DOCSLIB.ORG

Bicycling and Walking in the U.S. 2014 Benchmarking Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BICYCLING AND WALKING IN THE UNITED STATES 2 014 BENCHMARKING REPORT BICYCLING AND WALKING IN THE UNITED STATES 2014 BENCHMARKING REPORT Funding for this report was provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. This project was also made possible with support from AARP and the American Public Transportation Association. Copyright © 2014 by Alliance for Biking & Walking The Library of Congress, United States Copyright Office All rights reserved. This report may be reproduced or transmitted with the written permission of the Alliance. Requests should be sent to Alliance for Biking & Walking P.O. Box 65150 Washington, DC 20035 Phone: 202-449-9692 [email protected] www.BikeWalkAlliance.org/Benchmarking.org Cover photo by Bruce Bodjack. Traverse City, MI. Photo by Gabriella Salary. Courtesy of Alliance for Biking & Walking REPORT CREDITS Author, Project Manager: Andrea Milne, Alliance for Biking & Walking Co-Author, Research Assistant: Maggie Melin, Alliance for Biking & Walking Copy Editor: Michelle Milne Data Quality Control: Yolonda Weins Research Consultants: Ralph Buehler, PhD, Virginia Tech John Pucher, PhD, Rutgers University Contributing Writers: Evan Bontrager, Friends of the Pumpkinvine Nature Trail Ralph Buehler, PhD, Virginia Tech Tijs Buskermolen, Goshen College Clarrissa Cabansagan, TransForm Brian Caulfield, Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering; Trinity College, Dublin Alison Dewey, League of American Bicyclists Darren Flusche, Advocacy Advance / League of American Bicyclists Andrea Hamre, Virginia Tech Colin Hughes, Institute for Transportation and Development Policy Mary Lauran Hall, Alliance for Biking & Walking Ken McLeod, Advocacy Advance / League of American Bicyclists John Pucher, PhD, Rutgers University Eloisa Raynault, American Public Health Association Michael Samuelson, Alliance for Biking & Walking, Open Streets Project Hamzat Sani, Red, Bike and Green David Vega-Barachowitz, National Association of City Transportation Officials Kathryn Werntz, The Sahel Calling Project Liz Whiteley, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Susan Wilcox, BikeTexas Benchmarking Review Team: Laurie Beck, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Christopher Douwes, Federal Highway Administration Darren Flusche, Advocacy Advance / League of American Bicyclists Darnell Grisby, American Public Transportation Association Deb Hubsmith, Safe Routes to School National Partnership Jeffrey Miller, Alliance for Biking & Walking Gaya Myers, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Robert Ping, Safe Routes to School National Partnership Gabe Rousseau, PhD, Federal Highway Administration Stephen Skowronski, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Arthur M. Wendel, MD, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Review Committee: Philip J. Caruso, PE, ITE Mike Cyneki, Lee Engineering, LLC Jennifer Donlon Wyant, Alta Planning + Design Yung Koprowski, Lee Engineering, LLC Jina Mahmoudi, PE, ITE Monica Munowitch, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Matthew D. Ridgway, AICP, PTP, Fehr & Peers Edward R. Stollof, AICP, ITE Shawn M. Turner, PE, Texas Transportation Institute ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is the result of hundreds of people working together. The Alliance for Biking & Walking extends special thanks to our partners at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), AARP, and the American Public Transportation Association, whose generous funding ensures the continuation and growth of the Benchmarking Project. In particular, we would like to thank Arthur Wendel and Stephen Skowronski of the CDC’s National Center for Environmental Health for their guidance throughout the report development and for their continued support of the project vision. Additionally, the following agencies and organizations provided funds for the midsized cities pilot benchmarking effort included in this report for the first time: Bicycle Commuters of Anchorage City of Burlington Bike Chattanooga Great Rivers Greenway Bike/Walk Alliance for Missoula Missoula in Motion City of Albany PittsburghTODAY Many thanks to Dr. John Pucher of Rutgers University and Dr. Ralph Buehler of Virginia Tech for contributing their expertise to the research and analysis contained in this report. Thank you to Maggie Melin for her diligent work researching, collecting, and analyzing the mounds of raw data, as well as her contributions to writing and editing text throughout the report. We thank Nicole Wynands and Bill Nesper of the League of American Bicyclists for their collaboration on integrating the benchmarking state survey with the Bicycle Friendly States survey. Additional thanks are due to Michelle Milne (primary content editor) and Yolonda Weins (data quality control) for their meticulous review of the report text and data, ensuring a high quality report. The Benchmarking Report undergoes a rigorous review by a team of researchers and professionals who work with these topics daily in various fields of study. Our review team deserves much appreciation for the time and attention they give to each draft they receive. Their technical critique brings a much-needed multidisciplinary approach to the report. The team includes representatives from the Federal Highway Administration, Institute of Transportation Engineers, League of American Bicyclists, Advocacy Advance, Safe Routes to School National Partnership, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and American Public Transportation Association. Lastly, but most importantly, we thank the leaders of Alliance member organizations and the many state and local officials who supported this project by tracking down data for the benchmarking surveys. This project would not have been possible without them, and it is in support of their vital work that this report has been produced. 2 Alliance for Biking & Walking The following people were directly involved in providing the data contained in this report. Thank you! Activate Omaha, Julie Harris Caltrans, April Nitsos and Paul Moore Active Transportation Alliance / Chicago Department of California Bicycle Coalition, Dave Snyder Transportation, Charlie Short Central Dakota Cyclists, Mark Liebig Ada County Highway District, Matt Edmonds Charleston Moves, Tom Bradford and Pat Sullivan Alabama Department of Transportation, Mary Crenshaw Chattanooga-Hamilton County Regional Planning Agency, Alabama Bicycle Coalition, Stan Palla Tim Moreland Alaska Department of Transportation, Bob Laurie Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, Alaska Trails, Steve Cleary Bryan Davis Arizona Department of Transportation, Michael Sanders City and County of Honolulu, Chris Sayers and Brian Fellows City of Albany, Douglas Melnick, Kate Lawrence, and Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, William Trudeau, Jr. Kim Sanders, Paul Simms, and The Governor's Bicycle City of Arlington Texas, Christina Sebastian and Advisory Group Alicia Winkelblech Atlanta Bicycle Coalition, Rebecca Serna and Leslie Caceda City of Atlanta, Joshuah Mello Baltimore City Department of Transportation, Nate Evans City of Austin, Annick Beaudet and Nadia Barrera Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota, Dorian Grilley City of Baton Rogue/City-Parish of East Baton Rouge Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia, Diana Owens Steif Planning Commission, Warren Kron and Amanda LaGrange Bicycle Coalition of Maine, Nancy Grant City of Bellingham Public Works, Kim Brown Bicycle Coalition of New Mexico, Diane Albert City of Boston, Kristopher Carter Bicycle Colorado, Dan Grunig City of Boulder Public Works for Transportation, Bicycle Commuters of Anchorage, Brian Litmans Marni Ratzel Bicycle Indiana, Nancy Tibbett City of Charleston, Philip Overcash Bicycle Transportation Alliance, Susan Peithman, City of Charlotte Department of Transportation, Rob Sadowksy, and Gerik Kransky Malisa Mccreedy Bike Baton Rouge / Baton Rouge Advocates for Safe Streets, City of Chattanooga / Outdoor Chattanooga and Mark E. Martin Bike Chattanooga, Philip Pugliese Bike Cleveland, Jacob VanSickle City of Chattanooga, Ben Taylor Bike Delaware, John Bare and James Wilson City of Colorado Springs, Kristin Bennett, Anthony Pratt, Bike Denver, Piep Van Heuven and Tim Roberts Bike Easy, Jamie Wine City of Columbus, Leslie Strader Bike Maryland, Carol Silldorff City of Dallas, Max Kalhammer, Keith Manoy, and Jared White Bike Utah, Scott Lyttle City of Davis, Dave Kemp and Jimmy Fong Bike Virginia, Kimberly Likens Perry City of El Paso, Shamori Whitt, David Coronado, and Bike Walk Alliance of NH, Dave Topham Elizabeth Gibson Bike Walk Arkansas, Paxton Roberts City of Eugene, Reed Dunbar, Lee Shoemaker, and Bike Walk Connecticut, Kelly Kennedy Lindsay Selser Bike Walk Mississippi, Melody Moody City of Fort Collins, Tessa Greegor Bike Walk Montana, Melinda Barnes City of Fort Worth, Julia McCleeary Bike Walk Tennessee, Anthony Siracusa City of Fresno, Scott Tyler Bike/Walk Alliance-Wichita, Barry L. Carroll City of Houston Department of Public Works and BikeABQ, Heather Wess Arnold Engineering, Dan Raine Bikemore, Chris Merriam City of Jacksonville Planning and Development Department, James Reed BikePGH, Eric Boerer City of Kansas City, MO, Deb Ridgway BikeTexas, Robin Stallings City of Las Vegas, Connie Diso, Diane Phomninh, and Boston
Recommended publications
  • License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to Operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas

    License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to Operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas

    MEETING DATE: April 17, 2019 PREPARED BY: Crystal Najera, CAP DEPT. DIRECTOR: Karen P. Brust Program Administrator DEPARTMENT: City Manager CITY MANAGER: Karen P. Brust SUBJECT: License Agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC to operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, to execute a license agreement with Gotcha Ride LLC (in substantial form as attached) to operate the North County Coastal Bike Share Pilot Program in the City of Encinitas (Attachment 5). STRATEGIC PLAN: This item is related to the following Strategic Plan focus areas: • Environment—promotes the use of emissions-free bicycles as an alternative mode of transportation. • Transportation—supports a transportation mode that accommodates more people with minimal impact on the community. • Recreation—promotes active lifestyles and community health. • Economic Development—addresses the “last mile” gap between public transit and local businesses and promotes tourism. FISCAL CONSIDERATIONS: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendation. Gotcha will bear the sole cost of deploying and operating the bike share program. Minimal City staff time will be needed to coordinate with Gotcha to ensure that the program operates in a manner beneficial to the City. BACKGROUND: Bike share is a service through which bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a very short-term basis, allowing them to rent a bicycle at one location and return it either at the same location or at a different location within a defined geographic boundary. Transportation, especially travel via single occupancy vehicle, is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions in Encinitas and the North County coastal region.
  • Olathe's Bike Share Implementation Strategy

    Olathe's Bike Share Implementation Strategy

    CITY OF OLATHE + MARC Bike Share Implementation Strategy FEBRUARY 2018 Bike Share Implementation Strategy | 1 2 | City of Olathe Acknowledgements Project Partners Advisory Committee City of Olathe John Andrade – Parks & Recreation Foundation Mid America Regional Council Tim Brady – Olathe Schools Marvin Butler – Fire Captain/Inspector Emily Carrillo – Neighborhood Planning City Staff Coordinator Mike Fields – Community Center Manager Susan Sherman – Assistant City Manager Ashley Follett – Johnson County Department of Michael Meadors – Parks & Recreation Director Health and Enviroment Brad Clay – Deputy Director Parks & Recreation Megan Foreman – Johnson County Department Shawna Davis – Management Intern of Health and Enviroment Lisa Donnelly – Park Project Planner Bubba Goeddert – Olathe Chamber of Commerce Mike Latka – Park Project Coordinator Ben Hart – Parks & Recreation Foundation Linda Voss – Sr. Traffic Engineer Katie Lange – Interpreter Specialist Matt Lee – Mid-America Nazarene University Consultant Team Laurel Lucas – Customer Service, Housing Megan Merryman – Johnson County Parks & BikeWalkKC Recreation District Alta Planning + Design Liz Newman – Sr. Horticulturist Vireo Todd Olmstead – Facility & Housing Assistant Manager Sean Pendley – Sr. Planner Kathy Rankin – Housing Services Manager Bryan Severns – K-State Olathe Jon Spence – Mid-America Nazarene University Drew Stihl – Mid-America Regional Council Brenda Volle – Program Coordinator, Housing Rob Wyrick – Olathe Health Bike Share Implementation Strategy | 3 4 | City of Olathe Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND 11 II. ANALYSIS 15 III. SYSTEM PLANNING 45 IV. IMPLEMENTATION 77 Bike Share Implementation Strategy | 5 6 | City of Olathe Executive Summary Project Goals System Options • Identify how bike share can benefit Olathe. • Bike Library: Bike libraries usually involve a fleet of bicycles that are rented out at a limited • Identify the local demand for bike share in number of staffed kiosks.
  • A Contingent Trip Model for Estimating Rail-Trail Demand

    A Contingent Trip Model for Estimating Rail-Trail Demand

    Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(l), 79-96, 2003 A Contingent Trip Model for Estimating Rail-trail Demand CARTER J. BETZ*, JOHN C. BERGSTROM+ & J, M. BOWKER* *US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 320 Greene Street, Athens, GA 30602-2044, USA. E-mail: [email protected] ‘Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, GA, USA ABSTRACT The authors develop a contingent trip model to estimate the recreation demand for and value of a potential rail-trail site in north-east Georgia. The contingent trip model is an alternative to travel cost modelling useful for ex ante evaluation of proposed recreation resources or management alternatives. The authors estimate the empirical demand for trips using a negative binomial regression specification. Their findings indicate a per-trip consumer surplus rangingfrom US$l8.46 to US$29.23 and a price elasticity of - 0.68. In aggregate, they estimate that the rail-trail would receive approximately 416 213 recreation visits per year by area households and account for a total consumer surplus in excess of US$7.5 million. Introduction Greenways are corridors of protected open space managed for conservation and recreation purposes (President’s Commission on Americans Outdoors (PCAO), 1986). A primary recommendation of the PCAO during the Reagan administra- tion was the development of a national network of greenways characterized by local, grassroots activism. Although greenways have existed in various forms for many years, it was not until the PCAO report and the founding of the Rails-to-trails Conservancy (RTC) in 1986 that greenways finally gained wide- spread recognition as practical and cost-efficient recreation and conservation resources.
  • City of Reston Bike Share Feasibility Study

    City of Reston Bike Share Feasibility Study

    City of Reston BikeReston Share Bike Feasibility Share Feasibility Study Study Fairfax County Final Report FinalJune Report2011 PREPAREDJune 2014 BY: Alta Planning + Design PREPARED BY: AltaPREPARED Planning FOR: + Design Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments PREPAREDon behalf of FOR: MetropolitanFairfax County Washington Department Council of Transportation of Governments on behalf of Fairfax County Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 3 2 WHAT IS BIKE SHARING? ............................................................................................................... 5 2.1 DEVELOPMENT OF BIKE SHARE TECHNOLOGY .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 SYSTEM ELEMENTS ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.3 LOCAL BIKE SHARE SYSTEM .................................................................................................................. 8 2.4 FUNDING AND PRICING OF BIKE SHARE SYSTEMS ..................................................................................... 9 3 BIKE SHARING IN RESTON ..........................................................................................................
  • Trail of the Coeur D'alenes

    Trail of the Coeur D'alenes

    map A TRULY UNIQUE TRAIL Now, the trail itself is part of the environmental cleanup in a partner- ship between the Union Pacific The "Trail of the Coeur d’Alenes" is one Railroad, the U.S. Government, the of the most spectacular and popular State of Idaho and the Coeur d’Alene trails in the western United States. Tribe. The thick layer of asphalt on the Here, you will find 73 miles of newly laid trail and the gravel barriers along the asphalt that’s perfect for road bikers and trail serve to isolate the contami- in-line skaters. nants and allow the area to be The Trail of the Coeur d’Alenes used once again. Although not nearly spans the Panhandle of all of the trail is susceptible to Idaho as it runs along rivers, recontamination, it’s best to use beside lakes and through Idaho’s caution and follow trail rules. historic Silver Valley. The section between Plummer and Harrison has been thoroughly cleaned and is not susceptible to recontamination. Because the section between Harrison and Mullan is vulnerable to flooding, contami- nants may be in the soil around the trail. Please stay on the trail The unique- and in ness of the trail isn’t simply the desig- beautiful scenery and attractions along nated its route, but it’s an innovative solution picnic areas. to the environmental problems caused by the early miners in the Valley. Silver was discovered in the Valley PROTECT YOURSELF BY around 1884 and construction of the rail line to support the growing mining and FOLLOWING THE RULES timber industries was started in 1888.
  • Safety and Etiquette Guide

    Safety and Etiquette Guide

    SAFETY GUIDELINES A Trail for Everyone, About the Montour Trail No Matter Their Abilities! Honored by the Pennsylvania Department of Natural Resources People with physical disabilities are welcome to use Trail Rules for ALL USERS as the state’s 2017 Trail of the the Montour Trail, and the Council’s mobility-impaired Year, the Montour Trail is the policies address their special needs. All trail users are expected to obey the following rules, longest suburban rail-trail in the which are posted at all major trailheads: • Wheelchairs are always permitted, whether U.S., encompassing 63 miles. 1. No motorized vehicles powered or not. Running through communities west and south of • Other powered mobility devices are allowed if they 2. Keep right, except to pass Pittsburgh, the trail follows the abandoned rights of way are less than 36 inches wide and travel less than 3. Warn before passing of the Montour Railroad and the Peters Creek branch of 15 mph under their own power on a level surface. 4. Stay on the trail the Pennsylvania Railroad. • E-bikes, which are pedal devices with an electric 5. Leash your pet assist motor, must meet certain conditions: power The Montour Trail connects Pittsburgh International 6. Trail open daily, dawn to dusk rating less than 750 watts, weight under 100 Airport to the Great Allegheny Passage (GAP), which pounds, and top speed 15 mph. joins up with the C&O Canal Towpath that leads to 7. Camp only in designated areas Washington, DC. • Devices powered by internal combustion engines 8. No horses are never permitted on the Montour Trail.
  • KKKR – Közbringa

    KKKR – Közbringa

    KKKR – közbringa Közbringa versus kerékpárkölcsönzés – áttekintés Közbringa Kerékpárkölcsönzés általában speciális kerékpárok szériakerékpárok a városi közlekedés egyik alágazata elsősorban turisztikai céllal felvevő- és leadópont különbözik felvevő- és leadópont azonos ingyenesség vagy kedvező, majd progresszív régiónként eltérő, de mindenképpen magasabb, díjszabás degresszív díjszabás szabályosan felszerelt kerékpárok gyakran hiányosan felszerelt kerékpárok városi/önkormányzati szolgáltatás magánvállalkozás A közbringa rövid története Az első KKKR rendszer Amsterdamban épült ki az 1960-as évek közepén, mely teljességgel bizalmi alapon állt, azaz regisztrációs és díjfizetési kötelezettség nélkül. Ugyanakkor a vonzó feltételek okozták a rendszer bukását is: a számos kerékpárlopás miatt a rendszert néhány hónappal beindítása után fel kellett számolni. Az első sikeres közbringa-rendszert a franciák üzemeltették az 1970-es években, La Rochelle városában. A La Rochelle-i példát a világon számos város vette át az 1990-es években – ekkor volt az első nagy „közbringa-boom” –, igaz, ezek közül sok dőlt be a sorozatos lopások és értelmetlen vandalizmus, vagy éppen a politikai támogatás hiánya miatt. Néhány azonban – így például a Koppenhágában működő ByCyklen (1995) – napjainkig létezik. A második közbringa-hullám a 2000-es évekre tehető: számos európai nagyváros állított fel saját közbringa- hálózatot: az amszterdami központú (és szinte az egész országot lefedő) 2002-es „OV-fiets”; a 2003-ban indult bécsi „Citybike”; a 2003-as berlini „Call a Bike”; a 2007-ben indult párizsi „Vélib’”; vagy éppen a 2010-es londoni „Barcalays Cycle Hire” (avagy közkeletű nevén – Boris Johnson, London polgármestere után elnevezve – a „Boris Bikes”) mind-mind azóta is működő és sikeres hálózatok. Sőt, ami a legfontosabb, a politikai akarat is segíti működésüket. Közbringa-generációk Első generáció: a szabadon vihető Az első generációs közbringa-rendszerek mindenféle megkötés nélkül vehetők igénybe.
  • Public Bicycle Schemes

    Public Bicycle Schemes

    Division 44 Water, Energy and Transport Recommended Reading and Links on Public Bicycle Schemes September 2010 Reading List on Public Bicycle Schemes Preface Various cities around the world are trying methods to encourage bicycling as a sustainable transport mode. Among those methods in encouraging cycling implementing public bicycle schemes is one. The public bicycle schemes are also known as bicycle sharing systems, community bicycling schemes etc., The main idea of a public bicycle system is that the user need not own a bicycle but still gain the advantages of bicycling by renting a bicycle provided by the scheme for a nominal fee or for free of charge (as in some cities). Most of these schemes enable people to realize one way trips, because the users needn’t to return the bicycles to the origin, which will avoid unnecessary travel. Public bicycle schemes provide not only convenience for trips in the communities, they can also be a good addition to the public transport system. Encouraging public bike systems have shown that there can be numerous short that could be made by a bicycle instead of using motorised modes. Public bike schemes also encourage creative designs in bikes and also in the operational mechanisms. The current document is one of the several efforts of GTZ-Sustainable Urban Transport Project to bring to the policymakers an easy to access list of available material on Public Bike Schemes (PBS) which can be used in their everyday work. The document aims to list out some influential and informative resources that highlight the importance of PBS in cities and how the existing situation could be improved.
  • City Bike Hire Schemes

    City Bike Hire Schemes

    1 1 City Bike Hire Schemes - Emerging Trends in Europe 2 3 4 Stephen Parkes 5 6 Institute for Transport Studies 7 University of Leeds 8 Leeds 9 LS2 9JT 10 United Kingdom 11 Tel: +44 (0)113 343 1787 12 [email protected] 13 14 15 Dr Greg Marsden* 16 17 Institute for Transport Studies 18 University of Leeds 19 Leeds 20 LS2 9JT 21 United Kingdom 22 Tel: +44 (0)113 343 5325 23 Fax: +44 (0)113 343 5334 24 [email protected] 25 26 * corresponding author 27 28 Word Count: 5989 + 6 Figures = 7489 29 30 Submission Date: 14/11/2011 TRB 2012 Annual Meeting Paper revised from original submittal. 2 31 City Bike Hire Schemes - Emerging Trends in Europe 32 33 34 Abstract 35 36 This paper examines the recent increase in the uptake of city bike hire (also known as “bike 37 share”) schemes and provides an analysis of the emerging trends that are being witnessed. 38 The paper is based on an ongoing study into the spread and distribution in the adoption of 39 bike hire schemes throughout Europe. The data collection consists of two stages that first 40 seek to build a picture of the current situation before moving on to a more detailed discussion 41 with the scheme adopters. 42 The paper presents a brief history of bike hire schemes and describes the theoretical basis 43 for the investigation, drawing on innovation and diffusion theory. It then reports the findings 44 of the research, which suggests that the expansion phase of city adoption of public bike hire 45 schemes may be past its peak.
  • Vergelijkende Studie Van Stedelijke Fietsverhuursystemen

    Vergelijkende Studie Van Stedelijke Fietsverhuursystemen

    Academiejaar 2009 – 2010 UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPEN FACULTEIT TOEGEPASTE ECONOMISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN Vergelijkende studie van stedelijke fietsverhuursystemen Jeroen Jonckheere Masterproef voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van: Master in de Toegepaste Economische Promotor: Wetenschappen logistiek en transport Prof. dr. Ann Verhetsel Academiejaar 2009 – 2010 UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPEN FACULTEIT TOEGEPASTE ECONOMISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN Vergelijkende studie van stedelijke fietsverhuursystemen Jeroen Jonckheere Masterproef voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van: Master in de Toegepaste Economische Promotor: Wetenschappen logistiek en transport Prof. dr. Ann Verhetsel Voorwoord Een masterproef schrijven is een proces dat ongeveer een jaar duurt. In de loop van dit jaar krijg je hulp van een heleboel mensen. Ik wil dan ook gebruik maken van dit voorwoord om deze mensen te bedanken. De eerste persoon die ik wens te bedanken is professor Ann Verhetsel. Als promotor van mijn masterproef verbeterde zij op gepaste tijden mijn schrijfsels en gaf ze een aantal nuttige adviezen waarmee ik verder aan de slag kon. In tweede instantie zou ik ook Jan Schaeken van het Gemeentelijk Autonoom Parkeerbedrijf Antwerpen willen danken voor het geven van alle informatie die ik nodig had om het Antwerpse stedelijk fietsverhuursysteem te vergelijken met de al bestaande fietsverhuursystemen. In laatste instantie wil ik ook mijn ouders bedanken. Zij hebben er voor gezorgd dat ik 4 jaar lang heb kunnen studeren. Daarnaast wil ik hen ook nog bedanken voor het nalezen
  • Exploring Bicycle Options for Federal Lands: Bike Sharing, Rentals and Employee Fleets

    Exploring Bicycle Options for Federal Lands: Bike Sharing, Rentals and Employee Fleets

    FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 JANUARY 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS Technical Report published by Technology Deployment Program Western Federal Lands Highway Division Federal Highway Administration 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 For more information or additional copies contact: Susan Law, Planning Team Leader [email protected], 360.619.7840 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Rebecca Gleason, Laurie Miskimins 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Western Transportation Institute P.O. Box 174250 11. Contract or Grant No. Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration Final Report Western Federal Lands Highway Division August 2009 – July 2011 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 14. Sponsoring Agency Code HFL-17 15. Supplementary Notes COTR: Susan Law – FHWA CFLHD/WFLHD. Advisory Panel Members: Adam Schildge – FTA, Alan Turnbull – NPS RTCA, Andrew Duvall, National Science Foundation IGERT PhD student, Brandon Jutz – FWS, Candace Rutt – CDC, Diana Allen – NPS RTCA, Franz Gimmler – non-motorized consultant, Ivan Levin – Outdoor Foundation, Jane D. Wargo – HHS, Jason Martz – NPS, Jim Evans – NPS, Nathan Caldwell – FWS, Paul DeMaio – Bike Share consultant, Tokey Boswell – NPS. This project was funded by the Fish and Wildlife Service Refuge Road Program.
  • Virginia Tech Capital Bikeshare Study a Closer Look at Casual Users and Operations

    Virginia Tech Capital Bikeshare Study a Closer Look at Casual Users and Operations

    Virginia Tech Capital Bikeshare Study A Closer Look at Casual Users and Operations Prepared by Prepared for DRAFT December 2011 This report is based on the work of these students in the Virginia Tech graduate-level Urban and Regional Planning program, Alexandria, Virginia, during the Fall 2011 semester: Natalie Borecki Bradley Rawls Buck, Darren Buck Paola Reyes Payton Chung Matthew Steenhoek Paticia Happ Casey Studhalter Nicholas Kushner Austin Watkins Tim Maher With the following Virginia Tech faculty member assisting the students in preparing the report: Ralph Buehler, PhD Virginia Tech Assistant Professor Department of Urban Affairs and Planning – Alexandria Campus This research was approved by the Virginia Tech Institutional Review Board (FWA00000572, expires May 31, 2014) under IRB numbers 11-784 and 11-902. Acknowledgments The authors of this report would like to express our gratitude to the following individuals for the information and assistance they provided: Our 340 survey participants Chris Holben - District Department of Transportation, Washington DC Paul DeMaio - MetroBike Danny Quarrell - Alta Bicycle Share Eric Gilliland - Alta Bicycle Share Mari Isabelle - JCDecaux Adam Garrett - OYBike Matt Virlee - Denver Bike Sharing Mitch Vars - Nice Ride Minnesota Iván De la Lanza - Enlace Institucional, SMA - EcoBici Rodrigo Guerrero Maldonado - Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, Mexico City Erik Kugler – BicycleSPACE Fionnuala Quinn – Alta Planning Shi-Hung Huang- Kaohsiung Environmental Protection Bureau Kwo-Tsai Wang - Kaohsiung Transportation Bureau Mu-Sheng Lee - Kaohsiung Environmental Protection Bureau Raúl Ganzinelli Aguilera - Barcelona de Serveis Municipals Jordi Cabañas Faura - Clear Channel International Matthias Wegscheider -CityBike Wien 2 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary, page 4 II. Introduction, page 4 III.