Published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272

Molecular Review Research

Advances in Understanding the Expression and Function of 8 and 9

Hui Zhang, Yiqian Chen, Fiona M. Keane, and Mark D. Gorrell

Abstract DPP8 and DPP9 are recently identified members of the dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV) family, which is characterized by the rare ability to cleave a post-proline bond two residues from the N-terminus of a substrate. DPP8 and DPP9 have unique cellular localization patterns, are ubiquitously expressed in tissues and cell lines, and evidence suggests important contributions to various biological processes including: cell behavior, cancer biology, disease pathogenesis, and immune responses. Importantly, functional differences between these two proteins have emerged, such as DPP8 may be more associated with gut inflammation whereas DPP9 is involved in antigen presentation and intracellular signaling. Similarly, the DPP9 connections with H-Ras and SUMO1, and its role in AKT1 pathway downregulation provide essential insights into the molecular mechanisms of DPP9 action. The recent discovery of novel natural substrates of DPP8 and DPP9 highlights the potential role of these in energy metabolism and homeostasis. This review focuses on the recent progress made with these post-proline dipeptidyl peptidases and underscores their emerging importance. Mol Cancer Res; 11(12); 1487–96. 2013 AACR.

Introduction metabolic processes of and diabetes, the immune – Proteases are efficient processing molecules involved in the system, and cancer biology (7,12 15). Structurally related to physiological maintenance of all cells. They can no longer DPPIV and with overlapping proteolytic activity, DPP8 and simply be thought of as essential for protein degradation and DPP9 remain less understood but are gaining increasing recycling; they are also vital regulators and signaling mole- research attention to decipher their unique proteolytic roles. cules (1). They control all aspects of cellular life by modifying To identify and characterize DPP8 and DPP9, both their targets to alter location and function. In doing so, they proteases were cloned, sequenced, and discovered to display have crucial roles in both normal and pathological processes considerable with DPPIV and thus also and are thus important targets for drug treatment. likely structural similarity (2,3). DPP8 and DPP9, however have a different cellular localization to that of DPPIV, as well One such target is the ubiquitous serine , dipep- fi tidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV), with inhibitors of this enzyme as some differences in their expression pro le and are now in clinical use to treat . DPPIV and therefore likely to have distinct roles. In the past, treatment with a broad DPP family inhibitor produced functional related are members of the S9b protease subfamily, fl with a conserved of serine, aspartate, and changes in diabetes, the immune system, the in ammatory histidine (2,3) and a rare ability to cleave a post-proline response, and cancer biology (13,16,17). Although these bond 3 residues from the N-terminus of a substrate (2, 4–7). effects were attributed to DPPIV at the time, it is now DPPIV rapidly cleaves and inactivates insulinotropic hor- thought that inhibition of DPP8 and DPP9 contributed to the above outcomes. With more selective DPP8/9 inhibitors mones (incretins) and thus inhibitors of this enzyme are the – basis for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (8,9). Other being developed (18 20), there is now an opportunity to members of this family include DPP8, DPP9, and fibroblast delineate the roles of these enzymes and further explore the therapeutic potential of their chemical inhibitors. The search activation protein (FAP), which are of interest in cancer fi research. FAP is generally expressed at low levels in normal for DPP8- and DPP9-speci c substrates is ongoing, with the adult tissue but is greatly upregulated in diseased and challenge remaining to determine those that are most phys- iologically relevant. Although DPPIV has been reviewed at remodeling tissue as well as in tumors (10,11). Indeed, both fi FAP and DPPIV are multifunctional and have roles in length, few authors have focused speci cally on DPP8 and DPP9. Here we outline the molecular and biochemical characteristics of DPP8 and DPP9 so as to gain a compre- Authors' Affiliation: Molecular Hepatology, Centenary Institute and hensive understanding of these post-proline dipeptidyl pep- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia tidases (Fig. 1). Corresponding Author: Mark D. Gorrell, Molecular Hepatology, Centenary Institute, Locked Bag No. 6, Newtown, NSW 2042, Australia. Phone: 61-2- 95656156; Fax: 61-2-95656101; E-mail: [email protected] Structural Properties of DPP8 and DPP9 doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272 Initial identification and cloning of DPP8 was established 2013 American Association for Cancer Research. by Abbott and colleagues (2). DPP9 was then identified by

www.aacrjournals.org 1487

Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2013 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272

Zhang et al.

Proliferation Apoptosis ECM interaction adhesion EGF migration Akt Cell behavior Immune Lung organs Spleen Thymus Immunology Inflammation Figure 1. Overview of organs and Lymphocyte processes in which DPP8 and Colitis DPP9 have potential functions, along with molecules that interact with these proteases. DPP8 DPP9

H-Ras H-Ras

Tumor Tumor Alcoholic liver disease Liver biology cell lines Liver fibrosis disease Chronic Biliary cirrhosis Testicular lymphocytic tumors leukemia

BLAST search and sequence alignment with DPP8. With Properties growing interest in these novel homologues of DPPIV, DPP8 and DPP9 have been localized by fluorescence in several research groups have cloned DPP8 and DPP9 situ hybridization to human 15q22 and (3,21–23). Comparisons of the main physical attributes 19p13.3, respectively (2,3). A variety of diseases have of DPPIV, FAP, DPP8, and DPP9 are summarized been mapped to these loci, such as pulmonary fibrosis in Table 1. (27), ovarian adenocarcinomas (28), and Bardet–Biedl

Table 1. Comparative overviews of the 4 enzyme members of the DPPIV family

Attribute DPPIV FAP DPP8 short DPP8-v3 long DPP9 short DPP9 longa Synonyms CD26 Seprase DPRP1 DPRP2 GenBank accession M74777 U09278 AF221634 AF354202 AY374518 AF542510 References (24) (4,25,26) (2) (21) (3,23) (23) Gene location Human 2q24.3 2q23 15q22.32 19q13.3 Mouse 2:62330073 2:62500945 9:65032458 17:56186682 Number of exons 26 26 20 22 19 22 Gene size (kb) 81.8 72.8 71 ? 47.3 48.6 mRNA (bp) 2924 2814 3127 3030 2592 3006 Number of amino 766 760 882 898 863 971 acids Monomer mobility 110 kDa 95 kDa 100 kDa 103 kDa 95–110 kDa ? Dimer HH HH Transmembrane HH domain Catalytic triad Ser630-Asp708-His740 Ser624-Asp702-His734 Ser739-Asp817-His849 Ser730-Asp808-His840 Enzyme activity Dipeptidyl peptidase Dipeptidyl peptidase Dipeptidyl peptidase Dipeptidyl peptidase and Cellular localization Cell surface and Cell surface and Intracellular Intracellular soluble soluble

H, yes; , no; ?, not known. aThe long form is a splice variant.

1488 Mol Cancer Res; 11(12) December 2013 Molecular Cancer Research

Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2013 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272

Dipeptidyl Peptidases 8 and 9

syndrome type 4, which has the clinical manifestation of obesity (29). Thus, DPP8 and DPP9 are potentially associated with the pathogenesis of such diseases, but an underlying mechanism has not been elucidated. Adoles- cent idiopathic scoliosis maps to 19p13.3, but it is not associated with DPP9 (30). The human DPP4 gene spans 81.8 kb and contains 26 exons ranging in size from 45 to 1,386 bp (31). In contrast, the human DPP9 gene spans only 48.6 kb of genomic sequence and comprises 22 exons that are 53 to 1431 bp in length (23). The human DPP8 gene spans 71 kb and consists of 20 exons (2). The sequence around the active-site serine is encoded by a single exon in DPP8 and DPP9, but the homologous region in DPP4 and FAP is encoded by 2 exons (3,31), which suggests that DPP8 and DPP9 are the more ancient of the 4. Protein Model Protein structure is crucial for substrate binding and specificity, as well as for interacting with binding partners. The primary structure of human DPP8 contains 882 amino acids with 27% identity and 51% amino acid similarity to human DPPIV (2). Two forms of DPP9 have been cloned. A ubiquitously expressed transcript encoding 863 amino acids (short form) displays 26% identity and 47% similarity to Figure 2. A model of DPP9 protein structure. DPP9 residues 51 to 863 are fi depicted in ribbon representation of the monomer. The a/b- human DPPIV (23). The most signi cant homology is domain is in red and the 8-blade b-propeller domain in green. The observed between human DPP8 and DPP9 (61% identity catalytic triad (Ser-Asp-His) is shown as blue spheres and the 2 and 79% similarity at the amino acid level; ref. 23). The glutamates essential for catalysis as yellow spheres. An extended arm amino acid sequences of both proteins are highly homolo- (285VEVIHVPSPALEERKTDSYR304) in the propeller surface of DPP9 that gous between human and mouse, with human DPP9 having is critical in SUMO1–DPP9 interaction is colored pink. 92% identity and 95% similarity to mouse DPP9 and human DPP8 having 95% identity and 98% similarity to single-point mutations in the C-terminal loop, such as mouse DPP8 (3,23). Mouse DPP8 and DPP9 enzymes have F822A, V833A, Y844A, and H859A in DPP8 (34), or not been isolated for comparisons with their human counter- F842A in DPP9 (40) inactivate these proteases without parts in enzyme specificity and kinetics studies. Given that disrupting dimerization. Similarly, a deletion mutation the crystal structures of DPP8 and DPP9 have not yet been (residues 317-334) or a single-point mutation (Y334A) in solved, protein homology modeling has shown that DPP8 a propeller loop in DPP9 can cause decreased activity and DPP9 likely share a similar tertiary structure with without affecting dimerization (35). Thus, the C-terminal DPPIV and FAP (32,33). DPP8 (34) and DPP9 (35) are loop and the propeller loop are essential for DPP8 and DPP9 dimeric, with each monomer likely consisting of an enzyme activity but not for dimerization. Third, DPP8 and a/b-hydrolase domain and an 8 blade b-propeller domain DPP9 lack a transmembrane domain and are translated as and the of the peptidase locates at the interface of intracellular proteins (2,23), whereas DPPIV and FAP are these 2 domains (Fig. 2). The DPPIV family of proteins cell surface expressed type II membrane glycoproteins. share a conserved catalytic triad, with that of DPP8 con- fi sisting of Ser739, Asp817, and His849 and the equivalent Posttranslational Modi cation residues in DPP9 being Ser730,Asp808,andHis840 (3,23). Posttranslational modifications (PTM) regulate protein A distinguishing feature of the DPPIV is activity, localization, and interaction with other cellular that 2 important glutamates lie near the start of a loop that molecules. The DPP8 sequence contains no N-linked or protrudes from the b-propeller domain and borders the O-linked glycosylation sites (2) and, despite identification of substrate entry site (32) and these 2 glutamates are 2 potential N-glycosylation sites in DPP9, no evidence of essential for catalysis in DPP8 (36), DPPIV (37), and glycosylation has been found (3,23,40). Lysine 51 and FAP (38). Lysine 314 in DPP9 have been identified as potential Despite the close sequence and structure homology with acetylation targets in 2 separate proteomic and mass spec- DPPIV, DPP8, and DPP9 possess several distinct structural trometric acetylation studies (41,42), but this has not been properties. First, DPP8 has a larger substrate pocket (S2) verified in vivo. Further investigation is thus necessary to than DPPIV (39). This suggests that DPP8 and DPP9 might understand PTMs of DPP8 and DPP9, which may lead have either an additional element of tertiary structure at the to alteration of their localization, function, and enzyme N-terminus and/or a larger b-propeller domain. Second, activity.

www.aacrjournals.org Mol Cancer Res; 11(12) December 2013 1489

Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2013 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272

Zhang et al.

DPP8 and DPP9 Activity Regulation position. An in vivo substrate study confirmed that the DPP8 and DPP9 specifically interact with SUMO1 (43) majority of substrates of DPP8 and DPP9 contain a proline and a novel SUMO1-binding arm in the propeller domain of in the P1 position preceded by an alanine in the P2 position DPP9 (Fig. 2) has been shown to be important for its (47). DPP8 and DPP9 hydrolyze the synthetic chromogenic enzymatic regulation, whereby SUMO1 binding results in substrates Gly-Pro-pNA, Ala-Pro-pNA, and Arg-Pro-pNA elevated DPP9 activity in vitro and gene silencing of equally well (refs. 2,22,23, and 39; Table 2). Using sub- SUMO1 leads to reduced DPP8 and DPP9 activity in cell strates Ala-Pro-pNA and Gly-Pro-pNA, the pH optimum extracts (43). SUMO modification mediates numerous for DPP9 is between pH 7.5 and 8.0 (40). DPP8 has a intracellular processes including transcription, DNA repair, neutral pH 7.4 optimum with little activity below pH 6.3 chromatin remodeling, and nuclear translocation (44). (2), similar to the pH 7.8 optimum of DPPIV (48). Therefore, it would be interesting to explore the conse- quences of SUMO1 interactions with DPP8 and DPP9. Natural Substrate Proteins Furthermore, the activity of purified DPP9 from bovine Certain naturally occurring peptides and chemokines can testes (45) and recombinant DPP8 and DPP9 produced by be cleaved by DPP8 and/or DPP9 in vitro but significantly insect cells (33) is dependent on the redox state of their slower than DPPIV (refs. 22 and 49; Table 2). However, cysteines, whereby enzyme activity is reversibly decreased by the physiological relevance of these substrates is uncertain oxidation and increased by reduction (33). because they are predominantly extracellular whereas DPP8 and DPP9 are intracellular. However, in rat brain Synthetic Substrates for Activity Determination extract, Neuropeptide Y (NPY) can be cleaved in the Proteases regulate various physiological processes by cleav- presence of a DPPIV inhibitor, indicating that DPP8 and ing substrates to cause inactivation or modified function. DPP9 can cleave NPY in vivo (50). NPY-driven tumor cell Therefore, identifying the substrates for DPP8 and DPP9 is death has been achieved by inhibiting DPP8 and DPP9, essential for understanding their biological functions. DPP8 indirectly indicating that DPP8 and DPP9 can cleave and DPP9 have similar substrate specificities, with both releasable NPY (51). Other natural substrates have also been enzymes preferring substrates with an aromatic or branched identified. Silencing or inhibition of DPP9 in intact cells aliphatic amino acid (46) or basic residue (34,40) in the P2 results in increased presentation of the RU134-42 peptide

Table 2. Kinetic parameters of DPP8 and DPP9 substrates

Km (mmol/L)

Substrate DPP8 DPP9 References H-Ala-Pro-pNAa 0.991 0.171 N/A (2) H-Gly-Pro-pNA 0.467 0.064 N/A H-Ala-Pro-AFCb 0.18 0.02 0.18 0.07 (23) H-Gly-Pro-pNA 0.33 0.01 0.37 0.003 (22) H-Ala-Pro-pNA 0.34 0.10 0.31 0.13 H-Val-Ala-pNA 0.76 0.08 1.22 0.13 H-Ala-Pro-pNA 0.30 0.02 N/A (39) H-Gly-Pro-pNA 0.4 0.04 N/A H-Arg-Pro-pNA 0.11 0.005 N/A

t1/2 (h)

Substrate DPP8 DPP9 References

GLP-1 3.8 6.1 (22) GLP-2 4.0 6.7 NPY 0.2 0.2 PYY 50 8.0 CXCL 12/SDF-1a (1-67) 4 0.5 N/A (49) CXCL 12/SDF-1b (1-72) 2 0.6 N/A CXCL 10/IP10 (1-77) 13 2.4 N/A CXCL 11/ITAC (1-73) >24 N/A

Abbreviation: N/A, not available. apNA ¼ para-nitroaniline. bAFC ¼ 7-Amino-4-trifluoromethyl coumarin.

1490 Mol Cancer Res; 11(12) December 2013 Molecular Cancer Research

Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2013 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272

Dipeptidyl Peptidases 8 and 9

(VPYGSFKHV), which was the first natural substrate of as well as molecular tools. Isoindoline derivatives have been fi DPP9 to be identi ed (46). It is possible that many more reported as potent DPP8 inhibitors with IC50 values below proline-containing antigens present in the cytoplasm are 20 nmol/L (56,57), but were later found to inhibit both DPP8 substrates for DPP9. Recently, a number of potential natural and DPP9 (18). Recently, 1G244 has been modified into substrates for DPP8 and DPP9 have been discovered using a several substructures to obtain some selectivity toward either sophisticated terminal amine isotopic labeling of substrates DPP8 or DPP9 (19). Limited selectivity for DPP8 over proteomic method (47). In that study, calreticulin and DPP9 (roughly 10-fold) has been achieved in 2 compounds adenylate kinase 2 (AK2) were identified as potential sub- (12m and 12n), using methylpiperazine analogues of 1G244 strates of both DPP8 and DPP9 and acetyl-CoA acetyl- (19). The boroProline-based dipeptidyl boronic acids are , which is important in fatty acid metabolism, was potent DPPIV inhibitors (20). Various substitutions at the identified as a potential substrate of DPP8 (47). As AK2 4-position of the boroProline ring alter the inhibitory activity. plays a key role in maintaining cellular energy homeostasis, Arg-(4S)-boroHyp (4q) shows the most potent inhibition DPP8 and DPP9 may regulate this process by cleaving AK2. against DPPIV, DPP8, and DPP9, whereas (4S)-Hyp-(4R)- Although the impact of cleavage by DPP8 and DPP9 on the boroHyp (4o) exhibits the greatest selectivity for DPPIV over functions of these substrates remains to be studied, their DPP8 and DPP9 (20). Such studies point to the structure– identification highlights the potential roles of DPP8 and activity relationship that will facilitate the future design of DPP9 in energy metabolism and homeostasis. inhibitors toward either DPP8 or DPP9 alone and thus help to differentiate DPP8 and DPP9 activity from each other and Inhibitor Development for DPP8 and DPP9 also from that of DPPIV. These enzyme studies used human The properties of potent and selective inhibitors for DPP8 DPP8 and DPP9. It is likely that the homologues from other and DPP9 are listed in Table 3. The compounds allo- species would have very similar properties, but this has not Ile-isoindoline and 1G244 are the most commonly used been directly examined. DPP8/9 selective inhibitors. Allo-Ile-isoindoline had IC 50 fi values of 50 nmol/L against DPP8 and DPP9 when first Expression Pro les of DPP8 and DPP9 fi reported (52) but later IC50 values have been found to be Expression pro les of DPP8 and DPP9 have been an 200 nmol/L (18, 53–55). The most potent inhibitory important focus of interest in characterizing these new effect is observed with 1G244 (IC50 values of 14 and 53 proteases and their ubiquitous expression pattern has been nmol/L against DPP8 and DPP9, respectively), which does confirmed at mRNA and protein levels (Table 4). not inhibit DPPIV (18). 1G244 is a slow-tight binding DPP9 cDNA has 2 forms, with sizes of 2,589 and 3,006 competitive inhibitor of DPP8 and a reversible competitive bp (23). Using Northern blot analysis, a predominant DPP9 inhibitor of DPP9 (18). mRNA transcript of 4.4 kb (AY374518; short form encod- It would be of great value to distinguish DPP8 from DPP9 ing 863 amino acids) was detected ubiquitously with the activity in many biological processes using selective inhibitors highest levels in liver, heart, and skeletal muscle (3,23). A less

Table 3. Properties of potent and selective inhibitors for DPP8 and DPP9

IC50 (nmol/L) Ki (nmol/L)

Compound DPP8 DPP9 DPPIV DPP8 DPP9 References Allo-Ile-isoindoline 38 55 30,000 N/A N/A (52) (DPP8/9-selective) 120 290 90,000 N/A N/A (54,55) 145 242 >100,000 13.7 33.7 (18) 1G244 14 53 >100,000 0.9 4.2 (18) 12 84 >50,000 N/A N/A (19) 1G244 analogue (compound 12 m) 21 260 >100,000 N/A N/A (19) 1G244 analogue (compound 12 n) 55 540 >50,000 N/A N/A (19) Bis(4-acetamidophenyl) Pyrrolidin-2-yl 910 (irreversible) N/A 8,000 N/A N/A (57) Phosphonate with Lys in P2 position (compound 7e) Bis(4-acetamidophenyl) Isoindolin-2-yl 530 (irreversible) N/A >500, 000 N/A N/A (57) Phosphonate with Lys in P2 position (compound 2e) (4S)-Hyp-(4R)-boroHyp (compound 4o) 530 240 16 N/A N/A (20) Arg-(4S)-boroHyp (compound 4q) 1.2 0.31 0.3 N/A N/A (20)

Abbreviation: N/A, not available.

www.aacrjournals.org Mol Cancer Res; 11(12) December 2013 1491

Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2013 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272

Zhang et al.

Table 4. Expression features of DPP8 and DPP9

Characteristic DPP8 DPP9 References mRNA expression in normal adult tissues Ubiquitous Ubiquitous (3,23,58) Protein expression in normal adult tissues Ubiquitous Ubiquitous (59) Expression in tumor tissues HH(23,59) Expression by hepatocytes HH(59–61) Expression by activated hepatic stellate cells (59) Expression by lymphocytes HH(59,61,62)

H, yes; , no.

abundant 5 kb transcript (AF542510; long form encoding pancreas, muscle, and brain, express DPP8 and DPP9 971 amino acids) is abundant in skeletal muscle (23). (ref. 59; Fig. 3). Generally, concordant data on DPP8 and Similarly, 3 mRNA transcripts of DPP8 have been iden- DPP9 expression has been obtained from the cynomolgus tified with intense signals in testis, prostate, and muscle monkey and Sprague-Dawley rat (64), in which mRNA and (2,58). In particular, a transcript variant of human DPP8, protein levels correlated with specific enzymatic activity with 16 more amino acids at the N-terminus (898 amino (64). In addition, DPP8 and DPP9 activity is approximately acids in total), is abundant in the adult testis (2,21). DPP8 10-fold lower than DPPIV activity in nonrenal rat and and DPP9 enzymatic activities are predominant in bovine monkey tissues (64). DPPIV and DPP8 are more abundant and rat testis and immunohistochemical studies have than DPP9 protein in rat primary endothelial cells, however, localized these 2 proteases in spermatozoids (63). A about 60% of the total DPP enzyme activity is derived from natural form of DPP9 has been purified from bovine DPP8/9 rather than DPPIV in these cells (65). DPP9 is the testes and identified as the short form (45). Overall, the only DPPIV-like enzyme detectable by immunohistochem- abundance of DPP8 and DPP9 in testis suggests that these istry in human carotid artery endothelial cells, whereas 2 proteases might participate in the regulation of the male DPPIV is the predominant DPPIV-like enzyme in ventric- reproductive system. ular microvasculature by in situ hybridization (65). Thus, the The ubiquitous expression of DPP8 and DPP9 in mam- regulated expression of individual DPPs in these cells is mals has been shown by in situ hybridization and enzyme indicative of a role in endothelia. Altered DPP8 and DPP9 assays of mouse, human, and baboon organs (59). Notably, expressions, at both mRNA and protein levels in diseased lymphocytes and epithelial cells from many organs, includ- liver, point to important regulatory roles in the pathogenesis ing lymph node, thymus, spleen, liver, lung, intestine, of liver diseases (59–61).

DPP8/DPP9 enzyme activity in mouse organs 140 Highest 120 High 100 Medium Figure 3. Ranking mouse organs by approximate intensity of DPP8 and 80 Low DPP9 enzyme activity. DPP activity in DPPIV gene knockout mice mU/g 60 with/without N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) was measured by Yu and 40 colleagues (59). NEM is an inhibitor of DPP8/9 enzyme activity. Subtracting NEM-inhibited activity 20 Negligible from total DPP activity was used here to estimate the activity derived 0 from DPP8 and DPP9.

Skin Liver Lung Brain Colon Testis Heart Ovary Uterus Kidney Spleen PBMCs Plasma Thymus Adrenal AdiposeProstate Pancreas

Lymph node Bone marrow Small intestine Skeletal muscle

Submaxillary gland

1492 Mol Cancer Res; 11(12) December 2013 Molecular Cancer Research

Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2013 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272

Dipeptidyl Peptidases 8 and 9

Biological Functions of DPP8 and DPP9 experiments in which DPP9 is manipulated by overexpres- Enzymes of the DPPIV family are likely to participate in sion or gene silencing or enzyme inhibition have provided normal homeostasis as well as in the pathology of disease nonconcordant data and thus the pro- or antiapoptotic conditions that include tumor growth, type 2 diabetes, liver activity of DPP9 may depend on the cell-type and cell- cirrhosis, and inflammatory and autoimmune diseases culture environment. (13,16,66,67). As knowledge of the precise expression and DPP9 mRNA is generally abundant in human tumor localization of DPP8 and DPP9 advances, distinct physio- cell lines, such as melanoma (G-361), colorectal adeno- logical functions of these proteases are emerging. carcinoma (SW480), chronic myelogenous leukemia (K- 562), and HeLa cells (3). DPP8 mRNA expression is fi DPP8 and DPP9 in Cell Behavior and Tumor signi cantly greater than all the other DPPs in breast Biology cancer and ovarian cancer cell lines, but DPP8 and DPP9 protein expression is ubiquitous across those cell lines Intracellularly distributed DPP8 and DPP9 have previ- (70). DPP9 mRNA is also greatly upregulated in human fl ously been shown to in uence cell behavior, including testicular tumors (59). Interestingly, the highest level of – cell extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions, proliferation, DPP9 protein is in 2 estrogen receptor negative breast and apoptosis. HEK293T epithelial cells overexpressing cancer cell lines that are negative for DPPIV mRNA (70). in vitro DPP8 and DPP9 exhibit impaired cell adhesion, In many tumor tissues, including skin melanotic mela- migration, and monolayer wound healing, independent of noma,neuroblastoma,andleukemia,thelongformof enzyme activity (68). In HEK293T cells, DPP8 and DPP9 human DPP9 mRNA is expressed (23). DPP8 and DPP9 can enhance induced apoptosis independent of enzyme are more abundantly expressed than DPPIV and FAP in activity and DPP9 overexpression causes spontaneous apo- human meningiomas (71) and constitutive expression of ptosis (68). In HepG2 cells, the levels of active forms of DPP8 and DPP9 is found in B-cell chronic lymphocytic fi caspase 9 and caspase 3 can be signi cantly elevated follow- leukemia (CLL; ref. 72). DPP8 mRNA and protein ing overexpression of enzyme active DPP9 compared with an expression are significantly upregulated in CLL compared enzyme inactive mutant DPP9, indicating that the intrinsic with normal tonsil B lymphocytes (72). The ubiquitous apoptosis induced by DPP9 is mediated by the caspase 9/ but differential expression of DPP8 and DPP9 in tumor caspase 3 pathway (60). DPP9 overexpression attenuates the cell lines and tissues indicates that they may have roles – epidermal growth factor (EGF) mediated PI3K/Akt path- in tumor pathogenesis, perhaps in particular stages or way, resulting in augmented apoptosis and suppressed cell circumstances. proliferation (ref. 60; Fig. 4). This inhibitory effect on Akt Recently published data more clearly point to the roles of phosphorylation is largely dependent upon DPP9 enzyme DPP8 and DPP9 in tumor growth. A high-throughput fi activity (60), which is the rst indication of DPP9 enzyme screen has found that the DPP inhibitor vildagliptin syner- activity regulating cell behavior through the EGF signaling gistically enhances parthenolide's antileukemic activity in pathway. Perhaps surprisingly, knockdown of DPP8 or leukemia and lymphoma cell lines as well as in primary DPP9 can induce NPY-driven tumor cell death, mediated human acute myeloid leukemia (73). Inhibition of DPP8 by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and apoptosis-inducing and DPP9, but not DPPIV, is responsible for vildagliptin's factor (51) and enzyme inhibition of DPP8 and DPP9 by enhancement of parthenolide's cytotoxicity (73). In addi- 1G244 can enhance macrophage apoptosis (69). Therefore, tion, inhibition of DPP8 and DPP9 probably contributes to the tumor regression induced by the compound Val-boro- Pro (74). Moreover, a separate study suggests that the DPPs act as survival factors in the Ewing Sarcoma Family of EGF Tumors (51). In such sarcoma cell lines, cell death can be EGFR enhanced by blocking DPPIV, DPP8, and DPP9 with either selective enzyme inhibition or siRNA knockdown. These H-Ras effects were blocked by NPY receptor antagonists, indicating Plasma membrane that the cell survival might be dependent on the NPY DPP9 PI3K Raf pathway (51). Perhaps paradoxically, overexpression of DPP9 is antiproliferative and enhances intrinsic apoptosis in epithelial tumor cell lines (60,68), which might indicate MEK that high levels of DPP9 can be detrimental. More probably, Akt different responses of DPP8 and DPP9 under different pathological conditions imply that the roles of DPP8 and ERK DPP9 may vary with tumor stage or tumor type. DPP8 and DPP9 in the Immune System Figure 4. Diagram of potential involvement of DPP9 in the EGF signaling in vivo in vitro pathway. Cytoplasmic DPP9 is associated with H-Ras. DPP9 attenuates Good evidence, from both and studies, the EGF mediated PI3K/Akt pathway but does not influence the Raf/MEK/ indicates that DPP8 and DPP9 participate in immunoreg- ERK pathway. ulation. As described earlier, extensive in vivo expression of

www.aacrjournals.org Mol Cancer Res; 11(12) December 2013 1493

Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2013 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272

Zhang et al.

DPP8 and DPP9 occurs in normal immunological tissues Many studies have the limitation that DPP8 and DPP9 (59). DPP8 and DPP9 are expressed by all major lymphocyte activities have been examined in the presence of DPPIV. subpopulations and are upregulated upon B or T lympho- DPPIV-deficient mice and DPP8/9 selective inhibitors cyte activation (2,61). Intriguingly, there is one report can overcome this issue. In addition, most studies are suggesting that a minor fraction of typically intracellularly confined to in vitro models. More in vivo evidence and localized DPP8 and DPP9 might also be loosely bound on clinical data are needed. The development of DPP8 or the surface of immune cells under certain circumstances DPP9-deficient animals would be a breakthrough for such (75). functional studies. In addition, enzyme activity of DPP8 and DPP9 is present in cultured human and mouse primary leukocytes and B and Concluding Remarks T cell lines (2,52,75,62). Effects of DPP8 and DPP9 on the The recent insights into the emerging members of the activation and proliferation of immune cells seem to be DPPIV family reveal very interesting biochemical and mediated by enzyme activity. A selective DPP8 and DPP9 biological traits of DPP8 and DPP9. Both DPP8 and DPP9 inhibitor can attenuate both proliferation of peripheral interact with SUMO1. DPP9 has a novel SUMO1-specific blood mononuclear cells and the release of cytokine inter- interacting motif that is important for its allosteric enzy- leukin (IL)-2 (52). Moreover, DNA synthesis of mitogen- matic regulation. Both proteases are redox regulated and stimulated splenocytes of both wild-type and DPPIV knock- probably not glycosylated, whereas only DPP9 is predicted out mice is suppressed by the selective inhibition of DPP8 to be acetylated. Recent advances in this field have begun to and DPP9 (17). Collectively, these data point to DPP8/9 show functional differences between the 2 proteases. DPP9 enzyme activity having important roles in immunoregula- has a stronger association with H-Ras, attenuates the EGF- tion, but the mechanisms involved require additional mediated PI3K/Akt pathway, and regulates cell behavior. investigations. The enzyme activity of DPP9, but not DPP8, is rate limiting for degradation of antigenic proline-containing fl DPP8 and DPP9 in the In ammatory Response peptides and thereby may have an important role in antigen DPPIV activity is clearly related to the induction of the presentation, whereas DPP8 is more important in gut inflammatory response (76,77). Therefore, it would be inflammation. Some potential natural substrates of DPP8 interesting to know the extent of involvement of DPP8 and and DPP9 have been identified recently using proteomics, DPP9, which have DPPIV-like activity, in inflammation. one of which was specific for DPP8 only. These exciting Both mRNA and the enzyme activities of DPP8 and DPP9 new functional data reinforce the importance of expanding are upregulated after asthma induction. Thus, the increased our knowledge of DPP8 and DPP9 expression patterns in expression of DPP8 and DPP9 and their specific localization both rodent and primate species. The development of suggests that these enzymes have important roles during selective inhibitors and substrates for DPP8 versus DPP9 allergic reactions (78). is needed and would be instrumental in the future explo- An experimental colitis model in mice has provided ration and exploitation of the roles that DPP8 and DPP9 further evidence for the participation of DPP8 in the exhibit in pathogenesis. inflammatory responses. After dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) treatment for 6 days to induce colitis, DPP8, but not DPP9, Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest mRNA, and enzyme activity is elevated in the colons of both Mark D. Gorrell has an ownership interest in patents on DPP8 and DPP9. No fl wild-type and DPPIV knockout mice (79), with inhibition potential con icts of interest were disclosed by the other authors. of DPP activity impairing neutrophil infiltration at the site of inflammation (79). These data implicate DPP8 in the Authors' Contributions fl Conception and design: H. Zhang, Y. Chen, M.D. Gorrell in ammatory response in colitis. DPPIV, Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: H. Zhang, Y. Chen, N (APN), and DPPIV/APN-like proteases are involved in F.M. Keane, M.D. Gorrell ischemia-trigged inflammation (80). DPP9 mRNA is tran- Study supervision: F.M. Keane, M.D. Gorrell siently and significantly downregulated whereas DPP8 mRNA is slightly decreased at day 3 postcerebral ischemia. Acknowledgments The authors thank Ms. M.G. Gall for kind suggestions and proofreading. The DPPIV, DPP8, and APN are in the activated microglia and authors are grateful for support from the Australian National Health and Medical macrophages at day 3 postischemia and in astroglial cells at Research Council, grant 512282, Australian Postgraduate Award for H. Zhang and day 7 postischemia (80). Therefore, DPPIV, DPP8, and University of Sydney International Scholarship to Y. Chen. DPP9 have potential roles in cerebral inflammation. Most recently, abundant DPP8 and DPP9 have been found in Grant Support This work is supported by Australian National Health and Medical Research macrophage-rich regions of human atherosclerotic plaques Council Grant 512282; Australian Postgraduate Award for H. Zhang; and University (69). Upregulated DPP9 and unchanged DPP8 expression of Sydney International Scholarship for Y. Chen. have been observed during macrophage differentiation and The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with activation (69). Inhibition of DPP8 and DPP9 decreases 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-a secretion acti- vated by lipopolysaccharide and IFN-g, suggesting an anti- Received May 28, 2013; revised September 4, 2013; accepted September 5, 2013; inflammatory effect of the DPP8/9 inhibitor (69). published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013.

1494 Mol Cancer Res; 11(12) December 2013 Molecular Cancer Research

Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2013 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272

Dipeptidyl Peptidases 8 and 9

References 1. Turk B, Turk D, Turk V. Protease signalling: the cutting edge. EMBO J 22. Bjelke JR, Christensen J, Nielsen PF, Branner S, Kanstrup AB, Wagt- 2012;31:1630–43. mann N, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 8 and 9 specificity and molecular 2. Abbott CA, Yu DMT, Woollatt E, Sutherland GR, McCaughan GW, characterization compared to dipeptidyl peptidase IV. Biochem J Gorrell MD. Cloning, expression and chromosomal localization of a 2006;396:391–9. novel human dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) IV homolog, DPP8. Eur J 23. Ajami K, Abbott CA, McCaughan GW, Gorrell MD. Dipeptidyl pepti- Biochem 2000;267:6140–50. dase 9 has two forms, a broad tissue distribution, cytoplasmic local- 3. Olsen C, Wagtmann N. Identification and characterization of human ization and DPIV-like peptidase activity. Biochem. Biophys. Acta Dpp9, a novel homologue of dipeptidyl peptidase IV. Gene 2002;299: 2004;1679:18–28. 185–93. 24. Tanaka T, Camerini D, Seed B, Torimoto Y, Dang NH, Kameoka J, et al. 4. Aertgeerts K, Levin I, Shi L, Snell GP, Jennings A, Prasad GS, et al. Cloning and functional expression of the T cell activation antigen Structural and kinetic analysis of the substrate specificity of human CD26. J Immunol 1992;149:481–6. fibroblast activation protein alpha. J Biol Chem 2005;280:19441–4. 25. Scanlan MJ, Raj BK, Calvo B, Garin-Chesa P, Sanz-Moncasi MP, 5. De Meester I. Dipeptidyl peptidase 9. In:Rawlings NL, Salvesen G, Healey JH, et al. Molecular cloning of fibroblast activation protein editors. Handbook of proteolytic enzymes, 3rd ed. San Diego: Elsevier; alpha, a member of the family selectively expressed in 2013. p. 3384–9. stromal fibroblasts of epithelial . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 6. Abbott C, Gorrell M. Dipeptidyl peptidase 8. In:Rawlings NL, Salvesen 1994;91:5657–61. G, editors. Handbook of proteolytic enzymes. 3rd ed. San Diego: 26. Edosada CY, Quan C, Tran T, Pham V, Wiesmann C, Fairbrother W, Elsevier; 2013. p. 3379–84. et al. Peptide substrate profiling defines fibroblast activation protein as 7. Gorrell MD, Park JE. Fibroblast activation protein a. In: Rawlings NL, an endopeptidase of strict Gly(2)-Pro(1)-cleaving specificity. FEBS Lett Salvesen G, editors. Handbook of proteolytic enzymes. 3rd ed. San 2006;580:1581–6. Diego: Elsevier; 2013. p. 3395–401. 27. Fingerlin TE, Murphy E, Zhang W, Peljto AL, Brown KK, Steele MP, et al. 8. Deacon CF, Danielson P, Klarskov L, Olesen M, Holst JJ. Dipeptidyl Genome-wide association study identifies multiple susceptibility loci peptidase IV inhibition reduces the degradation and clearance of GIP for pulmonary fibrosis. Nat Genet 2013;45:613–20. and potentiates its insulinotropic and antihyperglycemic effects in 28. Wang ZJ, Churchman M, Campbell IG, Xu WH, Yan ZY, McCluggage anesthetized pigs. Diabetes 2001;50:1588–97. WG, et al. Allele loss and mutation screen at the Peutz-Jeghers (LKB1) 9. Mentlein R, Gallwitz B, Schmidt WE. Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV hydro- locus (19p13.3) in sporadic ovarian tumours. Br J Cancer 1999;80: lyses gastric inhibitory polypeptide, glucagon-like peptide-1(7-36) 70–2. amide, peptide histidine methionine and is responsible for their deg- 29. Bruford EA, Riise R, Teague PW, Porter K, Thomson KL, Moore AT, radation in human serum. Eur J Biochem 1993;214:829–35. et al. Linkage mapping in 29 Bardet-Biedl syndrome families confirms 10. Mersmann M, Schmidt A, Rippmann JF, Wuest T, Brocks B, Rettig WJ, loci in chromosomal regions 11q13, 15q22.3-q23, and 16q21. Geno- et al. Human antibody derivatives against the fibroblast activation mics 1997;41:93–9. protein for tumor stroma targeting of carcinomas. Int J Cancer 30. Qiu XS, Tang NLS, Yeung HY, Qiu Y, Cheng JCY. Association study 2001;92:240–8. between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the DPP9 gene which is 11. Wuest T, Moosmayer D, Pfizenmaier K. Construction of a bispecific located in the candidate region identified by linkage analysis. Postgrad single chain antibody for recruitment of cytotoxic T cells to the tumour Med J 2008;84:498–501. stroma associated antigen fibroblast activation protein. J Biotechnol 31. Abbott CA, Baker E, Sutherland GR, McCaughan GW. Genomic 2001;92:159–68. organisation, exact localization, and tissue expression of the human 12. Gorrell MD, Song S, Wang XM. Novel metabolic disease therapy. CD26 (dipeptidyl peptidase IV) gene. Immunogenetics 1994;40:331–8. International patent application WO 2010/083570; 2010. 32. Rummey C, Metz G. Homology models of dipeptidyl peptidases 8 and 13. Yu DMT, Yao T-W, Chowdhury S, Nadvi NA, Osborne B, Church WB, 9 with a focus on loop predictions near the active site. Proteins et al. The dipeptidyl peptidase IV family in cancer and cell biology. 2007;66:160–71. FEBS J 2010;277:1126–44. 33. Park J, Knott HM, Nadvi NA, Collyer CA, Wang XM, Church WB, et al. 14. Keane FM, Chowdhury S, Yao T-W, Nadvi NA, Gall MG, Chen Y, et al. Reversible inactivation of human dipeptidyl peptidases 8 and 9 by Targeting dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) and fibroblast activation oxidation. The Open Enz Inhib J 2008;1:52–61. protein (FAP) for diabetes and cancer therapy. In:Dunn B, editor 34. Lee HJ, Chen YS, Chou CY, Chien CH, Lin CH, Chang GG, et al. Proteinases as drug targets. RSC drug discovery series, vol. 18. Investigation of the dimer interface and substrate specificity of prolyl Cambridge, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2012. p. 119–45. dipeptidase DPP8. J Biol Chem 2006;281:38653–62. 15. Liu R, Li H, Liu L, Yu J, Ren X. Fibroblast activation protein: a potential 35. Tang HK, Chen KC, Liou GG, Cheng SC, Chien CH, Tang HY, et al. Role therapeutic target in cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 2012;13:123–9. of a propeller loop in the quaternary structure and enzymatic activity of 16. Yazbeck R, Howarth GS, Abbott CA. Dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitors, prolyl dipeptidases DPP-IV and DPP9. FEBS Lett 2011;585:3409–14. an emerging drug class for inflammatory disease? Trends Pharmacol 36. Ajami K, Abbott CA, Obradovic M, Gysbers V, Kahne€ T, McCaughan Sci 2009;30:600–7. GW, et al. Structural requirements for catalysis, expression and dimer- 17. Reinhold D, Goihl A, Wrenger S, Reinhold A, Kuhlmann€ UC, Faust J, isation in the CD26/DPIV gene family. Biochemistry 2003;42:694–701. et al. Role of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPIV)-like enzymes in T lympho- 37. Abbott CA, McCaughan GW, Gorrell MD. Two highly conserved cyte activation: investigations in DPIV/CD26 knockout mice. Clin glutamic acid residues in the predicted b propeller domain of dipeptidyl Chem Lab Med 2009;47:268–74. peptidase IV are required for its enzyme activity. FEBS Lett 1999;458: 18. Wu JJ, Tang HK, Yeh TK, Chen CM, Shy HS, Chu YR, et al. Biochem- 278–84. istry, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology of a potent and selective 38. Wang XM, Yu DMT, McCaughan GW, Gorrell MD. Fibroblast activation DPP8/9 inhibitor. Biochem Pharmacol 2009;78:203–10. protein increases apoptosis, cell adhesion and migration by the LX-2 19. Van Goethem S, Matheeussen V, Joossens J, Lambeir AM, Chen X, De human stellate cell line. Hepatology 2005;42:935–45. Meester I, et al. Structure-activity relationship studies on isoindoline 39. Pitman MR, Menz RI, Abbott CA. Hydrophilic residues surrounding the inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidases 8 and 9 (DPP8, DPP9): is DPP8- S1 and S2 pockets contribute to dimerisation and catalysis in human selectivity an attainable goal? J Med Chem 2011;54:5737–46. dipeptidyl peptidase 8 (DPP8). Biol Chem 2010;391:959–72. 20. Wu W, Liu Y, Milo LJJr, Shu Y, Zhao P, Li Y, et al. 4-Substituted boro- 40. Tang HK, Tang HY, Hsu SC, Chu YR, Chien CH, Shu CH, et al. proline dipeptides: synthesis, characterization, and dipeptidyl pepti- Biochemical properties and expression profile of human prolyl dipep- dase IV, 8, and 9 activities. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2012;22:5536–40. tidase DPP9. Arch Biochem Biophys 2009;485:120–7. 21. Zhu H, Zhou ZM, Lu L, Xu M, Wang H, Li JM, et al. Expression of a novel 41. Choudhary C, Kumar C, Gnad F, Nielsen ML, Rehman M, Walther TC, dipeptidyl peptidase 8 (DPP8) transcript variant, DPP8-v3, in human et al. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates testis. Asian J Androl 2005;7:245–55. major cellular functions. Science 2009;325:834–40.

www.aacrjournals.org Mol Cancer Res; 11(12) December 2013 1495

Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2013 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272

Zhang et al.

42. Zhao S, Xu W, Jiang W, Yu W, Lin Y, Zhang T, et al. Regulation of lymphocytes and injured liver. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:2883– cellular metabolism by protein lysine acetylation. Science 2010;327: 93. 1000–4. 62. Maes M-B, Dubois V, Brandt I, Lambeir A-M, Van der Veken P, 43. Pilla E, Moller€ U, Sauer G, Mattiroli F, Melchior F, Geiss-Friedlander R. Augustyns K, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 8/9-like activity in human A novel SUMO1-specific interacting motif in dipeptidyl peptidase 9 leukocytes. J Leukoc Biol 2007;81:1252–7. (DPP9) that is important for enzymatic regulation. J Biol Chem 63. Dubois V, Ginneken CV, De Cock H, Lambeir A-M, Van der Veken P, 2012;287:44320–9. Augustyns K, et al. Enzyme activity and immunohistochemical local- 44. Geiss-Friedlander R, Melchior F. Concepts in sumoylation: a decade ization of dipeptidyl peptidase 8 and 9 in male reproductive tissues. on. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007;8:947–56. J Histochem Cytochem 2009;57:531–41. 45. Dubois V, Lambeir A-M, Vandamme S, Matheeussen V, Guisez Y, 64. Harstad EB, Rosenblum JS, Gorrell MD, Achanzar WE, Minimo L, Wu J, Scharpe S, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 9 (DPP9) from bovine testes: et al. DPP8 and DPP9 expression in cynomolgus monkey and Sprague Identification and characterization as the short form by mass spec- Dawley rat tissues. Regul Pept 2013;186:26–35. trometry. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 2010;1804:781–8. 65. Matheeussen V, Baerts L, De Meyer G, De Keulenaer G, Van Der Veken 46. Geiss-Friedlander R, Parmentier N, Moeller U, Urlaub H, Van den P, Augustyns K, et al. Expression and spatial heterogeneity of dipep- Eynde BJ, Melchior F. The cytoplasmic peptidase DPP9 is rate-limiting tidyl peptidases in endothelial cells of conduct vessels and capillaries. for degradation of proline-containing peptides. J Biol Chem 2009;284: Biol Chem 2011;392:189–98. 27211–9. 66. Nagy LE. Recent insights into the role of the innate immune system in 47. Wilson CH, Indarto D, Doucet A, Pogson LD, Pitman MR, Menz RI, et al. the development of alcoholic liver disease. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) Identifying natural substrates for dipeptidyl peptidase 8 (DP8) and DP9 2003;228:882–90. using terminal amine isotopic labelling of substrates, TAILS, reveals in 67. Deacon CF. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in the treatment of vivo roles in cellular homeostasis and energy metabolism. J Biol Chem type 2 diabetes: a comparative review. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011; 2013;288:13936–49. 13:7–18. 48. Fukasawa KM, Fukasawa K, Hiraoka BY, Harada M. Characterization 68. Yu DMT, Wang XM, McCaughan GW, Gorrell MD. Extra-enzymatic of a soluble form of dipeptidyl peptidase IV from pig liver. Experientia functions of the dipeptidyl peptidase (DP) IV related proteins DP8 and 1983;39:1005–7. DP9 in cell adhesion, migration and apoptosis. FEBS J 2006;273: 49. Ajami K, Pitman MR, Wilson CH, Park J, Menz RI, Starr AE, et al. 2447–61. Stromal cell-derived factors 1a and 1b,inflammatory protein-10 and 69. Matheeussen V, Waumans Y, Martinet W, Van Goethem S, Van der interferon-inducible T cell chemo-attractant are novel substrates of Veken P, Scharpe S, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidases in atherosclerosis: dipeptidyl peptidase 8. FEBS Lett 2008;582:819–25. expression and role in macrophage differentiation, activation and 50. Frerker N, Wagner L, Wolf R, Heiser U, Hoffmann T, Rahfeld J-U, et al. apoptosis. Basic Res Cardiol 2013;108:350. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) cleaving enzymes: structural and functional 70. Wilson C, Abbott C. Expression profiling of dipeptidyl peptidase 8 and homologues of dipeptidyl peptidase 4. Peptides 2007;28:257–68. 9 in breast and ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Int J Oncol 2012;41: 51. Lu C, Tilan JU, Everhart L, Czarnecka M, Soldin SJ, Mendu DR, et al. 919–32. Dipeptidyl peptidases as survival factors in Ewing sarcoma family of 71. Stremenova J, Mares V, Lisa V, Hilser M, Krepela E, Vanickova Z, et al. tumors: implications for tumor biology and therapy. J Biol Chem Expression of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV activity and/or structure homo- 2011;286:27494–505. logs in human meningiomas. Int J Oncol 2010;36:351–8. 52. Lankas G, Leiting B, Roy R, Eiermann G, Beconi M, Biftu T, et al. 72. Sulda ML, Abbott CA, Macardle PJ, Hall RK, Kuss BJ. Expression and Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibition for the treatment of type 2 diabetes— prognostic assessment of dipeptidyl peptidase IV and related enzymes potential importance of selectivity over dipeptidyl peptidases 8 and 9. in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Biol Ther 2010;10: Diabetes 2005;54:2988–94. 180–9. 53. Chen SJ, Jiaang WT. Current advances and therapeutic potential of 73. Spagnuolo PA, Hurren R, Gronda M, Maclean N, Datti A, Basheer A, agents targeting dipeptidyl peptidases-IV, -II, 8/9 and fibroblast acti- et al. Inhibition of intracellular dipeptidyl peptidases 8 and 9 vation protein. Curr Top Med Chem 2011;11:1447–63. enhances parthenolide's anti-leukemic activity. Leukemia 2013; 54. Van der Veken P, De Meester I, Dubois V, Soroka A, Van Goethem S, 27:1236–44. Maes MB, et al. Inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase 8 and dipeptidyl 74. Walsh MP, Duncan B, Larabee S, Krauss A, Davis JP, Cui Y, et al. Val- peptidase 9. Part 1: identification of dipeptide derived leads. Bioorg BoroPro accelerates T cell priming via modulation of dendritic cell Med Chem Lett 2008;18:4154–8. trafficking resulting in complete regression of established murine 55. Van Goethem S, Van der Veken P, Dubois V, Soroka A, Lambeir AM, tumors. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e58860. Chen X, et al. Inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase 8 and dipeptidyl 75. Bank U, Heimburg A, Wohlfarth A, Koch G, Nordhoff K, Julius H, et al. peptidase 9. Part 2: isoindoline containing inhibitors. Bioorg Med Outside or inside: role of the subcellular localization of DP4-like Chem Lett 2008;18:4159–62. enzymes for substrate conversion and inhibitor effects. Biol Chem 56. Jiaang WT, Chen YS, Hsu T, Wu SH, Chien CH, Chang CN, et al. Novel 2011;392:169–87. isoindoline compounds for potent and selective inhibition of prolyl 76. Kruschinski C, Skripuletz T, Bedoui S, Tschernig T, Pabst R, Nassen- dipeptidase DPP8. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2005;15:687–91. stein C, et al. CD26 (dipeptidyl-peptidase IV)-dependent recruitment of 57. Van der Veken P, Soroka A, Brandt I, Chen YS, Maes MB, Lambeir AM, T cells in a rat asthma model. Clin Exp Immunol 2005;139:17–24. et al. Irreversible inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase 8 by dipeptide- 77. Ohnuma K, Dang NH, Morimoto C. Revisiting an old acquaintance: derived diaryl phosphonates. J Med Chem 2007;50:5568–70. CD26 and its molecular mechanisms in T cell function. Trends Immunol 58. Qi SY, Riviere PJ, Trojnar J, Junien JL, Akinsanya KO. Cloning and 2008;29:295–301. characterization of dipeptidyl peptidase 10, a new member of an 78. Schade J, Stephan M, Schmiedl A, Wagner L, Niestroj AJ, Demuth HU, emerging subgroup of serine proteases. Biochem J 2003;373:179–89. et al. Regulation of expression and function of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 59. Yu DMT, Ajami K, Gall MG, Park J, Lee CS, Evans KA, et al. The in vivo (DP4), DP8/9, and DP10 in allergic responses of the lung in rats. expression of dipeptidyl peptidases 8 and 9. J Histochem Cytochem J Histochem Cytochem 2008;56:147–55. 2009;57:1025–40. 79. Yazbeck R, Sulda ML, Howarth GS, Bleich A, Raber K, von Horsten S, 60. Yao T-W, Kim W-S, Yu DM, Sharbeen G, McCaughan GW, Choi K-Y, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase expression during experimental colitis in et al. A novel role of dipeptidyl peptidase 9 in epidermal growth factor mice. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010;16:1340–51. signaling. Mol Cancer Res 2011;9:948–59. 80. Rohnert€ P, Schmidt W, Emmerlich P, Goihl A, Wrenger S, Bank U, et al. 61. Chowdhury S, Chen Y, Yao T-W, Ajami K, Wang XM, Popov Y, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV, aminopeptidase N and DPIV/APN-like pro- Regulation of dipeptidyl peptidase 8 and 9 expression in activated teases in cerebral ischemia. J Neuroinflam 2012;9:44.

1496 Mol Cancer Res; 11(12) December 2013 Molecular Cancer Research

Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2013 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272

Advances in Understanding the Expression and Function of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 8 and 9

Hui Zhang, Yiqian Chen, Fiona M. Keane, et al.

Mol Cancer Res 2013;11:1487-1496. Published OnlineFirst September 13, 2013.

Updated version Access the most recent version of this article at: doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0272

Cited articles This article cites 75 articles, 16 of which you can access for free at: http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/11/12/1487.full#ref-list-1

Citing articles This article has been cited by 6 HighWire-hosted articles. Access the articles at: http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/11/12/1487.full#related-urls

E-mail alerts Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal.

Reprints and To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at Subscriptions [email protected].

Permissions To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/11/12/1487. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Rightslink site.

Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2013 American Association for Cancer Research.