DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of the Interior Vol. 76 Tuesday, No. 177 September 13, 2011 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Petition To List 42 Great Basin and Mojave Desert Springsnails as Threatened or Endangered With Critical Habitat; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:24 Sep 12, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\13SEP2.SGM 13SEP2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 56608 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ADDRESSES: You may submit (d) Historical and current population information by one of the following levels, and current and projected trends; Fish and Wildlife Service methods: and • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// (e) Past and ongoing conservation 50 CFR Part 17 www.regulations.gov. In the box that measures for the species, their habitat, reads ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID,’’ enter the or both. [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2011–0001; 92210–0–0008–B2] Docket number for this finding, which (2) The factors that are the basis for is FWS–R8–ES–2011–0001. You should making a listing determination for a Endangered and Threatened Wildlife then see an icon that reads ‘‘Submit a species under section 4(a) of the Act (16 and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Comment.’’ Please ensure that you have U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), which are: Petition To List 42 Great Basin and found the correct rulemaking before (a) The present or threatened Mojave Desert Springsnails as submitting your comment. destruction, modification, or Threatened or Endangered With • U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public curtailment of its habitat or range; Critical Habitat Comments Processing, Attn: [FWS–R8– (b) Overutilization for commercial, ES–2011–0001], Division of Policy and recreational, scientific, or educational AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Directives Management, U.S. Fish and purposes; Interior. Wildlife Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, (c) Disease or predation; ACTION: Notice of 90-day petition Suite 222, Arlington, VA 22203. (d) The inadequacy of existing finding and initiation of status reviews. We will post all information we receive regulatory mechanisms; or on http://www.regulations.gov. This (e) Other natural or manmade factors SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and generally means that we will post any affecting its continued existence. Wildlife Service (Service), announce a personal information you provide us If, after the status review, we 90-day finding on a petition to list 42 (see the ‘‘Request for Information’’ determine that listing any of the 32 Great Basin and Mojave Desert section below for more details). springsnail species is warranted, we springsnails as threatened or After November 14, 2011, you must will propose critical habitat (see endangered under the Endangered submit information directly to the Field definition in section 3(5)(A) of the Act), Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION under section 4 of the Act, to the We addressed 3 of the 42 petitioned CONTACT section below). Please note that maximum extent prudent and species in a 90-day finding dated we might not be able to address or determinable at the time we propose to August 18, 2009, in which we found incorporate information that we receive list the species. Therefore, within the that substantial scientific or commercial after the above requested date. geographical range currently occupied information was presented indicating by each of the 32 springsnail species, we FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill that listing may be warranted for those request data and information on: Ralston, Deputy State Supervisor, 3 species. In this finding, we find that (1) What may constitute ‘‘physical or Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. the petition does not present substantial biological features essential to the Fish and Wildlife Service, 1340 scientific or commercial information conservation of the species;’’ Financial Blvd, Suite 234, Reno, NV indicating that listing 7 of the remaining (2) Where these features are currently 89502, by telephone 775–861–6300, or 39 may be warranted. In addition, we found; and by facsimile 775–861–6301. If you use a find that the petition presents (3) Whether any of these features may telecommunications device for the deaf substantial scientific or commercial require special management (TDD), please call the Federal information indicating that listing may considerations or protection. be warranted for 32 of the remaining 39 Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. In addition, we request data and species. Therefore, with the publication information on ‘‘specific areas outside of this notice, we are initiating status SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the geographical area occupied by the reviews of these 32 species to determine Request for Information species’’ that are ‘‘essential to the if listing is warranted. To ensure that conservation of the species.’’ Please the status reviews are comprehensive, When we make a finding that a provide specific comments and we are requesting scientific and petition presents substantial information as to what, if any, critical commercial data and other information information indicating that listing a habitat you think we should propose for regarding these 32 species. Based on the species may be warranted, we are designation if the species is proposed status reviews, we will issue 12-month required to promptly review the status for listing, and why such habitat meets findings on these 32 species, which will of the species (status review). For the the requirements of section 4 of the Act. address whether the petitioned actions status review to be complete and based Please include sufficient information are warranted, as provided in the Act. on the best available scientific and with your submission (such as scientific If an emergency situation develops for commercial information, we request journal articles or other publications) to any of the 42 petitioned species that information on the 32 springsnail allow us to verify any scientific or warrants emergency listing, we will act species from governmental agencies, commercial information you include. immediately to provide necessary Native American Tribes, the scientific Submissions merely stating support protection. community, industry, and any other for or opposition to the action under DATES: To allow us adequate time to interested parties. We seek information consideration without providing conduct the status reviews, we request on: supporting information, although noted, that we receive information on or before (1) The species’ biology, range, and will not be considered in making a November 14, 2011. Please note that if population trends, including: determination. Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the you are using the Federal eRulemaking (a) Habitat requirements for feeding, Act directs that determinations as to Portal (see ADDRESSES section, below), breeding, and sheltering; whether any species is an endangered or the deadline for submitting an (b) Genetics and taxonomy; threatened species must be made electronic comment is midnight Eastern (c) Historical and current range ‘‘solely on the basis of the best scientific Daylight Saving Time on this date. including distribution patterns; and commercial data available.’’ VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:24 Sep 12, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13SEP2.SGM 13SEP2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules 56609 You may submit your information (CBD), Tierra Curry, Noah Greenwald, findings on the 42 springsnail species concerning this status review by one of Dr. James Deacon, Don Duff, and the within the mandatory statutory the methods listed in the ADDRESSES Freshwater Mollusk Conservation timeframe. section. If you submit information via Society (hereinafter referred to as the Evaluation of Information for This http://www.regulations.gov, your entire petitioners), requesting that we, the Finding submission—including any personal Service, list 42 species of Great Basin identifying information—will be posted springsnails in Nevada, Utah, and Section 4 of the Act and its on the Web site. If you submit a California as threatened or endangered implementing regulations at 50 CFR 424 hardcopy that includes personal with critical habitat under the Act. The set forth the procedures for adding a identifying information, you may petition clearly identified itself as a species to, or removing a species from, request at the top of your document that petition and included the appropriate the Federal Lists of Endangered and we withhold this personal identifying identification information for the Threatened Wildlife and Plants. A information from public review. petitioners, as required in 50 CFR species may be determined to be an However, we cannot guarantee that we 424.14(a). endangered or threatened species due to will be able to do so. We will post all In an October 19, 2009, letter to the one or more of the five factors described hardcopy submissions on http:// petitioners, we acknowledged receipt of in section 4(a)(1) of the Act: www.regulations.gov. the petition, and responded that we (a) The present or threatened Information and supporting reviewed the information presented in destruction, modification, or documentation that we received and the petition and determined that issuing curtailment of its habitat or range; used in preparing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2005 Wildlife Action Plan: Terrestrial Nongame Birds, Mammals, and Reptiles
    APPENDIX D IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIES OF CONSERVATION PRIORITY: DETAILED METHODS AND APPROACH 2005 Wildlife Action Plan: Terrestrial Nongame Birds, Mammals, and Reptiles Methods The Species of Conservation Priority identification process began in July, 2002. After initially gathering input from partner land management agency personnel at the field level, a Species Priority Matrix was developed using standard species conservation prioritization methodology (Natural Heritage Scorecard; Panjabi et al. 2001). Nevada Natural Heritage Program Species Scorecard scores were incorporated into the Species Priority Matrix. NDOW Wildlife Diversity biologists were subsequently asked to score all species of nongame birds, mammals, and reptiles using the Species Priority Matrix. The Species Priority Matrix contained the following scoring categories. 1. Endangered, Threatened, or Candidate Species Species with Endangered, Threatened, or Candidate Species status under either federal or state law were given 1 point. Total points possible in this category was 1 – multiple points for having both federal and state status were not given because state statutes are designed to generally reflect federal status. 2. Nevada Natural Heritage Program Score – Inverted Each species was given the inverted score of the Nevada Natural Heritage Program State Rank score; that is, NNHP scores run from 1 (highest risk) to 5 (lowest risk), so it was necessary to invert the score in order for “highest risk” to have the greatest arithmetic weight in the matrix. The conversion scale is illustrated in the following table. NNHP State Rank NV Species Priority Matrix Score 5 1 4 2 3 3 2 4 1 5 3. Threat The biologists were asked to assign scores to each species representing their perception of the degree of threat facing the species.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • Species Selection Process
    FINAL Appendix J to S Volume 3, Book 2 JULY 2008 COYOTE SPRINGS INVESTMENT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FINAL VOLUME 3 Coyote Springs Investment Planned Development Project Appendix J to S July 2008 Prepared EIS for: LEAD AGENCY U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, NV COOPERATING AGENCIES U.S. Army Corps of Engineers St. George, UT U.S. Bureau of Land Management Ely, NV Prepared MSHCP for: Coyote Springs Investment LLC 6600 North Wingfield Parkway Sparks, NV 89496 Prepared by: ENTRIX, Inc. 2300 Clayton Road, Suite 200 Concord, CA 94520 Huffman-Broadway Group 828 Mission Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901 Resource Concepts, Inc. 340 North Minnesota Street Carson City, NV 89703 PROJECT NO. 3132201 COYOTE SPRINGS INVESTMENT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Appendix J to S ENTRIX, Inc. Huffman-Broadway Group Resource Concepts, Inc. 2300 Clayton Road, Suite 200 828 Mission Avenue 340 North Minnesota Street Concord, CA 94520 San Rafael, CA 94901 Carson City, NV 89703 Phone 925.935.9920 Fax 925.935.5368 Phone 415.925.2000 Fax 415.925.2006 Phone 775.883.1600 Fax 775.883.1656 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix J Mitigation Plan, The Coyote Springs Development Project, Lincoln County, Nevada Appendix K Summary of Nevada Water Law and its Administration Appendix L Alternate Sites and Scenarios Appendix M Section 106 and Tribal Consultation Documents Appendix N Fiscal Impact Analysis Appendix O Executive Summary of Master Traffic Study for Clark County Development Appendix P Applicant for Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit Application, Coyote Springs Project, Lincoln County, Nevada Appendix Q Response to Comments on the Draft EIS Appendix R Agreement for Settlement of all Claims to Groundwater in the Coyote Spring Basin Appendix S Species Selection Process JULY 2008 FINAL i APPENDIX S Species Selection Process Table of Contents Appendix S: Species Selection Process ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Endangered and Threatened Species of Ash Meadows, Nevada
    RECOVERY PuN FOR THE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES OF AsH MEADows, NEVADA Prepared by Don W. Sada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES OF ASH MEADOWS, NEVADA Prepared By Don W. Sada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon ~FP2 3 ‘:XN Date This plan covers the following federally listed species in Ash Meadows, Nevada and California: Devil’s Hole pupfish, Warm Springs pupfish, Ash Meadows Arnargosa pupfish, Ash Meadows speckled dace, Ash Meadows naucorid, Ash Meadows blazing star, Ash Meadows ivesia, Ainargosa niterwort, Spring-loving centaury, Ash Meadows sunray, Ash Meadows inilk-vetch, and Ash Meadows guxnplant. THIS IS THE COMPLETED ASH MEADOWS SPECIES RECOVERY PLAN. IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL POSITIONS OR APPROVALS OF COOPERATING AGENCIES (AND IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF ALL INDIVIDUALS) WHO PLAYED THE KEY ROLE IN PREPARING THIS PLAN. THIS PLAN IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AS DICTATED BY NEW FINDINGS AND CHANGES IN SPECIES STATUS, AND COMPLETION OF TASKS DESCRIBED IN THE PLAN. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES WILL BE ATTAINED AND FUNDS EXPENDED CONTINGENT UPON APPROPRIATIONS, PRIORITIES, AND OTHER BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1990. Recovery plan for the endangered and threatened species of Ash Meadows, Nevada. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 123 pp. Additional copies may be obtained from Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Telephone: 301-492-6403 1-800-582-3421 : ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This plan results from the efforts of many who spent considerable time and energy to prevent the destruction of Ash Meadows and the extinction of its diverse endemic biota.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources and Management
    Vermilion flycatcher The upper Muddy River is considered one of the Mojave’s most important Common buckeye on sunflower areas of biodiversity and regionally Coyote (Canis latrans) Damselfly (Enallagma sp.) (Junonia coenia on Helianthus annuus) important ecological but threatened riparian landscapes (Provencher et al. 2005). Not only does the Warm Springs Natural Area encompass the majority of Muddy River tributaries it is also the largest single tract of land in the upper Muddy River set aside for the benefit of native species in perpetuity. The prominence of water in an otherwise barren Mojave landscape provides an oasis for regional wildlife. A high bird diversity is attributed to an abundance of riparian and floodplain trees and shrubs. Contributions to plant diversity come from the Mojave Old World swallowtail (Papilio machaon) Desertsnow (Linanthus demissus) Lobe-leaved Phacelia (Phacelia crenulata) Cryptantha (Cryptantha sp.) vegetation that occur on the toe slopes of the Arrow Canyon Range from the west and the plant species occupying the floodplain where they are supported by a high water table. Several marshes and wet meadows add to the diversity of plants and animals. The thermal springs and tributaries host an abundance of aquatic species, many of which are endemic. The WSNA provides a haven for the abundant wildlife that resides permanently or seasonally and provides a significant level of protection for imperiled species. Tarantula (Aphonopelma spp.) Beavertail cactus (Opuntia basilaris) Pacific tree frog (Pseudacris regilla)
    [Show full text]
  • Current Tracking List
    Nevada Division of Natural Heritage Department of Conservation and Natural Resources 901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 5002, Carson City, Nevada 89701-5245 voice: (775) 684-2900 | fax: (775) 684-2909 | web: heritage.nv.gov At-Risk Plant and Animal Tracking List July 2021 The Nevada Division of Natural Heritage (NDNH) A separate list, the Plant and Animal Watch List, systematically curates information on Nevada's contains taxa that could become at-risk in the future. endangered, threatened, sensitive, rare, and at-risk plants and animals providing the most comprehensive Taxa on the At-Risk Plant and Animal Tracking List are source of information on Nevada’s imperiled organized by taxonomic group, and presented biodiversity. alphabetically by scientific name within each group. Currently, there are 639 Tracking List taxa: 285 plants, Nevada's health and economic well-being depend 209 invertebrates, 65 fishes, 9 amphibians, 7 reptiles, upon its biodiversity and wise land stewardship. This 27 birds, and 37 mammals. challenge increases as population and land-use pressures continue to grow. Nevada is among the top Documentation of population status, locations, or 10 states for both the diversity and the vulnerability of other updates or corrections for any of the taxa on its living heritage. With early planning and responsible this list are always welcome. Literature citations with development, economic growth and our biological taxonomic revisions and descriptions of new taxa are resources can coexist. NDNH is a central source for also appreciated. The Nevada Native Species Site information critical to achieving this balance. Survey Report form is available on our website under Management priorities for the state’s imperiled the Submit Data tab and is the preferred format for biodiversity are continually assessed, providing submitting information to NDNH.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I: a List of Native Spring-Dependent Species Known from the Area of Projected Groundwater Decline in Nevada, California, Utah, and Arizona Table 1
    Deacon, J.E., A.E. Williams, C. Deacon Williams, and J.E. Williams. 2007. Fueling population growth in Las Vegas: how large-scale groundwater withdrawal could burn regional biodiversity. BioScience 57(8):688-698. Appendix I: A list of native spring-dependent species known from the area of projected groundwater decline in Nevada, California, Utah, and Arizona Table 1. Twenty federally-listed spring-dwelling and riparian species of southern and central Nevada that are dependent upon groundwater for habitat maintenance. NWR = National Wildlife Refuge. _______________________________________________________________________ Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status Habitat Special Federal Designation Lands Amargosa vole Microtus E Spring-fed wetland californicus areas scirpensis Southwestern Empidonax trailii E Riparian areas of Pahranagat NWR; Willow Flycatcher extrimus spring-fed streams Ash Meadows NWR Yuma clapper rail Rallus longirostris E Riparian areas of yumanensis spring-fed streams Woundfin Plagopterus E Spring-fed streams argentissimus Virgin River chub Gila seminuda E Spring-fed streams Ash Meadows Rhinichthys E Springs Ash Meadows speckled dace osculus nevadensis NWR Moapa dace Moapa coriacea E Springs Moapa Valley NWR Pahrump poolfish Empetrichthys E Spring pools Desert National latos Wildlife Range Ash Meadows Cyprinodon E Springs Ash Meadows Amargosa pupfish nevadensis NWR mionectes Devils Hole Cyprinodon E Spring pool Death Valley pupfish diabolis National Park Warm springs Cyprinodon E Springs Ash Meadows pupfish nevadensis NWR pectoralis Big Spring Lepidomeda T Springs and spinedace mollispinis spring-fed marshes pratensis White River Lepidomeda E Springs and spinedace albivallis spring-fed creeks Hiko White River Crenichthys baileyi E Springs springfish grandis Railroad Valley Crenichthys T Springs springfish nevadae White River Crenichthys b.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior
    Vol. 76 Tuesday, No. 177 September 13, 2011 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Petition To List 42 Great Basin and Mojave Desert Springsnails as Threatened or Endangered With Critical Habitat; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:24 Sep 12, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\13SEP2.SGM 13SEP2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 56608 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 177 / Tuesday, September 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ADDRESSES: You may submit (d) Historical and current population information by one of the following levels, and current and projected trends; Fish and Wildlife Service methods: and • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// (e) Past and ongoing conservation 50 CFR Part 17 www.regulations.gov. In the box that measures for the species, their habitat, reads ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID,’’ enter the or both. [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2011–0001; 92210–0–0008–B2] Docket number for this finding, which (2) The factors that are the basis for is FWS–R8–ES–2011–0001. You should making a listing determination for a Endangered and Threatened Wildlife then see an icon that reads ‘‘Submit a species under section 4(a) of the Act (16 and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Comment.’’ Please ensure that you have U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), which are: Petition To List 42 Great Basin and found the correct rulemaking before (a) The present or threatened Mojave Desert Springsnails as submitting your comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Aquatic Ecosystems and the Genetic and Morphological Diversity of Death Valley System Speckled Dace
    American Fisheries Society Symposium 17:350-359, 1995 © Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 1995 Desert Aquatic Ecosystems and the Genetic and Morphological Diversity of Death Valley System Speckled Dace DONALD W. SADA Environmental Studies Program, University of Nevada-Las Vegas 2689 Highland Drive, Bishop, California 93514, USA HUGH B. BRITTEN AND PETER F. BRUSSARD Biodiversity Research Center, Department of Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Nevada 89557-0015, USA Abstract.—The morphological and genetic diversities of fishes in North American deserts have been examined to estimate evolutionary rates, to create models of interbasin pluvial connectivity, and to justify protection of aquatic ecosystems throughout the region. Morphological and genetic studies comparing 13 populations of speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus from the Death Valley system, Lahontan basin, and lower Colorado River were conducted to quantify differences among populations. Differences in meristic and mensural characteristics among populations were highly significant, but differences in body shape were slight and best explained as representing two forms, one deep-bodied and short, the other elongate and slender. Starch gel electrophoretic assays of 23 loci showed isolated populations to be genetically unique. Fifty-nine taxa are identified as endemic to wetland and aquatic habitats in the Death Valley system: 16 forms of fish, 1 amphibian, 22 mollusks, 7 aquatic insects, 3 mammals, and 10 forms of flowering plants. Genetic and morphological differentiation of isolated speckled dace populations and the diversity and number of endemic forms associated with wetlands and aquatic habitats in the Death Valley system suggest that each desert wetland community functions as an evolutionarily significant unit.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Departhient of the Interior 200? OCT
    @2/82 FS PAGE 3øi2@07 @S47 7757268111 CALIENTE United States Departhient of the Interior BUREAU Of LAND MANAGEMENT Ely Field Oftce I-1C33 Bo 33500 (702 N. tndstria Way) TAKE PRIDE. Ely. Nevada 893(11 -940$ INAMERICA http://www.hlm.gov/n’/sVeii.html RecelvQd In Reply Refer to: So. Nevada Field Offlc JUL 2 ‘ 200? 6840(P) (NV-045.07) OCT 122007 Las Vegas, 1W Memorandum To: Assistant field Supervisor, U.S. fish. an Wildlife Service, Southern Nevada. Fish and. Wildlife Office, Las Vegas, NV From: Field Manager. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Fly Fie)d Office, NV Subject: Fornal Section 7 Consultation and Request for Concurrence, Southwest intcrtie Project (SWIP) — Southern Portion The BLM Ely requests formal section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act on the proposcd $WIP— Southern Portion due tø possible adverse effects to the Mojave population of lesert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). The BLM Ely Field Office has prepared a BioJogical Assessment (BA) to update the original BA for the SWIP that was prepared in November, 1993, Please find attached a BA analyzing the potential Impacts of the project to Desert Tortoise. The BA includes analysis on potential impacts to the endangered Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidon fratfli extirnus) and threatened Bald Eagle (Haliacetus leucocephalus) and a finding of “may affect, not likely to adversely affect” for these two species. Thc BLM requests concuiTence with this finding. A discuss n of these species and their associated habitats is included in the attached BA. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Wildlife Biologist Alicia Styles at 775-726-8 128.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Battle Mountain Oil & Gas Lease Sale
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-B000-2014-0001-EA DATE: February 2014 July 2014 Competitive Oil and Gas Lease Sale, Battle Mountain District, Nevada ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Battle Mountain District Office 50 Bastian Road Battle Mountain, NV 89820 Phone: 775-635-4000 Fax: 775-635-4034 2 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Purpose and Need for Action ................................................................................................ 6 1.3 Land Use Plan Conformance ................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, Policy, Plans and Other Environmental Analysis .... 7 1.5 Scoping and Public Involvement .......................................................................................... 8 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ............................ 9 2.1 Proposed Action .................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 No Action Alternative ........................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Freshwater Gastropods of Canada and the United States Paul D
    This article was downloaded by: [69.144.7.122] On: 24 July 2013, At: 12:35 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Fisheries Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ufsh20 Conservation Status of Freshwater Gastropods of Canada and the United States Paul D. Johnson a , Arthur E. Bogan b , Kenneth M. Brown c , Noel M. Burkhead d , James R. Cordeiro e o , Jeffrey T. Garner f , Paul D. Hartfield g , Dwayne A. W. Lepitzki h , Gerry L. Mackie i , Eva Pip j , Thomas A. Tarpley k , Jeremy S. Tiemann l , Nathan V. Whelan m & Ellen E. Strong n a Alabama Aquatic Biodiversity Center, Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (ADCNR) , 2200 Highway 175, Marion , AL , 36756-5769 E-mail: b North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences , Raleigh , NC c Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge , LA d United States Geological Survey, Southeast Ecological Science Center , Gainesville , FL e University of Massachusetts at Boston , Boston , Massachusetts f Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources , Florence , AL g U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service , Jackson , MS h Wildlife Systems Research , Banff , Alberta , Canada i University of Guelph, Water Systems Analysts , Guelph , Ontario , Canada j University of Winnipeg , Winnipeg , Manitoba , Canada k Alabama Aquatic Biodiversity Center, Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources , Marion , AL l Illinois Natural History Survey , Champaign , IL m University of Alabama , Tuscaloosa , AL n Smithsonian Institution, Department of Invertebrate Zoology , Washington , DC o Nature-Serve , Boston , MA Published online: 14 Jun 2013.
    [Show full text]