DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Nomenclature

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Nomenclature Chapter 2 Biological Nomenclature Biologic categorization is one of the most conspicuous aspects of successful behavior, not only of man, but of all animals, in meeting the requirements for survival in a complex environment. – Dunn and Davidson (1968:75) Linnaean nomenclature came to be universally employed by scientists, though initially it met with little enthusiasm by non-scientists. Even today many people are repelled by scientific names. – Evans (1993:12) Humans as Taxonomists We are all taxonomists. Pattern seeking and the urge to classify our environment are part of our biology. Like other animals, we need such behavior to tell food from nonfood, predator from nonpredator, and to recognize potential mates, relatives, and offspring. As human animals, we put our conclusions into words and names (Dunn and Davidson 1968; Raven et al. 1971; Pinker 1995). We also use classification in our daily lives to create order and to make things easier to find. We devise our own schemes for household organization–socks in one bureau drawer, shirts in another–to make dressing faster so we can grab an extra 5 minutes of sleep. And we depend on classifications made up by others to make books easier to find in the library, canned peaches in the supermarket, or a new pair of jeans in a department store. We can observe taxonomic behavior in children’s development: the excitement of a toddler as she learns to name the components of her world, or the concentration of a preschooler as he manipulates the pieces of a simple wooden puzzle. 20 INTRODUCTION Yet some children like puzzles better than others, and some adults are more interested than others in searching for patterns in their world. This may be at least partially due to innate differences in brain function and learning style. Most students of the mind now believe that intelligence is a not a single property, but rather a number of distinct capacities: linguistic, logical–mathematical, spatial, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, and so on. Children doing puzzles are using and developing their logical– mathematical, spatial, and kinesthetic abilities (Gardner 1983). If they also become interested in biology, young puzzle-lovers might well grow up to become professional taxonomists. Spatial intelligence, in particular, is important to taxonomists, whose science involves the mental sorting and manipulation of characters and taxa, cladograms, and trees. Unlike exceptional mathematical ability, which usually develops very early, but in which peak ability and contributions to the field come in adolescence and early adulthood, unusual spatial ability can manifest itself early and persist until late in life (Gardner 1983). The importance of spatial intelligence in taxonomy might explain why its mastery has often been likened to the mastery of visual arts such as painting, in which talent is often shown very early and technical mastery and creative expression continue to develop throughout life. Some unconscious perception that an innate combination of abilities is involved may explain the conflicting feelings I have heard expressed by taxonomists and other scientists that taxonomists are born, not made, but that it takes 50 years to become a master of the field. It may also explain why scientists in some other fields have had difficulty accepting systematics as science rather than art. However, despite our common human heritage as taxonomists, most of us, whether students, scientists, or even practicing systematists, have little patience with the nomenclatural aspect of the field. If we must deal with the codes of nomenclature, we can find ourselves reacting with irritation to their inconsistencies and contradictions, and behaving as if these rules had appeared engraved in stone for no other reason than to plague us. There is some justification for this reaction. The codes that govern the biological naming of plants and animals are written in a legal style and language. The aim of their authors was to make their terminology so precise that the meaning of each regulation could not be misconstrued. Unfortunately, it seems to have had the opposite effect, producing a legalese often completely impenetrable to the uninitiated. Even when their language has been decoded, reading a code of nomenclature is Biological Nomenclature 21 about as stimulating for most of us as reading a will in which we are not beneficiaries. However, because the chief purpose of this book is to enable you to research, write, and publish taxonomic descriptions–all activities that involve nomenclature–it must cover the subject in some detail. The rest of this chapter surveys the development of biological nomenclature, showing that much about the way we name things is consistent across cultures and over time. It also summarizes the history of our present codes of botanical and zoological nomenclature, pointing out what basic concepts they share and in what ways they differ. Finally, it discusses the inherent limitations and future of the current system. Biological Nomenclature Biologists have divided the living world into groups of organisms, or taxa, which they have arranged in a series of levels, or a taxonomic hierarchy (table 2.1), with the species (chapter 3) as its essential element. Below species are subspecies, populations, and individuals. Above the species level, taxa are grouped into more and more inclusive levels, based on fewer shared features. The levels of this taxonomic hierarchy are given names, or taxonomic ranks. Species sharing similar features are grouped into a genus, genera sharing traits into a family, families into orders, orders into classes, classes into Phyla (animals) or Divisions (plants), up to the broadest level of Kingdom (table 2.1). All taxa at the same level or rank belong to the same taxonomic category. Assigning names to these groupings is the part of taxonomy called nomenclature. By agreement among biologists, scientific names are assigned or reassigned according to sets of rules called codes of nomenclature. Biologists first began arranging taxa into hierarchies on the basis of shared features long before there was any understanding of the genetics and evolutionary basis of such similarities. Now, although the present system is not perfect or complete (and never can be because it is a compromise system), most biologists share the goal of attempting to make ensure that the groupings used reflect a common evolutionary history. This is deduced by making use of structures similar in a certain way (by homology), particularly by the use of the shared, derived features that give the best information, as well as by aspects of body chemistry, physiological processes, and genetics at both the organismic and molecular level. Table 2.1 Folk and Scientific Taxonomic Hierarchies Folk Classification Biological Classification Group Group Name Group Group Name Example 1 Example 2 Example 1 Example 2 Life form yakt* as† Kingdom Animalia Animalia Phylum Chordata Chordata Class Amphibia Aves Order Anura Falconiformes Family Hylidae Accipitridae Generic ccp as Genus Hyla Accipiter Specific ccp kamayket as jejeg Species Hyla angiana Accipiter melanochlamys Varietal as jejeg km Subspecies Unnamed variant‡ Sources: Karam names from Bulmer and Tyler 1968; Bulmer 1970. Scientific names from Bulmer and Tyler 1968; Bulmer 1970; Barnes 1984; Peterson 1980. * Flying birds or bats. † “Soft food,” frogs and certain small mammals. ‡ Avariant of this highly variable species with upper surface mostly green. Biological Nomenclature 23 As mentioned in chapter 1, there are actually five nomenclatural codes, but this book covers only those for plants and animals. Animals are named and described according to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), of which the latest edition is the third edition, published in 1985. The fourth edition is now in press, with publication expected in mid-1999, to come into effect on 1 January 2000. The ICZN is currently regulated by the International Union of Biological Sciences (IUBS). Plants are named and described following the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN), currently under the jurisdiction of the International Botanical Congress. The latest edition is the Tokyo Code, published in 1994. It will be revised again at the next International Botanical Congress, scheduled to be held at the Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, in July 1999. Farfrom being written in stone, the present rules are the result of many hard-fought scientific battles over the last 200 years. They represent the best compromise taxonomists have come up with to deal with two diametrically opposing needs: the need to name, to provide each organism with a unique and stable name; and the need to classify, to provide a system of classification that is explanatory and predictive. They are opposing because if the criterion of stability is to be met, a name once given could never be changed. Yet, as chapter 1 showed, we still have a lot to learn about relationships and even identities of Earth’s organisms, so the ability to continue to make changes that reflect increasing knowledge is vital. Each code is made up of a set of rules or articles that must be followed when taxa are named or names used or changed. Some of the rules are accompanied by recommendations, which point out what is currently considered to be the best procedure to follow in specific instances. There is no enforcement of these rules except the voluntary cooperation of biologists. But these voluntary sanctions are quite effective. No work that goes against them is likely to be published in a reputable journal, and if such work should get published, it will probably be ignored (Jeffrey 1989). Folk Taxonomy The system we use for the scientific naming of organisms developed over avery long period of time. Its roots go back to prehistory, maybe even to prehuman history. Some historians believe that the scientific study of living things developed via primitive medicine (Hopwood 1959). In that 24 INTRODUCTION case, taxonomy may well date back to prehuman primates, for scientists have recently realized that a number of primates dose themselves with medicinal plants to combat various complaints (Gibbons 1992; Clayton and Wolfe 1993).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Linn E and Taxonomy in Japan: on the 300Th Anniversary of His Birth
    No. 3] Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B 86 (2010) 143 Linne and taxonomy in Japan: On the 300th anniversary of his birth By Akihito (His Majesty The Emperor of Japan) (Communicated by Koichiro TSUNEWAKI, M.J.A.) President, dear friends bers of stamens belonged to dierent classes, even when their other characteristics were very similar, I am very grateful to the Linnean Society of while species with the same number of stamens be- London for the kind invitation it extended to me to longed to the same class, even when their other participate in the celebration of the 300th anniver- characteristics were very dierent. This led to the sary of the birth of Carl von Linne. When, in 1980, I idea that the classication of organisms should be was elected as a foreign member of the Society, I felt based on a more comprehensive evaluation of all I did not really deserve the honour, but it has given their characteristics. This idea gained increasing me great encouragement as I have tried to continue support, and Linne’s classication system was even- my research, nding time between my ofcial duties. tually replaced by systems based on phylogeny. Today, I would like to speak in memory of Carl The binomial nomenclature proposed by Linne, von Linne, and address the question of how Euro- however, became the basis of the scientic names of pean scholarship has developed in Japan, touching animals and plants, which are commonly used in the upon the work of people like Carl Peter Thunberg, world today, not only by people in academia but also Linne’s disciple who stayed in Japan for a year as by the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Nomenclature: Concept, History of Botanical Nomenclature
    Module – 15; Content writer: AvishekBhattacharjee Module 15: Botanical Nomenclature: Concept, history of botanical nomenclature (local and scientific) and its advantages, formation of code. Content writer: Dr.AvishekBhattacharjee, Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, P.O. – B. Garden, Howrah – 711 103. Module – 15; Content writer: AvishekBhattacharjee Botanical Nomenclature:Concept – A name is a handle by which a mental image is passed. Names are just labels we use to ensure we are understood when we communicate. Nomenclature is a mechanism for unambiguous communication about the elements of taxonomy. Botanical Nomenclature, i.e. naming of plants is that part of plant systematics dealing with application of scientific names to plants according to some set rules. It is related to, but distinct from taxonomy. A botanical name is a unique identifier to which information of a taxon can be attached, thus enabling the movement of data across languages, scientific disciplines, and electronic retrieval systems. A plant’s name permits ready summarization of information content of the taxon in a nested framework. A systemofnamingplantsforscientificcommunicationmustbe international inscope,andmustprovideconsistencyintheapplicationof names.Itmustalsobeacceptedbymost,ifnotall,membersofthe scientific community. These criteria led, almost inevitably, to International Botanical Congresses (IBCs) being the venue at which agreement on a system of scientific nomenclature for plants was sought. The IBCs led to publication of different ‘Codes’ which embodied the rules and regulations of botanical nomenclature and the decisions taken during these Congresses. Advantages ofBotanical Nomenclature: Though a common name may be much easier to remember, there are several good reasons to use botanical names for plant identification. Common names are not unique to a specific plant.
    [Show full text]
  • 237 Keanekaragaman Jenis Neogastropoda Di Teluk Lampung
    Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kelautan Tropis, Vol. 8, No. 1, Hlm. 237-248, Juni 2016 KEANEKARAGAMAN JENIS NEOGASTROPODA DI TELUK LAMPUNG DIVERSITY OF NEOGRASTOPODA IN LAMPUNG BAY Hendrik A.W. Cappenberg Pusat Penelitian Oseanografi (P2O) ± LIPI, Jakarta E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The research was conducted in April 2008 and March 2009, in the Lampung Bay on six locations: Lahu, Ringgung, Hurun Bay, Mutun, Pelabuhan Panjang, and Sebalang. The aims of this research were to determine the diversity of neogastropod and their condition in this bay. The neogastropod samples were collected by using square transect method. A total number of 176 individuals of neo- gastropod consisted of 15 species which were belong to 6 families were collected from the bay. Mo- rula Margariticola and Morula sp. (Muricidae) were the dominance species with relatively wide dis- tribution. The diversity index (H‘) ranged between 0,90 ± 2,10. The evenness index (e) ranged between 0.65 ± 0.91, and the species dominant index (C) ranged between 0.15 ± 0.49. The overall calculation indicated that the diversity of neogastropod in the Lampung Bay was relatively low. Comparison the diversiry of neogastropod from the other various areas in the coastal zone of Indonesia was also dis- cussed in this paper. Keywords: diversity, neogastropod, Lampung Bay. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini dilakukan pada bulan April 2008 dan Maret 2009 di Teluk Lampung yaitu di Lahu, Ringgung, Teluk Hurun, Mutun, Pelabuhan Panjang dan Sebalang, bertujuan untuk mengetahui kom- posisi, distribusi, dan keragaman jenis neogastropoda. Contoh jenis neogastropoda didapat dengan menggunakan metode transek kuadrat. Total 176 individu neogastropoda yang ditemukan terdiri atas 15 jenis dan mewakili 5 suku.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology Assessment Plan Spring 2019
    Biological Sciences Department 1 Biology Assessment Plan Spring 2019 Task: Revise the Biology Program Assessment plans with the goal of developing a sustainable continuous improvement plan. In order to revise the program assessment plan, we have been asked by the university assessment committee to revise our Students Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs). Proposed revisions Approach: A large community of biology educators have converged on a set of core biological concepts with five core concepts that all biology majors should master by graduation, namely 1) evolution; 2) structure and function; 3) information flow, exchange, and storage; 4) pathways and transformations of energy and matter; and (5) systems (Vision and Change, AAAS, 2011). Aligning our student learning and program goals with Vision and Change (V&C) provides many advantages. For example, the V&C community has recently published a programmatic assessment to measure student understanding of vision and change core concepts across general biology programs (Couch et al. 2019). They have also carefully outlined student learning conceptual elements (see Appendix A). Using the proposed assessment will allow us to compare our student learning profiles to those of similar institutions across the country. Revised Student Learning Objectives SLO 1. Students will demonstrate an understanding of core concepts spanning scales from molecules to ecosystems, by analyzing biological scenarios and data from scientific studies. Students will correctly identify and explain the core biological concepts involved relative to: biological evolution, structure and function, information flow, exchange, and storage, the pathways and transformations of energy and matter, and biological systems. More detailed statements of the conceptual elements students need to master are presented in appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Review of Systematic Biology and Nomenclature - Alessandro Minelli
    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol. II - Historical Review of Systematic Biology and Nomenclature - Alessandro Minelli HISTORICAL REVIEW OF SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY AND NOMENCLATURE Alessandro Minelli Department of Biology, Via U. Bassi 58B, I-35131, Padova,Italy Keywords: Aristotle, Belon, Cesalpino, Ray, Linnaeus, Owen, Lamarck, Darwin, von Baer, Haeckel, Sokal, Sneath, Hennig, Mayr, Simpson, species, taxa, phylogeny, phenetic school, phylogenetic school, cladistics, evolutionary school, nomenclature, natural history museums. Contents 1. The Origins 2. From Classical Antiquity to the Renaissance Encyclopedias 3. From the First Monographers to Linnaeus 4. Concepts and Definitions: Species, Homology, Analogy 5. The Impact of Evolutionary Theory 6. The Last Few Decades 7. Nomenclature 8. Natural History Collections Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary The oldest roots of biological systematics are found in folk taxonomies, which are nearly universally developed by humankind to cope with the diversity of the living world. The logical background to the first modern attempts to rationalize the classifications was provided by Aristotle's logic, as embodied in Cesalpino's 16th century classification of plants. Major advances were provided in the following century by Ray, who paved the way for the work of Linnaeus, the author of standard treatises still regarded as the starting point of modern classification and nomenclature. Important conceptual progress was due to the French comparative anatomists of the early 19th century UNESCO(Cuvier, Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire) – andEOLSS to the first work in comparative embryology of von Baer. Biological systematics, however, was still searching for a unifying principle that could provide the foundation for a natural, rather than conventional, classification.SAMPLE This principle wasCHAPTERS provided by evolutionary theory: its effects on classification are already present in Lamarck, but their full deployment only happened in the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusca, Neogastropoda) from the Mozambique Channel and New Caledonia
    Bull. Mus. natn. Hist, nat., Paris, 4e ser., 3, 1981, section A, n° 4 : 985-1009. On a collection of buccinacean and mitracean Gastropods (Mollusca, Neogastropoda) from the Mozambique Channel and New Caledonia by W. 0. CERNOHORSKY Abstract. — The present paper deals with a collection of 59 species of buccinacean and mitra- cean gastropods belonging to 4 families from moderately shallow to deep water around the Mozam- bique Channel area, north of Madagascar. A total of 27 % of the species recovered are new geogra- phical range extensions. The New Caledonian material consists of 21 species belonging to 5 fami- lies, and was dredged, with one exception, in moderately deep water. A total of 38 % of the New Caledonian species represent new geographical records, and one of these is a new species : Voluto- mitra (Waimatea) vaubani n. sp. The new name Vexillum (Costellaria) duplex is proposed for the homonymous Mitra simphcissima Schepman, 1911, and its var. glabra Schepman, 1911. Résumé. — L'auteur étudie une collection de 59 espèces appartenant à 4 familles de Gasté- ropodes Buccinacea et Mitracea dragués dans le nord du canal du Mozambique, à des profondeurs diverses. L'étude montre une extension de l'aire de répartition connue pour 27 % des espèces. Le matériel néo-calédonien comprend 21 espèces appartenant à 5 familles et a été dragué, à une exception près, en eau relativement peu profonde. L'aire de répartition connue se trouve étendue pour 38 % des espèces, dont une est nouvelle : Volulomilra (Waimatea) vaubani n. sp. Le nom nouveau Vexillum (Costellaria) duplex est proposé en remplacement du nom Mitra simplicissima Schepman, 1911, et de sa variété glabra Schepman, 1911, tous deux préoccupés.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGÍA DE “Oliva Bewleyi” (Marrat, 1870 )
    ECOLOGÍA DE “Oliva bewleyi” (Marrat, 1870) (MOLLUSCA: GASTROPODA:OLIVIDAE) EN BAHÍA CONCHA, PARQUE NACIONAL NATURAL TAYRONA (PNNT), CARIBE COLOMBIANO DIANA CAROLINA TORRES PALACIO UNIVERSIDAD DE BOGOTÁ JORGE TADEO LOZANO FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES PROGRAMA DE BIOLOGÍA MARINA BOGOTÁ D. C. 2008 ECOLOGÍA DE “Oliva bewleyi” (Marrat, 1870) (MOLLUSCA: GASTROPODA:OLIVIDAE) EN BAHÍA CONCHA, PARQUE NACIONAL NATURAL TAYRONA (PNNT), CARIBE COLOMBIANO DIANA CAROLINA TORRES PALACIO Director Juan Manuel Díaz Merlano Dr. rer. Nat Codirector Oscar Delgadillo Garzón Biólogo Marino, UJTL Coasesor Adolfo Sanjuán Muñoz Biólogo Marino, M.Sc. UNIVERSIDAD DE BOGOTÁ JORGE TADEO LOZANO FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES PROGRAMA DE BIOLOGÍA MARINA BOGOTÁ D. C. 2008 ii Nota de Aceptación ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ Firma del presidente del jurado ____________________________ Firma del jurado ____________________________ Firma del jurado iii Este trabajo está dedicado a mi familia por su amor, apoyo y paciencia. Y en este momento de mi vida, a Juan y a mi bebe Solé, por darle luz a mi vida. La perseverancia por alcanzar mi sueño de mar. iv AGRADECIMIENTOS Agradezco al creador del universo por darme vida y la oportunidad de poder disfrutar con toda la energía y amor, este trabajo de grado y en especial, de poder bucear mucho, del mar, la playa y el grupo de moluscos A mi familia, agradezco su apoyo incondicional, su paciencia, sabiduría, oportunidades y sobre todo su amor. Por que gracias a ellos he podido darme cuenta de mis errores, recuperar la confianza y así continuar con valor… Juan Manuel Díaz, más que un director ha sido como un papá, por su apoyo profesional y su amistad, por su gran paciencia y sobre todo por creer en mi y darme siempre la oportunidad.
    [Show full text]
  • Transfer of the Type Species of the Genus Themobacteroides to the Genus Themoanaerobacter As Themoanaerobacter Acetoethylicus (Ben-Bassat and Zeikus 1981) Comb
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICBACTERIOLOGY, Oct. 1993, p. 857-859 Vol. 43, No. 4 0020-7713/93/040857-03$02.00/0 Copyright 0 1993, International Union of Microbiological Societies Transfer of the Type Species of the Genus Themobacteroides to the Genus Themoanaerobacter as Themoanaerobacter acetoethylicus (Ben-Bassat and Zeikus 1981) comb. nov., Description of Coprothemobacter gen. nov., and Reclassification of Themobacteroides proteolyticus as Coprothennobacter proteolyticus (Ollivier et al. 1985) comb. nov. FRED A. RAINEY AND ERKO STACKEBRANDT* DSM-Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroolganisrnen und Zellkulturen, Mascheroder Weg lb, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany Phylogenetic and phenotypic evidence demonstrates the taxonomic heterogeneity of the genus Thennobac- teroides and indicates a close relationship between Thennobacteroides acetoethylicus and members of the genus Thennoanaerobacter. Since T. acetoethylicus is the type species of Thennobacteroides, its removal invalidates the genus. As a consequence, the remaining species Thennobacteroides proteolyticus is proposed as the type species of the new genus Coprothennobacter gen. nov., as Coprothennobacter proteolyticus comb. nov. Recent phylogenetic studies (8, 9) of anaerobic thermo- hybridization studies with all members of Thermoanaero- philic species demonstrated that the majority of strains fall bacter (6, 10) despite the fact that, like Thermoanaerobacter within the phylogenetic confines of the Clostridium-Bacillus species, Thermobacteroides acetoethylicus is an anaerobic, subphylum of gram-positive bacteria. In contrast to the thermophilic, glycolytic bacterium capable of growth above phylog enet ically coherent genera Thermoana erobac ter (6) 70°C that has been isolated from geothermal environments. and Thermoanaerobacterium (6), members of Thermobac- The reclassifications of the recent study of Lee et al. (6) teroides (1,7) belonged to phylogenetically very diverse taxa increased the numbers of species of Thermoanaerobacter to (8).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Botany
    Introduction to Botany Jan Zientek Senior Program Coordinator Cooperative Extension of Essex County [email protected] Basic Botany • The study of the growth, structure and function of plants Plant Functions BOTANY • Evolution • Taxonomy • Plant morphology • Plant physiology and cell biology • Plant reproduction • Plant hormones and growth regulators PLANTAE • Eukaryotic (with a • Chloroplasts nucleus) (green) • Cell walls with • Non-motile cellulose • Several phlyum • Food stored as • Development of carbohydrate pollen • Multi-cellular autotrophs DOMAIN KINGDOM PHYLUM CLASS ORDER FAMILY Genus species Plant phylums Mosses Cycads Liverworts Ginkgoes Hornworts Gnetophytes Club mosses Conifers Horsetails Ferns Common Name vs Scientific Name Foxglove Digitalis purpurea • Maybe local name • Universally recognized • General • Specific Common Name vs Scientific Name Fire bush Scarlet bush Texas firecracker Corail (or is it Koray?) Hamelia patens Polly red head Hummingbird bush Ix-canan Plant Types • Monocots: have a single cotyledon, flower parts in multiples of three, parallel venation of leaves, scattered vascular bundles in stems. Dicots: have two cotyledons, flower parts in multiples of 4 or 5, netted veins, and stems which are organized in a ring pattern. Humans sort things many different ways • Plants can be classified by the type of their seed structure – Gymnosperm: “naked seed” – Angiosperm: seed within a fruiting body • Lifecycles help gardeners distinguish between plants: • Annuals • Biennials • Perennials Annuals complete life cycles in one season Biennials live for 2 years, flower, then die Perennials live for 3 or more years, flower each year and usually do not die after flowering. Structures of Plants Roots Stems Leaves Flowers Seeds Examples of Stem Structure Herbaceous monocot and dicot stem Root cross-section • Apical meristem: point of vigorous cell division and growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Description of the Sauropod Dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis
    Schwarz et al. Swiss J Geosci (2020) 113:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s00015-020-00355-5 Swiss Journal of Geosciences ORIGINAL PAPER Open Access Re-description of the sauropod dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis/Cetiosauriscus”) greppini n. gen. and other vertebrate remains from the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, Switzerland Daniela Schwarz1* , Philip D. Mannion2 , Oliver Wings3 and Christian A. Meyer4 Abstract Dinosaur remains were discovered in the 1860’s in the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, northwestern Switzerland. In the 1920’s, these were identifed as a new species of sauropod, Ornithopsis greppini, before being reclassifed as a species of Cetiosauriscus (C. greppini), otherwise known from the type species (C. stewarti) from the late Middle Jurassic (Callovian) of the UK. The syntype of “C. greppini” consists of skeletal elements from all body regions, and at least four individuals of diferent sizes can be distinguished. Here we fully re-describe this material, and re-evaluate its taxonomy and systematic placement. The Moutier locality also yielded a theropod tooth, and fragmen- tary cranial and vertebral remains of a crocodylomorph, also re-described here. “C.” greppini is a small-sized (not more than 10 m long) non-neosauropod eusauropod. Cetiosauriscus stewarti and “C.” greppini difer from each other in: (1) size; (2) the neural spine morphology and diapophyseal laminae of the anterior caudal vertebrae; (3) the length-to-height proportion in the middle caudal vertebrae; (4) the presence or absence of ridges and crests on the middle caudal cen- tra; and (5) the shape and proportions of the coracoid, humerus, and femur.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding
    SCIENTIFIC AND STANDARD ENGLISH NAMES OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES OF NORTH AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO, WITH COMMENTS REGARDING CONFIDENCE IN OUR UNDERSTANDING SIXTH EDITON COMMITTEE ON STANDARD ENGLISH AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES BRIAN I. CROTHER (Committee Chair) STANDARD ENGLISH AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES COMMITTEE Jeff Boundy, Frank T. Burbrink, Jonathan A. Campbell, Brian I. Crother, Kevin de Queiroz, Darrel R. Frost, Richard Highton, John B. Iverson, Fred Kraus, Roy W. McDiarmid, Joseph R. Mendelson III, Peter A. Meylan, Tod W. Reeder, Michael E. Seidel, Stephen G. Tilley, David B. Wake Official Names List of American Society of Ichythologists and Herpetologists Herpetologists League Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles 2008 SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES HERPETOLOGICAL CIRCULAR NO. 37 Published January 2008 © 2008 Society for the Study of Ampibians and Reptiles John J. Moriarty, Editor 3261 Victoria Street Shoreview, MN 55126 USA [email protected] Single copies of this circular are available from the Publications Secretary, Breck Bartholomew, P.O. Box 58517, Salt Lake City, Utah 84158–0517, USA. Telephone and fax: (801) 562-2660. E-mail: [email protected]. A list of other Society publications, including Facsimile Reprints in Herpetology, Herpetologi- cal Conservation, Contributions to Herpetology, and the Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles, will be sent on request or can be found at the end of this circular. Membership in the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles includes subscription to the Society’s technical Journal of Herpetology and new-journal Herpetological Review. Currently, Regular dues are $60.00 ($30.00 for students), Plenary $80.00 (includes JH, HR, and CAAR), and Institutional sub- scriptions are $115.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    z Available online at http://www.journalcra.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT RESEARCH International Journal of Current Research Vol. 9, Issue, 01, pp.45366-45369, January, 2017 ISSN: 0975-833X RESEARCH ARTICLE A STUDY ON DIVERSITY OF MOLLUSCS IN NEIL ISLANDS *,1Priyankadevi, 2Revathi, K., 3Senthil Kumari, S., 3Subashini, A. and 4Raghunathan, C. 1Guru Nanak College, Chennai 2Ethiraj College for Women, Chennai 3Chellammal Women’s College, Chennai 4Zoological Survey of India, A&NRC, Port Blair ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: The Andaman sea Eco region is biologically rich in both diversity and abundance. The high diversity is encountered from genus to individual species, habitat and ecosystems. The coral reefs, mangroves, sea grass beds, Received 29th October, 2016 marine lakes and deep sea valleys of the region form a constellation of diverse habitat that support a spectacular Received in revised form variety of fauna. Molluscsare highly successful invertebrates in terms of ecology and adaptation and are found 28th November, 2016 nearly in all habitats ranging from deepest ocean trenches to the intertidal zones, and freshwater to land occupying Accepted 07th December, 2016 a wide range of habitats. Much of the molluscan diversity occurs in the tropical world. Despite this great diversity, Published online 31st January, 2017 very few studies on molluscs have been carried out in the tropical world. An attempt was made to study the diversity and distribution of molluscs along the intertidal regions of Neil islands. During the survey three different Key words: beaches of Neil Island were selected, named, Sitapurbeach, Laxmanpur beach and Bharatpur beach. The study area is located 37 kms to lies in the northern part of south of the Andaman Islands.
    [Show full text]