Nevada and Utah Springsnail Species Descriptions Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………..2 1] Amnicola Limosa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nevada and Utah Springsnail Species Descriptions Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………..2 1] Amnicola Limosa Appendix A: Nevada and Utah Springsnail Species Descriptions Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………..2 1] Amnicola limosa ...................................................... Mud Amnicola ............................................................................... 4 2] Assiminea infima ..................................................... Badwater Snail .............................................................................. 6 3] Colligyrus greggi ..................................................... Rocky Mountain Duskysnail ........................................................... 8 4] Eremopyrgus eganensis........................................... Steptoe Hydrobe ......................................................................... 10 5] Fluminicola coloradoensis ....................................... Green River Pebblesnail ............................................................... 12 6] Fluminicola dalli ...................................................... Pyramid Lake Pebblesnail ............................................................ 14 7] Fluminicola turbiniformis ........................................ Turban Pebblesnail ...................................................................... 16 8] Fluminicola virginius ............................................... Virginia Mountains Pebblesnail .................................................... 18 9] Juga acutifilosa ....................................................... Topaz Juga .................................................................................. 20 10] Pyrgulopsis aloba .................................................... Duckwater Pyrg ........................................................................... 22 11] Pyrgulopsis anatina ................................................. Southern Duckwater Pyrg ............................................................ 24 12] Pyrgulopsis anguina ................................................ Longitudinal Gland Pyrg ............................................................... 26 13] Pyrgulopsis augustae .............................................. Elongate Cain Spring Pyrg ............................................................ 29 14] Pyrgulopsis aurata .................................................. Pleasant Valley Pyrg .................................................................... 31 15] Pyrgulopsis avernalis............................................... Moapa Pebblesnail ...................................................................... 33 16] Pyrgulopsis bacchus ................................................ Grand Wash Springsnail ............................................................... 36 17] Pyrgulopsis basiglans .............................................. Large Gland Carico Pyrg ............................................................... 38 18] Pyrgulopsis bifurcata............................................... Small Gland Carico Pyrg ............................................................... 40 19] Pyrgulopsis breviloba .............................................. Flag Pyrg ..................................................................................... 42 20] Pyrgulopsis bruesi ................................................... Fly Ranch Pyrg ............................................................................. 45 21] Pyrgulopsis bryantwalkeri ....................................... Cortez Hills Pebblesnail................................................................ 47 22] Pyrgulopsis carinata ................................................ Carinate Duckwater Pyrg ............................................................. 49 23] Pyrgulopsis carinifera .............................................. Moapa Valley Pyrg ....................................................................... 51 24] Pyrgulopsis chamberlini .......................................... Smooth Glenwood Pyrg ............................................................... 54 25] Pyrgulopsis coloradensis ......................................... Blue Point Pyrg ............................................................................ 56 26] Pyrgulopsis cruciglans ............................................. Transverse Gland Pyrg ................................................................. 59 27] Pyrgulopsis crystalis ................................................ Crystal Springsnail ....................................................................... 61 28] Pyrgulopsis cybele ................................................... Nature Pyrg ................................................................................. 63 29] Pyrgulopsis deaconi................................................. Spring Mountains Pyrg ................................................................ 65 30] Pyrgulopsis deserta ................................................. Desert Springsnail........................................................................ 68 31] Pyrgulopsis dixensis ................................................ Dixie Valley Pyrg .......................................................................... 70 32] Pyrgulopsis erythropoma ........................................ Ash Meadows Pebblesnail ........................................................... 72 33] Pyrgulopsis fairbanksensis ...................................... Fairbanks Springsnail ................................................................... 75 34] Pyrgulopsis fausta ................................................... Corn Creek Pyrg ........................................................................... 78 35] Pyrgulopsis fusca ..................................................... Otter Creek Pyrg .......................................................................... 80 36] Pyrgulopsis gibba .................................................... Surprise Valley Pyrg ..................................................................... 82 37] Pyrgulopsis gracilis .................................................. Emigrant Pyrg .............................................................................. 84 38] Pyrgulopsis hamlinensis .......................................... Hamlin Valley Pyrg....................................................................... 86 39] Pyrgulopsis horseshutem......................................... Horseshutem Sp 1 Pyrg ................................................................ 88 40] Pyrgulopsis hovinghi ............................................... Upper Thousand Spring Pyrg........................................................ 90 41] Pyrgulopsis hubbsi .................................................. Hubbs Pyrg .................................................................................. 92 42] Pyrgulopsis humboldtensis ...................................... Humboldt Pyrg ............................................................................ 94 43] Pyrgulopsis imperialis ............................................. Kings River Pyrg ........................................................................... 96 44] Pyrgulopsis inopinata .............................................. Carinate Glenwood Pyrg .............................................................. 98 45] Pyrgulopsis isolata .................................................. Elongate-gland Springsnail ......................................................... 100 46] Pyrgulopsis landyei ................................................. Landyes Pyrg ............................................................................. 102 47] Pyrgulopsis lata ....................................................... Butterfield Pyrg ......................................................................... 104 48] Pyrgulopsis lentiglans ............................................. Crittenden Pyrg ......................................................................... 107 49] Pyrgulopsis leporina ................................................ Elko Pyrg ................................................................................... 109 50] Pyrgulopsis licina..................................................... Curved Filament Pyrg ................................................................ 111 51] Pyrgulopsis limaria .................................................. Squat Mud Meadows Pyrg ......................................................... 113 - 1 - 52] Pyrgulopsis lindahlae .............................................. Lindahls Pyrg ............................................................................. 115 53] Pyrgulopsis lockensis ............................................... Lockes Pyrg ............................................................................... 117 54] Pyrgulopsis longiglans ............................................. Western Lahontan Pyrg ............................................................. 119 55] Pyrgulopsis marcida ................................................ Hardy Pyrg ................................................................................ 121 56] Pyrgulopsis merriami .............................................. Pahranagat Pebblesnail ............................................................. 124 57] Pyrgulopsis micrococcus .......................................... Oasis Valley Springsnail ............................................................. 127 58] Pyrgulopsis
Recommended publications
  • North American Hydrobiidae (Gastropoda: Rissoacea): Redescription and Systematic Relationships of Tryonia Stimpson, 1865 and Pyrgulopsis Call and Pilsbry, 1886
    THE NAUTILUS 101(1):25-32, 1987 Page 25 . North American Hydrobiidae (Gastropoda: Rissoacea): Redescription and Systematic Relationships of Tryonia Stimpson, 1865 and Pyrgulopsis Call and Pilsbry, 1886 Robert Hershler Fred G. Thompson Department of Invertebrate Zoology Florida State Museum National Museum of Natural History University of Florida Smithsonian Institution Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Washington, DC 20560, USA ABSTRACT scribed) in the Southwest. Taylor (1966) placed Tryonia in the Littoridininae Taylor, 1966 on the basis of its Anatomical details are provided for the type species of Tryonia turreted shell and glandular penial lobes. It is clear from Stimpson, 1865, Pyrgulopsis Call and Pilsbry, 1886, Fonteli- cella Gregg and Taylor, 1965, and Microamnicola Gregg and the initial descriptions and subsequent studies illustrat- Taylor, 1965, in an effort to resolve the systematic relationships ing the penis (Russell, 1971: fig. 4; Taylor, 1983:16-25) of these taxa, which represent most of the generic-level groups that Fontelicella and its subgenera, Natricola Gregg and of Hydrobiidae in southwestern North America. Based on these Taylor, 1965 and Microamnicola Gregg and Taylor, 1965 and other data presented either herein or in the literature, belong to the Nymphophilinae Taylor, 1966 (see Hyalopyrgus Thompson, 1968 is assigned to Tryonia; and Thompson, 1979). While the type species of Pyrgulop- Fontelicella, Microamnicola, Nat ricola Gregg and Taylor, 1965, sis, P. nevadensis (Stearns, 1883), has not received an- Marstonia F. C. Baker, 1926, and Mexistiobia Hershler, 1985 atomical study, the penes of several eastern species have are allocated to Pyrgulopsis. been examined by Thompson (1977), who suggested that The ranges of both Tryonia and Pyrgulopsis include parts the genus may be a nymphophiline.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • Suterilla Fluviatilis Fukuda, Ponder & Marshall, 2006
    Suterilla fluviatilis Fukuda, Ponder & Marshall, 2006 Diagnostic features Shell globose to ovate-conic, up to 1.9 mm in length, thick, opaque, uniformly yellow-brown (white in some specimens); with narrow, open umbilicus. Teleoconch whorls convex, suture distinctly Distribution of Suterilla fluviatilis. Suterilla fluviatilis (adult size 1.6-1.9 mm) impressed; spire about equal to aperture in length; whorls smooth except for fine growth lines, fine spiral striae present or absent; aperture with thin outer lip and thick, wide columellar lip, inner lip thin across parietal area; aperture not extending across umbilicus; no varix. Operculum simple, pyriform , paucispiral, horny, translucent, yellowish. Head with short, narrow, cephalic tentacles approximately equal to half width of head with the eyes situated near central part of bases of these tentacles. A distinct transverse crease at posterior end of snout and confluent with anterior edges of tentacle bases. Omniphoric grooves distinct. Anterior pedal mucous gland along entire edge of foot, as many small, slender cells opening beneath inconspicuous propodial flap. Foot short and broad, sole slender, flat, smooth when foot extended. Mantle cavity with only two rudimentary gill filaments. The main differences between S. fluviatilis and other species of Suterilla (all of which are marine) are anatomical. They include the S-shaped rectum, lack of a flange on the penis, the albumen gland being markedly shorter than the capsule gland, a large bursa copulatrix (also in S. neozelanica) and a wide, folded bursal duct that enters the bursa mid anteriorly. Classification Suterilla fluviatilis Fukuda, Ponder & Marshall, 2006 Class Gastropoda I nfraclass Caenogastropoda Order Littorinida Suborder Rissoidina Superfamily Truncatelloidea Family Assimineidae Subfamily: Omphalotropidinae Genus Suterilla Thiele, 1927 (Type species Cirsonella neozelanica Murdoch, 1899).
    [Show full text]
  • THE NAUTILUS (Quarterly)
    americanmalacologists, inc. PUBLISHERS OF DISTINCTIVE BOOKS ON MOLLUSKS THE NAUTILUS (Quarterly) MONOGRAPHS OF MARINE MOLLUSCA STANDARD CATALOG OF SHELLS INDEXES TO THE NAUTILUS {Geographical, vols 1-90; Scientific Names, vols 61-90) REGISTER OF AMERICAN MALACOLOGISTS JANUARY 30, 1984 THE NAUTILUS ISSN 0028-1344 Vol. 98 No. 1 A quarterly devoted to malacology and the interests of conchologists Founded 1889 by Henry A. Pilsbry. Continued by H. Burrington Baker. Editor-in-Chief: R. Tucker Abbott EDITORIAL COMMITTEE CONSULTING EDITORS Dr. William J. Clench Dr. Donald R. Moore Curator Emeritus Division of Marine Geology Museum of Comparative Zoology School of Marine and Atmospheric Science Cambridge, MA 02138 10 Rickenbacker Causeway Miami, FL 33149 Dr. William K. Emerson Department of Living Invertebrates Dr. Joseph Rosewater The American Museum of Natural History Division of Mollusks New York, NY 10024 U.S. National Museum Washington, D.C. 20560 Dr. M. G. Harasewych 363 Crescendo Way Dr. G. Alan Solem Silver Spring, MD 20901 Department of Invertebrates Field Museum of Natural History Dr. Aurele La Rocque Chicago, IL 60605 Department of Geology The Ohio State University Dr. David H. Stansbery Columbus, OH 43210 Museum of Zoology The Ohio State University Dr. James H. McLean Columbus, OH 43210 Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History 900 Exposition Boulevard Dr. Ruth D. Turner Los Angeles, CA 90007 Department of Mollusks Museum of Comparative Zoology Dr. Arthur S. Merrill Cambridge, MA 02138 c/o Department of Mollusks Museum of Comparative Zoology Dr. Gilbert L. Voss Cambridge, MA 02138 Division of Biology School of Marine and Atmospheric Science 10 Rickenbacker Causeway Miami, FL 33149 EDITOR-IN-CHIEF The Nautilus (USPS 374-980) ISSN 0028-1344 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Assimineidae of the Atlantic-Mediterranean Seashores
    B72(4-6)_totaal-backup_corr:Basteria-basis.qxd 15-9-2008 10:35 Pagina 165 BASTERIA, 72: 165-181, 2008 The Assimineidae of the Atlantic-Mediterranean seashores J.J. VAN AARTSEN National Museum of Natural History, P.O.Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. A study of the Atlantic – and Mediterranean marine species of the genera Assiminea and Paludinella revealed several new species. The species Assiminea gittenbergeri spec. nov. is estab- lished in the Mediterranean. Assiminea avilai spec. nov. and Assiminea rolani spec. nov. have been found in Terceira, Azores and in Madeira respectively. A species from the Atlantic coast of France, cited as Assiminea eliae Paladilhe, 1875 by Thiele, is described as Paludinella glaubrechti spec. nov. A. eliae cannot be identified today as no type material is known. The name , howev- er, is used for several different species as documented herein. Assiminea ostiorum (Bavay, 1920) is here considered a species in its own right. Paludinella sicana ( Brugnone, 1876), until now con- sidered an exclusively Mediterranean species, has been detected along the Atlantic coast at Laredo ( Spain) in the north as well as at Agadir ( Morocco) in the south. Keywords: Gastropoda, Caenogastropoda, Assimineidae, Assiminea, Paludinella, systematics, Atlantic Ocean east coast, Mediterranean. INTRODUCTION The Assimineidae H. & A. Adams, 1856 are a group of mollusks living worldwide in brackish water, in freshwater as well as terrestrial habitats. In Europe there are only a few species known. They live in usually more or less brackish conditions high in the tidal zone, frequently along tidal mudflats. The two genera recognized to date are Paludinella Pfeiffer, 1841 with Paludinella littorina (Delle Chiaje, 1828) and Paludinella sicana (Brugnone, 1876) and the type-genus Assiminea Leach in Fleming, 1828, with the type- species Assiminea grayana (Fleming, 1828) as well as Assiminea eliae Paladilhe, 1875.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of the North and Central American Aquatic Snail Genus Tryonia (Rissooidea: Hydrobiidae)
    Systematics of the North and Central American Aquatic Snail Genus Tryonia (Rissooidea: Hydrobiidae) ROBERT HERSF LER m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 612 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan Endangered and Species Nevada
    RECOVERYPLAN FOR THE ENDANGEREDAND THREATENED SPECIES OF&H MEADOWS, NEVADA Prepared by Don W. Sada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES OF ASH MEADOWS, NEVADA Prepared By Don W. Sada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon ~FP2 3 ‘:XN Date This plan covers the following federally listed species in Ash Meadows, Nevada and California: Devil’s Hole pupfish, Warm Springs pupfish, Ash Meadows Arnargosa pupfish, Ash Meadows speckled dace, Ash Meadows naucorid, Ash Meadows blazing star, Ash Meadows ivesia, Ainargosa niterwort, Spring-loving centaury, Ash Meadows sunray, Ash Meadows inilk-vetch, and Ash Meadows guxnplant. THIS IS THE COMPLETED ASH MEADOWS SPECIES RECOVERY PLAN. IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL POSITIONS OR APPROVALS OF COOPERATING AGENCIES (AND IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF ALL INDIVIDUALS) WHO PLAYED THE KEY ROLE IN PREPARING THIS PLAN. THIS PLAN IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AS DICTATED BY NEW FINDINGS AND CHANGES IN SPECIES STATUS, AND COMPLETION OF TASKS DESCRIBED IN THE PLAN. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES WILL BE ATTAINED AND FUNDS EXPENDED CONTINGENT UPON APPROPRIATIONS, PRIORITIES, AND OTHER BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1990. Recovery plan for the endangered and threatened species of Ash Meadows, Nevada. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 123 pp. Additional copies may be obtained from Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Telephone: 301-492-6403 1-800-582-3421 : ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This plan results from the efforts of many who spent considerable time and energy to prevent the destruction of Ash Meadows and the extinction of its diverse endemic biota.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts
    Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts September 15, 2013 This report is the result of several years of field data collection, analyses and IBI development, and consideration of the opportunities for wetland program and policy development in relation to IBIs and CAPS Index of Ecological Integrity (IEI). Contributors include: University of Massachusetts Amherst Kevin McGarigal, Ethan Plunkett, Joanna Grand, Brad Compton, Theresa Portante, Kasey Rolih, and Scott Jackson Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Jan Smith, Marc Carullo, and Adrienne Pappal Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Lisa Rhodes, Lealdon Langley, and Michael Stroman Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts Abstract The purpose of this study was to develop a fully empirically-based method for developing Indices of Biotic Integrity (IBIs) that does not rely on expert opinion or the arbitrary designation of reference sites and pilot its application in forested wetlands, coastal salt marshes and wadable freshwater streams in Massachusetts. The method we developed involves: 1) using a suite of regression models to estimate the abundance of each taxon across a gradient of stressor levels, 2) using statistical calibration based on the fitted regression models and maximum likelihood methods to predict the value of the stressor metric based on the abundance of the taxon at each site, 3) selecting taxa in a forward stepwise procedure that conditionally improves the concordance between the observed stressor value and the predicted value the most and a stopping rule for selecting taxa based on a conditional alpha derived from comparison to pseudotaxa data, and 4) comparing the coefficient of concordance for the final IBI to the expected distribution derived from randomly permuted data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freshwater Snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Mexico: Updated Checklist, Endemicity Hotspots, Threats and Conservation Status
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 91 (2020): e912909 Taxonomy and systematics The freshwater snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Mexico: updated checklist, endemicity hotspots, threats and conservation status Los caracoles dulceacuícolas (Mollusca: Gastropoda) de México: listado actualizado, hotspots de endemicidad, amenazas y estado de conservación Alexander Czaja a, *, Iris Gabriela Meza-Sánchez a, José Luis Estrada-Rodríguez a, Ulises Romero-Méndez a, Jorge Sáenz-Mata a, Verónica Ávila-Rodríguez a, Jorge Luis Becerra-López a, Josué Raymundo Estrada-Arellano a, Gabriel Fernando Cardoza-Martínez a, David Ramiro Aguillón-Gutiérrez a, Diana Gabriela Cordero-Torres a, Alan P. Covich b a Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Av.Universidad s/n, Fraccionamiento Filadelfia, 35010 Gómez Palacio, Durango, Mexico b Institute of Ecology, Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 East Green Street, Athens, GA 30602-2202, USA *Corresponding author: [email protected] (A. Czaja) Received: 14 April 2019; accepted: 6 November 2019 Abstract We present an updated checklist of native Mexican freshwater gastropods with data on their general distribution, hotspots of endemicity, threats, and for the first time, their estimated conservation status. The list contains 193 species, representing 13 families and 61 genera. Of these, 103 species (53.4%) and 12 genera are endemic to Mexico, and 75 species are considered local endemics because of their restricted distribution to very small areas. Using NatureServe Ranking, 9 species (4.7%) are considered possibly or presumably extinct, 40 (20.7%) are critically imperiled, 30 (15.5%) are imperiled, 15 (7.8%) are vulnerable and only 64 (33.2%) are currently stable.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report for Beaverpond Marstonia
    Species Status Assessment Report For Beaverpond Marstonia (Marstonia castor) Marstonia castor. Photo by Fred Thompson Version 1.0 September 2017 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia 1 2 This document was prepared by Tamara Johnson (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Georgia Ecological Services Field Office) with assistance from Andreas Moshogianis, Marshall Williams and Erin Rivenbark with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Southeast Regional Office, and Don Imm (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Georgia Ecological Services Field Office). Maps and GIS expertise were provided by Jose Barrios with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Southeast Regional Office. We appreciate Gerald Dinkins (Dinkins Biological Consulting), Paul Johnson (Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources), and Jason Wisniewski (Georgia Department of Natural Resources) for providing peer review of a prior draft of this report. 3 Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Species status assessment report for beaverpond marstonia. Version 1.0. September, 2017. Atlanta, GA. 24 pp. 4 Species Status Assessment Report for Beaverpond Marstonia (Marstonia castor) Prepared by the Georgia Ecological Services Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment is a comprehensive biological status review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for beaverpond marstonia (Marstonia castor), and provides a thorough account of the species’ overall viability and extinction risk. Beaverpond marstonia is a small spring snail found in tributaries located east of Lake Blackshear in Crisp, Worth, and Dougherty Counties, Georgia. It was last documented in 2000. Based on the results of repeated surveys by qualified species experts, there appears to be no extant populations of beaverpond marstonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Snails of the Snake and Green River Basins of Wyoming
    Aquatic snails of the Snake and Green River Basins of Wyoming Lusha Tronstad Invertebrate Zoologist Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming 307-766-3115 [email protected] Mark Andersen Information Systems and Services Coordinator Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming 307-766-3036 [email protected] Suggested citation: Tronstad, L.M. and M. D. Andersen. 2018. Aquatic snails of the Snake and Green River Basins of Wyoming. Report prepared by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database for the Wyoming Fish and Wildlife Department. 1 Abstract Freshwater snails are a diverse group of mollusks that live in a variety of aquatic ecosystems. Many snail species are of conservation concern around the globe. About 37-39 species of aquatic snails likely live in Wyoming. The current study surveyed the Snake and Green River basins in Wyoming and identified 22 species and possibly discovered a new operculate snail. We surveyed streams, wetlands, lakes and springs throughout the basins at randomly selected locations. We measured habitat characteristics and basic water quality at each site. Snails were usually most abundant in ecosystems with higher standing stocks of algae, on solid substrate (e.g., wood or aquatic vegetation) and in habitats with slower water velocity (e.g., backwater and margins of streams). We created an aquatic snail key for identifying species in Wyoming. The key is a work in progress that will be continually updated to reflect changes in taxonomy and new knowledge. We hope the snail key will be used throughout the state to unify snail identification and create better data on Wyoming snails.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Endangered and Threatened Species of Ash Meadows, Nevada
    RECOVERY PuN FOR THE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES OF AsH MEADows, NEVADA Prepared by Don W. Sada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES OF ASH MEADOWS, NEVADA Prepared By Don W. Sada U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon ~FP2 3 ‘:XN Date This plan covers the following federally listed species in Ash Meadows, Nevada and California: Devil’s Hole pupfish, Warm Springs pupfish, Ash Meadows Arnargosa pupfish, Ash Meadows speckled dace, Ash Meadows naucorid, Ash Meadows blazing star, Ash Meadows ivesia, Ainargosa niterwort, Spring-loving centaury, Ash Meadows sunray, Ash Meadows inilk-vetch, and Ash Meadows guxnplant. THIS IS THE COMPLETED ASH MEADOWS SPECIES RECOVERY PLAN. IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL POSITIONS OR APPROVALS OF COOPERATING AGENCIES (AND IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF ALL INDIVIDUALS) WHO PLAYED THE KEY ROLE IN PREPARING THIS PLAN. THIS PLAN IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AS DICTATED BY NEW FINDINGS AND CHANGES IN SPECIES STATUS, AND COMPLETION OF TASKS DESCRIBED IN THE PLAN. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES WILL BE ATTAINED AND FUNDS EXPENDED CONTINGENT UPON APPROPRIATIONS, PRIORITIES, AND OTHER BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1990. Recovery plan for the endangered and threatened species of Ash Meadows, Nevada. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 123 pp. Additional copies may be obtained from Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Telephone: 301-492-6403 1-800-582-3421 : ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This plan results from the efforts of many who spent considerable time and energy to prevent the destruction of Ash Meadows and the extinction of its diverse endemic biota.
    [Show full text]