Transfer of the Type Species of the Genus Themobacteroides to the Genus Themoanaerobacter As Themoanaerobacter Acetoethylicus (Ben-Bassat and Zeikus 1981) Comb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transfer of the Type Species of the Genus Themobacteroides to the Genus Themoanaerobacter As Themoanaerobacter Acetoethylicus (Ben-Bassat and Zeikus 1981) Comb INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICBACTERIOLOGY, Oct. 1993, p. 857-859 Vol. 43, No. 4 0020-7713/93/040857-03$02.00/0 Copyright 0 1993, International Union of Microbiological Societies Transfer of the Type Species of the Genus Themobacteroides to the Genus Themoanaerobacter as Themoanaerobacter acetoethylicus (Ben-Bassat and Zeikus 1981) comb. nov., Description of Coprothemobacter gen. nov., and Reclassification of Themobacteroides proteolyticus as Coprothennobacter proteolyticus (Ollivier et al. 1985) comb. nov. FRED A. RAINEY AND ERKO STACKEBRANDT* DSM-Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroolganisrnen und Zellkulturen, Mascheroder Weg lb, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany Phylogenetic and phenotypic evidence demonstrates the taxonomic heterogeneity of the genus Thennobac- teroides and indicates a close relationship between Thennobacteroides acetoethylicus and members of the genus Thennoanaerobacter. Since T. acetoethylicus is the type species of Thennobacteroides, its removal invalidates the genus. As a consequence, the remaining species Thennobacteroides proteolyticus is proposed as the type species of the new genus Coprothennobacter gen. nov., as Coprothennobacter proteolyticus comb. nov. Recent phylogenetic studies (8, 9) of anaerobic thermo- hybridization studies with all members of Thermoanaero- philic species demonstrated that the majority of strains fall bacter (6, 10) despite the fact that, like Thermoanaerobacter within the phylogenetic confines of the Clostridium-Bacillus species, Thermobacteroides acetoethylicus is an anaerobic, subphylum of gram-positive bacteria. In contrast to the thermophilic, glycolytic bacterium capable of growth above phylog enet ically coherent genera Thermoana erobac ter (6) 70°C that has been isolated from geothermal environments. and Thermoanaerobacterium (6), members of Thermobac- The reclassifications of the recent study of Lee et al. (6) teroides (1,7) belonged to phylogenetically very diverse taxa increased the numbers of species of Thermoanaerobacter to (8). While the type species Thermobacteroides acetoethyli- now include Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus, Thermo- cus (1) was closely related to members of Thermoanaero- anaerobacter brockii, Thermoanaerobacterfinnii, and Ther- bacter (9), Thermobacteroides proteolyticus represented a moanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus. Thermobacteroi- deep root adjacent to members of the order Thermotogales, des acetoethylicus seems to have been overlooked in recent showing only 81.9% sequence similarity with Thermobac- studies, possibly because of the differences previously re- teroides acetoethylicus over the stretch of about 1,200 ported to exist between Thermobacteroides acetoethylicus analyzed nucleotides (8). On the basis of these phylogenetic and Thermoanaerobacterbrockii (1) in motility, Gram stain- findings, supported by phenotypic characteristics, we put ing, fermentation end products, cell wall structure, and forward the evidence for the reclassification of the species (detected later) spore formation (2). These organisms share investigated. The genus Thermobacteroides contains three as one of the main features used to define members of validly described species, Thermobacteroides acetoethyli- Thermoanaerobacter the reduction of thiosulfate, but not cus (1, 9), Thermobacteroides proteolyticus (7), and Ther- sulfate, to sulfide (1, 5). Other common features (for which mobacteroides leptospartum (4, 12). Attempts to obtain data are available) are rod-shaped morphology of organisms Thermobacteroides leptosparhrm IAM 13499 from the Insti- from the logarithmic phase of growth, DNA base composi- tute of Applied Microbiology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, tion of 31 to 37 mol% (not considering the high values of 37 Japan, failed. This article is composed of two parts: (i) the transfer of the to 39 mol% determined for Thermoanaerobacterethanolicus type species of Thermobacteroides, Thermobacteroides ac- by the buoyant density method), high G+C composition (56 etoethylicus, to the genus Thermoanaerobacter, with the to 59 mol%) of genes coding for rRNA, lack of catalase and consequence of invalidating the genus Thermobacteroides, cytochromes, maximum growth temperature above 75"C, and (ii) the description of the genus Coprothermobacter and optimal growth temperature above 65"C, and a pH for the assignment of Thermobacteroides proteolyticus as the growth between 5.5 and 8.5 (1,5,10,13). In addition, Wiegel type species Coprothermobacterproteolyticus . (14) pointed out that the only difference between Thermo- Thennoanaerobacter acetoethylicus comb. nov. Genera anaerobacter ethanolicus and Thermobacteroides acetoeth- Thermobacteroides and Thermoanaerobacter were both de- ylicus is the inability of the latter species to form more than scribed in 1981 (1, 13), and the type strain of each was not 1.5 mol of ethanol per mol of glucose utilized. available to the authors of the article on the other genus for Description of Thennoanaerobacter acetoethylicus (Ben-Bas- direct comparison. It was not until recently that the close sat and Zeikus) comb. nov. The description of the species phylogenetic relatedness of the type strains of the type has not been emended since its effective published descrip- species of these two genera was demonstrated (9). Thermo- tion (1, 3). The transfer of the species to the genus Thermo- bacteroides acetoethylicus was never included in DNA anaerobacter does not change the description of this genus. The type strain of Thennoanaerobacter acetoethylicus is HTB2/W (ATCC 33265). * Corresponding author. Description of the genus Coprothennobacter. The transfer of 857 858 NOTES INT. J. SYST.BACTERIOL. TABLE 1. Characteristics differentiating C. proteolyticus from phylogenetically related and phenotypically similar taxa Optimum Maximum Fermentation end So metabolism Bacterium(-a) products? Coprothermobacterproteo- Rods; pleomorph - 45 63 75 A, CO,, H, NR~ lytiCU ,Aquifexpyrophilus Rods, aggregates + 40 85 95 -c H,S from sulfur Thermotoga spp . Rods, toga VaP 4046 70-80 90 L, A, COz, H, H,S from sulfur Thermosipho spp. Rods, toga, chains - 30 75 77 L, A, CO,, H, H2S from sulfur Fervidobacterium spp. Rods, spheroids Var 3440 65 80 L, A, E, b, v, CO,, H, H2S from sulfur Thermoanaerobacter spp. Rods Var 31-37 64-69 75-78 A, E, L, CO,, H, H,S from thiosulfate Thermoanaerobacteriumspp. Rods + 33-36 60 68-75 A, E, L, CO,, H, So from thiosulfate A, acetate; L, lactate; E, ethanol; b, n-butyrate; v, n-valerate. NR, not reported. -, A. mrophilus is chemolithoautotrophic. Var, variable. the type species of the genus Thermobacteroides to the We thank Thomas 0. MacAdoo for his help in nomenclatural genus Thennoanaerobacter invalidates the genus Thermo- matters. bacteroides (rule 37a [l])(11). In order to find a place for the orphan Thermobacteroides proteolyticus, two options are REFERENCES available. One could revive the genus Thermobacteroides, 1. Ben-Bassat, A., and J. G. Zeikus. 1981. Thermobacteroides or alternatively, a new genus could be proposed. The revival acetoethylicus gen. nov. sp. nov., a new chemoorganotrophic, of Themobacteroides, in our opinion, is unwise since the anaerobic, thermophilic bacterium. Arch. Microbiol. 128365- -bacteroides part of the name implies a relationship to the 370. 2. Cook, G. M., P. H. Janssen, and H. W. Morgan. 1991. Endo- genus Bacteroides. As pointed out previously (8), Thenno- spore formation by Themzoanaerobium brockii HTD4. Syst . bacteroides proteolyticus is not a member of the Bacte- Appl. Microbiol. 14240-244. roides-Cytophaga phylum but constitutes a deep-rooting 3. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 1983. Valida- phylum of the domain Bacteria. The origin of this species tion of the publication of new names and new combinations from a thermophilic digester fed with cattle manure and previously effectively published outside the IJSB. List no. 11. tannery waste led us to propose the genus name Coprother- Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 33:672-674. rnobacter. This name appears to be appropriate, since the 4. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 1989. Valida- currently unavailable species Thermobacteroides leptospar- tion of the publication of new names and new combinations (12), which resembles Thermobacteroidesproteolyticus previously effectively published outside the IJSB. List no. 28. turn Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 39:93-94. in phenotypic properties and the base composition of DNA 5. Jain, M. K., and J. G. Zeikus. 1992. The genera Thermoanaer- (Table l),was also isolated from cattle manure. As long as obacter, Thermoanaerobium, and other thermoanaerobic sac- Thennobacteroides leptospartum is unavailable, its phylo- charolytic bacteria of uncertain taxonomic affiliation, p. 1901- genetic position cannot be determined, and hence, this 1913. In A. Ballows, H. G. Truper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder, species cannot be reclassified at this time. and K.-H. Schleifer (ed.), The prokaryotes, 2nd ed. Springer- C. proteolyticus is proposed as the type species because Verlag, New York. its description (7) predates that of Thermobacteroides 6. Lee, Y. E., M. K. Jain, C. Lee, S. E. Lowe, and J. G. Zeikus. leptosparturn (4, 12). Members of the genus Coprothenno- 1993. Taxonomic distinction of saccharolytic thermophilic bacter can be distinguished from other anaerobic, thermo- anaerobes: description of Thermoanaerobacterium xylano- iyticum gen. nov., sp. nov., and Thermoanaerobacterium philic bacteria by a combination of characters (Table 1). saccharolyticum gen. nov., sp. nov.; reclassification of Ther- Description
Recommended publications
  • Biology Assessment Plan Spring 2019
    Biological Sciences Department 1 Biology Assessment Plan Spring 2019 Task: Revise the Biology Program Assessment plans with the goal of developing a sustainable continuous improvement plan. In order to revise the program assessment plan, we have been asked by the university assessment committee to revise our Students Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs). Proposed revisions Approach: A large community of biology educators have converged on a set of core biological concepts with five core concepts that all biology majors should master by graduation, namely 1) evolution; 2) structure and function; 3) information flow, exchange, and storage; 4) pathways and transformations of energy and matter; and (5) systems (Vision and Change, AAAS, 2011). Aligning our student learning and program goals with Vision and Change (V&C) provides many advantages. For example, the V&C community has recently published a programmatic assessment to measure student understanding of vision and change core concepts across general biology programs (Couch et al. 2019). They have also carefully outlined student learning conceptual elements (see Appendix A). Using the proposed assessment will allow us to compare our student learning profiles to those of similar institutions across the country. Revised Student Learning Objectives SLO 1. Students will demonstrate an understanding of core concepts spanning scales from molecules to ecosystems, by analyzing biological scenarios and data from scientific studies. Students will correctly identify and explain the core biological concepts involved relative to: biological evolution, structure and function, information flow, exchange, and storage, the pathways and transformations of energy and matter, and biological systems. More detailed statements of the conceptual elements students need to master are presented in appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Botany
    Introduction to Botany Jan Zientek Senior Program Coordinator Cooperative Extension of Essex County [email protected] Basic Botany • The study of the growth, structure and function of plants Plant Functions BOTANY • Evolution • Taxonomy • Plant morphology • Plant physiology and cell biology • Plant reproduction • Plant hormones and growth regulators PLANTAE • Eukaryotic (with a • Chloroplasts nucleus) (green) • Cell walls with • Non-motile cellulose • Several phlyum • Food stored as • Development of carbohydrate pollen • Multi-cellular autotrophs DOMAIN KINGDOM PHYLUM CLASS ORDER FAMILY Genus species Plant phylums Mosses Cycads Liverworts Ginkgoes Hornworts Gnetophytes Club mosses Conifers Horsetails Ferns Common Name vs Scientific Name Foxglove Digitalis purpurea • Maybe local name • Universally recognized • General • Specific Common Name vs Scientific Name Fire bush Scarlet bush Texas firecracker Corail (or is it Koray?) Hamelia patens Polly red head Hummingbird bush Ix-canan Plant Types • Monocots: have a single cotyledon, flower parts in multiples of three, parallel venation of leaves, scattered vascular bundles in stems. Dicots: have two cotyledons, flower parts in multiples of 4 or 5, netted veins, and stems which are organized in a ring pattern. Humans sort things many different ways • Plants can be classified by the type of their seed structure – Gymnosperm: “naked seed” – Angiosperm: seed within a fruiting body • Lifecycles help gardeners distinguish between plants: • Annuals • Biennials • Perennials Annuals complete life cycles in one season Biennials live for 2 years, flower, then die Perennials live for 3 or more years, flower each year and usually do not die after flowering. Structures of Plants Roots Stems Leaves Flowers Seeds Examples of Stem Structure Herbaceous monocot and dicot stem Root cross-section • Apical meristem: point of vigorous cell division and growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Description of the Sauropod Dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis
    Schwarz et al. Swiss J Geosci (2020) 113:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s00015-020-00355-5 Swiss Journal of Geosciences ORIGINAL PAPER Open Access Re-description of the sauropod dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis/Cetiosauriscus”) greppini n. gen. and other vertebrate remains from the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, Switzerland Daniela Schwarz1* , Philip D. Mannion2 , Oliver Wings3 and Christian A. Meyer4 Abstract Dinosaur remains were discovered in the 1860’s in the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, northwestern Switzerland. In the 1920’s, these were identifed as a new species of sauropod, Ornithopsis greppini, before being reclassifed as a species of Cetiosauriscus (C. greppini), otherwise known from the type species (C. stewarti) from the late Middle Jurassic (Callovian) of the UK. The syntype of “C. greppini” consists of skeletal elements from all body regions, and at least four individuals of diferent sizes can be distinguished. Here we fully re-describe this material, and re-evaluate its taxonomy and systematic placement. The Moutier locality also yielded a theropod tooth, and fragmen- tary cranial and vertebral remains of a crocodylomorph, also re-described here. “C.” greppini is a small-sized (not more than 10 m long) non-neosauropod eusauropod. Cetiosauriscus stewarti and “C.” greppini difer from each other in: (1) size; (2) the neural spine morphology and diapophyseal laminae of the anterior caudal vertebrae; (3) the length-to-height proportion in the middle caudal vertebrae; (4) the presence or absence of ridges and crests on the middle caudal cen- tra; and (5) the shape and proportions of the coracoid, humerus, and femur.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylocode: a Phylogenetic Code of Biological Nomenclature
    PhyloCode: A Phylogenetic Code of Biological Nomenclature Philip D. Cantino and Kevin de Queiroz (equal contributors; names listed alphabetically) Advisory Group: William S. Alverson, David A. Baum, Harold N. Bryant, David C. Cannatella, Peter R. Crane, Michael J. Donoghue, Torsten Eriksson*, Jacques Gauthier, Kenneth Halanych, David S. Hibbett, David M. Hillis, Kathleen A. Kron, Michael S. Y. Lee, Alessandro Minelli, Richard G. Olmstead, Fredrik Pleijel*, J. Mark Porter, Heidi E. Robeck, Greg W. Rouse, Timothy Rowe*, Christoffer Schander, Per Sundberg, Mikael Thollesson, and Andre R. Wyss. *Chaired a committee that authored a portion of the current draft. Most recent revision: April 8, 2000 1 Table of Contents Preface Preamble Division I. Principles Division II. Rules Chapter I. Taxa Article 1. The Nature of Taxa Article 2. Clades Article 3. Hierarchy and Rank Chapter II. Publication Article 4. Publication Requirements Article 5. Publication Date Chapter III. Names Section 1. Status Article 6 Section 2. Establishment Article 7. General Requirements Article 8. Registration Chapter IV. Clade Names Article 9. General Requirements for Establishment of Clade Names Article 10. Selection of Clade Names for Establishment Article 11. Specifiers and Qualifying Clauses Chapter V. Selection of Accepted Names Article 12. Precedence Article 13. Homonymy Article 14. Synonymy Article 15. Conservation Chapter VI. Provisions for Hybrids Article 16. Chapter VII. Orthography Article 17. Orthographic Requirements for Establishment Article 18. Subsequent Use and Correction of Established Names Chapter VIII. Authorship of Names Article 19. Chapter IX. Citation of Authors and Registration Numbers Article 20. Chapter X. Governance Article 21. Glossary Table 1. Equivalence of Nomenclatural Terms Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in International Biological Nomenclature
    TurkJBot 28(2004)17-26 ©TÜB‹TAK RecentDevelopmentsinInternationalBiologicalNomenclature WernerGREUTER BotanischerGarten&BotanischesMuseumBerlin-Dahlem,Königin-Luise-Str.6-8,D-14191Berlin,Germany. Received:08.11.2002 Accepted:29.01.2003 Abstract: Afteraperiodofseveraldecadesofgeneralneglect,biologicalsystematicsandtaxonomyareagainsurfacingtothe awarenessofthescientificcommunityandofpolicymakers.Thisweowetothefactthattheyarethecoredisciplinesofbiodiversity research,nowperceivedtobeaprioritytaskinviewoftheimpendingthreatoflossthroughextinctionofagreatnumberofspecies, andthewholesaledestructionofecosystems.Yettherenaissanceofsystematicsandtaxonomyishamperedbytheinadequacyof thetraditionalrulesgoverningtheformationanduseofscientificnamesoforganisms.Namesareacoreaspectofhuman communication.Theyarethemeansbywhichscientistsandlaymenalikerefertoorganisms,theindispensablelabelsthatenablethe storage,retrievalandcommunicationofanyandallorganism-linkeddata.Thispaperhighlightsthefundamentalinadequacyof traditionalnomenclatural Codes tofulfiltheirrole.Pastattemptstointroducenewconceptsintobotanicalnomenclature,suchas theregistrationofnewnamesandthestabilisationoftheexistingoneswhicharepresentlyused,arementioned–aswellast heir failuretogainacceptancebythesmallandhighlyself-centredcommunityofspecialistsinthefield.Recentattemptstolaunc h competingsetsofrules,the“ Phylocode”inparticular,arealsodiscussed.Whiletheymaybeasuitablemeansofbreakingthedire monopolyoftheCodes,theyalsohaveadangerousdestabilisingpotential.Newsolutions,whicharedoubtlessneeded,requiregreat
    [Show full text]
  • 2. General Zoology
    Uppsala University Museum of Evolution Zoology section Catalogue of type specimens. 2. General zoology 1 UPPSALA UNIVERSITY, MUSEUM OF EVOLUTION, ZOOLOGY SECTION (UUZM) Catalogue of type specimens. 2. General zoology The UUZM catalogue of type specimens is issued in four parts: 1. C.P.Thunberg (1743-1828), Insecta 2. General zoology (this part) 3. Entomology 4. Linnaean specimens The groups 'Myriapoda' and Symphyla are included in this part of the catalogue although they are generally referred to 'entomology'. Naturally, the size of the type collection will increase in connection with new contributions but also with the 'discovery' of disregarded old type specimens not yet transferred from the general collections. Revised versions of the catalogue will successively be available. CONTENTS: • Introduction, p. 1. • List of protologues (published articles giving descriptions of new species), pp. 2-33. • Alphabetically arranged list, pp. 34-67 (type specimens grouped in:) Anthozoa Hemichordata Protozoa Anura Holothuroidea Reptilia Archiannelida Hydrozoa Spongiaria Aves Mammalia Symphyla Bryozoa Mollusca Trematoda Cestoda Myriapoda Tunicata Crinoidea Pisces Turbellaria Crustacea Pogonophora Entoprocta Polychaeta __________________________________________________________________________ This is a revised version 4 of a list compiled by Lars Wallin. Date of issue: 1996/12/04 (version 1 issued 1990/10/18). ___________________________________________________________________________ Uppsala University, Museum of Evolution, Zoology section (before 1999: Uppsala University Zoological Museum. International abbreviation UUZM is retained) Norbyvägen 16, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden 2 Protologues (UUZM:2. General Zoology) Afzelius, Adam. 1802. In: Latham, J. A Natural History, or General Synopsis of Birds, Suppl. 2. - London. Caprimulgus macrodipterus AVES type # 326 Ailly, Adolf d'. 1896. Contributions á la connaissance des mollusques terrestres et d'eau douce de Kaméroun.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 — Basic Botany
    Chapter 3 BASIC BOTANY IDAHO MASTER GARDENER UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO EXTENSION Introduction 2 Plant Nomenclature and Classification 2 Family 3 Genus 3 Species 3 Variety and Cultivar 3 Plant Life Cycles 6 Annuals 6 Biennials 6 Perennials 6 Plant Parts and Their Functions 7 Vegetative Parts: Leaves, Stems, and Roots 7 Reproductive Parts: Flowers, Fruits, and Seeds 10 Plant Development 14 Seed Germination 14 Vegetative Growth Stage 14 Reproductive Growth Stage 14 Senescence 15 Further Reading and Resources 15 CHAPTER 3 BASIC BOTANY 3 - 1 Chapter 3 Basic Botany Jennifer Jensen, Extension Educator, Boundary County Susan Bell, Extension Educator, Ada County William Bohl, Extension Educator, Bingham County Stephen Love, Consumer Horticulture Specialist, Aberdeen Research and Extension Center Illustrations by Jennifer Jensen INTRODUCTION varying from country to country, region to region, and sometimes even within a local area. This makes Botany is the study of plants. To become a it difficult to communicate about a plant. For knowledgeable plant person, it is essential to example, the state flower of Idaho is Philadelphus understand basic plant science. It is important to lewisii , commonly called syringa in Idaho. In other understand how plants grow, how their various parts parts of the country, however, the same plant is function, how they are identified and named, and known as mock orange. To add to the confusion, how they interact with their environment. Learning Syringa is the genus for lilac shrubs. Another the language of botany means learning many new example of confusing common names is Malva words. Making the effort to learn this material will parviflora , which is called little mallow, round leaf prove extremely valuable and will create excitement mallow, cheeseweed, or sometimes buttonweed.
    [Show full text]
  • Iridomyrmex Purpureus, and Its Taxonomic Significance
    4 ¿l 'lcl GENETIC STUDIES OF MEAT A}ITS (tazaouvaunx PunPuaws) . by R, B. Hallida/, B.Sc.(Hons.) Department of Genetics University of Adelaide. A thesis subnitted to the University of Adelaide for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in May, 1978' TABLE QF 'CONTENTS Page SUMMARY i DECLARATION ].V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION I CHAPTER 2 ECOLOGY AND SYSTET{ATICS OF MEAT A¡ITS 4 2,L Taxonomic background 4 2.2 Appearance of colour forms 7 2.3 Geographic distribution 10 2.4 Interactions between colour fonts T2 2.5 Mating and colony founding 15 2.6 Nest structure T7 2.7 Colony and popu3..ation structure 20 2.8 General biology and pest status 24 ?o 0verview 28 CHAPTER J MATERIALS AND METHODS 29 3 I Populations sanpled 29 3 2 Collection nethods 38 3.3 Sanple preparation 59 3.4 Electrophoresis nethods 40 3.5 Gel staining nethods 42 3.6 Chronosome nethods 47 CHAPTER 4 POLYMORPHISM AT TÍ{Ë AMYT,ASE LOCUS 48 4.L The phenotypes and their inheritance 48 4.2 Estination of gene frequencies 51 4.3 Geographic variation within forms 56 4.4 Differences anong forrns 58 POLYMORPHISM AT THE ESTERÄSE=] LOCUS 61 The phenotypes and their inheritance 6L Estination of gene frequencies 63 Within and between fo::rn variation 65 Discussion 67 CHAPTER 6 OTHER ISOZYME LQCI IN MEAT ANTS 69 6.1 Aldehgde. oxÍdase 69 6.2 Esüerase-2 70 6.3 Esterase:3 72 6.4 General protein 74 6.s G Tuco se*6 -.p/:o sphate dehgdrog enase 75 6.6 G Tutamate dehgclrogenase 76 6.7 Lactate dehgdrogenase 77 6.8 Leucíne amÍnopeptÌdase 78 6.9 I{alate dehgdrogenase 79 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Type Specimens of Birds in the Collections of the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology
    MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 174 Type Specimens of Birds in the Collections of the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Robert W. Storer Museum of Zoology and Department of Biology The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48 109-1079 Ann Arbor MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN July 6, 1988 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 174 The publications of the Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, consist of two series-the Occasional Papers and the Miscellaneous Publications. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. The Occasional Papers, initiated in 1913, serve as a medium for original studies based principally upon the collections in the Museum. They are issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, the Museum will supply a title page, table of contents, and an index to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. The Miscellaneous Publications, which include papers on field and museum techniques, monographic studies, and other contributions not within the scope of Occasional Papers, were established in 1916 and are published separately. It is not intended that they be grouped into volumes. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. A complete list of publications on Birds, Fishes, Insects, Mammals, Mollusks, and Reptiles and Amphibians is available. Address inquiries to the Director, Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1079. MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Classification
    Taxonomy and Classification Taxonomy = the science of naming and describing species “Wisdom begins with calling things by their right names” -Chinese Proverb museums contain ~ 2 Billion specimens worldwide about 1.5 M different species of life have been described each year ~ 13,000 new species are described most scientists estimate that there are at least 50 to 100 Million actual species sharing our planet today most will probably remain unknown forever: the most diverse areas of world are the most remote most of the large stuff has been found and described not enough researchers or money to devote to this work Common vs Scientific Name many larger organisms have “common names” but sometimes >1 common name for same organism sometimes same common name used for 2 or more distinctly different organisms eg. daisy eg. moss eg. mouse eg. fern eg. bug Taxonomy and Classification, Ziser Lecture Notes, 2004 1 without a specific (unique) name it’s impossible to communicate about specific organisms What Characteristics are used how do we begin to categorize, classify and name all these organisms there are many ways to classify: form color size chemical structure genetic makeup earliest attempts used general appearance ie anatomy and physiological similarities plants vs animals only largest animals were categorized everything else was “vermes” but algae, protozoa today, much more focus on molecular similarities proteins, DNA, genes History of Classification Aristotle was the first to try to name and classify things based on structural similarities
    [Show full text]
  • Biology (BY) 1
    Biology (BY) 1 BY-108 Evolution and the History of Life on Earth Credits: 3 BIOLOGY (BY) Term Offered: Spring Term Course Type(s): NS BY-101 Issues and Methods of Biology Credits: 3 Examines evolution both as a process and as a phenomenon. Students Prerequisite(s): SC-100 will examine how evolutionary processes occur in time, both very short Term Offered: Spring Term and geological time scales, and how both are studied. Students will Course Type(s): None review the history of life on earth with emphasis on major lineages Major concepts in biological science and their importance in current such as vertebrates, mollusks, insects and plants, as well as basic society. Methods and approaches to questions in biology. Cannot be used geological processes and continental drift during these time periods. in satisfaction of a major requirement in the Biology program. Bacterial evolution will be examined in the context of the importance BY-102 Applications in Biotechnology Credits: 3 of understanding natural selection and evolution and their impacts Term Offered: Spring Term on society and medicine. Emphasis will be placed on understanding Course Type(s): NS evolution of groups and processes often cited in creationist arguments, Introduction for non-science majors. The focus is on basic principles of to help students be prepared to enter civil discourse as informed biotechnology along with an exploration of associated bioethical issues. citizens. Evidence of evolutionary change from the fossil record and DNA The laboratory component serves to familiarize students with scientific sequences of organisms will be compared and reviewed. practice. BY-109 Introduction to Biodiversity and Evolution Credits: 4 BY-103 Environmental Science Credits: 3 Term Offered: All Terms Term Offered: All Terms Course Type(s): NS Course Type(s): NS An introductory course for biology majors.
    [Show full text]
  • Brachiosaurus Brancai Janensch, 1914 Mounted and Exhibited at the Museum of Natural History (Berlin, Germany)
    Fossil Record 11 (1) 2008, 33–38 / DOI 10.1002/mmng.200700011 museum fu¨ r naturkunde der Humboldt-Universita¨t zuBerlin A new body mass estimation of Brachiosaurus brancai Janensch, 1914 mounted and exhibited at the Museum of Natural History (Berlin, Germany) Hanns-Christian Gunga*,1, Tim Suthau2, Anke Bellmann2, Stefan Stoinski2, Andreas Friedrich2, Tobias Trippel1, Karl Kirsch1 and Olaf Hellwich2 1 Department of Physiology, Center of Space Medicine Berlin, Charit Universittsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Arminallee 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Computer Vision and Remote Sensing, TU Berlin, Franklinstraße 28/29, 10587 Berlin, Germany. Abstract Received 17 July 2007 Body mass and surface areas are important in several aspects for an organism living Accepted 10 September 2007 today. Therefore, mass and surface determinations for extinct dinosaurs could be im- Published 15 February 2008 portant for paleo-biological aspects as well. Based on photogrammetrical measurement the body mass and body surface area of the Late Jurassic Brachiosaurus brancai Janensch, 1914 from Tendaguru (East Africa), a skeleton mounted and exhibited at the Museum of Natural History in Berlin (Germany), has been re-evaluated. We deter- mined for a slim type of 3D reconstruction of Brachiosaurus brancai a total volume of 47.9 m3 which represents, assuming a mean tissue density of 0.8 kg per 1,000 cm3,a total body mass of 38,000 kg. The volume distributions from the head to the tail were Key Words as follows: 0.2 m3 for the head, neck 7.3 m3, fore limbs 2.9 m3, hind limbs 2.6 m3, thoracic-abdominal cavity 32.4 m3, tail 2.2 m3.
    [Show full text]