Precursors and Chemicals Frequently Used in the Illicit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Precursors and Chemicals Frequently Used in the Illicit III. EXTENT OF licit trade AND latest trends IN trafficking IN precursors 11 minimum, to use such information to generate actionable and cases of diversion or attempted diversion from inter- intelligence for use in further investigations.16 national trade, as well as activities associated with illicit drug manufacture. The chapter is based on information 59. Unfortunately, the information INCB has about the provided to the Board through various mechanisms, such level of voluntary partnerships worldwide continues to be as form D, the PEN Online system, PICS, Project Prism incomplete. Similarly, INCB only rarely receives informa- and Project Cohesion, and through national reports and tion about suspicious requests or denied orders, thus other official information from Governments. limiting the Board’s ability to alert authorities worldwide. With a few exceptions, Governments rarely inform the 62. Information about non-scheduled chemicals not Board about the extent of suspicious shipments whose included in Table I or Table II of the 1988 Convention, export has been stopped by the authorities or about cases including designer precursors, which are nonetheless used in which companies have voluntarily refrained from ful- in illicit drug manufacture, is reported to INCB pursuant filling an order. One of those exceptions is Germany, a to article 12, subparagraph 12 (b), of the Convention. country with a long-established and well-functioning Governments also share such information through PICS, partnership between authorities and relevant industries. which has thus developed into an early warning system for In the country in 2019, there were 14 incidents in which precursors, although the identification of non-scheduled substances in Table I or Table II of the 1988 Convention, or chemicals frequently presents forensic challenges due to chemicals not under international or national control, the mislabelling and misdeclaration of products that are were not supplied, representing a decrease from 23 such often found in clandestine laboratories or at points of incidents recorded in 2018. entry. INCB would like to thank all Governments for the information received and remind them that comprehen­ 60. INCB wishes to reiterate the importance of coopera­ sive reporting on form D of information regarding non­ tion with relevant industries in the successful and sustain­ scheduled substances and of circumstantial information able prevention of chemical diversion. While the nature, is critical to establishing and addressing new trends at an extent and scope of such cooperation is the prerogative of early stage and globally. INCB therefore again encour­ individual countries, INCB wishes to highlight the impor­ ages all Governments to improve the quality and compre­ tance of the voluntary aspect of such cooperation, in par­ hensiveness of their annual form D submissions and ticular with regard to designer precursors and other reiterates its recommendation to make better use of PICS. chemicals not under national control, which may present a global challenge. The Board also wishes to reiterate the importance of sharing information about suspicious A. Substances used in the illicit requests and denied orders and transactions globally, with manufacture of amphetamine- INCB, in order to prevent traffickers from shifting from type stimulants one supplier to another, across borders. 1. Substances used in the illicit manufacture of amphetamines III. Extent of licit trade (a) Ephedrine and pseudoephedrine and latest trends 63. Ephedrine and pseudoephedrine are precursors used in the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine but can be in trafficking in substituted with P-2-P, phenylacetic acid, APAAN, APAA and a number of non-scheduled substances (see subsects. precursors (c) and (d) below, and annex VIII). Both ephedrine and pseudoephedrine are also used for legitimate medical pur- poses and are therefore among the most frequently and 61. The present chapter provides an overview of the widely traded substances included in Table I of the 1988 major trends and developments in both licit trade and traf- Convention. ficking in precursor chemicals, by substance group, with a view to addressing gaps and weaknesses in precursor con- Licit trade trol mechanisms. It summarizes information on seizures 64. Between 1 November 2019 and 1 November 2020, 16 INCB report on precursors for 2019 (E/INCB/2019/4), para. 159, exporting countries sent almost 4,600 pre-export notifica- and INCB report on precursors for 2017 (E/INCB/2017/4), chap. IV. tions through the PEN Online system for planned 12 INCB REPORT ON PRECURSORS 2020 shipments of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, in bulk and Figure V. Seizures of ephedrine and pseudo- in the form of pharmaceutical preparations. The noti- ephedrine reported by Governments fications were for a total of more than 950 tons of on form D, 2010–2019 pseudoephedrine and almost 80 tons of ephedrine. The 90 000 40 shipments originated in 41 exporting countries and terri- 80 000 35 tories and were destined for 166 importing countries and ) 70 000 territories. Overall, the level of trade in both ephedrine s 30 m a r 60 000 and pseudoephedrine was about 25 per cent lower than g 25 o l i k 50 000 the average of the past three reporting periods. ( d 20 e Governments z 40 000 f i o e r s 15 e 65. Table 2 below presents the 10 largest importers of t 30 000 b n u m ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, ranked in terms of o 20 000 10 u m N volume notified through the PEN Online system, in the A 5 reporting period. 10 000 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 2. The 10 largest importers of ephedrine 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 and pseudoephedrine, by volume, Pseudoephedrine and prepara�ons 1 November 2019–1 November 2020 Ephedrine and prepara�ons Number of Governments repor�ng seizures of Ranking Ephedrine Pseudoephedrine ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine 1 Republic of Korea United States 2 Nigeria Switzerland main methamphetamine precursor seized in Australia and 3 Indonesia Egypt New Zealand. Yet, as in the past, no information was avail- 4 Egypt Turkey able on the origin of the ephedrine, i.e., whether it had 5 Denmark Indonesia been diverted from legitimate trade or illicitly manufac- 6 Ghana Brazil tured, either by synthesis, from chemical pre-precursors, 7 United States Republic of Korea or by extraction from the Ephedra plant. Both synthesis 8 Singapore Japan from propiophenone or its precursors and extraction of 9 Switzerland Canada ephedra are illicit manufacturing methods that have been 10 Germany France encountered in China. Considering that the approaches to addressing diversion from legitimate trade will differ from the approaches needed to address the illicit manufacture Trafficking of precursors and that, in the latter case, the approaches 66. On form D for 2019, seizures totalling about 5.7 tons needed will further depend on whether the ephedrine was of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine were reported to INCB illicitly synthesized from pre-precursors or extracted from by 38 countries and territories in all regions (see figure V). naturally grown Ephedra plant, the Board reminds That represents the lowest amount seized in several years, Governments to invest in determining the nature, or falling even short of the amounts seized in 2017 (12.1 tons), origin, of seized ephedrine. INCB therefore also and also falling significantly short of explaining the reiterates its recommendation to have selected samples amount of methamphetamine seized in those regions of seized precursors forensically analysed in order to where ephedrines-based manufacturing methods are provide strategic information about their origin, as a known to prevail. means to subsequently address any weaknesses in control mechanisms. Oceania 68. On form D for 2019, New Zealand reported sei- 67. In 2019, the largest seizures of ephedrines were zures of about 440 kg of ephedrine raw material, about the reported in Australia, amounting to almost 1,300 kg, of same amount as in 2018 (412 kg), thus indicating an end which 99 per cent was seized in a single incident, as the to the downward trend observed since 2016. The amount result of joint investigational efforts under a partnership of ephedrine was seized in 45 incidents. In over 90 per cent agreement between the Australian Federal Police and the of the cases, the origin of the substance was unknown; National Narcotics Control Commission of China. That single incidents could be traced to China, including Hong seizure provides another piece of strong evidence Kong, the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom. indicating that pseudoephedrine tablets (known as Most of the seizures were made by customs authorities at “ContacNT”) have replaced ephedrine raw material as the points of entry, including international mail centres. III. EXTENT OF licit trade AND latest trends IN trafficking IN precursors 13 East and South-East Asia ephedrines. In both countries, the amounts seized were the largest in many years. While Pakistan seized 80 kg of 69. The illicit manufacture of methamphetamine in East ephedrine, the largest amount reported since 2011, and South-East Asia continued to be predominantly Afghanistan seized 440 kg of pseudoephedrine prepara- ephedrines-based, but with increasing indications of the tions, the largest amount reported since the reporting of use of P-2-P-based methods, starting from non-scheduled seizures of pseudoephedrine started in 2016. The sus- chemicals or chemicals recently placed under inter national pected origin of 350 kg of the seized pseudoephedrine was control (see subsect. 2 (d) below). Pakistan; 90 kg allegedly originated in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The seizures provide further evidence of the illicit 70. Nevertheless, seizures of methamphetamine manufacture of methamphetamine in Afghanistan and of precursors in East and South-East Asia continued to fall the continued use of pharmaceutical preparations, in addi- significantly short of explaining the dramatic increase in tion to use of the Ephedra plant as a source for the seizures and abuse of methamphetamine in that and extraction of ephedrine.
Recommended publications
  • Controlled Substances in Mexico • Fraction I
    INTER-AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE CONTROL COMMISSION C I C A D SIXTY-SECOND REGULAR SESSION OEA/Ser.L/XIV.2.62 December 13 - 15 , 2017 CICAD/doc.2343/17 Washington, D.C. 12 December 2017 Original: Español NEW TRENDS AND EMERGING CHALLENGES IN THE INTERNATIONAL CONTROL OF CHEMICAL PRECURSORS, SYNTHETIC DRUGS AND NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY “SCIENCE AT THE SERVICE OF JUSTICE” New trends and emerging challenges in the international control of chemical precursors, synthetic drugs and new psychoactive substances 62 Regular Session of CICAD Washington D.C. December 13-15, 2017 Background Amphetamine-type stimulants have positioned themselves as one of the main drugs of consumption in the world. To maintain the supply of consumer demand, the production and trafficking of methamphetamine has evolved, always seeking to evade the regulation implemented by the authorities to contain the proliferation of drugs. Source: United Nations Office against Drugs and Crime, World Report on Drugs 2017 Legal framework International: United Nations Convention on Convention against Psychotropic Illicit Traffic in 1961 Substances Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs 1961. 1971 1988 Amended by the 1972 Protocol. Legal framework International: Precursors and chemical substances frecuently used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances I II 1. N-acetylanthranilic acid 1. Acetone 2. Phenylacetic acid 2. Anthranilic acid 3. Acetic anhydride 3. Hydrochloric acid 4. Acetic anhydride 4. Sulphuric acid 5. Ephedrine 5. Ethyl ether 1988 6. Ergometrine 6. Methylethylketone 7. Ergotamine 7. Piperidine 8. Alpha-phenylacetoacetonitrile 8. Toluene 9. 1-Phenyl-2-Propanone 10. Isosafrole 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Slang Terms and Code Words: a Reference for Law Enforcement
    UNCLASSIFIED Slang Terms and Code Words: A Reference for Law DEA Enforcement Personnel Intelligence DEA-HOU-DIR-022-18 July 2018 ReportBrief 1 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED DEA Intelligence Report Executive Summary This Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Intelligence Report contains new and updated information on slang terms and code words from a variety of law enforcement and open sources, and serves as an updated version to the product entitled “Drug Slang Code Words” published by the DEA in May 2017. It is designed as a ready reference for law enforcement personnel who are confronted with hundreds of slang terms and code words used to identify a wide variety of controlled substances, designer drugs, synthetic compounds, measurements, locations, weapons, and other miscellaneous terms relevant to the drug trade. Although every effort was made to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information presented, due to the dynamics of the ever-changing drug scene, subsequent additions, deletions, and corrections are inevitable. Future addendums and updates to this report will attempt to capture changed terminology to the furthest extent possible. This compendium of slang terms and code words is alphabetically ordered, with new additions presented in italic text, and identifies drugs and drug categories in English and foreign language derivations. Drug Slang Terms and Code Wordsa Acetaminophen and Oxycodone Combination (Percocet®) 512s; Bananas; Blue; Blue Dynamite; Blueberries; Buttons; Ercs; Greenies; Hillbilly Heroin; Kickers; M-30s;
    [Show full text]
  • Smokable Cocaine Markets in Latin America and the Caribbean a Call for a Sustainable Policy Response
    Smokable cocaine markets in Latin America and the Caribbean A call for a sustainable policy response ideas into movement AUTHORS: Ernesto Cortés and Pien Metaal EDITOR: Anthony Henman DESIGN: Guido Jelsma - www.guidojelsma.nl COVER PHOTO: Man smoking crack pipe Colombia, L. Niño. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This publication was made possible through the financial support of the Open Society Foundation (OSF) and the Global Partnership on Drug Policies and Development (GPDPD). GPDPD is a project implemented by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH on behalf of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and under the political patronage of the Federal Government’s Drug Commissioner. The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of TNI and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the donors. PUBLICATION DETAILS: Contents of the report may be quoted or reproduced for non-commercial purposes, provided that the source of information is properly cited. TRANSNATIONAL INSTITUTE (TNI) De Wittenstraat 25, 1052 AK Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tel: +31-20-6626608, Fax: +31-20-6757176 E-mail: [email protected] www.tni.org/drugs @DrugLawReform Drugsanddemocracy Amsterdam, December 2019 2 | Smokable cocaine markets in Latin America and the Caribbean transnationalinstitute Contents Introduction 4 Methodological approach 6 The Substance(s) 8 Smokable cocaine in Cochabamba (Bolivia) in the early 1990s 9 Users 14 Impact on health 17 The Market 21 Harm Reduction experiences 25 Conclusions and Discussion 28 Policy Recommendations 29 Good Practices: examples from Brazil 30 Bibiography and references 32 International smokable cocaines working group 33 Endnotes 34 transnationalinstitute Smokable cocaine markets in Latin America and the Caribbean | 3 Introduction regions.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent 15) 3,669,956 Borck Et Al
    United States Patent 15) 3,669,956 Borck et al. (45) June 13, 1972 54) 4-SUBSTITUTEDAMNO 260/472, 260/516, 260/518 R, 260/518 A, 260/519, PHENYACETIC ACDS AND 260/556 AR, 260/556 B, 260/558 S, 260/558 A, DERVATIVES THEREOF 260/559 T, 260/559 A, 260/.571, 260/574, 260/.575, (72 Inventors: Joachim Borck; Johann Dahin; Volker 424/244, 424/246, 424/248, 424/250, 424/267, Koppe; Josef Kramer; Gustav Shorre; J. 424/270, 424/272, 424/273, 424/274, 424/304, W. Hermann Hovy; Ernst Schorscher, all 424/309, 424/32 i, 424/324, 424/330 of Darmstadt, Germany 51) int. Cl. ........................................................ C07d 41/04 58) Field of Search........ 260/294X,293.4, 293.47, 239 BF, 73) Assignee: E. Merck A. G., Darmstadt, Germany 260/326.3, 294.3 E (22) Filed: July 22, 1968 56) References Cited (21) Appl. No.: 746,326 UNITED STATES PATENTS (30) Foreign Application Priority Data 3,252,970 5/1966 Huebner................................ 260/239 July 22, 1967 Germany.............................. M 74881 3,385,852 5/1968 Casadio................................. 260/246 Jan. 8, 1968 Germany... ....M 76850 OTHER PUBLICATIONS Feb. 23, 1968 Germany...... ...M 77363 March 1, 1968 Germany.............................. M 77429 Norman et al., J. Chen. Soc. 1963, (Nov.), 5431-6. (52) U.S. Cl................... 260/239 BF, 260/239 A, 260/239 E, Primary Examiner-Henry R. Jiles 260/243 B, 260/246, 260/247. 1, 260/247.2 R, Assistant Examiner-G. Thomas Todd 260/247.2 A, 260/247.2 B, 260/247.5 R, 260/247.7 Attorney-Millen, Raptes & White A, 260/247.7 H,
    [Show full text]
  • Drugs and Development: the Great Disconnect
    ISSN 2054-2046 Drugs and Development: The Great Disconnect Julia Buxton Policy Report 2 | January 2015 Drugs and Development: The Great Disconnect Julia Buxton∗ Policy Report 2 | January 2015 Key Points • The 2016 United Nations General Assembly Special Session on the World Drug Problem (UNGASS) will see a strong lobby in support of development oriented responses to the problem of drug supply, including from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). • The promotion of Alternative Development (AD) programmes that provide legal, non-drug related economic opportunities for drug crop cultivators reflects the limited success of enforcement responses, greater awareness of the development dimensions of cultivation activities and the importance of drugs and development agencies working co-operatively in drug environments. • Evidence from thirty years of AD programming demonstrates limited success in supply reduction and that poorly monitored and weakly evaluated programmes cause more harm than good; there has been little uptake of best practice approaches, cultivators rarely benefit from AD programmes, the concept of AD is contested and there is no shared understanding of ‘development’. • AD was popularised in the 1990s when development discourse emphasised participatory approaches and human wellbeing. This is distinct from the development approaches of the 2000s, which have been ‘securitised’ in the aftermath of the Global War on Terror and which re-legitimise military participation in AD. • UNGASS 2016 provides an opportunity for critical scrutiny of AD and the constraints imposed by the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs on innovative, rights based and nationally owned supply responses. Cultivation is a development not a crime and security issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Booklet 4 Stimulants Preface
    4 STIMULANTS 4 STIMULANTS 2019 2019 © United Nations, June 2019. All rights reserved worldwide. ISBN: 978-92-1-148314-7 eISBN: 978-92-1-004174-4 United Nations publication, Sales No. E.19.XI.8 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. Suggested citation: World Drug Report 2019 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.19.XI.8). No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from UNODC. Applications for such permission, with a statement of purpose and intent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Research and Trend Analysis Branch of UNODC. DISCLAIMER The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC or contributory organizations, nor does it imply any endorsement. Comments on the report are welcome and can be sent to: Division for Policy Analysis and Public Affairs United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime PO Box 500 1400 Vienna Austria Tel: (+43) 1 26060 0 Fax: (+43) 1 26060 5827 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.unodc.org/wdr2019 PREFACE The findings of this year’s World Drug Report fill in same time clamping down on organized crime and and further complicate the global picture of drug trafficking.
    [Show full text]
  • Production and Supply of Drugs, Pharmaceuticals, and Chemical Precursors
    THE DRUG PROBLEM IN THE AMERICAS: STUDIES PRODUCTION AND SUPPLY OF DRUGS, PHARMACEUTICAL, AND CHEMICAL PRECURSORS Organization of American States 1 2 The Drug Problem in the Americas: Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Findings ..................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1 COCAINE AND HEROIN ........................................................................................ 7 COCAINE PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION.................................................................. 7 Coca Cultivation ...................................................................................................... 8 Cocaine Manufacturing ........................................................................................... 11 Cocaine Flows ....................................................................................................... 12 Transport Methods................................................................................................. 15 HEROIN PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION .................................................................. 15 POLICIES TO CONFRONT COCAINE AND HEROIN PRODUCTION AND TRAFFICKING ............ 17 Illicit Crop Reduction .................................................................................................. 17 Impact of Crop Reduction Policies ................................................................................ 18 Interdiction and Attacks on Organizations ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Methamphetamine Synthesis L ______I ______D ______ Most Commonly Synthesized E Controlled Substance ______3 ______8
    S ___________________________________ l Introductions and Welcome ___________________________________ i d ___________________________________ e Course coordinator’s welcome ___________________________________ Instructor introductions 1 Participant introductions ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ S ___________________________________ Administrative Information l ___________________________________ i ___________________________________ Breaks and start times d Restroom location ___________________________________ Eating or smoking in classroom e ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 2 ___________________________________ S ___________________________________ Course Overview & Objectives l ___________________________________ i ___________________________________ Purpose: Train first responders to… d Recognize a clandestine drug lab… ___________________________________ Recognize drug lab paraphernalia… e Implement appropriate actions. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 3 ___________________________________ S ___________________________________ Drug Lab Definitions l ___________________________________ i ___________________________________ Lab—General Definition d Covert or secret illicit operation ___________________________________ Combination of apparatus & chemicals e Used to make controlled substances. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 4 ___________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Cocaine: Pharmacology, Effects, and Treatment of Abuse
    Cocaine: Pharmacology, Effects, and Treatment of Abuse U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • Public Health Service • Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration Cocaine: Pharmacology, Effects, and Treatment of Abuse Editor: John Grabowski, Ph.D. Division of Clinical Research National Institute on Drug Abuse NIDA Research Monograph 50 1984 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, Maryland 20857 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 NIDA Research Monographs are prepared by the research divisions of the National Institute on Drug Abuse and published by its Office of Science The primary objective of the series is to provide critical reviews of research problem areas and techniques, the content of state-of-the-art conferences, and integrative research reviews. Its dual publication emphasis is rapid and targeted dissemination to the scientific and professional community. Editorial Advisors MARTIN W. ADLER, Ph.D. SIDNEY, COHEN M.D. Temple University School of Medicine LosAngeles, California Philadelphia, Pennsylvania SYDNEY ARCHER, Ph.D. MARY L. JACOBSON Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute National Federation of Parents for Troy, New York Drug Free Youth RICHARD BELLEVILLE, Ph.D. Omaha, Nebraska NB Associates, Health Sciences Rockville, Maryland REESE T. JONES, M.D. KARST J. BESTMAN Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute San Francisco, California Alcohol and Drug Problems Association of North America Washington, D.C. DENISE KANDEL, Ph.D. GILBERT J. BOVTIN, Ph.D. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Cornell University Medical College Columbia University New York, New York New York, New York JOSEPH V.
    [Show full text]
  • 1951 Cocainas Fumables Pascale ENG
    INTER-AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE CONTROL COMMISSION C I C A D Secretariat for Multidimensional Security FIFTY-FIRST REGULAR SESSION OEA/Ser.L/XIV.2.51 May 9 -11, 2012 CICAD/doc.1951/12 Washington, D.C. 8 May 2012 Original: Español SMOKEABLE COCAINE IN SOUTH AMERICA DR. ANTONIO PASCALE PRIETO REDLA, URUGUAY Smokeable Cocaine in South America Dr. Antonio Pascale Prieto M.D., Toxicologist –REDLA Montevideo, Uruguay LI CICAD Regular Session CICAD - OAS, Washington DC . USA May 9-11, 2012 Presentation •Smokeable Cocaine Substances •The Epidemiology of Cocaine Base Paste (CBP) consumption •Profile of the CBP user •CBP: toxicology –health impact -Composition -Toxicity -Addictive Potential -Clinical Aspects -Chronic complications • Therapeutic Approach SMOKEABLE COCAINE Coca Leaf Kerosene Alkaline Substances Gasoline Sulphuric Acid COCAINE BASE PASTE BASUCO (Colombia) Hydrochloric Acid Acetone Ethanol COCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE Sodium Bicarbonate Sodium Bicarbonate Ammonia Ammonia Ether water Temp. 800° C Temp. 98° C FREE BASE CRACK Modificado de Castaño, 2000 Epidemiology of CBP consumption Surveys indicate low prevalence of consumption… …however impact is high. (demand for treatment, consultations related to acute and chronic effects) Consumption in the General Population Report on Drug Use in the Americas. OID. CICAD. OEA (2011) IV National Household Survey (2006) –Consumption of CBP in Uruguay 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 0.8 Prev. de vida 0,4 Ultimos 12 meses 0,3 Ultimos 30 dias 0,2 0.3 0,1 0.1 0 % -Signs of Dependency in 57 % of consumers -Three out of four CBP users are males -Average age of first use: 20 years. -History of inhalant abuse (60 %) 8% in highly vulnerable, peripheral areas in Montevideo Source: Uruguayan Observatory on Drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Freebase Cocaine in Mainland France: Recent Trends
    Updates on current research Freebase cocaine in mainland France: recent trends Michel At the end of the 2000s, the OFDT’s Gandilhon, TREND (Emerging Trends and New Drugs) scheme, which focuses on fol- Analysis of crack cocaine and freebase cocaine lowing intense drug-using populations, use and markets from a specific investigation Agnès within the 2011-2012 TREND scheme. Cadet-Taïrou, revealed trends on access to freebase co- caine - including crack cocaine - and its use. These trends were practically undetec- Emmanuel 1 Lahaie table in general population surveys . There was an observed emergence in several pro- vincial cities of micromarkets for freebase cocaine, which was previously produced on a small scale for individual consumption. At the same time, in Paris, the crack market underwent changes in terms of both sup- ply and demand. Given the highly addictive nature of freebase cocaine, the increased accessibility of this drug led TREND to in the United States since the mid-70s; the focus on examining these market changes. crack use phenomenon travelled to main- To confirm and explain the observed phe- land France through the French overseas nomena, in 2011 and 2012, six out of the departments (Martinique, French Guiana, seven TREND sites (Bordeaux, Marseille, Guadeloupe) [1]. Until the early 2000s, use Metz, Paris, Rennes, Toulouse) conduc- of this form of cocaine remained fairly stable ted a specific investigation. This issue of in terms of user profile (the vast majority of Tendances presents the key results. These users were very marginal) and geographic results, along with the data of the SINTES location (use mainly took place in districts (National Detection System of Drugs and in the north of Paris).
    [Show full text]
  • 3.2. Coca/ Cocaine
    3.1. Production: Opium/heroin 3.2. Coca/ Cocaine GLOBAL ILLICIT CULTIVATION OF COCA BUSH AND PRODUCTION OF COCA LEAF AND COCAINE, 1990-2005 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 CULTIVATION(a) OF COCA BUSH IN HECTARES Bolivia (b) 50,300 47,900 45,300 47,200 48,100 48,600 48,100 45,800 38,000 21,800 14,600 19,900 21,600 23,600 27,700 25,400 Colombia (c) 40,100 37,500 37,100 39,700 44,700 50,900 67,200 79,400 101,800 160,100 163,300 144,800 102,000 86,000 80,000 86,000 Peru (d) 121,300 120,800 129,100 108,800 108,600 115,300 94,400 68,800 51,000 38,700 43,400 46,200 46,700 44,200 50,300 48,200 Total 211,700 206,200 211,500 195,700 201,400 214,800 209,700 194,000 190,800 220,600 221,300 210,900 170,300 153,800 158,000 159,600 POTENTIAL PRODUCTION OF DRY COCA LEAF IN METRIC TONS (e) Bolivia 77,000 78,000 80,300 84,400 89,800 85,000 75,100 70,100 52,900 22,800 13,400 20,200 19,800 27,800 38,000 30,900 Colombia 45,300 45,000 44,900 45,300 67,500 80,900 108,900 129,500 165,900 261,000 266,200 236,000 222,100 193,340 170,730 170,730 Peru 196,900 222,700 223,900 155,500 165,300 183,600 174,700 130,600 95,600 69,200 46,200 49,300 52,500 50,790 70,300 67,900 Total 319,200 345,700 349,100 285,200 322,600 349,500 358,700 330,200 314,400 353,000 325,800 305,500 294,400 271,930 279,030 269,530 POTENTIAL MANUFACTURE(f) OF COCAINE IN METRIC TONS Bolivia 189 220 225 240 255 240 215 200 150 70 43 60 60 79 107 90 Colombia (g) 92 88 91 119 201 230 300 350 435 680 695 617 580 550 640 640 Peru 492 525 550 410 435 460 435 325 240 175 141 150 160 155 190 180 Total 774 833 866 769 891 930 950 875 825 925 879 827 800 784 937 910 (a) Potentially harvestable, after eradication (b) Sources: 1990-2002: CICAD and US Department of State, International Narcotics Control Strategy Report; 2003-2005: National Illicit Crop Monitoring System supported by UNODC.
    [Show full text]