Cites-Cop15-Report.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CoP15 article for the website_Layout 1 01/02/2011 14:49 Page 1 C I T E S C o P 1 5 ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 6. Financing and budgeting of the Secretariat and of meetings of the Conference of the Parties The Secretariat’s financial report for 2007 and 2008 (document CoP15 Doc. 6.2 (Rev. 1)), and its report on implemen- tation of the costed prog ramme of work for 2009 (docu ment CoP15 Doc. 6.3 (Rev. 1)) were presented in Committee II and subsequently noted in plenary session on the penultimate day of the meeting. The Secretariat’s report of its implemen- tation of the costed programme for 2010 to 2011 (document CoP15 Doc. 6.4 (Rev. 1)), and its costed programme of work for 2012 to 2013 in document CoP15 Doc. 6.5 (Rev. 1) were discussed by the Budget Working Group of Committee II and subsequently accepted in plenary session. The Budget Working Group also drafted a resolution on financing and budgeting of the Secretariat and meetings of the Conference of the Parties, which established a 6% increase in the budget for the costed programme of work 2012 to 2013. This was to be met by an annual drawdown of USD450 000 from the Trust Fund and contributions from the Parties of USD5 225 466 for CoP15 2012 and USD5 723 142 for 2013. This draft resolution, which included the scale of contributions from Parties for 2012 to S. BROAD / TRAFFIC S. BROAD / 2013, was adopted (Resolution Conf. REPORT OF THE 15TH MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO CITES 15.1). J. Gray STRATEGIC MATTERS OPENING OF THE MEETING 7. Committee reports and recommend - ations he 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP15) to CITES took place in Doha, Qatar, from 13 to 25 March 2010 and was attended The Chair of the Standing Committee Tby some 800 Party representatives and over 390 observers from inter- did not submit a report to CoP15, as he governmental, international and national organizations. The following is a was unable to attend the meeting. The summary of salient aspects of the meeting from TRAFFIC’s perspective. report of the Chair of the Animals Unless otherwise stated, amendments to the Appendices adopted at CoP15 Committee (document CoP15 Doc. entered into force 90 days after the meeting, that is on 23 June 2010. Official 7.2.1) and the report of the Chair of the proceedings of CoP15 will be published by the CITES Secretariat. Plants Committee (document CoP15 His Excellency the Minister of Environment, Abdulla bin Mubarak bin Doc. 7.3.1) were noted by the meeting. Aboud Al-Madadi; the Executive Director of UNEP, Mr Achim Steiner; and Additionally, it was decided to carry the Secretary-General of CITES, Mr Willem Wijnstekers, welcomed parti- forward matters arising from the cipants to the meeting. The nomination of Sheikh Doctor Faleh bin Nasser documents, namely to refer the question Al-Thani as Chair of the meeting was accepted by acclamation, as were the of extending the validity of Decision nominations of Mr John Donaldson (South Africa) and Mr Wilbur Dovey 13.93 on the periodic review of Felidae (New Zealand) as Chairs of Committees I and II, respectively. The meeting to Committee II, and to refer the issue was opened by Sheikh Doctor Faleh bin Nasser Al-Thani following a display of potential conflicts of interest in the of Qatari ceremonial processions, chants and dances. Animals and Plants Committees to the TRAFFIC report of the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES 1 CoP15 article for the website_Layout 1 01/02/2011 14:49 Page 2 C I T E S C o P 1 5 Standing Committee. Other significant items from the biodiversity; addressing wildlife crime; awareness- and reports are recorded under subject-specific sections of this capacity-raising; and enforcement of forestry and fisheries summary. laws. 10. Co-operation with other organizations 14. CITES and livelihoods Document CoP15 Doc. 10.1 on synergy with At its 57th meeting (SC57), in 2008, the Standing biodiversity-related international initiatives—specifically Committee agreed on the creation of the Working Group post-2010 biodiversity targets, the Biodiversity Indicators on CITES and Livelihoods and the chair of this group Partnership, the Intergovernmental Platform on presented document CoP15 Doc. 14 in Committee II. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), and This document reported on progress with Decision 14.3 climate change—had been prepared by the Secretariat and (to develop tools for Parties to assess the impacts of CITES contained draft decisions relating to the engagement of decisions on livelihoods and guidelines to address these). CITES with these initiatives. Following requests in A draft resolution in Annex 1 of the document set out key Committee I for some refocusing of the decisions and principles on CITES and livelihoods and draft decisions redefinement of parameters for engagement, the decisions in Annex 2 were for the Standing Committee to continue on IPBES and climate change were redrafted by a working the Working Group so that it could finalize the tools and group. They, and the decisions on Biodiversity Indicators guidelines, and for the Secretariat to co-ordinate review of Partnership and post-2010 biodiversity targets, were these by the Parties. There was much support for contin- subsequently adopted (Decisions 15.10–15.17), establish - uation of the Working Group. The draft resolution was ing preliminary or continued interaction between CITES supported by Malaysia and Mexico, but the European and these biodiversity-related initiatives, and requiring Union (EU) and St Lucia considered that the Standing reports on developments to CoP16. Committee should revise this, in time for CoP16, and the current version was then rejected. The draft decisions The Secretariat presented document CoP15 Doc. 10.2 in received general support. Once they had been amended to plenary session, reporting on areas related to CITES co- reflect the aim of revising the draft resolution and to operation with the Food and Agriculture Organization of include in the decision directed to the Secretariat a deadline the United Nations (FAO) since CoP14. There was for revision of the tools and guidelines mentioned in minimal discussion of the document but, in response to a Decision 14.3, they were adopted (Decisions 15.5–15.7). proposal from China, a draft decision directed to the Standing Committee was adopted (Decision 15.18) to 16. Capacity building analyse the current Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between CITES and FAO, determine co-operation between In document CoP15 Doc. 16.1, the Secretariat gave a the two bodies on forestry issues and ensure co-operation report on its activities to improve national and regional in general was within the framework of the MoU. efforts to implement the Convention, including work on an EU-funded project to identify underlying problems In document CoP15 Doc. 10.4, the Chair of the Plants affecting CITES implementation in developing countries, Committee reported on CITES activities in collaboration and collaboration with non-governmental organizations with the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) (NGOs) on CITES-related training. The report also and other aspects of the Convention on Biological recommended extension of the validity of Decision 14.10 Diversity (CBD) relating to flora. A draft decision in Support to Master’s programmes which, with support from Annex 2 of the document, essentially for further strategic Antigua and Barbuda, Chile, China and South Africa, was collaboration of this kind, was adopted by consensus agreed. Saudi Arabia stressed the need for training (Decision 15.19). materials in more languages, including Arabic. Benin, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Kenya cited obstacles There was provision within the agenda for statements from to CITES implementation in Africa and Fiji noted the representatives of other conventions and agreements on threat to the economies of small developing countries their CITES-related activities and interventions and these posed by trade suspensions for non-compliance with were heard from the Convention on Migratory Species CITES. Australia, on behalf of the Oceania region, and (CMS); the International Tropical Timber Organization Kenya put forward draft decisions directed to the (ITTO); and the World Customs Organization (WCO). Secretariat to support capacity-building in their regions, The Global Tiger Forum had submitted information to the including via meetings to be held before SC62. These meeting via document CoP15 Inf. 71. decisions were adopted (Decisions 15.21–15.22). 11. Co-operation with international financial institutions Committee I noted the Secretariat’s report on the Inter - national Expert Workshop on Non-detriment Findings in This item was introduced but not discussed during the document CoP15 Doc. 16.2.1. It also considered the meeting, but the World Bank submitted document CoP15 report of the Animals and Plants Committees on the Inf. 61, which set out its co-operation offered to CITES Workshop in document CoP15 Doc. 16.2.2 and adopted Parties covering a range of issues: investment in slightly amended versions of the draft decisions in its 2 TRAFFIC report of the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES CoP15 article for the website_Layout 1 01/02/2011 14:49 Page 3 C I T E S C o P 1 5 annex. These were decisions to further and improve was adopted (Decision 15.74) after inclusion of a Parties’ use of non-detriment findings (NDFs) based on provision put forward by Rwanda for greater involvement the outcome of the Workshop and to review guidance on of elephant range States in the review, and after a modifi- NDFs at CoP16 (Decisions 15.23–15.25 ). The cation suggested by the USA to direct the decision to the amendment to the decision directed to the Secretariat Standing Committee, rather than to the Secretariat.