DOCSLIB.ORG

Community-Based Dispute Resolution Processes in Balkh Province

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community-Based Dispute Resolution Processes in Balkh Province AfghanistanAfghanistan Research Research and andEvaluation Evaluation Unit Unit CaseCase Study Study Series Series Community-Based Dispute Resolution Processes in Balkh Province Rebecca Gang Funding for this research was provided by the United Kingdom Department for October 2010 International Development (DFID) Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Editor: Amanda Morgan Layout: Jay Lamey AREU Publication Code: 1036E © 2010 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Some rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted only for non-commercial purposes and with written credit to AREU and the author. Where this publication is reproduced, stored or transmitted electronically, a link to AREU’s website (www.areu.org.af) should be provided. Any use of this publication falling outside of these permissions requires prior written permission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be sought by emailing [email protected] or by calling (+93) 799 608 548. Community-Based Dispute Resolution Processes in Balkh Province About the Author Rebecca Gang joined the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit in June 2010 to complete the Community-Based Dispute Resolution series. She has been working on programs related to rule of law, legal aid/legal access, and legal development in Afghanistan since 2006. Between 2006 and 2008, Rebecca served as Project Coordinator for the Norwegian Refugee Council’s Information Counseling and Legal Assistance Program in Herat, Pul-i-Khumri and Kunduz, focusing on resolution of displacement-related land conflict through state and non-state legal mechanisms. She subsequently worked as Advisor to the Afghan Independent Bar Association during its inaugural year (2008-2009). Rebecca received her J.D. from Northeastern University School of Law and her LL.M. from Harvard Law School, where she wrote a thesis entitled Seeing Like a Law Reformer: A Case Study of the Afghan Independent Bar Association. About the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) is an independent research institute based in Kabul. AREU’s mission is to inform and influence policy and practice through conducting high-quality, policy-relevant research and actively disseminating the results, and to promote a culture of research and learning. To achieve its mission AREU engages with policymakers, civil society, researchers and students to promote their use of AREU’s research and its library, to strengthen their research capacity, and to create opportunities for analysis, reflection and debate. AREU was established in 2002 by the assistance community working in Afghanistan and has a board of directors with representation from donors, the United Nations and other multilateral agencies, and non-governmental organisations. AREU currently receives core funds from the governments of Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Specific projects have been funded by the Foundation of the Open Society Institute Afghanistan (FOSIA), the Asia Foundation (TAF), the European Commission (EC) and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC). Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Acknowledgements Above all, this paper would not have been possible without the efforts of Deborah J. Smith in designing and managing the data collection process during the research phase. I thus layer my gratitude on top of hers for the hospitality and cooperation of the people of Balkh Province in the two villages and district centre where this research was conducted, who willingly gave up their time to talk to the research team. Without these people’s knowledge, understanding and insights into their own lives and the way in which they experience and negotiate through conflict, this research would not have been possible. While my name appears on the front of this paper, I only served to bring together the hard work of others. This paper could not have been written without the efforts of Fauzia Rahimi, who spent countless hours talking me through the data, painting a picture of interviews as they took place, and helping me to sort and analyse. Fauzia also made significant contributions to the writing and analysis of the case summaries, glossary and Sections 5 and 6 of the paper. Thanks also to the other CBDR research team members responsible for data collection, translation and analysis, namely Shelly Manalan, Jamila Wafa, Gholam Sakhi Frozish and Wakil Ahmad Barakzai. Special thanks to Paula Kantor and Paul Fishstein for the opportunity, to all of those who offered excellent feedback and invaluable insight during the revision process, to Amanda Morgan for editorial support, and to my family, Susan, Evelyn and Albert Lerman and Toby Leslie for everything. Rebecca Gang October 2010 Community-Based Dispute Resolution Processes in Balkh Province Table of Contents Acronyms ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� v Glossary .............................................................................................. v 1. Introduction ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 1 2. Key Themes and Findings ..................................................................... 6 2.1 Adaptability and pragmatism ............................................................ 6 2.2 CBDR and the state ........................................................................ 6 2.3 CBDR principles, legitimacy and capacity ............................................. 6 2.4 Gender equity .............................................................................. 7 3. Research Methodology and Site Selection ................................................. 8 3.1 Research methodology .................................................................... 8 3.2 Site selection: District and village context ............................................ 9 4. Legal Pluralism and CBDR in Afghanistan ................................................. 14 5. CBDR Mechanisms ............................................................................. 18 5.1 The whitebeards’ jalasa ................................................................. 18 5.2 From the whitebeards to the woliswali and back ................................... 26 6. Choosing a Forum ............................................................................. 32 6.1 Big and small cases ....................................................................... 32 6.2 Other factors affecting forum choice ................................................. 41 7. Conclusion ..................................................................................... 47 Annex: Case Summaries .......................................................................... 50 Bibliography ........................................................................................ 64 Recent Publications from AREU .................................................................. 68 List of Boxes Box 1. Plural systems, regulated by autonomy and respect ................................ 17 Box 2. Characteristics of whitebeards in CBDR ............................................... 20 Box 3. The role of the mullah in CBDR today .................................................. 21 Box 4. Women’s role in family mediation ...................................................... 21 Box 5. The khadim: An evolving leadership role for women ................................ 22 Box 6. Keeping family disputes out of sight ................................................... 23 Box 7. The jalasa process ......................................................................... 24 Box 8. Women’s access to outsiders and the role of the wakil ............................. 25 Box 9. Women’s access to information and expectations of deference ................... 25 Box 10. Differentiating between district actors .............................................. 28 Box 11. The mesher as gatekeeper ............................................................. 30 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Box 12. Determining jurisdiction: Big and small cases ....................................... 33 Box 13. Social and personal significance of islah ............................................. 34 Box 14. From urfi to Sharia: The shifting value of documentation......................... 35 Box 15. Whitebeards’ enforcement mechanisms ............................................. 37 Box 16. Cases involving water ................................................................... 37 Box 17. Whitebeards in the district: Sharing local knowledge and enforcement capacity ....38 Box 18. Women’s access in land disputes ...................................................... 41 Box 19. Islah by coercion ......................................................................... 42 Box 20. Accessing the district as a violation of community autonomy .................... 43 Box 21. Women’s access to the woliswali ...................................................... 43 Box 22. Corruption among district officials .................................................... 44 Box 23. Abuse of authority by community elders ............................................. 45 Box 24. If there were no corruption... ......................................................... 46 Acronyms CBDR community-based dispute resolution, see Page 2 for definition NGO non-governmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Justice & Security Practices, Perceptions, and Problems in Kabul and Nangarhar
    Justice & Security Practices, Perceptions, and Problems in Kabul and Nangarhar M AY 2014 Above: Behsud Bridge, Nangarhar Province (Photo by TLO) A TLO M A P P I N G R EPORT Justice and Security Practices, Perceptions, and Problems in Kabul and Nangarhar May 2014 In Cooperation with: © 2014, The Liaison Office. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher, The Liaison Office. Permission can be obtained by emailing [email protected] ii Acknowledgements This report was commissioned from The Liaison Office (TLO) by Cordaid’s Security and Justice Business Unit. Research was conducted via cooperation between the Afghan Women’s Resource Centre (AWRC) and TLO, under the supervision and lead of the latter. Cordaid was involved in the development of the research tools and also conducted capacity building by providing trainings to the researchers on the research methodology. While TLO makes all efforts to review and verify field data prior to publication, some factual inaccuracies may still remain. TLO and AWRC are solely responsible for possible inaccuracies in the information presented. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cordaid. The Liaison Office (TL0) The Liaison Office (TLO) is an independent Afghan non-governmental organization established in 2003 seeking to improve local governance, stability and security through systematic and institutionalized engagement with customary structures, local communities, and civil society groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan State Structure and Security Forces
    European Asylum Support Office Afghanistan State Structure and Security Forces Country of Origin Information Report August 2020 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office Afghanistan State Structure and Security Forces Country of Origin Information Report August 2020 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). ISBN: 978-92-9485-650-0 doi: 10.2847/115002 BZ-02-20-565-EN-N © European Asylum Support Office (EASO) 2020 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, unless otherwise stated. For third-party materials reproduced in this publication, reference is made to the copyrights statements of the respective third parties. Cover photo: © Al Jazeera English, Helmand, Afghanistan 3 November 2012, url CC BY-SA 2.0 Taliban On the Doorstep: Afghan soldiers from 215 Corps take aim at Taliban insurgents. 4 — AFGHANISTAN: STATE STRUCTURE AND SECURITY FORCES - EASO COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT Acknowledgements This report was drafted by the European Asylum Support Office COI Sector. The following national asylum and migration department contributed by reviewing this report: The Netherlands, Office for Country Information and Language Analysis, Ministry of Justice It must be noted that the review carried out by the mentioned departments, experts or organisations contributes to the overall quality of the report, it but does not necessarily imply their formal endorsement of the final report, which is the full responsibility of EASO. AFGHANISTAN: STATE STRUCTURE AND SECURITY
    [Show full text]
  • 19 October 2020 "Generated on Refers to the Date on Which the User Accessed the List and Not the Last Date of Substantive Update to the List
    Res. 1988 (2011) List The List established and maintained pursuant to Security Council res. 1988 (2011) Generated on: 19 October 2020 "Generated on refers to the date on which the user accessed the list and not the last date of substantive update to the list. Information on the substantive list updates are provided on the Council / Committee’s website." Composition of the List The list consists of the two sections specified below: A. Individuals B. Entities and other groups Information about de-listing may be found at: https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/ombudsperson (for res. 1267) https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sanctions/delisting (for other Committees) https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/2231/list (for res. 2231) A. Individuals TAi.155 Name: 1: ABDUL AZIZ 2: ABBASIN 3: na 4: na ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻋﺒﺎﺳﯿﻦ :(Name (original script Title: na Designation: na DOB: 1969 POB: Sheykhan Village, Pirkowti Area, Orgun District, Paktika Province, Afghanistan Good quality a.k.a.: Abdul Aziz Mahsud Low quality a.k.a.: na Nationality: na Passport no: na National identification no: na Address: na Listed on: 4 Oct. 2011 (amended on 22 Apr. 2013) Other information: Key commander in the Haqqani Network (TAe.012) under Sirajuddin Jallaloudine Haqqani (TAi.144). Taliban Shadow Governor for Orgun District, Paktika Province as of early 2010. Operated a training camp for non- Afghan fighters in Paktika Province. Has been involved in the transport of weapons to Afghanistan. INTERPOL- UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/View-UN-Notices- Individuals click here TAi.121 Name: 1: AZIZIRAHMAN 2: ABDUL AHAD 3: na 4: na ﻋﺰﯾﺰ اﻟﺮﺣﻤﺎن ﻋﺒﺪ اﻻﺣﺪ :(Name (original script Title: Mr Designation: Third Secretary, Taliban Embassy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates DOB: 1972 POB: Shega District, Kandahar Province, Afghanistan Good quality a.k.a.: na Low quality a.k.a.: na Nationality: Afghanistan Passport no: na National identification no: Afghan national identification card (tazkira) number 44323 na Address: na Listed on: 25 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Security Situation in Nangarhar Province
    Report Afghanistan: The security situation in Nangarhar province Translation provided by the Office of the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons, Belgium. Report Afghanistan: The security situation in Nangarhar province LANDINFO – 13 OCTOBER 2016 1 About Landinfo’s reports The Norwegian Country of Origin Information Centre, Landinfo, is an independent body within the Norwegian Immigration Authorities. Landinfo provides country of origin information to the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (Utlendingsdirektoratet – UDI), the Immigration Appeals Board (Utlendingsnemnda – UNE) and the Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security. Reports produced by Landinfo are based on information from carefully selected sources. The information is researched and evaluated in accordance with common methodology for processing COI and Landinfo’s internal guidelines on source and information analysis. To ensure balanced reports, efforts are made to obtain information from a wide range of sources. Many of our reports draw on findings and interviews conducted on fact-finding missions. All sources used are referenced. Sources hesitant to provide information to be cited in a public report have retained anonymity. The reports do not provide exhaustive overviews of topics or themes, but cover aspects relevant for the processing of asylum and residency cases. Country of origin information presented in Landinfo’s reports does not contain policy recommendations nor does it reflect official Norwegian views. © Landinfo 2017 The material in this report is covered by copyright law. Any reproduction or publication of this report or any extract thereof other than as permitted by current Norwegian copyright law requires the explicit written consent of Landinfo. For information on all of the reports published by Landinfo, please contact: Landinfo Country of Origin Information Centre Storgata 33A P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT Assistance with Professional Training for Afghan Cultural Heritage Officials Part 2 January 12, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 3 PROJECT NARRATIVE .................................................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1 – PROGRAM BACKGROUND ......................................................................................... 4 SECTION 2 – UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA PROJECT TEAM ................................................................. 5 SECTION 3 – PROGRAM ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................... 6 Project Set-Up Arrival and Orientation Program Curriculum Teaching Modalities Symposium: Afghanistan: Cultural Heritage at the Crossroads SECTION 4 – PROGRAM EVALUATION ......................................................................................... 10 Program Structure and Administration Program Curriculum KU Faculty Participants Budget Other SECTION 5 – RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE PROGRAM FUNDING .................................. 14 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................. 18 APPENDIX 1: Project Administrative Data APPENDIX 2: Proposal: “University Partnerships: Building a Professional Education Program for Afghan Cultural Heritage
    [Show full text]
  • LAND RELATIONS in BAMYAN PROVINCE Findings from a 15 Village Case Study
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics Case Studies Series LAND RELATIONS IN BAMYAN PROVINCE Findings from a 15 village case study Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit By Liz Alden Wily February 2004 Funding for this study was provided by the European Commission, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan and the governments of Sweden and Switzerland. © 2004 The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU). All rights reserved. This case study report was prepared by an independent consultant. The views and opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of AREU. About the Author Liz Alden Wily is an independent political economist specialising in rural property issues and in the promotion of common property rights and devolved systems for land administration in particular. She gained her PhD in the political economy of land tenure in 1988 from the University of East Anglia, United Kingdom. Since the 1970s, she has worked for ten third world governments, variously providing research, project design, implementation and policy guidance. Dr. Alden Wily has been closely involved in recent years in the strategic and legal reform of land and forest administration in a number of African states. In 2002 the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit invited Dr. Alden Wily to examine land ownership problems in Afghanistan, and she continues to return to follow up on particular concerns. About the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) is an independent research organisation that conducts and facilitates action-oriented research and learning that informs and influences policy and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Tazkera and Other Civil Documentation in Afghanistan NRC > AFGHANISTAN REPORT
    Access to Tazkera and other civil documentation in Afghanistan NRC > AFGHANISTAN REPORT Researched and written by: Samuel Hall and the Norwegian Refugee Council Photographs: Jim Huylebroek and Farzana Wahidy Legal Editor: Sarah Adamczyk Design and layout: Chris Herwig This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union (EU) and of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). The contents of this document are solely the responsibility of the Norwegian Refugee Council and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union or the Swedish government. The Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) is an independent, international, humanitarian non-governmental organisation which provides assistance, protection and contributes to durable solutions for refugees and internally displaced people worldwide. www.nrc.no Samuel Hall is an independent think tank providing research and strategic services, expert analysis, tailored counsel and access to local knowledge for a diverse array of actors operating in the world’s most challenging environments. samuelhall.org Acknowledgements: Thanks are due to everyone who participated in the researching and drafting of this report, in particular the staff from Samuel Hall and from NRC’s Information, Counselling and Legal Assistance (ICLA) programme in Afghanistan. Particular thanks go to Dominika Kronsteiner, Mohammad Abdoh, Ezzatullah Raji, Christopher Nyamandi, Dan Tyler, Kirstie Farmer, Monica Sanchez Bermudez and Dimitri Zviadadze. Samuel Hall would like to thank Marion Guillaume, Nassim Majidi, Ibrahim Ramazani and Abdul Basir Mohmand. NRC also wishes to thank the individuals who participated in the focus group discussions and interviews, and who shared their personal experiences for this research.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND RELATIONS in BAMYAN PROVINCE Findings from a 15 Village Case Study
    Case Studies Series LAND RELATIONS IN BAMYAN PROVINCE Findings from a 15 village case study Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit By Liz Alden Wily February 2004 Funding for this study was provided by the European Commission, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan and the governments of Sweden and Switzerland. © 2004 The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU). All rights reserved. This case study report was prepared by an independent consultant. The views and opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of AREU. About the Author Liz Alden Wily is an independent political economist specialising in rural property issues and in the promotion of common property rights and devolved systems for land administration in particular. She gained her PhD in the political economy of land tenure in 1988 from the University of East Anglia, United Kingdom. Since the 1970s, she has worked for ten third world governments, variously providing research, project design, implementation and policy guidance. Dr. Alden Wily has been closely involved in recent years in the strategic and legal reform of land and forest administration in a number of African states. In 2002 the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit invited Dr. Alden Wily to examine land ownership problems in Afghanistan, and she continues to return to follow up on particular concerns. About the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) is an independent research organisation that conducts and facilitates action-oriented research and learning that informs and influences policy and practice. AREU also actively promotes a culture of research and learning by strengthening analytical capacity in Afghanistan and by creating opportunities for analysis, thought and debate.
    [Show full text]
  • “They've Shot Many Like This”
    HUMAN RIGHTS “They’ve Shot Many Like This” Abusive Night Raids by CIA-Backed Afghan Strike Forces WATCH “They’ve Shot Many Like This” Abusive Night Raids by CIA-Backed Afghan Strike Forces Copyright © 2019 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-37779 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org OCTOBER 2019 ISBN: 978-1-6231-37779 “They’ve Shot Many Like This” Abusive Night Raids by CIA-Backed Afghan Strike Forces Map of Afghanistan ............................................................................................................... i Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Overview: Central Asia and the Caucasus30 January-5 February 2021
    Regional Overview: Central Asia and the Caucasus30 January-5 February 2021 acleddata.com/2021/02/11/regional-overview-central-asia-and-the-caucasus30-january-5-february-2021/ February 11, 2021 Last week, violence in Afghanistan continued between the Taliban and government forces. The Taliban was also targeted by the Islamic State (IS), while Afghan forces clashed with another militia led by an anti-Taliban insurgent. In the de facto Republic of Artsakh, remnant landmines inflicted casualties on civilians and military forces for another week. Protests took place in Armenia against recent changes in the judicial system. In Georgia, demonstrations took place calling for the opening of the Armenian border, which has been closed due to the coronavirus pandemic, restricting economic migration. In Kazakhstan, oil and gas workers continue to protest for better working conditions. In Kyrgyzstan, a new round of opposition protests followed the appointment of the new parliament. In Afghanistan,1ACLED is currently conducting a review of sourcing and reporting of the conflict in Afghanistan since 2020. Afghan forces operations and airstrikes inflicted many fatalities on the Taliban last week in a number of provinces, mainly in Kandahar. Meanwhile, the Taliban attacked a military base in Khan Abad district of Kunduz, killing members of the National Security and Defense and National Civil Order Forces. The group also conducted a suicide attack using a car bomb, inflicting tens of casualties at the Public Order Police base in Nangarhar province. Such attacks have been rare since December 2020. In a separate 1/3 development, IS claimed responsibility for a roadside bomb that killed four Taliban militants in the Chawkay district of Kunar province and another that killed one policeman in Jalalabad city of Nangarhar province.
    [Show full text]
  • Over a Century of Persecution: Massive Human Rights Violation Against Hazaras in Afghanistan
    OVER A CENTURY OF PERSECUTION: MASSIVE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION AGAINST HAZARAS IN AFGHANISTAN CONCENTRATED ON ATTACKS OCCURRED DURING THE NATIONAL UNITY GOVERNMENT PREPARED BY: MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN HASRAT DATE: FEBRUARY,2019 ABBREVIATIONS AIHRC Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission ALP Afghan Local Police ANA Afghanistan National Army ANBP Afghanistan National Border Police ANP Afghanistan National Police ANSF Afghanistan National Security Forces ANDS Afghanistan National Directorate of Security BBC British Broadcasting Corporation DFAT Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade EU European Union HRW Human Rights Watch IDE Improvised Explosive Devices IDP Internal Displaced Person ISAF International Security Assistance Force IS-PK Islamic state- Khorasan Province MP Member of Parliament NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organizations NUG National Unity Government PC Provincial Council UNAMA United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan UNDP United Nations Development Programmes I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….…1 2. SECURITY CONTEXT OF AFGHANISTAN …………………………………………………………………………….….…3 3. METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………6 4. THE EXTENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION AGAINST HAZARAS IN AFGHANISTAN....6 5. TARGET KILLING AND ORCHESTRATED ATTACK...………………………....…….………….………………….11 a. THE TALIBAN ATTACKS ON JAGHORI, UROZGAN AND MALISTAN…...…................………….….…11 b. SUICIDE ATTACKS ON MAIWAND WRESTLING CLUB..................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Länderinformationen Afghanistan Country
    Staatendokumentation Country of Origin Information Afghanistan Country Report Security Situation (EN) from the COI-CMS Country of Origin Information – Content Management System Compiled on: 17.12.2020, version 3 This project was co-financed by the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund Disclaimer This product of the Country of Origin Information Department of the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum was prepared in conformity with the standards adopted by the Advisory Council of the COI Department and the methodology developed by the COI Department. A Country of Origin Information - Content Management System (COI-CMS) entry is a COI product drawn up in conformity with COI standards to satisfy the requirements of immigration and asylum procedures (regional directorates, initial reception centres, Federal Administrative Court) based on research of existing, credible and primarily publicly accessible information. The content of the COI-CMS provides a general view of the situation with respect to relevant facts in countries of origin or in EU Member States, independent of any given individual case. The content of the COI-CMS includes working translations of foreign-language sources. The content of the COI-CMS is intended for use by the target audience in the institutions tasked with asylum and immigration matters. Section 5, para 5, last sentence of the Act on the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum (BFA-G) applies to them, i.e. it is as such not part of the country of origin information accessible to the general public. However, it becomes accessible to the party in question by being used in proceedings (party’s right to be heard, use in the decision letter) and to the general public by being used in the decision.
    [Show full text]