Jolyon Troscianko, University of Exeter, UK.; Naomi E. Langmore, Australian National University When brood parasites exploit multiple host species, egg rejection by hosts may select for the evolution of host‐ specific races, where each race mimics a particular host’s egg type. However, some brood parasites that exploit multiple hosts with the ability to reject foreign eggs appear to have only a single egg type. In these cases, it is unclear how the parasite egg escapes detection by its hosts. Three possible explanations are: (i) host‐specific races are present, but differences in egg morphology are difficult for the human eye to detect; (ii) the brood parasite evolves a single egg type that is intermediate in appearance between the eggs of its hosts; (iii) or the parasite evolves mimicry of one of its hosts, which subsequently allows it to exploit other species with similar egg morphology. Here we test these possibilities by quantifying parameters of egg appearance of the brood‐parasitic Pacific Koel (Eudynamys orientalis) and seven of its hosts. Koel eggs laid in the nests of different hosts did not show significant differences in color or pattern, suggesting that koels have not evolved host‐specific races. Koel eggs were similar in color, luminance and pattern to the majority of hosts, but were significantly more similar in color and luminance to one of the major hosts than to two other major hosts, supporting hypothesis (iii). Our findings suggest that mimicry of one host can allow a brood parasite to exploit new hosts with similar egg morphologies, which could inhibit the evolution of host defenses in naïve hosts. Securing the future: How to conserve populations of critically endangered endemic passerines in Kaua’i Elizabeth Abraham, Kaua'i Forest Bird Recovery Project; Lisa Crampton, Kaua'i Forest Bird Recovery Project; Justin Hite, Kaua'i Forest Bird Recovery Project; Bryce Masuda, San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research; Michelle Clark, U.S Fish and Wildlife; John Vetter, DLNR‐DOFAW Hawaii is one of the extinction capitals of the world, having lost at least half of its native avifauna since colonization by humans, and with all but a few extant species listed as critically endangered. Alarming population trends of two endangered endemic honeycreepers on Kaua’i, ‘Akikiki (Oreomystis bairdi) and ‘Akeke’e (Loxops caeruleirostris), have necessitated immediate action. Largely restricted to the forests of the high elevation Alakai Plateau (>1000 m) these species face numerous threats: hurricanes; non‐native, invasive plants and animals, and deadly introduced diseases. Bird density surveys carried in 2012 found only 468 ‘Akikiki (95% CI: 231‐916) and 945 Akeke’e (95%CI: 460‐1,547) individuals, down 71% and 48% respectively since 1981, with steeper declines and range contractions since 2000. In 2013, experts deemed the creation of conservation breeding populations, along with in situ threat management, necessary to safeguard against the imminent extinction of these species. In 2015, egg collections began and collections continued in 2016 and 2017 with a goal of 60 founders per species. To date, we have collected 45 ‘Akikiki eggs from 29 nests and 10 ‘Akeke’e eggs from four nests. In addition, 150 GoodNature AOS/SCO 2017 Joint Meeting July 31 - August 5, 2017 3 Oral Presentations rat traps were deployed in 2015, with an additional 150 traps added in 2016 in order to extend our rat control along streams and ridges that are crucial nesting habitat for native birds. We have also recently partnered with the Kaua'i Watershed Alliance to document the effects of removing non‐native feral pigs on native birds within a newly fenced area of the Alaka'i. Nonbreeding abundance of Great Lakes waterbirds: integrating aerial survey data across multiple protocols Evan Adams, Biodiversity Research Institute; Beth Gardner, University of Washington; Kevin Kenow, United States Geological Survey; David Luukkonen, Michigan Department of Natural Resources; Michael Monfils, Michigan State University; Bill Mueller, Western Great Lakes Bird and Bat Observatory; Kathryn Williams, Biodiversity Research Institute The Great Lakes comprise the largest surface freshwater system in the world with habitats supporting a diversity of nearshore and pelagic birds. Making large‐scale inference about bird distribution and abundance over large regions like the Great Lakes often requires integration of data from multiple sources and addressing biases associated with these sources (e.g., survey type, observation conditions, etc.). Here, we integrate data collected during aerial surveys by 5 different organizations from 2012‐14 to estimate the abundance of 8 species of nonbreeding waterbirds in 4 of the Great Lakes. Most, but not all, surveys employed distance sampling techniques to estimate detection probabilities, and each distance protocol collected data differently. To integrate these different data sources, we developed a flexible hierarchical distance sampling model that allowed each survey to have different detection models and estimate detection probability for surveys without distance data. We modeled the abundance of waterbirds in relation to static features like bathymetry and lake sediment while accounting for variation in latitude and ice coverage across the lakes. We found that both latitude and ice coverage were important predictors of the probability of a species being present in a location, and bathymetry and lake sediment type were important determinants of waterbird abundance. We tested model fit for each species and found good fit overall, but a few protocols occasionally saw poor performance. This study describes a formal method for integrating multiple data sources to improve estimation of abundance and make large‐scale inferences about nonbreeding waterbirds across the Great Lakes. Using pedigrees and genomics to understand the consequences of limited dispersal Stepfanie Aguillon, Cornell University; John W. Fitzpatrick, Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Reed Bowman, Archbold Biological Station; Stephan J. Schoech, University of Memphis; Andrew G. Clark, Cornell University; Graham Coop, University of California, Davis; Nancy Chen, University of California, Davis There is strong theoretical support for the expectation that geographically limited dispersal will result in a correlation between genetic and geographic distance, commonly called isolation‐by‐distance. Despite its prevalence, to date no study has empirically demonstrated the processes generating isolation‐by‐distance within a pedigreed and genotyped population. Intensive, long‐term demographic studies and exhaustive genomic surveys in the Florida Scrub‐Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) provide an excellent opportunity to investigate the influence of dispersal on genetic structure. Here, we used a panel of genome‐wide SNPs and extensive pedigree information to explore the role of limited dispersal in shaping patterns of isolation‐by‐distance. We found fine‐scale isolation‐by‐ distance (within ~10 km) in both sexes using genetic and pedigree‐based measures of relatedness. Isolation‐by‐ distance patterns were stronger in males than in females, consistent with known differences in dispersal East Lansing, Michigan http://aossco2017.fw.msu.edu/ 4 Oral Presentations propensity between the sexes. Using a simulation of dispersal events across the pedigree, we estimated the expected geographic distances between breeding individuals of different pedigree relationship classes. We found that most simulations did not differ from the observed distribution of geographic distances between breeding individuals of different pedigree relationship classes. Furthermore, we can reconstruct observed isolation‐by‐ distance patterns in autosomal and Z‐linked SNPs using simulations parameterized by the observed dispersal curve and immigration rate. Overall, even within a continuous breeding population, the sedentary nature of the Florida Scrub‐Jay produces genetic structure at an extremely small spatial scale that can be reconstructed with just natal dispersal distances and pedigree information. Evaluating biodiversity of sagebrush‐dependent species within sage‐grouse habitat: an example from the Wyoming Basins Cameron Aldridge, Colorado State University and USGS; Joanne Saher, Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory and US Geological Survey;
Recommended publications
  • Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus Northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation Valerie A
    Loma Linda University TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects 3-1-2011 Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation Valerie A. Lee Loma Linda University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Lee, Valerie A., "Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation" (2011). Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects. 37. http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/37 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects by an authorized administrator of TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY School of Science and Technology in conjunction with the Faculty of Graduate Studies ____________________ Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation by Valerie A. Lee ____________________ A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology ____________________ March 2011 © 2011 Valerie A. Lee All Rights Reserved Each person whose signature appears below certifies that this thesis in his/her opinion is adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree Master of Science. , Chairperson William K. Hayes, Professor of Biology Stephen G.
    [Show full text]
  • Elbroch Et Al 2017 Benefiting from Carrion Provided by Pumas
    Biological Conservation 215 (2017) 123–131 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Short communication Vertebrate diversity benefiting from carrion provided by pumas and other MARK subordinate, apex felids ⁎ L. Mark Elbroch , Connor O'Malley, Michelle Peziol, Howard B. Quigley Panthera, 8 West 40th Street, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10018, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Carrion promotes biodiversity and ecosystem stability, and large carnivores provide this resource throughout the Biodiversity year. In particular, apex felids subordinate to other carnivores contribute more carrion to ecological commu- Carnivores nities than other predators. We measured vertebrate scavenger diversity at puma (Puma concolor) kills in the Food webs Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, and utilized a model-comparison approach to determine what variables influ- Scavenging enced scavenger diversity (Shannon's H) at carcasses. We documented the highest vertebrate scavenger diversity of any study to date (39 birds and mammals). Scavengers represented 10.9% of local birds and 28.3% of local mammals, emphasizing the diversity of food-web vectors supported by pumas, and the positive contributions of pumas and potentially other subordinate, apex felids to ecological stability. Scavenger diversity at carcasses was most influenced by the length of time the carcass was sampled, and the biological variables, temperature and prey weight. Nevertheless, diversity was relatively consistent across carcasses. We also identified six additional stalk- and-ambush carnivores weighing > 20 kg, that feed on prey larger than themselves, and are subordinate to other predators. Together with pumas, these seven felids may provide distinctive ecological functions through their disproportionate production of carrion and subsequent contributions to biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Perspectives on the Evolution of Birds
    Contributions to Zoology, 77 (2) 109-116 (2008) Current perspectives on the evolution of birds Per G.P. Ericson Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-10405 Stockholm, Sweden, [email protected] Key words: Aves, phylogeny, systematics, fossils, DNA, genetics, biogeography Contents (cf. Göhlich and Chiappe, 2006), making feathers a plesiomorphy in birds. Indeed, only three synapo- Systematic relationships ........................................................ 109 morphies have been proposed for Aves (Chiappe, Genome characteristics ......................................................... 111 2002), although monophyly is never seriously ques- A comparison with previous classifications ...................... 112 Character evolution ............................................................... 113 tioned: 1) the caudal margin of naris nearly reaching Evolutionary trends ............................................................... 113 or overlapping the rostral border of the antorbital Biogeography and biodiversity ............................................ 113 fossa (in the primitive condition the caudal margin Differentiation and speciation ............................................. 114 of naris is farther rostral than the rostral border of Acknowledgements ................................................................ 115 the antorbital fossa), 2) scapula with a prominent References ................................................................................ 115 acromion,
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithological Expedition to Southern Bénin, April 2011
    Ornithological expedition to southern Bénin, April 2011 Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire & Robert J. Dowsett Dowsett-Lemaire Misc. Report 80 (2011) Dowsett-Lemaire F. & Dowsett R.J. 2011. Ornithological expedition to southern Bénin, April 2011. Dowsett-Lemaire Miscellaneous Report 80: 16pp. Birds of southern Bénin -1- Dowsett-Lemaire Misc. Rep. 80 (2011) Ornithological expedition to southern Bénin, April 2011 by Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire & Robert J. Dowsett Résumé Ceci est notre deuxième visite au sud du Bénin, faisant suite à une première expédition pendant la saison sèche de 2009. Le mois d’avril 2011 a été partagé entre les forêts principales du sud (Lama, Niaouli), les forêts plus sèches ou forêts claires des Monts Kouffé et Tobé à l’ouest, les plaines marécageuses du Zou et du Sô, et la zone côtière (Pahou et Grand-Popo). Un séjour du 12 au 16 avril à la limite sud des Monts Kouffé et dans la zone protégée de Tobé (Bantè) a permis d’étendre l’aire de distribution de plusieurs espèces forestières ou de sa - vane, notamment du rare Aigle couronné Stephanoaetus coronatus (un ex. essayant de capturer un Daman des rochers sur le rocher de Tobé), du Râle perlé Sarothrura pulchra (un chanteur à Tobé, limite nord actuelle), de l’Oedicnème tachard Burhinus capensis (Tobé, limite sud actuelle), Malcoha à bec jaune Ceuthmochares aereus (Tobé & Kouffé, limite nord), Coucal à ventre blanc Centropus leucogaster (Tobé & Kouffé, limite nord), Grand-duc de Verreaux Bubo lacteus (Kouffé), Trogon narina Apaloderma narina (Kouffé), Calao rieur By - canistes
    [Show full text]
  • Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision
    Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision Joint Venture Landbird Committee Members: Kelly VanBeek, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Birds), Co-chair Chris Tonra, The Ohio State University, Co-chair Mohammed Al-Saffar, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Joint Venture) Dave Ewert, American Bird Conservancy Erin Gnass Giese, University of Wisconsin – Green Bay Allisyn-Marie Gillet, Indiana Dept. of Natural Resources Shawn Graff, American Bird Conservancy Jim Herkert, Illinois Audubon Sarah Kendrick, Missouri Dept. of Conservation Mark Nelson, U.S.D.A. Forest Service Katie O’Brien, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Birds) Greg Soulliere, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Joint Venture) Wayne Thogmartin, U.S. Geological Survey Mike Ward, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Tom Will, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Birds) Recommended citation: Soulliere, G. J., M. A. Al-Saffar, K. R. VanBeek, C. M. Tonra, M. D. Nelson, D. N. Ewert, T. Will, W. E. Thogmartin, K. E. O’Brien, S. W. Kendrick, A. M. Gillet, J. R. Herkert, E. E. Gnass Giese, M. P. Ward, and S. Graff. 2020. Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA. Cover photo: Whip-poor-will, by Ian Sousa-Cole. TABLE OF CONTENTS STRATEGY SUMMARY ..................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • American Redstarts
    San Antonio Audubon Society May/June 2021 Newsletter American Redstarts By Mike Scully At the time of this writing (early April), the glorious annual spring migration of songbirds through our area is picking up. Every spring I keep a special eye out for one of my favorite migrants, the American Redstart (Setophaga ruticilla). These beautiful warblers flutter actively through the foliage, tail spread, wings drooped, older males clad in black and orange, females and second year males in shades of gray, olive green and yellow. For years, the American Redstart was the only species remaining in the genus Setophaga, until a comprehensive genetic analysis of the Family Parulidae resulted in this genus being grouped with more than 32 species formerly placed in the genus Dendroica and Wilsonia. The name Setophaga was applied to the whole by virtue of seniority. Though now grouped in a large genus, the American Redstart remains an outlier, possessing proportionately large wings, a long tail, and prominent rictal bristles at the base of the relatively wide flat beak, all adaptations to a flycatching mode of foraging. Relatively heavy thigh musculature and long central front toes are apparently adaptations to springing into the air after flying insects. The foraging strategy of redstarts differs from that of typical flycatchers. Redstarts employ a more warbler-like maneuver, actively moving through the foliage, making typically short sallies after flying insect prey, and opportunistically gleaning insects from twigs and leaves while hovering or perched. The wings are frequently drooped and the colorful tail spread wide in order to flush insect prey.
    [Show full text]
  • 90 Records of the “Western Flycatcher” in Florida, With
    Florida Field Naturalist 48(3):90–98, 2020. RECORDS OF THE “WESTERN FLYCATCHER” IN FLORIDA, WITH EMPHASIS ON A VOCAL INDIVIDUAL THAT UTTERED CALL-NOTES CONSISTENT WITH PACIFIC-SLOPE FLYCATCHER (Empidonax difficilis) BILL PRANTY,1 DONALD FRASER,2 AND VALERI PONZO3 18515 Village Mill Row, Bayonet Point, Florida 34667-2662 Email: [email protected] 22181 Gulf View Boulevard, Dunedin, Florida 34698 Email: [email protected] 3725 Center Road, Sarasota, Florida 34240 Email: [email protected] In 1989, members of the American Ornithologists’ Union Check-list Committee (American Ornithologists’ Union 1989) agreed that the Western Flycatcher (Empidonax difficilis) complex consisted of two species: the Pacific-slope Flycatcher E.( difficilis) and the Cordilleran Flycatcher (E. occidentalis). These former subspecies were elevated to species status based on Johnson (1980) and Johnson and Marten (1988), who reported on apparent genetic and vocal differences and assortative pairing. However, Johnson (1980, 1994) found a mixed population breeding in northern California, and Rush et al. (2009) found hybridization and introgression in southwestern Canada. These discoveries have led some ornithologists to suggest that the two taxa should not have been elevated to separate species. Outside of the hybrid zones, however, Pacific-slope Flycatchers and Cordilleran Flycatchers maintain separate populations, with consistent genetic and vocal differences (Rush et al. 2009). The “Western Flycatcher” was not known to occur in Florida until recently (Robertson and Woolfenden 1992, Stevenson and Anderson 1994, Greenlaw et al. 2014). Pranty (1996) cited a probable report at Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa County, Florida, on 28 December 1995 by Bob, Lucy, and Scot Duncan. The first verifiable record was thought to have been discovered in 2015, but an earlier, unpublished record, dating to 2004, was posted to eBird ten years later.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- Checklist of New Mexico
    CHECKLIST OF NEW MEXICO BIRD SPECIES Sartor O. Williams III Secretary, New Mexico Bird Records Committee [email protected] 1 January 2021 This checklist contains all the species of birds that have been verified by specimen, photograph, or audio recording in New Mexico and have been accepted as valid by the New Mexico Bird Records Committee. Nomenclature, taxonomy, sequence, and spelling follow the seventh edition of the American Ornithological Society’s [formerly American Ornithologists’ Union, or AOU] Check-list of North American Birds (1998) as amended through the 61st Supplement (Auk 2020, Vol. 137; 24 pp.). Included are all families and species of birds known to occur (or have occurred) in New Mexico in the historical period (1540 to present). Through 1 January 2021, 549 species representing 68 families have been verified in New Mexico, including five established non-native species (identified as “Introduced”) and three species now extirpated (identified as “Extirpated”). Family ANATIDAE: Ducks, Geese, Swans Black-bellied Whistling-Duck, Dendrocygna autumnalis Fulvous Whistling-Duck, Dendrocygna bicolor Snow Goose, Anser caerulescens Ross’s Goose, Anser rossii Greater White-fronted Goose, Anser albifrons Brant, Branta bernicla Cackling Goose, Branta hutchinsii Canada Goose, Branta canadensis Trumpeter Swan, Cygnus buccinator Tundra Swan, Cygnus columbianus Wood Duck, Aix sponsa Garganey, Spatula querquedula Blue-winged Teal, Spatula discors Cinnamon Teal, Spatula cyanoptera Northern Shoveler, Spatula clypeata Gadwall, Mareca
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Dacninae Species Tree, Part I
    Dacninae I: Nemosiini, Conirostrini, & Diglossini Hooded Tanager, Nemosia pileata Cherry-throated Tanager, Nemosia rourei Nemosiini Blue-backed Tanager, Cyanicterus cyanicterus White-capped Tanager, Sericossypha albocristata Scarlet-throated Tanager, Sericossypha loricata Bicolored Conebill, Conirostrum bicolor Pearly-breasted Conebill, Conirostrum margaritae Chestnut-vented Conebill, Conirostrum speciosum Conirostrini White-eared Conebill, Conirostrum leucogenys Capped Conebill, Conirostrum albifrons Giant Conebill, Conirostrum binghami Blue-backed Conebill, Conirostrum sitticolor White-browed Conebill, Conirostrum ferrugineiventre Tamarugo Conebill, Conirostrum tamarugense Rufous-browed Conebill, Conirostrum rufum Cinereous Conebill, Conirostrum cinereum Stripe-tailed Yellow-Finch, Pseudochloris citrina Gray-hooded Sierra Finch, Phrygilus gayi Patagonian Sierra Finch, Phrygilus patagonicus Peruvian Sierra Finch, Phrygilus punensis Black-hooded Sierra Finch, Phrygilus atriceps Gough Finch, Rowettia goughensis White-bridled Finch, Melanodera melanodera Yellow-bridled Finch, Melanodera xanthogramma Inaccessible Island Finch, Nesospiza acunhae Nightingale Island Finch, Nesospiza questi Wilkins’s Finch, Nesospiza wilkinsi Saffron Finch, Sicalis flaveola Grassland Yellow-Finch, Sicalis luteola Orange-fronted Yellow-Finch, Sicalis columbiana Sulphur-throated Finch, Sicalis taczanowskii Bright-rumped Yellow-Finch, Sicalis uropigyalis Citron-headed Yellow-Finch, Sicalis luteocephala Patagonian Yellow-Finch, Sicalis lebruni Greenish Yellow-Finch,
    [Show full text]