DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Research Online Oro.Open.Ac.Uk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Research Online Oro.Open.Ac.Uk Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Taxonomy and phytogeography of the Cactaceae of eastern Brazil Thesis How to cite: Taylor, Nigel Paul (2000). Taxonomy and phytogeography of the Cactaceae of eastern Brazil. PhD thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2000 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.0000d49b Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Nigel Paul Taylor, BSe (Hons), Botany TAXONOMY AND PHYTOGEOGRAPHY 2 OF THE CACTACEAE OF 3 6 6 EASTERN BRAZIL .... 15 .... 15 .... 17 .... 26 ... 29 .... 30 ... 34 ... 34 ... 38 Thesis for the award of 'Doctor of Philosophy' ... 39 ... 41 .. 43 Life Sciences ... 47 .. 69 .. 72 The Open University ... 75 .... 78 October 2000 ... 90 ... 96 .. 99 . 108 .148 . 157 . 166 189 . 192 194 198 200 205 215 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Sponsoring Establishment) f>I u-n-t o~ N 6 . 1 Supplement 1* FORMAL TAXONOMIC TREATMENT OF TIlE CACTACEAE OF EASTERN BRAZIL CONTENTS Introductory notes ...... ........................ .... ... .... ............ .... ....... ... .... ....... ............ ............................ .......... ................... .... 2 Artificial Key to Genera ............. ................................................................................................................................. 3 Pereskioideae .............................. ........................................................ ......................................................................... 6 Pereskia .:...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Opuntioideae ............................................................................................................... ................................................ 15 Quiabentia .................................................................................................................................................... 15 Tacinga ......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Brasiliopuntia ............................................................................................................................................... 26 Nopalea ........................................................................................................................................................ 29 Opuntia ......................................................................................................................................................... 30 Cactoideae ................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Hylocereus ............................................................................................ ........................................................ 34 Selenicereus .... : ............................................................................................................................................. 38 Epiphyllum ................................................................................................................................................... 39 Pseudoacanthocereus ......................................................................................... ........................ .................. 41 Lepismium .................................................................................................................................................... 43 Rhipsalis ....................................................................................................................................................... 47 Hatiora ......................................................................................................................................................... 69 Schlumbergera ............................................................................................................ ............................ ..... 72 Brasilicereus ................................................................................................................................................. 75 Cereus ............................................................................................................................................................ 78 Cipocereus ................. ...................................... ....... ................................................... ................. .................. 90 Stephanocereus ................................................................................................................................ ............. 96 Arrojadoa ..................................................................................................................................................... 99 Pilosocereus ................................................................................................................................................ 108 Micranthocereus .......................................................................................................................................... 148 Coleocephalocereus .................................................................................................................................... 157 Melocactus ................................................................................................................................................... 166 Harrisia ....................................................................................................................................................... 189 Leocereus ..................................................................................................................................................... 192 Facheiroa .................................................................................................................................................... 194 Espostoopsis ................................................................................................................................................ 198 Arthrocereus ................................................................................................................................................ 200 Discocactus ................................................................................................................................................. 205 Uebelmannia ............................................................................................................................................... 215 * This appendix is a work to which the thesis makes frequent reference. It is not part of the thesis itself and hence has not been presented in double-spaced format. Some of the data it contains have been compiled with the assistance of Dr Daniela C. Zappi. NPT. 1 2 FORMAL TAXONOMIC TREATMENT OF THE CACTACEAE OF EASTERN BRAZIL Introductory notes As its scope this account attempts to include all taxa of Cactaceae that are native, naturalized or commonly cultivated outdoors in North-eastern Brazil, and in South-eastern Brazil north of 22°S and east of 46°W (entries for non-native taxa are indicated by an asterisk [*] below). However, the focus from the start has been on the terrestrial, rather than epiphytic taxa, the former having a centre of high endemism in the dry environments comprising south-eastern Piaui, southernmost Ceara, the southern half of Paraiba, mainland Pernambuco, Bahia, Alagoas, Sergipe, Espirito Santo, most of Minas Gerais and the northern half of Rio de Janeiro (Map 1, Chapter 4). While epiphytic taxa native within this area are fully treated below, their main centre of diversity in SE Brazil, around 22-26°S, has been intentionally excluded, since a preliminary account of the all­ important tribe Rhipsalideae was published quite recently (Barthlott & Taylor 1995). Except where expressly limited, synonymy aims to be comprehensive for names based on Brazilian types (Southern Brazil excepted), but all relevant botanical nomenclature is included in the Index to names and epithets (page 208). Vernacular names are also included from various sources, ego Menezes (1949). The morphological descriptions do not aim in principle to account for all aspects of the plant, but are meant to be primarily diagnostic, supplementing details in the dichotomous keys to facilitate identification. In some cases they are comprehensive where the data have been available or when the differences between taxa are particularly subtle. Details mentioned in descriptions of genera, subgenera or other infrageneric categories, which apply to all subordinate taxa, are not always repeated in those of the included species etc. Unqualified measurements refer to length (or height in the case of erect plants); those connected by a multiplication sign ( x ) refer to length followed by width/diameter and, occasionally, also thickness, in the case of laterally compressed structures. Dimensions of the whole plant or its stem are always given exclusive of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morphology and Anatomy of Rhipsalis Cereuscula, Rhipsalis Floccosa Subsp
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 82: 131-143, 2011 Morphology and anatomy of Rhipsalis cereuscula, Rhipsalis floccosa subsp. hohenauensis and Lepismium cruciforme (Cactaceae) seedlings Morfología y anatomía de las plántulas de Rhipsalis cereuscula, Rhipsalis floccosa subsp. hohe- nauensis y Lepismium cruciforme (Cactaceae) Alan C. Secorun and Luiz Antonio de Souza* Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Avenida Colombo, 5790, (87020-900) Maringá, Paraná, Brasil. *Correspondent: [email protected] Abstract. Rhipsalis cereuscula Haw., Rhipsalis floccosa subsp. hohenauensis (F. Ritter) Barthlott et N. P. Taylor and Lepismium cruciforme (Vellozo) Miquel are obligatory epiphytes that occur frequently on tree trunks of remnant forests in Maringa, Paraná state, Brazil. Morphological and anatomical analyses regarding the seedlings were carried out. The seedlings were prepared according to techniques of resin inclusions and histochemical tests. Seedlings were phanerocotyledonar and originated from seeds with operculum. The root was diarch and the hypocotyl presented transition root-stem structure. The cotyledons were sessile, reduced, with homogeneous mesophyll. The epicotyl (phylloclade) presented a lot of parenchyma and reduced vascular cylinder. The 3 studied species showed anatomical characteristics similar to those described for species of Lepismium and Rhipsalis as well as other cacti. Key words: epiphyte, root, hypocotyl, cotyledons, epicotyl, areola. Resumen. Rhipsalis cereuscula Haw., Rhipsalis floccosa subsp. hohenauensis (F. Ritter) Barthlott et N. P. Taylor y Lepismium cruciforme (Vellozo) Miquel son epífitos obligatorios que frecuentemente habitan en los troncos del árbol de matorrales secundarios de Maringá, Paraná, Brasil. Se analizaron la morfología y anatomía de las plántulas de estas especies. Las plántulas fueron procesadas según las técnicas de inclusión en resina y pruebas histoquímicas.
    [Show full text]
  • Cactaceae) Endêmicas Dos Campos Rupestres De Minas Gerais, Brasil
    Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Vegetal Ecologia da germinação e potencial para formação de banco de sementes de espécies de Arthrocereus A. Berger (Cactaceae) endêmicas dos campos rupestres de Minas Gerais, Brasil Ana Loureiro Cheib Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto de Ciências Biológicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Biologia Vegetal. Orientadora: Dra. Queila de Souza Garcia Belo Horizonte, Fevereiro de 2009 Agradecimentos À minha orientadora, Professora Queila de Souza Garcia, pelos conselhos, amizade e paciência; à Dra. Yule Roberta Ferreira Nunes, ao Dr. José Pires de Lemos Filho e ao Dr. José Eugênio Cortes Figueira, por terem aceitado participar da banca; aos amigos do laboratório, em especial, aos colegas Patrícia Oliveira, Victor Giorni, Letícia Soares e Fernando Marino Santos, e aos companheiros de viagens Marina Dutra e Ubirajara; à CAPES, pela concessão da bolsa; ao IBAMA e ao IEF, pelas licenças de coleta concedidas; ao Parque Estadual do Ibitipoca, pelo alojamento; aos motoristas do ICB, Valdísio, Messias e Luiz; à todos os funcionários e técnicos do Departamento de Botânica; à todos os amigos da biologia; ao Leandro Arruda pelo carinho e ajuda em todas as etapas; à família, por todo o apoio e paciência; e à Deus, pela complexa natureza que nos fascina; obrigada! 1 SUMÁRIO RESUMO .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Lacks Stem Succulents but Is It Depauperate in Plants With
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Australia lacks stem succulents but is it depauperate in plants with crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM)? 1,2 3 3 Joseph AM Holtum , Lillian P Hancock , Erika J Edwards , 4 5 6 Michael D Crisp , Darren M Crayn , Rowan Sage and 2 Klaus Winter In the flora of Australia, the driest vegetated continent, [1,2,3]. Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), a water- crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), the most water-use use efficient form of photosynthesis typically associated efficient form of photosynthesis, is documented in only 0.6% of with leaf and stem succulence, also appears poorly repre- native species. Most are epiphytes and only seven terrestrial. sented in Australia. If 6% of vascular plants worldwide However, much of Australia is unsurveyed, and carbon isotope exhibit CAM [4], Australia should host 1300 CAM signature, commonly used to assess photosynthetic pathway species [5]. At present CAM has been documented in diversity, does not distinguish between plants with low-levels of only 120 named species (Table 1). Most are epiphytes, a CAM and C3 plants. We provide the first census of CAM for the mere seven are terrestrial. Australian flora and suggest that the real frequency of CAM in the flora is double that currently known, with the number of Ellenberg [2] suggested that rainfall in arid Australia is too terrestrial CAM species probably 10-fold greater. Still unpredictable to support the massive water-storing suc- unresolved is the question why the large stem-succulent life — culent life-form found amongst cacti, agaves and form is absent from the native Australian flora even though euphorbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Backebergia Militaris (Audot) H. Bravo Hollis Backebergia Militaris (Audot) H
    2021/09/24 13:59 1/18 BACKEBERGIA MILITARIS (AUDOT) H. BRAVO HOLLIS BACKEBERGIA MILITARIS (AUDOT) H. BRAVO HOLLIS CACTUS & Co. 2 (8) 2004 Version pdf INTRODUCTION Backebergia militaris (H. Bravo ex Sánchez- Mejorada, 1973) has always been a difficult plant for which to find a taxonomical position. It is included in the tribe Pachycereeae Buxbaum, sub-tribe Pachycere- inae Buxbaum. However, its morphology and life cycle are distinct from those of all the other taxa included. Furthermore, it has a character which is unique in the whole Cactaceae family, that is, it bears an inflores- cence with genetically determinate growth, a decidu- ous one, which for this exclusive character deserves a specific term, that I define as “Tiponche” (pron. teep- ònche), from the vernacular name by which the species is known in its distribution area. The present paper describes for the first time the deciduous character of the inflorescence, and how this adaptation influences the dynamics of the life cycle of B. militaris. Furthermore, its functional significance is investigated, and related to a probable, sophisticated mutual symbiosis between the plant and a lepidopter- an of the Pyraloidea, of a yet undetermined species. This study is the result of bibliographic research and of observations carried out both in the wild, dur- ing a survey in March 1994 in a locality within the dis- tribution area of B. militaris, and with the dissection of authorized 1) samples collected on the same occasion. NOTES ON THE STUDIES CARRIED OUT ON BACKEBERGIA MILITARIS The species was discovered some 150 years ago, but the encounters between B.
    [Show full text]
  • Acanthocereus Tetragonus SCORE: 16.0 RATING: High Risk (L.) Hummelinck
    TAXON: Acanthocereus tetragonus SCORE: 16.0 RATING: High Risk (L.) Hummelinck Taxon: Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Hummelinck Family: Cactaceae Common Name(s): barbed-wire cactus Synonym(s): Acanthocereus occidentalis Britton & Rose chaco Acanthocereus pentagonus (L.) Britton & Rose sword-pear Acanthocereus pitajaya sensu Croizat triangle cactus Cactus pentagonus L. Cactus tetragonus L. Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 1 Nov 2018 WRA Score: 16.0 Designation: H(HPWRA) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Spiny, Agricultural Weed, Environmental Weed, Dense Thickets, Bird-Dispersed Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y
    [Show full text]
  • Elaboración De Una Guía Ilustrada De Cactáceas En Honduras
    Elaboración de una guía ilustrada de Cactáceas en Honduras Juan Pablo Schulze Rojas ZAMORANO Carrera de Desarrollo Socioeconómico y Ambiente Diciembre, 2004 i Elaboración de una guía ilustrada de Cactáceas en Honduras Proyecto especial presentado como requisito parcial para optar al título de Ingeniero en Desarrollo Socioeconómico y Ambiente en el Grado Académico de Licenciatura. Presentado por: Juan Pablo Schulze Rojas Honduras Diciembre, 2004 ii El autor concede a Zamorano permiso para reproducir y distribuir copias de este trabajo para fines educativos. Para otras personas físicas o jurídicas se reservan los derechos de autor. ________________________________ Juan Pablo Schulze Rojas Honduras Diciembre, 2004 iii Elaboración de una guía ilustrada de Cactáceas en Honduras Presentado por Juan Pablo Schulze Rojas Aprobada: __________________________ __________________________ José L. Linares, Ing. Agr. Mayra Falck, M.Sc. Asesor Principal Coordinadora de la Carrera de Desarrollo Socioeconómico y Ambiente __________________________ __________________________ George Pilz, Ph.D. Aurelio Revilla, M.S.A. Asesor Decano Académico Interino __________________________ Kenneth L. Hoadley, D.B.A. Rector iv DEDICATORIA A mi mamá Toya. A mi papá Juanca. A mi hermano Javier. A Claire. A mis abuelitos. A mis compañeros. A todos los que me apoyaron. A la naturaleza. A la esperanza por la PAZ. v AGRADECIMIENTOS A José L. Linares, por su asesoría, alegría y buena cocina. Al Dr. Pilz, por la tranquilidad. A mis padres, por todo su gran apoyo, soporte, aguante y cariño brindado. A Javier por ser mi hermano. A los clanes Rojas y Muñoz-Reyes, por haberme acogido. A los Babos, por ser un ejemplo de valores. A la Mimi, por su alegría.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Vascular Epiphytic Flora of Uruguay
    Acta Botanica Brasilica doi: 10.1590/0102-33062019abb0059 Catalogue of the vascular epiphytic flora of Uruguay Patricia Mai1* , Andrés Rossado2 , José Mauricio Bonifacino2,3 and Jorge Luiz Waechter4 Received: February 21, 2019 Accepted: June 17, 2019 . ABSTRACT We provide an updated list of the vascular epiphytic flora occurring in native environments of Uruguay based on literature review, herbarium specimens, and fieldwork throughout the country. The catalogue provides standardized information for each species, including accepted name, synonyms used within Uruguay, epiphytic category, distribution within the country, habitat, conservation status, observations, and a voucher citation. The effort documented 73 species for the epiphytic flora of Uruguay (3 % of the flora), distributed among 29 genera and 12 families. Bromeliaceae was the richest family (17), followed by Polypodiaceae (16) and Orchidaceae (12). Tillandsia stood out as the most speciose genus with 15 species. Characteristic holoepiphytes was the most diverse ecological category. More than half of the epiphytic species documented for Uruguay (53 %) reach their southernmost geographic distribution in the country, whereas only two mostly epipetric species of Tillandsia — T. arequitae and T. uruguayensis — are endemic to the country. Almost half of the epiphytic species found are presently under categories of threat of extinction, with 60 % of them occurring in national protected areas. Both the richest epiphytic families and the predominance of characteristic holoepiphytes coincide with findings from floristic and ecological studies previously carried out in humid subtropical regions. Keywords: conservation status, epiphytic category, geographic distribution, hemiepiphytes, holoepiphytes, subtropical forests, Uruguay, vascular epiphytes The most recent estimation of vascular epiphytes in the Introduction world reports 27,614 species, distributed in 73 families and 913 genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Cactus (Opuntia Spp.) As Forage 169
    Cactus (Opuntia spp.) as forage 169 Food •••A.gricultv,.. Org•nU.taon or United -N••lon• FAO Cactus (Opuntiaspp.) PLANT PRODUCTION as forage AND PROTECTlON PAPER 169 Ed~ed by Candelario Mondragon-Jacobo lnstituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias (INIFAP) Mexico and Salvador Perez-Gonzalez Universidad Aut6noma de Queretaro Mexico Coordinated for FAD by Enrique Arias Horticultural Crops Group Stephen G. Reynolds Grassland and Pasture Crops Group FAO Plant Production and Protection Division and Manuel D. sanchez Feed Resources Group FAO Animal Production and HeaHh Division Produced within the frameworl< of the FAO International Technical Cooperation Networl< ot on Cactus Pear ••u nttttd• NaUon• Rome,2001 Reprinted 2002 The designations “developed” and “developing” economies are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgement about the stage reached by a particular country, country territory or area in the development process. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations or of their affiliated organization(s). The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ISBN 92-5-104705-7 All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    SYSTEMATICS OF TRIBE TRICHOCEREEAE AND POPULATION GENETICS OF Haageocereus (CACTACEAE) By MÓNICA ARAKAKI MAKISHI A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 Mónica Arakaki Makishi 2 To my parents, Bunzo and Cristina, and to my sisters and brother. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I want to express my deepest appreciation to my advisors, Douglas Soltis and Pamela Soltis, for their consistent support, encouragement and generosity of time. I would also like to thank Norris Williams and Michael Miyamoto, members of my committee, for their guidance, good disposition and positive feedback. Special thanks go to Carlos Ostolaza and Fátima Cáceres, for sharing their knowledge on Peruvian Cactaceae, and for providing essential plant material, confirmation of identifications, and their detailed observations of cacti in the field. I am indebted to the many individuals that have directly or indirectly supported me during the fieldwork: Carlos Ostolaza, Fátima Cáceres, Asunción Cano, Blanca León, José Roque, María La Torre, Richard Aguilar, Nestor Cieza, Olivier Klopfenstein, Martha Vargas, Natalia Calderón, Freddy Peláez, Yammil Ramírez, Eric Rodríguez, Percy Sandoval, and Kenneth Young (Peru); Stephan Beck, Noemí Quispe, Lorena Rey, Rosa Meneses, Alejandro Apaza, Esther Valenzuela, Mónica Zeballos, Freddy Centeno, Alfredo Fuentes, and Ramiro Lopez (Bolivia); María E. Ramírez, Mélica Muñoz, and Raquel Pinto (Chile). I thank the curators and staff of the herbaria B, F, FLAS, LPB, MO, USM, U, TEX, UNSA and ZSS, who kindly loaned specimens or made information available through electronic means. Thanks to Carlos Ostolaza for providing seeds of Haageocereus tenuis, to Graham Charles for seeds of Blossfeldia sucrensis and Acanthocalycium spiniflorum, to Donald Henne for specimens of Haageocereus lanugispinus; and to Bernard Hauser and Kent Vliet for aid with microscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Ecology, Cultivation and Uses of Cactus Pear
    CROP ECOLOGY, CULTIVATION AND USES OF CACTUS PEAR Advance draft prepared for the IX INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CACTUS PEAR AND COCHINEAL CAM crops for a hotter and drier world Coquimbo, Chile, 26-30 March 2017 CROP ECOLOGY, CULTIVATION AND USES OF CACTUS PEAR Editorial team Prof. Paolo Inglese, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Italy; General Coordinator Of the Cactusnet Dr. Candelario Mondragon, INIFAP, Mexico Dr. Ali Nefzaoui, ICARDA, Tunisia Prof. Carmen Sáenz, Universidad de Chile, Chile Coordination team Makiko Taguchi, FAO Harinder Makkar, FAO Mounir Louhaichi, ICARDA Editorial support Ruth Duffy Book design and layout Davide Moretti, Art&Design − Rome Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas Rome, 2017 The designations employed and the FAO encourages the use, reproduction and presentation of material in this information dissemination of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any product. Except where otherwise indicated, opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food material may be copied, downloaded and Agriculture Organization of the United and printed for private study, research Nations (FAO), or of the International Center and teaching purposes, or for use in non- for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas commercial products or services, provided (ICARDA) concerning the legal or development that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO status of any country, territory, city or area as the source and copyright holder is given or of its authorities, or concerning the and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • South American Cacti in Time and Space: Studies on the Diversification of the Tribe Cereeae, with Particular Focus on Subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae)
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2013 South American Cacti in time and space: studies on the diversification of the tribe Cereeae, with particular focus on subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae) Lendel, Anita Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-93287 Dissertation Published Version Originally published at: Lendel, Anita. South American Cacti in time and space: studies on the diversification of the tribe Cereeae, with particular focus on subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae). 2013, University of Zurich, Faculty of Science. South American Cacti in Time and Space: Studies on the Diversification of the Tribe Cereeae, with Particular Focus on Subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae) _________________________________________________________________________________ Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr.sc.nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Anita Lendel aus Kroatien Promotionskomitee: Prof. Dr. H. Peter Linder (Vorsitz) PD. Dr. Reto Nyffeler Prof. Dr. Elena Conti Zürich, 2013 Table of Contents Acknowledgments 1 Introduction 3 Chapter 1. Phylogenetics and taxonomy of the tribe Cereeae s.l., with particular focus 15 on the subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae – Cactoideae) Chapter 2. Floral evolution in the South American tribe Cereeae s.l. (Cactaceae: 53 Cactoideae): Pollination syndromes in a comparative phylogenetic context Chapter 3. Contemporaneous and recent radiations of the world’s major succulent 86 plant lineages Chapter 4. Tackling the molecular dating paradox: underestimated pitfalls and best 121 strategies when fossils are scarce Outlook and Future Research 207 Curriculum Vitae 209 Summary 211 Zusammenfassung 213 Acknowledgments I really believe that no one can go through the process of doing a PhD and come out without being changed at a very profound level.
    [Show full text]
  • CACSS Seed Depot
    CACSS Seed Depot Sold for $1 per packet to members by the Propagation Education Group (PEG) Genus Species Common Name ID Adenium 142 Seed Origin Collection/ Collector's # Purity Date Collected Unknown Quantity Packets Available Dave's Garden Link 1 Genus Species Common Name ID Adenium hybrid - double white Desert Rose 3 Seed Origin Collection/ Collector's # Purity Date Collected Quantity Packets Available Dave's Garden Link 2 Genus Species Common Name ID Adenium Thai soco 141 Seed Origin Collection/ Collector's # Purity Date Collected Unknown Quantity Packets Available Dave's Garden Link 1 Genus Species Common Name ID Aeonium urbicum Saucer Plant 133 Seed Origin Collection/ Collector's # Purity Date Collected Open-Pollinated 8/28/16 Quantity Packets Available Dave's Garden Link 8 http://davesgarden.com/guides/pf/go/55105/ Genus Species Common Name ID Agave colimana 170 Seed Origin Collection/ Collector's # Purity Date Collected Chandler, AZ Open-Pollinated 2019 Quantity Packets Available Dave's Garden Link 11 Sunday, March 8, 2020 Page 1 of 14 Genus Species Common Name ID Aloe harlana 131 Seed Origin Collection/ Collector's # Purity Date Collected Unknown 5/2016 Quantity Packets Available Dave's Garden Link 1 http://davesgarden.com/guides/pf/go/58446/ Genus Species Common Name ID Aloe humilis 130 Seed Origin Collection/ Collector's # Purity Date Collected Unknown 6/2016 Quantity Packets Available Dave's Garden Link 3 Genus Species Common Name ID Asclepias curassavica Tropical Milkweed 59 Seed Origin Collection/ Collector's # Purity Date
    [Show full text]